https://www.seattleattorneysblog.com/tenancy-in-common-disfavored-in-washington-property-distribution/

"""The parties had been married about 14 years when the wife petitioned for divorce. The court awarded full custody of both children to the father. The court did not order child support, but the father received SSDI benefits for the children, both of whom have disabilities."""

Mostly everything worked out well for the father. But in my opinion, she should of been required to pay child support. Even if she's on disability. That doesn't excuse the need to pay child support. Fathers never get that excuse.

Also, she was a teacher on disability: how much do you think she contributed to those investments? Certainly not half. She was awarded tenancy in common rights to all investment properties and the primary residence. (Meaning she gets the value of half the equity when it sells).