Stefan molyneux is an idiotic f***ing asshole sometimes.

dcoburn2 · 2017-06-09T02:36:31+00:00

Key words seem to be "if you want". Hes not pushing anything and he's not really wrong here either. If you want a hot girl then you have to be someone she wants to be with.

MGTOW "don't want" so why should you care about his advice for the people that "do want"?

lonewolf-chicago · 2017-06-09T02:44:12+00:00

Typical PUA rhetoric. Inner Game stuff. Doesn't work. Has you chasing your tail or on the treadmill of life hoping some stupid bitch will find you worthy.

But there is this thing called Briffaults Law that trumps inner game.

wawakaka · 2017-06-09T04:03:07+00:00

he's a traditionalist at heart. married a single mom.
he's kind of plays both sides sometimes i guess which ever one benefits him the most since he's now a business man he is part show business. I've seen howard stern do the same when david lee roth is on he loves dave and hates sammy. but when sammy hagar is one he loves sammy and hates dave.

seethru1995 · 2017-06-09T02:59:07+00:00

The analogy isn't wrong. Women biologically possess what we want: the ability to carry and bear a child. Due to the fact that they hold this power and also the fact that a woman can only get pregnant once at a time for 9 months at a time, it should come at no surprise that women have the power when it comes to mate selection: there's a lot more of us that want them, then them that want us.

As a result, if you want higher quality women, you'll have to compete at a higher level and offer something more desirable than all of the other men who want her as well.

I mean you can easily avoid this dynamic entirely which is what many MGTOW do, but the logic is still sound. It only seems unfair because women derive their value exclusively from their biological characteristics (physical attractiveness, which is linked to fertility), whereas men have to work for their value. But, consider that it's a double edged sword: at least a man can increase his value. If a woman is born ugly as fuck, they're screwed, hence all the bitter land whales in the feminist movement.

Paladin2903 · 2017-06-09T04:52:05+00:00

He's an egotistical, narcissistic, cult leader/gatekeeper. Believe me when I say that he is bankrolled by our enemies.

I especially like one of the videos he released about a year-and-a half ago, where he arrogantly chastised and scolded his audience for not "paying for what they consume."

In Stefan's world, if you watch his videos, you are obligated to pay for them, because you "consumed" his product. The guy's a fucking jackass.

He can take his self-proclaimed "World's Greatest Philosophy Show" and shove it up his David Koresh-like ass.

He's nothing but another internet YouTube bum, who uses young naive people to pay his bills.

2017-06-09T09:39:47+00:00

He's doing it for the views/subs. Just ignore him - he's inconsistent in his opinion anyways.

Depending on which weekday it is or who his interview partner is he can swing from "taxes are theft" to "a guy getting shot for not paying his taxes is justified".

He also likes to "outsmart" call in guests for whom English is a 2nd language. Like a German dude who had some valid points but got fucked over technicalities because Molly took what he said literally and ignored the gist of what the dude was trying to say.

It's a shitshow really.

Paladin2903 · 2017-06-09T13:30:07+00:00

[deleted]

DWShimoda · 2017-06-09T13:57:18+00:00

Molyneux is part of the "entertainment" industry.

Granted he's only a marginal player, and casts himself as more of an "information/education" outlet -- but fundamentally he's no different than say Oprah Winfrey or Rachael Ray, or any of a thousand other "infotainment" talking heads.

As Albert Jay Nock noted many decades ago:

Everyone with a message nowadays is, like my venerable European friend, eager to take it to the masses. His first, last and only thought is of mass acceptance and mass approval. His great care is to put his doctrine in such shape as will capture the masses' attention and interest. This attitude towards the masses is so exclusive, so devout, that one is reminded of the troglodytic monster described by Plato, and the assiduous crowd at the entrance to its cave, trying obsequiously to placate it and win its favor, trying to interpret its inarticulate noises, trying to find out what it wants, and eagerly offering it all sorts of things that they think might strike its fancy.

The main trouble with all this is its reaction upon the mission itself. It necessitates an opportunist sophistication of one's doctrine, which profoundly alters its character and reduces it to a mere placebo. If, say, you are a preacher, you wish to attract as large a congregation as you can, which means an appeal to the masses; and this, in turn, means adapting the terms of your message to the order of intellect and character that the masses exhibit. If you are an educator, say with a college on your hands, you wish to get as many students as possible, and you whittle down your requirements accordingly. If a writer, you aim at getting many readers; if a publisher, many purchasers; if a philosopher, many disciples; if a reformer, many converts; if a musician, many auditors; and so on. But as we see on all sides, in the realization of these several desires, the prophetic message is so heavily adulterated with trivialities, in every instance, that its effect on the masses is merely to harden them in their sins.

If you can touch the fancy of the masses, and have the sagacity to keep always one jump ahead of their vagaries and vacillations, you can get good returns in money from serving the masses, and good returns also in a mouth-to-ear type of notoriety:

Now to be sure, Molyneux is going after a "niche" demographic, aiming his message towards (at least at present) a subset of the overall "masses" -- which itself is a sort of "opportunistic" aspect -- again not all that different than Oprah Winfrey (who too, aimed HER "message" at a specific demographic, and therefore NOT at others -- to wit, she certainly WASN'T trying to please or pander to blue-collar white adult males; but she often WAS pandering to their wives).

As his view & subscriber counts grow, one can guarantee that he "reshapes" his message in a manner that is aimed -- chiefly, if not solely -- at INCREASING his "view/subscriber" counts (i.e. the incessant please to "make sure you SUBSCRIBE to the channel" etc); and moreover that said "reshaping" will be done in a fashion that carefully MANAGES & DANCES around the feedback he gets from that audience (else he would have the comments turned OFF).

seethru1995 · 2017-06-09T18:25:11+00:00

Yeah, his "ideas" are dangerous and wrong in many circumstances. Still has some good interviews though. But I do not think of him as a modern "philosopher."

mentalidade_logica · 2017-06-09T03:21:10+00:00

Ever since I heard him say that Greece and other Southern Euro counties are living it up at the expense of Germany, when stats prove the exact opposite, I no longer take him seriously.

801735 · 2017-06-09T05:05:12+00:00

Gertrude

What is that? They prolly ment "get rude"? No?

RedPillMGTOW · 2017-06-09T12:57:48+00:00

He acts like a woman. Manipulating liar.

ylod7 · 2017-06-10T03:47:29+00:00

I find him revolting, especially his voice and the way he stares into the camera, reminds of Yuri from the old Red Alert games but i agree with him on a few things like the free market so I watch his channel

dnbjarhead · 2017-06-10T15:50:22+00:00

Stems from his R/K Selection theory. The greatest success for future generations is children being raised in a traditional family setting with a husband and wife which I 100% agree with. Half of this threads problems with women are from women with "daddy issues" broken homes no father figure or women wanting divorce and live off the welfare state and child support/alimony. The statistics are pretty staggering when looking at individuals raised in single parent households, so he's traditional in that sense.

Not a huge fan of his as he gets a bit cunty and has this "love for his own fart smell" delivery that gets old and super annoying after a while, but some stuff I agree with.

Title	Stefan molyneux is an idiotic f***ing asshole sometimes.
Author	seethru1995
Upvotes	11
Comments	29
Date	June 9, 2017 1:59 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/6g5hlj/stefan_molyneux_is_an_idiotic_fing_asshole/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/stefan-molyneux-is-an-idiotic-fing-asshole.582491 https://theredarchive.com/post/582491

Comments

Molyneux is part of the "entertainment" industry.