I apologize for a lengthy post. Hope its worth your time of reading.

Greetings to all of you red pillers. I have spent a decent amount of time lurking manosphere, especially MRA , MGTOW and the red pill. All of the subdivisions have a one common denominator that is generally accepted as a fact, and that is that men are disposable. Disposable in terms of genetics, historically and to a large degree in today societies it can be seen in a fact that mostly men are waging wars, are exposed to harsh working conditions, take more risks in careers, fightings and other actions. That is how things seem to appear today.

But, isn't this idea of disposable male just a current view of things based upon a female centred perspective of life? What I mean by that is that views and relationships constantly change and evolve. In 1950s or before that, I am pretty sure the views for women were in some regards similar to what is being portrayed today in a modern male. In that time, women were considered a second class citizens and were denied some basic human rights. They were viewed as a subhuman whose existence was to please a man. Her wishes and desires were put to the second place. Now it seems that we have evolved to the point where it seems that just the opposite is happening. To be fair, men back in that time still experienced the "exposable" characteristics in societies. Like for example, in wars. But women did not start those wars. The men did. So it made sense that they fought in them too. And in a very few instances were they fought because of women. They were started mainly because of fear, greed and thirst for power of those who were in top positions. And they were to a large degree men in power, who exploited the poor majority. So the exposability was, I would argue, greatly caused by a huge male ego centred mind. And yes, the women were to a certain dose a victim of it.

But then, the revolution happened. Women seized the opportunity and started making a firm ground and had a just cause. They won it. Then the second wave came. Women who started to feel entitled to a certain things, but still balanced. After that, the 3rd wave came and a complete shift of balance in a psyche of the world, who has now become female dominated and of course that now man are regarded as disposable. Women have been granted all the rights and kept all the privileges. They have a strong routed acceptance in general population and a voice against them is quickly shamed, marginalized and put to the corner. As someone said "If you want to know who is the dominant force in a society, look for a group of people that you are not allowed to criticize"(or something like that). I remember in 2000's that was a complete truth for women. But in late years, men are starting their own shifts of power. But it has just started. I do believe that with today technology it would not take as much time as it would take in the past to make the transition and evolution once more. So my point was that "exposability" of a male is just a passing trend of collective consciousness. And with that in mind, the gates are completely open for those of us who still want a long term relationship with a worthy female. Even if faced with the hard truths that this movement and others like it tell.

Agree or I deviated from the truth?