I've read a few quotes on Red Pill about this. Most recently I read this in the article, "On Sex Positivity, Let Women be Sluts - "I can't help being astonished when people suggest that women, by their flirting requirements, make us men better. They don't. If that was the case, we would all be psychopaths, the one class of men that Game consistently comes natural to."

Please explain this to me. At this point I would have to disagree with the tendency for the red pill view leaning toward the more the Psychopath the better the player. Examples. Two friends I had in college had extremely high SMV (tall, attractive athletes), smart, and confident. Yet throughout college they were good dudes with morals, were not into constantly hooking up and each had one steady relationship throughout their sophomore through senior years. Yet they were alpha, definitely not beta. They did not put people down, but wouldn't take shit at the same time. They were dominant without being manipulative assholes. At the same time it was as if all the girls in school wanted their dicks. on the other hand, I have, let's say an aquaintance who I notice has traits of a psychopath. Luckily thanks to Red pill I was able to reverse his manipulative tendencies to work for my own gain. Yet when it comes to getting girls he can't pull. He's too prideful and can't handle rejection. He thinks he's smooth, but can't be direct in stimulating a girl's sexual impulse.

I'd like to hear anyone's thoughts. Please give me examples if you can. I just don't see this connection between alpha and psychopathy. A lot of guys i know with much testosterone and high SMV are attractive to girls and could take advantage of it, but they choose not to play the game.