TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

"Why men should be better at mentally rotating objects is a weird thing," Cashdan says. "Some people think it is culturally constructed, but that doesn't explain why the pattern is shared so broadly across human societies and even in some other species ..."

justmanthings

November 14, 2014
16 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title "Why men should be better at mentally rotating objects is a weird thing," Cashdan says. "Some people think it is culturally constructed, but that doesn't explain why the pattern is shared so broadly across human societies and even in some other species ..."
Author

justmanthings

Upvotes 16
Comments 8
Date November 14, 2014 4:47 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2mapkq/why_men_should_be_better_at_mentally_rotating/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/why-men-should-be-better-at-mentally-rotating.24853
https://theredarchive.com/post/24853
Top posts by justmanthings

"I'd only marry a feminist guy... But most of the guys I sleep with are definitely NOT husband material! They're sexist jerks lol..."

78 upvotes
September 30, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

“I want men to take up this mantle,” Watson said. "... so that their sons have permission to be vulnerable and human too – reclaim those parts of themselves they abandoned and in doing so be a more true and complete version of themselves.”

49 upvotes
September 23, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

What is your mission?

17 upvotes
May 6, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

"Good men don't let women get raped. So why aren't you guys doing enough?" - Jessica Valenti, avoiding any whiff of responsibility

4 upvotes
September 19, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]aswokei 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you mention any kind of innate differences between men and women prepare for an ensuing shitstorm.

If you say that men's brains are 10% larger than women's, nobody will argue the point, but they will shut you out and shit all over you.

There was a fascinating thing that happened in 2005 when the President of Harvard, Dr. Lawrence Summers, suggested that the sex differences in representation in the sciences might have something to do with biological differences.

Quote: He went on to argue that boys outperform girls on high school science and maths scores because of genetic difference. "Research in behavioural genetics is showing that things people previously attributed to socialisation weren't due to socialisation after all," he told the Boston Globe yesterday. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/jan/18/educationsgendergap.genderissues

There was a shitstorm, and he lost his job, because he said that the research indicates that socialization doesn't explain women's lower representation in science.

"It was really shocking to hear the president of Harvard make statements like that," said Denice Denton, who is about to become president of the University of California at Santa Cruz.

Really? It's so shocking and awful that someone would make an observation of what research shows. It's so, so terrible. Bitch.

[–]logically_ 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If sexual differences are a result of cultural and societal influences, does that mean that gays and lesbians were influenced to be that way and not actually born homosexual?

Ask them that and watch the hamster go.

[–]sir_wankalot_here4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why do women have better hand eye cordination and can manipulate small objects much better then men ? There is a difference between a person of any gender having the right to take any profession as opposed to attempting to artificially equalize it.

[–]MoltenPhoenix2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When in school, I was told that men had better navigational skills than women because men were hunters. They forgot to include women as men's preys, it seems.

However, I found articles saying that it's because of higher testosterone levels.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/men-are-better-navigators-than-women-but-not-because-of-evolution-22477567/?no-ist

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2012/12/28/of-men-navigation-and-zits/

They note that when male rats are castrated, they do worse at navigating a maze; when they are given shots of testosterone, they regain their skill.

Higher testosterone levels could be what leads to having more children, and better navigation skills just a side effect.

[–]RandomlyPMsPeople1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not sure if I'd really consider this Redpill material, but it's interesting.

I had actually heard something similar many years ago. Supposedly, men are much better at visualizing a "bird's eye view" of their surroundings while women really struggle with it.

I've tested this out a little with different groups of friends and it seems to be true.

You guys should try it out for yourselves next time you get a chance. Point out which direction is north and then pick a street in your town/city. Ask your girlfriend/female friends which direction that street runs and see how long it takes them to answer. Most of the women I've tried it on take ages to think of the answer.

Do the same thing with men and most of them could give you an answer almost instantly.

[–]Watermelon_Salesman2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

In "The Blank Slate", a book about innatism by Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker, he tells the story of a person who was about to go through a sex change operation, and who at some point was taking testosterone injections. I can't remember precisely if this was a woman trying to become a man, but the point is that they measured her capacity for mental 3d rotation before and after the testosterone shots, and there was a significant increase in cognition.

Of course there are biological differences in cognition. At the very least, you have different hormones at different levels messing with your mind. Any man who has gone through weeks without ejaculation knows what it does to your cognition. Women should be be able to face this up front as well, since they go through a massive cognition rollercoaster as their menstrual cycles go through different phases.

And this is just hormones, we're not even talking about different brain architecture. The very fact that feminists could come up with the idea of gender as mere social construct and that most people would swallow this bullshit is something that mankind will regret for ages.

[–]BluebirdJingle0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Did you just take a study on evolutionary biology, conducted by a woman who clearly supports the scientific hypothesis postulated in the paper, and manufacture feminist outrage at the idea of gender differences?

[–]justmanthings[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No need to manufacture feminist outrage. There is already feminist outrage when it comes to female under-representation in STEM fields. And they blame it on sexist patriarchy, rather than looking to biological differences as a potential selector for STEM interest or disinterest.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter