TL/DR : higher the number, the closer to the danger zone, you have to calculate the floor and ceiling of her potential N count. In an ambigious environment, the floor/ceiling is multiplied by a factor of 4-5/10. In a situation where you know factual context is true, and you feel you can objectively trust the person, the floor/ceiling will be multiplied by a factor of 3/5. Now it is important to know that a very few number of people will actually report really low numbers...
For the men who have considered a healthy LTR or something of this sort. Taking advantage of purge week, I'll post a simple way of measuring the danger you have as an individual when dating any girl. Before anything, if you don't know the hot-crazy matrix, you should 100% take a look into this.
After having basic knowledge of the hot-crazy matrix, you move towards generating a list of good qualities AND deficiencies you would like the other person to have, which you have to discern (take a special consideration of both internal perception and emotional trauma)... Now it is important to note that this specific method is only based for women only. Although a male simulation would be similar in style and structure, it would have to be tweaked to fit differences (if you got any questions about a probable male n count number ... ask). There are many reasons for the decline in quality of relationships (feminism, Hollywood brainwashing, long abusive cultural dogmas from one gender to another, etc.) .
To begin with, no girl will tell you her N count is higher than 10-12... If they do... run. No girl will tell you she's had a lot of ONS's/FWB's/FB/'s, and of course no girl will ever tell you she has the infamous ''list'' (which is where the mythical Chad/Tyrone/Dylan/Juan, or the rest of the orbiters come from). You also have to take into account generational factors. For example, while dating milennial women, I have realized that most fall between two categories ''women with hoe-type behavioral patterns'' and ''women lacking hoe-type patterns''. It doesn't have to be summarized to two categories, you can expand it as you'd like (hot-crazy matrix has more than 3).
Now, to calculate the location of any girl you'd like to date in the hot-crazy matrix. You have to calculate her N count. There are many ways you can do it, in my case I decided to run estimates based on the 1-10 parameter most women will give you. be careful with the wording used when given this number. A ''I've been with a couple ons and 3-4 bf's long term'' can be much more closer to reality than ''I've only been with 2-3 bf's all long term/I've fucked X amount of guys per year''.
Obviously the higher the number, the closer to the danger zone, and you have to calculate the floor and ceiling of her potential N count. In an ambigious environment, the floor/ceiling is multiplied by a factor of 4-5/10. In a situation where you know factual context is true, and you feel you can objectively trust the person, the floor/ceiling will be multiplied by a factor of 3/5. Now it is important to know that a very few number of people will actually report really low numbers...
After acquiring a range, you take the list you've developed and calculate increments on exponents of ''10'' (not actually a 10, but more like a steady increase/decrease towards a more specific number). The more red flags you objectively notice, the more it increases, the more perceived good qualities for a companionship, the more it decreases.
[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GennyXThundercunt.0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]FeniZio94[S] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GennyXThundercunt.0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]FeniZio94[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RamboHoodie4200 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]FeniZio94[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link