Red Pill might be wrong...

OFAFV · 2016-10-28T02:30:53+00:00

LOOKS and BODY will always matter. And matter highly at that. You cannot judge intelligence with a glance. You can, however judge physical appearance.

Do you know why you think intellect = attraction? Because intellect usually = money = Beta Bux. And yes. You are correct. Women want to marry rich stable provider types when they start to lose their looks. Read Red Pill theory.

However, RP also says marriage is a shitty deal (Divorce Rape). So why do we want to marry these post wall sluts? We do not. RP mostly just fuck women and spin plates. TRP does not advocate settling down or marriage at all.

Your whole premise is wrong. Please do read the sidebar and RP material some more.

2016-10-28T03:21:23+00:00

[permanently deleted]

PaperStreetVilla · 2016-10-28T13:32:06+00:00

OP missed the following:

Rule 0
Effort and a good argument
Questions belong on ATRP, not here
Researching what he is talking about.

JJMcgray · 2016-10-28T03:32:03+00:00

Convince me I'm wrong.

Nope. If you can't see reality yourself then my words are pointless.

I will say this. About your gangbang point. It does actually happen. But hey, keep your blinders on.

Edit:

Just read the comments. Just a troll guys. Move along.

Atuli · 2016-10-28T12:42:51+00:00

Yeah bro sounds good enjoy your mountains of pussy.

2016-10-28T02:03:05+00:00

My only addition/argument would be that since women vary in intelligence level, your theory could be put on a sliding scale.

OFAFV · 2016-10-28T02:38:23+00:00

As for that cut off line, the saying is that 20 % of men are getting all the sex/attention from 80% of women. That number is not fixed but is a good place holder. Note Pareto principle. It is NOT saying only 20% of men have sex but that this "cream of the crop" is getting the most sex.

That said, Alpha traits are traits women find attractive/sexy. Alpha men are the top men in a given population/area/definable group. A man alpha in one room may not be in another because Alpha is the top men in an area.

2016-10-28T03:39:57+00:00

I think TRP is incomplete, not wrong. Plenty of studies on PubMed have been done to suggest the up-and-coming role of intelligence in society and its link to fertility. Assuming nearly equal personality traits of dominance (and a nearly equal relationship with the woman prior) and the only variations being in looks and intelligence; wherein, intelligence in one man is noticeably higher and vice versa for looks in the other man, then a woman will selectively go for what we call 'beta bucks' if she doesn't believe he would support another man's children. Luckily for the intelligent man, if he is the richer one, which statistically he is likely to be, there are paternity tests that now dissuade that sort of behavior. As much of TRP admits, he will likely reproduce. The better looking man will still be seen as more sexually desirable, but if he does not reproduce, then that means nothing. Why? His genetics are not in the next gene pool, and by definition, from the standpoint of the next gene pool, he is now relinquished to a less desirable male. If you run that same simulation with varying shades of grey in terms of looks and intelligence, you're going to start weeding out the strong biologically desirability for more muscular men, as the desire for intelligent features, which manifest in more ways than just mentally, will increase. That's... how evolution works. If you don't fuck and multiply, then not only don't your genes keep going, but the desire for other genes is increased.

MagicGainbow · 2016-10-28T03:45:41+00:00

due to shows like The Big Bang Theory. Intelligence is number one for women when they reproduce now.

Leonard's actor is a model and all the main actors are attractive.

In some ways Sheldon is very rp, I would say that TBBT is very much in line with trp theory.

But given you're other points I doubt you'll be convinced because you have made up your mind and also come across as a complete dumbass.

JamesSkepp · 2016-10-28T07:16:07+00:00

Intelligence is number one for women when they reproduce now.

You base this on what exactly?

Convince me I'm wrong.

You presented a new "inteligence based" theory. The burden of proof is on you.

stonepimpletilists · 2016-10-28T13:29:20+00:00

It's not something that is right or wrong

Also, you're going to be banned shortly, I guarantee it. Rule 0. Your lack of research into what youre talking about shows as well

Conceited-Monkey · 2016-10-28T05:50:47+00:00

"Revenge of the Nerds" was not a documentary.

Intelligence is not particularly important with respect to women unless she is looking for a provider. Also, due to the halo effect, attractive people are often considered intelligent by default.

nonthaki · 2016-10-28T06:13:55+00:00

However, I believe attraction is changing, in part, due to shows like The Big Bang Theory. Intelligence is number one for women when they reproduce now.

Haha , thats very funny . If you meant intelligence with social power Or a guy who has a very good social influence or high EQ or whatever , then its understandable and what you said makes sense.

If its a beta nerd who doesnt go out to the crowd, sits in his room or is shunned by everybody even when he goes out , then No way is what you are saying true . i.e. if intelligence = social intelligence or if your achievements as a nerd have made you famous for e.g. like Stephen hawking , then its understandable and it works ; otherwise it only works rarely .

A woman always requires some sort of value from a guy . Whether the value be derived from social status , looks , money or whatever ; abundant amount of each or any one of these parameters can override the lack of the other parameters to some extent .

For e.g. having money or social power like Trump has could make a lot of women wet which could override his looks . But ofcourse , the foremost aim of these chicks might be to get his money or get him as a potential provider & not necessarily out of deep sexual interest borne out because of his looks .

Women are what you call "difference" engines and are flaky . They are attracted to whatever quality she wants from a guy at a particular time . During her period , her biology determines her to go to the most alpha looking ripped chiseled guy to fornicate and thus procreate with him for the best genes . And after their period is over , they stick with less feminine bfs or guys . They have "different" mindsets at "different" times . They might even compare their current bf to another guy who she sees could fit her present needs more - Hence , the term I call them "difference" engines . Ofcourse , women do have control of their own mind and the decisions they make , even above the auto-control of these biological commands .

The other easy example is they will fuck Chads (just look at tinder statistics) during their teen period , and will marry a lesser-masculine guy when they are about to hit the wall (but thats most probably because Chads dont commit to ordinary women).

But , Women are not to be trusted cause women & men too do have different agendas of their own , but men have fewer desires compared to women & thats why men can be satisfied easily , whereas with a woman we always have to be in our toes - and thats why we hate women and dont want to deal with them in the first place most of the times .

Title	Red Pill might be wrong...
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	0
Comments	31
Date	October 28, 2016 1:46 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/59rx54/red_pill_might_be_wrong/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/red-pill-might-be-wrong.64027 https://theredarchive.com/post/64027

Comments