TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Lostboulevard Archive

View 4 posts and 105 comments by Lostboulevard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Um, okay?
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:33 AM
2

So every little boy is a prince Indeed. Good luck.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:06 AM
1

Still a roid monkey. Certainly he has no desire to do the right thing.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 06:41 AM
-1

Conan the Barbarian is anything but "smart." But he is rather intuitive.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:58 AM
2

Sorry was replying to someone else, no offense intended.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:35 AM
4

Switch some words around, and you have a full-blown SJW here. You're a fucking imbecile. NUff said.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:34 AM
-2

No not really. Just the other clowns.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:04 AM
5

Have you ever been falsely accused? No? Then have some respect for men who are falsely accused.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:31 AM
1

Don't fucking mention Florida you sexist Pig.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:29 AM
7

Fengpi is a sage. Reconsider his comment and give the thanks he deserves. It's really insulting that you dismissed him like you did. In answer to your question, "feminism" is a class analysis that blames men for all problems in the world. It's actually pretty straight forward.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:11 AM
2

It was a joke. Lighten up.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 01:06 AM
4

I'm gonna go ahead and repost this bit from Hamlet: “What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form, in moving, how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of animals!" The REALLY interesting part comes with the reply -- the woman doesn't really care about all that. But still, it exists.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 12:50 AM
7

this... Just sounds like a bunch of fruity garbage. Hahaha. Yeah I get your point. But it's so rare to see something positive said about males. I have a nephew, young boy, brilliant, and I worry for his future. Society is increasingly gynocnetric, to the point that boys are punished just for existing.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:16 PM
0

You claimed she makes unfounded claims. Have you heard of Thunderfoot? He does a good job (in fact a savage job) of debunking Anita's arguments. And you're wrong. In order for me to debunk something you first have to make some sort of coherent argument for me to debunk. Anita's content is laughable.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:07 PM
18

Thank you for your input, /u/Fart-Lover. Consider that boys need messages like this in the age of misandry. I grew up in the 80's, before helicopter parenting and before radical feminism. As a boy I did my own thing. My parents allowed me to rough-house with other boys and play and have adventures. I was frequently sent to the principle's office. My favorite Holiday was Halloween, when I terrorized the neighborhood with firecrackers. Now consider how so many boys are currently being raised. Shel…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 11:03 PM
98

I have a feeling I mentioned this to you when you and I went by another name on this forum, but for onlookers there was a really interesting study that asked men and women to judge themselves and their sex. It was conducted I think in the late 90's. Women declared themselves superior in every aspect except confidence and intelligence (they considered the sexes equal on intelligence), while men also declared women superior in every aspect except confidence and intelligence. Creativity, compassion…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:53 PM
14

That's unfortunate. Life is a miracle. Not only should you value the average man or woman you should value the slug, the snail and the dust mites on your pillow. :) I get what you're saying. But men are so beaten down in this culture that posts like this serve a purpose. Especially for boys, who should be celebrated as the princes they are but are treated like dirt and even denied contact with their own fathers.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:44 PM
13

Batman, Ironman, He-Man, GI Joe, Thor, Conan the Barbarian, James Bond, Han Solo Is that the best you can do? Bunch of one-dimensional roid monkeys. There are countless wonderful male characters in fiction. Expand your horizons. (I kinda like Conan the Barbarian though).
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:41 PM
11

Hamlet: What a piece of work is a man, how noble in reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and admirable, in action how like an angel, in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world, the paragon of animals—and yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? Man delights not me— nor woman neither, though by your smiling you seem to say so. Rosencrantz: My lord, there was no such stuff in my thoughts.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:36 PM
0

Yeah that's not how it works. That's exactly how it works. In order for me to take you seriously you first have to make a logical argument and back it up. Otherwise I would be arguing all day with people who think they are Jesus Christ or that our thoughts are controlled by aliens from beyond the moon.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:31 PM
1

First tell me which claims of hers were founded.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:07 PM
3

I'm a cat playing with a mouse. It amuses me :)
/r/MensRights15/07/17 10:01 PM
5

Someone is shadow banned.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:53 PM
5

Deeply disturbing essay, and a sign of the times. Batshit crazy women are given custody while fathers are only valued for their wallets. The good news is that the comments are full of righteous rage at this toxic bitch. A feminist tried to chime in but was rightly told to go fuck herself. I hope this cunt's boys read the comments on the essay -- it will give them hope.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:51 PM
8

That's an amazing but true story. Bernays was Freud's nephew and a major influence on the public relations industry (propaganda). Goebbels was a huge fan. Bernays also popularized smoking for women. He portrayed female smokers as "liberated" feminists. Women fell for it. It was all too easy.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:42 PM
2

triggered much? lol. Best go back to your feminist sub worm.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:31 PM
2

You know what a survivor is? A survivor is someone who went for a swim and got their fucking leg chomped off by a shark. A survivor is someone who went to war and got their arm blown off by an IED. A survivor is someone who attempted to commit suicide but was a bad shot, and blew off the top of their skull. Sexual assault sucks. But stop it with this "survivor" nonsense. Grow up and move on. I am honestly perplexed that the ruling class is willing to embrace feminism to such an extreme extent, b…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:28 PM
9

A million feminists who wish they were cat-called just wet their panties. Sickening.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:12 PM
1

I'm looking forward to a female Doctor Doctors aren't there for your lesbian fantasies. They're there to heal the sick.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:11 PM
10

FULL RETARD.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:09 PM
31

It's not a "small change" for men falsely accused of sexual assault on college campuses. I'm not a conservative, but we should support conservatives when they do the right thing.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 09:08 PM
2

I don't doubt it. Truth be known I'm opposed to the death penalty. If for no other reason than lawyers and judges are fucking incompetent. And innocent men HAVE been killed by the state for crimes they didn't commit. But some people only care about this shit when a woman gets her head on the chopping block. Never mind the hundred men in the background....
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:29 PM
2

To laugh at you mostly. What a pathetic little worm you are. Piss off worm.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 08:22 PM
2

Damn. I thought you were Canadian. Sorry, You provided a great example. Cheers.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:26 PM
2

Maybe they were stillborn. Jesus. That's cold. But I appreciate your position. I just wish Canadian Justice was equal. It isn't. If a woman commits a crime she can expect to take a vacation. If a man commits a crime he will be locked up. Tell me you don't agree.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:15 PM
7

Indeed. I just spoke at the UN last month.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:04 PM
11

Don't be smug. Of course I don't care about digitized "males." Any more than digitized big-boobed "females." The more interesting question is why Anita S. was able to build an empire on the backs of gamers.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:58 PM
2

Um, are you suggesting that she "killed" flesh rather than human beings? Because that same article mentions that the babies were ready to be born. Lemme guess: you're a feminist>?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:50 PM
10

Well since you asked. I care about them. Deeply.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:40 PM
0

That means when you hear some womens group saying "we need less harsh sentences" you need to organize against that. I'm not convinced of that, personally. Why not treat men like we treat women? Maybe that would produce less criminals.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:28 PM
1

Okay, well this post actually makes me reconsider my position. But are you honestly saying that if a man killed six babies he'd be given a few years in prison? So what is the solution? To treat men more like women or to treat women more like men? Don't give me a bunch of lawyer speak in response. You know damn well that women are treated like children in the criminal "justice" system.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:07 PM
2

She killed six babies. Your justifications are hollow and frankly sickening.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:53 PM
13

Crucified? lol. I'd be content with professional help to deal with her pathological man-hate.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:52 PM
9

Maybe. But until she makes a single compelling argument she's fair game for mockery.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:45 PM
7

You are the people who validate her. She regularly fades into obscurity, and then some dumbass makes a big deal out of her again. Hahaha you're absolutely right. However in my case I don't even play video games and have certainly never sent a message to Sarkeesian. I just find her "analysis" hilariously hypocritical. As "bad" as boobs are (apparently), what about the thousand men tortured and slayed to save the damsel? She's just a random woman with no political influence. I don't agree with thi…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:40 PM
11

I'm shocked that you have more empathy for digital objectification of women than digital slaying of men. Power fantasy indeed.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:24 PM
2

You would think. But many people glaze over at the mere thought of statistics. Sometimes real stories do the trick.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:18 PM
17

They made her successful. Perhaps. Or perhaps the media would have pimped her regardless. bass less sexism and threats. Anita is a sexist. She thinks male sexual desire is evil. Actually she doesn't: she's obviously just trying to make a buck off of feminist idiots. But I digress. In the context of video games, she cares more about a man potentially being aroused by digital boobs than a hundred digital men being violently killed. Now THAT is sexism, of the most extreme kind. Male disposability i…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:17 PM
14

Glowing reportage of the damsel in distress has been a boon for her business model, wouldn't you agree? If not for said coverage I doubt her Kickstarter would have earned more than a few bucks.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 02:03 PM
16

Find me a MSM article critical of Sarkeesian, then we'll talk.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:59 PM
1

I'm merely trying to show that there is similar insanity on the right. Not that it's the exact same type of insanity. In any case we can agree that "leftist" SJW's are a fucking menace to society.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:50 PM
13

We OWN you, sucker! US government
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:48 PM
10

Not necessarily. Dangerous jobs pay more. If a man doesn't pay alimony/child support he is sent to jail. "Choice" in this context amounts to the choice to turn over your wallet when a mugger puts a gun to your head. Even so, I'm pretty sure most men would be happy to work dangerous jobs to support their families IF they were granted shared parenting. However Feminist organizations like NOW oppose equal parenting rights.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:48 PM
44

Anita Sarkeesian's backers, for one.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:44 PM
4

Women appear to be biologically programmed to not "date down" in the same way that men are biologically programmed to find young nubile women attractive. It would be a lot easier if we all just admitted this and went from there. There's a very short Wiki entry on hypergamy which basically argues that women seek to date up because patriarchy. However what we find is that even extremely rich, financially independent women refuse to date men with lower social status/wealth. So I'm inclined to think…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:42 PM
1

Good. He deserved double that.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:37 PM
5

Do they ever describe what they are doing as "social justice"? No. I never claimed they did. Only that they have their own brand of identity politics. The War on Christmas! We need to outlaw Sharia! White people are a dying breed! The government is full of communists! We must protect Israel! Minimum wage is socialism! Abortion is genocide! Pornography is the work of the devil! Prostitution is the devil's work! Mexicans are lazy! etc. etc.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:36 PM
2

The MRM is only just now getting off the ground. Only a handful of cities have MRM groups. In Canada there is an umbrella network called CAFE that is forming chapters in every major Canadian city. For some reason the US is lagging behind. Some would argue that this is because feminism is less popular in the US, but it's no less popular among policy makers. Activists in the US really need to create an umbrella organization that brings together all the different men's rights groups and creates cha…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:30 PM
13

LOL! But others disagree. "If my husband just wants to go out and play games, what's the point of bringing him out?" Alternatively: "if my wife just wants to go out and spend my money, what's the point of getting married?" ;)
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:23 PM
2

Suck it up buttercup.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:21 PM
2

Err, religious nuts are not SJWs. Depends how we define SJW-ism. Certainly the right pushes its own brand of identity politics and gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:09 PM
2

At the end of the day, men should be as able to say 'I want a woman who is beautiful and slim' as women are able to say 'I want a man who can support my family'. The problem is that women are now privileged in the traditional male sphere. Women now out-number men at college and young women earn more than young men. Not to due merit, mind you, but feminist policy. This is self-defeating for both sexes.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:08 PM
5

Axe is trying to rebrand itself. Corporate activism is invariably lame.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:04 PM
5

all idiotic SJWs are Leftists. That will come as a surprise to the religious nuts currently working with feminists to ban sex robots, prostitution and porn. Also the nuts who think white people are oppressed, Sharia law is imminent and that Marxists are working with Goldman Sachs to undermine corporate capitalism.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:54 PM
1

Cheddar is fine. Camembert on the other hand...that cheese is straight up rape apologist.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 06:34 AM
5

That means he should be killed! According to his own logic. Ouch.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 05:06 AM
2

You couldn't be more wrong. Black Native American trans lesbian gender queer disabled LGBTQIRS snowflake-kin are biologically incapable of being bigoted. In fact your argument itself is an appalling act of bigotry and shows the continued need for intersectional feminism.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:28 AM
6

It's not just Canada, though Canada is particularly egregious when it comes to gynocentrism. Wasn't always this way but the radfems have been working over time behind the scenes. Most Canadians don't even realize what's going on. A bill is about to pass (C-51) that would effectively turn all sexual encounters into "rape". A study in Britain determined that if men were treated like women in their criminal justice system, 5 out of 6 male prisoners would be free. Pretty sure it's similar in the US.…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:12 AM
2

You jest but that's a pretty good description of feminist beliefs on the matter. Love your wordplay BTW.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:06 AM
9

A male victim who killed a woman RCMP officer only got like 4 years. He was drunk and tee-boned her. Intent probably played a role. Ie he had no ill intent. But I'm surprised at the low sentence given that the victim was a police officer. Women being let off scott free for malicious acts of torture, rape and murder is part of a broader pattern. Statistically they receive 63% shorter sentences, are 200 percent less likely to be charged etc.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:58 AM
7

Ironically it was the "hard left" that used to be at the forefront of defending due process rights and civil liberties, whether lynchings in the 19th century, free speech fights in the early/mid twentieth, or people accused of terrorism in the late 20th/early 21st century. This doesn't include communist regimes obviously. Feminism has managed to turn the traditional values of the left upside down.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:05 AM
5

I think conscription is an archaic dinosaur of a policy that creates a class of obedient, yet bitter slaves. Doesn't change the fact that men were oppressed by this policy due to their sex throughout history. Still are in some countries. Emma Goldman (one of the few historical feminists I can stomach) and other socialists challenged the law during WWI on the basis that it violated the 13th's amendment's prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude. Sadly the challenge failed. Females ha…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:24 AM
4

Your idea of "actual equality" and theirs don't match You can say that again! And that is your excuse for supporting people being gigantic pieces of shit to her. You'll have to offer an example. And I never claimed I supported people giving her a taste of her own medicine. Just that I don't give a shit about a piece of human filth receiving some comeuppance. you're literally giving her free money I can see your point here. But I'd prefer pushback to silence in the face of hate speech, even if so…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:20 AM
6

Ironic, considering that what is currently happening on college campuses has drawn comparisons to the witch hunts in Salem. Edit: Good news is that I found this post on R/Atheism and the top posts were all arguing against the feminist position.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 12:03 AM
10

No. She should be serving 51 years. She's serving 8.5 and will probably be out in 4. Then she can get pregnant and kill more babies.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 11:49 PM
18

So much for "true love" lol. And to think we used to regard women as "romantics" and men as shallow. Turns out it's the other way around.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 11:02 PM
13

The lunatics have taken over the asylum. Do these women really think they're helping other women? They're only giving ammunition to chauvinists who think women are irrational hysterics who have no business in academia or government.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 11:00 PM
5

Holy shit it's already up to 7,000 signatures. I feel so sorry for Clementine's son. Imagine being born onto this earth with that creature as a mother. I sure hope CPS keeps an eye on her. I would be surprised if she isn't already abusing the child.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:58 PM
6

Conscription is not a sexism issue. You feminists are un-fucking-believable. You think men sitting comfortably on the subway is "sexism against women" but men and boys being forced to kill and die to protect women is also...sexism against women. I don't know how your head just doesn't literally explode from the cognitive dissonance.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:52 PM
5

After how many years of insisting that women aren't doing anything to help and that you don't want feminists to help because they poison everything they touch, now you're getting pissed that they don't care about you more than they care about themselves? Pretty sure most MRA's would be thrilled if feminists stopped their hate campaigns and sought actual equality. Issues like how an Australian woman is on the brink of collapse thanks to the harassment efforts of the MRM? Why? Because she tweeted …
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:49 PM
13

Why not stay away permanently? It's not like you've ever added anything to the discussion.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 10:37 PM
2

Excellent post. The best way of controlling a population is divide and conquer. Feminists and SJW's are useful idiots. Plutocrats in the US and elsewhere have a long history of turning poor people against one another on the basis of race, sex etc. They were often very explicit about it. For example there are letters from plutocrats in Hawaii talking about the need to bring in Filipino immigrants to combat Japanese workers when the latter started to form unions in the late 19th century. In factor…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 09:44 PM
1

Cheers. :)
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:32 AM
–

It's like those posts on "WatchPeopleDie". You're better off not letting your morbid curiosity get the better of you. If you'd like more detail, they also had cameras set up so that the women could watch the caged boys in the cellar from the living room and kitchen. Honestly it was so bad I almost threw up. It happened in Europe (I forget which country), not the US, but the punishment was typically light despite the extreme torture involved. They were just boys after all. You might be able to fi…
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:19 AM
2

Well hopefully you are lobbying against the major feminist groups then. Are you?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:15 AM
1

No, I don't get your point. Are you trying to state that child abuse is ok and just because they are not killed they should be ignored and justice should not be followed up ? Yes, that's EXACTLY what I'm saying. Or, you know, I might be saying that there's a pretty big difference between a 17-year-old boy having sex with his teacher (wrong because she has power over him -- and yes she deserves punishment) and a pre-pubescent boy being skinned alive and forced to eat his own flesh.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:15 AM
2

And yet the "problem" remains -- why is a story about white kids "problematic" to begin with? That's my beef.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 12:10 AM
1

And yet, you still think it's "problematic."
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:08 PM
2

Do you agree with her statement that "everything is problematic to some degree"? By conceding the idea that anything straight and white is "problematic" you are essentially conceding the argument. I enjoy this DESPITE the fact that is it "problematic." Sorry that's not good enough. There is nothing wrong with enjoying art that features only white people.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 11:06 PM
7

Plus great comment: I'm a straight white man, and I assure you, I am very problematic. Time to own this shit bros. Yes, I'm very fucking problematic. What are you gonna do about it? ;) See also: "I'm not a role model" - Sir Charles Barkley
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:59 PM
2

I disagree. Feminists fight for female supremacy and oppose men and boys achieving equal rights. MRA's support equal rights period. The closest "manosphere" equivalent to feminism is the extreme MGTOW's who think women are the cause of society's problems.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:50 PM
2

If you expect to regulate this or any other sub with only material approved by you Nowhere in my post did I suggest that I wanted to "approve" posts. I'm not even a mod. And I explicitly stated that I don't think low effort shit posts should automatically be banned.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:48 PM
2

Great suggestion. Edit: could use with a general round table discussion about what books/articles/papers etc are most suitable.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 10:47 PM
2

The only good thing about this is that once feminism has had its 15 minutes, and becomes passe' again, they'll move on to something else fast. The bad thing is history will repeat itself once it returns. That would be cool if true. But there is a very disturbing book written by an Oxford Anthropologist named JD Unwin (foreword by Aldous Huxley of 'Brave New World' fame) suggesting that we're actually just repeating a cycle. Every empire becomes safe and decadent, women demand their "rights", mal…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 09:24 PM
32

Leftists -- and I say this as someone who identifies with the "traditional" left -- would be howling in outrage if this law was being applied to any other group. Leftists treat due process rights for men accused of sexual assault the same way rightists treat due process rights for men accused of terrorism.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 07:37 PM
26

Kafkaesque is the enforcement of rules of procedure to the point of irrationality. It is the conversion of the simple into the complex. It is the inexorable bureaucratic legal process grinding the helpless individual. It is the irrational combined with staying power. It is the nightmare become real. It is the anonymous voice that interrupts your telephone call and says, "If you want to make a telephone call, please hang up and . . ." It is the impossibility of filing a motion in a court encruste…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 07:30 PM
6

I was reading Reader's Digest at the barber shop the other day and found the same thing: it was full of feminist propaganda. Even men's magazines like Playboy and GQ are full of feminist propaganda. It's insane how they've managed to squirm their way into every nook and cranny of the media.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 07:13 PM
3

Women face problem = fault of men. Men must fix problem. Men face problem = fault of men. Men must fix problem. If feminists were consistent with their ideas about "female empowerment" they would be demanding that women face equal criticism and scrutiny for potentially harmful actions. But that would entail taking responsibility. This is a serious problem and I honestly don't know what the solution is. Females seem to be more risk-averse than males (and much more concerned about their safety), w…
/r/MensRights06/07/17 06:50 PM
2

Very sorry to hear this. Get better soon Brian.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 04:28 PM
1

Sure! Will check out tomorrow. :)
/r/MensRights06/07/17 12:55 AM
5

Do they really though? I mean, at least on a subconscious level women must realize that rape culture is complete bullshit, otherwise they wouldn't go near universities. And they certainly wouldn't be comfortable getting shitfaced and going to sleazy clubs and bars. Fantasies of being raped (by some chiseled billionaire) are not the same thing as desiring to be raped, as you obviously know. While your ideas are certainly interesting (as they come from a female perspective), I think a more mundane…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:30 PM
5

Or Elizabeth Bathory. Not a leader but one of the richest women in Europe when she went on her depraved killing spree. The idea that female rulers are more gentle than their male counterparts has absolutely zero empirical basis. Indeed there is a really disturbing website titled Unknown Misandry that charts the history of female serial killers and sadistic rulers throughout history. Don't read it with the lights off! ;)
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:01 PM
5

If you've read this far and you aren't butthurt, then you're probably already aware that feminism is just projection. They imagined how they would do things if they ran shit and just assumed that's what men did to women. This is exactly right and the probable origin of "patriarchy theory", "objectification theory" and God knows how many other feminist theories. It's all projection.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:54 PM
6

Seriously. The Inuit were one of the most patriarchal societies in history (I'm no expert on their modern culture). Yet -- wouldn't you know it -- even among the Inuit the women lived longer, safer lives. I'm sensing a pattern here....
/r/MensRights05/07/17 10:51 PM
14

Great to see them openly embracing female supremacy rather than limiting themselves to tired rhetoric about "equality". I mean let's face it, no one's buying their pretense toward equality any longer; might as well go whole hog and declare females the superior sex. It may surprise some people to learn that the very first feminist activist in the United States, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, held the same views. She wrote in her diary that "we are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men." It was all down …
/r/MensRights05/07/17 08:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter