TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Czar-Salesman Archive

View 0 posts and 89 comments by Czar-Salesman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Its just as bad as any other major news station, don't fool yourself with your bias.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 06:32 PM
-2

DAE LE FOX NEWS IS HITERALLY A TOOL OF THE DEVIL?
/r/MensRights16/03/14 05:15 AM
2

[Copied from someone else] Aggressive/energetic egg The human sperm cell has been accredited in scientific literature for actively penetrating the egg and causing the fertilization process to initiate, while the egg cell has been known to be the unmoving receiving end. However, Feminist scholars, such as Emily Martin and Londa Schiebinger, tell a different story of the textbook accounts of conception and the role of the egg. They “decode linguistics” and examine how gender has modeled aspects of…
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:20 AM
227

Social movements evolve. Feminism of today is not feminism of yesterday.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 10:32 PM
3

Thanks for the thought out reply. You make excellent points and I can definitely see your perspective. I just can't get on board with it because while you may be attempting to influence people positively these posts and the attitudes many people here hold and express are bad for the MRM, PR matters a lot for a social movement because you want as many people on your side as possible. So this subreddit is like a PR nightmare for the movement as a whole because nothing is done to promote better att…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:34 PM
1

I've been banned from /r/feminism for quite some time. You seem upset, probably because you are one of the immature bitter people here. This post is toxic and so is your attitude.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:27 PM
3

As a subscriber to /r/tumblrinaction and someone that makes fun of and bashes modern feminism quite I bit here on reddit I laugh at such baseless accusations. These shit posts aren't what this movement is about but they sure as hell makes it look bad, just like tumlbrinas and other feminists make their movement look bad. I compared it to these types of people further down in this vary thread. Its people like you that I'm talking about that are bad for this movement, your attitude is toxic. Someo…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:28 PM
-8

Serious question: what is your solution then when a subreddit is completely over run like this? It should be about men's rights issues but instead its half the time a bunch of immature dudes talking about how awful women are. What do you do? This is a subreddit for a social movement and you think it shouldn't be moderated to keep out the hateful crazies?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 03:32 AM
5

Which is sad because the actual movement has legitimate concerns, but this subreddit just keeps going down hill and the mods just don't care or are they themselves angsty little brats with a victim complex who hate women, who's to know.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:35 AM
-6

Completely disagree. That's part of what moderators are for. When the subreddit is overrun by immaturity and bitterness when it should be focusing on the MRM, mods need to get involved. I'm not saying start banning people but shit posts are easy to identify, and mods could be active and promote a better attitude around the sub.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:20 AM
8

Of god, are you fucking serious? This isn't some freedom of speech issue. This is an issue of shit posts inside a Men's Rights forum. You seriously think green texts posts from 4chan are a-okay? You have people posting dumb stuff all the time that make it to the front page and a plethora of really shitty bitter attitudes from the comments. Yeah, its not about censoring speech its about deciding whether you want a sub about men's rights or a sub for dumb little boys to bitch about women rather th…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:31 AM
1

Its similar to tumblr feminism, it grows for the same reasons. This sub needs to separate itself from these kind of people, they may agree with MRM but they are toxic people.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 10:24 PM
1

Lots of reasons some good some bad. Reddit itself is growing. The movement itself is growing. There are plenty of like minded people on reddit who have never heard of this sub, lots of people lurk reddit main subs who may just recently be getting into small subs and finding them, some of it is from bitter young men, trolls, altaccounts, SRS who watch, SRD who watch. Their will always be some fluctuation in subscribers some will be good and some will be bad. You can't just blindly look at things …
/r/MensRights16/02/14 10:19 PM
5

/u/Czar-Salesman -- From two days ago: "I am not a MRA, but I browse it." "I don't agree with some of the rules but the mods are nice people and mod very well." I don't self identify as a MRA, I care a great deal about MRs but identify as egalitarian. What's really funny is that you're taking two different comments, quoting small parts out of context, and splicing them together. I'm actually really flattered you'd go so far out of your way to invalidate my opinion. "I don't agree with some of th…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 09:53 PM
3

So we are, as you claim, being brigaded....by an unknown force? I was just looking for something to show that the sub is indeed being brigaded.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 08:35 PM
0

I never said ban the poster. There is such a thing as inappropriate, irrelevant, or even harmful threads. This thread is inappropriate and harmful to the reputation of both this subreddit and the MRM as a whole. You don't just abstain from one extreme by going to the other. This subreddit needs better moderating. There is a difference between keeping things relevant through moderators and being ban happy. You don't even have to ban people to do it. It is green text from 4chan, it feeds the angry…
/r/MensRights16/02/14 08:27 PM
1

By 4chan?
/r/MensRights16/02/14 08:03 PM
31

Why the hell is 4chan green text even being up voted here? Mods need to enact some rules to keep this place about men's rights and not stupid shit like this.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 07:59 PM
23

I've been banned from /r/feminism. What's funny is there have been several times that I have commented here disagreeing with everyone else and while I did received huge amounts of down votes people made counter arguments and tried to defend their opinion and have me defend mine, my comment wasn't deleted, I wasn't called horrible names, no one tried to shut me up. Its a big difference I've noticed. I don't self identify as either a feminist nor a MRA, I'd call myself egalitarian if anything pure…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:33 PM
1

The hell are you talking about? How often do men die from random scraps? Look at work place deaths, look at the dangerous jobs men take by a huge majority, and hell look at assault and murder statistics.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:06 PM
2

Specifically mentioning hyper-aggressive women are what keeps feminism alive by shouting down descent is in no way misogynistic. Unless you'd care to explain how it is. The comment in no way is hateful towards women.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:04 PM
42

Internalized misogyny. You can't win with these people. Anything that doesn't agree with their narrative is sexist no matter what.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:26 PM
1

One conspiracy theory ending up true doesn't mean anything about others. I'm always for being skeptical, being suspicious, but you can't throw around claims without evidence to back it up. You got some evidence?
/r/MensRights19/01/14 11:55 AM
14

Shit just got too crazy for me. You might be a tad paranoid there.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:15 AM
1

peace and love Illusionary unicorns, peace is something that will never come. Not on a global scale and not on a small community scale. Humans are incompatible with the concept, I truly believe that. I have no idealistic faith in humanity. There is no reason to make every physical interaction a legal issue.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 01:07 PM
0

I disagree to an extent. If someone hits you I believe you have the right to retaliate. Slap for slap, push for push, or punch for punch. If someone wants to fight I say let them. There is nothing immoral about fighting, we are physical beings and sometimes people need to fight. The idea that you only have to right to fight in a life or death situation is just ridiculous to me.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:31 AM
-3

we do live in a matriarchal society to an extent here in the west. No, stop it. Stop it right now. Do not pollute MRM with such language and turn it akin to women screaming about a patriarchal society. We live in a time where old gender views and feminist ideology are colliding creating a society that is currently favorable to women over men. The idea that women are the weaker sex is still very alive in society which ends up giving them a lot of extra help in this hard world, combined with all t…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 03:56 AM
21

Wow people really watch this trash? Not only is it garbage but it sounds like a literal copy paste of John Tucker Must Die.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 09:26 AM
1

Hence how it no longer is a religious endeavour, it can be but is not exclusive.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 11:02 PM
1

Its a legal merger, there are tax incentives, ministers must be granted privilege by the state to conduct a marriage, marriage licenses, courts may be involved upon divorce, etc. It is a social construct that has been going on before Christianity. Its simply incorrect to think otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 10:47 PM
10

If you want to make that argument: The church gave marriage over to the state a long time ago, the church no longer has a say and it is not inherently religious.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:03 PM
1

Not everywhere. Some places are doing well, others aren't. Just because you can where you're from doesn't mean someone someplace else can. My city is doing great I'm lucky for that.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:39 PM
3

Yeah shame on him for not making more money in this wonderful economy with jobs falling out of the sky!
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:05 PM
-1

Oh man my sides, came for the feminist jokes stayed for the wife fucking.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:19 PM
18

Its a reflection of how the sexes are viewed. You want to change things for men? You change peoples minds within society. This shows an ingrained view that needs to change, the post in itself isn't necessarily harmful.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:25 PM
1

None couple can get pregnant completely by weird happenstance even if both parties are doing their part not to have it happen. Well that's just part of it. That's the risk you take. Once again sex is not just for procreation.(expounded upon further bellow) The woman then has the choice to either absolve both of the responsibility or force the man into fatherhood. That's called biology, sir. And it's not just abolishing biology, it's called killing your kid. You could do it too, you'd just go to …
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:09 AM
3

None couple can get pregnant completely by weird happenstance even if both parties are doing their part not to have it happen. The woman then has the choice to either absolve both of the responsibility or force the man into fatherhood. Only one persons rights are considered in these situations. Sex is not just for procreation and if you truly think that then we won't get anywhere as it is already apparent we hold vastly different philosophical views.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:59 AM
3

You're wrong on every front. I'm a strong believer in personal responsibility. For far too long the only people held to any responsibility have been men. If a woman is allowed the right to choose then men are allowed the same right. Its simple.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:26 AM
6

For when abortion is legal a man should be able to legally absolve himself from an unwanted pregnancy. We give women the right to choose not only whether she wants to be a mother but also to force a man into unwanted parenthood, do not both parties have the right to choose or do you solely wish that right to one sex?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:48 AM
-4

No, like I already said he should first be absolved of any responsibility. She just doesn't have to pay out an unnecessary sum for her offense is all I'm saying. You're twisting the argument. It is a very specific situation and can't be applied willy nilly, this is a very unique crime.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:34 PM
-1

You're right she should have no access to the man's founds. She should have to take care of it by herself, however making her pay out $30,000 hurts her ability to do so thus harming the child further. However apparently he was made to pay support which I couldn't see because apparently my phone won't show me the full article so I went into this unknowingly without the info everyone else had.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:07 PM
5

In essence yes. Armed robbery is worse which is apparent. But absolving him of any financial responsibility from the get go would IMO be the proper course of action.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:37 PM
3

Thanks didn't see that. I'm on my phone and all I see is one paragraph outlining the situation I wasn't aware there was more as it isn't showing up on my phone. The idea that he should pay child support is disgusting and in that case deserves to be replayed and absolved of his responsibilities.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:35 PM
1

That's the kind of attitude that absolves women from responsibility in most cases. Like I said it can't be applied to all cases, you have to look at the situation as a whole and cast judgement based on a multitude of factors. That's what's wrong with our justice system the idea that everything is black and white. There will always be differences when discussing a topic like this because there is no male equivalent, a man cannot become pregnant so this is a unique offense that can only be done by…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:33 PM
0

I don't think society has the right to force the child out of her care based on her actions yet. Until she prices she is a bad mother to the child, she should be considered on probation as far as that goes due to her prior actions.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:19 PM
2

Wut.... you should never trust anyone when it comes to this kind of thing. You have to take responsibility for your own safety such as a condom. Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:17 PM
-3

I'd like to add that while he is a victim he chose to trust this woman on her word, she took it under false pretenses not force. There is also more than one victim the other being the child.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 03:44 PM
-2

Absolutely correct. However I believe in such matters we have to make decisions that don't cause further harm. I believe that the decision has a high likely hood of harming the child due to his mothers financial burden. He didn't want his genetic material out there but doesn't that really warrant such a pay out? Especially when the child is now a factor? What she did in no way caused physical or financial damage to the man in question. While there is emotional distress to account for I don't thi…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 03:40 PM
-1

Take every situation as unique. I'm not saying it as a blanket rule. In this situation I don't see the point in monetary compensation for the man as long a he isn't held financially responsible for the child, and forcing the single parent in this situation to pay out $30,000 to me seems detrimental to the child rather than beneficial to the man for the offense committed. If he isn't held responsible what damage has she caused him that warrants harming the child so that he gets compensation in th…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 03:28 PM
41

Or just absolve the man of any parental responsibility towards the child? I don't know the whole situation but if he isn't involved let him stay that way, while what she did is disturbing and wrong I think taking that kind of money from a single parent regardless of gender is only going to harm the child that is in their care. If a woman stole my sperm I wouldn't feel obligated to monetary compensation but rather be allowed to not be financially obligated to help her support said child. We need …
/r/MensRights03/12/13 02:40 PM
14

Do they really have nothing better to talk about than gender? Why is it that people like them are obsessed with it making it the center of every topic?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:38 PM
11

Its their safe space! You're safe space is everywhere shit lord! Not for you, stay the fuck out! EDIT: Just in case..../s
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:36 PM
1

While you might be right that that is what he was saying it is exclusionary language. He is replying to comment suggesting he forget the gender and just help people to help people and not make everything about gender. Then he goes on to talk about gender. Yes men suffer more from depression and commit suicide at higher rates. That doesn't mean our goal should be let's go help men in /r/suicide. If we are going to help /r/suicide we should be going with an unbiased voice and motive. This is not h…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:02 PM
14

Why get upset? Men's lives are being destroyed and society supports it! Its the same reason I get pissed off at the war on drugs, peoples entire lives are being destroyed and for what?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:51 PM
8

That's irrelevant in this conversation. We are specifically talking about helping people out on a specific subreddit. I'm saying that kind of thought process is toxic as we have seen from observing the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:21 AM
7

You're using the same logic is what I'm saying. They focus on women because women supposedly have more problems or worse problems. You're using the same flawed logic.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 12:55 AM
14

Your first point: isn't that exactly why most of us here dislike feminism? So how about not doing exactly what feminists do? Why are people this stupid? Forget gender and help people you dumb twat.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 08:23 PM
1

Of course, and men are already held to that standard. "Man up"
/r/MensRights16/11/13 01:29 AM
20

Its was posted here a few weeks ago. I'm also on my phone at work so I'm not much help. Something about women controlling 70% of wealth in the US, if you wanna search for it. EDIT: found it
/r/MensRights13/11/13 08:45 PM
19

Or you know, just actual mothers day. Haven't seen a second fathers day for gay couples.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 01:09 PM
1

I agree we should probably subsidise it but I don't know about making it completely free. Let's subsidies it and see if that produces any results first. Otherwise we are just getting stuck with paying for birth control and a similar amount of kids we are already paying for.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:08 PM
7

You really think the uneducated that are popping out babies left and right are not using birth control or condoms solely because of price?
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:52 PM
2

Is this a relatively recent comic? Because I think I've seen it a long time ago. Pretty sure it is talking about how there are people that think birth control should be free. I don't think this is a comment on current healthcare reform.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 08:47 PM
3

That doesn't mean we should stop gathering necessary evidence to find out the truth. We can't just convict innocent people based on the word of the accuser, that is something I am not OK with and neither should society be. Imprisoning an innocent person is worse than having to intrusively gather evidence from a rape victim.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:48 AM
-2

The point is we can't just drop proper procedure and not use actually evidence to prosecute just because the process of gathering evidence is uncomfortable for the victim.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:46 AM
4

For me it was the second to last. People find attractive people attractive, nothing will change that, it isn't advertisement or the media's evil doing. Furthermore it implies showing beautiful chiseled god like looking men in advertisement doesn't do the same to boys as the sexy models do to girls. I understand the way the poster is made was to flip back and forth and make two different points under each new scenario but this one could have been much better.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:09 PM
9

And look at that, a whole bunch of people didn't get to see it until now. Imagine that.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 02:49 PM
3

child celebrities Yeah it was the homeschooling that fucked them up /s Like what life lessons? Please explain. You keep saying these things about dating and socializing that are simply not true.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 01:34 AM
6

You speak from a point of ignorance, not calling you dumb, you just don't know the reality of that life. Children don't need to socialize 8 hours a day to be socially adept. Many home school families have more than one child. There are home school groups and weekly co-op group teachings, these are all over the nation. There are many ways homeschoolers socialize, they are not locked in the house. Most homeschoolers are also religious so they have community through church and church activities. Th…
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:36 PM
1

That is a huge field with thousands of options, are you looking only for a specific type of job?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:34 PM
5

You're an idiot if you think homeschoolers don't socialize.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:26 PM
10

It's my privilege FTFY
/r/MensRights30/10/13 05:28 PM
8

Daisy Fitzroy is the leader of the Vox populi and the person framed for lady Comstock's death.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:19 PM
-10

Feminism? Traditionally equality professionally and socially. Radical feminism?(the kind we see a lot of today) female superiority.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:09 PM
5

I've been discussing BioShock Infinite lately so excuse the parallel I'm about to draw. Radical feminists like this quoted in the comment you shared remind me of Daisy Fitzroy and the Vox populi. The idea that fed the Vox and brought them together was equality, they were oppressed. However Fitzroy was obsessed with vengeance against those who oppressed her and framed her. She showed her true colors when they went to war, brutal slaughter of anyone who was not Vox populi, civilians and children i…
/r/MensRights24/10/13 08:07 PM
16

Not a competition
/r/MensRights22/10/13 07:13 PM
9

No, they haven't. And while I agree they are sometimes taken to an extreme they do serve a purpose.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 10:26 PM
-1

/r/talesofprivilege
/r/MensRights16/10/13 02:40 PM
7

I also know a male friend who was raped, and he is a big dude and she was pretty small. He was so drunk he couldn't hold himself up, goes to bed, she sneaks in pulls his pants off while he is passed out, gets him hard and starts to get on him when he wakes up, he says "no" and attempts to push her off but can't really manage being so drunk and she gets right back on and sticks him in her while he tells her again "I said no, I don't want to" as he passes out and she continues. She stays the night…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:25 PM
17

They are
/r/PussyPass07/10/13 09:47 PM
3

If I bash in someone's head then proceed to jump on their head that isn't considered lethal intent? That is utter bullshit and I think you know it, regardless of what you could get away with arguing in court it is a lie to claim such premeditated violence didn't have some form of lethal intent behind it.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 09:32 PM
6

I think the point is feminism has strived yo elevate women to the level of men in that aspect of life but refuse to acknowledge that they also need to be brought down in other aspects such as the justice system.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 10:28 PM
2

I would only lightly touch on this, and focus on it being a human rights issues. The danger would be were to put it. Some men may have a negative emotional reaction to it and others including women will think it trivial or petty to be concerned about. Too early and you've already closed their ears to the rest of your speech and near the end will leave them on a bad note. Just some thoughts.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:23 PM
1

They aren't thin examples. Anytime a person writes a small part of them is put on the paper, a person's world view will always influence their writing in often very subtle ways. Those small examples give light to how this person thinks and what she believes. You see them as small but they are not, it shows exactly the kind of feminist she is. Every word choice is a reflection of her opinions. Also I recommend reading "how to read slowly".
/r/MensRights05/09/13 09:00 PM
4

Inferior is the wrong word, weaker would be appropriate. Women are on average physically weaker than men. Its a biological fact.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:50 PM
4

Thanks. Seeing its a child's toy market research consultant I imagine he has a pretty decent idea of this kind of thing. It also makes sense. But definitely something to take with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:10 AM
13

Citation?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 03:59 AM
13

Yes even if the Judge thinks it is too one sided. It's ridiculous. If a contract is signed under correct guidelines there is no reason it should be thrown out but it happens.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 07:08 PM
10

They can be thrown out at the Judges discretion.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 06:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter