Summary: I’ve been thinking a lot lately about SJWs using terms like ‘racism’ as slurs. Particularly, how it is monstrously hypocritical of these cucks to say that we’re racializing our enemies with terms like ‘beta’ or ‘pleb’ or ‘cuck.’

Body: Language is one of the most complex and vital aspects of society. It pervades culture and, in many ways, determines how we think. Language is fluid -- we can observe it from both sides. For example, we can not only examine how language influences our ideas, but also how our ideas warp language. In this way, the language of political movements can tell us a lot about the movement. Social Justice Warrior-ism is a prime example of such a movement. SJWs have stolen terms like ‘racism’ and made them devoid of meaning with their ‘philosophical exploration.’ ‘Racism’ is little more than a slur which those SJW beta-male pleb-tier spengler cucks use to describe anybody that they don’t like. Good thing the same can’t be said for us.

Within social circles, language is vitally important. For instance, GamerGate, has co opted military terminology, which communicates that they are bravely willing to stand up for what they believe in: not thinking critically about video games. It also communicates that they are a well-organized force to be reckoned with. Except for all those times that they’re not. God speed, GamerGate.

Language can also be used as a weapon in a movement. Specifically, working to demonize a group’s political enemies by attributing them slurs can be a potent and incredibly dangerous tool. A variation of this arguably occurred in Nazi Germany with the terms ‘Jew’ and its inverse, ‘Aryan.’ Some Social Justice Warriors would argue that us Red-Pillers are doing the same thing with terms like ‘cuck’ or ‘beta-male,’ only using them to advance a narrative of toxic masculinity, devoid of substantial intellectualism and filled to the brim with pompous, irrational, sentiments. To those regressive Leftists, I say, what about ‘racist?’ You’ve completely erased any meaning of that word by ‘exploring its societal implications.’ It’s as if to you, the dictionary isn’t adequate enough to describe the entirety of human society and culture in all its vast complexity. Plebs. It’s clear that the real reason the cucks have warped the definition of ‘racism’ is so that they can kill all the white people, or something.

So what is racism? Before the SJWs tried to make me feel bad just because I’m white, it meant ‘to believe that one’s own race is superior to another.’ Although the new definition is mind numbingly dumb, I’m going to consider it anyway, because I’m the most rational person ever. According to some ‘philosophers,’ like Falguni Sheth, racism is a system which societies impose in order to hold power. They supposedly do this by establishing universal liberal rights, then excluding certain groups from reaping the benefits of those rights. For example, the founding fathers stated that ‘all men are created equal,’ but also owned slaves. In doing so, they established that black people didn’t count as people, so it’s okay. According to this idea, racism is anything which degrades an already marginalized group, thus preserving the status quo.

This brings us to a new definition of racism -- one which would have it defined as a combination of prejudice and power. SJWs might argue that this definition provides a more nuanced and historically accurate lens through which to view racism, but they would be incorrect. You see, this definition of racism is different from the one which came before it, and that makes it wrong. Everybody knows that once a theory is present, it cannot be expanded upon or revised. That’s just science.

And who are these ‘philosophers,’ anyway? It’s a well-known fact -- that’s right, a fact -- that academia is just a bunch of SJW safe-spaces. Scholars can’t even listen to differing opinions from random 4chaners with no background in, or knowledge of the things that they’re talking about -- so much for the tolerant Left. It’s clear that philosophy and other forms of academia are really just indoctrination rituals to Social Justice Warriorism. Why else would academics keep not taking me seriously? Everybody knows that all you really need to be a scholar is a dictionary and an introductory high school history textbook. In fact, I would go so far as to say that philosophy isn’t a legitimate field, because if it were, I might have to shift my worldview. Indeed, the only real philosophers are the ones with no knowledge of philosophy who write random crap on The Red Pill Reddit page.

Now, I will concede, because I’m rational -- unlike the blue-haired white genociders -- that just because the new, ‘historically nuanced’ definition of racism is indisputably nonsense, that doesn’t in and of itself mean that ‘cuck’ and ‘pleb’ aren’t dangerous. So let’s dispel this conspiracy theory on its own merits, so that those SJWs can never call us Nazis again.

Let’s examine the label of ‘beta.’ The assertion that it doesn’t mean anything is simply preposterous. A beta is a second-class male citizen. They share a close kinship to Blue-Pillers. They are defined as any man who does not meet the evolutionarily defined roles of men. They are feminists, or are people who think that systemic racism exists, or people who -- god forbid -- actually care about women. They’re also the people who I don’t like. It is important to keep in mind that the definition of ‘beta’ is subjective, and it means different things to different people. In fact, it can pretty much mean anything you want it to. That’s the beauty of our community: we are sophisticated enough to recognize the fluidity of language and harness it. Nonetheless, betas are real and they are killing society with their ‘political correctness.’ As a true hero of Red-Pillers, The Golden One, once said, ‘don’t be a Beta.’ We can all gleam infinite wisdom from his divine poetry.

Now let’s examine ‘cuck.’ A cuck is a second-class male citizen. They share a close kinship to Blue-Pillers. They are defined as any man who does not meet the evolutionarily defined roles of men. They are feminists, or are people who think that systemic racism exists, or people who care about women, or the people who I don’t like. It is also important to keep in mind that the definition of ‘cuck’ is subjective, and it means different things to different people.

Now, ‘pleb.’A pleb is a second-class male citizen. They share a close kinship to Blue-Pillers. They are defined as any man who does not meet the evolutionarily defined roles of men. They are feminists, or are people who think that systemic racism exists, or people who care about women, or the people who I don’t like. Again, it is important to keep in mind that the definition of ‘pleb’ is subjective, and it means different things to different people.

Now, there is one of the very few things that all these otherwise distinct races of people have in common that is worth considering: they are all weak. One might even say subhuman. There, now how is using any of these terms in any way Nazi-ish? Those SJW beta plebs just looooove to call us Nazis whenever we insinuate that people we disagree with are sub-human. It really makes you think. Who are the real Nazis? The alphas who apply the specific philosophy of social darwinism and highly developed theories of racial superiority of one’s political opponents, or the betas who call them Nazis for doing so?

Conclusion: Clearly, I have proven that the assertion that us Red-Pillers have employed the use of slurs to advance our agenda is preposterously hypocritical. We have done no such thing, while the SJWs who spread this conspiracy have done the exact thing that they accuse us of in order to enact white genocide.