~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
realniggasstandup
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 13 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
According to the hypothesis established before the testing began, Dirty Harry should be a reliable Republican voter, while Napoleon Dynamite will be supporting Barack Obama until he can afford to hire a personal trainer and release his inner Tarzan.
My opinion is that TPR men realize that both Republicans and Democrats roll the same wagon, just change turns who represents the wagon.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, they are both essentially the same party, the illusion of choice as it's called
[–]baconOclock-1 points0 points1 point 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Republicrats.
[+]realniggasstandup[S] -6 points-5 points-4 points 13 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Any "TPR men" that don't realize the Republican party is the better choice for men is a clown.
[–]NINETY_32 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How do you figure?
Both parties are a part of the kleptocracy.
[+]realniggasstandup[S] -8 points-7 points-6 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which party loves to confiscate one's earnings, promote affirmative action and gender quotas, regulates the shit out businesses because they don't meet their silly "equal pay for equal work" or affirmative action policies, forces organizations to promote diversity and "equality," supports feminist organizations with taxpayer money, institutionalizes broad definitions of sexual assault to protect damsels and marginalize men, promotes the well-being of women at the expense of men (Obamacare, Title IX, are major examples), loves to play the role of a victim, attempts to censor the opposition, penalizes married couples to favor baby mommas, privileges said baby mommas with a cradle-to-grave programs at the expense of responsible citizens, and is supported by a majority of feminists?
hint: the other party is completely against all of the above.
hint #2: said party has been losing the men's vote for decades now (and for good reason), but the mainstream media is only reporting on "war on women."
[–]shhshhitsok1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Or not.
I can make up bullshit list like you did below for conservatives. Keep your biased politics to shitty /r/politics sub. Your points aren't even worth bothering with.
[–]realniggasstandup[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Go ahead and try, leftoid
[–]shhshhitsok2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ah, a troll. Aren't you fun kid. Go back to the blue pill or SRS or whatever hole you crawled out of.
[–]realniggasstandup[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So I take it that you couldn't think of any ways the Republican party screws over men.
I'm proud of you.
[–]ProbablyGlennBeck2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm a godless liberal. And am not wimpy.
[–]redpthrowaway-1 points0 points1 point 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
But the data according to what the Mail Online reported didn’t support the hypothesis. “The data revealed that wealthy men with high upper-body strength were less likely to support redistribution, while less wealthy men of the same strength were more likely to support it.” Had the hypothesis been accurate personal wealth should not have affected support for socialism as long their pecs were equally ripped.
Is there any better review of this article? The writer of this doesn't really understand that there could be multiple things affecting political views, such as such and both wealth AND how muscular you are. He also didn't clarify if this means wealth affected how against redistrubution you are OR if being wealth AND being ripped made you more against redistrubution. I'd guess that muscular men are just more sure of their opinions and thus rate that they are "more against" or "more for" certain things.
[–][deleted] 4 points4 points4 points 13 years ago | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]redpthrowaway0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would agree with that.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I really don't like when we get political, my governing principles for selecting a policy maker are 3 things:
"the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" "With great power comes great responsibility" "don't be a dick"
Usually that means I vote for the blue team, because the red team seems all about sucking up to their lobbyists and making their friends rich, at the expense of the masses (i.e. me and you). Not to mention stifling science, de-funding education, halting productivity like whiney bitches because people they don't like are in office. One guy crusades against the "tyranny of experts" like being educated on a subject automatically gives you some nefarious agenda, its fucking ridiculous.
That doesn't make a person feminized or wimpy, it bespeaks a concern for the future and a desire for a more level playing field, because not everybody can score a job at their daddy's company, and because people who work hard enough deserve to succeed instead of having the cards stacked against them. Being concerned about the public interest is not the equivalent of being beta, its just being a decent human being.
[–]realniggasstandup[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's some leftoid bullshit.
Usually that means I vote for the blue team, because the red team seems all about sucking up to their lobbyists and making their friends rich, at the expense of the masses (i.e. me and you).
That makes no sense. The red team wants me to keep my money so people don't get rich off at my own expense. D.C. area is the richest in the nation. Reason: it's the trickle up economics leftoids keep talking about, taxing Americans to fund bureaucrats.
That makes you a wimp.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]baconOclock-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]realniggasstandup[S] -6 points-5 points-4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]NINETY_32 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+]realniggasstandup[S] -8 points-7 points-6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shhshhitsok1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]realniggasstandup[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]shhshhitsok2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]realniggasstandup[S] -5 points-4 points-3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ProbablyGlennBeck2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redpthrowaway-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points4 points4 points | Copy Link
[–]redpthrowaway0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]realniggasstandup[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link