TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Contrapuntobrowniano Archive

View 7 posts and 435 comments by Contrapuntobrowniano on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Haha. That would be very impactful if we ignored the fact that women, despite "not wanting/liking it" actually do it. A lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 11:02 PM
1

Thanks. This gives me a lot more confidence. :)
/r/seduction20/01/25 04:16 PM
1

I understand. Thanks for the advice!
/r/seduction20/01/25 01:06 PM
1

Thanks. I'll report any news on the matter soon. I now see that the thing I'm lacking is mostly getting physical... Both in language and contact. Great advice!
/r/seduction20/01/25 01:04 PM
3

I see. Its kinda' difficult to not make it about self-affirmation when most people measure your success in terms of how many women you have available in your smartphone.
/r/seduction19/01/25 03:37 PM
2

Haha. Its a great attitude, yes. Maybe I could learn something from it.
/r/seduction19/01/25 03:04 PM
4

Do you think risking many rejections is a good strategy to seduce women?
/r/seduction19/01/25 02:59 PM
4

I get this, but is being exposed to many rejections a good strategic maneuver to seduce women?
/r/seduction19/01/25 02:58 PM
2

Okay. I get you, i am very "date-centered" guy in what it comes to strategy... But this only moves the problem further down the timeline. If i manage to get a date (which isn't usually a problem for me) I might encounter myself in a situation that begins with a flirty attitude, and ends up on the very same problem i was talking about.
/r/seduction19/01/25 02:56 PM
2

Thank you! This has been very useful! I never understood the "look at lips" thing, but with this i think i have a better idea of it. I'll try and report
/r/seduction19/01/25 02:48 PM
2

Hey! Thanks for the caring tips! I'll put some in use and let you guys know. So, this phase I struggle with, is it called "calibration"?
/r/seduction19/01/25 02:43 PM
1

Its cultural bro. And many people wouldn't accept it even if their life depended on it. Just ignore those fuckers and put your grain of sand in the bettering of the sexual gregarism beach.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 01:49 PM
3

Well, yes: lies are cruel. But the problem has hardly a sexual, but a human nature. That's why i claim that most feminist sexual politics is mistaken: feminism shouldn't be about sex, hookups, lesbianism, relationship dynamics, sexual activism... But about patriarchy, systemic oppression and women rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:43 PM
2

I could have rephrased it, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:34 PM
3

Women tend to notice men that other women notice, but avoid fuckboys from that subset. That's why real fuckboys don't go around pointing what women they slept with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:32 PM
1

Irl, most people would disappear if you say "stay around with no sex" from any kind of relationship with further-than friendship implications. Men and women alike. I don't think that any man that wants to fuck you, because they find you pretty and like you are sexist if they don't want a commited, formal relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:30 PM
0

I wasn't trying to say i disagree. I was trying to say its mistaken, based on direct experience with reality. Those are pretty distinct statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:23 PM
1

Yes? What i said is that many men like to keep their relationships intimate: it helps them get more.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:22 PM
0

Whats the offensive part? Enlighten me, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:20 PM
0

Because most men would be antagonistic about this comment. Its not personal preference: its ideology, and a pretty toxic one.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 03:17 PM
-7

No offense, but point two is very dumb. Making a man wait doesn't ensure the relationship will last (even marrying someone doesn't... Its like wearing a bulletproof vest in case you casually get shot). Also, not all men see sexual experiences as bragging: you could actually say that many men prefer their sexual relationships to be kept in secret. "Men" don't view sex as you claim... But coming from a radfem, its no surprise you say this. Anyways, many, many girls that have never "made a man wait…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 02:53 PM
2

I think making men wait has more to do with personal values than ethnicity or religion. Yet... Most here are Christians. Interesting
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 02:47 PM
-1

Oh, god... You really have the BP on your username? I can understand RP fanatics, but a BP this passionate is just odd. What do you think are the core tenets of the blue pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 12:53 PM
–

People need to get used to having their toes stepped without being jerks about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 03:18 PM
9

Normal people go "Thanks: i'm not interested".
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 07:40 PM
–

You know... If you don't get it, you don't get it. If you want to get more into the weeds, look for humanism on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:30 AM
–

Well, you're supposed to love your whole species. Its worldviews like these where wars stem from
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:07 AM
-1

This is basic Freudian psychology, not misandry. Sex isn't inherently bad, which might come as a surprise for many of the puritanical women here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/24 07:39 PM
1

Wow. Hang on you're a Red Piller, and a feminist? Hahaha! I love it! I thought you people didn't exist at all! I'm genuinely happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 12:53 AM
1

The post isn't for solving problems. The post is an advice for desperate women. You still have your problems, but now have a new perspective on them. Long live honest human speech!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:59 PM
4

I don't know everyone else, but i'm neurodivergent as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:56 AM
0

Aha, men being good with every mildly attractive girl isn't the problem. We like women. Women not being good with every mildly attractive man? That can be examined closely. Do you dislike men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:50 AM
–

Maybe they are? I'm not american, but if men say so, it might have some truth to it. Its pretty standard that a man that wants a girl mustn't be a creep (comes without saying that most men who are engaged in flirting with a woman that dislikes him will get rejected as creeps). By the same ruler, its pretty standard that a girl that wants a man mustn't be missappealingly fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 05:32 AM
–

Stupid men think that. Also, only stupid women think that a woman wanting an above-average height, super handsome, in good shape, with deep masculine voice, with a great income, socially skillfull, exciting and intelligent, not rude but ruthless, high on the social hierarchy, and who makes them feel feminine and safe is having "reasonably high" standards. Men in everyone of those categories are minorities... Lets not even discuss how many actually check all those boxes...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 12:17 AM
–

Yes. Its the toxic few. It is also the exact content of my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:06 PM
–

Expired women don't exist. What does exist is entitled women with stupid standards and dubious moral systems...which most of your premises seem to deny.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 08:03 PM
1

Hahahaha. Talk about not knowing the Man Code
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:14 AM
14

Misandry is tolerated, misogyny isn't. Its as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:13 AM
–

This is just shitty logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:10 AM
21

That isn't how men work, really. Most dudes will ignore the problems between a random guy and a random girl because its not their business. Also, men literally stand up against abusive men all the time, so idk wtf you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:09 AM
-4

Why do these pink pill users always speak as misandrist scum? What is up with that? The only point that is accurate is point 1, and it is even directed to a minority...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 11:48 PM
0

I really wish people knew sexuality isn't a monolith, and there are more than two options with regards to "what i want" in a relationship... But that's way too advanced for most people here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 12:55 AM
-2

Yup. This is the perfect post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 09:38 PM
3

This is an example of male narcissism and sexual entitlement I can't understand Nah, you're just womenpilled, which is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 02:01 PM
8

I second this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 03:27 AM
3

Its pure survival, my friend. If no man wants to never-getting laid, you can calculate form that what a very big deal it actually is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 12:43 AM
1

It's your own fault it isn't clear. Its my fault you're speaking nonsense? When did "reading" became a "women-dominated hobby"? You mean dramatic novels? Damn right it is. Its made from women to women. I could come up with hundreds of crazy men-dominated activities just like that...and then again, not even a social event... They're just... reading. :| "Nerd stuff" is more female-dominated (they overwhelm fandom) and women also dominate extreme sports I seriously doubt the statistics are on your …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 11:46 PM
1

Lol with reading. Obviously "hobbies are men stuff" is a joke... but i just now realized how much hobbying lacks within your gender in general. Like, everything that isn't super specific that i can come up with is mostly men-dominated. Billar, chess, surfing, nerd stuff, extreme sports, martial arts... (Sports & games in general)... Wtf duds?! After a long though i came up with ballet (...seriously?), knitting and watching dramatic content (these aren't even social). Maybe i'm biased but, from m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 12:25 PM
1

Have inconsistent communication they're flakey. Ghost for days and come back. This is a necessity for me. I'm a heavy academic. This shouldn't be considered a Red flag. Some people just lack the time. I don't ghost... But if you wanna talk to me, you can just open your chat. We're in fucking XXI cent. Also, what's up with the attachment? So i stopped talking to you for three days. Why would you see that as a bad thing? Don't you have a life? A friend to talk to? C'mon...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:13 AM
2

Remarkably good point, pal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:08 AM
2

I would, but i'm not from the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:07 AM
1

We are talking dating life here, mistress. Concentrate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:06 AM
1

Its insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:03 AM
1

What does "female-dominated hobby" even mean? Hobbies are men stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/24 05:00 AM
2

Youll get there, don't worry. But yeah, keep not doing shit. That always ends up in funny excitement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:36 PM
5

Wanna hang?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:35 PM
2

Wait untill the 30yo virgin 'till marriage women pop up. Seems like this sub is a genuine freak show.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 10:34 PM
-7

This is not being discussed. Concentrate
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:51 PM
5

And you had to be blue... lol. Nobody took that personally. We took that for what it is: stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 12:14 PM
-2

Your debate habits are off. 🚩🚩🚩🚩
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 12:11 PM
0

What? Men ARE the ones that can survive alone. The problem with that is that they get socially segregated. Sex-starved men are insanely less successful than non-starved ones, not because they are less capable, but because they struggle a lot more to get the same opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 11:44 PM
3

You might think otherwise, but these analogies with the capitalist indicators of market's relations are pretty dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:44 PM
2

Nobody: Random woman in the internet: men refusing to have sex restore my faith for humanity. Keep it up guys ! Maybe if we keep refusing we'll solve climate crisis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:10 AM
2

Sometimes one just needs to convince oneself thet a crush is definitely not attracted to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:22 PM
1

Its okay. Thanks for sharing
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:21 PM
1

I guess you achieved that level of certainty in your preferences. In my experience, that's an amazing goal to achieve. Even more so if you're a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:58 PM
5

I'm sure you have found a guy unattractive and time after encountering him in another context and setting, not finding him unattractive anymore. That's women (not trying to make generalisations). Women tend to function contextually. That's why men are way more sure about their preferences. "You like his body, face, and personality? My man, f*k the shit out of her". Women tend to add so much more to the requirements that ends up being very ambiguous what is it that they really want. My hypothesis…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:48 PM
4

Irl, there's no issue in re-trying. First of all some women directly want you to insist. Much more so if you're attractive. Secondly men and women do not function the same way: while i agree with your premise that you shouldn't insist immediately after a rejection, you shouldn't close your mind to the possibility of something romantic coming from that woman.women are indecisive folks. Also, pretty unassertive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:33 PM
2

As Immanuel Kant would put it: "Morality is treating people as ends, not as means".
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:22 PM
-2

No wife can. That's why marriage is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:15 PM
8

I think this fact deserves way mote attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:14 PM
–

Nah, there's no problem with that. Women are as faulty as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 10:46 AM
0

Women and men both have to find a match. But demanding the normalisation of gender roles to support some kind of "damage fee" to women just because they have a distinct biology is delusional. I would never pay up that fee. Also, it has nothing congruent with feminism ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:47 PM
2

Income? Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:39 PM
1

So sane, this take.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 09:27 PM
–

Again, not a gender issue. The majority of women don't orgasm during sex because the vast majority of people (both men and women) don't know how to enjoy sex. Moreover, if you can't enjoy sex you'll have a very difficult time understanding the sexuality of those who do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 10:59 PM
–

Still waiting for you to actually state how men weaponize things against women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 07:19 PM
–

Yes, but only one gender is made accountable for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 07:18 PM
–

Many women don’t orgasm. That just signifies the person that you have intercourse with isn't skilled enough to make you orgasm. Its not a gender issue, but a personal one. And no, you don't "give" sex to anyone. Nobody wants to do something that doesn't benefit him in any way... And many, many women love having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 07:15 PM
3

It is funny, yes.until you realize its true.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 03:47 PM
2

If you don't learn from the outcome (which is ultimately what OP is talking about, and also a kind of dependency) that's actually a recipe for whatever the opposite of "success" means to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 02:01 PM
0

You must be living in somesort of bubble... Good for you, i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 01:59 PM
2

People don't realize how hipersexual our culture is. (Ironically, how sex-starved)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 12:18 PM
1

So dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 12:17 PM
1

Because most women don't know what they want, just know what would be the ideal. They then pursue that ideal and get sad and horny when they find out that their ideal is also 20% of all women population's ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 12:13 PM
2

Well... It seems like you need some education.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 12:10 PM
6

This is just nonsense. feminist projects (this is, an non-patriarchal society, for starters) are far from complete. They're only getting more backlash now because now rich and privileged people are getting involved into them. Also, feminism is constantly being blamed for women being idiots which is ultimately also nonsensical.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:36 PM
1

Decent and boyfriend really don't match up so greatly. Most decent men in your age (i'm assuming mid or early twenties) aren't looking for anything so serious. Family? What are you talking about? We're literally in the talking phase.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:09 PM
1

Baggage to women is just what they seek. There's nothing wrong about providing the seeker. I can't be blamed for wanting money in exchange for tobacco from a tobacco addict. If I don't sell it, someone else will, and the chain will never end. The only way to really solve the problem is the addiction stopping.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:57 PM
1

Thanks. I'll watch it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:46 AM
0

You clearly lack some societal experience. The usually practiced discourse is: "men fall in love with looks, women fall in love with personality". That's what is said, and its total bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:45 AM
2

Having your eyes opened by the cruelty of women's gaslighting is a curse, because it hurts like fire melting your skin, but is also a blessing, because when you heal you get to know how biased you were. You get to know the truth about things that transcend even relationships. I have experienced it, so i know what you're talking about. Just wanna say: consider yourself a lucky person.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:40 AM
1

While i agree in virtually everything you say, i disagree in the paying part as an absolute premise. Paying for sex isn't bad. Paying for dates is. Hell, I wouldn't even try a job interview if it came with a fee to try ... Like: you decide wether you'll hire me or not, and i have to pay to give you that power over me? I say smelly jelly.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:25 AM
39

Short answer, yes. While you're at it you see all these super stupid guys getting a lot of girls by literally existing in a specific way, which makes you feel pretty dumb and used when you have to do all that work just to get laid. On the flip side you probably are a better person when you finish that process, but admiration for women isn't exactly peaking at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 03:02 AM
14

That's exactly what is said.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 05:16 PM
1

Did their looks had something to do about it? Like, the prettiest ones the coldest/most calculating, the uglier ones the addiction copers?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 04:35 PM
1

Umm. I understand. But how do you cope with the fact that a prostitute that falls in love with a rich man can really be satisfied in all her needs to the point of not needing prostitution anymore? There isn't a performative sentiment there. Sometimes i feel like this is just another form of sexuality that crops out of the conventional. I think people really do fall in love withe these kind of interactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 04:32 PM
1

I'm from the third world... and i also want boobs and vagina... but, like, 30% of the world's population fits in that description. Not really a keen observation. As for the hookers hypergamy, would you say is only based on who pays more? Or is it just normal hypergamy with extra cost? It’s odd you guys don’t know this yet I think the average man doesn't know that much about hookers.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 03:57 PM
1

While i get why you would say that, i don't think the issue is so simple. "Sex is free" is a highly debated topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 03:39 PM
1

You're right. There's a lot of variations. I guess this is just the classic biased point of view that leads one to think that just because some specific group of people is a minority it means that they are all alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 03:25 PM
2

And must really like having sex and meeting and pleasing new people sexually. Do you think this can be done from a position of "pleasure" and not plain survival?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 03:20 PM
2

I think too many people conflate "this person would make a bad partner" with "this is a bad person". I get you. It strikes me as too sex-centered as a worldview. You surely don't want to date a eunuch (as a woman), but nothing says he can't be a wonderful person. But also, too many people that make the point for some particular trait to be undesirable for commited monogamous relationshis fail to make the same distinction you're making, so it ends up being very controversial. Like when red piller…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 03:17 PM
0

Their hands are tied because women like older men.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 09:53 PM
1

Emotionally they're super immature. Most men at a very young age know when they just want to fuck and have fun, when they want to love and form a strong relationship, when they just want to fucus on theirselves, etc. Women tend to be absolutely blank about the same issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:24 PM
2

Yeah, sure mate. Just as an advice, read about intrasexual selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 09:03 PM
1

So are you. But keep throwing statistiscs to justify nonsense, i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 08:37 PM
1

Trust me. I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:27 PM
3

Extremely attractive people do that all the time. They pick somebody that's not so valuable as a person, but its nonetheless compatible with them. They do this because they need nobody to make them a decent person, and they only want to enjoy sharing themselves with a compatible partner. They good people were before meeting him, and they will continue to be afterwards. All this "picking a partner that's better than you is growing as a person" is just a political disguise to entitlement and a pra…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 11:23 AM
13

Nah, lots of women are shit and we pretend they are not because they are women. For god sake, women are super dishonest and hypocrite to eachother
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 11:12 AM
3

In women's eyes? Yes. You actually get turned on by it. Call it the "bad boy".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 11:10 AM
12

If ahe thinks ahe deserves a non-substandard man being a substandard woman herself she is probably very proud of being like that, and not going to change. Virtually oneof the worst possible human traits ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:58 AM
0

He never gets it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:56 AM
5

Lol wut
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 10:52 AM
2

Came here looking for this. Most women don't want to date their friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:00 AM
1

The main problem is that to redefine manhood one would necessarily need to redefine womanhood: as it is rn, manhood is mostly defined by some gender traits, and the availability of women you have. Unless there is a massive shift in women's perspective, even if there is a massive shift of perspective in men's, the social dynamics will eventually revert everithyng back to its original form. True, we don't need women's permission: but we do need women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 11:37 PM
2

The most common form of circlejerking in this sub is appealing to the "sex-starved rant" argument. Good thing is that effortless arguments like that can usually be effortlessly discarded as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:58 PM
2

I'm not giving you the final blow, because you seem to be a lady, and i'm a gentleman... But i must warn you: you are making this too easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:42 PM
3

So are cool people that don't check all your boxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:34 PM
0

Trust me, they think the same about women. Also, you did a lot of heavy lifting there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:20 PM
-19

You don't know how much i hate these hipocritocal takes. This just reads like "sex is bad". Disclaimer: it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:06 PM
-3

Ummm... lowering your standards isn't about satisfiying some man's demands. Is about you giving yourself the opportunity to date cool people even if they don't check all your boxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 07:04 PM
0

They aren't, but people like both, anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 04:40 PM
0

Dude, do you really thought i was talking about statistics and demographics? Read both comments again. But slowly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:31 PM
2

Lol. Okay bro. You convinced me. I'll trench and dirt my face.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:27 PM
-3

Ah. You're one of those. No wonder its BP. You're too on the dark side bro: as the Beatles said "get back to where you once belonged". Wearing makeup is cute. And fuckable. Why wouldn't you like that? Specially if its from a girl that likes you? Would you also prefer her to not shower, and grow a mustache? Pleaaaase hahahah.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 11:54 AM
1

I (man) use makeup and am not gay... girls love it. Idk, just for you to know your take is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 11:48 AM
2

Your take isn't accurate. As much as i dislike TRP ideologic stances, they have a point with the "chasing" part. Its not that women should be the chasers, its that if you get women engaged in actively trying to be with you, they will fall for you. The logic is astoundingly simple: if you make it easy for her, she will make it hard for you. Go the other way around and you'll both be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 07:25 PM
0

Not preferring bears over men. Liking sex. Being honest. Being reciprocative. Passes the attraction test. Yup. The perfect girl. These are high standards, because women tend to be fearlessly dishonest nowadays (everybody, to be fair), and don't like reciprocating a litle bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:36 AM
5

Daaaaaaamn
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 10:09 PM
–

I do me. But i notice people being jerks, both women and red pillers. Part of me being me is pointing that shit out. For the record, TBP is also full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:31 PM
–

I'm nt trying to please anyone. If anything, its the opposite. For men to let women do women, women should let men do men, and not be constantly dragging them into RP bullshit. Granted, they don't consciously do it, but that Just makes it worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:03 PM
–

The only thing a person can change is themselves. Agree to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:00 PM
–

Why does it matter as a man, what a women needs to do or not do. I could literally write an entire essay on this. Short answer is another question: "why does it matter, as a woman, what another man needs to do or not do?".
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 01:51 PM
–

Some people prefer to fix their broken pipeline, instead of trying to drain water from an ongoing leakage.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 01:45 PM
–

Check it out. There's brains in this sub. Nais.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 01:40 PM
1

They had me until they started to count bodies. I'm not cringe enough to ask that to a women i just met. Like, what part of being a virgin makes the sex good?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 01:34 PM
1

Fear and awareness are not the same. Fear is an emotion biologically ingrained in our brain chemistry to cope with dangerous situations that overtakes our primary logical brain. If you feel fear with random strangers totally unprompted, that's the first sign that something isn't okay: you don't know when you're in real danger. This means that you respond equally to dangerous situations and relatively normal ones. There are several problems associated with this, both psychologically and in terms …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 01:21 PM
2

Women don't understand themselves. How are they supposed to understand men? Most men actually study women's psychology to get laid. Women don't do shit to understand men, because they don't need to.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 04:34 AM
2

You completely misinterpreted the story. Kafka's Metamorphosis is literally the most famous metaphor in literature... You interpreted it literally, and you still have the balls to say that someone else misunderstood it? Lol. America is doomed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 04:29 AM
1

What the actual fuck...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 04:23 AM
2

I agree with your flair. TRP got stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 04:09 AM
2

Don't get too carried away with the other commenters here: it IS bigotry. That you may have reasons, and it is a very common form of bigotry? Yes. It doesn't make it okay. There's nothing wrong with being scared, as it is a primary defense mechanism of the human species, but if fear interferes with logic (which is something you seem to be noticing) then saying that its okay is just awful advice. You can be safe without being fearful...fuck stranger men: change for your own bettering.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 04:01 AM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 03:47 AM
–

And this is why you're single. Check it out. The lion finally showed his claws. "What has to be maintained through ego rather than through reason has probably no reason, to begin with".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 10:05 PM
1

Yeah. I took home that you need more hermeneutics. lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 10:49 PM
2

I (24 M) normally go for middle. Wouldn't date a girl in her 20's for LTR, because i'm not seeking that kind of relationship. Not closed to the Idea, but not actively seeking. I would preferably have a FWB or an open relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 01:33 PM
-1

So, your relationship is only based on sex? Someone casually comments that he's not staying in a situation in which he can't get the food he needs for survival... Some other person goes: "food is the only thing that matters to you? No air? No clothes? No water? No money? Food??? Really?!?" That other person is you. That's how you think (or you're being sarcastic, which i sincerely hope for).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/24 01:00 PM
1

This post isn't based on my personal experiences: I do casual more often than not (although not as much as i would want to). I wasn't aware of the "i don't do casual" trend until i joined TPPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 05:41 PM
–

I bailed r/askwomen. There were just too many rules that made everything boring. You couldn't ask spicy, provocative, dumb, controversial, factual, political... Its not in the rules, but all these get banned. I even sent a message to the mods complaining about this: "Reditt is a big place, if you have a problem following or don't want to follow the community rules you can leave the sub whenever you want." "No worries, already did. I'm just informing you."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 02:23 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/24 02:21 PM
1

I'm not crying about it. It is a question because i want to know women's opinion on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 12:46 PM
2

Thanks for your advice, brother.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 11:13 PM
1

Thanks for the advice. I've experienced that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 02:00 PM
1

Its difficult for me to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:40 PM
0

For many people there is nothing fun in commiting to strangers, either... Just a little thing to take into digestion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:36 PM
1

What makes you think it's a trend? Yah... Its not a trend. Realized it by now. May i ask what BYU is? (I'm not from the US)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:32 PM
0

Didn't say i was. But that also means you're not entitled to push me to commit just because i want a romantic connection. For me, casual stage is important, and I don't get absolutely any benefit to commiting to someone that wasn't previously a friend or a casual date.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:30 PM
1

You seem to be conflating "taking things slow" with "casual dating." Yes. That's how i interpret a natural form of dating culture. I think pressuring to commit its just not a good "get to meet you" talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:26 PM
0

I totally disagree with sexual shaming. Its immature, dishonest, and just does way more harm than good (if any good can be extracted from that). I agree its not a very good bet for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:23 PM
1

Yeah, i realized its not a trend, so it makes more sense to me now. We’re not men This, however its way off. Men are very biologically-driven when it comes to sex, dating and relationships too, and that's not a secret to anyone. We certainly don't "trend" very much, this is, apart from TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:15 PM
-1

I don't think I do. That's why i'm addressing this post to women. Although by now you girls have a pretty solid case. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:10 PM
1

I'm not solipsist really. I mean, my beliefs are (kind'a) but socially i'm as materialist as it gets. Which explains why the lack of orgasms in casual dating is a major problem in my argument. People don't want to do things they don't enjoy. My problem is when it gets ideological or societal, that makes no sense in modernist theory terms. I openly dislike Christian sexual values, so much of the argument is aligned with that mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:06 PM
3

they sufficiently explain the gender gap on this imo They totally do: lower chance compared to men of being rewarded with an orgasm This factor was completely out of my frame, but it is a huge one.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:59 PM
1

Well, i don't agree about sex being what you claim. But its in your rights to think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:55 PM
2

Although I don't align with your beliefs entirely, i do think this is a very good stance about modern sexuality. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:53 PM
1

Yes, i acknowledge this problem too. And and do think that women should abstain from dating men that "lie and judge" them... But "fucking" doesn't have to be a negative moral imperative.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:43 PM
1

Thanks. Its difficult, anyways. Not something lots of women want, as i understood from the comments. Also, I think its not a build up-thing, it apparently has an empirical cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:36 PM
-1

For many sex is not a super-deep thing. Is just something people just do to know each other sexually, and to have fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:33 PM
0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like you're accidentally equating an individual woman's preferences regarding sex with an overarching ideology. Well, yes. This is it, in a nutshell. Also, seems like the "trend" is not just ideological, but praxiological, as someone pointed out. Its not that "women don't do casual dating because of x or y moral beliefs" is more like "most women don't enjoy casual sex". Probability is that your mind not liking such freedoms is directly related to direct expe…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:31 PM
0

Women orgasm a lot less often from casual sex. I keep forgetting that women statistically enjoy a lot less casual. Most of the women i've dated enjoy it, so its not something that comes to mind a lot. Thanks. I still think that the casual market is very poor. Maybe awareness of women's pleasure needs would compensate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:12 PM
1

How is wanting casual sex a problem (genuinely asking)? And men DO put their sex drive in the back burner a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 12:04 PM
1

You're unhappy that women want commitment when you haven't had a chance to "sample the goods" and that this is a problem, other guys are complaining that too many men have "sampled" before him and that this is a problem Well, you have a solid point there. I would have to address some of these issues with the red pillers too. Also, "sampling the goods" its situationally accurate, but i'm nor refering to plain lust. I'm also refering to objective compatibility assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 07:07 AM
-10

But why do you call it risk? Many of the relationships i had were firstly physical. Then they got suuuper intense. men wanting to have casual sex isn’t really my problem I would say this is a both gender problem, because women getting too selective also. Attacks their own ability to have casual sex. I don't know how that works for women, but the overall ambient seems pretty dire for most people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 07:01 AM
1

Tomorrow? I'm sleepy... That is most of my premise, yes, but it isn't quite refuted. Its just points out that women might not be wrong in acting like that, but that would inevitably mean that the casual dating scene is a bad thing, or something edgy... And that's very debatable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:53 AM
2

I'm don't have factual rn, but shouldn't be hard to think it through. I know a lot of guys that have these same feelings, or slight variants of them. Also, there's the problem with the modern dating scenes: i'm sure even you had heard the "dating is hard nowadays". I claim what i posted is one big reason behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:47 AM
2

Well, then both things are unrelatable, which means your example is as bad as it gets.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:39 AM
-3

Probability of pregnancy with condomns alone is below 13%. With pills included its negligible. Dieseases are diseases, its not like you get to avoid the flu by starving your social life. Welcome to biology. Why does women having different priorities than men automatically make women wrong You might have a point with this, but that could easily be a social phenomenon. I'm adressing this tomorrow.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:38 AM
1

That's also something I dont support. I hate that "disgusting women" trend in TRP, practically because of the same reasons. Also, i think the statistics of casual-commited are way too skewed towards commited, which is bringing a lot of problems
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:31 AM
0

Well, then i'm not so far from truth: the casual sex scene is being screwed up. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:29 AM
–

Nah, just didn't match with her revent activity, so it caught me a little by surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:23 AM
1

Nope. Not what i'm refering to. But thanks for the effort. That you are personally offended that women don’t desire the same things you do when dating
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:21 AM
1

You can start with why you don't agree, for example. Also, if this is similar to asking a man to stop beating his wife, can we agree that both situations are asking for a bad thing to stop (figuratively speaking)?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:20 AM
-4

That's not women sexuality, that's a women trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:17 AM
0

More casual sex for everyone, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:16 AM
-8

I’ve never heard of this before, every marriage has a contract of some sort I was talking about LTRs So please leave the women who prefer to date the old fashioned way alone. I don't have anything against these preferences, but somethings just doesn't match, like "feminists" being old-fashioned, or left leaning women liking conservative ideals. That's not a healthy way to practice ideology. Edit: this is also a common theme in feminist movements, where feminists don't know how to react to a subm…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:15 AM
-1

Take it how you like. I'm interested in checking awareness, not offended reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:06 AM
1

Fat women and or men are disliked by everyone. That's on the fatties and their unhealthy body acceptance movement. Also, for the average man, at least 50% of women aren't attractive. Most of that percentage comes from old ladies or underages (yeah, as if anyone in the SMP would like to fuck a 80 yo person... No offense). For the rest, we couldn't care less: "not so pretty", "nerdy", "semi-chubby", "annoying voice", "late forties"... Most of it can do, as long it isn't the magazine-like women tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 06:04 AM
0

Most men don't want to fuck and commit. I call that a stalemate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:59 AM
-1

This is ridiculous. Men love nerdy women. God, if you're not plain ugly, most men would want to fuck you if they think it through with enough detention.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:54 AM
–

For me (24 M) its all the same shit, just that i'm hotter, richer, and women suddenly want to settle and don't like hot guys anymore (figuratively speaking). Yah... Fuck them, and fuck me. Not settling for a scam.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:35 AM
–

Shit changes when you get self-aware of your adulthood. For many, that happens in the early twenties.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:26 AM
–

In your case it is. In previous conversations you seemed pretty close to conservative ideals about love... So maybe i misrepresented your overall ideology, which doesn't seemed super radfem, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:20 AM
–

Heck, i'm not sure i agree with his definition of "thought experiment".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:14 AM
–

Actually, no, but the fact that there are a bunch here does make happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:12 AM
–

I wouldn't have kids myself. The fact that the top commenter doesn't want to is what surprised me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 04:11 AM
–

I would hate it, because i hate birth-related sex ideals... But more importantly... What the f*ck is your point with this thought experiment?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 05:08 PM
–

Wait what. You'd never have kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 05:06 PM
0

reality is that they know their league way better than men do. While this can be situationally true (specifically when talking about monogamous relationships), women have a too broad emotional spectrum. This makes them very confused pretty much all their lives until they're at least late twenties. Men do know their league, they just don't stick to it, because there is no inherent rule that dictates who you should date with, so men go for anything they like, as every human should, without regardi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 02:09 PM
1

Proceeding naturally, via the totally alien behaviour (yes, nature is rare now) of being "nice": reciprocating every effort the man does, being open about the wants and the needs (yes, this includes clearly stating if you want him to pay the check). Etc. Lack of engagement, conceived expectations or needs, deceptive communication, these are archetypical steps to get women in a relationship with an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 11:50 PM
1

Transhumanism has been happening ever since whe invented the wheel, my friend. We just didn't know it yet. Transhumanism is just bad for consumptionist societies, where techs become an purposeless merch, and not a part of the human history.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:55 PM
2

Are you a man or a woman? I think the same way, but this is to keep track of ideologic demographics.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:36 PM
1

To further decompose this to you, most women get "experience" from being active in sexuality, not "trauma". Just as most childs get dexterity from climbing trees, not fear of heights.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:30 PM
1

Again, the statistics is not on your side.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:26 PM
1

The more you live, the more opportunities you have to die. Avoid living because of it isn't anything near "logic".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 04:19 PM
1

Agree to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:15 AM
1

Yeah, but i also have statistics by my side. Not diving too deep into that. If you think most experienced women are damaged, the you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 12:07 AM
–

There is comparison, it is just that stealthing is absurd, and don't why anyone would do it, or even enforce law on such matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:52 PM
0

Those women are safe because i'm not a lawmaker. If a legally adult women got raped because of a false doctor telling her that it was the only way to cure a disease, i would imprison her by the crime of imbecility.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:48 PM
2

people don't take most forms of rape by deception seriously People don't usually like to take delusional things seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:40 PM
1

Women can have high body count and not be damaged, and the converse is also true. If you're really a polygamous person you should know this by now.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:35 PM
1

They do that all the time, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 03:23 PM
-4

If you agree women with high N-Count are disgusting, you're already way off. Not reading the rest. Let people fuck around,: ts fun and healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 12:15 PM
1

It isn't. Emotions take place in the motivation of the discourse, but a man would never say such an idiotic thing like "it just didn't feel right" which is suuuper coon among women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:23 PM
1

Whoa. That's nuts. Sounds horrible. But you seem to be up to "breaking the silence". Truth must be know kind of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 08:24 PM
1

I don't know how you leaped from my response of the problem being sexual to the unknown identity of a sperm donor in your family? I'll assume you confused "sexuality" with "paternity", which is a common thing in this sub... Anyways, no: what i'm talking about is that women are more miserable now because they can get less dates (without regards to the global economic decline, the worsening of the biospheric health and the worsening of psychological health within capitalist systems). People are ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 02:24 PM
1

True... But at the very least i can try.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:40 AM
1

Rommates might split everithyng that is "splittable". Some things are not. I do encourage 50/50 whenever its possible, but the issue with the "splitting" is a little more complex than that. There's a commenter on this thread that made out pretty well the point i was trying to.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:37 AM
0

Nope. Is about PROPOSING marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:32 AM
1

Lesser to what? You might think your sentence makes sense...but then again, it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:31 AM
1

If i had the money, and the love, i couldn't care less for providing. Literally anything would matter to me more than that.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:29 AM
1

This is the right approach, really. I was struggling to voice it out, but the idea of "splitting" EVERYTHING 50/50 is sometimes straight up not possible. Concessions need to be made. The important thing is both partners recognizing, appreciating and supporting each other's efforts, and being sure to invest as much as the other in the long run, if it isn't immediately possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:27 AM
1

Dude... Ancient civilizations didn't even know babies where born from sex, so cut out the post-truth narrative. Also, for all other animals sex isn't a great thing. For some is straight up awful. Maybe for us is a great thing because it gets so vanilla? Ha. Don't make me laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:13 AM
-1

Nope, the problem is totally sexual in nature (although capitalism IS a tough bitch)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:04 AM
1

Everything related to N-count, social media and chats, mind games or creep-avoidance.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:35 PM
2

You can resist. And modern women don't like simps anyways, so its a win-win situation. Men: don't listen to this guy, do stop simping. Its a trap
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:30 PM
0

There's no money, and we have a baby. Someone has to bring food, and some has to take care of the baby. How do you 50/50 that situation? We can't operate under the same job contract, and the baby can't be splitted in half. How do you decide which is more important?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:24 PM
0

We're also nymphomaniacs by nature... doesn't mean its ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 05:15 PM
1

Well, idk. I'm more of the idea of having kids only when i can afford so... But i get where you're at.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:33 PM
1

How? I don't see it as a feasible posture.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:32 PM
1

Is possible for both parents to work and share childcare. Maybe if they're rich or maintained parents, for most people, this is stupidly difficult, specially from the baby to kindergarten stage... After that, i could agree that it is possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:29 PM
2

He can... But he already said that he is the one bringing the food to the table. Its not like you could take turns in a job, ans most jobs need daily assistance.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:25 PM
-1

How do you measure that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:23 PM
3

This is kinda more simple than that: women, if you have great ambitions do not have kids. Also, fuck you, simps!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:15 PM
1

Someone has to do it. Chores get split when necessary. This take is ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:11 PM
-4

This is dangerously close to power struggle in relationships. It shouldn't rven be crossing your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 04:10 PM
1

I never suggested sex it is strange, nor that hypersexualisation is a recent tendency. As for its importance, there's arguably no logically reasoned argument to believe sex is a big deal. It isn't, and its kind'a contradictory to think sex is a big deal and think sex is the least important thing in a relationship (or something superficial) at the same time... which is the main take of much of these oxymoronic arguments about withholding sex because it is less important than other human values.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 03:36 PM
-1

Woah. This has been a surprise... The amount of people in this sub thinking about saving for marriage is stupid. We should record this out in the demographics, because having a sub about sexuality plagued with people that have never had sex in life is a little like having a scientific community of people who don't know how to add numbers: sex is basic knowledge in life, like talking or calligraphy, just gotten later on, like financial stability or job experience. I trust this section of the comm…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 01:47 PM
1

Whats cofee close?
/r/TheRedPill12/05/24 04:45 AM
1

probably are. Not probably: surely.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:14 AM
2

I disagree with your psychological profile for men. We're not like that. OP pictured in detail how men select their mating prospects, and it has nothing to do with "predatory instincts". We just don't need that for attraction, and attraction is what drives the most of our actions. If men want to predate, they will be preators for insecure and not insecure women, alike
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 02:46 AM
7

I know it because i've been there. Once i had a girl that had a lot of exes. She would tell me stories about them now and then... and i would get suuuper jealous and insecure, because i had way lower N-count. Anyways, when time passed, i would start actually feeling good, because i was in a good relationship with someone that had all those experiences and still liked me on top of it. Suddenly, i started feeling superior to all those men. Started to laugh about stories about the total fuck ups of…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 02:26 AM
6

These points don't make sense. Chads will commit with whatever women they like, and it doesn't need to be a virgin... In fact, it rarely is. Why would i commit to a totally inexperienced women that has totally not lived enough to maintain a mature relationship? The whole point of being a Chad is not giving a fuck about the women, cus you've already got everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:23 AM
5

What do they lose? The've already fucked every chad in town? They got charmed by a simp, and now they have a simp, and can occasionally fuck chads. Sounds like you don't know how women work... Seriously. This N-count thing might be literally the single most misguided thing in the whole RP movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:10 AM
7

Any girl can make a simp commit to her... If this is some kind of RP shit, know you are just making things harder for you guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:06 AM
14

I'm not a woman, but i'll tell you straight up WHY body count its, literally, shit (within decent boundaries). 1- First of all, a woman with decent body count WILL have more experience than other women regarding sex, relationships, dating, men, and probably society. This WILL make her a good wife material. 2- If the woman has high N-Count, she's probably super hot (if she's not a straight up hooker). 3- A highly sexual women will always attract a great deal of male attention. If you are the one …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:03 AM
9

Are you dudes aware that if a woman has high bidy counts its because she can get all the dick she wants, right? Like, literally. Also, she starts understanding better men, so she'll never be actually alone. Can settle whenever she likes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:52 PM
–

Yah.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:38 PM
–

You just hate men. We don't do that here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:40 PM
–

OMG. You're so biased. Good thing is that most women that think like this end up literally drooling over sume stupid dick that agrees to whatever they say just to have sex, and kids, and everithyng. Have a nice wedding!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:34 PM
–

Well, if that was the objective, let me tell you the reality: there was not a chance for that shit show to succeed in anything. If i went "i would rather stop breathing than using the internet" on social media people wouldn't see me as a super resilent human being that its aginst social media's dominance (with exception of other dumbasses like me), rather like some immature not realistic person that makes ridiculous claims about serious matters while also lying in everyone's face by using social…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:28 PM
10

Yes, and it is also easy as fuck to lose time, energy and money in women and getting Absolutely nothing in return. In fact, this very comment will attract the "women don't owe men nothing" bitches.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:23 PM
5

To me, the biggest red flag is her wanting marriage, in the first place. Don't even think about bringing that Christian shit up
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:10 PM
3

Totally crickets.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:08 PM
-2

Body count its pretty much insignificant for me, if any, the sluttier, the better.probably has a lot of contacts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:08 PM
2

But gender equality isn't a bad thing to men, tbh. We do struggle with military service and unrealistic resilence standards. Also, i think bringing women's POVs in male-dominated scenarios can be very productive. I get the women-coddling part, but i think most of our problems aren't stemming from feminism, but from our general loss of terrain in public opinion (this is, due to lack of engagement).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:29 PM
4

Yes, but all those things just begin being important well within the relationship. Its like talking about running to someone struggling with walks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:10 PM
2

they’d almost certainly have a lower tolerance for objectively negative/problematic things like dysfunctional insecurity in a romantic partner This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how men work ("we", if you're a male). Most men like variety, both in personality, and in physical traits. Heck, there's even men ho like totally psycho women, although at that point they're a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:08 PM
-3

Do you hate feminism? I hope you don't. Otherwise, i totally agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:04 PM
3

This applies to women too. Ha. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:03 PM
3

This. Its like we could read a lot of the future relationship's dynamics within a few interactions. I think that's totally crazy. With my ex-girlfriend i even predicted stuff out, like a frikin' psychic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:03 PM
4

This is as stupidly ad hominem as it gets. And you're wrong. In the dating scene men ARE much less selective, both by psychological and physical traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:00 PM
3

the ones who harp excessively on women’s submissiveness, age, and agreeability whilst misrepresenting those traits as “feminine”. You're just talking about creeps. Creeps are creeps because of lack of sex, nothing more, nothing less, so it really just adds up to the point OP was making. Men having a tough time in dating is what makes most creeps, in the first place. hard to say without lumping everyone together. There's a lot of heavy lifting in this phrase. Women mostly can't be "lumped" togeth…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:54 PM
5

Nope. We cope, but the actually attractive men just dismiss those bitches off.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:47 PM
12

That's why men are inherently better theorists than women. Women get to practice their sexuality, no matter how inexperienced they are. We have to learn a lot just to start trying, with a few exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 01:41 PM
2

If that's the case, her values are clearly very important to her. Just saying that "values" isn't the same as "political views", nor should be confused with it. Maybe you happen to strongly believe something, but that doesn't mean that something is right, so instead of a value should be considered a "belief", in order to be politically correct... I just stumbled here, but wanted to point that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 12:52 PM
2

Calling every ideological stance "values" is not really a wise thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 03:39 AM
2

I think some people are just weak against fear. Get overpowered by it. Doesn't mean it is ok. Most people that get terrified over a dude standing in the corner of a street are the same idiots that shit their pants when they see a roach.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:29 AM
5

Your takes are usually super strange. Women do have a totally distorted sense of danger. That's why they'll choose a frikin' bear and also need social pressure to leave their violent husbands. Thinking anything else is near delusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 02:20 AM
1

Obviously, they'll go "relationship it is" in most cases. Never understood why, but they seem to like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:41 PM
–

I wouldn't be so sure about models being soulless dolls. In fact, many extraordinarily beautiful women (this is, perfectly fit for the overall beauty standards) are super deep mfs. But anyways, i'm talking "settling for looks" in the subjective sense, here. We all have that "tier list of the girls i find the most physically attractive". Many of us don't automatically pick the top entry of the list, because we see much more potential on other women that might not be so gorgeous, but still cute en…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 08:05 PM
3

It will be kind of a Red Pill for women (no pun intended) if men were forced to answer the question "would you like to be FWB, or in a relationship with me?" Most men would be a surprise, to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 07:59 PM
–

Nah. Its not that, trust me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 12:27 AM
3

Yeah... whatevs. For many women men are means, and not ends, anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/24 12:15 AM
1

everyone, male or female, settles That's what i said. The difference is in why and how. doing a lot of heavy lifting in that declaration... Its not heavy-lifting, its simple math. You can't have "guys are attracted to most girls" and "there are far more than a few exceptions" as two statistically valid statements. Do you think that women are incapable of knowing if we want to date any individual guy unless we are able to directly compare him to other guys? No, i think they're incapable of knowin…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 09:40 PM
0

settling" means "very attracted to?" Because I don't see us being able to fruitfully engage on this topic if that's the case. You won't be able to engage with most men, tbh: i'm not talking me. "Settling" as "conforming with something which is not ideal" has the form i described for virtually every man. That we are physically attracted to a lot of women in a lot of distinct "leagues" is a fact, so we might like to "settle" by using logic and prudence in our choices (this is, after the filtering …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 08:09 PM
3

I don't think anyone's pickiness is or should be a "problem," regardless of gender. Basic biology dismisses this part entirely. Do men "settle for looks"? Yes, we do that all the time. When we say "we're attracted to most women" what we mean is that although we might find some other women heartmeltingly hot, we can be very attracted to an average looking woman too. Being with this other woman instead of the hot one is actually "settling for looks", and men do that a lot. For us, the "attractiven…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 06:52 PM
3

Hes bot talking about men. He's saying that what you posted is bs...but whatevs. Typical Bear-Pilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:49 PM
-1

Yeah, of course. You don't think about them, except when they casually appear in the same public meeting. Now, in concrete terms, if they're not chads, men HAVE lower standards and do settle for looks. This doesn't happen the other way around... So your logic is basically "the sex scarcity is driven by the non-picky gender being picky". Of course, men being picky would be an aknowledgeable problem... If it was a real one.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:48 PM
3

Forget real life,. My ex girlfriend always bragged about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:31 PM
1

Inequality is not so much of a solid case. Sometimes you just have to sit back and accept that democracy is better when everyone participates in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 05:41 AM
0

Stupid people do stupid shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:30 PM
1

Umm. I get you, but you're mixing the OP with my response to a comment. I'm not saying that sex is always good, i'm explaining What is sex, and why it matters... I put a lot of constraints in my explanation for that matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:07 PM
0

The implication being that sex, in the form i described it, is a bad thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:05 PM
1

Ok, this makes sense...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:04 PM
1

Woah. This is actually useful! Thanks sis!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:58 PM
1

a lot of cultures seem to think sex is something a woman gives to a man meaning women have no agency in their own bodies or lives, like someone would take sweets from a child, when the actuality is that sex is an activity that people do together. Kind of a lot to extrapolate from a single verb, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:56 PM
1

I get that. But i don't think its the exception, either. Most guys like to hang out with whom he can fuck, unless they're idiots.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:52 PM
2

Men don't usually post about they getting feelings with a fading love... We're just not like that. That's not a great indicator. Also, on average, I'm not that romantic, nor that monogamist.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:02 AM
1

I've been talked about the manifesto. Its horrible, and stupid, but it is also the most extremist branch of feminist theory. For Dworking i'll have to do more reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:44 AM
5

No, you're referring to feminist hatred examples. You're not actually referencing what you said. Like, in what reading can I see a mainstream feminist refusing to separate men from systemic patriarchy in the form you described? I'm a scientist, so i'm used to people knowing where they claims come from: its not that i'm being arrogant, its that you're not being clear with your bibliography.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:34 AM
3

I mean that most feminists don't hate men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:11 AM
2

Yes, but i believe the statistics are not in your favour.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:03 AM
3

Well, if you're that informed, why don't you reference your ideas? Feminists have refused to internalize these criticisms or debunk them with scientific rigor. I'll wait for it. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:00 AM
3

Look, i'm not responding to all that: I get you... But feminism is not only about that. There are great parts of feminist theory that actually want to make good changes for both genders. The thing you have to grasp is that "the patriarchy" is not just "the domination of man over women", but rather "the harmful, arbitrarily-stablished societal norms for each gender". We're very far from abolishing that too, but people equating feminism with hatred doesn't really help. The parts you hate about fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:56 AM
3

Because the're crap themselves. Don't blame the ideology because of crappy people, the same way you don't blame capitalism because of homeless, random dudes (there's a hell of a lot more blaming that you can do, in that direction).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:25 AM
1

I think you're lacking some literature. I lack it too... But hopefully, there's a place here on Reddit in which you can ask about it, and get the informed opinion you want: r/AskFeminists
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:20 AM
-3

Its a Red Pill. In TRP its kind'a default. I like some of the sexual proposals of TRP, but in a political sense, its super reactionary. That's why I'm purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:19 AM
5

But it has also given women rights that men had and they didn't. I call that a stalemate. I'm sure anti-slavery didn't came with a lot for the win of white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:15 AM
3

The funny part is that you think that most "not all men" comments aren't subscribing to an ideology. Also, the logical necessity you're talking about is completely unfounded. A pitty that a lot of pseudo-feminists have the same misconception that you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:09 AM
3

Nah. In my opinion: sex its a kind of therapy. You feel good, yes. It tickles... But that is not it. Shortly after a good sex session with a partner (specially if its a partner you like/love), everything gets so deep, so much more harmonious. Its not even in the act, but after. You feel in such a good connection with that person that was kind'a "stuck" before... It happens even in long marriages. Usually, the main indicator of a failing marriage its low sexual activity: i have the hypothesis tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 01:03 AM
2

Do you have a book recommendation for me? =)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:33 AM
2

First of all, i'm clarifying that i'm not a native English speaker so "get" might have a distinct connotation to you to what i has to me. Secondly, i like love, and like sex too (married or not), and I couldn't care less if you're one of the people that has a problem with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:31 AM
2

Exactly. Its the same car, but with another colour. Also, i fell in love with the way we had sex too.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:21 AM
-4

That's on you, sweetheart. We dated for a year and a bit, and loved each other's company. If you think relationships are based on hugs and tickles i suggest you marry a monk or a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:17 AM
8

I've had a lot of failed dates... A lot of them weren't feminists. Whats the point here?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:15 AM
1

Its the top commenter who gave a definition: "feminism is an ideology that encourages women to hate men" (as i interpret if from his comment). He was just corrected, and corrections are always a constructive thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:12 AM
-1

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:08 AM
-1

They don't. They seem to, but its just because you equate "men" to "patriarchy"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:06 AM
1

Not all feminists hate men though. Red pills hating feminism is just a political disaster. As a matter of fact, Red Pill should be a kind of "alternative feminism".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:05 AM
8

Yup. Couldn't care less. Wouldn't stand any generalized disrespect for men, though. If you're going to be anti-men, you better not be with one, in the first place... Otherwise its just bad theatre.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 12:02 AM
1

To see where things go. Yeah... This is not really a thing. You're just flirting with us redditors.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:15 PM
3

for you own good. For his own good, and for every other men that wants to get on the girl's pants good. Mever take brakes, bros. Unless you really think you need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:08 PM
13

This. The complains are not "i hate to lose" are, rather, "i lose every time because the rules are too one-sided".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:06 PM
–

This is not even the problem that is talked about. High standards are delusional. Women rights are not. Theres a whole subject gap between them, so large that i don't even know how you arrived at that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 11:02 PM
-1

Most women don't have a super good pick, tbh. Try to asses the connection you have with the guy first. Don't dump vulnerability, but put yourself some breaks. Men deeply like being wanted (probably because we get this a lot less than regular girls), but attraction lies elsewhere. Its not like you being vulnerable will scare men away: this is total bullshit. Make a couple of engagement tests, and go for the price when you think its the right time and guy, or dump the whole thing if you think its …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 10:55 PM
1

...you’re doing them yourself as well? I'm not so sure about this. I'm not a perfect thinker, and not the politest person in the world, but i'm definitely not a bullshitter, and never criticise disadvantaged people from a privilege position. Never act as if i'm superior to any other human, in any status or form. But i do have strong values, which are what (at least in my worldview) give foundations of my criticisms and my shared opinions. That's way different to simply start bashing entire group…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:16 AM
9

If your wife being close enough to kill you kinda' spoils the whole picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:12 PM
1

It'll keep scalating until dating stops being such a pain in the arse.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:47 PM
8

You're clearly ignoring trends, here.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:45 PM
1

I never disagreed with OP. Which is such an odd reply. How old are you? What happened that made you this way? I'm just cutting the bad weeds low. Seems like i have been a little harsh today, because i attracted even a mod attention... Long story short, i'm not happy with the way sexual politics is developing nowadays. Everyone is super immature and thinks just because they've been married they are an authority regarding dating, or because they're women they're entitled to say whatever they want …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:35 PM
1

I'm being sarcastic, but ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:18 PM
0

I might have misinterpreted your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:02 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, i don't like marriage. But if the case is that i'm soulbound with another person, she better be enjoying sex life as much as i do, because i'd prefer to drop my soul entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 04:00 PM
1

Its called opposite extremes, they're usually both a crappy take, so stop demonizing one and glorifying another.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:56 PM
–

I make love to women. Don't even need consent: they ask for it. If you get usually raped, clearly you're doing something wrong, and its not men's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:53 PM
–

I would be more scared of being alone in the woods with a strange man than a bear because a strange man could rape me if he wanted to and kill me the same way a bear can. At least the bear would make death quick One day you'll get to grasp the sublime idiocy of this argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:46 PM
–

Curious how many poeple don't know how statistics work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:43 PM
–

You see, you're part of the problem. Maybe stop staying around rapists? That might improve your biased takes about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:42 PM
0

Yes. And one was to uncover bullshit. The redditor HAD a good sex life and talked about it as if it was shit (hope nobody sees it). This one? This one is just my opinion about marriages, which i maintain.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:35 PM
-2

Congrats!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:17 PM
-6

If i have a partner that never fives me a handjob when i want it, i would probably just leave at some point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:16 PM
-6

Respectfully, i think you didn't do the "marriage" thing right.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:15 PM
4

Its not like if you runout of it. I'm an artist, and both ejaculate and create on a daily basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:12 PM
–

Edit suggested: where is the degrading?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:36 PM
–

So much crap.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:35 PM
–

Pick bear, then. And be a misandrist. At some point one just have to accept stupid people exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:32 PM
–

Would you pick the bear?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:30 PM
1

Many men think being so picky with women makes them "high value". Disclaimer: it doesn't. It just makes you "girly" and super beta. Men like sex. Promiscuous women like it too. As a matter of fact, most desirable women in the SMP have had a lot of sex, they just have been discrete about it. This post reeks of sexual immaturity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:24 PM
–

Hahaha, this is insane. This guy's really into penises.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:20 PM
2

OMG, sis, you're on fire. The most accurate analysis i've seen here so far. 🔥
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:12 PM
2

Yeah, you see. Not only the undesirable ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:03 PM
2

Haha. Talk about not knowing what a man is. Men settling is the only thing that separates dating from a beauty contest. Every time a woman settles, she's had a man, possibly for months, trying to convince her that he can be just as a good partner as the chad she's idealising. Men select from all their potentials, asses pros and cons, and settle for the highest bid... meanwhile, the woman probably doesn't even know he exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 01:57 PM
1

This
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 01:48 PM
2

This here is why politics in TRP are so bad. The real reason of women being arrogant pricks isn't feminism, but mass stupidity, which is in part a patriarchally-caused problem. You can't seriously argue that this "backslash" has been caused by feminism when feminism was literally born with the sexual revolution, which made women sluttier, and sex easier for both genders in the basis of a negation of patriarchal standards. If korean men are rebelling against feminism its just because they're igno…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 01:44 PM
4

If you personally aren't attracted to anything but chads, you're pretty much fucked. Plenty of evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:41 AM
2

Undesirable isn't in the eyes on the beholder. Women tend to get attracted to guys that majority of women are attracted to, with exception of random guys they fell in love with. Women attraction is pretty quantifiable, ans isn't anything you are saying it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:39 AM
1

Yeah, that isn't really the reason why women need to date less attractive men (within a logical margin). Prostitution exists in first place because of women being such a picky ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 07:30 AM
–

You're missing my point. The reason why most women should not follow their instinct is because "high value" is an abstract concept. While romantic value itself might be objective (i.e, a man with strong morals and ethics that sparks a reciprocal emotion for love), when you try to "measure" it, things get tricky. Essentially, there's not any good way to define and pursue a "high value man", because "high" is not a well-posed definition. While this alone might not seem like a big deal, irl it is. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 01:27 AM
–

That's what the post is about, to call instinct what it is... But some have stated that these ill-posed behaviours are effectively called out when women practice them... I don't usually see it, but apparently it does happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 11:53 PM
–

Because for most girls their concept of "standards" is shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 09:06 PM
–

For women, yes. For men discrimination ends the moment the girl passes the "hot test" and the "shit test". After that, all women are equals regarding treatment; in exception, perhaps, of the very special ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:35 PM
–

Exactly, nor did your strawman argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:25 PM
0

This is the kind of argument that makes politics in USA so bad. Its equivalent to saying that the proposition "End racism and slavery" is inconsistent because of the statements "all races should be equal and white people are evil".
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 10:58 AM
1

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 10:36 AM
2

I don't know how many men behave like this, but I literally got into a fight for protecting a random cow from being bullied. I'd easily make the same for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 07:20 PM
1

Dude, lack of sex in the relationship is bad. And when bad relationships keep going they become toxic. There's tons of studies about it, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:35 PM
1

This is just destructive criticism. Try to engage more, because ot looks like plain hate and counterarguing just because.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:32 PM
1

Sex is a pretty good gateway for "doing more" for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:16 PM
1

Yeah, of course, because sexless relationships are always so great? A sexless relationship is most of the time toxic af. More so if half of the people involved are not ok with it... But if you like not having sex, well, you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:08 PM
1

And who dictates what those degrees of immorality should be? You? Philosophy? Logic and mathematics? Don't fool yourself. (Not trying to be rude)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:04 PM
1

Why would i want to be with someone that is bored of me, at the point of not enjoying sex with me anymore? Because i can't easily replace her? Excuse me, but i don't need a replacement for unhappiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 09:00 PM
1

Well, that sucks. I honestly am not very experienced with these kind of gender-role assumptions, since I couldn't care less about who does the dishes or takes care of the baby. However, i'm pretty sure that in more progressive relationships quality of sex is not only important, but a great indicator of the quality of the relationship as a whole.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 04:11 PM
-2

Cuz you're one of the smart ones. Not every man gets it, so they end up in shitty-ass depressing lives with a woman that doesn't't love them (and will cheat after prolonged exposures to chads, anyways). Cheating is awful in a good, healthy, monogamous relationship. In a toxic one, its just another piece of shit over the pile.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 04:05 PM
1

Haha... You'd be surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 04:00 PM
1

get a divorce Why don't you get it, if you don't wanna fuck me?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:56 PM
1

I think most men aren't the type of man that goes "i have a wife now, so let's just make her do every housechore possible". Yes, it was common a few decades ago, but not anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:54 PM
-3

He just doesn't want to. The same way the woman doesn't want to fuck the guy she is demanding exclusivity from. Its a scam, at all levels of the word. A scam for a scam, i guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:50 PM
0

Maintaining a toxic relationship is as bad as cheating. Morality has no preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:48 PM
0

Makes me sick.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:45 PM
-1

the only thing which reminds men to stay attentive and and loving is the threat of competition. Wrong. The only thing thta keeps men engaged is reciprocity, attraction and well... Yes, sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:43 PM
-2

Amazing how people don't get this. Its a hard life out there for simps.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:40 PM
-2

Its not cheating, but making your supposed SO starve for sex is equally bad as cheating, so fuck morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:38 PM
-11

Nah... If your husband is happy having sex, you should provide it if him, specially if you have agreed wether by marriage or by simple agreement that you'll be each other's exclusives. Expecting no cheating is delusional. Of course, he should be homest about it, but at that point the relation is probably very toxic, anyways, so whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:36 PM
1

Sweet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 03:29 PM
1

I didn't know about those legislations. In my country that would be absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 11:29 AM
1

You seem to care. Maybe you're trying too hard to prove your worldview is the correct one. But "not caring" and simultaneously "stepping in to say that you don't care"... Idk what to tell you mate. I really don't care if you care.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 02:54 AM
1

Now you're just going in circles. The conversation started with you telling me i had a wrong attitude for literally posting what an ideal dating scene would be for me, and now you're telling me that i want others to do what i want? P.S.: still waiting for you to say what the "right attitude" should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 01:51 AM
0

If you don't care about someone suffering its kinda a super dicky mindset. That's why i'm not actually a red pill, because if all the individualistic bs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 01:40 AM
1

There's actually a lot of male psychology backing this up... But even it there wasn't, your numbers are off: saying that there's an abundance of beautiful women is the same as saying that the average women is hot (Which pretty much every male will agree) but if the average men likes the average woman... Well. Its simple math. Gaussian curve. Of course there will always be leftovers, but lack of intimacy would be far less than today's measures.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 01:34 AM
0

Sooo... You think that a high-moral, harmless, loving, and kind person should suffer from lack of sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/24 01:26 AM
1

No it doesn't. It really just sounds like you're bitter. This is a kind of discrimination. Discrimination shouldn't be accepted in any way. I hold any girl up to the same standards... But well... if i don't like her i will just tell her, and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:54 PM
1

This
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:47 PM
1

The stigma is real. The taboo is real. That should have ended in the sexual revolution... But here we are, stuck with the same BS again.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:44 PM
0

What attitude? That's how i think, not how i act. Maybe state what is the correct attitude, according to your worldview?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:42 PM
0

Men get bored, specially at young ages. Women don't suffer from that. Yeah, he will pick mostly the hot ones, but then another, and another... Eventually the average will have her time. Extend this to every man and the maths wil tell you nobody has sexual scarcity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:40 PM
0

I disagree entirely. Quick turnoffs are, mostly, selfish and overjudgmental attitudes towards someone you barely know.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:32 PM
0

If you think just dumping every person you may like because of selfish reasons is abundance... Well, so be it. I'm not that kind of person. And will never be.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:31 PM
1

There's quite a bunch of historical background there. You're not wrong, but there's more to it than simple biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:22 PM
1

Yeah... The thing is that in the matrix there's no purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:19 PM
1

I live in Cuba, but that's not the actual average. I just dropped a useful number. I think here the average is 1.70m.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:16 PM
2

This should be a law
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:14 PM
1

That's crazy af for me. My default is, "she's cute? I wanna fuck her". Can't imagine myself being in front of a hot girl i just met and not being totally melted away. xd
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:13 PM
1

Its biology. If you ask a man to fuck with him, his first reaction will be... "Well. Yes!". Women on the other hand, have a sort of "filter" that filters out a lot of bad and good men alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 11:11 PM
1

Study history and world philosophy. They're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:43 AM
5

That would be great.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:29 AM
1

But i can't help but to think that the male nature of seeking a lot of partners makes easier for us to just ignore the hot girl if we have an opportunity with the not-so-hot one. I feel like women push away this option a lot further.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:28 AM
1

God no... xd
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:20 AM
1

Relationships and excitement build up with time also. I have fallen in love twice, and both times i didn't see the girl as super attractive, but decided to give her a chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:19 AM
1

Plus, some people might loudly fart in purpose, cuz they think its fun... Anyways, you always have the option of clearing that up and saying tha you don't like like it. Uncomfortable conversation creates comfortable relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:16 AM
-3

My point its that humans are not perfect people. As an example, i don't like when a girl tells me: "oh, look that black dude just did something funny". Ok, but why the emphasis on "black"? I don't like it, but maybe she's just from a neighborhood where these slangs are normal. If she's not straight up racist, i can talk her about this when the relationship gets deeper. Me denying this opportunity just because it gave me an initial ick isn't a wise thing for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:04 AM
1

Yes, sorry. Really not a fan of christian morality. Nothing personal, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:58 AM
2

I agree. There's an interesting article about this. I'll post it here later.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:55 AM
2

Lucky you. Have strived for a FWB since i started dating. I suppose this is the classic, "the more you look for it, the less you'll get it".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:54 AM
2

Hahah. That's cool. xd
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:52 AM
1

Some do. Not a majority, but is a pretty heterogeneous subcommunity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:51 AM
1

I'm not talking about me... But you resorting to that to respond my comment gives a lot of "dicky vibes". I'm not following up this conversation anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:50 AM
0

There you have it. Seek for relationships in the actual physical world. Its easier that way, trust me. Make pre-contacts (visual, with a smile, with a hand wave...) before you engage in conversation, look in the other person's eyes when you talk. Everything you do or say its ok, don't overthink shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:48 AM
-8

The fact that you validate "turnoffs" over a potentially great relationship doesn't put you in a good light IMO. For god sake, just let people burp. You being open minded might actually turn into you having a SO.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:43 AM
2

I'm in the same page as you are! Bad thing i'm a man, tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:38 AM
0

Emmm... Because we don't think that's actually the manual of the maker?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:35 AM
6

This would certainly be a super not-impossible improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:34 AM
7

This. I've always thought about this. Women tend to be less interested in sex anyways, so, why don't they get to choose and go for their choice when they feel like it? Its very probable that they will be successful, anyways , since men are so sexually-driven... But instead everything its the other way around. That's just an awful strategy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:32 AM
2

Is it such a big deal? I'm 1.68 mts and am struggling af because i won't settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:29 AM
3

Slaves complained and whined about their state of slavery. Idk... Maybe you're talking from privilege, here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:27 AM
0

Cheating doesn't count as cheating if you're honest. If you're attracting too much dishonest people, that's not a good sign. Try stating it as your primary need in a relationship of any kind. It has worked for me, but i'm in the "promiscuous" side, so i think we stand in distinct places. Girls know i won't be exclusive, and, if i am with another girl simultaneously, its because i already told that that could happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:25 AM
0

But what do you want from women? A relationship? Sex? I'm sorry if i'm being inappropriate, but i think that's important. Some friends have told me that Dating apps do work for casual sex, but in regards of relationship the thing gets too "digital".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:20 AM
1

Again. Physically unattractive for men means, pretty much, that: physically unattractive. Physically unattractive for women means invisible. Its not the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:17 AM
0

That's pretty much biased. Unattractive women will get unattractive men attention on social media all the time. The thing is that those men only want sex, which they don't accept. I can get that, but if you know you're unattractive, you can easily just try to bend things your way. Men are quite flexible with regards to women's desires if they have a sexual offer that drives the change.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:14 AM
3

Not getting the same reaction is not the same as not finding her attractive. Of course, every guy will literally melt when he sees a hot girl, but that doesn't mean we only have eyes for her... Which is a pretty common thing between girls, specially young ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:12 AM
-7

In my experience, women will always reject you for silly things. "The mood" is a madly difficult thing to maintain. "The ick" should be a sign of you not being engaged enough, not a sign of the other person not being attractive. If burping gives you the ick, the burper isn't the problem, the problem its you. Of course, there's a fine line to draw here, because your date assassinating somebody can give the ick too... And you'd totally be justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 03:06 AM
1

This. You pictured exactly what i think is the majority of mens opinion on attractiveness vs proffesional status.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:57 AM
0

Maybe he's wildly attractive. Super tall, deep voice, BD vibes... That's just not a thing everyone gets.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:54 AM
0

Yup. I'm in.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:53 AM
1

That's a big one.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:52 AM
-2

Also, a lot of women think that saying "no" is valuing themselves. That doesn't make much of a sense. Some would actually be looking for silly reasons to reject a potential partner, like: "he didn't pay the check" or "he burped after a beer". That's not self-esteem, that's madness.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:51 AM
1

Unfortunately, what we got is a brain that lust after a lot of people just by looks. I would go up to the point as to say that both men an women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:48 AM
0

Haha. That would actually be men's paradise, wouldn't it? But makes me wonder... Would that constitute women's hell as well? I'm tempted to say that no, it wouldn't make things much worse for them so long everyone sticks to safe and healthy sexual protocols.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:44 AM
-1

Well, that's just an assumption you're making. Women tend to ignore average man in the SMP, and that's not a secret to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:40 AM
5

Well, that's just an assumption you're making. Women tend to ignore average man in the SMP, and that's not a secret to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:40 AM
1

Public lists of cheaters This is hilarious. Hahaha. I pretty much agree with a lot that you say, but i think the honesty part is two-folded. Its not only that we aren't honest, its that when we ARE honest, we tend to be less attractive because of it, and that makes me sick. For me (apart from the sex, as i stated in OP) honesty is a top one priority, and a girl being honest with me with what she wants with me, man, that makes me fucking horny. But some people like mystery, mind games, and that k…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:33 AM
1

I think that's partly why i struggle so much. I have little time to spend on women (not trying to be arrogant, just don't have a lot of time to myself) and my "nights out" are scarce. But i oretty much agree that the setting you are proposing is ideal in terms of mating strategies. Also, there's the direct "coffeshop date". That tends to work out fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:25 AM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:21 AM
3

You Don't have to be crazy-ass ugly to not be a chad. It just takes youre ≤1.65 mts tall and you don't have "the mood".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 02:20 AM
1

That is BS. A good woman that also works and its self-sufficient its a better than good woman. There's no place for discussion here (this is, if you're a sane person).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 01:10 AM
1

Well... Of course! If you're a bluepilled mf who married a shitty woman out of bluepilly shitty fantasies... well, shit is what you'll get. Don't see anything strange about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 12:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter