TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Perfect_Sir4820 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,891 comments by Perfect_Sir4820 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,891 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Because of social conditioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/26 11:34 AM
6

Unconscious people obviously can't consent. Blackout drunk is totally different. Some people can behave totally normally in that state and not remember anything afterwards.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 01:11 AM
1

So you're not familiar with how marriage law works and the concept of family property?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/26 10:20 AM
3

So you're saying that if you had a bf do all that stuff for you and not work then you should also pay him a salary?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 09:28 PM
1

works, wife takes care of the family He's paying for her living expenses. That is the compensation. What you are suggesting is that she is taken care of and is then further compensated for the opportunity cost for the choice she didn't make (career). Ridiculous nonsense. If a girl gets pregnant and decides to keep it and her bf gives up a lucrative career move to stay closer to his kid, do you think she owes him the salary difference? If that sounds insane then the gender swap should too.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 09:26 PM
0

She already addressed that: I can only assume you’re starfish in bed and men just get discouraged
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/26 11:09 AM
4

Even better just look at surveys that show women prefer male doctors as female doctors are more likely to be dismissive of their concerns and pain.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 11:03 AM
6

management realized it was bullshit they're probably super scared of a woman running off to social media to blame them for anything That was it exactly.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 09:39 PM
7

This happened recently at my company. Female colleague got caught abusing the expense reimbursement system, had a meltdown when confronted and blamed it on a "boys club culture". The higher-ups let her get away with it. No consequences as far as I'm aware.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 07:11 PM
0

It sounds like you're just lumping lots of online discussion by various men under the red pill banner.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:22 PM
-1

More recently tho, I think even Red Pill has acknowledged that RP THESE days is less about spinning plates and or keeping frame than it is a support network for men who feel wronged by society and specifically women. Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:24 PM
4

I think OP is misunderstanding the quote. So, you're categorizing women as "sluts" and "good girls", are you? In reality, there isn't much difference between them. The "slut" explicitly states she can sleep with other men. The "good girl" hides the fact that she can sleep with other men. Pay attention to this detail before categorizing. He's not saying that the "good girl" is sleeping with other men, just that she always has that option if she chooses to do so. Because she is a "good girl" she m…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:21 PM
0

Glasses are great just not for reading. Pol pot massacred people who wore glasses after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 02:55 PM
1

she didnt back away that must be a good sign 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 06:30 PM
1

You can show her what a great kisser you are. 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 05:56 PM
1

You're 32 still chasing after 18y.o. barely-not-children sloots on the apps. Not an enviable life my guy. To each his own though! 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 05:33 PM
1

Why are you assuming I'm being sarcastic? You should be really proud of yourself for getting a match on online dating. A great achievement!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 10:32 AM
1

Very impressive! 😳
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 10:02 AM
1

Wah!! 😭😭😭😭 Your inability to read and understand English is the problem my guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 09:22 AM
1

Aw someone's butthurt. Why don't you whine to the reddit police?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 08:31 AM
1

Just try it and see. What will it cost you other than a few seconds of time? Also why are you so triggered? If you go through life being upset at everything you don't understand you're going to be very unhappy. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 06:46 AM
31

Where are the criminal charges for her assaulting him repeatedly?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/26 06:28 AM
1

I don't think I could dumb it down enough for you without quite a bit of effort. Why don't you put it in chatgpt and get it to explain everything to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 05:47 AM
1

No. You just didn't understand the analogy. Maybe re-read the whole thread and see if you can figure it out sport.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 06:46 PM
1

So when I said this: Nah if the guy gets off then the 'tire' was changed just fine in the end. You took that to mean that he could not change the tire? Do you even understand the concept of an analogy? We're not actually talking about fixing a fucking car. 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 05:16 PM
1

Do you have a point with saying you dont care about your mechanic being competent ? Well I didn't say that so... If the mechanic is unable to change a tire he's also very unlikely to fix your car Did you even read what I wrote? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 04:14 PM
2

When women are given the same power over others that men have innately they behave the same way or sometimes even worse, such as with incarcerated youth. Highlights: - A higher percentage of male (6.1%) than female (2.9%) youth reported staff sexual misconduct. - A higher percentage of female (4.7%) than male (1.6%) youth reported youth-on-youth victimization. - In most-serious incidents of staff sexual misconduct, an estimated 91% of incidents involved only female staff, while 6% involved only …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 04:58 AM
3

Like not caring seeing your mechanic unable to change a tire properly Nah if the guy gets off then the 'tire' was changed just fine in the end. You think I'm going to get my car there, have the mechanic put it up on the lift, get all the wheels off and then I'll say no to the tire change because he's using the wrong color balancer or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 03:55 AM
1

This is nothing new. Back in 2011 The Onion came up with this gem.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 05:32 AM
2

Past criminal history would be the main reason Why not read the article before offering your ignorant opinion?
/r/MensRights20/07/26 05:29 AM
28

Nonsense. There are in fact studies on this very topic that have rates as high as 30-40% which is also very similar to polls that show more than 30% women would falsely accuse someone. The ridiculously low 2% figure you see feminists bandying about is lower than the exoneration rate of rape criminal trials ffs.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 05:41 PM
2

Your top comment only focuses on the crime of perjury. The guy you're responding to is talking about the additional crime of fraud. Recovering damages is a third issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 08:13 PM
-1

You're accusing me of mansplaining for having a different opinion? Gtfo. Being a delusional perma-vicitim is a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 07:56 PM
-1

A red flag is a covert thing. Deducimg potential warning signs from behavior. A guy being straight up about his intentions right from the get go in a take-it-or-leave-it fashion is the opposite of a red flag. If she's not interested it's because they're not compatible.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 09:03 AM
2

If you remain single then your sad, unfulfilling life will become more so as you age.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 04:27 PM
5

"Endemic hunger isn't real because dumpster-diving is a thing." Great thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 03:53 PM
8

Its also just a huge cope as anyone who knows any single woman over 30 is well aware of. This is also (mostly) true for men too. We are social animals and tiktok isn't a substitute for the real thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 12:45 PM
13

sos de Paraguay True statement. la concha de tu madre Generic insult. I'd even say it was a backhanded compliment as Mbappe paid homage to Paraguayan culture by using a regional colloquialism in Spanish rather than English or French. 🤷
/r/MensRights10/07/26 12:35 PM
17

This may come as a shock to you but players on the field can be mean to each other sometimes. Sometimes even the refs get involved. Nothing like a sitting senator, representing her constituents and country, spewing such ignorant, ridiculous, vitriol.
/r/MensRights10/07/26 12:28 PM
4

Its a pretty straightforward thing. This is what I've always done... The Rite of the Amorous Overture Classification: Segmentum Domesticus // Protocol: First Contact Phase I: Purification of the Vessel The Adept-Suitor must purge the flesh of the taint of Nurgle (stale sweat) before entering the warzone of romance. The Bath of Lustration: The physical carapace is scrubbed with the Holy Oils of Old Spice. The Litany of Dental Purity: The Adept scrapes his dentin plates while chanting: "By the Emp…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 01:19 PM
1

It should be that vegetarianism is a core belief of devout Hindus. That is your misunderstanding. Vegetarianism is a core tenet of Hinduism even if not all of them follow it. Some Hindus are conservative and some aren't. I was specifically referring to the conservative ones politically. They can choose to be devout or not and be vegetarian or eat meat. Just as a vegetarian can happen to be Hindu or not. The two things are linked in a venn diagram with some overlap but being one doesn't mean the …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 08:01 PM
1

You’re implying that all devout Hindus are conservatives, when that need not be the case. Is it opposite day or something? That's explicitly what I'm saying is not the case. Just to be clear because your reading comprehension is non-existient, the person I was replying to was implying that red-pill was synonymous with conservatism. That is just as false as saying that Hinduism is synonymous with vegetarianism. Hard to do when all the original redpill subs are banned, also never claimed all, just…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 04:34 PM
1

I shouldn't have used vegetarian and vegan interchangeably but that really is beside the point. I don’t think that’s right chief Well you'd be wrong then. Also no true scotsman etc etc You should look up what that fallacy means. If you're suggesting that only social conservatives are redpilled then you'd have to provide some evidence of that. I consider myself to be quite liberal for example. The red pill is dating advice for men. That's it. It hold both men and women to a higher standard and wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 03:15 PM
1

No. I'm pointing out the logical flaw in your reasoning. You do you though.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 12:25 PM
3

Vegetarianism is a core belief of conservative hindus. Does that mean vegans are conservative?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 11:32 AM
5

Red pill advice is just to work on yourself, get fit, decenter women. That's it. There is no immigration policy in dating advice ffs. Red pill is not conservatism, it's not white nationalism., it's not the 'manosphere', etc, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:54 AM
7

You basically just red pilled yourself. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/26 10:40 AM
7

I'd go scorched earth personally. She's basically scammed you out of a happy and fulfilling life. It's not going to get any better OP so it's time to put yourself first and get rid of her.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 02:08 AM
–

That's why I said it's the ego saving term. It has just enough ambiguity as to where the 'relationship' is going (be real, 90% of the time it's nowhere) for her not to think of herself as his fuck buddy only. It's really not confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 09:54 PM
8

"How do you write women so well?" "I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability." Truer words have never been spoken. 😂
/r/MensRights05/07/26 09:40 PM
–

Situationship instead of fuck buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 09:26 PM
–

The ego saving nomenclature is situationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/26 09:01 PM
2

Thinking that correlation = causation doesn't show any understanding of voting patterns and useful demographics (whatever that is supposed to mean) whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 03:17 AM
1

ideologies are on opposite ends of the spectrum You're going to have to explain why you think the red pill has a political ideology first.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 03:16 AM
0

Right and I'm saying that an incidental correlation is irrelevant and the premise of OP's post is misguided.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 02:45 PM
6

I am one so there's that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 02:11 PM
1

OK and? She has a problem with conservatism and is blaming that on red pill. I'd hazard a guess that there's a big overlap between wearing cowboy hats and conservatism too. Are cowboy hat wearers trying to take away women's rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 02:09 PM
5

Red pill is not political. It's advice on how to attract women (fitness, status, focus on self improvement). Also, a majority of white women voted for trump. Take some accountability for your gender's actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 12:06 PM
-4

Unfortunately for your analogy, water is not wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:56 AM
5

Read the article. Her childfree advocacy is at least partly based on the view that encouraging higher birthrates as being a way of controlling women. She is basically arguing for white women to not have kids and we replace the population lost with immigration.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 02:25 PM
9

It doesn't surprise me that this stat is true. If we consider many women work less, earn less They also save less and spend more. Actions have consequences. 🤷
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:11 PM
1

Keep trying and maybe someday you'll reach that bar too. 💫
/r/MensRights28/06/26 07:10 PM
1

If they are entering those spaces because they enjoy the activity and its not exclusively and officially male-only (like my examples above), then its perfectly fine. If they are entering male-only spaces then its not ok. If they're entering male-dominated spaces for political reasons and to make a nuisance of themselves then its also not ok. Is that clear enough for you? Jfc do you need everything defined and narrowed down to the nth degree in the course of a normal discussion? How's that women'…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 02:58 PM
2

That's a you-issue bro. My comment was in response to OP stating: However i have noticed that many women want to go into hobbies/communities/space where there are mostly men. Both of us were clearly talking about a specific group/type of women.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 01:26 PM
5

In US professional sports women sued and won to gain entry to keep up with male reporters who were already allowed in (Ludtke v Kuhn). You can see a similar thing happen in public men's rooms during concerts and non-sporting events where women will just barge in when their lines are too long.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 01:08 PM
4

Is there a male only basketball group you've pushed your way into? As usual along comes a woman playing(?) dumb and moving the goalposts of a discussion about male only spaces and trying to extend it to all things men like. No one is stopping you playing or watching basketball sweatie. But maybe you and your fellow women could stay out of the men's locker room when you do participate?
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:19 PM
4

I'm not talking about all women. I'm talking specifically about ones who fight tooth and nail to make sure women cannot be excluded from male-only spaces. Like this or this or a bunch of examples here.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 12:16 PM
44

Innate narcissism. They can't tolerate the idea that other people could be having fun without it being all about themselves.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 09:29 PM
1

If she fucks him, she's attracted to him. 🤷 I was very clear above that I am not referring to physical attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 03:28 AM
1

women aren’t “attracted” to a mans income either OK sure 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:43 PM
-1

You have a fundamental misunderstanding of what men are saying with regards to women's income. It's not that they don't care but that it's not what attracts them, unlike women who certainly are attracted money and status in the complete absence of physical attraction. Sure there are rich men who really don't care about their partners income but most men would be content with a woman who just isn't an extra burden. I.e. she... makes up for a lack of paid income as a good homemaker and mother or d…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:00 AM
2

Do machines even have step-moms tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 07:46 PM
55

Not too sure what it has to do with men's rights Are you kidding? If this was to become a criminal matter, all of the men she had sex with could very well be investigated for rape. Also any liability the website may have would essentially be for facilitation which could set up a horrific legal precedent where women can change their minds and hold others (let's be honest here - men) accountable for decisions they later regret.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 02:39 PM
3

Lock her up and throw away the key. Imagine how far a man would get blaming killing his family on depression.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/06/26 02:24 PM
1

Neither of your links work.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 03:21 PM
0

Maybe you just haven't watched enough youtube videos to give you your opinions?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:52 PM
1

What authority are you expecting?? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:41 PM
1

Why should I believe you and not the others? Believe whomever you like. I have no idea what you've read elsewhere. I have my opinion and do not claim to be an authority on the concept. What did bring as any evidence that anyone should believe you and them. I brought no evidence and neither did you. Why are they lying and not you? Do you always assume people are lying when they have a different opinion than you? Is this some paranoid delusion you suffer from? Or is it just a bunch of losers talki…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:27 PM
2

What message do you think I'm trying to convey other than the very clear comment I started with?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:19 PM
1

I was very clear above. RP is dating strategy for men. I am not going to try to explain or justify something you read online. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:17 PM
2

You blame your lack of success on the internet?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 02:02 PM
2

Sounds like you've got it all figured out. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:35 PM
2

Define woman for me bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 12:34 PM
2

Hold on let me reach out to RP central command and double check who's been telling you different things. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 10:18 AM
3

So it's a trust me bro post? 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 04:36 PM
2

All the denials but you still offer no explanation of what these experiences you're talking about actually are. What are you hoping to achieve with this post?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:41 PM
0

Logic I don't think that word means what you think it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:35 PM
5

You: "Men don't understand women's experiences." Him: "Tell me then." You: "Nooooo!!!! Wahhh!!" Great post OP. 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:32 PM
7

Okay. But then, this logic never extended to women's experiences. Why would it? RP is dating strategy for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 03:30 PM
1

First of all, you have to actually listen to women and not what you think women told you. 😂 Reminds me of this... because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don't know we don't know. I'll just stick with boring 'ol verifiable trial and error thanks. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 12:59 PM
2

Yeah i think the term is more closely related to military PTSD studies but having a huge shock to your world-view, being betrayed by someone that close to you probably has the same psychological effect. The description here is pretty good in terms of the expanding definition. Although moral injury was first recognized among military members, psychologists now understand that it can occur in healthcare workers, first responders, survivors of abuse, leaders, parents, and even young adults navigati…
/r/MensRights09/06/26 12:01 PM
12

The moral injury stuff is very interesting. They have done studies on this in the context of moral/immoral wars and the effects on soldiers PTSD. Basically moral wars (e.g. Ukrainians defending their homeland) results in much lower rates and severity of PTSD than immoral wars (e.g. Vietnam, Afghanistan).
/r/MensRights08/06/26 07:50 PM
9

The rest... Hyperbole OP's post was speciically about the industries that have sprung up around redpill 'stuff' (industry? ideology? milieu?) and female empowerment, not general gender wars bullshit. Where is OP being hyperbolic?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 01:01 PM
2

The answer to gender relations negatively affecting women is not for women to lower their standards and fuck men they don’t like. No its to realize that they got scammed and their recourse is OF and cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 12:57 PM
3

The article doesn't have a nice grid table like they do for the women responders but they do have a bit of info. Like this... A peer-reviewed paper in Social Forces (Robnett & Feliciano, 2011) analysed 6,070 U.S. heterosexual dating profiles and looked at who users said they were willing or unwilling to date by race/ethnicity. One striking set of findings amongst those who stated a preference was: 29% of white men and 65% of white women “prefer to date only whites” in their sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 03:25 PM
28

TL:DR: Indian, average looks, blames toxic masculinity for inability to find a date. I only mention his race because he brought it up and it is 100% a major factor in a western country where women of all races swipe right on Indian men the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 10:17 AM
16

The tinmen use 'men and boys' when referring to issues affecting those groups specifically. Violence against children generally is not gendered and neither are war crimes against non-combatants, both being instances where you commonly see 'women and girls' used frequently in the media.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 12:53 PM
42

You can't maintain a corrupt criminal theocracy without a bit of genocide.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 09:10 PM
1

Red pill is dating strategy. That's it. Online grifters leverage dating disaffection into politics. Quelle surprise. Farmers tend to be rightwing too. Would you say farming is an inherently rightwing occupation?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 10:12 PM
-1

It's frustrating having sex with a couple dozen dudes in a week and not getting a single orgasm. I learned my lesson with that one I can't imagine why they didn't want to go down on you. Real mystery. 🤢
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 12:10 PM
2

Do you know any 35+ single women?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 08:20 PM
4

Do you think they’d prefer that to having children which greatly contributes to the wage gap? Yes most women do want children. The wage gap is a myth though. There is an earnings gap between men and women due to factors like experience, hours worked, seniority, etc which can all be affected by having children but men and women are paid equally for equal work when you adjust for those factors. So really it boils down to a choice. Marriage and children with one set of risks or singledom and financ…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:27 PM
0

One of ther favorite quotes is stating “by 2030 45% of women 25-44 will be single and childless”. This is often stated as some sort of scare tactic for women but when we peel back the numbers it doesn’t really seem to be the case. When surveyed women rank financial and career security much higher on the list than marriage and children, especially for women who are left leaning which is the majority of young women today. We are talking about childless women. Having children outside of marriage ce…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:22 PM
5

Its not as completely without merit as you'd like to believe. Women spend more and save less at all income levels than men. Social security is becoming more and more tenuous and the cost of living is rising. Many single, childless women will find themselves working harder for longer than their married contemporaries. Edit: here's a good source with some numbers to back up claims. A couple interesting things: single women with children are the poorest (no surprise) married men and women have the …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 03:23 PM
22

How is that question relevant?
/r/MensRights11/05/26 12:04 PM
2

The data is clear, women recieve favorable sentencing in just about every country on the planet. Sure shift the goalposts and make this about global sentencing disparities. I'll accept that in lieu of capitulation and apology.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 01:17 PM
2

I'm saying it was a factor, mentioned by the judge, fact. Familial ties have nothing to do with sentencing, dependents have nothing to do with sentencing. In the UK it is commonplace for these kinds of things to be taken into consideration by the judge and commented on during sentencing. Did you bother to read the link I posted above? Its the exact same thing but with a male defendant. Refusing to accept the evidence in front of your eyes and acting like a victim is what women do.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 01:09 PM
3

You're saying that her sentence was entirely due to the judge commenting on her being a mother. I'm providing the additional factual context of why you are wrong. 🤷 Edit: and in case you are still having trouble comprehending, here's a recent example of a father being spared an even bigger jail sentence on a new conviction even though he was already released on conditions, with childcare difficulties being cited as part of the rationale.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 12:46 PM
3

She received a 3 month jail sentence, suspended. That is perfectly normal in the UK for both sexes and is actually a little heavier than you would expect for the crime of leaving the scene of an accident. In fact, the maximum sentence that could have been awarded was 6 months and obviously the judge would take into account her clean driving record, no priors, was not intoxicated, and if they determined that rendering aid wouldn't have changed the outcome.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 12:38 PM
1

It's clickbait trash. The 'journalist' does their very best to bury the fact that the driver was not responsible for the crash and the only charges were for leaving the scene of an accident and failing to render aid. Do you think people are usually sent to prison for that?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:43 AM
1

Well I hope things get better for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 03:01 PM
2

I hear you and you probably won't believe me but you are speaking from a place of rock-bottom self-esteem and what you are saying just isn't true. It might feel true for you right now but that's why working on yourself first and forgetting about everything else should be the priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:54 PM
1

Sure but it also has a big positive impact on mental health and self-worth which in turn will help you picking men who aren't fetishizing you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:49 PM
4

Get fit for you first, others second.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 02:45 PM
6

I’m fat and ugly. RP advice is for you then. Start with getting fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:56 AM
–

Don't post cringy shit on reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 10:54 AM
1

You still don't understand that the counterargument to an opinion is an opinion. It's really quite pathetic but the fact that you're so triggered makes it more entertaining than sad on balance.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 08:03 AM
1

All you had to do was offer counterarguments It's not on me to prove a negative. I responded to your opinion (though stated as fact) with my own, in essence that yours was very very dumb and obviously wrong to anyone who has ever spent any time in the company of men and women. You are projecting your own lived experience on to 90% of men, most of whom aren't basement dwelling losers who struggle to communicate generally, but especially with women. Is that clear enough for you? Maybe read it twic…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:47 AM
1

Pure unadulterated projection. All you had to do was provide anything that could back up your stupid claim that you started this post with. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:35 AM
1

My opinion on the matter is supported by the fact that I started this discussion 😂😂😂 The fact that you need to cite a scientist shows that you can’t even articulate an original thought. Here's another quote that might resonate with you. Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.' Isaac Asimov
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:13 AM
1

No. You chose to assume that I quoted in bad faith in spite of my clarifying comment that the context didn't matter either way. It's quite funny that in all these replies you still haven't even attempted to back up your opinion with anything at all. Anyway here's another quote you might find helpful if you choose to climb out of your mental cesspool of opinionated ignorance. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Carl Sagan
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 07:05 AM
1

I directly quoted what you wrote and fully accept the additional context. In the interest of brevity I didn't find it necessary to quote your full post. There is no changing of the subject on this end but nice try with the 'ol switcharoo.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 06:44 AM
1

And I think if you write something you should be prepared for criticism, particularly when you don't provide any supporting sources and when your opinion is quite obviously delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 06:36 AM
0

So you think it was necessary for me to quote the entire thing? You wrote 90% of men struggle with women (in a specific social way). Whether generally or with the added context, what you wrote is equally dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 06:16 AM
-1

Most men (I’d roughly say around 90%) struggle with women Ok lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 05:56 AM
-1

90% of men struggle with women? Touch grass ffs. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 04:59 AM
1

Thank you. 🎩
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:47 PM
1

he was referring to women as holes. No. I was saying the only thing of value they think they need to bring to a relationship is their hole. There's a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 03:11 PM
2

For the record I didn't downvote you and I'm fully aware that my comment is somewhat offensive/crude. I don't see anyone clutching their pearls when women refer to men as "good dick" or similar. The point was that many women think that they have intrinsic value by virtue of the fact of their sex so think it's perfectly acceptable to bring nothing else to a relationship. The fact that many men also accept that is unfortunate. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:54 PM
12

There are plenty of women who bring a hole to the table and nothing else. Is this surprising in some way? Shitty people existing is not a new phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:43 PM
0

It's very possible (and even likely) for both things to be true at the same time. Looking for LTR but he doesn't know if she's the one until they've had all sorts of experiences together including sex. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 06:38 PM
1

No. You seem to be confusing redpill talking points with incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 02:21 PM
1

You're completely missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 01:43 PM
1

Ok and? You're assuming he's red pilled because he's saying things you don't like despite his flair saying otherwise. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 01:18 PM
1

Because he said something you didn't like? That's a pretty low bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:33 PM
2

In one of her comments here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 01:45 AM
3

Well she posted a screenshot of the argument she was basing her post on and the guy was flared as no pill. Is that not clear enough for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 11:42 PM
4

And you think that interaction can be generalized to all red pill men, despite the fact that the guy is flaired "no pill"? Edit: a downvote and crickets. As to be expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 07:00 PM
1

They are also competing with the peace a woman feels when she is single. This just isn't true. Younger women might be able to credibly enjoy being single because they have options. Once they hit their 30s and they think about the next 20-30yrs, being single is a lot less appealing. Lots of desirable men will be off the market at that point the clock will be ticking for any woman who wants to have biological children. I have never met a woman past 25 who is actually satisfied being single and it …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 02:01 PM
2

I don't know what you are trying to say but I'm referring specifically to this: However none of this seems to be the case, women who are unmarried and childless often have much tighter knit communities and seem to be perfectly fine living their life this way. On the contrary marriage and kids is at the top of priorities for most men in these communities and especially right leaning young men and those groups appear to be very frustrated. The OP's post seems like a major cope to me. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:54 PM
0

Source? 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 07:49 PM
5

They're free to argue the views with her but it's easier to baselessly accuse her of being a grifter.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:50 AM
0

Yes but only when children are involved. The costs of marriage outweigh the benefits otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 05:10 PM
38

The right to cross-examine your accuser in court dates back to Roman times. If their case is relying solely on hearsay evidence then it should be thrown out.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 05:21 PM
2

Most women work and have always worked. Only the very rich could afford to keep his wife and children around on the lap of luxury. My husband and I BOTH put a lot of dough into the functioning of this household and the care of our kids, so sorry, boyo, you aren't being kept to your traditional role. Show me all the women pining to be SAHMs. First of all I never said anything about women not working or being SAHMs. I simply said that men give resources to women through marriage. This is supported…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 01:44 PM
1

Its based on a long-standing social contract rooted in biology from the days before genetic testing was a thing. Men exchanged resources and protection through marriage for sexual exclusivity. Now neither part is necessary but women are only concerned with ending their own traditional role while keeping men beholden to theirs. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 01:00 PM
32

Baseless claims should be easy to prove in court Sweet summer child...
/r/MensRights03/04/26 06:03 AM
–

Having your own standards isn't forcing those standards on anyone else. Wtf are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 07:37 PM
30

When women are ordered to pay child support the amounts are smaller and they are waayyy more delinquent.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 09:18 PM
1

So taking away all the irrelevant fluff, the answer is 1 SAHD? And how many SAHMs do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:16 AM
1

Yes, if she’s not raising kids, she should be doing something. We all should We agree then - a SAHM is not pulling her weight once the children are in school. So do you then agree that if she refuses to find paid work she does not deserve half in the divorce (which is what this thread is about)?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 03:38 PM
1

So you're saying that it's reasonable for a man to divorce his wife if she refuses to get a job?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 02:56 PM
0

So you don't know any SAHMs then or was that an attempt to dodge the question?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 02:55 PM
0

So you're all set. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:27 AM
-1

How many SAHMs do you know vs SAHDs?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:26 AM
-6

So go get a cat already. What is the point of this rant?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 11:18 AM
-8

You can say all this stuff and make bold claims about the value of being a SAHM but when the genders are swapped women hate being the main breadwinner and usually will lose all respect for their husband before divorcing him. A man losing his job is the number one predictor of divorce for that reason. So we all know that it's bullshit. SAHM is tough for about 3yrs until the kid is more manageable and is then in school. After that it's a free ride.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 10:54 AM
2

That said, it’s worth noting this is one high-profile example being used to make a broader point. No. You asked for proof of false accusations and I provided a high profile, egregious example. Research puts false sexual assault reports at roughly 2–10% Unbiased research absolutely does not. which means the overwhelming majority of reports are genuine Nonsense. We don't even have the most basic data for unreported false accusations so there is no way to make this claim. Surveys of women's propens…
/r/MensRights28/03/26 09:36 PM
2

One high profile example was the actress souad faress who falsely accused a random passerby of assaulting her in a crowded train station in broad daylight. Video clearly showed that she was lying and that she never even made contact with her victim. They still took it all the way to trial before he was found not guilty, his name is still publicly linked to the incident and the British media aren't allowed to name her. Wikipedia entry says nothing either. Zero consequences.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 11:52 AM
54

Apparently the women are afraid of attackers jumping out of the trees on them.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:42 AM
3

That's what redpill advice is for. Get fit, dress better, practice being socially charming and those upper class women will cheat on their fat wealthy husbands with you. 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:31 AM
5

You're ignoring the wealthy part of redpill entirely though about guys who get suckered into being beta bucks providers and are later divorce raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 11:28 AM
4

The "gender pay gap" will never be officially closed because there is a massive industry of grifters and bureaucrats whose sole reason for existing is to intentionally misread the data and mislead the public. Case in point...
/r/MensRights25/03/26 01:12 PM
0

🤣 some of us don't need to buy pussy bro. Sorry to upset your worldview like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 11:57 PM
0

Ask yourself why you're expected to pay for the first date as a man. Speak for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 09:38 PM
-1

So in contrast you think simping for women early on is better?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 05:01 PM
6

Just look at how many women claim that all their exes were abusive.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 03:07 PM
27

Nah he just defined any hierarchical system as patriarchy even when controlled by women. If that's the case then there's no need for a gendered term at all.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 02:44 PM
15

How long until she's back in prison? I'd guess less than 1 year.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 08:50 PM
2

The only similar case I can think of is this but the difference is that she was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter for directly pressuring her boyfriend to kill himself during the actual act. I disagreed with the charges at the time (and still do). It's ridiculous to basically claim that the suicidal person has less responsibility for their death than a third party. Will they charge casinos for their patrons' suicide when they gamble themselves broke? How is that any less harmful than a va…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 12:17 PM
1

Your argument is basically just the narcissist's position that others have value in what they can provide for you. That is the reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 06:13 PM
1

Your argument is that men somehow owe you their protection. There's not really much of a point there to refute.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:57 PM
1

Didn't y'all choose the bear? How's that working out for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 05:36 PM
1

I choose to comment on stuff I find interesting. White knighting and jumping into other users' arguments does not interest me. What is so hard for you to understand about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:31 PM
2

I can pick and choose where I comment, same as anyone else. The difference between us is that you seem to think you're owed something from other users.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:22 PM
2

So you think I should comment on everything I disagree with? There are only so many hours in the day.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:09 PM
2

Then where were those "good ones" when it was happening? Where was the real-time pushback? Why does the large, decent majority only show up to defend the group's image after women speak up? Do you think that just watching and doing nothing makes you good? Chivalry is dead and women killed it. Why would I stick my neck out for a woman I don't know?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/26 03:01 PM
3

Population statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 01:54 PM
1

The only reference I've ever heard to that town: Sono Inglese di Gerrard's Cross.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 10:51 AM
4

If you're talking about gold-digger situations then the "bad deal for women" is a calculated decision that she thinks she's getting financially compensated for. She can divorce him long before death and take a bunch of his money too making it a bad deal for the man. If they don't get married then the same applies but only so long as they're both happy with the relationship. Seems like a good deal to me. So the only bad deal to be found is for men who are deceived into marrying thieving gold digg…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:26 PM
–

He's telling on himself. Jfc 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:21 PM
9

The advice to not date single moms is because they are inevitably the ones who are looking for a transactional relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:19 PM
5

She's an online grifter using the tried and true method of posting ragebait for clicks.
/r/MensRights12/02/26 01:11 PM
14

Preferences, attraction, sexual history.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:56 PM
9

Be honest and upfront maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 10:54 PM
46

Both views are understandable. I HATE false accusers but if they're going to fuck someone over, its better when its a male feminist.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 03:55 PM
-3

No because that would imply that women have agency and are accountable for their actions which we all no is not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 04:56 PM
36

Because the post would be removed and OP banned before any discussion. Even if they didn't happen, he wouldn't get any real, substantive response. Just a string of incel, loser, small-dick, not-a-real-man, insults. The reality is that "strong, independent women" aren't really a thing. Women need men to provide for them to maintain the quality of life that they think they deserve. MGTOW is a risk to their entitlement and privilege so to them it feels like oppression.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 03:54 PM
–

It doesn’t mean she “wants the D”. It means she’s willing to tolerate it. It’s honestly kind of sad that you don’t already know this. Lots of women like sex. I'd say the vast majority probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:27 PM
–

What do her other boyfriends think of him?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 10:25 PM
1

OK well I gave my opinion, backed by my interpretation of the crime stats I've seen. I think the institutions & laws cited above are responsible for the trend. Anything beyond that you'll have to google for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 04:27 PM
1

Are you kidding? Are you unfamiliar with the concept of the criminal justice system? Links between poverty and crime? Education and crime? Civil rights and crime? Do you have any knowledge or even intellectual curiosity about the subject you're discussing?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 04:09 PM
11

Keep up the good work! 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:50 PM
2

So we shouldnt do anything anymore about violent crimes because there are less now? Nice try but I didn't say that or even hint at suggesting it. The point is that if you actually "observe the patterns" then its clear that society is doing something about it and already has, very successfully done something about it. Strangely you pattern observer types have somehow missed the biggest pattern there is. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:48 PM
10

Well I don't beat my wife. I'm doing my part. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:14 PM
8

Same with violence. Violent crime in all of the western world (ex countries actively at war) has been plummeting for decades. Modern women's collective delusion about the risk of being victimized is the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:10 PM
8

The problem is many “good men” will align with “bad men” on many other problematic dynamics. 3 You're going to have to elaborate on that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 01:08 PM
1

This one could also be challenged on the basis that she was no longer a student and the 90 day post-graduation waiting period was arbitrary and had no rational basis.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 01:06 PM
1

Literally the stereotype is that a man want to open it and then gets surprised Yeah from "totally true" stories on reddit. There are very few actual cucks in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:05 PM
–

Don't project your experience on all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:46 PM
1

She could give his balls a tug.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 02:25 AM
1

Before the victorians turned super puritan it was normal for ladies ball gowns to be sheer. Sexual liberalism and conservatism comes and goes in cycles. The greeks and Romans were the same at various times.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 03:18 PM
3

some reason red pill men think trad women in the past gave bjs (which are considered sinful by Christians) and generally looked and acted like pornstars. There's so much wrong with your post it's hard to know where to begin. But let's start with the basics. Where did you read this? A whole world of cultures exists outside of fundamentalist Christianity. Why you confusing American conservatism with dating advice? Women throughout all of history in every society and culture have given blowjobs. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 09:11 AM
5

That's quite hilarious coming from. Marissa mayer of all people.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 11:28 PM
16

Don't forget Australia!
/r/MensRights29/01/26 04:16 PM
1

there are more women than men, like a 60/40 split...the second issue, which is more blatantly a toxic patriarchal mindset, is that the men don't want LTRs with us This is some actual crazy incel shit right here. 🤣🤣🤣 Why don't you broaden your horizons beyond your uninterested classmates? 🤔 And then this... Men refuse to admit that they are intimidated by smart, independent women, which is why they tend to go for the nursing / hygienist bimbos. What a ridiculous cope. Did you ever stop and think …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/26 01:17 PM
-1

Who said you do? You still need a womb though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 11:34 PM
-2

He was obviously referring to bearing children. You don't need a relationship to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:33 PM
1

Based on what I read in this sub experienced.... FTFY 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:32 PM
-6

If the poison she's talking about is legal to possess then then there's no difference between it and a legally owned gun. If you murder someone with it that is a different story in both instances.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 01:15 PM
-10

If she had told people to buy guns would that have been better in your mind?
/r/MensRights28/01/26 12:00 PM
–

Nah. It’s the poverty. No it isn't. it was found that the concentration of SMFs had a much stronger conducive effect on youth crime than did the SFFs....However, the significant but relatively weak effects of low income in SMFs and SFFs on youth crime offered only limited support to the economic disadvantage hypothesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 04:49 PM
1

Grifters gonna grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 02:54 AM
1

That's for you to figure out and deal with in a healthier way than spewing vitriol on reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:45 PM
1

In aggregate. I thought my comment was pretty clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:10 PM
–

Your suffering is not the fault of the male sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 05:47 PM
9

OK and now do the opposite where a similarly undesirable woman puts up a profile and see how many matches she gets.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 03:41 PM
1

A few online grifters making a few bucks adds up to fuck-all. The total amount is probably much less than what is earned by the world's palm readers (who nearly exclusively cater to women and nearly exclusively regarding relationships).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 03:08 PM
1

Its genuinely sad to watch grown women spend hundreds of billions of dollars on makeup and cosmetic surgery in the hopes of attracting a man. As if desire is something you unlock after enough side quests. None of it matters if you're an ugly fat pig.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 01:42 PM
-2

Nah they income control those stats. Regardless though, men and women are equal. If the single moms worked hard and didn't view child support as full time employment then they wouldn't be poor right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 01:19 PM
–

It is relevant. Your bitterness is evident in every comment you write. It's not his fault lady!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 12:04 PM
7

Because maybe, just maybe, you could learn something about your own behavior and biases by their example?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 12:00 PM
0

It's funny how household structure is so highly correlated with future criminality in children, with single mothers representing the greatest risk but single fathers not so much. Seems having a father leads to better outcomes for kids. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 11:56 AM
3

SPLITTER!!!
/r/MensRights25/01/26 09:14 PM
1

His local grammar school was free and he came from a wealthy, educated family.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 08:01 PM
1

By 1600 European printers had printed hundreds of millions of books. You have no clue what you are talking about. Shakespeare was already widely published at that time even if that didn't include all his works. Only half the plays in the first folio hadn't already been published by that time. You can also go and read popular travelogues and books about court etiquette from the time.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 07:56 PM
1

Straight up nonsense. Books were widely published across Europe during Shakespeare's lifetime which was also one of the reasons his works were so well known. The printing press had been around for 150 years at that point.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:57 PM
4

Its quite silly really. He could obviously read so doing a bit of research into the subjects of his works wouldn't have been difficult. It makes much more sense that there's a huge conspiracy and the real person never claimed authorship of some of the greatest works of the English language because of embarrassment! /s
/r/MensRights25/01/26 01:33 PM
5

Yeah he was head of the Peoples Front of Judea.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 01:28 PM
–

Why should you choose what I do with MY body ? Limiting abortion to the 1st trimester or whatever is society choosing what to do with your body after that allowable window. If your position is that the choice lies solely with the pregnant woman then you would be ok with aborting much later right? Edit: crickets
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 02:37 AM
–

So why not have no limit on abortion, right up to the birth date?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 01:47 AM
64

Especially when deep down they all aspire to be SAHMs. It's pure projection.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 03:02 PM
5

Gonna have to narrow it down a bit more! 😂 😐 😭
/r/MensRights23/01/26 03:20 PM
7

Could you maybe say a little more for the majority of people who have no clue what you're talking about?
/r/MensRights23/01/26 12:41 PM
1

That's a different topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 11:55 PM
5

not a privilege that is available to all women Well of course its not available to all women but its certainly available to the vast majority of women. Whether or not its a good or bad career depends on numerous factors just like with any other job. The reason its a female "privilege" is because it is an easily available source of income with very low barriers to entry. This is not the case at all for men (maybe this is less true for homosexual men).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:58 PM
11

I was only kidding around but really, you posted all that to refute the existence of the world's oldest profession? Clearly many, many women do in fact make a career out of prostitution despite your hypothetical budget.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 09:30 PM
17

You've framed it as a full business but it could just as easily be more like gig work. You can drive for uber for very little extra overhead if you already have a car and some time. Similarly a girl can dole out a few handies on the sly for $25 a pop. 8/day would probably be quite manageable to start so lets say $2k bi-weekly, cash in hand (among other things). If she's ambidextrous she could double her income or even more.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/26 08:54 PM
3

Trump popularised DEI That is not true whatsoever. Regardless, what does that have to do with DEI policies (in terms of gender) being inherently misandrist?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 07:08 PM
3

Try again in English?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:58 PM
2

DEI
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 06:40 PM
3

No need to worry. It's all been cleared up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:01 PM
–

Yeah that tracks. He seems confused about a lot of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 11:55 AM
–

No disappointment. Just confused by you claiming to be speaking on behalf of the LBGT community in different post in here. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:47 AM
–

Wife? Aren't you gay or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 10:55 PM
–

I never said this was an advice sub… Was this you? Also, do you really value the advice and sentiment given by other men on here? I’ve seen some ridiculous statements on here. I know a lot of people on here don’t want to listen to women’s advice, but is speaking over and dismissing them doing you any favours? Your post claims to be a "genuine question" but comes across as an attempt to insult the men on here in the style of concern trolling. If the goal is to get with women, why are you dwelling…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 10:51 PM
1

So, we can assume the same out of men who behave the same way then, right? So you agree that we should not assume the same for men who behave the same way?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 01:11 PM
–

Sure maybe. But I haven't heard any men express regret and talk about trauma from their sexual pasts. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 12:41 PM
1

Adapt to what? Have women's dating preferences changed? Do you need some advice? Would you even listen to it? I'm just an autistic female Your stellar qualifications aside, why not just offer your advice directly instead of concern trolling or whatever this post is trying to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/26 02:18 PM
5

Whoosh 😂😂😂
/r/MensRights11/01/26 01:56 PM
1

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact chubby quicksand full follow lavish shaggy aspiring steer imminent physical
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 01:41 AM
44

You can see the rate of victimization of violent crime by sex here. The latest from 2024 is: Men: 24.7 / 1,000 Women: 21.9 / 1,000
/r/MensRights09/01/26 06:37 PM
1

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact rock abundant amusing fear shocking oil wine degree consist square
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 12:56 PM
1

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact hard-to-find tease mountainous recognise encourage practice profit safe ask office
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 12:29 PM
1

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact theory spectacular grandiose jar unpack society cooing outgoing entertain knee
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/26 12:11 AM
2

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact fanatical unpack station existence cooperative cagey ad hoc oil different voracious
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:47 PM
2

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact aspiring mighty innocent outgoing depend sip merciful makeshift cake handle
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:17 PM
4

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact gold skirt light brave plant telephone quack dependent tie office
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 10:04 PM
16

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact tart follow nose pen snatch fade sophisticated familiar arrest possessive
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 08:52 PM
–

Triggered!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 06:41 PM
3

Because she starfishes Chad to strike back at the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:36 PM
3

I have cancer and I can’t tell you the number of MEN that have told me that my husband is waiting for me to die and is probably cheating on me now. I don't believe you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 03:16 AM
9

Anthony Bourdain's ex gf Asia Argento, who hopped on the metoo train, paid off the kid she raped.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 06:41 PM
14

An AI can be trained to identify the same visual cues. Doesn't mean its empathetic.
/r/MensRights04/01/26 04:42 PM
2

I was reading into a story about tennis player John McEnroe yesterday, and how he commented that Serena Williams was the greatest women’s tennis player ever but that she would be ranked a lot lower if she played against men. You should watch the interview. He was asked if Serena was the best tennis player ever as a stupid 'gotcha' and answered with the perfectly reasonable and 100% true 'best female player'. Contrary to what you seem to believe, it is always the delusional women who are claiming…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:08 PM
1

See all those well adjusted, confident, happy women around? They were raised by good men. The dynamic might be hard for many of the women on this sub to recognize (for obvious reasons).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 03:05 AM
29

It was Karsten Braasch who had reportedly already played a round of golf and had been drinking before the match. He also destroyed her much more completely than in this fixed match.
/r/MensRights28/12/25 09:16 PM
2

Only 6yrs because physically it never went beyond a kiss. Sounds like the more serious charges were dropped as part of the plea deal.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/25 03:18 PM
9

Rebecca Auborn, 35, pleaded guilty... 🫣
/r/MensRights25/12/25 02:09 AM
13

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact airport liquid intelligent vegetable governor advise deliver hobbies knee simplistic
/r/MensRights24/12/25 08:54 PM
1

damn dirty lies. Expected response Can't use Google and can't use your browsers translate function either? Sad The wiki has loads of sources for the specific section linked right there as well as giving a good summary. Movember was started by men, taken over by women and now their funding of actual men's issues has been slashed to the bone. Same as above. Apparently you didn't read it or look at the site whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 04:00 PM
–

I'll take pity you on you because you somehow aren't able to use google yourself. Protests against MRA on campus. Here's one where they were protesting suicide prevention. 30 feminist orgs protest male IPV shelter. Feminists promote a false narrative on IPV as being a male-on-female phenomenon whereas actual studies show that perpetrators are pretty much equally represented by men and women Example: movember Feminist protest against falsely accused hockey players This is a well known pillar of f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:45 PM
–

Where was I asked to provide sources? I was responding to this: I’ve never heard of feminists trying to oppose mens rights except here which is never backed up. This is typical simp behavior though. Rather than address any of the points I listed, you just attack my character. I'm not at all surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 02:28 PM
1

All of these have instances plastered all over the media repeatedly. If you need me to do all the "research" for you then you're just being willfully ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 01:31 PM
4

I’ve never heard of feminists trying to oppose mens rights except here which is never backed up. Then you just haven't been paying attention. Just a few off the top of my head... Feminists will protest any attempt to discuss mens rights on campuses even when the discussion is internally led by academics conducting research. they have successfully protested and shut down efforts to create IPV shelters for men. they promote harmful views on men and masculinity based on flawed studies and false dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/25 12:54 PM
7

Yeah and I did the same for feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 06:56 PM
6

So it's not ok to baselessly slander an entire gender? Geez you need to make up your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 05:53 PM
8

You really don’t need some internet ideology to get married. Yeah but some of us like hot women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 05:08 PM
7

And women's rights is just about gold-digging and seeing how much value and social privileges women can extract from men without having any responsibility or accountability. Isn't slinging vitriol fun?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 05:05 PM
8

He's man-adjacent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/25 05:03 PM
1

Ah the 'ol switcharoo defense. 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 04:18 PM
1

I didn't say anything about what offends me. Not directly no. Your butthurtedness speaks for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:45 PM
1

Its insufferable and very common with these types of debaters arguers. Their lack of rationale thought forces them to fall back to circle jerking about word definitions rather than debating the merits of their opinion. You see it a lot in right-wing media too.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:43 PM
–

Why are you so desperate to be offended?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/25 02:24 PM
1

Now they just have to make it racially-neutral.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 04:35 PM
17

This is actually a pretty good result. People often escape jail altogether for killing people with a vehicle.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 02:20 AM
8

It's quite easy to prove that she is guilty. Yes and that proving is done in a court of law at her trial which will follow the rules of evidence and allow her to defend herself. The fact that she is facing charges shows that the justice system is working in this case. The fact that she is not jailed while awaiting trial doesn't show anything. People accused of much more serious crimes regularly get bail or are released on their own recognizance.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 04:59 PM
3

Other than the children part this pretty much just describes being a bachelor and dating casually + hiring someone for domestic labor (cheaper than a wife). It works for a lot of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/25 08:10 PM
7

Maybe she won it playing Monopoly.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/25 09:35 PM
0

Redpill = watch what women do, not what they say Bluepill = believe women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 05:20 PM
-3

The actual statement she made was a bit jumbled and its not clear if she was talking about verbal abuse as rape or verbal abuse plus actual rape. Trump does verbally abuse people and he is a rapist, just not at the same time as far as we know.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 05:32 PM
9

Good thing she's not bitter or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 03:33 PM
1

Wtf are you talking about? A woman would still have the legal presumption of innocence and it's up to the prosecutor to prove she lied. The problem is that even admitted liars and false accusers are rarely prosecuted.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 02:40 AM
7

I was responding to this comment: I don't think there are any *actual* feminists out there who don't want criminals to be held accountable. The organization's other activities are irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/25 02:36 AM
3

B..b..b..but I thought you couldn't negotiate attraction? Make up your minds ladies!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 06:43 PM
10

Surely you must be joking!? Just look at the subservience to feminism of the UK's Prison Reform Trust. Their mission statement: "Since 1981 the Prison Reform Trust has supported those locked into our prison system – prisoners and their families – to ensure that those without a voice get heard." The reality is quite different. They work tirelessly to reduce or eliminate imprisonment for women despite men comprising 96% of the UK's prison population.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 04:21 PM
4

His argument (while true) was jumbled and weak. Just say: men and women are paid equally for the same work. Proof 1: Claudia Goldin's Nobel prize winning research that demonstrates very clearly that the gap in pay outcomes is determined by differences in individual choices and preferences between men and women, not systemic discrimination. Proof 2: its actually illegal for employers to discriminate based on gender. Where are the lawsuits by women who have been underpaid?
/r/MensRights02/12/25 04:00 PM
–

Is that what your shrink told you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 02:59 AM
–

For all the doubters (and avoiders going after OP for his choice of the word cuck), I actually witnessed this exact scenario play out over a large thanksgiving dinner. A friend is a few years away from being able to afford early retirement, good career, sole breadwinner (wife has a hobby that generates enough to cover holidays or a bit of fun money), kids are getting older (2 in college, 2 in high school) and she literally said in front of his friends and family: "you can't retire until the youn…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 02:57 AM
–

Him: I’m not referring to men that help around the house, help cook, or anything You: So by implication, men doing their fair share around the house...is cuck behavior? This is why debate on this sub is pointless. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 02:41 AM
–

He was using the slang definition, not the "wrong" one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 02:38 AM
–

Are you new? Its the same reason women call anyone who disagrees with them "incel". Also the same reason people insult eachother with stuff like cunt, asshole, motherfucker, etc, etc. Sexual terms will never stop being popular as insults. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 02:35 AM
–

Being a degenerate slave to your mental illness expressed through a sexual kink is not in any way courageous.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 02:32 AM
7

Almost exclusively humans too! Maybe they should have just blasted everyone?
/r/MensRights01/12/25 12:43 PM
28

They're already trying to do away with juries specifically for rape trials in Scotland as a way of increasing the conviction rate. You'd be a fool to think that isn't the eventual goal here too. Giving the state the sole discretion to dispense "justice" whether that be for an actual crime committed or to punish someone for the imagined slights of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 01:36 PM
33

But it does count putting a load of laundry in and waiting around for an hour as an hour of unpaid work.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 12:50 PM
5

Funny that the article quotes Claudia goldin despite her winning the nobel prize in economics for proving that the "gender pay gap" is entirely the result of men and women having different preferences in employment and compensation and making different choices such as working overtime.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:59 PM
22

The UK has a publication ban on the second one but not for me. That false accuser was the actress Souad Faress who tried to ruin a completely innocent stranger's life for attention or something. Took it all the way to court along with the scum at the crown prosecution service despite clear video evidence that the incident never happened. And did she face any consequences? Nah of course not. She went on to land a role in Dune.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 01:39 PM
4

Anyone who has ever spent any time whatsoever with large numbers of women know how common false accusations are. Women will lie and slander others out of hand to deflect from their own malfeasance or get ahead in some way.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 04:28 PM
8

Delusions of grandeur is not the same thing as having confidence.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:27 PM
4

Your dictionary definition supports my definition of emotional labor. Where did you define the term?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 03:28 PM
2

Andrew Tate is the equivalent of all the hateful feminazis bloggers, journalists, and academics spouting utter drivel based on nothing but culture-wars clickbait-ability. The only difference in how they're perceived is that society isn't allowed to criticize women no matter how batshit crazy they are. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 03:59 PM
-4

That’s how debates work. 😂 Ok bud
/r/MensRights23/11/25 01:09 PM
-3

This is the most generous-to-the-point-of-delusional take on this 'debate'. Right from the get-go on what should have been an easy question to answer (sell me your worldview) he flubs with an admitted appeal to emotion. Absolutely nothing of substance. He then goes on to imagine that things would be better somehow if everyone followed his outlandish religious beliefs and conformed to gender roles. Back and forth for a bit until she asks him to basically justify the hypocrisy of his own life and …
/r/MensRights23/11/25 12:59 PM
18

He's such a clown. His idea of winning a debate is to endlessly ask for definitions of terms to avoid having to actually argue on merits. Its tiresome, repetitive nonsense devoid of any original thought.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:05 PM
2

You're commenting from a place of deep ignorance.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 12:59 PM
1

Where have you been? It's a general insult meant to shield women from any sort of accountability or criticism. I've seen it frequently leveled against all sorts of commenters including married men ffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 10:17 PM
2

I'd say your example is directly comparable. Really though I see incel being used as a generic insult-of-last-resort in threads about all sorts of topics, not just dating and sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:54 PM
–

Most women here would have no problem if a man who had a low body count wanted a woman with a similar experience level. The most common insult I see women throwing around at men is "incel".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:58 PM
–

On reddit when used by women, 90% of the time it simply means someone the commenter disagrees with.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:52 PM
–

Really? Disagree with a woman pretty much anywhere on the platform and you'll be called an incel. It's extremely common.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 03:26 PM
–

On reddit at least, it's far more common for women and feminine men to call other men "incel" for a huge variety of perceived offenses, than it is for men to call women whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 12:12 PM
10

It would be a shame if someone dumped concrete down the toilets.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 08:25 PM
5

Dear Zachary part 2. smh...
/r/MensRights17/11/25 04:53 PM
1

Your comment and link are unrelated to each other. Also just generally, linking AMAC? The whole site is a mess of contradictory, demented nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 10:23 PM
9

But why do you think liberals are statistically so miserable and lonely? Maybe because they're surrounded by crazies? At the country level the happiest nations are all very liberal, educated, wealthy and non-religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 10:05 PM
10

The vast majority of men are not able to attract women for sex? Seriously dude you need to take a break from the internet and touch grass. Jfc... 🤦
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 09:48 PM
1

implied You keep saying this but I don't think you understand what it means. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 08:16 PM
1

So, again it is not most women's preference's. Good thing no one is saying that it was then. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 01:22 PM
15

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact unwritten aspiring selective spoon snow edge encouraging rustic spotted distinct
/r/MensRights14/11/25 01:04 PM
1

Another disingenuous reply. The commenter above was not referring to general porn viewing rates by gender but specifically about who is watching the more deviant porn. Studies have shown that it is actually women who prefer the more violent "consensual aggression" porn by a large margin.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:36 PM
3

It has already been stated in this thread that that sort of thing appeals to a small subset of women. What's your point? I implied it appeals to a large subset of romance novel readers, nothing more. You just cannot help yourself desperately trying to alter the plain words of what I wrote to fit your false narrative. How very typical of the no accountability crowd. Just own it ffs. Lots of women have rape and other deviant sexual fantasies despite your pathetic and baseless denials. Edit: also d…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 11:38 AM
4

it is not women's preferences in romance novels. Ah so they just print millions of copies of these books and set them out on shelves all over the country for decorative reasons. You're a ridiculous person. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 01:15 AM
5

Anybody can go read my comment above. I was very clear: "women's preferences in mainstream romance novels". Your illiteracy is not my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 10:34 PM
4

"My" title? Jfc... 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 01:09 PM
5

I didn't write female sexuality either. I very specifically said "women's preferences in romance novels". Is this your whole thing? Having imaginary arguments in your head against comments you just make up and then thinking you somehow have a point? Are you off your meds or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 12:49 PM
5

Point out where I said "all women"? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 12:14 PM
4

Use ublock-origin + RES with old-style reddit in the browser and redreader on mobile to open links the page so you don't see any ads ever.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 12:27 PM
20

How does any of that relate to OP's post about women's preferences in mainstream romance novels?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 11:44 AM
–

Paternity fraud goes beyond simple perjury though because there is a victim who's been defrauded and the costs of that fraud can be reasonably estimated. If it was prosecuted as fraud the penalties could be far higher. Having said that, 2yrs in the pen would be a good start.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 12:59 PM
–

It would be more like trying to frame someone for murder which would get you a lot more than 2yrs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 12:10 AM
1

OK bro...
/r/MensRights08/11/25 06:58 PM
2

Because men and women are different. Sometimes its ok to embrace those differences. 🤷
/r/MensRights08/11/25 06:42 PM
1

Male/female segregated toilets are A-OK. Black/white segregated are not. Not all protected classes required identical rules.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 06:11 PM
2

It would not be gender based discrimination in the same way that sex segregated toilets are not. Not all protected categories require identical treatment in law.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 10:52 AM
23

So choosing to have a child justifies gender-based financial exploitation?
/r/MensRights08/11/25 10:02 AM
30

If both men and women could select drivers based on gender that would be great and perfectly equal.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 03:23 AM
22

Bow before the might and power of... Louis C.K.!? Really it's just like the fascist strategy of portraying their enemies as all-powerful and weak at the same time. Women want to be strong, independent, considered just as capable as men, while at the same time sweet, innocent, naive and easily taken advantage of by those same men. They want equal rights (great) while keeping all of the privileges and advantages they've been granted over time, but with none of the responsibility or accountability …
/r/MensRights06/11/25 05:42 AM
3

If you’re dating someone significantly younger, imma assume you’re a weird little creep till proven otherwise. This you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 03:13 PM
1

What am I supposed to keep up with? I'm guessing her attempt to slander 40% of the world's population and her magic ability to identify them by their reddit comments. Maybe she's just pissy because she missed her klan rally. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 12:28 PM
1

Well you wrote a bunch of semi-literate drivel. Not sure if there was a point in there at all. But regardless, western passport gals aren't a thing so why debate silly hypotheticals?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 11:43 AM
5

Well that's not really a thing so why talk about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/25 11:10 AM
8

Uber is following Lyft in this. I stopped using Lyft entirely when they rolled their program out but it looks like I'm out of options now.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 11:40 AM
6

Some people on reddit say that the rate of mass shootings will increase because of women not giving up sex as easilyas they are expected ... and expect people to cuddle them. Men feeling sexless should never be an excuse for them committing any type of crime. This is such a mind-numbingly gross oversimplification of a complex issue that I won't spend any time debunking it but instead cut to the chase of the broader social trend instead (not just violence but a extremely strong global surge of an…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 12:46 PM
6

Ironic
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:30 PM
67

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact boast grab swim quack books merciful imagine liquid future fanatical
/r/MensRights26/10/25 06:59 PM
–

The whole redpill / women are children thing is talking about accountability not mental acuity. And in OP's examples that is made abundantly clear. Younger man with older woman? A-ok because women can do whatever they want and should never be judged about it. Flip the genders and it's evil men taking advantage of sweet innocent women who aren't capable of knowing better.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 11:37 AM
16

Why not both?
/r/MensRights25/10/25 08:44 PM
3

Eric Van Lustbader's Ninja series was very successful but the erotic parts were ancillary to the main plot and often ridiculous when just taken out of context as a quote. When you're into a novel though they can be much more entertaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 01:47 PM
19

Just watch that men v women survival island episode and you'll get a pretty realistic picture. If all men disappeared tomorrow, even if women were somehow still able to reproduce, human society would quickly devolve into primitive agrarian villages after 99% die in the first year.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 10:05 PM
1

In free societies this works itself out. People can fuck who they want, enter and end relationships at will. People only do these things with people they consider “worth it”. Yeah but such a utopia doesn't exist in reality. When women are ultimately disadvantaged by such an arrangement, the law is changed to make sure that men pay up. In other words the legal reality adapts to the biological reality that women cannot simultaneously be independent and produce the offspring needed to sustain socie…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 08:17 PM
2

On this sub, there’s plenty of men who now see it as the opposite, any man who is conventionally attractive, socially confident, or otherwise successfully socially and romantically must be some kind of douchebag. Ah yes this is totally a new thing that men do! 🙄 Shallow Hal was made in 2001 ffs. A better question: what's with women on this sub taking any shitty behavior seen anywhere by anyone in any context and attributing it to some failing of the male sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/25 12:28 AM
25

Women also prefer male doctors by a wide margin because the women are more dismissive of their pain, complications and questions than the men.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 07:12 PM
5

They still justify affirmative action for women with things like their great grandmas not having their own credit cards 70 years ago ffs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 12:16 PM
5

Just looking at her face tells you all you need to know. That's the best that AI and photoshop could do.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 12:41 PM
2

No link and not even a name mentioned. Delete this garbage post op.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 11:58 AM
20

You can also block their bots. Can't remember the list though.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:48 PM
19

open only to individuals who self-identify as women and/or members of gender equity seeking groups, including persons who self-identify as trans, nonbinary, gender fluid, and Two-Spirit Well being a member here qualifies you for the role so. 🤷
/r/MensRights12/10/25 09:15 PM
-4

Dodge, duck, dip, dive and dodge!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 04:03 PM
–

Ah so taking care of toddlers for a few years and then being a cared-for dependent for the rest of your life is somehow different than a man expecting his wife to make some contribution to the running of the household. Very convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 03:13 PM
–

Do you feel the same way about SAHMs?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/25 01:53 PM
1

Good boy now keep going...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:10 PM
1

Now of someone made that claim and that’s not true why wouldn’t anyone say “that’s not what happens. Let me explain” Wanna try again in English sport?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:05 PM
1

The point is that men are not attracted to women because of their careers. Once they've found a woman they are attracted to then stuff like values, career, religion, etc. need to be aligned to take the next step to committed LTR or marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:03 PM
1

NO! The correct answer is that you sniff all seats with equal abandon, like your father before you, and your father's father.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 09:01 PM
1

Here's a little analogy that you can relate to. In your seat sniffers club some of you just like sniffing chairs. If I read somewhere that some other group only likes sniffing couches would that make you a liar? Or would you feel the need to justify your sick proclivities to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:37 PM
3

I know right?! Its quite entertaining how triggered he is though. The world must be such a bewildering place to him. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:33 PM
2

The evidence for TRP is the TRP? 🤯
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 08:05 PM
2

What evidence HAS been presented tho? Evidence of what? I used to think it was a selfish ideology You haven't even said what you think the ideology is. Jfc you're brain must be as smooth as a dorodango made from human shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:47 PM
2

Based on nothing. You keep saying this but its a non sequitur (so 3rd or 4th logical fallacy you've said so far). If you're expecting RP opinions to be backed by multiple peer researched studies or something then you will be disappointed. As it stands its simply opinions based on the experience and observations of many people. Like when you say: Redpillers are just selfish people who've found an ideology to excuse their selfishness You're basing that on your own experiences (I assume) and your d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:25 PM
2

And we've come full circle back to the fact you can't read. I've stated what my opinion is. For some reason you think that means I should be the arbiter of truth on what the RP is. That's because you have the mentality of an NPC who desperately needs to be told what to think. I can't help you with your mental deficiencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 07:05 PM
2

Lol keep on failing buddy. I'm sure you're well used to it by now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:59 PM
2

Redpillers are just selfish people who've found an ideology to excuse their selfishness. Well that's just like your opinion man. 🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:49 PM
3

What makes you think I do?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:48 PM
2

Before this comment thread what did you think the RP was? 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:26 PM
2

You are simply appealing to a non-existent authority. Your inability to form your own opinion is your issue, not mine. Pretty standard stuff for unimaginative dullards.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:22 PM
3

Did you think there was a RP professional governing body or something? 😂 Jfc my characterization of you might have been a bit unfair. You're too stupid to be a liar.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 06:00 PM
3

Are you off your meds or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 05:40 PM
1

No. I made a hyperbolic example to highlight the silliness of your example that was about a hypothetical 1%-er.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 05:30 PM
3

So you do say that the other side is lying then when they say “it isn’t about dating”? You are saying this based on something you supposedly read on a different subreddit. Why can’t you admit that then? And why can’t you clarify why your position is correct and not theirs?! I have an opinion that is my own regardless of what others may think. Are you so painfully insecure that you are incapable of independent thought? Scared? Of what exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 05:29 PM
2

Sure those are things to think about when deciding whether or not your gf could become your wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 05:25 PM
3

I made my position 100% clear. Your inability to read isn't my problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 05:15 PM
2

Well its even sillier to think that in a marriage where the wife makes $5k and the husband makes $100,000,000,000 that she is contributing financially. Wow its so fun making stuff up!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:53 PM
3

Why would I defend something you think you read somewhere else? Is that why there was such a triggered response Again you're misinterpreting what you read. I am claiming you're a liar and an idiot based on your direct statements which are false and stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:51 PM
4

I won't say the other poster is a liar from the snippet of text you posted above based on your myopic and biased reading of whatever was actually said. However, based on your comments I would say you are equal parts liar and idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:32 PM
8

I don't give a shit what you've read. Lots of people say lots of different stuff. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:19 PM
5

Cool story bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:12 PM
3

Yeah a silly one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 03:02 PM
3

Sure if we're putting extra emphasis on hypothetical households in the top 1% of earners. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:40 PM
9

Sole or primary where primary means the man makes 60%+ of household earnings. That would include households where the wife earns a pittance from part time hobbies and doesn't really change the conclusion. Women are the sole or primary in only 16% of households.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:35 PM
4

The data is from ages 25-64. Now that people are waiting longer to get married and marriage rates overall are declining quickly I really doubt there would be much difference in under 40s group.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:32 PM
1

You’re mistaken The data backs me up regardless of what you choose to believe. Source from Pew Research (ignoring the ridiculous editorializing of the title). % of opposite-sex marriages by earnings arrangement: Man sole breadwinner = 55% Egalitarian = 29% Woman sole breadwinner = 16%
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:10 PM
9

Red pill stuff is about dating. If she's not a good prospect for LTR across a range of stuff then she won't be sticking around.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 02:04 PM
1

Where did you use his words?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 12:55 PM
61

women with careers aren't particularly attractive No you misunderstand. Men don't care about women's careers because the vast majority of women have the attitude that "what's mine is mine and what's yours is mine." If she's not willing to spend her money on me then why would I care how much she has?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/25 12:54 PM
1

I didn't claim a causal relationship. Both are just faucets of the decline of traditional norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 11:51 PM
–

How many of those women are honest about their past with their partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:54 PM
–

but if you look at the real world, these women have no issues finding boyfriends or getting married Are you sure about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 05:51 PM
1

Ageism and misandry! Waaahhhhh!
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:24 PM
-8

A right-winger called me a boomer! Oh no I'm so insulted I'm going to change my political leaning to communist! 😭😭😭
/r/MensRights09/10/25 04:39 PM
-16

Whatever you need to tell yourself snowflake.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 12:43 PM
-20

What a terrifically rational reason to turn to autocracy. 🤡
/r/MensRights09/10/25 12:17 PM
12

Chicago teachers Despite the link this one's in Florida. Makes more sense.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 05:16 PM
3

If only your dad could unfuck your mom... 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 02:41 AM
5

Ever heard of a breakup?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 08:29 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 08:28 PM
4

One lie is curable, the other is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 07:09 PM
3

You have defended men lying about their virginity be more romantically successful so you seem to understand why people lie to get relationships enough that you recommend it yourself. The difference is that you can't unfuck someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 06:45 PM
5

Bro the social contract is dead. Women claim they want equality but really mean only in outcomes. Social security should be converted to PAYG with a much lower minimum payout.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 11:51 AM
13

Men also pay the majority of SS contributions so its doubly unfair.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 06:11 PM
41

You should really post the archive.org links for these stories and not generate clicks for trash like the guardian.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 12:05 PM
2

Common sense legislation in the best interests of fathers and children? Not gonna happen...
/r/MensRights01/10/25 03:37 PM
–

Highly attractive humans being bad doesn't corelate with reality Whose saying it does? What's with these low effort red-herring posts on here lately? If you have something to refute, maybe actually post something that supports the other side before you try to debunk it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 04:59 PM
3

No its the opposite (from the male perspective). Marriage is still a good prospect for ugly poor men and is a dangerous trap with little upside for more desirable, wealthier men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 09:33 PM
6

Marriage is dead and women killed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 08:45 PM
–

Men and women value different things in their partners. Are you confused as to why women prefer higher income, ambitious men even though women can now earn (or even outearn) their male counterparts?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:12 PM
2

Jfc you weren't kidding. What a loon. Even suggesting men kill themselves to get rid of sexual desire. 😬
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 08:42 PM
–

No you
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 08:12 PM
2

Translation: If I simp hard enough maybe some bimbo will pity fuck me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:47 PM
2

But women asking your job isn’t of being gold digger. She just wants to measure the future and your ambition Yeah to see how much gold you have or will have for her to dig. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 05:45 PM
6

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact lip fragile provide bake instinctive sense north crowd test payment
/r/MensRights21/09/25 10:53 AM
6

If you haven't already canceled your Disney+ subscription you should do it now.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 02:23 PM
7

You know they won't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 12:30 PM
1

Therapy? Gtfo
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 02:58 PM
4

Off your meds?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:30 PM
6

why women should want that? So you want men to guess? Women have casual sex and presumably enjoy it. Is there a deeper mystery you're hoping to solve? Maybe ask the women what they get out of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:22 PM
4

Why is this a question for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 03:15 PM
1

I assume that's what OP is talking about but he/she provides no details.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 01:19 PM
–

I've come to the mindset that men should just learn to be comfortable with making women uncomfortable. 100%. They are going to be uncomfortable no matter what so you might as well get used to the idea. Pay them too much attention? Uncomfortable. Don't pay them enough attention? Uncomfortable. Do some innocuous polite thing like holding the door? Uncomfortable. Don't hold the door? Uncomfortable. Earn more than them? Uncomfortable. Earn less than them? Uncomfortable. Treat them equally? Uncomfort…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 02:28 PM
7

Someone didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:23 PM
12

This discussion comes just ahead of the launch of their new Channel 4 sketch show, Mitchell and Webb Are Not Helping, a six-part series premiering on 5 September. Woo hoo! Added to my watchlist.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:18 PM
4

He said it right after the other guy was talking generally about the homeless population not taking advantage of the resources supposedly available to them, not just homeless murderers which is obviously already a crime so no need to single out homeless people for. He straight up suggested euthanizing homeless people because they (in his puddle of shit that passes for a brain) choose to be homeless.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 01:36 PM
1

"What is the orgasm gap" is not the question though is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 01:21 PM
3

If you want to have a debate about a topic you could at least make the barest attempt to define the subject you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 12:50 PM
1

This comment aged like milk.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 06:57 PM
1

There are still people living in mud huts in the jungle who have no concept of reading and writing too. Should we caveat every discussion on here with the specific culture and time period we're referring to or can we assume that most people commenting and reading aren't completely brain dead?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 04:13 PM
1

What difference does it make? Both men and women can and have been coerced into marriage. The social pressure would have been much higher in 1912 than now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 04:11 PM
1

And what do you think would happen in 1912 if a guy got his unmarried gf pregnant?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 02:52 PM
1

You don't have to marry the person your parents pick for you. It's not the 1950s anymore mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 02:07 PM
-1

It wasn't a true story though was it? It was a fictional "love" story that mainly appealed to women who's loyalty is to money first, getting whatever else they want in life second and the man who pays for it last.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 01:00 PM
-3

Does that also count for men who are baby trapped or otherwise coerced into marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 12:58 PM
3

He didn't say he wasn't did he?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 12:38 PM
1

Ya but this report was in australia where a commonly accepted polite way to approach a lady is "oi mate meet me in the dunny for a quick root".
/r/MensRights11/09/25 07:39 PM
2

Man-hating online lunatics aren't the way they are because they had good fathers ffs. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 07:32 PM
1

I assumed you weren't a serious person but gave you the benefit of the doubt. My mistake. 🤷
/r/MensRights11/09/25 02:28 PM
2

That is the full quote. If you're looking for additional context it doesn't change anything. “I can’t stand the word empathy actually. I think empathy is a made-up, New Age term that — it does a lot of damage, but it is very effective when it comes to politics,” he added. ”Sympathy I prefer more than empathy,” Kirk said, “That’s a separate topic for a different time.”
/r/MensRights11/09/25 02:27 PM
-2

Logical??? Has the word lost all meaning? Charlie Kirk was a Christian fundamentalist ffs. His whole shtick was claiming his magical sky fairy was superior to the other guy's thereby justifying the most insane, repressive bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 01:59 PM
1

Despite actual data that shows the opposite of course.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 01:49 PM
1

So that's a no then.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 11:09 PM
-1

Did you clutch your pearls as hard when 2 democrat politicians along with a spouse were shot in MN this summer? I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. -Charlie Kirk
/r/MensRights10/09/25 10:35 PM
20

Its complete insanity. Rape prosecutions often boil down to "he said /she said" where the credibility of the accused and the "victim" are the only thing that separates a conviction from an acquittal. These types of systemic biases guarantee wrongful convictions of innocent people and encourage false accusations to be made without consequence.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:43 PM
5

I don't know what you are seeing that leads you to believe this is a left vs right issue. Smh at how utterly gullible some of you people are letting propaganda divide working class people and keep the ruling class doing whatever the hell they like.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 01:35 PM
1

Lol I didn't say you were obese.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 07:30 PM
1

What's it like to have a BMI higher than your IQ?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 06:55 PM
1

Someone's triggered! 😂😂😂 Now go work yourself to death with zero holidays so zuck and musk can buy themselves a third yacht. Pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 06:50 PM
1

You realize of course that if you say "USA is better than Europe because X" and that X is not American and is from the UK or China or wherever that still invalidates your point right? And stuff like "gene therapy, mRNA" you do know that biontech is a german company right? And Sanofi is French and Arbutus Biopharma is Canadian and Curevac is another German? That's all the top mRNA pharma companies aside from the US's Moderna. Btw no one is disputing that the US does a lot of things very well but …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 06:29 PM
1

...rely on American technological innovation all our software: really? what software would that be? How many computers globally run Linux (originally by a Finnish developer) and its derivatives vs windows hardware like Apple products: Apple hardware runs on ARM chips. A British company weapons: sure Europe buys US weapons as part of their overall defense spending. They also develop their own. appliances: You're kidding right? What appliances are made in the US? The biggest appliance makers are C…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 06:02 PM
1

No sorry not going to happen. Your source is a cato institute blog post that posits that NATO countries failing to meet their spending targets constitutes a subsidy. Neither you or the "author" seem to know what a subsidy actually is so refuting can be easily accomplished by looking up words in a dictionary. You seem content to remain wallowing in ignorance so let's just leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 04:59 PM
1

I’m very much not MAGA. And proceeds to post the most utterly garbage faux news bullshit. 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 04:15 PM
1

No I live in the US but have lived in several other countries including in Europe. What you interpret as triggered is just me contradicting your brainless repetition of maga propaganda. If you make a claim you need to back it up with actual facts, not feelz. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 03:37 PM
1

I very clearly asked above on what metric your claim that "Europe is a failure" is based on. You provided 1 actual figure and 1 made up bullshit figure. My subsequent comment was in response to the former and why it isn't a good metric for judging a nation's success or failure. Did you just learn to read or something? None of that was very complicated and was following pretty clear debate logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 02:52 PM
4

USA GDP is higher but crime rates? You've got that one backwards. Also GDP alone is a terrible metric for determining whether or not a country is a success or failure. Its better to look at median incomes adjusted for social security benefits which narrows the gap significantly. Europe also scores higher than the US on human development index and happiness survey scores, education, life expectancy, gini coefficient, etc. We have sacrificed all of that to help billionaires get richer and artifici…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 01:45 PM
4

Europe is a failure because of unchecked immigration laws and leaning too heavily on socialist policies. On what metric?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 01:26 PM
–

So that's a no then.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 01:48 PM
1

it’s the removal of pressure Its the illusion of removal of pressure.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:54 AM
3

Its ridiculous misandry based on the difficulty the govt will have in replacing lost the revenue. Men work far more hours during their lifetimes, often in dangerous conditions that leave them with serious health issues, contribute the vast majority of income taxes paid, and have a shorter expected lifespan!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 07:58 PM
1

artificial wombs They could probably transplant a fertilized human fetus into various animals' wombs if ethical and legal restrictions were out of the way. But you'd still need the embryos from somewhere.
/r/MensRights01/09/25 08:04 PM
2

How many times do you think people have called me used up Maybe they were being sarcastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:01 PM
2

It bothers me how much hate there is towards women online for aging. This was after you responded to my comments above calling me "used up"? Gee I wonder why people are mean to you online. A real mystery for sure. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 07:14 PM
1

I'm not looking so its irrelevant. 🤷 But really, aging is something the vast majority will have to come to terms with at some point. Some people handle it with grace and maturity and some go kicking and screaming, angry at the younger competition. One day you'll figure it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 04:01 PM
0

No one's stopping you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 03:24 PM
1

Depends on what you mean. Women's peak physical attractiveness (on average obv) will occur before the age of 25 certainly. But we're not talking about just looks are we? The OP is asking if someone would leave their spouse for a younger women purely on the basis of attraction. If the marriage was already on the rocks then sure why not? Otherwise its a stupid question. Either way its nothing to do with the red pill which is all about dating and finding a woman who could eventually become a long-t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:51 PM
2

Men should work on looks/status/money if they want to attract women. Where's the incoherence?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:11 PM
1

Where?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:10 PM
5

Lol go ask all your friends to help you move next time and see who shows up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 11:17 AM
1

What they really don't seem to get is that having larger minority representation etc in media is perfectly fine. What people really despise is prioritizing DEI over storytelling, condescension, 'boss-babes' tropes that rely on all the male characters being stupid and useless, an endless stream of remakes and reboots who's sole purpose is to disavow old favorites in favor of political propaganda, etc, etc. And there are even great examples of how to do it right. Sony's Spider-Verse movies have an…
/r/MensRights27/08/25 12:19 PM
8

By the same token, why doesn't Wendys offer mental health services too?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 11:19 AM
1

Sure but crime rates including violent crime have been falling for decades and violent crime has not been a driver of mass incarceration. This article has a lot of good information.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 06:29 PM
4

No. I'm implying that you are the only one who thinks this discussion should also apply to Afghans or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 03:32 PM
0

That's what meeting his parents is for.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 03:15 PM
5

Yeah I'm sure those other countries where there is more of a cultural expectation to go dutch on first dates are cesspools of misogyny. Jfc you don't have room for a logical thought in that morass of woke victim brainrot do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 03:15 PM
1

That is a pretty weak interpretation of what I said. The gender pay gap does not exist and differences in earnings between men and women come down to hours worked, length of time in the workforce, men dominating higher risk or physically demanding jobs that pay more, women choosing non-monetary benefits over wages (flexible hours, more holidays and things), etc, etc. You can read Claudia goldin's paper that won her the Nobel prize in economics which demonstrated all this in data.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:13 AM
1

If you're getting that 46%/43% from this then you've conveniently left off a number of highlights: I'll grant you this one. Cus­to­di­al moth­ers and cus­to­di­al fathers were sim­i­lar­ly like­ly to receive full child sup­port pay­ments (46% ver­sus 43%). But the context is important. Cus­to­di­al moth­ers were more like­ly to have a child sup­port order or agree­ment in place (51% ver­sus 41% for cus­to­di­al fathers). Cus­to­di­al fathers were more like­ly to nev­er receive a sin­gle child su…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 11:06 PM
1

Maybe not specifically income adjusted but definitely adjusted for socio-economic background. As I put above, after accounting for that, income is largely a matter of effort so it should not really be excluded or adjusted for.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 10:47 PM
1

There are studies that are adjusted for income obv.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 10:21 PM
1

My point was that there's no real reason why single mothers should earn less than single fathers other than they are choosing to earn less (working fewer hours, working less stressful or lower risk jobs, favoring non-monetary benefits like flexible hours, etc). This is mirrored in studies explaining the 'gender pay gap' and differences in earnings by gender more broadly. So the income part is a bit of a red-herring. If a man works hard to earn a good living, that is part of his good parenting, n…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 10:03 PM
1

Like I said above, the sources you provided backed up an irrelevant point so they didn't contradict anything and didn't add anything to the discussion. If I posted a bunch of cat facts with sources would that prove anything? I also didn't accuse you of disregarding my sources (which I didn't provide). 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:21 PM
3

Crime is a necessary, even if not sufficient, condition for our levels of incarceration. So falling crime rates should have resulted in lower levels of incarceration then right? Right??
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:17 PM
2

You haven't given any evidence of anything so....
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:14 PM
7

Totally wrong. Mass incarceration has very little to do with crime rates overall and everything to do with the policy choice of over-using incarceration to punish criminals. The massive US prison population doesn't exist because Americans commit more crimes than in other countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:12 PM
0

Again with the irrelevancies. I don't think you're capable of understanding the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:08 PM
1

Well first of all, men and women have equal access to jobs and education so you can't just exclude the choices that led to single mothers earning significantly less than single fathers. Also single fathers receive less child support and women have much higher rates of delinquency with what little support they are ordered to pay so the fathers are really doing it on their own. To your second point, there is some research showing that cohabiting single fathers actually have worse outcomes on some …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:07 PM
3

Why do you think there is a positive correlation between violent crime and mass incarceration when data shows the opposite?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 07:41 PM
1

Totally unnecessary. To estimate the effect of bias you can simply look at sentencing disparities between men and women for the same crime. And that's before you even consider that women are less likely to be prosecuted in the first place. But regardless, none of these arguments have any significant bearing on the OP's post or my top comment above. The costs of mass incarceration are largely unnecessary regardless of the gender of the incarcerated prisoners, albeit that reducing mass incarcerati…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 05:21 PM
1

That is irrelevant though. Reducing incarceration rates would reduce the total cost relative to the cost of supporting single mothers which is what OP is pointing to. Also those statistics are heavily skewed by structural misandry in the justice system from who gets charged to the length of sentences to post-release conditions. That is also irrelevant however as we are not debating fixing those issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 04:02 PM
6

Sending people to prison for non-violent crimes should be a last resort after other rehabilitative options have been exhausted. Criminalizing normal behavior, overcharging for minor crimes, targeting minorities, failing to provide competent legal representation, etc, etc is why the US has the largest prison population in the world, not because of the inherent criminality of the people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:34 PM
3

Its not just about money otherwise you'd see similar outcomes for children of single fathers which is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:31 PM
11

Mass incarceration is a policy choice not a personal choice like single motherhood. Also men pay the vast majority of taxes so its self-funding.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:29 PM
4

I agree 100%. Marriage historically is a social safety net for women in exchange for the costs of childbearing and rearing. People who believe that men benefit more from marriage than women (in the material sense) are completely deluded.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:27 PM
14

woman lacks the legal benefits. So that would be saying that women get more benefits from marriage than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:22 PM
2

What does this have to do with anything? Presumably OP is talking about couples in long-term, committed relationships where the only question is whether or not they formalize it with a marriage contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 01:21 PM
2

The sources linked weren't completely clear on the source of violence (though you can see the broad rates are highest for bisexual women, then lesbians and then hetero women) but if you go to the main data source (CDC), they have a direct link to their data and reports based on their own broad survey. But the part that you're asking about is summed up here. Its also the case that rates are higher in all their domestic violence sub-categories too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 10:12 PM
2

Yes...they...do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:52 PM
1

Women initiate more than 80% of divorces. Lesbian couples have the highest rates of divorce (and domestic violence too). But don't let facts intrude into your alternative reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:23 PM
4

Is that your default response to women behaving badly? mEn dO It tOo! 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:49 PM
24

Because she kept that to herself until after the contract was signed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:26 PM
2

Is it this? Feminism is for equality for women
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 12:47 PM
5

Why would you expect a feminist to consider the interests of men? For the same reasons feminists want men to consider the interests of women. We're living in a society!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 12:44 PM
2

Every military in the world likely has rules against fraternization.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 05:19 PM
-2

Your baseline for policy is "other countries do it too so it can't be bad"? And no one said anything about other militaries not having "strict rules and regulations". The US however is pretty unique among modern western militaries for having bizarre puritanical regulations that have nothing to do with military effectiveness or discipline.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 01:28 PM
9

...the available men are still pining for lost youth. You missed the point entirely. They are concerned about the woman's motivations and sincerity. You'd be a fool to marry someone when you're their second choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 04:09 AM
–

The body positivity movement (which was really a massive propaganda program to convince fit men to be attracted to fat women) demonstrated this quite clearly. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 05:20 PM
17

I think there's an age distinction you need to make. Plenty of women hookup with and subsequently marry that person so definition 1 applies. The problem men have with being considered "husband material" is when they haven't had success when young and now that they're in their 30s there's an abundance of ex-party girls looking to settle down.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 03:41 PM
2

"chemical castration" is not mutilation. They are given drugs that kill their sex drive but there are no permanent effects if they stop taking the drugs.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 02:43 PM
1

Women need men to provide for them and having kids is the most effective way of cementing the relationship (along with marriage). OP and women like her are the most easily replaced and serve no long term use for a man other than temporary companionship. If that's what she wants then great but realistically it's a recipe for ending up old and alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 02:09 PM
1

We're talking about hookups not relationships. Lots of guys are attracted to a wide range of women while at the same time having higher standards for LTR or marriage. NYC is also full of young guys earning really good money who aren't looking to settle down at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 04:56 PM
28

NYC is a bit special because you also have a gender imbalance in favor of men which is unusual and makes it even harder for women to actually lock down a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 12:39 AM
13

If they even know who the father is though.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 12:48 PM
6

He was victimized first by the harassment and second by the mugshot.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 01:59 PM
1

male equivalent of hypergamy or more precisely it is a reflection of male polygamy Again that is not true and does not fit the definition of either word. essentially cheating (for some people) Such a small minority of people that we can dismiss their weird view out of hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 08:43 PM
0

The point is that hypergamy is specifically when women prioritize marrying up in status and resources. Sure men have a greater attraction to hotter women but they happily date and marry looks-matched partners. The OP equating looking at online prostitutes with dating and marriage is quite frankly ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 04:53 PM
2

I didn't say anything about how men treat each other and neither did your post. Nice dodge attempt though.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:10 PM
3

Just wait until high-end sex dolls get uber-ized as a service and you can rent one for a 1/2hr on demand. Then the company hoses it off and on to the next customer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 11:27 AM
2

So men/redpillers need to come to a consensus right now. Do men behave a certain way based on how “women reward them” or do men have their own morals/beliefs based on multiple types of incentives/disincentives? Not sure if many men are open to be criticized on behalf of their gender because some entitled half-wit's grandma couldn't get a credit card 75 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 06:27 PM
2

Because I believe that the ROOT of why men have voted against their own self interests, especially lately, is because women won't sleep with them. This is what you said. Examples of other groups acting in the same way for completely different reasons undermines your argument. You haven't demonstrated anything other than a correlation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 01:14 PM
2

Because words have meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:18 PM
2

This is really silly. Is a lack of sex the reason a majority of white women voted trump?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:08 PM
-3

No. Physical attraction is not the same thing as being attracted to status and resources no matter how hard you try to twist the definition to make it so.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 09:59 PM
7

Sure if you make up your own definition of hypergamy. For my part I think the majority of men lusting after a minority of women is equivalent to Zoroastrianism.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:54 PM
6

Are you suggesting that appreciation of beauty is synonymous with hypergamy? Do you know what the word even means?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 08:47 PM
2

As soon as men aren't held to 'traditional' standards by society then women not being held to the same standards ceases to be an issue.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:42 PM
43

The woman’s statement informed the court that since the night in question she was “stressed, angry, sad, and emotionally drained”. She set out how she now feels nervous in social situations and had begun taking taxis home from events so as to avoid strangers on public transport. The woman, who is self employed, stated that she had suffered financially due to the stress and sleepless nights as she had to take days off work. Ridiculous that the courts entertain this lunacy.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:46 PM
39

They were both put "on leave", he resigned and she will be following. There's no way the company will keep her on.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 10:03 AM
54

No she's out too.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 09:39 AM
2

No that is not the case whatsoever. If a group of trans people have mental disorder A then takes hormones and develops mental disorder B at the same rate as A what conclusion are you going to draw? Transitioning had no effect overall on mental health? Or maybe it did help with something but had an unintended side-effect that is reflected in non-trans people of that biological sex. Give up. You are clueless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 05:45 PM
1

In this case? Which case is that? Most people in here were having a general discussion about trans people's mental health and if gender affirming care can have a positive effect. Of course the starting point for that discussion is a comparison of the mental health of trans people relative to the general population. If you don't understand basic statistics or how population studies are constructed why even pretend to have anything of value to say? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 05:28 PM
2

Exactly. If you look at the thread between me and him it quickly jumps to exactly that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 05:21 PM
2

That entirely depends on what the study is trying to discover.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 05:20 PM
2

Is there a study that shows...? I don't have a narrative to push here but you clearly do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 03:18 PM
2

So the answer is no then. You can't back up your claims. Quelle suprise...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 03:11 PM
1

I asked you above if you could cite a study to back your claim that gender affirming care "helps significantly" with their mental health. I have never seen anything that is that conclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:55 PM
-1

That would be one type of control group but not the only one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:37 PM
3

it would just indicate whether they are at higher risk of mental health problems, which we already know they are There are all sorts of treatment options and support ideas you could derive from a comprehensive study but claiming "we already know they are..." is just silly if we don't know specifics and can actually quantify the risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:36 PM
2

Yeah that was what I was thinking. The guy above saying "It helps significantly" doesn't seem supported by any actual data that I've seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:24 PM
1

It wouldn't need necessarily but a well-constructed study would have control groups if they wanted to draw any conclusions about the mental health state of trans people generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 01:47 PM
1

Is there a study that shows pre vs post vs never transitioning suicide rates against the general population? Genuinely asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 01:23 PM
49

The problem is that the biggest misogynists are women themselves as they are incredibly competitive with each other. A lot of feminist hate is simply older women hating on anything that advantages younger women but without hating on younger women directly. That's why you see age-gap relationships being demonized and articles like in the OP. Its driven by jealousy and self-loathing more than anything else.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 01:14 PM
16

I watch these arrest videos all the time. Well there's your answer right there. 🙄
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/25 12:45 PM
2

Like without knowing them, how do you woo them accordingly to their taste in men? Alcohol is the traditional means.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 09:14 PM
3

The point is that women suffer less violent crime victimization than men. So the woe-is-me narrative is not in keeping with the actual risk you face as a woman. But the vicimization false narrative has certainly gained women a lot of privileges. Huge bias in family courts for child support and alimony, huge bias in criminal court means less liklihood of being charged, then begin convicted and then the length of sentence, bias in school grading from elementary on, DEI programs to favor women in c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:55 PM
4

This comment is reflective of a very big part of the problem. Women have a delusionally high estimation of these safety type risks that flies in the face of all the actual data. And then they use that as a wedge to gain political, legal and social privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 01:39 PM
1

Feminism and the Red Pill are not two sides of the same coin...is largely a conspiracy theory, perpetuated by a community of grifters. A harsh but fair assessment of feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 01:34 PM
1

Big difference. Lol ok. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 03:16 PM
1

She fully presented as a man to the point where the victim believed she was one. What are you talking about? Medical transition is not a requirement of being trans is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 11:36 AM
1

No. You've slept with closeted gay men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:50 PM
1

I don’t think that case law applies - she was a woman, she wasn’t a trans man. Do you know anything at all about the case? She posed as many, presented as a man and fucked her girlfriend with a dildo pretending it was her dick. What about that makes you think she wasn't a trans man?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 11:48 PM
4

Evolutionary psychologists, such as Dr. William Costello, have researched Manosphere/RedPill culture extensively A cursory glance at this guy's "research" shows him to just be another grifter but on the opposite side of Andrew Tate-types. His most cited paper is a survey of incels where comes to the startling conclusion that they're not ok! Amazing stuff right there! Your quote is much of the same. Does he even define what he means by the manosphere? It really sounds like he's gone about reading…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 10:24 PM
13

Red pill is basically just saying that women are attracted to looks, status, money and men should focus on self-improvement to attract them. Its not prescriptive in terms of the women they should be trying bang/date/marry/whatever. Purely going for looks in a LTR is very foolish as looks fade and you're left with personality, shared values, work ethic, etc. So really your post is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of RP more than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 09:44 PM
26

Some men have different priorities in long-term mate selection than pure attractiveness. This isn't new ground or some weird mystery!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 09:25 PM
-17

And if you don't breathe you'll die even quicker. Would you say breathing is more essential to live than peeing?
/r/MensRights10/07/25 12:28 PM
1

That's 1% risk for a single condition. Maternal mortality is another 1% risk. Other birth defects and health risks to the mother also go up. The problem is that the actual getting pregnant part of the biological clock has been greatly mitigated by modern medicine. IVF doesn't help at all with the other risks though. The reason we even have data is because a lot of women are getting pregnant and having kids way older. Edit: look at the lines for all the groups older than 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 05:38 PM
7

Sure that's a factor but I don't think its a bigger problem than geriatric pregnancies when they do happen. The risk of downs syndrome for example rise exponentially with maternal age. Also maternal mortality does the same. Not getting pregnant when you're trying is a bad thing for sure but not nearly as bad as dying or foisting a life of disability on your offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 05:16 PM
19

Sperm carries epigenetic information that influences how the placenta forms and functions. Poor quality sperm, whether due to age, lifestyle, or poor overall health can directly compromise the placenta, putting pregnancies at risk before they even begin to show signs of trouble. This flips a lot of common assumptions on their head. We often hear that older men can safely father children indefinitely, but that’s increasingly being challenged. In fact, a man’s age and health affect not just concep…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 03:14 PM
23

These sorts of posts are incredibly generalising of women 🤦 Who do you think is making the claim that men are intimidated by successful women?? This post is to de-bunk the cope that some high-earning women rely on which is to assume that their lack of relationship success is because men are intimidated. Like you say - women at all levels of achievement can find partners. The ones who can't have other issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 07:46 PM
39

I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability. Great quote that perfectly sums up why men and women will never be equal. Women don't actually want equality. They want equal opportunity, equal outcomes (regardless of effort or ability) and extra privileges.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 06:25 PM
1

And you keep using that feminist shaming language to validate your delusions!
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:49 PM
2

I was in a cafe earlier today and a baby kept staring right into my eyes. I just about shit my pants in fear and the barista didn't care at all!
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:37 PM
6

Yeah all those writers and poets in antiquity going on about romance and love were full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 07:27 PM
-1

Yeah they probably looked straight at their victims before committing those crimes too. Its a slippery slope.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:09 PM
1

Well I'm certainly not up worrying about people looking at me when I'm out in public.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:08 PM
-1

I'm not really into normalizing paranoid neuroticism whether the individual is a man or a woman.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 07:03 PM
2

You made the claim that red pill was political and that many of its 'arguments'(?) "revolve around some form of cucking women out of rights and freedoms". Can you stop being a victim long enough to backup your claims?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 06:58 PM
-6

"Valid concerns" ???? A mentally impaired janitor is looking at him in a public place. What is the concern?
/r/MensRights05/07/25 06:55 PM
–

This post and your comments are hilariously ironic projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:33 PM
1

What does the red pill have to do with politics? Before looking at anyone else you should take a look in the mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:26 PM
7

Ugh every get-rich-quick, psycho-babble quick-fix, reformed addict, etc becomes this type of insufferable "I was a loser and did something so everyone else doing that thing must also be a loser." Nothing has changed bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/25 02:22 PM
2

It might be hard to find a study specifically comparing paternal and maternal age risks on both the mother and baby but there are plenty of separate ones that can give the same conclusions. Just google "paternal age risks" and "maternal age risks" and you'll get plenty of results. E.g maternal and paternal The former shows massive increases in rates of downs syndrome, stillbirth, risks to the mother and all sorts of other health conditions. The latter: Compared with fathers between the ages of 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 02:44 PM
1

I'm sure you can figure out Google all on your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 11:16 AM
7

Debate What? Scientific facts? You seem to be seriously misunderstanding the statistics so maybe that could be debated. Even ancient geriatric fathers only contribute a small increase in overall pregnancy risk compared with geriatric pregnancies on the mother's side. E.g. if the father's risk goes from 0.005% to 0.01% from ages 20 to 50 you've doubled the risk but its still extremely low. If the mother's risk at similar ages goes from 1% to 2%, the risk is similarly doubled but the result is far…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:16 PM
2

Sure there are some few and far between exceptions but that doesn't really change the reality that aging and beauty are strongly negatively correlated. Also when you say this: I DEFINITELY am better looking now than in my 20s and I have photos to prove it lol. What is the reason? Losing weight, improving your style, etc are not relevant as your younger self could have done all the same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 02:10 PM
2

but plenty of men are attracted to and marry older women, single moms, overweight women Saying that women are at peak attractiveness in their 20s is not the same as saying that they aren't attractive at other ages. Its just a simple statement of fact that people don't look as good as they age.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 12:45 PM
-3

When women say they don't want to get in that dependent position, men reassure them that it's nothing to worry about, so I assumed it was nothing to worry about. Don't be disingenuous. Women do obviously put themselves at risk when they willfully become dependent on a man and its no secret. This is why marriage exists as an institution - to give them legal protection in such situations. The main point I was making though is that women being the sole provider is much likely to lead to a split tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 04:04 AM
6

Sure that is a stereotype but the point is that its not an "idea in the red pill community is that a much older man would marry a 15 year old submissive virgin that was chosen for her by her parents." Redpill: younger women are more attractive than older women You: PEDO! You all want to be just like Henry VIII! Seriously I don't know where you're getting your info from. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:46 AM
-2

OK I can speak for myself only and the below are generalizations (obv). Anecdotal counter-example do not contribute anything to the debate. There are very few women who are willing to be the sole provider which is reflected in stats about leading reasons why women file for divorce. Women get resentful when men aren't pulling their and the relationship is doomed more often than not. Any man who puts himself in that dependent position is really gambling with his future. Related to the above, men a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 03:42 AM
3

Genuine question. You're going to have to actually ask a legible question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 02:31 AM
2

That is not an easy question to answer insofar as happiness relates to red pill. Similar to the believers vs non-believers happiness studies. Some show that religious belief increases happiness but then also the most atheistic countries consistently rank as the most happy. Being the lone non-delusional person in a group is probably isolating and could certainly lead to unhappiness. But there is no alternative for those of us who are incapable of willful self-deception.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:45 PM
5

Sure they should if they want to and can find someone suitable who will marry them. Marriage exists for the benefit of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:35 PM
4

OK. Men shouldn't get married at all and 20-25 y.o. women are at their hottest. Not sure how that helps you. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:31 PM
2

On what? The best age to get married? The age of women I find most attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:20 PM
2

OK and? Your data is valid but the OP's is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:19 PM
3

Translation: "I don't like or understand someone else's viewpoint so I'm going to slander them as pedos based on my own delusions rather than having anything real to say."
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 03:17 PM
18

First sentence... OK so the idea in the red pill community is that a much older man would marry a 15 year old submissive virgin that was chosen for her by her parents. Where did you get this idea? I'm not going to bother reading the rest if the foundation is that weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/25 12:16 PM
-1

Something of substance? Like saying the definition of genocide "is “when violent extremists who I support, due to an inability to discern woke propaganda, loses a war they started.” There's no arguing with people who are so morally bankrupt that they celebrate the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, the destruction and theft of all of their property, and the mass starvation of the survivors because some of the oppressed dared fight back in an insignificant way. Israel is a …
/r/MensRights29/06/25 01:48 PM
-1

Is there no subreddit safe from garbage Zionist propaganda? Shame.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 10:02 AM
8

How many women would be comfortable getting married and merging finances without knowing their partner's financial information? The idea of blind trust goes right out the window. And the idea that it's an accusation is ridiculous. It is merely the acknowledgement of the possibility of infidelity and with such huge lifelong consequences, trust-but-verify is an entirely rational way to approach things.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:25 PM
–

You're disingenuously limiting gold digging to age/look/status mismatched couples. There are plenty of regular women married to regular men where the wife is a financially abusive gold digger. Why do you think the "his money is out money and my money is my money" trope comes from? Or the women using dating apps for free meals with no intent on actually dating? Or the sugar babies conning naive men out of $$? Or even the wife who changes her mind on having a career once the baby arrives?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/25 12:00 PM
32

She may have a case against the state sure. That's nothing to do with her attempt to sue the real victim in all of this.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/25 09:48 AM
0

It's better to measure each half inch separately and round them all up. 🦵
/r/MensRights12/06/25 11:04 AM
1

OK and? My question was directed at a woman who believes that "sex workers are regular girls".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 01:04 AM
1

I didn't do anything of the sort.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 12:07 PM
1

Jfc obtuse it is. I was merely explaining how the word "use" is not necessarily dehumanizing when talking about prostitution as it is used in the context of other services. That's it. My original comment was pointing out the hypocrisy of (mainly) women who simultaneously say nonsense like "sex work is just work" - or in the comment I was replying to "sex workers are regular girls/ civies" - while also negatively judging the men who use them. Personally, I don't use prostitutes and find them disg…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 08:33 PM
2

Fair. I deleted my comment. You are still either being just generally obtuse or willfully mischaracterizing my comments above.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 07:24 PM
1

Its reasonable for someone who took that conclusion from this comment thread to be considered an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:46 PM
1

🤦
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 06:45 PM
–

Ah so women have no agency. You have a very antiquated and low view of your gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 05:50 PM
1

Your inability to reason does not have any bearing on my view of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 05:33 PM
2

I totally agree with you! The above comments were to point out the hypocrisy of women claiming that sex work is just work, men shouldn't judge sex workers, etc, etc, and then simultaneously choosing to judge men who have used availed themselves of sex services in the past. Lets just be honest here - sex work is the lowest of the low and the workers and their clients can and should be judged harshly for their bad decisions. Obviously I'm talking about voluntary decisions on both sides, not traffi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:25 PM
5

Again a silly deflection. I was talking about the use of the word "use" in the context of using services. Grammar doesn't usually have a moral component. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 03:04 PM
–

I'll just re-post my previous reply for visibility in case you missed it. Seeing a dentist, masseuse, etc are passive activities where you just lay there and take it so some difference in description is understandable and doesn't imply the sex worker isn't human. Regardless I also use a lawn service and use a plumber and use an accountant. You are attempting to deflect attention away from your obvious hypocrisy in the way you claim to view sex workers which is incompatible with how you judge the…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:47 PM
–

Seeing a dentist, masseuse, etc are passive activities where you just lay there and take it so some difference in description is understandable and doesn't imply the sex worker isn't human. Regardless I also use a lawn service and use a plumber and use an accountant. You are attempting to deflect attention away from your obvious hypocrisy in the way you claim to view sex workers which is incompatible with how you judge their clients.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:46 PM
–

The sex workers are regular girls/ civies. Then why do women prefer not to date someone who has used a sex worker? Its kind of the whole point of OP's post. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/25 02:22 PM
1

The word "gymcel" is used on this forum constantly. No it isn't. Its the product of the brain-dead terminally online. continue to autistically screech You have zero self-awareness. 😂😂😂 What a funny little clown you are getting so emotional over a few comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 07:21 PM
1

Haha what a ridiculously obscure reference. According to the gymcel subreddit, which has just under 350 members, a “gymcel” is a subgroup of the “incel” community Your sub has 750k members! Woohoo!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 06:04 PM
3

The only way these traditions persist is through ignorance.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:28 PM
5

Write clearly. I don't know what you're trying to say. If you don't understand my first comment above you can re-read it.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 09:46 PM
11

I really don't know what we are arguing about here man. I'm not arguing with you - I'm correcting the misinformation you're spreading and your attempt to minimize the seriousness of MGM. If you want to think female circumcision isn't as bad, well, it's never going to effect you so whatever, keep thinking that I guess. I am in no way saying that FGM isn't bad or that it should be allowed or anything of the kind. Your attempt to insinuate otherwise is shameful and would be insulting if it wasn't s…
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:35 PM
19

I'm not making a gendered observation here at all, I'm making a very simple just medical statement. Female circumcision is more invasive and more prone to infection than male circumcising, due to just the biological fact that the clitoris is not, anatomically, equivalent to foreskin. The problem with your statement is that it is medically and culturally wrong. There are many forms of FGM with removal of the clitoris being among the rarest and most extreme. Removal of the clitoral hood is also on…
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:18 PM
6

severe bleeding following the procedure went unaddressed for about seven critical hours, resulting in Cole losing nearly half his blood volume Horrific
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:13 PM
1

I really don't understand what you even are trying to convey with 'gymcel'. Gym-celibate? Someone who doesn't go to the gym? Someone who doesn't fuck at the gym? Someone who chooses exercise over sex? A product of an unimaginative and petty little loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:07 PM
1

What does that say about you? I'm actually kind of disappointed that you seem to have nearly figured out that brevity is the soul of wit. Either that or the flying spittle has finally shorted out your keyboard.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 07:00 PM
1

Tbf you're doing most of the talking you young whipper snapper.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:54 PM
1

the only tool you have left is to lie about your life and accomplishments to hide the fact you're a loser who spends all day on Reddit starting internet beef with strangers, as is obvious from a cursory (that means hasty, in case your dumb ass didn't know) review of your posting history The projection is strong with this one. You sound like an unhinged maniac bro. Maybe one day you can be like me Its a possibility for sure. Early onset dementia can strike anyone without warning. and my wife is h…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:40 PM
1

Any examples? You must have dug pretty deep. 🤣🤣🤣 Reddit cares Reporting people you disagree with to the Reddit police doesn't mean anyone gives a shit bro. Either way I really don't get why you're so triggered. In this thread, you responded to the original poster with an off-topic rant and then continued bitch and moan when called out on it. 🤷 Maybe you've got a couple other original insults to throw at me? Gymcel, loser, edgelord - what could possibly be next? Quite pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:12 PM
1

🤣🤣🤣 the perfect little domestic life marred only by your uncontrollable rage. Sad. But regardless, I've been married longer than you, doubtless have had more success with women, definitely earn more than you, probably in better shape than you and I don't risk a heart attack when scrolling reddit. Checkmate simp. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 12:20 PM
3

The problem is that making adultery illegal or heavily punished (in the context of marriage) is at odds with modern western notions of individual rights and freedoms. This is a case where the rights of the individual can conflict with the best interests of society. Simply put, the institution of marriage has failed to keep up with changes in the rest of society. The solution for individuals who want to mitigate these risks is to simply not get married. It's unnecessary for its original purpose o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:42 AM
0

It's always projection with you angry little simps. 🤣 You only live once bud. You should lighten up.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 11:00 AM
–

A 'gymcel' fucked his wife I'm guessing (whatever that is).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 11:59 PM
2

Yeah complete insanity
/r/MensRights05/06/25 04:41 PM
4

The other thing some redditors have said is that Bauer stopped pursuing the libel case against Hill when it looked like evidence from the MLB investigation might get publicly revealed. IDK if that's true, but if so, it seems odd as well. False accusations against wealthy men tend to bring other false accusers out of the woodwork because numbers helps credibility which increases their chances of a payout. No actual evidence is needed beyond their word! Just see the case of Danny Masterson. 30yr s…
/r/MensRights05/06/25 01:44 PM
3

They locked up a guy recently for a month of the basis of a proven liar's accusation in spite of exonerating video evidence. The lengths people will go to bElIeVe wOmEn is despicable.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 01:37 PM
8

Relevant...
/r/MensRights02/06/25 05:18 PM
2

Weak dodge.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 01:53 AM
3

Correction: young men swung to the right in a normal way (if somewhat faster and more aggressively) typical of political cycles. And once they see that being a single issue voter where all the other political policies of their chosen orange turd candidate are going to fuck them for decades they will swing back to the left, assuming of course that they still have the right to vote in a fair election.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 02:23 PM
2

My heart breakes a little more every time i hear about her past He's projecting his ideal concept of pure chaste femininity onto real women and is disappointed as a result.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:51 PM
7

Stop putting women on a pedestal. You can have a nice mutually-fulfilling long-term relationship without exposing yourself to life-altering risks by simply not getting married. Sure she has a past and after you she'll have a future. Focus on yourself and it just doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:28 PM
2

Yes its appalling. A divorced 47 y.o. living off her ex is appalling. A 47 y.o. woman trying to get pregnant is appalling. Trying to get pregnant as a single person is appalling. Attempting to do so with some private commercial arrangement is appalling.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 03:23 PM
1

So not wanting to get ruined financially by divorce = iNcEl? I get that its just a catch-all slur against anyone who doesn't think exactly like you but can't you come up with anything a little less boring?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 12:54 PM
5

He was asking stupid questions not making a sensical point.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 12:39 PM
15

You want me to pretend to be a "little high schooler"? Sorry but I'm not interested in participating in your sick fantasies nor am I homosexual.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:26 AM
10

OP is a boss for posting the archive link instead of the original.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:00 AM
18

You have absolutely no idea what she said to them but it sounds like she told the staff that he was intoxicated and making her uncomfortable, as she wrote throughout the whole article. That could result in an arrest, cancelation of the next leg of his trip, being banned from the airline, etc. If you don't understand the danger then you are an idiot.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 02:55 AM
23

I even repeated her description of her making the false accusation to the airplane staff! Not only did you fail to read the article but you failed to even read the comment you're replying to! JFC some people...
/r/MensRights27/05/25 02:16 AM
26

In the end, nothing terrible happened on my flight (compared with horror stories about drunk passengers... ...making false accusations and attempting to ruin a stranger's life because they are delusional psychopaths with a victimhood complex? I waited before disembarking to share my discomfort with the flight attendants. They took my concern seriously... Oh wait that did happen.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 01:31 AM
0

I'm unaware of any studies that focus on specific subcultures (obv polyamorous people would likely feel differently) but am referring to large survey-style studies that have been done in western countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 07:37 PM
2

A woman is considered less valuable to red pillers Men prefer women with whom when they're on a date, don't run into 50 people she's fucked. Feminazis have turned that into "men only want virgins". The truth is that both men and women want less promiscuous partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 05:31 PM
9

In the US, federally that would be a violation under title vii which prohibits discrimination in public accomodations on the basis of sex. There may also be state and local laws as well. Other western countries have similar laws.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 01:43 PM
48

Its Aus. They probably classified the man as the aggressor in the official statistics.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 03:40 PM
–

The victim mentality is so ingrained in them that it blinds them to reality which is sort of OP's point. Feminism will always be needed because they will never achieve equality and even when they have equality under the law, it's not true equality because of indefinable fantasies like the patriarchy and rape culture. You're not responding to a necessarily hateful person but just a non-thinking, easily brainwashed one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 11:28 AM
10

Joe Rogan is the right's Bill Maher. Ultra-rich douchebags who got extremely lucky with having the right formula at the right time but attribute their success to ability instead.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:32 PM
-4

There is nothing good faith about your argument The reality that blue states default parenting time for fathers is higher than red states? Maybe go back and get your grade 10 so you can understand the words and numbers better. fuck off Take your own advice.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:28 PM
-9

Lol ok. I provided a good faith argument, a link to back it up and even a suggesting of avenues to follow up. If you can't formulate a coherent thought after all that then the problem is you. This is a sub for actually talking about mens rights issues, not just a safe space for rightwing morons to endlessly repeat propaganda. Maybe you'd be more comfortable on Facebook?
/r/MensRights21/05/25 12:04 PM
-22

That is one issue, and really that map states that right wing states favor men more. Then pick another one. Workers rights? Job safety? Rates of incarceration? Healthcare and mental health resources? Education? that map states that right wing states favor men more. Its difficult to even agree on what the issues are when the person you're talking to is illiterate.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 10:44 PM
-36

This is false. Just look at actual mens' rights issues and how they're handled state by state. Real laws not feelz. Example Edit: downvoting without debate is cowardly and pathetic. Edit2: I expected more from MAGA folks tbh. Usually they can at least spout some twisted half truth but to not even try? Shame.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:53 PM
9

Take anyone struggling with anything and there are some who will mock them for it. People can be assholes. There's no deeper meaning to be found.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 04:40 PM
26

This is just bad marketing by the government. Single people already subsidize married-with-children people through existing tax and entitlements.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:55 PM
1

The cause might be different but the solution is the same. More effort from the other party. But just to summarize your position: Man demanding effort from the woman = he's a lazy bad lover. Woman demanding effort from the man = he's a lazy bad lover.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:27 PM
1

Telling women to take some accountability for their own pleasure is not whining. Putting all the blame on men because you don't understand your own body is whining. 🤷 Its a pretty similar pattern for women generally. Nothing is ever their fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:59 PM
1

Well if its to the point where sex becomes painful and tiring then like I said, the juice isn't worth the squeeze. That is a small minority of women in my experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:40 PM
1

why whine about doing oral for a long time Don't make stuff up and act like you're making a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:33 PM
1

How about when a guy watches too much port and has "death grip" syndrome. Whose fault is it when he can't get off during sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:31 PM
1

This is what I actually wrote. Effort and communication widen the compatibility range but sometimes its just not meant to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:23 PM
1

they are too proud to follow very clear instructions Too proud or maybe that your needs turn sex into a chore. In my experience when you find someone you're sexually compatible with everything just falls into place. Effort and communication widen the compatibility range but sometimes its just not meant to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:13 PM
–

Toys? Watching porn? Sensation enhancing drugs or other treatments? Do you even tell your partner what you need? Tbh in my experience, for some women the juice just isn't worth the squeeze.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:05 PM
–

Toys? Watching porn? Sensation enhancing drugs or other treatments? Do you even tell your partner what you need? Tbh in my experience, for some women the juice just isn't worth the squeeze.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 01:05 PM
–

OK by all means continue to lay there and hope for the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 12:38 PM
–

Lol no. She dismissed my comment because in 1 specific position my suggestion didn't work for her. She also ignored the main point (take some initiative) so I'm guessing is just a pillow princess type (i.e. a bad lay) who expects the guy to be a mind reader of what she likes. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 10:58 AM
–

How many other women have you made orgasm?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 10:53 AM
-6

Sure I suppose that's something a functionally illiterate person might conclude.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 04:24 AM
-3

You don't understand the difference between sex with someone else and solo masturbation? I'm not sure you virgins really have much to add to this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 04:19 AM
-4

Missing the forest for the trees. 🤦 You guys just have no idea what you are talking about. The irony is palpable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 04:13 AM
-4

So flick your bean when he's banging you. Take some initiative!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 03:38 AM
4

He admitted the relationship was consensual and was one of passion......hardly the definition of duress Irrelevant. A prisoner cannot consent to an inappropriate relationship with a guard due to the power imbalance. Also, resorting to personal insults is another indication of how weak your argument is. The personal insults had nothing to do with my argument. I made them because you are contemptible and deserve to hear so.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 07:12 PM
2

Women initiate 80% of divorces and the single biggest predictor of divorce is the husband's inability to maintain his income (which obviously includes many situations where job loss is health related). Those are the relevant facts, not some edge case of husbands initiating divorce because of the wife's health which of course happens but is not a leading cause of divorce despite OP's flawed and discredited study's conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 03:41 PM
13

She committed an actual crime you utterly cretinous fool. He breached (under an assumption of duress given the power imbalance) a breach of prison rules.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 09:39 PM
33

He got 2 years for what exactly? Is consensual sex a crime? She violated her duties and the law multiple times and got nothing.
/r/MensRights17/05/25 03:26 PM
2

Well with every male exclusive social organization being forced to accept women it becomes more difficult for men to build those platonic relationships doesn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:19 PM
14

She even rejected his marriage proposals multiple times!
/r/MensRights15/05/25 09:16 PM
39

More and more men can see that marriage is a poisoned chalice, full of pitfalls, and with few benefits to the male. Meanwhile, when the female can see no present advantage in the arrangement, she walks. And when marriage rates fall to sufficiently low levels, the laws will be changed to uphold the same benefits for women and responsibilities for men without the need for a pesky formal contract. It already happens in other countries (warning: don't read if you suffer from high blood pressure), an…
/r/MensRights15/05/25 03:51 PM
17

The pig in the office makes wigum look like sherlock holmes. Edit: and charges for the false accuser?
/r/MensRights15/05/25 02:45 AM
4

Has she tried calling them to figure out what is behind this?
/r/MensRights15/05/25 02:38 AM
10

It sounds like a cliche but it really does happen It happens extremely frequently with estimates as high as 1/20 prison inmates are there because they've been wrongfully convicted.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 02:28 PM
-2

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact reply engine price wild paint summer apparatus seed retire lush
/r/MensRights13/05/25 01:40 AM
1

In many jurisdictions in the US at least, if one parent has sole custody then child support is determined as a percentage of the non-custodial parents income with no consideration of the custodial parent's income and resources.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/25 02:09 AM
1

What does my income have to do with anything? Do you think my comment was based on my own experience? Is that how you think economics works? If you believe the pay gap is real, significant and caused by gender discrimination you'll need something more than feelz to overcome the mountain of evidence to the contrary. A pay gap definitely exists but as I said above, the cause is peoples' choices and preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 09:31 AM
25

there were 5,651 prosecutions for rape and just 35 of them were for false rape accusations Those stats say absolutely nothing about the number of false rape accusations. If the CPS doesn't buy it then it never makes it to court. That doesn't mean an accusation wasn't made.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 08:28 PM
2

If you seek it out the algorithm will make it happen and lead you to believe that there's a pervasive social trend. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 01:21 PM
50

Very similar to the case of Mark Pearson in the UK who was falsely accused by actress Souad Faress of sexually assaulting her in a crowded tube station as he walked past her. He was actually taken to trial by the clowns at the Crown Prosecution Service depsite the entire 1/2 second encounter being recorded on CCTV. She made the false accusation and kept it up to the bitter end, even testifying in court in an attempt to ruin a total stranger's life for no reason whatsoever. No punishment for her …
/r/MensRights29/04/25 02:06 AM
–

Aren't we calling out fake victimization in this thread? That's what your post is all about right?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 12:45 AM
7

And you're not a victim because: a one night stand ghosted you your date didn't pay for your dinner or give you a ride home a man didnt walk you home or to your car or take care of you when you were drunk you don't get paid as much as a man who works more hours at a more demanding job your male co-workers like to socialize outside of work hours you couldn't join the boy scouts as a child the father of your child has 50/50 custody a man hit you back a group advocates for mens rights a domestic vi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 04:26 PM
–

ChatGPT prompt: write a diatribe related to BDSM in the style of someone who has recently stopped taking their meds.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 10:45 AM
–

Sure I agree and it's important for policymakers to take into account for things like paternity vs maternity leave which can affect the choices couples make.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 07:09 PM
–

How 2 parents split work and childcare is a choice not systematic discrimination. The fact is that men and women are paid equally for equal work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 01:13 PM
–

The dating stuff aside, I think most of the problems men have with women today aren't the women themselves but society's and the law's unequal treatment of men v women and vastly higher expectations of duty, accountability, etc for men. I wouldn't blame women for that necessarily but would blame feminists and the simps who pander to them. It's not about equality in all but very limited circumstances (e.g. abortion rights), but is about establishing and maintaining privileges.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:29 AM
–

The pay gap is closed not closing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 11:24 AM
12

I think 2 women have? I'm sure we'll see some make the attempt at the more difficult course so we'll see. I don't believe it will happen without a reduction in standards though.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/25 02:44 AM
5

It's just as likely that he thought the movie was based on a real person. That's why we have the /s. 🤷
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/25 02:24 AM
-6

No not really as they're still marines. It's the same for other professions that have physical standards like firefighters. It doesn't mean that the women meeting the lower standards aren't members of the profession.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/25 01:33 PM
168

Sure and as long as we're talking fictional characters I'm sure superwoman could do it too. 🙄
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/25 01:08 PM
7

Or... It could just be that the questions the survey asked elicited answers that reflected a reality that was unfavorable toward women and the study authors associated that with them being negative towards women. E.g. if you ask a question like "do you think women deserve equal pay?", unless you qualify with "for equal work" then your response answers can be interpreted however you like.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 11:42 AM
1

That wasn't my experience pre- marriage whatsoever. Nearly all of the women I banged were looking for a long term relationship other than 1 night stands where we didn't know each other at all. Now obv that's not to say that they all would have married me following a LTR as that's when values, goals, etc might conflict...but they wanted to try.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 11:38 AM
14

They lowered the standards for women but the fact that they have a standard at all should tell you everything you need to know. Yes there are women marines.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/25 11:21 AM
156

No woman has ever passed the SEAL training and I doubt one ever will. Maybe a trans man pumped full of hormones could but I doubt that will ever happen either.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/25 11:16 AM
0

I think there is this idea among a lot of redpillers/the manosphere that women in the past were perfect or chaste You think wrong. Next!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 03:10 AM
13

The difference is that single mothers universally are looking for someone to provide for them. Single fathers shouldn't date them either.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 11:55 AM
-12

The guy was shouting at other passengers, never touched anyone and was choked to death after being rendered unconscious. The attacker should have gone down for murder.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:26 AM
54

It's the prosecutor who is responsible for offering the plea deal.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 10:24 AM
8

Or at least post an archive.org link instead of direct.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 10:31 AM
-5

the left Are you capable of having a thought that doesn't rely on a stupid us v them mentality? Show me who on the right is actually concerned with real solutions to the problem of violent crime and with more than just appeals to the low end of the intelligence bell curve?
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:41 PM
2

You should repost this with a proper link title. Putting a URL in a text post is dumb.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 11:51 AM
12

Why would you make accusations without evidence? Oh wait...
/r/MensRights17/04/25 11:00 AM
3

Arguing against a straw man is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 03:22 PM
25

there is a HUGE difference between circumcision and FGM False. There is a huge range of types and severity of FGM. The mildest (and most common) is a little cut. Removal of the foreskin is analogous to the removal of the clitoral hood which is one of the more severe types of FGM. Regardless, ALL forms of FGM are banned in western countries. please educate yourself. Speak for yourself.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 12:04 AM
22

Non-verbal autistic with cerebral palsy. He might not have had any clue what was happening.
/r/MensRights14/04/25 03:56 AM
16

Yes but if the law was also gendered it would be doubly bad.
/r/MensRights13/04/25 05:39 PM
71

The falsely accused guy spent a month in jail and lost his job. This isnt remotely close to justice served.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/25 11:21 AM
10

No. This is a way of actually leveling the playing field. Women can still claim they face discrimination in hiring for pregnancy related reasons and therefore still need DEI policies and preferential treatment despite all evidence to the contrary. Gender-neutral policies like this take away some of those arguments.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 01:38 PM
1

That it’s a normal behavior for men to be capable of being resentful, inpatient, shallow, desperate, rude, pervy, thirsty, selfish, inpatient, uninterested and cold; no matter their looks, age or socioeconomic status? I'm not saying such behavior isn't normal but that its not the norm. Thinking otherwise is what puts you in the bitter and crazy bucket. Have you seen the shit you’ve said about women? What did I say about women?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:09 PM
2

😂 what a bitter, crazy thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 04:51 PM
2

Sure but do you think that is normal behavior for the majority of these men such that it would be the normal experience for women using online dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 10:41 AM
6

🤷 these are guys with options. Do you have a different explanation?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 02:46 AM
5

Those are online dating complaints by women who are fucking out of their league.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 01:31 AM
1

[–][deleted] 5 hours ago [deleted] ok
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 01:47 AM
1

If you could, you would.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 01:46 AM
4

Well (not that this has anything to do with the OP) I agree with you that men are attracted to non-appearance traits. I disagree that social status is on there in the same way we're talking about for men (leadership, power, career status) and also men don't typically pursue women for their money. Also some of the points you mention are just variations on physical attractiveness. Now none of that is to say that this is representative of all men or some such nonsense just like when men say "awalt"…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 10:40 PM
8

Who are you attempting to debate here? You're not refuting anything I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 08:57 PM
0

Close but wrong hemisphere...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 08:12 PM
-2

What if the dude was reaaallllyyy good looking and rich though? Not even a quick squeezer?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 07:58 PM
7

For every woman who's exclusively seeking those three things, there are far more who are more concerned with a man's character and internal qualities. A guy never gets the chance to show his character and internal qualities if he doesn't pass the initial screening. Your comment is quite illustrative of the kind of gaslighting women love to engage in though. When was the last time you gave a guy you were not attracted to a chance because he had "good character"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 07:56 PM
26

The red pill is basically just acknowledging that women are attracted to looks, social status and money. If a man wants to be successful with women then he should work on himself to improve in these areas. That's it. If a woman tells her fat single friend to lose weight is that not valid advice?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 07:41 PM
24

Enlighten us on the causes of dementia sensei.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 01:11 PM
11

Nah. Without the added context then switching pharmacy's sounds like itself would be politically motivated. If my non-working wife wanted to direct "our" money to anything MAGA because it was MAGA then she'd be out on the streets.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 06:29 AM
2

Liberals have their own delusions too. Current American conservatives are anti-science it's true. But that's not a core conservative value or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:04 PM
5

So you're a pro-lifer then?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 05:56 PM
1

Get in the mother's only line, tell them you identify as a mother, get kicked out, sue for discrimination...profit!
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:48 AM
3

Nothing like a night out in Tijuana!
/r/MensRights28/03/25 11:29 AM
1

She meant Charlie Manson the periodontist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:10 AM
3

Statistically men who pay child support are less delinquent than women who pay child support. There are more men paying because the assumption that the woman will be the primary custodial parent is backed up by social norms and the courts.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 12:30 PM
2

False equivalency. Be honest OP, would you rather be accused of something and be inconvenienced by it, or be asaulted? If you had the choice between being raped and spending 10yrs in prison which would you choose?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 06:31 PM
1

The threat of imprisonment is a physical threat. Wtf are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 06:30 PM
-1

Ah so it was just an irrelevant point to the argument being made. Great.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 06:27 PM
7

And yet your only counter-argument is an ad hominem attack. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 06:23 PM
5

If you go by rape convictions you won't prove anything. Every non-prosecution could well be the police not acting on a false accusation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 06:21 PM
24

You think a guy who sent an unsolicited dick pic to someone he was flirting with should be consoled when it backfires?
/r/MensRights21/03/25 01:00 PM
1

The reason is fairly obvious...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 02:13 AM
10

Not entirely true. Even with a signed acknowledgement of paternity it's possible to get your parental rights and responsibilities terminated. However, this becomes less and less likely: a) the longer you've established the parental and support relationship; and b) whether or not the real biological father has/can be identified. Regardless, it's complete bullshit but not hopeless.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 12:20 PM
18

Yeah this is a special case. He would legally and morally be the father if the IVF had taken place in the UK. He got out of his obligation based on a technicality. The main fact of the matter is that he was a willful participant, along with his gf at the time, in seeking IVF treatment with doner sperm in order to become a father. What happened after with their relationship is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 05:28 PM
-1

Proof: look at all the bullshit we put up with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 12:42 PM
13

1yr prison sentence for a minor drugs crime and they're surprised their prison population is becoming unmanageable?
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:05 PM
2

I am living proof that a man needs not to lie or deceive to maintain a FWB/Casual situationship That was my experience too. Now the women might have felt differently due to their own delusions. In many cases I was adamantly clear that the relationship would not progress beyond casual but and they stayed despite wanting more. I fully believe their memories of the relationship could very well be different though. People deceive themselves just as much as others. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 03:09 PM
1

If passport bro marries her then no it doesn't solve anything (other than potentially upgrading from what he could land back home).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 03:05 PM
12

Ok you're totally right. He really does love you and you're going to be happy ever after. 🌠
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 01:44 AM
10

He didn't want to even talk to you when you were long distance and he was seeing other people. Telling you he that he loved you meant jack shit. My guess is that he was never seriously interested, knew that you were a bit desperate and so kept you as a backup.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 01:08 AM
23

He wasn't interested in you. It's not some big brainwashing conspiracy. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/25 12:50 AM
1

If you use the ublock extension just disable javascript for the site and you can read it.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 02:16 PM
14

Of course there are lots of such cases. The issue is there are too few relative to the large numbers of false accusations made. Here's a recent one where a girl is facing criminal prosecution for a false accusation. Here's the latest in a long-running and precedent setting case where a guy is suing his former university, his false accuser and a bunch of women's groups for defaming him.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 07:04 PM
2

Those words are not masculine but are non-feminine in that they imply that the successful employee will be accountable for producing results.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 02:28 PM
22

It also encourages other false accusers. In the linked case if it weren't for the CCTV that woman would have gotten everything she wanted. All their stuff and a clean divorce while he's rotting in jail. Lots to gain with basically no risk.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/25 02:16 PM
6

You take a narrow definition of war and treat it as gospel. Ants wage inter-species war against rivals to defend their "state". Chimps do the same with their family tribes. Is an ant queen or alpha chimp not a "proper government"?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 04:04 AM
60

Where's a handy bear when you need one ladies?
/r/MensRights07/02/25 01:11 PM
86

Because of the patriarchy or something.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/25 12:54 PM
5

😂
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/25 02:56 PM
2

There's a show I can re-watch at any time and laugh just as hard as the first time.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/25 02:55 PM
15

The proper number is 0118 999 881 999 119 725 3 though.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/25 12:31 PM
15

The true test is how badly she'd be beaten at her "professional" sport by a 16yo boy.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/02/25 12:30 PM
1

There's no way you managed to convince some loser to put a ring on one of those little trotters.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 05:52 PM
1

Maybe you need to re-read the comments above. Can you do that sweatie?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 05:24 PM
–

My comment was explaining a possible reason for an observable social trend, not asking for advice. If you can't handle a 2-way discussion without projecting your bitterness and snark, maybe you should find a different sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:23 PM
–

Way to add to the discussion sport. 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 04:10 PM
–

alimony is rare Officially about 10% of divorces involved alimony payments. This excludes unequal division of assets in lieu of alimony, uncontested divorces where the couple agree privately on alimony rather than getting the court involved, family courts fiddling the numbers the pad child support payments (mommy support), etc. If you stand a 1/3rd chance of getting legally fucked in a divorce that's 50% likely it's not surprising that more and more men are finding marriage unappealing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 01:04 PM
1

It can also address stuff like custody. Definitely not pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:10 PM
8

Get a lawyer and shut the fuck up. Don't go and talk to the detective under any circumstance.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 01:03 AM
1

Do you need a dictionary?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:56 PM
2

They are encouraged to overlook such behavior. Proof? 😂 If I'm disrespectful its because you are posting nonsense and projecting your delusional victim-hood complex onto others.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:55 PM
2

You constructed a very specific scenario in your post. Wife is disrespectful towards her husband online and asked how men would feel upon discovering it. Not just generally posting mean things. There is a world of difference between those 2 scenarios which is why all of your subsequent "proofs" are irrelevant. Other posters went further and claimed that women are frequently encouraged to overlook such behavior in their partners which was an obvious implication of your post. Your inability to fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:45 PM
1

"Troll" has a double meaning in this context. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:37 PM
1

Lol wrong post. Trolling through my history for a gotcha? Sad. And I certainly did not ask for proof of men being disrespectful online. I asked for proof that women were advised to tolerate disrespect from their partners in a similar manner to your stupid hypothetical. You and several others seem to think its so common yet can't find a single example. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 12:07 PM
2

same energy Just give up already. You can't find a relevant post that actually demonstrates anything like the scenario in your post. Pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 12:02 PM
3

That example has absolutely nothing to do with your post. Jfc find an example of a woman who is being advised to stick by her OF simp bf/husband. Not some rando posting a joke online. Fucking 🤡!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 02:41 AM
3

Sure and I'm saying that doing anything before confronting her would be ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 12:11 AM
5

That is so far away from what you posted I don't know what point you're trying to make by linking it. Is the idea of people who have been married a long time wondering about what-if scenarios outlandish in your mind? There is zero disrespect, and zero indication that the OP is not attracted to or is unhappy with his spouse. He is wondering if he could have had it better had he made other decisions in life which is something that everyone does at some point. He's also asking if the grass is reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 12:07 AM
6

Well cat's out of the bag in your scenario. Once confronted it would be to your face no?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/25 12:02 AM
8

Why just tell me? Why not post a link?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:13 PM
–

Women are always told the behavior in the OP is not worth breaking up a marriage or family over Either that's your lived experience and you are a loser who exclusively dates losers, or you're chronically online and think that purple hair feminazi lunatic anecdotes are representative of real life, making you a different kind of loser. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 08:45 PM
20

Men or women finding others attractive is normal and unavoidable. Openly disrespecting your partner to their face is a completely different thing. If you can't understand the difference then I pity you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 08:39 PM
27

If your spouse has zero respect for you and tells you that he or she is not attracted to you then of course divorce is the answer, regardless of gender. Wtf would you stay in such a marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 08:00 PM
6

false accusations are an epidemic Why wouldn't they be? There are almost never any consequences when they're caught, and if they get away with it the benefits can be substantial.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 03:48 AM
1

Child support is entirely based on custody split and income split (assuming both are fit parents, have suitable accomodations, etc). It doesn't matter if the child was born to a married couple who then divorced, non-married partners, or a one-night stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 11:37 PM
0

Do you split custody 50/50?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 09:11 PM
2

Divorce and any prior relationship should be completely irrelevant in child support calculations. Alimony is a separate issue entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 09:09 PM
2

I addressed that in my top comment. But regardless, the current system often requires child support payments to be made in 50/50 arrangements or even to a parent with less than 50% custody if their earnings are low.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 08:36 PM
13

Lazy fucking pigs charge and lock the guy up on the basis of her word alone and then take a month to actually investigate anything. They should be jailed alongside her.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:11 PM
0

It can be designed to benefit the child and still be biased in favor of women when it comes to who pays. Do you not understand that both things can be true at the same time?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 08:05 PM
1

Child support payments obv.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:52 PM
-3

Those percentages are a result of systemic bias against fathers not the cause of it. Women start with a presumption of competency with regards to caring for the child and the man starts with the presumption of ability to pay. To change this, the man must pay for a lawyer (and often her lawyer) while working full time to maintain a high baseline income as his child support payments will be based on his past earnings even in the case where he wants to work less in order to be home with the child m…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:44 PM
0

Child support should be based on a fixed statutory amount adjusted for local factors. E.g. let's say for some area that could be $30k per year so each parent is responsible for $15k of the total. Any deviation from 50/50 custody should be calculated based on that. So if you had 75/25 custody arrangement, the 25% parent pays the other $7,500/yr. 50/50 should never require an exchange of payments. Edit: lol women in here are triggered about having to pay equally for their offspring. That's all the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 01:34 PM
42

For a totally unrelated reason.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/25 12:28 PM
3

I am discussing it, but obviusly if you want things to change, you should do something Nah you're just playing (maybe?) dumb. The point of this thread is highlighting the empathy gap between the suffering of men and women, not specifically looking to end African slavery. But tbh your attitude is refreshing. Its nice to see women not hiding their narcissism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 02:53 PM
6

So you don't want to discuss or acknowledge the issue. Why are you here?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 01:42 PM
2

There are niche groups for every conceivable human activity imaginable. We are talking about mainstream attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 01:28 PM
-1

The whole point of this thread is to discuss the plight of the enslaved men who are completely ignored by the world until a single woman is affected. Maybe I'm just totally off base, but I'm perceiving a lot of upset and anger over this from your post , and I just feel it's kinda like ....also can we just step back and acknowledge that issue is actually peanuts compared to the people we're using to base our debate off of What you're perceiving is the frustration of someone realizing the impossib…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:39 PM
3

What the hell are you even trying to say? Who's "we"? Who's "them"? This article isn't a prompt to discuss gender pay gap delusions or whatever grievances you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:00 PM
11

You are 100% wrong. This is an international news story because of the single woman pictured. The men are just background noise. It's the boko haram child kidnappings all over again.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:47 AM
7

You win the stupidest, most nonsensical take in the thread award. Congrats!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 11:44 AM
57

It's trivially easy to send text messages from anonymous numbers. The real problem is the victim facing consequences and having his name dragged through the mud before any real investigation has been done.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 01:10 PM
4

That's why they harp on about the gender "pay" gap and not the gender "wage" gap. The latter is actually illegal and really isn't a thing once you account for the type of job, level of seniority and hours worked. But its not really about equality let's be honest.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 02:34 PM
3

So the decision to have sex is also the decision to have a child? You should have said that you're anti-abortion earlier to avoid the confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 06:58 PM
3

Not if the decision to have the child in the first place falls solely to the woman. Society has concluded that forcing a woman to get an abortion is a greater evil than forcing an unwilling father to pay to raise the child. There is no perfectly fair outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 06:49 PM
4

Did you just completely miss the point of OP's post? No one is asking how child support currently works but whether or not there is a more equitable alternative. 🤦
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 06:13 PM
3

Well we already let pregnant women kill the kids so not giving them money doesn't seem like much of a stretch.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 02:21 PM
2

Very mature. "Hasn't affected me so its not a problem." The hallmark of the unthinking pleb. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 07:16 PM
2

Really? You responded to this top comment... Hilarious how that works. Both successful actors. But only one is expected to foot an 80 million dollar bill. I'm sure he won't hurt at all losing that money. But she does not deserve a percentage of his net worth for simply existing. The point is that equal division of marital property heavily favors women. Alimony almost exclusively benefits women. The courts use bias in custody and imputed income as a form of 'mommy support'. Legal equality in fami…
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:59 PM
3

which would imply... No you utter fool. The point of men's rights is to improve the lot of men, not to maintain the status quo. That means debating flaws in the current system, pointing out inequalities and biases and advocating for change. At no point anywhere in this thread was anyone wondering how the current law treats the division of marital assets in divorce.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 06:32 PM
16

You responded to a comment that was pointing out the absurdity of the law, not whether or not it existed. Thanks for explaining how marriage works though bud. It was a real mystery until your snarky comment.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 02:47 PM
99

She's also a porker.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/25 02:45 PM
2

Repeating yourself does not strengthen your argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 04:52 PM
0

Attacking the messenger, not the message. The hallmark of the intellectually challenged. What's next? Calling me an incel?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 04:24 PM
10

Sure but they don't have competitions for who's the dumbest.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 04:23 PM
0

And some people are born with only 1 leg. Does that mean we should do away with the para-olympics too? Please tell me more about your infantile understanding of society and the world at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:01 PM
23

doesn’t mean women are incapable of playing at the highest levels. There is no men-only chess league. There's open competition and a women's league. I know I don’t speak for all women but I hate the thought of being given a separate division because I’m not considered smart enough based on my gender. I don’t want pity representation. It's there to encourage more women to play the game on a more level playing field where they will actually have fun. If they are good enough they can compete with t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:17 PM
4

Wow such insight! Everything that's not perfectly equal is just like racism. I'm going to call my boss right now and get him to bump my pay up to his level. Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:11 PM
14

Because those genes are not random obviously. They skew in favor of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 01:07 PM
7

Or one team's jersey and another teams hat like a real slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 10:48 PM
2

As a man you'll have a higher chance of defending yourself or escaping the situation, and women are more afraid because when men target women it comes with the fear of being raped. Well if you bothered to actually look at the data you would see that this is a false assumption based on the same irrational overestimation of risk that women are prone to. 🤷 I'm not going to try to argue against your delusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:29 PM
2

Are you listening to yourself? The post states the fact that men are more likely to be victims of physical violence than women. That does not blame women for anything whatsoever, regardless of how much time you spend in this sub. The point is that women have a much higher perception of the risks they face than men do. We all know who the perpetrators of the vast majority of physical violence are - a small minority of men. That is completely irrelevant to the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:13 PM
3

If you think that anyone should have taken OP's post to imply that male crime victimization is higher because of women then you are the low IQ one friendo. You and the commenter above assumed something dumb and ran with it. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 01:14 PM
14

You’re looking for a way to blame women here No one did that at any point but you had to make women the victim again.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:02 AM
42

Yeah but what was he wearing?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:00 AM
5

"paying for" 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 01:27 PM
39

You're wondering why animals have an instinctual urge to reproduce? 🤦
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 07:10 PM
5

All that means is that you have to play by their rules. In this case you go to the gym, say you're a woman, and go get changed in the ladies room where there are no cameras. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 03:52 AM
8

It definitely has not been debunked. You're just assuming that male-on-lesbian violence is 100% not instigated by one of the involved lesbians and waving away the direct female-on-female numbers even though they alone reflect a similar rate or higher than hetero couples. If a woman hires a hitman, she's still a perpetrator. Similarly if a lesbian gets a guy to threaten or assault her partner, she's still guilty of IPV. Lots of sources in the wiki. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 01:24 PM
20

Lesbian couples also have the highest rates of domestic violence so lots would have a good reason to leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 03:00 AM
2

But only 10% of divorce ends with alimony. You conveniently ignore child support and courts using unequal custody time and using lower or zero imputed earnings as mommy-support (and this occurs frequently outside of marriage too). You are also ignoring the fact that marriage settlements reached outside of court (arbitration, agreement with lawyers or whatever) can involve spousal support that is not counted in alimony stats, nor is unequal distribution of marital assets in lieu of regular alimon…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:44 PM
6

So the guy should be ok with getting married, she decides to quit her job to stay home with the kids, then decides she wants a divorce and then she collects alimony and child support in this unbiased system? Genders reversed and what happens? She divorces him for not working (no. 1 predictor of women filing for divorce is husband's job loss), family court tells him to get his shit together and get a job, still often awards her primary custody (for reasons), same outcome in the end. The numbers d…
/r/MensRights26/12/24 02:38 PM
7

That is a legal fiction as 5 minutes in any family court would tell you.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 02:14 PM
9

Its not just about what women want though is it? Younger men are waking up to the risks of marrying in a system that heavily favors women in the quite likely event of a divorce. This is another byproduct of feminism that has successfully maintained the status quo when it comes to social enforcement of gender norms for men while doing away with the same for women.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 01:48 PM
8

Major social change doesn't happen overnight. Declining marriage and birth rates, and a growing share of single 30+ people tells the story pretty clearly.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 12:49 PM
9

The lawsuit is public record isn't it? You should be able to get the evidence they included in it.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 02:28 AM
9

Indeed. This was posted just a few days ago.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 02:16 PM
5

Its a straw man in that "red/black pillers who compare women role in the gender hierarchy to the capitalist class" is not a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:37 PM
9

It might be the max sentence for the careless driving charge but the destruction of evidence should be a separate crime that probably has stiffer penalties.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 03:33 PM
3

Well by the same token men don't oppress women. We live in a female-majority democracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:30 PM
2

No chance. Its much easier to argue against a straw-man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:28 PM
14

🤷 Don't know what to tell you. Its extremely common for people to attribute their successes to skill, innate abilities, and hard work, but their failures to external factors, bad luck, etc. The simple truth is that no one is capable of predicting the future and all of your efforts to mitigate risks in your choice of life partner can fail solely because of the other person.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 04:35 PM
162

The story is even more insane than the headline: Ashley McGovern, 31, drove the nine-year-old into the countryside near her then home in East Lothian before leaving the child who had a fear of the dark. The boy was only found 24 hours later with no shoes and socks on after a dog walker heard the crying child. The traumatised victim was found to have suffered brain injuries and spent more than four months in hospital undergoing extensive rehabilitation following his ordeal. It was found that ther…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 04:32 PM
31

Still just a guess though. Who knows what she'll be like in 5/10/+ years and/or after she's had children.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 02:06 PM
72

Indeed but you won't know she is the wrong woman until after you're married. 🤷
/r/MensRights19/12/24 12:39 PM
1

Ah so its irrelevancy you're going for now. OK don't forget to lube your dildo!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 09:22 PM
0

Look if you can misuse statistics then so can I. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 07:59 PM
-3

Most rapists and murders are men… Well the vast majority of rapes are not reported so we don't really know how many men or women are rapists. Also the most under reported crimes are against children and with women making up a large proportion of both known child sex abuse perpetrators and child care givers, you can't really conclude that most rapists are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 06:57 PM
5

Really? I count 13 school mass shootings in all of Europe since 1999. 10 in a single country is far higher obv.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:47 PM
11

Well ignoring female mass shooters who commit these types of crimes at a much higher rate than the total for every other western country is a bit foolish isn't it? We already know that mass shootings by male perpetrators is a problem and we (society) have refused to do anything about it at all. Your 'solution' would have us ignoring the ladies too?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 02:48 PM
4

The story was about a married couple who chose to have a 3rd child together. Then the mother abandons it behind her husband's back because she can't handle it, outside of the safe haven law's 7 day window. Now he has to fight to get custody back, likely faces a CPS investigation for the other 2 children and the wife faces no consequences. There is no question of paternity or custody. The woman should have been jailed, or at the very least, removed from the household and involuntarily committed. …
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:00 PM
8

Best thing for everyone here? The dad did not want to give up his kid and the mom did it behind his back. She should be prosecuted for child abandonment.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:53 PM
1

Throughout most of modern history... Doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 02:13 PM
25

what are they waiting for? Media hype to die down so they can quietly sweep it under the rug.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 03:11 PM
5

You dont think she has a point about these women being financially vulnerable? They arent married and could spend several years out of the workforce before being dumped and left with nothing. If this becomes a bigger trend watch how fast the govt expands common law marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 01:23 PM
1

It's not irrational to be scared of men (Or bears). You are confusing rationally dealing with normal life risks with fear. Of course women should be cautious when they're alone at night or whatever, as should men. It's rational to wear a seatbelt too while not being afraid to drive. It's not rational to fear men because tik tok told you to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 01:24 PM
1

I never said it's rational to think most men will hurt you...it's pretty understandable that women are scared of men. So it's irrational but understandable? Then what did you mean previously about not being scared of bears? You need to think before you write.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 12:51 PM
1

Ok great you've made a small step forward in logic. Now take it to its conclusion and think about most encounters women have with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 12:17 PM
1

Don't put words in my mouth. You accused me of being "post-wall". For all your vaunted IQ, you sure have trouble stringing a coherent thought together. 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 06:56 PM
1

Oh, so you’re with a run-through post-waller? Sounds beta. I don't know what you're trying to say here. I'm pretty sure I'm still fertile. 🤷 maybe you shouldn’t have gotten so offended when I mentioned that men criticize women no matter what choices they make A genius level IQ buy you failed to detect the irony of my comment? Don't blame me for your illiteracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 04:42 PM
1

My attitude? I think my responses above have been quite mild. Yours on the other hand, throughout the entire post I'd add, reek of bitterness and anger. As for your question, the answer is yes. I've been married for a long time but prior to that, did have plenty of success in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 02:12 PM
1

I think you're confusing resentment with contempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:23 PM
2

Posting in reddit? Dividends?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:22 PM
2

🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 12:28 PM
3

Well the intelligence bell curve does have a long left tail I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:07 AM
2

How many did you need telling you the same thing? 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 03:06 AM
3

wE cHoSe tHe BeAr...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:35 AM
3

There's a few good answers now. You just jumped the gun.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:35 AM
14

Yeah pretty simple explanation really.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:31 AM
8

Utter nonsense. Is it just a few boys or is it all of them? No outspoken girls in the class at all? Disruptive kids can be disciplined without the "teacher" making it a gendered issue. You are just parroting misandrist bias.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:15 PM
7

Oh so now its not about quiet girls and boys feeling excluded? 🤡 Has it ever occurred to you that a better solution might involve encouraging the quiet kids to become more engaged and confident, emulating those that already exhibit these qualities, rather than dragging everyone down to a lower level?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:01 PM
20

If she was looking to get shy kids to be more engaged then she would have asked that question. Your attempts to spin her blatant and harmful misandry as just regular classroom management are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 01:43 PM
7

"Who is responsible..." Biology mainly. The issue with the draft isn't that it's male only but that women are granted equal rights without equal contribution. A fair society would either have everyone eligible for conscription, or grant some social benefit to those that are.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 01:19 PM
12

So the system is biased because testify and testicles have the same linguistic roots? Can i interest you in a book on numerology by any chance?
/r/MensRights02/12/24 01:14 PM
39

The question wasn't "what can I do to control a noisy classroom better?" It was specifically asking for strategies to help girls and bring down boys. That's it. The context makes it even worse - girls are outperforming boys at all levels of education purely because of systematic bias. You'd have to be mind-numbingly stupid or willfully ignorant to not see why this is problematic.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 12:44 PM
68

Does a perfectly quiet classroom increase student learning and engagement? Highly doubtful. Specifically coming up with and enforcing conditions that she knows the boys will struggle with more. Then they can be punished, grades lowered etc. They do the same with laws targeting racial minorities too.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 12:29 PM
29

Not only that. They are worried about getting sued, same as universities ditching affirmative action policies.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 02:00 PM
4

Sounds like he put the money into an investment account in both of their names so the disagreement boils down just to cash management and financial returns. The hosts don't even ask what the mortgage rate is. Not much of a financial advice show.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 03:58 PM
5

Life isn't perfectly fair so everyone is a victim in their own way. The difference is that certain groups rely solely on their perceived victimhood as leverage regardless of the actual facts. Feminists and the wage gap or views on female perpetrators of domestic violence for example. A RP man complaining about paying alimony to his ex spouse who's fully capable of supporting herself is hardly the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 01:15 PM
1

Yeah that's the one I remember too. Basically a pro-slavery position.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 09:34 PM
1

Ok good luck 🙄
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:45 PM
3

The fair sentencing act reduced (from 100:1 to 18:1), but did not eliminate, the crack/powder cocaine sentencing difference. The first step act made that change retroactive. It did not address the wider issue of racial bias in sentencing. Going forward it was a Biden admin move to eliminate the sentencing disparity altogether but that was not applied retroactively (unlike the changes made under the fair sentencing act). You should have spent your time in prison getting better educated.
/r/MensRights26/11/24 05:51 PM
2

Lol. Well, I sure wish someone would've told my attorney and judge this at my sentencing. Thank you for schooling me on something you have no experience with besides a Google search. 🤣 I'm sure your anecdotal experience as a jailbird is fully representative of the entire Federal justice system. 🙄 I always find it funny when people who talk about systemic racism can only point to things that aren't provable. Can people be racist and biased? Yes. Is it happening on a systemic level? No, it isn't. …
/r/MensRights26/11/24 02:33 PM
0

That is an extremely naive take. It is incredibly easy to over-police segments of the population and incarcerate them at higher rates and for longer terms. Almost everyone in the country commits minor crimes every day. By enforcing the law against racial minorities you can ensure a higher rate of priors to use in sentencing. Just anecdotally in my suburban area I've been stopped by the police twice in the last 14 years. Once for speeding in a school zone and once for lane splitting on a motorcyc…
/r/MensRights26/11/24 12:12 AM
12

You cannot ignore race in the US justice system. Blacks and whites use drugs at similar rates yet black men are 6x more likely to be imprisoned for drug offenses. There are also huge disparities in sentences given for the same crime across racial lines.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:35 PM
3

Soooooo frustrating. Everyone in the room (including the women) know that they are utterly full of shit and their calculation methodology is incapable of actually proving the conclusions that have made.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:18 PM
2

If you want to de-google there are lots of options. Head over to /r/selfhosted and see some of the free open source projects you can use. Register a domain at cloudflare, use Zoho for email and you have a great email solution with total control over addresses (e.g. [email protected]) for free other than the domain registration costs ($10-12/yr). Immich lets you self-host photos, nextcloud to replace Google docs, etc. All you need to get started is any old PC with an internet connection.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:03 PM
3

I'm not sure that Cthulhu's clammy embrace is the happy ending that you think it is though.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/24 06:01 AM
2

That's probably just a reflection of your experience with your own uninvolved, useless dad. It probably explains your bitterness and snark towards men. It's not our fault sweaty!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 07:29 PM
0

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 02:33 PM
-1

Some kids sure. Mine weren't even much trouble as infants. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 02:24 PM
1

If women "hit the wall" at the age of 30 ( ignoring the fact you are considered a young adult at least till 35), why would women choose to waste their "good years" by getting married at 20 and becoming a bangmaid to a man that will find them old and ugly in 10 years time and will look at younger women? Bitter harpy characterization aside, you might as well be asking why people should save for retirement if you'll enjoy spending the money more when you're young?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/24 10:43 PM
16

study comparing the mental health of young men in fraternities to the mental health of young men not in fraternities. They found that fraternity men reported higher positive mental health scores, including a significantly lower risk of depression (though, a slightly higher risk of anxiety) I'd be curious to see what controls they put in place for the analysis. It seems likely to me that less-anxious, more sociable people will gravitate towards fraternities and skew the results.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:45 PM
-11

How do they know the shooters name? What a ridiculous story.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:30 PM
1

Your comment about episiotomies was a total non-sequiter in that case. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 10:23 PM
–

Well that is wrong and it doesn't make any other non-consensual medical procedure right. Anyway it seems that is an outdated practice and not widely practiced any more especially without the mother's consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 10:16 PM
–

Everything from jokes about the “husband stitch” after pregnancies, to disparaging women with large labia minora as being “worn out.” Yeah but that is comparing procedures done on fully consenting adult women to infants who cannot consent. Lots of men prefer women with big tits too and women opt to get implants as a result. Not the same thing as MGM or FGM.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 09:23 PM
0

As is my wont.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 01:59 PM
-1

Lets at least have a little honesty here. The vast majority of these posts are women blaming men for the election result despite the numbers being very similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 01:53 PM
-5

Well pretty obviously its not just about people not giving a shit about women's health isn't it? Women on here blaming men for all their problems before even thinking about taking a look in the mirror. Very typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 01:26 PM
2

And the majority of white women who voted trump? Is that also straightforward?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/24 12:54 PM
2

The premise of your question is incorrect. Post-divorce outcomes are worse for men in the short term but better in the long term. Source ...the key domain in which large and persistent gender differences emerged were women’s disproportionate losses in household income and associated increases in their risk of poverty and single parenting. Taken together, these findings suggest that men’s disproportionate strain of divorce is transient, whereas women’s is chronic. Source Women experienced a 45% d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/24 10:10 PM
-9

Sure but that is a progressive policy that you would only achieve through advocacy and campaigning by activists. Voting left or right won't do jack shit.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 02:27 PM
14

You are only able to relinquish parental rights in favor of a replacement parent who will adopt the child so yes, under those circumstances, you would no longer pay child support.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 02:03 PM
-21

Can we please stop with the political/voting posts about conscription? There is no vote you can make in this country that is for ending selective service. Trying to make this a left v right or men v women issue is really, really dumb.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 02:02 PM
21

To be fair, that sentence was the first time it had been applied for that crime and she did end up serving 4 yrs for an attempted framing. People get sentenced to the same for attempted murder. For example... 10yr sentence for attempted murder. He could be out in 5.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:44 PM
2

Did you even read my comment and the one I was responding to? Regardless of the morality of the law, OP would not have any case to sue for defamation over a false accusation because there wasn't one. Overly emotional, reactionary halfwits make me sick so we're even.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:10 PM
27

Anything to avoid accountability. Blame men when a majority of white women voted for trump too. Look in the mirror ladies!
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:35 PM
2

How was she terrible? Not perjuring yourself on the witness stand is not a terrible thing to do even if it has terrible consequences for the accused.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:30 PM
–

Do they just ignore that 45% of women voted for trump? They really ignore that a majority of white women voted for Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 10:24 PM
29

What do you mean? He broke the law and the prosecutor proved it in court. Personally I think its a stupid law but the point is that he has no case for defamation or false accusations.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:33 PM
8

He knocked her up at 16 but they started dating when she was 15 and she testified that they had sex then. Unfortunately she was asked by the prosecutor how long we had been having sex and she said that it was a while after we started going out - when she was still 15.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 09:31 PM
-12

The accusations weren't false though. Age of consent is 16 and they had sex when she was 15 and he was 17. Ridiculous law or not, OP did the crime.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:59 PM
0

I should take a civics class because you asserted rights that aren't enumerated in the constitution? Maybe you should take a logic class or maybe just go easy and start with passing middle school.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:49 PM
2

Really? You should go re-read the constitution. Not a single mention of "fetus". 🤡
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:21 PM
2

Tariffs are taxes. The difference is that they make us all poorer to protect the profits of special interests. Trump tariffs 1.0 generated billions in tax revenue that was promptly distributed to farmers who were no longer able to sell their soybeans to China. They also let US steel makers raise prices to match the prices of taxed imported steel which was pure profit, 0% of which was invested in new manufacturing capacity and jobs in the US. Trump 2.0 is going to be another nail in the coffin of…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 01:45 PM
1

In your new jersey example, it was different governments that gave women the vote and then took it away. You can either have progressive secular democracy or a system that represses rights in out-groups. The latter requires the in-groups to also give up rights to be sustainable. You can see this pattern repeat endlessly throughout history and Trump and his ilk are a (hopefully brief) step backwards. Along with women losing abortion rights, you are likely to see more limits on free speech, the er…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:35 PM
2

Not sure you've ever opened a history book then.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:07 PM
–

I got kicked in the balls so I cut my own dick off. That'll show 'em. - OP
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 12:56 PM
-3

"Fetal rights" go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:13 PM
7

He could have been a member of the raving loony party for all the difference it made. The point is that anyone thinking that voting GOP and taking away women's rights is a step forward in men's rights is completely deluded. We all move forwards together or backwards together.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 11:41 AM
18

Just waiting for the GOP to do away with selective service. Any day now I'm sure. 🙄
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:02 AM
0

Here's an idea - how about minding your own fucking business?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 09:38 PM
–

"Thanks Obama" has a nicer ring to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 07:42 PM
0

They need to learn accountability because when an entire group of people grows up without having to take accountability for any of their actions, it makes life a lot more difficult for everyone around them in various ways. How are women getting abortions making life more difficult for those around them? I don't expect a serious answer because its a cartoonishly idiotic statement to make but your reasoning might be good for a laugh. What will actually happen is that the number of unwanted childre…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:51 PM
1

Clarence Thomas and maybe Alito were planning on retiring in the event of a Trump win to ensure that they could be replaced by much younger people. The court will be far right for decades to come.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:47 PM
0

I don't really care as long as they leave the door open for victims of rape or people that need it out of medical necessity. That is major wishful thinking. If you get pregnant/get someone pregnant purely due to negligence, then you should face the consequences of your decisions without murdering your unborn child. Do you really want to punish women so badly for doing stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with you that you would put the rights of a barely formed fetus above theirs? Its very ha…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:17 PM
–

Such a meaningful distinction. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 04:53 PM
–

Yeah the GOP was quite effective in convincing rubes that a bunch of meaningless culture wars nonsense that has no real impact on their lives was a major issue that justified voting in a utterly contemptible clown like donald trump and the rest of the party who are hell bent on creating a christian nationalist theocracy. They really showed those transgenders!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 04:50 PM
0

Somehow these morons have convinced themselves that the GOP is going to step up to enshrine men's rights and individual freedoms despite them having never done so in the past and actively campaigning on the opposite. And in 4yrs when they're suffering under higher inflation, higher interest rates, slashed public services, a supreme court that will be putting the christian minority's rights above all others, they won't be able to do anything to fix it.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:42 PM
0

they misunderstand what Trump is actually going to do. He simply wants the decision on abortion laws to be determined on the state level without federally mandating that abortions be legal and accessible in all states. Do you seriously believe this? A large part of the GOP is pushing hard for a national ban and Vance has directly come out in support of it.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:37 PM
1

Roe v Wade was federal sure and the GOP will now work on a federal abortion ban. I wouldn't count on "state rights" being anything beyond a catchphrase that they whip out to generate nice little soundbites about freedom while they fuck over anyone who doesn't have $10mn+ in the bank.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:35 PM
29

...but Kamala+Liz Cheney will get all our sons, brothers, fathers etc…involved in endless wars What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights05/11/24 03:25 PM
30

*In Europe with a small sample size.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 03:24 PM
7

Don't fall into the trap of the terminally online by thinking that millions of years of human evolution can just be switched off. The vast majority of men and women want a long term, monogamous relationship with a member of the opposite sex. Edit: There was a response below that was deleted while I was in the middle of responding, but to expand on the above... Not to get too far off track with the original post but the fossil record and comparisons to other modern ape species supports the view t…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 03:36 PM
0

😂 why not quote the part of the study that you think demonstrates your point? The abstract is pretty clear.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:29 PM
2

Oh, you mean the planscamdemic which was cooked up by the globalists to derail his re-election? 😂 invalidates the other 3 years of his first term with a good economy and record low illegal immigration? Illegal immigration for the first 3yrs of Trump's presidency was lower under obama so I'm not sure what you think trump did that was so great. Whose economic "plan", by the way, will most definitely send us straight into a Second Great Depression. How do you figure? Pretty much every economist out…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 10:08 PM
-7

Because most of those jobs were going to American citizens and not illegal immigrants, thanks to Trump's border policies which resulted in record low illegal immigration. Illegal immigration fell because the global economy shut down during covid. Inflation rose because of covid. You can't claim trump is responsible for the recovery while having no blame for the downturn. Also the US has outperformed every major economy in the world post-covid on growth and job creation, real wages have risen des…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 09:48 PM
-1

I'm not going to address the study itself but just a couple of points you make. claiming that since "Feminists" reported largely "positive" and "warm" feelings towards men, then we must assume that "Feminists" are not "Misandrists". However again, they conveniently glossed over the fact that self-identified "Feminists" were significantly more likely to view men as a "threat". This is not a contradiction. You can have generally neutral or positive feelings about something while simultaneously per…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 09:30 PM
1

It was elected democrats - including Kamala - who dropped the charges, instituted bail reforms, and raised money to bail out the violent offenders during 2020. And you can back that up with sources right? BLM is not only focused on police brutality, but perceived racial injustice measured by disparate outcomes of all sorts which is inherently a left-wing position. It doesn't matter if no discrimination went into the process to them, the disparate outcome proves the system itself is racist. That'…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 09:10 PM
1

That's pretty spurious reasoning. There was no leftwing/rightwing political agenda unless you are suggesting that racially motivated police violence has a conservative/liberal divide. I doubt you have any evidence that the protestors were affiliated with either party or were even active voters.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 08:13 PM
3

As I said above and the poster you're responding to tried to explain, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, same as it is with a rape charge. If they don't have evidence of rape, they are unlikely to get a conviction or even take the matter to trial. In the case of a false accusation, they would require evidence that the accuser knowingly made a false accusation in order to get a conviction. This is how the criminal justice system works. Its not a new concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 06:45 PM
0

Your point being?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 06:00 PM
1

Its really not necessary to read beyond the first sentence of the abstract to see that you blatantly misrepresented both the study itself and its findings. Political ideology has been linked to beliefs regarding sexual harassment and assault (SH&A). Using data from the January 2018 Stop Street Sexual Harassment online poll (N = 2,009), this study examined associations of political identity and political ideology with self-reported experiences of being the victim of SH&A.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:59 PM
-3

The whole post and OP's outrage is pure projection. Its like the ad called him out personally. 😂
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:57 PM
-1

Cognitive Dissonance, with the leftist dogma, one or more dark triad traits, and dunning-krueger sprinked in make most leftists stuck. You unironically wrote this semi-literate drivel and think that its the leftists who suffer cognitive dissonance? 😂 And your source is Edward Dutton of all people! A doctor of Divinity and Religious Studies ffs! Btw just for fun I watched the first 10secs of the second link. Hilarious stuff really.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 05:53 PM
0

Yes you are correct. Regardless, the BLM protests had nothing to do with Trump or really even federal politics and law. Policing is a state and local issue the vast majority of the time.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 04:26 PM
2

Your first study links self-reported victimization of certain crimes with political identity, not the political affiliation of the perpetrator of the crime. 🤣 Read much? Edit: and this? The places with the highest murder rates are all Democrat hellholes. Pure fabrication. Source The red state murder rate was 33% higher than the blue state murder rate in both 2021 and 2022. 2022 was the 23rd consecutive year that murder plagued Trump-voting states at far higher levels than Biden-voting states. 8 …
/r/MensRights03/11/24 04:22 PM
-2

The ad is appealing to women who do have to lie to their husbands obviously. Do you get offended by ads for medications for diseases you don't have too?
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:35 PM
1

Maybe they are but those protests mostly took place in blue states and were protesting police violence. They had nothing to do with trump. They happened in 2020 at the beginning of the Biden administration ffs.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:33 PM
-5

You're so triggered by women voting independently of their husbands. That's exactly why the ad has appeal
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:49 PM
-3

BLM and antifa have had nothing to do with the election. 🤷
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:36 PM
1

How do you even know it's a false accusation? Like every other criminal matter? There's a presumption of innocence and the burden of proof is on the prosecution. So if there's evidence pointing to a false accusation the DA presents his/her case and the jury decides. This isn't new ground. The idea that a type of crime should not be prosecuted at all because it might result in false convictions is insane. The fact that this only really occurs in the case of women falsely accusing men is not surpr…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 02:26 PM
-2

Child support is set at a statutory amount with some adjustment for local cost of living and de-linked from parental income. Payments are solely based on custody time so 50/50 means no child support is exchanged. Marriage contracts require a negotiated pre-nup with standardization of terms. Alimony payments are only mandated in extreme cases and only for the purpose of getting a non-working spouse back into the workforce. 3yr max in all cases. False accusations of rape are punished equally to ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 01:34 PM
-2

This is straight up nonsense. Why even make such a stupid claim without having anything to back it up? The fact is that almost all of the political violence, vote suppression, intimidation and fraud have been carried out by Republicans and maga-fuckwits, doing the bidding of a cabal of billionaires.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 01:24 PM
-5

What do you think the conservative backlash against the ad tells you? The fucking irony! 🙄
/r/MensRights03/11/24 01:21 PM
1

You linked the article and I refuted the idea that the author "invented" anything at all. Its not that deep.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 01:07 PM
2

And before newton and his pesky gravity invention those 50yr old women were flying around having babies in the clouds. It was a magical time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:50 PM
1

So the popularized term to describe a biological fact was invented in the '70s. What difference does that make to the discussion? We had spinster before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 12:46 PM
3

Don't base your vote on some old crone's culture wars bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 08:33 PM
2

That is correct. I think the falling birth rate is an issue but to fix it you need positive incentives to get married and have kids. Right now with marriage, the risks outweigh the benefits and there are few or no incentives for men to have children outside of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 06:57 PM
8

Not when married. I think people should honor the contracts they sign.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 06:06 PM
0

Red pill is more likely to complain about a scenario where their wife stays home and watches daytime TV. I think this is somewhat true as some red-pill online stuff is about holding women to a higher standard (at least the ones you might want a LTR with). If one spouse is working and the other is SAH for whatever reason, that person should be putting in a similar amount of labor to maintain and run the household. The issue I generally have with this though is that the way marriage laws and famil…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 06:05 PM
27

This is a selfish individual who should never have gotten married. Nothing special.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/24 04:49 PM
11

Inmate on inmate sexual violence is 4x higher in women's prisons. Perpetrators of sexual abuse of male juvenile inmates are 90% female. It's pretty clear that when women have the opportunity they are as violent and rape-prone as men.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 02:45 AM
1

You're not making any sense. The whole argument is about whether or not the law is fair, which I'm saying it's not. That can be fixed. No one is disputing biological realities. Jfc 🤦
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 10:41 PM
0

Abuse literally changes brain pathways and reactions to abuse can be wild Well she would have actually had to have been abused for her brain pathways to be changed. Her claims were deemed to have been false and made with actual malice by a court so...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 07:35 PM
6

How about a more widespread backlash then. 30 feminist organizations were up in arms in Italy over some billboards raising awareness about male victims of domestic violence. Mainstream feminism is a cancer, not just the blue haired extremists.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:40 PM
1

So her shitting his bed was an attempt to even the playing field? 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:37 PM
2

😂 tellin' it like it is.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:45 PM
6

They're saying all those things + that they'd rather some poor sap pay to raise a child that isn't his rather than the mother or society at large. The reason for that is pretty simple - paternity fraud has the biggest negative effect on people on the lower end of the income scale.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:13 PM
9

Well if you're in the hospital, your wife or partner has just given birth and you're given the birth certificate or acknowledgement of paternity document to sign, refusing will tell her your intent right away. The point of mandatory testing is that it takes away the woman's appeal to emotion argument ("you're accusing me of cheating").
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:53 PM
9

Jfc that's insane. Anyone who had a baby in that hospital should be informed.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:49 PM
26

That's exactly it and why they hide behind the cost argument. Of course the small cost to society has a far lower impact than the huge cost suffered by victims of paternity fraud but those victims are men so they don't count.
/r/MensRights29/10/24 12:48 PM
1

You can’t abort a legal obligation. A legal obligation based on existing law that can be changed which is entirely the point of this discussion. 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 12:18 PM
1

Child support is not a biological function. Not sure what's so difficult to understand about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 10:36 AM
0

In North America, they go crazy over it, and don't understand that their viewpoint is not representative of other countries. Hey leave Canada and Mexico out of it!
/r/MensRights28/10/24 11:29 PM
1

But if the state is paying for it, the incentive isn’t being “taken away” from women. Presumably it would just be a part of existing benefits programs that single mothers who don't know who the father is are entitled to. And it’s an ADDED incentive for men... Added incentive? Do you know what an incentive is?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 05:09 PM
1

Sometimes mistakes happen resulting in unwanted pregnancies. Men can also be baby trapped etc. Abortion is a simple solution but forcing a woman to get one is never going to happen. Taking away the financial incentive for women to have kids they can't afford and giving men the choice to have children is more fair than the current system. That is the argument. Your appeals to emotion and "deadbeat dad" slurs offer nothing of value to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 04:43 PM
3

The point is that the funding for the child tax credit comes from all taxpayers including those who don't want or have children. Your comment has nothing to do with OP's post.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 03:22 PM
1

Well I'm pro-choice for both men and women so let's just say that my stance is this: in those jurisdictions where abortion legal and accessible, financial abortion should also be legal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 03:20 PM
3

Durr... that's the whole point of the argument. Women can choose to abort, men have no choice. Some here are arguing that a financial abortion would be more equal that what we have now. Why should random tax payers have to pay because you decided to drop your load in the only place that can create human life? As someone who pays quite a lot in taxes, I would rather pay for financial abortion rights for men over lots of other stuff my taxes routinely pay for. That's the nature of living in a soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 03:02 PM
-5

That is an entirely different scenario as she could have aborted the fetus when pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 02:57 PM
3

Your taxes pay the child tax credit don't they? We live in a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:09 PM
-3

Sure but I was using that example to show how far things are tilted towards women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 12:07 PM
3

It would likely be a lot less than what OP's current numbers are though as the lack of a child support incentive would make women more likely to abort in the first place. What we have now is a system where a man can even be raped and still forced to pay for the child born as a result. Choice for women, obligation for men is not a fair system.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 11:50 AM
1

I included statistics in my argument. You're making the same mistake as the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:29 AM
1

And I wouldn't disagree that women commit infanticide more because they are the primary parents and obviously give birth to children. Well exactly. Read my edit above. When women have the means and opportunity they are just as violent as men. In both genders though, its only a very small minority of the total that commit all the violent crime so using that as a basis to make claims about the emotionality of men vs women is extremely flawed from the get-go. Like I said originally, the OP of this …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 10:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter