I’d like to do an experiment with the community.

As men, it behooves us to continuously question and evaluate our beliefs and actions in light of new data points and experiences. This is why many of us discovered the red pill; our original beliefs were proven, time and again, to be erroneous so they required revision. This is the evolutionary circle at work: Performance; Feedback; Revision. Only politicians and fools maintain their opinion in the face of evidence to the contrary.

So to that end, I would like to pose open-ended questions to the community to stimulate discussion and maybe force us to take a deeper look at the underlying theories. Not to debunk or disprove, but to explore whether these work (and under what circumstances/with which women), whether these need revision, or whether they need to be dropped. Some of these will be issues I’ve been contemplating, and some will arise I hope out of the discussion.

I hope to get honest answers to my questions and not echo chamber parroting of RP theory.

So to begin:

PFR: Question 1

Does RP work on ‘that woman’ or does it require that women be treated as interchangeable? By that I mean, can you go to any given bar/club/meeting place, pick out a woman and have a reasonable expectation of success (number/date/etc), or does it require treating her like an object so if she’s not warm to your method, you go “Fuck it, I’ll try it on this other one.” Then by law of averages, you’ll eventually meet with success?