Contradiction?

Bea_OProblem · 2015-01-06T12:06:36+00:00

Doesn't it basically mean that, for a man to gain value, he must steal value from women?

There's far better ways to improve your SMV than increasing your partner count. Lifting, making friends, making money, dressing well, learning a skill. These are more attractive qualities than being able to say "I've slept with binders of women".

SickSadWorId · 2015-01-06T12:18:08+00:00

If partner count was literally the only way to judge SMV you'd be correct.

It isn't

walkingthelinux · 2015-01-06T15:09:11+00:00

It takes a LOT of hard work for a man to be with many women.

It requires ZERO effort for a woman to have sex with three strangers a day.

Goldfulgore · 2015-01-06T16:55:08+00:00

"Women's SMV drops with sex partner count. Men's SMV rises with sex partner count."

This is dumb and if TRP advocates this I disagree.

SMV only exists in the eye of the beholder. So a woman's SMV is determined by men, and a man's SMV is determined by women.

If you see a HB 10, even if she fucked a whole country, she'd still be high SMV. Cause a lot of males still want to fuck her. However knowing that she did, you would put your logic in the way of your attraction to protect yourself, lowering her SMV in your eyes. But your attraction is still there, make no mistake about this. A woman's SMV is mostly based on her looks and nothing else. That's why after her age hits 30 her SMV declines rapidly.

Women on the other hand determine a man's SMV on mental things. One of those factors is whether other women want him. Even if he has fucked a whole country, is immature and irresponsible as a person. So a woman to protect herself from those kind of men, use their logic to reduce them in their own eyes in order to protect themselves. But her attraction is still there, make no mistake about this.

tenientj · 2015-01-06T13:39:34+00:00

Look at the qualities that occur in each circumstance, those are what drive the value. The lay count is the offshoot indicator

masterrod · 2015-01-06T17:26:47+00:00

Doesn't it basically mean that, for a man to gain value, he must steal value from women? And by logical extension, wouldn't this mean that women make the man? Which clearly flies in the face of the whole RedPill "don't look for validation from women" philosophy, right?

Women have an edge anyway for being women. But there are a lot of low value women by this axiom. If she's freely giving the value it isn't stealing.

Women enhance the man, but he has to be a man to get the woman.

The woman is looking for the man for direction in most cases, so seeking validation solely in a woman is the antithesis of being a man.

InformalCriticism · 2015-01-06T19:24:01+00:00

Your own words seem to have inner conflict. You say RP men "steal" value from women, but then you turn around and ask "wouldn't this mean that women make the man?" Women have no real say in it if it is being taken from them, therefore qualifying men through their partner count is completely reasonable.

I had a passing thought of a similar kind about how you reasoned your question, but I recommend you look to MGTOW: if it doesn't look right or you don't want to do it, then do it your way.

Your question isn't a contradiction, it's a paradox. Paradoxes can and do exist, this is just a more pathetic and glaring one; more women will want you the more you degrade their value. It doesn't sit right in the mind, but that is the nature of the pill.

alreadyredschool · 2015-01-07T01:58:48+00:00

A men's SMV doesn't rise with his notch count. A men that can bang lots of women has a high SMV and it gets higher because of preselection. A men's SMV rises with preselction and a womens SMV drops with a higher partner count.

No women I asked could tell me why they hate sluts. There is something about easy girls that neither men nor women like.

Which clearly flies in the face of the whole RedPill "don't look for validation from women" philosophy, right?

No not at all.

Title	Contradiction?
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	1
Comments	10
Date	January 6, 2015 11:33 AM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/2ri7wm/contradiction/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/contradiction.192627 https://theredarchive.com/post/192627

Comments