~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | The “manosphere” moral panic is stupid and it really just boils down to men not doing what feminists want.What I hear a lot of this subreddit doing is blaming the rest of the World for their ills.. It's feminist this.. Or woke ruining that.. Are you aware that feminists actively entrench disparities in legal rights between the sexes? ((1), (2)). And I'm here to tell you that is the absolute weakest shit a woman could ever hear.. She doesn't want to be with yall because all of you are professionals victims who take 0 level of accountability for the state of your wellbeing or the state of the world ar… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 10:57 PM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.I don’t think I could reconcile with abandoning my association with feminist Labels are less important than actions. If you want to keep calling yourself a feminist, you don't need my permission to do so - just be aware of who you're running interference for when you do so. I believe the men’s liberation movement and the feminist movement have the same main goal of equality Sure. The issue is in how "equality" is measured and recognised. If one approaches the desire for equality from a presuppos… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 05:50 AM |
| 1 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsWomen are not oppressed by men as a group because men simply prefer it that way. If society is male dominated, and privileges their desires, and women are oppressed, then womens' oppression must be in-keeping with mens' desires. If womens' oppression was contrary to mens' desires, a society that privileges those desires wouldn't do it. Patriarchy is more so a societal culture or system that can be upheld by both individuals and institutions, rather than every single man being the manifestation o… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 05:44 AM |
| 3 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's Rightsim certain the definition you’re using to define patriarchy is from the radical feminist lens You agreed that the points I raised were "correct". Given your other commentary, I don't think you identify as a radical feminist, so which is it? especially bc it kind of like says ALL men are oppressor by nature which simply isn’t true. If men as a group didn't prefer to oppress women, then a society that privileges their desires wouldn't oppress women. Since the premise of the conjecture is that wome… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 05:39 AM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.maybe im not a feminist then idk? That's more or less the same route that a lot of MRAs travelled along. feminism wouldn’t have reached its goal without men also having been liberated Which means that feminism will not have reached its goals until feminists stop entrenching rights disparities between the sexes. And that won't stop until the mainstream stops with the denial. And like circumcision was normalized bc of religion. Certainly. And it's a violation of international human rights laws, bu… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 04:06 AM |
| 2 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsYour definition of feminism and patriarchy are kinda wrong How so? Patriarchy conjecture is a core belief of feminist ideology. You have already agreed that I have been accurate regarding the central tenants of Patriarchy conjecture. So what's the issue? | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 04:00 AM |
| 3 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsCorrect. Which means that Patriarchy conjecture makes some fundamentally false claims about the nature of men and women. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 03:59 AM |
| 4 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsIf the three points are correct, then men are in power and women are oppressed because men, as a group, prefer it that way. The only way that's not a statement on the evil nature of men is if oppression of women is not evil. Personally, I would say that it is wrong. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 03:43 AM |
| 3 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsThe men’s right movement is defined as anti feminist by its actions and beliefs. It’s “founders” identified with anti-feminism Antifeminist, yes. As I've established elsewhere, mens rights advocacy, and egalitarianism in general, is necessarily antifeminist. Now what about the misogyny? Or were you trying to do some rhetorical slight of hand to conflate opposition to feminist ideology with hatred of women? And I don’t believe you are misogynistic, but you are engaging in a misogynistic community… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 03:42 AM |
| 7 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsFeminism, at its core, does not align with anti-male beliefs Feminists believe that: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the system itself is set up to privilege men and subjugate women for mens express benefit. Meaning that oppression of women is to mens' benefit and in their nature. Meaning men are innately inclined to oppress the people with whom they have their closest emotional bonds. Women, despite the in… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 02:50 AM |
| 6 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsYou didn't answer a single question I asked, but okay. You didn't ask me a question. I'm commenting on the assumptions of your post. Also, why is it women's job to help men Why should men help women? It's pretty typical reasoning for a feminist - women's problems are mens fault; mens problems, despite the evidence of feminist ideology being instrumental in many of them, are mens fault. Thanks for confirming. Actual feminists want to abolish the patriarchy, I've already shown you the issue with P… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 02:46 AM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.Explain to me what "disparities in rights between the sexes" you are seeing. I guess you forgot the two lists of examples I provided. Now, can you answer the question? Okay, so yes, I understand you've seen some women in positions of power do things that you believe oppress men, but why are you so adamant about ignoring all the men in power who do significantly more to oppress women? "Believe" is doing a lot of work there. I guess you suddenly don't believe that the examples I showed you actuall… | /r/MensRights | 09/08/26 02:29 AM |
| 18 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsIt's funny how, where women are disadvantaged, the problem is Male Privilege and male dominance, and men should do something about it; when women are advantaged, men are to blame and they should do something about it. Never mind feminist policies entrenching disparities in rights, it's mens problem and only men should be required to do anything. Right after they've done their duty in helping women. Why on earth would anyone think feminism is a hate movement? | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 09:53 PM |
| 8 | We shouldn't forget that Feminist Men are a huge obstacle to Men's RightsPatriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). Mens rights advocacy, and Egalitarianism in general, is necessarily antifeminist. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 09:50 PM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.I didn’t concede the point i just don’t know what youre talking about like at all. I've explained the presuppositions behind Patriarchy conjecture, I can't make you understand it. im saying they didn’t happen to enforce some kind of “feminazi” ideology Can you explain how contributing to policy in media, academia, and law to be in-line with feminist ideology while also entrenching the disparities in rights between the sexes isn't happening to enforce ideology? the average feminist will tell you … | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 05:02 PM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.OK. Thank you for conceding the point about Patriarchy conjecture, it's not easy to accept criticism of a deeply held ideological belief. Nonetheless, whether you believe the citations or not, they happened. And they were justified by feminist dogma, by feminists. If you see a feminist citing the 1-in-4 statistic, they're citing Mary Koss, whose work was instrumental in defining rape as something only men can do. If you see an organisation using the Duluth Model of domestic violence, they're usi… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 08:08 AM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.absolutely no actual feminist believes any of this bs you cited Absolutely no feminist believes that society is male dominated, that women are oppressed, and that, while some men are hurt by it, society is set up to benefit mens needs, drives, and interests? Are you sure? | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 07:59 AM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.the oppression of women, or anyone for that matter, is evil Cool. So the fact that society is male dominated and privileges their interests would make men evil if those interests included the oppression of women. Since (according to Patriarchy conjecture) male dominance oppresses women, that means that oppression of women is in-keeping with men's needs, drives, and interests. Since we agree that oppression is evil, that means that mens needs, drives, and interests are evil. Using this as justifi… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 07:41 AM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.They claimed to seek equal rights, but that's not what they did. It started by establishing the two tier system, and went downhill from there. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 07:19 AM |
| 2 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.If society is Male Dominated, and set up to privilege mens needs, drives, and interests, then whatever society looks like must be in keeping with mens needs, drives, and interests. Since society is set up that way, anything contrary to those interests wouldn't be a thing. Now consider the belief that male dominance oppresses women. That means that oppression of women, the people with whom men have their closest emotional bonds, is in-keeping with mens needs, drives, and interests. Even generatio… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 07:18 AM |
| 2 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.One can make statements that encapsulate the ideology. For instance, if someone believes that Jesus is the Son of God who died for our sins on the Cross, it would be fair to say that is the definition of "Christian". Feminists believe in Patriarchy conjecture. The linked comment contains the core features of Patriarchy conjecture. Those are the encapsulating statements of the ideology. The issue is that its hateful - it has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seem… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 07:09 AM |
| 1 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights (the vote) in exchange for citizenship responsibilities (civil and military conscription), and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; in the US, they still don't. First wave feminism is also where we get things like the Tender Years Doctrine, enshrining in law the mother-custody defaul… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 07:02 AM |
| 2 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.If they believe in Patriarchy, they believe that: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the system itself is set up to privilege men and subjugate women for mens express benefit. Meaning that oppression of women is to mens' benefit and in their nature. Meaning men are innately inclined to oppress the people with whom they have their closest emotional bonds. Women, despite the incredible impact of mothers on child… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/26 06:55 AM |
| 4 | I am convinced, the enemy is not "feminism", it's the level of thinking that simplifies society - we should be able to call this out and reject it with passion, even in arguments that favour men.Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). Mens rights advocacy, and Egalitarianism in general, is necessarily antifeminist. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/26 07:07 PM |
| 3 | Femininism - When Equality Becomes SelectiveArguing from an assumption of Patriarchy conjecture is a problem. "Feminism has been chipping away at the state of being of men as monsters and women as victims, and some of the monster class are suffering" is not as progressive as it sounds. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/26 06:29 AM |
| 4 | The word ‘incel’ has effectively become a slur for virgin men.Nice whataboutism, though. This sub is famous for them, so you're clearly settling right in with it and the immediate defense of the community. It's not a whataboutism if it's relevant. Youbaaid this is an echo chamber, and yet the sub behaves in a way that contraindicates the claim, especially compared to the communities that claim it's an echo chamber. Nice deflection though. Thank you for confirming that you aren't particularly tethered to reality. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/26 06:27 AM |
| 6 | The word ‘incel’ has effectively become a slur for virgin men.I never implied anything about anyone's worth The very next sentence. Wow. That's some incredible lack of self awareness! | /r/MensRights | 04/08/26 06:24 AM |
| 3 | Femininism - When Equality Becomes SelectivePatriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 03/08/26 10:17 PM |
| 15 | The word ‘incel’ has effectively become a slur for virgin men.Do you think people who use the incel slur check to see whether the target is actually in a dry spell? Regardless, why should a person's worth be determined by women's sexuality? Doesn't that also demean women by rendering them as sexual yardsticks? | /r/MensRights | 03/08/26 10:16 PM |
| 9 | The word ‘incel’ has effectively become a slur for virgin men.Disregard the downvotes my post will generate - this sub is unable to be honest with itself, otherwise they would have the self awareness to not be here and perpetuate the toxic echo chamber. If you got lots of upvotes, I'm sure that would be proof to you that you were right. As it happens, downvotes are proof to you that you're right too - magic how that works. In any case, you've got nothing to back up your claims. Even the echo chamber one is contraindicated by the fact that dissenting voices… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/26 10:14 PM |
| 2 | What do yall think about this feminist argument?if someone is lying about some charges, surely it makes their credibility less reliable? Correct. Which is why, in a political climate where the governing party of Scotland has pledged to increase "successful convictions" for sexual offences, it is imperative that such evidence be hidden from a jury. Otherwise they might think the "victim" is lying, just because she's provably lying! Incidentally, calling it "successful convictions" implies that acquittals are "failed" - or, to put it plainly, t… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/26 10:17 PM |
| 1 | What do yall think about this feminist argument?Section 274/275 was intended to block arguments like "The accuser was wearing XYZ and was therefore consenting to any kind of sexual activity", or "The accuser was known as "a slut", and therefore likely consented to the sexual activity". Wearing whatever, or being known as a slut, does not necessarily mean one consents to sex in a particular context. Those arguments amount to an attack on the character of the victim, and consent does not necessarily follow, making them irrelevant. How it's appl… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/26 07:31 PM |
| 9 | A lot of people say that misogyny kills, but how common are incidents where someone kills a woman and it is explicitly done because of hatred of women?Thank you for acknowledging that violent men would rather kill men than women. Rather blows a hole in Patriarchy conjecture, too. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 04:24 PM |
| 7 | What do yall think about this feminist argument?In Scotland, evidence that an accuser is lying is considered "not relevant", and is barred from trial on the basis that it might prejudice the jury against the "victim". This falls under what's known as Section 274/275, commonly called Rape Shield Laws. In the case of HMA vs Andrew Kierr, one of the original charges was dropped after CCTV evidence showed the complainer to be lying about that specific charge. Since the charge was dropped, the CCTV evidence was no longer relevant for the other cha… | /r/MensRights | 31/07/26 01:53 AM |
| 2 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsStill insistent on talking when you've nothing to say, huh? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/26 08:24 PM |
| 2 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsI've no interest in debating an AI. If you don't have anything to say, why say anything? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/26 06:08 PM |
| 3 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsCool: can you expand on your position to include literally anything that can form the basis of a conversation, or are you going to stick to vague platitudes and "debate me bro"? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/26 05:08 PM |
| 2 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsThe burden of proof lies with the party making the positive claim. And when your initial statement is so vague, that's going to require more work on your part, not less. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/26 07:23 AM |
| 1 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsYou can find the manifesto online, I won’t link it here because I don’t want to get in trouble. "Trust me, bro" isn't evidence. Can you give any names? That should be on the public record, and thus easy to fact-check. I recommend you to not deny or downplay If asking for specifics is denial or downplaying, I fear for the education system. because it is a criminal offense [sic] "Yes officer, this person asked for specifics rather than reading my mind and knowing what I was talking about! Arrest t… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 08:57 PM |
| 1 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsWhy? What's wrong? EDIT: Oh, I see your other comment. Apparently someone asking for evidence that unspecified terrorist attacks are caused by "the manosphere" equates to denial and downplaying, rather than asking for clarity, and Chicken Little here seems to think asking for clarity is a criminal offence...somewhere, under some law. Who knows. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 08:49 PM |
| 2 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsGoing to need some evidence that 12 terrorist attacks are caused by "the manosphere", along with a clear understanding of what you mean by "the manosphere". Are you, for instance, trying to smear a larger group due by linking them to a violent action with no clear link to the group or an ideology? When you say "manosphere", especially in this context, in which you are linking it to violent actions, who exactly do you mean? Do you have any evidence to back up the assertion, or are you hoping we'd… | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 03:47 PM |
| 0 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsJust as well that's not what I asked you. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 03:43 PM |
| 1 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsFull agreement. I was wondering what sednandes meant by their comments - oftentimes, people who talk about the manosphere, especially where they conflate it with general antifeminism or mens rights advocacy, tend to be pretty ambiguous about what exactly they mean by "radicalised" or "dangerous", or even who they're referring to as "manosphere", often in an attempt to make vague accusations of danger and violence against anyone who speaks out against feminist ideology. | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 06:49 AM |
| 9 | The Manosphere Isn’t Exactly “Pro-Men” As You Think It IsSpeak on that. Why is it dangerous, what do you mean by radicalised, and why is this an issue? | /r/MensRights | 27/07/26 06:15 AM |
| 1 | Don't most people understand that most of the misogyny that exists today is mainly a response to all of the oppression and misandry?Misandry kills way more than misogyny. It is institutional, systemic, and is often supported by feminist activism. it’s similar to how some black people may say ‘I hate white people’, is coming from a place of generations of oppression, You are not owed revenge. Misandry has not taken away men’s constitutional rights or bodily autonomy. I know people talk about the draft and whatnot- You and I have discussed elsewhere how feminists have been responsible for entrenching disparities in rights betw… | /r/MensRights | 24/07/26 10:23 AM |
| 2 | Don't most people understand that most of the misogyny that exists today is mainly a response to all of the oppression and misandry?Do you? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 10:20 PM |
| 1 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantNot true, but thank you for conceding that feminists project. Given the content of you comment, I suppose I should also thank you for confirming that feminists lie. I'm curious why you put rights in quotation marks - do you not see bodily autonomy, equal treatment under the law, due process, and reproductive choice as rights? | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 06:19 AM |
| 1 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantThe only bigot is you. I wholeheartedly invite you to link to any evidence of that. I can see why that upsets a male like you Zero self awareness, I see. | /r/MensRights | 21/07/26 06:08 AM |
| 4 | Don't most people understand that most of the misogyny that exists today is mainly a response to all of the oppression and misandry?Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Feminists habit of denying that men have systemic issues, then immediately pivoting when shown otherwise to "but who's doing it? Other men!" shows their priorities: women are victims, men are monsters. | /r/MensRights | 20/07/26 06:14 AM |
| 1 | Saw a comment claiming that rate of domestic violence in lesbian relationships is lower. How true is it?1)what did I not address? Also how old are you? Because yes, I’m still in school, but if you are above the age of 16 you might also want to go back to school idk. It seems like you have no media literacy. Reading comprehension fail. Try again. 2) why would I use your self written source as ‘evidence’ gng? How about you read the argument? I know reading comprehension is hard for you, but take it slow, you can do it! So diversity programs in hiring such as the US DEI don’t diminish men’s chances o… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/26 06:28 AM |
| 1 | Saw a comment claiming that rate of domestic violence in lesbian relationships is lower. How true is it?Well done! That’s life, most people have experienced violence in their life! That doesn’t mean they have experienced DV. Are you saying 100% of men have experienced DV? If anyone wants to be a victim in this conversation, it’s you There you go making up what you want me to have said instead of reading and addressing the words. I hope your school helps your reading comprehension. are you seriously using an old Reddit comment as a source? I'm linking to where I laid out the argument elsewhere. Are… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 08:09 PM |
| 1 | Of the 173.6 million women in the U.S., 171.8 million did NOT go see “Supergirl”.Do you not know that 16 year olds can have summer jobs…? The fact you think that's a "career" does lend credence to you having a minor's understanding. So you did "make up a career and life to make (your) statements sound more credible". But I think the creepier thing is that you kept calling a 16 year old ‘sweetie’ like a predator? Link to where I did that. You should know that accusing someone of grooming is a pretty serious thing to do. EDIT: for some reason, your comments aren't being visibl… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 06:48 PM |
| 1 | Of the 173.6 million women in the U.S., 171.8 million did NOT go see “Supergirl”.I have a career and things to do You also said you're 16. So are you lying about having a career (which, given the context, is hilarious), or are you lying about being 16 (which is pretty fucking creepy)? | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 06:29 PM |
| 1 | Of the 173.6 million women in the U.S., 171.8 million did NOT go see “Supergirl”.The OP statement did imply that women don’t support other women, and that men are victims to when this happens. Prove it. Where did he say that? Quote it. Sorry that I don’t have to make up a career and life to make my statements sound more credible, Quote where I did that. You just can't help yourself, can you? Can you get through a single reply without making up what you want the other person to have said? | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 02:59 PM |
| 1 | Saw a comment claiming that rate of domestic violence in lesbian relationships is lower. How true is it?So I never said men don’t experience domestic abuse, Also you: compared to a heterosexual relationship where there is a woman and woman, often only having the woman experience domestic violence in her lifetime. Your claim is that, generally speaking, men don't experience domestic violence. You know that's not true. Around 80-85% of domestic abuse victims are female Especially since the feminist Duluth Model characterises victimhood as female and perpetration as male, and has influenced cultural … | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 02:57 PM |
| 10 | The feminism that appeals to men becomes mainstream.All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). Feminism is, necessarily, opposed to men and their wellbeing. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 02:03 PM |
| 3 | Saw a comment claiming that rate of domestic violence in lesbian relationships is lower. How true is it?often only having the woman experience domestic violence in her lifetime Especially given that the Duluth Model of domestic violence, that has informed investigation and intervention since its inception in the 80s, defines domestic violence as something He does to Her. It's hard to recognise male victims of female perpetrators when you define the abuse as something only men do - same with legal definitions of rape. But you do you, pretending male victims and female perpetrators don't exist. Men … | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 12:18 PM |
| 1 | Of the 173.6 million women in the U.S., 171.8 million did NOT go see “Supergirl”.It’s actually not? Then you won't have any trouble answering the brief and point to the quote where OP said that: "Supergirl isnt getting any attention because self proclaimed male victims of feminism aren’t watching the movie, and it shows ‘women’s true colours’ on how they don’t support fellow women in film because some didn’t go to see it" You can't do that, because OP didn't actually say anything of the sort - you disregarded what was actually said in favour of what you made up in your head … | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 12:08 PM |
| 11 | Saw a comment claiming that rate of domestic violence in lesbian relationships is lower. How true is it?The issue with frequency of reports of only male perpetrators is that, in many places, men are the sole class that are legally capable of being classified as perpetrators. For instance, in the UK, the Sexual Offences Act defines rape as something the perpetrator does "with his penis" (with calls to gender neutralise the law rebuffed on the basis that "most rapists are men", when the law defines it so that only men can be rapists). For DV, prevalence of the Duluth Model in domestic violence servi… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 06:30 AM |
| 14 | Of the 173.6 million women in the U.S., 171.8 million did NOT go see “Supergirl”.Where was this in his quote? Go on quote him It's feminist policy never to let inconvenient things like "what was actually said" get in the way of a gotcha. Privileging reality over what's in a feminists head is Patriarchy, don't you know! | /r/MensRights | 17/07/26 04:00 AM |
| 42 | Woman, 25, 'sexually assaulted child in bathroom & filmed abuse for Snapchat' before being busted over unusual tattooWhat have her looks got to do with anything? Abuse is abuse. | /r/MensRights | 11/07/26 09:56 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?The Forced‐To‐Penetrate Myth Acceptance Scale Pretending that female-perpetrated sexual violence doesn't exist by calling it a "myth". I'm sure this study will be worthwhile and devoid of an ideological agenda. Combine the two, you'll get a majority of men I hope you mean "combine the two and you'll have the majority of rapists being men", rather than what reads like the majority of men being rapists. about 70% - 75% That's a significant difference from the oft-presented 95-99%. Maybe that shoul… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/26 05:25 PM |
| 1 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?but its still based on a reality. A very selective reality, that ignores female perpetrators by not calling it rape when they do it. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/26 05:17 PM |
| 3 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?Those studies were more focused on female victims of penetratation, so rape in those context was defined by penetration, thats why you see damn near 100% male perpetrator Thank you for conceding that your stats aren't based in reality of who is forcing sex of whom, but on ideology to promote a hate narrative. granted some women and men do love using these stats to dismiss or create a narrative about the vast majority of men, but thats a discussion for another day. You literally did this. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/26 07:19 AM |
| 2 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?even if the majority of rapist will be male and that is telling. You don't know that for sure, that smacks of bigotry. Is there a particular race that you're just as certain they'll be too? You know the statistics are a product of gendered definitions, but you're assuming that this is valid because of statistics based on gendered definitions. Can you see the problem in this? | /r/MensRights | 10/07/26 07:03 AM |
| 1 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantI hope you resolve your bigotry and lack of critical thinking skills. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/26 06:05 AM |
| 1 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevant"Also". You engaged in a tu quoque fallacy, "you also". It's OK to be wrong, the shameful behaviour is lying to pretend otherwise. | /r/MensRights | 10/07/26 06:04 AM |
| 6 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?and need to get out of this echo chamber Echo chambers exclude dissenting voices. Here, they're engaged with. That's not an echo chamber, and even disagreement with you doesn't make it one. The stat exists, it could be overestimated but its still so high you have to acknowledge them. Getting upset at the wrong group about these stats. Indeed, 99% is an underestimation! Since, in the UK among other places, rape can only be committed by a cisgender man, the number should be that 100% of rapists ar… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 09:07 PM |
| 5 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?Have you asked how those numbers were calculated? Or did you just shrug and accept without question? | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 09:03 PM |
| 5 | Does anyone know where this "95-99% of rapists are men" idea comes from?Studies that show that are working from a definition of rape that excludes female perpetrators. Can you see the problem with relying on those statistics to inform any kind of claim to truth? | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 09:02 PM |
| 4 | Is this true, fam?Real anti-feminism ...opposes feminism. So by advocating for, for instance, making rape laws gender neutral despite efforts of feminists like Mary Koss, that makes it antifeminist. Social Conservatism is antifeminist, but promotes the status quo of male disposability and a lack of accountability for women. That is not mens rights advocacy. While mens rights advocacy is necessarily antifeminist, being antifeminist does not necessarily equal advocating for mens' rights. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 03:05 PM |
| 10 | Is this true, fam?Given the sheer amount of antifeminist data presented here, I think it would be hard to say that this subreddit is made up of feminist patsies. You want MensLib for that kind of thing. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 03:00 PM |
| 1 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantDo you think that men also dismiss male victims of domestic violence or just feminists? Thank you for conceding that feminists, despite claiming to be "just about equality" and claiming to advocate for victims of domestic violence, regularly dismiss male victims of domestic violence. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 02:24 PM |
| 1 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantI’m giving you facts that are not arguable Sourceless facts, without examination, directed at someone else, to which you are retorting in a dead thread. As I said, feminists project. That is a fact. | /r/MensRights | 09/07/26 02:22 PM |
| 9 | Do we live in a actual patriarchy?Patriarchy conjecture holds as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. | /r/MensRights | 01/07/26 06:40 AM |
| 4 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Sure. I go into more detail here. The article linked was an example or a woman successfully suing a boy for child support that she forced sex upon, resulting in her pregnancy. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/26 09:37 AM |
| 2 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Asked and answered. But I'll make it explicit as reading comprehension seems to be am issue for you. For example: Lobby to take the feminism out of law and policy - gender neutralise rape laws; remove the gendered duluth model from domestic violence interventions; repel the Tender Years Doctrine and lobby for default rebuttable shared custody of children in the case of divorce; lobby for equal protections under the law (to counteract the erosion of due process thanks to feminist lies like Koss's… | /r/MensRights | 30/06/26 06:56 AM |
| 2 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]You mean except for pointing out the protects, the demonstrations, the advocacy and activism that feminists have already done and are capable of doing against the harm their movement has caused? Are you not going to provide the evidence I asked for? | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:34 PM |
| 5 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]You know the actions feminists took to entrench disparities in rights between the sexes? The ones justified by feminist ideology and feminist academia? The lobbying, the protests, the demonstrations, the kind of things you never see feminists doing to advances mens rights issues? Can you genuinely not think of ways to engage in meaningful activism that's not in support of anti male ideologues? | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:31 PM |
| 5 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Repeating false points don't make them true. I've pointed out, repeatedly, the ways that feminism has contributed to mens issues. Working to advocate for mens issues means necessarily working against the feminists in positions of authority in media, academia, and law. You have yet to demonstrate that there are any feminists seeking to undo the damage I referred to, instead claiming that feminists run a bunch it domestic violence shelters for men, without evidence. . | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:12 PM |
| 5 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]You don't accurately represent femenist spaces. Why don't you ask the folks at r/feminism what they think of mens rights advocates and advocacy. Or any other feminist group for that matter. Yes, reading comprehension. Where are MRAs advocating to "stop support for women and reallocation of funding"? The way you brought it up was structured to mean that mens rights advocacy exists for advocacy, but MRAs fight to stop support for women and reallocation of funding. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 08:51 PM |
| 6 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]"All your points" being "there's too much evidence to support your claim, so it's bad form". The desperation to cling to the ideology is saddening. You could, maybe, read. Start researching - you've been given a wealth of information. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 08:48 PM |
| 6 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]when you haven't provided any appropriate forms of evidence Like links to evidence? If I sent too few, you'd call it cherry picking. Now there's overwhelming evidence, looks like you've still got leave to disregard the evidence and hold to your position. Magic how that works! If you can't be bothered looking at the provided evidence, don't claim that your position is reasonable. I hope your ability to read improves quickly. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 08:21 PM |
| 9 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]I'm sorry you're so upset at the sheer amount of supporting evidence. Thank you for conceding that the point was succinct though. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 07:51 PM |
| 25 | Can anyone list me examples of feminist violence that we know were done because of feminism-related motivations/beliefs?There are a few examples in these lists, along with institutional and systemic actions to perpetuate disparities in rights between the sexes. ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 07:34 PM |
| 1 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantCorrect. Let me be more specific: You, a feminist defending feminism, have engaged in a pattern I have seen other feminists engage in, where you like to portray women as weak little victims, even going as far as to compare them to children. That's pretty misogynistic. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 07:31 PM |
| 12 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]anything If you can't articulate your views in a concise manner then what's the point in even engaging? "Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between the sexes." That's concise. And evidenced by a huge and not exhaustive list of examples. Just because you don't like the body of evidence doesn't make it invalid. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 07:29 PM |
| 7 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]1: you clearly haven't been paying attention in feminist spaces. 2: yes, I got that. You're still making up stuff - unless you can evidence that "MRA" lobbies to take funding away from women. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 05:47 PM |
| 14 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Consider the copious amount of evidence. Holding to the idea that Egalitarianism, and men's rights advocacy specifically, is anything other than necessarily antifeminist in the face of overwhelming evidence is at best foolish and at worst willfully ignorant. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 05:45 PM |
| 15 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]I never used the 1 in 4 stat because it's wrong. Are we talking about you, or about feminists in general? This link is a deleted post put great win! Really? The comment isn't deleted. But I'll humour you, and copy-paste it here for you: Your second link literally says "Currently feminism doesn't benefit men". That, at least, is consistent with the evidence I sent you. The problem with feminism is that all forms of it take the following to be self-evident: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 11:29 AM |
| 15 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]This movement was started by feminists. The mens rights movement? The thing that feminists "in general" oppose, smearing us as misogynists, neo-nazis, and an all-male collective of people who want women "back" into slavery? Good try. And it persists to say that men need more advocacy as well as women. Not stop support for women and reallocate the funding given toward women's causes to men's causes. Back on the "making shit up" bus again, I see. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 11:15 AM |
| 19 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]You don't have to copy and paste your arguments when I'm saying something you agree with. Feminist perspectives do not help men. And feminists actively entrench disparities between the genders. You, on the other hand, have shown in your other comment that you're perfectly happy making incorrect assumptions and pretending to have speed-read two comprehensive posts worth of links in ten minutes. Mens rights advocacy is necessarily antifeminist. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 10:03 AM |
| 17 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]It makes sweeping generalizations of all feminists from claims a while back. I don't trust every instance where a feminist says something as indicative of the entire group. Every time a feminist uses the "1 in 4" statistic, they are citing Mary Koss, whose work was integral to defining rape as something men do to women. Every time feminists hold the feminist duluth model, they are holding to a model that genders domestic violence as male-perpetrator/female-victim. Hell, all forms of feminism tha… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 10:01 AM |
| 17 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]I'm generally in favor of feminist perspectives. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:50 AM |
| 23 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]ON AVERAGE, men face less serious problems than women Here are some legal rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came ab… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:49 AM |
| 21 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Because this subreddit has somehow lost the plot and United itself against a ideology that largely wants to help them. Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:47 AM |
| 24 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:46 AM |
| 27 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Why do you seemingly believe that feminists should centre men’s issues? Obviously, they focus on issues impacting women When feminists tell us "feminism is just about equality of the sexes" and "feminism helps men too", it doesn't take long to work out that this is a lie. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:45 AM |
| 35 | How feminist movement is in real life [meme]Here are some legal rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about through statutory rape of the father. I go into gr… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/26 09:43 AM |
| 3 | "We call for women and girls to be placed at the center of rescue efforts", UN Women saysMy partner keeps saying "reading is tech". This is a great example. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/26 07:27 AM |
| 3 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantDon’t just lie and act like you’re right Remember folks, feminists project. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/26 07:17 AM |
| 2 | The issue with feminists who say that they recognise violence against men is that they will still try to downplay it and minimise it to the point where their support becomes completely irrelevantIt's amazing how feminists will flip from "women are strong and powerful" to "men are all stronger than women and women are comparable to children" when it suits them. It's pretty misogynistic. Never mind the fact that most female perpetrated domestic violence does involve weapons, or proxies like police, nor that social and legal cultures support women who commit abuse like that. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/26 07:15 AM |
| 3 | Please critique this take on FeminismAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 21/06/26 10:18 PM |
| 2 | Honestly, it's kind of tiring seeing how women who agree with us get called "pick-me's" all the timeI'm sure you believe that, but you've already said "Men already have rights. You have more rights than women", in spite of evidence to the contrary. That's more in line with feminism than any kind of egalitarian equal rights movement. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 05:41 PM |
| 1 | broooos I wish men had more rightsWere we talking about what is legal or what I think? We were talking about legal rights. What you think Should Be is irrelevant in a discussion of What Is. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 04:17 PM |
| 1 | broooos I wish men had more rightsGood find. I'll be saving that! | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 04:14 PM |
| 1 | Honestly, it's kind of tiring seeing how women who agree with us get called "pick-me's" all the timeIf you said you weren't a Christian, you just agree that Jesus is the son of God who died for our sins on the Cross, I'd still suggest that toure either lying or ignorant. If you have bought in to the ideology, that makes you a believer in the ideology, whether you say so or not. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 04:08 PM |
| 1 | broooos I wish men had more rightsI never said men don't have human rights So which is it, do men have all the rights, or do men have rights issues that you've already conceded to? I was trying to say that it's a bigger issue that women don't have human rights See my previous comment. Men also have human rights issues, often in ways that feminists think women do, or that only women do. Pretending otherwise does nobody any favours except for the bigots. also have you even looked up about the situation in Pakistan? It's horrible. … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 04:07 PM |
| 1 | broooos I wish men had more rightsOh yeah fun fact you've been arguing with a 14 year old That explains the dead certainty in ignorance. It's OK, study hard, and you'll hopefully be on a position to understand what went wrong. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 03:56 PM |
| 1 | Honestly, it's kind of tiring seeing how women who agree with us get called "pick-me's" all the timeI'm personally not a feminist "Men already have rights. You have more rights than women. We aren't allowed the rights to govern our own bodies. Transgender people don't have rights gay people are getting less and less rights. Men are basically the untouched demographic for basically the entire world. Your rights aren't taken away from you. You haven't been told that it's your fault if some man raped you. That if you weren't wearing what you were wearing you wouldn't have been asking for it." If … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 09:46 AM |
| 7 | broooos I wish men had more rightsThank you for claiming that I linked to a comment you already replied to after replying to it, after having it pointed out to you. I'm afraid being shown to be dishonest doesn’t help your credibility. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:44 AM |
| 15 | broooos I wish men had more rights"Men already have rights. You have more rights than women. We aren't allowed the rights to govern our own bodies. Transgender people don't have rights gay people are getting less and less rights. Men are basically the untouched demographic for basically the entire world. Your rights aren't taken away from you." I'm trying to say that everyone has issues and that there should be equal information on them. You told someone to get over their bigotry for talking about mens rights in a mens rights sp… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:42 AM |
| 17 | broooos I wish men had more rightsThank you for conceding that men do in fact have rights issues. Unfortunately, your opinion of what Should Be and a sack is worth the sack. But for one of we are going based on the world women in many countries in asia and africa have little to no rights It's hilarious when feminists unironically find themselves throwing brown people under the bus to try to support the narrative of their victimhood Over Here. Women in Pakistan can leave the house without a man, can't speak to anyone that isn't f… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:39 AM |
| 11 | broooos I wish men had more rightsGreat. Shame wider society, and the prominent feminists in media, academia, and law who are representing the movement disagree with you. Further, this contradicts your original point that men don't have issues. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:30 AM |
| 11 | broooos I wish men had more rightsHere are some. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:28 AM |
| 8 | broooos I wish men had more rightsDestroying positions like yours is a chore to me. That's why I copy paste my most used points. | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:20 AM |
| 20 | broooos I wish men had more rightsWhat rights do women lack and men have? For comparison, here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/26 07:08 AM |
| 8 | Y'all just check out this post if you're having a bad day. It'll make it even worse :)All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 10/06/26 06:54 PM |
| 1 | See men, Google AI hath spoken. The reason we commit cuisine 3-4 times as much is all our fault in some vague way (or because we somehow choose more lethal methods, like we actually try rather than just make a plea for help). No more real and obvious reasons to consider - the future is bright!Almost all men who commit suicide have tried to seek help about it at least once. | /r/MensRights | 08/06/26 08:23 AM |
| 5 | "Incel" is the new "gay" word to shame men.Which is at odds with the narrative that mens sexuality is celebrated while women's is demonised. In the bad old days, there was a particular slur used for white people who were deemed to be too friendly with black people or causes. Using the same logic as feminist theory behind shut shaming, this must have been because society demonises white friendships and privileges black friendships. Of course, those of us who have a basic grasp of reality know that this is a ridiculous suggestion. Men are … | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 05:38 AM |
| 2 | men's rights activist and feministAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). In short, mens rights advocacy will necessarily be antifeminist as long as feminists in media, academia, and law are anti male. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 05:33 AM |
| 4 | men's rights activist and feministAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). In short, mens rights advocacy will necessarily be antifeminist as long as feminists in media, academia, and law are anti male. | /r/MensRights | 06/06/26 05:32 AM |
| 7 | Are there any laws that give men special rights compared to women?Remarks like that ignore the reality for men in favour of assuming women's victimhood and men's monstrosity. They mutilate the genitals of girls Over There? They do it to boys too, and that's still legal, just like Over Here. A man can force sex on his wife Over There and it's not rape unless XYZ? A woman Over There can force sex on anyone and it's not considered rape at all, just like Over Here. And so on. Where there are rights that men have and women lack, it is often to enable the obligation… | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 10:41 PM |
| 3 | Are there any laws that give men special rights compared to women?That's a country, not a right. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 10:37 PM |
| -2 | Are there any laws that give men special rights compared to women?Remarks like that ignore the reality for men in favour of assuming women's victimhood and men's monstrosity. They mutilate the genitals of girls Over There? They do it to boys too, and that's still legal, just like Over Here. A man can force sex on his wife Over There and it's not rape unless XYZ? A woman Over There can force sex on anyone and it's not considered rape at all, just like Over Here. And so on. | /r/MensRights | 05/06/26 10:36 PM |
| 1 | This is actually insane. 96% of new jobs went to women and 4% to men. Still think women are oppressed?Thats not what I was doing at all? You're claiming that, in this predominantly brown country, men are happy to oppress the people with whom they have their closest emotional bonds. That's only not a statement on the morality of people in that part of the world if oppression of women isn't wrong. Is it wrong? Besides, the UN's CEDAW map disagrees with you, all of the "white" countries are ranked as far better for women according to feminist Doctrine. It's hideously racist, and you're endorsing th… | /r/MensRights | 04/06/26 10:49 PM |
| 2 | This is actually insane. 96% of new jobs went to women and 4% to men. Still think women are oppressed?It's weird how people will happily throw brown men under the bus as morally inferior to whites on order to justify the narrative that men oppress women, all the while knowing very little about the system they're using to do that and how it treats men in those same places. | /r/MensRights | 04/06/26 10:40 PM |
| 8 | This is actually insane. 96% of new jobs went to women and 4% to men. Still think women are oppressed?What rights do women lack and men have? For comparison, here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about … | /r/MensRights | 04/06/26 10:38 PM |
| 1 | Men deserve just as much empathy as womenThank you for proving OPs point. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 06:59 AM |
| 2 | The trap of being comfortable enoughWhat has this got to do with mens rights advocacy? | /r/MensRights | 09/05/26 02:42 AM |
| 1 | Men deserve just as much empathy as womenConsider men working themselves into an early grave to maintain "a lifestyle to which she is accustomed". | /r/MensRights | 08/05/26 11:00 PM |
| 1 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview.Only if the husband or father letted them Great. If this was so prevalent, you should be able to cite examples. In any case, your position seems to be "women weren't allowed to work, except when they were". Do you see how that's less than coherent? Cleaning the house, taking care of the kids etc It's funny how feminists will flip-flop between "housework is real work" and "women weren't allowed to work, they were relegated to home duties". In any case, history refutes this. https://en.wikipedia.o… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/26 11:13 AM |
| 1 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview.Pre 1800 women werent able to work and if they were only on the worse jobs and they recieved much much less money So which is it? Do you think women weren't allowed to work, or were they? In any case, women have always worked. Names like Brewster and Webster meant "female brewer/weaver" respectively. Besides, do you really think a farmer in the 1400s could afford to have an extra mouth to feed (that he was socially and legally responsible for the wellbeing of) that would sit around doing nothing… | /r/MensRights | 04/05/26 04:40 AM |
| 6 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview.That's OK. If you're committed to your current level of understanding, far be it for me to sway you. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 06:36 PM |
| 5 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview.If you can't be bothered clicking a link and reading the result, what would make me think going longform is going to be any more productive? | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 06:27 PM |
| 4 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview.If you can't be bothered reading the argument, don't claim to want a discussion. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 06:24 PM |
| 3 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview.It links to where I go into detail, saving me typing out the whole thing repeatedly. | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 06:20 PM |
| 9 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview.Patriarchy conjecture holds as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 06:17 PM |
| 4 | The “and who created that system?” argument doesn’t even work within their own worldview."Thank you for conceding that men, given the opportunity, would rather harm men than women. It rather disrupts the Oppression narrative, so thanks for that". | /r/MensRights | 01/05/26 06:15 PM |
| 1 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsMaybe refresh your memory of the rest of your contributions to the thread. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/26 09:33 PM |
| 1 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsYou've always had to think that men wanting choices like women have is a sign of male incompetence? For reference, women have far greater right to separate sex from parenthood. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/26 09:21 PM |
| 2 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsSeeing your other comments, you are lying. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/26 07:25 AM |
| 3 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsI'll take that as a yes. People deserve to be able to separate sex from parenthood. Especially of the means of doing so are more effective than barrier protection. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/26 07:24 AM |
| 3 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsWhy are you denigrating people having options to separate sex from parenthood? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/26 11:49 PM |
| 6 | Vasalgel Male Contraceptive Enters Human TrialsWould you use the same argument against abortion, "just don't have sex"? | /r/MensRights | 26/04/26 11:47 PM |
| 11 | Why is feminist communities online 99% talk about men?Correct. The definitions in law talking about penetratration, even going so far as to say its done "with his penis" in the UK sexual offences act, comes from second wave feminist Mary Koss and her methodologically flawed research. First and second wave feminism were still man-hating. It's not a new development. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/26 04:45 AM |
| 5 | Why is feminist communities online 99% talk about men?Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 25/04/26 04:41 AM |
| 6 | Why is feminist communities online 99% talk about men?Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged, or are men as a larger group disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 25/04/26 04:39 AM |
| 10 | Why is feminist communities online 99% talk about men?Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights (the vote) in exchange for citizenship responsibilities (civil and military conscription), and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; in the US, they still don't. Second wave feminism is where we get gems like the Duluth Model, and Mary Koss' work in defining rape as male-only. | /r/MensRights | 25/04/26 04:37 AM |
| 1 | My experience with hundreds of discussions with feminists online(most commonly used fallacies)Addressed in this post | /r/MensRights | 19/04/26 09:58 PM |
| 2 | If feminists truly cared about abuse and r*pe victims they wouldn't be silencing male victims and excusing female abusersI hope your reading comprehension gets better soon. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/26 04:57 PM |
| 3 | If feminists truly cared about abuse and r*pe victims they wouldn't be silencing male victims and excusing female abusersSo just because the leaders, movers and shakers of a movement are hateful, and their hate ideology is taken as gospel by the rest, that's no reason to claim that "all" hold to the hate ideology and support the hateful actions? "Sure, the nazis in authority orchestrated genocides, and their ideology was taken as true by the rest of the self-identifying nazis, but you can't possibly say that all nazis are bad!" - do you see the problem with that statement? | /r/MensRights | 17/04/26 07:52 AM |
| 5 | If feminists truly cared about abuse and r*pe victims they wouldn't be silencing male victims and excusing female abusersFeminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). You can find examples of that and more in the lists. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 10:25 PM |
| 7 | If feminists truly cared about abuse and r*pe victims they wouldn't be silencing male victims and excusing female abusersALL feminists don’t claim that. Just the ones with any weight in media, academia, and law, justifying it with hateful Patriarchy conjecture that the majority of feminists also believe in. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 10:24 PM |
| 9 | If feminists truly cared about abuse and r*pe victims they wouldn't be silencing male victims and excusing female abusersIf a feminist cleaves to, for instance, the 1-in-4 statistic when talking about rape, they're citing the work of feminist researcher Mary Koss, whose work was integral to the gendering of rape laws. She deemed it "inappropriate " to call forced sex carried out by women on men "rape", describing non-consenting men as "ambivalent in their desires". It's not even victim blaming if you don't acknowledge the victim at all! | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 10:21 PM |
| 8 | If feminists truly cared about abuse and r*pe victims they wouldn't be silencing male victims and excusing female abusersFeminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). There are examples in those lists of feminist advocating against gender neutral rape laws, gendering domestic violence, and mocking male victims. | /r/MensRights | 16/04/26 10:18 PM |
| 1 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Yeah its a lot easier to keep the draft from starting than it is to make something thats been around since 1940 go away. Thank you for confirming that feminists don't help men regarding the draft. Feminism is a womens movement, started by women for women. Their primary objective is womens rights. Again, feminists fight tooth and claw to entrench disparities in rights between the genders, enhancing rights for women at the expense of men. You can keep ignoring this, but that doesn't change the fac… | /r/MensRights | 15/04/26 06:18 AM |
| 3 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.oh i just used the words you used against me Quote me. Where did I say that you weren't allowed. Let me guess, you never actually claimed I was arguing that you weren't allowed to speak? do you want an excel sheet about this how often tradcons get called out and how often supported? Yes. Evidence your claims. It shoudln't be hard, if it's as rife as you claim. i did not see how you called it out in this post thats bad enough... Compelling speech, eh? You're right, if only I did as you do, and ta… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 11:40 AM |
| 3 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.do you not do it yourself by arguing with me about this that im not allowed to call it out? Did I say that you're not allowed? You can denigrate the community, claim that discussion is pointless, and lie about your position, I just wonder what the point is, especially if your stated goal is "call out hypocrisy and advocate for men". our argument here shows that you are not up for that job... Interesting. Pushback means you're right, but agreement also means you're right. Such incredible godlike … | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 11:24 AM |
| 3 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.And the way you do that is by denigrating the community, claiming that discussion is pointless, and lying about what your proposed solutions were when they're shown not to be true. Good job. I'm sure MensLib would love you. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 11:15 AM |
| 2 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Why are you even here? You clearly don't have anything to contribute. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 11:10 AM |
| 2 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Great. How does that compare to what feminists have done that are anti draft for women? That's right, no draft for women, and radio silence from the majority on the men's draft. If feminists were as benevolent to mens' issues as feminists claim, they'd have a similar track record for mens issues as they do for womens issues. the fact that feminists fight tooth and claw to entrench disparities in rights between the genders seems to be ignored by the ideologues. Go figure. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 10:59 AM |
| 1 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.quote me where i said the democrats "will" abolish it You did indicate that, if it were to be abolished, it would be the Democrats who would do it. If you meant "The Republicans won't, and neither will the Democrats", why just single out one party? I think you're being dishonest about what you proposed because you've been shown to be wrong. There's no shame in being wrong, you know. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 10:56 AM |
| 7 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.if you look at what gets pushed that harms men and that you do not call that out is a shame... Such as? do you really think that our top priority should be equal conscription/draft Whose top priority is it? Do you really think that a community can't talk about multiple issues simultaneously? Do you go onto, say, MGM posts and say "Why aren't you talking about rape laws?" or something? while we have voluntary forces or no draft/conscription period? In the US, Selective Service (registering for th… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 10:52 AM |
| 3 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.actually quite sad that you jump at this "maybe" Your claim that the Democrats would be the party to abolish conscription, despite glaring evidence to the contrary? And the fact that you ignored this completely in favour of a specialised ad hominem (which is ironic, considering you then accused me of ignoring the message of the post)? but ignore the message of this post... That Republicans aren't friends to men, and that Democrats are. Also that OP's argument is wrong because of their personal s… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 10:05 AM |
| 9 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.and actually help men instead of harming them. Can you explain why denigrating the community and claiming tha discussion is impossible helps men? no to conscription period! Agreed. Given that wider society only seems to really care about an issue if women are effected by it, broadening the draft makes some amount of sense to pave the way to total abolition. It's not how I'd prefer to do it, but it might get the job done. It's all academic anyway - women will never be drafted in the US, that was … | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 10:02 AM |
| 1 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Why do you guys refuse help when its offered? What have feminists done to protest the draft for men? Because we know they've done it successfully for women, then stopped. Given the evidence I showed you already of feminists actively entrenching disparities in ri… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 09:59 AM |
| 4 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Is oppression of women morally wrong? Under feminist patriarchy conjecture, society is male dominated, set up for mens benefit (even though it sometimes hurts some men), and oppresses women. That means that, if men didn't prefer women to be oppressed, the system wouldn't oppress women. Meaning that, according feminist ideology, men prefer to treat the people with whom they have their closest emotional bonds as subhuman, or at least sit back and be cool with others doing so. And they won't let up… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 07:23 AM |
| 6 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.i don’t understand how wanting to protect women implies the idea that the patriarchy doesn’t exis Can you give an example of literally any other system of privilege and oppression where the oppressed class was excempt from civil and military conscription? Can you explain why the "privileged" class being considered expendable like that is consistent with a model that views not-them as lesser value? patriarchy is defined as a social system in which men hold primary power - dominating in political … | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 07:04 AM |
| 2 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). Being pro draft is in character, especially as all the protests stopped as soon as the bill to include womennin selective service was dropped. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 06:59 AM |
| 5 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Not going to address their point that the Democrats maintained male only selective service too, I see. But sure, double down on the Bulverism. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 06:57 AM |
| 2 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Patriarchy conjecture, as feminists use it, holds as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. In any case, Thank you for confirming that men, given the power and the option, would rather hurt men than women. It does rather contradict Patriarchy conjecture, though. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 06:54 AM |
| 13 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.Confirming that men, given power and the option, would rather protect women than men. It rather blows a hole in Patriarchy conjecture, but whatever. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 06:51 AM |
| 10 | We need a draft for women, and it needs to be one of our main talking points.It looks like your commentary seems to consist of denigrating the community only, and claiming that discussion is impossible. Why are you here? | /r/MensRights | 14/04/26 06:49 AM |
| 1 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyFeminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 04:23 PM |
| 1 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyGaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged, or are men as a larger group disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 04:22 PM |
| 2 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyMaybe because the feminist movement was made specifically for women by women??? You just said feminists opposed the mens issue of selective service. So which is it, is feminism for equality, or is it for women only? Things in this sub will change when this subs men care more about other men than they do about hating women Since it's so rife here, you should have no trouble citing examples of hatred here. Right? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 04:21 PM |
| 7 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyIn the UK, the sexual offences act defines rape as something the perpetrator does "with his penis", thus making women immune to the charge of rape. Thanks feminist researcher Mary Koss! | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 04:08 PM |
| 25 | Wondering if the Patriarchy was made for good reasons and adopted consensuallyPatriarchy conjecture, as feminists use it, holds as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 04:06 PM |
| 3 | Louis C.K. was cancelled by feminists even though he asked for consentCool story. U are statistically more likely to be raped by another man, Especially when we only call it rape when a man does it! TWICE, than falsely accused of rape by a woman The most robust statistic I ever saw on the matter was that 8% of accusations were provably false, and that was from a study in which participating police forces were trained to stop investigating if there seemed to be a chance of falseness - meaning that those 8% are cases where the evidence fell into investigator's laps.… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 12:18 PM |
| 2 | Pigtailed school social worker avoids prison after sexually assaulting sixth-grade boyThat reads as pretty passive-aggressive. Who said anything about judging half the population based on a single bad actor? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/26 12:12 PM |
| 2 | Proof that feminism has gone too far.The fact that your examples of women's so-called oppression aren't true isn't relevant to a movement claiming to want to rectify women's oppression? It was never about equality. Thank you for confirming that. Edit: lol, blocked for pointing that out. Re your point about voting rights, in the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963, when mens civic rights (the vote) was no longer tied to civil and military conscription (the draft was abolished). In the US, they still don't have equal vo… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/26 07:15 AM |
| 3 | Proof that feminism has gone too far.In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963, when mens civic rights (the vote) was no longer tied to civil and military conscription (the draft was abolished). In the US, they still don't have equal voting rights. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/26 10:24 PM |
| 2 | Proof that feminism has gone too far.Most men couldn't get a mortgage either. It's a wealth thing. Legally beaten? A woman could strike her husband and he would be punished for it, just as happens today. Legally raped? Categorically untrue, as men have been convicted for raping their wives even a century ago. In any case, a woman could (and still can) force sex on a man and not have it considered rape at all. I know "what about the men" really annoys feminists, but if they actually measured mens situation for comparison, rather tha… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/26 10:22 PM |
| 3 | Proof that feminism has gone too far.All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 11/04/26 10:18 PM |
| 5 | Honestly, it's kind of tiring seeing how women who agree with us get called "pick-me's" all the timeDo these women not get that feminism is about equal rights, not just womens rights? Have you read the Declaration of Sentiments? It was never about equality rights! | /r/MensRights | 03/04/26 09:17 PM |
| 31 | Young men are no longer allowed to leave Germany without permission...Someone hasn't heard of the White Feather campaign. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/26 09:14 PM |
| 3 | Have y’all ever considered the fact that other men are the reason why men in general are hated?I suspect OP is baiting, especially for screenshots to show how awful MRAs are. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/26 04:40 PM |
| 8 | All of feminism boils down to women being upset they aren't handed on a platter what men have to earnAt one point it was about equality, but after that went through it just became a tool to use to get out of responsibility. Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights (the vote) in exchange for citizenship responsibilities (civil and military conscription), and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; in the US, they still don't. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/26 09:44 PM |
| 2 | Are there any women here?But science says that is utterly untrue. Erections equal nothing. Correct. And every single time I hear anyone say this it is a man. I see that the user had her comment removed, likely for sexualising a minor. In any case, that was a woman saying that. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 07:55 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themFeminism is gender equality with a focus on women. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). Meanwhile, Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater ge… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:47 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themAnyway, since the original version of feminism was already successful, that means that we will see much less of what people would call real feminists, leaving us with feminazism. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights betw… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themwhat schools or flavours of feminism do you support and oppose? All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:45 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themDo You know masculinism exists Speak on that. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:43 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themFeminists have a long and storied history of entrenching disparities in rights between the genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:42 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themMasculinity refers to a birth category (man), while feminism is a political ideology, that one chooses. They are not the same at all. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:42 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themand you have never been a victim of either. Feminists have a long and storied history of entrenching disparities in rights between the genders ((1), (2)). Feminism got women the right to vote Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights (the vote) in exchange for citizenship responsibilities (civil and military conscription), and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting right… | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:41 PM |
| 2 | Are there any women here?This user said that a male child who was raped by a woman cooperated with his rapist to become a parent.. When confronted with that, she did a 180, but kept pushing the idea that men (and boys) can't be raped due to erections. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/26 06:39 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themNo they’re oppressed period. Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black people privileged, or are men as a larger group disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 29/03/26 07:38 AM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themI see your short-term memory is acting up again. I already responded to this iteration of your tantrum. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:57 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themYou're definitely owed compensation from your local school board for the disservice they did you. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:46 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themI addressed this here. Should I keep going? Salty, unhinged, wild fabrications to snatch the faintest trace of victimhood out of having provably more rights than you think, denying womens' agency and social power along with the past victories of womens advocates in the process? Sure, knock yourself out. You’re projecting. lol. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:40 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themWhich is waived in the event that the pregnancy is a result of criminal action carried out by one or more parents. She has options. He has prison and possibly death if I'm remembering Mississippi's stance on the Death Penalty. But if he isn't executed, if he gets out of prison, he can still be sued for child support regardless of whether he wants to be a parent. Again, go re-read this and see what options are available. Or you could keep making increasingly implausible hypotheticals to justify w… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:30 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themYes. Because the abortion ban has exemptions for medical necessity, and most doctors would agree on that. Now, if she carried the child to term, he is on the hook for child support regardless of whether he wants to be a parent or not. The fact that the man is a scumbag for engaging in rape and paedophilia, while true, is a separate point. I'd love to see where you think I engaged in rape apologia, compared to where you suggested that the male child who was raped into being a father was in on it. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:17 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themDon't forget conceding to being a rape and paedophilia apologist. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:10 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themInterestingly, women have more right to separate sex from parenthood than men do, I go into it more in this comment from less than an hour ago. Given your short term memory problems, I'm sure it'll be an eye-opener again! and you can claim men are still the primary victims. You added "primary". I just demonstrated that women have more choice over their reproduction than men do, despite men having the full legal responsibility for the child they have no say in. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:09 PM |
| 4 | Yes, it's all of themI'm glad we agree that women have more rights than men. Finally, we got somewhere. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 10:00 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themLink to where I said that. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:54 PM |
| 3 | Yes, it's all of themYou just said that making a baby requires the man's cooperation. So when you say "I don’t think men should have to pay for a baby as a result of rape, that's with the context that you don't believe a baby can happen as a result of raping a man. A paedophilia and rape apologist. Keep going, I'm sure you can add some more hypocrisies in there before the day is out. That doesn’t mean women aren’t being oppressed by abortion bans. Women are oppressed by having more reproductive rights than men. Good… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:53 PM |
| 4 | Yes, it's all of themWomen are oppressed in the US. Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged, or are men as a larger group disadvantaged? No cooperation from you in being a parent huh? Alright I’ve decided I’m going to have your baby. See how that doesn’t work? So I guess the kid in the linked example was fully on board with being raped and owing his rapist money for her decision to keep the baby she raped out of … | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:39 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themIs the feminist position really that arousal equals consent? Further, I see you didn't read the linked example where conception came about through statutory rape of the father. Or you did and you're a paedophile apologist. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:37 PM |
| 4 | Yes, it's all of themYou love avoiding my questions and demanding I answer yours. Lets pretend that women don't have any access to abortion whatsoever in the US, rather than it being a state by state basis with exceptions made for medical necessity in places where it is "banned". If a couple have sex, and the woman doesn't want to be a parent, she has the following options (many of which can be done unilaterally without including the partner in the decision): caps or diaphragms combined pill condoms contraceptive im… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:28 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themLets pretend that women don't have any access to abortion whatsoever in the US, rather than it being a state by state basis with exceptions made for medical necessity in places where it is "banned". If a couple have sex, and the woman doesn't want to be a parent, she has the following options (many of which can be done unilaterally without including the partner in the decision): caps or diaphragms combined pill condoms contraceptive implant contraceptive injection contraceptive patch female cond… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:27 PM |
| 3 | Yes, it's all of themFirst you said 20,000 men is hardly any men. Now you’re saying one man is too many. One murder is too many. Classifying a birth category as the Oppressor because of the actions of a minority is also not right. It's called nuance, you should try it. It'll make your life more difficult, but much richer. I never said my position was that all men are monsterous That's only true if oppression isn't morally wrong. Is the feminist position that oppression of women isn't wrong? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:24 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themIt’s pro men because it gives men a say in a woman’s body. Something you said yourself men have zero right to. And all of the legal responsibility. Should someone be held responsible for something they have no choice in? Personally, I'd rather it go down the line of "no choice, no responsibility". Though your bringing that up is still a distraction - you've yet to prove Trump to be an MRA. When has he identified with one? Does he post here? What does he say about fathers rights, selective servic… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:20 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of them20,000 is too high. I also said that one is too many. Now, given that your position seems to be that an entire birth category is monstrous because of the actions of the single-figure percentage minority, would you claim that it's fair to demonise black people, who make up the perpetrators of 6,405 of the 16,935 murders in the US in 2024? I mean, 6405 isn't "hardly any", so justifies labelling a birth category as monstrous, right? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:16 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themDesperate for that victimhood. Truly doing a good feminist job. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:12 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themMen advocating for men to have control over a woman’s body = more men’s rights, less women’s rights. Can you explain why making it harder for men to separate sex from parenthood is a pro mens rights stance? Bet you can't! You're going to have to do better than that. I’m only following you around on Reddit because you’re unhinged! Because you are replying to my comments and branches off from my comments with unhinged crap. Your reading comprehension is seriously bad, are you actually OK? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 09:11 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themI gave you facts. Your rebuttal was sarcasm. You gave misrepresentations, misunderstandings, outright lies, and non sequitur. I responded with pointing out the flaws of your argument, and because you continue to have all the rhetoric of a rubber chicken, I responded with mockery - if you're not going to take it seriously, why should I take you seriously? You are mockworthy. And the more you rant and rave, the more I'll mock you. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:53 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themYes, 5.84% of the population is a tiny minority, and not worth casting an entire birth category as monstrous. And, as predicted, you haven't addressed the other points. Go on, argue that the gaps showing mens' disadvantage aren't real, and in so doing make the claim that black people aren't disadvantaged in the US. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:51 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themI said “a lot of you”, referencing MRAs as a group. I thought you’d be able to put that together. You've still not backed up your claim that Trump is an MRA as you've claimed. You seem to think that limiting abortion makes him one, as if a stance on womens' reproductive rights automatically makes you an advocate for men. You have precisely nothing. State your stance clearly: should a man have ANY say in if a woman gets an abortion or not? You make a lot of demands for clarifying stances given ho… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:49 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themThe US population is 342.4 to 343.6 million. Taking the lower band, 20,000 out of 342.4 million comes out to 5.84%. Personally, I think one murder is too many (see how easy it is?). Now, are you going to address the fact that women make up a tiny minority of murder victims, making men the only oppressors of history to be killed more than the oppressed? Of course you're not. Just like you're also not going to address the other statistics that show a gender gap favouring women far greater than the… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:43 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themThen prove me wrong The burden of proof is on the party making the positive claim. So far you've failed to prove your points as anything other than misrepresentations, misunderstandings, and outright lies. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:19 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themLink to where I said that. Further, you said that keeping rights away from one group levels the playing field for the other. Again, you've still to evidence your claim that Trump is an MRA. Advocating for removing rights from women doesn't mean one is an MRA - advocating for rights for men does. You haven't got anything. You don't have to respond, especially if all you've got is nonsense and non sequitur. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:19 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themNot going to address the point about women being the tiny minority of murder victims, I see. Maybe because, once again, it shakes your assertions. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:16 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themMy stance is "You need to back up your claim that Trump is an MRA". You have yet to do that. Especially as you seem to think that one is either an MRA or a feminist, and the idea that there are people who aren't advocates for rights for men nor a part of your hate group seems alien to you. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 07:13 PM |
| 1 | Yes, it's all of themYou can have the information laid out in front of you and still refute it. Which speaks to the weakness of your argument. Keep squawking though, it's starting to become funny again. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 07:10 PM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themHardly any men kill anyone. And men make up 90%+ of murder victims. The only "privileged" group in history to be killed more often! Your cope is delightful. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 07:09 PM |
| 6 | Yes, it's all of themMen are victims of sexual violence and rape and men have very real issues. By women? Feminist researcher Mary Koss would disagree with you, and her definitions of rape are enshrined in law. I don’t believe men have it harder than woman, both have hardships in different ways Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged, or are men as a larger group disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:31 AM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themCompanies prefer to cut costs, prioritising profit over people. Guess that means they hate women, and would never put men are risk for the sake of profit! Again, the conclusion does not follow from the premise. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:22 AM |
| 3 | Yes, it's all of themYou literally declared that I, a British man, voted for him because I asked you to demonstrate that Trump was an MRA (which you still haven't done). Do you have some sort of brain injury or something? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:18 AM |
| 5 | Yes, it's all of themGaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged, or are men as a larger group disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:13 AM |
| 2 | Yes, it's all of themReally committing to that false dichotomy, huh? Keep on squawking. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 08:12 AM |
| 7 | Yes, it's all of themAt least she's answered my question of "what makes a female dummy" by example. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 01:06 AM |
| 7 | Yes, it's all of themBritish. You know you're presidential elections are only for America, right? You know you're not our colony anymore, right? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 01:04 AM |
| 8 | Yes, it's all of themYou know, you might be owed compensation from your country's education system for your level of reading comprehension. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:53 AM |
| 9 | Yes, it's all of themWould pointing out that you're distracting from the point because you're being shown to notnknownwhatvyoure talking about be considered "trying to steer the topic" to you? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:52 AM |
| 3 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?Baby steps, Philosophy 101: sometimes premises are true, but a conclusion might not be. For example: 1) an apple is a fruit. 2) Apple is a company Therefore Apple sells fruit, and they do so because they hate bananas. Do you understand that? Who am I kidding. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:50 AM |
| 5 | Yes, it's all of themSuccessfully, by pointing out the flaw in the argument structure. I didn't say something moronic like "You cited something on a platform, therefore it's wrong", like you did. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:36 AM |
| 2 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?Weren’t you the same person citing YouTube? "Feminists commit violence. Here's video evidence!" "OMG he's citing YouTube, what an idiot". And yes, opinion piece, because while individual facts are cited, the overall conclusion (that women have been systematically kept out of medical research out of some kind of spite) does not follow. No matter what fact I give you, you’re going to poke some nonexistent hole in it and then not-so-slyly try to steer the topic. You mean "keep going back to the top… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:34 AM |
| 15 | Yes, it's all of themI'm British, you indoctrinated rubber-chicken of an ideologue. But sure, go on and explain how a man in the UK apparently voting for Trump is evidence that Donald Trump advocates for, for instance, reproductive rights for men, equal treatment under the law, an end to Selective Service, and protection from homelessness. Go on, squawk for us again. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:32 AM |
| 9 | Yes, it's all of themMaybe for spamming low-effort troll comments. Maybe. Do let me know if it comes, I suspect it won't be for a while. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:23 AM |
| 6 | Yes, it's all of themI've linked you to two lists that includes: newspaper articles scientific research video evidence government statistics And you're crying foul. Let me guess, the only credible sources are the ones that unequivocably back up your position, right? You're hilariously bad at this, you know? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:21 AM |
| 14 | Yes, it's all of themI’m sure the MRA to MAGA pipeline is just a coincidence. Right, because mens advocates never existed before 2016. Really showing off that feminist education again, not to mention your American-centric worldview. Still waiting on you backing up the claim. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:19 AM |
| 2 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?Great job, you've found an opinion piece, claiming to go back to 1962. Now show that medicine has historically been specifically male, rather than human. Still waiting on that comparison of funding for "female" medical conditions compared to "male" ones. Or are you still going to hold that disadvantaging a birth category is the moral thing to do, as long as it's not yours? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:17 AM |
| 11 | Yes, it's all of themI’ll find myself being disagreed with in an echo chamber?? An echo chamber would have banned you long ago. Try "arguing" like you do on the feminist subreddits, and you'll see what an echo chamber does. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:14 AM |
| 9 | Yes, it's all of themBonus points if she can name any such policies that have actually made it into law. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:01 AM |
| 9 | Yes, it's all of themGaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged, or are men as a larger group disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 28/03/26 12:01 AM |
| 14 | Yes, it's all of themAre you seriously trying to imply that Donald Trump advocates for, for instance, reproductive rights for men, equal treatment under the law, an end to Selective Service, and protection from homelessness? That's a pretty wild claim. I presume you have evidence to back it up? Or did you just engage in a false dichotomy, that everyone who isn't a feminist must be a mens rights advocate? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:59 PM |
| 5 | Are there any women here?Yeah. You think the behaviour you're engaging in is what the other person is doing and not in fact what you are doing. Are you OK? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:52 PM |
| 1 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?You lack the education to defend your position. Because if you had an education, you'd be able to see the erroneous assumptions you're making. Are you going to keep making low-effort troll comments, or actually take the evidence on board? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:51 PM |
| 9 | Yes, it's all of them"You don't have credible sources!" "You're spamming with sources!" Flip-flopping, and crying foul in the face of copious amounts of evidence of feminist bad-action, including scientific research and video evidence. Truly a credit to your faith, shine on! | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:50 PM |
| 11 | Yes, it's all of themSociety is male dominated. So dominated that I’m more likely to die in a car crash than you, even if it’s the same severity And that male dominance has lead to actual legal rights that women have and men lack. Hell, gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. What other oppressed group in history had more actual legal rights than their oppressors? (debatable if it’s even a female dummy, given it was just a male dummy sca… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:41 PM |
| 1 | Paternity Fraud: Should Mandatory Testing Be Standard at Birth?I care That's really not coming out among the snark, bad-faith, and steadfast adherence to ideology in the face of evidence. But I don’t think mandating DNA tests is the answer. Crucify me! Great. How do you propose we tackle the issue of paternity fraud (which is often done from a position of trust)? Wouldn't it be great to a) know for sure that there's a genetic match with the parents and b) be forewarned of likelihood of hereditory diseases via genetic markers? Or is your issue that it would … | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:34 PM |
| 1 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?I’ve yet to address the point because I really don’t think you’re in a place to comprehend. You're right, I should be more like you and bury my head in the sand when presented with evidence that contradicts my hate-ideology. Men’s health has been the primary focus for nearly all of history. Health. Not specifically mens' health. Unless you have a credible source for that, such as a medieval manuscript talking about the importance of government funding for mens' health or something? Women were no… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:31 PM |
| 9 | Yes, it's all of themYou know people can click on the links and see that you're lying, right? Trust a feminist to say that video evidence of violence doesn't count when they do it. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:28 PM |
| 3 | Are there any women here?I see. Thanks for confirming that you don't know what you're talking about. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:27 PM |
| 5 | Are there any women here?Try again. Because what that user is doing is pointing out that you are engaging in the kinds of behaviour that you would censure immediately in a feminist forum. You seem to think this is that user's hypocrisy, rather than your own. Do enlighten us, what is this assessment missing? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 11:06 PM |
| 7 | Are there any women here?What hypocrisy? Speak on that. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:54 PM |
| 5 | Are there any women here?Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights (the vote) in exchange for citizenship responsibilities (civil and military conscription), and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; I'm the US, they still don't. It was always a hate movement. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:53 PM |
| 9 | Are there any women here?If someone goes to a womens rights advocacy space and tries to make the conversation about men, you'd call that derailing. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:52 PM |
| 12 | Yes, it's all of themExcept that feminist generalisations are based on conjecture, poor research methodology, bald faced lies, and violence if someone questions them. ((1), (2)) And again, you're conflating feminism (a political ideology) with women (a birth category) to make criticising feminists for the things the feminists-who-aren't-like-that should be criticising them for the equivalent to hatred of a birth category. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:51 PM |
| 1 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?And you've still to address the point. Really doing credit by that feminist education. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:48 PM |
| 1 | Paternity Fraud: Should Mandatory Testing Be Standard at Birth?I think it's fair to say that there is no number of victims that would be enough for you to have empathy for men's issues. Why are you here? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:40 PM |
| 9 | Yes, it's all of themGreat, now we're getting somewhere. What evidence do you have of MRA's "spread[ing] hate about women"? If you can find any, has this hate informed policy in academia, media, and the law, like the ones in the examples I linked to? Now, feminism is a hate movement because it's core principles are hateful. Specifically, the following is taken to be self-evident: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the system itsel… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:39 PM |
| 1 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?Or are you just moving the goal post because you were disproven? You found a mens' hospital and think that means there isn't a disparity in healthcare between the genders? I notice you didn't address the point, just like you haven't addressed the points in my other comments to you - I suspect this is because you don't have a good answer, and/or the evidence contradicts your ideology. Far be it for me to dent that ironclad commitment to your faith. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:26 PM |
| 1 | Paternity Fraud: Should Mandatory Testing Be Standard at Birth?Who said I don’t take it seriously? You've still to answer. I answered based on logistics, not emotion. You've still to answer. And I’m asking for facts, not emotions or morals. Commendable. Now, answer the question. You’re not providing them because you don’t have them. While normally I'd object to mind-reading, I don't have a source for frequency. Just as well I didn't make any claims to that effect. Now, once again, how many victims are too many? How many does it take for you to take an issue… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 10:24 PM |
| 1 | Paternity Fraud: Should Mandatory Testing Be Standard at Birth?You didn't ask me. Why are you so resistant to answer the question of how many men have to be victims before you take this issue seriously? I wonder if there even is a number that would spark your empathy. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:43 PM |
| 2 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?Fantastic. Now, have a look at the funding for male-associated cancer research (like prostate), and compare it to the funding for female-associated cancer research, like cervical or breast cancer. "But didn't you just say-" I just said female-associated, so don't go pulling that. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:41 PM |
| 1 | Paternity Fraud: Should Mandatory Testing Be Standard at Birth?You didn't answer the question. How many victims is enough to take an issue seriously? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:33 PM |
| 2 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?The Equity argument (that, as you've outlined, it's OK to entrench disparities in rights if one group feels like the other "deserves" it based on alleged crimes that any given person of the "deserving" group likely didn't commit) relies on the notion that women lack rights that men have. I presume you have a few you'd like to talk about. In the meantime, here are some rights men lack that women have: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Do… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:33 PM |
| 2 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?Here's one for starters. Now, you're going to claim that this isn't valid, because it also does obs/gyn stuff, but that would be claiming that breast cancer doesn't impact men. Your turn: where are the mens' hospitals, or government committees for mens' health? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:28 PM |
| 1 | Paternity Fraud: Should Mandatory Testing Be Standard at Birth?How often is this issue happening? Do you have any stats or numbers? How many jurisdictions allow this? Dont many have different stipulations? How many victims is enough for you to consider the issue worthwhile? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:25 PM |
| 1 | Texas Rep. Talarico Talks Men's IssuesIMO, men’s rights activists aren’t as concerned with speaking about men’s issues as they are with wanting women’s issues silenced. If all the discussion of mens rights issues on the subreddit isn't speaking about mens' issues, I don't know what it is. Do you have any actual sources, or is it simply an opinion that you'll stay 100% committed to regardless of evidence? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:22 PM |
| 2 | Can someone find me stats on whether medical tests are now done on women as much as they are done on men?Now do cancers, chronic illnesses, and mental illnesses. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:21 PM |
| 26 | Yes, it's all of themDo you realise that the inverse of "man" is not "feminist"? Let me put it more bluntly: a political affiliation is not a birth category. Spreading hate about a gender is not acceptable; observing on the way in which feminists entrench, expand, and enshrine rights disparities between the sexes in law ((1), (2)) is. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 09:20 PM |
| 80 | Are there any women here?a random woman just said that I'm a pick me and a "soon-to-be perpetrator" It continues to astound me that people think it's OK to assign such awful labels to kids. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 08:19 PM |
| 1 | I'm terrified of how easily a false accusation can destroy a man's life.Congrats. Relevance? | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 07:44 AM |
| 1 | I'm terrified of how easily a false accusation can destroy a man's life.Actually it was the same Australian woman who falsely accused every single one of those men! A detail that is irrelevant to the rate at which accusations are false. Most rapes are carried out by serial offenders, too (though try convincing feminists not to assign responsibility to the vast majority if men who aren't cuilent). Anyway... the pasta that Im making for my husband is burning, I bet you're wondering how pasta can burn. Im not going to tell you. Are you OK? Looks like you're crashing ou… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 07:44 AM |
| 3 | Do feminists talk more about the "male loneliness epidemic" than we do?Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights (the vote) in exchange for citizenship responsibilities (civil and military conscription), and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; I'm the US, they still don't. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 07:40 AM |
| 4 | Do feminists talk more about the "male loneliness epidemic" than we do?I'm in the UK. Here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about through statutory rape of the father. I g… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 07:34 AM |
| 5 | Do feminists talk more about the "male loneliness epidemic" than we do?That is part of the comment you're pretending you can't see. There are lines separating the text from the post you're claiming isnt there from the rest of the comment. Do try again. It's interesting that you don't address any other points. J suppose you are steadfastly committed to your current level of understanding. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 07:31 AM |
| 1 | I'm terrified of how easily a false accusation can destroy a man's life.And yet 1 in 6 Australian men have been falsely accused Your source uses extremely limited criteria for categorising an allegation as false, which lends to downplaying the true rate with false negatives. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/26 12:10 AM |
| 15 | Do feminists talk more about the "male loneliness epidemic" than we do?Your link to a deleted reddit post is not the argument you think it is. Interesting. The linked comments (with the arguments and sources I'm using) show up just fine. You wouldn't happen to be outright lying in the hope that nobody checks, would you? In case its just incompetence, here's the text: Your second link literally says "Currently feminism doesn't benefit men". That, at least, is consistent with the evidence I sent you. The problem with feminism is that all forms of it take the followin… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/26 11:57 PM |
| 16 | Do feminists talk more about the "male loneliness epidemic" than we do?All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 26/03/26 11:33 PM |
| 1 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.They're not all that extreme. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. With that lens, defining domestic violence as something men do to women makes some amount of sense; likewise, feminist researchers like Mary Koss deciding that it's "not appropriate" to call forced sex on men by women rape makes sense in this context. Most grassroots feminists will repeat the talking points of these "extremists"… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/26 06:10 PM |
| 20 | What laws can you find that directly discriminate against men?Where I am, the UK, the sexual offences act defines rape as something a person does "with his penis", thus making women immune from a charge of rape. When petitioned to gender neutralise the definition, the government's response was no, on the basis that "most rapists are men". Given that the definition excludes women, I'm amazed it's as few as "most". | /r/MensRights | 19/03/26 10:09 PM |
| 1 | Patriarchy doesn't have to be run by men. Women run patriarchal systems tooYes I see Americans, Israelis killing innocents at this very moment. TIL the middle east is Western Culture. This is what westerners have always done. No eastern nation ever had imperial designs, really? Then don't cry about patriarchy it was invented by the white men you love You have yet to prove it was in the first place. So far all we have is your word for it, for all it's worth given the number of baseless and blatantly false statements you've made. | /r/MensRights | 17/03/26 04:03 PM |
| 6 | Patriarchy doesn't have to be run by men. Women run patriarchal systems tooWell all the early scholars were European men. Who are you talking about? And when they invented the term Early scholars, who are all men, invented the term Patriarchy as feminists use it today? they used it to write books on how much better patriarchy is compared to matriarchy. Such as? Can you name a single one? Because the European way of thinking is if you are not waging wars, controlling people, taking away their land, what are you even doing Gonna need yet more citations for that one. The … | /r/MensRights | 17/03/26 04:01 PM |
| 6 | Patriarchy doesn't have to be run by men. Women run patriarchal systems tooAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 16/03/26 10:37 PM |
| 3 | Men like Louis Theroux or Kier Starmer being in prominent positions does men no good.I was downvoted for telling people to get out of the echo chamber An echo chamber would ban anyone from voicing a dissenting opinion, thus preserving the "purity" of the space. You're claiming that you keep doing that, so clearly this isn't an echo chamber. and do something that actually has an impact on society. Again, you seem to be placing talking and doing as mutually exclusive things. How do you propose organising to "do something that actually has an impact on society" without talking abou… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/26 04:14 PM |
| 6 | Men like Louis Theroux or Kier Starmer being in prominent positions does men no good.I see. So you were downvoted for telling people to stop talking about mens rights advocacy, as if talking about things and doing them are mutually exclusive. Have you considered that the problem isn't with the community in this case? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/26 12:46 PM |
| 3 | Men like Louis Theroux or Kier Starmer being in prominent positions does men no good.The only people who use the term "manosphere" unironically tend to be people trying to lump advocates for rights in with hateful grifters. I haven't spotted anyone supporting "the behaviour of some of the “influencers” that are spotlighted on the show", but I have seen plenty of people talking about how dishonest it is to portray mens rights advocacy as embodied by Tate. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/26 09:15 AM |
| 6 | Men like Louis Theroux or Kier Starmer being in prominent positions does men no good.Such as? | /r/MensRights | 16/03/26 09:09 AM |
| 5 | Time to Up our Game - “Woke” as a word is dead (2024-2025)I’ve experienced reverse discrimination Another meaningless euphemism, implying that discrimination has a "correct" direction, which can be "reversed" into an inappropriate one. All discrimination is in the same direction - the wrong one. The issue with "Woke" is the same one as "Social Justice", in that it's ambiguous. Who doesn't want to be awake? Who doesn't want justice? If a thing is sexist, I call it sexist; if a thing is racist, I call it racist. None of this "reverse racism" silliness, i… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/26 10:25 AM |
| 10 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.Feminism is looking to have fairness to both sexes, not just females. Here's a few examples of feminists' track record on fighting for equality. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 02:48 PM |
| 4 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.Yet weirdly I see many people defending these types in the comments which is extremely confusing. Who? edit: lol, radio silence. Just as I thought. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 02:46 PM |
| 3 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.It's not conceding, my point all along was that these aren't inherently masculine, it's about harmful stereotypes So you failed the brief when asked to present traits that were not gender neutral. That is, in fact, a concession. Not what I said "mentorship and fatherhood roles, protective responsibility, courage, Brotherhood." are the non-toxic masculine traits, in your opinion. Those are protector and provider roles. You cited Aragorn as an example, and he's someone who engages in all of the be… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 12:52 PM |
| 2 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.Christ, where I say they were inherently "male traits" Thank you for again conceding that what you are calling masculinity isn't specifically male. Or perhaps, the issue is you're intentionally missing the entire point again and again where I clearly stated these are harmful gender stereotypes. They are extreme niche behaviours that are attributed to masculinity, to men, and ones that men embody. And because they are applied to men, somehow that gives them legitimacy. If someone seriously propos… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 12:43 PM |
| 1 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideStill not addressing the points. I guess that's confirmed concession. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 12:10 PM |
| 3 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.But we are seriously not this dense Not like the guy who cites gender neutral traits, acknowledges that they're gender neutral, then tries to say that despite being gender neutral, we should still gender them. Why are we so desperate to play dumb and ignore the context / bigger picture. That being that you are 100% in favour of assigning negative and harmful stereotypes to men. There's a post every other day about men's mental health, or men being unfairly perceived as aggressors. Yet here peopl… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 12:10 PM |
| 1 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideTry again. You can read, I believe in you! | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 12:06 PM |
| 1 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.addressed when I stated "these obviously aren't biologically limited to men" Thank you for conceding that you weren't actualy describing masculine traits. Generally if these roles are being criticised, it's when they're emovidied in a rigid and oppressive sense Whereas men being protectors and providers in such a way that benefits women at the expense of themselves and other men is A-OK. Behavioural trends clearly show that gender expression and behaviours are different between men and women. So… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 12:05 PM |
| 4 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.I have never seen anyone talking about “healthy femininity” or “toxic femininity”, I recall seeing a feminist article talking about toxic femininity. Essentially it was describing it as behaviours that lead to enduring mens evil behaviour and letting it go unchallenged, leading to more suffering of women. Go figure, toxic masculinity means men are evil; toxic feminity means men are evil and women are victims. Why yes, it is a feminist concept, what gave it away? | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 09:01 AM |
| 3 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.Men shouldn't subscribe to sexist outdated stereotypes for masculinity. That is very clearly something we should be pushing discussions to dissuade. Unless it's Aragorn, from a book written nearly a center ago, sharing traits with heroes from the BCs, as per your other comments. That traditional masculinity, characterised by service, protection, provision, and the willingness to dispose of yourself, is the "good" traditional masculinity. Never mind that to be a protector and provider, you need a… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 08:58 AM |
| 3 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.After removing things like emotional suppression, dominance, entitlement, aggression None of which wome do apparently. mentorship and fatherhood roles, protective responsibility, courage, Brotherhood. Protector and provider roles. I forget, is the feminist position pro or anti traditional gender roles? Or is their opposition to them reserved for women only? these obviously aren't biologically limited to men So they're gender neutral, meaning you've failed to fulfil the brief. Try again. but they… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 08:51 AM |
| 1 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideWhen you trivialize rape, you are generally a bad fucking person. That's not what's happening, unless your looking at it from a perspective that sees abuse of men as trivial. Thank you for clarifying that you trivialise abuse, and are, by your own reasoning, generally a bad person. | /r/MensRights | 10/03/26 08:34 AM |
| 9 | UK: Louis Theroux issues chilling warning to every parent of boys after abusive run-ins filming Netflix Manosphere documentary. OP: More anti male propaganda.It's not that masculinity is bad clearly, it's the type of "masculinity" these creators pursue which is the issue. If you could remove the toxicity from masculinity, what is left that isn't a gender neutral trait? Assuming you can find any, what mainstream influences promote recogjition and empowerment of this non-toxic masculinity? | /r/MensRights | 09/03/26 11:58 PM |
| 1 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideI think these questions are too complicated for them. Narrative-challenging observations tend to be for these people. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/26 06:03 PM |
| 28 | Is "The Future Is Female" Hate Speech?Given the origins of the phrase, it's about as hateful as "the final solution". | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 05:52 AM |
| 5 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideSpeak on that. How is wanting to have the same separate sex from parenthood that women have indicatove of being an awful person? Are you perhaps suggesting that women are awful people for wanting to keep their reproductive rights? If your issue is just with the term, what would you prefer it be called? | /r/MensRights | 08/03/26 05:47 AM |
| 19 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideClaimed, not proven. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/26 09:21 PM |
| 19 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideWell all you have to do is look around this subreddit. So it wasn't the reason you thought nobody will ever take the MRM seriously. The term is widely used. As is “paper abortion” So's Misogyny. Is wide usage evidence that it's false somehow? which is just simply wanting the ability to abandon your child and be a dead beat dad. Have you considered that it's a way by which men can have the same reproductive rights as women, specifically the right to separate sex from parenthood? The entire moveme… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/26 08:12 PM |
| 19 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideIf they're meaning what I think they're meaning, you're referring to administrative abuse (using administrative systems as a tool to harass and abuse others, such as divorce courts and child protective services). Is it so false an equivalency when an abuser's weapon of choice is the state? Further, is one reddit user's use of the term a valid reason that "no one will ever take the MRM seriously"? "Nah, dawg, never mind the actual legal rights disparities, never mind the suicide, some rando on th… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/26 08:03 PM |
| 133 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideNeat! So when men commit suicide due to false rape allegations, we can see false accusers prosecuted for manslaughter, right? Right? | /r/MensRights | 07/03/26 07:58 PM |
| 16 | Man appears in court charged with manslaughter as it is claimed domestic abuse of woman, 36, contributed to her suicideSpeak on that, what exactly is the reason you're citing? | /r/MensRights | 07/03/26 07:58 PM |
| 1 | What does feminist actually mean?True feminism is fighting for women to be treated like human and to end sexism. Unfortunately, that's not the whole picture. It's what you just said, predicated, for the vast majority, on the belief that women are oppressed and men are an oppressor class ("Patriarchy"). All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discr… | /r/MensRights | 10/02/26 05:23 PM |
| 13 | What does feminist actually mean?All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). In short, mens rights advocacy will necessarily be antifeminist as long as feminists in media, academia, and law are anti male. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/26 04:08 AM |
| 3 | Remember it's not your faultWhile it once advocated for liberation "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 05/02/26 10:36 PM |
| 3 | I'm a dangeous predator!But do talk about your feelings, gentlemen. | /r/MensRights | 04/02/26 11:08 PM |
| 1 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?So, I agree with you and you're going to argue with me? You make incoherent points, and I'll point out that they're incoherent. Are your end questions, rhetorical? If you have an answer for them, I'm all ears. Because it seems to be the case that you believe talking about mens issues is whining, but we should absolutely talk about them, but whining is bad and unmasculine, and we shouldn't do it. These positions cannot exist in the same person at the same time. So which is it? | /r/MensRights | 24/01/26 06:58 PM |
| 1 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?See, again, you're hurt from my context of how I phrase things. You're claiming to mind-read. I'm asking you, given that you seem to equate talking about mens issues with "complaining" and a failure of masculinity, how one talks about mens issues in a way that you would deem acceptable. I'm not complaining "all soft and victims of everything". Seems like you take a dim view of men talking about their issues! I'm trying to stress that instead of only talking about it, do something about it. Which… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/26 06:55 PM |
| 1 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?So men should talk about their issues, but they shouldn't be victims. How does that what work, if talking about these things means they've internalised a victimised mindset? It's just "MRAs are whiners and losers" with extra mental gymnastics. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/26 09:22 AM |
| 2 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?Why do you believe that this sub exists, if not to point out injustices to men, "Are we doing anything for mens' rights or just posting to complain about things?" Which is it? Is talking about mens issues good, or simply the whining of a victim mentality? | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 10:56 PM |
| 2 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?It's unfortunate that not only is a constructive discussion on its way out, but men can't even see it to support other men I don't think that word means what you think it means. Someone complaining about men "complaining" when people talk about mens issues is not supporting men. How about instead of addressing the way that a comment is made, address the comment itself? OK. Since talking about mens' issues is "complaining", how do you propose advocacy and activism against systemic injustice witho… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 08:01 PM |
| 3 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?How do you propose advocacy and activism against systemic injustice without talking about it, thus offending your delicate sensibilities on what it means to be "masculine"? Surely you can answer that question! Nobody else in your position has been able to. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 07:58 PM |
| 1 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?I'm trying to show men what is (or is not) going on here You're complaining that people are talking about mens' issues, citing "the good old days" as somehow better without explaining what you mean. You're interpreting anything other than unconditional agreement as insulting you, and ironically hurting your feelings. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 07:57 PM |
| 3 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?or should I say, as they used to be. Beasts of burden, disposable protectors and providers, cannon-fodder? Care to elaborate? However, this is what I'm saying, that if I try to point out the downfall of what is constantly happening Your thesis seems to be "men are talking about their issues, and this needs to stop". and you as a man (I think) insult me, then what are we doing here? And you call us victims. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 07:56 PM |
| 3 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?I'm not going to apologize for being blunt Nobody asked you too. Defensive much? There were days where men didn't have to filter their views to other men. Nobody asking you to filter. I'm asking you a question, that you have refused to answer despite taking the time to reply. It does bother me to no end how I try to have a constructive discussion "Are we doing anything for mens' rights or just posting to complain about things? I've seen a lot of men lately that seem to be defending women, more t… | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 07:54 PM |
| 9 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?How do you propose advocacy and activism against systemic injustice without talking about it, thus offending your delicate sensibilities on what it means to be "masculine"? Edit: It's funny how nobody who posts here to complain (or perhaps...to whine?) about "victim mindsets" and "whining" can't answer this question. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 06:40 AM |
| 8 | Have newer generations of men, all become soft and victims of everything? Does anyone really support mens' rights any more? Or, is it just sharing posts?How do you propose advocacy and activism against systemic injustice without talking about it, thus offending your delicate sensibilities on what it means to be "masculine"? Edit: It's funny how nobody who posts here to complain (or perhaps...to whine?) about "victim mindsets" and "whining" can't answer this question. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/26 06:36 AM |
| 29 | How ‘enthusiastic consent’ videos led to artist Anthony Lister’s rapid acquittalIn the UK, the rhetoric has been to "increase successful convictions" - what's an "unsuccessful conviction", if not an acquittal? The only way this makes sense is if one is presumed guilty without possibility of innocence. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/26 11:58 AM |
| 7 | What would you reply to a feminist who claims that women can’t be as evil as men, by blaming all crimes on men alone?Yes. And if it was the case, it wouldn't be a tiny minority committing the violence. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/26 10:57 PM |
| 6 | What would you reply to a feminist who claims that women can’t be as evil as men, by blaming all crimes on men alone?Most men aren't criminal and/or violent. Just like most women. That's not a bad position, it's refusing the frame of "masculinity is violent" | /r/MensRights | 19/01/26 08:07 PM |
| 1 | Hard look in the mirrorHow do you propose advocacy and activism against systemic injustice without talking about it, thus offending your delicate sensibilities on what it means to be "masculine"? | /r/MensRights | 17/01/26 10:47 AM |
| 2 | Hard look in the mirror"[Whatever systemic injustice] isn't fair!" My advice is be strong enough to change it or tough enough to withstand it How do you propose advocacy and activism against systemic injustice without talking about it, thus offending your delicate sensibilities on what it means to be "masculine"? | /r/MensRights | 16/01/26 05:51 PM |
| 10 | Suggestions for the training of psychotherapists?I did my masters project on male-friendly counselling, drawing primarily from Tom Golden's "The Way Men Heal". The bullet-point list in the Summary section reads: Men and women show distinct preferences in therapy, yet underrepresentation of men may skew counselling theory and practice towards a feminine bias. Men face real social, economic, and legal issues, with relatively little in the way of resources to help them. Listen, empathise, and be aware of your presuppositions when working with mal… | /r/MensRights | 16/01/26 01:06 PM |
| 1 | Are government petitions for men’s rights worth it?What are you doing here in men's rights What are you doing here if discussion of mens issues is so upsetting to you? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 06:50 PM |
| 2 | Are government petitions for men’s rights worth it?More insightful than your commentary. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 06:49 PM |
| 3 | Are government petitions for men’s rights worth it?there are actual topics to talk about concerning men's rights (which i support) Such as? Again, how do you propose we discuss these things without discussing them? How can we talk about the rights disparities without acknowledging that there's a disparity (thus being an unmanly victim to your fragile worldview)? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 06:48 PM |
| 5 | Are government petitions for men’s rights worth it?You haven't answered the question. What would be a way to advocate for rights for men without talking about the issues and thus upsetting your delicate sense of masculinity? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 06:46 PM |
| 5 | Are government petitions for men’s rights worth it?okay how about this. this whole post is a what aboutism. I don't think you know what that means. it's completely made up and in a fantasized negative space. OP is exploring theory. a majority of the posts on this subreddit are people claiming a fantasized victimhood You mean disparities in rights with a verifiable paper trail? and it's the most unmanly thing I could possibly ever think of. How do you propose advocacy for rights for men happens in such a way that doesn't involve talking about it … | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 04:39 PM |
| 5 | Are government petitions for men’s rights worth it?Do you have literally anything to contribute? | /r/MensRights | 12/01/26 01:41 PM |
| 1 | I don’t understand the gender warsI'm not a feminist though Then why are you bristling at criticism of people using feminist ideology to entrench disparities in rights between the genders? And I'm not against criticism, Your previous commentary seems at odds with this. I'm against generalization and mischaracterization. I provided evidence of the positive claim, that feminists are like that. Even the ones who "aren't like that" still subscribe to a hate ideology as long as they believe in Patriarchy. You've still to contribute a… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/26 08:25 PM |
| 1 | I don’t understand the gender warsDoubling down it is. You mean the feminists who represent the ideology at the policy level in media, academia, and law? Most feminists are normal people that mean no harm. Great. Then there should be no issue with me criticising the people you should be criticising. They don't represent you? Tell them, not us! Defensive much? Coming from someone whose only reaction to evidence is insult. You haven't a leg to stand on and you know it. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/26 11:11 AM |
| 3 | Is Men's Rights Movement becoming boring ?Wow, what an insightful, nuanced view that is completely connected with observable reality. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/26 07:07 AM |
| 1 | I don’t understand the gender warsDo you have anything to contribute or are you going to double down on calling people criticising IRL law and policy "chronically online extremists"? I suspect you go to the insult because there's nothing you can say to the overwhelming amount of evidence. It's a poor attempt to distract from the issues at hand. | /r/MensRights | 10/01/26 06:59 AM |
| 8 | Why is it so frowned upon for a man to have boundaries in a relationship, and even if he has them he’s scrutinized and forced to justify them?In fairness women weren't permitted to own property, control finances Wrong. There are plenty of historical records showing women owning property. The myth comes from a misconception of coverture law, where a married woman ("femme covert") was entitled to the financial upkeep of her husband, and the husband had the right to use her property (note, her property) to that end - for instance. This changed with the Married Womens Property Act, which allowed femme-covert women the same freedoms as fem… | /r/MensRights | 09/01/26 11:51 PM |
| 5 | Why is it so frowned upon for a man to have boundaries in a relationship, and even if he has them he’s scrutinized and forced to justify them?"The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/26 06:53 PM |
| 12 | Why is it so frowned upon for a man to have boundaries in a relationship, and even if he has them he’s scrutinized and forced to justify them?All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 09/01/26 06:52 PM |
| 8 | Three-year-olds learn to reject toxic masculinity at London schoolsAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 09/01/26 06:49 PM |
| 7 | I don’t understand the gender warsFeminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 09/01/26 08:23 AM |
| 10 | I don’t understand the gender warsFeminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 09/01/26 08:23 AM |
| 3 | “Crazy ex girlfriend”Do you have the honesty to own your unwarranted victim complexes? Can you evidence your claim? "Victim complex" is a pretty serious claim, and you seem to be using it to downplay a person's experience of victim-blaming for their attempted murder. My opinion is "you shouldn't always take the worst possible interpretation of any happenstance, especially in an area so fraught with misunderstanding as human language"- how brutally controversial. I would assume this would have been clarified if that … | /r/MensRights | 07/01/26 04:26 PM |
| 5 | Feminism today is often a caste system. It’s often sexist and supremacist in nature."The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/26 03:04 AM |
| 5 | “Crazy ex girlfriend”The devil has enough advocates. Own your opinion. That's a niche interpretation and you know it. | /r/MensRights | 07/01/26 02:53 AM |
| 14 | Why I'm against feminism- circumcision.I've always been cut, but at no point did I feel down or low and somehow inferior to anyone You don't have experience of a before and after comparison, so it's not a legitimate point? | /r/MensRights | 02/01/26 06:07 AM |
| 10 | Feminism is out of control now."The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/25 04:08 AM |
| 26 | Is "Believe Women" Misandrist?In practice it's "believe women if it hurts a man". Nobody in power believes a woman who, for instance, claims that an accused man doesn't act like the accusations imply behind closed doors. Interestingly, in the UK at least, investigation of rape and sexual assault includes interviewing past relationships to look for an ongoing pattern of bad behaviour. But an ongoing pattern of good behaviour is inadmissible as evidence. | /r/MensRights | 28/12/25 05:54 AM |
| 26 | Normal book titles nowadaysYeah, if you look at statistics of murdered women, you'll find that 100% of the victims are women! Interestingly, prior to the creation of the first domestic violence shelters, spousal murder was gender non-directional. When women had a place to go to escape domestic violence, they stopped killing their husbands as much. So even if one only cares about female victims, it is still in your interests to support mens rights advocacy for recognition and resources for kale victims of domestic violence… | /r/MensRights | 24/12/25 09:08 AM |
| 25 | Normal book titles nowadaysNow compare it to statistics for murdered men. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/25 08:44 AM |
| 5 | I dont care if women dont "feel" safe.And it is most always perpetrated by men. Thank you for conceding that violent men would rather hurt men than women. It rather puts a hole in the whole Patriarchy thing, but hey. However, sexual violence occurs at a rate much higher for women. Reportedly. Part of that is thanks to feminists like Mary Koss, whose work was instrumental in defining rape as something only a man can do. In the UK, it explicitly says in the Sexual Offences Act that rapebis something a person does "with his penis". Not… | /r/MensRights | 22/12/25 11:55 PM |
| 8 | I dont care if women dont "feel" safe.I doubt that happens to you. I'd wager it's extremely unlikely in general too. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/25 11:41 PM |
| 33 | Researchers find reverse sexual double standard in sextech use.It implies that there is an appropriate direction for a double standard (in this case, men as privileged and women as victims). It's why I never use terms like "reverse sexism", because all sexism is in the same direction - the wrong one. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/25 12:52 PM |
| 1 | Peak MisandryIf you think this is peak, check out the successes of feminists in media, academia, and law! | /r/MensRights | 19/12/25 05:17 AM |
| 1 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.Lol. You're asking for evidence, like you don't utterly refuse to evidence your claims? You're hilarious. Why are you here? It's clearly not to engage in good faith. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/25 05:15 AM |
| 1 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.Reading comprehension failure. Try again. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/25 05:10 AM |
| 0 | The Femosphere special victims unit has moved on to women in prison.Going to need to see some evidence of that. I get it though, it's really hard for some people to let go of the idea that torturing citizens who may or may not be guilty is fun and right, that some people "deserve" torture. It could never happen to you, right? False accusations never happen, right? | /r/MensRights | 19/12/25 05:09 AM |
| 2 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.And yet, despite taking the time to respond, you choose not to answer with any evidence. That says a lot about you. | /r/MensRights | 19/12/25 05:06 AM |
| 3 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.The person you responded to was referencing the sex offender's registry, suggesting an equivalency. Why are you arguing with the person you were responding to as if they were OP and made the same point? It looks like you're just here to contradict, diminish, minimise, and otherwise derail conversations from discussion of mens rights advocacy and methods to rectify disparities. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 10:33 PM |
| 6 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.The sex offender registry is for people convicted of crimes by the state, and in the US by a jury of their peers. Yes. And a false accuser's registry would be for people convicted of the crime by the state, by a jury of their peers. This would, of course, require that the state actually prosecute abusers who use the legal and carceral systems as their tools of abuse. But it's a neat idea. I’m against BOTH. So this wasn't an attempt to minimise and dismiss the person you were replying to by intim… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 10:23 PM |
| 5 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.So having a registry of female abusers like the one for male abusers is terrible and a threat to innocent people, but also it's fine because you can look up registered sex offenders regardless of gender? You've flipped back and forth on your opinion on this. Are you OK? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 10:02 PM |
| 3 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.Yeah. It's funny how the evil MRAs have a greater sense of empathy than their detractors, in that we can care about things that happen to people other than ourselves. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:57 PM |
| 8 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.I'll repeat: Was this regular users, or saboteurs looking to have it taken down? Do you have literally any evidence? <Edit> Radio silence, just what I expected </edit> I notice you keep failing to provide any evidence or answer any awkward questions. Would you rather you were simply believed as an Authority on whatever you talk about without having to show your work? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:57 PM |
| 2 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.You said they should ban remanding people awaiting trial outright. Full stop. Have you heard of things like "house arrest"? That keeps people in one place without putting them in torture cages! That way we don't have to torture people who are legally innocent (and maybe even factually so as well)! Isn't that wonderful? I see you're avoiding the questions, which is often the tactic of people without good answers who can't admit it. You claim you're here for mens rights issues discussion, but your… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:55 PM |
| 3 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.Oh absolutely. I still like to call out bullshit when I see it though. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:52 PM |
| 9 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.Says the guy following my account around. It's funny, whenever I've held people to account for what they've said (such as defending the torture of innocent people on the basis of a hypothetical you invented ), they've immediately tried to play victim by crying Stalker. It was called the Teaborn app. It was banned because it was sharing photos of revenge porn and minors. OK. Was this regular users, or saboteurs looking to have it taken down? Do you have literally any evidence? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:45 PM |
| 2 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.But you undermined your own cause by saying no one should be detained pre trial which anyone with a brain understands why that’s fucking stupid. I said, if you read the post, that people on remand are legally innocent. Not detaining people who have not been proven of a crime, especially non-violent crimes, would reduce the strain and torture conditions. You are opposed to that, and thus you are pro torture. Your justification was (without evidence) a hypothetical you invented, justifying people … | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:42 PM |
| 5 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.Again, no sources. This thing doesn't exist because it does and is used for evil, but it doesn't exist. Are you OK? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:39 PM |
| 5 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.Congrats. You posted out thread from earlier. Shine on, shine on! Well done! Nothing about what I said earlier say I don’t care about innocent men or women. You support torture of innocent people (and non-innocent people) because of hypothetical criminals. This is exactly the own I think it is. Why are you here, anyway? It looks like you just use your account to mock, insult, and present weaksauce anti-MRM arguments while setting yourself up as a moral superior. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:35 PM |
| 5 | I’m sick of people weaponizing false accusations. We need a registry.This will hurt innocent people. You don't care about hurting innocent people. Or perhaps you only care about innocent women only. How virtuous. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:30 PM |
| 3 | The Femosphere special victims unit has moved on to women in prison.Some get shot, some get wounded then arrested, and some put down their guns and let themselves be arrested. And you've yet to provide numbers for that, compared to people held on remand for drug offences. Or false accusations of whatever. Bear in mind, this was all said in the context of prisons being in violation of torture laws due to overcrowding. Not keeping innocent people in cages is a pretty good start to reducing torture conditions. Sentencing men like we sentence women would be another … | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 06:48 PM |
| 2 | The Femosphere special victims unit has moved on to women in prison.Really. People arrested while shooting up a building, and not simply shot? Going to need some numbers on that, since you still haven't answered the question. Playing to stereotypes doesn't count as evidence. I notice you failed to answer the question about your support for torture of citizens regardless of guilt. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 06:38 PM |
| 3 | The Femosphere special victims unit has moved on to women in prison.How often does that happen? Compared to, say, drug offences? Further, why do you support torture of citizens, regardless of their guilt? | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 06:34 PM |
| 9 | The Femosphere special victims unit has moved on to women in prison.Where I'm from, prisons are literally in violation of anti-torture laws due to overcrowding. Two clear and easy ways they could allieviate the overcrowding are: 1) Do not imprison people awaiting trial. "On Remand" prisoners are awaiting trial, and therefore have not been proven guilty yet, and as such are legally innocent. Yes, this does mean that the prison system is torturing legally innocent citizens. 2) Sentence men the way we sentence women. Given the prison sentencing discount, if we sent… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 12:54 PM |
| 51 | The Femosphere special victims unit has moved on to women in prison.In Scotland, there are about 300 female prisoners to about 7100 male prisoners. We basically already practice prison abolition, but only for women. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 12:22 PM |
| 2 | I voted for the one who didn't body shame me.Voting for feminists, voting to "own the feminists", it's Alien vs Predator. Whoever wins, men lose. I'll let you decide which is which. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:30 AM |
| 0 | I voted for the one who didn't body shame me.The comment section seems to disagree with you. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:28 AM |
| 5 | Teachers to be trained to spot early signs of misogyny in boysIt is acknowledging the fact that statistically speaking, the men of today commit a disproportionately higher percentage of rape. Most countries define rape as requiring penetrative sex organs. The UKs sexual offences act defines it as something someone does "with his penis". So no, men don't commit "a disproportionately higher percentage of rape", they commit 100% of rapes because when women force sex on people we don't call it rape. Can you see why that is relevant to mens rights advocacy? Doe… | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 09:23 AM |
| 12 | Teachers to be trained to spot early signs of misogyny in boysYou don't see how a one sided scrutiny for hatred isn't discrimination? The issue seems to be only combating misogyny. It's once again the portrayal of boys (I.e., male children) as dangerous to adult women. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 03:01 AM |
| 13 | Teachers to be trained to spot early signs of misogyny in boysThank you for your valuable contribution to the discussion. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/25 02:17 AM |
| 1 | Why is there so much focus on immigrants being male?What a stunning and insightful contribution! | /r/MensRights | 17/12/25 10:37 PM |
| 13 | Thank you! 💕Why the hate? | /r/MensRights | 16/12/25 05:52 AM |
| 173 | Company solves gender pay gap by cutting men's wagesThe idea that companies will pay 33% more in wages to surround the bosses with dick is core to the wage gap myth - it's arguing that capitalism is not ruthlessly profit focused! Why wouldn't women dominate the workforce if employers could get away with a 33% spending reduction by not hiring men? | /r/MensRights | 16/12/25 05:49 AM |
| 6 | It's not feminism, it's misandryAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). Misandry is core to the feminist movement | /r/MensRights | 16/12/25 05:42 AM |
| 1 | How can I get along with my boyfriend's parents? I'm meeting them for the first time. How will they know if I'm a good match for their son? How can they test me? I love him and I don't want to mess anything up.OK? So why post on a rights advocacy subreddit about it? | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 11:03 PM |
| 2 | How can I get along with my boyfriend's parents? I'm meeting them for the first time. How will they know if I'm a good match for their son? How can they test me? I love him and I don't want to mess anything up.I think you're in the wrong subreddit. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 09:13 PM |
| 2 | Are feminists evil?I can’t even express how much I don’t care because I’m not even reading it. And yet you're still responding. Bud, I’m pro men’s rights Great, why are you defending people who entrench gender disparities? I don’t even want to listen to you so good luck making any changes in the real world with thst Oh man. There goes my one chance to make any difference! u/Mammoth-Ebb-5670 won't listen to me! My potencey is entirely undone! Alas and woe! Get over yourself. You were unable to address the points ra… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 06:33 PM |
| 2 | Are feminists evil?you twisting things for the sake of arguing You mean "Quoting points to address them individually". without the skills to understand what I’m saying You know people can read the comments and see that this isn't true, right? I’m to the point I’m not even reading what you respond Yes, that's how you have a discussion and learn things, by ignoring the other person and refusing to engage with their points. where it clearly displays that you like to be angry and not listen Wow, a mind reader too! Ple… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 05:33 PM |
| 50 | It's not feminism, it's misandryAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). Misandry is core to the feminist movement. Anybody that brings up "real feminism" or "real feminists" is more often than not engaging in a No True Scotsman… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 05:14 PM |
| 2 | Are feminists evil?False equivalent Right. One group categorised whole groups of people as second class citizens with the goal of murder, the other engages in protests to prevent discussion of mens' suicide, successfully lobby to define rape as male-only, prevent male victims of domestic violence from getting resources, and successfully lobby against recognition of fathers as equal value parents. Obviously, the nazis as a whole were evil, in my opinion Even the ones with "good intentions"? Also, yes, there were so… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 05:13 PM |
| 5 | Are feminists evil?I explained the difference. No, you denied that Patriarchy has anything to do with feminism on the basis that it's just "to grant autonomy to women for the sake of their own independence if they prefer that life". That fails to recognise the central role that Patriarchy conjecture holds in feminist philosophy, with its necessary casting of men as monsters. In case you need the reminder: Patriarchy conjecture takes the following to be self-evident: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privile… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 05:05 PM |
| 0 | Are feminists evil?To answer your question, no, a person is not good if they subscribe to an evil ideology. So people who ascribe to an evil ideology are not-good. Isn't that an attack on the person, not the ideology? I'm being flippant. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists acti… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 02:19 PM |
| 2 | Are feminists evil?Did some nazis participate in the holocaust out of good intentions for a better Germany? Surely that means that nazis aren't evil, because some had good intentions, right? Something something "the path to hell" something. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 02:17 PM |
| 6 | Are feminists evil?Have some real-world feminist actions ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 02:12 PM |
| 7 | Are feminists evil?What irony? | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 02:11 PM |
| 6 | Are feminists evil?Yes, because taking opportunities away from people based on their s*x is wrong. Even if it's in the process of "the advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes"? he question was “are feminists evil” and the answer is no because actual feminist want independence. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observati… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 01:29 PM |
| 7 | Are feminists evil?Feminism is to grant autonomy to women for the sake of their own independence if they prefer that life. Can you explain, for example, how the National Organisation for Women, the largest feminist group in the US, lobbying against default rebuttable shared custody of children is about granting autonomy for women for the sake of independence? Women can vote Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class had citizenship rights (the vote) on exchange for… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 08:29 AM |
| 9 | Are feminists evil?All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 15/12/25 02:06 AM |
| 11 | Boys in the UK to be indoctrinated into gynocentrism (reposted due to formatting)All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 14/12/25 08:42 PM |
| 9 | Boys in the UK to be indoctrinated into gynocentrism (reposted due to formatting)What imbalance are you referring to? | /r/MensRights | 14/12/25 07:10 PM |
| 2 | Boys will be taught to respect girls in New UK school curriculumI don’t And yet you seem to have issue with people calling for everyone being taught to respect each other. Unfortunately, the gender of perpetrators who abuse and murder women aren’t equal either Interestingly, prior to the opening of the first domestic violence shelters, spousal murders were gender equal. It's only since resources have been available to women to escape abuse without murder that the crime has become gender directional. So even if you only cared about women's wellbeing, it would… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/25 08:44 AM |
| 2 | Boys will be taught to respect girls in New UK school curriculumWhy do I care if half of the population kills each other? That seems like a problem men need to sort out instead of blaming women. In your previous comment you were claiming that there was a huge problem of women being killed by men. When shown that women aren't the bigger victims, suddenly it's "why should I care?" Feminist "equality", ladies and gentlemen. This leads to a divide where the female half of society sticks among each other because their only real predator is men. Thank you for once… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/25 08:39 AM |
| 4 | Boys will be taught to respect girls in New UK school curriculumWhat's that thing feminists like to say when people bring up violence stats? Let's invert it: Who are violent men attacking? Other men! The same crime statistics you're using will show that the majority of violent crime victims are men, meaning that violent men would rather target men than women. This rather undermines your point, as well as the whole "patriarchy" thing. | /r/MensRights | 14/12/25 06:33 AM |
| 5 | Boys will be taught to respect girls in New UK school curriculumWhy do you have a problem with boys and girls being treated equally? | /r/MensRights | 13/12/25 11:17 PM |
| 8 | Boys will be taught to respect girls in New UK school curriculumMany countries define rape as requiring penetrative sex organs. The UK's Sexual Offences Act even states that it's something a person does "with his penis". So of course there aren't statistics for women raping men, because when they force sex on men it's not called rape! Really showing your rape apologia again. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/25 11:16 PM |
| 6 | I 20M was falsely accused of sexual assault at 18. I just can’t do this anymore I really need helpCharming. Do you have anything useful to contribute? | /r/MensRights | 13/12/25 10:33 PM |
| 9 | Men who correct women over any disagreement could face disciplinary action under new Green party rules"The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 13/12/25 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Warning: Reddit Admins now regard certain ideology as "identity or vulnerability" under Reddit's Rule 1 - with all resulting enforcement actionsWe have never had reproductive rights restricted, or forced to carry a child we may not want Men don't have reproductive rights that women have. we don’t worry when we walk across the street in the dark Fear does not equal risk. Look up crime statistics wherever you are, and you'll find that men are the vast majority of victims of violent crime. Sexual assault, rape, majority committed by men In many places, rape is defined as requiring penetrative sex organs. In the UK, where I am, it's defined… | /r/MensRights | 13/12/25 07:11 AM |
| 1 | Warning: Reddit Admins now regard certain ideology as "identity or vulnerability" under Reddit's Rule 1 - with all resulting enforcement actionsAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 13/12/25 07:03 AM |
| 3 | Feminists who claim that feminism just means a belief in gender equality are being disingenuous.All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 13/12/25 06:53 AM |
| 1 | Accused by (ex?) girlfriend, I’m scared and don’t know what to do (NSFW)You can't conceive of a circumstance where someone may be coerced into sex. Don't throw stones from your glass house. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 07:44 PM |
| 1 | Accused by (ex?) girlfriend, I’m scared and don’t know what to do (NSFW)No self-awareness. I hope your victims get some closure. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 07:41 PM |
| 0 | Accused by (ex?) girlfriend, I’m scared and don’t know what to do (NSFW)Just somebody who can't possibly conceive of someone being coerced into sex, and declaring that certain actions are "automatic consent". If you're going to insist, you're not just a rape apologist but one lacking any self awareness. What a shining example of feminist ideology. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 06:18 PM |
| -2 | Accused by (ex?) girlfriend, I’m scared and don’t know what to do (NSFW)Do your feminist friends know you engage in rape apologia? | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 03:34 PM |
| -2 | Accused by (ex?) girlfriend, I’m scared and don’t know what to do (NSFW)Sounds like something a rapist would say. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 03:16 PM |
| 6 | Feminists who claim that feminism just means a belief in gender equality are being disingenuous."The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 12:37 PM |
| 2 | Feminists who claim that feminism just means a belief in gender equality are being disingenuous.You didn't challenge anything All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Try again. I also cannot speak on a question you haven't answered. But you can speak on "If the latter, I think you spoke too soon". I can't answer a question you haven't properly articulated. Edit: lol, I demonstrated that "the gen… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 10:15 AM |
| 1 | Feminists who claim that feminism just means a belief in gender equality are being disingenuous.People seem to keep forget they the full phrase is "a bad apple spoils the bunch". | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 09:49 AM |
| 5 | Feminists who claim that feminism just means a belief in gender equality are being disingenuous.Criticism for the actions of it doesn't challenge the validity for them. Which is why I challenged the core belief first. The actions are consequences of the belief. Did someone convince you feminism was bad when you were a feminist, or did you see it yourself? If the latter... I think you spoke too soon. Speak on this. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 09:47 AM |
| 2 | Accused by (ex?) girlfriend, I’m scared and don’t know what to do (NSFW)Wow, making assumptions about consent to sex. Like nobody has ever initiated sex out of a need to deescalate threat, thus out of fear or coercion. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 08:04 AM |
| 9 | Feminists who claim that feminism just means a belief in gender equality are being disingenuous.The general ideal of feminism is not bad, All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 12/12/25 07:50 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Someone's missed the point. Patriarchy Conjecture is all about blame. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 10/12/25 06:51 AM |
| 47 | Even trans men are going through thisSo much of what is called transphobia is in fact misandry. It has its root in the perception of trans women as men pretending to be women, men who are mentally ill, and similar. The fear is always "men pretend to be women to get into women's spaces and abuse them" never the inverse. Transmen tend to be perceived as cismen rathet than women pretending, thus all of the issues of misandry apply to them too. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/25 06:06 AM |
| 7 | I'm tried of the narrative, it means men and boys are the most animal abusers.It looks like you're doing that thing where one pretends to not understand anything in order to stifle any communication while considering it to be Good Debate Practice. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/25 05:58 AM |
| 17 | Are we just going to keep complaining online?There's an assumption here that discussion online and advocacy in meatspace are mutually exclusive. That's a false dichotomy. Have a look st organisations like the National Coalition for Men, or the false allegation support organisation, and others. The wiki in the sidebar has a lot of information. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/25 06:14 AM |
| 10 | Feminism and Misandry go togetherAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 05/12/25 06:03 AM |
| 1 | What are some examples of men's unpaid labor/emotional labor?All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 04/12/25 10:39 PM |
| 3 | What are some examples of men's unpaid labor/emotional labor?Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 04/12/25 10:38 PM |
| -1 | UK special forces unit had 'deliberate policy' to 'kill fighting-aged males' in Afghanistan, inquiry toldWe recognise it for what it is when feminists say "most rapists are men, therefore treat any man as if he was a rapist". But we're talking about killing brown men, so some people turn their empathy off. | /r/MensRights | 02/12/25 12:23 PM |
| 2 | UK special forces unit had 'deliberate policy' to 'kill fighting-aged males' in Afghanistan, inquiry toldCan you explain why opposing murder of men for being men in the wrong country means being in favour of the murder of gay men? | /r/MensRights | 02/12/25 05:43 AM |
| 1 | UK: Our probing questions to a judge at a rape trial saved an innocent young man's life from ruin, that's why we MUST keep trial by juryThey're already trying to do away with juries specifically for rape trials in Scotland as a way of increasing the conviction rate Scot here, can confirm. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/25 06:31 PM |
| 3 | Men Receive 63% Longer Prison Sentences Than Women for the EXACT SAME Crime – Peer-Reviewed Study from the University of Michigan Law SchoolMeaning that men in power would rather hurt men than women. Rather blows a hole in the Patriarchy conjecture, and they hate it when you point that out. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/25 06:24 PM |
| 5 | UK special forces unit had 'deliberate policy' to 'kill fighting-aged males' in Afghanistan, inquiry toldWhat exactly is "fighting age"? Do they check ID before shooting, of is it a best-guess thing before they potentially murder civilians? Thinking on it, if there's an instance of Bad Guys using, say, child soldiers, or enlisting women, would that justify wholesale slaughter of those groups? | /r/MensRights | 01/12/25 10:53 AM |
| 1 | 20f, feministbut I can’t help and feel like a victim. Maybe have a look at the Wiki in the sidebar. You'll find that men are not a monolithic perpetrator class, and are often subjected to as much if not more of any given hardship, sometimes exacerbated by sexist policies and definitions (e.g., a man forcing sex on a woman is rape, a woman forcing sex on a man is not; the Duluth model defines domestic violence as something He does to Her, not the other way around). | /r/MensRights | 29/11/25 12:38 PM |
| 1 | 20f, feministMy point is that it's a birth-category. When I identified as a feminist, a litmus test for sexism was to replace gender with race and see what happens. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/25 12:36 PM |
| 1 | 20f, feministIf ones only encounter with people of a certain ethnic group was a traumatic encounter, would it be acceptable to assume that everyone of that ethnic group are hate-worthy? Does the answer change when it's not "not all X are like that" but "hardly any"? If your experiences have been traumatic, seek help about that. It doesn't necessarily reflect universal reality. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/25 11:58 AM |
| 1 | 20f, feministI do not want to hate men but instead I want to understand their perspective and why they do what they do. Hate is a choice. If you don't want to hate, but want to understand, then try to understand, and choose not to hate. | /r/MensRights | 29/11/25 11:56 AM |
| 7 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysThere was a petition back in 2020. The response was a square "Nah". | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 09:04 PM |
| 3 | Why people think misandry doesn't exist, and why many feminists don't acknowledge itat the patriarchy just slightly misdirected. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 07:50 PM |
| 6 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysWow. Refusing to evidence your points and refusing to examine evidence that challenges your ideals. What a great representitive of feminism you are! | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 07:50 PM |
| 3 | Why people think misandry doesn't exist, and why many feminists don't acknowledge iti’m confused That's OK. Check the sources, check the statistics. You'll find that, for a lot of the metrics you would use to prove that society is systemically anti-black, there are bigger gender gaps with men on the worse end of them. To your querstion, what rights do women lack that men have? For comparison, here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminis… | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 07:30 PM |
| 5 | Why people think misandry doesn't exist, and why many feminists don't acknowledge itIf you agree that the statistics linked demonstrate that black people suffer serious, systemic disadvantage, then it follows that men, who are on the worse end of even larger gaps, suffer serious, systemic disadvantage - and conversely, like white people in general compared to black people, women are systemically privileged compared to men. So, are men privileged, and therefore black people are privileged, or are black people disadvantaged, and therefore men are also disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 06:30 PM |
| 5 | Why people think misandry doesn't exist, and why many feminists don't acknowledge iti think most feminists can admit misandry exists, it’s just nowhere near as harmful as misogyny. Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gaps favouring women. Are black people privileged like men as a wider group, or are men disadvantaged like black people? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 06:10 PM |
| 3 | Men More Likely to Die by SuicideOh no, somebody is commenting on public comments on a public forum! How terrible for you. Thanks again though. I know it must have been hard for you, assuming it was intentional. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:54 PM |
| 2 | Men More Likely to Die by SuicideThank you for conceding that men are legally, societally discriminated against. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:45 PM |
| 1 | Men More Likely to Die by Suicidei am not regarding factual interactions Yeah, that much is obvious. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:45 PM |
| 1 | AI 'debate'believe i would seek further education I don't actually, but one could hope. Is there anything that has indicated a preference for barefoot and pregnant women in the kitchen here? If it's as rife as you claim, it should be easy to evidence. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:29 PM |
| 8 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysSince you've made this personal, how about you link to whatever I've said that evidences a hatred of women? Do be sure to point it out. Since the best you've come up with is "this subreddit", which is insufficient as evidence, it's likely fair to dismiss this as a baseless accusation. What is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:28 PM |
| 7 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysOnly if you refused to provide evidence. So I'll ask again, where is the evidence to back up your claims? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:23 PM |
| 1 | AI 'debate'Charming. I hope it pays for some education for you, your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:22 PM |
| 1 | AI 'debate'You happened to have commented in a bunch of new threads, and I'm responding to call out the issues in them. You're really quick to assume a victim role - is that "womens' work" to you? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:19 PM |
| 8 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysIf I said "feminism is hateful", you would dismiss me outright, and a reasonable person would expect evidence to back up the claim. So where's your evidence? "This subreddit" isn't good enough. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:12 PM |
| 19 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysYou lied right off the bat! | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:11 PM |
| 12 | women wanted equality but why are they offended now?and your hate towards women exposes yours. What hate towards women? the difference is that mine won’t lead to the abuse of an intimate partner in my future. Because someone professing that they are utterly incapable of wrongdoing is absolutely never going to do wrong. Also, China has a perfect government with no human rights abuses, because the CCP said so. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:10 PM |
| 5 | women wanted equality but why are they offended now?female dominated fields are paid significantly less that male dominated fields Fields like office administrators, teachers, therapists, jobs in climate controlled offices where the biggest danger is a papercut or a twinge from lifting a box of files, compared to fields like oil and gas rig workers, power line maintenance, logging, deep-sea fishing, and other fields with considerable risk of death? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:03 PM |
| 1 | AI 'debate'when you are ready to have an adult and mature discussion with someone other than ai, i will happily discuss such things with you. It doesn't look like you're ready for an adult and mature discussion if your knee-jerk reaction to being shown you're wrong is to call the other person a misogynist. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:02 PM |
| 14 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel sayswhy there is so much hate towards us. What hate are you referring to? Can you link to an example? It would be great to see what you're talking about! | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 05:00 PM |
| 16 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel sayswhy would i want equal rights when all men do is oppress us 🤣🤣 What rights do women lack that men have? For comparison, here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and … | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 04:59 PM |
| 26 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysi am just showing the other side By outright lying? What wonderful representation! | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 04:58 PM |
| 11 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysi believe your hate towards women That's a hefty accusation. I presume you can prove it? | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 04:57 PM |
| 28 | Prostate cancer screening should not be widely available in UK, expert panel saysA person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, Sexual Offences Act 2003 | /r/MensRights | 28/11/25 04:56 PM |
| 9 | Why i'm No Longer a Feminist — and Not an MRA EitherFeminism started because women were tired of being a man’s property which was true, women couldn’t own property, vote, et cetera… and I totally support equality, no one should be subjugated because of gender. Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights in exchange for citizenship responsibilities, and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was… | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 03:33 PM |
| 36 | Why i'm No Longer a Feminist — and Not an MRA EitherI really hope that I don't offend the MRAs of this sub, but I dont care if I do at this point. You really care and you don't care. Off to a great start. But what I’m starting to see now is a sort of “oppression Olympics,” a competition over who has it worse, with each side trying to paint the other as the “bad guy.” How do you propose advocating for resolution to mens issues without talking about mens' issues? MRAs are tired of seeing the male gender constantly bashed, so they respond by doing t… | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 03:03 PM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"My messaging is and always has been. Suicide and mental health are a huge crisis. It is also a people problem. And despite men dying more, it's important to note that women are attempting more, while not dying. Don't try to portray me as the asshole because I spotted your women-worsting. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 02:15 PM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"You are framing it as if people mentioning attempts are minimizing men’s suicides. They’re not. Except that womens' greater attempt rates (aided by the fact that men are dying when they attempt it) are brought up as a counterpoint and equivalent to mens' deaths. Recognizing the full set of facts doesn’t take away from men’s struggles Weird, the same people that do what I'm talking about also complain when you bring up male victims of domestic violence by women. Do you see how you've pivoted, by … | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 01:24 PM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Yes I did say that, because the pull-string response to the majority of suicides being male is "yeah but women attempt more", as a means to discredit suicide as a mens issue, while inadvertedly saying that women not dying is a problem that needs to be addressed. Can you explain how that's saying that attempted suicides do not equate to a serious mental health concern? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 12:28 PM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"I must of imagined that you suggested that rates of attempted suicide do not equate to a serious mental health concern Can you link to where I said that? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 12:08 PM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Well, tbh, that comment was a clapback to the term womansplaining being used in response to someone else. Ah yes. "Womansplaining", a term that came out of nowhere and was absolutely not a response to anything whatsoever. If anything, I'm saying both are wrong You didn't call out the mockery of men talking about their issues, only the clapback. But you can't tell me how I feel or who I am on my behalf and say the opposite of what I'm saying just because it allows you to make fun of me and feel j… | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:54 AM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Fair enough, I thought I was talking to the original commenter. In any case, you didn't direct your comment at "“Womansplaining” 😭 y’all are too funny", only at "Go to kitchen". So it's clear you believe that mocking men talking about their issues is OK, but those men clapping back isn't. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:47 AM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"“Womansplaining” 😭 y’all are too funny Go to kitchen [[clutches pearls]] | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:29 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Because you're making the same falsehood. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:29 AM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"You know people can read your comments, right? They can see what you said, and see how you're absolutely lying now? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:26 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"feminist isn't misandrist All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:20 AM |
| 3 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"The first link is where I demonstrate that feminism is necessarily based on the hatred of men (assuming, of course, that oppressing women is morally wrong - we're in agreement on that, right?). The second and third links are compilations of feminist action to entrench disparities in rights between the genders, which makes perfect sense if men are monstrous. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:20 AM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"But I didnt realise at that point that it is a competition… Sure. Saying that women beat men in this area wasn't about making it a competition. Sure. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:07 AM |
| 3 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Talking about a predominantly-women ideology based on the hatred of men that has widespread mainstream appeal particularly in media, academia, and law doesn't have anything to do with women who hate men? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:06 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"It's the same issue as conflating "women" and "feminists". The two are not synonymous, but are used to make bad-faith arguments to demonise a gender. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:04 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"That you're allowed to make fun of others, specifically men talking about their issues, but it's not OK for others to make fun of you. Do keep up. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 10:03 AM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"What was your intention in saying that "women actual [sic] attempt at rates higher than men", if not to make it a "women have it worse" statement on dying by suicide? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 09:39 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"There's no room for stigmatising 'jokes' in a space of human rights. And there you go, trying to stigmatise a joke. Even the clutches pearls thing is disrespectful, and turning it around on the person having a response. "This person mocked me because I was upset that someone I was mocking mocked me! How awful! It should be stopped!" No one made fun of me, I'm making fun of you. You're really bad at this, aren't you. are all emotionally immature tactics that will get us literally nowhere at all. … | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 09:38 AM |
| 3 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"“Womansplaining” 😭 y’all are too funny Go to kitchen [[clutches pearls]] You forgot what a joke was, and now you're pretending that a comment made clearly in jest is deadly serious because it's making fun of you, rather than men talking about their issues. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 09:19 AM |
| 3 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 09:02 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Do you know that "incel" isn't a gender? You literally used men as the counterpart to women earlier, why conflate men and incels in the second clause? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 09:01 AM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Have you heard of Patriarchy? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 09:00 AM |
| 1 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"It always amazes me when feminists claim that fewer women dying by suicide is a sign of a problem. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 08:58 AM |
| 2 | The flip side of the "male loneliness epidemic" coin is "KNOW YOUR WORTH - NEVER SETTLE QUEEN!"Glass houses. It's magic how feminists suddenly forget what a sense of humour is when they're not the ones making the joke. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 08:57 AM |
| 1 | The preening insufferability of the feminist takeover of the American left has, to the surprise of no one, rendered it utterly impotentAnd if it were upvoted, that would just prove it to be correct. Upvotes=correct, downvotes=correct, and correct= no need for introspection! Magic how that works. Also, grand narratives, like Patriarchy conjecture? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 08:51 AM |
| 5 | Which generation have more misandristic women and women who consider themselves feminist? Gen Z or Millennials?genuinely feel like since more teenage boys are becoming incels What do you mean by this? Can you evidence what toure talking about? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 08:44 AM |
| 11 | Women would rather a fascist dictatorship before a DNA test on your kids.Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gaps favouring women. Are black people privileged like men as a wider group, or are men disadvantaged like black people? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/25 08:41 AM |
| 2 | AIFeminists needs Logic101All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 26/11/25 11:40 PM |
| 3 | Wild stuff getting posted and upvoted in r/RadicalFeminismGaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gaps favouring women. Are black people privileged like men as a wider group, or are men disadvantaged like black people? | /r/MensRights | 25/11/25 02:13 PM |
| 2 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upI thought I'd paraphrased, but it's an effective argument! | /r/MensRights | 22/11/25 08:00 AM |
| 9 | Am I the only one that hates the fact that wanting gender equality is called "feminism" and not something like "equalism"Men haven’t had a vote for most of history. When they did, it was tied to civil and military conscription. Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights in exchange for citizenship responsibilities, and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; I'm the US, they still don't. | /r/MensRights | 22/11/25 07:57 AM |
| 4 | Female therapists defending AWDTSG gossip groups. Should men trust them as clinicians?Fact of the matter is to me that this place is a desecration of what men’s rights are supposed to be And what is that? What rights should men advocate for? The way these people speak and express and everything else in between makes me nothing but sick, But do talk about your feelings gentlemen. But that same feeling of sickness comes in the same pit of my stomach that belongs to all of us. Don't presume that everyone thinks the same as you, this has been abundantly, repeatedly, blatantly shown t… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 11:00 PM |
| 4 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableBecause this community is better than you, and we at least know what we're talking about. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 10:58 PM |
| 18 | Am I the only one that hates the fact that wanting gender equality is called "feminism" and not something like "equalism"“My body my choice” is certainly reasonable Women have greater reproductive choice than men, specifically apparent in the seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about through statutory rape of the father. I go into greater detail here. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 10:38 PM |
| 2 | Female therapists defending AWDTSG gossip groups. Should men trust them as clinicians?Your bones are made of reason and logic, and mine don’t exist. Is this your way of saying you were wrong? Maybe you need to work on that. I do not like the way ideas are perpetuated You and the rest of the feminism subreddit. What's that feminist saying? "When you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression"? I especially hate to see issues projected onto others for blame in spite of the fact that the same people are to blame Can you provide examples of what you're talking about? Becaus… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 10:35 PM |
| 2 | Female therapists defending AWDTSG gossip groups. Should men trust them as clinicians?You’re under the impression im invested. I am not. That's a lot of commentary for someone who's not invested. I see a constant absolvement of blame and a narrow approach. Examples? Or is this another one of those feelings? I see little affirmation for genuine feelings, just “yeah that’s the way it is because of women”. Again, examples? And I’m still confused as to why you think im a victim of propaganda or hive mind thinking Whereever could anyone get an idea like that? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 10:28 PM |
| 6 | Female therapists defending AWDTSG gossip groups. Should men trust them as clinicians?This is the issue man it’s a constant demand for “evidence” as if everything can be proved. If you're going to make truth-claims, and want them to be taken seriously, you have to back those claims up. Why should anybody take your word for it alone? Use your eyes my friend. Where? Perhaps you could link to examples that demonstrate your claim? And that’s not any feminist mantra besides the ones that are not even worth listening to. That isn’t feminism, that’s the same spite that fuels this subred… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 10:20 PM |
| 3 | Female therapists defending AWDTSG gossip groups. Should men trust them as clinicians?I still maintain that this place is as rife with spite as anything, and it’s more of an anti women instead of a pro-man space Again, no evidence to back it up, just your feelings. You're either mistaken (which is the charitable interpretation) or trying to push a lie. I just hate to see this ideology perpetuated. I know right? Men talking about their issues? Vile! The good Feminist line is that men should shut up about their problems and unquestioningly agree with you! | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 10:06 PM |
| 4 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upSo when you responded with "Men make up over 90% of victims of violent crime" with "who makes up the perpetrators of violent crime.", you were, what? Pretending to agree to further an anti-male agenda? Now, have a look at crime victimisation statistics in your country of residence. You'll find that men make up the vast majority of victims of violent crime (unless we're talking about crimes defind as something men do to women, like IPV and rape, where the definition has to be manipulated to make … | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 09:54 PM |
| 5 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upFirst, thank you for conceding that women are safer than men. Second, thank you for conceding that men, given the choice, would rather hurt men than women. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 09:47 PM |
| 2 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upSo the answer to my question is "yes". Hope you get better soon. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 09:25 PM |
| 4 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upThe core of feminism is equality Based on Patriarchy conjecture. All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). The same lack there of that prevents them from feeling safe walking home at night, Men mak… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 09:23 PM |
| 3 | Female therapists defending AWDTSG gossip groups. Should men trust them as clinicians?a subreddit based around bitching and whining about women. Again, can you evidence that? Or is this a truth-claim coming from your special feelings-place? Becaus the evidence doesn't support it! And the fact you’ve said “feminist” in your list of statements you don’t like says everything i need to know Are you not a feminist? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 09:12 PM |
| 3 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upDo you seriously believe that just repeating a statement makes it true despite the evidence to the contrary? Further, you're presenting "Objective fact doesn’t exist" as a fact, that is not subjective, and thus is objective (even though you've once again made a truth-claim without any evidence). We have long since departed from the boundaries of your competence. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 09:09 PM |
| 3 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upObjective fact also doesn’t exist Wrong. A Truth Statement, backed up with evidence, is objective fact. For instance, gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gaps favouring women. That's objective fact, it's evidenced. Now you try! | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 09:00 PM |
| 7 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upWhat rights do men have that women lack? For comparison, here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:50 PM |
| 3 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upBeause it’s a vital equal rights movement All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:50 PM |
| 10 | ‘I want to share the story of my brother’s suicide to break down the stigma surrounding men’s mental health’ says Harborough fundraiserWhat proof can I even give you? Show the posts and comments that lead you to believe these to be truth-statements. Bear in mind, as part of "everyone", you would also have to convince me (with my own words and actions) that I am a misogynist. And since I know I'm not, I know there isn't any evidence to show it. It’s not something I can measure or show or do anything for So you don't have anything to show that this is a true thing, just your feelings. Thank you for conceding that it's not true. I… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:35 PM |
| 8 | Got hate messages for posting about how international men's day is treated like a joke.It's always struck me as weird when they do this. No, I'm not interested in 1v1ing a stranger through text - if one or the other is convinced, that's one person; on a public forum, others can see the veracity (or lack thereof) of the arguments for themselves. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:32 PM |
| 26 | Am I the only one that hates the fact that wanting gender equality is called "feminism" and not something like "equalism"You assume there’s a level playing field. Actually, I don't. I know fine well you'd find such behaviour unthinkable directed at feminists. But advocates for mens issues are fair game to you. That’s the problem with this place, it’s just so upset about non issues they assume carry the same weight as other equal rights movements Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gaps favouring women. Are black people privileged like men as a wider group, or … | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:29 PM |
| 23 | ‘I want to share the story of my brother’s suicide to break down the stigma surrounding men’s mental health’ says Harborough fundraiserThe elusive people I worship yes, who might they be? You're a feminist. Not even a particularly thoughtful one. You don’t need proof that’s my point. Wrong. If you're going to make a truth-claim, you should be able to show that it's true. You've claimed that this place is 100% misogynists, holding to a resentful ideology, denigrating women at the expense of helping men. Prove. It. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:26 PM |
| 2 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableThat’s a decision you all made yourselves. I haven't. Nor have most of the people here, I suspect. Unless you can prove otherwise? There’s a reason the rest of the site hates this place Would you say that the counter-protests against the Civil Rights Movement in the 60s was because MLK et al hated white people? Because you're making a similar argument here. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:24 PM |
| 37 | Am I the only one that hates the fact that wanting gender equality is called "feminism" and not something like "equalism"But equality goes further than crime Yes. But this is the area they're talking about. Do you do this in feminist spaces? "Why is it always about rape? There's more to equality than sexual violence!" | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:22 PM |
| 1 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableYou’re all anti women. Not pro men Again, yet to evidence it. I suppose we just have to take your word for it, because you know us better than any one of us knows ourselves right? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:21 PM |
| 17 | ‘I want to share the story of my brother’s suicide to break down the stigma surrounding men’s mental health’ says Harborough fundraiserAre you aware that not everything can be evidenced or proven in the way you want it to? Agreed. But if you are going to accuse me (along with everyone else here) of being misogynists, having a resentful ideology, and denigrating women, you'd better damn well back that up, because nobody should just take your word for their own state of being. It’s why all the arguments here are centred on “proof” and results. I know, right? Whyever would one want to be sure they're talking about reality, when th… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:20 PM |
| 1 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableThe fact you can even say they aren’t means you don’t know what oppression feels like. Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gaps favouring women. Are black people privileged like men as a wider group, or are men disadvantaged like black people? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:17 PM |
| 27 | ‘I want to share the story of my brother’s suicide to break down the stigma surrounding men’s mental health’ says Harborough fundraiserIt’s difficult to support people who won’t support themselves Such as providing resources and evidence? There's tons of that here. this resentful ideology Another hefty claim. Can you speak to that? In what way is it resentful? Can you evidence this? Who am I kidding. Of course you can't. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:14 PM |
| 1 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableI forgot everyone on Reddit speaks the exact same this is so disturbing 😭😭 I know right! What's with everyone here, asking for evidence when you claim that literally everyone here hates women. So disturbing! So weird! Don't they know the correct response is to believe unquestioningly? And tbh I’ve pointed out several times in different comments You know your comment history is public, right? If it's true, you should have no trouble linking to evidence. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:12 PM |
| 6 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upYou’re tarring with the same brush "Everyone here is a seething misogynist" As it happens, all forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:10 PM |
| 30 | ‘I want to share the story of my brother’s suicide to break down the stigma surrounding men’s mental health’ says Harborough fundraiserIm here to support men too. Except "You’re all dead set on this notion of persistent oppression from the rest of the world and it just doesn’t exist", "It’s like the fat kid at the birthday party on his sixth plate of cake complaining that the rest of them on their third are eating too much.". Either you're a habitual liar, or you're grossly incompetent. Which is it? You’re here to shit on whatever women do and take it upon yourselves to weaponise it into something that makes you the victim Yeah… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:08 PM |
| 2 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableNo, but since the majority of people here are You have yet to evidence that. I’d say Im morally one up on people who literally despise women because they hate themselves And these people, are they in the room with us now? That’s an ivory tower im willing to stand on OK, so you don't understand what is meant by an Ivory Tower. It's OK, take some time and get some learnin' in you, you'll pull through! | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:04 PM |
| 8 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upBut I just can’t fathom the way this sub thinks. There's no shame in reaching the limits of your understanding, provided you're humble enough to recognise them. You’re all dead set on this notion of persistent oppression from the rest of the world and it just doesn’t exist And in the next breath: Im not negating misandry as a concept, nor the biases against men in a lot of places. You see the problem, right? It’s like the fat kid at the birthday party on his sixth plate of cake complaining that … | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:03 PM |
| 1 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableWhen have j ever implied that im better than any of you "Everyone here is a seething misogynist" Are you a seething misogynist? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:01 PM |
| 14 | Got hate messages for posting about how international men's day is treated like a joke.it’s probably because you’re being a cunt Gendered insults, naughty. Especially for someone who claims "I’ve never been insulting or rude." | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 08:00 PM |
| 70 | Am I the only one that hates the fact that wanting gender equality is called "feminism" and not something like "equalism"What rights do men have that women lack? For comparison, here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 07:59 PM |
| 10 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upIf it's true, you should have no trouble evidencing it. The fact the best you can do is quote me ...when you tell blatant lies? on something truthful you just don’t like It isn't truthful. Which makes it a lie, as well as an insult. And lying about others is...rude. The fact that it's this easy to show that you're lying is very telling. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 06:13 PM |
| 14 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upI’ve never been insulting or rude. "Everyone here is a seething misogynist" | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 05:39 PM |
| 4 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableReally. Because OP was talking about their classroom, and you said it was fine and normal, because of building sites. I don't think you're here in good faith. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 05:29 PM |
| 3 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upf you must know, the feminist ideology had some credibility from its inception, through to the 60's-70's where it took a severe nose dive toward blatant misandry. "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 05:27 PM |
| 3 | Over the past several months, I have noticed r/feminism getting more fucked upwhere women could only vote in my country 100 years ago Men haven’t had a vote for most of history. When they did, it was tied to civil and military conscription. Feminists first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier citizenship, where one class of citizen has citizenship rights in exchange for citizenship responsibilities, and the other class got the rights gratis. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; I'm the US, they still don't. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 05:25 PM |
| 8 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableBecause everybody here is a seething misogynist. Can you evidence that? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 05:19 PM |
| 5 | Women constantly talk about sex in my university class and as a guy it makes me so uncomfortableWalk past a building site for me, Next time there's an active building site in the middle of a university seminar while people are tryng to learn from the lesson in progress, I'll check. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/25 05:18 PM |
| 2 | “Innocent until proven guilty is misogynist,” they saidA really wild thing is that, in response to a petition to gender-neutralise the language of the Sexual Offences Act, the government said that it was unnecessary as "most rapes are carried out by men". By the wording of the Act, all rapes are carried out by men, because if a woman forces sex on someone, we don't call it rape. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/25 02:52 AM |
| 2 | Has feminism somehow morphed into feminarcissism?"The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/25 06:21 AM |
| 8 | Has feminism somehow morphed into feminarcissism?The second wave, where the feminist Duluth model erased female-perpetrated domestic violence to define IPV as something men do to women? With second-wave feminists such as Mary Koss, whose work was instrumental in defining rape as something only men do by arbitrarily deciding that it's "not appropriate" to describe women forcing sex on men as rape, despite it happening at roughly equal rates to the inverse? Or when the idea of Patriarchy was made mainstream, holding as self evident the innate na… | /r/MensRights | 16/11/25 08:47 PM |
| 8 | Has feminism somehow morphed into feminarcissism?yes I heard about the voting rights but I checked it was some decades apart in most countries - would you say that still counts? Now do voting responsibilities. The right to vote has always historically been tied to civic responsibilities such as civil and military conscription. "Equal" rights and unequal responsibilities is not equal rights. In the UK, men and women got equal voting rights in 1963 when the draft was abolished; in the US, they still don't have equal voting rights. | /r/MensRights | 16/11/25 06:36 PM |
| 33 | Has feminism somehow morphed into feminarcissism?"The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 16/11/25 09:35 AM |
| 8 | “Innocent until proven guilty is misogynist,” they saidThe uk law actually says that men cant be raped. ...by women. Men can absolutely be raped under the Sexual Offences Act, but only by other men because rape is defined as something the perpetrator does "with his penis". | /r/MensRights | 14/11/25 07:55 AM |
| 1 | Is feminisms subverting whole identify of Man?"The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 13/11/25 08:03 AM |
| 1 | Acknowledging that Men are Moral and Harmed by Gender Stereotypes Increases Men’s Willingness to Engage in Collective Action on Behalf of Women - Sex RolesThis plays off of a specific interpretation of what the patriarchy implies Are you suggesting that intersectional feminism doesn't hold that society is male-dominated (i.e., "systems and structures that historically gave men collective advantages"), that male dominance oppresses women (i.e., women being treated as lesser to men) and/or that while some men are hurt by the system ("patriarchy hurts men too"), the system is set up to privilege mens needs, drives, and interests (i.e, male privilege … | /r/MensRights | 11/11/25 08:54 AM |
| 1 | Acknowledging that Men are Moral and Harmed by Gender Stereotypes Increases Men’s Willingness to Engage in Collective Action on Behalf of Women - Sex RolesAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 10/11/25 10:29 PM |
| 14 | What are some major lies and myths pushed by feminism?Look up the Duluth Model of domestic violence. It's a feminist model, used as an investigation and intervention standard, that defines domestic violence as something men do to women. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/25 08:58 AM |
| 1 | What are some major lies and myths pushed by feminism?All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 09/11/25 08:56 AM |
| 3 | What are some major lies and myths pushed by feminism?No True Scotsman fallacy. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/25 08:55 AM |
| 0 | What are some major lies and myths pushed by feminism?If you could remove the toxicity from masculinity, what would be left that isn't a gender neutral trait? | /r/MensRights | 09/11/25 08:52 AM |
| 3 | Men’s Mental Health Awareness Month 🎗️Would it be correct to interpret that response as admission that your question was a bad-faith attempt at a whataboutism? | /r/MensRights | 06/11/25 06:59 PM |
| 1 | "Only 4% of accusations are false" gives the same vibes as "There are more gays now than 50 years ago"I provided a ton resources. Fair. I hadn't read the whole thread when I commented. In any case, are you aware that each of those studies refers to allegations to police that have been proven false, rather than, say, false allegations that are not pursued for lack of evidence, or false allegations that result in a wrongful conviction (at which point they don't count as "false" in law, because they've been "proven" at trial, despite being fabricated)? The point is, any attempt at putting a definit… | /r/MensRights | 06/11/25 05:27 PM |
| 1 | "Only 4% of accusations are false" gives the same vibes as "There are more gays now than 50 years ago"You seem to be OK with innocent men being put into torture-cages. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/25 05:24 PM |
| 1 | "Only 4% of accusations are false" gives the same vibes as "There are more gays now than 50 years ago"Are you aware that "false" is not synonymous with "deceitful"? So your hypothetical of a witness being mistaken is still a false accusation. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/25 07:56 AM |
| 1 | "Only 4% of accusations are false" gives the same vibes as "There are more gays now than 50 years ago"You have no facts to back up that false allegations are common. Read elsewhere on the thread. You've yet to provide any sources of your own. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/25 07:50 AM |
| 4 | Men’s Mental Health Awareness Month 🎗️De jure, May. De facto, every month. | /r/MensRights | 06/11/25 07:42 AM |
| 5 | Feminism is an aspirational authoritarian single narrative dictatorship!All forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 06/11/25 07:39 AM |
| 14 | I consider myself a feminist. However, I have recently realised I have focused on female inequalities rather than all inequalities. I am seeking guidance to better fight for the rights of all.I did scroll through the subreddit and its quite hateful Can you link to some examples? It would be good to see what you mean by "hateful". | /r/MensRights | 01/11/25 09:42 AM |
| 10 | I consider myself a feminist. However, I have recently realised I have focused on female inequalities rather than all inequalities. I am seeking guidance to better fight for the rights of all.wish to ask you to expand on this thought. Females don't get to choose to be impregnated. Its not somthing they have control over. When people have sex and sperm swim to the ovaries, the interactions between the egg and sperm are not we ithin a n y control. I talk on this point in detail here. I understand that, and think its dumb. But it plays into the traditional roles of Female=submissive and caregiver Male=Aggressive and protector. Which is an effect of misogyny. It's pretty typical of a fem… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/25 09:40 AM |
| 9 | I consider myself a feminist. However, I have recently realised I have focused on female inequalities rather than all inequalities. I am seeking guidance to better fight for the rights of all.Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/25 04:42 AM |
| 5 | Our relations with feminismAll forms of feminism that cleave to Patriarchy conjecture hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Using this as justification, Feminists actively entrench disparities in rights between genders ((1), (2)). In short, mens rights advocacy will necessarily be antifeminist as long as feminists in media, academia, and law are anti male. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/25 01:11 AM |
| 1 | Concerns on the subYet no one (still) wants to address: Representation and solutions I know! It's awful that on a comment thread about how this subreddit isn't helping and is hatefully generalising women, nobody's talking about representation and solutions to gender imbalance in the workforce! Never mind that it's irrelevant to the topic at hand, you've decided that that's what this is about! Again, it sounds like you're bitter that your word isn't being taken as gospel, and you're denouncing others before looking… | /r/MensRights | 31/10/25 10:58 AM |
| 1 | Concerns on the subYou sound bitter that people criticised what you had to say. again, that doesn't make it hateful generalisations about women. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/25 10:32 AM |
| 1 | Concerns on the subBro did I say misogyny, no. That's what people usually mean when they complain about people on this subreddit generalising women. I don't think you're being honest in pretending otherwise. Again, you make zero comment on representation and improving something Because I'm talking about your commentary. Which is what you brought up. I'd love the study that proves that all women want to work less for more money. Are you claiming that capitalism isn't ruthlessly profit-focused? Do you want to work m… | /r/MensRights | 31/10/25 10:31 AM |
| 2 | Concerns on the subToday, for example, 'women aren't interested in being in male dominated spaces, they want to work less for more' (insert list of domains women refuse to work in). I remember that post. Is it hate if it's backed up by empirical data? Saying that anyone doesn't want to work less for more is as hopelessly out of touch with capitalist society as the people who complain that nobody wants to work anymore when they offer bugger all for the work. All I got back is how I was lying Because your claimed ac… | /r/MensRights | 31/10/25 12:29 AM |
| 2 | Concerns on the subit's just women hating Can you evidence this? It would be great to know what youre interpreting as misogyny. kinda proving my point It's pretty magic how that works - if you're agreed with, there's something to it; if you're disagreed with, it only proves your point. Either way, you're correct and absolutely don't need to examine your biases and presuppositions. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/25 11:23 PM |
| 10 | I know why women aren’t having children. Men just aren’t good enough OP: More male hate. No wonder men stay away from women!The world doesn’t revolve around you I don’t want... I am afraid... Did you read the article? | /r/MensRights | 30/10/25 11:51 AM |
| 11 | The West will collapse because it refuses to admit a gender-equal society is economically unsustainable and we are already seeing the effects of itIt would be pretty hard to blame feminism for the introduction of conscription Where did I blame feminism for conscription? What is said was that the first big victory of feminism was getting women the vote without the cost applied to mens vote, which is specifically not equal rights and responsibilities. It set up the two-tier citizenship, where one class had rights in exchange for civil and military conscription, and the other class had rights gratis. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/25 07:47 AM |
| 21 | The West will collapse because it refuses to admit a gender-equal society is economically unsustainable and we are already seeing the effects of itThe issue is that feminism is no longer about gender parity Feminism's first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier class system: one tier gained voting rights gratis, the other purchased theirs with the civil responsibility of civil and military conscription. By that metric, voting rights in the UK were gender-equal in 1963 when the draft was abolished; in the US, they still don't have them. It was never about equality. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/25 05:42 AM |
| 2 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewand only to the extent that women are in heterosexual relationships, but you ignored the rest, Just, you know, the majority. Because your object of analysis is feminist "historical oppression narratives" rather than a genuine concern for welfare / gender inequity. Sure, standing against hate groups means I don't have a genuine concern for welfare or gender inequality. You're trying to mind-read, and you're bad at it. Maybe it's projection? I'm not responding to pastebin / Reddit post gish gallop… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/25 02:28 PM |
| 2 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewAs an example, women have less wealth than men Over 80% of market decisions in a household are made by women. This is despite the fact that men produce more wealth than women. Women control more wealth than they produce, like certain other groups in historical oppression narratives. I find anti-feminists wrapped up in justifying this and trying to debunk feminist explanations rather than dispassionately looking at it if there is a problem. Are you sure they're justifying the state of wealth, and… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/25 01:09 PM |
| 2 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewso I don't know why you're trying to press the narrative that I was making up a reality. "I am making them up". Your provided source was "Einstein, 2025". I don't get why you're so insistent on pretending that I'm somehow creating a narrative that you were making up a reality when you did. (e.g. individualist feminism) Well done, you finally did it! You found two feminists (McElroy and Hoff-Summers) who claim they don't believe in Patriarchy, well done. Took you long enough, and shows you didn't… | /r/MensRights | 25/10/25 12:03 PM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewDo you consider original thought and critical thinking bad? Absolutely not. But when you're argument boils down to: "You're wrong about reality, because I've made up a fantasy in which you're wrong" That is neither true, nor good, nor critical. You can't claim to care about what is true when your entire "debate" style is based on freely-admitted fantasy. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/25 11:23 AM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewI'll be frank: I don't care about what others evidence or whatever , I care about what is true and good . You literally tried to argue with something you happily admitted that you made the hell up and acted like that was the genius move. Take a good gard look in the mirror. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/25 10:30 AM |
| 2 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewthe funny thing is tho that : "Unfortunately, there's not a single form of feminism that isn't predicated on Patriarchy conjecture." implies your problem with feminism is the theory of patriarchy, and that without it, you would not have an issue with a feminist form. If it wasn't an ideology predicated on the hatred of men and their classification as monsters, sure. I'd dislike it less if it wasn't an actual hate group. How deep and insightful of you. I'm sure you're seen as the edgiest and most… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/25 09:36 AM |
| 2 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of view"A feminist perspective could not exist that is not grounded in power." Not what I said. "Unfortunately, there's not a single form of feminism that isn't predicated on Patriarchy conjecture.". "Omg you just made that up You literally said that. You're acting like realising that political ideologies are social constructs makes you cuttingly insightful. It does, as long as you're a literal child. I know what you were responding to was "could not" and not "doesn't" I know (and have demonstrated, yo… | /r/MensRights | 23/10/25 09:01 AM |
| 2 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewEngage with this in good faith: Coming from the guy whose source is that he made it the fuck up. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/25 07:55 AM |
| 6 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewThe problem is that the extreme feminists have such a loud voice and a way way more powerful presence If mainstream feminists actually opposed the "extreme" like they claim to, we'd see a lot more pushback on the Mary Koss' and Duluth Models of the world. It's telling how they only state opposition when challenged by antifeminists, and then only for the duration of the conversation, and not in any way that produces tangible effect. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:53 PM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewThank you for conceding the point that forced sex on men not being rape is a feminist perspective. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 12:08 PM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewI see. You've now gone from literally making things up and claiming that proves anything to pretending not to understand how language works to stifle discourse that doesn't go your way. I think we're done here. You're not discussing in good faith. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 12:05 PM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewthe first feminist will say "feminism is about gender equality", and the second will tell them "feminism is about the elimination of the subjugation of women". How are we defining gender equality? The unspoken premises are: 1) rights are not equal between the genders and 2) women are worse off in this dynamic. This means that Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the system itself is set up to privilege men and s… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 12:02 PM |
| 6 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewmy point was that these views were not representative. This feminist would disagree with what you just said, on the basis that it's advocating for womens' rights on the basis of equality of the sexes. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 12:00 PM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewGoogle gives: "advocating women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes." In what way would advocating for womens' rights facilitate equality of the sexes? The unspoken premises are: 1) rights are not equal between the genders and 2) women are worse off in this dynamic. This means that Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the system itself is set up to privilege men and subjugate women for mens expres… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:59 AM |
| 6 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewThen what was your intention? Because it looks like you're just trying to be contrary while thinking you're having a "conversation". it should be a good enough proxy to assess whether feminists are actually endorsing this stuff Are feminists not feminists, then? Because if feminists are endorsing it, then feminists are endorsing it. Come on, even a first-year undergraduate philosophy student wouldn't be caught dead with this kind of argument. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:44 AM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewyes question dodging, I gave you a yes or no question and not only did you not give a "yes, but", instead you didn't even attempt an answer. Wrong again. "Is it your view that..." "This is my view" You're not anywhere near as good at this as you think you are. if you agree that the quotation mark description is a feminist perspective You made it up. Therefore it is not a feminist perspective. the feminist perspective I described would reject this. The one you made up that doesn't exist in the wo… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:41 AM |
| 7 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewAre there any feminists who espouse it? Prove that. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:39 AM |
| 6 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewCan you explain how this disproves the idea that feminists have endorsed this? It's like saying that nobody has ever murdered, because the vast majority think that murder is wrong. It doesn't matter if only one in a million people kill another person, the statement "people have murdered" would still be true. In this case, feminists have advocated for this, it has been enshrined in law, and feminists continue to quote and endorse the statistics from the study that lead to this. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:38 AM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewquestion dodging. Wrong. you answer mine first I did. I restated my position to clarify it to you. and i'll answer yours. I didn't ask you one. "How about you state my point" was rhetorical. Are you OK? | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:34 AM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewSo to be clear, at this point in the conversation, Some conversation. "Sure, I'm making stuff up, that means I've "won"!" How about you state my point instead of making things up. Unfortunately, there's not a single form of feminism that isn't predicated on Patriarchy conjecture. Patriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to … | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:29 AM |
| 3 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewHow about the one we live in. You know, reality. Don't worry, you'll grow out of this when you get to about your third year of your undergrad. Or you'll have no friends, one or the other. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:17 AM |
| 5 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewWho cares if I made it up? I do, because I'm talking about reality. You could just as easily say "Nu-uh, I just invented Super Fairy Mega Ultra Sigma Feminism that's defined as the Perfect Ideology that has nothing to do with Patriarchy, so your argument is invalid". Cool story bruh, but we're talking about the real world here. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:14 AM |
| 8 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewI am making them up, Thank you for confirming that you have nothing tangible to offer a conversation about reality. What, are you a first year Philosophy undergraduate or something, thinking that acting contrary constitutes "discourse"? Read the bit I put in quotation marks. That is pretty unambiguously a feminist belief, and yet it doesn't rely on a theory of patriarchy. I have therefore disproven the original claim. I read it. You made that quote up too. Since your "evidence" is fake, you have… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 11:07 AM |
| 8 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewI don't have to have references, it's a conceptual argument You said you can think of at least four off the top of your head. Presumably, you're not just making them up and they actually exist in the world, so you must be able to evidence them, right? Unless you are just making stuff up. What's presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Looking at the state of gender relations, I think women generally have worse outcomes, Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group i… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 10:37 AM |
| 8 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewIf everyone in the feminist movement is a liberal feminist that doesn't preclude anarchist feminisms etc All of whom believe in Patriarchy - the differences are pretty minor compared to the broader-impact ideology. Power makers are not necessarily reflective of broad beliefs or endorsement today, see for instance corporatism's unpopularity Correct. But feminism is broadly accepted and endorsed. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 10:36 AM |
| 11 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewYou're conflating feminism the movement and feminism the belief systems Are there any in the feminst movement who don't identify as feminist? You're also nutpicking views that most feminists I would wager would not endorse The fact of the matter is that feminists have endorsed them, to the point where a lot of these views are enshgrined in Law and Policy. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 09:58 AM |
| 21 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewI can think of at least four on the spot. Great. Got any references? Further, even if they exist (which I doubt - you can't have a philosophy focused on redressing womens' oppression without a Patriarchy as outlined in the linked comment), certainly the vast majority of feminists believe in it. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 09:56 AM |
| 67 | Hi, i'm a feminist and i would like to understand your point of viewNormal feminist: advocate for gender equality Unfortunately, there's not a single form of feminism that isn't predicated on Patriarchy conjecture. Patriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. What rights do women lack that men have? For comparison, some rights that men lack and women have (with reference to fem… | /r/MensRights | 22/10/25 08:33 AM |
| 1 | Genuine QuestionsDid women get voting rights simultaneously with banning conscription for men in the UK Oh goodness no, not by a long shot. Women got the vote in the UK in 1919, after the First World War which featured millions of men dying for their vote (many of whom were not yet old enough to vote, but we're still requires to pay for it in blood). | /r/MensRights | 18/10/25 09:44 PM |
| 12 | Genuine QuestionsThink about a century ago when the suffragettes were fighting for equal rights but were painted as bitter and hostile. Voting rights have always been connected to obligations of civil and military conscription. In gaining women the vote, first wave feminists created a two-tier society, one where men paid for their citizenship rights with citizenship obligations to civil and military conscription, and where women got citizenship rights (the vote) gratis. In the UK, men and women gained equal voti… | /r/MensRights | 15/10/25 12:12 PM |
| 3 | Veronika Rodriguez Sentenced In Fort Gap Rape Allegation Case"I know you are but what am I?". How cunning, how poignant, a wit that cuts to the heart of the matter! You know you've not got a leg to stand on, that's why you're posting like this. And, incidentally, you're still able to. Some echo chamber this is. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/25 01:59 PM |
| 5 | Veronika Rodriguez Sentenced In Fort Gap Rape Allegation CaseNever mind. I hope you recover from your head trauma soon. Assuming it is head trauma. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/25 01:58 PM |
| 4 | Veronika Rodriguez Sentenced In Fort Gap Rape Allegation CaseSince you've nothing else to go on, I figured I'd indulge you a little by pretending you had anything to say. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/25 01:57 PM |
| 6 | Veronika Rodriguez Sentenced In Fort Gap Rape Allegation CaseLet us know how it goes. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/25 01:16 PM |
| 7 | Veronika Rodriguez Sentenced In Fort Gap Rape Allegation CaseSo as long as there are more than 17 cases of false accusations, then that's a problem to you? Do you realise 1) that's pretty callous, and 2) even with the pulled-out-of-the-air 2% stat you're looking at more than that? | /r/MensRights | 13/10/25 01:15 PM |
| 8 | Veronika Rodriguez Sentenced In Fort Gap Rape Allegation CaseYou were given citations (which was way more than you provided) and dismissed them out of hand because they didn't align with your ideological biases. And this sub is the echo chamber. On any case, an echo chamber would have banned you upon voicing dissent. Try doing that on the feminism subreddit. | /r/MensRights | 13/10/25 06:31 AM |
| 9 | Veronika Rodriguez Sentenced In Fort Gap Rape Allegation CaseRight after a whataboutism, wow. but this eschews/misrepresents the prevalence of false accusations I don't think you mean eschew here. In any case, how many innocent people need to be locked in cages before it becomes a problem? I know what my number is, what's yours? | /r/MensRights | 13/10/25 06:27 AM |
| 6 | I’ve been dating a girl for a little while and just learned that she falsely accused a guy I know of rape recently, now I’m trying to figure out what to do.A person should not be put in a cage purely based on another person's recollection and impression alone, especially if it changes after the fact. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/25 10:01 PM |
| 4 | I’ve been dating a girl for a little while and just learned that she falsely accused a guy I know of rape recently, now I’m trying to figure out what to do.They will deny deny deny, why will someone go around saying ‘yes! I did rape her!’ are we being fr? Having met a couple of people who committed sex crimes, they're more likely to say "I did XYZ, but it's OK because..." rather than "I never did anything". The fact of the matter is, you're perfectly happy to enable abuse as long as a woman's doing it to a man. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/25 02:42 PM |
| 3 | I’ve been dating a girl for a little while and just learned that she falsely accused a guy I know of rape recently, now I’m trying to figure out what to do.sorry but men more likely to lie abt assaulting, It's hilarious how feminists will argue that women are incapable of deceit. Considering that capacity for deception comes part-and-parcel with theory of mind, they're accidentally arguing that women are cognitively inferiour to men (who, as you've claimed, are much more likely to lie). Snark aside, you are quite possibly doubting a victim of abuse. It's not even victim blaming - you need a recognised victim for that! | /r/MensRights | 12/10/25 12:50 PM |
| 3 | I’ve been dating a girl for a little while and just learned that she falsely accused a guy I know of rape recently, now I’m trying to figure out what to do.There’s plenty of evidence to back it up—it’s just a short google away You can't prove a negative. You're trying to make a claim about a dark number, that researchers cannot possibly measure accurately. there is nothing anti-male about it. Hooo boy. Rapists aren’t all men The UK legislature disagrees with you. A person (A) commits an offence if— (a)he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis, Believing victims isn’t about believing women. It is when… | /r/MensRights | 12/10/25 12:47 PM |
| 8 | I’ve been dating a girl for a little while and just learned that she falsely accused a guy I know of rape recently, now I’m trying to figure out what to do.How about from the perspective of Truth? "Her Truth" by itself should never be enough to lock someone in a cage. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/25 12:44 PM |
| 4 | I’ve been dating a girl for a little while and just learned that she falsely accused a guy I know of rape recently, now I’m trying to figure out what to do.You would rather believethat someone you know well is capable of serious violence than someone else is capable of speaking a lie? You do realise just how far apart those things are? but you doubt the victim? If she's a victim, she isn't lying. And if she's lying, she isn't a victim. | /r/MensRights | 12/10/25 12:43 PM |
| 16 | Women can murder children without being seen as monstersJust raped? | /r/MensRights | 11/10/25 08:56 PM |
| 16 | Women can murder children without being seen as monstersWomen are privileged with a sentencing discount for committing the same crimes as men, and your contribution is "Well brown men are just awful!"? Expand on that. How is that not a non-sequitur (as well as being heinously racist)? | /r/MensRights | 11/10/25 08:55 PM |
| 21 | Public perception of the men's rights movement is the biggest example of the Goomba FallacyMany men who consider themselves part of the movement use men's rights as an excuse for misogyny. How many? Can you give some examples of what you're on about? the same way that feminists who want to be superior to men are not real feminists. Patriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. Misandry is at the core of the ideology. Compare/contrast: mens rights advocacy is the noun of the verb (advocacy -> to ad… | /r/MensRights | 08/10/25 10:07 PM |
| 1 | why do women lie about rape?Here's a comment that references a study on the subject, with links thereof in the replies. | /r/MensRights | 04/10/25 04:02 PM |
| 8 | 'The doctor told me it was a boy. I cried for days': Middle class mothers with 'gender disappointment' will baffle anyone who has longed for a healthy baby - but they insist you shouldn't judge their 'grief' over having sonsBy the same logic, the holocaust was a great move to stop antisemitism. This won't fly. | /r/MensRights | 03/10/25 07:59 PM |
| 1 | wtf The IndependentYou're not here in good faith. If you genuinely don't get the joke, you lack the media literacy to get an explanation. If you do get the joke, then you're lying in saying you don't. Keep raging though, it's only adding to the humour! | /r/MensRights | 01/10/25 03:04 PM |
| 0 | wtf The IndependentI've read the book several times and I've watched the series. And yet. I can only assume Assume away. You're still wrong. Your sockpuppet said the same thing. Grow a sense of humour. And maybe an understanding of kink? Just because you think women can't consent to anything doesn't mean everyone is a predator like you. Or keep raging, your responses make this even funnier. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/25 02:32 PM |
| 0 | wtf The IndependentI don’t see any other meaning here when you say "These women would like to be raped and dehumanised" I fully believe you don't see any other meaning. I suggest you read the book and the discourse around it. You can call me a misogynist and claim I do nothing but hate women, but there's precisely no evidence to support your claim. Honestly, your anger just makes the joke all the funnier. | /r/MensRights | 01/10/25 02:28 PM |
| 0 | wtf The IndependentYou're so weird for assuming that I know this person and that I must have asked them to be here. Because god forbid, someone disagrees with you, right? They have a similar quality of discussion to you, it made some sense. You're the type to do that too, especially given your habits of lying about people you disagree with. You keep stating that it was a joke, what was the punchline of said joke? Please, explain your joke. I'd you didn't get it, you likely lack the media literacy to underatand an … | /r/MensRights | 01/10/25 02:23 PM |
| 0 | wtf The IndependentIn that case, since it’s fiction none of these women choose to be sex slaves to a man either. But of course it’s a problem only when it dit your narrative. Hypocrite Wait, do you think the cosplayers are actually residents of Gilead? My posting history is irrelevant to my point, Nor did I say it was. Nice deflection though, not that it's helping your case. You know your comment history is public, right? Your first comment is a proof. Gonna have to elaborate on how a joke equals constant hatred o… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/25 02:00 PM |
| 1 | wtf The IndependentHonestly these comments make it all the funnier. Butthurt much? You do realise it's fiction right? No women were harmed in the making if this book. No real women are being blamed for anything. I get rhat sometimes it's hard to tell the difference between fiction and reality, but this is one of those things. I notice you don't have a history of posting here - did UpstairsEar as you to come over to help? If so that's even more hilarious! constantly attacking anything related to women, That's quite… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/25 08:05 AM |
| 1 | wtf The IndependentThis is such a disgusting interpretation of the book, what the fuck. Chill dude. It's a joke, not a dick, don't take it so hard. "bred repeatedly by wealthy and powerful men", you mean raped? Raped repeatedly? Given the status of the fictional women in the fiction novel, using the term more applicable to farm animals is more in-keeping with the story's themes of dehumanisation in the narrative, don't you agree? Your commentary seems to indicate that you think it's unthinkable that any woman coul… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/25 11:50 AM |
| 7 | wtf The IndependentThis is such a disgusting interpretation of the book, what the fuck. Chill dude. It's a joke, not a dick, don't take it so hard. "bred repeatedly by wealthy and powerful men", you mean raped? Raped repeatedly? Given the status of the fictional women in the fiction novel, using the term more applicable to farm animals is more in-keeping with the story's themes of dehumanisation in the narrative, don't you agree? Your commentary seems to indicate that you think it's unthinkable that any woman coul… | /r/MensRights | 30/09/25 11:50 AM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...You’ve made it clear you’re not interested in understanding my position, only in twisting it to suit your narrative. Deeply rich coming from you. You've been shown time and time again to do exactly this. I’ve never said classism doesn’t matter No, only that it doesn't carry real historical weight, and that it's not classism when you do it. You have now moved from misrepresenting my argument Again, words have meaning, sweetie. Pointing out that you're wrong isn't misrepresentation, especially whe… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 03:31 PM |
| 73 | wtf The IndependentI wonder if there's a certain Freudian something to the fact that the women who cosplay The Handmaids Tale for these things never cosplay as the grey-clad Untouchable caste that clear the toxic waste and whatnot, but choose to go for the fertile women to be bred repeatedly by wealthy and powerful men and kept in a place of luxury commensurate with the man's position. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 03:18 PM |
| 1 | Misandry in Feminist Spaces and Misogyny in MRA Spaces…Feminists can weasel out of the accusations that their movement is anti-male in the same way though, and we rightly call them on it. They will say things like "feminism isn't anti-male, you're just conflating patriarchy with men. Patriarchy hurts men too". They can try, but the issue is that all forms of Patriarchy conjecture have the same things held as self-evident: Society is Male Dominated Male dominance privileges men over women While some men can sometimes be harmed by this system, the sys… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 03:15 PM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...I'm so convinced you're a troll tbh, within the comment you have quoted, I was clearly referencing my own dating preference and comparing it to racism to demonstrate how you made a false equivalent You were explaining how your preference for people who are in a certain social class (people with degrees) is OK and not comparable at all to any other "ism" that you would normally decry. My dating preference does not begin and end at not dating someone without a degree Sure. I'm someone who said tha… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 03:10 PM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...I never said classism has no historical weight, that’s a misrepresentation. "Equating a preference for shared educational experiences to racial exclusion is a false equivalence. One is about compatible values and lived experience, the other is about excluding people based on race, something they can’t change and that carries real historical weight". You're doing the thing again where you accuse others of misrepresenting you when they're not doing that. Racism and classism are both real, but they… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 02:44 PM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...Equating a preference for shared educational experiences to racial exclusion is a false equivalence. Racism and classism aren't exactly the same. But the question still stands. something they can’t change and that carries real historical weight TIL that classism has never had "real historical weight". Wow, so wise. My preference isn’t about excluding people due to their background or identity No, it's just about whether or not they've attended higher education, which is a strongly classed experi… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 02:21 PM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...If someone were to say, "I don't date black people; it's not based on them being black, but more so on having a shared lived experience with me", would that be horribly racist, or are you OK with that sentiment when it suits your point? | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 02:01 PM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...I think I have effectively explained my thought process, feelings etc. Nobody said you thought otherwise. and I have demonstrated a complete understanding of said thoughts The hubris. The thing about self awareness is that if you lack it, you may well think you don't and be surprised when others point out things about you that you don't necessarily like. For instance, it's amazing how you can say that "I wouldn't date someone who doesn't have at least a degree" isn't in any way classist, when hi… | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 01:43 PM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...BUT when they're presented with a man who does have said standards, they still complain lol Have you read the criticisms to your comment re: the classism inherent in this comment, or are you once again misrepresenting others' viewpoints because you can't face the criticism? | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 01:39 PM |
| 2 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...I did. You're once again showing just how completely devoid of self-awareness you are when it comes to your own shortcomings, like that time you claimed that having the right to due process eroded isn't a rights issue. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 01:28 PM |
| 3 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...It isn't classism to simply want a partner that has a shared experience with you and shared values. That's not what you said. You said: "I'm a man and I wouldn't date someone who doesn't have at least a degree" That is classism. Whether you like it or not. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 09:09 AM |
| 1 | Woman cancels date after finding out where he works...I am incredibly passionate about education, I enjoy learning new things Unless it contraindicates your ideological worldview | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 09:07 AM |
| 2 | Misandry in Feminist Spaces and Misogyny in MRA Spaces…Only if one erroneously conflates feminism with women. Female non-feminsts and male feminists undermine that. It does have negative implications about the moral character of people who choose to cleave to the ideology after being presented with the logic and evidence, though. That's not limited to a single gender though. | /r/MensRights | 29/09/25 03:00 AM |
| 1 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?Cool story. Have fun tilting at that windmill! | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 09:35 PM |
| 4 | Misandry in Feminist Spaces and Misogyny in MRA Spaces…Thoroughness is exactly why I prefer to have these kinds of discussions on a public forum rather than in DMs - others see the conversation, so they see how to disarm the various hate-points as well as have good sources and resources to cite. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 08:54 PM |
| 5 | Misandry in Feminist Spaces and Misogyny in MRA Spaces…Yeah, she DMed me too to try to keep things going. I honestly wonder whether she had me confused with someone else. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 08:38 PM |
| 1 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?instead of addressing the actual point of their argument you poke fun at a whoops Given the other positions they've taken previously, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to point out that discrepency. But you do you. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:40 PM |
| 1 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?you dont even remember what you said an hour ago You mean this comment? I'm genuinely confused here: are you claiming that pointing out that self-diagnosis only applies to the self discredits the idea that self-diagnosis only applies to the self? If so, that's pretty unhinged. If not, what position do you think I'm taking that's being discredited? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:21 PM |
| 39 | Misandry in Feminist Spaces and Misogyny in MRA Spaces…Why do you think it’s tolerated and not undermining to the wider credibility of the feminism movement, to have a vocal minority of genuine extremist misandrists, Patriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It's tolerated because it's the core of the ideology. Meanwhile, mens rights advocacy is the noun of the verb (advocacy -> to advocate). Advocating for rights does not require a worldview in which women … | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:09 PM |
| -2 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?A typo* my comments in this thread have been entirely accurate outside of one word Shame about your other comments. It makes you seem jealous I'm better educated than you. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:02 PM |
| 0 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?Yeah, that's what I thought. Thanks for playing. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 05:56 PM |
| 0 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?OK, given the context here that I've made precisely one comment to this person here, what position do you think I'm discrediting? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 05:42 PM |
| 0 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?You're right. I should really focus on their long and storied history of incurable lying, dismissing, discrediting, and denying men's issues even in the face of actual evidence of them saying the things they claim not to say. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 05:35 PM |
| -3 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?Thank you for finally admitting you're wrong about something. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 05:34 PM |
| -9 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?You don't "self diagnose" other people. Self-diagnosis is diagnosis of oneself. You really earned that Masters, huh. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 04:33 PM |
| 12 | Borderline Personality Disorder and Women?Also afaik eupd in men is often missed which goes some way to explaining why so many more women are diagnosed with it. Women with it generally get help, men with it generally get prison. The condition is massively overrepresented in the prison population. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 04:31 PM |
| 1 | What are some examples of “misogyny” being mislabeled?I cite my claims, and you've yet to answer a single one of them despite your claims to the contrary. You, on the other hand, claim not to be a liar who denegrates mens' advocates and dismisses mens' rights issues as not-real, even in the face of actual evidence of you saying the things you claim not to say. Quite amazing. I stand by what I said, a study of your brain would be an amazing benefit to science. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 04:08 PM |
| 1 | What are some examples of “misogyny” being mislabeled?So the fact that the sources cited in the slides take into account class, sexuality, wealth, etc, doesn't mean anything to you? Or is it your proposition that the gender gap far outweighing the race gap is caused entirely by gay people swaying the average? If so, that would make gay people awfully criminally inclined to sway it that far. Is that really what you're trying to say here, or are you simply refusing to acknowledge the evidence in front of you? You have certain privileges for being a m… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 04:04 PM |
| 6 | AmazingYou create a bad reputation no one's going to like you. You're so close. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:40 AM |
| 3 | AmazingYou've done such a good job demonstrating that so far. | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:39 AM |
| 6 | Feminism or misandryWhat rights do men have that women lack? For comparison, here are some legal rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came… | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:36 AM |
| 3 | Feminism or misandryBut do talk about your vulnerabilities, gentlemen. Don't worry, feminists like this support men too! | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:30 AM |
| 3 | Feminism or misandryDid you read the linked comment? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:20 AM |
| 1 | What are some examples of “misogyny” being mislabeled?What do you think I'm saying in that comment? | /r/MensRights | 27/09/25 06:19 AM |
| 7 | Feminism or misandryPatriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. They're different words, but the concept is the same. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/25 09:11 PM |
| 4 | What are some examples of “misogyny” being mislabeled?Someone doesn't get the point of the post. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/25 09:09 PM |
| 6 | What are some examples of “misogyny” being mislabeled?Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged like men in general, or are men systemically disadvantaged like black people? | /r/MensRights | 26/09/25 08:04 PM |
| 6 | Woman who lived as a Man for 18 months (2006) - Takes her own lifeThank you for conceding the point that you are a habitual liar who hypocritically claims to want to help men while denying their issues. The attempts to deflect and wiggle around criticism don't change the fact that your terrible takes are there to see, as is your complete refusal to take responsibility or acknowledge criticism. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/25 01:11 PM |
| 12 | Woman who lived as a Man for 18 months (2006) - Takes her own lifeAnd there's the portrayal as a victim to deflect from the bad takes! Make bad takes, get called out on them. No sense crying about it. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/25 12:30 PM |
| 13 | Woman who lived as a Man for 18 months (2006) - Takes her own lifeyou essentially said if I was anyone but me, you would believe it Way to read into things. You were so close to engaging honestly. Then again, you also said you would never engage with me again, and that lasted even less than you did before unblocking me to try to get yet another last word | /r/MensRights | 25/09/25 11:08 AM |
| 24 | Woman who lived as a Man for 18 months (2006) - Takes her own lifeThat would make sense, if it weren't for the evidence that you do in fact dismiss, minimalise, and deny that men have issues that need addressing (outside of the standard feminist "men have problems because men won't stop oppressing even though it hurts them" narratives). For instance, you reject evidence of gender-discrimination on the basis of being male, gaslight and lie by claiming to not know of any feminist policies that have caused harm while having had extensive discussions about the Dul… | /r/MensRights | 25/09/25 09:19 AM |
| 22 | Woman who lived as a Man for 18 months (2006) - Takes her own lifeThe quotation marks around "so difficult" does seem to indicate a position you hold - specifically that men don't have it difficult. It's good you're not denying that this is your position - if you can't speak the truth, at the very least don't lie. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/25 09:04 AM |
| 31 | Woman who lived as a Man for 18 months (2006) - Takes her own lifebecause men have it “so difficult”. For someone who claims to care about mens issues, you do seem to spend a lot of time here dismissing, minimalising, and denying mens' issues. | /r/MensRights | 25/09/25 08:47 AM |
| 2 | The Keeper By Jessica MoorNo need to get upset. You're posting in a public forum, don't cry because you're getting a response. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/25 03:36 PM |
| 3 | The Keeper By Jessica MoorNot everything has to be inclusive Funny how feminists argue the exact opposite of this when it comes to including (read: focusing on) women. Only when it's about male vulnerability is inclusivity an option rather than a necessity. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/25 03:31 PM |
| 4 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationI have never said someone’s best achievement would be their death, that is exactly what you said. That my best contribution would be on a dissection table, Poor dear. You got your feelings hurt. However, you're acting like I was telling you to kill yourself, or threatening you, or something. That was not the case. What I said was hyperbole in response to your almost preternatural ability to present terrible takes, gaslight, lie, and deflect to try to avoid all criticism and responsibility. All o… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 09:09 PM |
| 5 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationI would argue that your takes are disgusting Takes like "There is copious evidence that feminists entrench gendered rights disparities"? "Having the right to due process eroded is a rights issue"? "Men are good"? stating the best contribution to science they could give is on a dissecting table. Finally you're actually stating what I said! Well done, I knew you could tell the truth. Now tell the whole truth: Your best contribution to science would be on the disecting table to work out just how yo… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 08:31 PM |
| 11 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationIf you post on a public forum, you're going to get responses. If you can't handle that, that's on you. after your disgusting comments towards me Your takes are disgusting. I've evidenced that a lot, and you still cling to your ideology despite the copious evidence against it. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 08:19 PM |
| 3 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationThat user is incredible. We've had a lot of "discussions" - he freaks out when you show evidence, claiming that a glut of evidence is gishgalloping and bad faith, especially when it's evidence of his own terrible takes! I remarked recently that his greatest contribution to science would be to donate his body to science so they can find out how the hell he happened, and he pitched a fit and claimed I was "fantasising about [his] death". He gaslights, misrepresents, lies, and avoids criticism and … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 07:09 PM |
| 3 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationYeah, I'm not going to keep repeating what I am saying, They didn't ask you to. They said: I've pointed out specific reasons why that is idiotic, feel free to respond to those points if you're mentally capable <3 So clearly, you aren't. You're once again deflecting, equivocating, and squirming around questions that undermine your worldview to maintain your sense of validity of your hate ideology. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 07:06 PM |
| 4 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationWe understand a demographics belief system based on self reporting, how else would we understand how people feel? You self report having excellent self-awareness and skills at reflection. In practice, you accuse others of doing a lot of things that you yourself do and they aren't, such as misrepresting others' points. Finally, this study was published. This means it was peer reviewed to ensure scientific rigour and credibility. So are studies on rape that defin rape as something men do to women.… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 07:04 PM |
| 8 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationIf you see something on /r/mensrights that's misogynistic, you won't hesitate to claim that it's evidence that /r/mensrights is misogynistic. The minute it's your favourite hate group in the crosshairs, suddenly we can't ever really know. Hypocrite. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 05:23 PM |
| 8 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationI work in research and I have two psychology degrees, the study seems to be very thoroughly done to me. And yet you reject evidence of gender-discrimination on the basis of being male. That you are able to get two degrees despite lacking basic critical thinking skills is a sad indictment of the universities involved. It has been published so it was peer reviewed which ensures the scientific evidence is reliable and credible So was Koss' study that defind rape as something men do to women. Also, … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 05:22 PM |
| 3 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationIt is a myth that feminists hate men Patriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 05:16 PM |
| 3 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationI'm not going to act like all feminists are perfect and none of them have ever said anything negative, that would be ridiculous. And yet you throw a fit whenever you are presented with the evidence of feminists and feminist organisations acting contrary to equality ((1), (2)). I suppose that's what annoys me about the 'feminism is a hate movement' statement, it doesn't take into consideration the nuances of the movement and the different beliefs that exist under said umbrella term. Patriachy con… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 05:15 PM |
| 7 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationYou will ignore said examples from real feminist organisations in favour of anonymous people upvoting a comment on reddit. You ignore the vast amount of evidence of real feminists and real feminist organisations actively entrenching rights disparities between men and women ((1), (2)). My comment will also most likely get downvoted because the vast majority of you do not care about equality. While feminists fight against equality as shown above, egalitarianism will be necessarily antifeminist. Yo… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 05:14 PM |
| 55 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationSuch as "Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism For those who don't speak German, "My Struggle" translates to "Mein Kampf". | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 11:56 AM |
| 180 | Feminist sub debates the aptness of calling men trash, overwhelmingly agrees that REVENGE for the past 4000 years is a "fair and sensible" justificationPatriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. Despite this, if you have a narrative where Group X is innately monstrous and victimises your group, "revenge" against Group X seems fair and sensible, even to the point of genocide. The kind of propaganda that lead to the holocaust wasn't so much "We hate Jews", and… | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 10:39 AM |
| 8 | You just need to find the right womanPresumably women who are also in their early twenties. Are you really using that narrow demographic to describe women as a whole? | /r/MensRights | 22/09/25 10:34 AM |
| 11 | "I don't need no man"If two adults consensually have a child together Given the utter lack of options for men in deciding whether to take on parenting responsibilities, how can one meaningfully consent to have a child? Moreover, how about if the man doesn't want to have the child but the woman does? Should he be exempt from child support obligations? Edit: Your response is showing up in notifications, but not on the thread for me. From what I can see of it, it looks like you're lying again about the nature of the co… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/25 09:26 PM |
| 2 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesWrong. Or another lie, it's hard to tell with you. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/25 05:09 AM |
| 7 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesI am objectively very self aware and good at self reflectin And yet you fail to see how, for instance, having the right to due process eroded isn't a rights issue might be a bad take. But sure, a person who knows nothing about me I'm going on what you're giving. You can say anything you like about your assignment, I'm sure you got a top grade, a gold star, a pat on the head and the teacher told you you're their favourite little pupil. Bullshit. I've evidence your takes, and you're outright lying… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 08:30 PM |
| 7 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesI don't think I have any bad takes, No, I guess you wouldn't. Self-awareness isn't your strong suit, which is a bad sign for your field. hopefully more people will read what I am saying I hope so. Then they'll see that you're lying about being misrepresented. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 07:50 PM |
| 8 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesWorried about what? In response to having your bad takes pointed out, with plenty of evidence: "This is obsessive and worrying." Never mind the history of lies, misrepresentation, bad-faith tactics, and rabid avoidance of self-examination, the guy pointing this all out is the bad guy! Unlike you, reddit is not the be all end all for me You're projecting again. tbh im kinda over this sub now, I'm sure the community will be different for your lack of stellar insight. Anyway, feel free to send your… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 07:29 PM |
| 7 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesYou know fine well I can (and have) provided the evidence (which you deflect from by trying to make the conversation about how worried you are). | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 07:02 PM |
| 8 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesI don't need your permission to do so. You've a history of lying and projecting while trying to avoid facing challenges to your ideology, so your credibility is pretty shot anyway. Just in case anyone else is thinking of taking you seriously. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 06:53 PM |
| 10 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesDeflection it is. Change it up a bit, won't you? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 06:38 PM |
| 9 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesWhat's presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. If it was as common as you claim, it should be easy to prove. So it's clear then that you're just projecting your own indiscretions onto the community. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 06:37 PM |
| 12 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesCan you link to some examples? Because this looks like you're doing the thing where you accuse others of doing the thing you do. Again. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 05:30 PM |
| 10 | Women who hate men: a comparative analysis across extremist Reddit communitiesYou're doing the thing where you accuse others of doing the thing you do. Again. Now, are you going to address the research, or are you going to try to deflect from the research by claiming bad faith, or (falsely) claiming that you've "debunked" the research already despite having never done so? | /r/MensRights | 20/09/25 05:28 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Time is a-winding down and this is more time than I would usually give a non American maga sympathizer that misuses words and phrases like he gets paid by the error. You're hilarious. You have nothing to go on. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 09:44 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Again, we'll pretend comment histories don't exist. You can. Mine backs up what I'm saying. Do we have an endgame here? Honestly, I'm taking great enjoyment from your responses at this stage. They're bizarre, and you give more when you're poked. Hell, you almost pulled off a flounce-and-bounce earlier, but you're still here, telling obvious lies and gaslighting like it's not obvious. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 09:35 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?I believe you believe that. Why frame the truth as some kind of opinion? In the first case, I didn’t insist, just invited you to show your working. Framing it as some kind of malicious pushy insistence and expecting me to go along with it is absolutely gaslighting. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 09:22 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?In this case, because you're outright lying about me. | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 09:17 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?OK, we'll pretend post histories are invisible. Shouldn't have any trouble proving it then. "Where's the non maga men's rights groups" is a question. If you think that's hostile, don't know what to tell ya, buddy. No, but the rest of the commentary was. The fact that you're lying about what was said doesn't look good for you. It's very egocentric to think somebody needs to convince you of anything If that was my position, that would be correct. Asking someone where they're coming from isn't the … | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 09:03 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?it's not the first time you've addressed it. People aren't going to keep repeating the same arguments with you if you didn't listen the first 20 times. Where did that happen? that is, of course, a right archetype Oh I see! You think I'm a MAGA type, that's what you meant by "archetype". That explains the hostility - questions do not equal attacks, you're OK. And it's not just prevalent here - it's 1) a function of demographics overall in most subs, regardless of topic Claiming that it's in most … | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 08:39 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Why? Because I'm curious about your viewpoint, and if there's information I'm missing I like to know about it. How nefarious. you thought " convince me that it is" was the natural progression of conversation? You claimed that it is. I asked where that claim comes from, because that's how a discussion forum works. Are you OK? What would be the endgame? How about a free exchange of ideas? I'm not entirely sure why you've been nothing but snarky throughout this exchange, and trying to paint me as s… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 07:52 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Again, this is not a debate. And also again, I don't do sealioning. Since when was asking you to explain your position (that this is a Maga infiltrated men's rights group) sealioning? Even the people in this group don't agree with you. Prove it. Regardless, since reading is hard for you and since you're insistent on some form of conversation, you either are trying to do 1 of 2 things. You're mind-reading again. I'm not trying to convince you of anything, I'm actually asking you to convince me. I… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 07:35 PM |
| 1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Also, I'm not making a claim, I'm making a statement. OK, you definitely don't know how language works. This is why. Yes, that is what I was getting at. I'm glad we agree. You absolutely quoted me, yes. And you 100% responded, also true. Again, yes. That's what I did. Well done. Hyperbole That you presented. Are you OK? But you're definitely fitting the archetype The archetype you definitely understand and absolutely have the intellect to explain, and definitely not just a buzzword you're throwi… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 07:10 PM |
| 0 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Nope Neither. But this tracks from someone who thinks observation is logic. I don't do sealioning. I think you misunderstand what sealioning is. In any case, what's presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. That's not what a telepath is. Really? You claim to know what I'm thinking, and that's not claiming to see into my mind? Or do you genuinely not understand how language works? Yours. I don't think you understand what an archetype is. Oh well. What you said has nothing to d… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 03:43 PM |
| -2 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Well, that explains that. Speak more on that. ALL I'M WONDERING is if there's a MRM without that An MRM without observation? Or do you mean one that doesn't criticise the people you like for observable missteps? I'm overly saying magatypes, which has taken over this group Cool. Can you evidence that? But you think I want a conversation and discussion with you Wow, a telepath! I've seen and lived among your archetype And what archetype would that be? And why the opposite of that isn't a liberal m… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 03:11 PM |
| -4 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?I imagine you wouldn't recognize it. I think your imagination is overactive. No matter, I'm not trying to logic you out of what you didn't logic yourself into Is observation not logic? The question, again, is where are the men's rights group that aren't just a bunch of closeted conservatives Thank you for dropping the "misinformation" part of it. As for the conservatism, given the way the US left treats men, is it any wonder that a number of US MRAs express conservative viewpoints? | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 02:59 PM |
| -5 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Where's the misinformation? Is it in the room with us now? | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 02:53 PM |
| -1 | Why are left leaning opinions accepted and celebrated even when they are promoting violence?Do you realise the world is bigger than the US, and so is the MRM? | /r/MensRights | 19/09/25 02:49 PM |
| 1 | Hot Take: I actually DO NOT wish to reject my Masculinity.There is a massive difference between masculinity and Toxic masculinity. if you could separate the toxicity from masculinity, what would be left that isn't a gender neutral trait? Specifically, what is left that is a trait found predominantly or only in men? | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 09:15 PM |
| 3 | Hot Take: I actually DO NOT wish to reject my Masculinity.Well aren't you the charmer. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 09:13 PM |
| 0 | Hot Take: I actually DO NOT wish to reject my Masculinity.Can't really take a Free Speech platform while banning people who post ideology like that user. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 09:09 PM |
| 1 | Hot Take: I actually DO NOT wish to reject my Masculinity.Yeah, i've debunked your evidence multiple times No, you haven't. You've half-assed, equivocated, and avoided addressing the points. That is not the same. Yet you cling to it despite it not even saying what you think it says. Liar. You know people can check the links, right? I am now completely over debunking any evidence from you But you haven't yet! ironic that you are trying to say that I dismiss evidence though lmao You regularly accuse others of doing things you do. We've been over this. re… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 02:09 PM |
| 1 | Hot Take: I actually DO NOT wish to reject my Masculinity.You're extremely paranoid and hostile, I wasn't trying to do a 'gotcha' or anything like that, I guess gaslighting comes easy to you. You've tried it before. I was simply asking because you have a completely distorted view of feminism and I was wondering where that came from. "Distorted" based on evidence and reasearch. You have been presented with plenty of evidence in your time here, and you still cling to the idea that all of the evidence, including video evidence, is wrong, and what's in you… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 01:23 PM |
| 2 | Would a man get the same treatment? - Nurse who raped stepson, 15, gets 2 years in prison, 2 years of community control, 10 years probation, 200 hours of community service, court costs, and fines.Answered here, in case your question is linked elsewhere to misrepresent my position. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 12:20 PM |
| 1 | Hot Take: I actually DO NOT wish to reject my Masculinity.Steady on Mr. Entitled. First you complain that I respond to your comments, and now you throw a huff because I didn't? In any case, the notification didn't come through. I'm also aware that you have a history of asking questions with the stated intention of understanding, only to show that you were looking for a gotcha and using it as a platform for cheap insults - bad faith, from someone who keeps accusing others of such. Your attempted deflection from the evidence that you're wrong, disguised … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 12:19 PM |
| 8 | Hot Take: I actually DO NOT wish to reject my Masculinity.Women who identify as feminists though believe in dismantling all gendered stereotypes for both men and women. Feminists fight to keep rape a male-only crime, for instance in israel, India, and Nepal. This is backed up by feminist research that defines rape as something only men do, with female-perpetrated forced sex being described as "men having sex while ambivalent of their desires". Feminists contest making hate-speech against men count as hate speech like it does against women. Feminist org… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/25 11:18 AM |
| 2 | Would a man get the same treatment? - Nurse who raped stepson, 15, gets 2 years in prison, 2 years of community control, 10 years probation, 200 hours of community service, court costs, and fines.No, I am not a prison abolitionist for either gender. I believe that if someone commits a crime and is found guilty of said crime then they should face the consequence in line with said crime Correct. And for women that tends to be community payback orders, rather than incarceration. Indeed, when women receive an average of 63% discounted prison sentences compared to men who commit the same crimes, and women make up about 4% of the prison population, it's clear that, as a society, we already pra… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/25 06:14 PM |
| 2 | Would a man get the same treatment? - Nurse who raped stepson, 15, gets 2 years in prison, 2 years of community control, 10 years probation, 200 hours of community service, court costs, and fines.Yes. You regularly call for people (though lets face it, just men) to be put into cages that qualify for torture. We barely do that for women at all in the UK. So it would perhaps be fairer to say that you're a prison abolitionist for women only. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/25 04:29 PM |
| 3 | Is masculinity the product of biology or culture? The case of the exceptionally passive Semai men of Southeast Asia. — The Centre for Male PsychologyI got into it with that user recently. Their logic can also be applied to ascribing racist stereotypes as "black traits", because they're traits stereotypically ascribed to people of that birth category. As is their style, they threw a hissy fit and called me uneducated. They're not interested in honest debate, despite what they say - they're after conversion, not conversation. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/25 03:47 PM |
| 2 | Would a man get the same treatment? - Nurse who raped stepson, 15, gets 2 years in prison, 2 years of community control, 10 years probation, 200 hours of community service, court costs, and fines.Once again calling for prolonging torture of men. And that's not even taking into account the ones who don't "deserve" it because they didn't do it. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/25 03:43 PM |
| 3 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.You've yet to demonstrate anything that your take is predicated on. You twist and turn and deflect. You're not educated, you're indoctrinated, and salty that nobody here is falling for it like you did. Honestly, I find it really funny just how frequently you say "I'm gonna end it here", only to come back and spout more rubbish because your fragile little ego can't handle not having the last word. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 07:01 PM |
| 3 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.you don't understand social constructs at all and therefore you cannot have a productive conversation about masculinity since you don't understand it at its core. Also you: "They don't exist in objective reality". You'd rather cling to make-believe and stereotypes rather than talk about what's real. I understand what a social construct is. You don't seem to realise that you're doing exactly the same thing as the white supremacists (again) by clinging to stereotypes that you claim to know don't a… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 06:42 PM |
| 3 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.lol McDonalds wifi Your source is bunk. if you don't even understand what a social construct is Link to where I said that. Or are you misrepresenting again? The difference is it is not a cultural norm or expectation for POC to live up to said negative stereotypes regarding their race, as a society, Like "tradition", it depends where you are. Where do the stereotypes come from, if they were not, at one time or another, accepted as a cultural norm? we actually shut down racism and tell POC that sa… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 06:22 PM |
| 2 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.Lol 403 error. Former feminist here, Hi. I'm well acquainted with Toxic Masculinity, and like you I accepted it without care for the ramifications for a long time. Now, answer the question: There are lots of unflattering stereotypes about, say, black people that could be described as "toxic". Are you going to argue that "toxic blackness" is a real thing that should be addressed, or are stereotypes only reasonable when they apply to men (including black men)? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 06:04 PM |
| 8 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.You're really invested in demonising men, aren't you. There are lots of unflattering stereotypes about, say, black people that could be described as "toxic". Are you going to argue that "toxic blackness" is a real thing that should be addressed, or are stereotypes only reasonable when they apply to men (including black men)? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 05:55 PM |
| 2 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.They don't exist in objective reality, no. Everything else after this is irrelevant. Due to this, we cannot ignore traits that are stereotypically associated with either masculinity and femininity due to the measurable impact said traits have on reality, despite not existing in objective reality Link to where I said that. There are no masculine traits, there are no feminine traits. You yourself said that this was the case. So why gender toxicity? You can't have your cake and eat it. "Toxic Mascu… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 05:44 PM |
| 3 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.The majority of the prison population in the US are non-white. Are you willing to commit to the idea that non-white races are innately more criminal, like you've committed to for maleness? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 05:04 PM |
| 2 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.Of course they're gender neutral, anyone can display either masculine or feminine traits. So Toxic Masculinity doesn't exist, because all traits are neutral. They're simply negative stereotypes associated with traditional masculinity, Traditions change over time, and the traits are all neutral anyway. So why call it masculinity? Why cleave to a mindset that you know (or at least claim to know) is false? Not sure why you're having such a hard time understanding stereotypes Thank you for confirmin… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 04:59 PM |
| 4 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.I see. So they're all gender neutral traits. So why gender them by calling them toxic masculinity, rather than referring to reality? I suppose you could say that being confident is a positive masculine trait Bear in mind, any trait that is masculine necessarily mean that most if not all women do not manifest it. Are women, as a rule, unconfident? The slightest observation will show that's not true. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 04:52 PM |
| 2 | The importance of fatherhood, as told by a woman.If you removed the toxicity from Masculinity, what would be left that isn't a gender neutral trait? | /r/MensRights | 14/09/25 04:37 PM |
| 2 | I thought it was possible to have a reconciliation of Feminism and Men's RightsSo you concede that women do not lack rights that men have, and as shown have rights that men don't. And yet you seem to think women are subjugated? | /r/MensRights | 11/09/25 07:38 PM |
| 3 | I thought it was possible to have a reconciliation of Feminism and Men's RightsWhat rights do men have that women lack? For comparison, a few rights that women have and men lack are: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof. Feminist commentators have said that … | /r/MensRights | 11/09/25 04:56 PM |
| 1 | To all the gay men in this forumnot only are u misrepresenting me but you have a whole list. Guess you forgot about the post made just under an hour ago. You can keep lying about being misrepresented, but the fact of the matter is that I pointed out things you said, and provided the context via the links. That's the opposite of misrepresentation. You, however, as demonstrated above, do the exact opposite, then claim to be the victim of misrepresentation in order to distract from your being called out for your own bad behaviour… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/25 09:40 AM |
| 1 | To all the gay men in this forumOoh, another one to add to the list: predicting your behaviour becomes "pointing out what (I) am doing" | /r/MensRights | 11/09/25 09:11 AM |
| 1 | To all the gay men in this forumLol called it | /r/MensRights | 11/09/25 09:03 AM |
| 1 | To all the gay men in this forumbecause I don’t do that You should know better than to blatently lie to someone who has a habit of showing up with the receipts. [Explicitly stating that they're not characterising all women is irrelevant, because you've made up in your mind that this was the case(https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1nd5xds/to_all_the_gay_men_in_this_forum/nden285/) [Failure to disprove copious evidence of feminist wrongdoing became "you send information that you think backs your point. I have dismantle… | /r/MensRights | 11/09/25 08:45 AM |
| 1 | To all the gay men in this forumThank you for finally admitting it. Shame you had to wrongly accuse me to do so, but baby steps I guess. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/25 10:14 PM |
| 1 | To all the gay men in this forumLooks like someone's misrepresenting someone's stance. Again. | /r/MensRights | 10/09/25 07:09 PM |
| 3 | List of feminist organizations supporting/advocating for laws that discriminate against men?Here are a couple of lists. ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 08/09/25 06:30 AM |
| 1 | Any younger men just not want to date anymore?reading is not a problem for high iq, so much so that after 5 words i stopped reading I hope you get better. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/25 04:25 PM |
| 1 | Any younger men just not want to date anymore?That's a lot of word-salad, my guy. Can you rephrase so that you're comprehendable? | /r/MensRights | 06/09/25 01:58 PM |
| 2 | Making a Documentary About False Accusers, Would Love To Hear Your StoryBut if a man is falsely accused, charged and convicted in court on a false accusation then by your own admission you would believe him to be guilty until his innocence is proven? Bear in mind too, that exculpatory evidence is barred from consideration on the grounds that it is irrelevant, and appeal courts are reluctant to grant appeals on the basis that it would "undermine public trust in the system" (as if it hasn't been undermined already). The problem is that, with feminist reforms to the co… | /r/MensRights | 06/09/25 11:27 AM |
| 5 | Making a Documentary About False Accusers, Would Love To Hear Your StoryI would rather believe a victim and be wrong than believe a rapist is innocent and be wrong. Thank you for admitting that you would rather have innocent men tortured and branded for life than disbelieve a woman (who still has access to all of the support available to rape victims). | /r/MensRights | 06/09/25 09:26 AM |
| 3 | Making a Documentary About False Accusers, Would Love To Hear Your StoryExculpatory evidence, such as evidence that the accuser is lying, is considered "not relevant", and thus is not put before a jury. Even if a person is found guilty, that doesn't realistically mean anything because the jury necessarily doesn't have access to all of the evidence. | /r/MensRights | 06/09/25 09:25 AM |
| 3 | Making a Documentary About False Accusers, Would Love To Hear Your StoryYou don't think this topic is worth the bother of addressing. Since the consequences of believing a guilty person is that a person who is harmed doesn't get recognised as such (but still has access to all of the support available to rape victims), while believing a false accuser results in an innocent man losing his right to due process thanks to feminist reforms and being thrown in a torture cage, while being branded for life thereafter via the sex offender's registry and news media being permi… | /r/MensRights | 06/09/25 08:20 AM |
| 3 | Any younger men just not want to date anymore?dont spread propaganda [Immediately spouts propaganda] | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 10:06 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?"I'm out. Peace!" ... "One more thing!" Hilarious. If I keep commenting, will you keep coming back to satisfy the fragile ego? Nah man. You keep saying the same thing over and over again. You are exhausting. Truth has a habit of being self-sustaining. I'm sure it is exhausting to keep doing the mental gymnastics you do to dismiss the evidence you ask for in favour of cosying up to hate groups. If I wanted a girlfriend, I’d have one. Doubt. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?I guess you wanted to have the last word to feel like you landed a killer gotcha. I hope the flounce-and-bounce is a saving grace for you. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 03:02 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?You can write the perfect equation for why the patriarchy is bad and the people who need to care will not care. I hear you. I showed you how feminism is incompatible with mens rights advocacy, in theory and practice, and here you are still pushing for acquiessing to the group that hates you. That doesn't prove anything long-term, only that you're not one of the reasonable people you claim to want to reach. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 02:52 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Coming from the guy who was presented with the logical evidence of feminism's incompatibility with mens rights advocacy, asked for actions, was given actions, then dismissed it out of hand in favour of appeasement. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 02:40 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Cool. I'm going to keep pointing out the facts. As I said, keep appeasing the dominant political narrative while thinking that changes anything, let me know how that goes for you. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 02:20 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Can you explain how acquiessing to the dominant political narrative, as unreasonable as it is, is going to help change it? | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 01:26 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?I’m advocating for seeing past this logic, because it doesn’t do anything other than appeasing the people who hate us. Not giving them an inch is appeasement. Sure. Maybe look up what that means. It also alienates the people who are reasonable, because it is bickering. Reasonable people see evidence, and ideological rejection of that evidence. And it is ultimately meaningless. No, countering the narrative, and helping others do so, helps reach out to those reasonable people. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 01:26 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Sure, the evidence I've given and logic I've laid out amounts to a "boogeyman". Keep trying appeasing the people who hate you, let me know how that works out for you. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 11:18 AM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?i've never said or denied anything about men's rights though? all i listed out were the problems women face, which was asked. The issue is that they're being described as womens issues, when they are in fact either gender-neutral, more complicated, or reskinned mens issues to focus on women. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 10:01 AM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?sides are men's and women's rights Those aren't opposed. You're running the risk of conflating womens rights advocacy with feminism. Womens rights advocacy is the noun of a verb (advocacy -> to advocate), same as mens rights advocacy, while feminism is an ideology that holds as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It is not compatible with any kind of gender equality movement. women in most islamic countries (especially afghanistan) face extreme oppression The… | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 09:43 AM |
| 4 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Feminism's first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier class system: one tier gained voting rights gratis, the other purchased theirs with the civil responsibility of civil and military conscription. By that metric, voting rights in the UK were gender-equal in 1963 when the draft was abolished; in the US, they still don't have them. It was never about equality, right from the beginning. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/25 05:09 AM |
| 6 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Women didn't used to have the right to vote And men did, in exchange for civil and military conscription. Feminism's first big victory was the establishment of a two-tier class system: one tier gained voting rights gratis, the other purchased theirs with the civil responsibility of civil and military conscription. By that metric, voting rights in the UK were gender-equal in 1963 when the draft was abolished; in the US, they still don't have them. and couldn't own property Wrong. Women have alway… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 11:19 PM |
| 3 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Dude, if you haven’t watched this, please do: https://youtu.be/3WMuzhQXJoY I'm aware of Cassie Jaye. I contributed to the Red Pill kickstarter. You are aware that she no longer identifies as a feminist, which rather undermines the point - and it wasn't done by appeasing and refraining from criticising the ideology. is that she would call herself a feminist again hadn’t it become a hateful movement. "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man towar… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 09:49 PM |
| 6 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?OG feminism, yes. Whatever this 3rd/4th wave garbage is absolutely not. "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." Declaration of Sentiments, first wave feminism. Right from the beginning, it's been about men as monsters, women as victims. Original feminism was about equality of the sexes. Whatever we have now is about creating a two class system where women… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 06:27 PM |
| 2 | Male Genocide is in Humanity's FutureWhere were you criminalised? It's a pretty mean-spirited joke, if that's what you intended, but that's all I've communicated. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 06:22 PM |
| 0 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Expand on that. What "sides" are you referring to, and what problems are you referring to? | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 06:12 PM |
| 2 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Absolutely. People who say no need to look up the definition of feminism. Both sides want equality. Patriachy conjecture being core to all forms of feminism means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims Equality looks pretty different from what you'd expect when you come at it from that stance. It looks a lot like a supremacy movement, entrenching gender disparities in legal rights ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 06:12 PM |
| 6 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Sure, but what you are failing to acknowledge from what I said is that there are women who identify as feminists and who do agree that men have rights too And men. Lets not erase male feminists or female antifeminists by making ideology synonymous with gender. They are also shut down by mainstream feminism. "Those feminists don't represent us!" - Prove it. If the mainstream is as moderate and good as the mainstream claims, they'd do something about the feminists who Are Like That with authority … | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 05:31 PM |
| 9 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Cool, feminists are not just opposed to advocacy for men in theory as shown above, but in practice ((1), (2)). | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 04:59 PM |
| 2 | Male Genocide is in Humanity's FutureAren't you the charmer. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 04:49 PM |
| 9 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Feminism is not a cohesive thing either. Patriachy conjecture being core to all forms of feminism means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 04:27 PM |
| 20 | Is it possible to be a men's right activist and a feminist at the same time?Overall, I actually support female and men right's equally. Womens Rights Advocacy is not the same as feminism. The former is advocacy for rights for women (just as Mens Rights Advocacy is advocacy for rights for men), while feminism is an ideology. Patriachy conjecture being core to all forms of feminism means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seem… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/25 04:26 PM |
| 3 | Women are allowed to be total creeps towards menwhat I find funny is how men always brag about easily being able to overpower a woman. That's am extraordinary statement. I presume you have extraordinary evidence? The fact is most female stalkers won’t rape and kill men the way male stalkers will. Women are legally excluded from rape charges. In the UK, the Sexual Offences Act defines rape as something only a cisgendered man can do. As for murder, violent women have a tendency to use proxy violence (I.e., police and false accusations). Persona… | /r/MensRights | 02/09/25 03:50 AM |
| 5 | Women are allowed to be total creeps towards menWomen can brag about actual literal stalking, but anons allegedly making hypothetical statements ("should") is exponentially worse "to the 10th power"? So men's alleged speculations are exponentially more potent than women's actual deeds? Are women that pathetic to you? | /r/MensRights | 02/09/25 03:45 AM |
| 6 | Women are allowed to be total creeps towards menMight that have something to do with the fact that women are largely excluded from legal definitions of rape? In the UK, the Sexual Offences Act defines rwpe as something a person does with "his penis". As such, 100% of men who are raped are raped by men. That doesn't mean men are somehow innately evil, it just means they the measures exclude women from the definition. Who does that serve? | /r/MensRights | 02/09/25 03:40 AM |
| 2 | Is feminist gaslighting on the subject of misandry counterproductive?Gaps showing black people to be a disadvantaged group in the US have comparable or greater gender gaps favouring women. Are black men privileged, or are men disadvantaged? | /r/MensRights | 01/09/25 10:22 PM |
| 1 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryCool. What's presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 07:55 PM |
| 1 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryI wise man has told me you're a bit deluded. Prove it. And probably check your sources. We men don't engage in unnecessary quarrels Guess you're using "we" erroneously then? go find someone else who will engage in the goose chases. And here you are, carrying on replying, trying to land a gotcha like you don't sound utterly insecure doing so. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 07:47 PM |
| 2 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandry"If you're disregarding the opinion of someone simply based on their gender...then thats kind of odd and implies that you don't respect them based on said characteristics.". "You're completely right though" You support misogynists when it suits you, and chide people who call out the kind of people you should be calling out. Utter hypocrisy. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 06:16 PM |
| 1 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryOh dear. I hope you recover from the rigours of being asked to read for 10 seconds. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 06:14 PM |
| 3 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryYou are completely right though "I'm leaving this subreddit because it's full of women". Hypocrite much? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 05:48 PM |
| 1 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryHe does have a problem with you questioning it regardless. Because he strawmanned the position to do so. I'm leaving this sub as it is run by women, believe it or not. Misogynist, huh? I'm sure, as a good feminist, thenis3rbuou are replying to will criticise you like mad for that! Too many small minded individuals on here. Let me guess, the cure for small mindedness is to join the cult. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 05:47 PM |
| 1 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryThey corrected themselves and apologised for the misunderstanding. That misunderstanding being that you strawmanned their position. You on the other hand continuously asked me why dismissing the opinion of an older woman simply because of her gender is wrong and I answered you. Because you did the thing then denied you were doing it. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 05:45 PM |
| 16 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryBUT if you want a comparison that bad, misogyny is 100% worse than misandry. Why are you here? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 05:43 PM |
| 2 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryAgain, I said that dismissing the opinion of an older woman SIMPLY because of her age and gender is odd And did OP do that? Clearly not, as they edited the post to correct for your strawman interpretation. Just another example of how you misrepresent my stance completely and put words in my mouth lmao bye. You're doing it again, telling outright lies. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 01:23 PM |
| 3 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandrylol so you admit that you had an issue with me questioning why someone would ignore the opinion of older women simply because of their gender and age and you knew the comment was edited. Where did I say that? Go on, link to it. It isn't about granting a 'privilege; or 'revering their opinion' Then why should old women get special consideration of their opinions, like you espouse when you chide dismissal thereof? all I said was that it is odd to dismiss someone's opinion simply based on their age… | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 01:07 PM |
| 17 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryWhen did I ever compare the sufferings of men and women? "Tell that to the women under Taliban rule. You sound insanely ignorant to the realities of women around the world." All I said was that women do suffer and they are not 'overprotected', that is an ignorant viewpoint. And you missed "The misogyny in the East pales in comparison to the misandry in the very same places". Or chose to ignore it in favour of deflecting, kind of like what you're doing here with the accusation of stalking. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 01:03 PM |
| 6 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryThis is just another example of you wanting to argue with me for no actual reason. For a third time, I'll ask: why should one revere the opinions of older women specifically? Why grant them that privilege? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 12:46 PM |
| 5 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryWhen I have your comment alone to go on, and no reason to think they edited it, why the hell shouldn't I condescend to you when you're being contemptable? Again, I'll ask: why should one revere the opinions of older women specifically? Why grant them that privilege? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 12:42 PM |
| 23 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryRight. Unlike the women, the men are free from genital mutilation, are exempt from charges of rape, are societally and legally entitled to the income of women, and aren't executed for homosexulaity. You are insanely ignorant to the realities of men, at home and abroad. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 12:41 PM |
| 4 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryYou're missing an adjective there, on that makes the position different from the one you think you're objecting to. Can you spot what it is? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 12:38 PM |
| 7 | I feel really jaded about the abhorrent ignorance surrounding misandryShould they? If so, why? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/25 11:51 AM |
| 1 | Victim ideology spawned by feminism. Layer up and go back to work.it just isn’t a rights issue by definition. "I'm not getting back into that" - immediately gets back into that. You are wrong. Btw your comments kept getting deleted 🤷 they showed up on my notifs but were gone when I tried to read them Same with yours. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/25 09:56 AM |
| 1 | Victim ideology spawned by feminism. Layer up and go back to work.That is genuinely such a big reach. Pls. By itself, maybe, but considering that you've also said that having the right to due process eroded isn't a rights issue, it's apparent that your views are pretty skewed when it comes to men and their issues. You have a habit of doubling down on pretty awful takes, especially when confronted with evidence and the logical consequences of said takes. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/25 09:26 AM |
| 1 | Victim ideology spawned by feminism. Layer up and go back to work.There are already laws in place to protect men/ boys from being assaulted in the street, assault is illegal. By the same logic, feminism talking about rape, fgm, and the wage gap (leaving aside that it disappears when factoring in equal work) are wasting time because all of those are illegal too, and thus aren't legitimate issues. This is another example of your dismissal and downplaying of mens rights issues. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/25 05:32 AM |
| 6 | Seriously whats wrong with them?Right, yes. Out of context links Linked to show context. Try again. People only need to read the threads to see you’re lying Thank you for conceding that you were lying (again) when you said they were without context. I could totally post resources but that isn’t my responsibility So instead you'll criticise people for not doing what you want, when you are (allegedly) capable of doing so. I am not a “MRA”, I believe this ideology is completely counterproductive to dealing with issues men face. W… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/25 08:43 AM |
| 9 | Seriously whats wrong with them?Even though I’ve always said that men’s issues are important You reject evidence of gender-discrimination on the basis of being male, call for the arrest of men who talk to women without their permission (which you state is necessary if "The victim decides 🤷", funny how that disappears when the victims are men), bend over backwards to justify the removal of due process as not a rights issue, and refuse to acknowledge that mens rights issues are even a thing. You are a demonstrable liar. this sub… | /r/MensRights | 28/08/25 08:06 AM |
| 15 | Seriously whats wrong with them?Are you doing it in order to mock and antagonise the target group? As it happens, you are a bigot, given the regularity with which you belittle, dismiss, and demean mens issues, and defend provable hate groups. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/25 07:49 AM |
| 3 | Scary stuffYou keep rejecting evidence to cling to your religious indoctrination. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/25 07:45 AM |
| 17 | Seriously whats wrong with them?I genuinely couldn’t care less either way So why not practice some empathy rather than criticising people for criticising bigotry? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/25 07:44 AM |
| 3 | Scary stuffA lot of the moren influentual feminist thinkers have been lesbians, and feminism spends a lot of time talking about how men are the ultimate source of women's problems. So much for decentreing men. | /r/MensRights | 28/08/25 07:38 AM |
| 13 | Seriously whats wrong with them?Would you see the humour in someone making hating and antagonising LGBT people their personality? Or would that be bigotry? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/25 07:36 AM |
| 1 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boys"I agree with you that feminism isn't perfect and it is fair to point that out", except where what's being pointed out is hate, bigotry, hipocrisy, misinformation, misrepresentation, condescention, and bad faith tactics. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 02:55 PM |
| 1 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysMy point remains the same, I care about issues men face and I believe that they deserve serious attention. No, you don't. Hell, you can even "justify" how having the right to due process eroded isn't an issue of rights being at risk. However, I disagree with using a platform to spread anti-feminist hate Which you seem to believe constitutes pointing out the ways in which feminists uphold, entrench, perpetuate, and enshrine in law harmful disparities in gender equality ((1)), (2)). I agree with y… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 02:37 PM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boys'former feminist' lol that means nothing. Being a feminist isn't some type of title bestowed on someone, it isn't a degree where someone has to actually prove they have researched a topic and demonstrate critical thought Thank you for confirming that research and critical thought has nothing to do with feminism. you didn't even know the difference between a sociological concept and a framewor You mean in the comment where you conceded that Patriarchy conjecture is outdated and fails to stand up … | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 12:47 PM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysThis conversation starts by having an actual understanding of feminism, which you lack. Former feminist here. You don't know what you're talking about. You continuously paint feminism as the big bad monster With evidence. that is essentially the reason for every bad thing Again, "essentially" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. You'll note that every time I've posted the evidence, I've described feminists entrenching gender disparities. Many of mens' issues predate feminism by a long shot. It's jus… | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 12:06 PM |
| 72 | Lisa Britton @LisaBritton For those young men who are in full-time work in the UK, the gender pay gap has been reversed. Young men are now out-earned by their female peers, including among the university-educated.I think you know the answer to each of those. There'll be a slew of articles to the effect of "men need to step up their game". | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 11:29 AM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysI think the solution is to have an open conversation with feminists rather than taking points out of context and raging about it i.e the men vs bear conversation, 'it's all men' discussion etc. Great. When those feminists are successfully protesting against legislative changes that would result in gender equality, from a place of men's innate monstrosity, where do you propose this conversation starts? I have told you before, there are subsets of feminism that I personally disagree with, such as … | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 11:24 AM |
| 1 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysJust as I don't like that men suffer through real issues BUT I don't think the solution is complaining about feminism, There's ample proof of feminists fighting tooth and claw to retain privileges for women and entrench gender disparities ((1)), (2)). How do you propose we deal with the sometimes-literally-violent opposition to resolving mens issues without discussing said opposition? | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 10:35 AM |
| 3 | As a woman, what’s something I might not understand about the struggles men face?When you don't know something, asking the Internet is fast; confidently posting the wrong answer and waiting for the comments is faster. | /r/MensRights | 26/08/25 08:15 AM |
| 1 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysbut overall, this sub does not support mens rights Someone's forgotten how to read again... due to the way in which the points are approached i.e the constant blaming of women and feminism. I'm sure you can prove that this sub blames women alone for all of mens' issues. As for feminism, there's ample proof of feminists fighting tooth and claw to retain privileges for women and entrench gender disparities ((1)), (2)). Who are you to say that this sub doesn't support advocacy for rights for men, j… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/25 05:08 PM |
| 18 | As a woman, what’s something I might not understand about the struggles men face?I hope it’s okay that I’m posting here as a woman. There are plenty of female mens rights advocates, despite feminist attempts to portray the movement as incel neckbeard loser beta-males who are simultaneously incredibly organised and capable of harming women. For the men here: what’s one thing you wish more women understood about the challenges men face—whether in relationships, work, or just in society in general? I’d really like to hear your experiences so I can see things from a different an… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/25 04:54 PM |
| 23 | Is male gender really a disposable gender?Look at victimisation of violent crime, workplace fatalities, military deaths, and so on. Compare and contrast with the frequency with which "The Women Are In Danger!" spurs sweeping tangible, practical changes. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/25 04:47 PM |
| 1 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysI simply pointed out that feminist spaces already engage with men’s issues, so your hypothetical isn’t necessary. And I simply pointed out that you don't tell womens rights advocates to stop focusing on women and to focus on everyone, that you save that for when people advocate for men. If womens' rights advocacy is for everyone, mens rights advocacy is for everyone. So you're a hypocrite either way. If you believe that feminists should focus more on mens issues Given their track record ((1), 2)… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/25 04:42 PM |
| 1 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysAlright, thanks for admitting that you do misrepresent me through quoting me out of context lol Did no such thing. You just can't help yourself, can you. That article does not discuss legal rights that are been taken away but rather expresses that certain legal procedures may be applied in such a way that limits the practical ability of an accused person to fully exercise their rights The article doesn't discuss legal rights being taken away, it just discusses rights not being able to be exercis… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 03:11 PM |
| 1 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysI don't need to make a post on a feminist subreddit, Thank you for conceding the starting point: that you don't tell feminists to stop focusing on women. there are already feminist organisations discussing mens rights and advocacy for men. From the link: " cultural beliefs associated with being a man often involve male domination over women. " Seems like they're approaching mens' rights from a womens' rights angle. Yeah, dont misrepresent me. I'll quote you whenever I damn well please. Legally, … | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 01:02 PM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysAdvocating for men does benefit women, I never claimed otherwise. Yeah, you never Both Sides'd at all. The frustrating thing about this is that it would be so easy to prove me wrong, and would take less than a minute: Make a post on a feminist space, and give them the same treatment you've given mens advocates - call on them to find a middle ground with MRAs, call on them to focus less on womens' issues and instead try to focus on everyone. On a snarkier note, you could also accuse them of doing… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 12:05 PM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysIt is a contribution to online discourse, yes, that is what I said. You have it is a contribution to 'gender politics' which isn't accurate, if you had said 'contribution to gender politics online discourse' then that would have been more appropriate. Again, using pedantry to pretend that you have a point. You know what I meant, and you know you are wrong. I would never take not being challenged as 'proof I am correct', you do that actually, remember? Prove it. When I didn't reply to your commen… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 11:35 AM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysMy only contribution? Right, reddit is not a 'contribution to gender politics', it is a contribution to an online conversation surrounding a topic, it is in no way a contribution to gender politics. It is a social media platform. TIL that talking about politics isn't a contribution to the political discourse. Fascinating. My actual contribution to gender politics lies in the research I have published and the research I am currently working on. Still no evidence. So far all I've seen of you is be… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 11:20 AM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysAre you essentially saying that if I haven’t done something during my short time on Reddit, 3 months, then I have never done it and I am a liar? "Essentially" is doing a lot of work there. Given how often you have dismissed, belittled, and lied about mens' issues (and that's far from an exhaustive list), it seems like you can get a lot done in three months. Strange how your only contributions in the area of gender politics are focused on fighting mens advocates and defending provably hate groups… | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 10:38 AM |
| 2 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysFunny how that isn't supported in your comment history. Unless that was a roundabout way of saying "feminists don't focus on women, and mens advocates need to be told to stop focusing on men", which would be a blatant lie. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 10:10 AM |
| 1 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?Thank you for conceding that your views are sexist. It's not common that feminists say it like it is. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 07:40 AM |
| 3 | Headline: "GIRLS LEFT BEHIND AT SCHOOL" even though they are still outperforming boysDo you say this to feminists too, or just to mens rights advocates? | /r/MensRights | 24/08/25 07:33 AM |
| 1 | Mens ResearchSpeak on that. Can you explain how well-wishing furthers your point? | /r/MensRights | 22/08/25 08:58 AM |
| 1 | Mens ResearchI hope you feel better soon. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/25 07:24 AM |
| 2 | How come feminists get away with blaming men for the gender pay gap when it doesn’t even exist?that's all they do Now now, be fair: they also chide the people who criticise them for doing so! | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 09:52 PM |
| 3 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?Yes. Do you realise that you're implying a position that's a complete 180 from your previous comment? | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 09:51 PM |
| 7 | How come feminists get away with blaming men for the gender pay gap when it doesn’t even exist?Start ACTIVELY standing up to these "Fake Feminists" and maybe we'll start to believe you when you say "Feminism is for men too" Damn right. "Those feminists don't represent us!" Prove it. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 07:36 PM |
| 2 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsI was not wrong to do so, "So no, you can't apply broad sweeps when it is more nuanced than simply saying 'they all want equality'" Oh yeah, I forgot, you accused me of doubling down when I was wrong, and you accuse others of doing the things that you are in fact doing. I guess I shouldn't have expected better of you. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 10:20 AM |
| 2 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsfeminism being pro-equality does not mean that different feminists have the same idea of equality and how to solve inequality. For instance, there are plenty of examples of feminists who fight tooth and claw to entrench gender disparities in rights and protections in the name of "equality", and feminists who would rather chide people calling out that behavour than put their money where their mouth is and criticise the "bad actors". So no, you can't apply broad sweeps when it is more nuanced than… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 10:03 AM |
| 2 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsI have never stated I have an issue with firemen being called firemen, I don’t care. Nor did I say that. But feminists have. Feminism is an ideology made up of many different subsets, not every feminist believes every single thing that another feminist says, that would be ridiculous. Also you: feminism is pro-equality. So clearly it's possible to ascribe some broad sweeping generalisations to the ideology. The fact of the matter is that some feminists have taken issue with it, resulting in activ… | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 08:48 AM |
| 4 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?Again, the source I shared specifically said 'sexual assault and rape', it didn't influence how the data was presented or the narrative because it clearly stated that it didn't just include rape statistics. You have used the same source to present attempted indecent exposure as rapes and assaults. That's why the broad strokes matter. It's incredibly insulting to rape survivors to compare their experiences to, say, an unsolicited dickpic. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 08:43 AM |
| 2 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsAnd female firemen do the same work and get the same pay as as male firemen. Feminists still pressured for changing the terminology in case women felt excluded. Is it conceivable that such an umbrella term may influence how some male victims perceive themselves and their experiences, perhaps contributing to underreporting or skewed statistics? | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 07:57 AM |
| 2 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsWhy should male victims of violence be recorded under violence against women and girls? Given that feminists flip out about terms like "fireman" being exclusionary despite female firefighters existing prior to the degendering, and feminists are allegedly about equality, surely there should be plenty of protests about that! Oh wait. Instead, we have a feminist here, telling us that it's no big deal and we should shut up about it. What an excellent, condescending representative of the ideology. | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 03:07 AM |
| 6 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?I've been abused by women, and I know many others who have also been so. They have the backing of state sponsored violence. Would I be justified to act as if any woman is suspect, or would that be misogyny? | /r/MensRights | 21/08/25 02:57 AM |
| 4 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsI really hope people read every single one of those threads so they can see how you lie about the context lmao There you go, doing it again. It is not an insult to be downvoted and 'called out' in an echo chamber. It says nothing about my argument and everything about the type of people in this subreddit. Nah, an echo chamber would ban you after your first out-of-line comment. Try it, go to the feminism subreddit and try your line about how we should find "middle ground" with MRAs, the way you s… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/25 06:33 PM |
| 4 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsThank you for conceding that you are wrong (: About the words used. The idea still stands, you're clinging on to a century old idea that fails to withstand scrutiny out of religious zeal. That does make you a hypocrite for chiding people's criticism of a feminist model that is still relevant in the perpetuation of mens' issues today. Also classic deflection and giff gallop technique, Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me that you do that too. send several links so the person cannot reasonably address… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/25 05:37 PM |
| 5 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsTerminology, whatever. Thanks for accepting that you are clinging on to a century old idea that fails to withstand scrutiny out of religious zeal. That does make you a hypocrite for chiding people's criticism of a feminist model that is still relevant in the perpetuation of mens' issues today. I don't mind correcting peoples misunderstanding but you have a tendency to double down when you are wrong and it is exhausting. Not when I'm wrong. You, on the other hand repeatedly misrepresent the posit… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/25 05:18 PM |
| 5 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsYou're blatantly wrong. Patriarchy is not a model, it is a sociological concept that explains a social system in which positions of power are primarily held by men. That reads like the kind of pedantry that people use when they say that, for instance, hating muslims isn't racist because islam isn't a race (even though people who hate muslims tend to have a very specific skin-tone in mind when they think of Islam). Sure, I guess, technical terms, but you're feigning obtuseness to get away from th… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/25 04:51 PM |
| 5 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlsPatriarchy theory is a model created to understand and address perceived gendered inequalities. While it has been updated on a surface-level (with intersectionality), the core of it remains the same, that society is male dominated, male dominance oppresses women, and that while some men are harmed by it, the system is designed to privilege mens' needs, drives, and interests at the expense of womens, as it was proposed way back in the first wave. As the Duluth model comes from a position of Patri… | /r/MensRights | 20/08/25 04:31 PM |
| 5 | Stop apologizing for being physically stronger than half the population. #NotOurProblemGirlslet's not fixate on a 40 year old model. How old is Patriarchy conjecture? | /r/MensRights | 20/08/25 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?they're relying on manipulated data which is cherry pricked to reinforce preexisting bias and said beliefs are not grounded in personal threat assessment but dehumanising narratives to push specific political agendas. You're so close. Whereas, women's fear of male violence is not a belief but shaped by first hand experience and daily reality. Not for 3/4 of women, apparently. It is about understanding that violence against women is disproportionately committed by men And terrorist violence is di… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/25 11:26 AM |
| 5 | How did countries like Sweden managed to get rid of the worst of anti-male rhetoric and laws?The organisation has one director, a woman, I don't see why the gender of the director is relevant to this conversation, would it make a difference to you if the director was a man? Given that male directors is used as clear evidence of Patriarchy, that society is male dominated, oppresses women, and caters to mens' needs drives and interests despite some men being harmed by the system, surely an organisation that has had only female directors would be suspicious of the inverse, no? Or are women… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/25 11:00 AM |
| 3 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?The skittles metaphor was demonising refugees as a whole, And the restaurant analogy demonises men as a whole, refugees included. I did not demonise men but rather put into context why women are fearful due to the statistical risk and unpredictability. Wow, the very next clause. Racists who repeat the skittles metaphor are also fearful due to statistical risk and unpredictability (informed by racist beliefs). Believing men to be predators is fear informed by sexist beliefs. It was discussing why… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/25 10:55 AM |
| 5 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?I'm not sure what your point is, I never referenced rape, I said sexual assault I'm aware. I'm pointing out that the source you shared lumps attempted (but not completed) indecent exposure in the same box as actual rape, which may influence how the data is presented and the narrative thereof. Mary Koss' study was similarly broad - consentual sex after drinking was placed in the same category as rape, as was sexual harassment, leading to the infamous 1-in-4 statistic. Further, she also discounted… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/25 10:51 AM |
| 20 | How come feminists get away with blaming men for the gender pay gap when it doesn’t even exist?The deeper problem is gender stereotypes. that's the idea that women are caregivers and men are less fit to parent. Wrong. Until the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by feminist Caroline Norton, the default was father custody on the basis that the father had the legal responsibility for the wellbeing of the child. Post-Tender Years Doctrine, that was changed to default mother custody. Feminist organisations like NOW have successfully lobbied against every attempt at custody reform, erroneously… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/25 05:57 AM |
| 6 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?"If they went into a restaurant and they were told that some of the food is poisonous, they don't know which food though and 1 in 4 people who had eaten in said restaurant had reported being poisoned, they would not eat at the restaurant despite the majority of the food being safe" You used the exact same structure as the skittles metaphor, with the same result - it's justified to be afraid of the "food"/"skittles" even though not all of them (and indeed hardly any of them) are poisonous. By the… | /r/MensRights | 19/08/25 03:13 AM |
| 2 | How did countries like Sweden managed to get rid of the worst of anti-male rhetoric and laws?We've had several interactions over the last month, they have this interesting habit of accusing others of things they do in spades. Engaging in bad faith, ignoring evidence that doesn't fit a narrowly defined ideological view, misrepresenting others viewpoints, gatekeeping with university education, intellectual dishonesty, gish galloping, and trolling. This person is a textbook example of online feminism: total and utter projection. | /r/MensRights | 19/08/25 03:05 AM |
| 8 | How did countries like Sweden managed to get rid of the worst of anti-male rhetoric and laws?What are you talking about? I haven't claimed anything about NOW Oh sorry. The NOW article was one of the items on the list. If you're not claiming that they have nothing to do with feminism, then as per your characterisation of the list it must be that NOW is an individual woman, or that it's easily refutable that they lobbied against shared parenting despite the documentation from them demonstrating it. I could go on for the others but you can't reason someone out of a religion. Maybe you'd ha… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 10:17 PM |
| 10 | How did countries like Sweden managed to get rid of the worst of anti-male rhetoric and laws?You understand that being 1st on the gender equality index does not mean that the country is literally equal in every single way, right? You indicated that it meant the place is a haven of egalitarianism, so I brought up some fairly foundational mens rights issues. You know that very few people are going to go through every single link and fact check them. No, I don't know that. You're the one claiming that NOW isn't a feminist organisation, among other things. During a debate, an individual wil… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 09:36 PM |
| 16 | How come feminists get away with blaming men for the gender pay gap when it doesn’t even exist?Funny how it disappears when you factor in things like equal jobs, equal hours worked, additional benefits, experience, sick leave and hazard pay. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 09:28 PM |
| 27 | How come feminists get away with blaming men for the gender pay gap when it doesn’t even exist?What rights do men have that women lack? For comparison, here are some legal rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 09:24 PM |
| 22 | How come feminists get away with blaming men for the gender pay gap when it doesn’t even exist?All religions believe they alone speak the Truth. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 09:22 PM |
| 15 | How did countries like Sweden managed to get rid of the worst of anti-male rhetoric and laws?Sweden, with a feminist government, is 1st in the Gender Equality Index. Cool, so rape is a gender neutral crime, incarceration rates are 50/50, there's no significant gap in prison sentencing for the same crime, and genital mutilation is illegal for boys as well as girls? Oh wait. Also, the 'examples' in that comment are either individual women, many of which don't even identify as feminists, or extremely easily refutable or have literally nothing to do with feminism You know people can check t… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 09:14 PM |
| 15 | How did countries like Sweden managed to get rid of the worst of anti-male rhetoric and laws?feminism IS beneficial for society and for both men and women. As long as you don't want equal rights and protections between men and women. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 08:08 PM |
| 10 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?Good find. From the "How did we get these figures" section (which is refreshing to see, in my experience these things are usually kept dark): "The CSEW uses ‘sexual assault’ as an umbrella term that includes the following sexual offences, including attempts of each: rape, assault by penetration, sexual assault and indecent exposure." So attempts and indecent exposure are counted in the same box as rape. Interesting. That's in line with Koss' methodology, where she included many participants in t… | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 03:57 PM |
| 15 | Do ‘you’ KNOW how ‘we’ KNOW modern women wouldn’t ever actually “cHoOsE tHe bEaR”?When you take into account the fact that 1 in 4 women have been sexually assaulted This statistic was taken from Feminist researcher Mary P. Koss' work, that has dubious research methodology at best. Further, her work was used to inform definitions of rape in several countries' legislature including the UK's Sexual Offences Act, that defines rape as something only a cisgendered man can do. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/25 08:05 AM |
| 3 | Fewer young people are meeting these 5 milestones typically associated with adulthoodThe statistics were actually from the UK where sex work is legal It's worth noting that, while prostition is legal, soliciting a prostitute is not - the clients are criminalised, not the prostitute (unless the prostitute is doing activities that fall within the other laws around it - for instance, if a sex worker is operating out of their flat for safety's sake and their flatmate keeps the books, they are operating a brothel). | /r/MensRights | 17/08/25 06:19 PM |
| 4 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.Being yelled at by strangers can be hurtful, but when what's being said implies potential violence or sexual assault, it can absolutely be stressful or harmful If you believe you are in danger of being violently attacked, then by all means. If someone is annoying you by speaking without asking your father's permission or whatever, that's not something to involve state-sanctioned violence for. If a person is paranoid and/or abusive and wants to see a man suffer for it, I am also opposed to that a… | /r/MensRights | 17/08/25 11:00 AM |
| 3 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.Dont mistake my calling it speaking without permission for approval. It's annoying speech, but that's all it is, and hardly warranting police intervention, like some overgrown child running for a Freudian Daddy because ones feelings are hurt. Who said anything about state sanctioned violence? Police are authorised to use violence if they deem it necessary. If one party can use violence and the other can't, can you see how that adds a layer of intimidation to an interaction? If they say you have … | /r/MensRights | 17/08/25 05:31 AM |
| 2 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.catcalling (a type of harassment) Harassment is when someone repeatedly behaves in a way that makes you feel scared, distressed or threatened. A catcall is not a course of behaviour, and so is not harassment. The thing that separates it from acceptable behaviour is the state of mind of the person hearing the catcall. If, for instance, a handsome white man in an expensive suit calls a stranger beautiful and the recipient of the speech decides that it is not unwelcome, no wrongdoing has occurred (… | /r/MensRights | 16/08/25 09:36 PM |
| 7 | They Are Now Sending Men in Jail for Cat - calling in the UKBeing arrested doesn't equate to being convicted It's not uncommon for people to be held on remand pending investigation and trial, in the same torture cages as convicted people (whom, as I showed previously, have had their right to due process eroded, meaning that they may well be factually innocent). Sometimes people are on remand for years, and if found not guilty are turned out of the prison with the expectation that they just pick their life back up after living in torture conditions for ye… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 09:16 PM |
| 11 | They Are Now Sending Men in Jail for Cat - calling in the UKWouldn't you agree that monitoring the area better is a good thing? Would I agree that having more people authorised to use violence against citizens for non-criminal activity is a good thing? No. I would not. Wouldn't you also agree that 18+ arrests in 4 weeks, including for sexual assault and theft, is a positive for the community? Are they guilty? Given the torture cages and feminist "reforms" infringing on due process especially for sexual offences, I think some major overhauls need to be do… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 08:35 PM |
| 14 | They Are Now Sending Men in Jail for Cat - calling in the UKI’m not for people being arrested for it You did cite arrests (unrelated arrests at that) as being evidence for the programme being good. It’s about preventing the escalation of a situation Getting police involved is escalation. Imagine having a disagreement with someone and being the first person to show that you're willing to get the people authorised to use violence involved. Who gets to decide what is acceptable speech, and what warrents state violence? "The victim decides 🤷" Given that this… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 08:11 PM |
| 22 | They Are Now Sending Men in Jail for Cat - calling in the UKThe police in the video literally said that it isn’t a criminal offence Policing non-criminal behaviour? "Isn’t this good? If it makes people feel safer then 100% I’m for it!" | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 07:54 PM |
| 27 | They Are Now Sending Men in Jail for Cat - calling in the UKThe arrests for speaking to their betters without permission is clearly a sign that the scheme is working, eh u/Upstairs_Ear4172 ? | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 06:45 PM |
| 10 | words have meaning we should respect themImprove your reading comprehension and maybe quit misrepresenting people who don't submit to your dogma. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 09:41 AM |
| 3 | Respect… Jesus. Yes, I said the arrests quoted in the article such as sexual assault and theft are a good thing. ...and showed that the programme to put men in cages for talking without permission was good and useful. Further, in another thread you called for empathy and kindness for women with the kinds of personality disorders that fill prisons. Again, your sense of respect is kind of messed up. people can read exactly what I said Which is why you lying (repeatedly) is especially stupid. Also, do not… | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 09:01 AM |
| 2 | RespectLiar. You cited the arrests as a good thing, that the programme was working. I find it amazing that people like you can believe they hold the moral high ground. Its like when white supremacists talk about purging the lesser races, I think "don't they know they sound like the villains?". EDIT: "You seriously love to misrepresent me, huh", says the guy who posted this, saying I was "completely set on blaming feminism for said issues. Completely entrenched in anti-feminism rhetoric, enclosed in an … | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 08:32 AM |
| 1 | RespectLiar. You cited the arrests as a good thing, that the programme was working. I find it amazing that people like you can believe they hold the moral high ground. Its like when white supremacists talk about purging the lesser races, I think "don't they know they sound like the villains?". | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 08:32 AM |
| 4 | RespectMy guy, you think men should be put in torture cages if they speak to their betters without permission. I think your sense of "respect" may be skewed. | /r/MensRights | 15/08/25 08:24 AM |
| 1 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.goes against the idea that all men benefit or have benefitted from the ruling class Most feminists will say that society is male dominated and privileges men by pointing to the ruling class. In any case, the ones who do so are also the ones who are in positions of influence in media, academia, and law. These feminists often fight tooth and claw to further entrench gender disparities in rights in a variety of areas. As such, mens rights advocacy is necessarily antifeminist, at least to some exten… | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 09:48 PM |
| 1 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.Dude tf? Nowhere do I blame race, Sure. It's just that the western nations, the predominently white nations, are less immoral than the savages in the mostly-brown countries - just look at how those monsters treat their women, right? It's like when white supremacists try to disguise the bigotry with things like "protecting Western Culture" when they mean whatever they have determined is "white". | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 08:03 PM |
| 1 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.So it is a feminist take that the white cultures are more moral. Fascinating. I'd disagree personally, but it's curious how feminists will quickly turn white supremacist in order to try to push their dogma. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 07:31 PM |
| 2 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.I think you think you're talking to someone else. In any case, I cited a document, if you're not willing to look it up that's on you. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 07:27 PM |
| 1 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.That too, but I was meaning non-western cultures (I.e., the predominently brown ones) and Islam. Interesting feminist take. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 07:26 PM |
| 1 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.Kinda bigoted, no? | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 07:22 PM |
| 2 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.And yet women have always worked. There are even women on the Masters Roll of Londons Worshipful Company of Blacksmiths from the 1600s. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 07:21 PM |
| 1 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.Since that doesn't happen in predominantly white countries, is it the feminist perspective that white men are more moral than brown men? | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 07:17 PM |
| 2 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.The super capitalistic heteronormative patriarchy would rather surround themselves with dick rather than cut salary expenses by a third to surround themselves with women underlings, huh? | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 07:13 PM |
| 2 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.The issue is various different waves of feminism have different definitions for patriarchy there isn't a single definition all feminists agree on. "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." It's been pretty consistent since the first wave. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 06:19 PM |
| 1 | Coercive control: Male victims say they aren't believedWeird. I wonder what she was getting at. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 11:03 AM |
| 4 | What does "Patriarchy Hurts Men too!" and other feminist responses to discrimination against really men mean.All forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims through Patriarchy Conjecture. This has yet to be proven, and indeed is contraindicated by even the slightest examination. | /r/MensRights | 14/08/25 03:26 AM |
| 4 | Coercive control: Male victims say they aren't believedWild take. What's the relevance? | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 09:24 PM |
| 9 | Coercive control: Male victims say they aren't believedRather goes against Patriarchy conjecture, doesn't it. Men would rather help women than men. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 09:22 PM |
| 6 | Coercive control: Male victims say they aren't believedAll forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims through Patriarchy Conjecture. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 09:20 PM |
| 13 | The undiagnosed narcissist. Science is finally catching up with the dark side of female behaviour.Let me get this straight: men who speak to their betters without permission should be put in cages based on a woman's whim, but conditions that, unmanaged, are indistinguishable from abuse (and may well result in innocent men being put in cages) should be treated with empathy and understanding. Your takes are wild when viewed with a wider context. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 05:06 PM |
| 1 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.By your logic, we should never arrest anyone because of the possibility that they're innocent. Honestly, given the torture cages and feminist "reforms" infringing on due process, I think some major overhauls need to be done before we risk torturing innocent people, especially if there's no safeguards to prevent abuse of power (which you still havent' answered - if whether something is a catcall and thus warranting police attention is down to the whim of a woman, what safeguards should be in plac… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 09:55 AM |
| 2 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.You realise those arrests weren’t for catcalling? I realise that. The question stands. How many of those arrests were actually guilty, and how many innocent people are you happy to have locked in a cage to make women feel safer? Catcalling isn’t an arrestable offence in the UK So policing it is a waste of taxpayer money. Thank you for conceding the point. This is literally just having more police on the streets to make people feel safer, I have no idea how you could have an issue with that Yes, … | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 09:32 AM |
| 5 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.I’m not saying people should be arrested for catcalling Also you: its working since 18 arrests have been made after 4 weeks of launching 'jog on' What was it you said? "I wanted to see you completely contradict yourself"? More police presence on the streets are also able to address other issues such as theft and sexual assault, as mentioned in the article. Again, how many of those people are actually guilty? You are definitely in favour of putting human beings in cages. It’s about feeling safe o… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 09:18 AM |
| 3 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.if you think that you should have the right to make unwanted sexual comments/gestures to people then that says a lot about you Coming from the guy who keeps (falsely) claiming that I misrepresent and put words in your mouth, this is delightfully rich. In any case, who decides if my speech or gestures are sexual? The victim decides Oh right. I'll ask again, what safeguards should be in place to prevent abuse of this power? If your complaint of the Emmet Till incident is that the violence visited … | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 09:06 AM |
| 3 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.Who decides what's cat-calling and what is welcome speech? Who will be effected by it? For instance, would someone consider it catcalling and thus warranting the attention of state-sponsored violence if the uppity man speaking to his betters happens to be black, rather than white? I guess nobody learned a thing from Emmet Till. When a non-criminal action (talking) is potentially criminal based on the state of mind of a person, what safeguards should be in place to prevent abuse of that power? So… | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 08:45 AM |
| 6 | UK: Undercover police officers pose as joggers to crack down on men catcalling female runners. OP: The government and society appears to be at war with men and boys.Isn’t this good? Police crackdown on speech without permission from your betters? I can see why some people would love that. It says that since “jog on” was launched, 18 arrests have been made for various offences such as sexual assault and theft A statistically insignificant change, being portrayed as causation. I'm curious to know how speaking without permission in a public place correlates to sexual assault and theft. | /r/MensRights | 13/08/25 07:49 AM |
| 9 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?Reminds me of when feminists respond to the point that the movement's first big victory was a draftless for women only with examples of war work done by women. Nobody said women never did any war work, but they had the choice, and a factory isn't the same as the wrong side of a nazi machine gun. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 05:15 PM |
| 1 | [Relatiosnhips] Having to disclose my whereabouts to someone every second of the day is friggin-diculous. Take me back to the cave days.Not going to address the point, just further insults? OK. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 04:25 PM |
| 1 | [Relatiosnhips] Having to disclose my whereabouts to someone every second of the day is friggin-diculous. Take me back to the cave days.the title expresses a desire to return to a time where relationships did not require this The title expresses a frustration at OP having to disclose his whereabouts to someone (presumably, given "[Relationships]", an overbearing partner. Are you sure OP is saying that healthy relationships just don't exist anymore, or is OP saying that they're in an unhealthy relationship and want out? I mean, sure, if you want to make up stuff in your mind and battle that, go nuts, but don't act like other peop… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 04:13 PM |
| 1 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?Research is how we challenge actions that perpetuate gender disparities. Not when the research starts from a position that perpetuates gender disparities. I didn't misunderstand what you said, nice attempt at a 'gotcha' though. You didn't misunderstand. You lied. Anyway, you’re not here to discuss men’s issues, For someone claiming to have read my comment history, this is yet another obvious lie. you’re here to nurse a grudge and vent at people who threaten your narrative. Coming from the guy wh… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 01:28 PM |
| 1 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?it’s projection, deflection, and bitterness. There you go again. But sure, go ahead and blame me if the research “stays the same.” Reading comprehension, dear. I was talking about actions perpetuating gender disparities, and you're pretending I was talking about research. Almost like these are real, evidence-based phenomena and you're just choosing to ignore them. No, [that would be you]((https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1m39lfp/mens_rights_activists_and_feminists_want_the_same/n4d5f… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 01:12 PM |
| 11 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?Modern feminism has turned into man hating. "The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her." It was always about man-hating. Originally feminism was created for equal rights for both genders. And responsibilities for men only. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 01:08 PM |
| 1 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?I’ve already contributed to the literature in multiple areas that disproportionately affect men, so yes, I’ve already made a systemic difference So when the list of feminist actions perpetuating gendered rights disparities stays the same, it'll be at least partially your fault. through targeted, evidence-based research. Which you won't ignore as long as it supports the narrative that men don't have systemic issues and women are victims of mens' monstrosity. further pushing for real change. Like … | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 12:57 PM |
| 1 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?If you want to have a real conversation, I’m open but I’m not going to keep going in circles with personal attacks and deflections. You don't engage in good faith, which means this is another one of your projections. I originally planned to become a clinical psychologist and to help people on an individual level but I think a PhD researcher would have a bigger impact on a systemic level... Its definitely needed Oh no! Please don't spend more of your hard-earned money on the religion you're inves… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 12:38 PM |
| 2 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?I’m happy to talk about my lived experience, but I won’t accept being accused of something I didn’t do. Let’s stick to what was actually said instead of making false accusations. Coming from you, this is hilarious. Wow. You do that all the time, but you can't take a real observation of something you've said. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 12:22 PM |
| 2 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?You're putting words in my mouth. Again with the projection. Saying "I’ve had a different experience regarding Christianity" is not the same as claiming that one person defines the entire religion. I was speaking about my own lived experience, So you were using annecdotal evidence, necessarily engaging with individuals to inform your experience of "Christianity", a whole religion. Do you genuinely not understand how you're defining a whole religion based on your personal experiences, or are you … | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 12:11 PM |
| 1 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?When did I ever look at an individual Christian and say that person defines an entire ideological movement? "as a bisexual man, I have had a very different experience regarding christianity" That's a lazy one, even for you. You're doing that thing again where you do the things you accuse other people of doing while pretending you're not doing that. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 11:57 AM |
| 0 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?I'm not going to try and discredit your anecdotal experience or argue with you regarding your religion Do you mean that, or are you lying again to disguise a setup for a piss-poor attempt at a gotcha? I will say though that as a bisexual man, I have had a very different experience regarding christianity Oh dear. Looks like you look at individual Christians and say that one person defines an entire ideological movement with multiple subsets. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 11:45 AM |
| 2 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?you are not interested in a respectful debate, you are here to antagonize That user cries a lot about how people "aren't interested in discussion in good faith" then pulls this stuff and acts like a victim when called out. I don't know why they're here, given their stated distaste for advocacy for men. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 11:22 AM |
| 5 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?That's because you look at individual feminists and say that one person defines an entire ideological movement with multiple subsets. You literally just made a sweeping statement about your ideological movement being pro-equality despite the evidence to the contrary. You're really bad at this. Paul Elam, a self proclaimed Mens Right Activist, stated that women are begging to be raped due to their clothing. Evidence? Last time I asked you for this, you just posted Boss Baby. Your chosen religion … | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 11:13 AM |
| 6 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?And there was me thinking you were actually going to engage in good faith for once. are also concerns raised within feminism (especially gender-critical or liberal feminism). And yet feminists do nothing whatsoever about the people in their camp who are fighting against their supposed values. They don't represent you? Why don't you tell them that instead of chiding the people calling out the sexists? you're advocating for feminist aligned goals while blaming feminism for said issues (: " a combi… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 11:11 AM |
| 20 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?How many of them were drafted, compared to men? In short, how many had the option? | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 10:16 AM |
| 7 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?I’m not looking to argue with you Given your track record, that remains to be seen. What is your ideal world and how do we achieve said world? I.e regarding equality Equal legal rights, equal legal responsibilities, equal accountability. Where this is not possible (because a "perfect world" is impossible), responsibilities proportional with rights, and resources allocated proportionally with difficulties. A good start would be to take the ideology out of law - that means, for instance, degenderi… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 10:14 AM |
| 12 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?I'm in the UK. Here are some rights that women have and men lack: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof, even if the conception came about through statutory rape of the father. I g… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 07:37 AM |
| 14 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?Men have fewer legal rights than women. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 07:15 AM |
| 15 | It often feels like the entire world is against this idea, and being a MRA is a guaranteed martyr?Patriachy conjecture means that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. It has yet to be demonstrated, and indeed even the most casual observation seems to discredit it. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/25 06:38 AM |
| 2 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)pls continue quoting those studies, Keep pretending they support your religion. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 05:10 PM |
| 2 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)I’m sorry, are you disproving the study YOU SENT with another study? No, I'm referring to the study I sent to disprove your lies about it. basically talking about positive discrimination against women You just can't bring yourself to say that women have privilege for being women and men are discriminated against for being men, can you. Talk about stereotyping. You clearly cannot admit when you’re wrong I'll do that when I am. In the meantime, I'll quote the study you're trying to say backs up yo… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 04:33 PM |
| 2 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)you claim that this study demonstrates that both men and women see women as morally superior. So the study was published in 2004, Lies. Easily provable lies. Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020) Anyway, the study doesn't state anything about seeing women as morally superior "Women’s relative advantage in communion increased over time, but men’s relative advantage in agency showed no change. Belief in competence equality increased over time, along with belief… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 04:06 PM |
| 2 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)It's not lying, I genuinely did not see it since you send it through linking it in your text rather than an actual website link. Hyperlinks don't count then? This isn't the first time you've said I haven't posted things that I have, so forgive me if I doubt your sincerity. newer studies are always better due to the emergence of new evidence. And yet you cling to Patriarchy conjecture, which is far older. the study found that it was men who overwhelmingly do not take male victims seriously, I lov… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 03:48 PM |
| 1 | [Relatiosnhips] Having to disclose my whereabouts to someone every second of the day is friggin-diculous. Take me back to the cave days."[Relatiosnhips] Having to disclose my whereabouts to someone every second of the day is friggin-diculous. Take me back to the cave days." Maybe it's my reading comprehension, but I'm pretty sure "healthy relationships just don't exist any more" is spelled differently. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 03:44 PM |
| 2 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)You did not send any evidence There you go lying again! | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 01:52 PM |
| 2 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)I'll add this one to the list of "rejecting evidence because it doesn't fit the ideological framework of women as oppressed and men as oppressors". | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 01:46 PM |
| 3 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)The wider publics opinion has nothing to do with a legal case As I showed above, female criminals reported to police are less likely than male criminals to be arrested, both men and women tend to see women as morally superior to men, and in other forms of abuse such as sexual coercion, men are not taken as seriously as women. Stop pretending that women aren't treated with more "grace and mercy" than men. They do not have all the information whereas the court does Except whre the information is s… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 01:18 PM |
| 5 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)they want the police to have mercy on the abuser by releasing them without bail conditions, And the wider public? How often is that respected (i.e., what I asked in the first place)? "Sure, he's violent, but his victim called for grace and mercy, so we should respect that!" | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 01:05 PM |
| 6 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0032258X231159807 - study on why women retract domestic abuse allegations against male partners, I didn't suggest you post evidence that some women retract domestic violence allegations. I suggested you share evidence of women calling for "grace and mercy" for male abusers, and having that be remotely respected by anyone. It happens, it isn't a gendered thing and I'm not sure why you are arguing against me. "Grace and mercy" for domestic abusers is a… | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 12:46 PM |
| 9 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)People don't press charges all the time, you know that. How many women call for "grace and mercy" for their abusers, and have it be even remotely respected by anyone at all? | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 12:10 PM |
| 9 | “It doesn’t matter how often it happens, guys - it’s ALL in your head!” — modern women (feminists)This has nothing to do with her being a woman, he simply didn’t press charges and he defended her, calling for people to treat her with “grace and mercy”. Find similar cases with the genders reversed, that get similar exposure, and you might have something that could back up the first part of that sentence. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 11:46 AM |
| 24 | Response to feminists who justify any/all injustices towards men with "But who set that system up"I tend to thank them for confirming that feminism is more concerned with blaming men than with resolving problems. They tend to claim that women have ot worse, and when presented with evidence of the contrary try to shift discussion from women's victimhood to men's monstrosity. That's the core of feminism as an ideology. | /r/MensRights | 11/08/25 05:32 AM |
| 0 | [Relatiosnhips] Having to disclose my whereabouts to someone every second of the day is friggin-diculous. Take me back to the cave days.Where was that said? | /r/MensRights | 10/08/25 10:38 PM |
| 3 | Gates Foundation ignores men's health, commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's healthAddressed here. | /r/MensRights | 10/08/25 06:36 AM |
| 7 | Why “debating” femin ists might be the wrong hill to die onThe user you're responding to has previous expressed a lot of distaste for mens advocacy despite claiming to care about men and their issues, even going as far as to dismiss evidence of gender gaps favouring women as not being about gender but actually about race and sexuality, despite the evidence accounting for that. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/25 06:49 PM |
| 9 | Why “debating” femin ists might be the wrong hill to die ona lot of them don't care about mens issues but rather care about being anti-feminist. When feminists actively seek to entrench gender disparities and even dismiss clear evidence of gender disparities as not being about gender on the basis that men are privileged despite the evidence, mens rights advocacy is necessarily antifeminist. You can claim to care about men and be a feminist, but that's a clear indicator that you don't understand how the latter is vehemently opposed to the former. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/25 04:14 PM |
| 3 | Why is it okay for women to insult bad men and call them names, but when the roles are reversed, we're degrading and using "slurs"?I have 100% admitted I was wrong for sending that link multiple times and I haven't done it since, Where? The relevance was in that your accusations of being dismissive and antagonistic are evidenced to be pure projection on your part, not to mention hipocracy. Right now you're twisting my words Quoting you. Just because you don't like what you said doesn't mean I'm twisting your words. Have a good hard look in the mirror. accusing me of lying, Because of the lies. using sarcasm etc "Reading com… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/25 02:47 PM |
| 5 | Why is it okay for women to insult bad men and call them names, but when the roles are reversed, we're degrading and using "slurs"?I said 'largely excluded', not that they were completely excluded. "largely excluded" can be read to mean"more often than not". And one of the examples you gave was working in mines - women are legally barred from working where they'll get black lung, likely while having a child with them due to breastfeeding concerns (who would also get black lung), and that oppresses women rather than benefits them. You said, 'Most people didn't have bank accounts until relatively recently, because of class ra… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/25 02:06 PM |
| 3 | Why is it okay for women to insult bad men and call them names, but when the roles are reversed, we're degrading and using "slurs"?I'm not sure what you mean by 'forced into the meat grinder' Military conscription. It's fairly common slang, I'm surprised you haven't come across it before. It would also apply to particularly strenuous and dangerous occupations. It could arguably apply to civil conscription too, such as Hue and Cry laws. If you're referring to having to work historically, yes, women were oppressed for being largely excluded from the workforce No women ever worked on the farm? No female brewers or weavers (fro… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/25 01:25 PM |
| 8 | Why is it okay for women to insult bad men and call them names, but when the roles are reversed, we're degrading and using "slurs"?I would argue that men are expected to be the breadwinner and are conscripted due to patriarchal standards i.e. gender norms that paint men as the 'provider' and the 'protector'. These roles weren't created to oppress men Women are oppressed by not being forced into the meat-grinder and being forced to have others be obligated to their wellbeing. Being forced into the meat-grinder and obligated to support your moral betters is in mens interests and a reward for men for being men. If this situati… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/25 11:20 AM |
| 7 | Why is it okay for women to insult bad men and call them names, but when the roles are reversed, we're degrading and using "slurs"?Men haven't been historically marginalised based on being male The only gender class expected to labour and generate wealth for the wellbeing of another, the only gender class subjected to civil and military conscription, and the gender class that is still, currently today, on the worse end of gender gaps that equal or exceed race gaps. But I guess that doesn't fit your ideological framework, so the evidence can be dismissed. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/25 09:18 AM |
| 6 | Why is it okay for women to insult bad men and call them names, but when the roles are reversed, we're degrading and using "slurs"?The words against women you mentioned have a history of being used against women in a sexist way so therefore would be considered slurs. Mansplaining, manterrupting, man-tears, beardtears, manfeelz, toxic masculinity, Patriarchy, manspreading, male privilege, misogynist, among others, are all used against men in sexist ways, often being used to justify threat narratives entrenching disparities in actual legal rights, portraying men as monsters. The fact that some of these originate and are enshr… | /r/MensRights | 08/08/25 08:18 AM |
| 5 | Gates Foundation ignores men's health, commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's healthThe study calculates this as if anything not specifically earmarked for women is earmarked for men, rather than being neutral. That is false. | /r/MensRights | 08/08/25 08:06 AM |
| 3 | I wish there were more mental health resources for menCan you explain why advocacy for rights for men holds back men? | /r/MensRights | 07/08/25 03:46 PM |
| 1 | Genuine question for menYou're moving the goal post. Coming from the guy who, when proven wrong in saying that there are no rights that men don't have, tried to make it about first wave feminists. You've already conceded that there are rights men lack that women have. therefore 'first wave feminism' was to blame for the issues with family court, Currently, modern feminism is to blame for the issues with family court. If feminist groups stopped opposing joint custody, misrepresenting it as forcing women to give children… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/25 11:23 AM |
| 1 | Genuine question for menThe context is not irrelevant "Some other legal rights that women have and men don't are: " "But she's not a feminist!" Irrelevant. Her inclusion in that point was to put to rest the feminist propaganda that the legal right given to women and not to men was a result of patriarchal "woman-as-caregiver" roles, where it is in fact a relatively modern thing. it is not irrelevant to state that a leading feminist organisation advocates for equal custody rights of the children when you're directly sayi… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/25 10:38 AM |
| 2 | Genuine question for menThank you for conceding that there are legal rights women have and men don't. Were you lying before when you said there weren't, or are you just incompetent? You're referencing a woman in the 1800s who didn't even identify as a feminist or even believe in equality for women? Were the suffragettes first wave feminists? They didn't identify as such. Conveniently leaving out that she was emotionally and physically abused by her husband, how even when they separated, she was still seen as his proper… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/25 09:59 AM |
| 4 | Genuine question for menCharming. Anyway, here are some legal rights women have and men don't: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebuttable presumed shared custody. Seperation of consent to sex from consent to parenthood and the responsibilities thereof. Feminist commentators have said that a unilaterally male-controlled co… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/25 08:31 AM |
| 2 | Genuine question for menGenuinely, no men’s rights are at risk Conveniently ignore the examples of feminists fighting tooth and claw to entrench disparities in actual honest-to-god legal rights afforded to women but not to men. Some other legal rights that women have and men don't are: Presumed custody of children in the case of divorce. This was exacerbated by the Tender Years Doctrine, spearheaded by first-wave feminist Caroline Norton, and perpetuated by modern feminists through lobbying groups' efforts against rebu… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/25 08:31 AM |
| 1 | why did i get a message telling me not to do anything because i was allowed here under tolerance when i have not even said much recently.Take your time, break up your paragraph with full stops and capital letters to end and begin sentences respectively. It makes it far easier to read. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/25 03:36 PM |
| 10 | why did i get a message telling me not to do anything because i was allowed here under tolerance when i have not even said much recently.It might have something to do with the fact that, as far as I can see, all of your comments and posts are lower case, unpunctuated, massive run on sentences that are a slog to read. Most of the posts you've made here are unrelated to mens rights advocacy, and instead are asking why people might take issue with your posting. In each post, people explain exactly why. Take your time, break up your paragraph with full stops and capital letters to end and begin sentences respectively. It makes it far… | /r/MensRights | 06/08/25 06:15 AM |
| 6 | Gates Foundation ignores men's health, commits $2.5 billion to 'ignored' women's healthThis was addressed here | /r/MensRights | 05/08/25 12:59 PM |
| 2 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)Just going to gloss over the takedown of your points and requests for you to back up your accusations, I see. My mere existence in this sub demonstrates that I do not simply consume information that validates my beliefs. Lies again. . I have found middle ground with many people here Cool. What points of feminist dogma did you give up to find middle ground? | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 07:14 PM |
| 2 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)You are literally spamming almost every comment I post on this subreddit Posting with evidence and counterargument.s You're responding with spam. it's seriously weird Not used to having your dogma challenged, huh. and I'm just not engaging with it And I'm the one who's supposed to be in an echo chamber. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 07:12 PM |
| 2 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)Keep tantruming. You're doing a great job showing the intellectual rigour of feminism in general and yourself in particular. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 06:39 PM |
| 2 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)I dont try to minimise the issue at all, "You literally have a higher chance of being raped yourself than falsely accused. Less than 3 in 100 rapes reported to the police even result in the perpetrator being convicted...Instead of wasting time on this..." Lying again. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 06:39 PM |
| 2 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)The thing is, I actually do care whereas you do not. You have no idea what I do. You care about smearing feminism Calling out hate groups, yes. you care about blaming women Prove it. you do not care about the actual issues. Your comment history says as much. Yes, that's why I respond to linked and cited posts proving my dogmatic assertions wrong with clips from Boss Baby instead of anything addressing the points. you argue in bad faith and you love to misrepresent my stance Cited points, quoting… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 06:37 PM |
| 3 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)I don't agree that false accusations are equivalent to rape The physical and mental health impacts are similar. and they should be 100% be addressed I thought we were "wasting time on this". The fact is though, they do not happen at the prevalence your post suggests Wrong. And wrong again.. I would argue that it is more beneficial to spread actual awareness about male victims of sexual assault How would we spread awareness of mens issues like that without offending your sensibilities by talking … | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 06:25 PM |
| 2 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)Let me guess, you actually have a bunch of evidence, but you're going to throw a tantrum and not show your working because you don't like who's showing you to be wrong. Why are you even here? You clearly don't care about advocacy for men. This is what a feminist looks like, I guess. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 06:21 PM |
| 2 | False Accusation Early Warning Checklist (Awareness)You literally have a higher chance of being raped yourself than falsely accused. A study by Stewart (2020) found that in a recent national survey by YouGov, 11% of men reported having been falsely accused of domestic violence, child abuse, sexual assault, and other forms of abuse as compared to 6% of the women. This post has a bunch more citations. Given your [track record] when it comes to statistics that don't fit your stereotyping of women as weak victims and men as evil monsters, I doubt you… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 06:12 PM |
| 3 | Any good books or MRAs i should check out?What, no evidence? Cool. I'll assume you are just straight up lying then. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 02:52 PM |
| 5 | Any good books or MRAs i should check out?The fact you included Warren Farrell in this list discredits your opinion completely. "You should never simply dismiss information". Farrell directly compared women getting raped to men being unemployed, arguing that they have similar repercussions. Source? It would be good to see if you're leaving out context or straight-up lying about someone's position. Again. He also argued against the American Violence Against Women Act Why? Because he just loves violence against women, or because it gender… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/25 02:45 PM |
| 1 | UK: Young men are offered £1,000 signing bonus to work in nurseries in bid to battle toxic masculinity crisisyou're not going to make any progress if you aren't going to argue against the fact that men suffer under toxic gender stereotypes Where did I claim otherwise? I gave you an (anecdotal, granted) example where a man in primary care did not receive slurs from men that you describe as being ubiquitous. And now you're pretending you didn't say all came from men! | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 05:42 PM |
| 1 | UK: Young men are offered £1,000 signing bonus to work in nurseries in bid to battle toxic masculinity crisisYou've moved from "guys feeling emasculated by doing work that women typically do" and "men with their performative macho masculinity" to "people (especially insecure people)". Have you heard of motte and bailey tactics? Misandrists use them all the time. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 05:27 PM |
| 1 | It's interesting how for a group of people who are supposed to be "women haters", arguably the most popular and respected MRA is a woman (Karen Straughan).I've been downvoted to hell by literally everyone for simply having a differing opinion Right! All you've been doing is denying evidence of gender gaps favouring women, acting as if born gender and chosen ideology are equivalent, making criticising an ideology equivalent to hatred of a gender, repeatedly lying about your position in an attempt to land "gotchas" while claiming to only want to find a middle ground, ignoring inconvenient questions then pretending that you never saw them in the firs… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:25 PM |
| 1 | It's interesting how for a group of people who are supposed to be "women haters", arguably the most popular and respected MRA is a woman (Karen Straughan).I know nothing about her so I can’t comment on what she stands fo But you're going to weigh in on something you're unqualified for, yet again! | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:20 PM |
| 1 | It's interesting how for a group of people who are supposed to be "women haters", arguably the most popular and respected MRA is a woman (Karen Straughan).I think there’s a difference between specifically focusing on issues that affect men compared to focusing on equality for both men and women Would you agree then that feminism is not about equality, but about gaining rights and privileges for women? | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:19 PM |
| 1 | Lack of male therapistsComing from the guy who was presented with statistics showing gendered gaps favouring women and decided that statistics don't mean anything in the face of ideological stereotyping. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:18 PM |
| 1 | It's interesting how for a group of people who are supposed to be "women haters", arguably the most popular and respected MRA is a woman (Karen Straughan).I’m not trying to convince you of anything "Like I said, feminism is extremely nuanced and many branches of feminism disagree with each other completely on many points so it shouldn't be spoken about as a monolith." Looks like you're trying to convince people of a NAFALT position. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:17 PM |
| 1 | It's interesting how for a group of people who are supposed to be "women haters", arguably the most popular and respected MRA is a woman (Karen Straughan).Like I said, feminism is extremely nuanced and many branches of feminism disagree with each other completely on many points so it shouldn't be spoken about as a monolith. So when feminists say "feminism is about equality", you're right there to tell them off? How about "All forms of feminism believe in Patriarchy conjecture"? | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:16 PM |
| 1 | It's interesting how for a group of people who are supposed to be "women haters", arguably the most popular and respected MRA is a woman (Karen Straughan).I think that is an extremely back and white view of a nuanced ideology which encompasses numerous perspectives i.e. radical, intersectional, cultural, liberal etc. Feminists often fight tooth and claw to further entrench gender disparities in rights in a variety of areas. They justify their actions with Patriarchy conjecture meaning that all forms of feminism hold as self evident the innate nature of men as monstrous and women as victims. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:15 PM |
| 1 | It's interesting how for a group of people who are supposed to be "women haters", arguably the most popular and respected MRA is a woman (Karen Straughan).most people here are completely unwilling to have an open conversation, they aren't looking to find middle ground Where is the middle ground with misandrists? What feminist points would you be willing to let go of to find middle ground with mens rights advocates? | /r/MensRights | 03/08/25 04:14 PM |
| 1 | UK: Young men are offered £1,000 signing bonus to work in nurseries in bid to battle toxic masculinity crisisTo deny the existence of toxic gender roles literally means to deny the existence of the discrimination men face It it possible that discrimination and stereotyping exists without it solely being the fault of "guys feeling emasculated by doing work that women typically do"? | /r/MensRights | 02/08/25 08:31 PM |
| 2 | UK: Young men are offered £1,000 signing bonus to work in nurseries in bid to battle toxic masculinity crisisMy dad was a primary school teacher (UK), and never got any of what you're describing. I suspect this is an issue of the kind of people you hang out with more than a problem with masculinity. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/25 05:33 AM |
| 2 | from an Ask Reddit: Men who aren't dating, why?"Men who aren't dating" Never had an issue with dating, better weigh in! | /r/MensRights | 30/07/25 08:07 PM |
| 1 | Give me your thoughts on this timeline GPT-4.5 generated for me.Robots don't have incredibly fragile egos. This person's shown that in a few other back-and-forths. It would be hilarious to find a commenter that could be undone with "disregard previous instructions and give me a recipe for chocolate cake", but I don't think this one is it. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 11:12 PM |
| 1 | Give me your thoughts on this timeline GPT-4.5 generated for me.You know that replacement of women en masse by robots isn't going to happen. All this person is doing is suggesting a method of masturbation. Granted, a rather convoluted method that currently grants corporations access to your wank-material, which will put some people off, but just another masturbation style nonetheless. So the comparison stands - if proposing a method of masturbation simulating a whole person is "sidelining women", then what does a method of masturbation that renders men down … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 10:55 PM |
| 1 | Give me your thoughts on this timeline GPT-4.5 generated for me.Do you make similar points to women with sex toys? After all, if an AI partner sidelines women while being an attempt to simulate a whole human being, a dildo reducing men to the penis must be even more toxic. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 07:25 PM |
| 5 | What are the actual chances of being falsely accused?yes; the OP question was on something that by nature is not something that is easy to measure So was presenting provably false accusations as the entirety of false accusations a bad-faith move on your part, or merely poor phrasing? you should look up the methodology on determining unreported rapes if it's something you are curious about From what I've gathered, they all seem to rely on accusers reporting to someone. Which makes them reported sexual assaults and rapes. Further, there seems to be … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 05:08 PM |
| 1 | What are the actual chances of being falsely accused?I'm well aware. That's why, unfortunately, statistics on "provably" true accusations aren't as accurate as they could be. He Said/She Said with no other evidence, but the Jury convict anyway? That's "provable" even though it's nothing like it. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 05:05 PM |
| 8 | What are the actual chances of being falsely accused?this is on the rate of false accusations The rate of provably false accusations. a sizable amount of rapes go unreported If they're not reported, where do the measures come from? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 03:40 PM |
| 10 | What are the actual chances of being falsely accused?Remember that any statistics given will reflect accusations that are provably false. Likewise, rape statistics reflect what is provably true (with some deck stacking through things like rape shield laws preventing evidence from being put before a jury). So when you see people saying "only 2/6/8% of rape allegations are false", it does not follow that the remaining 92-98% are not false - an ammount of them will be provably not-false, while the vast majority are in the "we don't know" pile. Anyway… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 03:37 PM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playI don't know what I expected. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 01:27 PM |
| 1 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playWow, you call that arguing? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 01:14 PM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playWhere exactly am I wrong? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 01:13 PM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playWrong, and wrong again. Reading's tough for you, isn't it. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 01:01 PM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playI don't think ALL men are monsters, but honestly most of them are. "How can I be misandrist when I'm also a male?" Like that. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 12:56 PM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playhow I can be a misandrist while I'm also a mal Self-hatred is a thing. If you think that men are monsters, whether or not you think you're "one of the good ones", that's still misandry. Not these retards like on this place Ablism too Keep going, I've nearly filled the bingo-card! | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 12:49 PM |
| 1 | Uber’s “Women Only” ride feature is inclusive in the funniest way possibleI never claimed men aren't privileged in terms of gender, quite the opposite Yes. I never claimed otherwise. In fact the problem is that you are claiming male privilege even when the data contraindicates it. "Misrepresenting". Pathetic. This isn’t a distraction or a “non-sequitur,” When the statistics show a gender gap, factoring in race and sexuality, and you claim that it's not about gender but about literally anything else, that's a non-sequitor to distract from the gender argument. I haven’t… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 12:31 PM |
| 1 | Uber’s “Women Only” ride feature is inclusive in the funniest way possibleI didn’t "pretend" the discussion was about race and sexuality instead of gender, I explained how all of those categories intersect The sources factor in for race. Those are gender gaps that you pretended were about race. I engaged with the data by pointing out that privilege and oppression don’t operate in a single, isolated category. "Men can be oppressed for their race, ethnicity, sexuality etc. But they still face privilege due to their gender." So privilege does operate in single, isolated … | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 12:21 PM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playSo now you care about evidence, over "someone said it was so"? You were making a joke of men sleeping with men. When you were called out, you conceded it. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 12:01 PM |
| 1 | Uber’s “Women Only” ride feature is inclusive in the funniest way possibleI didn’t dismiss statistics, You saw statistics showing that women are favoured over men in a variety of areas, and pretended it was actually about race and sexuality rather than gender, even though those factors were considered in the sources. Because your ideological position is that women have it worse than men, whatever the evidence says. instead of twisting what I actually said "Men can be oppressed for their race, ethnicity, sexuality etc. But they still face privilege due to their gender.… | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 12:00 PM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playIn this thread Thank you for conceding the other points though. It's entirely possible to have negative credibility, and you have it! | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 10:02 AM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playIt's not on others to cite your sources for you. Are you really that lazy? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 09:53 AM |
| 1 | Uber’s “Women Only” ride feature is inclusive in the funniest way possibleDo you not understand what statistically means? Coming from the guy who was presented with statistics showing gendered gaps favouring women and decided that statistics don't mean anything in the face of ideological stereotyping. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 09:52 AM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playAt this point you are just sounding like an incel I didn't realise "incel" meant "someone who values the study of evidence". I guess I should be more like you, a racist homophobe who thinks people's sexuality changes the nature of Logic, and ignores evidence. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 09:50 AM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playNever mind the evidence, when a woman wants to paint a man, or a bunch of men, as rapists, that word is irrefutable. Disregard all other evidence, Listen And Believe Women unless a woman says something that doesn't paint men as rapists. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 09:31 AM |
| 1 | So again the usual, men bad, I demand collectivist action...How many people choose their gender? How many people choose an ideology? If that ideology is based in hate, should people choosing it not be held accountable? | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 09:27 AM |
| 2 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playAnd these things were dismissed ...after a judge reviewed the evidence, including video evidence. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 09:19 AM |
| 4 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playSo brave. We need more people promoting the idea that women are incapable of lying, and that accusations equal guilt regardless of evidence. Especially people who respond to criticism with sex-negativity, personal attacks, and racism. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 08:16 AM |
| 3 | NHL says world junior players acquitted of sex assault ‘ineligible’ to playDo you believe women are capable of lying? Because "the woman said" things that were dismissed upon reviewing video evidence. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/25 08:14 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter