Matt Riddle makes the argument that in nearly every culture studied, women of low socio-economic status throughout centuries have had the ability to marry into wealth. Men of low socio-economic status typically stay single and cannot do much about that. You can try and argue this all you want, but I'm going to trust the number of scientists who have studied it.

Why is this important?

It's no secret that the majority of us here are either lower-class, low-middle class or middle class individuals. All of that can be tied in with the lower class since it is the elites that typically have more boys and favor them more as well. With that said, this is important because if the majority of us are in a lower class than the elites, then we are destined at birth (if we do little to change our surroundings) to stay single and keep striking out. This brings me to the importance of this point: What is it that seddit suggests on the sidebar?

Get your life together.

Honestly, that is the best thing you can do. Become successful in whatever it is you want to do. Keep trying to become successful and push forward because we're all red queens, running only to stay in place. You will be more confident, enjoy life more, and strive for excellence if you practice excellence. This does not mean you abandon who you are or your ethics; it means you combine that with the more successful self. If science is saying the higher class males are more successful, it is imperative to get into a higher class to become more successful if you are not looking to be a PUA.

TL;DR: READ THE SIDEBAR BECAUSE NATURE IS NOT YOUR FRIEND ON THIS ONE!!