TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

MelissaMiranti Archive

View 6 posts and 3,503 comments by MelissaMiranti on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,503 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

No, I fundamentally understand that you're trying to apply things you've seen to entire demographics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 04:18 PM
7

"Lived experience" is the same thing as "perception."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 04:02 PM
5

And, once again, that's your perception of them. Do you know what "perception" means? And do you know why it's wrong to hate people for things they didn't choose? I'm not gaslighting you, I'm using words properly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 03:47 PM
9

Developing a hatred for an entire group of people based on your perception of them is wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 03:36 PM
3

The point isn't about the man's pleasure, I'm saying, since that's basically never the point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 03:33 PM
11

You were hating "millennial and Gen z women" in your comment. They did not choose either of those things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 03:32 PM
7

Yeah, the fear is that they're "secretly gay" or that bi people can't control themselves and definitely will cheat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 03:19 PM
8

It's competition, yes, but I don't think it's about "pleasing" men. Its more about stereotypes of gay men being uncontrollable animals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 03:08 PM
8

How so? I'm curious what you mean, and would like more information.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 02:58 PM
16

Please don't. It's not okay to hate people for things they can't choose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 02:56 PM
17

No, you see, it's an epidemic of Violins Against Women. Men should need a license to...walk a trail. Or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 10:56 PM
37

Hang on, I was told you could break up with someone anywhere, anytime, for any reason. What if these guys Got The Ick? You're not entitled to his physical labor in helping you walk yourself back home if he says no. You're a grown ass woman, walk yourself down the mountain instead of crying about it. /s but really only a little. I have sympathy for the people who were left unprepared in the middle of a dangerous climb or hike, and that's about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 09:54 PM
2

Ah, I see what you mean. Yeah, it's a weird kind of conformity that must be observed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 03:47 PM
1

the only thing that actually matters is the Q, I'm not sure what that means, would you mind elaborating?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 03:43 PM
40

Yeah, there's a lot of hostility towards men who are "only" gay in queer spaces, as if gay men weren't one of the most persecuted parts of the entire community forever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 06:30 PM
9

Ah they be hitting that bi-cycle hard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 06:18 PM
19

Yeah, I've seen that happen before. They wanted everyone to follow certain patterns that they dictated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 06:15 PM
0

Hilarious how they're mandating gender-affirming treatment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 03:13 PM
23

Just about every time there's a clash of civilizations, there's propaganda about How They Treat Their Women. It's been used as a rallying cry for millennia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 03:10 PM
77

I've noticed that bi men have to be very performative in certain spaces in order to be accepted. Otherwise it's easy for them to be lumped in as just another Straight Man. But this performativity makes him lumped in as a Gay Man, and is thus stained by the sin of male sexuality, making him ineligible for heterosexual relationships. It's this idea that male sexuality is inherently corruptive, demeaning, staining the soul of whoever it gets pointed at, that is so much of this stigma against bi men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/26 03:08 PM
31

We do have capitalist oligarchy with sexist elements, but it's definitely not a "patriarchy" as feminists claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/26 10:44 PM
34

Look at "made to penetrate" rather than "rape" since they use a sexist definition of rape made specifically to exclude male victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 11:24 PM
33

That defines rape as the penetration of the victim, which excludes basically all female perpetrators of rape against male victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 11:12 PM
20

CDC numbers from the various NISVS surveys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 11:11 PM
1

I don't have to yield an inch to you on anything until you can find real information.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 10:50 PM
22

Do you call out everyone ever who says anything? I do it when I can. Like you, here, now, when you pretended that women don't do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 10:40 PM
28

You're distracting from your own generalization that "only men say it" by deflecting. And your response makes no sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 10:35 PM
1

Interesting how you're twisting and turning to minimize conscription as an issue when it so obviously is a huge one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 10:31 PM
-1

Were any of the countries listed as not having conscription incorrect? Find me sources that aren't trash and maybe I'll have a look.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 10:29 PM
22

Maybe you shouldn't generalize rather than distracting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 09:44 PM
20

I've seen women say it too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 09:38 PM
29

The vast majority of sexual assault and rape done to male victims is done by female perpetrators. It's about 90% if I remember correctly, and I think that number is soft.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 09:37 PM
2

Even countries without armies can benefit from defense agreements with countries that have active or dormant conscription.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 09:34 PM
5

You need to prove that with a real source of information.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 04:32 PM
6

I'm trashing the answer because the source cannot be trusted to know what is and isn't real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 04:20 PM
8

Are you seriously using that trash to hallucinate an answer?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 01:23 PM
25

Conscription is a universal issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 03:26 AM
11

Avoid generalizations on the basis of immutable characteristics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 03:08 PM
3

Misandry has been prevalent in feminism since the very beginning, and there was no point in time when feminists bothered to tamp down their hatred.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/26 09:10 PM
5

Why would they be interested in fixing a problem? Equality? What's that? They're explicitly not egalitarians, they're feminists. That means that when women and girls are ahead of men and boys, that's a good thing, and the gap should be increased. That's why feminists want to remove Title IX now that young men might benefit from it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/26 08:57 PM
1

Democrats are liberals, which means they serve corporatist interests. Get it right, and drop the sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/26 06:00 PM
1

https://msmagazine.com/2010/03/07/australias-war-on-small-breasts-2/ Pretty much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/26 02:42 AM
3

You're making several assumptions which can only be driven by idiotic hatred. Edit: Oh he big mad now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 02:06 AM
3

You're just talking without any meaning to cover up the fact that all you're doing is advocating against freedom of association like a fascist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 01:49 AM
40

We get a lot of concern trolls around here who question if we're really left wing because apparently wanting men to have the full set of rights is right wing to some people. Do you mean that, or do you mean something else? If you want a discussion, that's what the discussion is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 01:00 AM
1

And my point was that said indicators are just a bad way of doing things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 11:27 PM
1

This is as good faith as reactionaries who cry about the destruction of civilization deserve.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 11:27 PM
1

You wrote a bad sentence, trying to get me to prove your point for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 06:24 PM
1

Where, because this is the last quote I see from you. Feel free to check it yourself though! If you think it's a stereotype, then show that higher numbers of sexual parterns is a stereotype of substance abuse and mental health issues that cause poor impulse control rather than a correlation substance abuse and mental health issues that cause poor impulse control rather than a correlation mental health issues that cause poor impulse control that cause poor cause Do you see it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 06:14 PM
1

My last quote of you says causation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 06:03 PM
0

You said causation right in your comment. I quoted you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 04:46 PM
1

And I told you to prove causation, which you said in the text from you I quoted, but you didn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 04:39 PM
1

Lay out precisely what you're asking for proof of.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:59 PM
4

"Destroying civilization" is such an alarmist overreaction that I wonder if you're doing a comedy bit. Oh no, some people like having sex! Surely that's what's putting greenhouse gases into the atmosphere!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:41 PM
0

Prove it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:39 PM
-4

Yeah, it really does seem to me like some people want to shame some women for liking sex. This is not something we should be caring about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:38 PM
1

If you think it's a stereotype, then show that higher numbers of sexual parterns is a stereotype of substance abuse and mental health issues that cause poor impulse control rather than a correlation You wanted me to prove something that's the opposite of what I was arguing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:35 PM
0

You said causation, not correlation. And I can't provide proof of a negative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 06:10 AM
2

It's on you to prove that, it's not on me to prove that it's not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:17 AM
0

The connection is a far, far stronger one than the tenuous stereotypes being thrown around here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:07 AM
2

Yeah, that's stereotyping.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 03:04 AM
0

Except breaking things in anger is the behavior of an abuser. Having a lot of sex is...just enjoying sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:58 AM
2

So, again, you're trying to divine one piece of information from an unrelated piece of information based solely on your own stereotypes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:56 AM
2

Number of past sexual partners is also not an indicator of whether or not a person will cheat on you. It is shaming. I don't care who is doing it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:49 AM
1

Not if that's your sole indicator, and not if you're not a mental health professional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:43 AM
2

Paternity issues aren't issues if she wasn't cheating. And we're not talking about "preferences" we're talking about needless shaming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:41 AM
2

It's not related, but you're pretending it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:39 AM
2

This is like finding a lump in your pudding and assuming you have cancer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:37 AM
2

And I'm saying you're basing your ideas on some things that aren't necessarily connected together in reality, and that's going to result in throwing out a lot of women who did nothing wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:30 AM
2

It doesn't seem useful at all to me. More like it's just a direct act of shaming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:21 AM
3

Okay, so you're jumping in to say that it's totally right to look at number of sex partners as a shorthand because sometimes you catch a person who has a disorder? Just look for the disorder instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:13 AM
2

Because you're looking at a stat that's likely to be a false indicator rather than looking for the things you actually want to avoid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 02:10 AM
2

So there's no reason to say anything about sex partners.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 01:18 AM
2

What they're doing is connecting issues that don't have to be connected. Avoiding a partner who cheats, or who might hurt you in one way or another is the point, not avoiding a partner who has had a lot of sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 01:03 AM
2

Having a partner that has had a lot of sex partners in the past does not inherently cause these things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 12:32 AM
2

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. People are acting like it's a problem, but if it's not causative and it's not the problem itself, why even call it out?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 12:22 AM
2

Because it's not the fact that a person has a lot of sex that's at all a problem. It's the other things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 12:17 AM
-3

But they're talking about the wrong end of this thing in that case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 11:43 PM
-7

Show me the research that shows that having sex with more people makes you have mental health problems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 11:09 PM
-8

That's putting the cart before the horse. Nothing about that says that a higher number of partners is bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 11:04 PM
1

Does it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 09:22 PM
51

Yeah, it doesn't matter nearly as much as real issues like circumcision, conscription, or the gaps in health, education, and justice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 07:00 PM
2

Any study worth anything would control for that discrepancy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 07:53 AM
5

Can't edit titles on reddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 07:51 AM
60

Segregation always benefits the privileged class.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 04:55 PM
18

If the majority of workers are men, which they are, it makes sense for the majority of hires to be men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 07:02 PM
0

Probably shouldn't be calling them "queers" in English. Use "queer people" since "queer" is an adjective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 05:53 AM
1

They're doing what they can to avoid conscription. There's no need to look down on them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 03:23 AM
0

Ah yes, let's demonize immigrants...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 03:19 AM
15

Minority men aren't allowed to leave either under this policy, and they're thrown right in with the white men when convenient in Australia.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 02:22 AM
1

Yeah, but whether a market is closed or open isn't a prerequisite for fascism. This moron tried to make several wrong arguments in defense of Trump before linking a piece that said fascism is socialism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 04:27 PM
0

It doesn't. But I also didn't want you to think that the guy likes the market being free.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 12:02 AM
1

I'm not the one who started in on irrelevant points like "fascists hate free markets" which isn't even true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:44 PM
0

Why would I answer an irrelevant question? Doing so only lends credence to your bullshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:32 PM
0

And I said I don't care about this particular subject, since it isn't remotely part of establishing whether or not something is fascist. You refuse to accept that because it would ruin the defense you're running for the fascists ruining my country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:27 PM
3

It was removed. You can still see it because it's yours. You're a bigot, and you're stupid, and you can go off out of here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:24 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/1ohR0aSpqT This one, bigot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:20 PM
3

In the comment that got removed, bigot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:15 PM
1

I've gone out of my way to respect your arguments, answer your questions, and treat your ideas with the dignity that this space deserve. Can you not reciprocate? Not when they're an irrelevant defense of fascism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:15 PM
-1

Well, yeah, because they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:12 PM
3

Yeah, once you reveal yourself as a bigot, we tell you to fuck off. Pretty simple to not be a bigot. So fuck off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:10 PM
0

So now you're splitting hairs on something that isn't even a signifier of fascism. Cool. I don't care about your esoteric definition of whether his direct interference in the market constitutes enough interference to pass your personal line. I care that he's doing it and hurting people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 11:02 PM
1

Tariffs are a method of control exerted by the government. You're wrong by your own definition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 10:31 PM
3

Oh, I see, you're a transphobe. Fuck off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 10:02 PM
4

I would like to know what you believe and ideal man should be like. Whatever he should choose to be, in whatever way he chooses and feels best to him to express it, so long as nobody else is harmed. You know, same as for anyone. Genders are expressions, not prescriptions. Please describe to me what you think "positive masculinity" is, if you believe there is one. I never really put much time into thinking through that particular buzzword. I don't use it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 09:47 PM
6

We are the left, too. Our concern is far beyond that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 09:39 PM
6

a free market is an economic system where prices, production, and distribution are determined primarily by supply and demand rather than government fiat. Government fiat like...random ass tariffs, cronyism, and market manipulation? that's the context i think you're missing. trump clearly supports economies based primarily on private ownership, markets, and supply and demand over alternatives like state planning. he also supports tariffs and industrial policy. those positions make him a protectio…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 09:30 PM
3

Why do you think that the goal of our small rights group is to win votes right now?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 09:16 PM
7

Attacking the Republican Party is just the morally right thing to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 09:11 PM
3

a: you didn't give examples, you gave accusations. b: i'll accept your claims without evidence out of respect. c: those accusations don't imply someone dislikes markets. they imply they want to shape markets. Shaping a market means the market isn't free. You were saying he's in favor of a free market. Which is it, a shaped market or a free one? If he likes it free, why is he shaping it? true, but american kids still do it every day, right? about 81% of american adults say that, growing up, they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 07:33 PM
7

All of your drivel about Trump pretends that he's honest. Look at his actions, not his words. Look at the examples I gave, not his propaganda. i'm happy things are changing from when i lived there as a child. you have know idea how weird it is to pledge allegiance to a flag for a kid who has never done that before. weirdest of all is the nobody else thought it was weird. saying that it was normalized is an understatement. And it would have been weird in my one school to actually stand up and do …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 05:06 PM
59

Erasure of the vocabulary of suffering is important to hate movements. It's why they rail so hard against anything being called misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 04:24 PM
5

You already saw the comment and responded to it. You are willfully ignoring points made against your argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 03:56 PM
6

Trump likes free markets because they benefit trump. He routinely participates in them to his advantage. I see we're ignoring what I said and what he did in service of your agenda. What evidence do you have that he hates free markets the way that fascists did? Do you intend to respond to anything I actually said, like the reasons I already listed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 03:52 PM
3

Go reply to the other comment I made, then. Pretending I didn't tell you when I already told you is dumb.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 03:36 PM
3

I did. You are wrong in several important ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 03:28 PM
4

Sounds like you got told you were ignorant and got mad about it to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 03:24 PM
4

trump is an authoritarian populist. fascists hate free markets, for starters What makes you think he likes free markets? All the stupid trade wars, or the cronyism? Perhaps the market manipulation? but there's a whole lot of fascism baked into the USA before he ever got there. making school children pledge allegiance to the flag every day seems pretty fascist to me, Kids aren't required to say it. We didn't even do it in most of the schools I attended. Too much going on in the day. also: trump i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/26 03:23 PM
4

Let's not make caricatures of our enemies. Let's see them for what they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 09:05 PM
55

The Republican Party is fascist, and every decent person is morally obligated to destroy the party.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 09:01 PM
9

but...conservatives and their allies of convenience don't actually have an issue with anything on spectrum of human sexuality. Bullshit. This is a complete lie. They hate anything that disgusts them, whatever that may happen to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 08:12 PM
62

It's just another way to victim blame.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 02:23 PM
7

Feminists pretend to be accepting of trans people, but they don't accept trans people at all. It's a feature if it hurts a trans kid, not a bug.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/26 04:37 AM
3

I hope it all goes smoothly!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 08:16 PM
30

Once again, gendered research not accounting for the realities they're supposedly researching to try and make their research "matter" in some way. It reminds me of the anthropologists who were trying to find out why this one group wore all black clothes. It turned out not to be a cultural reason. The group simply only had black sheep.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 08:15 PM
3

You're calling the idea of people being influenced by ideas "lysenkoist"?!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 07:04 PM
2

What contempt is there for anyone else except the judgement of the judgemental?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 06:58 PM
17

The point in applying that label is the same as labelling a society "woke" or "globalist" for nut job conservatives. It's so you can implement sweeping changes however you want without worrying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 06:47 PM
187

Well, this is what bigots do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 06:43 PM
12

The very fact that the right wing relies on crushing human rights in order to enforce their fascist ideals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 05:03 PM
1

Wow, yeah, that would make sense. Thanks for the info!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 05:02 PM
12

Well, yeah, what if they need more force to try another round of genocide?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 05:05 AM
99

This is why freedom of expression is so absolutely important. Minority rights groups can easily be censored and persecuted by actions like these.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 04:55 AM
15

That women only view men as simps and workhorses, and the only reason they feel any sadness when men die is because they lose out on resources. It was pretty bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 06:36 AM
30

Looking at the original thread there are so many of these people trying to blame suicidal men for their own problems or trying to make themselves the victim of someone else's suicide. It's disgusting how little empathy they have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:11 PM
-2

You're acting as if women only care because they only see men as servants and workhorses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 09:45 PM
-5

Honestly this is a really dim view of women and what they see men as.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 08:24 PM
54

Trans women often have prostates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 07:42 PM
244

Well, you see, if a man dies, he leaves behind women to deal with his death, which is misogyny. Susan Sontag and Hillary Clinton are notable people who said as much. No man has ever been the primary victim of his own death, because men's lives don't matter. Logically this means that we have to make men immortal to fix misogyny. But that would mean women would die more, which is also misogyny. Or we could just drop this hateful bullshit that feminism pushes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 06:46 PM
12

They were very active in implementing aid for women and blocking all efforts at giving aid to men. It's a failing that can be directly attributed to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 11:47 PM
30

I wasn't yet born when femosphere theorists influenced the government to exclude men from protections from domestic violence and rape. Since then tens of millions of men have been directly harmed by toxic feminist ideology denying them even the recognition that they're victims of women's violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/26 09:36 PM
7

Of course, fitting for a hate movement
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 10:48 PM
1

Yeah, I've seen that kind of stuff, but always pushed back on here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 10:47 PM
15

Misogyny is when you treat people the same regardless of gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 07:38 PM
7

What? Where are you seeing that, what context is it in?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 07:36 PM
2

Treat that as a problem with the individual, not the entire gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 02:49 PM
5

That's one of those things that's sad about queer communities now. Gay men were some of the first people who made them, and now anyone masculine isn't exactly welcomed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 04:10 AM
5

The theory is a confused mess that tries to be everything while also making a thousand exceptions and modifications for where it completely fails due to not being attached to reality. There is no pure theory you can pin them down on. It's like any right-wing movement, the only purpose is power and hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 11:36 PM
3

Focus on one, build that up first, then try another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 05:23 PM
5

It might take a while for them to open up to you about it. The world is pretty harsh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 05:18 PM
3

Any card game, for one set of examples. I play MtG and I've met a whole range of people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 05:06 PM
4

Get involved with hobby communities and you'll get to know all kinds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 04:28 PM
7

I've known a couple IRL, and they tend to stay away from explicitly queer communities, sticking more to communities centered on one of their interests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 04:02 PM
4

The sexist belief in men as predators or instruments of violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 08:19 AM
4

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/26 01:51 AM
7

What's your point? That because sometimes a man does a bad thing then bigotry against men is fine?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:53 PM
4

Having interacted with radfems in person, they're exactly the same, but with the added threat of physical violence against you for disagreement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:52 PM
20

There's no use in separating the people from the theory, since the subscription to the theory is exactly the problem. And even if we directly criticize those people, it is not sexism in any way. The category of "feminist" is not the same category as any gender or sex. It is an ideological group, based on thought and action, not an immutable characteristic. I can criticize and rail against Impressionists all day long, since that's a group a person can choose to leave or join at will. I shouldn't …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:32 PM
2

Definitely 16+ and mislabeled.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 02:57 PM
1

Well, that would require examining our beliefs about consent, military service, and gender, and we can't have that. Better to just give women a privileged position.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 02:53 PM
1

She could join the military directly, but there's no way to enter the draft pool, that's right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 02:39 PM
2

Okay, I see you're just bad at speaking with others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:28 PM
1

Sure, dehumanize someone when you can't explain yourself. That's a real great one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:24 PM
0

Yeah, bearish, as in "plausible" is a pessimistic word to use in that context, but you then chose to use an optimistic example of "plausible" to illustrate your point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:23 PM
1

You literally said that putting a force of 50/50 men and women would be the same as putting just the men in place, and that the men would have to work twice as hard. I'm reading your words, now back them up with evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:18 PM
-3

Yeah it makes no sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:16 PM
0

Your comment assumes that they're a complete nonentity for absolutely no given reason. Cite your source that a woman with a gun and training is completely incapable of fighting in any way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:16 PM
-2

Maybe you should have used your words.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:14 PM
0

Do you know anyone who is bisexual or trans? Taken together that's about 5% of the population.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:09 PM
1

Your base assumption is that women would be completely useless in combat, which isn't true at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 09:05 PM
44

I treat it like learning about any hate movement. They're going to say and think and do hateful things, and you have to recognize that it's a flaw with those people, not with whoever they're targeting. This goes extra if you're in the group they hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:48 PM
8

The "basic research" is the article I linked, which clearly says no food for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 04:02 PM
7

This was them setting up their food distribution. At no point before this did they give any food to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 03:14 PM
10

Starving people would steal food, and it's downright stupid to think that that would stop if you didn't give them any food.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 03:08 PM
9

The UN gave food exclusively to women. This wasn't a request, this was a bad policy that was actively carried out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 02:59 PM
10

Which this distribution method does nothing to stop. All it does is try to starve and kill men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 02:47 PM
17

So the response isn't to have better distribution and rules enforcement, it's to starve and kill men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 02:38 PM
25

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/un-sets-up-womenonly-food-aid-in-haiti-1884361.html The whole UN is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 01:06 AM
8

Bell Hooks is also moderately well regarded for having written humanising things about men from time to time. Bell Hooks is well-known in this sub for being incredibly racist and sexist. She outright denies that male slaves were ever subject to rape, for one of many, many examples of her stupid bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 12:43 AM
18

Yeah, they already have for excluding boys from genital mutilation laws and tailor-made definitions of rape and domestic violence that inherently exonerate women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 12:45 AM
1

Ah, yeah, that makes more sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/26 05:55 PM
1

I have no idea what you're saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/26 05:49 PM
1

Yeah, it would be nice for feminism to remember that actual equality is the right thing to do, and not eternal prosecution of gender war. But that faction of feminism lost a long time ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/26 05:44 PM
6

The quote really read like someone saying "I wish I thought of that."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/26 03:16 PM
10

I can say that as a writer, some of my characters have meaningful names, but the majority do not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 11:11 PM
11

Interesting connection there that "mental load' is something that happens to people in charge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 03:01 PM
34

I do want to note that the director said the name "Bear" wasn't actually a reference to anything, just a name he threw in, but that he wished he had thought about the "man vs bear" stuff people are attributing to the movie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 02:57 PM
2

So why do you want to limit the language we use do describe suicide to just men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 07:11 PM
9

Issue: Doesn't matter. Issue, but feminist: Real shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 07:00 PM
2

Are you going to stop?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 07:00 PM
2

"Your problems don't matter" is what you're directly saying to women who are suicidal by trying to make the concept of suicide for men only. It's wrong to do, and you need to stop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 06:56 PM
2

You're interested in hurting people that are already hurting. I don't care what your other ideas are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 06:51 PM
1

The term was originally used to describe the state of men's prisons. Since then it has been stolen and used exclusively to attack men and make it out to be as if men aren't victims of rape. If you're trying to do that with suicide, your work is immoral.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 06:47 PM
2

Explain your reasoning for doing what you know to be wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 06:29 PM
3

But you see that what they did with that is wrong. We shouldn't replicate their wrongs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 05:44 PM
5

Suicide is not exclusively male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 05:35 PM
9

That's why we have terms like "male disposability" to capture the way that people don't care about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 05:25 PM
12

Whatever you do, don't participate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 04:55 PM
5

You mean like what happened in reality, where peoples names were based on their jobs? Smith, Cooper, Fisher, Wright, Carpenter, any of those ringing a bell?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 04:48 PM
20

I have yet to find a real argument against it. It's all deflection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 04:43 PM
15

It's not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 04:41 PM
8

Your worth to others is meaningful, but it's not the whole. Your worth to yourself, as the only person whose job it is to always take care of you, also matters a lot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 04:40 PM
17

They were worried about false accusations. In all cases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 04:37 PM
30

In Spain and Italy feminists protested against billboards that dated to spread awareness of domestic violence against men in the most milquetoast way possible. In Israel and India feminists successfully protested against laws that would protect men from rape. In the UK feminist leaders have consistently opposed changes to law that would consider male victims of female rapists to actually be victims of rape. In the US feminists worked to hide any mention of rape or domestic violence done by women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 01:36 PM
34

Nobody's going to make that study. It falls to us to see feminist actions for what they are. When they organize protests in multiple countries against recognizing men as victims of rape and domestic violence, that signals a movement that's inherently against equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 12:43 PM
54

Feminism is about equality of the sexes. It is very demonstrably not about that. Why would they protest and fight against the same legal protections for men that women already enjoy?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 12:36 PM
32

Feminists routinely fight against laws that would protect male victims and/or prosecute women for rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 03:29 PM
13

My god there was so much hate towards Latinos after the last election from Democrats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 02:40 PM
5

The legend himself posts!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 02:24 PM
19

The only thing you're disputing is exactly their experience of suffering, attributed to the unfalsifiable idea of "patriarchy" rather than the very much more simple and provable idea of misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 02:21 PM
40

Most feminists will default to a defense of their specific ideal version of rape culture, where rape is okay if it happens in any way other than a man doing it to a woman. Every other type of rape is 100% fine, because the whole point is defending women who rape and denigrating men who are victims. That's rape culture. They invented that which they claim to hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 02:13 PM
59

Yet another example of feminism lionizing the most hateful people they can, just because those hateful people hate men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 01:15 PM
3

Exactly!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 09:53 PM
16

Using your example as a base, she's directly saying men are failing to code switch to what she says society wants men to do. That's blame put on men, not on the rest of society for demanding code switching.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 03:13 PM
8

But they are mutually exclusive. Bigots don't want to want the people they hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 03:08 PM
21

Men being hired at lower rates, all else being equal, is just one element of pervasive misandry in society. The blame in this article is her saying men are failing to adapt to other people being bigoted against men. Imagine saying that about literally any other group. "Sorry, Sikhs should just change what their religion is so other people don't treat them as terrorists." "Why does your skin have to be so dark anyway? You're really failing to adapt to the new lightened economy."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:49 PM
12

It's very poorly phrased because it relies on the reader immediately psychically knowing that women want to want men, when we empirically know that isn't the case at all. Most women outright hate men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:45 PM
17

Because telling a joke is a different concept from pointing at a specific person and making fun of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:43 PM
13

Then you're too far gone to see past your own nose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:41 PM
20

You're still placing the blame on men, rather than on people treating men poorly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:32 PM
18

It really is poorly phrased because I came up with a far better representation of a best-case reading of the article within a minute.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:29 PM
23

There's no need to bring up an anecdote about this one guy one time unless the reason is to still mock men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:27 PM
24

But the article places the blame on men not adapting to this strange kind of desire economy that's somehow different from the previous desire economy, when the stats show that it's clearly other people rejecting men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:25 PM
27

Yeah, I always counter them by saying my mom had a credit card before that supposed ban was lifted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:14 PM
14

"A woman doesn't need a man anymore to get by" and "Men aren't needed anymore" are two wildly different phrases. One is at worst ahistorical. The other is so poorly phrased that it can be confused with some serious forms of bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:13 PM
26

These days, women make fun of men for being liberated, and that's totally cool because of this one moment of a single man supposedly doing something wrong. She softens the blow, but she's still punching.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:10 PM
29

It shows that men are definitely not wanted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 02:05 PM
15

One person's "tasteless" is another person's "flavorful."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 01:52 PM
62

The thing about Latinos is that we're suddenly 100% white if one racist wants us to be, and cartel members if another racist wants us to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 01:46 PM
137

Nothing good was ever achieved by giving up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/26 11:14 PM
17

Who are you going to believe, people who want more money for a discriminatory agenda, or your lying eyes?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/26 04:48 PM
3

Yeah but that's their lack of reading comprehension. It's not a problem with the book itself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/26 04:24 PM
9

That's part of the point of her character, though. She's a horrible person who thinks and does horrible things, and the narrative makes it clear that she's to blame for her own actions and unhappiness. It's also a brilliant look at how easily a man can be torn apart by false allegations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/26 04:45 AM
2

Yeah, she hated the weirdos who popped up, performing off of her victimhood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/26 02:33 AM
8

The whole rest of the book makes a mockery of feminist performativity, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/26 02:58 PM
21

Obsession luckily doesn't make it out to be as if it's a man thing to be messed up like the main character is, just that it's his character flaws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/26 03:09 PM
23

Yeah that's not true. Humans have worked together to build what we have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/26 04:22 AM
5

It's not using their weapons against them, it's surrendering to their preconditions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 06:07 PM
100

It means whatever you need it to mean at the moment, so long as you remember men=bad. That's what feminism is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 05:24 PM
4

Why surrender immediately by using their language?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 05:16 PM
5

This isn't mere semantics, this is discriminatory language.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 02:51 PM
28

"Patriarchy" doesn't exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 04:26 AM
78

There's no need to be a feminist. The dehumanization you feel from feminism is absolutely real and intended. We are the same thing as men's rights, because there's nothing wrong whatsoever with wanting equal treatment for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 02:42 AM
9

Great Britain had the habit of just shooting their slave soldiers with ptsd on the spot, or executing them later. Never heard of this one. Do you have a source for this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 12:15 AM
31

So she got to have her fun and then get paid millions of dollars just for the hell of it? I was told women never lie about rape and nothing ever happens to people who get accused.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 12:13 AM
23

Bodily integrity and freedom from military enslavement are the obvious two. A boy has no protections against medically unnecessary genital mutilation, while girls do. A young man has to register for military aervice, where as young women do not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 02:36 PM
2

That's part of the problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 02:33 PM
3

I have already explained how you have been sexist. And it's okay if those are the central tenets of the ideology you chose to subscribe to and identify as a member of.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 08:11 AM
6

Not every feminist shares the same views or has the same attitude. But you haven't shown yourself to be any different. You've simple asserted it while continuing to espouse feminist sexism. Just because I self identify as a feminist doesn’t mean it gives people permission to mischaracterise me and attack me based on things other feminists have said. If you align with a movement, don't be surprised when people treat you as a member of that movement. Isn’t that one of the things male advocates are…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:26 AM
6

"People like you" meaning feminists. You know, the ideological group you self-identified with. He engaged directly with you, on how you sound like every other feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:16 AM
6

The only quotes from you are in blocks. The others are frequently bandied catchphrases by feminists. The use of quotation marks around them is to denote that those aren't his words, not that they're yours. It's very simple, I'm sure even you can get it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 07:06 AM
14

They responded to you in detail, quoting what you said back to you so you can track what was what. Yet you come back and pretend that it didn't align. No, you just didn't like what was said, so you pretended it wasn't connected because you can't handle something going against your dogma.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 06:56 AM
16

You're not listening. He's giving you the same energy you justified feminists giving people. Is he not allowed his own feelings because he's a man?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 04:36 AM
–

since being male is an immutable characteristic and being a feminist is a choice. This particular troll doesn't understand that difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 04:32 AM
46

We don't have legal equality. Men lack basic rights that women have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 04:30 AM
2

Not to you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:17 PM
2

No, I understand exactly what you're getting at and how stupid your argument is. You're just trying to avoid reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 10:50 PM
3

The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club. You're playing pretend that any of your replies are relevant. You're not grappling with anything real here, you're just being sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 10:43 PM
3

And you reinforce your sexism with gender-essentialist nonsense. Feminists are identified by their choices. Men are identified by something they can't choose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 10:34 PM
3

No, you're not, since you're comparing a gender to an ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 10:24 PM
3

You're really doubling down on equating people with concepts, huh? You really are so far gone that you absolutely have to place feminism in opposition to all men just to avoid admitting the well-documented history of feminist racism, when earlier you were arguing feminism isn't in opposition to men. Do you have principles outside your dogma?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:46 PM
3

Men, as a whole, are not an ideological group. If you can't see the difference between a group of just under half the human population and a system of ideas, I question your ability to recognize what a concept is as opposed to an object.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:42 PM
2

Do you somehow think that your sexist statement about all people of a certain gender is in any way equivalent to my statement about an ideology? This is another flaw in feminist thinking. You automatically place feminism in opposition to men, taking action against men yet simultaneously trying to claim feminism isn't sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:39 PM
1

Yes. Since feminists continue to engage in racist practices. Every new initiative from feminists seems tailor-made to push out nonwhite men and push in white women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:34 PM
1

Those are branches that had very good reasons for separating from the main trunk of feminism, which is racist as hell. There's a pretty large body of texts that show the racist roots of feminism, and how those roots continue to show themselves through carceral feminism and the fearmongering that feminism embraces, particularly for men with darker skin. Feminists continued to embrace racism well through the 20th century, and continue to use arguments borne from racism to justify treating men diff…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:28 PM
1

See, what I said is true, even feminists say so. What do you think black feminism and intersectionality were meant to fix?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 08:34 PM
2

She uses her trauma as an excuse for her bigotry. She's extending not an olive branch, but a piece of bait, to try and ensnare the gullible into her hateful ideology. She speaks authoritatively on men, as if she knows anything about the inner lives of men, when her words resemble nothing of any men I've ever known save for a couple feminist snakes. Her book is unique in the respect that it's the first thing feminists throw at people to pretend as though they have any human empathy for anyone but…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 06:43 PM
2

Feminists are racist as hell.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 06:40 PM
2

If you read the book while viewing people as equals regardless of gender, you would hate the book, her, and everyone that recommends her. Feminist texts like hers are barely different from the writing you find from racists and other bigots, pretending that it's a fundamental problem with "The Way Those People Are" with only twisted versions of facts to back anything up, if they even bother. Bell Hooks doesn't bother backing up her claims. Feminist writings are more like religious texts than scho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 05:58 PM
10

It's definitely not just women doing it. I've seen men, women, and non-binary people do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 09:13 PM
19

It's the only way it really works, if you ask me. The right doesn't care about anyone downtrodden, so how are you going to get real advocacy from them at all? All you get is in-group extension of privileges, which is why I call feminism right wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 09:12 PM
24

I wouldn't say that the US is the only country where the idea of serving in the military is glorified. Not at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 09:11 PM
12

Yeah, these are things that happen that directly tell men and boys not to share.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 01:46 PM
27

Talked to who? These are general cases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 05:46 AM
73

It looks like annoyance when feelings are shared. It looks like someone changing the subject right after you said something important. It looks like someone making fun of you for the thing you told them in confidence. It looks like parents punishing boys more than girls across the board for any given infraction. It looks like schools punishing boys more, too. It looks like a culture that tells boys not to hit girls, but tells girls to go for the balls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 05:30 AM
1

I guess. It was apparent they didn't know anything when their response didn't address the fact that the supposed lifespan was actually a statistical misreading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 03:10 PM
2

Israel is the Nazi side here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 07:28 AM
1

I'll be the Mobil to your Exxon.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 04:33 AM
2

Omg you got picked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 03:28 AM
4

Justifying colonial violence is a ridiculously bad look. But I should expect such things from Zionists. Edit: Androcide defender blocked me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 01:31 AM
2

There's one side that's getting slaughtered by the tens of thousands and another side that's doing the slaughter. Sounds like maybe Israel should stop killing people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 01:22 AM
5

https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/ Maybe stop supporting genocide for five seconds.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 01:09 AM
14

Israel created that environment. They funded Hamas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 12:56 AM
18

Get used to it. I've lost track of the number of times a feminist has used misogyny against me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/26 12:54 AM
0

Yeah, I doubt you actually made much of a study of anthropology at all if you can't handle reading two sentences and the singular point made.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 05:04 PM
0

Did you read what I wrote or did you just go on some tangent?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 04:37 PM
12

She just makes things up about men, and about black men in particular, and acts as if everything she said was true with no citations for anything. She called for the Central Park Five to go to prison without knowing anything, and they were subsequently exonerated. She pretended black male slaves were never raped with no evidence. She groomed her male student and bragged about how "broken" he was. Nobody but a feminist could get away with the bigoted stances she takes on black men in particular.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 01:51 PM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/V0Ln0wjoGX Here, a thread on this subreddit about her hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 01:35 PM
19

There it is, the mandatory Bell Hooks recommendation! The problem with Bell Hooks is that we have read her hateful crap, and we've talked it over, and we see her for the bigoted piece of shit she is. You don't view men and women as equals if you're talking up Bell Hooks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 01:32 PM
10

You didn't study anthropology closely enough if you believe that 30 year thing. Humans regularly lived into our 60s and 70s, but the average was brought down by babies who didn't survive long out of the womb.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 04:45 AM
57

Because those other systems are real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 04:37 AM
5

Yeah, people everywhere have always had xenophobia lurking about. But history has shown us that it's usually a bad idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 05:15 AM
3

I thought you were maybe talking about the Tang Dynasty or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 04:16 AM
1

Tans?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 03:31 AM
1

Except sexual appeal was also for male characters in a very much more real way than violence was done with female characters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 03:30 AM
3

That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that one of these complaints is puritanical moralizing, and the other is people wanting to be seen as being worthy of living at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 01:37 AM
5

Sex for titillation is a perfectly valid framing, though. Your comparison fails because you're viewing sex as inherently degrading to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 12:38 AM
4

Yeah, being called a "princess" doesn't really hit the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/26 12:00 AM
7

Also for Canada: put any resources whatsoever towards even just counting Missing and Murdered Indigenous Men and Boys, like they do with women and girls. They don't even count.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 11:55 PM
3

Except sex is a perfectly healthy aspect of the human experience. Murder isn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 11:53 PM
57

People who want to get rid of people that are "creepy' will find that their threshold of "creepy" moves closer and closer to home, and that the purges must become greater and greater. That's why the list of reasons for "The Ick" is so very long and has so many utterly normal and harmless things that a person shouldn't ever think twice about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 11:51 PM
6

My bad, I forgot that infant boys have more agency than adult women. smh my head.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 07:14 PM
7

Yeah, these things are always about misappropriating an idea that does work in favor of bigotry that doesn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 06:43 PM
27

"If it doesn't apply, let it fly" is for shit like PSAs about disabled accommodations. Ignore it, the airport announcement about baby changing facilities isn't for you, they're not calling you a baby or a parent. It is not about generalizations based on immutable characteristics. That shit always applies, don't let it fly if someone is saying black men are coddled.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 05:07 PM
2

You minimized it the moment that you changed 17 to 18 and 8 years to 7 years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 06:49 AM
4

16 and 26 isn't very much different from 17 and 25, and you're minimizing that with the way you're talking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 04:06 AM
21

Remember when there was an uproar over HeLa cells being taken and used without the consent of Henrietta Lacks? Remember when that uproar was extended to creams used for cosmetic procedures made from mutilation of infant boys? No, just the first part? Yeah, same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/26 04:02 AM
33

That's great! I hope others can be led away from hate just as you have!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/26 05:18 AM
5

Sorry you don't like real challenges to your premise, no matter how correct they are, even by your own admission.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 10:11 PM
6

When your whole premise is that they're not seen as men, yeah, that's a big difference.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 10:07 PM
4

Lesser man is still a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 09:45 PM
4

Why would that make them "not a man" rather than being the target of homophobia? You've got to prove that specifically it's because they're not thought of as men by men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 09:33 PM
8

Is this true? What are you basing this very broad question on? Until you can explain that, I don't accept the premise of your question.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 08:44 PM
4

I see, thanks for explaining.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 03:48 PM
4

Would you mind explaining what the Daniel Penny situation is?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 03:31 PM
2

Don't generalize about women as a whole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 03:29 PM
24

"Your fear is your problem." I have a phobia of needles. Every time I have to deal with them, there's a good chance I have a panic attack. I wouldn't dream of blaming someone else for this, or shaming a doctor for requesting a blood draw. It's my problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 07:37 AM
26

If I remember correctly those "tactics" involved half the stuff we know as "forming a relationship with someone you don't know." They were such innocuous things that I think even asking questions about what someone likes was one of them. Also online survey doesn't mean shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 07:18 AM
4

Not really, when it comes to propaganda. They talked about certain methods of physical control, such as camps and laws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 03:08 PM
3

Are you sure? I've never seen anything that connects the propaganda specifically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 02:59 PM
58

It's a smear tactic that originated with Nazi propaganda and continued through conservatives ranting about immigrants. Now feminists use it in the proud tradition of hate groups. "There might be good Jews/immigrants/men, but we can't tell the difference, so until it's none of them, it's all of them." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Giftpilz
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/26 03:17 AM
8

That, cancel culture and the scare around fanservice and the classic gateway drug fallacy of AI girlfriends/porn/SW being r*pe are things the left should just stop being cowards about and walk back 😵‍💫 Yeah those things are just part of the regular misandry you see feminists spray everywhere. If it's associated with sex and men are engaging in it, it must be exploitation and rape, there is no other explanation. No woman would ever debase herself enough to perform sex work, trading the labor of h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/26 10:14 PM
2

I see, it's the same as when people see their own problems and assume that others must have it better than them. Can't see beyond their own noses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/26 07:52 PM
13

Sorry, best we can do is slowly morph it into "Women and girls" to intentionally devalue the lives of even boys. Doesn't matter that that's not moral, that's what's happening.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 08:55 PM
39

The whole idea is another extension of the abusive tactics of feminism. It's DARVO for men as a whole. Deny that men have any problems, Accuse men of not opening up about their problems, and Reverse Victim and Offender by putting the onus on the individual man to open up, rather than society for not accepting him and his problems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 12:32 PM
7

Not quite, they include penetration with an object.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 12:23 PM
28

Right, classic feminist thought of looking at a few high-profile men and pretending every man is like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 04:17 PM
7

Ah, the loop seems self explanatory. Nack is something I've never encountered before. Thanks for explaining!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 03:59 PM
39

How in the world do they get away with thinking black men are coddled?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 03:47 PM
6

Nack and loop aren't familiar to me, would you mind explaining what those are?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 03:45 PM
54

Naturally when asked for reasons, all the reasons are victim blaming, rather than structural inequalities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 01:26 PM
0

I'm so sorry, you're just too fucking stupid to talk to anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 02:04 AM
0

Idiots when a socialist has actual reasons for not calling themselves a communist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 01:36 AM
-1

"rEaD tHeoRY" motherfuckers when someone accurately points out that two different things are different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 01:17 AM
-1

That's not how it works.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/26 01:12 AM
16

32% of what they bothered to count. There is no official count because they don't care enough to count.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/26 09:29 PM
19

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacha_bazi Just one example of the practice now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/26 08:55 PM
49

Also the places that tend to practice child marriages tend to simply rape and murder the boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/26 07:19 AM
71

It's just one of the ways that feminism is a conservative movement. Not only do they enforce traditional gender roles for men, they follow the old "rules for thee but not for me" that all right wing movements do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/26 04:05 AM
11

And World War I showed that when millions of men died, the millions of women who lived did not have children. Restoring numbers isn't a valid reason.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/26 03:07 PM
37

Feminist academics outright lying to pretend as though they're oppressed? Sounds like they're functioning as intended.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/26 03:05 PM
11

It doesn't support your assertion that civilian status is conditional to everyone, it contradicts it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/26 02:28 PM
12

There haven't been that many wars that have gone to a point where governments fought right up to total annihilation. And yet none of those governments ever enacted conscription for women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/26 02:10 PM
15

It would affect domestic violence shelters, hotlines, and other resources that are currently monopolized for women. Religious institutions it would depend on what was going on. I don't expect matters of doctrine to fall under something like this, but charity works should.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 10:57 PM
1

You mean the Nordic countries with unequal conscription?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 10:06 PM
17

A ruling that providing services to one gender and not to another is illegal under equal protection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 10:05 PM
3

Do you think this is you dunking on anyone in any way? You failed to make any actual arguments with any evidence and then you throw out xenophobia on top.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/26 03:25 PM
6

Keep in mind that perpetration rates that show women being twice as violent as men are based on unidirectional violence, which is only half of all domestic violence. If you math it out, women make up about 57% of all violent partners in heterosexual relationships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 08:34 PM
10

We're to the left of you. You seem to think a lot of things that aren't based in reality and you can't form a coherent response as to why it's okay to assume what you're assuming. You're probably doing that dumb feminist bullshit where you think any criticism of feminism is misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 06:09 PM
7

You didn't answer shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:51 PM
11

Did you just copy every thread name and pretend that they all support your ridiculous assertion? You need to do better than that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:51 PM
11

About a single woman spewing bigotry. We dislike people for what they do, not who they are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:45 PM
14

You pretend you see us complaining about women but you're lying. Find me the complaints about women. If it's all you see, it should be easy for you to find. None of you sexists ever actually find anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:32 PM
11

Pretending that some victims deserve special treatment due to their gender is sexist. I don't care what other factors you pretend matter more, that's the core factor. What makes it worse from a practical standpoint is that you're not even standing up for the majority of victims, you're actively discounting their deaths as something that doesn't matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:31 PM
15

But... They do share the gender of all murders. It becomes statistics, what I enjoy as a data analyst. One problem doesn't make the other disappear that's absolutely true. But they are not comparable as they don't have the same factors. You think that it doesn't count when a man is murdered if another man did it. Your worldview is inherently immoral.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:23 PM
12

The term is intentionally badly designed, much like every feminist term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:17 PM
18

Right, I forgot the absurd claim that when a person kills another person, if they share a gender, it's magically okay. I'll note that you listed personal issues as a reason it's okay for men to be murdered and a reason it's not okay for women to be murdered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:16 PM
18

Did you know that for every woman killed in Brazil, almost 9 men are killed? Hungary is far more gender equal, with only 36% more murders of men than women. "Femicide" is a grift designed to draw eyes away from the majority of victims of violence and to the privileged minority.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:09 PM
13

Who says anyone is ignoring it? On the contrary, the overwhelming message to boys and men is that they're nothing but rape monsters. Meanwhile rape and sexual assault rates by women are rising every year, yet not a peep about teaching girls not to rape. No, instead they, and you, double down on teaching only boys that they're awful, and only girls to watch out for themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:05 PM
27

Nah, I'm not going to be lectured on how bad men are when the self-reports all indicate that it's really a you problem. By 19 you should already know. And by whatever age you are you should know that other people are very different from you, and it's not okay to assume everyone is as scummy as you were at 19.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 02:27 PM
36

No like really. I had a classmate that had sex with his girlfriend sleeping drunk. He told that to us, when we were like 19. No one said a thing, I remember to this day. He didn't seem to think that was sexual abuse. So you let it slide? Sounds like a self report. It wouldn't be that unproductive to have extra explosion to what is and isn't sexual abuse, no? And how you shouldn't do it, because it hurts others. I can assume the reason why other men don't do it is because someone passed that idea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 01:19 PM
27

I think it's horrible advice given that the opposite is never once suggested, that girls be taught not to hurt people. All she's doing is tarring a gender by calling them all rapists. You should try finding out how many men are murdered in Brazil for every woman murdered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 01:10 PM
2

Let me add 2 and 2 for you. Russell's Teapot is about how the burden of proof falls on those making unfalsifiable claims. Patriarchy is an unfalsifiable claim, since every single argument against it is dismissed as just being part of it, somehow. I talked about the teapot in an effort to get you to understand why "patriarchy" is a bad lens to use.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 08:00 AM
1

Sure, but we could just as easily try to understand problems through the lens of retrieving Russell's Teapot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 07:54 AM
2

The lens is useless, since it's predicated on something that can't be proven or disproven.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 05:06 AM
118

Because they have to shrug it off. Who is going to care? Who is going to help?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 04:47 AM
11

It isn't ridiculous to worry about it. It's not usually acceptable for men to comment on women's abuse and bullying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 01:43 AM
8

u/jon_boopin would you care to respond to any criticism of your article?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 03:51 PM
5

I quoted everything in it for posterity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 06:46 AM
2

It's not. The main drivers of MAGA are racism and classism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 06:30 AM
39

Yeah but that's exactly what feminists do every time they try to talk at men. It's always about what men can do for women, #heforshe, "what have you done for me lately" kind of talking. Never "how can I help?"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 05:12 AM
120

This whole article leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It rarely seems to be seeking any kind of help for men for their own sake. It focuses on what we must do to win, for the future, for politics, for women and children, but never what we have to do to help men for themselves. It has no heart for men. They don't have value for themselves, because this is yet another article riddled with the artifacts of feminism's myopic lens. It barely touches on all of the contradictory messages society rarely te…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 04:39 AM
18

There is no evidence that could ever disprove the idea because the idea doesn't actually mean anything solid. It exists purely to hurt people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 11:51 PM
23

Even when I'm around men or boys, they openly state how rape allegations against them are fake, victim blame victims of rape, abuse and etc Funny, I've literally never seen these happen except coming from the mouths of women. women or girls who blame themselves to their loved ones about this or be discarded as dangerous and emotionally broken when they're pissed or traumatized about it Word salad. police officers who never face backlash for showing pictures of CP to random people for an investig…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 11:50 PM
11

The Left, of course, being a monolithic force that all thinks in unison...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 11:46 PM
2

Is it that odd?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 03:38 PM
10

His existence threatened feminist dogma.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 04:23 AM
7

Yep, see, he's just like the people he imagines oppose him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 12:24 AM
6

The term, in case you didn't know, is actually "kowtow" with a k. But ignore me if it was just a typo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 11:21 PM
21

He's a champagne tankie. Not even socialist, he shills for the CCP from his multimillion dollar home, calling people racial and ethnic slurs, abusing his dog, and ambulance chasing to try and get a crumb of relevance from actual leftist leaders. He pretends to care about actual social issues, but shows up for a few minutes, self-aggrandizes, complains, and goes home. His mother is a slumlord, and his uncle is a fascist. He used to be in the "Manosphere" as much as that term exists as a pick-up a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 11:19 PM
47

Simone de Beauvoir wrote glowingly about pedophilia like it was something necessary for life, and Bell Hooks wrote about how she turned one of her own students that she had a relationship with into a shell of himself. Comparison is always okay. Warren Farrell meanwhile merely said that not every victim of incest considers it a negative experience, and some viewed it positively. He talked about nuance in how we consider things. The papers who push the idea that men and boys can't be victims of wo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 08:06 PM
3

Yeah, it's not a complex concept, and I think that's what a lot of "anti-schooling" people don't really get. They're railing against a particular set of things that don't have to be a part of a given educational institution. Then their solutions, performed on their own kids, invariably result in higher rates of illiteracy and poor socialization.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 03:11 PM
3

I define it as institutional education of children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 03:06 PM
5

You need to specify those right wing talking points and whether they were supported. As for European parties, basically all the right wing parties try to dismantle healthcare systems while pretending they're not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 03:00 PM
3

Less punitive schools is definitely not the same thing as being anti-schooling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 02:56 PM
2

It is, because it's not true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 02:31 PM
0

People don’t learn because they are beaten with a stick to memorise lines Creativity, discovery and self creation is natural to humans Yes, and rote memorization is not a feature of western schools, and it hasn't been for some decades. Modern schooling is made to churn factory workers not critical thinkers Not the modern schools I went to or taught at. Aso your assumptions imply that people have to develop a certain set of skills at a certain age Teaching literacy as early as possible makes all …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 02:31 PM
1

Factional issues like, say, a Cold War?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 02:24 PM
2

Anti-schooling is an inherently stupid idea the moment that you see literacy rates amongst kids who don't go to school.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 02:08 PM
3

This is not purity testing. That's called political demonization or persecution. Marxists aren't "purity testing" business owners when they talk ill about them. It is purity testing, whether or not you would like it to be. McCarthy went after Americans for not being American enough in his eyes. You seem to put forward a garbled interpretation of what is what in an effort to score political points. My point is that rhetoric might matter, but it doesn't matter more than action. And Republican acti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 02:00 PM
9

I usually tell people that say that mens issues are only brought up in opposition that they are brought up on their own, but they just don't go those places or listen to those people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:42 PM
5

This is not purity testing. You seem to be unwilling to evaluate behavior in a neutral context. The purity testing was applied to Americans, not the internal politics of the Republican Party. Pay attention. The point isn't about actions but rhetoric. The point is both.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:38 PM
9

Another framework is absolutely necessary, since you can't frame the suffering of boys as a women's issue without inherently devaluing the boys themselves. Yet feminists do it all the time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:36 PM
13

Exactly, but it's especially galling coming from the exact same people who wanted every part of speech de-gendered for the benefit of women and girls.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:30 PM
6

He was attacking supposed leftists, who were Americans exercising their free speech. Do you realize that internecine struggles are completely different than bashing your own Mr Nobody supporters? The equivalent would be Trump leading a crusade against non college men. Like the way that he's made society worse and worse for everyone not a billionaire?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:27 PM
4

More.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:20 PM
22

Stick "toxic" with "masculinity" to get the two associated, but take the selfsame concept for femininity and it's suddenly internalized misogyny. It paints women as victims and men as poisonous by nature. It's the same thing as tradcon gender roles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:19 PM
5

McCarthy was purity-testing American citizens. And Newt Gingrich did the same for internal party politics. And look at how Republicans target one another for not being Nazi enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:17 PM
16

I don't think the framework is good because it just does the same wordplay feminists have done a thousand times and complained about when done by others a thousand and one times. I don't keep up with what they do over there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 01:10 PM
27

It gets a bad rap here because of exactly what you said in your last paragraph. That mod really showed their ass in this sub some years ago, trolling about and attacking people relentlessly. They embodied the worst aspects of feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 12:59 PM
8

Some posts/comments here shouldn't be here because they're indiscernable from what you can read in conservative MRA spheres. Why should that matter? for example, being for universal healthcare in Europe isn't controversial even in most of right-wing circles Sure, if you just accept lying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 12:56 PM
6

Republicans started purity testing on a wide scale. McCarthy, anyone?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 12:45 PM
6

Source on the custody reform? I'm not specifically doubting you, I'd just like to have it. And the shaming absolutely does not get pushback if the man isn't the Republican ideal of a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 12:43 PM
8

Both of them expect men to fall into a very specific set of rules, and they're both very clear on what those rules are. If you don't like those rules, both will tell you to keep your mouth shut.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 07:51 AM
10

The right absolutely hates men. They hate any man who doesn't fit into their extraordinarily narrow worldview of what a man should be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 07:49 AM
10

There's no possible way that the right isn't more sexist. They're the party of hate, it's their whole platform for their voters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/26 05:13 AM
4

It may be ambiguous but that's the uncharitable interpretation, and the wrong one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 11:38 PM
9

Yeah, I've seen a lot of that too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 11:22 PM
6

That's why I said "added" and "more" in my comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 11:22 PM
1

So what do you do with those that are actively harmful?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 10:32 PM
48

Republicans are far, far more sexist. They're just as sexist to men, with added misogyny and even more transphobia thrown in to complete the list. No minority ever won more rights by going more conservative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 09:59 PM
2

Okay, I didn't realize your whole thing here was an act. That was actually pretty funny. Good one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 04:06 PM
2

You are very obviously judgemental. You are also wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 03:50 PM
3

So you admitted that divorce rates were lower lmao, thanks for proving me right Yes, and obesity rates were lower in the 1500s, so we should all eat the same as we did then. Your argument is disingenuous, your facts are wrong, and you're needlessly combative.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 03:45 PM
1

Do we know it's extremely high by historical standards, or do we have incomplete information and you're relying on an idealized view of the world? A lot more marriages didn't end in divorce because divorce didn't exist before. A lot of marriages ended in death by disease, childbirth, spousal murder, or one partner walking away and never coming back. Now the first three are markedly less common, and the last can still be dealt with by divorce.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 03:35 PM
-1

First marriage divorce rates are 33% https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/10/16/8-facts-about-divorce-in-the-united-states/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 03:25 PM
-1

Divorce rates are skewed significantly by repeat divorces from the same people again and again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 03:20 PM
58

Also failure for fertility to return.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/26 03:23 PM
6

Ah, see that makes sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 02:57 PM
6

The gender dimension is actually bigger than the racial/ethnic dimension in quite a lot of places, especially when it comes to the law.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 02:32 PM
32

I reject them outright and tell them why I'm doing it. If they can't handle giving people of all gender identities grace, why should I give them my time?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 07:34 AM
41

"By other men" is said by the selfsame people who say "feminism is not a monolith." As if an ideology deserves more consideration than human beings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 02:54 PM
160

And they say that feminists don't hold institutional power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 02:50 PM
8

There's nothing valid about randomly insulting people for liking something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:50 AM
2

“The sexism of colonial white male patriarchs spared black male slaves the humiliation of homosexual rape and other forms of sexual assault. While institutionalized sexism protected black male sexuality, it legitimized sexual exploitation of black females.” In her book "We Real Cool" which spits up myths as if they were fact. She also wrote an article called "Passionate Pedagogy" where she defends taking advantage of her male student. She even describes how messed up he was by their relationship…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 05:05 AM
4

That's perfectly fine, but it's not what most people would call being in favor of gender roles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 05:01 AM
3

Ask them whether you should read Bell Hooks for the parts of her writing where she claims male slaves were safe from sexual violence in the antebellum South, or the part where she talks about how it's perfectly okay for professors to have sex with their students as justification for her own actions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 04:20 AM
7

So you believe in the ability to pick your own course in life. That's generally fine, but it doesn't fall into the same category as the idea of gender roles. Gender roles are highly restrictive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 04:16 AM
4

Yeah, conservatives ruin everything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 04:15 AM
20

Meanwhile the same cannot be said of the gay male subreddits. The worst you'll see is some weird incidental misogyny, not a tradition of a daily Two Minutes Hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 04:12 AM
5

Well yeah, most of these gendered beliefs cut both ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 10:20 PM
8

He definitely is. He went on a whole PR tour for them recently.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 11:15 PM
7

Unironically what Sally Miller Gearhart advocated for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 02:29 PM
22

Hasan is a tankie, not a lib. He shills for the CCP.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 02:23 PM
22

Hasan and Pool are both awful grifters and because of that they're very similar people. It's no wonder they'd hop on the same train to shame.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 02:22 PM
8

Oh yeah, much better now. My friends now are way more supportive and not sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 05:09 PM
3

Yeah, I've talked about it a few times. It was not fun.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 03:24 PM
6

Should we let wrongs slide?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 02:22 PM
8

Which organization is that? It sounds exactly like the misandrist bullshit that I objected to that lost me all my friends some years ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 02:05 PM
3

Yeah, because if it's a legitimate rape, the body has ways of shutting that whole thing down. Somehow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 12:57 AM
11

At what point would a man think of himself as too intoxicated to consent? Because I'd bet it's a lot higher of a bar to clear than for a woman, if that bar even exists for a given man. That seems to be most of the discrepancy here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 03:44 PM
3

Lots of places like to pretend that we're a hate sub because we don't subscribe to feminism. Every time we ask for even a shred of proof, the request is never fulfilled, or it is fulfilled by a blatant lie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 07:52 AM
1

I've been caught!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 07:50 AM
2

Are you just two sides of the same coin? Would you both switch sides if you swapped genders? No, most of us here were over there until we saw what they do and who they truly are. While some of us here did switch gender identifiers, that's not most.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 03:31 AM
2

Hey, I'm in at least 3 entirely normal discords. And 12 weird ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 01:07 AM
13

Oh my god do you even know what happens to those programs after the game comes down in the mainframe?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 05:42 PM
13

Yes, sex and gender based oppression do intersect with other systems of oppression, Women's Aid. For example, some people are denied help from domestic violence services because of pittances like their sex or gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 05:21 PM
1

Yeah, pretty much.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 04:17 PM
35

Naturally they have to talk about "control" to make these kids out to be rapists, even though it's a chat program, not a person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 06:06 AM
136

Paragraph 1: We help women and children. And men, I guess, if we have to, but we're going to prioritize mentioning male-on-male violence. Paragraph 2: Here's why men aren't even victims actually. New section: Here's why men suck and how they suck. We will steadfastly ignore any real evidence to the contrary no matter how true it may be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 05:55 AM
1

She took them away from a possible leftist slant and hard into capitalist aims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 02:55 PM
3

I think you're misinterpreting my words to be a defense of feminism being truly for equality at some point. What I'm saying is that it was less controlled by capitalists before Steinem steered them hard in that direction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 02:54 PM
9

"Less cloak-and-dagger and more a young, energetic, global representative for American values and freedom, Steinem leveraged her underwriting to attend international youth festivals organized and otherwise ideologically dominated by America’s adversaries." This is the part where it's danced around. But her goal was very much in line with what capitalists want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 07:46 AM
6

Focusing your personal advocacy on men and boys doesn't mean you're less egalitarian, which is what you were directly saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 11:43 PM
17

There is no comparison between the massive institutional power that feminists wield and the couple of tiny organizations that work for men. There is no comparison between the harm that feminism has inflicted with their massive institutional power and the complete lack of harm done by the complete lack of power that men's activists have done. There is no comparison between one person who could arguably have said some hateful things and the continual glazing of misandrists by feminists. There is n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 11:36 PM
25

You're downvoted because your comments suck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 10:14 PM
21

They challenged you to name hateful prominent people. There are no goalposts being moved. You are trying to dodge the challenge so you can preserve your blatant falsehood.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 10:13 PM
35

I call them a hate movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 10:10 PM
20

https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/feminist-was-spy Gloria Steinem was very explicit about subverting feminism away from true equality and towards the goals of capitalists. That's why feminist causes are so well funded and why so much tax money goes straight into feminist pockets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 10:09 PM
1

Self-developed?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:23 PM
2

Any research by Mary Koss is trash.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:14 PM
3

It uses Mary Koss's research, which would also create discrepancies even for a more limited scope. That whole "study" is trash and should be used only as an example of what not to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:07 PM
3

This study cites Mary Koss's study in their dataset, do it is at play here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:02 PM
10

"Coercion" is here defined partly by feminists doing everything they can to boost the rates they report. So many of these reports include things like going in for a kiss at the end of a date without directly asking beforehand as sexual coercion or assault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 04:23 PM
42

Feminism is a tool for the elites.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 04:19 PM
36

Sorry you can't handle either reasonable and well-sourced arguments or emotional responses to rampant hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 04:18 PM
19

Well, I figured some women would take it well, considering how they'd like to hang out with wild animals in the woods.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 05:26 AM
47

"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 04:21 AM
0

How about you explain what your objection to that scenario of repeated asking is before pretending we don't know what consent is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 04:19 AM
1

Your entire comment is completely ridiculous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 03:16 AM
1

We don't really, because pretty much every actual production with any quality is totally consensual.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 07:28 AM
5

Yeah, how dare people not just submit to rampant lies and misandry?!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 07:24 AM
2

Why do you pretend as if I needed to be told this? Why make this comment at all?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/26 07:23 AM
1

I didn't make any comparison to video games, that was you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 08:49 PM
14

Yeah, makes me think it should be super easy to find evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 07:09 PM
1

Do you think porn doesn't have an age rating?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 07:08 PM
23

It shouldn't be difficult to provide proof of your assertions if what you claim is true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 05:16 PM
9

Like Australia banning all porn with women with smaller breasts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 03:04 PM
5

For real, there are some playgrounds that make for excellent shortcuts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 03:02 PM
9

Reason to believe that it's a mixed population.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 02:57 PM
2

Yeah, it very much is a double standard. I think it should all be just fine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 02:57 PM
1

I've written some. But the good part about those is at least they're fictional. You know, like nearly all of the similar videos on Motherless.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 02:52 PM
20

Note also that this claims every hit was from a man, when that's not true either.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/26 02:39 PM
1

I don't really think so, I think just the knowledge of something being fiction should be enough. It's not on the artist if someone does something stupid that the art isn't directing them to do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/26 07:10 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/SgjeZlkoaE You were in a thread with stats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 09:27 PM
13

Controlling the conversation... because the only way they can have a conversation about themselves without the subject getting switched away is to leave humans behind altogether.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 08:05 PM
15

The point isn't to have a coherent critique, the point is to challenge and bury any possible threat to the feminist monopoly on rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 07:54 PM
36

And it's visits to a site that is almost entirely normal porn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 07:57 AM
3

Good, her name should be consigned to the dustbin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:56 AM
9

It's a porn site where the vast majority of the porn on it is made by consenting adults. Of course it's going to have a lot of visitors. I spend way more time on sexual activity in a week than I do ordering pizza.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:54 AM
8

We're not questioning victims, we're questioning a reporter whose dumb ass thinks every porn video is a video of rape.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:52 AM
12

So if I were to pretend to be asleep and have sex on camera, that's somehow different and worse than me pretending to be thrown off Hell in a Cell and plummet 16 feet through the announcer's table?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:49 AM
7

I've written some stuff like that, and I just have to say it's not bestiality if the other being is sapient, no matter how they might be shaped.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:47 AM
141

Absolutely horrible how much the UK thread is blaming men for this. Real "What did you do to make her hit you" energy over there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:40 AM
4

"Repeated asking" can also take the form of "Want to have sex?" "No, not now." "Are you sure? We've got that thing tomorrow and I know you'll be too tired." "Yeah, good point, let's do it." There's absolutely nothing wrong with this scenario.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 01:57 AM
11

in the 80's 90s 2000s the societal beauty standards for women were much higher and more complex than for men. it created many cases of body dysmorphia and eating disorders. This is probably true. the body positivity movement asked everyone, women and men, to examine those standards. to understand that make up, photoshop, airbrushing, etc were utilized to make women look perfect. to take these images of perfection with a grain of salt because humans are much more varied and flawed than those unat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 12:29 AM
1

No, this is how I speak when I'm dismissive of someone, like you. You're being rude, I'm done with you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 02:31 PM
10

It's both, really.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 12:48 AM
15

I was asking them to make sense of it, because it doesn't make sense now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 11:36 PM
20

So a law meant to combat murders of women somehow fixed the domestic violence problem? While the number of murders of women went up? Something isn't adding up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 10:48 PM
34

Nobody has heard of this bullshit divide you're trying to introduce. This isn't real. The overlap between feminists and misandrists is massive. I'll note that you're also denying the term "misandrist" to pretend as though men aren't the primary target of feminist hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 08:10 PM
60

It's an intentional smear word to dismiss any and all activism and rhetoric that is aimed at helping men and boys. That way they can pretend everyone here is just a pack of rapist misogynist incels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 08:30 PM
10

Because that's an entirely different conversation, and your bringing it up is a deliberate tactic used by feminists to derail conversations about very real sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 03:45 PM
7

A direct result of the constant shaming of male sexuality. Imagine if these boys weren't ashamed of things like their arousal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 03:30 PM
3

You're in the place that's the parallel for men. This kind of intellectual space has been marginalized by feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 03:18 PM
19

bc rape is seen as one of the very serious crimes Somehow we should only teach one gender not to do it. and bc men (as far as I’m aware) do more rapes than women Ah, so we should let the rest slide? no, feminists don’t want men to die Then they should stop saying "kill all men" and lionizing people who do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 03:10 PM
4

Sure why not. I didn't write the comment, and I see no reason to be sexist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 10:29 PM
7

It's not, since the group defined is based on ideology, and not gender identity or sex. Far more akin to being judgemental based on membership in a gang.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 09:33 PM
18

The argument against lesbian IPV is actually that somehow all of it can be explained away by woken having been abused by men during the period that they might have dated men. But this excuse doesn't cover the correspondingly opposite lower rates for gay IPV. That only gets explained away by the "dominance" narrative that feminists love to push about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 09:13 PM
34

Ah, so your reservations are all completely based on your own stereotypes and not on reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 04:32 AM
1

I don't usually see threads "riddled" with them here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 05:40 PM
12

I think it's more the goomba fallacy, where these things are being espoused by different people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 04:40 PM
89

There's also been an effort by some people to make it seem like crossdressing itself is somehow misogynistic, because they imagine that the point is that the most humiliating thing a man can be is a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 07:58 AM
12

You are not misremembering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 01:27 PM
1

Sure, why not?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 07:48 AM
18

And there's a super common narrative that men are only into it so they can beat women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 04:13 AM
10

We are interested in uncovering systems and dynamics. It's just that the systems and dynamics we've uncovered are those that reveal that feminism is not at all interested in equality, and that there are systemic sexism against men that is being perpetrated and perpetuated by feminists. Some of these "struggles against sexual violence" have actually resulted in the exclusion of male victims and the protection of female perpetrators. Some of these "struggles against degradation" are just anti-sex …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 10:39 PM
17

There's a lot of bigotry to undo out there. In here you can at least speak your mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 10:31 PM
40

Privilege is getting the right to have actions against you be called the proper terms. Rape, not "made to penetrate," for example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 09:06 PM
66

It's like feminists actually think they live in a weird porn universe where everything really does run on dominance and submission. Actual BDSM doesn't even run like this, it runs on consent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 06:32 PM
6

Well try changing your user flair to “feminist guest” and make a neutral comment Your characterization of "neutral" is such a huge lie. You regularly defend conspiracy theories and sexist narratives, and people, including me, attack those. If there is an attack to be levied at you, it is for your actions here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 04:17 AM
4

Just so you know, the proper word is "tenet'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/03/26 04:10 AM
2

We do have empirical evidence. You, however, have nothing but an axe to grind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 07:13 AM
5

Downvoted for saying we should turn a blind eye to the racial factors at play, and definitely downvoted for saying we shouldn't have a political siding
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 09:03 PM
7

1: That statement is contained within the original in pretty much all cases. There is a pervasive myth that men have no fear of what might happen to them at night. This myth leads to statements like the one I lead off the example conversation with. 2: They are all tied to violent crime and the fear of it in one way or another. You are refusing to see that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 07:04 PM
9

So those fears are all basically tied in to violent crime. Responding to a dismissal of the danger men face with a rebuttal about exactly what danger men face is absolutely appropriate, not tone deaf. The invalidation contained in the first statement is inarguable, and it is everywhere in feminist rhetoric.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 06:44 PM
3

You inserted quite a lot of subtext all on your own. And yes, that is typically what is claimed, that men don't have to fear going out at night. Also, You think violent crime is the only thing a woman is afraid of at night? What does this mean?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 05:49 PM
7

Statement B1 is definitely dismissive. It's not, it's a rebuttal to the claim that men have no fear of violent crime at night. Your characterizations otherwise are wildly off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 05:38 PM
13

B is talking to A and addressing the core of their argument. A is looking for any reason to dismiss whatever B is saying, no matter how nonsensical it is. This is not two people talking past each other.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 03:18 PM
16

I'll illustrate it with a sample dialogue. A: Men aren't afraid to go out at night like women are. B: But men are most victims of violent crime. A: That's men doing it to other men. B: That's the exact same argument conservatives use to dismiss "black on black" crime. I've seen it come up numerous times, and it always results in the feminist flailing to claim racism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 02:32 PM
4

Most states have a law that disregards relatively small age gaps like what you cited.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 09:41 PM
2

Then why is the constant call from feminists to protect women and stand up for women in all kinds of spaces?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 07:20 PM
5

Talarico is not talking about the same Jesus that our Nazi party talks about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 07:00 AM
19

Talarico seems like the only Christian in Texas who actually understood Jesus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 05:08 AM
4

We were speaking about WHY gender roles look the way they do and HOW they get reinforced. I understand that through a systems lens. But you appeared to say it had to do with survival so it appeared you meant gender roles have biological origins mostly. Which is not what I believe. Biological differences between men and women are way smaller than most people claim them to be. Also if you look at apes or monkeys females in several species are equally violent to males. Sometimes they are just viole…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/26 12:43 AM
3

None of that is biologically gendered. It only is culturally gendered. Yes, gender roles are culturally-based. Did you think something different? Lying is intentionally twisting the truth. I haven’t done that. I speak what I think is truth. Then there is a gulf between what you think is real and what is demonstrably real. Not many? Maybe some teachers see themselves as feminists idk? Even if some teachers would, I don’t think they are that influential with the schools board. My own schools board…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 11:31 PM
6

There’s no reason why women are portrayed as temptress For the same reason men are portrayed as lustful beasts. To discourage sex when birth control doesn't exist. why men are portrayed as weak for crying. For the same reason animals hide their pain. Crying is a sign of pain, and men are expected to be strong to protect the family, tribe, town, etc. It’s not an argument. I’m not here to debate. Obviously. I’m here for open discussions. Then why are you spending so much time lying? I have no acce…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 10:27 PM
3

A way to pretend bad faith in others.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 09:31 PM
4

Gender roles is the consequence of the system. The system produces gender roles. I’m more interested to examine WHY gender roles exist and HOW they get reinforced in feedback loops. That system is what is called “patriarchy”. But I wouldn’t mind another name. No, gender roles are the consequence of human survival in a brutal world. Now we can shed them. You're just adding another rung on the ladder so you can keep blaming men directly. I disagree. A weak argument with no substance. The anti-sexi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 09:30 PM
3

Yeah I prefer a different name as well but so far there isn’t another name. Gender roles. That's what I use. It blames the roles and not a gender specifically. That's why feminists push back when I say that term and why I use it. Yes there are several branches or individual feminists that do this. But not me, not the frameworks and authors that I support. Every feminist whose words you quoted has done that. Can you show me which cases you are talking about? Belgium convicts first man under anti-…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 08:00 PM
1

For real, the "algorithm" feeds you what you click on. I watched a Yu-Gi-Oh video some years back and it gave me more of that. Was I "radicalized" into watching Farfa and MBT, two YGO creators, or was it just a system designed to give you more of what you seem to want?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 07:43 PM
4

I don’t justify it, I judge it You're defending the people who do it and the ideology that leads directly to it. Patriarchy is a real thing. Sounds like conspiracy thinking to me. Maybe there should be a documentary about feminists and their radicalization. Patriarchy is the name given to a system that causes institutionalised sexism against both genders and that explains gender roles. Both men and women reinforce patriarchy. Like bell hooks described. A lot of feminists even reinforce patriarch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 07:04 PM
7

I don’t think it’s intentional. That being said most harms in the world aren’t intentional. Nobody ever said “let’s intentionally harm black people” or “let’s intentionally harm women”. Those things absolutely happen. How can you justify protesting against support for male victims to get even a crumb of support? How can you justify protesting against making rape laws gender neutral? That's premeditated action with no result other than hurting people. And yes I take that seriously. Honestly why d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 05:31 PM
4

I believe there are extreme branches out there in some specific places who do that So you're conceding that there are elements of feminism that really are conspiring to hurt men? That's the whole argument right there. But I’ve never heard of that and it’s definitely not happening in my own country. You've heard of it in this very thread. Tell me your country and I'll tell you what feminist hate movements are doing. The loudest voices online don’t always represent the views of the majority. When …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 04:29 PM
1

The penis responds to stimulation and becomes erect. A rapist may then use that erect penis to penetrate themselves without consent of the owner. This unwanted sex should be called rape, but through feminist obfuscation it is not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 03:43 PM
8

That’s conspiracy level thinking indeed. The massive feminist organizations that do their best to fight against men's movements for even just recognition of men's problems are real. Feminists organize to protest against things like equal custody, resources for male victims of sexual and domestic violence, resources for homeless men, and even awareness of these issues. Feminists organize to protest against laws that would recognize men as victims of rape by women. It's not paranoia if they really…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 03:40 PM
2

Indeed it would be! And those other things need investigation anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 02:59 AM
9

Yes and after watching the Louis Theroux documentary, what stood out to me is how often manosphere spaces are tied to broader conspiracy-style thinking. You mean the ravings of a nutjob that tries to pretend as though there are no real problems men face, and that there aren't real massive organizations actively working to keep men down? Because there most certainly are. And feminists are at the head of those organizations. That's where the distrust comes from, because feminists are not at all tr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 01:39 AM
17

There aren't ways for societies to exist at large scales without bureaucracy. Bureaucracy is more efficient than anarchy, which is just plain stupid, or fascistic control where the state bends entirely to one will with no recourse or reason. Capitalism might be efficient, but it is not moral. For morality you need to be less efficient.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 01:28 AM
4

People travelled with caravans for all kinds of reasons. Best to travel in some numbers for safety.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 05:35 PM
5

(like a train or the historical equivalent of a bus - but it took days to get somewhere, so it wasn't for commute). That would be a caravan.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 03:14 PM
8

Traditional conservatives actually don't have a decent reason for intentionally obfuscating stats that they collect. They just wouldn't collect those stats, not caring about them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 03:07 PM
35

You see, fixing problems is way cheaper when you ignore the vast majority of the problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 09:53 PM
13

What exactly isn't left wing about this?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 11:05 PM
8

Her view of men is so hateful and so full of made up stereotypes that it's concerning you feel those awful ideas apply to you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 06:19 PM
12

And that says a lot about how hateful the movement is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 05:24 PM
3

He can be mercurial.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:52 PM
9

You know, I never thought about it that way. I suppose my own failure of imagination is trying to understand people who don't start with assuming that everyone has similar fundamental humanity to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:15 PM
6

u/ExternalGreen6826 isn't arguing in bad faith. They've been around enough that I can say that pretty confidently.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:57 PM
10

What if he was raped? He never consented, yet he is forced to be a parent. Keep in mind that we also do this to make children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:54 PM
11

I wasn't even thinking of that, I was just thinking it was rather obvious that rapists are going to rape those they have power over.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:47 PM
15

Her good standing amongst feminists, her long career, and the numerous accolades and pieces of recognition she's received over the decades that she's been spreading her hateful filth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 05:49 AM
17

It's better for her weird intersection of racism and sexism if she doesn't admit to that. Or if she did happen to admit it, to pretend as if white women were only doing it because of white men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 05:29 AM
12

My generalizations are by ideology. Feminists generalize by sex and gender. You can abandon an ideology. You can't abandon sex or gender identity. It is perfectly fine to criticize people based on ideology. Your response is further evidence of the conflation that feminist propaganda has made between terms. Feminism=woman=good, while patriarchy=man=bad. Look at what terms you flipped and how.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 04:46 AM
9

Feminists pretend to care all the time, but devote their books and what passes for scholarship on hate. Traditional conservatives also write children's books, am I supposed to believe that they're not filled with hatred too, when all evidence says otherwise? Millions of men are abused and raped by women every year. Feminists are very active in preventing them from being helped. Let's not pretend they care.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 04:06 AM
8

Then you swallowed the propaganda that feminism fed you. It means men. It has always meant men. That's why feminism names everything good a feminine term and names everything bad a masculine term. This sub is egalitarian, but feminism, and especially Bell Hooks's feminism, are not egalitarian. You're excusing her anti-egalitarian statements with far more grace than anyone should be giving for such vile statements. It's like pretending conservatives really care about women's sports, or pretending…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 03:34 AM
7

You yourself have been arguing that what people say isn't always what they mean. It's horrifically obvious that "patriarchy" is "men" but you get to play dumb like it isn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 03:06 AM
19

Your entire comment is coping with the idea that your paragon of feminism is actually just a bigot. "Oh, but she didn't reaaaallyyy mean that when she said exactly what she said." Her entire body of work is to be dismissed for being this the whole way through. She just starts being smart enough to engage in the usual feminist dodge of pretending "patriarchy hurts men too" isn't just victim blaming.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:59 AM
10

You must really bend over backwards to pretend that that isn't directly blaming men. "Patriarchy" has always been men to you people. That's why feminists gendered the term male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:39 AM
11

“The sexism of colonial white male patriarchs spared black male slaves the humiliation of homosexual rape and other forms of sexual assault. While institutionalized sexism protected black male sexuality, it legitimized sexual exploitation of black females.” The second one doesn't have a direct quote, but it comes from "We Real Cool" her screed against black men and black culture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:33 AM
11

Can you not read the words I quoted from her?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:30 AM
10

Patriarchy is a political-social system that insists that males are inherently dominating, superior to everything and everyone deemed weak, especially females, and endowed with the right to dominate and rule over the weak and to maintain that dominance through various forms of psychological terrorism and violence. It's right here in the thread.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:11 AM
22

She doesn't write at an abstract level, she writes at the level of a bigot complaining about groups she hates. You're not taking her total manufacturing of a fantasy world seriously enough. Theory requires you not do things like make up whole cloth the idea that most men are raped by other men, or that somehow male slaves weren't raped. It requires some connection to reality. She's just a font of hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 02:09 AM
10

Oh but that's just two of the many, many definitions feminists use whenever called on their bullshit. And the one I cited was one of the ones Bell Hooks uses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:51 AM
15

She just makes things up and feminists swallow it all uncritically. Then they go out and change laws according to these fantasies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:46 AM
12

And yet you support this conspiracy theory that men work to keep women down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:45 AM
14

The radfem version was the one that went mainstream, with all of its delusion about men supposedly being all about dominating everything. Turns out that was just the intrinsic dehumanization necessary for a hate movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:27 AM
22

You cannot possibly view her works that way without hating everything she writes about men unless you, too, have no idea what men are like. Have you ever listened to men talk about themselves? Or have you only listened to feminist shit-slinging? I find that just about every feminist text is colored not by reality, but by hate and fear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:04 AM
16

Radical feminists came up with their version of "patriarchy" as a way to directly blame men for all the gendered problems of the world. Don't try to put this on anthropologists for coming up with a term for the rule of fathers. The two terms are entirely different in connotation and denotation. The only thing I've ever seen feminists do harder than defend the movement is pretend that they're not all the same. I don't care what wood the burning cross is made of.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 01:02 AM
22

Yeah. I interpret her from the point of view that men are human and not a target for hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:34 AM
24

Because feminism totally made up the idea of "patriarchy" including the idea of intentionally gendering the term to help induce misandry. Me Too gave the lie to feminism to a lot of people. Asia Argento and Amber Heard being valiantly protected by feminists for statutory rape and abuse really showed that it was never about victims, it was about making sure women won and men lost.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:34 AM
22

Hilarious, then, that all of her analysis about men reads like she's never actually listened to a man in her life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:24 AM
42

She has no proof that enslaved black men weren't raped by white men. Another piece of random bullshit she throws out with no hesitation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:22 AM
26

And feminism reinforces both sides of the male gender role rather than doing anything real to help dismantle it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:20 AM
27

The fact that you love her says very, very bad things about you. She drips with hate and dehumanization. Her entire concept of men is based on hateful conjecture, with basically no input from actual men who would tell her in an instant that she's wrong about nearly everything she thinks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/26 12:19 AM
18

Maybe the quotes themselves were caught by an auto-filter for hate messages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 09:09 PM
14

Why would you test period products with a biohazardous material when you can replicate that same effect with non-hazardous materials that don't need to be extracted from a person?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 08:37 PM
52

Racist, sexist, doesn't use citations or facts, and is all around a shitty person. No one who has read her stuff and trusts it should be trusted themselves. Endorsing her work is the easiest way to prove that feminists are just members of a hate movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 08:34 PM
3

If you name every group allowed but one that's the most discriminatory you could possibly be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 08:32 PM
5

A trans what? Trans is an adjective, not a noun.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 08:31 PM
7

The source is the CDC, like most of our rape/sexual assault stats. They just hide those stats under "made to penetrate" to pretend only women are victims and only men are perpetrators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 08:30 PM
26

You're actually significantly more likely to be sexually assaulted by a woman, as a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 04:44 PM
-6

It's not remotely near the harm you're pretending it is. And you're kafkatrapping any criticism of your false equivalence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/26 01:00 AM
-4

Are you seriously comparing kink and humiliation play with real world disparagement and hate?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 02:27 PM
-1

And on top of that her recent statement about “you can’t be illegal on stolen land” while she lives in a fucking mansion. These two things aren't at odds with one another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 01:07 AM
2

The probability of you drawing a bad conclusion from a small sample size is incredibly high.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 07:44 PM
1

Again you are trying to draw a conclusion about a very large group from one very small dataset.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 07:38 PM
2

Your lived experience isn't wrong, your conclusion is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 07:33 PM
4

Your assumption is that most women are delusional. It is wrong to assume that from the experience of just one person. I could easily counter it by saying that hasn't been my experience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 07:16 PM
3

I'm saying you're wrong to assume from just your experience. It runs counter to egalitarianism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 07:10 PM
1

You're projecting onto billions of people what you've found in a few.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 07:03 PM
19

Don't engage in misogynist generalizations. We don't do that here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/26 03:36 PM
26

Differences in Frequency of Violence and Reported Injury Between Relationships With Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence - PMC https://share.google/jCuBWHCAvylnV7oHV
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/26 05:20 PM
40

Eg when discussing who are the more common victims of assault, it IS relevant to mention that most assailants are also men. It isn't, because that's not even true. Feminists promulgate myths like this because it helps them divert resources away from male victims. Same with shelters - it’s relevant to discuss the grassroots activism that led to shelters for women. Yeah, Erin Pizzey tried continuing that activism to open shelters for men. Feminists terrorized her enough to drive her into exile.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/26 04:32 PM
45

In their minds feminism is representative of all women, everywhere. So whoever they label as the enemy must be representative of all men, everywhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/26 06:00 AM
10

Already normalized.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 05:49 AM
21

Well, they've published manifestos. I) Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. II) Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. III) The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race. That's the big one that "The Future is Female" means. It's their 14/88.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/26 09:23 PM
7

Being a centrist is a bad thing when the center point is tolerating fascism. Being a centrist is fine when the center point is not wanting to be an activist for or against feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/26 09:17 PM
19

That is a great exercise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/26 09:16 PM
4

Very nice how literally none of your answers stray from the No True Scotsman fallacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/26 07:39 AM
6

These are things done by feminists in the name of feminism and you want to quibble over degrees rather than admit that only a movement with rot at the heart could do so so so many misandrist things?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:33 PM
5

Respond to each of them or admit that you're wrong, and that feminism is a misandrist movement rather than an egalitarian one. Your position is that feminism means equality, but every issue I've listed is anti-egalitarian. You need to dispel every single one, not just a single cherry you picked off the tree.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:11 PM
5

"The system" here meaning "the system of gender roles and the organizations and movements who have control over what happens, the largest of which is feminism." Feminists were behind leaving out men and establishing the "made to penetrate" category that the CDC still uses. It's so they can get away with myths like men are the primary rapists of men, because feminist redefinition requires the penetration of the victim. Feminists in the UK rejected proposals to define rape as nonconsensual sex rat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:09 PM
10

The Duluth Model of Domestic Violence Enforcement is the easiest one off the top of my head that exists just to hurt men and protect abusive women. That's pure, indefensible evil, and it belongs entirely to feminists. The redefinition of rape to exclude male victims of female rapists. The enforcement of exclusion of men from every kind of gendered violence shelter, including boys who should not be separated from their families. The protestation of any and all efforts to change rape laws to be mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 08:23 AM
6

Depends on the mentors. I can't imagine what damage a feminist man might do to a boy with self-worth issues who can't get away from his government-appointed brainwasher. Sounds like a recipe for more suicide.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:33 AM
5

I love how that show has the slight possibility of maybe showing that the main boy could be reacting like a victim of harassment by freeing himself from said harassment the only way he could. That would have been a useful show. But no it's because boys are all evil and all they need is to read that Manosphere to turn them all into Super Misogynist Predators. Make sure to demonize boys as early and as often as possible. And make sure to demonize anything that could make them possibly resist this …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:31 AM
4

Wartime statistics for death are that nearly all soldiers and warriors for all of history have been men. When we talk about wartime death tolls, men are always the vast majority of those deaths. For example the War of the Triple Alliance had Paraguay losing, by modern estimates, enough to reduce their male population to 1 in 4 people. Whatever number of women died, and there were some, it was rather low in comparison. Boys as young as 12, with some cases as young as 9, were conscripted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:25 AM
11

There are men at the top, but that's not all men. The vast majority of men are stuck at the bottom.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:17 AM
12

There are many issues men face that are directly caused by or hurt by feminist actions. Why should we ever stop fighting people who fight against equality?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:16 AM
9

Framing it as a feminism issue, the movement that gave women rights, insinuates that the "cause" of mens problems is that women got rights. No, it doesn't. It's a feminism issue because feminists push for other policies and laws that directly oppress men. The Duluth Model is one massive example of this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/26 06:14 AM
1

Blockers are the beginning stage of medical treatment, I'd say, and one that transphobes are happy to deny. And yeah, some kids might be miscategorized at first, whether by themselves or by the adults around them, or both. But that's why we have the whole system of therapists and doctors to help figure it out. Granted, there is definitely a layer of homophobia/transphobia when it comes to male people who are gender nonconforming. Hopefully more acceptance changes that over time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/26 03:29 PM
-1

Where did I say anything here about economics? That's what Libertarian means. You don't even know what you think. You're acting like freedom and equality are mutually exclusive, whereas they certainly aren't. Yes, but they're both in opposition to your ideas. Libertarians also oppose special treatment of any sort, Which is why you want to specially prevent people from getting help because you find it icky. Because discrimination isn't special treatment somehow. You're not even real about your ow…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/26 05:16 AM
1

The reality is more nuanced than you think. Apparently they're better at brainwashing than I thought. I think it's abusive that they encourage their GNC children to medically transition instead of letting them be masculine girls or feminine girls, but I also understand that the number of persons who identify as transgender, even within Gen α, is less than 5%. You're wrong about that. It's abusive to prevent your kid from beginning treatment for something they need. It's not abusive to allow your…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/26 05:04 AM
-4

I've been sent to troubled teen camps before by conservative parents. IK what it's like. For me it was worse because I had no internet for 2 years (2021-2023), a time gap you can even see on my Reddit account's history. So somehow you're playing pretend that conservatives don't abuse their kids to the point of death when you went through that? even if they decided that they're trans Not how it works, transphobe. On the off chance that I'm wrong, I'll leave my kid alone and let them do whatever t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/26 03:02 AM
5

Okay, I'm sorry your complete inability to communicate has caused you to become angry. Maybe learn how to unfuck yourself and come back later.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/26 12:04 AM
8

Do you even know what you wrote in your first comment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 11:01 PM
11

Hey, it happens. Take care of yourself. You're the only person whose #1 job it is to take care of you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 10:38 PM
9

Care to explain not only why you think OOP is "disillusioned" and why that's reason to dismiss everything?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 10:17 PM
1

Are you being edgy, stupid, or both?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 10:06 PM
8

Do you need a new thesaurus?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 10:03 PM
25

You don't have to be a misogynist. Recognize that people can be hateful and awful regardless of category.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 10:00 PM
8

Normal for a Ferrari fan.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 09:59 PM
1

They're a transphobe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 04:18 PM
0

Conservatives own the entire term "honor killing" and you want to play pretend that they're just fine. They run entire conversion camps and troubled teen camps and you want to pretend they love their GNC kids? You really want to pretend that? These are people who will happily, gladly say things like they'd rather their kids be dead than trans, rather they be dead than gay, and you think they're defensible? Yes, those are things that conservatives say. But what would you know, you're exactly that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 04:10 PM
0

I'm not even trying to scratch the surface on how much conservatives hate their GNC kids, but it's obvious as hell.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 04:04 PM
0

Because you can easily not be a conservative. It's not an immutable characteristic of a person.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 04:02 PM
1

You think conservative parents literally kill them?! It happens quite a lot more than you or I would like to think it does. One in 10 children face elevated risk of abuse due to gender nonconformity — Harvard Gazette https://share.google/vBe5mj7jwzgFbC5MA Characteristics of Fatalities Among Sexual- and Gender-Diverse Youth in the United States: 2015–2020 | Pediatrics | American Academy of Pediatrics https://share.google/MswzpHDCWPwOPCOld This abuse leads directly to suicide. It's conservatives d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 09:08 AM
2

It's normal to hate bigots. It's a waste of life to be a bigot like you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 07:24 AM
1

Generally speaking there are ways in which racism has decided that certain races are to be perceived. The rule seems to be that the darker you are, the more masculine your race must be. That's why so many issues that men get hurt on also disproportionately hurt blacker and browner people. Police violence targets people who are generally darker, but most often men, to the point that a white man is 10x more likely to be shot by police than a black woman, but a black man is 2.5x more likely be shot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 06:26 AM
0

Weird, because it's not true. Some parents might look into therapy for their gender nonconforming kids. Conservative parents kill their GNC kids.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 06:09 AM
0

You're really proving the emptiness of the argument of every single transphobe like you out there with everything you say. If the mods ban you yesterday it's a disappointment. If you lose the ability to communicate it's justice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 06:06 AM
2

Ugh, it's like we listen to people when they tell us who they are rather than just believing whatever we're told to believe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 02:16 AM
2

Yeah, I don't need to be told twice this person is obviously a transphobe. Defending Rowling is an easy signal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 12:18 AM
4

So similar to the JK situation where the hate is almost exclusively from the progressive extremists towards her, yet it is portrayed as the reverse. Lots of propaganda out there, I suggest going beyond headlines and actaully reading primary sources. Primary sources like her own fucking transphobic bullshit that she shovels every single day? Yeah, there is hate for her as there absolutely should be. Hate for bigots is always justified.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 07:50 PM
11

At a certain point it is All Feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 07:47 PM
2

You live in a made up land where conservative people don't beat kids for stepping out of gender roles. I've seen it with my own eyes. Conservatives are the worst human beings to exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 07:46 PM
2

Really, more than any conservative? Keep in mind conservatives would beat and kill their children who didn't confirm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 04:40 PM
66

I've seen misandrist rhetoric drip from the mouths of the most trans-inclusive feminists I've ever seen. It's all feminism, not limited to one sect. That's feminist propaganda trying to make it seem like they're not all swimming in hate. They are. The ideology is nothing but hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 08:14 AM
9

Feminism does not mean misandry or enforcing traditional gender roles. It absolutely does. You're seeing criticism of a right wing hate group as criticism of women when the two are not the same at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 07:45 PM
17

I'm sorry you're having a hard time with finding out these splits between how feminists speak and how they act. It's a human flaw, that split, and nobody is immune to it. You touch on a few other human flaws, like the need to look down on The Other, and I think what defines whether or not it's okay is how we define that Other. I try to define the Other based on actions and choices taken. Feminists define the Other as based in sex and gender. Lastly, there are things that matter. What you make of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/26 04:24 PM
7

No, you can definitely see a difference between classes, in that there's a social safety net for women that just doesn't exist for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 05:03 PM
4

Why did you turn "trans" into an initialism? It looks like they're an organization now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/26 04:47 PM
4

Yeah, they didn't lose hard enough on the pathologization of young black boys and men last time, so they're doing it again on a wider scale. All they learned was to drop the racist part of the argument, but not the sexist part, and definitely not to drop the argument altogether.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 05:26 AM
5

Well yeah. They're pretty much all the same people that tried branding young black boys as "super predators" back in the 90s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 02:11 AM
1

You wrote that they don't use it. Mobilization is just preparation for war, it has nothing to do with this conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 05:23 PM
1

I did. You are either wrong or lying when you say Russia is not using conscription, just as they are. Don't badger me when you don't like the answer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 05:16 PM
1

Russia actively uses conscription. To assert otherwise is to either be wrong or lying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 04:51 PM
9

This is one of the results of traditional gender roles, where men and boys are disposable and to be punished, shunned, and thrown away should they step outside the expected parameters. Feminists engage in this quite a lot, and we call this Carceral Feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 04:49 PM
1

I was correcting their assertion that Russia did not use conscription.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 04:29 PM
2

Well if all the people I'm not going to believe, you, the tankie CCP shill, are pretty high on the list.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/26 08:23 PM
3

Yes, they are. Where the hell are you getting your information?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/26 05:52 AM
1

I've said it's "the favorite misogyny of feminism/feminists."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 10:50 PM
6

I've called it the favorite misogyny of feminism when I've had it thrown at me. Hits a nerve.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 05:25 PM
3

Russia uses conscription and keeps expanding it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 05:19 PM
14

But, um, that's not Real Feminism!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 05:17 PM
2

I think they mean his actual criminal conduct he was arrested for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 05:06 PM
1

The younger the voter, the more likely they are to vote against misogynist parties and candidates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 05:05 PM
4

Yeah, a supremacist movement that's anti-male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 04:38 PM
7

Not only that, but the remaining men would be isolated and kept from forming bonds with other men in any meaningful way. An enforced loneliness that would amount to endless torture for any male unfortunate enough to exist in that world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 04:31 PM
14

Laws against vagrancy were very popular at the time that the Declaration of Sentiments was written. Vagrants were most often poor men, just as today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 04:29 PM
2

I'm not sure about frequency on either count. I would, however, caution you to keep in mind that correlation is not causation. Maybe the rappers are making music about what they're already in, rather than the music encouraging a culture of violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 04:56 PM
3

I think some are true stories and some are guys trying to be hard and fit in. As for the metal lyrics, some are real, but most are definitely fake.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 04:35 PM
3

Have you ever looked into the more violent genres of metal music? I feel like you'd find similar types of lyrics in those songs. I'd be interested to hear what you think of those parallels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/26 03:46 PM
3

I think the problem with your argument is that a lot of those labels are perfectly accurate for the people being called them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/26 03:31 PM
11

Part of the problem is that feminists think it's okay to be critical of men as a group. Criticize actions, ideas, and arguments all you like, but criticizing a group based on immutable characteristics is bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/26 03:11 PM
2

Awww, thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 06:21 PM
2

It's not the only prerequisite. If it's not necessarily a bad thing, why does it prove a bad state of affairs? Patriarchy is an academic term. So was drapetomania. Something being an academic term doesn't mean anything. I've supported the term with empirical facts central to its definition. In other words, I've demonstrated in what sense it constitutes systemic privilege. You can assume something to be true and then choose to demonstrate why it's true without it being circular. You've demonstrat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 04:00 PM
31

Around 90–95% of recorded sexual assault and rape perpetrators are male (a demographic skew). Yet some go further and use the rhetoric "not all men, but always a man" which shifts from statistical observation to categorical attribution, collapsing correlation into identity-level blame. This stat isn't remotely true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 09:21 AM
3

I didn't even imply this. One could conceive of some society where the majority in power are men and it isn't inherently unacceptable. But I'm talking about the real world. What I said is that these truths, in context, constitute a patriarchal system. You made it a prerequisite for the standard of patriarchy, so the implication is that it needs to be removed. This is a ridiculous thing to say. Not rigorous at all. The point is about systemic inequalities. What ever privileges you can point to wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 09:17 AM
3

Do men occupy the majority of positions of power, or don't they? And has this always been the case, or not? So there's literally no way a society can be acceptable with even a bare majority of people in power being men? Do we live in a society in which women's rights were harshly constrained, or don't we? Were, yes. Are? Women have more rights than men, demonstrably. Turn down your hostility. No need to be a jackass.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 08:50 AM
4

It's okay not to know what to believe. That sounds like a good first step. I hope you can find some good information here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 05:14 AM
3

Is there a way you could reasonably believe that there is no patriarchy? What would have to be true at a minimum? Because your points are largely about the past, and some of them are... dubious.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 05:07 AM
4

When you say that "feminism is the best deal they could get from men" you frame it, intentionally or not, as men's fault that feminism is the way it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 05:06 AM
2

The mods removed a lot of them, unfortunately, so I don't have any.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/26 04:52 AM
9

In effect, feminism promotes sexism so long as that sexism benefits women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 03:46 PM
4

Both, really.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 08:35 AM
3

Please don't use "Latinx" as a term for us. It's a form of cultural imperialism and it sounds dumb.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 05:22 AM
17

Basically the main mods were all outed as being massive transmisandrists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 05:12 AM
14

So you saw the whole CuratedTumblr thing, too?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/26 04:38 AM
14

Even in the best places you only have the slightest chance of anyone believing that discrimination against men is possible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 11:38 PM
8

Even the war against the Axis was mostly a result of the Western elite funding Nazi Germany before they invaded Poland What in the world are you talking about? America only joined late in the war. Apparently joining 2 years into a 6 year war is "late." The brunt of the war was fought and won by the Soviets who were also being explicitly genocided by the Nazis. And the Soviets were imperialist as well, but no need to call out how their early entry into the war was also to kill Poland.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/26 11:07 PM
9

Or you could just not do any of that dumb bullshit and use protection.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/26 03:53 PM
5

Please don't bring up a notorious sexist and racist as a good example of your beliefs and expect anyone to respect you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 11:06 PM
2

Perhaps, but given that only one of those is being enforced with massive numbers of laws, and only one of those has people that claim to be helping while actually hurting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 10:55 PM
10

Did you come in here thinking we don't know anything about women's issues at all, so you decided to explain everything? We know all about them already. And they're completely irrelevant to the insane amount of misandry being pushed from all sides.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 09:56 PM
29

saying you're a scientist yet not bothering to compile the evidence yourself. Citations are perfectly normal in science.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 04:19 PM
6

Women needing their husband's permission to buy stuff was a thing for a long time. Gonna need some proof for that big claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 05:35 PM
3

Putting aside your own feelings for a time in order to take action that you may not want to do. That's classic stoicism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 05:20 PM
3

Spartan Lover is just one company that makes sex dolls for women on about the level you see people bag on men for having. Yet the knowledge that these dolls even exist is not widespread because there isn't much of a drive to criticize and shame female sexuality in the same way now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/25 08:26 PM
5

I don't know about that, there are some really realistic dildos and other toys made to resemble various parts of the male body all the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/25 08:05 PM
3

Cartel type behavior.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/25 07:55 PM
7

Feminists often pretend that all men are only interested in the dominant role in these kinks, so naturally men are into them to hurt women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/12/25 07:53 PM
5

That's a myth spread to allow people to get away with false rape accusations, despite the fact that there would have to be evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the accusation was knowingly false.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 10:50 PM
1

They want specialized training for all professionals involved, which means judges, and coordination between the prosecution and judges for the cases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/25 03:33 PM
170

Women can't be wrong, silly. Oh boy do I love how much feminism leads straight into traditional gender roles again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/25 03:38 PM
3

Of course!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 04:01 PM
2

Great!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 02:39 PM
6

Age I can see being a different category, but because of the general helplessness of those who are very young and very old.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 02:33 PM
12

What standard would there be for establishing abuse?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 01:18 PM
19

This is good news, now the lynch mob of 200,000 people has been somewhat blocked in their efforts. Time for whack-a-mole with the endless new ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/25 08:52 AM
1

Repealing the 19th Amendment is abhorrent and you have no place in civilization if you think that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 04:35 AM
3

Because there is no scenario where everyone dies if nobody is genitally mutilated. There are scenarios where everyone dies if nobody fights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 04:33 AM
9

The people who choose feminism over equality make that choice every single day. They're the ones who protest against male rape victims and victims of domestic violence being recognized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/25 04:26 AM
1

You're not sure what my stance on the issue is because you don't even know what you're talking about when it comes to mental disorders. You've thrown around a dozen of them interchangeably, and now you're bringing up BPD for the first time, which could be an initialism for two different disorders in itself. I have been saying that a lot of your talk has been shaming people who have been through tough times for things that aren't their fault. You need to stop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 04:58 PM
1

These aren’t random conclusions, but traits of several personality disorders that get caused by trauma and which result in promiscuity. Unfortunately, it’s only one of their most benign traits. Sure, we'll just pretend that these are all things that it's appropriate to shame people for as you're doing and not disorders that need help. but you’ve abandoned this position already. No, you just gish galloped away from it. Now you’re arguing that problems with emotional regulation, attention-seeking …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 04:40 PM
1

Second, it very often means a tendency to cheat. Shaming like these random conclusions. the dysfunctional emotional regulation often goes together with risk-seeking behavior, anger issues, or substance abuse. You're walking across twenty different things to try and get to a place where you can pretend as though your problem isn't with promiscuous behavior itself. It would be very nice if they didn't, but this isn't what happens in my experience. Or the person who struggles to connect is trying t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 04:20 PM
1

Where that promiscuity isn’t a way to get attention from other people, I see nothing in that that requires the shaming you're talking about here. or a way to feel something despite dysfunctional emotional regulation Oh no, you mean trauma might hurt someone's emotions? Surely shaming them will help! or a lack of ability to connect with others emotionally? Then they're not looking for a relationship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 04:00 PM
1

Or it doesn't and you're stereotyping victims.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 12:53 AM
2

Are you in the Toronto area? Pretty sure that kind of discrimination is illegal up there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 12:09 AM
1

Then the problem isn't promiscuity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 11:40 PM
1

You didn't understand the analogy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 11:39 PM
1

Sometimes it's not that easy to drop a person from your life. Especially if that person already holds power over you. A kid shouldn't be punished for being in the deep end if their parent is the one who keeps pushing them in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 08:30 PM
1

Maybe they were also being taken advantage of. It can be both things at the same time. You want to indulge to 30% and someone else drags you to 100%, you know? Like dragging a kid to the deep end of the pool. Yes, they wanted to be in the pool, but not that part.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 08:26 PM
7

Also the pressure to have sex as soon as possible for boys makes it very easy for predators to operate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 08:24 PM
5

Yeah, some people just really like sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 08:22 PM
1

...or they were working on fixing them and it took time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 08:22 PM
11

We shouldn't use that as a reason to dismiss a problem. Men are overwhelmingly the victims of violent crime, and it's dismissed by feminists who pretend that it's okay since men commit most homicides.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 08:21 PM
5

Well yeah, their ideology explicitly teaches that women aren't to blame for any abuse. What else do we blame when Good People do Bad Things? The Devi...I mean Patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 03:19 PM
14

If you're a man who got help from a feminist organization for dealing with abuse from a woman, you're a very, very rare kind of person, as were they. Most feminists and feminist organizations will do anything to excuse women's abuse of men and try to label the man as an abuser. After all, it's the normal response of a movement that blames everything bad in the world on men and men alone. That's just one of many reasons why people here do not have any respect or sympathy for feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 04:32 PM
18

Or you could take the baby out of the bathwater before throwing it away. We care about those issues, we just reject the feminist framework as limited and often hateful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/25 08:25 AM
1

Try to convince yourself you're not guilty of whatever you did. I'm sure the next drink will do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 08:44 AM
1

You care enough to keep switching accounts to be incoherent on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 08:43 AM
26

The main point of Menslib and LeftWingMaleAdvocates is to focus on male issues within an egalitarian focus. No, that's solely the focus of this sub. Menslib has a focus of downplaying and burying men's issues in service of feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 07:16 AM
-2

You may want to start considering opinions other than your own, which seem wholly informed by "both sides" propaganda rather than anything real.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 07:15 AM
3

You wish. The last sloppy drunk you encountered you raped and got caught now feigning to be female in an incel group. Making shit up, as usual for the nuts who like to stir shit up in here. Regurgitating weak, unsubstantiated theories of men being victims of the most savage experiences women have. Denying one victim is denying all of them. But I wouldn't expect a bigot like you to understand anything further than your next bottle. Unrealistic. And total projection, likely the product of the perp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 07:05 AM
4

From hateful people like you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 07:02 AM
2

So what if other people think certain ways and act certain ways? The point is not what they do, it's what you do. If you believe in helping all people, not just a few, you're on the left.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 07:02 AM
4

Says the sloppy drunk who can't even write.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 06:07 AM
3

Ah, that explains why you're so confident about how stupid you are. I can only assume you're drunk and trolling because you're a failure with no friends.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 06:07 AM
4

We're asking you to have empathy for men forced into military service. But that's a bridge too far. You are not a victim of rape Assumptions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 06:05 AM
6

You Don't want Equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 05:40 AM
4

Oh boy quite the zinger! Haha, you're so funny. It seems like they're nowhere, given how the measure was rejected by a 70 point margin.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 05:39 AM
4

The only one I see jerking themselves off in a self-righteous rage is you. But it's always nice to see yet another person whose manner demonstrates that they never learned what that silly "empathy" notion was come in here and make a fool of themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 05:24 AM
8

It does come off as delusional in that you think that all ideologies are equal or that all people who choose an ideology to champion are doing it because of some kind of identity reason. I think what I think because I'm trying to make things better, and I see my ideological path as the best way to get there. If I found out beyond a doubt that it didn't work, I'd throw it away and try something new. It's mutable. You're also wrong in the idea of left vs. right being about whether corporations or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 05:20 AM
8

I've been here for quite a while. And that's not evidence of ideology. Show evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 05:12 AM
4

Where are these women in Switzerland that want the draft?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 05:07 AM
8

Indira Gandhi was responsible for numerous aggressive military attacks during her time as Prime Minister of India, including against her own people. She sent a great many young men to their deaths, while not drafting a single woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 05:04 AM
6

Don't worry, you're not one of those men. And never will be. So why are you upset. None of us are free until we are all free.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 04:56 AM
6

Back up your claim.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 04:53 AM
11

We're used to baseless claims like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 04:31 AM
8

Sounds like you're assigning a trait based on gender identity. Don't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 01:50 PM
25

It doesn't matter what a person's gender identity is, only whether their ideas and arguments are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 03:51 AM
3

Plenty of bad-faith people would start shit with him if he didn't say that, no matter how obvious. It's like how tons of posts here have to emphasize how much we're not against women's rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 07:49 PM
16

People who trade their labor and time for the money they need to survive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 02:14 PM
0

I read it as saying it's not women's responsibility (exclusively) and you read it as saying it's not women's responsibility (at all.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 02:09 PM
3

He didn't do that though, he just said it's not their responsibility. While I think it's the responsibility of everyone to make sure everyone feels welcome, he did not blame women nor men, and he did not say women were most affected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 08:21 AM
5

Maybe if life was solely about first impressions, but it's not. What do you see here, with us?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 04:36 PM
3

So... absolutely necessary for a struggle because without them supplying you with (ideological) arms you won't have much to fight with?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 04:34 PM
6

Are they? I don't see "turning back the clock" on most things, I see wanting the same freedom that women got.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 04:17 PM
7

What's your point?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 02:58 PM
5

Make sure to dump together feminism (more general women's movement) and fans of reality TV (hobby with mostly women) to really drive the point home how bad the conflation is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 02:56 PM
11

And they're fighting working-class men who are blatantly left behind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/25 02:52 PM
0

Sure, you just came in and insinuated that any porn use is a problem given your experiences. I tend to push back on people who push these agendas. Lol. Yeah we just pretended to talk about how it makes us feel and how it makes our partners feel. Etc. all made up. You know if someone seems to be a weird anti-porn nutjob, I wouldn't feel safe talking about how it has a perfectly fine place in my own life and relationship, especially if everyone else seems to agree with them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 05:17 PM
1

I never said I was doing that. You're making assumptions. Yeah, because if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck... I explicitly stated the men that I am close enough to talk about it have. My brothers, close friends, therapists. All of them? Really? And you think they're honest with you, the person who assumes porn use is a struggle? Who am I to judge? The person whose judgement oozes from their comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 04:25 PM
1

If you're doing it to push some kind of strange anti-porn agenda, yeah. I called bullshit because the men who have a healthy relationship with porn wouldn't be the ones to tell you about it. And apparently you know about the porn habits of every man around you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 03:56 PM
5

Sounds like bullshit to me that literally every man you know that used porn had problems with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 05:00 AM
1

Not all of us have to make progress on a large scale to be decent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 02:45 AM
1

What do you mean by solve problems? And which technological industry are they against? And what's wrong with being a novelist?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/25 12:26 AM
3

wing who are all mostly useless nerds What does that even mean?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/25 11:45 PM
2

"Struggle" with porn meaning what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/25 11:44 PM
3

Haha, it happens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 07:45 PM
3

I...I said that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/25 07:22 PM
5

Ummm..the most bad-ass warriors on the front are women - they volunteered for it. I fail to see how they're any more badass than the men who volunteered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/25 02:35 PM
28

Hasan defends Russia invading Ukraine, he never had common sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 05:22 AM
35

19 and 17 is such a tiny gap that the law shouldn't even care. Most states wouldn't care about this at all, whether because the age of consent is 17 or even 16, or because of "Romeo and Juliet laws" that say that tiny age gaps like this are allowable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/25 05:20 AM
27

I'd call it more of a manosquare.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 05:26 AM
22

He could have said “young people,” unless college bursars and landlords run a discount program for the ladies which I haven’t heard about. They do. There are 10 scholarships for women for every one for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 05:25 AM
14

Seems low given what I know of UK politicians. I can't name a single good one from any point in time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 05:22 AM
12

Oh I've seen firsthand. It's the favorite misogyny of feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 11:10 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 08:34 PM
10

under the banner of feminism whether labelling itself so or not If it's not under the banner, it's not feminism. You don't get to claim random shit just because it looks good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 04:07 PM
11

If a person chooses to be a feminist, they sign on for the shitty takes that feminists espouse about CEOs not being femme enough. If you want the feminist movement to not be some kind of capitalist adjunct, you have to police the movement. A person does not choose their gender, so they bear zero responsibility for what others of their gender do or do not say. "Men" as a group have no ideology or internal consistency necessary, so there's no need for ideological policing in the same way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 03:59 PM
13

It’s like saying modern women, “hoes” and “401’s” are one of the biggest complaints of men You're comparing a stereotype of men, who do not choose to be men, with a reality of feminists, who choose to be feminists. You have consistently done this over many conversations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 03:42 PM
24

But feminism does get in the way of that struggle. Look at all the complaints over the specific gender ratio of CEOs. That's one of the most common complaints from feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 03:36 PM
17

She rejected feminism as being too divorced from the reality of the struggle against capital.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 03:31 PM
21

The top comment in this thread asserts that. Please read it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 03:22 PM
22

If someone explicitly rejects a movement, they're not a part of it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 03:12 PM
2

Except people with empathy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 07:44 AM
16

because of toxic masculinity You mean misandry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 07:36 AM
80

We do. It just doesn't matter what we say. Feminists have created an environment where either you're with them, or you're a regressive bigot. Any dissent or criticism is not okay, no matter how thorough you are in backing it up with empirical evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 12:13 AM
0

Revenge is wrong, plainly put. The people who want to turn the wheel of oppression to place themselves at the top are on the right. That includes feminists. I don't want there to be a wheel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 04:02 PM
1

The difference is that when you choose to be a part of a group that does bad things, you chose to be a part of the bad things, too. When you can't choose your group, you're not responsible. It's like how women aren't responsible for other women's bad actions, but someone who joins up with Boko Haram is absolutely responsible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 03:59 PM
1

You haven’t in any way substantiated why feminism is a hate groups I have in other conversations with you. As much as woman and girls are socialised into submission And men and boys are socialized into being taciturn. I personally do think in some sense shy men should be more appreciated but this is because I support shy men Same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 03:56 PM
1

I'll stop criticizing feminists when they stop being shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 06:25 AM
1

“You don’t have to make you’re life small in response to the pains of women” Indeed, no matter how much you get yelled at to step aside for women because something something thousands of years. tell them either that this is what women have gone through Apparently being shy is another evil that the supposed "patriarchy" inflicts on women and not men. Please don’t associate feminists with conservatives I have no reason not to. They've shown themselves to be a supremacist movement. That's conservat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 06:24 AM
1

You're very welcome! Good luck in building your language-house!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 05:32 AM
5

Well, I'd be fine with it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/25 05:30 AM
19

It's already established precedent under UK law that men don't have bodily autonomy. It's also established that women can't be guilty of rape, so there's no need to have a gender-neutral punishment for a crime that they define as gendered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 01:51 PM
2

Diversity is valuable, but in my opinion experience and expertise are more valuable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 08:03 AM
29

They all seem qualified. I have no issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 07:27 AM
31

It's much, much better described as a system of gender roles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/25 06:50 PM
1

I have it on good authority Luigi is innocent. Maybe he should just be released.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 01:28 AM
2

Awww that sounds fun! Would it help you to know that Spanish has a ton of dialectical differences, or is that already part of your motivation? My mom's Spanish is so completely different from what I got from teachers in school.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 05:28 PM
2

that my ESL is like sandpaper. I'm not sure what that means, care to expand?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 05:06 PM
6

Plenty of feminists protect mothers from being suspected of these crimes, and some of those feminists are mothers, does that count?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 05:02 PM
2

I also try to track new slang, but just so I can make my partner cringe!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:51 PM
3

Nice!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:47 PM
3

If you aren't communicating so the other person understands what you're saying, you're not communicating.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:41 PM
3

It's more classist than racist, in my opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:38 PM
3

Oh yeah. After all, don't stereotypes dictate that men are into cars?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:36 PM
5

See, I also switch things up when I know someone has autism, but I switch things up to make myself more verbally explicit in communication. I've been told it's helpful, and I wish more people would do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:23 PM
4

To be fair whoever killed that guy is fucking based. And Luigi hasn't been convicted of anything.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:19 PM
7

It's a common meme that people with autism are really into trains and the like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:18 PM
12

Taking up space is the right of every human being. We need voices to be heard, not to be silent because they were born wrong. Conservatives and other right wingers like feminists want dissenting voices silenced to make their own message stronger. But each person matters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/11/25 04:12 PM
1

"Something good about them" meaning the men who volunteered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 07:35 PM
6

It's about retirement and benefits of retirement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 07:34 PM
5

Because that's an entirely different subject?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 06:06 PM
2

Irrelevant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 05:53 PM
1

No, my point was that this behavior (acting safe, not being safe for LGBT people) is not exclusive to women. I didn't engage with every single point on every sentence because I agree that society does act as if women have more empathy in this regard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:47 PM
1

I engaged with the original point, not whatever extra stuff you came in randomly accusing me of with no evidence of any wrongdoing on my part. Is there nuance involved? Yeah maybe. But I rejected the blanket stereotype that this is something women do that's exclusive to women. That's all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:39 PM
40

I remember a moment in a college class where we were to read Susan Sontag's book "Regarding the Pain of Others" and how disgusted I was by it. It made the case in an early chapter that it's so terrible to have to watch bad things happen to other people, and that it's just as bad as living through them. I led a little bit of a revolt in the next class session where I made my case that grief was way better a fate than being conscripted to die, and the professor agreed that the book sucked. That's …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:27 PM
63

The funny part of this is that by raising the retirement age for women above that of men, you might close the lifetime earnings gap significantly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 01:22 PM
1

I did engage with the point in that this behavior (homophobia under a guise of progressive ideals) is definitely not exclusive to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:55 PM
1

but i wonder if you do the same in the face of criticisms of men. I do. I've been on this sub since the beginning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:45 PM
9

Oh ok, it’s not a bodily autonomy issue It most assuredly is also a bodily autonomy issue as well, and that was only one of a few physical effects. but I’m interested in the concept of paternal surrender First thing is that it's not paternal surrender, it's parental surrender. If a woman wants to give birth to a child and leave it for a willing father to have as a single parent, that should also be allowed, in my opinion. However every time I've talked about it with other feminists, they pretend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 04:44 AM
9

The foreskin keeps the head of the penis moisturized, for one thing, and without it you get a tougher, less sensitive glans and frenulum. r/intactivism can tell you more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 04:28 AM
6

Yeah, there definitely are in most places. For example there is nowhere in the world that bans cutting infant boys.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 04:24 AM
1

Pretty sure they were talking about MGM, not FGM
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 03:34 AM
7

The legality is the same in both respects, but at least the Australian government doesn't push it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:29 AM
73

United States, New York. FGM is illegal here, whereas MGM is very common and pushed by the American Medical Association and hospitals.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 02:24 AM
134

And women's bodies are legislated in a way that men's bodies aren't. It is explicitly disallowed to cut parts off of a female body in ways that it is allowed to cut parts off of a male body.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/25 12:58 AM
2

Next you're going to tell me that abortion for women is a poison because conservatives won't negotiate about it, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 05:24 PM
-4

Yeah but that's true of some people regardless of gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 05:23 PM
4

A lot of people are passively homophobic, but I don't see how that relates.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 01:55 PM
4

Are there any reproductive rights that men should have in the case of rape? Pleasing conservatives is poison. Feminists are conservatives, so pleasing them is poison to equality too. Why should I take you seriously if all you do is make declarations and shit on equality? Why should I take you seriously as to whether or not someone is "hinged" or "cooked" if you won't say anything more than imperious demands for us to give up? You want to leave? Good, get out and never return. This space is for p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 01:14 AM
5

You've presented absolutely no argument as to why you think that, just asserting that it is that way. Our political effect won't be increased by making needless compromise with people who find even our most milquetoast positions abhorrent. It's by convincing third parties and making progress with awareness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 12:45 AM
6

Are there any other rights and ideals we should be capitulating on just to appease people who will never be appeased with us existing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 12:26 AM
198

So men, despite being a tiny minority in education, were most of the volunteers to help out a vulnerable population? Says something good about them. And it makes me wonder why there weren't more women volunteering.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/25 01:34 PM
2

Sorry, you're gonna have try again, but this time without being completely wrong. Intersex conditions are part of the bimodal distribution of human sex.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 11:52 PM
3

Intersex conditions | Intersex Society of North America https://share.google/RUDV3obdgtpy8h2ml It is a bimodal distribution. Sorry about your bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 11:17 PM
19

Men have not been conditioned to be stoic, so much as women are more sensitive to negative emotion. This is most likely because of the extreme attention and sympathy required by newborns. Those are two separate ideas. Men are conditioned not to share their pain, and you're reaching for a strange evo-psych response when evo-psych says that it's to keep up the appearance of fitness, like many animals do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 11:13 PM
7

I don’t necessarily think analysis’ centred on toxic masculinity are bad In some sense I agree with them and I definitely find it useful as a way of reflecting on my own sense of masculinity with all the difficulty that entails It's a lot less damaging to people if you refer to the problems you encounter as misandry rather than associating masculinity with toxicity. Then you place the blame where it belongs, rather than with your own masculinity. I’ve seen folks talk about boys in school and why…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/25 02:29 PM
26

No, because any better model has to run smack into the fact that men are humans, not monsters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/25 05:40 AM
5

That's why I threw in the fans of a show, since it makes no sense, but it's a group of people made up primarily of women around a hobby, like "gamers" always get demonized as part of the "manosphere" despite only playing games.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 06:39 PM
8

It should be "Children and vulnerable first" in my opinion, that captures the disabled and elderly in a single term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 06:03 PM
25

If the "manosphere" can conflate completely different groups, why can't the "femisphere" do the same? If we use the terms the same, the bullies from the Tea app, TERFs, femcels, and fans of shows like Love Island are all exactly the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 02:28 PM
33

I think you might need to edit this a bit, as Movember has surely gotten more than $800 over 20 years.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 05:22 PM
3

What is the W-word you mention?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 04:06 PM
3

No, I mean report to the moderators.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 02:48 PM
7

You know it's incumbent on you to report bad actors too, right? Not just compile a list to be mad about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 06:28 AM
7

Uhm, actually feminists talk about rape culture and criticize this double back speak of requiring men to have clairvoyance. They do talk about how women perpetuate it. That's why it is a problem that is on a societal level, and simply saying men bad isn't taken seriously. I have literally never seen a single feminist acknowledge this except to disparage the concept as misogyny. Just because someone is criticizing men, or is a woman, doesn't make them a feminist. Just because you interact with so…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 05:46 PM
3

The point is that "patriarchy" as a term has always been poorly defined, and the fact that no single definition coalesced out of all of these feminists writing alongside one another and working together means that they were fine with defining it poorly in this way. A poor definition allows them to define it in whatever way it needs to be defined at the moment. It's a multi-tool of debate, used to make sure that whatever side the feminist is on is the right side, the Women Are Wonderful side, and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 05:38 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/hUTEn1tSmb There you go. You talk a lot of shit and you never back it up. Projecting onto me. I think you are lying. I'm not but thanks for assuming. I don't think you know you're lying, but you have a lot psychologically invested in this victim mentality and it makes you make extraordinary claims (that bell hooks thought men were monsters inside) that are not evidenced. It's so "white woman's burden" of you to assume I'm unintentionally lying (ly…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/25 08:57 PM
58

So how would you say this kind of thing is meant to be taken? It's clearly mocking men for suffering. Is that usually supposed to be taken well? Is it usually okay to mock someone for having a problem?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/25 03:02 AM
50

Opinion column, so they're under zero obligation to tell any kind of truth. I expect nothing less from TERF Island.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 11:35 PM
3

It predates capitalism, but capitalism makes it worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 03:43 PM
5

They just don't have nearly as much responsibility for solving the patriarchy as you're letting on. you're absolving YOURSELF of the responsibility you know DAMN WELL you have for fixing this mess. Patriarchy is our mess. That's just a fact. Putting this together, you are in fact absolving women of the 50/50 responsibility they deserve in the system of gender roles, and heaping responsibility more than they deserve onto men. You do this partly by calling it "patriarchy" so you can get away with …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 03:42 PM
5

Soft objection on the grounds of talking about the man being non-fictional and the like. "A real man would never act like Christian Grey does."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 03:28 PM
1

Then you didn't read it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 02:57 PM
61

Dear Name of Son, will add later I am writing to you because renowned director Stephen Graham told me that you're going to be an incel terrorist. Don't do that. Get a job instead. Regards, Your Father.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 12:04 PM
2

This is classic feminist slop where everything is actually misogyny and patriarchy. I fixed the statement because there was everything to fix in it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 11:48 AM
23

This is classic in our patriarchal society. Emasculating men is part of our culture of toxic masculinity. This is part of the system of gender roles. Emasculating men is part of our culture of misandry. Fixed that for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 09:43 PM
14

Feminists placed that specific expectation on themselves. That's where the disconnect comes in. Personally I'll push for women's rights when necessary. But don't misinterpret that as me speaking for the movement. As it stands in my country men have markedly fewer rights than women, so my focus is there right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 07:05 PM
1

I'm not getting your meaning.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 02:52 PM
10

Yeah, that's pretty much the tone of her writing about men. She knows men better than men know themselves, so sit down and shut up while she womansplains men. Never mind that it's all based on stereotypes. Norah Vincent talks about how all men are pushed into intensely masking at all times, and she talks about how much of a burden that is. Bell Hooks talks about how men mask because they're actually all just monsters inside.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 02:36 PM
10

The call is coming from inside the house.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 02:10 PM
14

Of course feminists love Bell Hooks and hate Warren Farrell. They're polar opposites. Hooks spews vile hatred with nothing but her own ass to pull information from, while Farrell gives actual reasons and stats to back up his non-hateful points.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 07:36 AM
28

"The enemy is both weak and strong."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 06:07 AM
2

Yes, it does. A person bears zero responsibility for the things done by a group they didn't choose. Meanwhile when a person chooses to attach themselves to a group that actively harms others, they are far more responsible for what that group does. You have said you're a man, but that doesn't mean you bear any responsibility for what other men do. You do, however, bear responsibility for the group you chose as a feminist, since you chose to support them and continually choose to keep supporting t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 06:36 PM
7

Social democracies can still go straight into right wing nutjob land.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 02:42 PM
8

Indeed, the goal seems to be reinforcement of certain aspects of traditional gender roles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 02:39 PM
2

And I can’t in turn list alot of things that men do? No, you can't, because men don't choose to be men. Feminists choose to be feminist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 01:33 PM
2

unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386852/PDF/386852eng.pdf.multi https://share.google/nKGlsloprlX63p0BE UNESCO says the ratio reversed after 2010.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 01:29 PM
9

Aktion T4, which was systematic mass murder of people with disabilities, was the result of right wing nutjobs. The right wing is predicated on hierarchy, and there has really never been a hierarchy that puts people with disabilities anywhere but the bottom.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 01:18 PM
26

Producing no physical product isn't a problem, that's just what services are. What they do is produce fiction passed off as fact. They're a propaganda arm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/10/25 01:15 PM
3

as they often have to tame their man’s ego as well as act as his emotional carer disproportionately Ah, I see we're doing blatant misandry now. Tell me what other gender stereotypes you subscribe to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 02:57 PM
9

"Mental load" you cite as if women are the only people who ever struggled with a mental load in a relationship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 06:21 AM
3

I just tell them it's impossible for that to be true since my mom has had the same credit card account since 1973.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 05:56 AM
2

And then people use the combined number anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/25 09:19 PM
11

More women attempting is an artifact of self-harm without suicidal intent being counted as a suicide attempt. Given that women use self-harm more often, the statistics are greatly skewed by that miscounting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 07:27 AM
2

Seconded on Dadvocate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/25 10:52 PM
13

None of the things you listed as being caused directly by feminism, are caused by feminism. This tells me you didn't read anything they wrote.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 02:38 AM
19

So this survey does not capture a man being forced to perform oral sex on a woman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 01:31 AM
1

It happens all the time: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0010782421001815
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/25 08:15 PM
16

Well, the Geneva Suggestion does say that POWs are to be treated somewhat like one's own soldiers, so Russia is doing that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 06:28 PM
7

Generally people don't like it when you call them worse than an animal. It's dehumanizing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 12:50 AM
15

Oh, so sorry, what you're looking for is "gender roles" which has no inherent misandry to the concept and covers more of the problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 12:45 AM
2

Whoever takes care of the kid. Foster parents, probably.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 11:49 PM
2

The basis of it was actually to prevent infanticide. Post-partum depression often leads people, usually women but not always, to kill their babies. Handing over the baby instead of killing it is often easier to convince people to do. Then the misandrist double standard of child support enforcement kicks in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 11:43 PM
2

You're not understanding me. Many of these states might allow men to give up their kids this way, however those states may still impose the responsibility of child support onto parents who give up their children. Now we take what we know about child support enforcement, that it's nearly exclusively enforced on men, and you have the situation where women have the right to legal parental surrender, no strings attached, and men don't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 10:57 PM
3

And how many of those states terminate parental responsibility for fathers? We already know about completely unequal enforcement of child support, where women can get away with not paying quite easily, whereas men are sent to prison for doing the same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 09:47 PM
1

And that's not the whole picture.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 08:03 PM
1

until suddenly one man out of the entire study complains about a trivial side effect that makes the entire process a failure. This is a malicious misreading of what has happened to each human trial. The trials were nearly always shut down due to ongoing sterility after taking the contraceptive. That's not a minor complaint or a trivial side effect. That's a fundamental failure of the contraceptive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 08:03 PM
1

Tax reform is far more likely and easier to accomplish than a revolution.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 07:54 PM
1

Defeatism helps nothing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 07:51 PM
1

I see no reason to hold back celebration if someone really was that bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 04:43 PM
4

They are explicitly not gender neutral.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 04:41 PM
5

You said "all it takes is a pen and paper for a man" in the scenario of Legal Parental Surrender. I'm telling you that women already have this right. Men want it too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 03:20 PM
3

Rape happens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 02:49 PM
1

We can afford a lot more social support than we have by taxing the rich properly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 02:49 PM
5

Women already have Safe Haven laws to hand over their baby, no questions asked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 02:48 PM
14

Custody, visitation, and financial support. Look at what a woman gives up under Safe Haven laws, and apply that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 02:46 PM
8

Stealthing a man isn't a crime.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 01:02 AM
14

The right to both prevent pregnancy The right to prevent a pregnancy is not available to men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 11:18 PM
7

Like it or not, women are still a vulnerable class in society, despite all the improvements in their legal rights. Women have more legal rights than men, and receive far greater protection under the law.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 11:15 PM
5

I'd be laughing the exact same amount if Laura Loomer got shot, let me tell you. Gender doesn't matter, only the hate these people spread matters.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/25 11:14 PM
16

Link to what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 05:27 AM
26

Tell that to all the other feminists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 04:59 AM
27

Most people are told culturally and sometimes outright that talking about men's issues is forbidden. Maybe the men you speak to are so wrapped up in this feminist idea that men don't have problems that they think it's actually true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 04:18 AM
3

Me: Some people like it. You: NOT EVERYONE Now did I say everyone? I did not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 03:50 AM
29

Not exactly possible with Russia in your hemisphere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 03:44 AM
2

Why do you think that? Do you think it's impossible for people to enjoy sex work?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 03:36 AM
1

Your position on this displays a lack of empathy and negative revolutionary potential. Someone like you telling me I lack empathy and won't be a part of your "revolution" is a compliment. It tells me you can't identify empathy with both hands. I suggest you immerse yourself in the accounts of women who've survived sex work, I suggest you immerse yourself in the accounts of people, not just women, who don't regret sex work. or better yet donate your time and energy to community efforts to support…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 03:21 AM
1

You see, I don't think it's quite so binary. I think a person can make a choice, assuming they're a free person. And if that choice is sex work, then on some level they did consent, whether or not they like it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 03:12 AM
1

Is consent a binary yes/no to you, or do you realize that sometimes we do things we don't really want to do because we have a reason to do them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/25 02:59 AM
19

They have been engaging here before, but not on this issue specifically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 08:36 PM
12

I think it happens in Sweden, too. Don't quote me on that, I just know it's not solely a UK thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 08:35 PM
5

You're assuming it's rape without giving a moment's thought to anything else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 08:34 PM
30

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/yyNFWqTxeZ
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 07:55 PM
33

It is evaluated wrongly in many different ways. In some countries all domestic violence is filed under "violence against women" regardless of if the victim is a man. There is a far lower standard for counting this violence than for hate crimes in most places. The same standards are not enforced for men at all, anywhere.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 07:54 PM
45

I reject "patriarchy" theory for the same reason I reject MGTOW. A person's gender should not be the reason for you interacting with them differently. Acolytes of "patriarchy" gospel pretend that men need to be brought lower and women need to be raised up, so we should decenter men in all things. MGTOW people say that the world is too harsh to men, so they need to take their ball and go home, not interacting with women. Neither is good for humanity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 07:50 PM
7

I think they're just like the vast majority of people who engage in work they don't enjoy whatsoever due to economic disenfranchisement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 07:43 PM
12

Both are career paths. Both can produce dopamine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 03:27 PM
-1

It's really not, since under a perfect communist utopia pornography and sex work would be done solely for the love of the act rather than monetary compensation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 03:09 PM
2

You can't have sex slaves (or only technically not slaves) and rebellious/bored rich daughters doing wildly different things with wildly different consequences in the same umbrella. What does this even mean? Is this about genres or what? There is also something to be said about dehumanizing sex. Not from a feminist angle, but at some point I realized that the more I watch porn, the more I disconnect the idea that sex is something that happens WITH a woman, vs TO a woman. But thats a different co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 03:07 PM
17

So what? Being a writer is heavily correlated with depression, you want to outlaw that job, too?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 03:04 PM
8

Does our society at large have a healthy relationship with porn? No, because the moralizing over it makes people develop insane shame complexes and compulsions over using it and hiding it. The healthiest people with respect to porn are those who have moved beyond this religious pseudoscience.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 03:00 PM
3

So what do you think about gay porn? What do you think about people who enjoy the work and choose it over other options?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 02:02 PM
7

Ah yes, pseudoscientific mumblings that moralize about the "soul" are always welcome. It's a great way to totally ignore the ways in which people use porn in their healthy sex lives with their partners.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 02:01 PM
14

Funny enough, that is an entirely different concept. If you want to say that, say that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/09/25 01:56 PM
1

A hypocrite misandrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 03:43 AM
3

You're assuming that I'm talking about the person who makes a single imperfect action. I'm not. I'm talking about people who are activists for equality until the moment that it comes to their hated group, then they start talking like Nazis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 03:35 AM
4

Applying your ideals inconsistently is evidence that you don't actually hold those ideals, you hold a perverse version of those ideals at best, and should be considered different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/09/25 02:53 AM
5

What was that dumb bullshit about everyone being Charlie Kirk, a fascist whose death only makes the world better? Edit: They replied "Keep fucking around and you'll find out" as if that isn't a massive threat.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 10:22 PM
11

There is, actually, but it's a lot narrower in scope than people think. Most of what people call transmisogyny is really just misandry, but some of it is specific to trans women and does not carry over to men or cis women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 08:29 PM
12

Yeah, I know the effects on women, whether cis or trans, so we're totally in agreement there. It was just odd that you talked about minority men specifically, but I see what you're getting at.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 03:30 PM
16

Misandry is a general term for hate against men, so I have no idea why you felt the need to talk about different kinds of men. Obviously they're under the blanket term of "men."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 03:19 PM
12

It's not exactly the same, since conservatives were doing that to push transmisogyny specifically, whereas this is pushing misandry. But it is the same in that it is pushing hate for people who don't conform to exactly what the speaker views as good for AMAB people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 03:02 PM
9

If they go hardcore right wing depending on who they're talking about, they're not actually following leftist principles, and shouldn't be considered as such.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 02:59 PM
13

The fuck are you on about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 07:29 AM
28

He wasn't Hitler. In function he was more Goebbels.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 02:15 AM
1

Is the bigger coincidence that the evidence aligns with the irony-laced ideals of this minuscule, fringe far right group that has been rarely heard of until right now, or that the evidence straight-forwardly aligns towards the ideals of the much larger, much more mainstream group? The bigger coincidence is that someone who is a secret left winger who secretly went extremist leftist subsequently used the exact same language as a far right wing group who have been around for quite a few years in e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 12:24 AM
1

Information which may or may not apply in this case, with no reason to believe it does. Yeah we should just believe in the massive coincidence theory instead! His family has self-reported that they are conservative and have been much less clear on what his politics are. They asserted that the whole family, inclusive of him, was MAGA. Other contacts have suggested that he may have been a leftist contrary to his family. Other contacts that are anonymous or have had those accounts retracted. I'll t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/09/25 12:09 AM
2

I'm relying on the information that we actually have Except the information I've shown you. You are speculating past what we have You are speculating that he did a magic secret flip to the other side of the spectrum. I am speculating that his own family is telling the truth. Quote me calling you insane and desperate. Don't play that game with me. It's three comments up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 11:57 PM
2

I have never once said that your theory is impossible. It just very unlikely. You pretended that I was insane and desperate for thinking these things. How is my evidence "lesser?" The evidence I'm referencing at an obvious face value suggests antifascist tendencies. If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, what is it? You are using speculation to recontextualize that evidence away from the obvious conclusion into pointing at a specific group of right-wing extremists. Again, you may be correc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 11:44 PM
2

Which, given that this guy was turned in by his own dad, doesn't apply to the shooter. Apparently it's impossible for that to happen for some unknown reason. So out of the people that don't share the politics of their families how many of them are going to go further in the same direction as their folks? You're pretending it's a given that he didn't share his family's politics. It's not. You made that up. Again, you very possibly could be correct, but what I'm saying is all common sense. You kno…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 11:26 PM
2

Any direction except the one their parents like. Not always. I came from a left wing background. People usually share the beliefs of their families.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 11:18 PM
6

(like a lot of young people do...guess which direction they tend to do it in?) Any direction. Your proof is literally my proof but weaker because it requires extra conjecture to get there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 11:14 PM
4

The idea that someone used a calling card phrase from a right wing group that definitely opposed Kirk while killing him while that someone came from a right wing family who also said he was MAGA like them is orders of magnitude more likely than you speculating he's left wing... because!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 11:07 PM
-1

So you read the part where people who were against Charlie Kirk specifically were right wing nutjobs that used the song? You read that part and decided to claim the source was bad?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 11:02 PM
1

What's The 'Bella Ciao' Song, And Did Charlie Kirk's Shooter Have It On His Bull... | Know Your Meme https://share.google/1f3nlM1VmVxrkG6PD Your narrative is false and your pearl-clutching isn't warranted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 10:49 PM
5

What evidence we do have seems to point out that the kid's politics were ANTIFA which is, let's be honest, left-of-center extremism. This is absolutely not true whatsoever. He was a groyper, a follower of Nick Fuentes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/09/25 10:25 PM
95

Men aren't "falling behind" so much as being intentionally held back. Teachers give worse grades to boys and punish them more often and more harshly for the same infractions. Boys are more often victims of infanticide. Genital mutilation is legal against boys. Boys and men are more often victims of violent crime. Young men get a fraction of the scholarship support that young women do. Young men are paid less and less often hired than young women. Men are more likely to be homeless. Men are far m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/25 10:25 PM
1

If you have suitable skills, you don't need 40 minutes. And I didn't demand it. Just don't judge things you aren't willing to assess. Or you could use your words like an adult. The level of argumentation I see here very low level. Consider working on that. r/iamverysmart Why? I presume anyone saying that doesn't understand what patriarchy is. No, I know what it is. I find it offensive to suggest that the whole of humanity has boiled down to men hurting women. A proclamation, but you've yet to pr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/25 02:41 PM
1

First off, 40 minutes is a lot of time to demand from people. You don't get to dictate what I do with that much time. Second, the entire concept of "patriarchy" theory is offensive. Thirdly I find your criticism hilariously shallow.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/25 05:58 PM
1

Why would I devote 40 minutes to this "patriarchy" drivel?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/25 04:00 PM
7

A person who uses those terms is trying to pretend as though all the problems in the world are made by men. The terms don't have concrete definitions because they're twisted to mean whatever the user wants them to mean, so long as it always blames men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/25 07:04 PM
6

They're bullshit terms, and their use means what I said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/25 06:37 PM
13

Basically "I want to twist this so I can blame men for something that may in some way mean that women more commonly have a certain flaw than men do. As women are wonderful, that's impossible, so it must be men."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/25 02:44 AM
3

some of them are horrendous and misogynistic though Which ones? I haven't seen any that go unchallenged.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 07:21 PM
8

It was invented by feminists who started with the conclusion that men are violent and controlling, and asked leading questions of women to get to that conclusion. Then they used that "study" to pretend as though men are the sole problem when it comes to domestic violence, and that women are only ever violent in response to men being violent. Feminists leveraged their institutional power to put into place laws and law enforcement rules that would demand men be arrested in any domestic disturbance…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 07:21 PM
9

Not surprised at your language choice there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 05:03 PM
7

Ha! You have a sense of humor at least.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 04:18 PM
8

Your style is just one reason why you fail to convince people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 03:50 PM
1

How do you feel when you run away from debates?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 03:37 PM
3

Kid, nobody's watching a 40 minute video on subjects that are actively offensive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/25 02:57 PM
3

If you think they're wrong, explain how.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/25 07:51 PM
17

Forced chemical castration for men, mandatory maximum of no prison for women. Allow in solely female migrants, reject male migrants. The Labour Party has made sexism a central tenet of their policymaking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/25 07:48 PM
2

They think it's unnecessary because they think men don't have problems. Even the slightest help towards men is too much for these hateful people to handle. It doesn't matter if it whimpers and says it's not like the others, it's still about men, so it's still part of the evil patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 07:19 PM
2

You said you weren't going to do something and then you did it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 07:18 PM
3

If they don't call out the misandrists in their ranks and fight them down, they're complicit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 07:17 PM
1

And there are more types of cops than bastards but ACAB.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 04:54 PM
2

Anarchy doesn't get you to the stars. It abandons you in the wilds to die.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 04:48 PM
8

This sub is a place where relevancy to the main issue matters more than reciprocity. A sub not devoted to a single concept like this one is shouldn't be shutting down a related issue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 03:08 AM
3

such as what menslib has done Menslib is what we call captured opposition. They pretend to care so that feminists can point to them as the men's movement of choice, making sure that nothing gets done and there's less resistance to their hate movement. And no, I don't care if some of them are good. They're like good cops, still taking part in a broken structure and nodding along when the bad ones hurt people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 03:32 AM
3

https://archive.is/AWSEN A large list of feminist actions that directly oppose equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 09:57 PM
3

I thought it was mostly men in power? and I’m not gonna “by other men this one” Pick a lane.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 03:45 PM
3

Those feminists are major roadblocks standing directly in the way, that's the problem. Stop defending them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 03:34 PM
3

You consistently insist that "patriarchy" is a real phenomenon that exists in western countries, and you keep defending a hate movement. Claiming feminism isn't a monolith is only serving to give cover to what feminists actually do with the power that they have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 03:33 PM
5

Male disposability, and thus the oppression of underclass men, long predates capitalism. Dismantling capitalism will do nothing to protect these men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 03:20 PM
3

No, you're more interested in defending feminism than you are in anything approaching equality. Feminism has fought against fixing every single one of those issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 03:15 PM
3

Seems like small peanuts compared to issues like the life gap, prison gap, education gap, lack of reproductive rights, lack of protections against sexual and interpersonal violence...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 02:57 PM
3

even in the micro men take up space Men tend to be larger as a matter of biology. Should we malnourish boys to be more feminist, or should we recognize that taking up more space as a result of simply being larger is okay? norms from marriage to sex are privileged in the favour of male interests Have you ever actually seen the stats on how many fathers get equal custody?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 02:35 PM
8

More boys die from male genital mutilation each year than girls die from female genital mutilation. You want worse? One of these problems is worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 02:28 PM
10

Yea some feminists, just like any humans can be sexist (shocker) The movement is stuffed absolutely full of sexism, basing nearly everything on sexism. It's a hate movement. Conflict is a part of politics that everyone has to Apparently we're just fine with harrassment and vitriol as long as it's from feminists? Women are forced to be the carers of men because patriarchy and because capitalism erodes spaces for other connections that are the amatonormative nuclear family No, the "mankeeping" ide…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 04:25 AM
6

Explain?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 09:39 PM
8

You didn't actually reply to me, you made a new thread, hotshot. Who cares if feminists are misandristic so are alot of men (misogynistic to boot) Feminists love to claim to be against sexism. Either they're lying or hypocrites. If men have a problem then they should criticise them nothing is above being criticised Men do, and this is met with extreme backlash by feminists. How is this not a problem if capitalism? Are you a leftist the overwork cost of living crisis, degrees that won’t lead to j…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 07:47 PM
9

Misandry? In the echelons of power or in actual real life leftist spaces?? I have less ability to buy the former and still not the latter. Both. I never said that, men can create spaces if they want to that fine to address male specific struggles but this is just about focus women and non binary folks are perfectly fine to join in and in fact their perspective is appreciated Unless that perspective goes against the grain and asks feminists to not be so misandrist all the time. Some men can be to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 04:15 PM
6

I have a friend who is like you, and I think it would be good to let out some more of your blue collar personality with your friends. Either open their minds or get rid of people who suck. However it goes, you'll have to mask less.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 02:20 PM
9

This is the same thing woman do when they excuse their “misandry” because it was a response to misogyny and patriarchy, we don’t stoop that low It's not, because feminists constantly excuse that pattern of action. This, however, is an explanation, not an excuse. Plenty of people care about men they are in positions of power, wealth authority and privilege and have their views given higher presidencies, there is a reason the term “male as default” exists it’s even in language, perhaps discourse i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 02:12 PM
5

Your diagnosis is lacking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/25 05:47 AM
5

Bad attitude. Grow some empathy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/25 05:46 AM
2

Once again you and Hooks have drawn conclusions out of thin air, and you've brought in this Flower Bomb person to talk about how some black men embrace capitalism...to somehow prove patriarchy. You're playing pretend, just like every other feminist, thinking that the gender divide is somehow the result of men being horrible and women being innocent victims. This is capitalism. Your example before about the police was capitalistic violence and racial violence, not proof of patriarchy. You haven't…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/25 03:19 PM
2

Yes, I absolutely still think Bell Hooks is without merit. What Baldwin writes has little to do with "patriarchy" as a concept and everything to do with rejection from the in-group. You're using tangentially related ideas to defend a thesis that just isn't true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/25 07:37 AM
2

Imagine reading the appalling mountain of stereotypes Bell Hooks ascribes to black men and pretending as though you're somehow enlightened for agreeing with it all. I disagree with her words for the simple fact that every word of hers is so at odds with basic humanity that I can't for one instant respect her or anyone who thinks like her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/25 06:49 AM
1

Since they actively sabotage efforts to actually help men, they're not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/25 09:27 PM
2

Why shouldn't I hate a movement built on hatred? What possible reason is there for me to be accepting of a movement that is so consistently sexist? Why should I need to be free of that? Here is a sadly truncated thread detailing just a few of Bell Hooks's numerous problems with being racist and sexist as all hell. If this is your paragon, you're lost. https://web.archive.org/web/20220427172255/https://twitter.com/RezistansM/status/1149181945206792192
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/25 05:09 AM
3

You're so incredibly gullible when you read the drivel that they write to defend the indefensible. You just went ahead and believed Bell Hooks and her slop that's meant to be the exact passage that feminists quote to pretend as if the other 99% of her writing isn't Mein Kampf. Because you so badly want to believe that you haven't been suckered in by a hate movement. You imagine yourself to be an intellectual, and better than the people you talk to because you can spit out these concepts, so how …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 04:41 AM
3

You didn't acknowledge even a single thing I said. You just gave me some feminist boilerplate nonsense and pretended I'm too stupid to understand anything. Read what the person in front of you is saying before you say another useless condescending word.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 10:41 PM
5

You're equating two very different things here. They don't, and I don't, like the continual assertion of All Men as The Oppressor of All Women for All Time, like feminism loves to say. You're then using this perfectly reasonable objection to put words in their mouth about specific places and circumstances that you're oversimplifying to a dangerous extent. What does your theory say about intellectual dishonesty of this scale?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 03:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter