~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
n4cer126
[–][deleted] 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
[permanently deleted]
[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
getting rich first
This is why I cringe when someone asks for advice on how to write an essay challenging Feminism in school or to one-up a feminazi teacher in his mandatory women's studies course. It's proven that women are harder on male students as it is, you really want to fuck your GPA up over some feminist hamster with power over your future? Academia has surrendered to the feminist narrative a long time ago, but it is still necessary for a college degree.
Just shut up, parrot what needs to be parroted, get your A, get your non-fluff degree, make bank, then work on challenging the narrative.
[–]MrExpress 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
If we're going to admit that the patriarchy is gone then we must similarly know our place in a situation like this. I think this is lost on a lot of people. The rules are what they are and we're not going to get anywhere fighting it, but beating them at their own game.
[–]ohboyahuman 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I would encourage men here to take Gender Studies courses. Not only is it a field study on RP in action (GREAT place to pick up women if cards are played right), but it's also a chance to see how much using emotion to argue doesn't work. I took one last semester, and got a B- on a paper arguing against the prevalence of the Wage Gap. Fortunately, the teacher wasn't a total idiot, and I managed to argue it up to an A-. I really think that to defeat the hamster, one must understand every hinge in their wheel.
The subject matter also isn't horrible. Once you make your way past the bias, the history is really interesting. I took it as a fall-back course from a full math elective and would definitely recommend.
[–]self_made_guy 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Like I said above, I'm writing a paper ( monograph) on men's issues. Any refrences, ideas ... to help ?
[–]ohboyahuman1 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Men's Issues is a super delicate topic. I would advise really focusing on proving your premise before you work at musings on solutions or directions for social change. Don't use any devices that assume your audience will be sympathetic. Don't be a knight for the issue. Speak of it from the frame of mind that they come from, otherwise they'll just be reading a different language. All of this is pretty obvious, but it's so crucial, as feminists masturbate to this well-constructed piece of awful rhetoric.
Don't compare men to women, and don't focus on issues that affect men vs. women, such as dangers at workplaces. If you do, then they can make the automatic counter argument that 'if women were in the same position, we'd be in the same boat.' To be fair, they're correct. It would be the case. Only use issues faced in society unique to men. Such as disproportionate action for changing legislation on divorce laws against in most countries, and use models of countries that have great divorce laws (like Sweden, somewhat). I'd say your best angle for success will be focusing on not saying a bad word about feminists, as the idea behind the article is not a reaffirming tug on the cock for those of us already skeptical about the trajectory of the gender debate, but an attempt to make someone who totally opposes the idea of men's rights understand the need for change. In a course, you're not meant to trumpet your opinions, but show that you understand where they fit in the context of your knowledge. I got an A- on my paper because I got carried away with rhetoric for a good page and a half and that made the prof. angry.
Anyways, good luck. Do your readings. Make connections. You probably have the hardest paper in the class to make a calm case for without seeming like a bigot. Do your best to treat these hamsters with decorum, and you'll do just fine. They're very, very, very prone to being total jerks the second you give them a reason.
[–]self_made_guy 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I am thinking about not mentioning at all. Political correctness in key here, but when using 'big shot' theorists, they will not have anything to say.
I'm writing a thesis on how men oppressed too. You should see the expressions on the professors faces when they head my arguments. It's like hei wold is crumbling down. However, the male hamster kicked in and I was disappointed. Note that I am in a Muslim country where social norms are mainly dictaetd by religiorn and women are somehow 'free'. They work, study and do whatever they want. Still, stupid PhD holders think women are still oppressed by the mulim 'patriarchy'. Pfff
[–]1Claude_Reborn -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fuck I am so happy I will NEVER have to take a class like that in my Uni system.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can you post a link to the essay?
[–]joaquim56 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've been reading his stuff years. He's definitely Red Pill. He has a very admirable fitness and diet routine as well.
[–]Endorsed ContributorRed_August 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
A quote from Adams from that blog article he wrote:
"The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It’s just easier this way for everyone. You don’t argue with a four-year old about why he shouldn’t eat candy for dinner. You don’t punch a mentally handicapped guy even if he punches you first. And you don’t argue when a women tells you she’s only making 80 cents to your dollar. It’s the path of least resistance. You save your energy for more important battles..." - Scott Adams
Cue the usual ensuing theatrics, and outrage from the centrifuged obese hamsters, but Adams goes even a step further, and responds to them in the comment section of a feminist blog article vilifying him:
Adams' response comment:
"Is this an entire website dedicated to poor reading comprehension? I don’t think one of you understood the writing. You’re all hopping mad about your own misinterpretations.
That’s the reason the original blog was pulled down. All writing is designed for specific readers. This piece was designed for regular readers of The Scott Adams blog. That group has an unusually high reading comprehension level.
In this case, the content of the piece inspires so much emotion in some readers that they literally can’t understand it. The same would be true if the topic were about gun ownership or a dozen other topics. As emotion increases, reading comprehension decreases. This would be true of anyone, but regular readers of the Dilbert blog are pretty far along the bell curve toward rational thought, and relatively immune to emotional distortion.
I’ve written on the topic how you can’t mix incendiary images in the same piece without the readers’ brains treating the images as though they were connected, no matter how clearly you explain that they are not. My regular readers understand that I do that intentionally as part of the fun. When quoted out of context, the piece becomes dangerous.
You can see that the comments about the piece were little more than name-calling. When confronted with that sort of reaction, would it be wiser to treat the name-callers as you might treat respected professors with opinions worthy of consideration, or should you treat the name-callers as you would angry children, by not debating and not taking it personally?
You’re angry, but I’ll bet every one of you agrees with me."
[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow, that's a damn good response.
And he's in a position of power to be able to say it, too.
[–]RICCIedm 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
those are some great Strips. Thanks for that, n4cer126
[–]2RedPillSafe 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's the irony about Red Pill.
If we really wanted personal advantage we would want all other males as beta as they can be to keep them as losers and lower the competition.
But on the flip side if we keep allowing things to get worse (increasing Monk Mode MGTOW as well as hordes of betas, white knights and manginas) the civilization will completely collapse and that is a bad future.
Seems the idea is to allow anyone smart enough to learn to become Red Pill.
It will likely create a counterbalance to Feminism.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 9 points10 points11 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrExpress 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ohboyahuman 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]self_made_guy 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ohboyahuman1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]self_made_guy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]self_made_guy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]1Claude_Reborn -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]joaquim56 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Endorsed ContributorRed_August 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Senior Contributorcocaine_face 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RICCIedm 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]2RedPillSafe 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link