It has previously been argued on this blog that women of a more mentally unstable nature, who often leave a cornucopia of destruction in their wake, are merely extreme versions of their less catastrophic sisters. In a previous essay on "The Methods of Female Madness", this was summarized as "AWALT on steroids" as the less stable variant of woman manifest the same behaviors, just in a much greater volume and variety. For instance, all women issue congruence tests, the variant lacking in stability merely does so more frequently and at a more extreme level.

The danger in such overlaps between the normal and the abnormal is that a man, recently freed from his blue pill shackles may struggle with determining which variant he is facing, and thus which precautions are necessary. The recently red-pilled man who adopts self-improvement, himself as his mental point of origin, and builds solid boundaries may experience an increase in his success rate with women, however the new behaviors and principles are merely the early beginnings of a new mindset. The blue pill male still remains beneath the surface, ready to jump back out and take over at first opportunity. Change is difficult, remaining the same is easy. Thus, if such a man meets a woman of a more unstable archetype, his behavior may rapidly revert to his old patterns.

A common pattern to the relationships with a damaged woman is over-evaluation, devaluation and discard. This essay follows that same structure outlining the common behaviors of both the damaged and the normal woman, and their differences. As the behavior of a normal woman towards a masculine alpha male largely mimics the behavior of an unstable woman towards her prospective victim, being able to distinguish these from each other can drastically improve the odds of avoiding introducing drama into your life.

Normal Feminine Behavior and Love Bombing

It has long been an established axiom of the red pill sphere, that a feminine woman will seek to prove her worth to a masculine man through among others deferring to his judgment, providing acts of service and lavishing attention upon him. These are also the major stratagems of the unstable woman during what is known as the "love bombing phase", wherein such a woman will seek to establish a special place for herself within the man's mind, in effect making herself the center of his world.

Thus, the recently freed man who elects to adopt red pill teachings, must learn to discern the abnormal from the normal, in order to make reasoned judgments about the woman in front of him. The challenge he will often have to face, will be one constructed within the confines of his own mind, wherein he will desire to believe that his recent change in mindset, dedication of self-improvement and increasing sexual market value is the cause of the female behavior. This may often be a case of post-hoc ergo propter hoc, where he assumes that his recent change in approach is reflected back by her something, which is further compounded by confirmation bias wherein the man views her behavior as a validation of his recent choices, and thus this flatters his ego.

For the normal woman, this is a case of her attempting to prove herself to be worthy of his attention in the same manner a Beta male approaches his oneitis, whereas for the damaged woman she is treating the man at an inflated value. She is well aware of his actual value, however her treatment of him is that she would normally reserve for a man of much higher value. Most non-Alpha males are not used to being treated in this manner, and thus it is a persuasive strategy on her part in order to ensure that the relationship grows at a high rate.

Rapid Relationship Progression

The rapid relationship progression is in many ways a goal of much seduction material. The old wisdom in this area is that up until a man and a woman has sex, the woman holds more power than the man, and once a couple has sex the man holds more power than the woman. This is frequently summarized as "Women use sex to negotiate a relationship, men use a relationship to negotiate sex". Thus, for the man in order to better his bargaining position a rapid escalation of a relationship to the physical is a requirement.

Such behavior is often reflected in the damaged woman as well, and her resume is often filled with relationships of varying lengths, but at extraordinary depth. The chief ability of such a woman is an ability to rapidly progress a relationship forward in depth and seriousness, often seeking to secure for herself matrimony or paternity. This is akin to the seduction technique of "venue bouncing" wherein a man transports a female between multiple secondary and tertiary locations in order to rapidly escalate familiarity and alter the female's perception of time.

The damaged woman will seek to escalate a relationship rapidly to the physical, much sooner than even a highly competent seducer would be accustomed to, and then convincing him that the ease and speed of seduction comes from genuine emotion. In this moment seeking to pivot herself into a position of "The One". This is not dissimilar to the behavior of more stable examples of womanhood, in that both seek to maximize the gain from a sexual liaison, the difference is in the remarkable competence and methodology the damaged woman will employ in order to secure such payouts.

Negs and Congruence Testing

Within the red pill theoretical framework, the neg is in many ways the swiss army knife of a seducer's arsenal. It has many situations where its use serves to shift the balance of an interaction in favor of the seducer. The major function of the "neg" is to communicate control of self-, states and frame, and establishing dominance within the interaction. For the female congruence tests (commonly called "shit tests), exist to reveal the weaknesses in the mindset of a man, their purpose being to increase the stress of an interaction to see whether the man will be congruent with the image he projects and that she perceives, or whether he is engaging in dishonest signalling. One could say that the neg exists as a signal of mate value, and the congruence test exists in order to assist a female in determining if the signal is true or false.

The essay touched on the major difference between the dangerous woman and the normal woman in the introduction, it often being in how frequently congruence tests are issued by the female, furthermore their level. Negs exist in a spectrum from light to nuclear, as is the case for shit tests. A mild congruence test may be "I bet you say that to all the girls", where a nuclear one may be throwing a tantrum in public to see how the male responds.

For a normal woman the amount of such tests a man will have to face depends on the stage of the relationship and the context of the interaction. A normal woman will frequently issue less and less tests as the relationship progresses, whereas the dangerous woman will issue more and more tests the longer the relationship lasts. This is due to the inherent different approach these women have to their relationships with men. The former seeks to eliminate unsuitable partners prior to any sexual interaction, the latter seeks to lure a man into large investments in a relationship early on, so that she can maintain her hold on him for as long as he is useful to her.

The degree of shit test also differs in that a normal woman will often follow a predictable pattern wherein her tests become less and less volatile over time, where the other type will eventually find herself in the position of issuing nuclear shit tests on a daily basis. This often takes place shortly before the discard phase. The congruence tests of a damaged woman serves the purpose of enabling the control and alteration of their mate as part of the devaluation stage.

Altering Their Mate

Once a woman recognizes that a man has made an investment in her, she always tries to leverage that investment into a better deal for herself. This is part of the reason why I often refer to women as the ultimate "bait and switch" artists. While a degree of misrepresentation is prevalent in both sexes during the mating process, it is more prevalent among the female. One could say that men misrepresent themselves prior to sex, and women misrepresent themselves after sex. Once the relationship is established, the normal and the damaged woman will both seek to alter the frame of the relationship, this may be as simple as the sexy lingerie disappearing, or as destructive as a drastic increase in performance burden for the man.

The change will often be dependent on the sexual strategy the woman employed in order to secure the relationship. If the woman elected a strategy that placed little demand on the man compromising his lifestyle, she will often start to increase her demands for him to compromise. This is a behavior common to all women, whereupon securing a relationship they slowly start working to change the man into what they think they desire.

The distinction between the damaged woman and the normal woman in this regard is not so much in their behavior, as all women have a tendency to seek to alter their mate during the course of a relationship, often to the detriment of the relationship. It is the catch 22 of womanhood that if a man permits a woman to sand off his rough edges, it will turn out that those edges were what she found attractive in the first place. This is often what "we grew apart" or similar turns of phrase mean, the man permitted the woman to get rid of those parts of him to which she was most attracted.

Read the rest here:http://wp.me/p78k8O-Hs