~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Nutz76
[–]Veritisia1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, but the host is rather bitchy, besides her voice is horrible.
[–]McDoogleSnatch 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's depressing that she's obviously a listener to his program but is still blindingly blue pill in her comments. Is she really not persuaded in the slightest? No revelation at all? How long can you listen to something you disagree with without changing your mind?
I'm probably stepping out too far in my analysis here, but bear with me. I get the impression that she thinks she's different. She's saying that she's a fan of his show and demonstrates it by referring to his recent content. She attempts to put themselves on the same level by making some comments about how they are in the same field.
Then, with this established, she butts heads over the obviously misandric treatment of men when it comes to alimony, child support and child custody. When Lykis creates an analogy about how silly it is to continue to pay rent for a car that you've already returned, she retorts with, "Well, maybe you're a bad driver." She even says it twice as if she really thought that would sting.
Her comment, nay, her point of view, is so wildly petty that she can't even acknowledge the obviousness of the matter. Since when does a spouse's performance of being a spouse weigh into how much money they're supposed to pay the other when they split up? Is everything seen by her through this "It's the man's fault" prism? It's completely asinine.
She then contradicts this stupidity by saying that women are entitled to half of their spouse's net worth because they played a role in building it - not because he was just a bad husband. Lykis rebutes calmly, and effectively I might add, that wives can actually be a detriment to the man's success. Meaning, shouldn't there be some kind of analysis as to how much the wife contributed to their wealth? Because, maybe she really didn't do all that much after all.
What still surprises me is her demeanor. She keeps wanting to argue. She even calls him a misogynist. What is she hoping will happen? Is she really hoping that he's going to lean back in his chair and re-evaluate his point of view? It's like she thinks he'll say, "You know, everything you've said, I've heard before. But, because it's coming from you, big breasted post-wall woman who is in the entertainment industry and is a fan of my show, I'm going to completely change my point of view. I'm so glad for this interview. You're right, women can change men."
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Well, I had a bunch of things to say about this interview. You pretty much covered it all. The only other thing I noticed was how her sunny demeanor changed when they got off the topic of a woman's right to half.
[–]McDoogleSnatch 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, that's kinda my point. Her demeanor was a lure, a false sense of camaraderie and simpatico. She doesn't agree with him. Instead of saying, "Your point of view is fascinatingly different from mine and I'd like to see if can meet on any mutual ground," she deceptively tries to befriend him and then shame him into submission when she feels like she has the upper hand.
In short, she is acting exactly how Lykis would criticize a woman for acting.
[–]TRP Vanguardss_camaro0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"50% of managing your life"
LOL
[–]Nutz76[S] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
It's a pretty good interview chock full of red pill material.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Veritisia1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]McDoogleSnatch 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]McDoogleSnatch 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TRP Vanguardss_camaro0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nutz76[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link