Just as Morpheous gave Neo this reality breaking concept with the spoon, so too will people have to square with reality. Hampster is an extremely poor, gynocentric ideal used to soften and give excuse to inherent female nature as some sort of stupidity, rather this concept is mainstream thinking outright, pieces of a social program still engrained in many here.

Women do not hamster but rather are forced to repress their sexuality to the extreme in order to extract economic utility/resources from men. Women know the sexual game far in advance over men who sexually mature in their thirties, they understand that having a sexual reputation makes them outright repulsive and destroys their economic value in the eyes of men they like. What is termed for hamstering is this concept wherein women like men want to satisfy their sexual desires. Wherein men can act publicly on their biological, subconscious drives, women are still economically penalized for doing so. Feminism, an extremely advanced piece of globalist social programming is meant to give women sexual freedom. Freedom of action comes obviously with a cost given the biological drives of the human animal, but for the sake of expediency that topic will be ignored.

Women are AWALT, they love the utility of men, they love the feelings of a situational moment endowed upon them by men but love is not something they share equally or in equity from the male perspective. Women will unlike men place the value of a man on the trinity, beauty, wealth, social utility, if you have none of the trinity you have no value to women. Women are situational and opportunistic especially with the present social programming. There are far and few inbetween that understand the economical value of loyalty, but even then its a struggle for them to keep in line with the skew of their biological drives.

Men are from Mars, women are from Venus, a childhood quip derived from the ancient Greeks who wrote the books on the destructive nature of female on male interaction. Women will never operate in the interest of the male perspective neither is the new economic reality forcing them too, the reality is plain for us to see now. Women will conduct themselves within their perspective while men who're either biologically or socially programmed by religion and the government must either adapt or suffer indefinitely from this new reality. The human systems of old were used to coerce economic cooperation from men to sustain the orders of older gynocentric societies. Now thanks to technology and globalization occupying much of the laborious and automated work men are not required to waste their lives away. The new order doesn't need men as much and the social programming is here to shift the economical/social interactions of men and women to reflect this.

TRP can help men deal with there inherent biological drives operating the sexes, but there are limitations in the philosophy that are derived from our own exploitable deficiencies as men, the hamster concept is one of these popularized memes which masks the beast for what it really is.

Edit 1: Correction, it was the child in the movie who gave Neo the spoon metaphor, possibly an example of an analysis from individual who's minimally programmed by society.