Women hate it when a man acts overtly beta in a relationship and isn't in tune with his masculinity, especially if he was more masculine and assertive prior to them being exclusive as the power dynamics of the relationship is already established. However, when your girl is bitching at you and you retaliate back being assertive, 2 things usually happen:

  1. She will get turned on by the fact that you actually have a spine and aren't a little bitch anymore. The sex that same night, she'll be more submissive and she'll be more wet.
  2. She won't take you serious and she'll start bitching at you more. If you were a beta who couldn't even talk to your women with a strong manner, now you'll be even more hesitant to speak up.

The question isn't why these two outcomes exist, the question is what defers one outcome happening to another? Is it the type of girl, the first girl is more feminine and the second girl is more masculine? What is it?

What I Think:

For the first situation

  1. Not enough time has been established compared to situation two, so there is less time for the dynamics of the relationship to be established. It's called Maintain Frame not Create Frame and Let it Dissolve.
  2. It's a shit test, she wants to see what you're made of and if you pass it, she'll realize you're a masculine man since no man would dare challenge her and this will result her into becoming more feminine towards you.

For the second situation

  1. The dynamics of the relationship are already established, this is most likely from a LTR of years, and likely married or are approaching marriage. She wears the pants of the relationship which is a paradox of TRP.

Any clue why these two different things happen if they both started bitching at you for say the same thing? What makes one different then the other?