Getting out of my blue pill ways I've been thinking a lot about optimizing my views of the relationships I hold.

I made a few structures depicting what I think is the alpha structure in both his natural settings.I also made the female structure.

I devise relationships in levels.Someone in your level is your equal in terms of respect and devotion, above you your superior, under you those who receive less of that from you.

Male Social Structure 1: Roaming Alpha

Male Social Structure 2: Monogamous Alpha

Female Social Structure : Alpha seeking Female

Making such a structure has helped me have a clearer view for myself.
Especially on how to act and abandon my natural Beta ways.

The roaming Alpha.Clearly you always put your own interests in front of others.You dominate everywhere you go, you lead your relationships and your friendships.
One could argue that brotherly love is genuine.And it is.But amongst brothers there is always a big brother.The one who came first, and even though you both love each other, he's the one that will lead you in life.You are the big brother of your friendships. Thus no one shares a place as your equal in your social structure. You'd never put a plate above a professional connection.Neither would you put a professional connection above a close friendship.Thus the lower levels.

Monogamous Alpha :

Males are monogamous.
They give their emotional commitment to a single woman. ''The idea is that monogamy in humans and other primates evolved as a response to the threat of males killing babies at the breast, the latter being a reproductive strategy for hurrying up the female's return to fertility. Once the father starts sticking around, the threat is obviated, carrying along with it associated benefits.''

So once you've wisely chosen an exceptional woman to pass your genes onto and to care for your children, the Offspring takes a superior place in your structure.
I was thrown off at first too, perhaps Offspring should be viewed on equal level.After all the Alpha father is the one leading the family financially and emotionally and has authority over his children.

But in the end nature is what it is, the next generation is there to take over.
From the second they're born you love your children unconditionally.
You'd be willing to pay as much as needed for the full education of your children.No one else in this world could get such full financial support from you.(unless you've been tricked and married 2.0)

If your child is born with a disability, mental and physical, you'll go as far as needed to care for that child.Some parents just take their mentally retarded child under their wing for as long as they can.

In contrast some children will get annoyed if they see they have to start taking care of you when you're old and sick.
Sick and old parents get stick intoretirement homes with a visit here and there.In contrast your parents could take care of you your entire life if you're sick and with full emotional support.

A parent would gladly throw themselves in front of the bus to protect their child.
A child however will hesitate, you've had to live your life after all and they're younger.It wouldn't make sense for them to die for you It seems like a bitter reality but such it is, no matter how much we like to think we love our parents as much as they love us, and we could return the same amount of love,it is in our genes to put ourselves first. The Offspring takes priority.
I think it's enligthening to know just how important children can be to us, especially as someone without kids I'm starting to understand more what the ''fatherly instinct'' could feel like.
A man must know his priorities to live his life to the fullest.

It is quite disheartening to know the barbaric favoritism towards women when parents separate regarding the child custody, especially knowing how bad a job single mothers can do. (mostly raising beta's and criminals)

Anyhow the Female Social Structure is as presented.
Their life mission resolves around finding an alpha to impregnate them. That's why there will never be a female Tesla.Men can live their life in one of the settings, one being without kids.
As long as a man is fucking around he's fullfilling one his 2 missions given by his genes, ''impregnate all the females of the herd or provide care and protection for a single man and her children''

Equally a female will never give the time to a Beta Orbiter if she needs to give attention to a professional connection.
Cause then the Orbiter would lose its only use, its utility.

Also makes it clearer why women cannot possibly ever attain happiness on their own.In their only setting they need either a child or an alpha, for either she needs a man.They're uncompleted beings.
Put a woman on a desert island and she will die a mental death.
Put a man on a desert island and he will keep on living.
In his first settings he's got all he needs.And that is himself.

In a theoretical long term gender war..and let's not kid ourselves it's not that theoretical anymore..women will always lose.
In my opinion the term ''woman'' is brilliant, in order for a woman to be a wo-man she needs a -man. Without one she's not a fulfilled woman, just a small piece of her potential.

What I find interesting is that theoretically, real unconditional love can only be given to someone above your own level.And it's a one way street. Of course we all know women only love conditionally, but as long as you fill the only condition, that is to be above her and being the best alpha she can find she will love you ''unconditionally''.
It explains the strange cult phenomenoms where men and women can even take their own lives at the word of a ''prophet''.

It makes sense I guess, putting someone above your own self, and they are like Gods in your life.Ruling over all your priorities.
While women are unable to love like men, if you fulfill the condition of making her believe you're best alpha she can find, she will love you like a God.
Which explains the hysterical female fans some celebrities have, eg. atrocities like justin bieber fangirls.

It also makes me think about the act of dating women that have a palpable strong passion for a certain actor or musician.
Such women are only as plate material.Nothing more.Especially not the mother of your kids.As they will never be able to see you as their most Alpha and give their full commitment.

In the male social structures I did put male friends on the same level as parents,brothers.
That is because I mean mature and fully developped friendships with male friends, eg. you love them like brothers.

In the male social structure there doesn't seem to be any place for ''friendship'' with a female that is not part of your family or is not taken by your bro's.
So unless you've grown up with a woman from childhood and she feels like a sister or she's a lesbian there is never any place to offer or take friendship from one.You fuck them and you move on.
The only way to have a friendship with a female is if she cannot be impregnated ''family or taken by someone you do not want to compete with''.
It makes it absolutely clear that a plain friendship with a single woman is damaging to a male's indentity and borderline against nature.

This is all armchair theory so I certainly invite correction.