Okay guys. I just had a moment of logical insight here, that I wanted to share with you. I usually hear lines like:".. equalization for women","we need to equalize women first..." and stuff like that - you know what I mean. Suddenly today it hit me: you can not equalize 1 ting without equalizing another. You need 2 objects to equalize.

"Equalization for women" is logically the same thing as saying "mixing a banana". "Mixing a banana - with WHAT?" you may think - and that is exactly my point. I have rarely heard the therm "equalization of genders". When people discuss and some rightfully ask: what about male rights? The answear is often:" We need to equalize women first".

How can we equalize women, without equalizing men? Logically that is not possible. Equalization of women without men in it can never be equal, unless they want to equalize themselves with other things than men. So this is my RP wisdom for you and a tool to further understand the social complex world of feminist argument bingo. I have summed it up in a nice line: Equal without 2 becomes only ego