I saw it many times where people dismiss what happens online as "isn't the real world". There are so many examples of misandrists trends online actually becoming an issue. Look at how much bigotry spread against men among even regular women just because of trends online like "KAM", "Man or Bear", "not all men, but always a man", "all men till it's no man". All of these were massive online trends that negatively impacted both regular men and some regular normal women who didn't even know hateful misandrists got to them. The skewed stats is perhaps where it actually started to take real effect.
All of these trends have one major thing in common, all started as small misandrist trends online. It was in the beginning, limited to just small corners of the internet but got huge and normalized even in non feminist circles.
It's not just the ones that went big and were obvious that are the problem, but also the smaller ones that are not always noticed. For example, misandrist and feminists on TikTok started using the words ran through and bop for men. Two of the words that were only to be directed at women and popularized by men. It was only used for women for years, up until the misandrists started trying to do it back. And eventually many non misandrist women also started using it for men. What I found amusing is that those same women would support actual ran through women, be the biggest bop around, and will be shaming only men. They also would straight up gaslight and lie that these words were only for women.
These femcels will eventually be the downfall of society.
[–]TypicalNPC 89 points90 points91 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterestMedical674[S] 15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]leroy2007 32 points33 points34 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheLadForTheJob 14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]minorkeyed 17 points18 points19 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TrickyPollution5421 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]thinsoldier 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shaq1f 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]doogles -3 points-2 points-1 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterestMedical674[S] 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]doogles -6 points-5 points-4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterestMedical674[S] 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]doogles -5 points-4 points-3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterestMedical674[S] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]doogles -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]InterestMedical674[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]netver -6 points-5 points-4 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]Entheosparks 5 points6 points7 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[+]netver -8 points-7 points-6 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]InterestMedical674[S] 7 points8 points9 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]netver -4 points-3 points-2 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lui_Le_Diamond 4 points5 points6 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]netver -1 points0 points1 point (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lui_Le_Diamond -1 points0 points1 point (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]netver 0 points1 point2 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lui_Le_Diamond 1 point2 points3 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]netver -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DirectConstant7 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]netver2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link