TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Code_Bordeauxx Archive

View 2 posts and 928 comments by Code_Bordeauxx on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
35

Red Pill TheoryCode_Bordeauxx/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 06:49 PM
30

Red Pill TheoryCode_Bordeauxx/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 05:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Depression is a state of mind that people can enter and later exit. Sure, some people have an inborn proclivity, but that isn't the pathology; depression itself is. Autism, or Asperger syndrome, describes a psychological trait you either have or do not have. (setting aside the issue of misdiagnoses here). People can learn to cope with this disability in various degrees, but the trait is incurable regarless of effort. As such, you can not simply compare the two, just because they are both mental …
/r/TheRedPill07/01/18 04:11 PM
2

I think of long term pair bonding as not a goal on its own, but rather a product of a prevalent underlying value system; responsibility, commitment, discipline, investment. These are the factors required for a functional society. (And maybe lifelong isn't necessary, fair enough. But that's missing the problem. If you can make it work for 20 years, good chance you can make it work for life. Most disruptions are on a much shorter timescale.) What we're seeing now is a shift towards short term indi…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 05:36 AM
2

There's a difference still between being overtaken geopolitically and being culturally destroyed. Geopolitics is mostly external; trade, wealth, war. But regarding the latter, MAD is and remains a powerful deterrent. How things will play out for us will mainly depend on internal factors. Although it's looking grim, I don't believe the outcome is certain. And let's not forget that all other major players on the world stage have internal struggles that are arguably worse.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 05:24 AM
14

Society hasn’t caught up Ha! Do tell, how do you envision a functioning society with these current trends extrapolated? No sir, society hasn't 'caught up' because there is no alternative. Society is currently, powerlessly, watching its once functional structures implode under their own success. The only reason matters are still as good as they are is because we're living off the welfare created by the previous generations. But look around, there are cracks appearing everywhere. This is not susta…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/17 07:45 PM
11

Women have that -and we don't- because people care about the complaints of women and not the complaints of men. This is because women have intrinsic value, while men are disposable. It's hard-wired into our psyche. Only the wishes of men with power count in the eyes of others. And so: Women ask. Men demand. Redpill 101, really.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/17 08:01 PM
5

Then there's some legit misogynistic stuff in the sidebar Hardly, and you ought to be more careful with the words you pick. Words are a virus, remember that. Misogyny = hatred towards women. There is nothing hateful about describing women the way they are. Highlighting negative elements still isn't hate. Not if the claim is reasonably backed up, such as the comparison with childlike aspects. On the contrary, is is all part of the necessary steps towards acceptation and then ultimately appreciati…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/17 05:36 PM
2

You can present that as fact all you like, but the reality is that it's a matter of opinion and observation. And I stand by my observations, some empty insults have zero influence on that. It's not that I can't see good intentions in some or even most so-called feminists, mind you, it's that I see how these good intentions are based on fundamentally flawed premises. The road to hell is paved with these kind of good intentions and short-sighted activism. They haven't thought it through, and neith…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/17 11:03 AM
3

I disagree, it averages out. But the 'value distribution' -so to speak- is much wider for men than it is for women. Men are either utterly usesless or highly important. And yes because the important men are a minority, most women are more valuable than most men, but the successful men at the top are many times more valuable than a single woman ever could be. Take it from me, if there would really have been a net value difference, biology would have taken care of it long ago.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/17 08:36 AM
2

Have you considered that the reverse can be said about your statement? That you cherry pick the 'good' elements and present that as the standard? Feminism is rotten to the core, both as an ideology as well as a community. A few outliers aren't going to change this.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/17 08:27 AM
25

we've become the victims of our technological advancements. The changes have come too quick, with no time to properly adapt our social structures to it. We've hardly had time to remodel society to the birth controll pill (unsuccessfully yet, if you ask me), don't even start about the behemoth that is social media. Our artificial environment has always demanded of us that we suppress some of our biology, but at this rate the rate it's going people are just lost at sea. They have nothing left but …
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 09:59 PM
113

You can characterize the entire phenomenon that is feminism by the following saying: "trying to have your cake and eat it too" All the benefits, none of the downsides. It's not shocking that they want this. What's shocking is that men, as a collective, agreed on that deal. It's pathetic. And the most ironic part: at the end of the day it doesn't serve women either. Like a 10 year old kid wanting to drive a car. The moment you let it, it doesn't know what the fuck to do and becomes a danger to it…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 09:44 PM
2

And lastly, I'll gladly point out the hypocrisy in first claiming that men should just accept the behaviour of women 'because it is their nature', and then following this up by bashing men for presenting their own natural response (anger). But enough of this. Do something with the message you've gotten, or otherwise if you can't handle the content you can fuck right off.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 07:16 PM
2

"I didn't call anybody here stupid" ..."and still can't accept the nature of things, such a stupid thing" Even if it wasn't your intention, take it from me that it was interpreted this way. Also, I stand by my assertion that your entire approach has been overtly antagonising and that you've received the pushback you've gotten as a deserving consequence. Anger can be expressed in other ways Who are you to say this? Who are you with your meager personal experience to decide what others need or do …
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 06:53 PM
2

Your assumption is that I don't understand the core of the movement and that I don't live the redpill mindsets. Both assumptions are false. My assumption is that as much as you may (think you) know already, there's more you need to learn, more nuances to understand. This goes for any one of us. You've certainly not proven me wrong in this assumption. So, I propose a shift in mentality. Now as for the content of your post: The one thing I don't see is why is there a need to call women bitches, cu…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 05:43 PM
17

Money makes money. Social status creates more social status. When you start winning, you keep winning. If you start losing, you keep losing. This is the foundation that leads to a Pareto distribution (instead of a normal distribution) and the closely associated Pareto principle (commonly known around here as the 80/20 rule). I think this is the 'golden thread' you're hinting at. And it's true, virtually all human skill and productivity follows such a distribution. But it's less about mentality a…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 02:17 PM
2

You want a more constructive dialogue? You start with one. You've been antagonising from the very start, and so you're not fooling anyone; you're not here to consider the posibility that your understanding is lacking, instead you're here to tell everyone how 'you've figured it all out and everyone else just doesn't get it!' It's shockingly naive. Nevertheless I gave you the chance to engage in an honest dialogue, but you flat out ignored it. You are the problem mate, and I would really deeply re…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 11:39 AM
6

There's a lot of bias in the way the questions are chosen and formulated, and a lot more bias still in the given answers to choose from. If you want any credibility for this investigation of yours, you'll need to craft a way better survey. Have other people help with designing it to minimize personal bias.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 08:07 PM
1

A fair point. But I'd also emphasize that we are more than our biological imperatives. Past social structures have had a rather impressive track record in suppressing disruptive instincts like hypergamy or overt male aggression. It is only now, in the last few decades, that hypergamy is coming back in full force. The system still has a very strong grip on men, as evidenced by the very presence of this forum. So yeah, on one hand it's pointless to be angry at natural behaviour. On the other hand …
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 02:45 PM
4

You are thinking in absolutes. I'm sorry to say the world isn't that simple. Humans are in an exceptional position in that we can alter our enviroment faster than we can biologically adapt to. Because of this, nature (our instincs) are not our friend, but indeed they are not our enemy either. To deny nature is to invite misery, to embrace nature is to invite chaos. Balance, then, is key. Like it or not, we need society in some shape or form. This means we will need to supress some of our instinc…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 02:17 PM
56

You have yourself to blame for the situation you are in. First you must own up to that. Then you must accept that there is no way back: this marriage is over (sunk cost fallacy, look it up if you don't know it). After you accept the consequences of your failure, you can steer towards the best possible outcome regarding kids and company. Then start over, make sure you've learnt from your mistakes
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 02:07 PM
3

The world is improving in so many ways. Dating is actually better than ever if you're top 10%. And the bottom 90% are so weak and misled that most could be top 10% IF THEY TRIED. Society works by serving the masses at the cost of the elite few. I don't think I even have to tell you this. Things may seem better on the surface, but only because we're rapidly burning up all that was carefully built up over the course of centuries. You know damn well the price we'll soon pay. Back to the chaos of na…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 11:16 AM
8

Just because something is natural doesn't mean it's desirable or meant to be accepted. "Society" isn't natural. It's a human construction that defies some, if not most, of our basic instincts. Would you do away with it all? There are plenty of thing wrong with the current construct that is society though, and therefore plenty legitimate reasons to be angry. But it's a phase people are encouraged to move past. You only have a very superficial understanding and make enormous assumptions. Instead o…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 10:42 AM
2

The other commenter hints at some good points but misses the most important one. Testosterone = willingness to take risks. And it is risks that open up the door to greater rewards, thus resources. Passiveness is safe but won't get you anything. Safety and care is the female domain. Risk and action is the male domain. This is how we complement eachother.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 10:29 AM
15

Ha! Only for so long. A man pursuing a goal that doesn't involve her is much more enticing to a woman. Perhaps if asked she'll tell you she cares about attention above all, but we all know how much value words carry. No amount of attention is going to compensate for a lack of productivity.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/17 10:23 AM
5

You have my deepest sympathies. It's good you face these issues and continue to do so. But then you must turn your eyes to the future. Reflect on the past but don't dwell on it. You have a choice now on how to move forward. And so: I hate the world we live in. You have the power to shape your personal world. Start small, sort yourself out. Invest in positive elements and cut out all the rest. That may even mean your very own parents if it comes to that. Nothing about it will be easy, but the res…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 10:06 AM
1

The whole construct of a 9-5 work day seems to be put in place to tire out and drain most people of all energy by the time they get home and have a chance to do something productive in their own life That's not a result of malevolent intent. Rather, the system has over the course of many years been optimised for maximum productivity. You are not mentally suppressed, you're 'just' exploited. Of course maximum effort towards work means minimal remaining time and energy for leisure time.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/17 02:58 PM
1

Morality is questionable. I disagree, though I think we mostly share a common view. It's hardly ever questionable what is moral and what is not. Also, immoral acts do not become moral depending on context. Stealing food because your children are starving doesn't make it moral, it makes it a necessary evil. Morality is a tool, with clear costs and benefits to using it. The only thing that varies depending on circumstance is how sensible it is to apply it. From there, I agree with your post.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/17 02:48 PM
4

Men have allowed women to turn into degenerates, by collectively dropping the personality bar to abysmal levels. As it is sometimes said around here: feminism is a massive shit test that men collectively failed. The sad truth is that people -all of us- are only as good as our environment requires us to be.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 03:30 PM
3

Adam is left leaning as fuck, and as such has an agenda regarding sex positivity he is pushing. Some of his vids are decent, but this one is far from unbiased. There are lots of valid psychological and biological reasons for women to abstain from sex in their developing years, even if they are technically fertile. In essence, sex at a young age means a more unstable environment, and biology has picked up on that, pushing their mental state more towards achieving short term gains. It goes without…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 03:20 PM
3

Carbs refined sugars are poison Nothing wrong with the complex carbohydrates, it's the sugars we're adding to everything that's causing the issues you mention. Agreed on the influence of the sugar lobby in shifting the blame to fats.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 02:44 PM
2

Agreed on the first two. It seems you're describing the differences between 'moral' power and 'immoral' power. One is predatory, the other is not. Moral discussions aside, their relative effectiveness depends on the environment they operate in. The weaker the group, the more effective the dark triad type is and vice versa. To me, the third category just sounds like the other side of the dark triad coin, most specifically regarding psychopathy. They are the ones who played high risk-high reward g…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/17 02:33 PM
51

Spare us your petty ignorance. It can be for one reason or another, or for a whole collective bunch of reasons, but it certainly didn't come to be 'just because'. No intincts were shaped without a strong incentive to do so. That's not 'male logic', that's just LOGIC, plain and simple. It's the foundation that life is based on.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 08:29 PM
11

You want to find a decent girl not prone to cheating? You can (if you bring enough to the table too). Perhaps rare these days, but they exist. You want a decent girl who's not prone to cheating and also a hot wild extrovert? Yeah... that's unicorn territory. Can't have everything mate. The more you want her, the more others want too and the more she'll be corrupted from the endless validation shower. There's madonnas and there's whores. Most are whores, and once they are, you can't turn them int…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 04:57 PM
4

Based on personal observation, even if she's seemingly the best, most kind and well mannered girl in the world, serious commitment/investment is too risky if she's around HB8 or higher. Simply too much attention, too many sollicitors, too many opportunities to slip up. With these girls, just assume they are fucking other men from the start and act accordingly. Even if she's past her prime, you bet she's adopted the corresponding mindset. Not that I can think of any reason to commit to a girl pas…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/16 04:43 PM
1

A conclusion based on 'women' who aren't women, and 'men' who aren't men. Women will serve those who -they believe- serve (provide for) them. Quid pro quo, which is nothing but reasonable. Men are no different. However, women are already provided for by the collective of invisible men that is the government. With seemingly little left they need from men, there is little more they will do in return. In their ignorance, women stopped being women. And in their desperation, men stopped being men.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/16 06:32 PM
9

What is bad is when the elite-masses relationship becomes perverted. When the elite use their power for corrupt purposes and things become distorted. This happens because of globalism. Over the past decades the elites have seen a vast increase in the amount of people they can reach, and thus influence and draw power from. Look at companies like Facebook or Apple. Their ability to operate worldwide stands at the base of their immense power. Now, increased power is one side of the coin. Decreased …
/r/TheRedPill20/11/16 12:27 AM
1

I wasn't talking about growth on a population level. That's a whole 'nother debate. Within the context of this forum we are talking about men's personal growth, and in this specific debate: how women tend to interfere with this.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/16 01:17 PM
1

But do you guys think women are slowing that process? Yes. Either by giving counterproductive advice ("be romantic, buy her gifts, treat her like a queen") -some of which can be helpful when you are already in a relationship, but none of it will get you IN a relationship, or laid for that matter-, or by straight up discouraging improvement ("you're FINE the way you are, don't pretend to be someone you're not"). And, if you're already working on improving yourself the right way, they tend to heav…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 04:28 PM
2

Blue pill society = complacency, its members subdued by instant gratification, comforting, porn, consumerism... you get the picture. Complacency is the killer of progress, because striving for something better requires investment (energy/resources) and risk. If your life is 'overall, fairly ok', there is minimal incentive to attempt to change your situation for the better. The red pill = realising you should be better, demand more and give away less, all to the sole benefit of YOU. It is the rea…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/16 05:09 PM
14

If that was female nature, feminism would not have happened and this sub would not exist. I disagree. I think you overestimate the extent in which feminism is a result of women's own choices and desires. For a large part, the movement can be explained by structural socioeconomic changes. Technologic advancements have made it so that housekeeping is no longer a full day job, which has forced women into the job market. More supply in workforce means lower value for work done, and all of a sudden f…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 09:52 AM
1

Oh and I don't see why y'all fight each other. Not that I like to see the divided state the manosphere is in, but I do understand why this is as it is. MRA is inherently PRO society, albeit they prefer some structural changes ('changing the system from within'). TRP is actively against what this society has become and advocates behavior that benefits individuals but is disruptive at the larger scale ('let it burn and benefit from the chaos' or at a minimum; 'forget about the rest, get yours'). W…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:16 PM
2

Equality between the sexes, at least according to MRA consensus. It appears that MRA's seek to accomplish what feminism says it tries to do. To pick things up where feminism lost its way, so to speak. Full equality all across the board. I think that this, for a large part, is a pipe dream, ignoring important biological realities. I'm all for equality in opportunity as a fundamental principle, but the government can't expect and shouldn't endorse equal outcome between the sexes. Gender roles are …
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:29 PM
5

You have trouble associating with these movements because you still have faith in the system. You speak of seeking compromise, good faith, you seek a way forward. This, of course, is to be expected of an MRA. You wouldn't be here otherwise. But, perhaps consider what happens when you do not believe reconciliation is achieveable. What the implications are of observing a system that is only spiralling more and more out of control. Consequently, this shifts the focus away from (perceived) fruitless…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 06:52 PM
9

"I need no maine!" They do, those who don't have one are failures and the know it. Although not a golden rule it often applies: the more people feel compelled to make these claims about themselves, the more likely it is that they are/do/need exactly that. At the very minimum, it tells you that their mind is preoccupied with that topic, which should tell you something. "I hate drama" = I am a drama queen "I hate that guy!" = I am very much intrigued by that guy "I am not that kind of girl" = I am…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 11:17 AM
1

t won't let me respond to your other comment anymore because the mods suspended me. Give it some time, like a month or so, and then message the mods, explaining you got the message and have read up on the sidebar and top posts. They are, in my experience, strict but reasonable. we could talk about politics, money, family, other people, without getting into arguments. That is rare. Perhaps, but not thát rare. You will find this again in a girl, no doubt. Also, you may be surprised still by women'…
/r/askTRP18/08/16 12:18 AM
1

It probably got deleted for two reasons: the mods are trying to keep the main sub free from personal advice requests that are less interesting to the population in general (that's what this sub is for) and also because the post features many elements thoroughly covered in the sidebar and top posts, such as avoiding oneitis, dealing with red flags and (lack of) abundance mentality. I'm guessing their general sentiment was one of 'read more, type less'. Which, for now, would also be my advice for …
/r/askTRP17/08/16 11:58 PM
1

When we say 'do not marry' we generally tend to mean that in the very literal sense, as in signing the legally binding contract. This is not only about what you risk to lose (financially), but also about the imbalance of power in favour of women that comes with it and the monetary incentive for divorce on her part. The lifestyle aspect is much less opposed, although it does come with a few important warnings. So no, TRP isn't necessarily against having kids or long term relationships with women.…
/r/askTRP17/08/16 11:31 PM
2

1) don't address the situation directly, ever. For as far as you are concerned, that guy doesn't exist 2) Set very clear boundairies if you haven't already. That girl needs to know that if she enters shady territory with anyone -actively or passively- she stands to lose an 8 year relationship in an instant. Following up on this...: 3) ...amp up the dread game a bit. She won't have much attention for Trey if she's busy keeping you around. 4) If she keeps mentioning him, you have every right to si…
/r/askTRP17/08/16 11:03 PM
1

The traits you mention will make you a manly man... in the eyes of men. And while that's important to consider, it's irrelevant to the SMV debate. Women don't give one shit about honor. Hell, they don't even get the concept. Mastery of skill? To women it only matters if you're perceived as skillful. And macchiavellianism will get you much further than blind courage. Also, where's looks and appearance in your list? Sure, looks and strength are connected, but definitely not the same. I'd say take …
/r/askTRP17/08/16 10:44 PM
1

For women, what matters most is how they look and who they are For men, what matters most is what they do. Now, although there's variation to everything and personal preferences matter (ass vs tits, as an aptly mentioned example), beauty and character traits fit a much more narrow consensus on what's desirable. Being desirable based on what you do can mean everything from having good game and going to the gym to earning a lot of money and being in a respected profession. But also less obvious as…
/r/askTRP17/08/16 10:27 PM
1

Maybe they are, maybe they aren't, but this seems to be rooted in a belief that a mans value is based on his ability to attract women. You think wrong. This has nothing to do with the approval of women. All we are interested in is that men go after whatever it is they want, instead of avoiding it out of fear and inability. And yeah, I find it hard to believe there are many MGTOWs who are genuinly not interested in attracting women at all. Seriously, if after swallowing TRP a man comes to feel th…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 09:17 PM
1

First off, based on many aspects of your story I can confidently say you had plenty of legitimate reasons to break up. So congratulations, you made the right call. I know it won't feel like it, I know there may be shitty times ahead, but you're free, back on track and long-term is all that matters. Now, there are a few things I'd like to comment on. So I have had struggles in our relationship where I'm either not ready to settle down, because I'll always see a hotter girl and think... What if? W…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/16 08:29 PM
51

It's not only about being legally in the right. Lawsuits are long, time consuming processes. Even if you are certain to win the lawsuit, it's still a time and energy drain. The doc doesn't want to create situations wherein his patients may feel wronged enough to sue. Remember, people are stupid and people are emotional. So, I can undertand where he's coming from
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 11:23 PM
1

I don't think, I KNOW. I know because it is what I do. You on the other hand, do not know. You think, you assume, but fact of the matter is you haven't tried.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/16 07:21 AM
1

Works until kids come into play. And if you're planning on having kids, I would want to have lived with the woman in the same home for a substantial period of time beforehand, to prevent unpleasant surprises at a moment when there's no turning back. Not like I think the mistress would be a suitable candidate for such a plan by the way. As if a mistress ever is.
/r/askTRP27/07/16 05:50 PM
1

She is flexible about marriage = She is warming you up to the idea, gradually pushing you towards it. Until proven otherwise. Which isn't strange, women have everything to win by marrying. Why do you think they are so obsessed by it?. She is acting in her best interest, as she should. But SO SHOULD YOU. And whereas she has everything to win, you have everything to lose. Prenup is damage control. You don't want damage in the first place. It is no valid compromise, as they can be and are being thr…
/r/askTRP27/07/16 05:43 PM
0

Look, in theory, I can get behind this. I'm sure there are many amongst the MGTOW ranks who played the game and played it well, but got sick of it at a later age. Fine with me. Now, don't get me wrong, I still see it as quitting, which I can't endorse, but at least this I can understand. But you and I both know these are not the only members, and likely only a minority. I must then assume that the rest of the members are, at best, following a sub-optimal philosophy that isn't designed for them, …
/r/TheRedPill27/07/16 12:37 PM
1

If you've made yourself familiar with the TRP sidebar and all-time top posts, and you're still overthinking to MARRY this other woman, there's really nothing we can do to help you. Have you learnt nothing? You can have a long term relationship perfectly fine without signing the contract, if that's what you are after. So what could you possibly stand to gain? Meanwhile, you have everything to lose. This other chick can want whatever, you have your best interests to defend. take a hard stance that…
/r/askTRP27/07/16 12:08 PM
2

All I read here is "if you think your SMV is low, you will probably have very little success even if you tried, so you may as well not bother and go do something else". Which is bullshit. The only way to find out is to try and to give it your maximum effort. You have everything to gain, not only the interest of women. Personal health, people's respect (thus greater willingness to be around you and help you), greater physical ability, more money to spend, just to name a few. If you worked your as…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 07:35 AM
3

TRP is telling men to become a high quality man, both in body and in mind. Fact is that most are lacking in the body department, so that's where a lot of the attention is focussed. But this is not only for women. This is important for whatever you want to achieve in life. Very rarely are men of historical significance focused on suitability for women. This is such a small minority, and besides, most of them still had wives and children. They focussed less of their attention there because they co…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 07:19 AM
-2

The way I see it, people who have children with surrogate mothers are just as naive -using very light terms here- as intentional single mothers. You'd do that to your child? Knowingly denying it a (biological) mother before it is even born? Hell, only denying breastfeeding will aready fuck up its immune system. If you know your way around here, you know full well the psychological consequences following an absent (biological) father, do you really think cutting out the mother straight after birt…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/16 06:57 AM
13

I once wrote the following: MGTOW has a bad rep in TRP because it is TRP, unless you try to define it as different, ending up with something inferior in the process. Allow me to explain. So, here's my personal frustration with MGTOW: everytime it becomes the topic of discussion, people will claim something along the lines of 'no, MGTOW isn't about abandoning women completely, it's about putting your own interests first'. Again in this video. And the statement is (at least partially) true, I see …
/r/TheRedPill25/07/16 08:34 AM
2

Your error is that you are constructing schemes that have no base in reality, most likely because it is inconceivable to you how complex and sometimes 'bad' things can and do happen entirely without the intent of small groups of influential people, or any deliberate human intent at all for that matter.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/16 08:10 PM
2

"more like take you home and fuck you twice guy" -Credit goes to The Lonely Island. Really, do whatever. Agree and amplify, pressure flip (only if YOU give me a good reason to) or keep it deliberately vague.... But do it with a shit eating grin and don't take it seriously. That's the most important thing to remember.
/r/askTRP18/06/16 06:24 PM
1

It didn't. Life is inherently meaningless. So what?
/r/TheRedPill18/06/16 05:28 PM
3

80% will see deliberately vague and 'mysterious' descriptions thrown around like "God", "Hebrew Torah", "psychopathic globalists" (it's called a scapegoat, people) and "Rubik's Cube" and misinterpret it as wisdom. If you are part of the top 20% you'll see it for the incohesive, pretentious pseudo-intellectualism that it is. If there is a valid point in there somewhere, it is burried under heaps and heaps of utter nonsense. Seriously, are you on drugs or medication or something?
/r/TheRedPill18/06/16 04:55 PM
5

Dread game, the halo effect, the Ben franklin effect, just to name a few. These are great to run as background processes. If you maintain an active social circle with people -including a set of girls- who appreciate you (and publicly show this), if you dress well and if you make a habit of asking small favours/requests from those around you, you will experience a continuous 'status boost'. And they are not exploitative, so there's really no reason not to make use of these effects. Of course drea…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/16 01:36 PM
4

We cannot collectively remember to "not bow to the feminine imperative", any more than a man can swear off breathing. If that is true, then we are either doomed for the cycle, or doomed for an inevitable permanent decline. It doesn't matter if everyone wakes up to reality tomorrow, if the rules are simply 'get what you can get', then you will be stuck with a bottom 60-80% regardless. This is not about individual freedom to climb the ladder in that system, this is about the overall picture. For e…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 10:40 PM
12

Ok, so I too recognise the historical 'boom and bust' cycles of feminism as you so nicely put it. True, marriage, even in its best form is far from an optimal system. But I fear your proposed cure might be even worse than the disease. Look, society is fundamentally built on one principle and one principle only: everybody gets their piece of the pie, and everybody contributes to make the pie bigger. Collaboration, not competition. To sustain this, monogamy is key: give everyone who contributes to…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 10:14 PM
1

...if the ceremony was performed by an official or minister, it seems. Still, that's crazy.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 08:00 PM
2

I am fairly certain they didn't sign a legal marriage contract though. So they just decided to call themselves married and threw a party. If that's indeed the case, in his situation he has little to lose. Worst case she leaves him and he has some great new material.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 07:12 PM
4

Could marriage be resurrected? I have a different question in mind: should it be resurrected? In the best interest of individual men, alive today? NO. For the sake of the survival of society, and thus everybodies long term interests? Damn right it should. In what form, that is up for debate, but when monogamy isn't the norm society crumbles. EDIT: see further down this comment chain for a more detailed explanation.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 07:08 PM
47

It may be sad but it is true: the best way to avoid being emotionally manipulated is to become skilled in emotional manipulation. As a man, you must learn at least the basics of how to do this. How you then apply it, either for exploiting women or for making them happier, that is up to each individual to decide. Macchiavellianism cannot be overlooked if you wish to live your life efficiently.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 06:37 PM
1

The qualifications of the man don't matter, his sources do and you know this. Also, why am I the only one who has to provide data? Have you ever even TRIED to look for alternative arguments? Also, social sciences are a joke, and if you read the sidebar you know this. If you're seriously going to defend china's one child policy as a valid ethical intervention, I think we're done talking.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 04:57 PM
1

Jump to min. 40 in the video for a good starting point, if you're not too scared of conflicting information.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 04:53 PM
1

you don't need to watch all of it, you just need to skip trough the graphs until you find the right ones. Shouldn't take you more than five minutes. But it sounds like you just can't be bothered because your mind is already made up. They're many people who quality of life has been increased dramatically by medical intervention over the years. Because they were already ill, the balance was already upset. You're comparing apples and oranges. Try giving medication to a healthy person and see what h…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 04:51 PM
3

You are losing this argument. There are things we can influence, and things we -realistically- can not. Gay couples can only get children by means of adoption or specific medical intervention. This we can regulate. Ideally, poor, less educated people would have fewer kids, but you can't simply force this. The means required to do so would be unethical. It makes no difference, just because you can't stop one high-risk group of becoming a parent, doesn't mean you should not restrict the ones you C…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 04:35 PM
5

Let me make one more thing very clear. I'm not arguing that being gay negatively influences ones ability of being a good parent. The data you have provided also supports that this is not the case. My point is that no matter how good of a mother or father you are, a mother can never adequately subsitute a father and a father can never substitute a mother. This manifests most strongly in long term outcome, and this is what my data shows, at least for fathers. This is what we must assume until exte…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 03:48 PM
2

You can't just judge all content in a video by its title, sorry. I told you it covers the data and so it does. A substantial part covers children raised in fatherless homes, and that remains the same whether one or two mothers are involved. Let's get rid of all medicine then It's called side effects. See how many medications you can take for years and years without dealing with negative effects. My point stands. You just don't simply mess with nature. There is a reason medication has to be so th…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 03:29 PM
2

two things: 1) I already gave you a reference for the first. The video covers all the data, including many reliable sources. Pardon me if I don't list them here. If you don't trust my word, go look for yourself here I am certain of this. The data is out there, it's reliable and it's hardly unexpected. In a nutshell, growing up without a father leads to significantly higher crime rates, more substance abuse, earlier sexual development in girls, as well as more sexual partners (which has many asso…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 02:57 PM
3

I completely disagree. Kids that are adopted by gay parents do not necessarily have a loving hetrosexual couple waiting for them. If you have proof gay parents are not ideal, they're better then no parents. I will agree that when there is a shortage of heterosexual partners adopting kids, adoption by homosexual partners could be a viable option. Be it, without any uncertain terms, a lesser alternative. I'm less informed about motherless homes, but the negative consequences of fatherless homes ar…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 02:39 PM
1

Life owes you nothing. If you want a good or 'cool' job, if you want to make decent money, you're going to have to work hard for it. Either by getting a degree, or by working very hard at the job itself. Probably by working very hard even after getting the degree. As far as well paying jobs that aren't very 'draining' and don't require a degree go.... Even if they exist you bet your ass those spots are already taken. Because virtually everybody is looking for those. If you're too afraid to put i…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 02:15 PM
3

I doubt gay marriage actually has had much of an impact on the decline of marriage in general. If it has, it'd be small compared to the other factors OP listed. Having said that, acknowledging that gay love exists and being gay isn't a choice (I think that much is universally agreed upon here) doesn't necessarily mean that allowing gay marriage follows as a logical conclusion. You have to question why marriage exists in the first place. There are two important reasons: 1) to ensure most of the p…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 01:45 PM
1

I applaud you for taking the fight to conspiracy theories and explaining the more complicated truth in such a clear and thought out way!
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 11:24 AM
4

You don't know... what exactly? Also, while being emotionally affected by such a tragedy is understandable, it isn't an excuse for spreading nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 11:14 AM
8

Soft socialism is literally the best possible system. As in, a little socialism is better than no social structure at all? Yeah, that's true. Society needs a safety net for the unfortunate; the young widowed mother, the loyal worker duped by corporate bankrupcy and those struck by great illness. What you can't have, however is a social structure that subsidizes bad decisions. If you practice an extreme sport and as a result become paralyzed, don't come to the state like a financial leech. Your r…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 10:06 AM
3

A non existing scapegoat invented to avoid having to understand complex cause and effect relations, for example as brilliantly laid out by Whisper. It's just a group of inmagined evildoers who people point their fingers to, while thinking they are so smart and figured 'it' out. NeoreactionSafe has shared great RP insights, but it's mixed in with idiotic dark enlightenment bullshit. Know what's what.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 07:55 AM
8

All these conspiracies stem from one effect: people observe complex shifts/movements in society and they try to explain it. However, instead of asking WHY? HOW? They start by asking WHO? As in, who is or who are causing these shifts. Because people are easy to point your finger to. Many people appear unable to understand how many tiny, simple factors such as technological improvement can interact and snowball into large, complex and often unexpected outcomes. In all of this, no coordinated effor…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/16 07:44 AM
6

There is nothing wrong with adhering to your own set of principles. In fact, I'd say any man needs them to function in society and to be respected by others. The only thing thats important is knowing what you value and knowing what you sacrifice for setting these personal boundaries. Put them on the balance, weigh them and make an educated decision. You value integrity, as do I. You know what you're giving up (sexual opportunities) and you still stand by it, so all the more power to you.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 09:04 PM
5

There's a big difference between 'treating someone respectfully' and feeling deep respect/admiration for someone. I think bruh_my_jays is hinting at the latter when he mentions 'falling in respect'. The first one is just common manners, the second one has to be thoroughly earned. It may just be the best indication that you have achieved some degree of reliability and sustainability in the relationship. But don't be foolish, always keep your guard up.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/16 04:38 PM
3

Look, you're personally invested in the argument, makes it hard to discuss it. But even though you're right that it COULD work just fine if she's well medicated, that gives no guarantees for the future. Her depression could exacerbate, the effectiveness of the medication could change over time due to any number of factors. At the end of the day, it's another liability, and while good 'high quality' girls are rare, they are not rare enough to start gambling on lingering red flags. You'll have to …
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:53 PM
6

Depends on your LTR goal. If it's 'let's have a good time together for the coming years' It's B, because you have a head start in the green flags and although the relationship will still likely eventually fail due to the red flag, it's no big deal because it's likely lasted plenty of time by then and you got out of it what you wanted. However, if your goal is, what appears to me the most legitimate reason to enter in a monogamous LTR, to eventually have kids and your scope is 20+ years, that red…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:21 PM
8

The fact that you think AWALT and high/low quality cannot both be relevant, or that you try to claim that 'TRP is about X, not Y' tells me that you are still in an early phase of unplugging, meaning you should read more and type less. Yes, AWALT is universal, but what IS AWALT? Even more importantly: what are the limits in applying it/what doesn't it mean? More than anything, AWALT is a warning that certain tendencies can grab hold of her behaviour if you let your guard down, and a warning that …
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 03:02 PM
5

You're welcome Here's to get you started
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 01:02 PM
23

It's one thing to assume the mentality that all guns are loaded (i.e. you can never let your guard down with women), it's another to believe that all guns can and will blow up in your face (i.e. minimize your interactions, only plate etc.). The first one is arguably reasonable (but still a mentality, not an absolute reflection of the truth), the second isn't. Once you've learned the dangers and where it applies to be careful, you'll have to examine the individual case you're dealing with and adj…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/16 12:14 PM
7

I appreciate your attempt at sharing a more nuanced perspective, but if you feel the need to mention good sides whenever negative aspects are discussed, you're already standing with one foot in PC culture. The boomers good achievements weren't the topic of discussion, their faults were.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 04:42 PM
21

A man feels powerful based on what they are able to create, women girls feel powerful based on what they can destroy, consume or bend to their will. Corrupting alphas to betas is little more than a power trip to them. Granted, feeling power from destruction isn't limited to women either.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/16 04:24 PM
3

It's not that it can't work, obviously it can (rarely). Rather, (in the western world) it's a risk you can not afford to take. So I agree with you nonetheless. When taking risks, (1) the consequences of losing should be manageable, and (2) the potential reward should justify the degree of risk taken. With marriage in the western world, neither applies.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 09:20 AM
2

Even though that may be statistically significant, that could just as well be attributed to an imperfection in nature's ability to find the perfect balance. Either way, it's such a small difference that for all intents and purposes it's a 50/50 divide. But you are right of course.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 04:48 PM
1

In the dark triad, what does "psychopathy" actually entail? What you must first understand is this: when it comes to getting results (becoming successful!) there is always a 'shortest route' that can be taken. However, just like paving roads, going for the straightest line can have some serious side effects. It's likely you'd need to cut straight through other people's property or destroy other obstacles that are in the way. In human interactions, these 'obstacles in the way' often present thems…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 04:32 PM
2

You are right that they do exist. I can verify from personal experience. But it takes a good family, great introspective capability and no small amount of luck for them to turn out that way. And they certainly aren't increasing in numbers.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 01:31 PM
7

You're wrong though The state would sooner try to burn the male candle at both ends than be able to extract anything of value from the feminists Because at a certain point the state will have no other means of coercion left but to resort to violence oppression of men. And who are supposed to carry out this violence? Indeed: men. And so it is not going to happen. I don't know to what degree men will fight and hold back the changes to law and society that feminists are trying to bring about, but I…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 01:18 PM
6

Yes, however: even though male offspring was less likely to reproduce, IF they did they did produce huge amounts of offspring. So male offspring would be a riskier bet 'for nature', but a bet worth taking. In any (human) population the amount of offspring by men is the same as the amount of offspring by women, simply because you need exactly one man and one woman for each child born. This is why equal numbers of boys and girls are born: as soon as this ratio shifts towards, say, more girls being…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 01:05 PM
6

You can but this into a wider context. For almost everything we have that is stable and sustainable, isn't there always something better present, yet unsustainable, that we could trade it in for? And it's always tempting to give in to that. Sacrificing the long term in favour of short term gains. Maybe it's that cool high(er) paying job that only has a short term contract. Maybe it's that hot girl you could have a ONS with, but you have a wife and kids. Maybe it's that more expensive car you cou…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/16 10:35 AM
1

I felt compelled to respond to this, because you're touching upon an essential nuance to your post. Yet the way I'm reading into your comment makes me believe you've got it backwards. Agreed, there is a conflict between what we want (short term) and what is best for us (long term). This goes for both sexes, but because men have a stronger aptitude for logic and reason, it's only natural to men that what's best for us (and women) even crosses our minds. What I'm trying to say is that women have a…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 01:22 PM
19

I am not usually ready to be submissive or obey every man just because they are men Nor should you ever. You get to choose to whom you give your trust and dedicate yourself to. That will only be totally the case for one man and at most partially for a select group of other good friends. Once you have chosen (as you seem to have done already) it is adviced to go all in, as holding back will create suspicions of distrust. If all goes well the trusting bond will last a lifetime and will only contin…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 03:40 PM
1

Settling down and starting a family, sure, all the more power to you if it's a well thought out decision. There are more amongst us who share the same vision than you may think. However, you must realise that signing a marriage contract is not a prerequisite for starting a family, and it's exactly that part that TRP rallies against the most. Quality LTR women can be found, but there is no developed country in this world where the institute of marriage gives men a good deal. Sure, in certain situ…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 01:26 PM
1

While we all have to start somewhere, your real overarching goal(s) better be something else than filling basic necessities. Sure, you must go after the things you need, but at the end of the day it's the things you WANT but not NEED that define you and make life worth living.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 08:16 AM
1

No. Not fulfilled, subdued. Distracted. It's a pleasant feeling and certainly a vital part of life, but it is not fulfillment, it's not ultimate happiness. That, a man must seek in something completely outside the realm of women or sexuality. True fulfillment comes from our deeds and our achievements. Creation. Aiding others/teaching. Seeking the thrills of adventure. Our drive to do this is completely separated from our sexual desires. But I think this is at the heart of the issue. You don't se…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 11:19 PM
1

Still likely porn-induced. Being artificially saturated with validation so there's a higher threshold to seek it out in real people. Be careful to accept it as a true reflectance of your personality.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 10:45 PM
1

Sound like you were raised by a narcissist. You have my sympathies for that. I can't help but wonder however if this has left you with any predictable mental alterations. If so, it's good to be aware of them. Sexual power fantasies by any chance? Gravitating towards mentally instable girls? Anxiety issues? EDIT: upon further inspection I see you've already verified the second one.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 10:39 PM
1

No alpha will ever ask: am I alpha? They may question certain behaviours they exhibit, but never will they doubt the greater picture. Because that is what true confidence does with you. So I am sorry but it is true: if you doubt you are a beta then you are a beta. The fact that you can't inmagine it being different for other people is telling. But I refuse to be labeled as a beta, I have power in groups without even trying to obtain it, especially with girls. A beta doesn't have that. This shows…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 10:22 PM
1

Will you please do us all a favour and don't say anything instead of talking about things you clearly know nothing about? Because if you knew anything substantial about mental disorders, you wouldn't have mentioned them here. I'm sure it comes from a good place, but it's nevertheless distracting from the useful advice.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 10:07 PM
1

No, but you can just delete it and create a new one in the other subreddit, which you can either do as soon as you read this or prepare to see it deleted shortly thereafter anyway. As for my reply to your situation: I'd say you exhibit many traits of asexuality, but this doesn't match up with your porn addiction. This causes me to believe that your porn viewing habis are artificially inducing this strange state you find yourself in. Lastly, I don't think you've given any good reason why you woul…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/16 10:00 PM
1

I do not like how you, for the sake of your argument, try to separate 'choosiness' from status seeking. By very definition, being selective ('choosiness') implies going after the best thing available and discarding the rest. All TRP does is acknowledge that women tend to use status as a metric for determining what is 'the best', but by no means is it implied that that's the only factor at play. I'm sure that men also share some hypergamic tendencies, but 1) this is of less interest to RP men to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 06:29 PM
2

First off, fuck that attitude of yours. You don't get to barge in here and decide what advice can be given and what can't. Don't like it? Go to another sub. Secondly, -while poorly fleshed out- that guy got the main gist of it. You say you've been self improving, well I'd like to know what you've achieved. Have you developed interesting skills? Have you shaped your body into that of an attractive male? Have you been practicing on the application of game? The simple fact of the matter is that, wh…
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 11:05 PM
14

That, and them chasing the pipe dream of 'true (outcome) equality between the sexes'; something that's also never going to happen, if only because of the very nature of hypergamy. The sooner we start recognising our differences and start working with them, instead of denying their existence, the better.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 02:43 PM
3

An absense of an antidepressant doesn't imply the induction of misery. As always, it's not that simple. EDIT: also, you broke Rule Zero -->
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 02:38 PM
104

Yes, people care about women's issues and they completely disregard the same issues for men. People care about women, they don't care about men. Outrageous isn't it? You know what's even more outrageous? People thinking this can be corrected by 'raising awareness' for the male side. This isn't some cultural bias, it's straight up biology. Women are valuable because egg cells are valuable, men are unvalued because sperm and labour is cheap; there's always the next guy in line to take your place. …
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 01:30 PM
1

And where do you suppose these jobs magically appear from? Look beyond your idealism, there are no jobs for every person anymore and there'll only be less as a direct cause of automation. Yeah, in an ideal world everyone who is able to would be working. Now back to reality.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 08:40 AM
2

By the definition of the word -hating women- it's not a good thing. However it's almost always used as a replacement for sexism and there's nothing wrong with that, i.e. recognising men and women are different. It's ludicrous that sexism has a negative connotation.
/r/askTRP20/01/16 03:41 PM
8

But it's also good to realise that's an entirely different beast than full on communism. It's a capitalistic system with a social safety net.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 03:25 PM
7

He does have a point that feminism and communism share similarities. You make a couple of mistakes in your reasoning. First off, while there is no consensus on economic theory, communism is not a model that's generally taken serious anymore. As such, it's an extreme outside of the reasonable spectrum. The same goes for feminism as it relates to sexual strategy: it's an unreasonable extreme. While TRP may seem like the other extreme, I'd contest that. It's actually fairly reasonable middle ground…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 03:18 PM
2

Understanding is key. In virtually all cases, if a woman is doing something that antagonizes you, it's because of either two reasons: 1) She's acting in her own self interest. While this may sting and the execution isn't always perfect, can you really blame her? Everyone has to put their own interests first. Treat it as a good reminder to do the same. 2) She's acting out of stupidity, sometimes in the pursuit of (1). But you don't hate people who are stupid, you pity them. Sometimes you help the…
/r/askTRP20/01/16 03:01 PM
1

Try not to limit yourself to thinking in such simplistic concepts. You're, at best, starting to get a hint of the gist of it. Life is complicated, it's never that simple. There is much more to being blue pill or 'plugged in' than looking for motherly love. And not every blue piller is exactly looking for that either. Women are looking for someone they respect and can depend on, and that MAY look like a fatherly figure. But there's also those that go after typical 'bad boys' which doesn't fit tha…
/r/askTRP20/01/16 02:48 PM
3

All repeat after me: 1) move mouse to report button 2) select 'other' 3) fill in one of the following reasons: Hasn't provided any useful theory or analyisis Didn't comply with posting guidelines Didn't read the sidebar before posting Is probably a troll. or come up with a relevant one of your own.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 11:30 PM
1

The next step is to copy this text, remove this post and make a new post in the askTRP sub. Also... LTR flare? Really?
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 11:04 PM
1

Can't say you've got me completely convinced, but you make solid arguments and it seems you're definitely on to something.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 10:45 PM
2

Politicians in a democratic system are at the mercy of public opinion. No matter how reasonable they are, if the public wants something different, they're out. And that's exactly the problem: it's the public at large that's vulnerable to sympathy seeker influences, and this public at large is keeping the politicians that represent them in office. What you suggest would work in theory, but you'd need to install a dictatorship to get it done.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 10:39 PM
2

It's not that Germany hasn't overtaken Japan in that regard -that much is a fact- it's the interpretation of said fact that's troublesome.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 10:24 PM
3

Is it just me or is there more and more of this conspiracy and faux-enlightenment shit going around?
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 10:18 PM
2

Every step towards violence is a step towards disorder. All you'll accomplish is prioritizing fighting capabilities over everything else, while the real world is just about the polar opposite of that. You must understand that it's probably the least masculine men that contribute the most to our current society. Mind is more important than muscle in virtually every field. And do you think a man who's learned to fight is going to do tedious IT jobs behind a computer after that? Besides, it doesn't…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 09:56 PM
4

I would ask how anyone in their right mind could think that a low birthrate in a country could only be the result of malicious intent of another organised group, but then again I'm likely not dealing with such a person. Is it too far fetched that germans have low birthrates because the modern specialized economy necessitates postponing pregnancies until a later age, coupled with the influences of feminism (having babies is enslaving yourself!) and the unhappiness that comes with an economic cris…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 09:30 PM
1

Sidebar. Under The Rules & glossary: personal question/advice? <-click there. Also, 3rd listed under 'The Red Pill Network': askTRP. Ignorance is not an excuse, you are to read the sidebar before even thinking about posting.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 09:23 PM
8

I'm fucking related to the Jewish royal bloodline because my father was conceived when my grandmother was a peasant working in the house of a wealthy Jewish family. You promised me victory !!" "The West has betrayed me and I'll get my revenge with the holocaust." .... So in order for the Jews to get revenge they seek to erase germans from the earth and they do that by making it impossible for german men to be masculine by blaming them for the war. Will everyone take note and realise this guy act…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 09:14 PM
1

Good, then there's no problem. Make sure you post in the right subreddit next time, the main sub isn't for asking personal questions and you should have made yourself aware of that.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 09:07 PM
2

I have said it many times before and I will say it again to you: if ANY red flag presents itself, or any major issue early on in the relationship for that matter, that means for the woman in question a monogamous LTR is from that moment. permantently. off. the. table. PERIOD. And for the record: her not being physically attracted to you is a red flag, that's clear as day. The alternative is you settling with a woman with at least one big problematic aspect. It means you have internalised that yo…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 08:57 PM
0

That's because we're not talking about a theory, but about a categorization. These fetishists just fall in the tiny 'other' category that's too small to justify in dept analysis.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 08:42 PM
6

Interesting perspective. It seems like one big unsolvable dilemma to me. The more prosperous you want your society to be, the more you'll need to chain masculinity down. No fighting, no resistance, now get to work and provide. And on top of that: as soon as the first chains are in place, women sympathisers -be it just or unjust- will make sure more chains are added by the year under the banner of 'progression'. So even if something like a productive middle ground is found between male rights, fr…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 08:14 PM
1

What women want is easy. They just cloud it with what they say. Because half the time what they say doesn't reflect what they want, but what they believe they SHOULD want (in the eyes of others). Makes sense a psychologist wasn't able to figure that out.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 04:25 PM
0

Masculine love is directed outwards, but there is always a vested interest in the recipients. True altruism doesn't exist. Men radiate positive energy towards their women and children to create and support their offspring. They radiate positive energy towards their friends to stabilize their social situation and to feel good about themselves as persons. There is ALWAYS a feedback line, it is ALWAYS directional. Receptive love is as fragile as it is corrupted Undirectional love as we know it is s…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 04:17 PM
0

Love is actually a radiant energy. I agree, well noted. A person who is truly in love thinks "what can I do to make this person happier", not "what can this person do to make ME happier" (wanting to 'possess' love as you call it). the person who experiences Love radiates in all directions and literally is "in Love with the world" I don't agree with this much. Love acts as a boost of positive energy, surely, and that may express itself in interactions with other indiviuals when this positive ener…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 03:38 PM
7

How about this: everyone 'wants to be wanted'. We all want others pursuing us for being desirable humans. But I don't agree with you that this 'wanting to be wanted' equates the love that women so very much obsess over. To women, 'love', is more than feeling desired (validation!), it's about security. They want love from men because that means protection, resources and alleviated social status. In a way you've got it backwards: women want to be loved not because they want the importance of what …
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 02:54 PM
3

This is because it's the end result people long after, not the road that leads to it. In your case: I take it you WANT to be wealthy, and not doing what is required to get there is certainly a lack of willpower. But what you DON'T WANT is to do the actual work to get wealthy. So, because you'd rather browse the internet than do the work, you end up doing the former. Willpower and discipline is still required to get what you really want: the end result of your efforts.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 02:23 PM
22

No, I disagree with that statement. At the heart of this there's an idea that women want to believe: that their minds and (sexual) behavior are incredibly complex and cannot be captured in a model. And when it comes to things that people wish believing, they will never embrace thoughts that claim otherwise. Compare it with beta beliefs. The complexity of female behavior is to women what the importance of marriage is to betas. If they are not married you can talk to them man-to-man and discuss wh…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 01:56 PM
35

The thing with women is: they can have these little revelations and even write down these accurate thoughts... but make no mistake, they won't truly believe it and they won't truly internalize it. To them, it'll at most be a tiny part of the 'magically super complex' female nature, meaning that that whenever it's more convenient for them to deny this, they'll solemnly believe that it totally doesn't work that way!! The only women that will ever agree with this are the ones to whom it's of absolu…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/16 12:35 PM
6

The joke's mildy entertaining, but it does very little to aid men in their personal growth and their understanding of the world. This is entertainment, and this sub is not the place for it. Not without a lot more underlying theory at least, with an accompanying clarification. Your post is an example of the posts that caused the mods to put up the stickied "the signal is getting lost in the noise". I have no doubt then that this will soon be removed.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 12:02 PM
7

yeah, how about guiding her towards long term happiness, instead of maximal short term leeching that'll leave her an insufferable trainwreck post wall.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 02:02 PM
26

If you know you have 800 siblings, yeah, asking about the other's background might be a logial thing to do Mr. Sarcasm.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 06:08 PM
8

I'd say it gives an overview of the entire process to become alpha, with all the key elements involved (lifting, setting goals, social skills...) like no other post has done so far. It's valuable in a 'this is what's needed', 'this is what you can expect' kind of way.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 05:48 PM
13

The incest shouldn't be too much of a problem since they should easily be able to trace whether they are half-siblings or not by checking the guy's register. I'd say the single parent households are a far greater issue.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 05:01 PM
3

It seems 'people' got replaced by 'gente' in the whole article. You might want to check that.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/16 12:18 PM
20

This is the first post in a long, long time that could actually be sidebar worthy. Regardless, thank you for this. Maybe have the guy speak for himself here some day eh?
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 10:44 PM
1

Lol, if those things would be invented tomorrow, EVERYONE would be able to tell they are androids by the sheer contrast in personality!
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 07:13 PM
5

I'm not angry, I'm merely refusing her to excuse her for her behaviour because she's a woman. I'm saying that no matter the circumstances, the end result isn't right. She was in all likeliness a normal woman to begin with, but she's become something that's far from normal. And damn right I am applying morality to natural instincts expressing themselves under articifial circumstances. Compare it with adult men going after 15 year olds. It's perfectly natural, but it's 100% immoral in our modern s…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 05:04 PM
6

What's the point? The point is that for two weeks they went to great lengths to censor it, and just because they couldn't uphold that policy this time doesn't mean they won't try (do!) this again.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 04:31 PM
3

Look, I understand how this situation has come to be. I understand she's facing no consequences. That's not what this is about. I'm responding to one very specific line of yours in which you said "I don't see anything wrong with her". This is nonsense. She isn't excused because she's a woman and neither is she excused because there were never consequences to her actions. I stick with my metafor. There are plenty of people who get away with countless crimes before they are finally persecuted for …
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 04:02 PM
21

I don't see anything wrong with her. Women are the products of their environments and nothing more. Of course she's going to turn out like that given the money, fame and validation. What the fuck is this? Are we dealing in Pussypasses now? People develop (positively or negatively) based on their circumstances, true. That doesn't mean there's 'nothing wrong' with a criminal who turned out that way because he was raised by a single mother. He's still a criminal. Just like this woman is still a nar…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 02:50 PM
1

If you get a son he'll turn out even shorter and it will fuck him for life This seems to be the crux of your problem. It's also false. The predicted hight for a son of yours is the average of your length + (the mother's length +13 cm). (may vary slightly per country) This means that if your wife is less than 13 cm smaller than you (unlikely judging by your story), a son of yours will likely grow taller than you. Secondly, and more importantly, Aesthetics for men are only decisive on how hot his …
/r/askTRP12/01/16 02:01 PM
2

By all means do report back and share your experiences!
/r/askTRP11/01/16 02:57 PM
2

He's a stand up comedian who's main topics are things that women do and what's wrong with them, other typical male-female stuff, major things that are wrong with the world (and his hilarious solutions!) and generally things he finds peculiar, with some stuff from his personal life thrown in. In his podcast he talks about these things, as well as sports, his hobbies and current news events. He alsways spends some time answering questions (giving advice) from his listeners. Those are often about r…
/r/askTRP11/01/16 02:47 PM
1

If you could technically build it to function perfectly like a human, you've built a human. The discussion becomes pointless if ultimate realism is assumed.
/r/askTRP11/01/16 02:14 PM
1

If she did in fact say no, and he kept doing it, then she was raped, regardless if she actually wanted it to happen I still disagree with this statement. Let's remove the sex aspect, in general: how ridiculous is it to "want something to happen you don't want to happen". It's impossible. You either want it or you don't, and by the looks of it she wanted it.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 08:54 AM
1

Any red flag permanently disqualifies a girl as LTR material, and you've just identified one. There's nothing more to it than that. You have two sensible options: 1) reduce to plate status, meaning you make it clear to her that her behavior is unacceptable and she lost her monogamy privilege because of it or 2) you straight up break up with her, which will likely be the result of 1 anyways.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 09:02 PM
3

I'm suprised Bill Burr's podcast didn't get a mention yet. Definitely that one. Every monday and thursday. Don't know about soundcloud.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 08:57 PM
4

I fully agree. But on the other hand sex with advanced androids is not something that's unthinkable to me either. So it'll not so much depend on how good they are able to make the robots, but on how much more shitty girls are going to become.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 08:52 PM
4

Then I'll politely have to deliver the news that you're doing it wrong.
/r/askTRP10/01/16 08:49 PM
1

This is a personal opinion, but I believe there's no such thing as 'intentionally getting raped'. If it was intentional, then it was sex she was after and sex was what she got, meaning it wasn't rape. No sufficient grounds to punish the perpetrator in this case. Same with 'intentionally getting robbed'.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 07:38 PM
4

No, this is neither you being blue pill, nor do 'good women' not exist. You're seeing the truth for what it; that the huge majority of women is useless for anything more than uncommitted fucking. This is a direct result of feminism. Women are being told that they deserve everything, don't have to work for it in return and don't need to worry about accountability/responsibility and it's making them insufferable. But not all of them are entitled brats... yet at least. Good women, or 'LTR worthy' w…
/r/askTRP10/01/16 02:56 PM
11

I tried, I really fucking tried, but I can't watch such a blatant display of narcissm and attention whoring. For what I've seen there may be some nuggets of truth in her story, but it's mostly hollow emotional attacks. Then again, what did I expect. The best part of all this is not the video, but the reason it was made: there appears to be a real anti-feminism bandwagon forming. It's about time.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 10:06 AM
5

I know the mod's policy here for long enough to know that that's not the full story. Especially the beating up women part, no mod here is going to defend people who advocate that.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/16 10:17 PM
1

You'd be wrong to disagree face your fears. If he seeks out a therapist it means he needs help, guidance, in facing his fears. A woman is likely to send him in the wrong direction and he'd be worse off. For all you know the male he sees can be a beta and therefore have a female perspective anyway. ... is like saying "for all you know you may still get lung cancer if you don't smoke so go ahead an pick up a sigarette". Nothing in life is certain, so you go with the best odds. That means a male th…
/r/askTRP09/01/16 11:15 AM
2

If you're not doing this already: I'd say be proactive when it comes to helping out with ordinary things, if only as small as whiping a table clean or preparing/bringing a nice snack. You're probably letting him take the lead, which directs his attention to the big picture. That means you can make a big diffference by paying extra attention to all the details and it will be appreciated. Also, openly communicating your preferences and reservations (fears, uncertainties) -without being demanding- …
/r/RedPillWomen08/01/16 11:46 PM
3

No paragraphs, no introduction/summary, meaning you haven't read the sidebar, with a post that belongs in askTRP... and you couldn't even be bothered to add a flair. So either fuck your ignorance or fuck your attitude. I have no good words for this.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 11:08 PM
2

Whatever suits you. And if not for me, there are legions who'd gladly help you out instead. It's what the community is for.
/r/askTRP08/01/16 09:49 PM
4

Because this is about fixing male issues, and women know shit about male issues, let alone fixing them.The rare woman that does will be smarter than making the choice to study psychology.
/r/askTRP08/01/16 09:37 PM
5

Absolutely a male therapist, and do make sure it's not a white knight. May take a few tries. Still, it's far from guaranteed to help you. Consider discussing your issues here, the community is likely very helpful. (but be critical of everything you're being told. EC's usually give the best advice) If you don't feel like throwing it out there, feel free to pm me and I may be able to give you some helpful advice.
/r/askTRP08/01/16 09:14 PM
3

Good. Be aware it takes a few days after subscribing until you're allowed to post. Two more things: If you're new, it's almost a certainty you will have nothing to contribute on the main sub. Make sure you know the contents of the sidebar, as well as the top posts of all time before posting anything other than a (non personal advice) question. It will take some time before you've taken it all in and that's perfectly fine, we'll manage until you have. It would be nice of you to remove this post t…
/r/askTRP08/01/16 09:08 PM
5

TRP's motto could be "enjoy the decline I disagree. That's merely a sentiment shared by a minority. At the very least it isn't common core (sidebar). If anything, it's "make the most out of the hand you're dealt"
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 08:23 PM
3

Fair enough. Then I can only say I see a needless divide, with The Red Pill being the more advanced form as it encompasses more and doesn't share the weak points (hamstering InCels, notably) that are present in the MGTOW community. The healthy part of MGTOW could be fully incoorporated within TRP, the inverse isn't true. But that's my perspective.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 08:11 PM
31

MGTOW has a bad rep in TRP because it is TRP unless you try to define it as different, ending up with something inferior in the process.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 07:46 PM
3

So why the need to give it a different label than TRP?
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 07:42 PM
3

Yes, but the problem with that is, as MGTOW, you either have uncommitted sex (how is this different from TRP?) or you don't, but there's not really a sensible reason for that unless you're asexual.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 06:18 PM
20

My problem with 'MGTOW' has always been the mixed signals and defininitions that people amongst their own ranks come up with and none of them really make sense considering the alternatives. First there's the obvious interpretation that MGTOWs are people who completely abandon women. While somewhat understandable, this is denying yourself a basic biological necessity. And unlike marriage, it frankly hasn't come to the point yet where the costs/risks of casual sexual encounters outweigh the benefi…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/16 06:00 PM
1

I disagree, not the part I meant at least. The notion that women don't distinguish negative and positive validation is new, and in my opinion interesting. It's already well established that women can get away with questionable behaviour (obnoxious, overly dramatic, straight up lying), but you're right in taking it a step further: it's actively rewarded and thus incentivized by means of validation. This better explains extreme examples like matress girl and (other) radical feminists. Do with it a…
/r/askTRP08/01/16 05:05 PM
1

Good material, you could build a thread around this.
/r/askTRP08/01/16 01:48 PM
1

Agreed, better.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 09:10 PM
3

Power is merely the ability to influence the world around you. Knowing this, Obama is more powerful than Putin in virtually every way. Strenght, however, is a character trait. Considering putin's KGB background, this is hardly a contest. Putin certainly seems to be a stronger leader than Obama is. But you must ask yourself which of the two aspects is more important in the grand scheme of things.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 08:47 PM
15

You're close, but not entirely correct. There's facing challenges, and then there's pointless risk. My point being: we (men) must endure hardships, but only those that present themselves as obstacles on our paths to success. We must always balance risk and sacrifice with reward. If the struggle and/or risk isn't worth the reward, walk away. Struggling just for the sake of character developement is idiotic. Live life the smart way and choose your battles. Other than that I agree; it's overcoming …
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 07:07 PM
10

I'll be honest, I don't like this post very much. First off because the sub isn't for posting work in progress. If you want feedback then there's askTRP for that. Secondly because very little work has gone into making this, resulting in a product that -at this point at least- is adding nothing of value at best and actively misleading at worst. You failed to provide any information about the way you believe this chart to represent reality. When it comes to judging the content, the two upper rows …
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 06:54 PM
3

step 1: figure out if it is a shit test or comfort test. step 2: adress the underlying question If shit test (can I leech on you for validation?): something along the line of "Yeah, you kinda do. Don't worry baby, you can make up for it in plenty of other ways" + large smirk. If comfort test (Is this a problem that may cause you to leave me?): "yeah, but I think it suits your figure. I haven't got much of a thing for big breasts anyway" or something like that.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 03:58 PM
7

Hell, the more powerful, the greater the shit tests.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 03:48 PM
2

Blue pill men are passing comfort tests that never presented themselves Intersting perspective. That endorsed flare is right around the corner I'm sure.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 03:11 PM
28

Either you pay nothing for sex, nothing at all, or you pay with everything; all limits are off. if you made more money, we would have more sex OP: this is you paying. There's only one sensible thing to do now, and there's a timer attached to it on top of that. Now cut loose from this sunk cost and do what you need to do for the sake of your future mental well being.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 02:50 PM
1

I'd say start here, it links further to scientific articles. https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/more-evidence-that-routine-multivitamin-use-should-be-avoided/ Regarding the joint pain, you could at least try to figure out which supplimentary components contribute to resolving it and which don't. (The fish oil would be the most plausible IMO). Could still all be placebo. Then again, a placebo effect is an effect nonetheless.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 01:59 PM
1

No, you are dating her. If you were plating her, you wouldn't have so much trouble letting go of her. Also, if your relationship with her is exclusive, you have yet to understand the definition of plate spinning and I'd refer you to the sidebar.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 01:53 PM
1

Love and hate are much closer related to each other than people claim. Think for example about breakups, and more importantly why they are so often so spiteful. This is because in both love and hate you have a strong presence in a person's mind. So love can quite rapidly turn into hate, and to a degree the inverse is also true. That doesn't make hate a 'good' emotion, but it's good in an at least kind of way; 'at least she has strong feelings for me'. As pointed out in a previous comment, the re…
/r/askTRP07/01/16 01:18 PM
2

Also: the supplements you're already taking are just a way of extracting money from you. Unless you experience real, tangible benefits: wise up and cut it out.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 11:07 AM
0

Agreed. This screams crazy and drama. Hard next, ignore her from now on.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 11:02 AM
1

Always be specific in making plans. Indeed, if she's unavailable at the proposed time she'll suggest a different date if she's interested at all. You got the general gist. Now stop over analysing and see for yourself what works. Good luck!
/r/askTRP07/01/16 11:00 AM
1

Don't believe a word you hear about vitamins these days; they're hyped and most of it is pseudoscience. You only need very, very small amounts of them to stay healthy and adding more won't give you any benefits beyond placebo. If you aren't experiencing any health issues you're probably in the green. Keeping a stash of fruit on your desk may be a good idea nonetheless, that would be my advice for you. Stay away from fast food. I'll repeat that last part for added emphasis: Stay away from fast fo…
/r/askTRP07/01/16 10:56 AM
2

The importance of this all is up for debate, I agree, but there's no denying there's a stark contrast between the previous movies and the new one when it comes to female focus. In fact, they put so many minorities and female main characters in it that -to me- it felt like an apology for the lack of them in the earlier ones. if that isn't the mark of PC culture (women, minorities and guilt) then I don't know what is. It's good to notice this trend, as well as how they had to get creative with the…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 12:27 PM
1

Aside from some quick fixes to your text game (which doesn't appear to be the problem) and maybe a few better pictures, everything you could possibly do (notably: lifting more) to enhance your online dating game is going to require a significant investment of your time. So either you have time and you spend it effectively -I'd say by approaching girls IRL- or you don't have time and you reevaluate your priorities. Could be you're just too busy at the moment. A man can't have everything. That's a…
/r/askTRP04/01/16 02:21 PM
4

Yes, but you're missing the context. This girl isn't bringing up sex straight out the gate, but only after some text walls and being ignored. To me, that screams manipulation and risk for LMR and drama. And we know the best way of dealing with LMR is to disengage completely, leaving it up to her to reinstigate. Yes, women like sex just as we do, but remember: that which you chase will run away from you. Sending her out in the case of LMR is meant as another test: either she changes her mind, or …
/r/askTRP04/01/16 02:14 PM
2

If online dating doesn't work for you, stop doing it. It's that simple. Approach girls in real life. Online dating is only visual with some text game in the mix. In real life you can let many other qualities work for you. Do what works, and quit complaining about what doesn't work. Do you want sympathy or do you want results? Also: quality women with options are not on dating sites. Why the hell would they even bother? Reevaluate the pond you're fishing in.
/r/askTRP04/01/16 02:02 PM
1

I'm sorry man, but if your brother reads TRP yet still plans on marrying, he's likely incapable of logical reasoning on this matter. There's a good chance there's nothing you can do. All I can think of -but few can pull it off- is continuous emotional manipulation over a prolonged period of time, during which you subtly highlight her negative aspects and associate them being together with negative emotions on his part. There's no playbook for these kind of things, so you'll have to figure out fo…
/r/askTRP04/01/16 01:54 PM
5

To add to this: if she agrees and when she arrives, instigate kino immediately. This will be a mayor test on her part. If she's withholding, be prepared to tell her you're not interested in playing games and make it clear -calmly- that if she's not interested in having sex now, that's ok, but she is to leave.
/r/askTRP04/01/16 01:44 PM
7

Get straight to the point. Skip the drinks and chatter. Respond with: "my place, [insert date and time], wear something sexy" (specify the last part if you wish). Agreed that you're overthinking this, be aware of that, but the best cure from that may be some success on your part. Have fun and don't get caught in her drama.
/r/askTRP04/01/16 01:37 PM
7

the /s means sarcasm
/r/askTRP04/01/16 01:35 PM
1

Respect for going so thoroughly through all the questions. And thanks for the answer!
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 07:12 PM
7

Hi Milo! Appreciate you spending time here. My question: What is your general view on today's women? Since you're kind of an 'outsider' on this yet very well informed on the major issues surrounding them. To put it very bluntly: do you mostly see narcissistic insufferable brats who lost all their use except for their uteri? Or do you see a group of people with many redeeming qualities who have been victimised by feminism just as much as we (men) have? Or whatever is in between that? I'm curious,…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 05:34 PM
21

Why did you even think she was a unicorn in the first place, nevermind even that they don't exist at all. Because she was easy to get in bed? That's a red flag, not a unicorn mark, it's the complete opposite. Girls who put out easily only do so because they perceive their own value to be much, much lower than yours (what you don't want for anything more than a quick fuck), or because she is trying to manipulate you (in your case). Read up on red flags and forget about hunting unicorns high LTR v…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 04:39 PM
19

I cannot see how women actually value commitment as they dont need it.by staving off marriage til 34 they have shown en masse that they do not need commitment on a basic human,chemical and bonding level Interesting thought, but how many of those are genuinly happy? You are forgetting that the depression rates for women are off the charts. Them believing their own bullshit all the while thinking their shitty lives are as good as they could possibly be is no indication that women don't need commit…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 04:17 PM
2

Not too long ago (let's say like 50-60 years) being red pill was basically the norm. Men were strong, they didn't give a shit, they knew their worth. Basically every man had these qualities that have been lost in men in our modern society You've got it backwards. Men were hardly more RP, certainly not stronger or more confident, perhaps just a bit less catering to feminine demands, but that's about it. What changed is that once society respected hardworking men who provided for their family and …
/r/askTRP17/12/15 01:26 PM
2

The key word is 'tendency'. All women share a certain set of tendencies, but whether they act on them or not varies from person to person. It depends on circumstances and their personal willpower. Tendencies like hypergamy can certainly be suppressed, but it will always be their default operating mode.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:28 AM
5

All men are polygamous, meaning we'd prefer having sex with as many women as possible and we're capable of loving a multitude of them at the same time All men have a dualistic mating strategy: we are driven to invest in quality women and their offspring, but also to have minimal-investment sexual intercourse with lower quality women. this is also known as the 'madonna/whore' complex. All men lean towards rational thought as opposed to emotional thought All men prefer women who are in their prime…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:23 AM
2

We've seen many posts on this subject over time, this being another quality one, but I can't help but feel one part is always missing. OP, and many others, have talked extensively about what makes up the AWALT umbrella; hypergamy, solipsism, child like behaviour... the key concept indeed being female nature. But in my opinion an article like this is incomplete without discussing what the limits of applying AWALT are. What I'm getting at is that there are certain traits in women that are so commo…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:00 AM
4

Capitalism is a great system... as long as it operates on a relatively personal level. Small to medium scale. If the CEO knows the employees and the town folks know the CEO you have built in protection against employees being reduced to tools, as well as excessive corporate greed. When a bad rep is a danger to your immediate social life you'll be forced to act reasonable. It's when companies grow too big that capitalism turns ugly. When employers don't know their employees personally they are re…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/15 11:18 AM
2

Just say fuck it and walk away. Ignore everyting that follows from her, and warn close friends and family beforehand that you two are done. That'll suffice to protect against any manipulation attempts. This woman isn't worth any more of your time and energy than that.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/15 01:24 PM
1

However Is there any suggestions how to bring them into my social circle? Am I understanding correctly that you want the people that disrespect you (back) in your social circle? Because you don't, fuck that. You want to build a social circle with people that do respect you, and so you will need to start over. Find new group activities to participate in, or go to events by yourself and chat people up. Socialize, but not with the people who already developed a negative opinion about you.
/r/askTRP08/12/15 09:24 PM
3

Depends on your take on 'applying TRP theory'. If the thinks you're acting mean, could it be because you're overly agressive in your tone/body language? Because not only is there rarely a need for that, it's also a way of breaking frame. What you want to be is stoic and -for lack of better words- 'kindly dominant'. For example, if you want her to do something, tell her in a calm fashion. If she refuses, calmly explain that you expect her to be cooperative and that you will not tolerate her refus…
/r/askTRP08/12/15 09:09 PM
3

this girl is 18 She's literally gorgeous This guy of hers was her only boyfriend Sounds like you're using this to rationalise everything else. You're acting out of scarcity mentality. "Oh this girl is so pretty, oh, this girl is so sexually unexperienced, oh this girl is so young. I'm so Lucky, so I must endure" BULLSHIT! The reality is that this woman shows tons of red flags, which at the very least completely disqualifies her as LTR material. (read up on red flags will you?) So basically you'r…
/r/askTRP01/12/15 11:50 AM
14

Make sure you've made your intentions clear (best is right from the start). If she's not showing interest, it's good to remember that's still infinitely better than living in prolonged soul sucking uncertainty. If she lets you down respectfully it's not hard to let her go respectfully too; smile, thank her nonetheless and move on. If she's being a bitch about it, than that's a bullit dodged. That's really all there is to it.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 11:01 PM
0

This doesn't explain anything. It's just a menstrual chart depicting hormonal levels. Did you really look into it any further than "curving lines are no straight lines, so women must fluctuate more in everything"? Because that's as nonsensical as it is irrelevant. This is noise. Contribute to the signal or don't contribute at all.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 10:55 PM
1

I see what you mean, but I'm not convinced pragmatic is the right word to desribe it. It implies using reason, a sensible approach. While women certainly act based upon what they think is wise to do (who doesn't?), it's rarely thought through. IMO, girls are too emotional to call them pragmatic. It may be pragmatic to branch swing in theory, but women are terrible at judging who the better partner is. Too often they regret their decision later. It may be pragmatic to cry rape to cover up cheatin…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 01:40 PM
1

I'm not so sure about pragmatic, but you're right about solipsism. I'll add it to my post.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 10:23 AM
1

I couldn't have said it better.
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 10:20 AM
2

No, All Women Are Not Like that. You fundamentally misunderstand the meaning of the phrase. There are some traits that so many women share, virtually all, that we can simplify to 'all', such as hypergamy and seeking providers. Those traits are literally in their nature, and that's where AWALT comes in. Other traits are only shared by a large number of them. But not a large enough number to disregard those that do not share said traits. These are more products of the current social climate, and n…
/r/TheRedPill19/11/15 10:19 AM
2

It's good alright, but don't get overly excited. There's much more quality material out there for you to explore that'll put it in some perspective.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:07 PM
4

AWALT never claimed that women were incapable of logical reasoning, but that they don't use logic when it comes to relationships. I see what you mean and I know that. It's kind of the entire point I'm trying to make. People take the word and run with it. There's a difference between its intended use and the way I've seen people use it. That's why I said: only applies to a limited set of traits that women share.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 03:24 PM
1

And you make very valid points. My intention however is to emphasize that in the whole AWALT/NAWALT discussion the focus shouldn't merely be on the 'all' in AWALT (statistical outliers), but also on the 'that' (some/many traits are common among women, but not common enough to disregard those that do not share said traits. Thus AWALT doesn't apply), which is just as important if not more so. I may have hijacked your post somewhat with this, but I see it as an important addition.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 03:06 PM
7

Indeed. AWALT serves as a warning first and foremost: proceed cautiously. But it can't be said enough that the 'that' in AWALT 1) only speaks of tendencies, not actual outcome and 2) only applies to a limited set of traits that women share. In other words: no, it is not a statistical certainty that your girl will cheat on you. no, not all women are narcissistic brats (though they come in sheer numbers) and no, not all women are incapable of logical reasoning (far from it). I could continue. But …
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 02:49 PM
1

You need to read more of the quality material my friend. You've misinterpreted key elements and failed to see the nuances. The goal isn't to become a sociopath, AWALT doesn't mean suitable LTR women don't exist, maintaining frame doesn't mean you need to be on edge all the time and you don't need to give up on 'goodness' altogether. Instead, don't only acknowledge that Dark Triad traits work, but understand WHY they work (confidence, DGAF mentality, instilling excitement, etc.) and use this to y…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 12:24 PM
11

That following Monday after ending things with her on Saturday, one of my buddies tells me he found out this girl had fucked my friend Steve and her other friend from college who she was visiting both in the same weekend.....AWALT AWALT doesn't mean all women are raging sluts, if that's what you're impying. You use the term outside of the right context, and so it loses all its meaning. In this case you almost dated a worthless slut. That has nothing to do with AWALT, and everything to do with yo…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 10:45 AM
9

You're not wrong, but I think you missed the main problem with AWALT/NAWALT. The main issue isn't with statistical outliers, but with people who place way too many aspects under the AWALT umbrella, sometimes even to the ridiculous extreme of 'all women are virtually the same'. When confronted with the fault in their generalisations, the invalidity of NAWALT is used to defend their backward statements. An example: Poster: "My girlfriend turned out to be a borderline nutjob. AWALT people!" Comment…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 10:24 AM
1

To each their own political convictions, but do realise that 18 is just a made up number for sexual consent that some countries happen to share. Some, not all. I'm from a fully western country where the age of consent is 16, and there are more countries with similar legislation. Besides, legal or illegal, 16 year old girls are gonna fuck. Girls aged two years below that is far from unheard of and in fact becoming more common. Now, don't interpret this as me endorsing men to have sex with 14 year…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 04:17 PM
4

They Everyone want to win the competition, yet they don't actually want to compete . They hate the player* because they hate the game, and they hate the game because most of them are losing it. *Substitute the following words freely: Thin hot girls Big muscular guys Successful businessmen High achieving students Celebrities ...and anyone else who's ever been successful at something. You worded it very well. Everyone wants to win. Everyone wants to be in the spotlight. But few actually want to pu…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 12:18 PM
19

Married? You don't. You could get a monogamous LTR, but forget about signing the contract. As for finding the girl to have the LTR with: focus on girls that are just joining college and have very little sexual history, all of which in the form of committed relationships. No more than two previous partners should be doable if the girl is 18-19 years old. Don't go after the hottest one, look instead for those that are more shy, modest and well mannered. Then you have a chance to make it work. You …
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 11:43 PM
6

All this stuff is right on the mark, but you missed the disclaimer at the top. Your comment should be directed at the narrator (who won't read it here), not at the OP.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 11:27 PM
1

You know, after I was done reading this my first thoughts were something like 'brutal' 'awesome, cold as ice' and 'total savage'. I get the feeling most of you did too. But now I'm going to have to interrupt that party unfortunately. What happened to sexual strategy is amoral? I hope that's not only relevant when it's convenient? Assuming this story is true, this guy Rudy found a chick who was willing to have sex with him and so he acted on it. If he'd done a field report here at that point, we'…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 11:16 PM
3

As much as I like a brutal story like this, just as the rest of you do, this guy is right you know. Think from Rudy's perspective. So what he was boning this chick? I've seen enough 'sexual strategy is amoral' being thrown around that I'll make sure it sticks in this instance too. He may have been an asshole by all accounts, but no man deserves to lose his unborn child without him even having a say in it. As entertaining as it may be, if this story is real it's an unhumanly cold thing to do.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 10:59 PM
17

Yeah, but look at it from his perspective. He's a comedian, and half his stage material is about women. He doesn't need a loyal submissive girl, he needs a sparring partner. Hell, he needs a wife who he can complain about some times on stage. I've listened to many of the podcasts and I do have to say that although they have a remarkable dynamic, it seems to be a working one. Also, it seems Bill gets what he wants out of the whole deal, which should really be all that matters. I would never have …
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 03:10 PM
9

Not only that, it actually shows in their physical appearance. Women actually, objectively LOOK more like children. Smaller, more narrow shouldered, rounder body (more curved), they even have a higher voice. This is not uncommon in biology, it's called neoteny and seen in many other species. I second that you have to take another look at the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 10:10 AM
16

Just to make sure, you've been watching Bill Burr too I hope? He does a podcast twice a week, carrying on where Patrice left off. They were good friends actually.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 10:04 AM
2

Yes, there is definitely a problem with the signal/noise ratio in this sub. So it's all the more important to do what we can to contribute to the signal. Even if your proposed link is better than most the noise, that hardly matters. What matters is that you post in the best quality you can achieve. Knowledge of the sidebar articles doesn't only help you weed out what's redundant, it also helps you better shape your own posts and put it in context with the other topics we discuss. I stick with wh…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 12:35 AM
2

Look, I respect you for your efforts to contribute to this community. And who knows, that may be a good link. But you only know if it's original if you know what's already written (over and over again). And at this point you don't. What's the harm in checking that out first, will take you a few days tops. If you're still convinced it adds value, then you really have a reason to post it. I think TRP will survive a couple days longer without your contributions, don't you think?
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 12:15 AM
1

What makes you an expert in these ideas? Quite the long history with this forum and it's written materials. I'm sharing with you what is offical subreddit policy, which you felt too good for to have it apply to you for some reason. You're not that special, and you're undereducated on the matters we discuss here if you haven't read the sidebar, no matter how many other related books you read. All you're doing is taking up space on the front page at the cost of better posts. Also, drop the ad homi…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 12:06 AM
1

What's the point in having format requirements and a 'read the sidebar' requirement if they're not going to be enforced? I don't understand why this thread is still up if you've read it already. As you said, it's not like he's posting something new in any way.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 11:46 PM
1

You say this casually, but if you're new you have no business commenting or posting. You're unequipped to post quality content at this point, and even posting in askTRP will likely lead to question which anwers you could easily have figured out yourself. It's good you have the will to participate. Now suck that up and educate yourself first by reading the sidebar. ALL OF IT. You're more than welcome to participate after that.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 11:26 PM
1

Well according to this sub the only women who deserve to live are those who can get "alphas". Enough. That is a lie and you know it. This is stated nowhere, and you can't just interpret this because you feel bad about what's said here. Give me a quote that says otherwise or drop it. The only thing we're saying is that you put yourself at a disadvantage when it comes to securing a high value male. Well guess what, that's what the other 90% of women out there are doing as well in varying degrees. …
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 09:51 AM
1

Oh, so only the women that can secure an alpha -by definition a small minority- can have a life worth living? Is it only worth it if you can have everything just the way you like it to be? Ridiculous. So yes, maybe you're not so worthy of alpha commitment. Doesn't mean you can't find a man who, while having some flaws, shows potential and help him become the man you want him to be. Despite feminism telling you otherwise, you're entitled to nothing in life just for being there. That includes happ…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 11:24 AM
6

If anyone is trolling it's you mate, you are the one who just went ad hominem as a matter of fact. You present evidence that you have to pay up more in a divorce if the woman is more uneducated. I admit I didn't even read it, because it's irrelevant when you consider that the chances that she actually divorces you are far, far lower when she commits at a younger age. Men are not committing to the women that cost the least amount of cash to divorce, they commit to the women that pose the smallest…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 10:47 AM
2

I've been lurking or a while. Not long enough to read the sidebar apparently. You overlooked the thread format requirements or blatantly ignored them, and you don't seem to be aware personal questions should be asked in the askTRP sub. Here's what you do: stop engaging with the community. Don't write, don't ask and START READING THE SIDEBAR. Also click on the 'top' tab and select 'of all time' to read the very best posts in the history of this sub. It's a goldmine of information that you can't s…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/15 09:58 AM
6

The key feature of an alpha widow is having had a taste of something so extraordinary that the ordinary will no longer be sufficient and more of the extraordinary is sought after. In the narrow sense this is a woman who has had sex with at least one real alpha, but in a broader sense it can also be applied to girls who've lived the PartyWorld life. In that case it's the validation, not even so much the thrill of sex, that gets them hooked. In short: once you've experienced a certain thrill you'r…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 07:11 PM
7

Bad? Maybe not. But I'll place my bets on 'severely damaged'/'messed up personality' for the majority of them. Not the kind of people I'd like to have in my social circles. Doubt you see that differently.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 06:10 PM
3

This... it hits home hard. It's strange to read about someone who has lived such a similar life. Now let's see if over the coming years I can look back the same way you can. Thank you for the valuable insights.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 09:36 AM
1

I am not trying to downplay the importance of lifting or sports in general. However we'd be foolish to ignore all the other factors that are involved.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 02:44 PM
12

So... basically you're saying have alpha traits, otherwise women will reject you? That's all I got from it at least, and sorry to say it but that's about as old news as it gets around here. Also, there's this misconception that "evolutionary fitness" equates being physically fit. Nonsense, that's only a small part of it. Evolutionary fitness means that your total set of attributes and abilities allows you to survive, and even better, to come out high on the hierarchy to increase your chances at …
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 02:12 PM
7

I'll leave the suggestions for improving your personality and social skills part to the ladies, but in my experience the most valuable men can be found in the locations where they go to actively improve themselves. IOW: think sports and hobbies. If you throw some adventure in the mix it may help bonding, but that has to suit your character. Options are endless, varying from taking sailing classes to joining a theater group and everything in between. However, this comes with a caveat; if you only…
/r/RedPillWomen22/10/15 01:10 PM
1

Maybe not if you look at where the state money flow comes from, but society has one thing at its foundation and that's the family unit. And within family units, it's the man that's holding everything together. If those families consist of men that are slaving away for their job (whether that is in the army or at a desk job) with women that leech on them and boss them around, I'm going stick with my argument that the society is fully dependent on beta provisioning. Cut out the oil money and you'l…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 09:33 AM
1

Well, essentially, but there's a reason I used the word reliably. You can't base your perceptions on one-time events. A 7 still might incidentally get lucky with an HB 8 chick. But sure, if you're seeing improvements in the pattern, good for you you've made progress.
/r/askTRP21/10/15 03:57 PM
56

You're not living in a "Red Pill country". You're confusing RP with traditional. It's not that the people in your country are more alpha, it's that being beta is rewarded more. While we at TRP recognise that without a more traditional structure society crumbles, we also see that a working society is run by hardworking complacent betas. It's a working model, but hardly something most of us here would be a part of. There has never been such a thing as a red pill society, women have always had the …
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 03:43 PM
2

You are capable of judging the SMV of women, are you not? Well then it's simple. Take the highest SMV of girls that reliably show interest in you (or that you can get with) and add half a point, maybe a full point. That's where you're at. Girls date up, remember? If you can't get girls to notice you at all, your SMV is below the point where it serves you to label it. Improving is all that matters in that scenario. Come to think of it, one might ask what the purpose is of rating your SMV in the f…
/r/askTRP21/10/15 02:59 PM
4

So, if I understand correctly you used to date this woman before you found TRP? Then be warned, once a girl has qualified you as a beta she won't easily let go of that image. If you all of a sudden start treating her by red pill principles, expect an explosion of shit tests. From what I see in this text, that's exactly what she's doing. ("how many times have you insulted me"/ "you used to be so sweet") If she marked you as beta in her mind, know that she isn't contacting you for alpha fux, but f…
/r/askTRP21/10/15 01:53 PM
5

I've always been the one to make the plans, but I used to discuss most matters nonetheless before making the final decisions. Then one day a girl told me she hardly even listens to my propositions, because she trusted my decision making blindly and preferred to just go along with it and be surprised. Has been a real eye opener. Now I simply present the plan and follow the 'no objection = agreement' model. My girl loves me for it and I dare say the same would go for most of them.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 03:08 PM
6

Reputation is everything though. It's not so much that he got dropped that's worrying, it's the reason why and what effect this will have on how his environment thinks of him. Ignorance on these matters makes all the difference between a blunt Chad Thundercock and a RP alpha who lives life the smart way. Why throw up obstacles for yourself when it isn't necessary?
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 02:57 PM
0

It's easy to understand once you realise the origin of the problem. It's not that feminists aren't actually fighting for equality in their eyes, however it's the underlying premise that's flawed. If you believe that women are treated unfairly and at the same time take men as the gold standard, of course you're going to focus on women's problems (only) while attempting to balance things out. Not only that, if the initial premise is that men are the gold standard then by default any issues on thei…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:08 AM
5

It's not often anymore that I stumble upon entirely new insight here, but today I sure did. Another very important reason to be wary women aged 25+. Thanks for the good writeup.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 08:24 PM
2

No, Estrogen suppresses it's production.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 08:06 AM
1

Running will only improve your cardio a bit and help you lose a marginal amound of weight. (If that's what you need, adjust your eating habits). It does very little for your physique. If you want to get noticed, upper body strength + abdomen is your first priority (that isn't to say ignore the rest). You can substitute to some degree by doing other sports, but make sure those sports train power, not endurance. Not that this isn't good for your general health, but it won't do a thing for solving …
/r/askTRP08/10/15 07:38 AM
10

but I don't believe for a second that this is because men are x and women are y Allright, bring on the downvotes... Good thing science doesn't care one tiny little bit about what you believe or don't. Everything, and then I really mean everything we've observed so far -from the the chemical properties of sex hormones, to the human anatomy, to behaviors we observe- point us in one direction: that women are designed (evolutionary) to nurse children and men are designed for doing tough jobs. Have y…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:12 PM
15

""Women and children first!... ...there are no feminists in a housefire. -The Red Pill" "Girl, what do you even have to offer besides sex? -The Red Pill", with the most confused bimbo in the background you can find.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/15 05:40 PM
0

TRP is about sexual strategy, but the term is misleading. It's not limited to 'strategy for getting sex'. Instead, you should read it as 'strategy to better the lives of the members of our sex', an important difference. This was explained by mod Redpillschool. So no, it's not all about getting girls, it's about living a life worth living. For whatever it is you want to accomplish, understand the use of the halo effect, i.e. people who look better are treated better and thought higher of. So get …
/r/askTRP06/10/15 01:30 PM
2

Allright, I'll have to admit that I got a better impression of what you're saying after you expanded on your reply. If I understand you correctly, the point you're trying to make is that we can't "turn off" the violence that allowed us to conquer external threats to your existence, so now it's directed at ourselves, correct? Now, I agree with you that violence is indeed a part of us, but where our opinions differ is that I think it follows clear incentives. I don't see, nor believe in "violence …
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 10:04 AM
1

I said bad boys, not alphas. It seems you equate these in your mind. Understand that in fact most 'bad boys' are absolutely NOT alpha. Most of them are degenerates who smoke and drink and fight their lives away. That's not power, that's stupidity. A true alpha is in control and knows what he's doing. This means that the more quiet and calm man may actually be the greater alpha. Hence, the greatest value will actually be found hidden within the 'insecure betas' group. But they are rare and women …
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 10:21 PM
2

Unfortunately you can't dismiss this kind of stuff in a few sentences. You're most welcome.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 09:51 PM
2

You seem to have this idea in your head that agressiveness and dark triad traits are optimal for humans. That these people are the strongest, that they are most fit to produce offspring... Let me tell you right now that that is bullshit. And there's a lot more bullshit in this post. Agressiveness is useful sometimes, but often it's risk seeking behaviour while the situation doesn't necessarily call for it. Who amongst the aggressives gets hurt and who doesn't is decided by one thing and one thin…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 09:24 PM
1

No, not really. If your intent is to educate the guy, just stick to 'look up operant conditioning'. That is all, and you could have picked that up already since I said the second part was unnecessary. If you insist on mentioning another synonym, use the accurate one: instrumental conditioning. If you really feel the need to mention positive reinforcement, for reasons that are unclear to me, I think the best way to say it would be 'look up operant conditioning by positive reinforcement'. And yes,…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 08:36 PM
1

You were wrong, because operant conditioning is as much 'also known as positive reinforcement as drinks are 'also known as tea'. I know what your reply was intended to do, but you should just have stuck with the first part. The second part was unnecessary and false. I'm only pointing out what is factually incorrect.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 08:16 PM
1

Operant Conditioning, aka positive reinforcement Huh? No you got that wrong. Operant conditioning is learning through trial and error. That can be through positive reinforcement (rewarding), in which case the 'error' is not getting a reward. However it can also be through punishment, in which case the 'error' is an unpleasant experience. Inmagine a cage of mice with in the centre a red button. Positive reinforcement would be that the mice get food if they press the button. Punishment would be th…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 06:44 PM
1

Sex bots are coming, and will be nothing like the cold inflatable sex dolls that go around today. The question isn't whether they will be as good as the 'real deal', but rather if they will be good enough to keep betas from spending the extra effort and resources required to get with a real woman. And I expect they will be. Hell, porn alone is already doing exactly that, be it to a lesser extent. My problem is that OP thinks this lack of interest in real women is going to make these men alphas, …
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 02:55 PM
3

You gravitate towards having a nuanced worldview and I appreciate that. I can relate. However, you need to understand two things: AWALT is complicated and many don't fully grasp its meaning and its use. In general many of the people in this community don't understand important pieces of information. If you want to see the more nuanced picture, look at what's highly upvoted, what's written by endorsed members and what's in the sidebar. Ignore the huge number of comments that are fuelled by anger …
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 02:10 PM
1

Your post is optimistic, but naive. You need to understand that TRP isn't presenting a well functioning model for society. Instead it exists to help men get the most out of living in a society that's broken. The Red Pill gives men the tools to compete effectively in this environment and to come out on top, but society isn't founded on competition, it's founded on collaboration. Apply TRP on a large scale and we're back to the laws of the jungle; survival of the fittest and kill or be killed. If …
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 01:00 PM
1

It's beyond sad to see this downvoted to the bottom. The anger phase may be justified, it still overshadows reasonable speech. Do know that comments like this are appreciated, even though they're downvoted by the masses.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 12:30 PM
4

You have provided a clear example of how vile a woman can be. And that's what TRP does as well. We take women off the pedestal and showcase what they are capable of as well what their basic instincts are. But mind you. AWALT does not mean all women are dysfunctional cunts like your mother, nor is it in their nature to be this way. Don't project her behavior onto all others. Most girls are really not that bad -some are even great persons- as long as you keep in mind what their limitations are. Th…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 11:18 AM
1

1) Improve yourself in both body and mind. Add interesting life experiences to the mix. 2) Women are pleasantries along the way, do NOT make them the goal. 3) Society is against you. Don't play games that are designed to make you fail. Live life the smart way and be critical in what principles you adhere to, as they will hold you back.
/r/askTRP05/10/15 10:55 AM
17

Pussy devaluation doesn't create alphas. The only thing you'll get is a large group of men who don't care about anything else than eating, fucking their sex toys and gaming. If you think that's an alpha you're beyond delusional. It just may be an incentive for women to put more effort into being kind and feminine, but with so many men retracting from the market completely and so few women left to learn feminine values from my predictions for the future are bleak. Also: read the sidebar, all of i…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 07:50 AM
1

The sidebar isn't some stuff that'll just become clear to you if you stick around long enough. It isn't a fucking game manual. Go read it in its entirety and then read the top posts of all time. Before you do you have no business posting or commenting here. You can either comply or find your ass banned soon enough.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/15 07:35 AM
3

Well, what would an actual, literal first mate do when (s)he feels used by the captain, not rewarded and respected enough for his/her hard work on the ship? Exactly. The first mate would start working at another ship where the crew is treated better. It's that simple.
/r/RedPillWomen04/10/15 01:37 PM
1

Then I'm really done debating.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 07:37 PM
1

Oh come on! [this] (https://archive.is/1qdi5) one.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 06:25 PM
5

With almost every absolute we deal in there are exceptions when it comes to rare cases. You have a friend you trust to not judge you for participating in a sub such as this. You also trust him not to spread this knowledge about you to other people who might not be so free of mind. This is rare. I don't know your situation but in many cases it's also naive. People generally suck at keeping things secret and at that point it's out of your control where sensitive information ends up. This friend of…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 01:24 PM
3

If a specific message is widely interpreted wrongly the problem is in the accuracy of the message, not in the recipients who interpet it. And I don't agree with the other user. It's not that you only need to do what you really want. In the process of becoming a man you need to do a lot of things that you don't want to do and that's exactly what this is about. Nobody likes going to the gym for the first time. Nobody likes cold approaching girls. Nobody likes studying hard. Nevertheless you still …
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 11:12 AM
3

It's not that you can't mention our ideas in a conversation, there's no problem in that. It's that linking yourself to TRP, either intentionally or due to stupidity, equates linking yourself to a misogynist hate group in the eyes of the regular population. No matter how you look at it, that is a stupid thing to do and it's completely unneccessary. You risk your reputation, perhaps some friendships and maybe even more. And for WHAT? Don't use the name, nor use our specific jargon when discussing …
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 10:49 AM
3

I picked three very clear examples, but the underlying problem is much, much wider and manifests itself in many ways. Let me share a short personal story: I had a bully in primary school. When I told my parents, the advice that was given was 'don't let it get to you and just ignore it'. What I should have been told is to punch the guy in the face the next time and ignore whatever reaction follows. The pattern is what's important here, and every guy has relevant personal stories. I don't doubt pa…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 10:34 AM
1

It is just you. People are selfish, but they're social beings just as much. This means caring about the well being of the people around you, which crosses gender barriers. It may be the type of girls you're dating and surrounding yourself with that's eliciting this responce from you. Otherwise, maybe you're just not that empathetic as a person. Just because sex is required to maintain a relationship doesn't mean there isn't much more to them that makes them worth the effort. (with the right type…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 08:09 AM
88

Don't speak about TRP with women anyone Why so many casually abandon this fundamental concept for the sake of some trivial conversation topic is beyond me. People: stop trying to impress people with your newfound knowledge and shut your mouths. If the wrong people connect you to TRP the damage could be severe. Don't gamble with that. You have nothing to gain, much to lose. EDIT: typo.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 09:00 PM
1

Allright, well that's done now anyway. What you really need to do is start reading the sidebar. It's non-optional, certainly if you're going to post here. Other than that, by all means welcome to the community.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 08:42 PM
61

Don't forget it's also a case of keeping betas betas. Girls can't have too many providing betas around and they don't like to lose a source of their validation and free stuff. I think this may be just as big an incentive for them to act the way they do. And I think there's one factor there that's most important and not even malevolent in its nature: girls simply don't know any better than that it works. "Just be yourself" has always worked for them after all. It's a typical case of projection. I…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 08:31 PM
1

Abdada has told you everything you need to know. However: As pointed out, this belongs in askTRP. Since you did not know this, you haven't read the sidebar. Do that before asking questions again. You're unnesseccarily taking up space and the valuable time of users here. You haven't complied with the thread format requirements, which is also another indication you haven't read the sidebar. Did you even read anything from it? Your layout sucks. This should have been two paragraphs at the very leas…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 08:16 PM
441

Interesting thoughts. But it's worse than you portray. Not only are men not taught how to attract girls, we're actively being misguided. 'Just be yourself', 'share your feelings', 'buy her presents'. That's why it's so effective. If you don't know something you naturally look for answers, which you will find through observation soon enough. But if you were fed lies you perceive as truths it turns you into a complacent idiot who thinks he himself is the problem. TRP isn't just some stuff you need…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 08:03 PM
1

With the 'not taking criticism' part I was referring to our other conversation.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 03:50 PM
3

I have the utmost respect for the ones that take the time and effort to write the high qualtity, insightful, thought out materials found here. Whether those are short paragraph insights or lengthy essays, all is greatly appreciated. Yet I will say this: only post when you have something to say that adds value. Creating content is not a value on its own. If you came up with some good points but burried them in an unneccessary wall of tekst or if your post is only a cheap rehash of sidebar materia…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 03:15 PM
1

You say you value sex more than others. Sorry mate, but that's bullshit. You don't even know what it's like. All you're doing is putting it on a pedestal, and the only thing that does is making it less accessable for yourself. For what it's worth, I'll share some personal perspective. I've always been a relationship guy, but in hindsight I've allowed girls in my life who were just not worthy of such a position. And so what, I've made mistakes, I learned. In fact, I would say these past experienc…
/r/askTRP01/10/15 10:01 AM
1

Well, at the very least you can't know you 'don't want mindless sex' until you've actually experienced it. You must really ask yourself why you are restricting yourself in such a way.
/r/askTRP01/10/15 09:48 AM
1

Yes, well, the problem is all in the definitions then is it? Look, by aborting a fetus you're not killing a human being, you're destroying a group of cells with the potential of becoming one. Otherwise, when is something a human being? An egg cell? a fertillized egg cell? After the cells attach to the uterus wall? after 10 weeks? 15? when? You have to draw a line. As long as it can't survive unattached from a woman's body, it's a part of the woman's body. Is taking a biopsy killing too then? Amp…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 07:58 AM
1

No doubt that there are men, perhaps even many men here, that over generalise based on very little information. I think your intentions are OK, but you don't fully grasp what the function of this forum is. What, other than ego, makes someone put down an entire population of people based on the few they happen to meet in their area? I'll tell you. It's warning and protecting other men. We are not here to talk shit about women for our own egos. We are here to make men aware of women's shortcomings…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 07:33 AM
1

I will answer all your statements point for point, but before I do I want to remark that you didn't write one word to pardon or justify your strongly exaggerated comments which I pointed out. Do you see how you completely block out criticism for yourself that way? It's not a good trait. If you can justify it, by all means. Otherwise the very least you could have done is admit where you agree. You'll see I do just that in the text below. Now then: Men also have a group bias. No they don't, that's…
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 07:05 AM
1

If you really believe there's not much that separates doctors from mass murderers, I can only say you need to actually meet and talk with a few doctors. Though if you're that delusional your mind may be beyond saving. Either way, there's only so much distance a debate can bridge.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:29 AM
0

No... free speech unless it involves advocating the act of killing, or assaulting other people for that matter. Free speech should have all the opportunity we can reasonably give it, but there are certain hard limits that need to be set when it involves extreme cases. I don't think that's too crazy a notion. For every kind of freedom you have there are limitations, speech is no different.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:45 PM
0

Now, I completely agree that censorship is bad and the country's legislation is stupid, but can we be reasonable here? This guy is advocating the execution of doctors. For as far as I'm concerned his anti abortion stance shouldn't be a reason for banning him from the country. But when it is taken to such an extreme, I can actually understand the decision.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:52 PM
1

If there is such a thing as disingenuous speech, what you wrote here would be the very definition. You conclude things, rather severe things, based only on negative suspicions and not on what was actually said. I have 2 things to say to you: 1) Your gender was never assumed, it was mentioned by yourself in your very own posting history. No need to dig deep for that either. 2) No, it's not that 'nothing you say is valid because you're a woman', however things you say, as a woman, that try to defe…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 12:24 PM
1

Yes, It seems that you have trouble admitting the same though. So how about instead thoughtless redirection of my argument, you tell me in what way we, men, are ego invested in this topic? Are you seriously going to defend the notion that we twist our observations in our heads because we so desperately need to feel 'better' than women? Because I'd say it's the exact opposite. In case you missed it in the article, men would rejoice if they actually found a girl with interesting hobbies who is cap…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 12:09 PM
7

Great beginner-level field report. I'm sorry to hear about your health issues. Even better then to hear you're combatting your insecurities. For follow up advice: get some leadership in there. Make propositons, take initiative and make the plans. Best of luck to you and great to have you in this community!
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 07:01 PM
13

Dude, there's a big difference between 'cashier' and 'shop owner who also sells stuff', also in how they are treated. The former has a low skilled job, whereas the latter is respectable and has status as a skilled and passionate entrepeneur. People sometimes treat common cashiers as servants, but they tend to be a bit more respectful if they're dealing with the guy who can kick them out of his store.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 01:16 PM
0

Indeed, the only thing that would disclose the real truth in the best way possible would be a scientific article from a respectable source. I take it this is what you demand? What you need to understand is that almost everything we discuss here can't be backed up by science. In some cases because there are certain things that can't be measured, but more often because researching what we discuss would be career suicide for a researcher. However, do realise you too have nothing to back up your sta…
/r/TheRedPill29/09/15 07:41 AM
1

I get what you're saying, but I see a problem with your reasoning. True, you can't raise people's ceilings, but who's to say what those ceilings are? I for one wouldn't dare argue any of the educational fields are running at their max potential. More money always buys better teachers, better equipment and better research to what works and what doesn't. The question is not if, but to what extent specific fields are underachieving and how much difference a certain influx of money could make. A cam…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 07:13 PM
1

Angela Merkel comes to mind as a prime example.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 06:58 PM
3

Just because they exist on both sides doesn't imply even the slightest that it's balanced. Also, it's obvious that you're a woman. If anything, this kind of hollow reasoning proves OP's point. You're defending a false premise because you're emotionally invested in the illusion.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 06:55 PM
3

Stupidity doesn't discriminate you say? There are many kinds of intelligence, but the intellectual/academic kind certainly favours men. Women are prone to abandoning reason in favour of emotions, which hinders their ability to think rationally. If abandoning reason isn't stupidity, I don't know what is. Men have greater rational/spacial intelligence while women have greater social/verbal intelligence. The only reason this doesn't show in IQ scores is that the test is designed to even the scores …
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 06:52 PM
1

Don't fool yourself, even the skinniest girl will get fat if she would switch to a fastfood diet. Some can seemingly eat whatever they like, but almost always that's because they normally don't eat all that much and what they eat tends to be on the healthy side. 'Watching your diet' in this case means: keep doing what you do. Your body weight gain is caloric imput minus caloric output, it's as simple as that. Science has found that differences in metabolism rate do not have a significant effect …
/r/TheRedPill21/09/15 07:07 AM
0

Believe what you wish to believe. By your logic women can only feel compassion for their children. Do you also believe women are incapable of loving men? Same logic there. My experiences tell me something different. That isn't to say their compassion, as well as their love, isn't highly conditional.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 12:15 PM
1

It's not the opposite, you just found one exception to the rule. The only people a woman can feel compassion for without respect are her very own children.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 09:58 AM
8

I see your reasoning, but there's a small nuance that undermines it in my opinion. You see, women don't need to be fit (though that could certainly be a bonus), they need to be skinny enough (i.e. not fat). The first one can only be attained by going to a gym, but the second one is merely a product of watching your diet. It's a common mistake to equate losing weight to working out. Working out is for muscles and general health, weight is determined by eating habits first and foremost.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 04:11 PM
44

Women can only have compassion for people they respect. And even then this person better keeps his/her act together or the woman's respect fades quickly. Other than that they only pity the weak. People distance themselves from those they pity.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 01:29 PM
113

Aside from the obvious hypocrisy you point out, it's because feminists are very well aware that a dick, synthetic or not, is only made valuable by the alpha that's attached to it. No dick alone has ever given a woman the 'tingles'. And we know this too. Have you, or anyone else here, ever felt threatened by the invention and use of dildos? I don't think so, not me at least. But men don't care about the status, confidence and skills of women. For sex it only matters they look and fuck good. And w…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 02:37 PM
1

I'd tag it as meta. It's a post about the Red Pill medium itself, a conference in this case. And if not meta, there's still 'off topic' to consider. Rants are always negative in their nature, fuelled by anger or dissatisfaction. Not really applicable when your post starts with "the conference went well."
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 02:19 PM
99

When the betas start using these in large numbers, women will suffer a huge blow in the value and entitlement their pussy brings them. But consider this: what if engineers start making them really good? What if they find ways to make it better than the real deal? I doubt it will even come to this point, but still, it's not uninmaginable. It could cause a shift where women will almost completely be abandoned by men. I think alpha commitment robots will be siginificantly harder to make, lol. Almos…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 02:02 PM
1

Why is this post tagged as a rant?
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 08:34 AM
2

You test it out in exactly the way I mentioned before. Actually virgins are the most easy to confirm. Not only will most of them have an intact hymen (so they'll bleed, there's your evidence), they'll also be very insecure and shy about the whole deal. Perhaps even afraid. Girls can lie they're a virgin, but they can't fake real genuine fear or insecurity. Now, a low partner count is somewhat more difficult, but if she would rather confess she used to be very prudish and boring that definitely g…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 05:48 PM
1

There are still girls around who actually have a low partner count, you know. So the best case scenario would be that you found a girl with partner count 0-3, who doesn't feel the need to lie about it because it's nothing to be ashamed about. Granted, it's getting harder and harder to find them, but they are far from extinct. You're being overly pessimistic.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 05:31 PM
1

Allright, confidence. I've actually spent quite some time thinking about how it forms, how I found mine and why others sometimes seem to lack it. Maybe some of my thoughts can help you out here. I've come to see confidence as the belief that one has skills or abilities that allow you to 1) cater to your own needs in your life and 2) add value to the lives of the people you care about. Actually, you can separate these; let's call them 'personal confidence' and 'social confidence'. So, personal co…
/r/RedPillWomen14/09/15 05:10 PM
17

She can say whatever she wants, yes. But you make it look like there are no things we, men, can do to get to the truth. There are never any guarantees, but still, it all depends on how you ask. For example, if you straight up ask her how many men she's slept with, I wouldn't believe whatever she answers. But if you take that number and say after a few glasses of wine in a laughing tone "I can't believe you have only been with x men before, were you really such a prude when you were younger?" Tha…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 07:07 AM
3

You don't. Fixing her isn't your job, that's her own. But this girl has way too many red flags that aren't going away. I've said it, and will say it again: if you want to LTR a chick, she can't have any red flags. AT ALL. NONE. Because it's exactly those faulty behaviours that will accumulate until it comes to a breaking point. Remember, it's a whole lot easier to learn a person new good behaviour than it is to break their bad habits.
/r/askTRP11/09/15 10:41 PM
2

Well, you have two choices. Either you accept this girl's crippling insecurity as your personal burden and thus allow it to cast a heavy shadow over your life, or you decide that you have to take care of your own life first and foremost (hint, I suggest this one), which means that you're inevitably going to have to next her. Better sooner than later in that case. If you break up now, she's going to make your life hell for the next couple of days/weeks. But whatever she does to herself is her res…
/r/askTRP11/09/15 10:35 PM
1

Many countries in Europe, and also the US, used to be countries that'd fit right on such a list of yours. It may not have produced the highest happiness rates (living conditions were generally quite good nonetheless), but it is what got those countries wealthy in the first place. You make the mistake to think those countries are wealthy because of their left policies. In practice virtually all countries that are wealthy now have a much more libertarian past. The only reason those countries are r…
/r/TheRedPill08/09/15 07:47 PM
1

Norway can afford to do what it does because of a shitload of oil money. Sweden has very similar politics but lacks such funds. The result: their wellfare model is crumbling down and many government systems are failing. Somalia on the other hand has been fucked over by so many factors that you could hardly claim libertarian politics got them there. In your cases the politics aren't the cause, they are a symtom. Wealthy states turn left because spending money is awesome while you have it. But you…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/15 06:46 PM
2

Just because you read some theory doesn't make you any better at applying it. Reading a book isn't going to raise your SMV either. You have a better understanding now of what you have to do, so get to it and practise. Also: read the sidebar of the main subreddit. ALL OF IT. That part is not optional. Lastly: proofread your writings before you post it, what you wrote is a mess.
/r/askTRP04/09/15 12:11 PM
1

I do not now what specific thing people have been talking about. However: Everything revolving around LTRs. Full acceptance as a valid option and life goal. Their benefits, not only their downsides. What to screen for, where to search. Long term strategy and how it differs from plating. What would be a good moment in life to start one. What to do if you want kids. What to look out for (red flags) but also what the positive indicators would be. I could go on. I understand the reason (newly conver…
/r/askTRP04/09/15 11:02 AM
1

I am sharing what is general policy here. Hence the link; a mod post on unsollicited advice. So if you can't deal with that, perhaps you should be the one to drag his arse elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 09:38 AM
3

Nevertheless, they perceive you as a threat -rightly so- and treat you accordingly. Aside from that; you have failed to secure a good quality partner during your best years. You are an idiot.
/r/askTRP03/09/15 01:00 PM
1

Your entire story hinges on your belief that you won't be able to find a girl with a low partner count/virgin when you drop her. And somehow you think your age is a factor in this. BULLSHIT You just have to be on the lookout for the shy yet pretty kind of girl that just started college/finished high school. And you have to improve yourself. A lot in your case. But you're still 3 years away from the point that dating these girls will even remotely become a problem. We, all of us, are here to tell…
/r/askTRP03/09/15 12:50 PM
1

You don't want advice, you want validation. Truer words were never spoken. I salute you sir.
/r/askTRP03/09/15 12:37 PM
3

While I do completely agree with your stance on single mothers and the gaps they leave in raising a kid, I don't think this is a very well chosen example. Considering what we know, this woman seems to be doing a great job with the options she has. Your main issue with it seems to be that she first only asked female advice (well, her sister, can you blame her?). But she was smart enough to ask the question on reddit later. That there are mostly beta men there is a different problem, but that's gl…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 08:41 PM
1

Thanks for the thought out response. I will never shy away from an honest discussion, I just hate it when people short-circuit to 'that's not what other people here tell me! --> downvote!' kind of thought. Now then, regarding the content of your reply. You seem to have some insights in the field that I have not. And perhaps you're right; their policy may for the largest part be motivated by PR goals after all. What I do not know -and what would be a major factor at play here- is how likely it is…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:12 PM
0

You're speaking in absolutes and there's no reason for that. The world is never that black and white. Can you not deal with nuanced truths? Of course women can do stupid things they didn't think trough and feel bad for afterwards. And they will genuinly apologise for it just as men would. However it sounds like you're emotionally invested in a belief that says otherwise. What you have right is that there are many instances where a girl's apology actually means she's frustrated because she fucked…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 07:44 PM
2

This whole post reeks of concern trolling and time waste. Whatever words we pick for alpha or beta behaviour, they are going to inevitably get linked to asshole/nice guy by our detractors, while we at TRP know full well how to interpret these words correctly anyway. Changing is pointless and the system is functioning fine the way it is.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 09:41 AM
4

This isn't a charity, this is business. Your sentiment is a just one, but you cannot compare the two that easily. See my other comment here for further clarification.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:35 AM
4

Well, to be fair, this may not be a case of 'positive discrimination' just for the sake of it. Good programmers are rare and valuable, and while women may not be as interested in it as men are generally, that doesn't mean there aren't those amongst them that could show great talent. Maybe this isn't about google having a false notion of equality, just about them trying to size up the recruiting pond they're fishing in. Just saying. And since people are downvoting this: If you simply downvote bec…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:33 AM
1

I'm honestly surprised the girl would apologise at all. What I first thought of as an indicator of maturity turned out to be born out of mere necessity. Too many character flaws. It had become routine for her: 'oh, I did something wrong again, better apologise'.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 07:20 AM
3

"The true nature of people is this. They want to be controlled. By their nation, their religion, their traditions, and by figures of grand authority" To be under good leadership is a luxury. You don't have responsibility, you don't have to think. You won't take the fall when things go wrong. Women have that luxury. We, men, do not. Not if we want to be respected and to be loved. We must be the leaders, we must set out on our own paths, we must take up responsibility. And the more we rise to powe…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 07:08 AM
0

What I was talking about is when a girl at the very least feels legitimately guilty for something she did wrong, but you're very right: too often they are actually just upset that they failed in their scheming. Honestly, I don't like the whole 'in this very moment' stuff all that much. I get what you're trying to say, but while girls' emotions are fickle, they're not thát fickle. When a girl says she loves you she probably will do so for at least a reasonable amount of time. If you have to add s…
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 07:59 PM
1

NOBODY IN THIS SUB IS INTERESTED IN YOUR ADVICE. If you want to give advice, go to askTRP. We are here to share theories. Share good ideas if you have them, as well as comments that add value. Otherwise, shut up. https://archive.is/hIaJv
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 07:36 PM
5

Sounds like she wasn't even sincere on the first part. Good for you to have standards.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 06:11 PM
2

I never said you have to apologise. However when you do, it better cover both layers, not only the first one.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 06:08 PM
3

But I just want to seduce this girl. Let me spell this out for you. Your obsession with this girl is: Making you needy, which is unattractive A sign you haven't got an abundance mentality yet Probably not going to give you good enough results to justify the high amount of effort it will take combined with the low chance of succeeding. Distracting you from other girls/other things you could be doing Most likely stemming from a need to satisfy your ego after your perceived improvements. You're try…
/r/askTRP01/09/15 03:52 PM
2

Unnecessary tekst wall that I'm not going to read. If someone put you in the friend zone the only thing you can do is break contact and let go, because she sees you as a tool. Fuck that oneitis of yours. Once a girl has classified you as beta she isn't going to let go of that easily, if she's ever even going to. Trying to fight that is not worth the effort with any woman. So improve, forget about her and if she so happens to approach you later, make sure your sexual intentions are clear.
/r/askTRP01/09/15 03:24 PM
2

Does oral and finger sex make someone a non-virgin? For women: Yes. For men: Not really, no. In other words, there is a double standard and I'll explain why. People who say PIV sex is the only way to lose your virginity do not accept that this double standard exist, and only apply the male one. Often because they are trying to push the female sexual agenda. In short: Female virginity=valuable-> low threshhold for losing, Male virginity=negative attribute-> high threshold for losing. The reason f…
/r/askTRP01/09/15 10:28 AM
1

I never understood that lol. Firm and perky is where I'm at. But all the more power to you! I think we've derailed this discussion far enough, wouldn't you say? Thanks for the convo!
/r/askTRP31/08/15 09:41 PM
2

Almost all of it is a product of negative culture. If you can set yourself free from that all that's left is your normal SMV just like with everybody else. The colour of your skin is irrelevant to me, and I bet the same goes for many of us.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 09:31 PM
2

that birth control simply hasn't existed for almost the entire last 2000 years. How about we make that the last 200,000 years; the lowest estimate of how long our species (homo sapiens) has existed.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 06:45 PM
1

I don't know how you envision that hotness is going to remain over multiple decades then. Personality is the closest thing to a reliable constant, a foundation if you will. Everything else is greatly susceptible to change. Nonetheless, that is my opinion, and you have yours. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 04:01 PM
1

I see what you mean and I indeed misunderstood. His description is pretty open to interpretation. Anyway, does it really matter that much? Fat is never attractive and you shouldn't want to get with a chubby person anyway, because of what that tells you about their personality, background and health. If a girl is physically in shape and has a pretty face (that's mostly objective), I couldn't care less what race she is from. Her personality would be the single decisive factor after that. (and porn…
/r/askTRP31/08/15 03:36 PM
1

Guys that are worth dating are so not only for you, but for other women as well. That means they are probably already having sex with women before you come into the picture. None of those guys are going to go 3-4 without sex just because of what the relationship with you may evolve into later, believe me. Sex is an essential part of the relationship for men, so you won't have a guy convinced until he knows how that aspect will be. One month is far more reasonable, 2 months is really pushing it.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 02:51 PM
9

Well, don't EVER do that again. You have a lifetime ahead of you, and you can do without skank disease.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 02:03 PM
8

Not worthy of commitment. But by all means fuck away. (Protection!)
/r/askTRP31/08/15 01:56 PM
1

NO NO NO don't listen to that idiot. He's confusing madonna's with whores. If you try to catch his interest by being overtly sexy, he will indeed be interested, only not in a committed relationship. It is possible to lose out on good men by stringing them on for too long. You can counter this is by gradually working towards intimacy/sex. But the most important thing is to be very selective before you even start dating, being clear about your intentions early on and then not hesitate too long to …
/r/askTRP31/08/15 01:52 PM
1

OP is female.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 01:45 PM
2

•Before any form of commitment has been established? YES, that is rather slutty indeed •Red flag may be too strong of a word here, but it's far less than an optimal situation. Also, don't be an idiot: oral sex and fingering is still sex. If a girl has done this, she isn't a virgin anymore. If you disagree with this you probably fail to understand WHY it is so important for men to find a virgin girl. I'd be happy to elaborate if this is the case. •YES, that is a sign of narcissism and attention s…
/r/askTRP31/08/15 01:33 PM
5

Because men are attracted to women who behave womanly and women are attracted to men who behave manly. Black women are behaving manly in many ways, and asian men are behaving like women. So they are not attractive. I do declare I have more experience with the latter. Asian men in general are short, narrow shouldered, generally too fat and otherwise likely fragile looking. Even those who are more muscular tend to have it covered by chubby fat. They are shy and docile and 'having fun' equals 'maki…
/r/askTRP31/08/15 12:49 PM
6

Your 'friends' are opportunistic assholes. Drop the dead weight, hard as that may be.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 12:42 PM
1

What you have to gain? Kids. The privilege of nurturing something you created to eventually watch it blossom. As good a valid purpose for your life as they come. If this is beyond your scope of understanding you are -as a woman- biologically broken. Question is: are you going to accept that making babies is the main purpose for your existence and thus use your body the way it is intended, or are you going to cast that all aside in favour of better physical aesthetics for a few years, after it di…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 12:13 PM
1

Thank you for your critical thoughts, but I stand by my words. Hypergamy doesn't mean that women want to 'date up', it means that they want to secure the best possible mate available and will jump ship if needed. See this definition: Hypergamy Evolutionary Psychology theory on the instinctual desire of humans of the female sex to discard a current mate when the opportunity arises to latch onto a subsequent mate of higher status due to the hindbrain impetus to find a male with the best ability to…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 07:02 AM
-1

Then what's with the stuff about the "imagined disorder"? You can't say he invented it to protect his ego on one hand and then claim he's probably right at the same time.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 12:10 PM
2

While what you say is not impossible, you make assumptions you cannot back up. You fully neglected the fact that this particular woman was one of the very few women vs MILLIONS of men that actively used the site, and in her case we even speak of an addiction. So there's at least something odd about her. Cluster B personality disorders are disorders where there is an abnormal need for attention/validation. Sounds not unlikely to me at all. Neither of us know what is exactly happening, and I do ag…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 12:03 PM
11

But nobody here is saying TRP is only useful in dealing with entitled women, nor any other specific category for that matter. However 1) Of course usually TRP comes into play when (potential) problems with women arise and 2) The sheer amount of women that act entitled is bizarre these days.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 10:47 AM
27

Good question. First of all, because men are not hypergamous, but polygamous. So while it is true that we may sometimes want to get with a better partner than we're currently with, that doesn't mean we have to lose affection for the woman we're currently with. By default we wouldn't choose to drop one for another, rather we would expand our group of partners. Men literally can love several women at the same time, women can't do the same with men. Is it that men are not usually spending their cur…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 09:46 AM
2

You say women share key characteristics. He says not every individual displays these characteristics as excessively. (Not every woman has a personality disorder). You're both right.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 08:39 AM
86

AWALT (All Women Are Like That) is a very useful but also particularly tricky acronym to use and understand. Because of misunderstanding and misuse it's also a common reason for people to distance themselves from TRP. Allow me to clear some things up. Anyone who claims all women are exactly like your ex wife on all fronts failed to understand it properly, ignore them. Your wife's need for validation proved to be excessive and she may well have a personality disorder for all I know. Not all women…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 08:33 AM
0

Hardly, they're just rare. But I take it you're well aware of that. Let's reserve the word unicorn for non existent girls shall we? There's enough confusion on it already.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/15 10:23 PM
2

Sounds like you have a gf but want to start fucking others on the side. Anyway, I'd advice being a man who sticks to his word. If you promised a girl monogamy, keep your word or break up. Otherwise, don't be vague about the fact that you're not exclusive. If she actually knows you are fucking other women, this may elicit a far better response than you might expect. Makes 'em competative, it seems.
/r/askTRP26/08/15 09:20 AM
0

No woman will care about your face or your hight if you are a confident witty muscular guy. Let this sink in for a second and make sure you believe it. Forget about your imperfections and realise that aestetics mean shit to women. Get muscular and become an interesting man. That's what matters. Set goals, figure out the best route to achieving them, and get to work. And STOP FUCKING WHINING. Sidenote: cardio isn't going to build muscles, forget about that stuff for the time being. You'll live. A…
/r/askTRP26/08/15 09:08 AM
1

So they blend in nicely with the rest of girl-world then. Slutty narcissism is the norm and everyone seems to accept it. Don't tell me you haven't noticed yet. These women can get money out of it as a plus. As SpinalArt said: why not?
/r/askTRP26/08/15 09:00 AM
4

How about, do exactly what jeezydasnowman said. (except sunday appearantly) What you don't want to do is have much conversation between the fuck dates. So ignore what you can ignore and short (witty) responses to anything else. If you were considering of LTRing this chick: don't. She's set herself up to be a fucktoy, let her be one.
/r/askTRP26/08/15 08:55 AM
2

I agree with machimus: paying for pussy is ridiculous. Having said that there may be one exception: If you never had sex or not in a very long time it could be beneficial to see an escort. It would take away the desperation and help you to stop overvaluing pussy. Since women detest desperate men, this will help you in your further endeavors with women. If you need such a 'desperation reset' and can't break the dry spell in another way, a prostitute may be an option. Better still to improve yours…
/r/askTRP26/08/15 08:47 AM
1

The false rape accustations are a concern of mine (absense of evidence isn't evidence of absense), but nevermind those even. If a 13 year old boy and 13 year old girl have sex and people find out (because she told it -eyes teary-, because she regretted it), they're going to automatically assume the boy pressured her to do it. This is how society works. Sex between minors is a very, VERY touchy subject. I wouldn't encourage anything if they are both not AT LEAST 16 and everything else being legal…
/r/askTRP25/08/15 02:04 PM
1

young girls have no idea what they are doing. They will easily do something they later regret. You know how that will play out. Better to wait until the girls are older so they are attributed at least a small amount of sexual agency Sex is distracting, even more for a young teenage boy. Better to wait out a little longer so he can focus on other important activities.
/r/askTRP25/08/15 01:07 PM
3

Never too young for RP knowledge. In the same sense as you're never too young to know about driving regulations and how a car works. Still, best to wait until a certain age before driving the actual thing. Same with using RP strategies to get girls.
/r/askTRP25/08/15 12:59 PM
1

Because the girls have no idea what they are doing and will blame him for their mistakes. No 13 year old kid is ready for that kind of shit. Besides, hormonal teens tend to get really distracted when girls come into play. Best to have him focus on other things for the time being.
/r/askTRP25/08/15 12:55 PM
1

Teach him that he has value as a man. Teach him that the world is set up against him and that society is actively feeding men lies. Tell him physical fitness as well as sharp wits are important for living a good life and success with women. Tell him to be very wary of girls his age because they are obsessed with sex and relationships but have no idea what they are doing. When they come to regret anything that involves him, have him know he'll be at great risk. Furthermore, tell him girls will ha…
/r/askTRP25/08/15 12:52 PM
2

It means she's not interested in you sexually. Since she doesn't outright reject you and redirects you to her friend it seems she likes you 'as a person'. That her friend probably won't have any sexual interest as well is none of her concern. Forget about her and improve so the next one might have more sexual interest.
/r/askTRP25/08/15 12:39 PM
2

Indirect links can just as well mess with your job stability. Question is: what pussy is even worth that risk? Answer: none. Just say you're not interested in a polite way. (you don't share the same feelings for them or whatever bullshit). That's all they need to hear.
/r/askTRP21/08/15 11:53 AM
1

your title: make it say something about what your post is about, not what it isn't Learn to use paragraphs Read the thread format requirements, and the rest of the sidebar for that matter This post of yours will be removed because of these reasons, no doubt.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/15 11:48 AM
5

First off: don't even think about fucking women you're dependent on for doing your job properly. Period. Aside from that: women may be selling themselves out expecting someting in return, but you never discussed this with them nor agreed to anything. Don't bother overthinking what they may or may not expect from you. Take whatever you can, give nothing back. They may not be happy about it afterwards because they expected more. So what? Remember: no such thing as bad publicity.
/r/askTRP21/08/15 11:04 AM
1

It isn't going to spark attraction, but it can be one hell of an enhancement once attraction is established. I'm not going to reveal my brand to you and I doubt that would even be useful to you. Try out a few and see what suits you. Drag a girl along if you think that'd help. Wouldn't go for something smelling too sweet.
/r/askTRP21/08/15 10:56 AM
1

I asked it because of your last remark: How is it even possible for me to have a success with women if I keep thinking I need to experienced before? Either you have success with women or you don't. Good you feel on top of your game sometimes, but I am trying to figure out if you only feel as such or if you are really doing some stuff right. So your sex drive is normal now? You should see results then under certain circumstances and that would answer your question. Confidence and repetition. If y…
/r/askTRP21/08/15 10:29 AM
1

Sometimes i feel perfect and i am at top of my game So how many girls have you fucked already then?
/r/askTRP20/08/15 03:26 PM
2

One of the most bitter parts is accepting that while your eyes have now been opened, there's nothing you can do to save those who set themselves up for failure. People won't listen, because they're invested in their beliefs. All you can do is be there for them when their world comes crumbling down. But your eyes are open. Best of luck!
/r/RedPillWomen20/08/15 01:55 PM
2

I wouldn't know. But I can guess. Probably little to nothing about LTRs, almost certainly material on shit tests. I do wonder why you have taken such a fascination with this book though. PUA strategies have very little practical use for women as I explained. Is it mere curiosity? Because if you -being female- start to apply those tactics don't be surprised to find yourself being treated as a sex object only. EDIT: I wouldn't break your head over a couple having read some theory once but not usin…
/r/RedPillWomen20/08/15 09:25 AM
2

In my experience, when it comes to people with a social inhibition, people will notice and respect you for joining in the activity nonetheless. More likely than not they will actively encourage you to come out of that shell and just drag you along to whatever activity. That's why I suggested adventure activities; everyone inevitably struggles with something and you help eachother out. Protip: try to make friends first with many girls without sexually pursuing them, and make friends with the men …
/r/askTRP20/08/15 08:46 AM
6

Game/PUA focusses on selling a product on the sexual market. It's marketting. In the spirt of 'a good salesman can sell anything', the importance of a decent, valuable product sometimes gets lost on them. What TRP does is putting the focus on creating a good product. To improve yourself. We lean in this direction because good products tend to get noticed and sell themselves. But it isn't a far stretch to see how the concepts of PUA and TRP can strengthen eachother. PUA is of course very male cen…
/r/RedPillWomen20/08/15 08:07 AM
3

PUA gives you the skills to market a product on the sexual market (YOU), but TRP says you need to be a good product first and foremost. PUA's tend to gloss over this.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 07:53 AM
4

As it is so often it's not the numbers, but the story behind them. You build a good case, but I do wonder how common the whole 'high school sweetheart/inseparable for years' scenario is. I also doubt the 'high n-count without pair bonding' scenario is a likely one. In my experience, the n=1 girl usually jumped into a relationship once while having no idea about what type of guy she could form a lasting relationship with. Because of this inexperience they inevitably break up within the year. Most…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 07:49 AM
2

That would be a very viable option indeed. Only downside is the costs. I'm sure it has happened in the past.
/r/askTRP20/08/15 07:32 AM
1

except you don't want a woman who works and earns as much as you or more if your plan is to raise kids. The woman will have to take on the major share in looking after the kids, because if you do it she'll lose respect quickly. Don't buy into this stay at home dad crap. And if you don't want kids than there is really, REALLY no reason to marry at all. So practically we've returned at the same point, which is don't get married, because favourable circumstances do not exist these days. Want a wife…
/r/askTRP19/08/15 03:11 PM
1

Most of it has already been covered it seems, so I will just leave this here to stress one thing: expand the pond you're fishing in. try out new group activities, sports would be a good place to start. But I'm sure there are many other associations you could join. Meet new people and make your life more interesting all at the same time. Organised holiday trips for singles (active/adventure!) is an interesting thing to look into as well.
/r/askTRP19/08/15 03:04 PM
1

More or less what I said, glad to see this backed up by an endorsed contributor. There's a lot of 'don't get married AND don't LTR' echoing around unfortunately. OP: that last sentence can't be stressed enough. Do realise that the USA is actually pretty high on the list of 'retard common law countries'. So if you live there: while it is good to avoid the worst parts of it as a start, don't automatically assume the US is as good as it gets.
/r/askTRP19/08/15 02:57 PM
2

You are Asian are you not? Anyway, so you know you won't be perfect. What you don't seem to know yet is you don't have to be to get with girls. You don't need to be at the very apex of the pyramid, you need to be roughly at the top 20%. So the very first question you need to ask yourself is this: are you attractive enough? This is easy enough to figure out: are girls approaching you? showing signs of interest? Do you have looks/money/status? IF NOT, YOU HAVE WORK TO DO FIRST. (and so what you ca…
/r/askTRP19/08/15 02:42 PM
5

TRPs stance on marriage is a very clear DON'T. You are confused because you think marriage is a prerequisite for having kids or a lasting relationsship. What you need to realise is that you can have all that (and whatever else you want for that matter) without signing a marriage contract. If lasting monogamy with kids is what you want, make sure to properly explain your SO that you are committed to the relationship but have very good reasons to refrain from signing the contract. If those very go…
/r/askTRP19/08/15 02:17 PM
2

it's not modern women who are entitled. It's modern hot women who are entitled I agreed for the most part, but you went seriously off the rails here. Girls all across the board make the same mistake over and over again: to think they are as valuable as the guys that fuck them. This causes the vast majority of girls to believe they are worthy of relationships with men 1-3 points higher on the SMV scale because they got fucked once by one. As we know, however, men have far lower standards when it …
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 09:12 AM
5

bake him fresh bread every morning Don't touch bowl for two hours How early do you wake up every morning?
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/15 10:31 PM
1

^ this one gets it. Allow me to throw sailing, cooking and woodworking to the mix. Builds skills that will last a lifetime. Learn to play squash/tennis and play pool. Great activities with friends.
/r/askTRP27/07/15 10:29 AM
1

Unlike in college or high school, you get no points anymore for doing crazy irresponsible shit. Life does't reward those who party the hardest. If you want to hang with the popular crowd, you will actually have to be succesful in something. So start setting goals and start working on attaining them. Make sure you cultivate your body and mind. That is how you climb the ladder. There is no other way.
/r/askTRP27/07/15 10:14 AM
2

You have a scarcity mentality and really need to change that into an abundance mentality. Ask yourself this: if you have improved yourself to the point she finally starts to take interest, why would you even want to get with her? She rejected you after all. What makes this one so special that you feel the need to prove yourself to her? If she takes interest plenty of other women will as well. My bet: among those will be better girls than her. Have the last laugh and forget about this chick. Impr…
/r/askTRP27/07/15 10:03 AM
2

An alpha is a good product on the sexual market. PUA is marketing: they try to sell their product on this market as effectively as possible. As you can see these things strengthen eachother. It is easier to sell your product when the product is better, and if you have a good product salesman skills will help you sell it. (I.e. get with women). TRP leans towards being alpha (the good product) because good products tend to sell themselves. Women will notice you and approach you. Still, having some…
/r/askTRP27/07/15 09:41 AM
1

For every good thing there is a point where you have too much of it. In general this is the case when it turns obsessive. If she is a nympho for example, or the sex keeps you from doing important other activities like socialising or work. But it is probably hard to get to this point because of physical limits; you not getting hard anymore after a few times or her getting sore. Too little sex is a lot more common. From your side this is easy to assess: if you are not getting enough then just inst…
/r/askTRP27/07/15 09:24 AM
0

By far the largest part of PCOS women have the condition because they are fat and the fat messes with their hormone balance. The condition itself makes them more manly due to excess male hormones. I question what kind of degenerate women you are fucking. Yes they are easy, yes they may work extra hard in bed. All of that is them compensating for how worthless they are, something they are all aware of on some level. If you want to go for the low hanging fruit, have at it. The rest of us here are …
/r/askTRP27/07/15 08:59 AM
1

If you think AWALT means all women will cheat and divorce you have some reading to do. At the very least men themselves have agency in this. In my experience it's not so much the presence of a higher smv alpha that triggers breakups and adultery, but rather the man himself showing weakness. Society has always played a role in surpressing hypergamy and did that job very well. Even today there are shreds of that force left. There really is no other way around it: AWALT has always been true (be it …
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 09:58 PM
1

Well, if it is fair representation you are after: never been a feminist myself. Always had some base resistance to bullshit so to speak. I dropped many of my egalitarianist convictions since I found this place though.
/r/askTRP26/07/15 04:58 PM
1

Simple. You head over to askTRP, ask this question again in a more thought out layout and after critically overthinking the advice given you follow up on it. And before you even do any of that you read the sidebar articles. Not only what seems interesting to you, no, ALL of them. That includes the posting guidelines that you missed.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 07:06 AM
1

Initiative. (And some darn good cooking skills on the side)
/r/askTRP25/07/15 09:26 PM
4

Yes, the majority of men is a concern of ours. I don't think you fully grasp how it will affect us if more and more men are destroyed by alimony/child support claims. How it will affect us all when more and more kids grow up in fatherless homes. How much our future kids will suffer growing up by even further (d)evolved feminism. Fatherless boys will turn criminal, childless men will not help sustain the economy. Society will crumble under poverty and hate. We will not be the first ones to suffer…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 02:52 PM
5

Resisting implies that I am not stupid enough to put myself in the vanguard fighting feminism, but I will hinder feminists whenever a reasonable opportunity presents itself.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 02:37 PM
5

You can live mostly for yourself, but also do some good for society you know. They are not mutually exclusive.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 07:04 AM
16

I will resist a movement that actively turns society to shit, thank you very much. Your argument is short sighted. At least to me, this isn't about fucking bitches in the upcoming years. This is about what world I will later live in and my future kids will grow up in. I wouldn't like to live in a country/world where the family unit is destroyed. I think neither would you.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 06:59 AM
0

There is no agenda. There is only popularity and companies exploiting that popularity for profits and goodwill. Votes and goodwill in case of politicians.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 06:50 AM
12

Go read the sidebar. It's clear you didn't, at least not in full. Start with the misandry bubble I'd say
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 06:43 AM
1

Never marry. But if you were talking about LTRs as well: to be fair, people usually don't undergo such radical personality changes. If she has always been kind and loving she isn't going to suddenly transform into a ball busting bitch. Of course you need to spend a reasonable amount of time with them to establish their true character and filter for any red flags.
/r/askTRP24/07/15 09:20 PM
3

It certainly is possible, but it's gonna be hard and you'll never have any guarantees. You can strive for a lasting relationship, but you still always need to be able to step out when things turn sour. You can never become emotionally dependent on her, that will ruin things faster than anything else. Some experience with previous women on your side is highly recommended so you know what to expect and won't make major stupid mistakes. If you really intent to invest in a longer relationship, the g…
/r/askTRP24/07/15 01:06 PM
1

I'm sure redpillschool has a good reason for moving those threads up highest, but I was rather surprised to find 'freeing your mind of blue pill social programming' only in phase 3. Especially the antibiotic nuke is about as good a primer as it gets. If you only reach that at phase 3 it kind of loses its added value and powerful message. If it were me I'd have that phase, and that thread in particular, move as high up as possible.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 09:21 AM
1

in the United States. You guys should really open your eyes to the rest of the world. While almost every country has some dubious marriage/divorce laws, almost none has created as much of a mess as the USA did. Just saying.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 09:01 PM
1

The answer to your question is that you stumbled upon a limit in AWALT's use and it's blatant overuse nonetheless. In truth, all women are ultimately capable of certain behaviours under the right circumstances (part of which you control!). But the thresholds for engaging in these behaviours can vary greatly. Some girls are so promiscuous that they will eventually cheat no matter what you do. Others have a threshold that's high enough that it becomes very unlikely they will ever cheat on you as l…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 03:21 PM
1

Good you considered them, perhaps mention them too in your post next time for a more balanced report. And well, of course people are not out to maim you, but too many people are also idiots who act before they think, something I'd rather not expose my body to more than necessary. You need only one 'oops, sorry' to fuck up a joint for life. Beginner level might be relatively safe, but beginner level is something to be surpassed, isn't it? Overall risk of injury is just higher in fighting sports. …
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 01:38 PM
4

All the shortcomings you mention are other sides of the coins that are their strongest evolutionary aspects, at least until human technology intervened. As vys1 explained, their fickle hypergamy may harm them in long term decision making (EDIT: though what's the point if you're a hunter/gatherer?), but it also ensured their survival by staying close to the strongest protectors. And yes, they scheme and that sometimes backfires, but they are generally very apt at controlling the men around them. …
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 12:22 PM
4

OP, as much as I know it sucks, you ARE still a child. Adopting a different mindset and working out won't change that. College women don't fuck children, it's that simple. Accept the fact that your SMV is at its very lowest point. What you need is time to run its course, and it will soon enough. What you should focus on is improving yourself in both body and mind so that when the time comes to prove your worth you'll be ready. Oh, and careful with the ones your own age, they have no idea what th…
/r/askTRP23/07/15 12:00 PM
1

Indeed. (and defend ends with a 'd')
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 09:30 AM
2

Her interest in the higher smv guy is temporarily surpassed by her interest in a guy who actually dares to not-validate her anymore (you). In other words, she is now more focussed on retrieving something that was lost than getting something new. As I said, temporarily, it will not last. If you wish to, you could use the momentum and get a few more fucks out of it, but be ready to fully drop her at any time now. Maybe better to not push it too far since you're working together.
/r/askTRP23/07/15 09:10 AM
1

While you do a good job at highlighting the benefits of martial arts, you also completely ignored the downsides. Did you even consider there are any? As much as it will help you become a better man, you do so by putting your body's health on the line. Of course there are some dangers involved in any sport, but that's nothing compared to full contact fighting. As much as I like the idea of being a fighter, I do not like risking my fingers or wrists (which I will need to make money), I do not like…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 07:32 AM
1

Changing your mentality is one of the hardest things to do. It certainly can be done, but if you want too much at the same time you'll be disappointed and eventually give up. Small steps, reasonable goals, clear priorities. For example: merely limit social media and video games at first so you can focus more on ignoring your oneitus. Keep a diary to track your progress and setbacks, be honest with yourself and evaluate.
/r/askTRP22/07/15 09:13 PM
4

You're really dense aren't you? Are you trying to lecture an endorsed contributor on what TRP is about? Get your head out of your arse. Also: TRP isn't about fucking women, it's about becoming a man women want to fuck.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 08:45 PM
1

Happy now?
/r/askTRP22/07/15 07:39 PM
1

Lol, well let's be real here shall we? OP is never going to have the balls to even order a prostitute, because of the social stigma. If your confidence is so low you are considering the strip club to see a woman naked for the first time, the hooker really is out of the question. We're more or less debating hypothetical situations here at this point. So how about this then: see my upcoming edit in my original post.
/r/askTRP22/07/15 07:37 PM
1

I disagree, buying sex is really beta, but it is surpassed by buying a sex tease without getting the real deal. The difference is the strip club will only add to the mystique and pedestalising of the woman with the pretty body he can't get with, while the hooker will completely shatter this mystique, because he can just buy it.
/r/askTRP22/07/15 07:30 PM
1

Well, maybe a girl with a low partner count is more likely being influenced by social pressures, or from a certain kind of culture. That really doesn't change much if your goal is to find a girl who won't likely divorce rape you. You'd find out the girl with the low partner count falls into one of those categories, so what? The correlation still stands. You are right about correlation vs causation, but for as far as I know there is no way to prove direct causation, at least not in this field. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 07:26 PM
1

Hey, I wouldn't choose the hooker either (never visited one anyway, though it is legal where I live), but all I'm saying is if you're desperate then don't go to the strip club and visit a hooker. Better still to self improve and do things the natural way, but I can inmagine situations where ordering a hooker might do some good. At the very least OP will learn that it isn't that special as he has likely made it out to be, and he will assign less value to the sex normal women are trying to sell.
/r/askTRP22/07/15 07:20 PM
2

I'm not talking about some possible indirect correlation involving hormones, I'm talking about a direct correlation between premarital sex partners and divorce risk. http://socialpathology.blogspot.ca/2012/03/promiscuity-data-guest-post.html http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-4uvCNpBV-Ps/T3Gym13I1bI/AAAAAAAAAYY/8Sm0qt_OU10/s1600/linear.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 07:14 PM
4

I'm not talking about specific tasks, I'm talking about the total sum of specific tasks. And not only about speed, but also quality and motivation. In other words, if you compare me with a random dude, you're always going to find a few specific things he is better at. But that doesn't mean my total set of skills and abilities won't have him pale in comparison. That is what makes me better, it's the total sum. And just like that men exist that humble me. I strive to become like them, while keepin…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 06:58 PM
1

The vast majority of people I know, male and female, have ended up with about 5-9 partners by their mid twenties Alright, fair enought, but I have two remarks. It will be a lot of conjecture, but still. First: men and women aren't the same when it comes to the effects of having a more promiscuous past. In other words, 9 previous partners by the age of 25 it by far not as detrimental to men as it is to women when it comes to pair bonding ability. Despite what society wants us to believe, 5-9 prev…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 06:11 PM
9

So much nonsense here, where do I even begin... Let's just break it down then. There is no problem with beeing a "lost ship". That jugdement comes from the mind, and the mind is womansterritory. The mind is a man's most important tool. Without our capacity for logic and structure we are nothing, and it is this that separates us from women. Logic and structure allowed our species to thrive in both numbers and technology. Emotions, on the other hand, are indeed primarily a thing women cling to. Th…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 03:14 PM
9

change their view in a blink of an eye I doubt it, much more likely she will only give you the benefit of doubt while remaining sceptical at first. It will take some time to fully convince her you''ve become a different person, if you ever completely pull this off at all. I think that the goal for a man is also to completely live in the moment Well, then we totally disagree there. A man needs to have a plan, a goal. And if a goal is ever attained, a new goal must come in its place immediately. S…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 02:24 PM
1

You should probably have mentioned that you swapped the genders in the quoted text, since this was originally written by a girl.
/r/askTRP22/07/15 12:24 PM
2

OP: this. Strip clubs are nothing more than a painful tease for thirsty men. It will only leave you wanting more while not being able to proceed. Keep your mind healthy and stay away from that stuff. EDIT: OP, even though you'd be better off with a hooker than at a strip club, both are pathetic. You have found the RP subreddit and you know our message. Stop whining and improve yourself. Forget about women at this point, they will come back into the picture when you did some actual work first.
/r/askTRP22/07/15 12:23 PM
37

Insightful stuff. I would go even further and say that women hardly ever consider the future. They do not think something will last forever, instead they do not even think about how things will be the next day/month/year. It simply doesn't cross their minds. Women tend to live completely in the moment, which has everything to do with the fickle nature of hypergamy. But what you say is true: when a person's situation changes for the better women will remain sceptic for a long time whether this ch…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/15 12:05 PM
2

If you're only in it for the casual hookups, get off on whatever gets you off and block the girls from having any personal influence on you. But reading between the lines I do not think this is what you are after. Sounds like you ultimately wish to upgrade to LTRs (but I may be wrong here). In that case it is imperative you seek out more valuable women and discard the rest. Remember, the people you surround yourself with attract more of the same kind. Lastly, realise that any fatty you invest in…
/r/askTRP22/07/15 09:06 AM
2

...won't be a good role model for my children... Some here are playing the longer game, sounds like OP is too. If he is, he should care about finding more suitable women. Your advice is only useful for casual hookups where any longer perspective is lacking. Nothing wrong with that, but I do not think it applies here.
/r/askTRP22/07/15 08:58 AM
1

Almost without exception, anything that is built up quickly can be lost just as quickly. If you want something more durable (again, this applies to almost anything) you will need to build it steadily and with more patience. That isn't a guarantee it won't be burned to the ground just as quick, but it opens up the longer lasting alternative.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/15 05:24 PM
1

The people you keep using in your examples grew up in a different time and with a society willing to help keep their women in line. I will repeat my question then, since you didn't answer it: So, you are saying that statistic went from 90% to 0% in a few decades? Or even below 50%? Do you actually believe society and social constructs had that much influence? And nevermind your beliefs, where is your proof of it? I have reliable data that are not up to date anymore. You have no data at all. Who …
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 01:43 PM
1

It can be both a legal contract, a religious contract and a moral contract all at the same time, you know. As I stated earlier, morals can be viewed as behaviour meant to benefit (a healthy) society. Under normal circumstances, society wants you to find a wife, stay together and have/raise kids together. Any willful deviation from that could technically be seen as immoral, even more so when there are kids involved. Remember, people who failed to marry or who divorced used to be actively shamed a…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 11:19 AM
2

Exactly, the last line is key. Some things are for fun and for fun only. Making a crossword puzzle or reading a fiction book is no different. It may be a good way to relax and enjoy yourself a bit, but spend too much time on it and you are going to ruin other facets of your life.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 08:50 AM
1

So, you are saying that statistic went from 90% to 0% in a few decades? Or even below 50%? Is that the realist speaking? We have no data that is fully up to date of course, so it may be lower now (probably is). But is it more reasonable to say it will be closer to 0%? Or to 90%? Society changes things, but we haven't made a full 180. And yes, as long as women are alive, they can cheat. But sexual drive goes down with age, particulary in women. A postmenopausal one really has very little incentiv…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 07:05 AM
1

They have full right to make the rules as they please. I have full right to share constructive criticism when I think they could do better.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 09:27 PM
1

I do not care about becoming endorsed. Certainly haven't done enough to earn it personally. What I care about is that we, the regular members have to abide by strange rules that a rather arbitrarily chosen group doesn't have to abide by.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 09:23 PM
1

No, in fact it is not a disagree button. At least not in this sub. Take your cursor, hover it over the downvote button and read. "Still plugged in". That is more than a gimmick, you know. It means that you downvote if what someone says runs contrary to RP theory or what they say is factually not true. We are not here to discourage critical thought. Instead, we discuss it.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 09:13 PM
2

Yes, but please do interpret it as a beneficial philosophy, and not as the literal truth. The quote helps in developing a mindset that protects you from heavy disappointment when good things come to an end. But it goes too far to interpret it as 'no relationship can possibly last a lifetime'. Because look around you, of course it can. Hell, as much as 90% of the marriages which start with the girl being a virgin last, don't they? (do NOT marry, that is not what I mean). That is the part KungPaoE…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 08:52 PM
1

Good idea, I will probably start doing that. Though Sometimes it's hard to pinpoint an exact comment that stands out, and it's more the overall contribution instead.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 08:42 PM
1

Perhaps some are capable of it, but I do not think 'pure selflessness' is a factor in the vast majority of people. There is always some form of ego involved. I have yet to observe it any other way.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 04:42 PM
-4

I aint gonna stop m8, because contrary to your belief, the truth is on my side. And opposed to you, at least I have examined counter arguments over and over. So, deal with it. Whatcha gonna do about it?
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 04:36 PM
-3

The hierarchy of women, go read that post already. And then the latest post from Archwinger. Let me know when you have so I can suggest further education material.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 02:48 PM
10

I have wondered why he made that choice for a long time, but I have come to see it makes sense. He is a comedian; he needs a sparring partner. And I think you need a certain type of woman to deal with him too, he is far from a saint himself. They have a weird relationship, but they seem very compatible on the other hand.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 01:44 PM
3

Not if that incentive is that you value society and wish to continue living in a functional one; being willing to be part of the collective effort to make that possible.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 01:21 PM
4

You misunderstand. I think under normal circumstances there is a base incentive to do good because you value society and those around you. But I can understand when people no longer want to adhere to general morality because they feel deserted by their environment. This is not how I personally feel, but that is irrelevant. My point is that negative incentives can counteract the base level positive incentive, with abandoning morality as a result.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 01:05 PM
7

Life is not fair, but that is hardly an excuse for imposing bad rules. All I am saying is that there are other, better ways to adress the issue the mods are facing. Constructive criticism if you will. I think I will leave it at that. Thanks for the reasonable conversation.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:01 PM
3

Sorry, reposted because of many edits. I would say there is a big difference between what is immoral and what we should actively condemn. That is a whole new discussion even. People are not perfect, so you need some leeway. Maybe indeed the consequences in the case of eating fast food are not severe enough to make it illegal. Then again, ethically and medically you could certainly build a case for it, which people also have tried in the past. I will not claim that my definition is a perfect one …
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 11:03 AM
4

On the contrary, not taking care of yourself and thus being a burden to those around you is certainly immoral in my opinion. As long as it is a concious decision of course. One can wonder if this is the case with food, substance and alcohol addiction. With the addition of it having to be a concious decision, I stick to my definition. But thanks for your critical imput. (this comment should be where the deleted one is)
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:55 AM
2

Oh come on people. Yes what he says is completely irrelevant in a practical sense. On a philosophical level he may be right though. Whether you agree or not, the guy is providing us with some critical thoughts, no need to downvote.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:49 AM
2

Yes, and part of becoming more awesome is having less time to spend around here, making it even harder to be picked up. That is as it is, but it is rather blunt then to state that you 'just have to earn your endorsed status'
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:29 AM
4

Yes, well, about that endorsed status. It is reasonable to say you have to earn it, but you make it sound like you will certainly become endorsed if you reliably provide good content. You neglect the fact that the mods have to pick up on it as well, making the whole thing pretty arbitrary. In this ever growing community you can easily snow under. I could name a few people who by all reasonable standards should be endorsed by now. I kinda see the reason the mods chose to do this, but I find the e…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:13 AM
49

The great dilemma is this: the more exciting and lively a girl is, the more likely she is to cheat on you. This girl in particular has a crazy sex drive and smokes pot. It was obvious that this was not going to last. That is perfectly fine though, plenty more wild rides out there. If you want lasting monogamy, better find a relatively shy one. Intensity versus endurance is the tradeoff.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 09:21 AM
16

Brilliant analysis, you really hit the core with this one. But there is one thing I object to: we cannot simply ask "What is right?", as if morals were a single, universal absolute People always say this around here, but I disagree. And the reason for that ties in with the second contract you mention. You want to know what is morally wrong? You ask yourself the question: "if many people were to do that, would it be detrimental to society?". And then you have your answer. Would it be bad for soci…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 07:35 AM
0

No, a unicorn is a woman who loves unconditionally, who can be trusted blindly and who you can marry in today's society. An exceptional woman is one who remains loyal as long as you do not fuck up. An interesting post for you to read is 'the hierarchy of women'. It explains it in more detail and it's an overall good read.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 08:28 PM
0

You have no idea what you are talking about. You interpret NAWALT, and you interpret it wrong. I will no further waste my time on your ignorance and stupidity. In the eyes of a bitter pessimist everyone is a naive optimist. So, to put it gently, fuck off and educate yourself.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 08:10 PM
3

It's one thing to state quality women can't be found at bars, clubs or on tinder. That is what I would call a sound observation. It's another thing to state they are locked up in their houses all day playing board games and reading the bible. Unicorns do not exist, exceptional women do. But they are rare, and you will have to venture out of PartyWorld to find them. (Hint: sports).
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:48 PM
11

Scientists have established after thorough research that there is no sarcasm in this post whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:40 PM
7

This is an excellent way to deal with last minute resistance, you handled that very effectively. It is also a very effective way to get a false rape accusation directed at you. If you completely shut down a girls ability to think clearly by pushing the sexual vibe that much, she will go over it later and rationalise, not always in the way you want them to. This is why most of us advocate dealing with LMR by interrupting kino completely. You have been warned.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:34 PM
2

Fuck him for thinking rules do not apply to him, but I too would much prefer this required setup to be abstract, content, conclusion. Not 'what I am going to tell you' and ' what we have learnt today'. Come on, that is rather belittling and scholar. It reminds me too much of the setup they use in RPW. Too feminine for my taste. The fact that some of the ECs and vanguards actively ignore it should tell you something too. It would mostly be a matter of framing it differently, I am aware of that, b…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 09:03 AM
1

You tell me what the added value of the word is then. Looking at it that way we are all mgtow. It becomes a useless distinction.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 06:51 AM
0

I have seen it in relationships that have not ended, and in relationships that have ended (old age) just as well. Confirmation bias does not apply when you clearly detect something which someone else claims not to exist. Furthermore there is a difference between attraction happening and a girl acting on said attraction. They are not completely slaves to their biology either. You are right to be sceptical, but you are overly pessimistic. I suppose it is the anger fase, it will pass.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:47 PM
1

Which is why, in a succesful ltr, you embody both AF and BB in a sufficient manner. Besides, it is not like a women will jump ship at the very sight of a potentially higher smv man. There are risks involved in cheating and branch swinging and she knows it. But if you, as her partner fuck things up, she surely might eventually.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:40 PM
0

Expectation that this will not come to fruition at some point in a relationship is laughable. This is where we disagree, strongly I might add. It is also how you ended up with your false interpretation. If RP theory is correctly applied and the girl is selected with strict criteria, you can certainly keep a girl loyal and pleasant. Not easy, certainly possible. I have seen it personally.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:33 PM
3

We all want a trp woman but at the same time say AWALT. Then you do not understand what AWALT means. I have shared the following before and I will share it again: AWALT speaks of a limited and clearly defined set of tendencies all women share. The most important tendencies are: all women tend to look for AF/BB, all women are hypergamous in nature and all women have evolved to manipulate the men around them. By no means however does this mean the outcome for each women is the same. It all depends…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 09:19 PM
4

When in doubt, I assume people are stupid and short sighted. It explains a lot of human behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 08:10 PM
4

Well yes, of course, and not something I do either. But then I also do not care much for top class entitled pussy. I think we have to be reasonable though and acknowledge that if your goal is to fuck attractive women, dealing with this craving for validation is becoming almost inevitable nowadays. Exceptions are very, very rare.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 08:05 PM
0

So where would you propose we draw the line? The only differences between 'better not sleep with the married chick or you might get stabbed' and 'better not cuckold other men because you would then help society go to shit' are that in the latter the negative consequences hit you indirectly and they affect more people. Unless you were to think you are not dependent on society like everyone else. In my view good or bad has nothing to do with it, I agree shaming or moral judgement has no place on t…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 05:04 PM
1

Well, happiness is indeed more an internal mindset than is is a product of external influences. When it comes to happiness vs sadness, adding more 'means to become happy' -as found in OP's list- is not typically going to make the highs higher, but it will make the lows less low. Still, with more elements from that list the result will be raised average happiness. Not by raising the ceiling, but by elevating the floor.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 01:07 PM
3

Many people here are going to disagree with you that forming a happy family is an important element in living a fulfilling life. The reason for that is the same as the reason women slut it up and do not look for a stable relationship: they only realise they want this later in life, often when the prime moment for it has long passed. I never understood why some men here have this idealistic notion of spinning plates until they are 50 and maybe then settling down and getting a chick pregnant. By t…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 12:57 PM
1

Wait... what do you mean? That we, as men, must eat their cake and have it too? Because that is a rather hilariously worded power flip I can get behind. Or it could mean you just want the order of the words to be switched. Doesn't matter, had a good laugh.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 12:41 PM
1

OP is under the impression that to be red pill is to sleep with anyone you can. And thus the title; you don't have to swallow the pill. But this is a false premise. To be red pill only means you have to realise you CAN sleep with married women, not that you also have to. The red pill is not a behavioural instruction, it is only meant to make you aware of your options.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 08:19 AM
1

Sorry mate, if you cannot handle or follow critical thought and have to cling on to dogma and populism, join a religion or something. Your empty words mean nothing to me, entire schools of philosophy support my statement. Newsflash kid, moral subjectivism is not an established fact. If you think your convictions can withstand some criticism, watch 'the poison of subjectivism' by c.s. lewis on youtube.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 08:58 PM
1

You can never be sure your relationship will work out. You have to accept a certain degree of risk and then give it your best effort. If I understand you correctly you say feminism made the risk involved too high. I do not fully agree with you there. They have made things more difficult, sure. But you are in the position to be selective. Find a woman who is anti feminist and loyal, not entitled. Look for red flags and avoid any woman who has those. Fatherless home? Sorry, not gonna work. Promisc…
/r/MensRights21/06/15 07:11 PM
1

And then there are those who shout out that you can be MGTOW and still sleep with women from time to time, but they fail to realise that's nothing more than low effort plate spinning.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 06:54 PM
71

As a famous comedian we all know once said: there are no feminists in a housefire.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 06:49 PM
27

We have a natural tendency to. It stems from our duty to protect and support women in earlier times. And that was fine, because women were aware of this dependence and treated benevolent men with according kindness and respect. That awareness, and with it their respect, is gone. Our biological wiring remains the same, and so we must resist it.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 06:32 PM
11

Though it is mostly preaching to the choir here, that is indeed well worded. And it does not even mention that a large part of the supposed misogyny is in fact a response to females treating men harsh without a sense of respect. Indeed, 'respect women' made sense when women were still taught to respect men. Not anymore.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 06:27 PM
1

Fair enough, but negative visualisation is a useful mind trick, it has nothing to do with truth. Ok, theoretically nothing lasts forever, but practically 'until death' is as forever as it gets for us, and plenty of things can last that long. LTRs included, just pay some attention to elder couples to see just that. If your point is that negative visualisation is a philosophy that may be beneficial, we can agree on that. If you state that nothing lasts for life and present that as fact, then we ha…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 11:25 AM
0

You could have saved yourself the trouble of writing that if you just would have read my last paragraph. How else can I put it... I do NOT suggest people should marry. We all know that to be stupid as hell. I am trying to convey something about monogamous long term relationships. OP said they are only temporary. I say that this is not true, and you can look at marriages, a form of LTRs, to get an indication about how many serious LTRs last for life out of the total. This gives a baseline of arou…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 11:05 AM
1

Seriously, are you blind? How much more do I need to stress that you can negate that by staying together but not marrying?
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 04:00 AM
1

Yes, and they are. Not considering happiness in those relationships, but we have no data to compare happiness with that of plate spinners or mgtows either so looking at that is rather pointless. You operate from a goal -protecting newbies from poisonous LTRs- and I respect that, but you are bending the truth to better suit your narrative. Your intended goal is not superior to the truth, stop posting false information.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 11:12 PM
2

Well there is no reason to assume it certainly won't either. Only then would it be delusion. We have too little information to come to any conclusions in this area, but choices still have to be made. I can not claim my relationship will last until I die, but you do not have the evidence to claim the opposite either. And we know for a fact that some relationships do last that long. Again, not making happiness a factor.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 11:05 PM
-1

I do not care how helpful it is, it is not the truth. How hard is that to understand? If we deviate from the truth in favour of the intended goal, we are no better than feminists making up statistics to further their narrative.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 10:58 PM
1

I do not have those numbers, neither do you. Are you suggesting we swear off LTRs until we do? 43 percent divorce after 15 years is the most recent number i could find. Happiness is a whole other factor. It is important, but you would also have to compare that with plate spinning happiness at that age, something people conveniently seem to forget. I do not claim to have all the answers, I am merely taking the best educated bet I can make while refuting claims that are certainly NOT true.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 10:46 PM
1

I have always preferred a genuine intrinsic motivation over a rather extrinsic religious one. Those girls do exist. But then again I live in a rather secular country.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 10:06 PM
1

No I do not, i am just responding to the claim that it is only your turn, implying someone will come after you. That simply does not hold true. What you say may be true, but is simply another assumption at the end of the day. Fact is that we do not know. When it comes to long term happiness, the odds are probably stacked against us when you consider society as a whole. But we are not society. We are red pill aware. We are not naive, we know the red flags and we know the protocols. With that arse…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 10:01 PM
-2

You confuse something difficult with something impossible. The rest is thoughtless dogma. I never claimed an LTR will bring you eternal bliss when you are well past your 50s. But guess what, newsflash, nor will spinning plates. The way you present it, society in the US is really fucked up. It is bad, but not that bad here in western europe. If you are sick of it, stop complaining and leave.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 09:52 PM
2

Well yes, and that is why the words 'at all costs' are missing from my statement. Sorry, but banging random sluts well into your 60s without having a solid family is not my path to happiness eiter. Choices have to be made. I will maximise my odds and take a gamble. No rewards without risks, that is red pill too. Do you really think I did not consider what you said there? It does not matter. He said, or at least implied, nothing is meant to last your entire life. I say that is bullshit, you just …
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 09:43 PM
-3

What nonsense. These 'so low' odds you speak of are still around 50% in the entire population, and that includes all the naive ones, all the red flag women, all the betas, all the white knights and all the sluts. Armed with red pill knowledge and with a woman who withstood a strong selection your chances are one hell of a lot better. I am not saying this is the path you should choose, but it just as valid as plate spinning or mgtow. btw, I am talking about a life long LTR, not marriage. I just u…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 04:26 PM
3

Absolutely. This cannot be stressed enough.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 03:53 PM
1

I like to try new thing with cooking, grilling on an open fire, impressive desserts, that sort of things. That can get you through a lazy afternoon and you build skills for life. When I have more time: outdoor sports/activities. Could sailing or surfing be something for you? If you really have too much spare time, find a job though. Then you can later spend that money on an interesting holiday. Some of the things I do are rather area dependent. Can you, without getting too specific, give me a ge…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 03:51 PM
-7

Yes, and 50% of marriages that DO make it really crumbles the validity of that statement. He is right in some cases, in other cases he is wrong. I am sorry to say it, but if you feel the need to downvote this your convictions do not line up with reality. It is only your turn? 50% of the married couples disagree. An inspirational quote isn't necessarily a truthful one. EDIT: not advocating marriage here. It is just a good indicator for current monogamous LTR success rates.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 03:36 PM
2

By all means have it your way. Just make sure you are not limited by false notions, inmaginary barriers or irrational fear. That is all.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 02:08 PM
12

That is for you to decide, but you can discuss it in an adult way and compromise at some points if necessary. Have the ceremony, but do not sign the contract perhaps. You can very well make it clear you are serious about the relationship but have lost faith in the institute of marriage. If she cannot reasonably accept this, she might not be an LTR worthy woman.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 01:20 PM
5

You need to educate yourself on what is concern troling and what is not. This term is used too much as an easy cop out for silencing opinions as it is. I am sick of it. You are completely right that anyone claiming that it's all the alpha's fault is a delusional white knight. But I have never seen anyone here claim that. The discussion is about whether the man in that situation is also to blame. And people make a strong point that enabling immoral acts is immoral itself. Buying stolen goods is i…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 01:15 PM
5

And vice versa; indeed do not confuse 'do not marry' with 'do not LTR'
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 12:53 PM
13

Yes, too many have made that mistake, myself included. In no way does AWALT imply that LTR worthy women do not exist though. It's just that you have to be a lot more selective and wary of red flags than you otherwise would have been. Unicorns do not exist. Exceptional women are merely rare. It may behoove you to know when you are dealing with one.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 12:44 PM
-4

Not much of a mentality if you ever plan on having a kid, and raising it properly though.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 12:38 PM
-4

Yes, all of that is true. But the term only covers a small, limited set of characteristics, tendencies to be precise. Yet the term is applied in a much broader spectrum. (E.g. no woman can be trusted, which is hollow in its oversimplification). The intended goal -guiding newbies in this case- may never be a reason for bending truth, or we end up doing the same as feminists with their narrative. Unfortunately even TRP is not completely free from this practice.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 12:06 PM
0

You confuse sleeping with married chicks with being red pill.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 07:36 AM
0

Power is amoral. How you obtain it isn't, nor how you use said power.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 07:35 AM
2

Yes, my friend, you have actually hit the very definition of paranoia.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 07:06 AM
5

Well, there is logic in that, but let us also take a clear and honest stance then. There is a difference between "I know what I am doing is immoral, but I have reasons to do it anyway" and "no bruh, what I am doing is actally amoral. You can not judge me" I did always find the whole 'if not me then someone else' argument really weak. You don't buy stolen goods because otherwise someone else would do so, right? You also don't rationalize someone selling drugs by saying that people would otherwise…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 07:10 PM
0

Yes, but I am trying to say you confuse a feeling of guilt with doing something immoral. You can feel great about doing something you know you should not be doing. But only when you do not care. You know you shouldn't sleep with the arranged wife. But maybe you do not care enough about that and consider what is to be gained more important. People do not have different codes. Like I said, we all know what those are. What differs is their threshold for abandoning it.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 07:01 PM
1

I know, I know. I have found that it people consider it too valuable a tool for training newbies. A strong catchphrase is more important than the nuanced truth.That it may not be completely true, not in the way some use it at least, is of less importance. I do not like that, nor do you seem to, but waste no effort in trying to change this. It will be in vain. To play devils advocate a little bit though, most people are utterly terrible in dealing with nuanced truths. Say what you want about how …
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 06:51 PM
0

So then is adultery immoral in all circumstances? Some would argue yes, others would argue no. I wouldn't really feel bad fucking the wife of some dictator or warlord who was basically pressured to be in the situation. Or really feel bad fucking a woman in an arranged marriage. Or even fucking a woman in a generally dead marriage. Does that make it OK? No that's just my moral code. Another way to look at it is that it is never ok, immoral in every case. How you feel about it has nothing to do wi…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 06:39 PM
5

Maybe there isn't 100% overlap, but generally speaking we are all very much aware of what is moral and what is not. Do not steal, do not harm, do not lie, do not break promises... (cheating falls under the latter). Clear as day.The problem arises when people know deep down they are engaging in opportunistic immoral acts, but try to rationalize it away, posing as amoral. (He will sell the stolen bike anyway, might as well sell it to me/she would have cheated anyway, might as well be with me). I s…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 06:19 PM
1

Same with money. No you do not need it to be happy. That doesn't mean it's not highly preferable to have it. Anyway, you are nitpicking and completely missed the point of that quote.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 02:56 PM
3

Relevant, from another post of mine: AWALT speaks of a limited and clearly defined set of tendencies all women share. The most important tendencies are: all women tend to look for AF/BB, all women are hypergamous in nature and all women have evolved to manipulate the men around them. By no means however does this mean the outcome for each women is the same. It all depends on their individual thresholds and how you handle these women. Realise that some women have much more favourable thresholds t…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 02:37 PM
2

Who said anything about marrying? I just intent to stay with her, that doesn't mean signing a contract. Not living in the US btw.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 02:24 PM
0

Except morals are arbitrarily defined. There is no universal morality. What you speak of is subjectivism. Many, including myself, disagree with that stance. It is certainly not the fact you make it out to be. I say that if there is such a thing as immoral behaviour, surely breaching an agreement has to fall under that umbrella.
/r/askTRP19/06/15 12:11 PM
1

I refer you to my other comment.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 12:00 PM
2

I fully agree with you. That is why I only engaged in an LTR when I found a more traditional, reasonable and non-entitled one. I never said it was easy to find one, but at least I have. I have been screening very strongly for red flags and found none. Many green flags to add. Don't get me wrong, I remain vigilant and boundaries are well established. I am no fool, certainly not delusional. I just consider it very much worth the shot.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 11:59 AM
1

It seems we mostly agree. I can recommend reading the sexodus. It's a well written piece that really ties the facts together. Not ridiculously long either. I'll leave it at that, see you around.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 06:34 PM
4

yes, men generally. I take it you have read the sexodus? This involves all men, from the video game nerd to the mistreated athletic. But I agree, it's the men that they want to have not being there that's going to deliver the biggest blow.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 05:45 PM
3

Knowing you are 'the prize'/knowing you have options isn't mutually exclusive with knowing you found a special girl.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 05:22 PM
8

To me a girl gives me a feeling of intimacy -a pleasant feeling in other words- that I can not experience with male friends. I choose to have an LTR, so I will hopefully (I'm doing what I can to maximize my chances) have a partner for the rest of my life who knows me better than anyone else and can complement me where I fall short. Sex and love are necessary to make such a long term commitment possible and likeable. Besides that I would very much like to have kids in the future. I have a GF who …
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 04:49 PM
20

I really like the analogy "if you keep scoring against your little brother in a game, at a certain point he isn't going to play anymore" In that case both people lose in the end. Feminists are too busy 'scoring points' and completely ignoring the bigger picture. Men are more and more deciding not to play the game anymore.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 04:23 PM
0

Just because someone has control over you doesn't mean they are the more valuable one. You can very well argue that in the farmer-mule relationship, the mule is the more valuable one. After all, the farmer only provides food, which the mule could get by himself in the wild. The mule however does valuable work the farmer couldn't do himself. The mule is captured and can't walk away from the deal. We, men, are free whether we realise it or not. We can walk away, and it's the women who will lose th…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 04:14 PM
8

Yes, but that is completely beside the point. They are always dating BECAUSE they are dependent on male support. Because of this dependence we have to conclude there is value in this male role.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 03:50 PM
3

Right now you're in a committed relationship. You have agreed to a verbal contract of exclusivity, right? Looking for other prospects without telling her is immoral in that case. Don't be such a pussy and just tell her. You're only stalling at this point. Have some confidence that you will land a better girl even if she breaks it off, because you will. Just tell her that you really appreciate all that she does, but without the sex it's more of a friendship and not a relationship. MrEiffel's inst…
/r/askTRP18/06/15 03:43 PM
6

I think you meant to say for millennia. Just to let you know. Millennials are a recent generation of people.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 02:35 PM
24

It is not a pill, no. To call it surgery is overstating things a bit too though, it is an injection. And while I agree that it will not be as popular as many claim it will be, it's a bit too simplistic to compare it with female subdermal pills that only last a couple of months. This procedure will give protection lasting as much as 10 years. That a whole different scope. People are exaggerating, but so are you.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 02:14 PM
1

Mhm, I myself am very much a supporter of committed LTRs with highly selected suitable women and I agree with your points, but it is arguably still better to have kids with a woman out of wedlock in the US. If you stay together, all is well anyway, and if you don't, no alimony.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 01:26 PM
-1

About the first part: let him answer that will you? Besides, he has more or less stated just that in other comments. And the second pard: that is just typical American ignorance and arrogance. You have no idea how hilarious you sound to me. reasonable marriage laws? You guys have shotgun marriage and and some states consider you married if you just live with someone long enough. That is unheard of in northern europe. Child support? Through the state, not through a divorced spouse. Some unjust al…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 12:48 PM
5

This is not so much about who has the highest value for society, this is about who holds the highest value in the context of a relationship. Who that is you can derive from the quote in my other post.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 12:27 PM
112

This is not so much the key to understanding women. I mean, what have we learnt about women with this knowledge? Nothing. No, we have learnt something about ourselves. What you speak of is much more a key to confidence and understanding your own true value. May none of us undervalue themselves ever again. Edit: and not to be an asshole here, but I find this to be mostly a rehash of one of the elements found in the sidebar. If you have read the sidebar, anything that is written here should not be…
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 12:14 PM
1

I think you need to make some adjustments to that particular paragraph (estrogen). It doesn't make logical sense to me. What exactly do you claim the reason is women are "very horny during menstruation"?
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 12:05 PM
2

When it comes to human behaviour in relation to evolution we often hit unconfortable truths, and those tend to be bad to bring up when you want people voting for you. Having said that, I'm glad to live in a country where the mainstream right wing and most of the other paries aren't linked to religion. That at least opens up some room for debate.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 11:53 AM
1

When a woman stops menstruating her estrogen levels fall off, this why a lot of women are very horny during menstruation Do you not mean to say during ovulation? Estrogen levels in women are relatively low during the menstruation period. I indeed have some suspicions that women crave sex more during menstruation too, but I'm not sure of this and I find it illogical to link this to estrogen levels.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/15 11:37 AM
2

Men do not get a good deal from today's society - a man in his 20s without children today, would be almost crazy to agree to starting a family, considering how the laws work. Maybe, but why don't you come clear and agree that you wouldn't be interested much in it anyway, even if the laws were fair. Laws are limited to countries, and there are still some pretty reasonable western countries left. If you actually would value having a family, then you wouldn't be stating that men should abandon wome…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 10:16 AM
5

He is not. But I can not prove him wrong either, because I do not have the experience of being a father myself. Do you? The manosphere is filled with people shitting on the values of being a father, while they have no clue about what it actually means to be one. It's hilarious, and rather stupid.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 10:07 AM
3

And all that freedom can be yours, if you just completely distance yourself from women and accept that you will never become a father. That element of life, the actual creation and guiding of new life, will be lost on you. Yeah, fuck that. If that is your personal wish, power to you. But not for me. I say cut out all the women from your life that add no value. And those are going to be high in number. And never marry, at the very least not in the US. But there are women who see the contract for …
/r/MensRights18/06/15 09:58 AM
4

You are downvoted -not by me- I think because your reasoning is flawed. For Starbucks it doesn't matter who is giving them the 5 bucks for the coffee. They couldn't care less about who is giving them money. Not so with women. Do not forget that they still want a valuable man too. And they are willing to lower their price to zero to get him. But indeed, you have to become that man first. Or it means that you deciding "I don't pay for pussy anymore" simply means you don't get it anymore either.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 06:28 PM
6

That must have been before my RP days. Care to elaborate what happened to the site? I'm interested in the history of RP media.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 06:12 PM
3

Well.. yes, but selection bias. These women hired a male stripper in the first place. Not saying you are wrong, just that your example might not be so well chosen.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 06:06 PM
6

But you are forgetting that it's only very temporarely. Can we really speak of being lucky here? Let me make an analogy: Inmagine you could eat some of the best foods available every day for free, easily accessable. Tender steak, haute cuisine and all that kind of stuff. But after ten years, that would be gone and you know for certain that for the rest of your life after that you have to live on ordinary food just like everyone else. Is that really what you would call being fortunate? Would you …
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 05:35 PM
5

But at the end of the day it's not so much that they want something in return for giving up their pussy now is it? It's that they are way, way overpricing themselves and offer nothing BUT their pussy. That's the difference between 1) a loyal wife who just wants to be provided for and 2) a spoiled narcissistic whore.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 05:24 PM
11

You are of course right. But there is something else to consider. We are no longer speaking about a few women who whore themselves out, we are talking about a vast number of them. None of these are going to form stable families later. Society is going to shit, and they have a major share in that. Now, I know, I know. Nothing we can do about it. I accept that as the fact it is. But that doesn't mean I like it. In the grand scheme of things, I disapprove of this trend.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 05:20 PM
20

Exactly. Each one of them is forever changed into an alpha widow in the broad sense of the word. If you are used to getting money that easily, you are never going to settle anymore for anyone who provides less than that. Well, not for long. That's when they realize they can force the money in their pockets anyway through divorce.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 05:14 PM
21

I think it makes more sense if you add "over you" to the quote. like this: pussy only has as much power over you as you give it. There is power in general, and then there is power over you personally. Some people have power over you no matter what you do. Most notably the government. You can say 'I don't believe in their legitimacy', but that doesn't change the power they hold over you. If you don't pay your taxes, you go to jail. But other people only have as much power over you as you give the…
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 05:10 PM
2

+health in general. Skin conditions due to poor hygiene and scars will ruin the prettiest of faces.
/r/askTRP17/06/15 01:39 PM
1

Well, something interesting to consider is that sexual selective pressure usually only works against men. Most women will reproduce for the sheer sake of being women. When it comes to sexual selection on males, historically looks -facial in particular- are less important than skills and overall fitness. I.e. the ability to provide for a woman. In Scandinavia, however, there has been a period of selective pressure on females due to harsh living conditions and thus scarce men being very valuable a…
/r/askTRP17/06/15 01:24 PM
1

RP deals with what is. You define TRP by its 'dictionary definition', so to speak. From that stance I can agree with everything you say. I define TRP by what I see, by how the community acts. I see so many deviations from that dictionary definition that I find it rather useless to adhere to it.
/r/AlreadyRed12/06/15 09:03 AM
-3

Thanks for the response. I'm not sure where you picked up I advocate extremism. I, myself, am far from extreme right oriented. I fully agree with your stance on extremism, and I am familiar with the Horseshoe theory. I guess what I was trying to say is: We all recognised we are way too far on the left spectrum here, and that it's for a great part causing the problems we face. If we had our way, we'd see that left influence dialed back. Doesn't that automatically make us swing to the right (not e…
/r/AlreadyRed12/06/15 08:52 AM
-3

From a purely ideal perspective you are right, and I understand what you are saying. But let's be realistic now. The TRP you speak of is how you think it should be. Perhaps the way the very intellectual elite of who are already red would have it be. But it is not the way it is. You can see the true state just as I can. So very often does the theory and observation flow into advice. In the main sub you can spot a 'go lift' or 'don't marry' in almost every other post. Where we enter the realm of a…
/r/AlreadyRed11/06/15 11:31 PM
-1

No need for hostility, like I said I didn't read into it. It's just that that short quote of yours doesn't necessarily back up your claim. You should have seen that and posted additional information, as you have done now. I don't fully get why they approach it so indirectly. I mean, first they are looking into the effect of phytoestrogens (or other estrogen-like substances) in beer, and then they couldn't detect any at all and had to use yeasts? Our current tech is completely capable of quantify…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 04:04 PM
0

I have not read into this, but there is a whole different meaning to 'no human health hazard' than 'no significant effect on the human body'. I take no stance in this, but think critically will you?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 03:29 PM
1

Ive been married to one for 20 years this October RP helped me land her. Wait what? Then not this sub for sure. Can you tell me a bit on where you found RP knowledge back then? And how you found this sub later? I'm interested in how we came to the point where we are now.
/r/askTRP07/06/15 12:31 PM
2

I wouldn't throw it all away for a thirsty freeloading pothead who only wants to fuck and nothing more in his life. Well, he only wants to fuck (her words), and she is still hanging with the guy. You do the math. If she is a plate, it may be time to drop this one. If the thought of that triggers immediate resistance in you, that should tell you something about your relationship status with this girl.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 10:22 AM
1

She's a plate, she can(and it should be expected that she) sleep with other people. Absolute nonsense. If your SMV is high enough you can -and probably should, as it is in your interest- set the conditions so that you can sleep around but she can't. I agree with the line after that. If she doesn't stick to the rules you set, don't be upset but just drop her. Two+ or none. She's not a plate if she's the only one. Not really, no. Say you have 3 plates and you happen to drop two, does that make the…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 10:01 AM
0

Why the hell is this comment downvoted? That's the whole point of plate spinning AKA the 'soft harem'. She wants to fuck you, she's going to adhere to the conditions you set. Of course these are unbalanced and in your favour. If she doesn't like it, she can go fuck another guy. Having said that, you have to be clear about this. On the part that she's not allowed to sleep around, but also on the part that you will do so. If you let the girl believe you are exclusive and you sleep with other girls…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 09:50 AM
1

Because he can fuck other girls, but she can't fuck other men. It's unbalanced, it's unfair, but if you're enough of a catch you can pull this off. So why shouldn't you? Remember, girls rather share an alpha than have their own beta. I thought this was more or less standard plate theory.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 09:43 AM
4

Information Technology (IT), Engineering and the medical field (doctor) are by far the best options. Anything that involves social human interaction (coaches, psychyatrists, social workers) is the least likely to be automated in the near future. Unfortunately these are mostly women dominated fields and they tend to pay less.
/r/askTRP06/06/15 08:39 PM
2

I may be somewhat late to the party, but I haven't seen this mentioned yet: at this point you have to believe that she babytrapped you. Pills do pretty damn good job at preventing that otherwise. Do you realise what a big red flag that is? Even if you were open to the possibility of having the child, for god sake don't go through with it with this woman. If she is capable of manipulating you to this extent it's only going to get worse when she has you on daddy lockdown. She doesn't care about yo…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 08:23 PM
1

Well, in theory you are right, but they are not as reversible as you may think. In practice, if you look at the % of who are actually able to get a woman pregnant, it's only around 55% if the reconstruction is done within 10 years. Half that when over 10 years. Source: Wikipedia vasectomy reversal.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 08:04 PM
2

I have to say though, as much as a thrill this must have been, you got there by taking "with greater risks come greater rewards" a bit far. The choices you are making can come around to bite you. I am not ashamed to say I envy you, but at the same time I know there's a very good reason I'm not living such a life. You do not need my advice, but I just hope you know what you are doing.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 10:39 PM
0

I see that a little different my friend.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 10:26 PM
8

Same for me. But then again, can you really condemn her? Can you really say she is broken? This girl has everything she ever could have dreamed of and more. It reminds me of 'The Wolf of Wall Street' in a sense. If life really is pointless, all about the ride, she's doing a pretty fine job at it.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 07:51 PM
1

Perhaps you are a 'Devil's daughter widower' now.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 07:42 PM
6

At the end of the day, everyone has a price. Now you know yours. Still, betrayed as you may feel, know that this is just beyond. Beyond words, beyond anything any of us is ever going to experience. No matter how much lifting, how much sharpening of mind and game, I know for a fact my life is never going to bring this on my path. Be glad for the experience, I guess. Nice writeup, you're on a roll.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 07:38 PM
1

I have one thing to add, since I should have noticed earlier that you are a woman. Regarding your question 'Does TRP work for a woman?' There are two sides to this forum. One side revolves around discussing the way the world works. We look at biology and economics and see people act differently -and on different incentives- than we were told while growing up. This part is shared with the RP women sub. It doesn't matter if you are a man or a women, we can both look at the world as it is and searc…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 01:25 PM
3

Nice article, but no evaluation - no upvote.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 11:47 AM
1

Now that some of your questions are answered, I suggest you read the sidebar material -all of it- and also the top posts of all time before you post in this sub again. Any further questions are welcome, but should be asked in r/askTRP. Consider removing this thread, because it is unnecessarily competing with other posts on the front page.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 11:31 AM
2

We try to use as much logic, reason, cost/benefit analyses, as possible to make our way through our daily life. But when you get to the very core of what makes life worth living for you, reason and logic do not apply anymore. What you want in life is an emotional choice. There is no better or worse. If you wish to form a deeper emotional connection with a woman, find some stability and comfort in your daily life, LTR is the way to go. If you instead wish to be free and unattached, MGTOW may be y…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 11:27 AM
2

No, they do not correlate with age. Taking the pill is in many ways a grieving process, in that you let go of something you were very attached to. The stages of taking the pill are just like the stages of grief. As you can see now, they are not bound to any age, nor do the five stages always follow the same order. Have you read u/whisper's post about the five stages? Interesting material. Is there an age when TRP starts not to care at all for a search of LTR? No, and this is also not something w…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 11:16 AM
1

Most certainly! But you have to understand this: by far the most men here have just 'woken up'. As such their very first priority is getting more comfortable around women and trying to sleep with them. Any longer perspective isn't really considered yet. Besides that, many here are severely disappointed in how they were treated by women, and as a result they don't trust them (but not hate them) enough anymore to engage in a serious commitment. That's part of the stages of taking the red pill, the…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 11:02 AM
1

Listen, maybe this has been said in other comments -I'm not reading them all-. but I think you are looking for an LTR with a girl you actually value. So, you are working on yourself. Great! Sex has become easier for you, and you now find that it isn't that special anymore. Well of course it isn't special, you're banging random sluts. The girl you did LTR sounds like a dull little-value women the way you talk about her. First and foremost you need to become happy with who YOU are. A nice partner …
/r/TheRedPill03/06/15 11:00 AM
2

Some women rationalize their own delusions. FTFY. The rest of this text is just so the bot doesn't kick out my post.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 10:37 AM
1

I don't think so. Would be interesting though. So I, and you, have to rely on observation. In my experience women -people for that matter- are usually a lot more stupid than they are of malicious intent. On that basis I operate.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 09:26 AM
2

Oh come on. You are LTRing a women with whom you party and drink for 11 hours. What did you think, she'd make for a good mother some day? Just because you are engaging in the same behaviour doesn't make it any less of a red flag. And another one is that she apparantly has a bad temper. This women of yours is hardly LTR material. Don't act so surprised.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 09:32 PM
4

Actually you are completely right. But then you are also completely wrong. As long as the law doesn't state that double standard (which I don't see happening very soon, nor do I think it's a good idea) no judge has the right to use more than one standard.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 09:21 PM
2

Of all the things to call self absorbed, basic, narcissistic women who can't be bothered to show even a little respect for the men in their environment, who have absolutely nothing to contribute except for the hole between their legs they were given at birth, [lovely women] isn't one of them. I'll stick to my choice of words. This is not because of anger, this is because if the word 'cunt' has any meaning to it, it was intended for these persons. You state they are already fully aware of their d…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 09:07 PM
2

While I agree with the general gist of your comment, that's exaggerating a bit (whole fucking much) now itsn't it?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 08:38 PM
20

You're saying they should sell sex for a higher price? Whichever way you cut it, you're making sex transactional and therefore women as whores. Sex is transactional. They are whores. Some just sell for a better price in a more socially accepted setting. As Patrice o'Neil once said: women always want to get something out of their pussy. Women are doing just fine. They're getting their AF years, they are settling down with a BB for a few years, and then a divorce for a few more years on the CC. Lo…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 03:16 PM
4

Because deep rooted sexism that's why! /s
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 03:12 PM
4

Allright, it's hardly a relevant post, adresses a very small issue, and could have been somewhat shortenend.... But I like it. Could see this work. Have an upvote.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 02:56 PM
2

CheezStik exaggerates and I can't say I agree with him much, but you are off as well. Religion is great for maintaining a strong moral society; it's good for maintaining order, having people walk in line. But on the other hand religion is an absolute plague for technological advancement and science. Our understanding of biology and genetics lead to astonishingly new medical interventions, to give just one example. Paternity testing comes to mind. If you think that's because of Christianity you c…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 08:27 AM
30

No, no no. It will not be the backup forum. It will be the backup messaging board to inform us where we move to. The site was never intended as a reddit substitute
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 05:12 AM
1

A noble goal, and I would certainly say we continue in our efforts. But realistically, we can not all be alpha. Not without society collapsing into an animalistic state of competition.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:53 PM
5

It will help, but no guarantees whatsoever. Peer pressure is real, it's powerful and it's a bitch. Don't be naive. As they say(or once said), it takes a village to raise a child.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:46 PM
3

This is not about me. I (will) have my high sms chick. Don't worry about me on the alpha scale. But betas are pretty fucking useful, and I for one wouldn't do away with em. If you want to have fun on top of the pyramid you better have a wide base. I would have thought you would have had a bit more eye for the big picture here.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:33 PM
5

God forbid the day you ever get a daughter, you would have your mind changed on the spot.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:29 PM
2

Not me I won't, they are the ones who keep the gears of society running. Now, ego inflated beta ignoring sluts, society could do with a few less of those. And there would be plenty for the alphas to go around still.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:21 PM
1

Yeah right, I quote: TRP exists everywhere. It's the truth. Ever hear of the phrase "Nice guys finish last"? That's TRP. You ever hear Chris Brown's song "Loyal"? That's TRP. Just because it's not named TRP doesn't mean it's TRP. It's everywhere. What we do in Reddit, and what we do in this sub, is attach terminology to its concepts and have discussions about it. Even if that was not exactly what meant by it, it only makes your previous point weaker.You are unable to form a coherent argument. We…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 05:37 PM
1

No, then you are again missing the point. Focus your brain, read the following text and then read it again. You said: don't share TRP at all. You defend this with the reasoning that those who are ready will find us themselves. That is nonsense; our sub is not big and visible enough, nor is reddit for that matter. You said to this that they will maybe not find us, but something similar. I say that that 'something similar' isn't in the smallest sense comparable with what we offer here. There is li…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 04:44 PM
2

Will you, for the love of god, see that there is a difference between approaching blue pillers (which is indeed stupid as fuck) and approaching those who are ready? There is a difference between not sharing TRP at all, and not sharing with unsuitable candidates, the blue pillers. Your statement of 'don't share at all' is nothing more than brainless dogma. I agree that you have to be extremely on the safe side with this, but that is not what you are saying.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 04:20 PM
2

While you are of course right, it is entirely besides the point. Our delivery man here is using some bizarre logic that beta's don't need to be shown the way to TRP once they are ready for it, just because some 'natural alpha's' can do without us. It was never about those guys, that's what I'm saying. So maybe spend more attention to frustratingly stupid logic and less to nitpicking details?
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 03:31 PM
0

Outside of TRP it's just loose shards. I don't know of any other place that offers something that even remotely resembles a full picture. And that's exactly what people need. Natural alpha's never needed help in the first place. We are not talking about informing natural alpha's, wasn't that clear? We are talking about people who are ready for the information we present, who need that information. Not loose shards, not some guy saying never marry, not some guy telling them being an asshole works…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 01:40 PM
3

You gave the subject some thought, yes. But it doesn't seem like you see the whole picture. You don't see how she will change after marrying. You don't see how divorce and possibly child support could still screw you over. You are likely willingly overlooking red flags. And so: But no matter how much we discuss, no matter how much advice we give you, we know what your answer is going to be, don't we? "I'm still going to do it" Sorry kiddo. You got the knowledge, but it looks like you're waiting …
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 01:27 PM
2

Nice. Add in some /r/askfeminists while you're at it for some laughs
/r/askTRP31/05/15 10:42 AM
8

She's easily a HB10 Those few words alone tell me you are being delusional about this. EDIT: as I stated in my other, burried post: I have always said, and I will say it again: when it comes to a woman you're considering committing to, the absense of red flags is more important than the presence of good traits. Scan for red flags. No matter how pretty she is, no matter how hot, it's emotional flaws that are going to mess things up. And I don't think you have really tried looking for them. You wa…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 09:25 AM
5

I have always said, and I will say it again: when it comes to a woman you're considering committing to, the absense of red flags is more important than the presence of good traits. Scan for red flags. No matter how pretty she is, no matter how hot, it's emotional flaws that are going to mess things up. And I don't think you have really tried looking for them. You want to really find out if you can spend a long amount of time with this chick? Take her on a holiday (and not the party island type).
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 09:23 AM
3

a) Subtle sarcasm (not so likely IMO) b) Not making a big fuss about someone damaging your property c) The halo effect. She likes you and will attribute positive traits to you as long as you don't completely mess up More than one can apply. Having said that, It's hardly worth giving any second thought.
/r/askTRP31/05/15 09:08 AM
2

/r/personalfinance comes to mind as potentially useful. Of course /r/fitness. Lastly, in the spirit of building bridges: /r/mensrights
/r/askTRP31/05/15 09:03 AM
1

So, is the point system still in place? And who can hand these out?
/r/askTRP31/05/15 08:59 AM
1

You could make a thread with a comment for every country and us state, then people can select anonymously by upvote for the relevant comment. Have everyone who votes also upvote the original post, so you can use it to check if not too many people are voting double
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 08:01 AM
3

Take this idea, make a thread for it and contact the mods. I support it. It needs a system for filtering out the trolls though. And only per state or, if smaller, per country. No doxxing risks.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 07:47 AM
2

It is still relatively small, not to mention censored, and you overlook the fact that only a small percentage of men is on reddit.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 07:35 AM
3

People will only accept TRP when they are ready, yes. But that they will also find it then on their own is bullshit and nothing more than some baseless belief. You can pretty much forget about finding it if you are not on reddit, and even if you are it is still pretty much burried here. People who are ready can be aided to find their way here, little steps at a time. But no, don't go around telling people about this cool place you found called TheRedPill.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 07:32 AM
1

Yes. Just like a rock.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 07:20 PM
0

I was constantly bouncing from girl to girl attempting to make some sort of closure towards sex So approaching isn't the problem but you're too dependent on the result. Then forget about women completely for now. Make new friends while you're there, chat with men. Start an interesting converstation. And if the party isn't fun still, don't be afraid to just leave. Stop wasting your time there. If you truly don't care anymore, if you can have a good time without approaching any girl, then by all m…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 06:56 PM
2

What are you even trying to prove here? Truth isn't stupid, truth doesn't rely on anything, truth doesn't even 'do' anything, truth just 'is'. This is not to start a discussion about the philosophy behind truth, it is to show you are incoherent and you are not making any sense whatsoever. Are you just saying things for the sake of saying now?
/r/askTRP30/05/15 06:40 PM
0

That's all well and good, but not the reason I wrote that comment down. Of course people should be free to defend their opinions. However, in my opinion -especially if you come here to ask a question- you can discuss in a mutual respectful manner or you can get the fuck out. Doesn't have to be all cuddly and friendly, but some basic codes of conduct apply. To add to that, he is not so much asking a question as defending a statement disguised as a question. So not only is he behaving like an allr…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 06:20 PM
2

I think you're on to something there
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:44 PM
1

Strength is useless when controlled by stupidity. It takes a strong man to know when to shut the fuck up and listen. But fair enough, I will leave you to it. Gratz on the updated flair.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:19 PM
0

Just so you know, I have been here a while, and if there is one person around here who can be relied on to give solid advice it's the guy you were conversing with. You being the question asker here, I suggest you fix that attitude of yours and show some respect, not only for the flair, but also for the people who come here to answer your questions in general. You are nothing. And you are dead wrong on top of that.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:06 PM
2

You're welcome. One small addition I neglected: all three aspects I mentioned speak of tendencies, not of outcome. Individuals have different thresholds for acting on their tendencies. Not every woman will be a manipulative bitch, not every woman will have an alpha fuckbuddy on the side and although virtually all of them will branch swing if they aren't attracted to you anymore, not all will do it as quickly and impulsive as others. There's a lot AWALT means, but also a lot it doesn't mean.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:53 PM
1

Thanks for the thought out response! On a side note, you appear to not be aware of the bot that removes any comment in TRP below a certain word count. Just a heads up, some of your shortest comments are not visible. Since you just linked there, I'd be very interested to read your take on my response to your 'attraction can be negotiated thread' (also not visible, links and quoted text don't count). Not before you've worked your way through all these comments of course. Thanks again!
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 03:33 PM
1

You could say that they are mentally ill indeed. But in the hardware, not the software if you understand what I mean. No pill or psychological intervention is going to 'cure' them, and many wouldn't want to be cured even if we could do so. I agree that we shouldn't try to normalize it, just like we don't do so with people born with a missing finger. Doesn't mean we can't treat them like any other person though. But fuck that kind of overcompensational effeminate behaviour. That is a choice, and …
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:09 PM
2

AWALT, or All Women Are Like That has nothing to do with sexual orientation, as /u/seedang mentioned. The confusion is in the 'That': it only encompasses a very limited set of traits all women share. Usually we talk about one of three aspects: all women are hypergamous, all women search for AF/BB (sexual arousal and a sense of security) and all women have evolved to be manipulative (against men mostly). See that each of those three can be applied to whatever partner they choose, from whatever ge…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:02 PM
3

Good advice will float to the top of the tread, whether it comes from a 13 year old or a 70 year old. We can base information on its value regardless of the person of origin. There is no need to mention age, and it only makes it easier to doxx people
/r/askTRP30/05/15 02:51 PM
8

The way I see it this law has two parts. What the first part of this law basically states is that women have more, higher requirements for sexual association (the 'family') than men in general. Of course if a man's conditions aren't met, no association takes place either. But since the woman has more demands, she effectively sets the rules. The second part states that no matter how much a women is 'in your debt' for previously provided services, if she has no reason to assume future benefits, sh…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 02:47 PM
1

Exactly. unless you're willing to abandon your country and citizenship that's an utterly bullshit argument. MGTOWs sometimes conveniently forget that their freedom to do as they wish is restricted by their governments.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 02:31 PM
1

I'd argue having the power and ability to enforce your will is absolutely a part of leadership. Fear being a form of respect. And that's where you're completely wrong. Fear and respect couldn't be more apart. Fear comes from having no choice if you wish to survive/not be harmed. Respect stems from a wish to follow someone, even if you don't have to. No real choice vs full freedom to choose. Leadership has nothing to do with fear. Tyranny does.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 01:03 PM
2

Probably. It could be based on some kind of scent though. We can (subconciously) smell things that allow us to find a mate with the most complimentary immune system. And because some uneductated fuckface downvoted this: yes, this is scientifically proven, dating sites have been built around this phenomenon. Search for HLA matching. If we can do that, then picking up someone just had sex by their smell seems at least plausible.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 07:51 AM
3

Yes, you do. But those insights we've seen over and over again and they are well covered in the sidebar. I appreciate your efforts in contributing, but I don't consider your post valuable enough to compete for the front page. Don't be overly surprised if it gets removed for lowering the signal to noise ratio.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 07:46 AM
5

Well, yes, but we are not speaking about herbivore 'genes', nor herbivore 'families'. We are talking about herbivore culture. Culture doesn't depend on genetic lineage to spread. By far the most of men could be susceptible to this culture if the current trend of men-kicking continues. I'm not so sure about this being self regulating. Not on a small scale at least. Perhaps in a 'collaps of society' kind of way.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:50 PM
1

There is some truth to that. But you go and convince those people of that. If there is such a thing as left liberalism, the things I listed are at the heart of it. I think this stems from a notion that being constricted by lack of financial means or a feeling of being oppressed creates a belief of being not free. Thus, the political movement which tries to fight off these disadvantages is considered a fight for freedom in their eyes.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 09:06 PM
6

If that first part isn't a reference to one of the best movies of all time, I don't know what is. Voilá, a Valued Versed Visionary.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 06:42 PM
1

Absolutely agree. They won't. But the opposite is true as well: don't believe either that if you choose not to procreate, that such a choice will never come around to haunt you. After millions of years of evolutionary reproductive drive, you can bet you will find some sadness later in life for never having raised any children. Then again, that isn't to say I think it is unwise to not have them. I don't think there is a good choice or a bad choice here. This is not a simple matter. Whatever choic…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:35 PM
6

Now, I may be wrong here, but I see a whole clusterfuck regarding the word 'liberal'. By the literal sense of the word it means nothing more than 'in support of freedom'. But this has a completely different meaning when you look at it through a right wing or left wing lens: In the right wing interpretation it means 'free from unnecessary state legislation'. Free to do as you will with minimal obstruction. This is the kind of liberal we as TRP tend to side by. In the left wing interpretation it m…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:01 PM
2

Pretty much an exact copy of my question, so feel free to ignore mine and post any answer here.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:14 PM
9

Hi Karen! Tnx for doing this AMA! My question to you: You appear to support the MRA in their efforts while also recognising that the ball is now mainly in the women's court for changing the current problems in society. Unfortunately the men aren't very succesful in their pursuits; people are not willing to listen to us. Undoubtedly this is also partly where your succes stems from. In your view, how can we, the men facing these injustices- better make our voices heard? What can we do to really st…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 03:11 PM
18

You draw the wrong conclusions. Women like assholes because not catering to their needs is a display of value; something that is almost fully absent in the rest of the male population. Don't make the mistake to think they actually like being treated badly. It's just that being treated badly by a valuable man is better than to be treated well by a worthless man. Better still is to be a valuable man and treat women well who have shown they deserve to be treated well. What do you give them? The att…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 01:47 PM
0

I did, just not the kind of "research" where I skipped all the less complex explanations and went straight to searching for conspiracy evidence. I'm sure you don't like it, but you don't need those theories of yours to explain the matters at hand.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 12:38 PM
1

For the most part I agree, but nevertheless I felt the need to reply to this. You are approaching this very one-sided. You define 'success' by short term attraction. To this end you talk of approaching, flirting and talking to strangers. Many of us are after longer lasting attraction though. To accomplish that you need other, more important elements than the ones you name. Perhaps this is not useful to you personally, so be it. I find your concerns for it being used as an excuse for not aproachi…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 11:59 AM
2

Still, if you are after a more sustainable form of attraction raising SMV is the only option. Maybe you can pull a ONS with overconfidence and luck, but you're going to need more than that to keep her around, either as a plate or as an LTR.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 11:05 AM
2

My bad, I should have said: If you have little attractive qualities to begin with... You emphasize the importance of confidence in attraction. Partly I agree. Don't wait until you have a six pack, no. But if you are a fat fuck without any sense of style that confidence will not only be hard to internalize, it will also get you nowhere. I am not making up excuses for anything. You're missing the point of my post. Real, powerful attraction goes beyond a succesful approach. It is stronger, longer l…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:55 AM
1

women no longer need protectors and providers And this is where you are so very, very wrong. It is just that you do not see it anymore. The protectors and providers have become invisible: the protectors are fighting on the other side of the world fighting a war against terror, and the providers provide through the taxes they pay, which the government hands out in the form of social security. Yes, women are earning their own money. It is still the men who earn the biggest share of the national GD…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 10:43 AM
9

Men want to create. That is a valid goal in itself. Raising a child may be the ultimate form of creation, and because of this there is great fulfillment in doing so. At least, that's how I look at it. Don't listen to anyone on this forum who claims that raising a child isn't a valid goal in life.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:16 AM
5

Look elsewhere? not necessarily. But you have to filter out more stuff that isn't useful. r/redpillparenting might be useful as well. Another problem is that TRP focusses mainly on the situation in the USA, where marriage legislation is so corrupted that it really isn't a valid option in any situation. In other countries however, it might be worth considering if your end goal is having kids, despite there being notable drawbacks.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 10:09 AM
3

Or all that conspiracy thinking is bullshit and it is just a nation that caters to the needs of women and minorities to an insane degree out of misplaced sympathy. You almost answered your own question: How did the women's liberation movement get AirPlay during an era that was patriarchal? Because it wasn't. We left that station long ago, heading for a full scale matriarchy. Will you people get it in your heads that you look for the simpler explanation FIRST and if there isn't any that covers al…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 08:18 AM
1

Actually, I was pretty content with her response. It just showed me that she didn't understand what we mean when we say that attraction cannot be negotiated and that she probably interpreted it differently. I liked the part about the painting experiment in particular.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:24 AM
1

Exactly as you you say: you can get a sort of 'multiply bonus' if you approach in a confident way. But if you have little attractive qualities to begin with, little to back that confidence up with you won't get anywhere. They will see right through you.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 07:13 AM
0

She had no gun on her head when she discussed it on the hilltop with littlefinger now did she?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:01 PM
4

If Ramsay wasn't going to have sex with her, she wouldn't have had sex with him. By this logic, any male initiative for sex is rape. What do you think would have happened if she'd said no? She was on the hilltop with littlefinger, she could have turned around right there. She didn't say no. She knew full well what she was getting into. She also didn't say no during the wedding. I know what you're getting at, and it is a dubious and severely confrontational case indeed, but you cannot classify th…
/r/MensRights28/05/15 06:00 PM
2

Sex on a wedding night, where the girl doesn't say no, is no rape. It would have been completely different if she would have said no, but she didn't. Not because she couldn't, but because she didn't want to. So yeah, it would be entirely fair to not classify this as rape. Where is the girls agency in all of this?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:52 PM
0

She was clearly raped by the legal definitions of most western countries. Yes, and we are all here because those laws are unjust, unfair and plain wrong. Was it extremely unpleasant? Surely. Was it an extremely mean and vile act? You bet ya. But was it rape? Most certainly not.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:45 PM
3

not liking the consequences of saying "no" is not the same thing as being unable to say "no". I applaud you sir. I cannot stress this enough. If only more people understood this.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:41 PM
3

You talk about something different; allow me to explain: Attraction cannot be negotiated. People are attracted to certain attributes, with great overlap within the sexes in the attributes they are attracted to. Men like feminine traits: caring and fit, pretty looking women. They don’t like women who swear, and they are also strongly prefer tender steak over raw potatoes. Naturally, women are attracted to masculine traits. They appear to prefer physically and mentally strong men with high status …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 04:38 PM
0

This is somewhat frustrating. I say it's better for most men to take the lead, and you claim that means I say men are somehow 'better'. Nonsense! Will you get it out of your head that leadership equals superiority? Leadership is a skill like any other. Stop acting like it is the gold standard we measure a persons value by. We value a person by the sum of their useful skills, and they are all more or less equally important. You wouldn't say I claim women are superior when I say they tend to have …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 11:35 AM
-1

Exactly what tallwheel said. How about when we say: we recommend that men take the lead. Is that something you can agree on, or is your ideology of equal outcome getting in the way here? I'd love to hear your take on the part I wrote about gender roles.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 08:06 AM
-1

And really, legalized prostitution is only a half solution. We need to get back to a system where one on one monogamy is the norm, enforced by strict rules, in which feminine and masculine values are embraced and endorced (= no sluts, not betas), but everyone has the choice to take the paths they want to take. That leads to balance, that leads to happiness. Is that realistic in today's society? Absolutely fucking not.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:44 PM
0

My whole point can be summed up like this: Red Pillers aren't (generally speaking) hurting beta men; beta men are hurting themselves. I support pretty much all the things the MRA fight for. But I also see a lot of value in TRP theory for personal goals.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:40 PM
0

Oh, make no mistake, if there's one thing the men at TRP aren't doing it's promoting cuckolding. I also fail to see what other social injustices they would use in their favour. They just set up their conditions as such that they will not be hit by those injustices themselves. So no marriage, avoiding women who are prone to make false rape accusations and no children except for with a women who has passed very, very strong selection criteria.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:36 PM
2

Ah, I see. No, I don't think any redpiller would steal women away from betas if that's what you mean. I think we can agree that a women wants to be with a man she is attracted to. When such a man is not present or available, she may choose a male who is only useful to her (betabux) or not choose a man at all. Still, she won't be happy in either situation and she will be looking for the first ticket out of there. And that is going to happen sooner or later. If anything, a TRP man who snatches awa…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:28 PM
1

Hypothetically, yes. But not every man is going to get into PUA. Not every man is going to fight off his obesity. Not every man is going to have the intelligence level required to understand core TRP philosphy and not every man is going to have the heart to accept the harsh truths. Thus the bar for the 20% remains low and may even be lowered in the coming years. Understand this: TRP isn't laying out a solution for a working system, it's giving you the tools to be succesful in a flawed system. Id…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:17 PM
1

Anyway, no I was only saying that, just because TRP motivates men to become better versions of themselves, that doesn't mean those men will then treat the other men badly. If anything, they are more likely to motivate other men to step up their game.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:54 PM
1

Did you reply to the wrong comment of mine here? because I said no such thing here
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:51 PM
-1

Ah, an intelligent question. I admit, if you are sure you can't get into that 20% or close to it, TRP is not the place for you and MGTOW might be more interesting. Having said that, realize that at this moment, the threshold for that 20% is LOW. So many men have given up and are in bad shape that if you just go to the gym and get a muscular body you may already be in the hotzone (haha, pun sorta intended). Add some interesting hobbies, some game, a bit of personal style... So yeah, right now alm…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:45 PM
3

My man, if you state that there won't always be a top 20% of men then you don't understand how statistics work. The differences may be smaller, but that's not the point. If all men make a million a year then the women will fight over those who make 1.01 million. Hypergamy isn't a theory, it's a biologically accepted fact. And never will men be 'taught' to be attracted to a women who doesn't behave like a women, nor will women be 'taught' to be attracted to non masculine men. At best they will be…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:12 PM
1

I'll admit that in the community a lack of morality is a bit of an issue. There was a big debate about that recently. However, the ECs and mods seem to support a more moral and constructive mindset. I do as well. In general, as a person who frequents the sub, I do not see that destructive aspect that much. About the 80/20: this is unfortunately a reality we have to deal with. You must realize we will never be completely equal; there will always be better men than others, there will always be a '…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:59 PM
0

Can't say I agree much with you, but you make some interesting points. On the gender roles: too bad you don't support them. I'd say two people specialising in their own things is always better than two people doing exactly the same. People themselves seem to want this as well. Ever seen the first part of the documentary Hjernevask? People from the most liberal (as in 'free') countries allign themselves more along gender roles, not less and they appear to be happier for it when looking at polls. …
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:33 PM
2

There's what they say, and then there's how YOU interpret what they say. TRP often promotes chauvinism... No, they promote gender roles. They aren't saying men are better, they are saying men are better at some things while women are better at other things, and there's equality in that. they are saying women should stop trying to compete with men and start to compliment them (as in, doing other things). Saying that men should lead doesn't mean that they view women as lesser beings. ...at times m…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 05:53 PM
-1

I'd say the status quo used to be better. From what I can tell things were going pretty well between the sexes around 2nd wave feminism. But the roots of misandry seem too deep nowadays. With so many families broken or not even formed because of this, the near future seems bleak. Very bleak. Perhaps we can find balance one day. I hope to live to see the day.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 04:56 PM
0

It's sad. The subs have far more in common than they'd like to admit it seems. What I can understand however is that, for a movement like the MRA who try to influence society, being associated with the TRP sub is dangerous since they refuse to conform to political correctness. For TRP this is definitely a good thing, but for the MRM it's harmful. There is some logic behind the strong negative sentiments, but being ill informed about the other party's viewpoints and relying on prejudice certainly…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 04:46 PM
43

And when you do find out you have that power, I have to say... The sheer extent of it is unreal. When a girl/women has decided you're the man she wants to fuck, she'll allow you to take control of pretty much any aspect of her life. I can honestly say that it scares me sometimes to see how easily they completely surrender and become dependent. It is not in my nature to take advantage of this, so I deal with it with a sense of responsibility and honor. The quote 'with great power comes great resp…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 04:28 PM
2

When it comes down to it, RP men who see themselves as "alpha" will treat other men they see as "beta", with as much disdain and disposability as any other woman/feminist would. This is a rather huge assumption. Ever considered it might not be true? We all know how fucked up society is. There is no disdain to anyone who is still trapped in that. I see your reasoning, but it is flat out wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:58 PM
1

True, but that is an ideallist view. You are right, we should not be competing against each other. But that isn't the reality. Women have been competing against men. They have been trying to 'win' And they have been largely succesfull too. We fight, not because we want to, but because we have to. We have to fight for fair education for men. We have to fight for fair divorce laws. We have to fight for fair and equal judgements in court. And we have to fight to restore balance between the sexes. Y…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:28 PM
4

I agree with you and upvoted, but I have a problem with one element: PUA see's women as a goal, as something to be manipulated (seduced when women do it). TRP see's women the same way, minus the long term relationship bullshit. TRP is basically PUA's who understand women. If you don't agree with TRP, fine with me, but at least do it for the right reason. What you state here is simply not true. TRP is about as far from 'putting pussy on a pedestal' as you can get, which is also why they distance …
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:19 PM
4

It is, so I urge you to correctly interpret this analogy from now on, at least within this sub. The way you interpret it, it would NEVER be a good idea to use it. Why would it be discussed then on this sub? You go ahead an tell everyone then that they should use 'scorched earth policy' instead of going nuclear. In the meantime, understand what the people here mean by it.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 01:01 PM
6

Going nuclear means nothing more than destroying every possible opportunity to further associate with a women. Cutting off all ties, so to speak. Nowhere is it implied that you have to be overly theatrical about the whole thing. I think you misunderstand the analogy. Going nuclear isn't about you yourself 'exploding' (anger, yelling and stuff), it's about the destruction of it. Permanently laying waste to the grounds it hits. By going nuclear the girl becomes 'radiated wasteland' that you can no…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 12:48 PM
5

MRAs work on a national scale. They try to improve the lives of men by working the system. TRP works on an individual level. They give you the tools to adapt to the world we live in. This is where words like 'alpha' and 'beta' come from: people who are adapted, and people who are not. You both see little value in the non-MRM manosphere, because you're only looking at it from a large scale. But if you don't adapt on an individual level as well, you are missing out. You won't hear me say that you …
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:35 PM
0

I was looking for this, unfortunately it's a bit burried here. So I've come to say that you are right. These different movements can be fully explained by having different objectives, and each has merit to the manosphere. Since this vid covers TRP, I'd say to everyone reading this: Yes, there is a lot of anger there in the community. Yes, you may not agree with every statement there. But where elements of the MRM help you on a national scale, elements of TRP will help you on an individual level.…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:25 PM
2

Eh? going nuclear =/= yelling. Only making sure she is aware she doesn't have OPs interest. More like sending her off in a cold manner.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 11:45 AM
1

Thanks for the good laughs ^^
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 11:12 AM
2

Sorry, I meant overthinking as in thinking it over. I support philosophizing. Good you already saw the vid. It seems we're on the same line here.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:16 PM
1

Yes. Since you're so strongly overthinking this, may I suggest you watch the first episode (and perhanps then some more) of the Norwegian documentary Hjernevask? Not too long and really insightful. It covers, among other things, why equality in outcome is in fact less in the most liberal countries. You may thank me later.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:27 AM
2

Do I agree women need to stop being passive beings and start contributing to society and doing what they want to do in life? I certainly do. But you won't see me cheering them on to engage in programming. If that's what a woman wants to do? By all means. But for the future of society, I think we need to stop pushing (but ofc keep allowing) women into the workforce and accept that a lot of them serve society and their own interests better by running a decent household first and foremost. Equality…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 05:40 PM
12

Actually, there is more and more evidence that it isn't the animal fats that cause the vascular damage. Instead, fructose is to blame, and especially the US diet is packed with this substance. IIRC alcohol is another big contributor, but the way it looks now it isn't the fats. (They don't elevate the subtype of LDL cholesterol associated with heart attacks) Meat and eggs are probably perfectly safe. Can't be too careful though with salt and fructose (as a part of table Sugar and HFCS) intake. Of…
/r/RedPillWomen25/05/15 05:16 PM
5

Women face misogynistic attitudes (and men face just as much misandry, probably more), oppression (largely debunked and certainly not more than men), othering (so do men), objectification (so do men, only less as sexual objects, and more as worker drones, which is just as bad), subordination to paternalist norms (largely debunked, perhaps once, but we live in a mostly gynocentric society nowadays), a life of subjectivity and of feeling inessential (by their very own agency, not because of the op…
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:04 PM
1

There is no certainty in life. We at TRP deal in probabilities. So no, there's no certainty a slut will cuckold you. But a monogamous women can't cuckold you by the very definition of monogamous. So what we have here is an increased risk. You asked why sluts are viewed in a negative way. As I explained, this is for a large part due to the cuckolding risk, and I agree with u/Piroko that risk of divorce accounts for a second major share. Sluts are bad for any serious investments. Biology imbedded …
/r/askTRP25/05/15 01:42 PM
1

And to add to this: you're overlooking children. If a man is promiscuous it is still up to the women whether they want to have kids with HIM. And with birth control they are usually not having those kids. If a women is promiscuous however, there is the risk involved that a man spends a HUGE amount of time and resources on a child that isn't actually his.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 11:08 AM
1

Whatever you want it to be. Biologically speaking you're only here to spread your genes, so whatever other meaning you want to attribute to it is up to you. If anything, try to create more in life than you destroy. That's my 2 cents.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 10:58 AM
1

This is absolutely vital. If you want to engage in a serious LTR, the absence (not scarcity) of red flags is much more important than positive traits the woman posesses. It is way easier to cultivate positive traits than to supress negative ones.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 10:53 AM
1

Turns out, the term 'sexual strategy' is used in a very broad sense in this sub, as explained once by u/redpillschool in the comment section of a 'direction of the sub' post. In this sub we discuss sexual strategy, but interpret this as 'any theory that helps improve the lives of the members of our sex (i.e. men). 'Its meaning is not limited to 'strategy for getting sex'.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 10:49 AM
2

No, but nationalism can be found in the far right as well as the far left, and conservatism isn't necessarily bound to the right wing. It just so happens that's mostly the case in the US. 'left' or 'right' is mainly determined by ideas/actions involving the economy. A huge amount of control on where the money flows? Thus a big government to regulate this? That's left. This is where we find Putin. (And also feminist male -> female wealth transfer). A free market where taxes are used solely for go…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 11:23 PM
2

The jokes you can get away with really depend on the crowd you're in. You overestimated their threshold, and pretty badly too it seems. Time for damage control. "whoa people it was a joke, wasn't meant to be taken seriously" Protip: refrain from engaging in rape jokes. Subject's too sensitive.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 10:15 PM
1

Well that's solved then. A more personal opinion (yet one I think is widely shared within TRP): cheating is weak. Fuck as many as you want, but don't agree to exclusivity if that isn't what you're after.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 10:00 PM
1

To lend my perspective... I would never, NEVER put even the slightest effort in pursuing a girl who chose a friend of mine over me. She made her choice, and it wasn't you. If she comes to you, pump and dump if it doesn't compromise your friendship with the guy. Bros and hoes 'n stuff. Don't date, don't plate, don't validate. Fuck if appropriate.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 08:53 PM
4

And then you realize you need a home of stone, with fine clay interior elements and a patch of fertile dirt around it that isn't too large nor too small. Be the rock, be the clay, be the dirt. Apply its strenghts, cancel out its weaknesses. That shall be your full potential.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 07:57 PM
9

As glad as I am that you are doing so well, this isn't a field report. This is a thankTRP thread. The little takeaway at the bottom doesn't compensate for this. You have to understand that you're competing with valuable posts for spots on the front page. Again, great job on the progress, but it'd be better if you don't post this stuff here.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 07:32 AM
1

As much as humans are biologically selfish, so are we social creatures. Societies formed because this social drive was stronger than the individual selfish drive. A society in which morality is highly valued isn't an utopia, it was once reality. Agreed, a 100% moral society can't exist. Of course there have always been thieves and cheaters, but the latter was once way more strongly condemned. What I can understand is if you feel so let down by society that you no longer wish to support it any mo…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 12:06 PM
3

I'm interested in what caused the breakup. Care to elaborate?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 11:49 AM
8

It seems you have no idea what is happening in SE Asia at the moment. They have a whole culture now of transsexual men and the men in general behave ridiculously feminine. What you speak of is happening.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 11:41 AM
1

Could you please elaborate on why you think she's an alpha widow? You more or less answered this yourself already. I mean alpha widow in the broad sense of the word here, i.e. that she now knows a lifestyle that -while destructive- provides excitement far beyond what a normal day to day life can offer. Far beyond what you can offer. Raving, drugs and bad boyfriends may be detrimental to a healthy and balanced life, but they also provided her insane thrills. There is a reason after all that she e…
/r/askTRP20/05/15 11:04 PM
1

I knew it. Let me start by saying that you're contradicting yourself. First you say you know you can do better, and now you state that your current gf is in fact 10x superior. Which one is it? If she is still that much better than the other girls you have been dating, then it's not that she's so great, it's that the other ones were even worse. You need to examine why that is, and it should not be an excuse to stick with this one. You bring up over and over again that you're convinced she isn't a…
/r/askTRP20/05/15 10:35 PM
1

So, after all this advice that has been given, I want to hear from you: what are you actually going to do now? what's the plan? You've had the story examined from pretty much every angle, what are you going to do with it? I want to hear this from you, because to be honest I'm not sure if you fully grasp the gravity of the situation you're in.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 10:03 PM
1

I think at the very bottom of this is a fear of not being able to pull other girls. A scarcity mentality. Be very honest to yourself now; how much time and effort have you spent on improving yourself? Your physique, but also your hobbies/interests? Have you improved your social skills? Or were to content too quickly because you found a girl already? The best way to get over her is to realize you are better and you can get better girls than her.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 06:42 PM
1

You have your epiphany. Be strong, and know that one day you'll look back with gratitude to what you learned today.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 06:26 PM
1

I'm sorry mate, truly am. Considering the statistics and what's at stake, I think you should reverse the question: is there a way to determine if she is not an alpha widow. And I wouldn't know of any way to do so. We'll be here to support you after te breakup, that's all I'm afraid. Ever heard of the 'sunk cost fallacy'? May be relevant.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 06:24 PM
1

I know, and I feel you. But you're only adding to the list of red flags at this point. The pitfall is that at this point she will genuinly believe she moved on. But this mindset will not hold. She can think like this now because she isn't bored, because there is no other temptation and because there isn't any hardship. It is not a question of 'if' but 'when' this will come around only to poison the relationship.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 06:15 PM
2

If you read the sidebar then you know how many red flags surround this girl. Red flags indicate underlying problems which will pop up eventually and are difficult/impossible to overcome. You have read the theory, you know what the RP stance on this is. You're just afraid to do it, so you're trying to rationalize the flags away. I know, this makes it all very real very suddenly, and breaking up with her is going to be very tough on your part. But there is no other way. Accept this and move on.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 06:11 PM
1

Get this in your head: partner count is irrelevant at this point. What's going to fuck things up is the exitement she had with her previous partners doing god knows what. She lived the partyworld lifestyle. Everything else is going to become boring in comparison. She probably convinced herself right now that she doesn't want that anymore -that is also why she will seem so genuine- but whenever she'll be bored, sooner or later her partyworld fantasies will reintroduce themselves. And you are not …
/r/askTRP20/05/15 06:04 PM
1

I can be very short in this. She has lived in PartyWorld and she was in deep. She is almost by definition an alpha widow because of this. There is no point in making an alpha widow an LTR, no matter how much alpha you yourself are. I'd say fuck her all you like but don't ever invest in her, however it seems you passed that point. For the sake of your future, cut her off.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 05:57 PM
12

At this point, if she is any bit of a decent human being, be there for her. Support her. Take care of her. Even though you haven't been dating for a long time, she deserves this for being your girlfriend. Forget about being 'alpha' right now, be the stoic man she can cling on to in this emotional vortex. When the dust starts to setlle you can make decisions about the relationship status.
/r/askTRP20/05/15 05:50 PM
1

Yeah yeah, we get it. So you don't value teamwork. It seems you'd rather go back to the laws of nature where the strong prey on the weak. Well let me tell you this: it is teamwork -strong men working together under a moral code- that allowed a structure of society to exist in the first place. A sense of morality is the glue that holds larger groups of people together. It was teamwork that allowed us to advance as a species, teamwork that gave us todays astounding medical technology, teamwork tha…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 04:36 PM
2

But when it all boils down to one man and one woman, on an even playing field, fucking each other - just leave morality out of it. It's the wrong word. It's rude. It's unbecoming. It's a lot of things. But 'immoral' isn't one of them. I'm not sure what you mean with 'on an even playing field' but in any case, you're oversimplifying. If a man and a women, both single, have sex then indeed morality isn't in the picture. But if a man and a women have engaged in a contract of monogamy - be that verb…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 03:03 PM
1

Looks like you fully understand it. It appears morality is just too complex a subject for many.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 02:28 PM
0

I know I'm not going to convince you, but nevertheless. State my arguments are bad all day if you like, that doesn't make them so. Besides that, your definition of ad hominem is off. I never attacked you personally, I used a conditional approach. Compare: you're an asshole, with: you're an asshole if you steal from someone. It seems to me like your ego is in the way. I'm done discussing with you.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 01:59 PM
2

Well, allow me to be honest with you here then. No, it isn't, not even close and you utterly failed to see the bigger picture. This discussion of morality isn't about some guy fucking my wife, this discussion is about some guy pulling a scam on your highschool teacher. About some guy stealing from the house of your tailor. About some guy fucking the wife of your nearby grocery store owner. How do you think these people are going to respond? As I stated in my other comment, morality serves societ…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 10:16 AM
0

Yes you do. You depend on clean drinking water? Then you have a responsibility to not pollute it. You depend on freedom? Then you have a responsibility to allow others this freedom too. You depend on schools, laws, roads that are maintained, that grocery shop in your area, I.E. society? Then you have a responisibility to adhere to a moral code in order to keep that society healthy. Turns out that road builder, grocery owner, judge and teacher, they need a stable home environment. They need a cul…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 09:49 AM
-1

Well, fair enough. If you have lost all trust in society I can see why you wouldn't value a moral code outside of your circle of friends and family very much. Still, I hope you can see where I'm coming from here. There are still plenty of people who value society, and they are going to need to work together within a wider moral frame to keep the wheels turning. I'm sorry to hear things are that fucked up in the US. At least for now it's not as problematic here in Europe.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 09:22 PM
-2

If you value society, then you also have a responsibility towards it. If you don't value it, perhaps instead of shitting and leaching on it, you pack your stuff and move. I am well aware that I cannot counter immoral behaviour, so indeed any statement condemning it is useless. I will not swallow my opinion on this matter though.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 09:14 PM
-2

A fair question. Perhaps the best answer to that is this: because there isn't a better alternative. What are we going to do? Enjoy the decline? (I know that unfortunately the answer to this question will be 'yes' for some). I wholeheartedly agree that society treats men badly, but it is easy to focus on the negative and forget about all the useful and functional aspects of society. The way I see it we can either deal with the problem in the best way we can, find our way and start to invoke chang…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 09:07 PM
5

Remember, whatever cheating wive rate we have now is still contained by a moral system. There is a potential for much higher numbers if we leave it to female instincts. Besides, you don't need a 0% marriage rate for society to bleed. I don't agree with your statement of this being an argumentum ad absurdum. If enought people abandon morality the consequences will be severe. And fuck off with your assumptions. I say there is a very good reason people have moral standards, I say these standards ca…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 08:54 PM
-5

Well.. sorry but no. As you more or less stated, morality serves society. Society isn't your group of friends. It isn't your family, it isn't your neighbor. Society is the stranger, the guy you don't know, the one you have no reason yet to trust. And still, because they are all part of the same system -if you value this society at all- you must adhere to the same moral codes with them as with any other. Moral codes are simply a rephrasing of what benefits society and what does not. And at the en…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 08:38 PM
1

At least now we're talking somewhat civillised. You stated an opinion. Fair enough. But I say that this opinion goes against TRP philosophy as found in the very sidebar. (direction of the sub). Since we are in askTRP, not askkingofpoplives, perhaps it's better to refrain from stating opinions that run against TRP core theory. I'll leave it at that. To quote: (by Softharem (M)) Girlfriend game Not exactly something we're known for, but I think there is enough demand that it is relevant. Women wor…
/r/askTRP19/05/15 08:14 PM
0

Now you're just behaving like a feminazi brat who resorts to ad hominem attacks because you ran out of reason to use. Pathetic.
/r/askTRP19/05/15 07:53 PM
2

I hinted at this when I said: 'if you are dependent on a well functioning society...' So yeah, I fully agree with your hypothesis. If society has nothing to offer you, then why offer society anything in return. But I find it hard to inmagine anyone would prefer to live in such a situation, so the foundation for the moral codes remains.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 07:49 PM
1

As others have mentioned: have some fun with her, ride it out for a while, but realise this is not going anywhere. By the little information you have provided I can already tell she isn't LTR material. She's older then you, not very good looking and in all likeliness values her career over being a good companion. Why would you even want to LTR her? It seems you are looking for something more serious. That is fine, but never forget that you must be EXTREMELY selective when it comes to women you i…
/r/askTRP19/05/15 07:37 PM
0

TRP encompasses three major sexual strategies. Plate spinning (AKA the soft harem), MGTOW and LTRs. Each of these strategies has value and inherent pros and cons. Whatever works for a person depends completely on said person. Don't make the mistake again to think yours is the only one, or the only valid one TRP backs. That doesn't mean I consider the woman OP speaks of LTR worthy material.
/r/askTRP19/05/15 07:29 PM
9

You make some interesting points, but your entire thread seems to be built around the premise that morals are entirely subjective, bound to an individual. Something, therefore, that reason doesn't apply to. I see this fundamentally different. Allow me to share my view. The way I see it, morals are at their very core a set of rules that follow a clear format; If you (don't) do this, then I will/won't do so as well, and then we both benefit. And then these rules are applied on a large scale. You d…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 06:43 PM
1

And the fact I see this downvoted is why I sometimes have my doubts.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 03:56 PM
0

I agree with you more than you might realize. First off, I said it isn't their default modus, I never said women aren't capable of rational thought. As a group, they swing more to the short thinking (immoral) behaviour. This is also I think what OP meant when he said women are immoral. Having said that, I have met plenty of women who were great rational thinkers. They just throw it overboard easier in favour of emotions. There are exceptions to every generalisation of course. I admit some here f…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 03:11 PM
2

It is not about about showing your strength. It is about living a meaningful life. You can choose to be a parasite, taking what you can through means of strength at the cost of others. And this lifestyle might work for you. But there are people who choose not to be a parasite. People who realise how important society is and realise men need to work together in a constructive, not destructive, mindset to keep it working. There is strength in making that choice. Choosing not for what is easy, but …
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 02:43 PM
1

I guess you could see everything as an animal instinct that way. True. Allow me to be more specific then. When I was talking about letting animal instincts rule, I meant following immediate incentives without long term thought. You could argue we have evolved a higher rational 'long term thinking' instinct which can supress our (lower instinct) urges for short term gains, in favour of the bigger picture. Morality can only exist if we are able to supress these urges by means of rational thinking.…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 01:42 PM
2

By imposing male moral values upon them, as we have done for milennia. If we fail to do so and let animal instincts rule, that will be the end of society.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 10:38 AM
4

I consider this one of the most important written pieces. It is the bridge between RP philosophy and real world application of this theory. This had to be written, but you see the backlash it gets. Only the most prominent of RP writers can get such a message across without it being burried immediately, so I'm glad you took it upon yourself to write this article. How's the book coming along?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 10:32 AM
1

Although you are technically right... In this sub we first and foremost discuss what you CAN do. Stating how the world works and how you can act in it. This is the amoral side of things. But it is easy to mistake this for something that you also SHOULD do. This is where moral matters come into play. Morality is what keeps a society healthy and whether you like it or not, we are all part of that society and dependent on it. People advocating going rogue and dropping any sense of responsibility al…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 10:19 AM
3

I disagree. At its very foundation, a moral code is nothing more than a 'you do/don't do this, I will/won't do the same, and we both benefit' applied on a large scale. You don't murder me, I don't murder you. You don't steal from me, I don't steal from you. You be honest, I will as well. And then we both benefit. In this sense it's highly rational and there isn't a need for any higher authority to impose these values on us. In fact we have an inborn understanding of these matters. But then, natu…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 10:05 AM
11

I will only say that I have waited a long time for this article. You have my gratitude.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 04:47 PM
1

As many stated, if you want to fuck her just make a move. However: It sounds like this women might be approaching the wall and is desperately looking to lock down a partner. Women normally aren't that assertive. Be very careful with this one, she will likely turn vicious when she finds out you only want casual sex. Obviously don't LTR her.
/r/askTRP16/05/15 08:53 AM
1

Aren't the children tying our fates together so much that marriage is negligible, or at most, on par? Whatever reason you would have to get married would need to compensate for the fact that you will risk 50%+ of what you own +alimony/CS if she decides to divorce you one day over the next 50 years. If you didn't live in the US things might be different, but realise in the US the institute of marriage gives your wife a financial incentive to divorce. If you live in a state where you would become …
/r/askTRP16/05/15 08:39 AM
1

There is no right and wrong in meanings of words, there is only consensus in how to use it. Within this sub, the consensus is as I stated. Don't like it? Create your own RP forum.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:16 PM
-2

I'd encourage you, if not for the sex work. You and your parents are severely misguided. I see no point in further debating, so i'll leave it at this. Feel bad for the beta.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 07:03 PM
0

Call it sad, it still is the truth.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:57 PM
-2

Theres a whole lot between a cashier and a neuroscientologist my dear. Plenty of well paying jobs. Work the ladder within a company for example. Considering that, yes, that would be much better. As a man, can't even begin to tell you how much. But don't worry. Have a cookie. You'll start feeling better. You'll remember you don't believe any of that RP crap. By the time you have finished it, I guarantee you'll feel right as rain.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:55 PM
-5

Well, i can only hope for you that it won't fuck up your future as much as i highly expect it will.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:43 PM
-2

It is very well doable to support yourself and be independent without the degree. In your mind the degree is worth working in the sex industry. That is a mistake, a big one. But one that has been made already unfortunately.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:39 PM
-2

Your relationship with your parents is amazing, they make enough money, and yet they can't support you, forcing you into sex working? Something is missing here. If I were a father i'd live out of my car before my daughter would end up in your field.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:31 PM
1

If you will allow me I'd like to leave one last question here. There's no way around it, it will be a bit harsh. Since you mentioned you like to find a good husband: You have some things working against you. You have a history of being a sex worker, you have asperger, you have a bad relationship with your parents, you do drugs and as I interpret you don't have much interest for the typical feminine stuff. My question to you is: why would a guy pick you over another girl? What can you offer to co…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 06:12 PM
3

You are distracted by dollar signs. That was once, you can't pull the stuff they did anymore. The book is a nice story of times past. Treat it as such and let it go. If you wish you can always invest the money you make as an MD.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 05:41 PM
1

Glad to hear you're working on it. Remember: muscles are built by working out, but weight it lost by adjusting your diet. Cutting out sugar is one of the most important things. Still, a healthy body is not the endgame. It's a means to an end. And almost anyone here will agree that there are way more interesting things to enjoy than porn or games. Figure out what it is that you want to do, and then find out how you're going to accomplish it. The women will follow naturally. Whether you want to ha…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 12:35 PM
3

It's always a balance of risk vs reward. I think the great thing about the medical field is there are high rewards with relatively low risks. You only need to invest a bit more time. Of course, it won't make you a billionaire, but if you go down that path there's also a way, WAY bigger chance you won't make it and end up with less means than you'd have had as a doctor. You'd have to do do pretty well as an entrepreneur/investor to bypass the earning potential of a doctor and it will probably giv…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 12:04 PM
1

I didn't want to be a gold digger with no skills or qualifications Ah, a noble goal but you're wrong here. I'm absolutely dead honest when I say men don't care about your degree or non-feminine skills. If you can be loving, caring and know how to run a house properly you'll have all the skills you need. I realise you are in a very fucked up situation. I do hope you find a way to get your life on the rails. At least you'll be out of the industry in 6 months, see if you can do this sooner by findi…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 11:30 AM
-2

I've always wanted to be a housewife and make my man happy If that is really what you want, then I can only cheer you on for it. But why are you in university then? Your degree is never going to pay off, and men won't think any higher of you because of it. You are a clever girl, so even without the university degree you will be able to find a job to support you for now. When you have your life on the rails, then you can look for the guy to share it with.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 11:19 AM
0

Past sex work does not equal disloyalty. I know it's tough, but by all statistical means, yes, it does. I'm sorry. This is how people will think of you, and that is the price you pay for being a sex worker. Maybe you think differently about it. Good luck convincing the rest of the world.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 11:06 AM
-1

I understand your situation a bit better now, thanks. And that sucks. However, you might not fully understand how this is going to fuck up the rest of your life. As much as I would encourage people to study, your degree might not be worth what you're now sacrificing. You should seriously consider dropping out, finding a normal job and finding a suitable husband to support you. Perhaps then you can consider studying again. Or perhaps part time instead? EDIT: also, have you talked with anyone at t…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 11:02 AM
-1

You asked why men would consider you damaged goods. As I explained, this is because they can't look inside your head and they realise you're a statistical liability. Even if they don't realise this conciously, evolution gave men an instinct to not commit to promiscuous women. Sex workers fall under this category. At the very least from the viewpoint of men, it has everything to do with your future loyalty. You say you need it to pay for the bills, I don't think so. I think you need it for a bigg…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 10:58 AM
-4

And regarding the 'needing it to pay for the bills' aspect: and how are other people your age managing it then? Are you simply living a too luxurious life or what? In almost any country I know of you can borrow from the state to pay for your time in college. And if you don't expect to be able to repay this debt with your future job, then you will have to conclude your education is worthless and quit it.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 10:14 AM
0

Why am I damaged goods? Because the more men you've been with, the less likely you are to remain faithful to one. And that likelyhood has immensely dropped for you at this point. Any guy who chooses to stay with you has a higher chance his investments in the relationship will be wasted. More importantly, he has a higher risk the kids he raises aren't his. You might say you are not like this, that you are different. But how well do you know how you'll be in 20 years? In reality, you can only hope…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 10:08 AM
2

Fortunately for you the vast majority of men are RP unaware, and they'll be willing to settle with you if you behave like a proper RP women. They probably told themselves over and over that it's wrong to judge a girl on her past. I think the more important question here is if you can really settle down and not look back. It's going to be boring compared to the thrill you're in now. Most people would call you an 'alpha widow' at this point. Don't ruin a man's life if you're not absolutely certain…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 09:58 AM
1

The vanguard ones appear to be those who contribute the most in writing new RPT posts and/or are experts on a certain part of it.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 09:01 AM
1

Any girl that has had an abortion because her partner isn't ready to support the child is a fucking saint. There are way too many state-leeching single mothers out there already. Fuck off.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 10:39 AM
1

Some life skills off the top of my hat: Wilderness backpack hiking. Learn to be able to spend a few days in nature. Take a friend with you, don't go alone. This will teach you a LOT about cutting things out you don't need and it's great for your physical condition. If you live in an area where you can do fishing/hunting while being out there, do it. Do a course in watersports. Sailing, (wind/kite)surfing, or go canoeing (can be combined with the first one). Woodworking. Awesome and useful. Cooki…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 10:25 AM
1

Find a hobby, something new, and devote much time to it. Life skills are forever.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 10:11 AM
1

I see. It's very easy to interpret differently though. The kind of fake smile people put up when they don't actually like you or think you belong there. Maybe say nothing if you have nothing to say.
/r/askTRP11/05/15 07:04 PM
2

TRP encompasses three major sexual strategies: Plate spinning, LTRs and MGTOW. All have their place here. Plate spinning may be the most popular, but never again try to act like you represent the only one. And maybe you should refrain from representing TRP at all, considering your apparent knowledge on the subject. You have some reading to do.
/r/askTRP11/05/15 06:15 PM
2

Something isn't mentioned here, and I feel that's the most important thing. (BTW, I'll assume you mean a monogamous LTR, just so we're clear.) If you're looking for a LTR you will need to be extremely selective. Do not underestimate the importance of this. There are LTR worthy girls out there, but you're fishing in a tiny pond. If you enter a serious LTR you're going to invest a huge amount of time, money and effort and you need to make sure she's worthy of this. Know all the Red Flags by heart.…
/r/askTRP11/05/15 06:09 PM
1

I see you understand AWALT. I'm glad you do. Apparently I have failed to let you see I do aswell, nor did my opinion on the matter come across right. I am not further debating here, if you want to understand my thoughts on AWALT then I would redirect you to the recent thread 'the importance of awalt' by EC u/fluviant. First comment.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 05:04 PM
1

Prepare for the most popular opinion of the day. To be honest I'd say avoid both. The army? I have deep respect for the people who can endure that and they're damn important in the grand scheme of things, but as a soldier you're a pawn who's sent out in one condition only to return in another (if at all) and to be left to rot afterwards. If your injuries aren't physical, be prepared for the mental ones. As it stands you have a higher risk of dying by suicide then by combat, IIRC. And then the fr…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 04:44 PM
3

Grow up bro. You sound like a kid who hasn't discovered responsibility yet.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 04:16 PM
0

Read carefully before you comment next time.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 03:27 PM
1

And does that look like Concern trolling about other people being too concerned about other people concern trolling? Perhaps is does. LVL up.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 02:43 PM
1

Alright alright, kudos for taking it lightly I guess :P People are going overboard with the concern trolling accusations at the moment. It's used as a cheap way to silence opinions that aren't mainstream RP and as you can see that's kind of getting to me. The guy wants to raise a point. Can we let him be? That's all.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 02:38 PM
1

And you're not 'starting to get fat', You are overweight. Also, you're slightly over 1 BMI point away from being clinically obese. Fact.
/r/askTRP11/05/15 10:13 AM
1

Oh fuck you. He has made a point saying sex shouldn't be the end goal, nor should it be obsessed about and he is defending that statement. If we call this concern trolling then half of the discussion -the critical side- is done for. We might as well call it the Red chamber of echoes then.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 10:05 AM
2

Have you ever written (or considered writing) anything about your experiences as a father or with parenting? I know there is a special sub for that, but a detailled experience story of a true patriarch in the main sub would be a breath of fresh air considering all the plate spinning stories. Many of us still have ambitions to become a father one day, and it seems we can use all the help and advice we can get.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 08:59 AM
3

Listen up. Nevermind the girls at this point. You have to think long and hard about what you want with your life. Do you want to explore what the world has to offer? Do you want to create, instead of only consuming? Right now, you have a choice. But the path you're on now leads straight to diabetes, very limited physical capabilities and all around dependence on the medical sector, followed by a likely early miserable lonely death. If you don't want to be bound to your house and hometown by the …
/r/askTRP11/05/15 08:50 AM
6

Fuck, and if you don't doubt it, do it anyway.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 06:30 AM
5

You think you're being strong, standing behind the choice you make. In reality you are hamstering. You are weak, you are afraid. You should have no fear talking to any women, any person for that matter. It is your choice if you want to change this, but never have the illusion you're doing what you're doing now out of strength.
/r/askTRP11/05/15 06:11 AM
6

Make really, REALLY sure you aren't rationalising because you can't get any.
/r/askTRP11/05/15 05:30 AM
1

I take it you live in the US? Only consider the university if it has a very good internationally recognized name and the overall costs are reasonable. Most universities over there aren't doing too well. That's what I can tell you from the intellectual side of things. If you have no problem with the risks of joining the Navy, you might consider doing now first what you can't do later I.E. the Navy. You can learn a trade later in life. But don't take my word for it, these are mere considerations.
/r/askTRP10/05/15 09:49 PM
7

Jezus man, looking back, were there any red flags? any at all?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 09:30 PM
10

The fact that you've got Archwinger impressed with your writing seems like an achievement on itself... I'd strongly consider writing that book, be it under a pseudonym. Appreciate the post, will use this knowledge later in life. Downvoted as requested.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 08:21 PM
4

Funny, I always thought you'd be Dutch, judging by the name. Germany is certainly one of the better places to be in Europe. The country is lagging behind a bit compared to the other countries I mentioned when it comes to mastery of English, but I'm sure the younger generation is catching up quickly.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 06:48 PM
2

Good laugh of the day. Aint no denying this now is there?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 06:17 PM
7

A fair point. Then again, There's a gap between forcing laws into the books and countries actually enforcing them. As is happening with the european anti piracy laws for example, very, very few convictions.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 06:13 PM
13

Exactly. for as far as I know countries like Denmark, The Netherlands, Belgium, and I think Norway and Germany too, are still pretty reasonable in their lawmaking. The people tend to speak English very well too, except for Germany maybe.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:33 PM
1

And I agree, not worth losing sleep over. Useful information though for decisions involving real estate, retirement and other major economic influences in your life.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:29 PM
1

You are aware that your post got removed right?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:26 PM
20

And if you do want to have kids, this is as good a reason to move out of the US as they come. Fortunately not every western country has laws and policies this fucked up. But things are not changing for the better.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 04:24 PM
1

My goal seems to always fall upon finding a life partner, but I understand that it is wrong to search for one. Am I forever damned to never enjoy the emotional side of things and only the physical side of relations? And if I do trick myself into enjoying emotions, I know that it is all short-lived and in vain. You have hit a common misconception here my friend. Allow me to clear things up. First of all, while MARRIAGE is universally thought of as a bad idea in TRP, this is not the case for LTRs.…
/r/askTRP10/05/15 04:17 PM
12

We have a saying in my country: one swallow in the sky doesn't make it summer. In other words: I place my bets on a tide that won't be turning for a long time to come.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 03:35 PM
1

If you adhere strictly to the truth a lot will follow naturally, for it is undeniable. If you let go of it, be it for an envisioned goal or for the sake of emotions, all bets are off.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 02:24 PM
2

Good points. Don't agree with your stance on the declining birth rates. Fuck racial arguments, but the impact on the economy and wealth of the western world is gonna be huge by all expectations. Big change you're a taxpayer. Increasingly fewer of those, and increasingly more elderly. That's something to be aware of. How relevant that is to this sub is a different matter.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 02:05 PM
2

The hamster, also known as the rationalization hamster, is all about -you guessed it- rationalizing. Inventing reasons for past actions that were not really executed because of said reason. The hamster is a necessity that comes with a mind that emotionally acts before it logically thinks. So at the end of the day, indeed the hamster just 'is'. If you want to talk about it in terms of right or wrong, good or bad, you will need to philosophize whether 'acting before thinking' is a bad thing. It is…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:25 AM
1

I think you mixed up 'deserve' with 'being entiled to'. The last one implies receiving something without doing anything for it.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:15 AM
2

Are we going to shoot down legitimate questions now because we simply 'don't care'? This is the biggest non-argument ever.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:05 AM
41

Fully agree. To add, I will leave this here: AWALT speaks of a limited and clearly defined set of tendencies all women share. The most important tendencies are: all women tend to look for AF/BB, all women are hypergamous in nature and all women have evolved to manipulate the men around them. By no means however does this mean the outcome for each women is the same. It all depends on their individual thresholds and how you handle these women. Realise that some women have much more favourable thre…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 08:03 AM
1

For the most part I agree with you... But you seem to be under the impression that women having mental disorders falls under the AWALT umbrella. I don't know what made you think that, but I can assure you no mod or EC has ever claimed this. From that assumption you are also forced to add NAWALT in the equation. If you look at my posts you will see I never claim NAWALT, just that there are some things AWALT doesn't cover.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 07:40 AM
1

I would redirect you to the post on AWALT by the EC u/fluviant on the front page right now. Since they have picked up on this, I will let it rest.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 07:22 AM
2

Can we please, please stop with suggesting a surrogate mother is a good option? This will leave you a single parent just like all the single mothers. How is that any different from women becoming single mothers by means a sperm donor? Society has forgotten how important fathers are in raising a kid. Let us not make the same mistake when it comes to mothers. A kid needs both.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 10:20 PM
2

Can't stress this enough. This needs more upvotes.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 10:15 PM
0

You have just shown your bias. You compare the legitimacy of the LTR to that of marriage. The first one can perfectly well be defended, the second one can not. It appears you're not the kind of guy who wants one. That's fine. However, you don't see me bashing on plate spinning or ONS either. In other words, AWALT is legit safe advice, for as far as YOU are concerned. This is of no use to me. To make things perfectly clear: I have no problem with AWALT being used where it can be used. All women a…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 07:30 PM
-1

Ok, forgive me for what's coming, I respect your thoughts on this very much, but I want to reverse it: 1/1000 rapes are officially diagnosed... I'm sure many more rape victims are out there. Actually, looking around me, I wouldn't be surprised if 1/10 men are potential rapists. Really, even if the numbers are really low... it's safer to assume all men are potential rapists. Whether you approve of it or not doesn't matter though. Women come here needing to realize that men are dangerous and take …
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 06:17 PM
0

AWALT should always be used. It means that a man will not miss the warning signs and red flags women put out there as easily. You say this, I do not agree. You can hand out the warning without the generalisation. You plea for twisting the message in order to get a stronger point across. Why imply all women are mentally messed up, when it's closer to 1/3 as you say? I understand where you're coming from, but to me this is no different from women making false claims about rape statistics to warn g…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 05:14 PM
-4

I would just like to see us stick to the facts. I have no problem with AWALT being used where appropriate, but in other cases a 'many women are that, be on the lookout' would suffice. This unnesessarily discredits LTRs as a viable sexual strategy.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 04:56 PM
1

Well, I'll be honest with you. I'd love to have a civilized talk about this, make an informative post, but after spending more than a year here I found that, to gain some attention, the nuanced way isn't going to cut it. At least not with this kind of material.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 04:32 PM
1

It has been done succesfully for god knows how many years. Still so in many places in the world.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 04:25 PM
2

I don't need your strategic advice, thank you. If you can't handle the language then go right ahead and leave. Besides, you are also trying to evade the fact you were flat out wrong in your first post.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 04:03 PM
1

I'm glad I found a sensible person here. Then you can also understand how it pains me to see such a large part of this sub in that state. Maybe I should give up on it, but I wasn't planning on doing so without trying to get this message out there. But it looks like I could use some upvotes...
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 03:58 PM
1

Be that as it may -I never said I didn't understand where it comes from- that is no reason this lack of clear thinking is to be allowed. Do we deal in truth? Or do we deal in sentiment?
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 03:45 PM
3

You're exactly the kind of guy my post is about. Your ignorance is astonishing. Have you even read Archwingers post? And you didn't read my post properly. I said it ISN'T about what our detractors think about us.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 03:25 PM
2

Good for her, but not something he should be bothered with.
/r/askTRP09/05/15 02:03 PM
18

No, of course all women aren't like these psycho cunts. (Edit: not saying NAWALT, but these types of behaviours/tendencies simply aren't covered by AWALT, know the limits in applying it.) There is a strong selection in which women are attracted to such a site, witness selection bias in full glory here. Having said that, it's an interesting perspective on how messed up women can be, and there are surely some among those who you'd never expect these kind of thoughts from. Stay vigilant people!
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 01:47 PM
2

True that, but I'm willing to wager this women is surrounded by red flags. There are more trustworthy ones out there with flags as green as grass, however admittedly rare. Never do it for them though, as you say, pursue your own goals. And always beware of the same underlying tendencies all women share (AWALT) and deal accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 01:21 PM
1

Was the actual term. It's listed officially as Alpha Man Of the Group in the Mod-made Glossary of Terms and Acronyms (2015) in the sidebar. So at the very least that's how we use it here. Have a problem with that? Contact the mods.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 01:12 PM
15

Welcome my friend, the world will never be the same for you. Don't forget to work on intellectual improvement as well; challenge yourself mentally by getting in uncomfortable situations and learning to deal with those. Best of luck!
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 12:57 PM
0

Two words: diminishing returns. After a certain point the rewards don't justify the investments anymore. That is where the line should be drawn if you have half a pair of brains. You talk about dumb fucks, this is hilarious to me. Know how to most effectively use your energy and investments. But I know I'm not going to convince you.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 12:44 PM
0

You're simplifying complex situations and promoting paranoia. Smart people balance risk and reward. I'll take the (extremely small) risk of being hit by a nuke for the reward of living close to my family in a well developed country, thank you very much. Have fun living in your desolate wasteland.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 12:38 PM
2

It's completely understandable from his POW, he's likely hosting the party to get with the girls. Go figure he doesn't want succesful competition. These are not the kind of friends you want to associate with. Leave him to his tryhard misery.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 09:45 AM
2

There's a whole bunch of beta celebrities out there. What's your point? Being beta is a failing strategy? Yeah, I think we got that. As in: all of us got that.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 09:40 AM
4

This exactly. Sounds like you're too shocked you found a HB8 willing to get naked with you and now you caught oneitis. Take on an abundance mentality and drop this chick.
/r/askTRP09/05/15 08:59 AM
8

What's the takeaway from this? Talk back if you're being insulted? Deflect shit tests? Sorry mate, this is a low quality post. Looks like you're mainly trying to brag about how you handled the situation, and there isn't much impressive stuff going on there.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 08:50 AM
2

As much as I am glad things are working for you, there's something you have to understand. Your posts are competing with other posts on the front page, and you have nothing new to add besides "I'm texting back less and it works". If you want to thank the people of TRP, do so in r/thanktrp. Best of luck to you but I will downvote.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 07:30 AM
1

I fully agree, thanks for the insight.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 07:17 AM
2

You fucking know what you should do then. There are no tricks, you have to start doing things. Try something new if that'll help you.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 10:42 PM
1

Yeah, pick one or more interesting hobbies and socialize with people. Sounds like you're missing the close intimacy. A warm and fun group of friends will help a lot.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 10:17 PM
4

You really need to be more selective in the subjects you talk about. First date and you talked about the red pill? We even tell our brethren not to mention it even to their best friends. And talking about the friendzone... Don't rely so much on words, let your actions speak for you.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 10:05 PM
1

I have a feeling he did
/r/askTRP08/05/15 09:50 PM
2

Not saying you need to go on a vacation far away, just a city at a comfortable distance. If you can't get a hotel room for 2 nights you don't have the money for going on dates either. As for hobbies... Photography? Could be a nice incentive to get out there, whether in the city or in nature. Woodworking is one that's often mentioned, chances are you can find a community workshop nearby? Learn to do some fancy cooking you can impress with? Hunting? Learn to play a music instrument or improve your…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 09:43 PM
1

One more thought; the date you thought went well but failed... Did you compliment her? said she was beautiful or something like that? More or less expressed your interest in her with words other than actions? Because you DONT want to do that No quicker way into the friendzone. Instead, make some teasing remarks. Talk down on her with a smile on your face. You get the idea.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 09:07 PM
1

I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on these kind of situations, mainly since I'm younger than you, but I have some thoughts for you nonetheless. What might really help you is to travel to a place you don't know, book a hotel for a night or 2, and try your luck there. Approach, go to a bar, whatever you like. There's a big chance you're subconciously hold back and stay in the role of the nice guy in fear of being judged by your environment. Going out of town might to wonders for your DGAF a…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 08:58 PM
1

Tiny steps mate. Tiny steps, controlled and one at a time.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 08:27 PM
13

If you're going to post, then please at least take the time to cut it into readable paragraphs. There is some truth to your post... Nothing I haven't read in the sidebar though. Perhaps it's more useful to others.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 08:25 PM
1

That still isn't a green light for you posting this here. Take it to 'TRP off topic' if you must.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 08:14 PM
2

Never, NEVER EVER, give lifestyle advice to anyone who isn't asking for it specifically. I know it will be hard, I know you want to help, but it will only backfire and nothing will change.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 08:07 PM
1

The way I read into this you are planning to make a long term commitment to your current gf, otherwise this wouldn't be an issue. The real question in that scenario is then: do you have a sufficiently strong grip on your girlfriend and do you trust her in her choice of friends (this one is very dubious for sure). If you do trust her, no problem. If you don't, DO NOT make a long term commitment to this women or start building up emotional distance while looking for other women.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:56 PM
2

I second this.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:48 PM
2

well, then all you need to ask yourself is if you want to take her there.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:46 PM
1

It is a tough one, but I can share my viewpoint with you. Changing behaviour, especially radically changing it, is one of the hardest things to do. Don't expect a magic solution that will turn it all around in no time. If you want to change behaviour, you'll need to set small, achievable goals, and then you raise the bar each time you complete a goal. You'll also need to make it a habit to work on your goals. An example: Goal (lvl1): Tomorrow, give a girl you don't know a compliment. Now make it…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:43 PM
2

I'd say make use of the DD offer. Remember, she comes along, she isn't your date. You can still do whatever you feel like doing. If you go to the party and chat up other girls aswell with her watching, now there's some potential to change things around. Throw some dread game in there! EDIT: something I missed at first: you were only planning to go to the party if she was willing to tag along? that's not a good mentality to have. Either you go, and she can come along if she likes, or you go do ot…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:23 PM
3

Even if women exist who lack said tendencies, then AWALT will still hold true for the vast, vast majority. The 'A' In AWALT stands for >95%. I hope you see this is why it's so useless to discuss NAWALT.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:15 PM
2

AWALT speaks of tendencies, doesn't mean there aren't women who suppress these or don't act on these for any number of reasons. She's a women, so she'll have a tendency to secure AF and BB. But perhaps she likes to have a pushover husband for max BB? Going after AF will jeoparidze that goal. Some girls have some fear for getting into AF situations as well. It's just theorising of course, I don't know her. The take home message however: AWALT means all women share some underlying tendencies. That…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:06 PM
-1

I get the bigger picture, thanks. It's not like I don't take agency for my actions and the life I live because of them. I just think OP goes too far with his examples, and that's too bad, because it distracts from the greater message.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 06:17 PM
1

Fair enough, and it's true that there's always something you could have done different. But there isn't always something you should have done different, taking into account the knowledge available to you at that time. Let it be known that I fully agree with you that we're not damsels in distress and that we should take responsibility for our actions and their consequences.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 06:12 PM
-1

Yes, but according to your statements, if nuclear war were to break out, it'd be my fault for not buying the shelter. That's nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 06:03 PM
0

You're stretching this reaaaaly far aren't you? Is it so hard to accept some things are out of your control?
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 06:01 PM
0

Put up rocks in your yard to divert cars from hitting you house, not an uncommon thing where i live Do I also need to purchase a bunker in case of a nuclear war? where do you draw the line? There are faults, and then there are things you really can't reasonably expect to prepare for. Do you also wear a swimming vest all day long in case of a sudden megaflood?
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 05:56 PM
9

Not everything bad that happens to you can be attributed to your wrongdoings. A guy can shoot you tomorrow in the street. Was that your fault then? The truth doesn't care what you 'believe' and what you don't. You, however, seem to be talking more about a life motto. Something like: Treat everything bad that happens to you as your personal fault, unless proven otherwise. That, I can get behind. Edit, to also mention: there is a difference between your 'faults' and your 'actions'. When you talk a…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 05:44 PM
1

Don't be naive, no TRP post is ever going to make it there. The front page is heavily edited.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 05:27 PM
1

If your whole point is to make another post proving AWALT, one of the most key concepts of TRP, then for the love of god don't bother. The signal to noise ratio is low enough as it is. Your posts are competing with other posts, so it's not always 'more is better'.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 05:15 PM
1

It's not wrong, what he says. The problem is he is judging her as a man. Treating her the way he wanted to be treated is probably why it failed. Or it was beyond saving in the first place because she was indeed messed up. There are god nows how many ticking time bombs out there. But they do not represent all women. That all women share key tendencies, I do not deny. You should know that's not how attraction works. Pandering to feefees earns you no respect or admiration. I'm not talking about inc…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 05:01 PM
1

It reminds me of a saying that goes somewhat like this: May I find peace and agreement with what I cannot change, may I find the strength to change what I can for the better, and may I find the wisdom to distinguish between the two. Note that this post only covers the first part.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 04:50 PM
2

Then I think we've come to an agreement. I doubt if everyone agreeing with this post added that mental asterisk though.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 04:44 PM
2

Hate to be 'that guy' but while it is a funny anecdote your sample size is near to non-existent. You have whores approach you; some are better than others. You may be right, but this is useless for any conclusions. Good you're following up though. Keep this kind of stuff off the sub and report when you have something that's statistically relevant.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 04:32 PM
3

While I do not deal in Yoga, I can identify with the anger towards people with such a child like mental framework -to use your words- but not because I ever thought like that. Not because it reminds me of my failings. I find these people repulsive, because their rationalising minds are immune to logic. This makes them unpredictable backstabbers who are useless to me in the first place because they're so self absorbed. Useless and a liabilty, hence the hate. I realise my personal feelings may not…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 04:01 PM
1

I don't know why you're being downvoted m8, you have my support.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 03:24 PM
1

Personally, I would see the Female TRP to be a return to "traditionalism". Exactly as it is already happening in r/redpillwomen.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 03:23 PM
0

I think you really, really got me wrong here mate. Allow me to clarify. I like to think I fully understand the core concepts of TRP. I did a lot of reading into it and have an academical mind to process them. (Edit to mention that I ofc also have experience with them). I believe we have a large influx of members who do not understand these concepts at all, but still throw the corresponding terms around in their posts, AWALT being one of them. "My girlfriend was messed up and I went along with it…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 03:14 PM
1

r/Redpillwomen. Do some reading here before you post stuff.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 03:05 PM
1

I'm afraid no studies exist -by my knowledge- that prove validation, social acceptance, is a biological need. Since in order to prove it, you would have to take it away first. Can't do that to human test subjects now can we? In that sense I'm theorising, but it's the most believeable theory I have. Some answers can only be found within yourself.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 02:43 PM
1

Maybe, but if that would imply, for example, pushing against the current marriage laws would only make it worse, I wouldn't want to have anything to do with Taoist belief. And I'm not even a MRA. Not anything should be blindly accepted. However, it is true many things should.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 02:34 PM
1

This will be the case for many things, but you have to understand my concern for it being a slippery slope that leads to blind acceptance of the world around us. What about the MRA movement for example? Many things are, and they should be accepted that way. Some things were made and may be imperfect, subject to needed change. Do you deny there are things worth fighting against? Aside from that I fully agree with your post.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 02:29 PM
-2

When used in that fashion it's very easily interpreted as "wow EVEN my women did that (cheating, manipulating, you name it) so now I'm sure ALL women will do that to you eventually." You'll see AWALT often in this context. That is simply not true, not the way AWALT is intended to be used and it will do more harm than good.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 02:15 PM
1

Mostly generic stuff I'm afraid, but one thing I can think of: Ask questions all. The. Time. Participate as much as you can. Just maintain a critical attitude, you'll do fine. Go forth and create!
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 02:07 PM
-1

But that's not how it's used all the time, now is it? I will do my part in reporting this stuff, but I think it's an issue to be aware of.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/15 09:33 AM
1

Mhm, you certainly have a point, but I hope you do realise he's shedding light on a legitimate issue we're facing.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 07:04 PM
6

To hell with PC speech and all the fem-centric social conventions. But with all the ridiculous ways AWALT, among other things, is thrown around here (Edit: by this I mean by naive new members), there is certainly some room for improvement.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 06:50 PM
1

That can be said for any game. Virtually all of them have some merit. Doesn't change anything.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 06:31 PM
1

Absolutely a great, high quality post, thank you for that. However, I have one problem with it. Because we do not live in a world in a natural state. There is unnatural technological/legal human intervention everywhere. By the natural way, women were never meant to have birth control. And men wouldn't need to spend years in school before they could become valuable for society. The balance is already upset. Indeed, many things should be accepted as they are and doing so will leave you better off …
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 05:34 PM
6

Thank you for that, my favorite applied-reason post of the day.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 04:48 PM
6

My first thought is that, if you still have to ask after reading my post, you still have a lot of work to do. You're asking questions, that's good, but askTRP might be a better place to go to. Have you read the sidebar? The misandry bubble and the RP antibiotic nuke in particular? We can give you advice, we can aid you in becoming a better man, but you have to take the initiative, you will need to do it all in the end. We're not here to hold your hand, and judging by your post you're still looki…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 04:16 PM
3

It is plain crazy to follow these factors for every date but I’d rather not take the risk of a bad date. Even though I am a planner myself too, that right there is a lack of abundance mentality, no way around it. I cannot approve of this post.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 04:06 PM
5

I understand your sentiment. It could have been written by myself. The anger, the complete lack of understanding AWALT, little critical thinking, conspiracy theories, cult like behavior and on it goes. Still, I chose to stay. In fact I have become more active now than I have ever been. These people need to be shown the true way, the right way. In a sense, if you indeed are one of the more critical minds around here, we need you now more than ever. Consider it.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 03:40 PM
1

"TLDR: She's cheating, All Women Are Like That" Then tell me how I am supposed to read this. You're delusional.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 03:16 PM
19

It is tempting to categorize things as alpha or beta, but you must understand that things are often too complicated for that. If you like to play a game every now and then to wind off, no one is stopping you. In that regard it's just like making a puzzle or reading a fiction book for pure entertainment. But when it hinders you in your efforts to improve yourself, when it pulls you away from the things you should be doing, then it surely is behavior that needs to be eradicated.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 03:06 PM
3

Oh yes, women too are suffering under the comfortable lies and half truths echoing around. The hangover may hit them even harder, but until it does the world bathes them in wealth and sex, free of any responsibilities. The bluepill state is like a continuous hangover starting from day 1 for men.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 02:50 PM
0

I will interpret as I wish. If the man disagrees with my statements he is more than welcome to share his viewpoint. This is none of your business, so I suggest you fuck off and do some reading into the meaning and application of AWALT, looks like you need it.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 02:34 PM
1

Ah, so you wish to live your life with a broad abundance mentality. Hard to argue with that.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 11:52 AM
16

"It's the question that drives us, Neo. It's the question that brought you here" What brought me here was the search for answers after a failed relationship. I have never been a compliant beta, always knew there was something wrong in the way girls treated me and in the way I was expected to treat them. But because everyone kept telling me that I had to treat them as equals, be a nice guy and just wait for the right one, that's what I told myself, that's what I did. Now I know better. I could fi…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 11:32 AM
0

Listen up. I hear these similar stories over and over again. You thought a girl was special, even though you ignored a communist parade of red flags, she didn't turn out to be the girl you hoped, and from that you conclude AWALT! The fact that you haven't been selective enough in your girls, and perhaps not of high enough value to attract the interesting ones, doesn't mean that there aren't girls out there worth investing in. As you found TRP, you now know the warning signs. Filter out the bad a…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/15 11:04 AM
1

Although it is an inspiring post, someone who has nothing to lose has never built something up. He has never created, never invested, he was never dedicated to a cause. The risk of losing comes with playing the game that is life. Maybe (probably) you mean something different then I interpret, but I'm interested in your opinion on this.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 11:16 PM
2

having a career you can find satisfaction in and having a nice group of friends and family while trying to stay healthy can perfectly well be a good mission to have. Maybe the word 'mission' is a bit misleading because it may imply a grand, inspiring goal, but I think it all comes down to having a plan to find happiness in life. You call it a philosophy, I call it a mission, they may be the same. At the very least there is huge overlap.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 11:03 PM
2

Fuck that, you don't need an 'inspiring' mission, you need a working strategy. One that gives you the happiness you seek after. There's a reason men have had this very comparable mission for over millennia.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 10:56 PM
5

My mission? I want to create and explore. Creating a skillset in the medical field, creating things by working with my hands, creating creative ideas to work from, creating a big and pleasant social circle and creating a family; becoming a dedicated father with a loving wife one day. (and before I'm 35 if possible, thank you very much) And to explore. I want to see as many corners of the world, participate in exciting activities and to keep trying new things until the day I die. That's my missio…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 10:48 PM
3

Yeah, how about no. If we're talking biological realities, there is a whole lot more to it than that. Have you forgotten that humans are a social species? The need for group approval, validation (and also internal validation), is just as much a biological reality as the ones you mention. And fucking girls isn't going to cut it, big chance you'll be left an outcast among men. Since men are judged by what value they bright to the table, having a plan -a mission if you will- to create a personal sk…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 10:36 PM
2

dude, =/= means 'is not equal to'. I literally said AWALT doesn't mean all women cheat. I think we're mainly on the same page here. True though, it should be confirmation bias. I myself used that term too in a reply a bit higher up. What I think 330d tried to say is that this isn't a case of AWALT, but mainly confirmation bias. That I strongly agree with.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 05:29 PM
0

Layout is way better this way. I read through it, personally I don't think it adds all that much value because this stuff has been covered over and over by our most skilled writers; the sidebar is littered with it. You can't reasonably expect to compete with that at this point. However, there's probably no reason to remove it, let the community decide I'd say. On a last note: I may be wrong, but I kind of get the feeling that you're relatively new here. If that's the case, there's absolutely no …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:53 PM
8

Although you shouldn't be the one doing all the cooking; yes, you should also be cooking. Unless your gf/plate/wife/whatever is at home while you're at work of course. And never because your chick is simply too lazy. But men need to have cooking skills as well, no excuses.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:42 PM
7

Why so strictly limit their use? Well, something to consider is that if you hand out fewer compliments, the ones that you do hand out are generally higher valued by people. As a result they may start to put more effort into getting these 'valuable' compliments from you. Your goal isn't to make others happier, it is to get them to put more work into the relation, be it friendly or sexual.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:23 PM
3

walking is good for many things, but if your goal is burning fat then walking isn't going to cut it by far. As a general rule you don't lose weight by burning more, you lose it by consuming less. Now, building muscles is a whole different story.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:12 PM
1

I'm gonna be honest with you, I didn't read a word of it as soon as I saw the layout. Protip: if you want (more) people to read your article you would at the very least need to add headers and paragraphs, perhaps some bold accents too.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 04:08 PM
9

I think the key concept here is that any attention given to a girl by a man with strong alpha traits will make her feel special. By definition an alpha man cannot be needy, dependent on others or catering to other people's needs too much. At the end of the day we're back again at 'be alpha'. Still, good story!
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 03:37 PM
3

good for you, you're not the majority.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 03:17 PM
10

Now that is the way AWALT is supposed to be used
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 03:08 PM
11

If you're new to TRP then may I suggest you read some more into the meaning of AWALT? Because I fear you might not fully understand it. AWALT means women have a tendency to do certain things, but that doesn't mean they will actually do it. Some chick cheating on her bf doesn't have anything to do with AWALT, at most it makes for an example how screwed up some (most?) women behave. Besides, you always have to be wary of your own confirmation bias when dealing with these kind of situations. There'…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 03:05 PM
2

Well isn't this great. I finally find someone who shows some rational thinking and wouldn't you know it's being downvoted. It's a nice anecdote. Really. But that's it, an anecdote. OP: your single experience here doesn't 'prove' or 'confirm' anything. And guess what? AWALT =/= all women cheat.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 02:52 PM
1

The red pill is a constantly evolving belief system At the top: perhaps. But too many at the wider base of the piramid treat it as dogma and fight against/heavily downvote anything that goes against the dogma without any shed of reason. comments like: TRP is like (..insert dogma here..) Period. It's pathetic. Not much room for evolution that way.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 12:52 PM
1

And if you think that, withing reddit and rp context, the time my account exists says anything about my time spending here, you're the biggest RP newb around here
/r/TheRedPill06/05/15 09:21 AM
1

The way finds you. You talk about this as if it were some rule set in stone. It isn't. Besides, I'm not talking about trying to make the masses aware of TRP, that would be stupid as fuck. Only to those who are more or less fighting our cause already. And perhaps (but only perhaps) things will work out naturally in the way you say it will, but that still doesn't mean we can't try to speed up the process. Why wait and hope for 10 years if something can be done now?
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 10:05 AM
1

A member of this forum, who has therefore the full right to talk in terms of 'we' and 'us', whether you like it or not.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 10:00 AM
-1

What on earth has got you so afraid of the possibility that some e-mails might be sent out? Quit fearmongering. We are already affecting the world with rp influence in case you didn't know. You can hardly call it activism, it's forging alliances if anything.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 01:08 AM
0

What's activist about sending a 'we're here, you might find this interesting' letter to those it might concern?
/r/TheRedPill04/05/15 12:13 AM
1

Rollo, as much as I agree with you that women are very driven to seek out the 'true' alpha and distinguish him from the 'fake' ones, I have really strong doubts that this is the reason that the JBY is so common. It is true that you have a hypothesis that explains the phenomenon, but I can present you a different one that is more basic and straightforward. It all comes down to this: Either you believe that all women give the same advice to the men in their lives, husbands, sons, friends and every…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 10:27 PM
3

True, and it's mostly nitpicking I guess, but by the time 'she won't give two fucks if you stay or go', she'll be gone already. I think we more or less agree, have an upvote!
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 05:16 PM
1

I fully agree with you that women feel revulsion to aspiring alpha's. I consider all your points to be true, but I'm very sceptical to the idea that this is the reason behind the 'be yourself' advice. The 'they don't know any better' hypothesis is a lot less complicated IMO. That isn't to say that there aren't other types of behavior in which this evolutionary drive would present itself. Think for example of the common mockery of the man who just started training on something and isn't good at i…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 05:04 PM
7

If you haven't raised your SMV to the point where you're "the prize" then she won't give two fucks if you stay or go. If you haven't raised your SMV to the point where you're 'the prize', she wouldn't be with you in the first place. Hypergamy. Great points though!
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 04:57 PM
3

The sexual marketplace indeed is like any other marketplace. Any trade, any negotiation, any compromise: if you want the best deal make sure you have one step out of the door already. Great post, fully agree!
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 04:51 PM
3

They mean "be genuine" because there is nothing worse for a woman than a beta pretending to be an alpha. That is a HUGE genetic investment risk for women. So they mean "be a genuine beta, or a genuine alpha please, that will make it easier for us to know who to go for" I agree with you on almost everything, but this I strongly disagree with. You could argue that's the case, that all women instinctively decide to trick you into staying a beta by advices like this, but I'm afraid you're attributin…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 04:37 PM
5

Top quality post. Where as most posts in this forum, even the very good ones, usually serve to extend or rephrase sidebar information, this kind of material pushes the very frontier of RP knowledge. Keep it up, much appreciated! Definitely some points to take home.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 09:00 PM
1

yes, but I wasn't talking about intelligence now was I? I was merely talking about high IQ (which is almost completely nature and little nurture) and its link to obtaining wealth. Are you denying a high IQ is strongly correlated with the money one makes in life? Also, you didn't answer my question. It seems like you're just attacking the only weak point you can find. There are several studies, among the one OP mentioned, which strongly back up my viewpoint. It is a stronger predictor than even r…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 08:06 PM
2

I would say that in no developed country being poor is an excuse for not getting proper education. Maybe not the best of the best, but that's a whole other story. Nice reasoning, but like I said it doesnt hold. I am not denying money isn't also a factor in this. But like gottlobfrege stated: coming from a single mother family was more strongly correlated to all the negative points listed than income was. Unless you can present me with some credible other study, this is what i'm going with.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 07:56 PM
3

You have greater odds against you then. Doesn't mean you can't beat them. At the very least you found this sub to aid you. Best of luck to you.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 03:39 PM
4

Obviously you're against it. That doesn't make it any less true. Any statistic between 0% and 100% has exceptions. It appears you might be one of them. Congratulations.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 03:30 PM
4

Do it. Flip the logic, I don't think it will hold. And what would have been solved already then? Are you saying if a strong causation would indeed be proven, in that case mothers and fathers would all of a sudden stick together for the benefit of the child? Please. Of course things aren't that simple. It is only one factor, but I have a problem with you acting like money is more important. Is it possible that you're biased in this discussion because you yourself were raised by a single mother?
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 03:20 PM
3

I argue mine because you see plenty of wealthier kids with single moms being much more successful than you see poor kids with two good parents... Statistically, I'll bet you'll find that it's not a 1:1 correlation, but better odds really Define 'succesful'. Are you talking wealthier? Because that can easily be explained by direct genetic influences on IQ. I doubt you are looking at the real possible consequences of a single parent upbringing. Think behavioral problems, unstable relationships and…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 02:59 PM
9

I don't agree with your reasoning here. Less intelligent and less responsible people make bad decisions (causation). That's why they tend to end up poor and also (correlation) more often single mothers. Thus, mothers who end up single tend to be people you wouldn't have wanted to become mothers in the first place. Combine that with [a single mother] is a stronger predictor than income and OP has a strong case. His research is solid. Children need a (good) mother AND father. That's the most impor…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 02:32 PM
2

I logged in on reddit -something I almost never do- to make sure this gets upvoted. To people complaining about it being too long: learn to do some reading. Not everything can be caught in a tl:dr. I have no sympathy for your whining. It may not allign with everyone's personal experiences (my case wasn't this bad either), but it is very insightful for determining what's exactly wrong with the education system, and many things are wrong indeed. You cannot deny that schools fail miserably to creat…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 12:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter