TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

LucifersHammerr Archive

View 27 posts and 827 comments by LucifersHammerr on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
135

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights10/01/17 11:38 PM
115

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights09/01/17 12:15 AM
115

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:04 PM
111

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights04/01/17 09:43 PM
96

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:06 AM
75

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights27/02/17 06:55 AM
52

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights28/02/17 11:04 AM
52

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights28/02/17 10:29 AM
46

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights04/03/17 05:06 PM
44

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:44 PM
35

DiscussionLucifersHammerr/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 12:44 AM
33

FeminismLucifersHammerr/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:19 PM
32

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:44 AM
25

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:26 PM
25

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights15/03/17 07:45 PM
23

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights20/01/17 01:12 AM
20

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:26 PM
18

Legal RightsLucifersHammerr/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:19 AM
13

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights11/02/17 07:01 PM
13

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights13/02/17 03:14 PM
11

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:32 AM
10

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights24/01/17 09:14 PM
7

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights20/02/17 11:51 AM
7

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:20 PM
7

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:51 PM
6

GeneralLucifersHammerr/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:56 AM
3

LucifersHammerr/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:31 AM
3

Well if you know someone in prison, which I suspect you do, he would probably not be in prison if he was a chick. A study in the UK determined that five out of six males would not be in prison if they were treated like females. Also I'm pretty sure you know someone with a cut dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:13 AM
18

They often use these "issues" But they are real issues. It's a "real issue" when a father can only see his daughter/son once or twice a month. Either way, I don't think this should be gender-based. Yet men pay 98% of alimony. Alimony aside, I think the important issue here is shared parenting -- WHICH NOW OPPOSES. Why? I have no idea. Because all the studies show that shared parenting is best for all concerned. Especially the kids -- who have a tendency to fare awfully in single-mother homes, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:08 AM
4

I haven't been affected by most of the stuff that MRA's talk about as well. But I have a cousin who went through possibly the worst divorce in history -- his ex trained his daughter to call him on his Birthday and scream obscenities -- so I'm very sympathetic to their cause. Plus I've seen the stats: kids need fathers. So we should try to make that happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:03 AM
6

Well you'll be happy to learn that I'm not part of any "movement," but I admit that the MRA's have good points. The feminists have some good points as well, but frequently are blind to context.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 01:00 AM
5

But I'm guessing a lot of men are intimidated by the aforementioned feminist juggernaut, and don't speak out. Ironically I think women will have to come to the rescue if men are ever to achieve equal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 12:58 AM
2

Cool...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 12:54 AM
10

Isn't it about time we looked at the other half of the equation?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 12:47 AM
3

What a colossal tool.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:08 PM
2

This seems fake.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 04:04 PM
19

This is what happens when the Duluth model becomes institutionalized. Out of all the crimes feminists have committed against society, their enabling of child abuse is probably the worst. It is well known that mothers commit the majority of child abuse but feminists continue to paint domestic violence as a patriarchal conspiracy. Failing to allow shared parenting also increases the abuse of children, both by mothers and non-biological fathers. I hope you can find a non-feminist at CPS.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 06:15 AM
14

The man himself resigned. That's bullshit. Now he's set himself up for more persecution.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:49 PM
1

sorry wrong post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQc7C4Ug96M
/r/MensRights11/04/17 06:19 AM
4

Congratulations to Spike Lee for his new job!
/r/MensRights10/04/17 10:21 PM
19

According to a woman who was at the screening (see latest episode of Honey Badger radio) a feminist journalist left the theater crying because her worldview was completely shattered. It will be really interesting to see if she writes a review. Two of the protesters also decided to watch the film after being invited in; they were "literally shaking" because they honestly thought they were in danger from the evil MRA's. In other words, some people really believe the ridiculous nonsense being peddl…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:25 PM
3

whereas the early writings that refer to men's rights did not lead directly Paul Elam has argued that Bax's complaints are extremely similar to those of the modern MRM. In any case I don't suppose there's much point in continuing this debate. Suffice it to say there was a (tiny) men's rights movement a hundred years ago but it didn't really catch on since men lack in-group bias. Feminism has become so egregious, however, and men so oppressed, that they no longer have any choice but to put aside …
/r/MensRights08/04/17 04:25 PM
2

Nah. It would be more like saying the Marxist movement dates back to the writings of Marx.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:44 PM
3

The "men's liberation" movement was pro-feminist, whereas Bax wrote works like "The legal subjugation of men" and "The fraud of feminism." It's true that Warren Farrell emerged out of the 70's feminist movement, but his work has little in common with the likes of Robert Bly. In a sense your original comment was correct I suppose, since the men's rights movement has always found itself in conflict with feminism going all the way back to the first wave. It just took a lot longer to coalesce since …
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:27 PM
2

Well the Honey Badgers all seem to be right-libertarians. Paul Elam seems fairly right wring. Mike Buchanan in Britain is a conservative.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:10 PM
4

Nope. The "mens lib" movement of the 70's has little in common with the MRM, whereas Bax's work is arguably its foundation.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:06 PM
11

Nah it's much more complicated than that. There were was an article posted here the other day by the Canadian conservative Christie Blatchford about how Canadian family courts got so fucked up. Surprisingly, she points out, it was actually conservatives (aligned with feminists) that screwed over men. In that climate emerged a social policy aimed at reducing poverty by focusing on private responsibility. “The new view laid the blame for poverty at the feet of former husbands, a dynamic that appea…
/r/MensRights08/04/17 03:03 PM
9

I think the leadership of the MRM leans right, but the base leans left. This makes sense, since prominent leftists are worried about having their careers destroyed by feminists, while the right has historically been anti-feminist anyway (though not pro-men's rights).
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:52 PM
7

Incorrect. You can find men's rights literature going back to at least Earnest Belford Bax (a socialist, interestingly enough) in the early 20th century.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 02:49 PM
7

Agree with you entirely. It SUCKS when a female character is simply all awesome all the time; the male characters have to work to become eg Jedis, and so should the women!
/r/MensRights05/04/17 07:31 PM
5

Exactly. Fans don't reject "strong female leads," they just oppose obvious politicking.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 04:25 PM
21

Technically you could have filed a complaint with higher authorities -- she deserved it -- but I think you did the right thing. There is something to be said for treating people like human beings and talking things through one-on-one. If everyone did this instead of tattletaling we would have a much more civilized society.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:15 PM
41

During the recent hoopla in Calgary, a feminist was literally quoted as saying she "hadn't seen the film" but that it "promotes hatred against women." Hasn't seen the film. Promotes hatred against women. Facepalm.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:09 PM
8

The same man-haters who post on Against Mens Rights post on MensLib. That tells you all you need to know about that deplorable sub.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:04 PM
31

Find me a man who doesn't love Alien, Ridley Scott's sci-fi film featuring a very "strong and independent" female lead in Sigorney Weaver. That's one example, there are thousands more. People don't like it when SJW's artificially insert hamfisted feminist politics into their art. That is all.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 02:50 PM
8

Fair and tragic point.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 07:27 AM
3

Thanks Karen. And congrats on your new haircut. But I think I speak for most men here when I suggest that you grow your hair long, wear a pink dress (or tutu), flit about in a coquettish fashion while "accidentally" bending over, and make me a ham sandwich. In all seriousness, you rock and good luck with the screening (I was also serious about the tutu thing).
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:23 AM
–

Now you sound gay.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 06:05 AM
13

lol that would be a beautiful solution but most men would have too much dignity to go through such drama (unless they were entertainers). That's one of the problems with the MRM. We have too much dignity and don't want to wallow around in the mud with the SJW's. It's ironic that the saintly Warren Farrell was ignored for thirty years, then Paul Elam came along, made some shit posts, and a documentary was produced about men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 05:25 AM
19

Such slippage in support for gender equality Feminism has nothing whatsoever to do with "gender equality." The political scientist Dan Cassino suggests that the increased support for male leadership in home life among 18- to 25-year-olds may reflect an attempt to compensate for men’s loss of dominance in the work world. "Dominance" is an interesting way of describing work. Most people don't get to have fancy careers. They have to toil in rather miserable circumstances. That includes female wage …
/r/MensRights04/04/17 04:00 AM
23

I would also add that the Canadian public seems to be on Peterson's side. He has said that he gets dozens of supportive emails a day -- including by trans people! There is undoubtedly a political aspect to this whole affair: Prime Minister Trudeau is an avowed feminist and loves to virtue signal. Trudeau could actually become a great man (rather than feminist man-child) if he switched gears and supported men's rights aka ACTUAL gender equality.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:45 AM
12

Names of the peer review committee members will be publicly posted once all applicants have been fully notified, she said. Good. Let's see who these pieces of excrement are. I am radically at odds with Professor Peterson when it comes to the philosophy of egalitarianism -- I support it, he doesn't. But his stands on feminism, free speech and PC authoritarianism are absolutely righteous. Anyone who actually believes in freedom and "equality" must reject the modern "left." Leftists used to fight f…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:44 AM
40

A friend of mine applied for a position at a University and they told him flat out they were looking for a woman or a "minority" (he's a fucking white male). This is in Canada. I was surprised this is actually legal but apparently it is. We have a Charter of Rights and Freedoms but there's fine print allowing for "positive discrimination" in favor of "historically oppressed" groups. If it was the 1970's I could possibly see the justification for these practices, but now that young women are out-…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:31 AM
8

This must be so frustrating for you Karen. I recall that you were recently invited onto CTV news to debate feminists but they cancelled at the last minute. Now this. The empress is naked. Feminists understand, at least subconsciously, that their ideology is bullshit. I've seen the Red Pill and there is nothing "anti-woman" in it. It simply showcases problems affecting men and boys. The film actually gives feminists a fair shake, allowing them to present their arguments -- silly as they are. Peop…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 02:07 AM
11

Even the author of this piece can't help herself: It’s true males commit more violent acts than females: think school shootings, homicides and terrorist acts. WRONG. Men are not more violent than women. Women are simply more cowardly when it comes to violence. For example women are the majority of child abusers. They inflict violence on those who are less likely to fight back or speak out.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:32 AM
3

that was really bad satire.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:26 AM
4

Wrong.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:23 AM
1

She's sexy at any age. But doesn't compare to "Honey." ;)
/r/MensRights03/04/17 06:10 PM
1

Nice, nice ass
/r/MensRights03/04/17 10:35 AM
4

Hur Dur empowerment.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 07:09 AM
1

Mariah Carry.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 02:34 AM
–

Gibberish. Learn to speak coherently.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 11:52 PM
1

I'd much rather see Karen debate Laci head on. But if Laci is too chicken then yes, it would be nice to see Karen do a video on this. Another alternative, since /u/girlwriteswhat likes girl-girl action, is for the two to make love not war and produce an amorous video for the enjoyment of MRA's and feminists alike.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:19 PM
2

I have no problem with women's centers -- provided there are male equivalents. Men are now a persecuted minority on college campuses. It sounds bizarre to say but it's true -- they are repeatedly denied the right to get together and talk about men's issues outside of a gynocentric focus. In a sane world, sans feminism, men and women would get together and try to work out their issues together, showing empathy for the opposite sex. Feminism does not allow this and must therefore go the way of the…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:14 PM
2

whining about divorce rape A man literally committed suicide last week over being divorce raped. Show some goddamn respect, or at least empathy, for men who are denied access to their children while still being forced to subsidize their ex-wives. false rape accusations The majority of people released under the Innocence Project were men falsely accused of rape. Again, show some respect, or at least compassion, for men subject to the hell of false incarceration. I know it's not as bad as mansprea…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 08:09 PM
15

You better believe it. You can't harm men without harming women. A recent study determined that the occupation with the highest happiness rate is...drumroll...housewife! So the entire feminist experiment was not only a waste of time, it made women unhappier. In fact women are unhappier than they've ever been. The "new American dream" for women is to become a housewife. There are many other factors. Females are taught by feminists that men try to oppress them. This causes feelings of anger and re…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 07:02 PM
3

I don't engage in cross sections of intellectuals. Ms. Sommers may be right about one thing and wrong on another.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:30 AM
3

I do agree we should clean up pollution and clean the oceans. Well, we can agree on that.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:20 AM
3

You can't be serious. We pump billions of X__ shit into the atmosphere, you think it has no effect? That's absurd.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:13 AM
1

lol. She's got the moves but she lacks the booty.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 09:56 AM
1

I'll allow it.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 09:49 AM
–

A Ha! I knew you were a girl, and I knew you wanted to twerk. DO NOT TWERK in front of eg ttraffic. IT'S FINE
/r/MensRights31/03/17 09:43 AM
3

I think it's self-explanatory. Bitch shakes her ass.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:41 AM
1

The ironing is delicious.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:39 AM
2

WILL WE RALLY BEHIND THIS...? no. But we should.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:36 AM
2

Horrific.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:34 AM
2

I'm not gonna sit through this.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:34 AM
5

Bitch, don't twerk, problem solved. *actually I kinda like twerking, because it's so animal. But there is a time and place!
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:31 AM
1

I wanted to take time out of my day to say that you are AND a douchebag. Carry on.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 08:28 AM
2

You are awesome. No two ways about it.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:52 AM
6

Just to be clear, that was a sick joke. Straight white men should stay ALIVE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmUkR7fViHY
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:45 AM
6

You're a male, and possibly straight and white. Why are you even alive? You should put a bullet in your head.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:33 AM
1

I'm in love!
/r/MensRights31/03/17 07:15 AM
2

She? Probably nothing. But you -- you can do amazing things.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 04:15 AM
1

Her writing is excellent. Her presentation...not so much.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 03:49 AM
–

I will repost: She said that feminists are hating on boys. Do something about it -- don't just blather online.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 03:48 AM
-1

As much as I love Camille, she is borderline hysterical. Bitch, get it together. The next best feminist is Christina Hoff Sommers, but she made the mistake of working for a global-warming-denying outfit, so she is dismissed. We are left with ZERO credible feminists who oppose the modern insane wave. The good news: there are tons of brilliant ANTI-feminist women like /u/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights31/03/17 02:02 AM
26

Wasn't Mattress girl aka porn girl given an award by NOW? The largest and most powerful feminist organization in the world? That denies men shared parenting and abuses children? Well? Hell...)=O? Anybody home?
/r/MensRights31/03/17 01:56 AM
1

What do you expect? Of course the Marxist is going to try and place the blame on 'Capitalism' instead of admit his ideology has been hijacked and ruined lol. I offered facts. Your anti-capitalist obsession is not borne out by the facts. Some people are smarter than you.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 10:25 PM
1

THE LIGHT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGZqDzb__bw
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:08 PM
1

lol. Noooooo!
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:30 PM
9

Ahem, "The Boys are back in town." "Boys night out." Etc. It is primarily women that refer to themselves as "girls." This is just more naval gazing and whining from spoiled brats who want to portray themselves as victims.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 01:06 AM
4

Love your moniker and cartoon character. Great job. It's heartening to see more and more women showing empathy for men and boys.
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:51 AM
8

A Plymouth University student has been denied the chance to set up a "men's rights" forum - because they do not suffer discrimination. I wonder if they realize that by denying the student this right, they are practicing discrimination against males. In other words they have just disproven their own argument!
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:35 AM
3

One of the problems is that men don't want to leave their children at the mercy of abusive mothers. Since men will themselves be arrested if their report the abuse, they are forced to endure the violence. Sometimes they snap. There is an easy solution: end the feminist Duluth model and recognize that women can and frequently are violent behind closed doors. Anyone supporting feminism is supporting mass child abuse, which ironically will produce more domestic violence -- including against women -…
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:31 AM
4

The irony is that males most certainly do not get their gender identity by "degrading" girls, not even in the most hardcore patriarchies. The reason boys are taught to "man up" is to prepare them for life as the disposable sex. They must be taught to put female life before their own and to sacrifice their own happiness to provide for women. To demonize males for acting as the disposable sex is absolutely unconscionable. It is profoundly sadistic. These teachers -- most of whom are female -- are …
/r/MensRights30/03/17 12:05 AM
3

So if I am understanding your position correctly, the Powers That Be (TPTB) are using feminists and groups like BLM to create wedges between various groups in order to prevent the people from coming together. Yeah that's about it. Being a bit of a conspiracy theorists myself The term is obviously being used to prevent people from pointing out the obvious. In fact even Noam Chomsky was characterized as a "conspiracy theorist" for pointing out the obvious. By creating a Men's Movement instead of a…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 05:03 AM
5

Yes, but could you imagine an audience of men laughing about and celebrating the exploits of eg Edmund Kemper? I cannot. This is a female trait, and you know it.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 04:07 AM
4

I don't mean to be determinst. Just talking in generalities. Obviously there are exceptions. Sharon Osborne joked about a guy having his penis chopped off, and the ENTIRE female audience laughed. I'm sorry -- but that is evidence.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:47 AM
4

Governments like to have more power. Yes I agree with that for the most part. It's just too bad right wing types make exceptions for the police, military etc.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:24 AM
6

I'm an anti-capitalist, so you'll have no argument from me. Except for this: We welcome efforts by women to achieve "liberation", but deny men the same. You can say "well Karen DeCrow in the 70's admitted that equality would entail the possibility of male parental surrender", but by and large feminists have expressed zero interest in "equality." Another obvious example: a study in the UK determined that five out of six male prison inmates would not be incarcerated if they were female. What are f…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:04 AM
5

Society is already organized to their liking. Agreed. But that has nothing to do with "apha" vs. "beta." Presumably MOST super-rich men are not highly athletic handsome tall male models; and many are probably insecure rather than confident. So there goes your theory. Improving oneself is fine and great; subscribing to /r/redpill views os society is retarted.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 02:28 AM
2

Thank you kindly.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:20 AM
4

People who regurgitate the phrase "conspiracy theory" are generally dim-witted, at least in my experience. In fact your first claim contradicts your second: if "alphas" are the cat's pajamas, they would presumably have the wit to organize society to their liking. As for "alpha" theory itself, it's partly insightful but mostly retarded.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 01:12 AM
1

hahaha, fair enough.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:44 AM
8

That's a marvelous essay, better than OP.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 12:28 AM
5

Feminists are anti-capitalists who want moar female CEOs. It doesn't matter what feminists claim to be. As stated, they are simply useful idiots.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 11:33 PM
-11

No, the words from his mouth, when he embraced the neocons. I don't support genocide. Sorry.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:49 AM
-1

You just couldn't accept a happy ending could you? Douche bag.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 09:09 AM
-26

Hitchens was scum. A man without honor.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 08:37 AM
10

Reverse the sexes: life in prison.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 07:01 PM
7

'In all legends men have thought of women as sublime separately but horrible in a herd.' - G.K. Chesterton No wonder the feminist movement has been such a clusterfuck.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:54 PM
5

If I were to be honest, it seems that men have more systematic advantages than women on the hole That's absurd. What you say may have been true in the 19th century but is certainly not true today. The reality is that women are now privileged in both the traditional male and female spheres. Which isn't surprising: it was inevitable that once women entered the male sphere they would be given undue advantage by chivalrous male leaders, since men have out group bias toward women. The stats for the v…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 06:07 PM
21

Feminists are jelly. A recent poll determined that stay at home moms have the highest happiness rate of any occupation. That includes high flyin' career gals. I guess women should have listened to men when they said the grass wasn't greener on the other side. Oh well. Enjoy being the bread earners, ladies! The MGTOW movement will grow exponentially as men see The Red Pill and do a cost benefit analysis. Then comes male birth control. Women will be left with the worst of all worlds: no marriage o…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 07:44 AM
6

Act "like a woman" and get less. Not really. Women (especially housewives) control the majority of household spending. Someone's getting a raw deal here but it sure as hell isn't the woman.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 07:31 AM
17

Men work longer hours in more difficult and dangerous jobs. When feminists start trying to correct the workplace death gap I may take their complaints over being paid less for working less more seriously. Women also spend most of the money that men earn, control the majority of household spending, and receive more services from the state even though they pay less taxes (including health care funding).
/r/MensRights25/03/17 07:30 AM
1

I wouldn't hesitate to refer to the Jewish state as "our country," It certainly isn't the country of the Palestinians, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:44 AM
67

Yes, I would imagine that fighting an imaginary enemy is very exhausting indeed. Firebrand preachers in the South also work up quite a sweat railing against Satan. In all honesty this is nothing more than cynical marketing playing on female insecurities and delusions. It's not all flattering to women that this sort of advertising apparently works.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:28 AM
2

Let's just say that people much smarter than you are extremely concerned -- not do to some benevolent impulse but because angry disenfranchised young men are dangerous. Sociologists call it "social dynamite". By privileging women in the traditional male sphere, attacking men relentlessly, and reducing the possibilities for young men to achieve fulfilling and well paying jobs we are creating the ingredients for a revolution.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:02 AM
3

You know who else throw things? Toddlers. Grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 03:58 AM
2

You should read up on the history of the movement. Warren Farrell and others spent about 20 years supplicating before feminists and begging them to take men's issues seriously. They received only abuse in response. Then came Paul Elam and his shit-posting. Within only a few years a documentary was made about the MRM. It would be nice if we could all join hands and sing Kumbaya but that's not the way the world works. Feminists have profound institutional power and they play VERY dirty. MRA's have…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:24 PM
3

They have not made men unequal Uh yes they have. To cite one example, the largest feminist organization in the world, NOW, opposes equal parenting rights. Many laws have been tabled for shared parenting but have been shut down due to feminist lobbying efforts. Men actually used to get default custody. It would be wrong to say "all men's problems are caused by feminism," but it would be right to say that feminists have taken away some rights from men and that they actively work to thwart gender e…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:20 PM
9

If someone's staring puts them within a mile of being slapped then they are creepy as hell. That's assault. If you're worried about people looking at you wear a burka. Come to think of it I'm starting to wonder whether that's how Burkas came about in the first place: insecure women whining about the "male gaze."
/r/MensRights22/03/17 03:47 PM
10

I can't believe this was published in Cosmo. It's more astute than 99 percent of the feminist drivel found in academia. Still, after mentioning a bunch of ways that men and boys face discrimination, she insists on saying "I'm no men's rights activist." Why the hell not? Why not just say "I'm a WRA and an MRA -- I advocate equal rights for both sexes." There is no need to dance around the stigma about MRA's created by lying feminists. But that's a minor quibble. People can call themselves whateve…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 07:14 AM
7

It's more evidence that modern women don't have any kind of functioning creepiness filter. I think you misunderstand the word "creep." It doesn't refer to actual creeps, it refers to guys who lack confidence. Hence the recent Tinder experiment where a guy posing as a male model started with lines like "I wanna blow a load in your face" and there was nary a mention of creepiness or sexual harassment. "The erotic message therapist" line is fucking hilarious though. What exactly did she expect?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:16 AM
2

I have repeatedly wondered the same thing. Pretty sure Britain has hate speech laws. Sounds like a job for someone like Mike Buchanan.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 01:38 AM
6

Wow, the definition of "hero" sure has gone downhill. Does she clean up her disgusting mess or does she expect some man to do it for her?
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:49 AM
13

The anarchist Bob Black predicted this back in the 80's: "It will be totalitarianism beyond anything Hitler or Stalin achieved when criticism is redefined as coercion and coercion is redefined as protection from criticism. Radical feminism can hardly hope to come to power, or maintain it, under any other circumstances."
/r/MensRights22/03/17 12:17 AM
31

Yep. Started off fair but then ironically descended into the exact same rhetoric and misleading bullshit Cassie decried. but based on Department of Justice figures, estimates that out of every 1,000 rapes, 994 perpetrators walk free. What!?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:59 PM
5

For days you couldn’t walk past a television, radio or computer screen without encountering a defensive rant about how the most valuable work a woman can do involves nappies, play-doh, and a strict adherence to only leaving the family home during the hours of 9am to 5pm to attend playgroup or a similar non-work sanctioned activity. Yeah, who cares about raising kids! That should be the state's job, like in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Methinks these feminists are jealous of stay-at-home moms…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 10:05 PM
3

This needs to be talked about more. Women spend the majority of the money men earn. It is absurd to portray women as the "oppressed" party in this scenario. To put it in Marxist terms, it would be like saying that the capitalist is oppressed and the worker is privileged.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 08:26 PM
10

Ditto. I sent a letter to CBC and hope others will as well.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:42 AM
13

She may have been set up but it was her own damn fault for not watching the film first. Can you imagine going on national television and railing about a film that you haven't even watched?
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:41 AM
14

Yep.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:07 PM
2

By looking at triviality, mockery, panic, and anger that women’s studies as a field elicits, we conclude by outlining the stakes of framing women’s studies as an infectious, insurrectional, and potentially dangerous, field of study. In doing so, we frame two new priorities for women’s studies—training male students as viruses and embracing “negative” stereotypes of feminist professors—as important future directions for the potentially liberatory aspects of the field. And you would have gotten aw…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:04 PM
12

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:58 PM
7

There's lots of support for the MRM on R/Kotakuinaction, the gamergate sub.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:57 PM
9

The "retaliation" clause was a clever move by feminists. They know that vanishingly few men will ever accuse a woman of rape due to the shame it would bring on him. However a falsely accused man might do so to bring attention to the double standard (eg sex while intoxicated).
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:36 PM
16

So the CBC knew she hadn't seen the film and aired the interview anyway? Without even informing their viewers? Would that make them liable in the event that Cassie sues for slander? Being accused of promoting the rape of women is a rather serious charge.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:31 PM
5

Really? We're gonna blame video games again? Here's the thing: young men are faced with a society that hates them and disadvantages them at every opportunity. The male gender role has been destroyed, huge numbers of young men grow up without fathers, and females are privileged in every sphere. Men are even harassed if they just want to go sit on a bench at the park (pedophile!). If it was just feminism or just lack of good job opportunities young men might be willing to contribute. But the combi…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 09:32 PM
3

This lecture is terrifying. I bet 90% of Canadians have no idea what feminists are trying to do to the law.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:44 PM
1

I agree. However realistically there's no possibility of her being fired. A more interesting possibility would be to use Canada's hate speech legislation against some of these gender studies professors. I don't agree with the laws but since they are on the books it would make for an interesting court case.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:38 PM
2

the sheer amount of grooming and fashion expected out of women sucks. Yeah, it must suck having sexual power. My heart especially goes out to those poor oppressed super models. If women don't want to appear attractive to the opposite sex nothing is stopping them from becoming legbeard feminists with hairy pits.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:29 PM
15

It was a gradual process. Most men (and women) didn't even realize there was a problem until recently. Meanwhile the man-haters have been working tirelessly behind the scenes. In our defense, Canada has produced an inordinate number of MRAs, including Karen Straughan and Alison Tiemen (the two original honey badgers), Janet Bloomfield, Diana Davison, etc. The most important academic works about misandry were written by the Canadians Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young. And CAFE is one of the best…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:21 PM
15

The mere fact that these debates are happening is a sign of progress.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:10 PM
1

Seems like she hates men and boys a huge amount...
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:45 AM
1

Einstein was a socialist. You're just some monkey retard typing online.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 09:03 PM
7

You know how on Thanksgiving we're supposed to be thankful for this or that? Jess Phillips has a son. I am thankful that Jess Phillips is not my mother. We laugh, but remember that many feminists have sons. These man-hating harpies are so narcissistic that they care more about things like "female self-esteem" than their own offspring. Disgusting human beings.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:52 PM
1

I have downvoted you for failing to stimulate me intellectually.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:23 PM
1

What!? If voting made any difference they would make it ilegal.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:17 PM
1

David Futrelle ..may well be the most disgusting human being ever to live.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:57 PM
-1

he applied (presumably to the government?) and was granted an exemption. Indeed he was. He promoted war throughout his entire career while hiding like a coward. My grandfather flew hundreds of bombing raids over Europe and ended up with PTSD. He was lucky: he didn't die. I'm sorry but I have no respect for people who celebrate war but refuse to fight.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:07 PM
0

John Wayne is the classic chicken hawk. I don't begrudge him for not dying in the war. I begrudge him for promoting war while simultaneously hiding. My grandfather was a pilot in WWII. John Wayne was busy acting. There's nothing I hate more than a chicken hawk.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:43 PM
-1

John Wayne was a cowardly little bitch. End of story.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:37 PM
2

So then your pissing in the wind, because you'll never convince everyone or even a majority to adapt the life style you prescribe. That's absurd. The history of eg the US has been one of constant struggle and murder. A basic minimum income Is a good start.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:29 PM
3

Just the argument if we should honor men as a whole. Why would you even say that? That's horrible. Women have historically done great things but also awful things. Why wouldn't you want to honor women? OF COURSE we should honor men. And women. Period. And you know what? All those awful things you attribute solely to men? Women weren't little flowers. They played a role. They played a role in the good stuff -- and the bad stuff.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:37 PM
7

whether it's fair that men's vote is tied to military service Are you insane? Of course it's not fair. Dying in a trench being eaten alive by rats was not "fair." But that was and is the fate of men. If society was "fair" we would be honoring men every minute of every day. But life isn't fair. Virtually no MRA's think women shouldn't have the right to vote. But we ask that feminists acknowledge the sacrifice of men and boys to give women that "right." It was an act of chivalry. Nothing more, not…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 12:06 PM
10

We could fairly discuss whether men's right to vote is tied to military service (I don't think it is) It is. It's called the "Selective Service Act" and was passed during WWI when only 70,000 men volunteered to die for monarchs in the trenches. More American men were forced to fight and die in WWI than were conscripted. 50 years later came Vietnam. Men achieved the vote through blood. Women were simply given it due to chivalry.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:27 AM
2

lol. John Wayne was a coward. Pussied out of service in WWII and never got over it. Chicken hawk extraordinare. Thirteen wartime movies later, and the flag of heroism he rose in the said Sands was still awaiting his recruitment in real-life. And this was a fact that John Ford, now a commander in the U.S. Navy, never shied away from letting the Duke know about. He would frequently berate Wayne “to get into it,” saying that he was growing rich as other men died. http://www.denofgeek.com/us/movies/…
/r/MensRights12/03/17 11:19 AM
2

Hypergamy. The entire point of traditionalism is to ration out sex. Female sexual liberation is incompatible with hierarchy, since females will pursue only the the men at the top of the pyramid. It is what it is.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:26 AM
1

I have no idea what you're talking about. Capitalism kills billions per year. Communism is also a shitty system. I don't see why this opinion is even controversial.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 10:01 AM
-1

poverty, authoritarianism and death You mean capitalism? Because yes that fits to a T. You capitalist ideologues fail to impress; in my mind you're just like the folks who think North Korea is splendid awesome system. Believe it or not, all U system suck ass too. There are clearly better ways of doing things.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 08:32 AM
1

Bullshit. Children require mothers, just as children require fathers.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 06:31 AM
13

Karen and Janet raised legitimate points, you didn't.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 05:37 AM
2

So basically I agree with most of your arguments. But I think you may be dismissing hunter-gatherers with prejudice. We actually EVOLVED in these societies, so it seems foolhardy at best to dismiss them without even examining their social organization.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:48 AM
2

No noble savage here. The Iroquois brutally tortured people from other tribes. But they also maintained -- yes -- a "fanatical" devotion to individual rights for people in their own tribe. Any body of people that respects individual rights should be studied. You dismiss them as savages.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 04:12 AM
30

Both women argue that it is unfair that men should be forced to fight and die for the state, while women aren't. That's it. Remarkably, the suffragettes didn't actually want "equality." That's their point.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:35 AM
14

If Reddit had integrity this would soon appear on best/of.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 03:13 AM
13

I want -- nay, demand -- games with more sexy female characters. I want a gaming company that completely rejects SJW feminist bullshit and delights in showing Anita Sarkeesian's nightmare -- female butts. Actually I don't play videogames. I'm just making this argument as a matter of principle.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:29 AM
3

Well since I'm not a communist we may be in partial agreement. Take for example the Iroquois Confederacy. Most property was held in common, but individual property (so long it didn't infringe on the rights of others) was allowed and there was a "fanatical" emphasis on the rights of the individual. They lived in a very large territory and used decentralization and federation. Every single person had a say in the running of the society.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 02:11 AM
3

You're a WHITE MALE.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:52 AM
1

https://www.amazon.ca/Hierarchy-Forest-Evolution-Egalitarian-Behavior/dp/0674006917
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:44 AM
2

My best guess is that there are fewer women than men who enjoy - or can even stand - the pretty ruthless competition that is needed to climb up the hierarchy and to keep the power position. Not at all. Women love competition. They just don't like taking responsibility.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:36 AM
1

Socialism is one of the main causes of the destruction of men. That and any other Marxist leaning ideas. Again it depends on definitions. For 99 percent of our history we have lived in societies where everything was shared.
/r/MensRights12/03/17 01:24 AM
1

Just wanted to add: everyone is down-voting this post, without actually examining its arguments.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:50 PM
2

A woman being a woman is a wonderful thing to behold. Women can easily turn men into putty by a wink or a flash of the breasts. This is an unfair power differential in which women should recognize male weakness. Lol.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:44 PM
1

Those don't make for very healthy children. Ted Bundy is one example.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:32 PM
3

Feminism is anti biology and anti happiness. Indeed. What is striking is that men have NEVER considered traditional "womanly duties" inferior. Quite the contrary: eg the "horribly" un-pc GK Chesterton basically said that the raising of children is the far more important role. It was only feminists that denigrated motherhood.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:26 PM
6

Point taken. But without a woman to breastfeed the child, there is no future generation at all.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:22 PM
2

You're welcome :) I think one of the biggest stumbling blocks is that women don't feel respected for raising children. But again -- that's the most important job!
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:13 PM
3

Interesting that the far left and the far right come to similar conclusions about gender...Thanks for your post.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 08:12 PM
2

Traditionalism and socialism are like oil in water. If someone wants to live that way, no one is stopping them. I'm not sure what you mean. Traditionalism is rendered impossible by feminist law; socialism is rendered impossible by capitalist law. So yes, someone is indeed "stopping them." But to force people to live that way when they don't want to is authoritarianism. I agree. You mention socialism, but do not make it clear how traditionlism and socialism intersect. To be clear, I'm not talking…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 07:47 PM
7

He's flat out wrong about feminist societies being more economically productive. Correlation does not mean causation. What actually happens is that when a society reaches a period of sustained growth and safety, feminist movements arise. The society then immediately falls into decline. This was recognized by the anthropologist JD Unwin a century ago. https://archive.org/details/b20442580 There has so far been no exception to this rule. He is also wrong, at least partly, about why women are less …
/r/MensRights11/03/17 06:48 PM
15

Wow. Actual journalism. What a crazy idea! The "journalists" at the CBC should be fucking ashamed of themselves. They contacted some gender studies professor to comment on the film (she thought or pretended to think it was about the Red Pill subreddit) without even contacting Cassie or a single MRA. Meanwhile CTV invited Karen Straughan onto their morning show to debate feminists and they cancelled. What a bunch of cowards.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 04:04 PM
1

I'm actually surprised no one has attempted this. A TON of feminist literature could easily to described as hate speech.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 02:46 PM
1

ass hole.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 12:45 AM
4

I hate to say this but they're gonna butcher your interview. You know this already. Janet's interview will be butchered worse; hello Donald Trump and the "alt-right". Perhaps some sanity will bleed through amidst the nonsense. I remember a remark of yours, "patriarchy -- you so craaaazy" lol. That's the long and short of it. Where can I get my patriarchy card? I could use a leg up. In sum: you're awesome, and I hope you will write that book. Also: more videos please. As a
/r/MensRights09/03/17 12:26 AM
5

And here you are. So might as well explain what happened. We all love you Karen.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:39 PM
1

Well done. If no one complains they won't know the difference.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 11:35 PM
2

I think they will probably show clips of interviews with Karen and Judgy Bitch -- emphasizing the Trump angle. Tin foil? Everything is a bloody "conspiracy" these days. If you were super rich, wouldn't you conspire?
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:56 PM
–

Hmmm, you strike me as a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 09:43 PM
15

For those who don't know, Karen was supposed to appear in a debate with feminists on the "morning show" of CTV -- Canada's most watched news program. Apparently the feminists chickened out, and I'm not sure that Karen will even be featured :( This whole situation sucks ass. Hopefully they will at least broadcast her interview. Edit: I encourage everyone to demand of CTV that Karen be given air time. They manipulated her and wasted her time when she was supposed to be in Washington for a long-sho…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:33 PM
1

Bitch should be celebrating the MENZ. Period.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:17 PM
–

Who are you? did you lil' friend ask you to front? You stupid little bitch. What are you saying? You make no sense moron.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:46 PM
–

kid, you got owned. Lick your wounds etc and go home. Perhaps you can do better next time, and even get an ice cream.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:41 PM
–

You got owned. Man up, and shut the fuck up, twerp.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 06:36 PM
2

I don't give a shit what 'most people' do or prefer You should. Because that's the entire point of activism. I have an interview to join the board of a national father's organisation My apologies. That's awesome. Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 05:09 PM
–

I just can't see how you can fault me for arguing for higher quality I can and I will. Example: I love Kurosawa and Herzog. Most people don't. They would prefer to watch "Friends." You are a snob, not an activist of any kind.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:14 PM
1

That's a good start.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:07 PM
1

It's a no-win situation. Eloquent MRA posts do not reach the front page. Snarky posts about Lena Dunham will reach the front page, because that's what most people want. Despite popular belief, the vast majority of posts on this sub are sincere. When a shit post reaches R/all, it skyrockets. That is not a reflection on the MRM, but the average person. Either way it makes no difference: MRA's have completely reasonable complaints: eg a man being allowed to see the child he supports.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 04:00 PM
3

The members of R/MensRights routinely get attacked for promoting memes. Yet if you view the front page of the sub you will find serious outrage after outrage -- almost enough to commit fucking suicide. So I have no problem with the occasional shit post. Introduces a little levity. I'm not sure that whining about shit posts actually helps men and boys.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:44 PM
-1

Looks like someone got triggered ;)
/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:32 PM
3

NOW opposes shared parenting. This isn't a controversial statement. They call father's rights groups an "abuser's lobby." This despite the fact that shared parenting actually helps women in addition to the children and the father.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:26 PM
11

I saw that article. It was despicable. I don't like the Red Pill sub but it's really no different than Cosmo magazine: people want to get laid and will use every trick in the book. That's it. The MRM is a human rights movement and has nothing to do with "pick up artists." The fact that feminists frequently conflate the two says more about them than us.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:24 PM
17

Here's a spotlight: The woman who essentially launched the feminist movement in the US, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, wrote in her diary that women were "infinitely superior to men." The woman who founded the first "gender studies" program, Sally Miller Gearhart, openly proclaimed that men and boys should be slaughtered and reduced to "ten percent" of the population. Gearhart also coined the phrase "the future is female," which has been embraced by the third wave, including its most prominent spokespe…
/r/MensRights08/03/17 02:05 PM
10

This should be stickied.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:32 PM
12

It also helps that females are privileged in every aspect of society. Thanks to the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:30 PM
15

NOW, the largest feminist organization in the US, opposes equal parenting rights. This despite the fact that every single study undertaken on the subject has revealed that shared parenting is helpful to the kids, the father, and even the mother. There is only one conclusion to be reached: feminists are more interested in hurting men than helping women and children.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:28 PM
24

Wikipedia is a great resource if you want to learn about eg a TV show or cats. When it comes to political affairs it may as well be written by the CIA. Perhaps it is.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:22 PM
1

Help
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:19 PM
1

Cheers brother. I won't stop.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:10 PM
1

I'm not saying that this is invariably good: clearly it's not.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:55 PM
1

But I don't worship some "leader" like Peterson either.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:24 PM
1

"we can get it right this time" marxist, I already said I wasn't a Marxist.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 09:23 PM
4

I admit to being irritated that posts like this that could engender real dialogue receive a few upvotes while shit posts easily make it to r/all. To use that cliche "it is what it is", I guess.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:57 PM
1

I don't think (relative) equality of outcome is necessarily evil if it's voluntary and understood to be of benefit to all concerned. Have you read "Hierarchy in the Forest"? Interesting book on this topic. But yes, attempts to enforce "equality" by the state may sometimes help (eg if men are being denied the right to unionize -- which is basically the right to free association) but can also be used to cause great harm, eg in Stalinist Russia. I would also point out however that Stalin never desi…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:41 PM
3

I used the word marxist as in social-marxist/marxist/communist/facist/feminist. Yes. I reject all of those ists and isms. But the reality is that feminists don't actually desire "equality of outcome," regardless of whether one considers that desirable. For example, men are sentenced to on average 62% longer prison sentences, but I see no feminist attempts to redress this obvious inequality.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:21 PM
5

Thanks, glad you enjoyed it. I don't think women will ever become "obsolete" because despite popular belief, men are not uncaring assholes. We just want justice and fairness. Something is going to snap in this current system, because men will not continue embracing their traditional gender role of disposable workhorse if they are not afforded justice and respect. I consider the odds that modernity and feminism can peacefully co-exist to be approximately zero. Men will simply choose to bow out of…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 08:00 PM
6

You're welcome. Glad you found it of value. Depending on whether people like it I may clean it up and send it A Voice for Men.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 06:28 PM
1

I dislike the idea of sate secrecy in any form.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:36 AM
13

Interesting how the headline is phrased. "Force women" rather than "Allow men to know".
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:03 AM
6

I think you're being dishonest. Experiments like this show that there are clearly different rules for different men. If a "neckbeard" introduced himself to a girl on Tinder by saying he wanted to blow a wad in her face he would be accused of being a borderline criminal pervert. I'm not speaking on behalf of myself. I've never had a problem with the opposite sex, and in fact when I was younger I rarely had to pursue at all. Not tooting my own horn, I was simply lucky enough to be very athletic. B…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:43 PM
1

I may be wrong. Aren't you one of our resident feminists? I may be thinking about someone else.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:08 PM
3

Go team!
/r/MensRights03/03/17 10:52 PM
1

You don't do language good do you?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:45 PM
10

Don't forget feminism.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:36 PM
1

Huh? Who is "they"? I have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:29 PM
6

Nailed it.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:28 PM
12

lol the guy was acting like a complete pig. Why not stop being a hypocrite? All men are asking for is an end to the hypocrisy. Admit that it's not the behavior, it's the individual who engages in the behavior. Ergo the constant wailing and moaning about sexual harassment and catcalling etc. is just snobbery disguised as oppression.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:26 PM
26

Let's not fall into that SJW trap I've read your posts. You are a SJW. What's this "we" stuff?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:23 PM
11

I wonder how many women realize that they will never be respected if they refuse to take responsibility for their actions? Women used to be respected for their roles, and yes that included working women. But you can't try to "compete" with men then demand artificial privileges while simultaneously claiming to be both superior and oppressed. Feminists sound like crazy religious fundamentalists blaming the devil for everything. As for math and STEM, Norway already tried wasting millions trying to …
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:18 PM
4

Your posts are always hilarious. Keep it up :)
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:10 PM
12

Femininity is better suited to maintain stability lol. I'm guessing you don't spend a lot of time around women.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:08 PM
13

It's a way of making excuses as to why we shouldn't take men's issues seriously. Apparently it's okay for feminists to literally advocate male genocide (Sally Miller Gearthart, who founded the first gender studies course, did so earnestly) but if MRA's make a shitpost or say something uncouth it's supposed to invalidate their concerns.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 05:26 PM
6

This is nothing less than an harassment campaign targeting men for their biology. We have differently shaped hips and a higher center of gravity and (ahem) things called balls. If we routinely compress our testicles while sitting that can actually cause reproductive issues. Has a single prominent feminist demanded an end to this hate campaign targeting men on public transport? No? Then you don't have the right to claim "not all feminists are like that."
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:31 PM
30

"Men don't have to do that. I'd so love to be a fun dad, coming home from the road & being my best fun dad self," she wrote, adding, "So this is just a lil f*** all y'all bc u can't be a woman w/out sacrifice & that's the fact jack." Unbelievable. This stupid bitch doesn't appear to realize that (a) many fathers are currently unable to see their children due to feminist laws and (b) when fathers are "on the road" they are working to support their families. And by "working" I don't mean standing …
/r/MensRights02/03/17 04:26 PM
7

Keep digging your own grave man-hating scum.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:16 PM
14

Real women are submissive, nurturing, supportive, give daily blow jobs and are great cooks. Unacceptable. Real men are x, y and z. A-okay. The reason the male gender role is policed much more heavily is that if men collectively decided to stop being "manly" civilization would collapse. Feminists refuse to admit it but without a group of men bearing traits like stoicism, willingness to put oneself in danger, risk-taking etc. there would be no one to do the dangerous jobs that maintain our infrast…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 12:29 PM
4

It appears to have started in the 70's when the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations began pumping huge amounts of money into "gender" and "ethnic" studies. These foundations have historically been linked to the Central Intelligence Agency, which in turn was founded by a bunch of Wall Street bankers and lawyers. Essentially the big foundations are used to control the opposition and make sure the working class doesn't coalesce into a force that could threaten the billionaire class. Encouraging factio…
/r/MensRights02/03/17 11:06 AM
5

Brownmiller is one of the more notorious man-hating feminists. Her stat is laughable. The fact that feminists can't even find a good rape case to demonize men and boys says it all. They keep highlighting obviously fake cases like mattress girl. The reality is that we have no idea how many accusations are false. Some experts have put it at about half of cases. I think it's probably the majority. The situation is complicated by the fact that some some women feel like they have been assaulted when …
/r/MensRights02/03/17 10:10 AM
25

She was only sentenced to 13 years. The other gang members got similar sentences. Its only 78 years if you add up each of the sentences for each of the members. Damn. For a second I was thinking, "wow the judges are finally doing their jobs!" I should have known better. Rule of thumb for judges: send petty criminals and drug addicts away for life; let violent killers out as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights02/03/17 02:57 AM
6

it will continue indefinitely. I'm surprised you haven't read JD Unwin. "Sex and Culture." Ain't no way this thing is gonna last. Men maintain civilization. If a sufficient number of working class males decide to bow out, the whole thing will collapse.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 11:59 PM
3

The movement for a balanced law system should be gender-blind. Indeed it should. But that is not currently the case. The feminist movement is funded by the likes of JP Morgan Co and Goldman Sachs, while MRA's meet in broken down buildings in Detroit (the first international men's conference). That alone should cause feminists to say "hmmm...maybe my theories are unadulterated bullshit." Everyone should be both an MRA and a WRA. No one should be a feminist, as their theories are clearly false.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 11:28 PM
3

The brutal reality is that the travelling lifestyle isn't very compatible with 21st century Britain (other than the travelling show-folk) and no realistic course of government action is going to greatly improve their prospects. You're evading the point. Go ahead and replace Roma with some other minority then. Demanding it would be tricky as its hard to force someone to parent. You're again evading the point, and no it's not hard at all. For example men are often subject to imprisonment if they f…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 09:10 PM
1

Well the most direct one would be their work on Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities (they would be classified as white see). What are they doing for poor Anglo males? You can see the problem right? Let's take a Roma male and an Anglo male. You help one but not the other. The "other" is going to become the new disadvantaged group. There is also their Fathers and the workplace inquiry. At least some fathers are white and male and poor. Are they demanding shared parenting, which studies repeatedl…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 08:41 PM
5

You can say that again.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 08:14 PM
6

No you're wrong, it's reversed. Studies also show that eg if a man is asked "if you had to kill a stranger, who would you choose, a man or a woman"?...the men will choose other men. This makes sense for a number of reasons. Men are nurtured by their mothers -- it's their first loving relationship. Women have a higher degree of neoteny, which elicits sympathy. And women are the bottleneck in reproduction. Men are biologically programmed to keep women safe. Exceptions are just that -- exceptions. …
/r/MensRights01/03/17 08:10 PM
1

What is this "equalities" committee doing to help poor white males, who are now the most disadvantaged group in the UK? Who would have thought that by helping every group except straight white males that a new victim hierarchy would be created? It's almost like intersectional feminism is complete and utter bullshit, and was designed to replace class analysis in order to keep the fatcats swimming in cash.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 08:06 PM
10

My logic is: if the people with power are mostly male, and those in power mostly give opportunities to those of the same gender, then most opportunities will be given to males. And yet that clearly isn't the case. Men love to act chivalrous toward women, hence the smashing success of feminism. They do not like giving benefits to their sexual competitors, aka other men. Studies confirm this over and over again: men have out-group preference toward women while women have in-group preference toward…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 07:58 PM
35

Little known fact: over half the men who died in WWI did not even have the right to vote. This included the UK. In Europe, voting rights were based on property ownership. This was originally true in the US as well. Before the civil war most white males couldn't vote. There was actually a failed rebellion in Rhode Island to enfranchise Irish Americans. Another little known fact: at least as many women opposed female suffrage as men. In the UK, a poll determined that female opposition to suffrage …
/r/MensRights01/03/17 07:19 PM
5

Feminism is rooted in the hatred of men, not "female oppression." You can easily determine as much by reading this list of quotes by the major figures in first, second and third wave feminism.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:54 PM
8

FGM can also include the cultural belief that it prevents 'slutty behavior' MGM was popularized in the US by the eugenicist Harvey Kellogg, who argued that it would decrease masturbation.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:51 PM
10

I'd consider myself a feminist in that I think that women should be given equal opportunity as men Studies show that when men treat women as equals they are regarded as "sexist" by both men and women. Feminism is a gargantuan act of chivalry and always has been. Women complain ----> men come to the rescue. Rinse and repeat. Their latest campaign is called "HeforShe." What does that tell you?
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:47 PM
9

That's exactly my point, though. These individuals were oppressed based on their class. Men are not oppressed on account of their gender. That's absurd. It is men that face the vast majority of institutional oppression in the modern West. Oppression means cruel or unjust treatment. To cite one example, men are twice as likely to be charged with a crime and receive 63 percent longer prison sentences. If men were treated equally in the criminal justice system then five out of six men currently imp…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 06:10 PM
28

It's not really unusual. In the UK for example the number of self-identified feminists is down to 7 percent. If you think Fiamengo's fierce just look at Karen Straughan. More and more people, men and women, are starting to actually read feminists texts and wondering to themselves, "how did I ever support this crazy ass man hating movement?"
/r/MensRights01/03/17 01:44 PM
2

Holy shit. That's unbelievable.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 12:27 AM
5

How dare you insult a lady's honor, sir! Off to jail with you!
/r/MensRights28/02/17 11:06 AM
21

a group which appears to be similar to the emasculated little boys who cowered behind red hankies in Ottawa is planning to protest the film as well. Good opportunity. Just ask them if they think fathers should be allowed to see their children. Or ask them if they're aware that men in Canada have less rights than women. Watch them squirm. I am reasonably certain these lads have been a fed a line of bullshit about MRA's from their devious feminist "comrades" and have no idea what they're actually …
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:58 AM
1

I got sick of watching this so I may be off base but it seemed like they were (what a novel idea!) simply blaming men. Who would have thought that if you take away the male gender role, privilege women in every aspect of society, and literally attack men 24/7 they would decide not to play the game? I'm not sure why the billionaire class funded feminism. They clearly did (Ford, Rockefeller foundations etc.) Perhaps it was a cash grab (more wage slaves); perhaps it was to break up the family (more…
/r/MensRights28/02/17 07:40 AM
2

What a weird speech. She spends 90% of it talking about herself and denigrates older men several times. I didn't hear any "for he". Just she.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 05:41 AM
5

Ideological orthodoxy isn't something we should strive for. I agree. These are simply my opinions on a handful of MRA issues, and I'm open to changing my mind on said issues in light of additional evidence. I'm actually ambivalent about a few of them, such as anonymity for people accused of sexual crimes.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 05:20 AM
1

Deleted.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 04:01 PM
1

Fuck that's brutal. Well what to you have to say? What would help men in Germany?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:34 PM
2

Damn. I'm really sorry to hear that. So even in Germany we're currently fucked and have a long way to go. I'll edit the post.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:21 PM
6

...and who said "nagging" was the idea?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 09:26 AM
2

yikes...
/r/MensRights27/02/17 07:53 AM
1

Hmmm...Americans have killed millions of Muslims. I wonder if they will be angry? Derp derp de derp
/r/MensRights25/02/17 11:10 AM
9

I will simply say that we should work to change discriminatory laws of any kind, regardless of who they target. Tell it to the people who run your movement. If feminists spent one-one hundredth of the time lobbying their leaders for change rather than defending their brand name on the Internet we'd be in great shape.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 04:32 PM
10

Remarkable woman. Any other speeches from the conference available?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:35 PM
42

Feminism is not about stacking the deck against men, it's about having the same rules apply to everyone. Huh? Where did you get that idea? The largest feminist group in the US, NOW, opposes what you claim to want (equal parenting rights). Feminists in Israel and India oppose allowing women to be charged with rape, and indeed feminist Mary Koss was the one who excluded male victims from rape statistics in the US. Conscription? There's no way any society will allow their women to die en masse in w…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:23 PM
12

But the problems go deeper. There is the insidious influence of macho conditioning that beseeches to "man up" and demands that "boys don't cry" on pain of mockery and humiliation. "What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor. https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-o…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:10 PM
1

Not only would acknowledging the gap put a massive female privilege at risk, it would blow yet another huge hole in patriarchy theory. I've seen them try to work it into their wacky theories. Eg "That's based on the patriarchal idea that women have less agency and should be protected." Strangely however I've never seen them actually argue for the removal of this privilege; indeed as the article points out they are currently doing the opposite -- demanding yet more leniency for women in the crimi…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:27 AM
1

Thanks, added to OP.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:22 AM
3

Specifically, I ask you this: how many of you truly believe that men are discriminated against more than women in Western societies? There is no question about it. Claims to the contrary are rooted in emotion, not fact.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:56 AM
1

"Oppression" simply means unjust or cruel treatment. So yes, all sorts of people are indeed oppressed on this continent. The fact that certain privileged snowflakes falsely claim to be oppressed is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:52 AM
36

CBS and USA Today reporting this as well. Let's see if there are demands that he be fired from his job like there were with Milo (who has since resigned from Breitbart). Note also that "there is an alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders and sexually aggressive men - 59% (Petrovich and Templer, 1984), 66% (Groth, 1979) and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993)." Turns out feminists were wrong about the cause of male sexual aggression as well. Have…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:42 AM
11

This is the line that the men's movement should pursue. I agree. But I also think it's hypocritical for women to expect men to fight for their reproductive rights when they won't do the same for us.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 04:42 AM
2

Moreover, the study found that equal-shared parenting schedules benefited mothers more than the standard model, in which the kids visit with dad every other weekend. “Not only did overnight parenting time with fathers during infancy and toddlerhood cause no harm to the mother-child relationship, it actually appeared to benefit children’s relationships with both their mothers and their fathers,” Fabricius said. So shared parenting benefits the children, the father, and even the mother. Yet NOW co…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 04:33 AM
1

Thank you. I think I'll make a separate post using that source.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 02:01 AM
7

Take it up with the scientists dude. This isn't exactly controversial: "Women and children first!" etc.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:33 PM
5

Bitch is a pedo.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:29 PM
5

This is insane.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:28 PM
14

Feminists need chaperones like in Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:26 PM
10

I didn't say that. But there is obviously an empathy gap (women and children first). Society cares acutely about female suffering, to the point where we spend more time talking about things like the Tampon tax vs. the epidemic of male suicide. Men also have much more difficulty organizing along gender lines because they lack in group bias. In other words patriarchy theory has it backwards.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 09:10 AM
7

Singling out women is simply sexist. Sexist or not it accords with studies on the subject. It also explains why feminism is celebrated by the likes of J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs while MRA's meet in broken down buildings in Detroit (first International Men's Conference). I'm not blaming women for this. Female in-group bias was evidently necessary for our survival. Unfortunately it has now become maladaptive. The good news is that more and more women are joining the MRM, so such biases are clea…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 07:42 AM
3

They also shut down the poppy trade. Now it's flourishing. It's almost like the CIA is the world's biggest drug trafficker.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 06:05 AM
2

men's misogyny has taught women to hate anything feminine and all traits typically considered female. Are feminists really so idiotic they don't notice that feminine traits are only maligned when they are seen in men? Men LOVE feminine women, however women don't love feminine men. Males discourage weakness among other men because someone has to protect the women. That's it. That explains it rationally. But no, we have to pretend as though society hates all things female.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:24 AM
9

Sure. The problem is that the bad feminists are the ones in control. They direct bodies like the National Organization of Women (which opposes equal parenting for example) and teach the gender studies courses that demonize men and boys. There is simply no point in being a feminist. Most of their theories have been discredited and women already have more rights than men. If you're worried about women in the middle east then feminism is not the answer either, since it ignores or attempts to justif…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:15 AM
9

Karen Straughan mentioned an old study (I haven't seen it) conducted on male rapists in prison. Something like 60 percent of them had been sexually molested by WOMEN as children. So even if we don't give a shit about the boys, or want to pretend they all enjoy it, we should be very wary indeed of dismissing these cases. I'm not a sexual prude but too young is too young. Neither Milo nor Bill's comments are defensible, even if Milo was himself abused and his comments were his way of coming to ter…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 05:08 AM
4

The most interesting (and disturbing) thing to me is how feminist doctrine has gone virtually unchallenged in academia. This is slowly changing with works like "The Second Sexism" by David Benatar, "Spreading Misandry" by Paul Thathanson etc. But for well over a century there was very little serious critique, excepting perhaps among biologists, whose work automatically draws into question feminist theory. One could even argue, in a delicious bit of irony, that academia's reluctance to criticize …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:44 AM
6

How those beliefs are acted upon and how it affects others is a different matter. Indeed.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:25 AM
10

Women are also forced by law to pay child support in some cases (like my parents case, where my dad was given custody). Men currently pay 97 percent of child support and alimony. NOW -- the largest feminist organization in the United States -- opposes reforming antiquated alimony laws. To their eternal shame, they also oppose equal parenting rights. NOW's position on those two issues alone is a pretty good indication that feminism is a supremacy movement rooted in hatred, not an equality movemen…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:07 AM
7

That's probably true in many cases. Perhaps most. It's hard to imagine they're not at least experiencing some niggling doubts though. I mean the stats are getting downright absurd. Perhaps I'm underestimating gynocentric instincts. I mean when you think about it it should have been obvious for first wave feminists that 99% of men were not "oppressors" and that men also had a raw deal in life. It's almost like, for many women, they only see the men at top of the pyramid. I also think feminism may…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:00 AM
7

I said my personal belief is that feminism stands for equality And Kim Jong Un's personal belief is that North Korea is a democratic republic.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:40 AM
11

I can think of one working class lady in the UK parliament that represents me They don't represent the working class, no. But they represent women a lot better than they represent men. Women pay about 30 percent of taxes but get significantly more benefits from the state, including health spending. Where does that money come from? Mostly from men. Your mistake is in assuming that men in power have some sort of gender loyalty to other men. They don't. Studies show that men have out-group bias tow…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:35 AM
15

The problem is sunk cost fallacy. There are tens of thousands of professional feminists who have literally devoted their lives to the cause. Unfortunately it is now obvious that their theories are horseshit. Men have out-group bias toward women while the same is not true in reverse. What are they supposed to do? Admit that they wasted their lives on a movement that is ultimately causing more harm than good? Ideally, yes, but most people aren't going to do that.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:18 AM
1

Virtually every major advance made by mankind has previously been described as "utopian". I agree with you that Men's Rights are an uphill battle due in part to our instincts but I don't think the movement is utopian. I mean if you look at shared parenting, for example, it's already the law in Germany. The fact that women care about their male relatives and sons in particular also complicates the situation in our favor.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:12 AM
3

It's basically a form of infantilization. Feminists complain constantly about this, eg "women aren't taken as seriously in the workplace" -- but they show no desire to hold women accountable for their actions -- which is the only way women will ever be regarded as equals. In short, they want their cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:44 AM
25

If you lived during the civil rights era, would you trust a group known as the "Good Negro Project"?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:11 AM
–

Persons over 21 minimum age of consent is 18. It's 16 in most countries. I don't see the point in raising it. Teens are sexually mature at that age. I still wouldn't want to date a 16 year old though, they're too frivolous and immature. I'll leave that to Jerry Seinfeld ;) There's definitely a potential problem with teenagers that age though. Eg if they are coerced into sex by an unscrupulous producer in Hollywood. But that coercion can also occur with adults. I was really bothered by the docume…
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:46 AM
23

The recurring theme is the number of MPs in different parties who tell me, privately and in a whisper, “Of course you are absolutely right about this, it is all ridiculous” but – with very few but notable exceptions – will not dare to say so publicly. Ladies and gentlemen, the "patriarchy."
/r/MensRights22/02/17 01:41 AM
2

It provides an interesting background to the debate about women and property rights in "patriarchal' societies leading to the publication of Bax's work. I thought you'd find it of interest.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 02:38 PM
12

Weird. Sorry to hear about your experiences. I can only say that I've found the mods to be pretty fair. They let feminists drone on endlessly when a post makes it to R/all.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:47 PM
3

Yep. If you're looking for an accurate portrayal watch Never Cry Wolf. Come to think of it that's arguably a superior MGTOW movie.
/r/MGTOW21/02/17 01:38 PM
11

Huh? Care to provide an example?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:32 PM
2

Good paper on the subject: http://www.academia.edu/746242/Favoured_or_oppressed_Married_women_property_and_coverturein_England_1660_1800 Good book written around that time (by a socialist, interestingly enough): https://www.marxists.org/archive/bax/1913/fraud/
/r/MensRights21/02/17 01:01 PM
3

Objectification is, by definition, the practice of viewing a person as a physical object. It's also bullshit like every other feminist theory. Studies show that when men view women naked they regard them as more vulnerable and in need of protection -- the exact oppose of regarding them as "things." Objectification theory is simply a way of turning female sexual power over males into "oppression."
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:18 AM
4

I'm not remotely interested in your female supremacist justifications for expanding already-existent female privilege in the criminal justice system. Just have some self respect and fuck off.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:37 AM
14

Mostly gynocentric navel-gazing. In order to withstand the pressure of a culture constantly telling us that women are only meat, only sex, only property, we create this idea of our specialness. What culture is this? It doesn't remotely resemble our own. But these attributes are not innate. In fact, the idea that women are naturally more empathetic and nurturing originates with men. They used it as an excuse to keep us at home, tending to the children. Lol. Yes, men conspired to keep women in the…
/r/MensRights21/02/17 06:22 AM
5

Women behaving badly to men is put down to individual badness, not a social problem. That must be why feminists are trying to ban female prisons. the effect of patriarchal structures that pit women against each other. lol.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 04:52 AM
19

InB4 "those are radical fringe feminists!" or "it's just ironic misandry!" Here is a list of quotes by the movers and shakers of first, second and third wave feminism. They are united not by any sort of commitment to equality but a deep, irrational hatred of men. Once you understand this, the actions of feminist groups like NOW (eg opposing shared parenting) begin to make sense. The recent, laughable claim that "feminism helps men too" is simply damage control. People don't try to help those the…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:39 PM
6

Yeah. You don't see the problem in this statement? No. We're a sexually dimorphic species. Gender roles evolved because they were efficient. I mean, it's as irrelevant as bringing up WWI death rates in a conversation about practical improvements to our day to day struggles and where we aim our support You claimed that society has become "more equal". I disagree. Male war deaths and androcide are important topics if you want to gauge advantage/privilege historically (and today in certain countrie…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 07:00 PM
5

this fact does not do anything to undermine my point about society being run by Older Males. ...And their wives. It seems to me that the generals, politicians, and major players involved with creating, facilitating, and running the war were largely from the "male" class. Irrelevant. That's like saying we shouldn't care about black murder victims if they are killed by other black people. Females had (and have) a profound privilege in not being forced to fight and die in wars. Men lacked this priv…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 06:41 PM
2

Read Sex and Culture by JD Unwin. It was written in the 1920's.
/r/MGTOW20/02/17 06:12 PM
6

an entire sex couldn't vote for over a hundred years. Half of the men who died in WWI didn't have the vote. Poor men in Britain were given the vote after the war, the argument being that if you are forced to fight and die for the state you should have a say in how it's run. Women were simply given the vote after a majority said they wanted it. It was essentially an act of chivalry. It is a myth that it was primarily men that opposed female suffrage. In NY alone, 20,000 women joined an anti-suffr…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 05:46 PM
9

Seems like there are rather more pressing issues. It is outrageously gynocentric to be worrying about things like "societal bias toward valuing the masculine traits of testosterone" (a laughable idea) when hundreds of male babies are dying every year from having their genitals mutilated; when boys are falling way behind in school; when young women are out-earning young men; when 95% of workplace accidents are male; when men are working longer hours than women; when it is legal to discriminate ag…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:56 PM
51

Life's too short to read Buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:51 PM
1

There must be some reason why nearly all muslim countries are undemocratic hellholes where people, especially women, lack basic human rights. There is. It's called the CIA. The West has consistently funded Islamic extremism as a bulwark against what John Foster Dulles called "Arab secular nationalism." It's been going on for about 80 years now. There have been attempts by Muslim nations to modernize but they have been repeatedly thwarted by the West. Eg the moderate secular leader Mohammad Mossa…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:46 PM
8

My personal opinion is that a society will become more or less patriarchal based on the level of prolonged danger. That's why the Inuit are so patriarchal. The Islamic world is a very dangerous place and has been for some time. The male chaperone thing is the entire point: keep the women safe. This leads to paternalistic sexism against women, but can also lead to real oppression, such as extreme punishment for infidelity. When a society becomes safer the women demand rights and are given them, i…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:38 PM
0

treating women as property That's an odd way of putting it, considering that boys in Afghanistan have to work from as young as age five to support their mothers and sisters. denying women basic freedoms Check out how the men live in Islamic societies. They get a raw deal too. Patriarchal societies are much more complex than you are acknowledging. That doesn't change the fact that feminists are hypocrites though.
/r/MensRights20/02/17 03:10 PM
1

Men are belittled and called ‘less of a man’ anytime they portray a trait that is associated with femininity. If women and the feminine were equal to men and masculinity then that wouldn’t happen. Incorrect. Feminine qualities are appreciated in women but they are not appreciated in men. Why? Because someone has to protect the women from the wolf at the door. It's ingrained in our DNA. If what you said was true, then men would not have out-group bias toward women. We also wouldn't observe the wo…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 02:20 PM
5

And let me guess, your scent is the nearest one.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:04 PM
–

I have no idea what you're rambling about, but the obvious answer to this question involves not just males but females. Who would have thought?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:42 PM
3

If a man shit talks about his partner If a man talks shit about another man's partner. Fists. I've literally never met a man who talks shit about his own partner unless it's after divorce or there are massive thunderclouds afoot. That was my point. I'm not saying women don't shit talk about their partners waaay more often than men do Indeed.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:51 PM
20

Men earn more because they work longer hours in more difficult and dangerous jobs. Men make up 95% of workplace deaths. The feminist Karen DeCrow suggested back in the 70's that alimony was antiquated. Feminists continue to oppose alimony reform and shared parenting. Any more questions?
/r/MensRights19/02/17 04:05 PM
18

This is a controversial opinion: Feminism is an act of projection, because females have in-group bias whereas males have out-group bias toward females. When women imagine men getting together in fraternities and male-only groups, they imagine the worst. Those men probably talk about us the way we talk about them! Except we don't. If a man talks shit about another man's partner he's likely to get his ass kicked. If a woman talks shit about her husband it's...normal. There are accounts going back …
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:52 PM
23

Men pay 97 percent of alimony, retard.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:46 PM
16

This is what I have to say to men who believe that "feminism" and "anti-male" go hand in hand: And here's what I have to say I do not apologize for being intimidating. You're not intimidating. The men with the guns who support your agenda are intimidating. Acknowledge your ignorance. This one's my favorite. In my experience anti-feminists tend to know significantly more about feminism than feminists themselves. Hell many of us used to be feminists until we actually researched the history of the …
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:41 AM
19

That was...depressing. I think the jury's pretty much out on this one. Men care about women alot more than women care about men. Edit: Wow it's been deleted.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:59 AM
3

Don't be too hard on the neocons. At least they're occasionally willing to admit when they make catastrophic errors. Hillary Clinton has never once taken responsibility for her actions. Even after losing the election she proceeded to blame the FBI, "fake news" and even Russia for her failures. Bitch is literally willing to risk nuclear war rather than act like an adult. Edit: I should have read the article before commenting. This is just more gynocentric naval gazing about "bourgeois feminism," …
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:46 AM
1

But as Winston Churchill put it, if you’re not liberal at 20 you have no heart – but if you’re not conservative by 40, then you have no brain. Til Albert Einstein was an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:29 AM
8

No, they are not right about "the patriarchy." I'm not sure why you decided to editorialize the title, or even what this has to do with men's rights. Powerful men (and women) get away with crimes. This does not "trickle down" to the average man on the street. Example: a rich actress from Game of Thrones was able to turn a British man's life into a Kafka-esque nightmare by falsely accusing him of sexual assault in the subway station. Even though the video evidence proved him innocent he was charg…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 06:02 AM
7

The SJW are a left wing problem. I never denied that.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 09:27 AM
7

Don't get me wrong, I don't think men should be shamed for that behavior either, but if feminists are serious about this issue they should be talking to women, not men. It is primarily women that determine how masculinity is expressed. Think of it this way: if women valued knowledge and sensitivity there would be lineups at the library and men bawling their eyes out on every streetcorner. I would love to see men granted permission to talk about their problems. But that's a discussion that has to…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 06:05 AM
31

“The reason [liberals] want to police humor is they can’t control it — because the one thing all authoritarians hate is the sound of laughter,” Yiannopoulos said. This isn't really fair to liberals. Many, perhaps even most of them are just as irritated by SJW bullshit as conservatives. No one wants to be called a racist or a misogynist so many of them stay silent. Not all of them mind you. There are plenty of articles on eg the radical leftist website Counterpunch criticizing snowflake culture a…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 05:27 AM
7

I think a lot of the distinction as to why it's more unusual for men to wear women's clothing is because the more unisex styles of jeans + t-shirt, for example, more closely resembles male clothing. E There's another way of looking at it: the male gender role is much more heavily policed by both men and women. It doesn't much matter whether women want to play at being a man. They still retain their uteruses and therefore their value. However if men suddenly abandoned masculine virtues (courage, …
/r/MensRights18/02/17 04:57 AM
11

Gloria Steinem dated Henry Kissinger, one of the most powerful men in the world. Feminists are full of shit.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 02:15 AM
3

Get the hell out of there. Reframe the issue in terms of class. This the only argument I've found that actually works on these people. Traditional "leftism" was rooted in class analysis, before the feminazis took over. Just point out the absurdity of claiming middle and upper class women are oppressed compared to straight white male homeless men. Also, there has never been a society in history in which the "more oppressed" group worked less than the supposed "oppressor" group. The earnings gap a…
/r/MensRights18/02/17 01:48 AM
5

"What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor. "Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed to fall apart." Ironically, she explained, men are often pressured to open up …
/r/MensRights17/02/17 03:19 AM
32

It's pretty easy to find misogyny on MGTOW boards. Most of it probably comes from men who were utterly screwed over by the family courts. The concept itself is reasonable enough though. Why work your entire life only to have your assets and children robbed from you during a divorce? Then be forced to become an indentured servant? That's insane. You'd have to be a fool to get married in this day and age. The laws have become so anti-male that it doesn't surprise me men are deciding not to play th…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 02:08 PM
2

This hideous beast needs to be investigated by Amnesty International and other human rights orgs.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:52 AM
–

Stop whining bitch. This is the MRM forum not your safe space.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 06:46 AM
1

I'm not sure what you're getting at.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:41 AM
1

raw materials Provided by the laborer. technology Standing on the shoulder of giants. Modern high tech comes mostly from heavily subsidized industries. That does not remotely qualify as "free market." The computer revolution came largely from the Pentagon.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 01:06 AM
15

It wouldn't work unless at least half the marchers were women. A much better idea would be for men to take a day off work. It wouldn't even have to be a large percentage of men to cause utter chaos throughout society. As Karen Straughan pointed out, if all men went on a strike for a week or so "it would take three years to clean up the mess." But it would be worth it. Hell it could even force job creation programs for men out of work ;) Sadly I think we're at least five and possibly ten years aw…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:56 PM
3

Eh, there are lots of shows like this (with the female equivalent) in Europe and Latin America. There used to be one in the US called "The Man Show" (though I don't think it was on basic cable, and definitely not during daytime hours). What's more interesting is that the women feel entitled to touch the guys and stick their hands down the mens' pants. I'm pretty sure feminists would consider that sexual assault if the genders were reversed. Indeed this would basically be rape according to "affir…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:21 PM
18

Sadly, at a time when pregnant feminists write articles about how horrified they were when they learned "it's a boy", the message on the sign applies to a lot more than MGM.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 10:12 PM
8

Yes. You are. A four year age difference between two teenagers should not be punished by life in prison, especially when girls mature faster than boys. Only a complete sadistic degenerate who has profoundly weird hang-ups about sex would suggest as much.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 09:36 PM
27

lol. I especially like the part where she encouraged men to become more feminine and sensitive then proceeded to date the head of the football rugby team. Sorry honey but actions speak louder than words. She urged men to 'go away and speak to the women in their lives about what they are experiencing' so they understood what it meant to be discriminated against. LMAO. So what is this discrimination the poor dear is facing? Not being able to see her kids? Having her genitals mutilated? Being twice…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 08:32 PM
5

People like you make Wahabis look positively reasonable in comparison. The US is deranged when it comes to sex.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 08:30 PM
6

You're a sick freak.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 08:27 PM
1

"Chiefs" are only a thing in stationary societies with food surplus. Chiefdoms are also highly egalitarian compared to state societies, with leaders competing to gave away the most goods. The Iroquois were stationary but nevertheless maintained a democratic decision making structure based on decentralization and federation. Property was allowed, but most property was communally owned. Individual rights were respected (unlike in our own society).
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:16 PM
1

All collective forces effectively form a State. Huh? I don't understand what you're saying here. because some State that doesn't follow those rules is going to eat the lunches of those who do. I don't think it's that simple in the era of cyberspace. And frankly I'm more concerned about being harmed or killed by my own state than a foreign government. Look up "democide."
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:12 PM
2

Socialism is when private companies disappear, along with all your freedom, and everyone is forced to work for the government. You're thinking of communism.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:05 PM
1

Seems like "father" could be a meaningful role for most men.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:04 PM
2

They absolutely are. As long as there is a State (collective force) to aggress against you, you're going to need more than just yourself to defend yourself. States are not the only form of collective force. And if you don't magically implement that everywhere at the same time, you fail; Not really. This ignores the fact that there have repeatedly been expansions in human freedom from anarchic action. In the late 19th century most Americans lived in virtual slavery in company towns.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:03 PM
1

I don't see why not. It is under capitalism that people are robbed of the fruits of their labor via surplus value.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:56 PM
1

States are not required for self defense. If states are indeed inevitable in advanced technological society, and they may be, the next best option is minimize state power and corporate (tyrannical) power as much as possible. That means pursuing egalitarian policies and maximum decentralization with an emphasis on individual rights.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 05:22 AM
1

Traditional societies do it by the man's choice (who he chooses to marry). Progressive societies do it at the government level and force all men to support all women via taxation. I don't support either arrangement. I'm an anarchist.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:35 AM
6

This is the problem with tradcons. They are engaging in a futile doomed-to-failure crusade to bring back traditionalism instead of doing the sensible thing and supporting men's rights. Half of these right wing politicians probably aren't even religious, they're just using these hot button issues to get votes. The only way (and yes, it's quite possible) patriarchy will return is if we see a huge social collapse.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 04:05 AM
5

I have no idea where the whole "feminism is about spooky scary feeemales stealing men's rights!" thing started but it has little basis in reality. It started in the 1970's and beyond when feminists came up with their kooky patriarchy theories. That isn't to say there weren't significant problems in the first wave as well. Eg Eizabeth Cady Stanton, who organized the first feminist meeting in the US, claimed that women were "infinitely superior" to men. The reason people claim that feminists oppos…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:40 AM
2

they still have to go along with it. No they wouldn't. They could just go join some other group of like-minded individuals.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:24 AM
7

I would argue the opposite. Feminism is a female supremacy movement and therefore is antithetical to gender equality. It is also highly authoritarian and turns men and women against one another, replacing class analysis with "patriarchy" analysis. This was long ago recognized by capitalists. "The Women's Liberation Movement may be considered as subversive to the New Left and revolutionary movements as they have proven to be a divisive and factionalizing factor.... It could be well recommended as…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:44 AM
3

Okay, but it'd be much worse under socialism. Men would not be able to opt out. They are not really able to "opt out" at present. Unless you want to go live in shack in the woods. I don't see why socialism would make that issue better or worse. No society has ever actually been completely equal men will always be competing and hypergamy will always exist to select the winners. About 97% of our history was spent in hunter-gatherer bands where the defining ethos was egalitarianism. More equal soci…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:36 AM
3

women would be dependent on men for resources women are dependent on men for labor and resources regardless of the society. If men took a day off work civilization would collapse. women spent their entire youths trying to become the most wife-able of her friends because it was that important. And men spend their entire youths working in order to make themselves more attractive to the opposite sex. An egalitarian society would eliminate hypergamy. The govt would force men to work for women's bene…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:21 AM
9

brocialist bullshit. What area you twelve? Grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 12:10 AM
5

MRA's understand that men are invariably going to work more so long as women keep having babies. What we object to are the lack of equal rights and responsibilities between the sexes.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 11:21 PM
2

Difference is socialism nor the current system does so voluntarily. Not all forms of socialism are statist.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:33 PM
8

/r/RedFlag is intended to be a general purpose radical-left subreddit dedicated to open discussion of issues relating to socialist, anarchist, and communist thought, news, and action; or anything else that may interest somebody of such a persuasion. This is one of many smaller subreddits that is presenting an alternative to the culture of haphazard censorship and exclusion that dominates larger political subs. The result of disagreement should be conversation not purges, and having an official '…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:23 PM
3

so wouldn't a socialist society just be state subsidized women and men footing the bill? To a certain extent yes. But that's already the case anyway. Every society entails a transfer of male labor and resources to women.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 10:19 PM
8

That's not a solution either. The number of false accusations by women against their husbands will go through the roof.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 01:08 AM
43

And yet men pay 97% of alimony. Presumably that's why the feminist organization NOW opposes alimony reform (they actually worked with Republicans in Florida to make sure it stays on the books).
/r/MensRights14/02/17 01:07 AM
3

if he was serious about men's rights then he could use those opportunities to raise point about it missing men out but he rarely does, he would rather throw insults and derail constructive debating. I didn't see any "insulting". I saw a perfectly reasonable complaint. how many has done in his 12 years as an MP? Didn't he only just recently get appointed to this "equality" commission? If what you're saying is true, I can see your side of the argument. However one could argue that he is engaging i…
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:41 AM
2

The MRM has a steep climb as it is without being anchored down with racism. It's a losing proposition. I didn't recommend banning anyone. But mods need to have their own pimp hand to slap down this silliness.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 12:34 AM
20

Doesn't matter if he filibustered a bill preventing the prolonged torture of kittens. His speech laid out a simple criterium: include the one-quarter of men who are the victims of honor killings. He was jeered by both male and female "patriarchs" in response.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:31 PM
3

Thanks, will edit post. Edit: wrong video. Here's the proper one.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 05:25 PM
3

You're right. However it's not a bad metaphor for the relationship between the sexes.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 01:55 PM
40

That’s right. I was jeered and heckled for arguing that men and women should be treated equally. I always thought that was what the equality agenda was all about – but clearly not. If you haven't seen the video it's a must watch. I dare say it should be studied by every anthropologist, sociologist, political scientist and above all gender studies professor in the world. Those ten minutes alone will forever put to rest the idea that we live in a "patriarchy" that privileges men. On the contrary, …
/r/MensRights13/02/17 12:52 PM
13

Mods need to delete this. Misogyny and racism should not be promoted on this sub. Take it to the Red Pill or The_Donald.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 12:46 PM
9

I just also think most women aren't out to get you and you can avoid a lot of headaches in life if you learn to spot the crazy people. I agree with that. One of the problems however is that the current climate not only fails to discourage false accusations but actually rewards them with "victimhood status" and even fame and fortune (see eg "Mattress girl).
/r/MensRights13/02/17 02:09 AM
20

No you're right. Spouting lame platitudes about crazy chicks is a much better solution than opposing the current rape hysteria which strongly resembles the KKK's war against black "rape culture" during and after reconstruction. We should put all of the onus on men to become mind readers rather than demanding an end to kangaroo courts, the vilification of male sexuality, feminist terrorist campaigns that claim one in five women will be raped, "affirmative consent" madness that turns normal sex in…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:37 PM
15

Perhaps the better analogy is the KKK's war against "negro rape culture." The similarities are remarkable: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the-war-on-rape-the-logic-of-the-lynch-mob-returns/16349#.WKDhVLRVhBc
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:28 PM
49

Yep. That's the main issue. The claim that the male suicide epidemic is caused merely by "mental health issues" or "men not talking about their feelings" ignores the fact that western society is currently engaged in a war against men and boys. Just because your barber cares about your problems doesn't mean anybody else is going to. Hypothetical which is a reality for many men in the UK: you're living in a shitty apartment eating ramen noodles for dinner while your paycheck from your shitty low p…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 10:20 PM
5

Then how are we to trust that portion of their claims? By reading her arguments and judging accordingly. Alright, sure, but does your own example not demonstrate who wielded higher authority? Yes. Women did. They even argued as much in anti-suffrage petitions, claiming that women already occupied "a sphere higher" than men. This was certainly true at the community level, and evidently at the state level as well. Male legislators basically signed away their own rights because women said they were…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 06:58 AM
9

No. The author is ironically suffering from the same biases she imputes to researchers who claim traditional peasant and hunter-gatherer societies are "male dominated." Males have out-group bias toward females, whereas the same is not true in reverse. This is why, in the 19th century, a mere letter writing campaign by a handful of women convinced all male legislators to reverse custody rights to the detriment of their own sex. Patriarchies are best understood as systems in which mostly male lead…
/r/MensRights12/02/17 05:11 AM
3

She wrote a full book on the subject by the same title. I think she's updated it in more recent versions.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 02:25 AM
12

hahaha. That's [funny](www.realsexism.com) To cite one example of hundreds, a great many men are currently being forced by the state to subsidize their ex-wives while being disallowed from seeing their own children. If you don't care about yourself or your rights, you should at least consider fighting for boys. Your tough guy act isn't fooling anyone. Only cowards refuse to stand up for their rights.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 12:55 AM
12

MRA's tend to have a different view of what it means to be a man. For example we consider men who refuse to stand up for their rights pussies. You let women dictate your behavior out of fear. In that sense you're kinda weak.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 12:44 AM
5

they want to dominate society the same way men traditionally have. Some interesting reading on that subject that might change your mind.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 12:41 AM
47

It's fair. In fact you could have added a bunch more (get arrested when your husband hits you, be forced to subsidize your ex-husband while he prevents you from seeing your kids, sentence you to 63% longer prison sentences, be x percent more likely to die on the job etc etc). A lot of women seem to have a difficult time empathizing with men, maybe this will help. More likely they will say "that's different because patriarchy!" Oh and before the inevitable argument about MGM vs. FGM comes up, her…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 11:55 PM
3

This sub allows posts about feminism. Nobody agrees with Dunham, what's the problem?
/r/MensRights11/02/17 10:49 PM
10

The demonization never ends... I think I may need to take a break from this sub. It's all so fucking depressing.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 10:18 PM
9

I'm not a Trump supporter (or Hillary supporter), but I find this sort of rhetoric incredibly condescending. It never occurs to spoiled rich liberals like Dunham that working class women don't view their "fathers...brothers...husbands" as enemies but rather appreciate the sacrifices they make to put food on the table. The "jobs" issue doesn't even register to her because she's never been in a position of want. Despite this, she still considers herself "oppressed" by the patriarchy. Perhaps inste…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 07:08 PM
2

Hmmm, I think you're partly right. The now-defunct Alt-Right sub had a lot of anti-Jewish sentiment. The_Donald however seems to focus 99% of its hatred against Muslims. This is in keeping with the imperial designs of the neoconservative movement, which has strong ties to Israel. Posts about Israel on The_Donald tend to portray Israel as a bulwark against the "Islamist hoards." Much of the anti-Islam rhetoric embraced by Trump can be traced to Zionists. The documentary "Reel Bad Arabs" is instru…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 03:47 AM
6

chivalry is dead. If only. The entire feminist movement is arguably a monumental exercise in chivalry. Women claiming they are in danger and feeling oppressed and in need of help by men the state. Men, having out-group preference toward women, have been only too happy to oblige, even at the expense of their own rights and well-being. Feminism is a dirty trick rooted in the exploitation of male and female biology. Yet men have their limits, and with the growth of the MRM and MGTOW we are finally …
/r/MensRights11/02/17 02:26 AM
87

It's kind of tragic when you think about it. Women have always had great power even in so-called "patriarchal" societies. Imagine if they used said power to pursue justice and real equality rather than playing "damsel in distress" and engaging in a never-ending search for more privileges. Right now, women are being manipulated into fighting their husbands, brothers and sons while the billionaire class runs laughing to the bank.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 01:03 AM
1

Except she was dead serious when she said it: she thought males should be reduced to ten percent of the population (I don't think she really thought that one through -- who is going to do all the dirty and dangerous work?). I don't even think feminists dispute her sincerity. They may try to justify her hatred but they don't claim she was joking. She wasn't even alone in her opinion. Her colleague Mary Daly, another famous feminist "scholar", argued the same thing. Only recently have feminists be…
/r/MensRights11/02/17 12:50 AM
2

I'm not entirely sure. In the current culture female sexuality is regarded as benign or positive whereas male sexuality is "threatening" and "harmful." This is why no one gives a shit about Lena Dunham molesting her sister or why the Vagina monologues author wasn't attacked for portraying female-on-female statutory rape as a positive experience.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:42 PM
8

TheFutureIsFemale is a catchy phrase that traces its roots to a lesbian separatist movement of the past century. Notably, no one is pointing out at the lesbian separatist in question, Sally Miller Gearhart, advocated genocide against men. She also founded the first gender studies course.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:34 PM
4

People with wrong-think?
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:34 AM
2

I don't post on TIL. Just pointing out how appalling the deletion was. You gotta be a pretty sick person to consider basic human rights "inflammatory."
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:25 AM
2

It is quite possible -- probable in fact -- that the reason male chaperones were created by patriarchies was to allay such fears. Short of going back to chaperone systems I'm not sure much can be done about it. If you hang out in some sleazy bar you're inevitably gonna end up with drunk louts. Men are routinely groped by drunk women, but it doesn't seem to bother them as much. Feminist campaigns to "end groping" will only "work" on men who wouldn't do it in the first place, and are therefore ent…
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:20 AM
3

I wonder if the UN or Amnesty International will be speaking out about this. Especially given that over half of the men released under the innocence project were men falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 11:07 AM
8

It had tons of upvotes. The only people who were bothered were feminists.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:47 AM
7

I don't understand your bizarre analogy. But it does say a lot about you as a person that you consider the idea of helping male domestic violence victims "inflammatory."
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:41 AM
22

I found this video is extremely disturbing. Nothing Davies said should be considered remotely controversial. Since one quarter of honor killings involve male victims, male victims should also be protected in legislation. Yet the entire parliament -- including the men -- are jeering at him for advocating equality. In a so-called "patriarchy"! Madness. Utter madness.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:40 AM
8

Til the idea of helping male victims of domestic violence is "inflammatory". Says alot about the cretins who moderate that sub.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 10:21 AM
7

The vast majority of feminists oppose men achieving equal rights. For example NOW opposes shared parenting. That is why we oppose feminism. Well that and the fact that patriarchy theory is (a) wrong -- men have outgroup bias toward women, while the same is not true in reverse and (b) hateful -- it assumes that men desire to oppress women when again, the opposite is true. It's refreshing to hear from a feminist who at least acknowledges the problems in their movement, however.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 07:12 AM
3

The CIA also has a long history of using foundations as a front, including the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, which were largely responsible for the gender studies revolution in the 1970's. The CIA itself has been accused of being a front for the top 0.1 percent banking families. When it was founded at least it was made up mostly of Wall Street bankers and lawyers.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 05:58 AM
1

Even the obsessive scapegoating of Jews has been adopted. (This is a change from the uncritical support of Israel by the US Christian conservative right wing which I was surprised to first notice around 2000. Earlier in the US Jews were disliked and distrusted by many on the right). I don't see much evidence for this. The alt-right focusses mainly on Muslims, and Trump has surrounded himself with hardcore Likud Zionists.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 05:54 AM
9

No, fascism is definitely far right. Anti-union, pro-capitalist, pro-corporation, anti-civil liberties, etc. There is a consistent history. Indeed the American Legion actually invited Mussolini to be their guest speaker in 1923. The fact that there is a left wing equivalent in authoritarian communism doesn't preclude the fact that political scientists and historians rightly view fascism as right wing.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 05:52 AM
1

So sad that he continues to call himself an "intersectional feminist" even when, by his own accord, feminists spend more of their time hating on and abusing men. Interestingly some of the comments by feminists show compassion, but only because (s)he is trans. They even acknowledge that their groups are completely hostile to men, but are unable to make the obvious causal link that maybe feminism has nothing to do with equality and is simply a hate movement.
/r/MensRights10/02/17 04:36 AM
1

I hope that after all this is over people remember what feminism actually means. It means what its proponents have always said it means: women are superior, and men are disposable. The claim that feminism "used to" be about equality is false. If first wave feminists were interested in equality, they would have demanded that men no longer be forced to pay for their wives' debts when they reformed property law. Feminism is a female supremacy movement that harms both sexes.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 07:39 AM
2

Bleak post. But not an unreasonable portrayal of current trends. I hope you read the quotes in the OP and not just the title ;)
/r/MensRights08/02/17 10:39 PM
11

Feminism however is the idea, not the founders or professors. There is nothing wrong with the idea of equality Feminism has nothing to do with "equality" and never has.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:44 PM
17

certain people who undermine the core principle These "certain people" include the founder of the feminist movement in the United States, the founder of the first gender studies department, the most well known figures in the second wave, and the quasi-intellectuals who developed feminist theory. Feminism is rooted in the hatred of men. That's why they've only ever looked at ways in which females are supposedly disadvantaged by the system (ergo, nothing to do with equality). That's also why it is…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:21 PM
28

Read the quotes. Title is sarcastic.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:48 PM
34

Here's where the slogan comes from: “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” – Sally Miller Gearhart [Sally Miller Gearhart, “The Future - If There Is One - Is Female,” in Pam McAllister, Reweaving the Web of Life?, New Society Publishers, 1982] “Why have any men at all?” – Sally Miller Gearhart [Sally Miller Gearhart, “The Future - If There Is One - Is Female,” in Pam McAllister, Reweaving the Web of Life?, New Society Publishers, 1982, p…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:39 PM
1

Botox much?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 01:07 PM
2

There are plenty of leftists here as well. I'm one of them (on some issues at least -- the modern "left" has largely abandoned its focus on class issues and war). It's inevitable that we're going to have these sorts of debates, as the MRA sub does not ban people according to political persuasion. I just wish people wouldn't use the downvote button so often when they disagree with someone's political views. One can support men's rights and even be an anti-feminist without subscribing to right win…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 05:30 AM
13

Ruling elites want a docile population. It's easier to rule sheep than wolves. If elites were wise they would be channeling masculine energy into positive things. They are taking a very short-sighted view, because not every country will be content to let their society stagnate and decline under the weight of feminism. In fact China recently issued a book for school children about the virtues of masculinity.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 01:48 AM
3

The ones that have been killed by police without reason are all in jail Good lord. I'm not gonna sit here and have a debate with someone who actually believes this. Not even the most strident pro-cop ideologue would make such a claim. You're living in fantasy land.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 01:44 AM
2

I don't understand your argument. Plenty of men, especially black men, have been murdered by police even when they have been fully "compliant." This results from a variety of factors, including the militarization of the police and the lack of community control over police forces. Cops who murder people are often given a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 01:39 AM
5

I agree. For example there's a post on the front page about black lives matter. The justification is that "men are generally more conservative" and conservatives don't like black lives matter. I understand the frustration of Trump supporters because they are often banned from other subs, but turning every issue into a partisan squabble is not going to advance the cause of men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 12:59 AM
5

Bit of a stretch to include this in Men's Rights. Black men do have a legitimate grievance when it comes to policing, even if BLM itself is a mess.
/r/MensRights06/02/17 12:55 AM
3

I would argue that the state does benefit in a certain sense, since feminism turns men and women against each other (divide and conquer). It also disempowers lower class males in particular, breaking up their only source of strength (family), since unions have become weak and feckless. Feminism has created a more atomized society. The black community is a mess. It's also undeniable that the CIA funded Ms. Magazine (Gloria Steinem herself admitted it) and that the Ford and Rockefeller foundations…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 12:48 AM
6

If by "patriarchy" you mean "a system in which women have more rights than men, and wherein mostly male politicians pass laws that overwhelmingly privilege women and girls" you'd be correct. Men have out-group bias toward women (the same is not true in reverse). If you mean "men are privileged" or some such nonsense you are simply delusional
/r/MensRights06/02/17 12:34 AM
7

Why do you think women "tend to gravitate" towards those sectors? The pressures are all around us and can range from the media's portrayal of women to parenting styles. Your arguments remind me of a passage from the anarcho-primitivist Bob Black's classic Feminism as Fascism: "radical feminists actually reduce women to nothing but helpless, cringing near-vegetables, passive victims of male contempt and coercion. This profoundly insults women in a way which the worst patriarchal ideologies — the …
/r/MensRights05/02/17 11:47 PM
7

Vacuous, gynocentric feminist infighting. not rebellion, not revolt against an institution that has historically enslaved women and children lol. Enslaved? I'm pretty sure it was the men who were forced to provide for their wives and children under threat of imprisonment (look up "abandonment" laws). What of the single woman pushed into a homeless shelter and separated from her child by the Department of Child and Family Services, which deemed her an unfit mother because she was too poor because…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 11:17 PM
11

Good video, but he only spends a few seconds on divorce rape. That is the reason most men no longer want to get married. Studies show that men are the real romantics. They are willing to die for the woman they fall in love with. Women have a much more mercenary view of relationships. When their husband loses his job they will mysteriously fall out of love with him. The argument that men aren't getting married because they can get sex for "free" may be applicable to some men but not the majority.…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 10:18 PM
10

They're also not as represented in highly dangerous jobs. Not all of said jobs require brute strength, yet men make up 95% of workplace deaths. Shouldn't we be trying to encourage girls to enter more dangerous fields in order to eliminate the workplace death gap? Because equality? Alternatively, we could simply stop privileging girls in the education system* and through affirmative action programs and let the chips fall where they may. *See Christina Hoff Sommers "The War Against Boys"
/r/MensRights05/02/17 09:56 PM
-1

Honestly posts like this is what give MRM a bad name. Nah, posts like this, while dumb, are only read by a tiny handful of people. The MRM gets a bad name mainly because we are constantly lied about by the media.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 02:10 AM
3

What keeps the opposite from happening? What about men with hurt egos due to everyone mocking the natural state of their penises seeing things like this video and feeling better about their sexuality? We don't need to disparage either group, is my point. This is yet another example of gynocentrism and male disposability. "Who cares about men having their genitals mutilated? What's important is that we please women."
/r/MensRights05/02/17 01:49 AM
2

Okay, well then I encourage you to start a campaign shaming female victims of FGM. See how that goes over.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:49 AM
2

And even then I think a slightly lessened ego of a few guys is less important than changing a broader opinion like this. Imo cut men will become more entrenched in their support of mgm if we try to portray them as less virile. They will cling to bogus studies about health benefits etc. So far as I know, denigrating cut men was not a part of ending widespread circumcision in Europe. It doesn't need to be in the US either. I think it's quite vicious actually, to disparage men who have already suff…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:47 AM
1

How else are you going to counter that argument? Point out that 200 baby boys die every year from MGM in the US alone. If parents were aware of the risks they probably wouldn't bother. Or just show them a videotape of the practice.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 12:16 AM
2

And yet feminists in Australia are introducing the concepts of "toxic masculinity" and "male privilege" to pre-pubescent children. So I dispute your point. The mistake people like you make is in assuming that the coffee shop feminists you hang out with who have some wishy washy idea about "equality" are somehow representative of the people who run the movement and teach gender studies. They aren't. The people who run the movement and actually create policy are man hating radicals.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 10:06 PM
5

I think in a country such as America, where intact men are made to feel inferior and the culture is still ignorant on foreskin, videos like these can be helpful. There is no need to make cut men feel inferior in order to "balance the scales." We can simply point out that it's harmful to men, full stop.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 10:03 PM
5

Again I agree with most of your points but not this one: It's still needed but only down in the coal mines, sewers and other places where most people don't ever look. There have been a great many studies revealing that men are crucial to child rearing. Not just for their wallets but the unique ways they interact with children. Unfortunately we are more concerned with protecting the feelings of lesbians who want to raise kids than providing a positive gender role for men that would simultaneously…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 09:56 PM
19

This is the wrong approach to take. It makes cut men feel inferior. Any discussion of male genital mutilation should focus on the harm done to the man, not potential benefits to the woman. Would we oppose FGM on the basis that men would rather have an intact clitoris?
/r/MensRights04/02/17 09:44 PM
6

I agree with your post, but there is one area where traditional arrangements were much better off for men: respect. That's no small thing. In fact when men are asked what they want most from a partner, respect comes in at number 1. Men have been willing to fight and die in wars and work themselves into early graves because they were afforded respect for doing so. It could be argued that men need a gender role much more than women because women are simply given one by virtue of having a womb. I a…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:58 PM
2

You're right that the research doesn't specifically mention "feminist" teachers. However, it's not exactly a stretch to suggest that feminist teachers would try to hamstring boys. In Australia feminists are even introducing "male privilege" lessons to little boys, which amounts to child abuse imo. There was also a recent case in the US of a feminist kindergarden teacher who refused to let boys play with toy trucks and other male-oriented toys and forced them to play with dolls instead (the girls…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:44 PM
2

and at the adult with prepubescent end they are overwhelmingly male. According to a major 2004 study commissioned by the U.S. Department of Education - In studies that ask students about offenders, sex differences are less than in adult reports. The 2000 AAUW data indicate that 57.2 percent of all students report a male offender and 42.4 percent a female offender with the Cameron et al. study reporting nearly identical proportions as the 2000 AAUW data (57 percent male offenders vs. 43 percent f…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 08:28 PM
1

And here I am opposing both...
/r/MensRights04/02/17 05:35 AM
3

Recruiting male teachers will require raising teacher's salaries and social status (which partly comes with pay). Men can get better pay for far easier work in other fields. It would also entail ending pedo hysteria and feminist "listen and believe" doctrine (which was started by the KKK). Pedo hysteria is also promoted by the religious right, members of which sometimes have unhealthy hang ups about sex. Realistically it may even require anonymity for those accused of such a crime until they are…
/r/MensRights04/02/17 01:25 AM
20

I agree. However it's hypocritical for women do demand that men support female reproductive rights when (to my knowledge) the number of feminists who support male reproductive rights can be counted on one hand. Only one or two feminists, like the late Karen DeCrow, have been consistent on this issue. She argued that if men should not be allowed to control women's bodies then nor should women be allowed to control men's bodies by demanding 18 years of child support. Both the tradcon and the MRM p…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 09:49 PM
16

Complaining is half the battle really. I don't think women realize just how difficult it is for men to speak up about these issues, since the male gender role is based on strength. With some exceptions like Ernest Bax, it has taken a hundred years for men to finally start speaking up in large numbers, and even now it is mostly done anonymously online. We would much rather remain stoic about all of this, even it means suffering endless abuse by the opposite sex. It is the height of hypocrisy for …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:52 PM
9

I don't think so, personally. Women's rights can obviously co-exist, and indeed most MRA's are WRA's (the same is not true in reverse, interestingly enough), but feminism is an ideology rooted in patriarchy theory. For all its academic pretensions and post-modernist lingo, patriarchy theory essentially amounts to "boyz suck! Girls rule!"
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:49 PM
21

Men abused by their wives have always been treated horribly. However it's also worth noting that prior to feminism, some states had gender neutral DV laws. "It has often been claimed that wife-beating in nineteenth-century America was legal... Actually, though, several states passed statutes legally prohibiting wife-beating; and at least one statute even predates the American Revolution. The Massachusetts Bay Colony prohibited wife-beating as early as 1655. The edict states: 'No man shall strike…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:19 PM
6

Parents can instead treat their boys more like girls, by taking part in poems/rhymes/songs, and draw and paint with their boys. There is nothing uniquely "feminine" about poetry and music. Most of the great poets and musicians have been men after all. No what is needed are (a) more male teachers (b) campaigns reminding female teachers that they have in-group bias and are morel likely to mark down boys (c) significantly more physical activity and "hands on" learning (d) no more drugging boys and …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:12 PM
3

was the result better for children or not It definitely wasn't. https://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/single-women-raising-children-do-a-poor-job/
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:02 PM
9

Feminists are not obligated to help men, who never helped them. LMAO. The entire history of the feminist movement has consisted of (a) feminists whining and (b) male legislatures responding to their concerns, often at the expense of the male gender. Feminists have never accomplished a single thing without the help of men. The problem, of course, is that females have in group bias, so they are much less likely to extend the same compassion to the opposite sex. This has led to the current clusterf…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:00 PM
5

It's a shit article. It claims that men are angry because they are losing "privileges" that they never actually had. The title is correct though: the war on men is going to backfire in a spectacular way. Attacking men and boys in this fashion is completely unprecedented. Buckle up: it's gonna be a helluva ride.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 09:21 AM
20

And in the next issue: A sexy spread featuring Lena Dunham in a bikini. Plus an op-ed by Ashley Judd on why men are oppressive bastards.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:08 AM
6

Wow, they managed to get through the whole article without mentioning why people are irritated. Who would have thought that men are sick and tired of being painted as villainous oppressors when the earnings gap arises mostly because their work longer hours in more difficult and dangerous jobs -- often to financially support their wives!
/r/MensRights03/02/17 08:04 AM
348

Marketing. They're taking advantage of female delusions about oppression to sell their product. It's quite patronizing actually. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a bunch of dudes who made this add.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 04:00 AM
6

Actually they do: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vicki-larson/divorced-dads_b_3389434.html
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:26 AM
18

Sorry but we have more important things to worry about, like taxes on tampons. This is a patriarchy after all.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 01:45 AM
2

you managed to lose the argument you were having with yourself by remembering the existence of CP and CHS. As I said, they are opposed (rather viciously) but the leaders of the feminist movement. In most cases their opinions are diametrically opposed. If the feminist movement was represented by people like CHS I would have no problem with it at all. I would even call myself a feminist.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 01:42 AM
5

I'm not aware of a single prominent feminist that spoke out against what feminists in Israel and India did. Nor a single prominent feminist that defended the journalist (sorry forget his name) who was attacked by feminists when he argued that women were equally culpable as men for engaging in sexual activity while drunk. Scratch that: I know of two. Christina Hoff Sommers and Camille Paglia. They are both considered persona non grata in the feminist community and are protested by feminists when …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 01:30 AM
12

And yet there is overlap. Women have value simply for being, men are "human doings" and therefore suffer more when they lack good jobs and the respect and mating prospects those jobs entail. Feminists demand that women maintain all of their gender privileges, but also be privileged in the traditional male sphere (affirmative action etc). This is not only unfair but downright cruel. Exhibit A: "Last November, President-elect Obama addressed the devastation in the construction and manufacturing in…
/r/MensRights03/02/17 12:33 AM
2

That's a goofy comparison. I'm not suggesting that most spaces should be gender segregated, only that the policy should be allowed for both sexes in certain circumstances. Every human society in history has done this to some extent.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 12:25 AM
2

Hmmmm I don't think that's accurate. Mike Buchanan recently claimed that the male suicide rate has risen by a large percentage, not just in relation to female suicide rates. Perhaps someone can dig up the actual stats.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 12:17 AM
13

Like that women shouldn't rape and that men shouldn't be raped? The feminist Mary Koss excluded "forced to penetrate" from the definition of rape. Feminists in Israel and India fought against laws that would recognize female rapists. I've also heard feminists claim that if a man and women are equally drunk and have sex, the man is a rapist and the woman is a victim. So I dispute your claim.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 11:43 PM
10

The majority of perpetrators of domestic violence are men but not all. This is false. Women are actually more likely to physically assault their partners. They are also more likely to physically assault children, which perpetuates cycles of abuse.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:45 PM
2

A belief system that treats women as second class citizens If women are second class citizens, why is it the men who have to provide for them under threat of imprisonment? Why do boys as young as five in Afghanistan have to provide for their mothers? At best this is hyperbole. and a belief system whose adherents engage in female genital mutilation It is primarily women that enforce this practice, not men. It is also illegal in almost every country on Earth. Why doesn't the author care about MGM,…
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:40 PM
6

Refreshing to see the comments pushing back against the feminazi lynch mob. Is the tide finally starting to turn?
/r/MensRights02/02/17 09:16 PM
23

I don't have a problem with "female only" clubs. But we need to have corresponding "male only" clubs. Realistically the sexes need time apart from each other. Right now the trend is to allow female only clubs and businesses while not allowing men the same. They're even trying to make the boy scouts multi-sex.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 07:56 PM
55

Pretty incredible that in a "patriarchy" we can only find one politician willing to fight for our interests.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 06:48 PM
5

No. It's revisionist history. Not wasting my time. You're thinking of feminism. Why post on this thread if you're not willing to take a few minutes to watch the video? Seems kind of silly. (fingers in ears lalalallalala).
/r/MensRights01/02/17 10:19 PM
7

She explains all of this stuff in the video, Seneca falls etc., just watch it.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 09:38 PM
11

The "patriarchy" also protects powerful (and indeed ostensibly powerless) women. This is a class issue not a gender issue. Rich, powerful men are more likely to be given the same leniency as women in the criminal justice system. There was a recent case of a woman living in a trailer park who molested three boys. She was given probation. For a man to be treated similarly he has to have serious political juice.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 02:09 PM
3

This guy has balls the size of church bells.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 02:28 AM
18

A judge recently blocked Doe's attempt to subpoena his female accuser's text messages on grounds that re-litigating the matter "would impose emotional and psychological trauma" on her. You know who else used that logic? The KKK. "One of the key claims of today’s non-racist crusaders against rape is that the cross-examination of rape claimants is too tough and we need softer, less combative ways to establish the guilt of rape suspects. The Guardian says rape claimants who are subjected to a rigor…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 02:23 AM
2

You may be right. A small number of women are already involved, so that's a positive sign, but yeah it's ultimately up to us.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 01:30 AM
1

That's a little bit deceptive. Blacks were given an enormous amount of help by sympathetic whites. It's far more difficult for men to organize along these lines. The male gender role is based on strength, and it is primarily women that enforce this gender role. Men have no problem fighting on behalf of other groups, especially women and children, but it is much more difficult for them to organize along gender lines. This is probably rooted in biology -- studies show that men have out-group bias …
/r/MensRights01/02/17 12:58 AM
2

Interesting. I appreciate the response.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 02:42 AM
3

There's a reason the word "women" comes first in women and children. One would think that neoteny would cause us to have more empathy toward children than women, however this does not appear to be the case. I'm not sure why exactly. Perhaps because women combine neoteny with sexual and reproductive power? A tripple whammy? Until fairly recently female infanticide was fairly common, and still is in some parts of the world. But I'm not aware of there ever having been a time when women were deliber…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:43 PM
2

We'll have to wait and see. It is certainly a fallacy to say that right-wingers generally support men's rights. Paul Elam himself remarked the other day that it is mostly non-feminist judges that give women sweetheart deals in both the family and criminal courts. Feminists have allied with right wingers to prevent alimony reform and equal parenting. They have also allied with right wingers to demonize male sexuality, try to ban pornography and prevent the legalization of prostitution. Republican…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:30 PM
2

Oh boy. Are we supposed to ignore empirical evidence? The hard sciences? Differences in hormones and brain chemistry? Observable reality? While I agree that evolutionary psychologists have a tendency toward reductionism, blank slatism is equally fallacious. Look at that poor boy who was raised as a girl and ended up committing suicide. Are we really gonna sit here with a straight face and say that "social conditioning" explains why Gloria Steinem was attracted to the ugly old troll Henry Kissing…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:06 PM
6

Conservatives are gynocentric in their own ways. Typically "The men in my tribe are awesome and we treat our women wonderfully" but "the men in that other tribe are brutes and treat their women horribly." Naturally the men in "that other tribe" say the same of them.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 10:01 PM
32

No Brocialism LMAO. So we're going to dismiss discrimination against men with an epithet that sounds like it was dreamt up by a teenage girl. Yay equality! Most of these "leftist" or "socialist" or even "anarchist" subs are run by spoiled middle or upper class white kids. The modern day "left" looks nothing like it did a hundred years ago. Back then it was made up overwhelmingly of working class men and women. Tellingly they were often hostile to feminists. The socialist Earnest Bax wrote the fi…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 08:10 PM
1

masculinity halting human progress is actually desirable. Everything you see around you -- from the chair you're sitting on, to the computer you're typing on -- was caused by masculinity. Without masculine virtues there would have been no "progress" to begin with. Even if humans caused a nuclear winter, there will still be remnants of past technology and knowledge left behind to pick up humanity right back where it started. Feminism would go extinct the moment the first bomb dropped. As would an…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 07:13 PM
4

in short, men — even fathers — were motivated primarily or even entirely by some atavistic need to control women. It's projection. Almost every feminist claim about how men feel about women is actually how feminists feel about men.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 02:12 AM
1

Let's just say we have very different ideas about what the future is likely to bring. Assuming we avoid some sort of nuclear apocalypse or other disaster I predict social collapse. The first feminist movement occurred in ancient Babylon and from that time forward the result has invariably been the same: gradual decline and displacement by patriarchy (see JD Unwin). This time around the collapse is likely to occur rather quickly and without many people anticipating it. Can automation prevent coll…
/r/MensRights30/01/17 02:01 AM
5

lol this is a brilliant idea.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:40 PM
2

hear hear. I don't know how accurate it was but supposedly a recent poll had the majority of US college students thinking the US invented slavery (!)
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:25 PM
1

lol.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 10:53 PM
2

Ah that makes sense.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 10:06 PM
7

I wish posts like this would get more upvotes. The posts that make it R'all are usually low effort memes. I guess that's just the nature of the beast.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 09:06 PM
8

You're confused son. There's nothing "masculine" about accepting unjust treatment. Quite the opposite in fact. If you're not man enough to stand up for your rights then at least have the dignity to sit passively, shut your mouth and let others do it for you.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 08:36 PM
3

More gynocentric "think of the Muslim womynz!" by a tradcon who doesn't give a flying fuck about men.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 08:14 PM
56

We are living in a dystopian matriarchy enforced by cowardly men and nasty, vindictive women. Whereas under patriarchies women are afforded many privileges (not having to fight and die in wars, being provided for materially etc.) matriarchies offer no corresponding privileges to men. Men are still expected to perform all of their traditional gender roles but without any respect or dignity; in fact they are still blamed for all of society's problems. Women have more rights than men but none of th…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 08:08 PM
2

-Simply because society has advanced to a point where traditional masculine gender roles are no longer needed. Tell that the dudes risking their lives to provide your electricity. Dangerous jobs -- of which men perform 99% -- are necessary to maintain the infrastructure you rely on to type your petty complaints on the Internet. Dangerous jobs require hard work, courage, stoicism, grit etc. The vast majority of men enjoy being masculine. We are fine with allowing for outliers like yourself, but d…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 07:33 PM
2

I would like to think that it is primarily ignorance, rather than some sort of ingrained tendency to resent and even hate the opposite sex, that causes women like the ones featured in this video to be a rarity. Yes, women have in group bias and yes, men are more empathetic toward women than vice versa. But we also have to realize that we are raising girls with a toxic mindset. We are teaching them that men are "privileged" and that we try to and have always tried to oppress the opposite sex. Thi…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 06:55 PM
5

What best describes the world as it currently is? Neither women nor men face significant disadvantages. Men face significant disadvantages, and women do not. Women face significant disadvantages, and men do not. Both men and women face significant disadvantages. This question is made difficult by geography. I would argue that eg in Saudi Arabia the last option fits best, whereas in the West the second option fits best.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 06:23 PM
68

"We are living in a world which is globalised and multicultural and diverse and [many white working class men in the US] are really struggling with a loss of power" and a sense that "they don't own the world anymore", Professor Lumby said. Jesus. This person is a professor? The good professor needs to read a basic history book. The average white working man has never had any "power" to speak of. I mean go back to the 19th or early 20th centuries and you find white men consistently being brutaliz…
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:21 AM
30

What the hell are they teaching kids in universities!?
/r/MensRights29/01/17 01:40 AM
-2

shit post. And a little mean spirited to be honest. Shouldn't be on R/MensRights. Mods should delete this.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 12:03 AM
1

Yeah it's pretty bad. When I said "fair" I was setting the bar extremely low. Most MSM articles on the men's rights movement consist solely of lies and slander and omit all of the relevant information.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 11:33 PM
-2

This is a men's rights forum. Go take your female empowerment bullshit elsewhere.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 10:26 PM
31

A shockingly fair article from the BBC, though includes obligatory feminist bullshit sprinkled throughout and still maintains a hostile tone. It's telling that the men's rights movement is only being taken seriously now that women are becoming interested in the topic. So much for patriarchy.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:55 PM
3

I'm about 15 minutes in. Good job so far. I disagree with you that feminists desire equality of outcome. If they did they would eg be trying to achieve parity in criminal justice sentencing or dangerous jobs. Feminists want female supremacy. Edit: your opponent is a terrible debater. I can't even make sense of his arguments.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 09:05 PM
8

Great article. A couple of complaints: In a world where men still call (most of) the shots, make most of the money and still dominate the corridors of power, it might seem perverse to suggest that women need to check their privilege, too. But oh, we do. This continues to be one of the biggest mistakes women make. I don't think it's malicious, it just arises from differences between the sexes. Women have in group preference and assume men do as well. We don't. Men in power do not privilege other …
/r/MensRights28/01/17 08:38 PM
–

Can we get MORE Jerry Springer on here? Because there is a distinct lack of morons and Florida people. Alternatively we could...
/r/MensRights28/01/17 08:02 AM
5

"Proxy violence" is just the genderflip of "he made me do it." Bullshit either way. No it's a perfectly simple concept. I'll give you an easy example. A woman hits herself in the face, calls the police and claims her boyfriend hit her. They arrest him. He is imprisoned. She is using the state as a proxy. Do you understand? Without her making the phone call the chain of events would not have been set in motion. She lacks the physical capability or courage to commit violence against her partner, s…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:31 AM
5

They're miserable and pathetic losers anyway, so there isn't anything that will make them happy. This. We are rapidly approaching the time when everyone is going to take this approach, because as you say there is no pleasing them. They are fundamentally irrational and in truth have no interest in actually helping any of the groups they claim to represent. They just like to bully people online. It's a power trip by mentally disturbed individuals with inferiority complexes, riding on the coat tail…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:19 AM
3

Here is a must read from Spiked on this topic. Discusses the remarkable parallels between feminist "rape culture" mythology and the equally non-existent rape culture of African American men toward white women in the old south. All the ideas about rape that feminists are currently trying to codify into law were already tried -- by the KKK. http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the-war-on-rape-the-logic-of-the-lynch-mob-returns/16349#.WIv6sbRVhBc
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:10 AM
3

You are an AMAZING (though particularly repulsive) example of a typical feminist: you deny female power and female agency and simply blame the nearest men. Even when it comes to atrocities. This is in fact a perfect example of female proxy violence. She wanted attention and she was okay with having a boy murdered to get it. You're right to blame the men (for embracing feminist style "listen and believe" doctrine) but they're just the muscle. She is responsible for her actions, and they are respo…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 01:59 AM
3

I think it started out as you claim but at a certain point elites recognized a good thing when they saw it. Hence CIA funded Ms. Magazine, and the Ford and Rockefeller foundations funded gender studies. It was mostly out in the open. The idea that elites don't "plan" for their futures is silly. They meet privately at groups like Bilderberg, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bohemian grove (where policy proposals are indeed discussed -- in the presence of a giant stone oil representing Minerv…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:30 AM
2

Bingo.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:24 AM
7

That's the problem. When people hear "sexual assault" they think of some brute lurking in an alley raping a woman. They don't think of a clumsy teen trying to kiss a girl, or a woman smacking a guy's butt (as happened to me numerous times when I was a kid). They certainly don't think of a crude joke, which some of these "studies" list as assault. Feminists are deliberately terrorizing women by conflating normal if sometimes uncomfortable or awkward sexual interplay with brutal assault.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:02 AM
6

Gillard was sentenced to 31 months behind bars, while Cunningham received a 10 month sentence. Unreal.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:50 PM
3

Quote him Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, one of the first female labor leaders. An Anarcho-syndicalist. "Society moves in grooves of class, not sex." Feminism is an authoritarian movement that uses the violence of the state to separate men from their children and turn them into indentured servants. They also work with religious conservatives to demonize male sexuality. Everything about the movement is based on wielding state power against working class men.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 10:47 PM
11

"The Women's Liberation Movement may be considered as subversive to the New Left and revolutionary movements as they have proven to be a divisive and factionalizing factor.... It could be well recommended as a counterintelligence movement to weaken the revolutionary movement." This was from an August, 1969 report by the head of the San Francisco FBI office.[4] Within several years, the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations were pumping millions into women's studies programs on campus.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 09:13 PM
18

I then saw this sub change to become very Alt-right, White males are only welcomed kind of place. I read this sub daily and you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 06:34 AM
2

That's a silly analogy. A better one would be "don't complain if you stub your toe because there are people out there currently being tortured to death." Tampon taxes don't compare to things like not being allowed to see your own children.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 05:20 AM
6

Yep. That explains it.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 04:33 AM
14

Except we're talking about people living in the same society. This thread is a truly remarkable example of gynocentrism. Feminists claiming that paying a few bucks for tampons is somehow equivalent to not being able to see one's own children. It's a microcosm of the grand canyon sized empathy gap between the sexes.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 04:19 AM
4

Yeah I should have clarified that obviously not all men would be as blase about it.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 02:29 AM
15

I would love for you to point out where I made the claim that tampons are more important than a human life. I think you'd be pretty hard pressed to find a feminist quote for that. I can do much better. The founder of the first gender studies course in the US, Sally Miller Gearhart, advocated genocide against men. She did so in all sincereity, claiming that males should be kept at no more than ten percent of the population. So she actually placed a negative value on male life, rather than being m…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:36 AM
11

I think that's a very dangerous position to have. Every group has its looneys, and antagonising everyone because of it is not a good idea. When the "dangerous looneys" are in control of the asylum, we have ourselves a problem. If feminists spent one-hundredth of the amount of time trying to get rid of the man-haters who run their movement rather than trying to defend their brand the problem would disappear over night.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:11 AM
2

People can support feminism without identifying as feminist. Yes they can. However the same poll also asked whether they supported gender equality and the overwhelming majority said "yes." I wonder if there's a reason most people don't think feminism has anything to do with equality? And what's this about wealthy elites being the only feminists, are you daft? I didn't say they were the only feminists. I said elites support feminism, which they do. There are currently feminist initiatives being u…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:07 AM
18

The problem with trying to categorize the "feminist" movement is that its in no way or shape organised. If by this you mean "ask ten feminists a question and you will get ten different answers" you are correct (unless it's about the mysterious patriarchy, which they all agree is the devil). However feminists certainly do not lack in organization or funding. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. I don't particularly care what Jane Q feminist thinks. I care what the feminists who influence policy …
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:55 AM
19

Every time someone brings a female issue someone has to come shouting BUT MEN HAVE IT WORSE and it honestly weakens a lot this movement. It's sort of difficult not to though. It's not as though men started this fight. Feminists created a laundry list of alleged oppressions suffered by females; they claimed these were "gendered issues". Well as it turns out a lot of them actually apply to both genders or there is some male equivalent of X issue. If the feminist movement had begun as an egalitaria…
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:34 AM
1

You're welcome. And yes I agree that these people have much in common with fascists and Stalinists.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:05 AM
15

Yes that's a fair point while men's issues are seen as niche problems. No, the reason we are less likely to recognize male problems is because males lack in-group preference and are less able or willing to unite along gender lines. Ironically this means that patriarchy theory is incorrect. Not only do men not try to privilege other men (their sexual competitors) but they tend to favor women in most circumstances.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:05 AM
5

How is redistribution of wealth socialist? Because that is the definition of socialism. No it isn't. Socialists believe workers should own and control the means of production. So eg factories would be owned by workers. The theory is that this would end the redistribution of wealth from workers to the rich. This is based on surplus value. "Surplus value is a central concept in Karl Marx's critique of political economy. Marx did not himself invent the term: he developed the concept.[1] "Surplus va…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 11:50 PM
10

Wow. That's an interesting example of the cyclical nature of feminist activism (and stupidity). They complain about policies that they themselves were responsible for. It reminds me of what's her face claiming women are "more oppressed than ever" because they have to both work and take care of children. But that's what you wanted! Mark my words: if every single feminist demand was answered they would complain about the result and blame it on teh patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 10:24 PM
13

I was routinely groped by women and girls as a young man. Must have happened about two dozen times. I even had a teacher slap me on the butt. I'll be honest though: it didn't really bother me much. I'm not sure if it's because men suffer much worse (give me a crotch grab over a fist fight any day) or if it's because males don't have sexual power like women (when a "creepy" guy hits on a woman it's seen as an affront to her power). The fact that men are larger and stronger also presumably plays a…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:56 PM
47

Most men aren't negatively impacted by a lack of reproductive rights, circumcision, custody rights, the draft, prison, or suicide. Interesting. So most males aren't impacted by having sensitive tissue removed from their penises. They aren't impacted by gynocentric education systems. They aren't impacted by a woman literally controlling a man's body (via the state) and forcing them to become indentured servants. They aren't impacted when their wives divorce them and prevent them from seeing their…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:35 PM
7

Your suggestions are way too logical to appeal to the hysterics populating this thread.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:36 PM
279

A study actually demonstrated that when men treat women equally, without chivalry, they are overwhelmingly regarded as "sexist" by both men and women.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:30 PM
24

You minimize the claim in the same way the author does. Someone somewhere else has a claim to a larger issue, therefore, you don't get to complain about your smaller issue. You can complain, but it would behoove you to recognize the fundamental absurdity of caring more about a few dollars than male life.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:16 PM
5

By that logic isn't it fairly narcissistic and geocentric of US men to protest the possibility of Selective Service when there are dozens of countries around the world that currently do require military service. No. The issue of men being forced to die for the state, whether in the US or elsewhere, is orders of magnitude more important than a few dollars. The fact that you don't seem to recognize this is actually quite chilling. It's not that women don't care about men. It's that they care about…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:15 PM
11

Yes I understand your argument and agree. I just find it telling that no one seems to give a shit about men's rights. If MRA's tried to organize a march in defense of male rights they would simply be mocked. There is a profound empathy gap between the sexes.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 08:00 PM
70

And at the end, he tells women that they need to be more inclusive of men's issues and campaign for equality and not privilege over men. Sure, that makes sense if you buy into the rest of his claims where he's trying to show that women don't have any problems here and have nothing to complain about. It's a question of priorities. Eg whining about a tampon tax vs men having zero reproductive rights, boys having their genitals mutilated, men being denied access to their kids, being subject to cons…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:56 PM
6

Women shouldn't be allowed to complain about the Tampon Tax until Select Service is repealed? Is that your point? I'm confused here. Shouldn't be allowed? No. But it's incredibly narcissistic to be whining about a few bucks when men are legally obligated to die for the state. Again, this is about priorities. A few bucks vs. male life. The very fact that I'm having to debate this shows just how fucked up this society is. Gynocentric to the point of absurdity. Are men not allowed to protest? So th…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:35 PM
15

What's your point? I'm not opposed to birth control or abortion. Did any of the women in the march demand legal male parental surrender? Why am I supposed to care about women's rights if they don't care about mine? That's the problem here. The hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:28 PM
4

I do recognize the absurdity of Selective Service. But what does that have to do with the Tampon Tax? Why is it one or the other - can't we be against the Tampon Tax and be against Selective Service? Sure you can be against both. But comparing the two is ridiculous. One is profound institutional oppression, the other is a few dollars. See the problem? You're more worried about a few dollars than men's lives. Also, why is it women's responsibility to protest Select Service? Do you care about equa…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:20 PM
9

The author points out that women do in fact pay $7 more than they should due to the Tampon Tax and basically says "whoop de doo" because men have to sign up for selective service. I wonder if you recognize the absurdity of whining about $7 vs. being compelled by the state to fight and die in wars. I mean this is just off the charts narcissism and entitlement. While it's true that Western men do not currently face a significant risk of being drafted, they are still live under threat of conscripti…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:00 PM
27

Exactly. As much as it's really not fair that a man has no choice if his son/daughter is aborted there isn't a way to make it fair. It is her body. There is no way to make everything "fair Sure there is. Equal rights. That means male parental surrender. Right now it's "her body her choice." But it's also "his body her choice." Men are currently forced to become indentured servants for 18 years even if they don't want the kid. Surprisingly traditionalists are actually more intellectually consiste…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:50 PM
14

No. Feminism is and always has been a movement for rich women. A poll in the UK revealed the interesting fact that a much higher percentage of working class women would like to become house-wives than their upper class counterparts. Why? For the simple reason that the vast majority of women don't get to have "careers". They live as corporate wage slaves just like men. If feminism was about "socialism" then it wouldn't have been funded by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations. Goldman Sachs and JP…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:17 PM
5

I am willing to bet that the vast majority of men would continue to pay child support without any legal obligation, PROVIDED they had equal custody rights.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:59 PM
2

This. Feminism is very popular, particularly right now, but even just generally. Even most who don't like it acknowledge the good it has done A recent poll in the UK had the number of self identified feminists at 7 percent. As rg57 points out, the seeming support for the movement derives from the fact that wealthy elites and their media mouthpieces are staunchly pro-feminist. I also dispute the idea that the feminist movement has done "good" things. Every single "advance" they made was an act of…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:41 PM
3

That thread is a perfect example of ivory tower elitism. 99 percent of the questions and answers are post modern gobbledygook. The professor is concerned about "micro" inequalities allegedly suffered by women but refuses to address the massive systemic discrimination suffered by men. When a man asks a sensible question in plain English, the response is an ad hom attack that he posts in The Donald. It is pretty shocking (well not really) that these academics have become so detached from reality. …
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:31 PM
2

I'm done with you white knight.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:51 PM
2

What you are doing, however, is not only advocating for gender bias but gendered violence, because you seem to derive some twisted sense of vindication when the victim is female. You're totally out of line. The Youtube comments (including by women) are about 90% in agreement that he was justified in the self-defensive maneuver. The reason you're so upset is because of your gynocentric instincts. It's not your fault, we all have an empathy gap when it comes to men, but don't go around insulting p…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:28 PM
2

What you are doing, however, is condoning violence because the victim was female, which is literally the opposite of equality. No. You're excusing female violence. The victim in this case was the man she assaulted. People like you are the reason male victims of domestic violence are often themselves arrested. "Expendable One" indeed.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 09:00 PM
3

Re-watching the footage I noticed that she also kicked him in the stomach (aiming for balls?). Anyway like I said, don't wanna be subjected to violence? Don't initiate violence. Pretty simple. Also note the girlfriend after the takedown, "what are you pussies doing, hit him!" Perfect example of would-be female proxy violence. Glad to see the men didn't take her advice. Equality bitch.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 07:14 PM
3

You can't expect people to act with the perfect level of force when they are attacked. People are not robots. She was hitting him in the face. Don't wanna got body slammed? Don't pick a fight with a dude twice your size.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:58 PM
10

Sophie Linden, Deputy Mayor for Policing And Crime, said: “We know most women serving prison sentences have committed a non-violent offence, and by providing support across a range of areas we can help them deal with the root causes of their problems, drive down re-offending, cut crime and make our communities safer.” Why is this aid not being given to both sexes? Because men are twice as likely to be charged when they commit a violent crime? Because men receive 63% longer sentences and are so m…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:30 PM
5

Interesting. She says hypergamy (without using the word) is one of the things she would have liked to have covered in the film. Basically what we're doing right now is privileging girls in every single sphere (indeed we're actually hamstringing boys) then when women want to find a "good man" there aren't any because the men are earning less money than they are (or have one of those icky blue collar jobs -- you know, the ones that maintain civilization). I think I speak for most MRA's when I say …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:54 PM
4

Well said. Those juvenile insults (what are we teenagers?) are themselves a sign of how far the left has fallen. It's interesting to go back a hundred years and look at the gender debates on the left. The Marxist Earnest Bax wrote "The Fraud of Feminism." Emma Goldman was a feminist but not a female supremacist, arguing that female suffrage would not end wars or create a utopian society (as many of her sisters believed). Elizabeth Gurley Flynn of the IWW stated that "society moves in grooves of …
/r/MensRights25/01/17 04:23 PM
3

Interesting. It was different for married women though (abandonment laws).
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:41 PM
1

Glad to hear :)
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:29 AM
2

Thank you for your sensible comment. Unfortunately this post is being dowvoted because some people would rather characterize all 1 billion Muslims as cartoonish barbarians rather than acknowledge the complexity of gender relations in Islamic societies.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:15 AM
9

It would certainly be justified but I don't think people are ready for that sort of thing yet. It would just be mocked. The best method of activism right now is getting people to watch The Red Pill. It will be released shortly.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 09:39 PM
1

I decided to make a thread for it: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5pyu75/brilliant_muslim_woman_critiques_feminism/?st=iyc11chw&sh=56aa032b
/r/MensRights24/01/17 09:26 PM
2

I'd be happy to. Perhaps you might be interested in this as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnfT6xWGQv4 It's a Muslim woman's take on feminism.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 09:04 PM
1

I'd have to see (non-feminist) sources. Remember that there are over a billion Muslims living in a multitude of cultures. They have elected female heads of state seven times, which kind of puts a crimp in the idea that they regard women as subhuman. War propaganda is also an issue. Eg one of the Wikileaks documents had the CIA highlighting female oppression in Afghanistan. Not male oppression mind you, since there is a well documented empathy gap between the two sexes. It's very difficult to acc…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 08:44 PM
89

I can anticipate the feminist response to this. "When women are in charge, we'll solve things non-violently!" The problem with this theory is that Queens were more likely to engage in war than kings.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 08:27 PM
-1

women have it harder for sure, I think that's debatable. Eg in Afghanistan boys as young as five have to work to support their mothers and sisters. Men are also probably about ten times as likely to be violently killed. always listen to your husband even if he beats you. I'm pretty sure Muslim women have the right of divorce. In fact they had it before Christians. Muslim women also seem more willing to acknowledge female on male domestic violence than feminists, at least judging from articles li…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 07:11 PM
-3

Again, I find it implausible that that sort of thing occurs with any regularity. It would shock me if women are beaten more often than men in Muslim nations. Edit: downvotes for arguing that men are almost certainly subjected to more physical violence in Muslim nations? (as they are everywhere else?) On an MRA forum? Seems like people here are more interested in demonizing Muslim men than painting an accurate picture of what men and boys go through in such societies.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:37 PM
15

"when they would be executed on the spot for simply trying to speak in the presence of a man." Uh, I very much doubt that. Tradcon complaints about feminism are all the same. They're basically "what about the Muslim womynz!" while ignoring the fact that men and boys have it at least as bad in those countries. They're just as gynocentric as feminists.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 05:33 PM
4

I keep thinking we've reached the Mount Everest of feminist idiocy. But there's always a new, higher peak.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 01:24 PM
3

Interesting. There is a widespread delusion that feminism has only recently gone off the rails. Whereas it used to be about "equality" now it's about hatred of men and boys. This isn't true. Feminism has never been about equality. If it was, first wave feminists would have eg demanded that husbands no longer be forced to pay their wives' debts when they changed property laws. Or that women be subject to conscription. The feminist movement has always been led by female supremacists who hate men. …
/r/MensRights24/01/17 11:39 AM
1

They don't even try to hide their hypocrisy anymore.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 11:30 AM
1

:) Cheers, but remember that there are men who can't even see their own kids. That's horrific.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:20 PM
–

What about your feet?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:08 PM
9

Indeed. If everything were "equal" then men would have proper prostate cancer funding. But of course it's not "equal."
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:07 PM
–

I disagree. Soccer is fun. Football is mostly boring. Now consider that those words are interchangeable.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:02 PM
–

Do you support male genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 07:54 PM
–

You can pick it up at the nearest feminist station.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:09 PM
3

Well, if that's true I applaud you. But you certainly must understand that, in general, mothers are given default custody even if they're drug addicts. I would be happy depressed to give you hundreds of examples of men being denied their children even when the wife is demonstrably dangerous.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 06:05 PM
2

More importantly legal issues.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:50 PM
4

Ironically I'm actually fairly liberal despite the fempire types routinely calling me alt right and whatnot. I think that's the way it is for most people. We have opinions that are stereotypically of the "right" or "left" but in the end we are (surprise!) human beings capable of coming to judgements about a great many issues which don't fit into neat little boxes. The George Soros' of the world, and their "right wing" counterparts, want us all to fit into little boxes so as to better divide us. …
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:02 PM
3

Feminist and sjws having power? What kind of power do they get? Well for starters, they get to force a man into a position of indentured servitude who can't even see his own kids. That's power. That's extreme power. The power to wield the most violent institution ever created: the state. One of the many problems with feminism is that it doesn't recognize female forms of power, or only recognizes female power in particular contexts. Yet this is absurd: mother nature does not have a political bias…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:56 PM
6

Sure. But the average person doesn't read studies. This post hits them on a gut level, which is why it reached R/all. We sense the absurdity and unfairness of rich women demanding that blue collar men make their signs "gender inclusive" even as they risk their lives. Hopefully some people who see it will go on to read and study gender through a non-feminist/gynocentric lens.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:51 PM
9

You do great work 5th law. Rest assured that your posts do not go unappreciated. I would like to see more frequent updates on AMRsucks but their output seems to be gradually declining. Perhaps they recognize that public opinion is gradually turning against them. Ironically I would be considered a "radical leftist" on a great many issues (though definitely not gun control), which goes to show that this isn't about left vs. right, it's about justice and fairness and freedom vs. illogic and authori…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:34 PM
8

Little peculiar that you used the term "fuckboys". You sound like a teenage girl jilted by her boyfriend. Anyway, this isn't just about creating business opportunities. Every time someone wimps out and bows to feminist/SJW demands they grow more powerful and more bold and more authoritarian. PC becomes ever more stifling.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:17 PM
9

Of course people knew it was a joke. That doesn't change the fact that grannies offering blowjobs is fucking disgusting. And your comments on her denigrating the men who keep her safe and privileged?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:12 PM
10

She offered to suck cock for the election. But hey, if she wants to make granny porn that's her business. The far more offensive issue is her denigrating the working class men who keep her safe and privileged.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 04:00 PM
9

If you already had a half a billion dollars would you continue to do denigrating shit? Perhaps it's time for Madonna to go to the nursing home instead of volunteering to suck cock for elections and denigrating the working class men who keep her safe and comfortable.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:58 PM
18

True. But there is such a thing as "basic dignity and self respect." Some would argue that there are more important things in life than money.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:49 PM
5

Feminists, then.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:46 PM
5

0 women whatsoever want to do manual labo No one wants to do manual labor. That's why it's called "labor."
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:45 PM
16

So, men being needlessly put in danger while building the infrastructure you rely on is A-okay?
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:44 PM
24

If I saw a construction girl swinging a pickaxe, or digging up dirt in a 5 foot hole filled with hard heavy rocks, the first thing I wouldn't be looking for is their ass, it'd be for steel toed boots! I'd be looking for the pigs flying in the sky.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:39 PM
-3

And you sound like a right pussy. If feminists want gender inclusive signs why don't they make them themselves? Right: that would require learning a skill rather than simply bitching at people who work for a living. Also, I think it's about time we got rid of all these "women's studies" and "status of women" commissions etc. Only if we have "men's studies" and "status of men" commissions. I'm willing to accept your argument but you feminists need to be consistent for once in your lives. Also, th…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:26 PM
14

you whiny fuckboys LMAO. We rightly condemn the idiocy of these people whining about a sign and placing men's lives at risk -- you call us whiners. You feminists never cease to amaze.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:21 PM
1

I don't see the point in this stuff from an MRA perspective. Yes, we all know that feminists are ridiculous hypocrites when it comes to Islam, but instead of just aping their arguments about female oppression we should be looking at areas where men suffer under theocratic rule. I'll give you an example from an article I read the other day. Up until only a few years ago in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and other countries, boys as young as four have been forced to serve as camel jockeys.…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 03:06 PM
3

We know about the concept of hegemonic masculinity (a specific type of masculinity), where males whose self-worth is defined in certain ways makes them toxic to others and such, and through displays of power to elevate themselves above others. The problem with this theory is that it examines masculinity in a vacuum. If women repeatedly demonstrate that they are sexually attracted to powerful (and even brutal) men then men will try to become powerful. Conversely, if women sexually selected for tr…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:22 PM
36

Not entirely useless. It shows people that they care more about "gender inclusive language" than men dying on the job. Priorities.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 02:05 PM
3

We live in a society where genders have their benefits AND disadvantages. That was true in the 19th century. It's true today in Saudi Arabia. In the modern West? Nah
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:25 PM
13

As strange as it sounds the right is actually more intellectually consistent on this issue than the left. The right demands that a woman carry the baby to term and that the man support the child. The left demands that the man support the child (with 18 years of labor), but that the woman can opt out of parenthood either through abortion or simply by dropping the kid off at a safe haven. Her body, her choice; his body, her choice. The left also has big problems when it comes to claims of "caring …
/r/MensRights23/01/17 12:11 PM
1

Not so fast: While there is certainly evidence of violence, it is not very extensive before 10,000 years ago. For example Brennan (1991) studies all skeletons available from the 100,000 – 10,000 BP from southwestern France – fragments of 203 individuals – and only 5 (2.5%) showed any signs of fractures, but even these were compatible with accidental injury. In the Middle East, 370 skeletons from the Natufian (10,800 – 8,500 BC) were analyzed, and only 2 showed signs of any kind of trauma. There …
/r/MensRights21/01/17 04:02 PM
1

BTW I made a few edits to previous post, in case you want to reply. You should, as I think it would make for an interesting debate.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 10:23 AM
3

BTW if you want to learn more about this stuff I highly recommend Christopher Boehm's "Hierarchy in the Forest." He's a zoologist well acquainted with the hard sciences so you don't have to worry about airy fairy feminist theories or utopianism. More than any other book I've read he does a terrific job of summarizing ethnographies of hunter-gatherer societies as relates their defining ethos, which is egalitarianism. We can agree or disagree about what is appropriate in the here and now without r…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 09:05 AM
4

you're supposed to make me believe that Indian tribes never had chiefs? lol. You can learn about this stuff by reading an introductory anthropology textbook (I really wish they taught anthropology in high-school). We spent about 97% of our history as foragers. These societies are essentially reverse-dominance hierarchies. Any attempt by a man (or a woman) to rule over other members of the tribe is considered the gravest form of social deviancy. This is not controversial among anthropologists. Ch…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 08:38 AM
4

That link does not dispute egalitarianism in hunter-gatherer bands (hierarchical hunter-gatherer foragers have never been observed; this is explained in introductory anthropology textbooks). Nor did I claim that these societies contain "gender equality", whatever that's supposed to mean. In fact they tend to have a larger degree of sexual division of labor than civilized societies, and men are typically given higher social status due to their role as hunters. Your link claims that nomadic forage…
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:45 AM
2

Cheers. I find it a little bit troubling that the post only has 2 upvotes. There seems to be an ideological reluctance on the part of some MRA's to acknowledge egalitarianism in hunter-gatherer bands even though the issue isn't even in dispute among anthropologists.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:03 AM
11

Edit: I agree that gender roles are rooted in biology. However I don't agree with Karen Straughan's statement here: But prior to man as provider and protector was our male ancestors as polygynous harem-keepers who used dominance as the decisive factor in monopolizing mating opportunities. This is completely false. It certainly does not accord with the observations of actual experts in the field of anthropology. No offense Karen (I'm a fan) but you should spend less time studying chimpanzees and …
/r/MensRights21/01/17 05:16 AM
7

A little levity for a change. This is a brilliant scene from an otherwise forgettable Hugh Grant romantic comedy called "The Rewrite."
/r/MensRights20/01/17 01:13 AM
9

Did you just fucking MANinterrupt me!?
/r/MensRights19/01/17 11:31 PM
55

Cry me a river. Those issues pale in comparison to having a man's knee touch yours on public transit aka MANSPREADING. THAT is where the real oppression lies. Additionally there are issues like women's razors costing a few more cents, sexy characters in videogames, fat shaming -- the list of atrocities is endless. Oh yeah did I mention MANSPREADING?
/r/MensRights19/01/17 10:23 PM
5

Eh, seems harmless enough.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:45 PM
32

Dammit I used to really like Ashley Judd. There was an experiment where men were asked to treat women as equals. Observers from both sexes viewed the men in the experiment as "sexist." Conversely, men who acted chivalrous toward women were viewed as treating women equally! That shows you what we're up against. Women are so used to being placed on a pedestal that equality feels like oppression. That's what is happening online. Anonymity allows men to treat women just like they treat other men. I …
/r/MensRights19/01/17 05:37 PM
13

We already know the answer to that. I've seen the Red Pill and it's terrific, but it does not compare to the exceptional "Man Woman Myth" series (available on Youtube). So far as I know the latter has not received any mainstream recognition at all. To be fair, the latter is a low budget "amateur" affair of significant length. Some of the best documentaries these days are being made by people who never went to film school and have never even used a video camera. But overall your point stands. If …
/r/MensRights19/01/17 03:40 PM
1

It's a disgrace to journalism, no question, to say nothing of basic human decency. On the other hand, a more cynical (accurate) reading of the journalistic profession finds that these hacks have mostly supported whatever the current status quo is throughout history. It makes me feel warm inside to understand that these man-haters will eventually be regarded in the same way we currently regard the KKK.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 11:15 AM
1

The prison abolition movement existed long before feminism. For example after the Russian revolution, anarchists argued that "Prisons are the symbol of the servitude of the people, they are always built only to subjugate the people, the workers and peasants. . . Free people have no use for prisons. Wherever prisons exist, the people are not free. . . In keeping with this attitude, they [the Makhnovists] demolished prisons wherever they went." [Peter Arshinov, The History of the Makhnovist Moveme…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 11:12 AM
1

Well I'm pleased to see that you appear willing to alter your opinion. http://www.femalesexoffenders.org/2009/07/female-pedophiles
/r/MensRights17/01/17 10:55 AM
2

Title is satire.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 10:53 AM
7

Better than the interview ;) Farrell has the patience of a saint. It's instructive that the MRM didn't even appear on people's radar until Paul Elam came along. The Marxist Earnest Belford Bax wrote a trenchant critique of feminism back in the early 20th century. Warren Farrell wrote a still more trenchant expose of feminist myths in the late 20th century. Both figures were ignored. Then along comes Paul Elam and before you can say "bash a violent bitch" (emphasis on the word violent) and sudden…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 10:49 AM
10

lol. This reads as parody.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 08:25 AM
6

Jesus. What a tremendously idiotic interviewer.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 08:23 AM
59

The bias in our court system that almost invariably favors the mother in custody cases often isn't really for the benefit of the child, it's for the benefit of the mother. Nailed it. Feminists use children as a shield. If NOW cared about children they would support shared parenting. IF feminists cared about children being abused they wouldn't paint it as a patriarchal conspiracy. Since women would also be better off in shared custody arrangements it's hard not to conclude that they literally val…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 08:19 AM
1

Literal pedophiles (i.e. a strong drive for sex with kids pre-puberty) are rare among females, there is very little to compare to the male predatory pedo's who do so much damage. Incorrect. If you're worried about male rapists for example you should be extremely concerned about female pedophiles, since the majority of male rapists were sexually molested by women as children. Adult women's abuse of children is nearly all from 13 onward, and is nearly always seen as consensual at the time by the b…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:18 AM
1

Wait, so you're saying that if a woman's baby boy is raped by a woman, and she gets off scott free, that doesn't affect her? Ya see, this is what happens when you try to view each sex as "at war" with one another. You end up harming the people you supposedly want to help. It is refreshing though to see you admit that feminism has nothing to do with "equality."
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:13 AM
1

I'm not sure what you mean by "report". This is happening in numerous countries.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:11 AM
1

India does not recognise the concept of rape within marriage. Right. So it's a double whammy on the man. Choosing Israel and India (where the same argument was made) as models for policy on sexual violence in the western world is just weird. They are both extremely conservative and patriarchal societies There's nothing "weird" about it at all. They provide a perfect example of how the feminist movement evolved in the West: all of the rights, none of the responsibilities. Feminists have historica…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:10 AM
2

In modern western countries feminists see patriarchy as a system perpetuated by both men and women, and encoded into our systems and institutions. They should probably change the name then, since it makes no sense.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 05:07 AM
–

Feminism is the unscientific, quasi-religious delusion that everything bad comes from men and everything good comes from women. Also, females have zero agency, had little or no effect on history (apparently Queens sending off men to die in wars were victims of the patriarchy), and play no role in male behavior. Men engage in stereotypical male behaviors not due to biology or socialization (mostly by women) and female sexual selection -- no, just for the hell of it! When challenged with these obv…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 10:03 AM
9

Reminded me of Steve Shives. It's painful to see men that pussywhipped and/or abused. The girl kept saying, "But you're not an MRA right? Right?" as though her sole concern was whether it is currently fashionable to support Men's Rights rather than the actual issues raised (or God forbid, the well being of her boyfriend or males in general).
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:49 AM
8

If you need something to compare it to, check out the podcast that feminist Gigi Engle recorded with her long-suffering, abused boyfriend after they went to the premier in New York. Oh God. Don't encourage people to listen to that. It was literally fucking painful even when Karen Straughan was tearing her apart.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:34 AM
13

Good criticism of the review. Gynocentrism is a helluva drug. I still say it's positive overall in that she was able to recognize (at least in some cases) her own bias, and ultimately the need for a MRM. She doesn't appear to be very well versed in the role feminists have played in creating many of these negative outcomes for men and boys.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:26 AM
11

Decent review by a feminist who began to question her own beliefs while watching The Red Pill. She seems to be a typical example of a "coffee shop feminist" who "supports equality" and had no idea what her movement was and is actually doing in terms of policy and law. Although she still uses the term "patriarchy" (and whines about supposed male privilege in the work place) she seems to support bringing these issues to the fore. Her puzzlement over why feminists express no interest in helping men…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 07:27 AM
4

If you read sites like Against Men's Rights or SRS, snark is literally all they have. You never see them actually arguing the logical points of a particular debate, everything is reduced to "oh cishet white males are totes oppressed lol." It's all about feeling rather than facts.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 05:27 AM
6

Men have literally been arrested for "manspreading." In other words feminists have created a hate campaign targeting males for their biology (men have a higher center of gravity and differently shaped hips). Manspreading is a wonderful example of (a) female privilege and feminist institutional power -- we take manspreading more seriously than the male suicide epidemic (b) feminist stupidity -- instead of learning about male physiology they assumed that men spread their legs to assert "patriarcha…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 05:23 AM
2

patriarchal gender role The so-called "patriarchal" gender role is heavily influenced by women, especially in terms of female sexual selection: "What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor. "Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fa…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 02:27 AM
4

Feminists in Israel fought against having the law changed to recognize female rapists: "The Knesset Law Committee on Tuesday decided to postpone a vote on second and third reading of a bill to add the crime of rape by a woman to the statute book after women’s organizations warned that it would lead to a situation where women would be afraid to charge men with rape." http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape Moreover, I have never heard of a feminist attempting…
/r/MensRights16/01/17 02:24 AM
5

This is what happens you fail to take into account context. Example: woman gets knocked up by douche bag, he stabs someone, now he's in prison. Guess what? She's gonna be given a roof over her head and a monthly pay check and electricity and plumbing. She is ALSO going to show up in the stats as living in poverty. The context is lacking. We don't hear about the men doing all that dirty dangerous work and having the government taking a cut of their paychecks to provide for the single mother. In f…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 08:01 AM
2

If you live in Canada be sure to contact your local NDP and inform them of your decision to no longer support their political party.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:39 AM
2

Women are property without rights, lol no. Women have been elected to head of state in seven Muslim countries. In Afghanistan, boys as young as five have to go work to support their mothers and sisters. In Saudi Arabia, about 50 men are stoned to death for every woman. Qatar only recently abolished the practice of starving 4 year old boys in camel races. Think of it this way: rich women in Muslim countries eat caviar and can have a male servant executed on a whim. That's not consistent with your…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:17 AM
2

You don't seem to understand. There is no controversy among anthropologists about whether hunter-gatherer bands are egalitarian. The observations by ethnologists have been consistent. Universally so. The relative level of violence is not particularly relevant to the discussion. Eg if a man attempts to become an "alpha" by hoarding resources and monopolizing females, and persuasion fails, he will indeed be killed. The Inuit even have a word for it, a guy having an "accident" while out on the hunt…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:36 AM
4

Or...as with all things political, the pendulum will swing the other way. Have you read Unwin's book? (Sex and Culture). That has literally never happened in history. Female sexual liberation has never once been reversed by the males of a particular society; it has only been reversed by conquering armies.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:38 AM
2

Edit: above, counter-science opinion has more upvotes than this.... This is not so much based on strong evidence, but has been the prevailing opinion among many anthropologists for the last half century. No the evidence is rock solid and is not disputed by any serious anthropologist. Note that hunter-gatherer bands (i.e. how we lived for 99% of our history) are very different from stationary tribal societies who possess food surplus. Though the latter societies are much more egalitarian than our…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 04:29 AM
30

lol at first comment: Dear women, You hitched your wagons to a hateful ideology, so get off your asses and solve your own problems for a change instead of begging men to do it for you. Sincerely, an evil white male
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:37 AM
11

This should have the "anti-MRA" flare. I will upvote however for purposes of discussion. It is also supported by concrete archeological evidence, which suggests that, in caveman times, only about 40% of men managed to reproduce, while 80% of women did. I'm not sure this is correct. The stat may be skewed by the fact that men and boys were/are the overwhelming victims of war and genocide under civilization. Primitive hunter-gatherer bands are fiercely egalitarian -- it is their defining ethos -- …
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:19 AM
7

systematically funneling our children particularly children of color, queer and trans youth, foster care children, and girls into the justice system" Wait, they're particularly concerned about girls being targeted by police when the justice system is already heavily skewed in their favor? Are these people aware that the gender "injustice" gap is six times larger than the racial injustice gap? Why is one "oppression" and not the other?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 01:28 AM
2

Indeed. Hey Pigman, how are you? I hate both Hilary and Trump, so no need to consider me an enemy.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 10:31 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 10:21 AM
–

So are you are such a weakling that you won't stand up for you think is right? Let's find out: prediction: you are a pussy, and won't do anything to stand up for male rights. Am I wrong? No, I don't think so. You're a pussy ergo you won't stand up for male rights. That's not exactly a controversial subject. You are a coward, ergo etc. you are a pussy.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 10:17 AM
–

So when are you going to THANK male "patriarchal" bastards for providing you with safe birth control and abortion? Never? I thought so ;) You're scum. You hate men due to envy but you deny the obvious fact that men have always worked toward trying to help women. Because men are -- shock of shocks -- decent, kind, caring human beings. One thing you SHOULD recognize -- your hatred of males bleeds over into hatred of girls. Little girls do not have magical armor, and indeed it turns out that little…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 08:46 AM
3

Sorry, I was hacked by Russian hackers...except...no I wasn't really. I just got drunk. Here's a ground-breaking idea: people shouldn't claim they were "hacked" by the Russians unless they are able to present evidence as such. This is a radical hypothesis: it would mean that eg John Podesta can shut the fuck up and admit that Obama's cabinet was chosen by Citibank, but also that he may be a little TOO fond of pizza. Republicans? Sorry to break it but they suck too. Have Republicans ever wondered…
/r/MensRights11/01/17 07:31 AM
–

she is being facetious and pretending the patriarchy really exists to make a joke at the expense of man hating feminists say what? No. Just no.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 07:24 AM
–

So long story short is that you are a loser.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 04:19 AM
–

This is a "derp derp" quite argument, in which you agree that losers like yourself are capable of being less than a "real man." Whereas you are a loser, and all that entails.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 04:19 AM
–

You miserable little piece of shit.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:58 AM
–

are you a feminist troll? I honestly can't tell at this point. are you wondering whether you're a pussy? Yes, you're pussy, and use your limited muscle to abuse other men. You know it, and now everybody else knows it as well. You should be ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:35 AM
16

A feminist who studied the issue for ten years came to the same "surprising" conclusion, namely that it is "primarily women" who are "repelled" when men show "chinks in their armor." When you really think about it it's almost unbelievable that feminism is taken seriously as an "academic" discipline at all. Imagine trying to analyze the behavior of two male rams butting heads without reference to female rams. In fact the whole thing is kind of sick. It is female sexual selection along with female…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 10:21 PM
2

Are you aware that feminists in Israel opposed allowing women to be charged with rape because, they claimed, it could lead to false accusations against women? Are you aware that feminists in the UK sent death threats and chased Erin Pizzey out of the country (founder of the first domestic violence shelter for women) when she suggested that men can also be victims of domestic violence? Are you aware that feminists in Canada condemned a billboard by the group CAFE stating that men can also be vict…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:55 PM
31

"Emotional labor." Jesus fucking Christ not this idiocy again. What do feminists mean by this? Women getting upset over trivial bullshit and nagging their husbands? The various hardships of spending their husband's money? Yes, I realize that many women make equal contributions to the household budget and actually support their husbands when he goes through tough times, but let's be honest here. Men have to expend at least as much "emotional labor" in a relationship as women, and judging from who…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 09:37 PM
2

Race, sex AND class play into all politics and theories of power and development. To ignore one on the basis of it being potentially divisive is absurd. And to ignore the long and storied history of elite groups using "divide and conquer" strategies to prevent class struggle is equally absurd. Consider this passage: "The Women's Liberation Movement may be considered as subversive to the New Left and revolutionary movements as they have proven to be a divisive and factionalizing factor.... It cou…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:37 PM
15

Excellent. Women should be publicly shamed when they selfishly try to use their kids as weapons in divorce. The data is now in and it is conclusive: children need fathers. Any woman who tries to seek "primary custody" in opposition to the father's wishes, and unless there is very clear evidence of bad behavior on his part, should be considered a child abuser. NOW should also be rebranded as an organization that supports child abuse. Because that's exactly what they do.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:26 PM
5

Men are finally wising up. They may not be talking about their rights publicly yet due to fear of the feminazis but it's only a matter of time. The Red Pill will open a lot of eyes, both male and female. Feminism's days are numbered. Ironically the mass rejection and debunking of feminist theory is taking place just as they have achieved serious institutional power. Sparks will fly.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 06:26 PM
10

Idiotic review by a feminist white knight. Thankfully he's being torn apart in the comments.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:58 PM
2

Hahaha! "Run away! Run away!" I'm trying to educate you here. Are you so attached to your ideology that you're willing to ignore evidence staring you straight in the face? You're like a religious zealot. Good luck with the whole misandry thing.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:20 PM
2

The majority of the sub is not TrublrInAction style posts. It's not our fault that people on r/all are more likely to upvote goofy shit like this vs. serious men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:02 PM
2

Many of the countries in the Western world and East no longer have national service, meaning that a very large proportion of army recruits are volunteers. You just got through claiming that it was a "privilege" that men and boys were and are forced to fight and die in wars lol. Again, one of the dumbest things I've ever read. You should also be made aware that the vast majority of people killed in genocides are also men and boys. This is why Rwanda was absurdly cited by the UN "gender inequality…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:35 PM
23

"Rape culture" mythology is terrorism against both men and women. If what feminists claimed was true then Western college campuses would be more dangerous than the Congo.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:29 PM
3

The privilege to be able to join the army and be involved in advanced combat situations This much surely rank as one of the stupidest things I've ever read. You're claiming that men and boys being forced by the state to fight and die in wars throughout history was a privilege? LMAO. I wonder why they bothered executing or imprisoning men who refused to fight lol. We should go back and tell those men who had their guts blown out while dying in a rat infested trench during WWI that they were privi…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:09 PM
2

If a movement becomes violent and oppressive, should one stick with it because they believe in the values they once began with? That's a good question and I'm not sure I have an answer. I actually used to consider myself a feminist. It wasn't until I started reading feminist literature that I realized they had men all wrong. They were basically attributing to malice what is better explained by other factors. For example, a great deal of female "oppression" is paternalistic sexism designed with t…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 12:54 PM
6

The "men's rights" agenda doesn't exist in a vacuum and MRA's should be working with feminists to put an end to gender-based discrimination. Sadly I often see misplaced blame laid at feminists/feminism for problems that men face, which would be more properly directed at existing power structures. For example, the overwhelming majority of military casualties being men... not an problem if you have a career alternative to the military, or you can get out of the draft by going to college on your ow…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 08:29 AM
1

Well, feminists could start a campaign to get an equal number of female bomb disposal experts. They aren't. Why?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:48 AM
1

There's another factor you don't mention: empathy. Women have much higher neoteny. This is why when a man gets hit in the balls we laugh, but if a woman gets hit in the vagina we don't.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 07:45 AM
2

lol you're about as alpha as Richard Simmons. Don't worry though, not all men are too pussy to stand up for their rights. Other stronger men and women will do the job for you. Perhaps instead of criticizing them you should show a little gratitude.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 06:50 AM
1

That's because only rich men who can afford good lawyers try to get custody. Poor men don't have a prayer, even if she's a drug addict. A recent documentary called "The Red Pill" goes into this a bit. If what you're saying was true then NOW wouldn't be fighting tooth and nail to prevent shared parenting, even though numerous studies have determined that males are essential to child rearing and that children do much better in shared parenting environments and are much less likely to be abused. Ir…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 06:22 AM
2

I do think we have it pretty easy for the most part. Nah. The suicide rate alone debunks that notion. A man who eg is false accused of domestic violence, kicked out of the house he has spent his life building, can't see his own kids, and is forced to subsidize his wife while she hooks up with some guy who becomes the new "father" does not have it easy. And that sort of thing is a routine occurrence due to feminist law. If you're comfortable being discriminated against that's fine, but don't disp…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 05:18 AM
25

Excellent article by Christina Hoff Sommers. Truly astounding the outrageous lies feminists peddle. But recent government data show that Hispanic and Native American women are now more likely to attend college than white men. Wow. Even I was shocked by this. The problem with viewing "oppression" through the lens of identity is that eventually you're going to end up with new "oppressed" groups. It has already happened in the UK, with poor white boys now the most disadvantaged: http://www.bbc.co.u…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:53 AM
2

Do you mean to say that men are "privileged" for biological reasons but not legally? Or that the biological privileges of being a man outweigh legal discrimination? That would at least be a defendable argument. However claiming, as "privilege theory" asserts, that men in power try to privilege other men at the expense of women is just silly. There is literally zero evidence to support such a claim and a mountain to suggest the opposite.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:41 AM
2

Exactly. So hit the books.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:24 AM
2

Til trying to change laws that discriminate against men and boys is "whining." Somebody has to have the balls to do it, because most men are ironically too scared of looking like a pussy to man up.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:17 AM
2

You're free to your own emotions, but not your own facts.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:15 AM
2

I feel like you irritate the issue by instead of trying to elevate men, you want to cut down women. That definitely isn't my intent. Threads like this that make it to R/all are maddening because most people are completely unaware of laws that negatively affect men and boys. They have only ever heard the feminist pitch. It's great that you support parental surrender. That may become increasingly a non issue in a few years if male birth control ever gets off the ground. It seems to me like most of…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 03:59 AM
1

After reading the comments in my thread I definitely have a chip on my shoulder ;) It's frustrating because every time men try to bring up issues that are important to them they are met with an army of traditionalist male white knights as well as feminists telling them "women have it worse [objectively untrue] so man up and shut up". Unfortunately it's gotten so bad then men really have no choice but to go against their tendency toward stoicism and -- loudly complain. Ironically it will probably…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:22 AM
1

Men are bigger risk takers, it's true. If they want to get laid they have to take some risks. It's just another way that females are privileged.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:11 AM
2

Where is the statistic about which gender is a victim of sexual assault more? Men are. When you take into account prison rape (men are also sentenced to 63 percent longer sentences are twice as likely to be charged with a crime) men are raped more often than women. Combat deaths will of course skew towards men, since for the longest time women couldn't be in combat roles. Lol. Yeah women were lining up to go fight and die in wars. Are you retarded? You're claiming that men and boys being forced …
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:07 AM
3

Perhaps if they were allowed to see their kids and didn't have to subsidize their ex wives they wouldn't kill themselves as often. Check out the stats of men committing suicide after divorce.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:04 AM
3

"Male privilege" is quite possibly the most idiotic concept ever created. Yeah, the sex that has spent all of history working and dying for the other is actually privileged! lol. Here is a good book about the actual privileged sex If you want more stats, go nuts
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:02 AM
5

Are you literally so dense that you didn't read the title? The graphic is designed to debunk the idiotic notion that men are "privileged." There are plenty more stats where this came from.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:00 AM
2

feminism strives for the equality of genders lol, it most certainly does not. For example I'm not aware of any feminist campaigns to redress the gender sentencing gap (men receive 63 percent longer sentences), instead they're trying to eliminate female prisons entirely! And you're wrong: men used to get default custody until feminists changed the law (19th C). Strangely however feminists didn't change the law about men being forced to support their wives under threat of imprisonment, even when s…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:58 AM
2

Nope. SJW's falsely believe that men are "privileged" when the opposite is true. One opinion is rooted in fantasy, the other hard data.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:53 AM
2

Soooo...you think the subject of men dying is funny?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:52 AM
3

Actually in the US men are more likely to be raped than women if we include prison rape. However unlike women they get no pity and are often mocked. Childbirth deaths are also rare nowadays due to advances in medicine by male patriarchal bastards.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:51 AM
7

What are you babbling about? Do you want more stats?
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:48 AM
3

whiny bitching. Lol. You don't realize it but you're basically a slave to your emotions. Try thinking logically about the issue. We currently live in a society where it is claimed that men and boys are "privileged" when the exact opposite is true. What does this lead to? It leads to ever more advantages being given to women to the detriment of your own sex. You want more stats? Here Feminists sometimes talk about "fragile masculinity". Ironically, it applies best to cowards like you who are so s…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:47 AM
4

Who expects that? Other men. Wrong. "What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor." http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/04/messages-of-shame-are-organized-around-gender/275322/ Who is fighting to get women in combat roles in the military? Women. Are women fighting to be conscr…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:41 AM
1

Do you have any idea how many women would live in poverty or be homeless if men weren't working long hours to put roofs over their heads and provide them with social services? Go ahead and look up the differentials in which sex pays more taxes and which sex receives the lions share of social services. Also, when you say that women "earn" less than men you are correct -- women work fewer hours in easier jobs so -- surprise! -- they earn less. This is supposed to be oppression? lol. It's MEN being…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:33 AM
1

We're both free to make the choice. Yes. And you're also "free" not to hand over your wallet if a mugger points a gun at you and demands it. Globally, the most dangerous jobs are performed by men trying to support their families. In many cases men can be imprisoned if they fail to do so. This has a long history going back to "abandonment" laws, which feminists strangely failed to challenge. Regardless of how we look at it, men are certainly not the "privileged" sex. Quite the opposite in fact. S…
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:26 AM
2

showed the stats that favor men as well. Such as? Honestly OP could have made a hundred different posters with similar stats.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:17 AM
1

If I had to guess -- envy. It's certainly not "oppression", so we are forced to come up with alternative explanations. Feminist disinformation (which amounts to a terrorist campaign -- telling women they are constantly under threat from men) obviously doesn't help.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:09 AM
2

Going in hard rarely opens anyone's eyes as it just makes them defensive. If you say so. I've had the opposite experience with women.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 12:26 PM
2

Not just bloodlines. Men perform virtually all essential work. Judgy Bitch wrote a nice essay on the topic. If all men suddenly went on strike civilization would collapse in a manner of days.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 07:37 AM
1

Not just bloodlines. Men perform virtually all essential work. Judgy Bitch wrote a nice essay on the topic. If all men suddenly went on strike civilization would collapse in a manner of days.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 07:37 AM
13

Pretty good video but it's not enough. Saying, "both males and females have advantages and disadvantages" is true in a state of nature. It's true in Saudi Arabia. It would have been true a hundred years ago in the United States. It is not true in the modern western world. Females are given artificial advantage in virtually every sphere, and the statistics prove it. Men don't like to describe themselves as "oppressed", but if we were talking about any other group that's exactly the term we would …
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:32 AM
5

You may be right. The writing is terrible and it's not worth your time. However I think articles like this may be a good thing in the long run. They show people the black, twisted heart of feminism beneath the facade of "equality."
/r/MensRights09/01/17 05:18 AM
1

I've compiled an extensive list below. Might be worth adding a few of the titles to the sidebar "recommended reading" list. Though I assume mods would have to read them first.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:46 AM
19

A Reference book of men's issues is probably your best bet for finding relevant studies. MRRef is more extensive but will require more digging. Videos: The Red Pill (NYA) Everything by Karen Straughan Everything by Janice Fiamengo Books: Is There Anything Good About Men? (full book online) by Roy Baumeister The Myth of Male Power: Why Men are the Disposable Sex by Warren Farrell The Privileged Sex by Martin Van Creveld The Second Sexism: Discrimination Against Men and Boys by David Benetar The F…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:31 AM
1

Terms like "Zionist" and "neocon" don't fit with the others imo. These are real movements, unlike say "misogynist" or "racist" or "rape apologist", words thrown around by feminists and SJW's with wild abandon. If someone calls you a "Zionist" it's probably because you are one, ie you support the idea of a Jewish state. Similarly "neoconservatism" is an actual movement based on the ideas of Leo Strauss. He argued in favor of "perpetual war"; if a population doesn't have an enemy then one should b…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 02:43 AM
11

I don't think she "guaranteed" a war with Iran but her declassified emails certainly show a desire to attack the country: Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted. She also mistakenly thought Russia wouldn't get involved: Some a…
/r/MensRights09/01/17 01:36 AM
34

benevolent sexism? Probably best to avoid that term. It was invented by feminists as a way of recharacterizing female privilege as female oppression. Exhibit A: the fact that men were forced to fight and die in wars throughout history was actually oppression against women because they were "viewed as less capable fighters." I'm sorry, but hurt feelings over women being generally less capable fighters does not compare to having your guts blown out in a trench.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 11:12 PM
1

Sorry, I should have added a /s. I was joking because of the silliness of the topic.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 10:03 PM
3

That's true. But so are dogs. I was surprised to learn that dogs are just as likely to eat their "owners" as cats when the former dies.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 08:15 AM
13

I don't like this "secondary" Inception form of legal punishment where everyone is guilty of everyone else's crimes down to the lowest common denominator. It bloats up the already bloated prison industrial complex, lines the pockets of unscrupulous lawyers and reminds me of men being sent to jail for the crimes of their wives (and yes this did occur -- one of the things we're not taught about in feminist Herstory). There should be such a thing as ethical laziness while leaving room for actual cr…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 07:32 AM
4

Mike Tyson is a cat lover ;) Besides. I do think that cats have more feminine qualities and dogs more masculine qualities. Dogs are loyal to a fault and like to hump everything in sight (even the females are incorrigible when in heat), have a general go get 'em attitude, are bold and courageous, rescue people; raised badly they'll fucking kill you and tear you to shreds. With cats you have to earn their affection, sneaky and manipulative, vain, "naked self-interest", will simply go elsewhere if …
/r/MensRights08/01/17 07:23 AM
9

Gotta keep that prison industrial complex humming. Call me crazy but I don't think the founders of the US would be very pleased that their country imprisons more men than any other country. Land of the free? Not quite. Especially when half of these dudes were just caught with a dime bag of weed. Disgraceful.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 07:13 AM
206

Beautiful quote. About that war thing. The world would be a better place if women were in charge, many people say — or, at the very least, a place with fewer armed conflicts. Psychologist Steven Pinker said so, as did Francis Fukuyama in a 1998 article for Foreign Affairs. There’s just one problem with those arguments: From the end of the 15th century to the start of the 20th, queens were more likely to start wars than their male counterparts. Also, forget starting wars -- what about reconciliat…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 06:29 AM
3

Just another stage in humanity's long march into feline slavery.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 06:11 AM
10

My opinions have changed on this since I discovered the now voluminous research indicating the importance of males in child rearing. A single parent is better than an orphanage, yes (unless the parent is abusive), but I think there should at least be programs designed to make sure kids have access to "big brothers" and "big sisters" ie both male and female influences. It's especially important for men to be supported in such endeavors owing to the dearth of male teachers. Under no circumstances …
/r/MensRights08/01/17 05:59 AM
37

Jesus Fucking Christ. God forbid a woman be held accountable for her actions without blaming some man.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 05:12 AM
7

Hahaha. I knew this post would bring out the cat-haters. I like both animals personally. Dogs are loyal and trainable and fun at the beach but they're needy as fuck and you have to literally pick up their shit. Cats are independent, provide great pest control, are graceful, a good hot water bottle replacement, perform entertaining hijinks, but yes are aloof assholes (part of their charm) and bring in sometimes half-dead animals, including snakes (not part of their charm). Anyway, the "professor"…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 05:08 AM
3

Most articles don't even bother mentioning the huge difference in mortality rates. Imagine my shock.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:25 AM
3

there were rights women lacked. There were also responsibilities women lacked. Strangely feminists were only interested in correcting the disadvantages but not the advantages. To call it "reasonable" is therefore erroneous. It did seem reasonable, I'll admit, but only when viewed through a sentimental/gynocentric lens rooted (ironically) in chivalric gender roles. It's important to remember that most women in eg 19th C American didn't actually view themselves as "oppressed due to gender." Factor…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:20 AM
13

Edit: this turned out a little longer than anticipated... i) Person A argued that ‘misandry’ does not exist, since there is no systemic sexism against men The exact oppose is true. It used to be true in both directions, now it's only true against men and boys. This is easily demonstrated, eg the gender sentencing gap. It is six times larger than the racial sentencing gap. The latter is described as "institutional oppression" of blacks, ergo the same applies to men. Feminists may counter that "we…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 03:50 AM
4

British people will be aware of the "Baby P" case. The wife divorced the husband after they had a few kids. He wanted custody but she got it despite being a drug addict. She hooked up with a borderline retarded Neo-Nazi sadist who she described as "every woman's dream" because he was 6-foot-four and lifted weights. He proceeded to torture her baby boy to death and rape her baby daughter while she covered up the crimes. The torture inflicted on the boy was right out of the middle ages. I won't go…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 01:30 AM
3

This guy is a fucking legend. You can read his full book "Is There Anything Good About Men?" here: https://gendertruce.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/baumeister-roy-is-there-anything-good-about-men.pdf
/r/MensRights07/01/17 11:23 PM
3

Feminism began as a movement of ugly bitter rich white women. Very little has changed. They don't give a flying fuck about working class men (or working class women for that mater); in fact the struggles of working men don't even seem to enter their consciousness at all. They're too busy looking up enviously at the tiny fraction of male billionaires. How else to explain how they could come up with the idiotic notion that the sex that has spent most of history working and dying for the other is a…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 11:11 PM
11

As always, feminists only look at the men at the very top of the pyramid. Edit: On the subject of Trump, I think a lot of people assumed that the accusation was politically motivated due to the timing. No one knows what happened. Either way I think you can make a good case that there really is a "rape culture" when it comes to super-rich and powerful people (male or female) since they can just buy off the victims or false accusers. Even when they're caught red handed they are usually given a sla…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 10:46 PM
12

Lesbians who abuse another women may do so for reasons similar to those that motivate heterosexual male batterers. Lesbians abuse their partners to gain and maintain control Pure conjecture and not consistent with the mountain of studies showing that the vast majority of DV does not correspond to the Duluth fantasy.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:45 PM
33

Go look up the Duluth model. It's a conspiracy theory about "patriarchal aggression" invented by feminists. Current domestic violence laws have been heavily influenced by said theory, which has led to male victims of domestic violence being themselves arrested and charged with DV. Lesbian DV rates put rather a large kink in the theory, but then again so does every study on the subject. In actuality DV is not a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:42 PM
11

Saudi police beat man who used "woman only" ATM machine: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/saudi-religious-police-beat-man-women-atm-article-1.1924954 I won't deny that women have a raw deal in Saudi Arabia but so do the men. It is extremely repressive for both sexes. Unfortunately it's very difficult to get information about the male half of the equation since everything about the subject is written by feminists. I did read that the majority of the labor force (which includes boys) are fore…
/r/MensRights07/01/17 01:33 PM
3

I've actually studied feminist theory in school That was your first mistake lol. The number of feminists that make any sense can literally be counted on one hand. For the most part their theories are easily refuted by statistical data or a basic biology textbook. Men in academia are scared shitless of being targeted by feminists so they mostly stay silent, but make no mistake, the great bulk of feminist theory is unadulterated bovine excrement.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:57 AM
3

Gloria Steinem dated Henry Kissinger lol. On the one hand she condemns men for trying to be dominant, then she spreads her legs for the most dominant male she can find.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:43 AM
3

The difference is that feminists have institutional power whereas MRA's do not.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:36 AM
3

If what you're saying is what I think you are saying about the biological value of "eggs", I hate to break it to you but scientists have been able to create functional artificial eggs using methods such as stem cells. I think the point is that all societies are gynocentric because men have an instinctual impulse to protect women. That is rather at odds with feminist "patriarchy" theory.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:35 AM
6

"Anti-religious sneers are a hallmark of perpetual adolescents." A lot of atheists are pretty juvenile about the whole thing, and I say that as an atheist. "Every man must define his identity against his mother. If he does not, he just falls back into her and is swallowed up." That one's a little weird. I'd have to see the context. "Men know they are sexual exiles. They wander the earth seeking satisfaction, craving and despising, never content. There is nothing in that anguished motion for wome…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 04:27 AM
3

How is she nuts?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 03:44 AM
4

Indeed. Extreme violence by men is considered a natural extension of male behavior, whereas extreme violence by women is considered an unnatural perversion of female behavior (which is "pure" and "nurturing"). Obviously this is not accurate. Women simply use (on average) different forms of violence (emotional violence, proxy violence, targeting weaker people like children, babies and the elderly etc.) due to their inferior physical strength. I also think we tend to forget that one of the reasons…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:54 AM
1

Hi Alison, I was actually quoting Karen. Not sure if it's accurate or if it was just her way of saying "way more men are executed in Saudi Arabia than women". Keep up the great work by the way. Good luck with the lawsuit :)
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:47 AM
2

Good explanation and yes I agree in broad terms. Mainly I object to the fact that the media (and even academia and law enforcement) tends to portray serial killing as a uniquely male phenomenon when female serial killers have been quite common throughout history.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:35 AM
2

Can you elaborate? I haven't actually read her work. One statement of hers I do object to her line that there has never been a female Jack the ripper. There have lots of female Jack the rippers. This website has a ton of data about female serial killers and cruel female leaders throughout history: http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/
/r/MensRights06/01/17 01:22 AM
1

Yeah I hear ya. Someone should make a new (and more extensive) infographic without the fake quotes. Feminists have said enough awful things, there is no need to embellish.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:25 PM
1

Yeah I'm not blaming you, just pointing out that the article only succeeds in debunking a couple of the quotes.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:14 PM
2

Males and females each have their own privileges. That's one of the concepts which the true feminism movement (NOT THE TUMBLR WHINY BULLSHIT "FEMINISM") addresses. Huh? I've never heard of a feminist talking about female privilege. In fact they have a tendency to laughably claim that female privilege is actually sexism against women ("benevolent sexism"). This leads to utter absurdities like male conscription and androcide being interpreted as "women being viewed as less capable fighters." Well …
/r/MensRights05/01/17 11:01 PM
5

About 50 men are stoned to death in Saudi Arabia for every woman (before you say they deserve it, "crimes" that are punishable by death include "sorcery"). Will the Saudi feminists attempt to redress the capital punishment gap, or will they follow in the footsteps of their Western sisters and only look at areas where females are disadvantaged? We all know the answer to that. Also, it's anecdotal I realize but I have a friend who teaches English in Saudi Arabia. He said the "women rule the roost"…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 10:34 PM
3

That page you linked is utter trash. It succeeds in debunking one or two of the quotes, but the rest is just making excuses. Quotes from works of fiction, works of humor, and different time periods. The "works of fiction" excuse is fine (or at least would be if the views of the fictional man-haters were actually different from the authors; Dworkin's scholarly work was simply less colorful in its misandry). However the "I was just joking" and "it was a different time period" excuses fall flat. Mo…
/r/MensRights05/01/17 10:03 PM
5

Nice to see feminists increasingly on the defensive. It's become so bad that they are literally trying to come up with a new name for the "bad feminists" who are supposedly markedly different from the "good feminists." Good luck with that. As a society, we should be grateful for, awed, and humbled by what feminism has accomplished. lol. Should we? One would be hard pressed to find a single thing accomplished by feminists that isn't outweighed by the negatives. Even the stuff that seems positive …
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:24 AM
2

By being a woman she has in the college applications and job placement at the least. That's possible I suppose. But she also had excellent grades, a medical background and a ton of volunteer work on her resume. I can't prove it but I really don't think she was given any special treatment, even though I concede that women very often are.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:44 AM
2

Heh. I personally don't think she received any preferential treatment, although many women do. As mentioned we were not born rich. She spent ten years working at the Cancer society and paid for med school herself. She was probably one of the least privileged people in her class, most of whom came from wealthy families.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:19 AM
3

Indeed.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:11 AM
3

The first insult should have been enough. You should have enough self-respect to not take shit like that.Plus who's gonna listen to someone who has no respect for themselves? Well, she was red faced and very angry as I was challenging her worldview. She insulted me, I insulted her back, then I left. She apologized quickly afterwards, and we're fine now, though I haven't brought up the subject again. I probably will at some point via email.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 12:11 AM
3

6 times is still a helluva lot. Thanks for your research.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:57 PM
6

Important post. Did you say previously that boys from fatherless homes are 8x more likely to become rapists? Paging /u/girlwriteswhat She should be aware of this. I would be curious about the percentages of "mass shooters" that come from fatherless homes. Feminists blame them on "toxic masculinity" but perhaps it is a lack of masculinity that encourages such carnage. I've also heard Karen mention that the majority of rapists were sexually abused by their mothers. Would be interesting to see that…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:34 PM
7

Yes good points. In future I will try to interject some emotional arguments.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:53 PM
6

Yes my family is very down to earth and supportive, I'm very lucky in that regard. I tend to get angry, freeze, forget what I was talking about, stutter, argue my way into silly traps that I know are dead ends. Well, it's still great that you're willing to stand up for your rights despite potential opprobrium. Practice makes perfect. Honestly I think the opposition to men's rights is in the process of breaking down. That British MP who talks about the criminal sentencing gap is a sign of the tim…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:49 PM
13

Thanks for the recommendations, which are good ones. You'll be happy to learn that my mother was much more receptive, and even brought up her own argument in support of men, namely that the media constantly portrays male villains and male violence even though the vast majority of men are kind, decent people. I also discussed the topic with a friend who is literally writing a book about the supposed relationship between "patriarchal religion" and war. He was surprised when I pointed out that Quee…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:13 PM
1

Yes I completely agree with you there. The vast majority of women (like men) are decent people, so there's no need to go through life as a misogynist due to the feminist movement. I do think that men seem to have more empathy towards the opposite sex than vice versa (I mean just look at that clip from the View where women celebrated a man being castrated). In all likelihood this derives from biological factors (neoteny, females being the bottleneck for reproduction etc.), though feminism certain…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:38 PM
4

Awesome. You should make a separate post on this sub as well. It's an amazing statistic because it simultaneously debunks feminist theories about both rape and the "patriarchal family."
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:27 PM
4

You are conflating two different issues. The claim that "Only a very few feminists — not the same as women — have the 'cultural and legal power' you're talking about" is plainly incorrect, as I demonstrated. They do indeed have said power. Whether they use it or not is another question. Men are capable of physically beating and raping women left and right, but there is no risk of that on any mass or organized scale either. I agree that the odds of a woman falsely accusing you of rape are low. Ho…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:21 PM
3

You need to make a separate post for that. It's an incredible statistic that should be widely known.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:08 PM
3

Only a very few feminists — not the same as women — have the "cultural and legal power" you're talking about. That's not true. On any given a day a woman can accuse you of sexual assault and destroy your life. Look what happened to that poor guy in London. He was just walking through a subway station and some crazy bitch (an actress from 'Game of Thrones') accused him of assault. His life turned into a Kafka-esque nightmare. Karen Straughan has spoken eloquently about what she could have done to…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:03 PM
6

"The patriarchy" doesn't exist. It's a shit tier conspiracy theory that isn't supported by empirical evidence.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:44 PM
8

The MRAs’ plea for gender equality will fall on deaf ears because neither feminists nor conservatives actually want it. But most importantly, one of the central MRA claims—that men are “forced” to continue in their historic protector and provider roles by taking on dangerous work, or otherwise sacrificing themselves for their family and society—is simply wrong. Nobody is in fact forcing men to do that. Wut? Has this guy never heard of alimony and child support? Men routinely go to prison if they…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:39 PM
2

Ah, apologies. When posts on here get to r/all there is often an influx of feminists, so I wasn't sure.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:28 AM
3

I wouldn't waste more of your time, to be honest. Feminists have been creating "men's groups" for a long time and they invariably collapse. MensLib will go the same way. Sooner or later even the most chivalrous lad figures out that in feminist theology, man is the devil and woman is the saint. This is a toxic way of viewing gender. Ironically I keep seeing articles by feminists castigating their male "allies" for this or that supposed transgression. The latest fad is stuff like "Why I will never…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 12:37 AM
5

Or should menslib's description read "Menslib is a place for helping men, but not when feminism is hurting them"? As it is now, I think that is a very apt description of menslib. I disagree. Even the supposedly "helpful" things feminists (like the MensLib crew) advocate for men are actually harmful. "Expressing your feelings like women" is exhibit A. It might work for a while when you're a boy but as soon as puberty hits the empathy gap between the sexes becomes the size of the grand canyon. Als…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:41 PM
5

You are exactly right. Feminist power theory is based on the idea that since there are more men in overt positions of power than women, then men as a "class" somehow benefit. This is upside down. Men in power have never attempted to privilege middle and lower class men, quite the opposite. Their theory makes no sense from either a biological or class based perspective. Men in power DO like appearing chivalrous, however, and that's why feminism has been such a smashing success. Ironically it reli…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:27 PM
6

FWIW I think the feminists who protested The Red Pill movie did so because they were ignorant and misinformed. That's no excuse. If you're going to call people "misogynists" and "rape apologists" and attempt to ruin their lives at least have the courtesy to watch the fucking film first.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:23 PM
2

I'm married dipshit. It just so happens that I care about the world my son inherits. Also, I find it ironic that a white knight like yourself accuses other people of placing women on a pedestal (not that "you must be a virgin!" is actually an argument). Have some self-respect for Christ's sake. If you're a woman you should be doubly ashamed of yourself.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:21 PM
4

Technically most American men had the right to vote after the civil war. However, poll taxes, literacy tests and other measures were used to disenfranchise African Americans and other minorities, especially the Irish. So voting "rights" were still largely based on property ownership. In Europe they were overtly based on property until after WWI, when leaders decided that it was wrong for men to have to die for their country and not be allowed to vote. Over half of the men who died in the war did…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:32 PM
12

I resent that. HeForShe is a groundbreaking campaign that fundamentally challenges gender roles by suggesting that women are weaklings in need of help and that men should be chivalrous toward m'ladies.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:13 PM
11

The feminists who have all the power and craft policy and laws are not representative of feminism. Feminism is about people who have a wish-washy view of "equality" who haven't studied the history of feminism and yearn for a better world while sipping lattes ;)
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:19 AM
19

What you say is partly true: eg Republican governors have vetoed alimony reform bills as well as bills that would provide relief for men behind in child support payments who CAN'T FIND A FUCKING A JOB BECAUSE IT'S BEEN SENT TO CHINA OR MEXICO but who are sent to prison if they fail to cough up the cash for baby Mama even when they're scarcely allowed to see their own kids. All the better for a go straight to jail card so the poor sap can work for Chinese style wages here at home. The problem wit…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 11:07 AM
33

Okay. Less than a century then. Although some programs continued until the 1970's, the philosophy fell out of favor after WWII, and it was mainly during the early 20th C that most sterilization programs occurred. Unless I'm mistaken. There used to a be a Eugenics department in every major university, just as there is now a "Gender Studies" (aka hatred of men and maleness studies) department in every major university. Speaking of feminism and eugenics, quite a few of those first wave feminists th…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:03 AM
2

Seriously. He's what -- five pounds overweight in the gut? Is every man supposed to look like Gerard Butler in 300?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:47 AM
46

Soooo let me get this straight. Men are several times more likely to profiled for criminal behavior, about twice as likely to be charged with a crime, and receive 63% longer sentences. Now, instead of attempting to redress this grievous institutional discrimination -- which is six times larger than the racial sentencing gap in the US -- feminists want to make it worse. Because vagina. Yay equality!
/r/MensRights03/01/17 07:42 AM
6

Agreed. There is nothing in this article that is anti-male.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:57 AM
3

Very interesting counterpoint to the claim by feminists that 'patriarchal religion' regards women as inferior beings. Thanks for the post.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:52 AM
21

Pretty good article but the author still couldn't help herself: we destroy the family because girls and women are not interested in marrying into “failure to launch” boys and men. It leads to women asking themselves, “If I’m going to have a child, why should I marry one more child?” So many women end up not being married. Um, okay? That's one way to describe hypergamy I guess. Men don't view women as "children" if they make less money, especially in this economy. Perhaps, if women insist on enga…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 05:34 AM
661

Fucking appalling. This is another clear example of feminists not only failing to help men, but taking direct action to prevent men and boys from receiving help. I used to think MRA's were exaggerating when they described feminism as a "hate movement." No more. The feminist movement should be recognized for what it is: the most wildly successful hate campaign in the history of the modern world. At least eugenics only lasted a few decades.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:27 AM
1

Ah okay.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:59 AM
3

I don't see the point in archiving pages when they are pro men's rights and/or allow comments. It is the anti-male/no-comment- section bilge that should be robbed of ad revenue.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:38 AM
3

I often send these videos to feminists because this guy is not an "MRA", just a sensible historian.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:27 AM
9

MRA's are continually maligned for being "rape apologists" just for questioning "rape culture" hysteria and demanding due process rights for men. It shouldn't be surprising therefore that they are reluctant to take on such an explosive claim. However, I agree with you. This deserves attention. When you consider that a study of the "epidemic" of "date rape" that occurred during the 80's determined that ZERO percent of these "victims" had actually had their drinks spiked -- they just drank too muc…
/r/MensRights02/01/17 09:47 PM
12

Right. The most powerful people in the feminist movement act as a "monolithic entity" to prevent equal rights between men and women. Coffee Shop "feminists" who know nothing about their movement and have some sort of hazy idea about the Suffragettes play zero role beyond enabling the man haters. That's why it's fair to characterize the feminist movement as I have.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:22 PM
7

You need to stop "thinking" with your emotions and simply look at the facts. There's very little in this thread by MRA's based on opinion. We're talking about empirical evidence.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:14 PM
3

You'll have to elaborate. I'm not seeing it.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:12 PM
5

I thought you wanted equality? Tsk tsk.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 02:00 PM
3

Sure. Feminists squabble about degrees of man-hatred. What's your point?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:59 PM
8

I suppose. On the other hand the Nazis didn't portray themselves as "bad guys out to kill people." I'm sure their definition of fascism was quite pleasant sounding. MRA's look at feminist theory and action, not dictionary definitions. Yet even the definition is flawed, because it doesn't include the word responsibility. Equal rights yes, equal responsibilities no. I still won't allow the equal rights claim, however, since feminists express no significant concern about equal rights either (genita…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:58 PM
6

a class in australia? Really? Do you have some sort of bigotry against Australians? What the hell? The rest of your post is too rambling to make sense of.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:35 PM
10

So? Those actions are not mantras of feminism as a whole Sigh. Look up the Duluth model. You have a lot to learn about feminism and "patriarchy theory."
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:31 PM
6

She didn't say masculinity is toxic. You may or may not be aware that Victoria (Australia) has mandated courses about "toxic masculinity" that will be taught to children as young as five. Now, I do have one memory from when I was about five (seeing a cat for the first time) but being that I wasn't Mozart I don't think I would have had the capability to understand concepts like "toxic masculinity" -- even if they did make sense to full grown adults. Evidently the vast majority of the population c…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:23 PM
6

Don't forget "bro". Feminists managed to turn the "brother" word used between close male friends -- bonds that have protected women throughout history -- and turn it into a snarky joke. Not a modicum of thanks or respect. "Brogrammer." "Brocialist" etc.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:04 PM
6

I've never met an MRA who opposes women's rights. But every feminist I've met opposes men's rights. They openly say so.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 11:56 AM
12

The Duluth model and "primary aggressor" laws were created by feminists to marginalize male victims of domestic violence. As a result, many victimized men are themselves arrested for DV. Feminists have a long tradition of opposing MRA's on this subject. Thus, the image in OP is not a non-sequitor.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 08:41 AM
15

Also, have you considered that having a male DV shelter could combat female victims as well? If a woman is abusing her man, he has no recourse due to social pressures and discrimination in the legal system that will usually consider him the abuser if his spouse has so much as a bruise on her body. The abuse will go on until he's had enough, and then he'll snap and kill his spouse. Excellent point.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 08:27 AM
7

a non-sequitor Go look up the Duluth model.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 08:25 AM
14

Are you a woman perchance? I find it extremely fascinating that some women claim to be such experts on masculinity when they've never lived as a man. Apparently the vast majority of men disagree with you. They don't think their masculinity is "toxic" and they have no interest in going around crying. They want fair laws and economic opportunity. It is an extremely nasty thing to be telling boys to act like girls. You are abusing them by doing so. As soon as they reach puberty the neoteny that cau…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 08:21 AM
22

I think "the vast majority" is an overstatement 4 percent of men in the UK consider themselves feminists. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/only-7-per-cent-of-britons-consider-themselves-feminists/ "female sexual selection is perhaps the most important factor in driving male behavior" is a ridiculous oversimplification, and frankly a little insulting to men. It is women who determine how masculinity is expressed. “It is within their power of selective neglect to produce a sex ration heavily …
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:55 AM
30

That merely shows how safe women are. Men are much more likely to be murdered, killed on the job, die of premature heart attacks, commit suicide etc.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:39 AM
13

" The mask you live in" It's a feminist hate film that grotesquely targets boys and labels masculinity "toxic." The Red Pill is excellent. It essentially debunks feminist theory, which is why feminists are trying to get it banned.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:38 AM
24

Monarchy and oligarchy follow similar constructions, and aren't meant to malign anyone. Men sure seem to have a problem with it, or at least the vast majority of them. Given the notorious feminist predilection for policing language (fireman needs to be fireperson etc) perhaps you should listen to what men are telling you and use another word? It's an especially odd word to use when female sexual selection is perhaps the most important factor in determining male behavior. Now that women control m…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:36 AM
27

Egalitarianism supports the men's rights movement, as well as women's rights. Feminism is an ideology that demonizes men, lobbies for discrimination against men, and opposes men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:23 AM
43

enforcement was hardly followed through with. Sure it was. Countless men were literally tied up and whipped if not lynched outright if it was revealed they were beating their wives. Violence Against Women Acts that had marked benefits on the reporting of DV. Perhaps we need a violence against men act. More than just MRAs have advocated for men here. Feminists certainly have not. They're the ones who paint DV as a gendered issue. The laws on this were more progressive hundreds of years ago lol. T…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:11 AM
11

This isn't the first time this sort of thing has happened. The feminist group NOW opposes educating women about fertility: "Back in 2001, the ASRM devoted a six-figure sum to a fertility awareness campaign, whose goal was to show the effects of age, obesity, smoking and sexually transmitted diseases on fertility. Surprisingly, the US National Organization for Women (NOW) came out against it. ‘Certainly women are well aware of the so-called biological clock. And I don’t think that we need any mor…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:06 AM
100

The Duluth Model is widely being done away with. Thanks to MRA's, domestic violence against men is finally being recognized despite decades of feminist opposition. Unfortunately only a tiny, tiny fraction of the resources devoted to the issue are going to male victims. Again, this is due to feminist lobbying. Women lacked the societal standing thus lacked the ability to get out of abusive situations. That's feminist revisionist history. "In America, there have been laws against wife beating sinc…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:58 AM
40

Men popularly being viewed as unable to be victims of domestic abuse is definitely a result of patriarchal conditioning. Nope. If you go back eg to colonial Virginia there were laws on the books that prohibited men from striking their wives and wives from striking their husbands. Feminists came along and created the Duluth model, which portrays DV as a patriarchal conspiracy even though it is not a gendered issue. The Duluth model is the dominant model in every Western country. Its result is tha…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:48 AM
15

There are about 1000x times more dog shelters than shelters for battered man. Good to see that your group is an exception to the rule.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:38 AM
11

See post below. It explains why this is very much an issue about feminism. DV shelters, Duluth model etc.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:36 AM
31

Nope. Feminists believe in patriarchy, which is the conspiracy theory that men as a class oppress women as a class. They oppose men's rights. Egalitarians support both WRA's and MRA's.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:36 AM
164

Feminists fought against allowing a male domestic violence shelter in Canada (see Earl Silverman). They teach the "Duluth model" which presents domestic violence as a patriarchal conspiracy. This means that male DV victims are often themselves arrested in disputes. In Australia, the feminist White Ribbon campaign doesn't even recognize male victims. In the UK, feminists harassed and sent death threats to Erin Pizzey -- who founded the first women's DV shelter -- when she realized that DV wasn't …
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:34 AM
20

Actually, studies now demonstrate that males are absolutely crucial to child rearing, including in early child development. Feminists assumed that males were only needed for their wallets. The result is an epidemic of single mother homes, and corresponding societal decay. What is the greatest predictor of juvenile crime? (We’re talking about humans here!) Answer: Fatherlessness. The one human being most capable of curbing the antisocial aggression of a boy is his biological father. The percentag…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:38 AM
14

“The MRM has never even pretended to give a shit about non-upper middle class straight white cisgender men unless they think they can use us to bash feminism. It’s the sum of all hate groups,” reads one anti-MRA Reddit thread. Lol. The largest MRM is in India. Article is trash.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:43 AM
3

Interesting. I still think it should be tried. Clementine Ford for example is an Ozzie feminist who has made repeated hateful comments about men and boys.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:14 AM
9

What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor. "Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed to fall apart." Ironically, she explained, men are often pressured to open up a…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:30 AM
9

I noticed above you wrote "yeah only from men" about the tendency of enforcing gender roles. This is backwards: What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor. "Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:25 AM
15

Actually a lot of history's biggest bad asses loved cats. What a weird article.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 01:09 AM
21

Haven't seen any studies but it would certainly comport with my own experiences as a boy. The bigger issue is that natural boyish behavior is regarded as deviant. Girls are naturally more docile, and their transgressions tend to be more sneaky than overt.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:02 AM
5

Wikipedia is a lost cause. Great site if you want to see a list of episodes from a TV show you like but if it's a controversial subject forget about it.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:59 AM
9

men's rights space MRA's don't believe in safe spaces. We encourage dialogue and fact checking. feature length feminist films I've watched several, including Mask You Live In. Essentially hate propaganda against men and boys. The next time you watch such a movie, imagine that they're not talking about men but black people or "black culture." Seriously just try it.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:54 AM
9

Yep. The script is exactly the same every time. Feminists make hateful statements about men and boys, people criticize them, then they claimed they received "rape and death threats." No evidence is provided. They apparently don't feel threatened enough to call the police. White knights in the media come running to protect the poor damsels in distress. This theater owner is the same. I reckon that 90% of the emails were "you should be ashamed of yourself" etc. Another 10% "you're a fucking douche…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:49 AM
5

Not a fan of Molyneux generally but this is some serious truth right here.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 10:32 PM
8

Hughes was convicted in the 2003 death of a 1-year-old who was tortured in her home and died, and sentenced to 18 months in prison and four years of supervision. What the everloving fuck!? Feminists constantly use children as a shield. Women and children. They don't give a flying fuck about children. If they did they wouldn't portray domestic violence as a patriarchical conspiracy, they would support shared parenting, and they would be demanding parity in criminal justice sentencing rather than …
/r/MensRights04/12/16 10:26 PM
10

Peter Lloyd vs. 3 feminists lol. He did a terrific job. Audience comments are interesting. The feminists just can't help themselves, eg trotting out the old canard that "women attempt suicide more often!" They seem to have a borderline pathological need to view themselves as victims. I think it's pretty clear at this point that males have about a thousand times more empathy toward females than vice versa. If any of this grotesque treatment was being meted out against females, men would be united…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:24 AM
3

Karen Straughan, Janice Fiemengo, Alison Tiemen, Judgy Bitch, Paul Nathanson. That's a helluva fucking line up.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 03:00 AM
9

I'm starting to think EverdayFeminism is run by MRA's. Sure these people are trolling?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 07:38 PM
14

And therefore the world.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 07:35 PM
1

Wow. This one's a game changer.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:18 PM
171

Sickening. I've seen the film and it gives feminists a completely fair shake. The problem is that, as the film shows, they're wrong about practically everything. Feminists hate men. There's no denying it anymore. Here is a film that does nothing more than present men's issues in a fair way and encourages compassion for men and boys. Feminists don't want you to see it. Why?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 05:16 PM
20

That's good stuff. Next time save that tear and sell it under "male finally recognizes pig-headed ways, oppression". They'd buy THAT for a dollar :)
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:20 AM
7

I'm a chocoholic, except for booze!
/r/MensRights01/12/16 11:52 PM
22

It would help if these "feminists" could agree on some sort of unifying message beyond "everything is the fault of men." Saying "please, cry!" and "don't fucking cry or I'll give you something to cry about!" are rather contradictory messages for us poor hapless men-beast patriarchs, wouldn't ya say?
/r/MensRights01/12/16 11:46 PM
33

e.g. employment law Care to elaborate? I'm sorry but I'm just not seeing the "balance" here. On the one hand we have 97% of combat fatalities, 81% of all war deaths, 93% of workplace deaths, 94% of suicides, 70% of the homeless. Baby boys can have their genitals mutilated. Boys are being drugged with Ritalin and disadvantaged in a gynocentric education system, men lose custody in 84% of divorce cases, are sentenced to 63% longer sentences (THAT is "institutional oppression", not being fucking ca…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 11:06 PM
7

Shouldn't you be thankful so many leftists are coming around? Do you blame every conservative for the Dick Cheney administration and the bombing of Iraq? You'll see that most of the leftists posting here agree that feminism is a big problem on the left. It's not something that can be fixed overnight. You should be supporting the leftists who support your cause. That's what leftists did during the Iraq war when people like Pat Buchanan and other paleoconservatives opposed the neocons: they tried …
/r/MensRights01/12/16 10:54 PM
12

I feel exactly like you do. It's not an enviable position to be an anti-capitalist who also rejects feminism and SJW authoritarian bullshit. Subs like LateStageCapitalism and r/socialism and even r/anarchism are actually feminist subs that just so happen to dabble in leftist ideas. Feminism is their religion. You can go there and criticize socialism all you want, you will receive healthy debate. Criticize feminism? Down comes the ban hammer. Instead of addressing any of the relevant issues they …
/r/MensRights01/12/16 10:46 PM
28

Indeed. The whole thing is really quite horrifying if you step back and look at it. It's intraspecies dysfunction on an epic scale.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:31 PM
3

Are you now suggesting that Hitler was a communist? If your argument is that communism and fascism end up with similar results regardless of supposed intent then I agree. That's why a simple left/right axis is inadequate to explain political systems. At least four quadrants are required.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:23 PM
25

Relax, no one outside of Reddit has ever heard of the red pill sub. It refers to the Matrix. men are having some issues neglected, not being systematically poisoned. Watch the film for yourself. You may be surprised just how bad it's gotten.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:16 PM
94

Quite a sinister movement if you ask me. It takes advantage of the biological impulse of men to protect and serve women (and the in-group bias that women have toward their own sex) in order to create endless new heights of female privilege and male disposability. Strangely however this is not making women happy. Polls show women are unhappier than they have ever been. Why wouldn't they be? Non-rich people have never been able to "have it all". The average woman has effectively doubled her worklo…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:14 PM
360

Ironically the largest men's rights movement is in India. Also, I wish feminists would make up their bloody minds. One day it's "men need to learn how to cry! Toxic masculinity!" then the next it's "lol whiny crybaby drinks from male tears mug."
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:02 PM
16

Hillary is about as left wing as Genghis Khan. I suppose it depends how we define the term. If "left wing" means blathering on about feminism and what pronouns people should use and transgender bathrooms while serving the billionaires class and bombing people then I suppose she is a leftist. The left used to stress class issues and imperialism. Somewhere along the line it was co-opted.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 08:41 PM
1

Great post, but not sure I agree with this: but only if you're Muslim. Have you seen what orthodox jews get up to? It's not that different.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:58 PM
11

Nazis when fascist ideology is on the left of the political spectrum lol. That must be why the first groups fascists in both Germany and Italy targeted were labor unions, followed by socialists and anarchists. Or why Franco went to literal war inside his own country against socialists and anarchists. What history books are you right wingers reading!?
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:46 PM
9

doesn't mean I hate women, think they are inferior or wish ill on them nor do I think they are all out to get us. Who the hell said that?
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:40 PM
3

There's a set OUTCOME that's deemed to be desired, and so the system is forced by legislative mandate into producing that outcome. Sooo...similar to the entire history of capitalism then. Desired outcome make rich richer and poor poorer. Steal land. Establish monopolies. Control the state. Destroy unions. Fund right wing think tanks. Etc.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:39 PM
15

The feminist movement in the US was started by wealthy Christian women. During the second wave it was given massive financial support by the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, displacing traditional class based analysis (quite a brilliant trick by the capitalists). Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA. Today, feminism is sponsored by the likes of JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs. Blaming the current situation on some sort of borg like "left" is simplistic at best. Besides, most right wingers have shown t…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:35 PM
17

There's a pretty even split here. Unfortunately the righties can't go five minutes without blaming everything on an all encompassing "left." The criticism is partly warranted since feminism has become a dominant ideology on what passes for the left in the US.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:29 PM
19

Don't make it a pissing contest, especially not when the most atrocious free speech violations have happened in far left states like China and the USSR Wait, didn't you just say not to make it a pissing contest? You may want to check out the history of US backed far right dictatorships in countries like Indonesia and Guatemala by way of comparison. The enemy should be authoritarianism of any stripe, whether classified as "left" or "right".
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:27 PM
17

prohibit them from working Women have never been "prohibited from working." This may come as a shock but work is generally not considered an enjoyable activity for the vast majority of the population who don't get to have careers. This is probably why polls show that the "new American dream" for women is to become a housewife.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 06:46 PM
19

some feminists are blind to the plight of some social issues that target men They are certainly not "blind" to the plight of men. They actively work to increase the plight of men. Have you seen the film yet? It discusses feminists in positions of power fiercely opposing equality between the sexes on numerous issues including domestic violence laws and custody laws. Also, MRA's are not primarily concerned with "social" issues but institutional oppression against men and boys, some of it (though n…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 06:32 PM
30

When women didn't have the vote? Women were not and are not subject to the same civil obligations as men. Even today, the "right" for men to vote is conditional. He must be willing to die in wars or face imprisonment or execution. If first wave feminists wanted "equality" they should have stipulated that a women's right to be vote also be conditional -- that they be conscripted into war or that conscription should be ended. What did first wave feminists do instead? They supported the "white feat…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 06:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter