This 10 min Video is a self shot video from a Woman who was followed by some guy she flipped off

It's reasonably entertaining and not long enough to be boring, and it also clearly highlights some very important lessons in a real life setting. It's one thing to read the side bar, but seeing them in action is something else. Watch the video and note the 3 important RP lessons as well as a bonus legal lesson on top. Try and spot them and make your own opinion before reading on.

Trickle Truth:

This video is first of all a superb example of trickle truth, that is the original story is only ever a half truth and as time goes on the story changes. This is very common with Women and a changing story is indicative of deception. You should be aware of elements in a story that change or don't add up.

This section is just a synopsis of the timeline of her changing story and not that important unless you want to compare notes.

One of the first things she says is that "something very bad is going on" as time goes on you will see that this is not the case. This is actually the second thing she said in the video, the very first thing she said was in reference to her lack of make up. So obviously the "very bad" thing was not as bad as no make up.

In the first retelling of the story she describes a house with Trump Pence signs in the front yard as well as Hillary for Prison sign (Centipede detected) that she "has" to pass every day. Today was different today because she saw a "big ugly redneck guy" and she "gave him the finger" which she said she is allowed to under the first amendment.

Now the first trickle comes out at 1:11 where she says "this guy has been taking pictures of my car" Now this doesn't match up with what she has previously said in that she has driven past every day and today flipped him off as she went past.

It's not clear at this point when he was taking photo's, however as she said, he was in the driveway. Now if she did drive past and flip him off, how could he take a photo of her car while she was driving past? not even a 14 year old teenage girl is that fast to get a phone out and snap a photo.

At 1:40 the first mention of her height and weight is used. "5 foot tall 102 pound"

The next trickle, or new piece of info about the story comes at 2:06 where she says "I'm going to film him yelling at me and the cop" She hasn't mentioned him yelling at her/the cop previously. Now ask yourself how would he have been yelling at her previously if she has just driven past and flipped him off?

For that matter how would he even follow her if she had flipped him off while driving past? Even if you were standing by your car, keys in hand, it would take 15-20 seconds to get on the road, meanwhile the other car is already moving. It is possible that she was behind another car but this is still a detail that doesn't add up.

2:25 The story changes! Now she admits that she did more then just give him the finger, she rolled down the window and said "back off you fucking racist" This is not a phrase that you can tell while driving past, she must have slowed down/stopped to do this, which is a contradiction of her earlier story.

2:58 "All I have done is this (Flips bird to camera) this is a direct contradiction to what she said literally 30 seconds prior.

3:04 she says "continue to do this to every Donald Trump supporter who wants to mess with me" At no point has she referred to the guy "messing with her" and how would he if she had just driven past and flipped him off, or as the story is now, yelled "back off you fucking racist"

3:08 now she's back to claiming that she just gave him the finger, and admits that she's a turbo bitch outside of this situation

3:38 In response to the cop questioning her she said "by driving his car super fast behind mine" think about this, if you are driving fast behind someone, you will overtake them or slow down, to be driving fast and remain behind, she must also be driving fast.

3:48 Now she tells the cop she flipped him off only, which is a reversal of her previous statements to the camera

4:00 now she alludes to her freedom of speech to call him a "racist" which is a trickle from what she previously told the cop, but still less then what she told the camera 2 minutes prior.

4:24 now she refers to her back off statement, but now it's changed it's location in the story

5:46 There it is, now she admits that she "slowed her car down" in front of his house, contradicting every previous statement she has made

6:00 "No I just gave him the finger at that time" There are two previous times she has claimed to have yelled at him to back the fuck off, at his house and later on, this contradicts herself if she yelled it then

7:22 Now she mentions that she "stopped her car because she saw him" This is completely different to everything she has said previously.

7:41 now her weight goes up from when she mentioned it previously.

8:00 "I silently protested something" not only is this completely false but I highly doubt this Woman has the capacity for silence.

8:06 "THIS IS A SILENT PROTEST" This isn't trickle truth, it's just funny and needs to be recognised.

8:54 "I haven't gone after him" which is curious since she has already said repeatedly that she drives past his house every day

9:17 another claim of "silently protesting" which is comical at this point

At this point I think what happens has become reasonably clear, she drove past, saw him in the driveway and slowed down/stopped to abuse him, and for long enough that he was able to get in his car and follow her and take pictures of her car and license plate. It's likely that this is not the first time either.

Subjective V Objective Reality

The subject is 100% focused on her own feelings and perceptions of the events, which as seen above, are constantly changing. Notice her constant justifications for what she did, she is focused on WHY she did what she did, rather then WHAT she did. Having the cop there provides an excellent mirror as he focuses on what actually happened.

It's not untill the end of the video that it's clear that what happened was a bit of a storm in a teacup, but to her it's harassment and evidence of how Women are treated in America. That guy was probably a little annoyed, maybe 2 out of 10. That Cop was probably bored at 1 out of 10, and she was having a full on 10/10 traumatic experience.

To her, she was completely in the right, and in the heat of the moment she truly believed it. And most telling of all, outside of the moment. She still believed it. Enough to get home, watch the footage over, and upload it to youtube because she was still convinced that her experience was the correct one.

What you feel may not be what actually happened.

A handy tip is that if you feel strongly about something or an event, you are experiencing/remembering it subjectively. Do not act while you are in this state.

Emotional Stoicism

It's hard to tell without seeing the guy in the other car, but it's pretty clear he was calm and reasonable when dealing with the officer as he would have been in cuffs if he hadn't.

The Cop however was completely stoic and merely interested in determining the objective truth of the matter, which was revealed via trickle truth. Had he let his emotions rise, he would have missed the evidence in front of him.

It's pretty clear that the Guy in the other car "Won" that interaction, and he did it through non reactive behaviour, just like the cop, and letting the Women, in the grip of her emotions blabber on and on till the truth came out.

Stoicism is just sometimes letting people talk and giving them enough rope to hang themselves with.

Dealing with Police

The final point refers to dealing with the Police and I can't let it go without plugging this famous video If that Woman had just shut up and said the guy had followed me, the guy probably would have been arrested.

Summary:

Ignoring the ridiculously close scrutinisation for a single video, sometimes it's important to see lessons in action. Trickle truth especially. Knowing when you are being deceived is a very important skill to know and this is what it looks like when that little thread is pulled to unravel the truth.