Interesting phrasing indeed

goodmod · 2020-01-18T05:12:49+00:00

Your post was removed due to rule 14, titles must be descriptive.

Titles must describe the content so that:

Users know what the link they are clicking on content before they click it
Users who are searching for specific material can easily find the post they are looking for

Take the time to describe your link, and save the time of hundreds of other people.

When making a title, it's best to assume the reader doesn't know what you're talking about - but don't go overboard with every detail. Then check if there are any words you can cut out without losing any important information.

It's a good idea to pause for a few moments before hitting the "Post" button. Check for typos, ambiguous phrasing, redundant words - and of course for unintended meanings!

otterlyclueless · 2020-01-18T03:49:09+00:00

It depends on the age of the son. Still wrong, just if the son was of age then it is a different issue.

nice-username-bro · 2020-01-18T03:59:55+00:00

I will claim this is the article associated with it:

https://www.drphil.com/videos/how-a-womans-reunion-with-son-she-did-not-raise-took-a-dark-and-criminal-turn/

GmanTEM02 · 2020-01-18T04:51:59+00:00

It’s also incest which is also illegal.

Title	Interesting phrasing indeed
Author	nice-username-bro
Upvotes	6
Comments	6
Date	January 18, 2020 3:39 AM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/eqbbcx/interesting_phrasing_indeed/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/interesting-phrasing-indeed.860805 https://theredarchive.com/post/860805

Comments