TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Aspiring_Hobo Archive

View 1 posts and 383 comments by Aspiring_Hobo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Question for BluePillAspiring_Hobo/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Small portion of your childhood meaning it's 6 years compared to 20+ years of not experiencing that. I was years behind in social skill development too but those are skills that can be learned and developed. But if you have a defeatist mindset and only look back at your past you can never progress because you'll just blame the next few decades of your life on 6 years. How logical does that sound? Unless you're content in living in misery then at some point you have to let go of that stuff from w…
/r/BlackPillScience28/08/20 07:15 PM
1

I experienced that too. I had "kick me" signs put on my back and people actually kicked me, got jumped, didn't get any girls, and people only talked to me when they wanted answers on a test. But at some as an adult you have to understand you can't let a small portion of your childhood dictate the rest of your life. I mean everyone's different I guess. I stopped caring about having friends (still don't really have any today) and school once I had bigger responsibilities. All of that childhood stu…
/r/BlackPillScience27/08/20 07:43 PM
1

Once you realize that women aren't us you'll have an easier time
/r/BlackPillScience26/08/20 11:04 AM
1

It's just called life. Adults don't get bullied. Kids calling each other names isn't real bullying it's just what kids do. I got roasted a lot one year in elementary then the very next year didn't get roasted as much even though I looked the exact same and was at the same school.
/r/BlackPillScience26/08/20 11:01 AM
1

Imagine taking women this seriously to get angry at this heaux lol. Honestly I agree with her with the first tip. I'm too old to be engaging in the song and dance of courtship. If I'm famous and I bring you to my hotel bitch you already know what it is. I'm not trying to watch a movie. I'm trying to finger pop you.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/08/20 11:03 PM
1

If you've done something 2000 times and haven't learned how to be better at it even the slightest bit then that's on you I'm afraid. Either you aren't trying to learn or aren't applying yourself.
/r/seduction02/08/20 01:08 PM
2

Depends. I train relentlessly and (not internet bragging here) am usually one of the biggest and strongest guys in my gym. I get some looks, a few more smiles, and girls will add me on snapchat when my cousin posts me working out on his story, but it never goes anywhere because although confident in myself and not socially retarded I'm still very asocial and don't really seek people out. I'm sure if I were more involved in social media or went outside more it'd be different lol
/r/seduction02/08/20 09:55 AM
2

Working on yourself is only one part. The harder part is actually learning how to interact with people because despite all the shit about "game" or whatever, there's no blueprint. It has to be unique to you. So you have to take it upon yourself and get rejected and learn from it while crafting your own philosophy. OP's path isn't yours, yours isn't mine, etc.
/r/seduction02/08/20 09:49 AM
2

You're just being a guy. This is the desire and natural mentality of 90% of dudes but they just aren't able to do it. Keep doing what you do.
/r/seduction08/10/15 01:09 PM
2

"Dread game" isn't abuse, plain abuse, plain and simple. It's not about threatening to do anything. It's simply tapping into the competitive nature of women. Most people mistakenly believe that once they get into a relationship, their job is over. Once men stop working, women get comfortable and start displaying the aforementioned behavior of denying sex. On another note, women do hold pussy hostage though. So the term "terrorist" is somewhat applicable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 02:22 PM
2

That's cool and all, but I should still be able to make fun of you for being fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 06:35 PM
1

Not at all. Girls think it makes them more attractive to guys because that's the kind of shit they find attractive in guys. It doesn't matter if a girl is a lawyer or the average bitch at McDonald's: as long as she's sexy we'll give her a chance. And on top of that, simply because she has a vagina, the bitch at McDonald's will have the same level of arrogance as the lawyer. I still have to jump through the same proverbial hoops to fuck her as I do with the lawyer.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 06:02 PM
1

They aren't completely devoid of it, it's that they don't show it in regards to men. When discussing issues men face, especially in regards to women, many women are dismissive and uncaring. That's all fine and well, but then they act confused as to why some guys are angry. But what you have to do is just train your girl. I don't mean "train" like a dog or some shit. I mean teach her how to be likeable and be your girl. Girls rarely have to think about being likeable as it relates to guys, becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 02:02 PM
1

Because women innately don't don't want to be leaders and be responsible for everything else. They don't want to win, they want a winner. Leading doesn't make them feel womanly because they're just emulating the male equivalent of whatever they're doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/15 12:36 PM
1

Because women don't know what makes women attractive. A woman doesn't even know that she herself is attractive until a guy tells her or is harassing her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 01:40 PM
14

No, you're right. I don't know how this devolved into some kinda rant about black people/culture though, lol.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 01:37 PM
1

By reacting to what men say. Women don't know they're sexy until men tell them or are harassing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 12:50 PM
3

Women are goofy, so when they start getting girly, don't get angry. You just have to be dismissive sometimes. That said, women can build tenure and have say in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 08:25 PM
1

Yes it is, but most men have too much ego to do it, and haven't trained their women well enough to be comfortable doing it righteously.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 04:44 PM
2

She's definitely cute, but not extremely gorgeous or anything. Just a regular looking white girl to me though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/15 03:03 PM
0

I know there's a man who is better at what she does
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 08:00 PM
2

Short answer: looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/15 07:58 PM
2

Firstly, there's no neutral zone for guys. There's either "would fuck" or "wouldn't fuck". There are different levels of intensity to those feelings, but those are the two categories. To answer the question, no. If a woman is in the "wouldn't fuck" category, trying to personality her way into the other category won't work. She has to get hotter.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 05:22 AM
2

In which ways did they differ? And what were your reasons for breaking up? No need to go into details, I'm just looking for a general overview
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/15 05:17 AM
1

Women actually think this? Are they stroke victims or in a coma? Women are propositioned dick on a daily basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 04:43 PM
15

What do you mean "type of women"? It's not about appealing to a certain kind of woman. It's about tapping into the feminine nature that all women have. Sure, they can have differing personalities and whatnot. But all women have an underlying nature, just like men. I'm curious though. What type of woman do you think "RP tactics" only work on?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 04:25 PM
2

Women say they like a shy, awkward guy but it's horseshit. No girl wants a guy she has to lead and nurture like he's her son.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 04:19 PM
6

You gotta understand, women have the memory of goldfish. They don't remember what you did for them 2 weeks ago. They develop a sense of entitlement. This broad expected to be treated like his girlfriend yet she wasn't his girlfriend. Women need to understand that we (men) value our time, space and attention like they value their bodies. Why is she entitled to his time? Hell, even if she were his girlfriend she wouldn't be entitled to anything.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 07:48 PM
1

Being the apartment building for another human being isn't fun or cool. If women could have children without the pregnancy, they would all do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 08:40 PM
1

Eh, somewhat accurate. Not the way I would use that analogy though
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 04:10 PM
1

+/u/user_simulator /u/Aspiring_Hobo
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 02:53 PM
1

It just shows how much better it is being a guy. I sat down to pee on accident before. It was just...sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 02:48 PM
1

In the eyes of God / the Universe (whatever you believe in) men and women are the same. Meaning, men don't deserve to live more than women or vice-versa. In a social setting too, like individually, not every single man is better than every single woman. However, just as a creature, men are better. We don't bleed every month, we don't sit down to pee, and we don't have to carry humans inside of us. The worst NBA player would destroy the best WNBA player, etc. Men are just great.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/15 12:54 AM
1

How in the world is polygamy immoral or unethical? You really compared that to rape or murder? Rape and murder exist outside of a societal framework. Polygamy only exists within the norms of our society in which a relationship is expected to consist of just two people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 01:37 PM
8

When I say "teach" I quite literally mean teach. Not in an explicitly instructive manner, but just actual teaching. Many women don't know how to be good girlfriends because they are always used to doing what's good for them. But in a relationship, it's a woman's job to keep a man around. Sure, you can learn together, but in the end, a man in a relationship has to make a commitment. That commitment isn't to a woman, but to himself. It's a commitment to himself that he can not be a piece of shit a…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 05:01 AM
10

All of this ignores the simple fact that regardless of culture or whatever, you're gonna have to teach your girl how to be your girlfriend/wife regardless. The only thing that changes is the degree of difficulty in the training I.e. some women are bitchier than others, some are more hardened than others, etc. Unless you hit the lottery and meet a broad who has already been taught well or just has great instincts, you're always going to have work to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/15 04:48 AM
2

No, it's not. It's your BF's fault for asking. You can't ask women to be filthy. You have to trick them into doing it because they don't want to feel like whores. Subtle suggestion is what he should have done. But if you don't wanna do it then you don't wanna do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 01:53 PM
1

It's the same thing, but women and men aren't after the same things so it has different practices and effects.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 02:20 AM
1

you're basically saying "My life would be fine without you even if you called me on my dread game bluff and left me." I see nothing wrong with this. The other end of this is a guy feeling like he would be nothing without his woman which is what women like to refer to as "needy" and "clingy". A guy can be sad that his girl is gone, but not sad enough to just...quit life. If an employee gets fired from a job, they don't just stop hiring people. Business flows as normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 02:18 AM
1

I'd need to replace her with like 3-4 women to adequately fill that void. She's developed a lot of equity over time and I don't have time to train another woman. Doubt it. You don't find Generals just walking around outside. She'd have to train him and would grow tired of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 08:09 PM
2

Yes. Pretty simple question. There are some men who think like women (emotionally) though
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/15 07:57 PM
1

They don't have to be, but they just...aren't funny biologically. Anytime you try to joke with a girl she'll get offended, even the "sarcastic" ones. They just don't know funny.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 08:23 PM
0

The stuff that girls like us for is what men offer. You can give a bitch money, protection, time, guidance, open her pickle jars, build her back porch deck, etc. Men are pretty great
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 03:17 AM
15

Yes. Men have to keep women happy. Women don't keep themselves happy in a relationship. Guys are always expected to be protectors, providers, romantics, etc. None of that is expected of women to do for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 01:51 PM
1

I personally don't care if a girl used to be a ho before I got with her. Some dudes get insecure about that and think that they will be unable to satisfy their girl and she will inevitably cheat on them. That's our arrogance as men. I look at it like this, if your bitch is gonna cheat, she's gonna cheat. Just let her go and open up the HR department again. But what they don't realize is that women don't like us for the same stuff we like them for. They don't objectify us to the level that we do …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 06:25 PM
1

Women like sex too, but when no girl wants 100 different dicks in her. Some try to be like men and act like they just can't get enough dick (see "nymphomaniacs") but dick isn't hard for them to get, so they don't crave it. It would be like me craving a glass of water every second of the day. Water is abundant, so I only drink when necessary. Women want love, but they have no skill in getting it. So what they (sluts) do is give away the greatest thing they have to offer (pussy) and HOPE (key word…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 06:19 PM
-1

Lol people always spew this horseshit that only dumb girls like the type of guys who post in here and in TRP. It has nothing to do with intelligence. It's about appealing to the feminine nature. I've met girls who work at McDonald's and girls who are on their way to getting PhDs and they are all just as goofy as the next. At the end of the day, they're all women and although they will have differing personality traits, they all have the same human and female traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:56 AM
0

I'd say 23. Still young and delicious but starting to explore her woman-ness. Sure most 23 year olds are goofy as fuck, but that's gonna be an issue with any woman of any age.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 02:50 AM
3

Newsflash: Getting dick isn't hard for women. Welcome to Genesis
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/15 07:57 PM
5

Women don't know what they want. They know what they want subconsciously, of course, but what they tell you doesn't always add up. They just know it when they see it. Guys usually know what they want because we're simple creatures. Our list of things that a girl can do to not piss us off is very short, whereas your girl can love you on Monday and hate you on Tuesday despite you doing the exact same shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 02:27 PM
2

Not all women are capable of being more than just their looks. Women who shout that women should never be sexual objects ruin it for the sexy women who have nothing else to offer. Let them be objects, and you be something else. But being a sexual object has many benefits as a woman as well. Despite what they say, the sole reason a guy approaches a girl initially is because he finds her physically attractive. No guy looks at a girl and goes, "Man, I bet you she knows how to factor trinomials" He'…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 02:16 PM
1

Firstly, yes, we're equal as humans and equal that neither of us are obligated to the other. She's free to do what she wishes. Secondly, I said women don't want to guide men. No girl wants a guy she has to nurture and protect like he's a little boy. They don't want a son, they want a man. It doesn't mean that you need to subjugate her, or treat her bad or any crap like that. It's just that she knows you're better and you both want to be with each other so you both behave accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:42 AM
1

In a relationship, yes. If a guy is miserable his woman will be miserable as well. You have to keep them happy. Women want to find a guy who is happy and be happy with him. How is that a master/slave dynamic? Nowhere have I ever said that a woman needs to be subjugated or be treated like dirt. It's like you're purposefully reaching just to be offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:36 AM
1

When did I ever say that a girl needs to be manipulated? The girl CHOOSES to stay with me just like I CHOOSE to love her. It's not about brainwashing or anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 11:31 AM
0

That sounds simple, but many women don't understand that
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:39 PM
1

It's a tricky matter though. What you consider likable and suitable wife material isn't universal Sure when it comes to specific character traits. But I'm talking about respect, mainly. All men want their time, space and attention to be valued. The woman needs to decide if you are worth changing for, or if finding another guy who likes her personality as it is would make her happier in the long run. Sure, she can run off with a guy who lets her run over him. She'll think it's great at first, but…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 04:00 PM
2

It's unconscious. They just don't like having to be with a guy they have to run, but they also don't want to feel like they're being subjugated. That's where a man's tact and skill come into play. It's not about treating a woman like dirt. You can treat her like a queen but you have to be the king. If you aren't, she won't respect you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:46 PM
2

Most women don't like being the lead
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 01:53 PM
4

On how to be a likeable and suitable girlfriend/wife. Many women never have to learn how to be likeable because stupid guys just want to fuck them and will put up with their nonsense. Then when in a relationship they will endure their suffering because they believe in the whole "there are ups and downs in a relationship" horeshit. There are enough "downs" in the real world. I don't need the person I'm with causing more grief. But that's where the guidance comes in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 01:13 PM
3

Many women are goofy and need guidance. They also want a guy whose hand they don't have to hold, and who they don't have to protect. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 01:02 PM
3

True. But the best Olympic male precision rifle shooter would be no competition to the best Olympic female rifle shooter. Men may have a better body for basket ball, but women have a better body (and patience) for precision shooting Ok. You get precision shooting and some gymnastics. Men have everything else. Yeahp, and one could argue that it builds character. You're never going to know the struggle. We have to endure more, we have more of a daily struggle, and we're transformed into better peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 01:02 PM
6

On a social or human level, no. But just as a creature? Absolutely. The wackest NBA player would destroy the best WNBA player 21-0 no contest. We don't bleed every month. We can waste life by jerking off and it will be replenished the next day. Women don't know the freedom of being able to be frivolous with life. They can't shoot out eggs. We don't have to sit down to pee We don't get fucked. We do the fucking We can open our own pickle jars and carry our own groceries It's amazing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/15 01:56 AM
3

I never said women can't control their actions. I said some behavior is instinctual. That just means it isn't always conscious but it can be overridden. You have an instinct to breathe, or pull your hand away from a fire, but you override those instincts if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 05:21 PM
6

This is a great question, and it really shows how clueless women are when it comes to advice on getting women. An even better question though, if women didn't have vaginas, how would they keep their man around? What would you do?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 01:00 PM
7

It's not intentional; it's simply in your nature. It's not like a woman consciously thinks like "This guy has to be 'alpha' for me to like him." It's just that when you see a weak ass dude, you are unattracted to him. With the testing in relationships, again, it's just nature. Women many times don't consciously think about what they're doing in regards to "shit testing". It's just that when they wear you down and catch you slipping, it can be bad for the both of you. You want a guy you can look …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 12:55 PM
1

Young and supple but still extremely goofy (even moreso than the average woman). Not worth spending time to raise her.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 02:54 PM
2

When girls do it, like saying they have to wait X amount of time before they do this or that, it just makes me walk away. A lot of young guys, and from my experience white guys, like that teasing shit, but I don't really have time for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 02:45 PM
2

You just need to relax, dude. You're trying to game when there's no reason to game. I mean, you should always stay sharp and not let her fag you up and turn you into a wimp, but it doesn't sound like she needs any training. I'm just trying to figure out exactly what your problem is here. What is making you unhappy? That's the question you gotta answer.
/r/askTRP19/07/15 02:30 PM
1

They don't man. I'm talking about for relationships. Will big giant dick 6'5'' buff guy get a 1 night stand before you? Sure. But dick isn't what girls are after. It means nothing to them because they don't have to work to get it. They all want love, but don't know how to get it. So what whores do is give away the greatest thing a woman has to offer (pussy) in HOPES that a guy will love her afterward. So after she fucks big buff guy she'll then start to get girly like "Where is this going?" and …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/15 02:26 PM
2

I didn't say anything specific about your relationship. I used the pronouns "you" and "we" to just refer to women and men respectively. It's like I feel TRP goes around their elbow to get to their asses, making stuff far more complicated than need be and actively breeding resentment in their partner- which while it might be a bandaid to keep you feeling in control of her- in reality is setting up a whole other ball of problems. It's not about feeling in control of or actually being in control of…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 06:33 PM
2

Your problem is that you care if she's chasing you or not. You want to be the king but you have a jester's mentality. I want more info though. Describe her behavior more. Does she treat you like you don't matter, or is she just that confident in you?
/r/askTRP18/07/15 05:45 PM
2

It's women's downfall because it causes them more problems than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 05:38 PM
4

it's simple, girls like us for different stuff than we like them for. They don't objectify us to the level that we do to them. A girl can't personality her way into dick. If a girl was funny, smart, and all of that, but looked like Precious, I'm gonna shoo her away instantly. A fat guy (regular fat, not "My 600lb Life" fat) can charm, status and money his way into good pussy. That's women's downfall.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 05:07 PM
3

..our relationship is based on openness and not playing shitty emotional games I 100% agree with this. I support honesty in all situations. It's just that nowadays, many times man honesty is called misogyny. If we married and a few years down the road he got caught up in using "dread" and "amused mastery" to make me stfu and cater to him whenever there's a problem, that sure as hell wouldn't be what I signed up for. Exactly. This is why the whole "fake it till you make it" stuff doesn't work. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 05:02 PM
3

Girls don't want equal. They want better. And no, those scenarios are not necessarily the same. It depends on what they are attracted to each other for. For instance, if I married a woman who was sexy, then she decided to get fat, she would have to lose weight or I would leave and just go get an actual fat girl. The reasons are as follows: 1.) I wasn't attracted to her on that level to where she could get fat and I wouldn't care. I got with her because she was a sexy girl 2.) She wouldn't know h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 02:15 PM
10

Only ugly/fat girls have to deal with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 08:08 PM
1

Firstly, the stay at home dad thing. How did it happen? You said it was mutual so did she ask you to be a stay at home dad or what? Secondly, the working out for her stuff doesn't matter, especially considering she doesn't do it. What has happened is that she's gotten used to you. She's successfully fagged you up, meaning that she feels she has you figured out entirely and you aren't a threat to her self esteem. What you need to do is get out of the house. And when you go out, make sure you're w…
/r/MarriedRedPill17/07/15 08:04 PM
2

Pussy isn't a top priority for me but I still want it. It's just part of being a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/15 12:15 PM
2

Not necessarily. Dick isn't something that women crave like men crave pussy. It isn't special to them because it isn't hard to get. Women cheat on men because it's something they don't like about him, not because they want more dick. When men cheat, it has nothing to do with his GF/Wife. It's just that he saw some girl that was irresistible that day. So you just have to make sure that you stay vigilant and don't let your girl catch you slipping then she won't feel like she has a reason to cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 07:29 PM
1

Or just make fun of them. 9/10 times they take selfies in messy ass rooms or in bathrooms with scratched up countertops. If you're going to compliment a woman's appearance, it has to be in an objectifying way. Pretty women are used to hearing that they're pretty, so there's no point in telling them that.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/15 03:59 AM
21

That's why they put so goddamn much rhetorical weight into sexualization and objectification. If they were special, then more than their bodies would be valued This is the key right here. Women like to claim they are more than just their bodies but the first thought that goes through their minds when a guy approaches them is "Is this guy just after pussy?" If they really felt that their bodies were a small part of their value, they wouldn't be so concerned with if a guy just wanted pussy or not.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 12:13 AM
1

Well, sure, but you're just as likely to find a goofy guy who needs guidance. Any given guy is not any more likely to have his shit together than any given woman, so it's silly to suggest that, as a rule, in relationships "the guy" needs to lead "the girl," or it can't be the 'best' it could be. Just because not every guy is a capable leader, doesn't mean it's not the guy's job to provide guidance for his woman among other things. I said not every guy is a capable leader. They have to grow into …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 06:42 PM
1

Do you think you're better off in life with or without your guy? Do you think what he adds (if anything) is easily replaceable?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 12:19 PM
2

Not every woman is doing just fine before a guy. Some girls are goofy and need a guy to give them guidance. Doesn't mean every guy is a capable leader or that she's less than human or anything. You can love each other just fine but still have one person be the leader. And your flair fits in with what I'm saying...lol. I'm
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 12:13 PM
1

It could be whatever characteristics you view as valuable in yourself, or just the fact that you feel "completed" by having him in your life and feel you'd be better with him than without him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 05:40 AM
0

I didn't say you can't do all of that. That doesn't mean he isn't better than you or vice-versa.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 03:52 AM
8

There are different contexts of dominant. A dominatrix is only like that sexually. BDSM isn't an all-encompassing lifestyle necessarily. The example in the OP was a woman trying to be a guy and treating her man like a girl. That's why I used the phrase "dominate in a masculine way".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 08:39 PM
5

You want to dominate a guy in a masculine way? Unless you're a dyke, dominating a guy (in the sense of you being the lead in life) isn't even remotely sexy to you as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 07:15 PM
9

That sounds unhealthy. I don't think codependence should ever be encouraged. I'd counter that the best relationships are the ones where neither person needs the other, but where they choose to stay together out of mutual affection and satisfaction. Sorry I should have explained better. I don't mean codependency like, the guy will be a wreck if she leaves or his life will have no purpose. I mean that she needs him in her life because she needs guidance. He's the provider, not necessarily just fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 06:21 PM
2

Alright so speak specifically about your relationship. In what ways does it differ from that model? Or better: what are some of the characteristics of your relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 05:59 PM
2

What exactly do you guys mean by "BP relationship"? Like what are the characteristics?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 05:51 PM
9

There's always someone better. Better in this scenario meaning what they bring to the table. I can still enjoy a girl's companionship, and she can be a great girl and have all the self-esteem in the world, but still know I'm better. The best relationships are the ones where the woman feels like the guy doesn't need her, but he wants her ; then on the other hand the guy feels like the woman doesn't just want him, but she needs him. If you aren't needed in a woman's life you won't be there very lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 05:50 PM
19

I don't even know what a "Bluepill relationship" entails exactly but sure, you can be in a square relationship and be happy. The only thing I say is that a woman can't respect a guy she feels she's better than, and will eventually come to resent a supplicating, spineless guy. She'll become an unpleasant mess and he'll become a shell of a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 05:36 PM
12

So she basically becomes a guy? I know the tongue-in-cheek point of this whole scenario but these are all guy things and no woman (unless she was a dyke) would feel natural doing. Actually, the motivations are guy things, not necessarily all of the actions themselves. You're just reversing male and female nature: saying men are the emotional ones, that women need to lead guys, lol. This is silly, but cute. The only oroblem I have with this scenario is the assumptions about me (the guy). Firstly,…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 05:26 PM
1

That's just typical young, suburban white girl goofiness. She'll grow out of it eventually.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 04:58 PM
1

Tits and ass. Vaginas are ok too when they're not bleeding.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 05:30 AM
0

She has some of the right mentality, but her approach is wrong. She looks at it like she's building him up, like she lets him do the things he does. Now she may just have tenure with him and he allows her to think that way, which is fine, or maybe she just hasn't broken in completely yet. Either way, she's been trained well. But the thing she's right about is men having few needs. For most guys, it's VERY easy for their women to not get on their nerves. Just shut up, fuck him, and don't get fat …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 06:46 PM
1

My level of filth is fine. I've just gotten a little jaded. Pussy is great but it's not special.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 06:59 AM
1

Jerking off. The only reason I fuck is to have a memory to jerk off to later.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 02:36 AM
2

I don't have a problem with former hoes, but many guys do because they can't let go of that ego that we guys have. They are the same guys who would feel uncomfortable around their girl's ex-boyfriend because they're so attached to her body still. I know we guys are possesive, but it's silly. Nowadays even if you're a teenager you're not going to find a bitch whose hymen isn't broken. So just get over that and focus on raising a good girlfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 06:57 AM
4

Pussy is an object though. 35 year-old wrinkled vagina doesn't carry the same weight as 23 year-old supple vagina, at least in man world it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 06:52 AM
-4

Dude, right now she feels that she has you figured out and on lockdown. You're not cool to her anymore. Honestly, just go get some side. It'll raise your swagger back up. You ain't even gotta actually have sex with another woman, but your wife just has to know that other women still find you attractive. When she does, she'll get competitive and start trying to earn her place again. But it has to be a righteous fuck. You have to explain the logic to your wife. But just start dressing in your best…
/r/MarriedRedPill22/06/15 03:39 PM
1

If I'm out with a regular girl - I'll comp her If I'm out with a fat girl - We pay for our own stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 04:43 AM
1

True, it's the woman's job to keep a man around, but that's usually accomplished by just sticking it out through his nonsense. If she can do that, and just...not get on his nerves (which isn't hard for most guys) they'll be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 10:47 PM
1

Men don't have a checklist after sex. The main thing is that a girl doesn't get on a guy's nerves. And for most guys, it's not hard to not piss them off. If she just shuts her face, lets him watch the game and stays pretty, most guys wouldn't have a problem with their women at all. That's all it takes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 10:44 PM
1

In terms of how necessary it is to get bitches? Yes. In terms of just being a good way to live? No
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/15 02:48 AM
1

Pussy, not prostitution. And I could do it I'm sure
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 08:07 PM
0

I would be a whore. If pussy were a stock I'd bring the value down to zero. I don't know why young, supple women waste their youth trying to have dignity. They should do that when they're 30 and wrinkled.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 05:14 PM
8

No, no I agree with you here. I'm not saying a guy will or should purposefully be in a miserable relationship. I mean that a guy can make his woman better. Like, guys can bring a girl up from where she used to be, whether it be financially, or just lifestyle wise. You know, giving her guidance and everything. Women aren't looking to grow with a guy. They want a guy who is already established and they can then become a part of his life and make it theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 05:37 PM
12

Of course, that's why I said It's not just about having more money... The difference is that men have to go and create their own happiness. Women just wait until the right guy approaches them and for him to make them happy. Men don't have that luxury. If a girl meets a guy who doesn't fit her template: the looks, personality, etc that she wants, she gets rid of him and waits for the next guy to approach her. It may not be frequent, but she'll just sit and wait. But if a guy meets a girl who isn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 04:24 PM
17

The fact most of us will agree with is women have more access to casual sex than men, but generally they want commitment Yes this is true, but the difference between men and women is that man have to make themselves better to get what they want (sex) while women get to sit and complain. Women aren't taught to make themselves suitable girlfriends / wives at all. For instance, if you ask a woman what would make her a good gf / wife, she starts naming traits that are good to her i.e "I'm smart and …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/15 03:59 PM
3

You can be a good looking, successful guy and still be a chump and subservient guy. We've all seen guys who seem like they should be great with women but aren't. Women's downfall is that they love us for stuff other than just our looks. Would a girl rather fuck a 6'3'' muscle bound hunk? Sure. But it'll be an empty fuck if he doesn't get and stay in her mind. Dick isn't as important to women as pussy is to men. Look, women are abusive creatures, and power corrupts us all. So even being a good-lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/15 06:04 PM
4

I disagree with women are at their best from 18-23. Freshman girls in college are absolutely horrendous to be around. They are immature, have low self-esteem and have generally have no idea what they want in life. I 100% agree with all of this. I was speaking purely from a sexual standpoint though, which is the angle guys consider first when pursuing women. You don't even know what type of girl she is at 18-20 years old. People change so much in college. I think prime time age for a girl is 22-2…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 08:05 PM
6

Me too. I never said old broads can't still get guys, just that they aren't the first choice. It's like spending thousands trying to fix up an old jalopy instead of just buying a new car. But you're still in the supple stage right now so you don't have anything to worry about for a while.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 07:10 PM
8

Is that right? I'm guessing that's the case with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 06:49 PM
5

Women are at their best from 18-23. Not to say women in their 30s or 40s can't be sexy, but guys aren't going to work as hard for 40 year old pussy (which is like Moses age for women) as they will for young, supple 22 year old pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 06:18 PM
2

You're right in the sense that women's entire power structure comes from what men allow them to do, and men only allow women to do shit because we want to fuck them. But once guys understand that pussy is plentiful, and that we're better than women, it's not a chore dealing with them anymore. Many guys in relationships get like this. Their girlfriend/wife uses her pussy for leverage (because that's all women have to use against us) and they just go along with it because they want to fuck. I say …
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 05:10 PM
6

Speak for yourself. I hate women, but not in the bitter "Oh they're so terrible" way some guys on here do. I just hate what they put guys through to get pussy. Other than that I feel more annoyance toward women than vitriol.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 02:49 PM
2

You're right, but the thing people don't get is that most women fall into the first category. I'm not talking about sluts, but I mean women who have guys wanting to sleep with them and who are validated through that. Thats's the most common "normal girl". Any girl will feel validated by a guy wanting to sleep with them. I've met all kinds of women and they all respond to the same shit because it's about appealing to feminine nature, not someone's personality specifically. At least not initially.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 02:21 PM
1

The same reason they can retroactively decide that a guy raped them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 02:14 PM
1

That's true depending on how you classify "high". Any girl I've been with is usually the 4th or 5th most important thing in my life. I'd say that's decently high though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 06:26 AM
1

The unadulterated vitriol in this post is beautiful, but a bit off base.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 07:56 PM
1

18-25. The value of vagina is akin to cars, not houses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 06:37 PM
4

I'd rather be an ugly guy than a pretty woman. Being a woman period would...just be awful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/15 01:45 AM
1

Nowadays, when guys are being honest, it's called sexism or misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 07:37 PM
1

Women aren't unlikable for their entire existence. That's where the training comes in. If you don't know how to raise your woman then she won't be worth being around. That is, unless you hit the lottery and find a girl you're immediately compatible with. As for trust / love, you always save some for yourself in case the person you're with turns out to not be shit. You never give 100% away to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 04:55 AM
1

Being the object of men's sexual desire is a huge advantage. It's what puts them ahead in some cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 07:28 PM
0

There are no tips because it's not up to women whether or not a guy wants to make them his girl. Women's job is to keep us around. It's our job to get them in the first place. That being said, the odds are against her. Women depreciate like cars. 30 is where things start going downhill.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 05:40 PM
2

You were a whore. You gave away your time and conversation freely while getting nothing in return. When she started talking that "You can kiss me on after such and such amount of dates" crap, you should've told her, "You can talk to me after 3 dates." "I'll spend money on you after 3 months" Let her know that your time is more valuable to you than her and she isn't entitled to it. If she takes away your time and attention without your consent, that's rape.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 05:30 PM
1

Women and men cheat for different reasons. When guys cheat, it's never about his girl. It's just that he found a piece of pussy he couldn't turn down. That's how a guy can cheat yet still love his girl wholeheartedly. It's purely a physical aberration. However when women cheat, it's because the guy is not doing his job. Women don't cheat because they want more dick, that's not in a female's nature. They cheat on you emotionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 05:45 AM
1

What do I offer? Her being with me is what I offer. If she wants to be with me and I'm not attracted to her on the level to still want to be with her if she gets fat then she has to get it together. Otherwise, I'd just go get an actual fat bitch.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 05:42 AM
1

Insecurity gives the object of your insecurity power over you. If a woman knows she has that power over you, she'll abuse it the first chance she gets. Power corrupts us all, and women are by nature abusive creatures so it's a bad combination all around.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 02:29 PM
1

It's a phrase that partially illustrates how (pretty) women get to feel entitled to guys who are much better than they are, just because they have a vagina I.e. a pretty yet otherwise unremarkable woman can date a successful, well-to-do man. An average, unremarkable dude cannot date a successful, spectacular woman. There's no such thing as a "kept man"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 02:24 PM
3

This is a global movement to be compensated for our years and lifetimes of unpaid emotional, physical, sexual, and intellectual labor Fair enough. But when I treat you like a prostitute or a machine instead of person don't start bitchin.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 01:08 PM
3

Just like polls. When taking a poll, you don't poll every single person a available. That's impossible. You just get enough to make a general concensus.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 05:29 PM
16

This is why I always ask the question: why should we make them better? They boil themselves down to nothing more than being a vagina.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 04:49 AM
1

Lol @ this humble brag horseshit
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 03:57 PM
1

Idk, maybe they do, but I'm not TRP. But that's what it's always about: who's better. That's why I initially used the example of a bum guy and a well off woman. Women want a guy who is better than they are. What "better" entails exactly depends on whatever the woman values. Some value wealth, some value a sense of humor, some value intelligence, fashion sense, etc. Whatever it is she feels makes her a suitable partner, she wants a partner who exceeds her in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 03:37 PM
1

Sorry for the late reply. I wasn't able to get back to you as soon as I would have liked. but anyway: That's not what I said. I most certainly have had sex with women (that my wife knew about). But I wouldn't go try and get laid by some homeless lady because "eh, it's a vagina". Nor would I (or did I) in college. Wanting to fuck multiple women =/= wanting to fuck every single woman that walks by. All I'm saying is not every single girl you had sex with, you wanted to spend the rest of your life …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 03:22 PM
2

Im straight, so the sex I havd had was with men I never suggested otherwise, sweetie. Don't know where that's coming from My having had sex doesnt proove that its somehow effortless for me, men got laid too Yeah, but the two parties involved did different things My answer- for a start, whenever I had sex with a boyfriend or someone I met online who wanted to be my boyfriend. Im ok looking but when men fall for me its always after they get to know my personality, so there you go. I had to work on…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 03:07 PM
1

My question was very relevant. I knew you wouldn't answer it but I am going to ask you a follow up question anyway: When have you ever had to charm your way into dick? Meaning, when has there ever been a time that a guy didn't want to fuck you, but did something that made him want to fuck you after the fact?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 02:38 AM
1

You want to fuck multiple women. You know men that want to fuck multiple women. Not all men want to fuck a thousand women So you've only had sexual feelings for your wife? You're never seen a girl and had the thought that you would have sex with her (not wanting to cheat on your wife, of course) since you've been married? By flirting. Sorry for not being specific before. I meant in what ways does she flirt? No it's not. Where the hell are you (and the rest of TRP) getting your "expectations"? It…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/15 02:33 AM
2

Are you a virgin?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 09:16 PM
3

Not all guys want to fuck 100 different women. Not all women don't want to not fuck 100 guys. The scale of human sexuality isn't by gender it's by person. Ok not 100, maybe you want to fuck 50 instead. But guys want to fuck multiple women. It's just nature. [Citation Needed]. There are women that aren't looking for love. Yeah, when they're young. But in the end, that's what they want. Even the most promiscuous of women will want that eventually. Holy hell. That IS some women flirting. It's how m…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 05:57 PM
2

The point you're missing OP, is that women do like those things. But, they like those things in guys they're already attracted to. Those things are not what attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 05:09 PM
7

You must not know a lot of women. I do, actually. Women don't want to fuck 100 different guys like how guys want to fuck 100 different women. Sluts and wholesome women are after the same thing, which is love. They just go about it in different ways. The one thing they have in common is that neither of them know how to get love. So women who fuck a bunch of different guys, are "experimenting" hoping that one guy will want to settle down with them after they give him the most they have to offer (p…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 05:06 PM
6

Their "experiment" is just seeing which guy will actually want to stick around after they fuck him. Women don't fuck guys for sport. It gets old quick because there's no challenge or skill in getting dick for women. They just open their legs.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 09:04 AM
0

Haha, he's not fond of dogs?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 11:12 PM
2

Haha, you're missing my point, sweetie. I'm not comparing women to dogs. I'm saying men aren't "lovey dovey" type creatures by nature. We do that because it's what we learned from women, and to get women, we do what we think they like. That's why men always try to do elaborate stuff on Valentine's Day or be spontaneous. Women aren't satisfied with just knowing that we love them. They want to see it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 11:10 PM
3

Yes, but the way men love women, in the affectionate, all over you type of way is just us doing what women do. Man love is like how we love our dogs: we feed them, take care of them and let them become a big part of our life. That kind of love isn't enough for women though. They want more...deliberate displays of love.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:19 PM
0

Lol women are so silly. You know what men do is sit around and formulate ways to fuck you, and they work, but then you always act like they don't, or that what does work on you is somehow different or "more genuine".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 07:16 PM
1

Where did I say that men can't be emotional?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 05:28 PM
3

That's once you've already fucked her and you guys are involved with each other more. That's the growing process that men go through: we have to grow to like a woman because they're naturally unlikeable. It's very rare for a guy to luck out and meet a girl that he hits it off with right away (in terms of personality), but there's still a training process. The girl having a compatible personality just makes the training period easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 04:19 PM
1

It's science. You already answered your own question in the thread title
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 04:16 PM
3

Ok sure. Guys can get hurt feelings. My point is that all women have to hurt a guy's feelings is the idea that she or other women won't fuck him. If a woman told her husband that she wouldn't talk to him, but would still fuck him, he'd be in heaven. The opposite isn't true. Women do want dick, but to them it's what dick represents.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 12:49 AM
2

Take a piss on the floor in front of him then start washing dishes in the other room, but do it naturally. Don't be obvious with what you're trying to do. I guarantee he'll be ripping your clothes off after that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 09:21 PM
2

The only way women hurt men's feelings is by attacking their ego. It's why the first thing people say about guys in RP is that they're neckbeard, pencil-neck basement dwellers who can't actually get pussy. That's what it always goes back to
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 09:19 PM
2

Sexually, young men are the most wanted. Old guys with dick problems can't compete with young guys on a sexual level, so they have to beat them in other areas, like status, wealth, experience, etc. Young men (I'm talking early 20s) can still get their fair share of pussy. I agree about older women though. 30 is where it starts. But 40 is where the train crash happens. Women depreciate like cars.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 04:38 PM
3

Yes, it's called not fucking him. Pussy is the only offensive weapon women have to use against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 04:34 PM
1

Sure, if that's what the guy wants. But here's the thing: it's not up to a woman whether or not a guy likes them. We just grow to like women, because they aren't very likeable by nature. That is unless a guy hits the lottery and finds a girl he hits it off with right off the bat. But for the most part, just be pretty and don't be annoying. After that, if you stick around through the guy's bullshit there's a strong chance of him making you his girlfriend / wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 04:26 PM
1

Simple: Get filthier. Surprise him. Women try to do things for us based on how they feel, instead of thinking about how we feel as men. Men don't care about, or won't notice your new sexy dress, or the fact they you're wearing your hair down. You have to appeal to us on an animal level, because men's reasons for sex are purely animalistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 04:23 PM
1

I'd be insulted if she did
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 08:45 PM
1

Sorry, Idk what that's supposed to mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 03:06 PM
1

Absolutely. Women upgrade men on a physical level. In most relationships, the woman is the prettier of the two. That's why you're more likely to see a not so handsome guy with a cute girl rather than a handsome with an ugly chick.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 02:51 AM
1

Short answer: Yes Long answer: Fuck yes
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 02:49 AM
0

People seem to purposely ignore the concept of context. Leading in a relationship doesn't mean that the first mate is a slave or has to walk on eggshells. Leading just means that as a man, my happiness dictates the relationship and comes first, then it trickles down to the woman. A happy man is a happy everyone else in a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 02:48 AM
1

You're overlooking the role of fat bitches. They're supposed to be your stepping stone towards hot bitches. Fat girls who have a fat girl mentality are just a way to get an occasional nut and free meal. It's not like you get attached. But it also depends on how fat. There's regular fat bitches, and there's fetish fat bitches like the ones on porn sites.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/15 07:53 AM
2

This is the fault of other men not women. You're half right. It is men's fault for wanting to fuck them but that's just nature. But women prioritize their pussy more. Many men are just playing by women's rules to get what they want (sex). And it's women's fault when they try to use their pussy as a weapon, even though that's all they have to fight us with. Speak for yourself man some of us actually enjoy their company. I'm sure you can. But they have to grow on you. Women aren't very likeable by…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 04:10 AM
2

But why though? why do you think access to pussy should be easier than it is? Because like I said, it's not special. And it's treated as if it's more important than my time or attention (as a man). Like, the only reason men put up with women is because we want to fuck them. If they didn't have vaginas, women's entire power structure and sense of entitlement would be gone. Basically, they get to bring nothing but looks (pussy) to the table, but men have to bring everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 01:05 AM
14

I hate women because of what they men go through to get pussy, even though it isn't that special. But I don't hate women on a level of like, walking out in public and just refusing to talk to them, or wishing bad upon them. It's not something I actively think about every moment of the day. I just hate when women abuse men through their pussy, then try to act like there's more to them than just being an object. But on a lighter note, many women just aren't fun to me. They aren't funny, get offend…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 03:59 PM
7

I'm sure some are, but they have to grow on you. They aren't very likeable by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 03:15 PM
2

Guys aren't trapped in the friendzone. They let themselves get stuck in that situation. They think that by being nice, they're going to get somewhere. They aren't interested in being just friends with a girl because most women just...aren't very fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 07:08 AM
10

All men already lie to get laid. Men lie by pretending to be interested in women's boring stories or by laughing at their corny jokes, or by not making fun of how stupid she is. Women know that men want to fuck them. That's why I say it's best to be honest. Women already know the whole "pretending to be interested in her personality" game.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 07:02 AM
2

Right. Women aren't extremely abusive at all.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 01:27 AM
33

It's really amazing how women take for granted the leeway that men give them. Women feel so confident talking shit to guys who are much bigger and stronger they are, and could chokeslam them through a table with ease. Yet at the same time, guys get no credit for not slapping these women around when they act like this. It's crazy.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/15 03:11 PM
1

On a relationship level, I can't answer that. That depends on what kind of trainer a guy is and how he wants to mold his woman. That is unless he lucks out and she's already the type of woman he likes. On the initial level, men just want to fuck women. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 06:17 PM
1

On a human level? No. Empathy is a human trait. But as it relates to men in their dating sphere? Yes. Women aren't interested in helping a guy up. It's our job to make them better.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 06:12 PM
2

Our differences are rather small. There's a bigger difference between individuals than there is between the sexes. So you might think that a woman is imitating a man when she is leading when the reality is that masculine and feminine traits are interchangeable between humans, and that leaders share common characteristics amongst one another across genders. There are differences between individuals, sure. But there are many things that are the same. We're all humans first, then gender, then cultu…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 12:06 AM
2

You're going off the idea that men and women are vastly different creatures. Because we are. If we weren't, this entire sub and the opposing ideas behind it wouldn't even exist. On a very broad level we're all the same as we're all humans. But when you get a little deeper than that, that's where a lot of the differences begin to pop up. Why are these the only 2 options? What's the alternative? If they aren't either alone, with a man who's better than they are, or with a man who they are better t…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 09:08 PM
2

If you're unable to see how your reasoning is the definition of 'circular' there, I really can't help you. You asked me what type of creature women were, and I said that they are a creature incapable of and not comfortable with leading men. What, did you want me to elaborate on more characteristics of women as a creature, that make them incapable/not comfortable with leading men? You can ask me that. Where are you getting this information from? Why ignore all of history's dynamic female leaders …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 08:59 PM
2

Probably in the same way a man can How? If a woman were trying to lead a man, she would just imitate what a man would do. How can a creature that's not a leader...just...lead? The point that was trying to be made is that there are women who don't want to be #2 period. That's fine. They can be lonely cat ladies or find a guy who is willing to be their bitch then. In either scenario, they won't feel fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 08:39 PM
2

Digging the circular definition thing you have happening. It's like fun Orwelian doublespeak! You asked a question and I gave you a definite answer: women aren't capable of nor comfortable leading men. Women aren't that type of creature. Not sure what's circular about that. When you are not in charge of making decisions in your personal life that is absolutely a lack of autonomy. Where are you getting this from? Show me a post where I said anything that remotely resembles advocating a woman not …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 07:49 PM
3

If he's a good leader and has his stuff together, it'll trickle down to her. So to answer your second question, she'll be unhappy if he isn't a capable leader. If he is, she'll be happy. But on the same token, if the girl is unhappy because the guy isn't a capable leader, she can bring him down to her level of unhappiness as well. To answer your first question, if the guy is miserable, yes. But if he has everything in order, she'll be happy as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 07:44 PM
3

What type of creature? A creature capable of leading men I simply disagree with this line of reasoning. It's sorta why dictatorships fail across the board. People enjoy autonomy too much I didn't say that women can't have autonomy in a relationship. Being #2 doesn't mean being a slave.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 07:20 PM
2

Why? Because women aren't that type of creature. Like, where could a woman lead me? I've never met a woman who was happy being #2 to her man. Some that act happy for a spell, sure. And then years down the line the bubbling resentment at being treated as, well, #2 comes surging to the surface (divorce, infidelity, etc). They're not happy being #2 to a guy who's not better than them. That's the key. If your girl doesn't believe that you're better than her then she won't be comfortable with you lea…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 07:04 PM
2

Well no, at least not technically speaking. If the inferior is the man, his woman will be happy, but he'll be miserable.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 06:59 PM
6

If he acts like it, and he seems happy then how do you know he's not? It's like women who claim they are happy being with in an abusive relationship: cognitive dissonance is a powerful influence. How does a woman disrespect him? It can be in a myriad of ways. She doesn't even always have to actively, or outwardly rather, disrespect him. She just won't view him as "my man who is the shit". He's just an accessory. Basically, she'll view him as needing her more than she needs him, which is always a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 05:01 PM
2

Would you consider you self a good leader? Yeah, I've grown into one. I'm at the point where I can be a General now. How do you know this? Just from field research. I've never met a man in my entire life, nor have a heard of a man someone else has met, that is happy being #2 to his woman. He may act like it, because he's afraid of losing her, but he's not truly happy. And out of every relationship I've seen like that, the woman never fully respects the man. Think about it, how could a woman resp…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 04:43 PM
3

Yes, because women can't respect a man they have to lead, and there's really nowhere a woman could lead a man. Not every man is a capable leader though (although that much is obvious). I already know people are gonna come in with the "Well me and my SO both make decisions!" I'm not talking about splitting chores or some shit. What I mean by being a leader is, whose happiness dictates the relationship. Normally, if the man is happy, then his happiness trickles down to his woman and everyone wins.…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 04:16 PM
2

It relates to your girl "dreading" the fact that you could leave, like a cloud hanging over her head.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 04:11 PM
2

I agree with that for the most part. The part about women wanting men who are better than they are is nature, but what "better" actually entails has been taught and has changed as society has progressed. For instance, guys nowadays aren't hunting animals anymore. Women don't care about that. Having a good job (making more money) is more important than that. In essence, the reason it's taught is because it's nature. It's just affirmation of things that already exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 07:50 PM
3

(I think we can agree that women get away with being quite solipsistic more easily than men) You answered your own question. As it relates to men, women aren't taught to take care of them. Women are taught to be taken care of. No woman wants a guy she has to run and look after, because then she would be better than him, and that would make him unattractive to her. She wouldn't respect him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 07:34 PM
8

If you're not fully willing and committed to walking away and never seeing her again then DO NOT ATTEMPT IT. Absolutely true. Like I said, women see right through charades like that. If you're going to dread, you have to be righteous with it. Meaning, it has to be honest and you have to truly be unafraid of losing your woman. Many guys try to use it as a tool to keep your woman around, when it reality, her staying around should be a side effect of dread. It won't work if your woman doesn't belie…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 07:52 PM
3

Making her jealous is a side effect. But some guys do try to use that and it's understable because no girl will want you if no other girl wants you. That's why guys always talk about how when they were single they didn't get much attention but as soon as they got a girlfriend they were getting hit on much more often. Dread game, when used in that respect, can be used to keep your girl from getting complacent and getting bored with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 06:47 PM
1

It's not culture. Across different cultures and sociological spheres there are certain traits that women and men possess. That's nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 06:30 PM
17

People seem to think that you can just "dread game" any bitch and it'll work like some magic spell. Dread game only works if your girl knows that you're better than her and that she needs you more than you need her. And dread game isn't just completely ignoring a bitch and secretly hoping that she'll chase you. Women see right through that. It's just asserting your value and letting your girl know that your love, time, etc aren't free and that if she abuses them, she risks losing them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 06:24 PM
1

If men didn't know what women wanted, then we wouldn't get women. But that's obviously not the case. We're masters at getting women. We have to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 06:20 PM
2

Men: Want to fuck 100 girls once Women: Want to fuck 1 guy 100 times
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 01:23 AM
2

Firstly, any guy who wants to fuck you will act nice in some way. Only guys who misunderstand what the words "alpha" and "asshole" mean would just be a blatant dick to a girl he wants to fuck. The guys who do that just don't understand what the phrase "Girls like assholes" means. Secondly, the type of "nice guy" described in the OP are the minority. Most "nice guys" are just passive dudes who would genuinely enjoy a relationship with a woman, but only romanticize it because they haven't discover…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 01:20 AM
1

NO. Untrue. This is the kind of stuff that you guys believe but it just has no basis in truth Show me a man who is happy with his woman being better than him, and show me a woman who respects a man she is better than and I'll concede. In any case, isn't trp a 'sexual strategy' sub? If a woman just wants a shag, why the hell would she be looking for a man who is 'better than her' as opposed to a good looking guy with a good body? I suppose it is. I'm not a RP guy though so I can't speak for them.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 09:44 PM
2

It's not really negging. Like, I'll make a comment about something that, in effect, knocks a pretty girl off of her pedestal although that isn't always a conscious decision. Many times it's just my nature. But what it does is remove that pedestal that many attractive women are on. If you let them stay up there or even worse, make them even higher, then you'll never have a chance. But you don't have to be an asshole to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 05:41 PM
0

It's not about being a douchebag. I'm very polite to women IRL. It's about appealing to women's nature as a creature, then to her personal nature. What I mean by that is that all women have an overlaying nature, then there are personal "quirks". For instance, all women want a guy who is better than them (overlaying nature) but exactly what better entails depends on the woman in question (personal nature)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 05:36 PM
3

Also everyones most prized possession is there body Sure in the sense of a living organism, but overall men aren't as guarded with their bodies as women are, partially because we don't derive our value to women from our bodies, like how much of their value to us is based on their body (looks). sex != love I never said they were equal. I said that women don't know how to get love, ultimately because it's not up to her whether or not a guy loves her, so she fucks him in hopes that he will love her…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 12:42 AM
3

Love. A slut isn't a slut because she just...wants 100 different dicks in her. It's just that women don't know how to get love so they give away their most prized possession (their body) in hopes that a guy will love and commit to them. What they don't understand is that it's easy to love you (women) but you aren't that likeable . That's the challenge.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 12:20 AM
3

A girl who is slutty or sleeps with a guy on the first date is no worse than a girl who doesn't do those things. They all operate on the same female wavelength, meaning they all want the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 12:04 AM
1

You're projecting your own values upon others. What you want is a chance to bond with a partner, without regarding what the man wants. Men by nature, want to fuck many women. It's not that guys just make a conscious choice to want to fuck a bunch of women. They can, but it comes from an innate desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 11:22 PM
4

Lol always the same horseshit response. I've met women of all backgrounds and creeds, from doctors to bitches at McDonald's and it's all the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 11:16 PM
1

Like what? What do you do to get sex from the guys that doesn't involve being an object of his lust?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 02:02 AM
1

Alright so can you explain your counter argument, please? Explain your logic and why it contradicts mine and why I'm wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 05:48 PM
1

Who wants what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 05:22 PM
2

Of course. Always an attack on the ego instead of actually addressing and countering and argument with logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 05:21 PM
3

I didn't say that women don't like sex. I said that men have to do more to get sex than women. Women don't have to learn "game" like men. Even if a guy is handsome, he's not getting much pussy if he's shy, awkward, boring, etc. Because women find men attractive for more than just their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 05:19 PM
-1

Not that women are having a bunch of sex, just that it's easier for them to get it. To put it bluntly, there's no skill or quality that a woman has to master (outside of being pretty) in order to get sex. They just open their legs and they're good to go.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 08:47 AM
1

I told her this would be a long road to total forgiveness, if it came at all. How can you say that you don't know if you're ever gonna trust a bitch again, yet you're still gonna marry her? Tragic. Just absolutely tragic the kind of hamstering that goes on in that sub.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 12:42 AM
2

Good Lord that top post was amazing. Spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:34 PM
3

Their beliefs are just in opposition to RP, so that could be lots of things. But a few beliefs they seem to share are the following: That some stuff in TRP is true but it only applies/works on dumb or insecure women. A man should be happy by sacrificing his own happiness for his woman's happiness. Both partners in a relationship should be equal and that's the best way to make it work RPW is like a sub for Stockholm Syndrome victims
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 03:06 PM
1

Nah not married. Don't think I could see it happening anytime soon. I guess you could say I'm sort of in the middle between TRP and MGTOW. I think that a man's happiness should always be the #1 priority because a happy man is a happy relationship, family, etc. So I tell guys to just think about their own lives first. Pussy isn't that special to be tripping over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:34 PM
0

I'm subbed to TRP and a few of its views line up with mine but I wouldn't consider myself fully TRP, mainly because I don't think you need to lift to get bitches (although it helps) and I don't have a problem with women being whores when they're young. (Better to do it when you're young and supple than when you're old and wrinkled)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 07:34 AM
0

I didn't list cooking because that's a regular adult function to me. I expect any adult to be to at least cook for themselves and someone else, but I guess I should've listed it. As for bitchiness, that's a product of how you train your woman. She'll only be bitchy with you if she doesn't respect you. And she won't respect you if you aren't a good trainer. You can't be a cadet trying to raise another soldier. You have to be a general.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 11:32 PM
0

Well shucks, I'm sorry. You caught me red-handed, pal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 08:07 PM
1

My bad. I didn't know that sex wasn't implied. It's like listing "breathing" as a requirement for being alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 06:45 PM
2

Because pulling a random bitch's hair in a public setting isn't "alpha" or cool. People really misunderstand what alpha means. It doesn't mean just doing stupid shit with no regard for anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 05:56 PM
1

Male Don't get fat Leave me alone when I want to be left alone The end
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 05:53 PM
1

Really? Ok then since your husband was the fish, what did you do to get him? What do you do to keep him around? What skills did you employ in making him like you then marry you? Red herring is red herring. There's a reason I asked that. It's not meant to stray away from the main topic as it fully relates to it. If you can't answer it that's fine, but I was actually going somewhere with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 04:55 PM
1

You keep bringing up the fish analogy but I'm a fisherman, sweetie. I'm Captain Ahab with this shit. We're masters at getting you (women), but there's no art or skill in getting caught. Fish don't learn how to get fisherman to catch them. Ultimately, it's not up to you whether or not a guy commits. You want love, but have no clue how to get it. That's why you think making a guy "respect" you by using him for his time, attention and money while you bring NOTHING to the table is acceptable. That a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 01:58 PM
1

Who cares Of course. Who cares about the guy who you want to commit to you? This is what I mean by the arrogance of women. You talk about mutual respect being built, but you're disrespecting him by disregarding what he wants. THAT is the same objectification that women complain about all the time. Again, you're a man, you know fuck all about what it's like to get commitment from men. Right and you're such a master at it that your Brother's Lock & Key panties are just so desirable that you have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 01:00 AM
1

I'm not a RP guy so I can't speak for them. But sure, I guess they would call you a slut. I wouldn't though. Actually, I would but I wouldn't chastise you for it because I understand the reasons why women do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 12:54 AM
0

I disagree. I think women need to go through the ho phase when they're young and supple instead trying to have dignity when they're young and be whores when they're all old and wrinkled in their 30s
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 11:44 PM
1

Because that's ignoring the male side of it. If the woman wants him to commit, then ultimately it should be up to him through what methods he wants to commit. To stick with the fisherman analogy, it's like a catfish telling a fisherman that it prefers a certain type of bait, or it only wants to be caught on Wednesdays. It doesn't work like that. Like, if a guy told a girl he's not gonna spend money on her, or have deep conversation with her on the first few dates, he's an asshole. But why? He's …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 11:41 PM
2

The OP asked how to get men to commit, not how to drive them away.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 11:29 PM
1

That's the question women have been trying to answer for centuries, and they still don't know. And the truth is, it's going to be a challenge because you're asking a guy to go against his nature to want to fuck a bunch of other women, just for you. But to answer your question, we aren't hard to please. You just have to stick around and deal with our bullshit. You need to sell what he's buying. You may think you're a great person and everything, but it has to be about what he wants. Because ultim…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 11:27 PM
2

I used to be really misogynistic but I no longer hate women for what they are. It's like getting mad at a snake for biting you (inb4 "omg he compared women to snakes so stupid!) But one thing that frustrates me is how men aren't allowed to be emotional or rather, aren't allowed to be without a filter like women. That's all I want for us: to be able to be honest and truthful without being disregarded as a misogynist
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 11:22 PM
3

Agreed, but they aren't concerned with hypocrisy. Hypocrisy requires a sense of accountability, which many women lack. Women's egos are tied to their looks (initially) so if you want to hurt them you attack that. As men, we're prideful and have a strong ego. Women know how sensitive we are to it being attacked so that's why the initial insults are always assaults on the ego. Just look at what some BP women say about TRP: that all of the guys in there are socially awkward, neckbeard, overcompensa…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 10:56 PM
2

Because they (women) want to attack your ego. Their goal is to tear it down, but you have to let that ego go.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 08:39 PM
2

But they themselves don't think they're pretty enough. That's the key. I said a woman who knows she's pretty. Models who think they aren't pretty enough, don't know, or rather don't believe that they're pretty. And we're getting into a different space because like I said, it's their job to be the prettiest. If someone else is prettier, they don't have any work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 06:14 PM
1

Women are the fuckee (not a real word, I know lol). I know there are other positions besides missionary but for the most part, the woman is receiving the dick. As a guy, I don't get anything put inside of me. I'm the fucker. And I don't mean sex is degrading, it's just that I'd feel vulnerable laying on my back and having someone thrust me, or on my stomach. I've accidentally sat down to pee before and it just felt...not right.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 06:08 PM
0

Ok so let me ask you this: how do women know that they are pretty / sexy?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 06:39 AM
1

Right, so again, they think they aren't pretty enough
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 06:37 AM
0

Eh, nothing wrong with that. But I mean, to be fair I can't really say whether or not your dad is submissive from that example.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 03:00 AM
1

Because again, they think they aren't pretty enough. Their job is being pretty so when it's potentially in danger they're going to freak out.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 02:58 AM
0

Because I'm looking at it from a pragmatic standpoint instead of an emotional one. You're saying the same shit in both examples, just one is phrased to make someone feel worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 02:56 AM
-1

It's not projection. Women themselves judge their own value (as it relates to men) by their looks, and men do as well. A girl being smart, successful, funny, etc has no bearing upon whether or not a guy finds them sexually attractive. When it comes to feeling sexy, or how much men value them (on a primal level) it's absolutely based on appearance. Later on, once guys get to know them, then the aspects of a woman's personality matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 02:54 AM
1

Both are wanting to control behavior though. In both scenarios, the guy wants the same thing: for his girl to recognize that he's valuable and that he wants her to treat him with a certain respect because he's not obligated to love her, and his FREE love is not to be abused. Guys don't just wake up and use "dread game" one day because they feel like it. It all comes from the same core. People's misconception about "dread game" is that it can just be applied whenever. It only works if you're actu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 07:17 PM
0

Better in terms of whatever the woman values: whether it's money, charisma, intelligence, etc. I mean, name a woman who is the absolute best at something... And sure, you know your parents better of course, but I know men better. And no man is 100% comfortable being submissive. But in what ways is he submissive? Because I don't mean that for a man to be dominant that his woman gets to have no say whatsoever. That's silly. I mean that she's better than him and he's afraid of losing her. That's su…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 07:11 PM
-1

Hypergamy doesn't mean that women always want the best, it just means that they want a guy who is better than them. If a guy is with a woman, and he isn't better than her, she's going to keep moving on until she finds one who is. That's hypergamy. And no, no man is happy being his wife's bitch. It's impossible. She may be happy, but she won't respect him, and he won't feel actualized as a man. He'll be submissive because he's afraid of losing her.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:56 PM
2

I'm sure there are women who have difficulty finding a relationship due to obesity or some other problem Even pretty women have problems finding relationships. They have problems getting relationships because they have problems getting guys to like them. It's easy to love a woman, but hard to like her so that you commit to her. That's where the whole "Men are the gatekeepers of relationship" comes from. Because ultimately, it's not up to a woman whether I like her or if she loves me. That's what…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:51 PM
0

In life? idk. Women have an easier time getting sex though. But I would most definitely rather be a guy. I'd be miserable as a woman tbh. Being weak, sitting down to pee, bleeding every month, just having to get fucked is...so vulnerable. Like laying on your back while someone thrusts you seems so...degrading. I'd rather do the fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:42 PM
1

How can you "accidentally" tell your partner that you're better than them and they should value you if they want to keep you around? How can a power dynamic haphazardly shift? One day a guy wakes up and his girl just happens to decide that she values him?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:21 PM
-1

Sure, but their low self-esteem comes from them not thinking that they're pretty. No girl who is pretty, and knows that she's pretty, has low self-esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 06:18 PM
-1

You can love a woman but still not want to kill yourself if she leaves. TRP calls it "outcome independence". And it has nothing to do with self esteem. If anything that tactic works worse on women with low self esteem because they already know that you're better than them. Women with high self esteem are more likely to go for it because they can't fathom some guy not bowing to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 04:33 PM
2

So what if a guy is weak then starts to implement "dread game"? Is it shitty? Or is it just him learning? It's like people just overlook how abusive women can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 04:11 PM
4

Lol you'd be surprised. Actually jealousy works less on girls with low self esteem because they already know that they aren't good enough to be a soldier in your army. Pretty women are the most susceptible because they're so used to their looks (vagina) getting them whatever they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 04:08 PM
2

Actually it isn't. The sex game is in women's favor, but women don't just want sex. What they want, is what they aren't in control of: a man's love. Women don't want to fuck 100 different guys. They want to want to fuck that 1 special guy 100 times.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 02:29 AM
0

Not sleeping with a drunk girl is basic human decency? That's just avoiding a rape case.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 02:27 AM
1

God, that post is fucking disgusting. This why we lose when we should be winning. I can't believe that there are guys who actually propagate this vaginal horseshit
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 02:22 AM
0

Among men it's cool to be aggressive in competition, like sports or something, but not in everyday life. Women get to be as emotional as they want (towards men specifically) because...they're women. Women can yell and act belligerent with men and not have to wrry about repercussion, because of the social contract we have. Despite the fact the average guy could easily snap a girl's neck, they don't have to live in fear. If I act belligerent towards a guy and he kicks my ass, I'm an asshole and I …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 12:57 AM
2

The only reason a woman would to do that shit is because we (men) give it power. If you give your girl the impression that her fucking another dude will crush you, she'll take advantage of it in a heartbeat. That's what I mean by guys letting go of that ego. I know it's hard: we're naturally possessive over our objects. But you have to understand that women are abusive creatures, and you can't give in to that nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 07:10 PM
1

Men love romantically because we try to love women how women love us. The thing is that many women take love for granted so they have fewer issues with abusing it than men do. But women don't love pragmatically. A woman's love is very tender.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 06:49 PM
0

You of course have fucked more men than I have, but that doesn't make you...a guy. You think you think like us, but you can't. At the end of the day you want love, but don't know how to get it. It's like casting a wide net: you fuck a bunch of guys in hopes that one will love you. As a creature, men don't require much. Past all the human complexity, all we need (from women) isn't hard at all for women to give us, because you just need to be an object. But the thing is, 99.9% of the time women do…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 04:40 PM
0

Not really. Gentleman and I have a relationship that includes multiple persons- our first "date" was to invite him to one of the private little parties I go to, to defile and use a cute red head First, I'd just like to say that this is wonderful. How do men usually react to that? So I'm supposedly pretty and filthy enough for anyone. And you know what? Men are wonderful, clever, full of depth and all sorts of good things- they will always be my favourite gender sexually, but they are not univers…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/15 01:25 AM
0

Hah, fair enough. But it is exciting. Having to learn the technique is pretty cool imo
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 11:25 PM
0

We all see the same shit, we just have different explanations for it. To keep with the hand in the fire example, the only thing that differs in our perception when sticking our hand in a fire is exactly how hot it is, but we both agree it's hot. What we'll probably disagree on most is exactly why it's hot, or why it feels hot, sure. But the fact that our hands are burning will be absolutely true for either of us, or any person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 06:09 PM
1

What you're describing is what many women go through: the man doesn't seem to want to fuck them as much anymore so they feel they have to do something extra. Many try to "make themselves sexier" but they just have to up their level of filth. It's just that a guy gets used to you and gets tired of fucking the same girl everyday. But you also described something else: your guy wasn't able to match your sex drive, or level of sexual deviancy. There are guys who aren't at that level. You needed some…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 06:04 PM
1

What're some of these examples? Because it seems to me that anyone will perceive behavior the same, just that their explanations for it may be different. If people see both a man and a woman yelling at someone with a scowl on their face, most people will perceive that as anger. The explanations for why they're angry may be different, but the outward behavior is perceived the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 05:54 PM
0

I've been sharing what I've learned. Maybe if I'm bored I'll write a book one day. We've been having a discussion about one part of one my posts though. I'm more interested in hearing your opposing viewpoints than describing how I go out and talk to people though. Is that fair?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 05:47 PM
1

We're discussing perception, that is, different people interpret things differently . It was simply an analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 05:41 PM
1

How does anyone? I've said time and time again I may be wrong. I've just come with the best explanation for what I've seen. Do I read research? Eh, sometimes when I have time. Depends on what it's covering. And I don't have goals. My goal before was to understand the shit I saw happening. I'm past the research portion though. Those years are over. I'm just sharing what I've learned.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 10:07 AM
-2

Sure. What about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 09:56 AM
3

Please don't marginalize my experiences. I didn't formulate this stuff overnight by reading an internet forum. This is from years and years of trial and error, meeting thousands of people, and reworking my thought processes. You use the term professional as if it's hard to just go out and talk to women. "Professional" researchers just go out and interact with people like you or I when studying them. It's just that they pay more attention to what goes on in those interactions than the average per…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 09:48 AM
4

Alright so answer this, if we both stick our hand in a fire, will it be hot to me, but cold to you or vice-versa? Or will it be hot to both of us?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 09:29 AM
6

You're really arguing about some shit that's a minor detail of the overall point I was making, but whatever. A herpetologist would still study the same way whether they were "paid by society" or not. The training is just years of studying, which anyone can do. People just come up with different explanations for what they observe. In it's most simple form, that's what science is. Why is that so hard for you to grasp?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 09:26 AM
5

Aggression isn't seen as cool. Maybe with young dudes on the internet it is, but in real life, it's not cool to be angry or be aggressive as a guy. The coolest guy is always the assertive one who never gets rattled by anything and thinks things through. Hotheads are looked down upon because men aren't allowed to be emotional. And when we are, our emotions are always marginalized as "insecurity" or anger. Just look at how people react to TRP. Even if some of the guys in there are making good poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 07:52 AM
1

You're purposely misunderstanding what absolute means in this context. I'll try to use a simple analogy for you to follow: I mean that certain behavior is certain behavior. For instance, anyone, no matter what, would say fire is hot if they held their hand in an inferno. Exactly why the fire is hot, or what makes the fire hot could be up for debate. But the fact that it is hot, is an observable, undeniable truth. That's what I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 06:58 AM
5

Read my previous comment. I said it may be wrong, idk. I can only draw conclusions from what I've seen. No scientists thinks they know 100% about everything. But you're arguing about perception, as if I'm just...misinterpreting some otherwise obvious shit. I'm saying there isn't any perception on my part. Hot is hot and cold is cold. What you're saying is that I'm experiencing hot, but to someone else it could cold, which just, frankly, isn't the case with my observations of men and women. What …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 06:13 AM
-4

Lots of guys haven't gotten over that ego. They feel like if a woman has been with a lot of men, she probably isn't going to be loyal to him. That's silly though. Considering how easy it is for women to get laid, it's stupid to expect a girl to not have been fucking before you met her. It's nigh impossible in 2015 to meet a girl whose hymen is still intact.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 05:18 AM
0

There's really no perception about it. It's not hard to tell emotion apart from logic. Humans are naturally in tune to patterns and identifying the hidden connections between otherwise separate phenomena. It's like reading the equation "2 + x=4". All I'm doing is solving for X.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 05:15 AM
5

Yes. We have to be better. Men have to develop skills to get women. No woman has ever had to develop a skill outside of learning how to put on makeup or push up her bra, just to get sex from men. It's the reason you see celebrity, multimillionaire, successful men hooked up with attractive, but otherwise unspectacular women. You hardly every see a very attractive, successful woman with a guy who just...isn't shit. She may be with him for a bit, but she won't respect him. She can't respect him if …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 05:07 AM
4

I never said that men can't be emotional, but emotion in men and women functions differently. Men aren't allowed, or rather, it's not as acceptable for men to act on raw emotion. Men have to have a filter for that emotion, and that filter is logic. Women are allowed to be as emotional as they want without having to have any filter because it's expected that they act on emotional impulses.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 05:03 AM
3

Quite a large sample size believe it or not. But you're missing the point. No herpetologist, for example, has observed every single snake ever known to man. That's impossible. But once they've been at it long enough, they can see certain trends and draw conclusions. Someday their observations, or rather, their explanations for them may be proven wrong, but until then they stick with the best possible one. That's all I'm doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 04:58 AM
2

It may be wrong, idk. I only draw conclusions from what I've seen, like any scientist. I've interacted with all kinds of women, of all nationalities, professions, backgrounds and creeds and they all subscribe to the same emotional shit. There are some cool broads out there, but the underlying nature is all the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 03:04 AM
0

Every man has / wants to fuck multiple women Women want men that other women want as well. That's just girl nature. If a girl thinks that a guy can't get other women then she won't find him as attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 02:52 AM
3

Obviously they mature mentally as they get older as any human does, but it doesn't matter because they don't operate on logic anyway. Emotion more times than not takes precedence over logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 02:46 AM
0

Are you unable to get dick, or are you not able to get the dick you want ?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:10 AM
1

A girl doesn't have to look like Jillian Michaels (body wise) to get dick and you know it. Stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 06:47 PM
1

I didn't say I would fuck a girl passed out by a dumpster, but there are guys who would. Whether it's thirst or not doesn't matter, the desire still exists. And putting on makeup doesn't compare to having to better your personality or life. Like I said, women don't need to be drop dead gorgeous to get dick. Do you know any women that have trouble getting dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 04:39 PM
1

Sure, guys don't want a shallow whore as their girlfriend or wife. But when it comes to sexual attraction, the only thing that matters to men initially is what a women looks like. Later on, men grow to like a woman for her other qualities. And guys do need to have some kind of good character qualities to fuck women, because women want to fuck us for more than just our looks. I couldn't be an average bum on the street trying to get with a girl who had it all (looks / money / smarts / etc). But an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 04:35 PM
1

They have to look nice Right, all they have to do is be an object of a man's lust. They bring looks to the table. Men bring...everything else. And women don't even have to be smoking hot to get dick. There could be a girl passed out near a dumpster and there would still be some guy wanting to fuck her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 05:26 AM
0

Really? Tell me, in what ways do women charm their way into sex that doesn't involve sexuality? Do you know any women who have had to convince a guy into having sex with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 04:23 AM
1

I'm not talking about PUA nonsense when I say game. By game I mean things like developing a sense of humor, learning an interesting skill, being intelligent, having money, having a job/car/apartment, etc. Men need to have some of those things to get laid. Women don't need to have any.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 11:27 PM
1

It's as difficult as it is for a guy to realize that pussy is plentiful and not worth belittling oneself over. Some guys in TRP get that and some don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 08:20 PM
1

It relates to getting sex because the only reason women can manipulate men is because men let them...mostly because men want to fuck them. Hence why I said "because they have vaginas". And there's no complexity about it. A girl just has to open her legs. No woman has ever had to charm her way into dick. No woman has ever had to convince a guy, who didn't want to fuck her, to fuck her. Like buy him dinner or some shit. Men are much simpler than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 07:58 PM
1

I mean that there's no skill in a woman getting dick. Women don't have to learn "game". A woman doesn't have to learn how to talk to men. Hell, most women aren't even proactive in getting men, they just look pretty and wait to be approached. Unless you're saying there's a sub that tries to help women learn how to get dick? If so, please share.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 07:09 PM
-4

Getting fucked, that's about it. They're also more in tune with emotions, so much so that their emotions override logic, which is a downfall. The average woman is better at manipulating men than the average man is at manipulating the average woman, but that's because they have vaginas. There's no skill in women's bullshit like there is in men's.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:30 PM
2

Honestly the girl doesn't even have to be fit. Regular fat girls (not fetish fat like the ones on Maury) don't have problems getting dick either.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:22 PM
7

Because women don't have to have any "strategy". You already know this. They just open their legs and they're set
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 02:10 AM
0

Lol please don't take what I said out of context. What I said is that no one uses internet words like "HB9" or "Alpha" in real life. Just like people don't use words like "Lmao" or "ttyl" in real life. I doubt RPers even use the word "redpill" in real life when not discussing the subreddit with another redditor. It's internet slang, and in the case of TRP, niche internet slang. It has nothing to do with being honest or not. Telling a bitch she's fine and you want to have sex with her is the IRL …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 05:50 PM
0

Not the point. The point is that if you're hiding your true intentions and/or feelings while trying to get something out of somebody, you're manipulating. Ok But I would be honest with what I wanted I guess you missed this part of my post. I have never advocated lying to women. I've done nothing but argue the opposite: that men should be completely honest with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 05:33 PM
2

He did want to have sex prior to that. Yes, I think it was fair for me to wait a month before deciding to lose my virginity to a guy. Fair enough, thanks for replying btw. The reason I asked those questions was to demonstrate that men and women barter with different chips, so to speak. For example, it's perfectly acceptable for a woman to say she won't have sex with a man right away, but if a man says that he won't give away his time and attention (or in your case his conversation) right away th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 04:27 AM
1

Alright, cool. Now let me ask you one last thing. Do you think he wanted to have sex before then? And if so, do you think it was fair to make him wait, even though he didn't make you wait to have a 10hr conversation with him?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 03:34 AM
3

How is it deception? I've never advocated lying to women. In fact, I always argue the opposite: that men need to up front and honest with what they want. That's what I see a lot of RP argue as well. The "beta" approach is actually one of deception: witholding your feelings from a girl and hoping that by being nice you'll get to fuck her. Like, all women know that guys want to fuck them. There's no deception there. Seriously, what "trick" is there to a girl sleeping with you because she likes you…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 03:32 AM
3

Ok. Did you guys continue to have 10hr (or at least close) conversations within that month? And whose idea was it to wait that long?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 01:54 AM
3

How soon did you guys have sex after that first 10hr talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 01:33 AM
5

This is where I disagree with RP. I think women should be whores when they're young, supple and desirable then when they turn 30 and start getting old and wrinkled they should start to try and have dignity. Lots of women do it backwards which is silly because women (pussy) depreciates in value like a car as they get older. That's why "cougars" are just trying to make up for lost time.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 01:20 AM
6

Unethical? My goodness this is getting ridiculous...What makes a woman entitled to a man's time and attention? A man isn't obligated to love or provide his time to a woman. She has to show him that she is worth loving, just like he has to show her that he is worth fucking. That's the foundation of any relationship What's childish is believing that women are somehow entitled to love, time and attention on no basis other than...they're women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 12:51 AM
6

You're focusing on the semantics of what I'm saying instead of the principle. The point is that any behavior that attempts to incite a specific response is manipulation. And no one talks like that in real life. People talk like that on here because...it's the internet. No guy uses words like "HB9" or "Alpha" in real life. But I would be honest with what I wanted. You don't come out telling some random broad you're better than her because she hasn't invested in you yet. That's game 101 sweetie.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 12:02 AM
9

Ok fair enough, let me ask you this: what's so conniving about learning about how women work and appealing to them through THEIR OWN nature? It's like saying I'm being manipulative by wearing nice clothes to a job interview.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 08:48 PM
1

Treating them like children/dogs in that they need training, and they have certain natures that you can't get mad a, not that they have the intelligence of a child or dog. For instance, no one gets mad at a child for acting irrational, and no one gets mad at a dog for chasing their own tail, because it's in their respective natures. You just try to curb those behaviors to make your relationships with them better. I prefer to look at it like training a soldier to be in your army: not every woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 08:46 PM
2

I don't see what any RP person would disagree with here. RP doesn't argue that a guy should control everything his women does. Your guy is just secure with himself and isn't a bitch. There's nothing wrong with this. This is just two adults living life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 08:29 PM
3

Fair enough. If you want to argue emotional (not tangible) morality instead of actual observable behaviors and their causes/effects then I won't bother you anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 07:51 PM
7

Sure, if you want to say that, ok. Again, no dude is putting a gun to a women's head and making her feed into his bullshit. It's women who CHOOSE to buy into it. That sounds like personal agency to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 07:46 PM
3

Idk, I'm not seeing what's so bad about letting a woman know that your time and love aren't free. Women always say that they don't want a guy who they can just walk over, and "dread game" is just letting her know that you aren't a doormat.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 07:44 PM
6

I never said it was right. That doesn't matter. It's not malicious though. Just like how women manipulate men isn't always inherently malicious, it's just in their nature. And what's so complicated about it? I'm being sincere. What are some of the complex things that I'm not understanding? I'm open to hearing other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 07:40 PM
2

How? Why can't the woman leave if it's that horrible? All dread game is, is threatening to take away from women what they value most: men's time and attention. If a woman doesn't value a man's time, she doesn't value him at all. It's no different than a man going above and beyond trying to please his wife / gf so she gives him the "reward" of fucking her in the ass or something. It's in the same vein. If men use emotional manipulation, then women use dick manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 06:54 PM
8

How is that any different than what women do? You know how many men get suckered into shit on the pretense that they'll get pussy? And I'm not even talking about just men who are chasing after women. I'm also talking about men who are already in relationships with women, who have to treat their wife/girfriend's pussy as some kind of reward. It's just that men and women value different things from each other. Men want pussy from women, while women want time and attention (love) from men. A man th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 06:50 PM
1

Is your husband on reddit? If so I would like to ask him some questions. But let me ask you something OP, are 2 equal because he wants it that way, or are you 2 equals because you made him (I don't mean necessarily verbally demanded) make you 2 equals? I know this is a CMV post so I hope this doesn't get deleted but I say that to say this: there's nothing wrong with you doing what you want as a woman in a relationship. Where things get messed up is when women try to tell men what they can and ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 06:45 PM
12

This is hilarious. For real, you don't want a guy that sleeps around with a bunch of other women? Oh my what a shocking revelation! You're such a catch for wanting exclusivity! Every girl says this shit. No girl says that they want to be #2, or be with a guy who sleeps with other women, or be with a guy who cares more about himself than her. Every girls wants their opinion respected. Every girl wants to feel like they matter more than anything else. This is typical girl horseshit, not some groun…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 06:39 PM
10

People seem to try and capitalize on the connotation of manipulation (emotion). It's not like RP advice is telling dudes to put a gun a bitch's head and force her to do anything. It's just playing to the feminine nature: figuring out how women work and knowing how to interact with them. That's the case with any group of people you wish to interact with
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 06:11 PM
2

It's an immature fantasy. That's cool when you're young and have time on your hands but as you get older you realize how lame this shit is. I used to hunt like a cheetah, now I hunt like a sloth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 05:36 AM
0

Because women want to fuck us for more than just our bodies, and our bodies aren't as important to us as theirs are to them, which is why we as men don't mind being objectified and actually like it. That's women's downfall: they want to fuck our personalities just as much because dick is plentiful for them and isn't hard to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 05:05 AM
1

I'd tell him that even though women are many times full of horseshit, he shouldn't hate them. Like Jesus said, "They know not what they do". You can't hate them for the creature that they are. You just have to learn about how they operate. But most importantly, I'd tell him that his own happiness as a man mattered more than any bitch no matter how pretty she is. He has to love himself first then it trickles down to everything else
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 04:42 AM
1

Bingo. Women are emotional. That doesn't just mean that they act on emotion, but that they are very receptive to it as well, and are much more in tune with emotion than men are. I always say I'd rather have a bitch hate me than not feel anything at all, because I can turn hate into love.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 03:56 AM
2

I don't know if it's feminism specifically that did it but women have been raising generation after generation of weak ass kids, specifically males. Even light namecalling is considered bullying, and you can even bully people online now. Shit is crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 03:02 AM
2

There is no "game" for woman. All they have to do is be an object of a man's lust and he'll do everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 08:14 AM
2

A lot of RP guys may look at it as the sum of negative characteristics that women share, but I look at it as simply a woman's nature. For instance, First and foremost: Emotional (incapable of putting logic before feelings) Entitled (Think they deserve things because they're women...aka they have a vagina) Manipulative (Using said vagina, or rather, a man's belief that he can get her vagina to her own advantage) Much more emotionally dependent than men These are just a few. A lot of them do have …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 07:32 AM
2

Idk about other guys, but I don't discourage women from being whores, at least when they're young. I feel women should spend their young and supple years (their 20s) going through their whore phase then when they get old and wrinkled (in their 30s) they can try to have dignity and make something of themselves. A lot of women do it backwards: they try to have dignity in their 20s then in their 30s (and older) they go through their whore phase. They're just trying to make up for lost time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 07:24 AM
0

We'll fuck anything too. I don't mean that every guy wants to fuck every bitch, but that there's some guy out there who would fuck a particular bitch. We all have that one girl who just...isn't sexy (I think Reddit likes to use the phrase "conventionally attractive") but we still want to fuck her brains out. And I don't mean that she's a fetish or anything but she just has some...imperfection that makes her sexy.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 07:06 AM
7

I wouldn't really consider myself RP because of this but the only tenet I disagree with is that you absolutely have to lift just to get pussy. It certainly helps, but it's not a prerequisite especially when you realize that women like us for shit other than just our looks. And you shouldn't lift to get pussy in any scenario. You should lift because you like doing it. That's the thing that gets lost in the shuffle: your own happiness as a man should matter more than any woman or man for that matt…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 06:54 AM
1

Serious question, are you built like a powerlifter (Mark Henry) or chiseled and really muscular? Anyway, no one with sense will tell you lifting alone will solve all of your problems. It's just supposed to be one part of the equation. Being in good shape and having a good appearance is one component. You can be the most buff guy alive and still be too weak and afraid to get bitches. But where I kinda differ from TRP is that I don't believe you need to be jacked to get bitches. Maybe to get a jac…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 06:47 AM
3

Tell him to ditch the feminism, then worry about his own happiness. He can't be weak enough to let people that he doesn't even know determine whether or not he's happy in life. Women aren't out to make you happy. You have to akready be happy then let your happiness trickle down to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 02:49 AM
1

Women are capable of love and true loyalty. It's just that women don't love in the same way men do. To answer the question, part of it is what I just said, the other part is that as a general, you have to train your soldiers. Once you are dating a girl who, for lack of a better phrase, isn't shit, then you can elevate her and help bring her up so she's worthy and willing to be a soldier in your army. Not all women are hopeless cases. They all want love, but the problem is they don't know how to …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 06:31 AM
1

No. There's no rule against dunking in the WNBA. 99.9% of them just can't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 05:05 PM
1

Alright. Fair enough. Let me ask you this: are men better than women? If not, what are women better at than men? Or better yet, name a woman who is the best
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 05:44 AM
0

But what you listed is so subjective. Maybe those things make men better to you, but again that's your opinion. I could see some down falls of peeing standing up. I mean, I could be at a urinal just minding my own when some crazy guy comes up and chops my dick off. If I gave you two pills (no pun intended): one made you weaker, shorter and made you bleed every month, then there was another that made you stronger, taller, and able to be frivolous with life if you wanted, which would you choose? M…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 05:31 AM
2

I should have clarified: I didn't mean that women can't hunt, just like women can play basketball if they want, they just won't be as good at it as men. There's a reason they were caring for children and doing housework instead of doing physical things. Men are just...better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 04:42 AM
-2

I mean better overall, from the fact that women have to sit down to pee, they bleed every month and they're frail. I would be miserable if I had to have a nosebleed every month. I would feel so vulnerable having to sit down to pee. I have a nigh unlimited amount of sperm. I can just...waste life by masturbating. On that level, men are better. But that's just on a biological level. As it relates to male / female interaction, men are better because of what we have to do to get what we want (sex). …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 04:35 AM
1

Men did the hunting because men were better at hunting. There are no gender roles keeping WNBA players from being able to dunk. Men are just better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 03:31 AM
2

Somewhat biologically speaking, like removing all of the social elements that make men "men" and make women "women" the composition of the "man stuff" makes us better. That's the most basic level. Does that mean every single man is better than every woman? No it doesn't. But the absolute BEST man, is better than the best woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 03:30 AM
7

Which part of my post do you not agree with: that humans are animals? That as animals we have certain natures and are therefore predisposed to certain actions?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 03:25 AM
-1

Simply put, if women were capable of doing all that men can, they would have done it by now. Men are simply better. And I don't mean that women are sub-human or should be treated poorly or some shit, just that as a creature, men are better.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:30 AM
8

Very well said. People seem to have a problem understanding context when it comes to this kind of stuff. Humans have different personalities but we are all animals with natures and habits. That's the essence of AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 01:26 AM
2

No, I don't reject them. We're all animals and have overlying natures. Men have certain natures just like women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 08:16 PM
0

Don't know why you're being downvoted. This is true. If you're passive and just let people do whatever that want to you, that is a form of submission. Passivity often times comes from fear of confronting things head on. One would rather be submissive and let shit happen to them than try to do something about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 04:53 AM
3

What turns women on is universal, as in, there are certain core things that all women do like. But that doesn't mean that those are the only things like they like. For instance, any woman would like a man that's in good shape, but that doesn't mean that an in-shape guy is the only thing that a woman would like. To go with the dread game example: true, not every woman will respond the exact same to dread game. Some can't handle it, some can. But that is irrelevant. What matters is the man's happi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 07:42 PM
7

Sure, people have differing personalities but we're still animals that have overlying natures. Does it mean we always act according to those natures? No. But it's still there.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 06:26 PM
1

Even though this is true, it isn't the only disparity between how men and women get sex. The thing is, women don't need anything other than their vaginas to get sex, whereas no man gets laid simply because he has a dick. No woman has ever had to charm her way into getting dick. They don't have to learn "game" or develop verbal skills, or take a guy on a date and convince a guy, who didn't want to fuck her at first...into fucking her. It just doesn't work like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:03 PM
1

Just being an object isn't hard or unrealistic. The cool thing about men is that even though we are very physically driven when it comes to sexual attraction towards women, they don't have to be the most attractive girl for us to want to sleep with her. I'm sure even guys like Brad Pitt, Ryan Gosling and Clooney have slept with average, or even low level (socially speaking) broads. And as far as sex, just don't lay there like a fucking mummy and expect us to do everything. If a woman takes pride…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:57 PM
3

It is true though. People just don't understand what it means. It doesn't mean that all women are actively trying to screw men over, it means that given the proper circumstances, any woman has the potential to be that way. Ergo, don't put any bitch on a pedestal, which is what women claim to want anyway. They don't want to be treated as goddesses. They want to be treated as regular, fallible humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:48 PM
1

What's the difference? I'm talking about in actual application, how would a woman tell the difference between a guy thinking she's sexy and objectifying her?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:31 PM
2

Isn't it weird how women, when they're young and at their most attractive, don't want to be treated as objects, but wheb they get old and wrinkled, want to be sexy? Just be an object when you're young then develop more when you're older.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 04:45 PM
1

Short answer...yes. Girls can like those aforementioned qualities in a guy, but those qualities aren't what attract them to a guy in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 05:09 AM
1

Your statements are too broad. As a man, your perspective is skewed. I think it makes you feel better to believe this worldview because it might make rejection easier to handle. But if you're having a hard time getting laid compared to "women," it's because you're one of the unattractive people. And ALL unattractive people have a hard time getting laid. You are probably overestimating your level of attractiveness (something too many people do). Are you a woman? I ask that because this is a very …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 03:08 PM
2

It's not meant to be vague. I mean overall, is your man better than you? When you first met him, did you look at him like he was better?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 02:27 PM
1

You're focusing on the minute details. The man in question doesn't even have to have slept with hundreds of women for other women to find him attractive. Just him being able to get many women will make him attractive to women. Women know that we all want sex from them. It doesn't matter if she's cute, ugly, has a crooked nose or yellow teeth. That's not misandry. That's nature. Standards vary. Some girls that I want to fuck you'd agree with me are very attractive. Some others, you'd probably say…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 06:47 AM
2

That "something" is something that keeps guys from wanting to be around them, not something that would keep every guy from wanting to have sex with them. But there is nothing that stops them from being able to get dick. Now, they may not be able to get the dick that they want , but they can still find someone. With fat women, there are plenty of "chubby chaser" dudes. Or dudes who would just boink a fat chick to bust a quick nut. Even with ugly women, there could be a homeless girl passed out by…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 06:35 AM
3

No, not any guy can find any girl to fuck...on the basis of just having a dick. That's the difference. You all don't have to charm your way into getting dick. There's no "pick-up community" with women because you guys don't need to have "game". And let me ask you this, is your man better than you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/15 12:39 AM
1

You're confusing preference with standards. I mean that any girl, of any shape, color or size can find a guy that would fuck her. Men can't say the same. Every guy has that one girl he wants to fuck even though something is wrong with her. I mean wrong as in she's not "conventionally attractive" or she has a little hair under her arms or her forehead is huge. Just...something about her that would make other people think she's unattractive but to him it makes her 10x sexier.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 09:21 PM
5

I mean that to women (and men) pussy is a valuable commodity. Not any guy can be very charming, charismatic, intelligent, etc. So the guys who are those things are better than the rest which is what women want. They want the best man they think they're entitled to. If every guy would just buy pussy, women would hold no power over them. 99.9% of what men do in relation to women is because they want pussy. If they decided, "Eh, it's not worth the effort of becoming better and I can just pay for it…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 05:56 PM
2

You're trying to quantify something that isn't quantifiable. The point is that women want a man who is also attractive to other women. That shows objective value which is what women want in their man. Then when that attractive man chooses her, it makes her feel special because she "changed him" because she was worth settling down for. And what do you mean by "god-awful women"? Ugly women? Fat women? Slutty women? That doesn't matter. A guy will fuck just about anything if he's able. If you had a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 05:50 PM
1

I first heard of it through other subreddits trashing it then just decided to check it out one day. Turns out that a lot of the information and philosophy there was similar to a lot of the things I had already been learning throughout life so I decided to sub. I didn't really seek out TRP for any kind of guidance or whatnot. A lot of my views on stuff is just developed from going through life.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 04:45 PM
2

Depends. As far as a high partner count? No. That just makes you sexier to them. It's like you chose them out of all of the other broads you could have had. Women like to feel special. As far the prostitutes example, maybe some of them would be put off by that, but I don't think they would care after you had already started dating them. The reason women don't like when guys pay for prostitutes is because it: A.) Makes them look desperate and more importantly B.) Devalues the importance of pussy …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 04:38 PM
0

The whole "debate" is just red pill people saying that TRP works and blue pill saying "No it doesn't!". But this sub tries to be too gray at times. Life is black and white, but just on a spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 05:09 PM
0

My confidence skyrocketed once I realized my non-fear of death. I look at it like this: I'm not afraid of the ultimate end of life (dyingl so what the fuck can any bitch do to me that is worse than that? Tell me I'm ugly? So what. She probably wakes up with a funky pussy anyway
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 05:40 AM
0

If anyone says yes they're lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 02:33 AM
1

You also want to know her because you think you can use some of that information to charm your way into some pussy. That's what women want you do: they want you to play on their terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:19 AM
2

You want to know her on the level of knowing if she's crazy or not. Like if she's the bitch from Misery or something. But your desire to fuck her isn't any stronger than it was when you first met her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 01:18 AM
0

Does it matter to most men when deciding on whether or not they want to date a woman? No. For the most part, all a woman has to do for a man to be interested in her is be pretty. Men have a much larger responsibility in attraction. That's why you never see "Pick up tips for women" or anything like that. They don't have to do anything but be pretty and go out somewhere. Guys don't care if you're funny, smart, wealthy, etc. All of that is just icing on the cake. With women, some or all of those th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 08:19 PM
4

No one wants to do that though. No one wants to give up power. I can explain to woman all day about the plight of men and it won't matter. She's not obligated to care anyway. Men and women get attacked and face issues. This isn't some legal shit where women and men are treated differently under statute of law (overall). This is just a social dynamic that has gone on for decades and will continue to go on. We can understand each other all we want, but no one will act on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 05:10 AM
2

AWALT doesn't mean that literally every single woman is actively plotting to destroy a man's life. Like it's the Final Solution against men or some shit. It means that every woman has the potential to "be that bitch" if given the circumstances. It's simply a reminder for guys to not worship women. It's no different than women saying they hate guys who put them on a pedestal. AWALT is just knocking them down in their place.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 04:59 AM
3

It's because men and women operate in opposite fashion. A guy's thinking is, "Hey, you're cute, I want to fuck you." And then later after he gets to know her is like, "Hey you're a cool person" A woman's thinking is "Hey, you're a cool person." And then once they get to know you "I want to fuck you." Neither is really worse than the other (That's a fruitless conversation anyway) but both could be solved if both parties respected themselves. If men valued themselves enough to not hang around a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/15 04:54 AM
1

We always hear about how "Women are emotional creatures". That doesn't mean that they only act on emotion, but that they are sensitive to it as well. You gotta look at a girl's emotions on a vertical spectrum of intense and calm. Whether it's hate or love doesn't matter. What matters is that there is emotion involved. Just treat it like a volume slider: turn it up and down. Be an asshole 1 second, then turn around and tell her how beautiful she is. Be as elusive as possible with your behavioral …
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 04:47 AM
0

Even when women want something from you, you onky exist as that thing they want from you (when it's not sexual). You exist to her as much as a lamp exists to us. It has no sentience or significance outside of what we want it to do for us. Women are neither born nor taught to be providers for anyone (including themselves) so they lack any semblance of empathy or concern for anything outside of their own being
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 04:12 AM
3

Such as?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 03:39 AM
42

"You claim you're a strong woman and don't need a man yet you're taking alimony" Damn...rekt
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 08:42 PM
7

No it's perfectly normal. No guy sees an attractive girl and goes, "Man I bet she has a great sense of humor!" He sees her nice curves, soft face and fat ass and wants some of that It's the same thing with women. No woman sees a fit guy with nice hair and a nice car and thinks, "I bet he'd be great with kids!". She just finds him visually (sexually) appealing. Attraction always begins with the physical.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/15 11:13 PM
5

Exactly. Like Patrice said before, you can be a Time Ho. In a time where women work and can earn their own money, finances aren't the only thing they solicit you for. They will siphon your time and attention given the chance
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 08:49 PM
10

"she told her sister that she only married me because she knew I'd be a stable provider and father, not because she loved me." Classic BB in action, but NAWALT!
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:54 PM
417

Tragic. Absolutely tragic. This is the shit our young men are being taught: to disregard their own dignity and common sense because females are somehow beyond reproach when they act like whores. Their setting this guy up for failure. This is like the fucking template for beta bux right here
/r/TheRedPill27/11/14 06:25 PM
1

Amen. The effectiveness of "game" is stringent upon how good you look. That bullshit about women caring more about "personality" is the greatest hamster lap ever run. They care about personality in guys they already want to fuck. No one fucks your personality
/r/TheRedPill21/11/14 06:48 AM
12

So simple, yet so true. Empathy is an evolutionary trait that skipped women
/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 02:07 AM
3

I tried repeatedly to "date" a girl I had encountered on Facebook. Never saw her in person when we were "talking", but I acted like I was her boyfriend while she was fucking other guys. Tragic
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:20 PM
2

Funny, most of the girls I see who have pink/green/blue hair are all either whales or just plain ugly
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 07:11 AM
4

They always think they're being "edgy" with their quips, but when you get really sarcastic with them they can't take it and get offended
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 07:10 AM
2

Cringe, but not in a self-loathing way. I cringe at how much of a bitch I used to be, but it makes me that much more pleased with how far I've come.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 07:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter