Just some intellectual ego stroking here (indicated by, I'm sharing). Most people base their perceptions of reality based on the scientific models presented before them. The weakest link in the intellectual chain will resort to the simplest model to explain what they experience. And to explain the forth dimension to someone who can only see 2 dimensions is so impossible, I just relativized an absolute. The simplest model can only come so far in explaining a more complicated model and will halt where it can proceed no further. The most complicated model that is starting to open up new frontiers, is the quest to make an adequate model for Fluvial Dynamics. (I'm not talking about fluvial geomorphology) Fluvial dynamics model would essentially predict the actions of individual molecules, given compound, mass, isotopes, charge, and energy/heat And then aggregate the data to build a bottom up model for the container of fluid.

Where does the redpill come in? Well, since science has yet to come out with an adequate model for Fluvial Dynamics (picking out the mates we would rather have, a model would take some of the uncertainty out of the equation), something that would IMO greatly aid in modeling human interactions, we must continue to treat the rest of the container as though our level of reproductive success relies on keeping true to the 1 billion years of hind-brain evolution that have brought us to where we are today.

TL:DR I whoopdefuckindoo think a model for selecting the best mating pairs in any given sexually active sample size would be based on a model for fluvial dynamics, and since we don't have an adequate model for fluvial dynamics, NAWALT isn't an appropriate reaction by an outsider to any chosen reproductive strategy.

Of course I made this post to 1. scratch my back 2. allow young RPs an avenue to try when they undoubtedly will try to speak to their friends about the RP. It is the TOR version of trying to explain the matrix, layer and layers

Now, Discuss!