TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Tebbo Archive

View 5 posts and 18 comments by Tebbo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

He's not. He's a brony faggot loser. I am leagues ahead of this chump. I was frankly insulted by the way she compared me to him.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 12:13 PM
3

This is fair. I realize this.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 12:11 PM
-8

I'm not really ashamed of it. If I ever do have someone I'm in a LTR with, I'd want to be honest with them about it. If that causes me to never have a LTR, so be it.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 05:49 AM
0

No I'm not. The problem is if you only have one group, people think you're pandering to the majority. Which, honestly you sound like you have no support for. The minority representation is a principle American Government. When people don't have representation in this group of people, they're going to cry inequality. :/ So which is more racist really?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:18 PM
0

Well the majority of poor applicants will be white. I can almost guarantee you that.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 08:34 PM
-1

Yes, but will this blind need-based granting only allow the majority to overpower the minority? For instance: 10% of black people are elegible 10% of whites ... other races genders etc. well, the white are the majority is certain geographic areas. So even though it's 10% whites will outnumber other races with just sheer numbers. Plus there's availability problems, funding problems etc. so you can only give a number of these away. If you randomly choose them among elligible entrants, then you're …
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:57 PM
3

Custody aside. I was just trying to explain the reasoning.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:57 AM
6

I think this thinking is the root behind laws like these. The courts assume they know how to raise a child better than the father (or other major breadwinner) and assumes that they can only do so via a percentage of that father's income. In some cases they're correct (see trust-fund babies and ivy league children), but in other cases they assume too much about the upper class' ability to raise their own kids in a manner in which they see fit. A father (or parent) may choose to raise a child with…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:14 AM
1

Sorry Gov. I'll remove it.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:22 PM
3

Which I do believe is still possible through "palimony"
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:05 PM
1

Nonono. You've misinterpreted everyone in this thread. It's if someone sues HIM. It would not make sense for him to sue anyone.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 10:30 PM
1

Yeah, but it could eventually be brought to court, which is the main concern.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 09:48 PM
1

In the context of a classroom, I don't think this applies. I can't be sure though. Even still, just get her consent.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:54 PM
9

The solution is simple. Laws must be passed that forbid reproduction until the invention of time travel. Without the society being able to produce there will be a strong imperative by science to bring this technology into existence just so that the continuation of our society may take place. This has to happen because parents must be able to go into the future to talk to their child so that they may be able to determine its gender properly. I personally feel that without these extreme measures t…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:28 PM
1

I was going to say you were using the proverbial "you", but apparently you aren't.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:03 PM
1

Agreed, I am dissapoint.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:45 PM
1

Bravo.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:57 AM
3

My Response.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter