Here is one of our most important points. This is how the 'Gamecore' school of Game is different from other schools. First, while other schools of the game are focused on making high-value guys we are focused on getting laid. I believe the first principle of Gamecore is, "Master of Seduction≠High-value guy." Here I disagree with Mike, even if he is my friend, just because he is my friend doesn't mean I need to agree with him. I believe that you don't need to be cultured, well-travelled or to 'worldly' to get results. In fact, I believe a lot of these things might be counterproductive to your success.
Here I agree with Todd that girls separate guys in the lover and provider category. However, Todd delivers this in the abstract. In the concrete, we need to focus on the girls.
Who are they?
What is their age?
What are they here for?
What kind of guy do THEY find attractive?
Notice that none of these questions has anything to do with who YOU are as a person, whenever you are high value or not. It has more to do with what kind of guy and approach is going to work for that specific girl. Most likely if you are on a nightclub environment those girls have already dated a kind of guy: Club Promoter, DJ or musician. Moreover, those girls are of a specific age range(18 to 28) being a guy with a math degree or a manager at a firm is not going to be attractive in this case. This is why I believe JMULV gest laid just as much as he is saying because is delivering targeting this and saying blowing himself up as a huge DJ, even if they are 'white lies'.
Now you might be wondering, well why isn't this taught? It's because it involves 'white lies' and crushing guys expectations of the world, telling them yes objectively there are some professions that girls from the ages of 18 to 28 find more attractive when they are looking for a guy to hook up with and yours isn't one of those because it's boring. Notice that most PUA's filters their content to see what can be appealing to their clients and what would be too much for them to handle.
I on the other hand, only care about getting results and have no qualms being flexible with the truth. These identities are you, "access key" or your "passcode." However, you don't need to actually be any of this. Rather you can appear as that frame and leverage it-use it to your advantage. The only argument to consider is Jax's(top NYC PUA) argument where he would say, "We'll you are levering something else to get access, its not 'pure' attraction that the girl has for you.' My answer would be," It's called leverage game, dude."
Chart
Most attractive(Club Promoter, Couch surfing host, Sugar Daddy...etc)
Mid attractive( DJ, Musician, Film director, Manager at hooters)
Least attractive(all the others that other people might find valuable but girls will not)
In reality, all you need to get laid is an attractive identity that the girls values or they feel it could bring value to their life+some basic game(moving things forward, being persistent+volume(that both Jeffy and JMULV talk about). You don't need to watch 1000 hours of content or take YEARS of training. However, most guys are very stubborn and want to get laid+live up to all these societal standards and expectations+maintain a squeaky clean image+be cheap and never user anything external to their advantage, that is why they have so much difficulty getting results(Self-consciousness).
I'll give you one last example why I believe that high-value guy≠Master seducer. I met this Russian girl a friend of my ex-girlfriend. Now this girl was super hot 21, dark hair, thin legs, tight body. She was an aspiring actress. You might think that your heroes Chad and Tyrone would be banging her(not really most of this guys are playing beer pong in their room). This girl showed us the picture of the guy she was hooking up with and he was a pale, mustache Hispanic kid with poor hygiene(Meanwhile you are deep in the PUA treadmill, lol). I asked her how she met the guy. She told me that this guy knew a director and she wanted to meet the director so she went ahead and hooked up with him(Cindy Meston) in hopes of meeting the director. She never got the chance to meet the director but the kid had was teaching her acting so she just kept hooking up with him since he occasionally introducer her to people of value.
This Kid: Strong lead source(the theatre packed with girls, not day game with no sets)+not being afraid of leveraging what you have(connections)+an attractive identity THAT THE GIRL VALUES+having some basic game(leading the interaction).-THAT'S IT.
there doesn't seem to be anything here