This is another point I haven't seen brought up much. The traditional Christian understanding of marriage, for two baptized Christians, is "until death do you part". If a divorce happens, it's still "until death do you part" - I believe no remarrying is allowed until the other spouse dies, or if the marriage has not been consummated (physical union in the bedroom has not taken place). (The legitimate exception then is widows, who can choose to remarry, but there is also the legitimate option to not remarry.) From a religious perspective, a "remarriage" that includes a previously married spouse (where the other divorced spouse is still alive) is considered to be adultery, and the new "remarriage" is not considered to be valid as a religious marriage.

There seems to be shaming out there suggesting that divorced people are supposed to "remarry". Instead, traditionally the husband of a divorce would either become a religious leader/monk or basically be MGTOW (unless the marriage perhaps could be salvaged).

This implies a few other things: since each person is pretty much allotted one marriage for life (exceptions of widows, etc. aside), a man would have to stay MGTOW for a while before finding a woman today who is seriously willing to take on a lifelong commitment, since we know many women today who have frivolously divorced and thus a man cannot tell who is serious about commitment (and there is no clear signal indicating who would be a "true NAWALT", presuming that is a real thing).

Secondly, if divorce seems more likely today, then one also expects with greater probability to be a MGTOW (or monk/religious) after a marriage fails (if statistics suggest this, which I get conflicting reports about if the divorce rates have gone up or down ... however we do know marriage rates are down).

Thirdly, this is supposed to remove divorce from being an option for multiple "marriages". Couples are supposed to get together and stay together, through thick and thin. I'm sure there's other points to make about the implications of rejecting the "remarriage" idea as if it was an option.

So in both instances, for (Christian) tradcons MGTOW seems to me to be much more of the equation than the popular perception suggests. The only part that would be subject to variation is the "my own way" part - religious monks would be more like going "the religious way" rather than "my own way", since they basically have a boss/leader and that can be like being married, and someone's "own way" doesn't say exactly what they will be doing with that, for good or ill, and maybe God has some things he wants a MGTOW to do.