TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

VodkaKitty Archive

View 0 posts and 452 comments by VodkaKitty on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Hey, when people here are shitting on women, don't be surprised when someone shits on men. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 08:54 PM
-1

LMAO you are such a fucking moron. "U DONT HAVE ANY SOURCES 4 YER CLAIMZ!!!!" "What claims?" "UHHH DUHH UHH I DUNNO 🤷🏼‍♂️ "
/r/MensRights19/10/17 10:13 PM
-1

So if a man takes a woman to court because she raped him and he didn't have any proof of it, he's a liar? Lmao men have the most retarded fucking logic 😂
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:42 PM
-1

LOL I love how much of a fucking moron you are. You can't even name the claims that I supposedly made. Hahahahaha holy fuck.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 09:21 PM
-1

What claims in particular?
/r/MensRights19/10/17 08:17 PM
0

I'm asking a question. If men don't report their rapes, did it never happen?
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:56 PM
0

Yes, it is a fair trial if you also believe that men who think it's okay to rape women being on the jury of a rape case is a fair trial. Yes, men need to be taught not to rape because you brutes can't figure out that raping, assaulting, and beating women is wrong on your own.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 11:23 AM
-1

Lmao how embarrassing. you: "MEN ALREADY KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG!!!! WE DONT NEED TO BE TAUGHT NOT TO RAPE AND ASSAULT!" Me: "well, actually there are countless men here defending assault." You: panics and changes subject after getting proven wrong
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:00 PM
-1

I clearly should have put a trigger warning on my post.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:55 AM
-2

Uhh men do need to be taught not to rape and sexually abuse women. Have you seen this thread? There are countless upvoted comments defending the assault and abuse of women. Men ABSOLUTELY need to be taught not to do that to women.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 01:45 AM
0

If anyone on the jury had the mentality that it's acceptable for men to assault women, would that be a fair trial? Because it's a million times more common for men to think that assaulting women is okay (as seen in this thread, where men are supporting this man's abuse in great numbers) than it is for women to think that stabbing men is okay.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 12:46 AM
0

Where is your proof that this will not show up on a background check?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:39 PM
-2

Where do you have any proof that all the jury members think that men are all violent rapists?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:29 PM
-1

If the jury thinks all women are violent bitches is that a fair trial?
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:35 PM
0

THERE IS NO CRIMINAL REGISTRY YOU DUMB FUCK. HOLY SHIT. You don't get a notice on your door if your neighbor stabbed someone. You do if they're a pedophile. Does it make sense? No. Does it have ANYTHING to do with gender? No. Is it "discriminayshun" against men because there's a sex offender registry and not a generic criminal registry? No. This is NOT a gender issue. Get over it. By the way, her full name is published so literally ANY employer or patient will see this when they google her. Her …
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:03 PM
0

You are SUCH an oversensitive whiner lmao. Why the fuck would she be on the SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY for not committing a sex offense? By the way, HE HAS HIS MEDICAL DEGREE. He didn't get it taken away from him. You are literally out of your fucking mind. Yes, let's put someone who stabbed someone on the SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY, because that makes perfect sense. Literally what the fuck. And somehow saying that her career is ruined is DEFENDING her? You are literally out of your fucking mind. Just com…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 02:38 AM
0

Is this a fucking joke? Me: states fact about a girl ruining her career You: "OMG YOU JUST HATE MEN!!!!!!!!111" Like what kind of logic is this...?
/r/MensRights16/10/17 02:28 AM
0

HE WAS CONVICTED. HOLY FUCK. What are you not getting about this? Question, are all men innocent of all crimes? Are men all innocent even after being proven guilty?
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:18 PM
0

And her career isn't fucked? Uh...
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:58 PM
-2

lol I love when this happens. When a man doesn't get his way, he throws a hissy fit and starts spewing out bullshit left and right. What a child. 😂 go and beat a woman or rape a kid or whatever men do in their free time.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 10:19 PM
-1

LMAO you are literally such a dumb brute that you can't figure out that the people who SAW ALL THE EVIDENCE knew enough to convict this man. It doesn't matter how the article worded it- the people who LISTENED TO THE ACTUAL TESTIMONIES heard it and determined that he was guilty. You know how infants don't understand that an object doesn't disappear just because it's hidden behind something? That's kind of the level that men's brains are at. They don't understand that the article doesn't contain …
/r/MensRights14/10/17 09:56 PM
0

Nah. The average man is stronger than 99.9% of women. Sorry, but facts are facts. Also, yes, MANY men have killed people with just their bare fists. Hell, men have killed people with just a SINGLE punch before. I've never heard of a woman killing a healthy adult male with a single punch before, but I suppose it could theoretically happen.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 04:27 PM
-2

Well, no, I thought you said that the amount of damage matters. You said that this case isn't a big deal because it just left bruising. Most women don't leave any marks on men they abuse because they just don't have the physical strength. So why should they be punished as severely as a man when they don't cause as much injury?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:46 PM
0

Uhh yes he did. He didn't go to jail lmao.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:45 PM
0

No, it's not open to anyone's guess. The people who listened to all the evidence were able to convict him of abuse you dumb fuck. But your brutish male brain couldn't figure that out, so instead you start whining about semantics and act all pedantic and think that the way the author of this article wrote this sentence is the end-all, be-all of the evidence when the people who ACTUALLY LISTENED TO THE TESTIMONIES convicted him. God damn men are so fucking stupid holy shit. It's like trying to exp…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:45 PM
-1

Studying and looking after children is still working.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 01:55 AM
-1

Despite the woman consenting to sexual intercourse, Philip Queree, 37, was found guilty of indecent assault after reportedly grabbing at the victim’s breasts “really hard” to the point that the victim started crying and was in pain. Now you're a dumb brute who can't read. 😂😂
/r/MensRights14/10/17 01:55 AM
0

Both of them got a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 01:54 AM
2

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/59de2228fc7e930f328b4568/amp/406384-tinder-indecent-assault-sex You dumb brute. 😂
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:37 AM
1

Yes, it DID say she was crying during it. Did you not read the article? What a fucking dumb cunt you are 😂😂 hahahahaha Yes, if she said no and he kept going, it was assault. It's hilarious how this needs to be explained to men, but men's brains are so brutish, I understand that things need to be said multiple times for men to understand. "Ooga booga. No mean no. Rape bad. Ooga booga." Was that easier to understand?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:25 AM
3

She was crying and telling him to stop, and he didn't. Is that not assault to you? And even if he had kept going, that's still assault. How many times does a woman have to say no for something to be rape? Every thrust? Every two seconds? Every minute? How long have you been raping women?
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:01 AM
1

Where did it say that she had sex with him afterwards? It's weird how men are prone to just make up lies left and right and then whine and pull the victim card about how oppresssssed they are.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:33 PM
5

She obviously didn't continue to give consent for sex, he beat the shit out her while she was crying and saying no. Holy shit this is why men need to be taught not to rape lol.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:16 PM
2

It doesn't matter. No means no. Crazy how much you have to beat that into a mans head until he understands.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:12 PM
0

Question - should women ever be punished for raping or assaulting men? They can't do much, if any, physical damage to men. Seems like it's not much of a big deal if a woman goes around beating her boyfriend.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:11 PM
1

Both people were convicted. Neither were jailed. Also, he attacked her until she was bruised while she cried and told him to stop. That's assault.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:05 PM
1

Lol I should have put a trigger warning on my post.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:01 PM
1

LOL do you not know how a courtroom works? Jesus Christ.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:00 PM
1

The people who saw all the evidence knew enough to convict him.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:59 PM

Narrow minded? Lmao you're the one believing pure bull crap just because this subreddit upvoted it.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:52 PM
1

Okay? She's still working and has less free time than her husband. I don't get your point?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:51 PM
-2

Some people are freaky. Some people like drawing blood. It's a fetish. Some people like other people drawing their blood. How do we know this wasn't just a false accusation?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 08:44 PM
0

LOL I'm surprised the factual statement was the one that triggered you instead of the incensed statement.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:35 PM
-1

Men are deadly weapons in and of themselves. Lol I'm glad you finally calmed down. I was worried you were going to go all "white male" on me and shoot up a school out of anger.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:26 PM
0

I never said that grabbing someone's breasts too hard can kill them, either. However, sexual assault is still just as bad as other types of assault. You done with your little tantrum now? Did you get a good nap in? You sure seemed cranky.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:23 PM
0

PS a woman having sex with a man while he sleeps can't kill anyone either. Neither can your girlfriend biting your lip too hard.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:20 PM
0

To which I responded: Stabbing and sexual assault are both equal crimes. Did you miss that the first time or what?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:18 PM
1

No, I'm describing what he did (grabbing his sexual partner's tits too hard) and comparing it to legitimate cases of violent assault. What? Like how your girlfriend bit your lip too hard and now that's somehow assault? LOL. You dumb cunt. Men like it when you play rough with them. How was she supposed to know it went too far? You won't throw them in jail despite advocating jail time for a man who did less than they did? Explain it to me. If you don't think the man should be in jail for assaultin…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 07:14 PM
1

You're minimizing her assault as him just "grabbing her tits too hard" and implying he's not a monster for that. Similarly, it sucks that you and your friends regretted fucking a fatty, but that doesn't mean we need to throw them in jail. OH NOEZ!!! A woman had sex with a man who was sleeping?? A woman got a little too rough with a man in bed and gave you a swollen lip? WHAT MONSTERS!! JAIL HER OMFG!!! WHAT AN EVIL RAYPIST!! BTW: while those women should not? That deserves jail but a stabbing do…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:59 PM
0

Man mocking a woman who was violently assaulted - completely and totally okay Woman mocking a man who was violently assaulted - FIRST OF ALL HOW DARE U!!! HOW DARE U DO SOMETHING SO HORRIBLE!!! HAVE SUM SIMPATHY FOR THE OPPOSITE SECKS U EVIL FEMALE U FAT USELESS KUNT KUM DUMPSTUR!!! GO KIL URSELF BETCH!! IM SO ANGRY RIHGT NOW !!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:48 PM
0

Sounds kinda like how I came back one night with a swollen lip, lacerations down my back which had bled into my underwear and a sore head from where she'd pulled my hair so hard. Sounds kinda like how my friend woke up pinned down by an absolute she-whale of a human who gagged him and refused to let him move until she'd raped him. Sounds kinda like my friend who used to get anally raped by his mother with a broom. Sounds kinda like that guy in the posted image who met a girl who got super high, …
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:36 PM
0

I, as a person, do not know. However, the people who have access to those documents do know and knew enough to prove him guilty.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:27 PM
0

He attacked and assaulted her enough to leave a bruise while she was crying and telling him to stop. What about that is not a crime? I do find it sad, though, that men need to be taught what consent is and isn't and what assault is and isn't. Men have a very difficult time understanding that it's not okay to attack a woman while she's crying and saying no - they need to be taught that this is wrong. It's not innate or natural for them to stop assaulting a woman when she's crying and telling him …
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:14 PM

How do you know? Did you obtain access to all of the court documents? How did you have time to review these documents enough to make a judgment since this article was just released yesterday?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 06:12 PM
0

He should have also gotten jail time. Also, it's hilarious how emotional men are. 😂
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:51 PM
1

Then why even bring it up? OP's wife never said that doing chores was a full time job. However, being a SAHM is definitely a full time job. However, OP's wife goes to class 3 days a week for longer hours than her husband works and takes care of her kids for long hours as well. It's no wonder she may be feeling burnt out.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:51 PM
0

You don't know if he was convicted on someone's word alone. You don't have access to the court documents. You're making things up. They were both charged. Neither got jail time you stupid cunt. Read the articles next time.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:37 PM
1

So you don't think OP's wife thinks that doing chores is a full time job?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:31 PM
0

Well, you do thing this guy was innocent even after he was proven guilty.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:26 PM

I totally agree. Unfortunately, most people here believe that the man should not be jailed.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:21 PM

Maybe you shouldn't believe every shitpost /r/mensrights upvotes without doing your own research?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:16 PM
0

Despite the woman consenting to sexual intercourse, Philip Queree, 37, was found guilty of indecent assault after reportedly grabbing at the victim’s breasts “really hard” to the point that the victim started crying and was in pain. Do men have poor reading comprehension skills as well?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:16 PM
0

I'm the psychopath when you're the one saying it's okay to attack a woman when she's crying and telling you to stop?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:15 PM
0

Where did I misinterpret anything?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:15 PM
0

You gave up because you couldn't make a logical response.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:06 PM
1

You keep denying that the articles said she was crying and told him to stop when I've sent you several articles that say that.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:06 PM

Well, no, plenty of men in this thread think that he shouldn't have gotten any punishment at all. He got off very light, no jail time at all for his violent assault. Maybe the woman who "stabbed" her boyfriend is innocent as well and she was wrongly convicted.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:06 PM
1

So to be clear, you lied when you said OP's life thinks that doing chores is a full time job?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:03 PM
1

lol I love how you couldn't come up with a logical response to me.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:01 PM
1

No, you gave up when you couldn't come up with a logical argument.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:01 PM
0

No you didn't.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:00 PM
1

So basically, men's logic is "I don't like an article, therefore it must be unreliable"? I've sent you two sources and both times you were upset because they proved you wrong. Weird.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:51 PM
1

I'm talking about all the men in here who support assaulting women.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:45 PM
1

Source that the independent is unreliable? Here's another source btw. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rt.com/document/59de2228fc7e930f328b4568/amp/406384-tinder-indecent-assault-sex
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:45 PM
0

Shows the true nature of men to support and defend assaulting and attacking women.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:43 PM
2

I already gave you the TL;dr. Yes, if you hold someone down and assault them until they're bruised while they're crying and telling you to stop, you should be in jail. What the fuck is wrong with you? Are men this completely devoid of empathy?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:42 PM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/junior-doctor-convicted-indecent-assault-tinder-date-grab-breasts-sex-philip-queree-jersey-a7996126.html%3Famp
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:41 PM
3

Where is his testimonial evidence? Where is her testimonial evidence?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:36 PM

Both of them deserve to be in jail.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:35 PM
2

Once again, where did you find the court documentation that showed that this was the only evidence? Where's his testimonial evidence?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:35 PM
0

Answer the question.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:34 PM

So why are you denying that those things were in the article?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:33 PM
0

So men are always innocent even after being proven guilty?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:27 PM

How do you know it was word of mouth? I'm curious - how were you able to obtain documentation of all the evidence used in this court case and combed it over so quickly when this article was just released yesterday?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:26 PM

Yes it did. Do you need a link to the article?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:25 PM
1

Where in the post did she say that? Are you just making up lies now? Also, she's only a SAHM two days a week. The other three, she goes to class full time and for longer hours than her husband.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:25 PM
1

Because it's a fucking safety regulation. Yes, safety regulations should exist.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:22 PM
0

I didn't have access to the court documents. The people who DID have access to the court documents had enough evidence and knowledge to convict him of the crime.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:22 PM
1

LMAO omg you literally just compared forcing mcdonalds to follow safety regulations to actual child rape victims 😂
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:16 PM

Yeah, obviously I'm going to be pissed off if a guy is fucking assaulting and bruising me. Are you fucking serious? Same with the guy who got stabbed - his girlfriend must have pissed him off, right? Also shows the true nature of men to defend violently assaulting women.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:14 PM
0

And you still couldn't come up with anything logical to say.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:13 PM

He wasn't stabbed to death lol. Once again, someone didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:13 PM
1

Sorry you couldn't form a logical argument.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:12 PM
-3

Yes, if you insult childless women and assume they all are desperate for babies, that's pretty fucking shitty.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:12 PM
1

Clearly it does, considering it's a law. People much more educated, qualified, and knowledgeable than you have already decided that it is justified. A random guy whining on the internet isn't qualified to make those decisions.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:11 PM
0

How do you know? Were you on the jury? Do you have access to the court documents? Genuinely curious how you got a copy of all of the evidence and testimonies used in this case and were able to comb through it all so quickly, since this article was just released yesterday.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:08 PM
1

Drinks that are hot enough to violate safety regulations are illegal to sell. Honestly not sure why I need to spoon feed this to you - my meaning is very clear, and I'm not sure why you're having such difficulty understanding my posts.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:05 PM
1

Hot drinks aren't illegal to sell. Drinks that violate safety regulations are illegal to sell.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 04:01 PM
-1

Yes it does. You're claiming that he's innocent.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:57 PM
0

So men are always innocent, even after proven guilty?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:55 PM
0

Where did he say that?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:53 PM

If the gun does not meet safety regulations, then yes, they are illegal.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:53 PM
1

But what about the prevention of injury or death for the woman who was injured by the coffee?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:49 PM

It is dangerous to serve a very hot drink.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:48 PM
1

What about safety regulations that prevent people from harming themselves, such as in machining and manufacturing?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:46 PM
-1

They should both be in prison.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:44 PM
1

She works more hours than her husband.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:42 PM

They both got convictions. Neither got jail time. What are you confused about?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:42 PM
1

She never said that doing chores is a full time job. Where did you see this?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:41 PM

He also didn't get any jail time. Did you not read the articles?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:39 PM
-2

So to be clear, you don't believe in innocent until proven guilty, you believe that men are innocent of all crimes?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:38 PM
0

If you hold someone down and assault them until they're bruised while they're crying and telling you to stop, you should be jailed.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:37 PM

Lol I love how this is being downvoted. It's crazy how men support assaulting women.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:36 PM

If you hold someone down and assault them until they're bruised while they're crying and telling you to stop, you should be jailed.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:36 PM
-2

I'm confused - what does this have to do with grabbing breasts?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:36 PM

He doesn't give a fuck lol. Us women know that very large numbers of men support raping and assaulting women and don't see an issue with it.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:35 PM
5

She didn't retroactively call it assault. She cried and told him to stop, but he didn't.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:34 PM
1

Wow, seems like men are very keen in minimizing rape and sexual assault of other men. It seems like you guys are your own worst enemy!
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:33 PM
0

If you hold someone down and assault them until they're bruised while they're crying and telling you to stop, you should be jailed.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:33 PM

In the article, she was crying and telling him to stop. What's the issue?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:32 PM
1

If you hold someone down and assault them until they're bruised while they're crying and telling you to stop, you should be jailed.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:32 PM

Good. He should be. If you hold someone down and assault them until they're bruised while they're crying and telling you to stop, you should be jailed.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:32 PM

Yes, if you hold someone down and assault them until they're bruised while they're crying and telling you to stop, you should be in jail. What the fuck is wrong with you? Are men this completely devoid of empathy?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:31 PM

He was found guilty in a court of law. End of story. What ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? Or is it "men are always innocent even after being proven guilty"?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:30 PM

He was found guilty in a court of law. End of story. What ever happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? Or is it "men are always innocent even after being proven guilty"?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:30 PM

He was found guilty in a court of law.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:29 PM
2

What does this have to do with what /u/AgentSkidMarks said? She didn't take issue with the fact that he touched her breasts, he violently assaulted her.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:29 PM
2

Are you aware of what subreddit you're in? Lol. These people are completely lacking in empathy. There are countless comments attacking the female assault victim in this thread.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:28 PM
1

What do you think about things such as OSHA regulations that make the workplace safer for men? Do you think companies have the right to violate health and safety hazards, resulting in the death and injury of men?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:27 PM
5

McDonald's was serving coffee that was a health violation. They were found liable. End of story.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:26 PM

So? McDonald's has the right to serve a hot drink - even close to boiling temperatures - if they want. No they don't. They violated health standards. Is this a fucking joke? Hahaha come on dude you are obviously not a liar. The whole crux of the case was that McDonald's was serving coffee that violated health standards.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:25 PM

The magistrate stated that he knew that she was not consenting to the abuse.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:23 PM

Was it a fact that the stabber asked his girlfriend to stop stabbing him?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:22 PM

She also got a conviction.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:22 PM

Men have weird definitions of "hateful."
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:21 PM

I think that violently assaulting another person warrants prison time.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:20 PM
-2

Both should be in jail. I'm not sure how the poster was being misandric for pointing out facts?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:19 PM
0

Here it is, boys! Men justifying the rape of women because men just can't control themselves. Lmao. It's crazy how men are upvoting such a misandric statement on a men's rights subreddit.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:18 PM

Violence is still abuse. It doesn't matter if it happened during sex or not. If a woman held you down and scratched your back and drew blood while you were crying and telling her to stop, it would be assault. It's crazy how you have to frame it like this in order for men to have empathy towards women who have been assaulted.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:14 PM

He didn't get any jail time lol. Stop making shit up.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:12 PM
-1

Who suffered any consequences? Neither one went to jail.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:12 PM
2

Hahahaha this is such man logic. "I got proven wrong, so instead of admitting it like a grown adult, I'm going to call you a liar!!!!" Also I love how you started ignoring our other comment chain because you got proven wrong. Just goes to show how men aren't the logical sex after all. :) Us women have you beat there!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:57 AM
2

LMAO you've been a redditor for over a year and you still don't know how Reddit works 😂😂😂 Yes, kiddo, if a mod deleted your comment, it still shows up in your post history. You can message the Reddit admins or mods for help if you missed the memo on this. Really embarrassing on your part. Hahahahaha
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:53 AM
2

Let me explain this to you since you seem to be new to Reddit: If a mod deletes your comment, it still shows up in your post history. If I deleted my comment, it doesn't. Since a moderator deleted my comment, it will still show up in my post history. Is this clear to you now?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:44 AM
2

Still waiting for you to provide a link to my claim.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:42 AM
2

I didn't delete any comments. You can check my post history. They're all there. Also, learn to speak English because that was not a sentence LMAO. Once again with that testosterone-addled brain.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:39 AM
2

I've been asking you since you first posted what my claim is. You still haven't answered because you know you're wrong. Instead, you're trying to deflect by asking me another question. Your brain is so addled with testosterone you can't even think properly.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:35 AM
2

Where did I say that I think the study concludes that most rape reports are false? Please provide a link to this comment.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:35 AM
2

I know what the link was. What was my claim that he provided excellent evidence against? I've asked you this question three or four times now - I'm not sure why you're having such difficulty answering it!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:27 AM
2

Yes, I read the study. What are you confused about? I read the study, it never proved that the vast majority of rape accusations are false. You clearly did not read the study, or else you would have known that. You're digging yourself into quite the hole and it's very embarrassing on your part - you're accusing me of not reading the study when you didn't even read it yourself!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:26 AM
2

How can I have an open mind without any proof to back up your claims? Do you expect me to just believe everything a man says, even when it's not supported by any evidence?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:23 AM
2

First of all, I didn't delete any comments. They must have been removed by the moderators. Second of all, can you point out where that link "proved" that the vast majority of rape accusations are false? Or did you not read it?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:21 AM
2

You said "He has provided excellent evidence against your claim." What claim was that? Surely you must know, or else you wouldn't have said that, correct? (It's funny how obvious it is that you're slowly realizing you're wrong and are too embarrassed to admit it.)
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:20 AM
2

What evidence said that the vast majority of rape accusations are false? Please point out where this evidence is.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:16 AM
1

Still waiting. :)
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:16 AM
1

Well, no, of course I can't clarify for him what he meant by his comment. Only he can clarify his own comment. I didn't have any trouble understanding it, you did, so you should ask him to clarify!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:15 AM
2

Please tell me what my claim was.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:15 AM
1

Still sitting here waiting for proof that the vast majority of rape accusations are false.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:13 AM
1

Once again, you can always message him for clarification!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:12 AM
2

What claim?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 05:10 AM
3

Oh look, a man getting overemotional and resorting to childish insults when he didn't get his way. What a surprise! I'm still waiting on a source that the vast majority of rape accusations are false. Stiiiill waiting.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:47 AM
1

That's actually not what he said. If you're confused, you can always message him and ask for clarification! :)
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:28 AM
4

Isn't feminist logic the same as MRA logic, then? Since you said it's acceptable for MRA's to claim that 83% of rape accusations are false. It's weird how you state that a certain type of logic is wrong, yet you go on to use it anyway!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:23 AM
1

In case it's unclear, he's saying that I'm a misandrist for saying that it's unprofessional to hit on people at work.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:05 AM
4

To be clear, you're asking why shouldn't MRAs claim that all 83% of unresolved rape accusations are false when you just explained why that logic is wrong?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:01 AM
5

So let me get this straight: You're saying that the logic behind "92% of rapists go free" is incorrect logic, but you're going to use the exact same logic to say that 83% of rape accusations are false? What in the... Is this a troll post?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:55 AM
1

🤢
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:11 AM
1

Ew.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:28 AM
1

Whoops, my bad, I meant to say b in the first place. Edited to be fixed. ;)
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:25 AM
1

Manlogic: "I can choose between a) supporting men's rights or c) shitting on men's rights to make cheap jabs at women. Which one should I choose? I know... I choose b!"
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:20 AM
1

Shouldn't you be taking depression seriously instead of making fun of it? After all, men are less likely to seek help for mental health because of the stigma. Looks like you're doing as much as you can to make things worse for men. So much for men's rights!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:03 AM
1

Please message the moderators and ask them to change the rules if you don't like them. I did not make the rules.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:54 PM
6

I asked for proof for the claim that the vast majority of rape accusations are false. I am still waiting for proof that this claim is true.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 10:18 PM
5

That's flawed logic, though. Saying that only 1-8% of rape claims have been proven in court does not mean that the remaining 92-99% are false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:48 PM
2

So what's the issue?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:19 PM
2

If men are allowed to call people cunts, shouldn't women be allowed to as well?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 09:17 PM
5

So you're saying she's innocent of making false rape accusations? Which one is it?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:49 PM
4

No, you don't. What about the woman? Isn't she also innocent until proven guilty, or is that just men?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:00 PM
8

Does this mean that men can't be raped because they rarely report their rapes?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 08:00 PM

Do you have a source that the vast majority of rape accusations are false?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:59 PM
0

Lol this is some man logic right here. No, someone saying "well every woman I've been with has cheated on me, so all women are cheaters!" is not data, and I find it quite embarrassing on your part that you believe that.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:22 PM
3

No, is your penis clouding yours? All that testosterone can't be good for your brain. I thought men were supposed to be the logical ones, yet you can't even provide a source for your claims. So much for logic and reason! I guess women have you beat there. :)
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:20 PM
1

It's a misogynistic hellhole here.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:34 PM
2

From your moderation policy: Personal Attacks & Flippancy: Conversations between people with disparate opinions often devolve into including personal attacks and/or flippant/sarcastic remarks. Each person feels perfectly justified in making their statements, but always feels the other person's retorts are unjustified. Only in extreme cases will moderators get involved in these situations and may censor both parties. Racism and other hate speech: This is a difficult issue to address. Messages tha…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:14 PM
2

Yes, you did. Your moderation policy states that sexism against women isn't allowed here. The user I originally responded to said "oh look, a woman shaming men. That's all women do." According to your moderation policy, this comment should be deleted. In addition, your moderation policy states that personal attacks are not allowed, yet you allow personal attacks against women to stand. Is it also acceptable to make personal attacks against men? If so, I have no problem doing this!
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:47 PM
1

So to be clear, you do have difficulty telling the the difference between opinions and attacks? What a fucking dumb cunt. Lmfao!
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:35 PM
2

What other words are acceptable here? Is it also acceptable to call people niggers and faggots? Just trying to figure out the moderation policy! Is it also acceptable to say that men can't help themselves from raping women?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:31 PM
2

Is saying "fuck off troll" an opinion? Super confused here.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:25 PM
2

So if someone calls me a cunt twice, that is harassment since it is repeated? Also, why did you ignore my questions about your policy against sexism? Also, what about your policy against personal attacks? Is "cunt" not a personal attack?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:19 PM
2

So telling someone "fuck off troll" isn't harassment? What about calling people cunts? Am I allowed to do this to men as well, or is harassment only acceptable against women here? Also confused - your moderation policy states that personal attacks and misogynistic statements are not allowed. However, you allow personal attacks and misogynistic statements to remain up. Why is this? Are misogynistic comments allowed, but not misandric statements? I'm confused by your moderation policy, it seems to…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:59 PM
2

No I didn't mention that. I'm not aware that if a woman wanted to be an artist and could match the talents of a Van Gogh that...I don't know her work would have been burned or something? I mean the very fact that we have those books written by women kinda disproves your point. You literally JUST said that all men had the opportunity to pursue art, while only rich women could pursue art. You even gave Jane Austen as an example of this. Did you forget this already? It was only a few posts ago. The…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:58 PM
2

Actually, harassing other users is against the rules of your subreddit. :) Please message your mods if you don't like these rules and want harassment to be allowed here. I don't make the rules.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:53 PM
0

Reported.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:20 PM
10

I take it you're still in high school - did you just find out how health insurance works? You don't have to subsidize anything, and no one else has to subsidize you. You can simply choose not to pay for health insurance and then pay the small fee for not having any health insurance. Then you won't be subsidizing anyone's medical care and no one will be subsidizing yours.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:49 PM
3

Yes, it does. If comments like that were not allowed, they would be downvoted and reported. However, it's clear that this subreddit and its mods allow sexist comments and harassment as long as they're against women.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:48 PM
1

Still waiting for that source.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:47 PM
1

Still waiting for that source.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:46 PM
1

Why are you spamming this subreddit?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:46 PM
2

Hey, at least I'm not a miserable, racist, sexist incel like you. :)
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:46 PM
2

No. Only a tiny, tiny percentage of men ever became famous for their art. Again, men are over-represented at the extreme high end of achievement. They are also over-represented at the bottom rungs of society. But all men had the opportunity to. Women did not, as you mentioned. You're grossly misinterpreting what I'm saying. I said men are over-represented at the extremes (genius and idiocy). The great majority of men and women cluster around the mean. Yes, you did say that. You also said that wo…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:10 AM
1

Lmao wtf? How on earth is saying that it's inappropriate to hit on people at work the same as saying as men exist to please me and are robots for my convenience? How does saying that it's inappropriate to hit on people at work make me a cunt? You have serious anger issues. You're not making men look very good right now.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:39 AM
2

Okay. But we were talking about Mozart. I didn't say "there's never been a female Frank Sinatra" or "there's never been a female Jay-Z". Mozart's IQ has been estimated at upwards of 200. He never took an IQ test so... You're apparently unaware of the fact that 99 percent of women hadn't the time to pursue careers in art and music. Men hadn't yet invented effective abortion and safe birth control. Raising children and taking care of the home was a full time job. If a woman was rich and felt like …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:32 AM
2

According to the people I'm responding to there are. There are obviously careers that are female dominated and careers that are male dominated.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:13 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 03:05 AM
2

However let's pretend you're correct. That literally has no bearing on my argument. The science shows that the vast majority of geniuses (and idiots) are male, whereas women tend to cluster around the middle of the IQ scale. The majority of men also cluster around the middle. It does, though. First of all, there's no proof that the best musicians and artists had a high IQ score. Second of all, are you seriously denying that people thought women's art and music was worse because of the fact that …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:55 AM
1

Sure they were. There were just no female composers that had anywhere near the same ability as Mozart. Ditto 99.9 percent of men. Women who showed exceptional talent (eg a Jane Austen or Madam Curie) were celebrated. It's just that they were exceedingly rare and most women had no interest in working obsessively to pursue careers. I mean just look at the history of jazz. 99% of the great jazz musicians and composers were males, and females were never barred from participating. The few that did we…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 02:02 AM
1

Yes, you did advocate for that lol. You have said multiple times that you think women should be at home raising their kids, not working.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:56 AM
2

Okay, but women raising their kids is still work. If all women just stopped working, society would collapse because a bunch of kids and babies would die. They can't raise themselves.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:55 AM
1

So do you think all children should be homeschooled?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:54 AM
1

Women can't repair roads or fix roofs? That's news to me.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:54 AM
2

Why would I get banned for saying that you shouldn't hit on other people at work? Are you a mod? Also, I'm confused, why does being a TSA agent mean you can hit on people at work? What other jobs allow you to hit on people at work?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:07 AM
1

Sorry you got proven wrong! It sucks, but it's even more embarrassing that you can't admit it.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:04 AM
3

Oh god, you're in for a BIG surprise when you reach 16 and are finally old enough to get a job lol.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 01:03 AM
1

It's in the case of your postulate. You set the postulate, not me. I just played along and laid fair requirement for this to work. Obviously you want all the benefit and none of the obligation, it's not me being misogynist, it's you being entitled. But it is your postulate. Based on your views, you must agree with it. That's not what I want to happen, as I already explained also twice, I don't want to go back to these kind of ancient marriage. Because it was a bad trap for women, but if was an e…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:53 AM
1

He's advocating motherhood, he sounds like a traditionalist, which I disagree with, He's advocating that women should stay at home with their kids. Just like I said. Now will you admit you were wrong when you called me a liar? but if you think women are actually happy with the way western society then you are utterly delusional. As opposed to who? Men in western society? Women in eastern society? Idgi. There's also a big difference between advocating for something and trying to force it to happe…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:50 AM
0

I explained why, twice. Do you have reading or understanding problems? No, I just wanted you to confirm that you're a misogynist. Goal accomplished! If the husband are required to pay the wife a full salary in case of divorce, which is your postulate, then EVERY women would ask for divorce for absolutely no reason, just to get the free salary. How is that hard to understand? Or do you think women wouldn't do it? But that's what you want to happen. Let me remind you that we currently have non fau…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:44 AM
1

You're coming onto a sub to deliberately dismiss issues that men talk about and act as if they don't have any legitimate problems in life, Where did I say men don't have any legitimate problems in life? there's plenty of evidence to show that you treat men like shit. Source? As for me, I stick up for women's rights more than most feminists do because I have the balls to criticise Islam not just the soft targets like Christianity. People like you do absolutely no favours for the causes you claim …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:38 AM
1

He thinks that women shouldn't work in corporations. He also said that women shouldn't be allowed to file for divorce. You can literally see this in his post history. Please stop lying, it's embarrassing. You can message him and ask him if he thinks women should have jobs. He'll tell you they should stay at home with the kids. Here is a link to his post. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/74vy86/young_women_getting_richer_as_young_men_getting/do1zsc7/
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:35 AM
1

Lmao so you think women shouldn't even be allowed to file for divorce? What kind of misogynist are you?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:34 AM
2

I'm going to give you a walkthrough of what happened since you seem to have trouble understanding. The person I was responding to was saying that if women stopped working, men would fill their jobs just fine. I said that there weren't enough men to fill their positions. He said there would because women would be taking care of the children. I said that taking care of the children is work, so if women stopped working, they would also stop taking care of the children. This conversation was pretty …
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:33 AM
2

That's a comforting thought but sadly no. Yes, it is. Women weren't even allowed to perform as composers back in Mozart's day lol. If a woman tried to sell a painting, people wouldn't buy it because she's female, not because of the quality of her work. Don't feel bad. The vast majority of men aren't geniuses either. Duh lol. Listening to men talk could tell you that. I never said that. I said it would make sense if they were less inclined towards fields like engineering; that they generally woul…
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:30 AM
1

Oh, so you basically made up a lie that I treat men like shit. What about you? Do you treat women like shit because you think we're all pedophiles and abusers?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:27 AM
2

It's not relevant to the conversation I was having. You've completely derailed it to a totally different subject.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:26 AM
2

Okay, and that's not relevant lol. If women stopped working, including childcare, then there would be no one left to take care of the kids.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:23 AM
2

Childcare is still work. If all women stopped working, there would be no one to take care of the kids.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:20 AM
1

So men should be allowed to file for divorce, but women shouldn't?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:19 AM
0

That's literally EXACTLY what he said. Are you dense?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:19 AM
1

...What on earth are you talking about? Where did I say I'm treating men like shit? And once again, do you think I'm going to be a pedophile just because I'm a woman? It sounds like you're demonizing women to me.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:15 AM
0

Such as...?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:10 AM
1

...Where on earth did I say that? Do you think I'm going to be a pedophile just because I'm a woman? Lmfao.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:09 AM
1

So then who's going to be taking care of the kids?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:09 AM
0

So you don't actually agree with the guy who is saying that women shouldn't have jobs?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:06 AM
1

Why would she not be allowed to ask for a divorce?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:05 AM
1

"Men fix everything, women are abusive pedophiles" - OK "Men commit the vast majority of violent crimes" - "YOU'RE LITERALLY DEMONIZING ME FOR HAVING A DICK!!!!!!!!!" Lmfao!
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:05 AM
1

Sometimes. Not most of the time. What's wrong with working for a corporation? Or is it only bad when women do it?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:01 AM
1

I noticed you have a habit of doing this, I actually recognised your username, sorry, but in the grand scheme of things a few deranged families means nothing, it's harsh, but that's life. Men are the ones who fix everything, when your computer goes wrong it's a man you immediately run to, if an internet connection goes down it's a man, when there's crime happening, it's men that respond. Apparently my family didn't get the memo that they're supposed to go to men for computer or Internet problems…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:59 PM
0

Wow, that's super misandrist of you. I guess it makes sense the way our society is - men shouldn't ever get custody of their kids in a divorce or breakup since they're just going to get a nanny for them. For a breakup, men should be legally required to pay an entire salary for his ex girlfriend or ex wife so that she can continue to stay at home with the kids and he can slave away at his job. Sounds like a plan, right?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:57 PM
2

Childcare is also work. If women stopped working, that means they would stop taking care of their children as well, since taking care of their children is many women's jobs. So once again, there would be no where near enough men to fill all the positions that women left, including childcare and homemaking.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:49 PM
1

...What on earth are you talking about? Do social workers work for a corporation? Lmao.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:45 PM
1

But kids don't need their father? Sounds like you're a misandrist. Shouldn't men be with their children instead of working in some corporation? Btw I had a nanny and loved her, so your point is moot.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:44 PM
1

TIL that kids being in abusive homes is a mild annoyance.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:40 PM
2

There would be no where near enough men to fill all the positions that women left, and no one to take care of their kids.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:40 PM
1

Women's workforce is equally as valuable, just in a different way.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:32 PM
1

Honestly, providing and maintaining infrastructure, water and electricity is essential. If this came to an end, it would be total havoc withing a few days. I never said otherwise. I consider teacher, social worker and therapist as luxury in comparison. We could easily make do without those for several weeks. Maybe a few weeks. Definitely not a few years. Also, I disagree. Social workers collectively not coming to work for a few weeks would mean that children in abusive homes would endure many mo…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:27 PM
1

He was saying that traditional women's work was important (raising kids), but now women have corporate jobs and send their kids to school and daycare, which is ignoring the fact that schools and daycares are, in fact, women's work.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:15 PM
2

I'm not going to explain things to you like you're a six year old. Read it again. Nah, I'm good. By, um, training other men to do the job. You can train a nurse in a week? That's news to me.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:13 PM
0

Men comprise the vast majority of people with extremely high IQs (and extremely low IQs). That's why there's never been female Mozart or Einstein, and that's why men continue to create the vast majority (almost all) of new inventions. There's never been a female Mozart or Einstein because of sexism. There is also a question of whether any but a small number of women are inclined toward fields like engineering (men have better spatial reasoning; they are the vast majority of chess grandmasters). …
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:12 PM
1

Misinformed? What...?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:10 PM
1

Look, your logic was that teachers don't repair roads and nurses don't fix roofs. Road repairmen also aren't teachers and roof repairmen also aren't nurses and electricians also aren't therapists. You're going off on a totally unrelated tangent here.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:04 PM
1

It's like going around in circles here. Yes, I've said that 3 times, there are more women in health care than men, but there is a higher ratio of men in healthcare than there is women in trade work. The argument is that female dominated work is unnecessary. Nursing is a female dominated profession even though there are more male nurses than female electricians. So yes, doctors are more educated than nurses, nurses are more educated than paramedics. And without paramedics, the patient will be dea…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:02 PM
1

No, that wasn't what I was saying. "Lol" That was exactly what you were saying. Like I said, there would be some major headaches if women stopped working. However men would quickly correct the problems. If men stopped working it's back to the stone age. Men would quickly correct the problems? How? The fact that you're unwilling to admit this shows you're arguing from a place of emotion, not logic. I'm arguing quite logically, thanks! No need for any concern. :) Also, why did you ignore me when I…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:59 PM
1

You seem to be missing the point. Men can perform all of those jobs while women are physically (and possibly mentally) incapable of performing many of the jobs that men perform. What jobs are women mentally incapable of performing? You do realize that men and women both have the same average IQ, right? You should be thanking men for keeping you safe and comfortable, and you should also thank fate for making you the privileged sex. You should be thanking women for the jobs that we do. :)
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:56 PM
1

And who are most physical healthcare professionals? Oh wait, women. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUCKING MIND? Paramedics are trained to specialize in on-site health care and resuscitation, and to get the patient to a hospital as quickly and safely as possible. You think a fucking nurse or doctor can do anything at the site of an accident? Basic first aid, CPR, and assisting paramedics. Nurses and doctors absolutely do more than paramedics, yes. They are much more educated than paramedics in the medical …
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:54 PM
0

That is because (a) females are hypergamous -- if men want to find a mate they have to work harder and earn more money became women demand it and (b) women have the luxury of "marrying up" to a far greater extent than men. Also, lol at the idea that men who provide your electricity and keep a roof over your head aren't "helping others." You're completely out of touch with reality. You think electricity comes from the "electricity fairies" and that meat grows in the supermarket. Are you claiming …
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:52 PM
1

So women are okay with taking lower pay if it means helping others. Men aren't. Men are more motivated by money. When it comes to early breast feeding and early child rearing, yes. When it comes to many professions, yes. Do you seriously think that no female dominated jobs are necessary for civilization? What would happen if no nurses showed up to work for a week?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:44 PM
1

Many essential professionals for society are also dominated by women, such as nursing, teaching, social work, therapy, medical professionals, etc.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:42 PM
1

the idea that females are equally necessary in the workplace is just completely delusional. Lol what? Okay buddy. Take away all the nurses, teachers, daycare workers, therapists, medical professionals, social workers, etc. and see where society ends up.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:41 PM
1

Actually, I already pointed out that nurses are also invaluable to society, however the same cannot be said for therapists, particularly for anything non-clinical. Having suffered a brief bout of debilitating depression, I found that the answers were easy, but the execution was difficult. So physical health is invaluable to society, but mental health is not? What the... My point was that there is a higher percentage of men in health care, teaching, etc. than there is women in trades and other la…
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:38 PM
1

Not their mothers, that's for sure. Okay, but women are. Not some genderless "the state." Men would certainly have no problem doing so. Women might have a hard time working on oil rigs. Then why don't men choose to go into these fields? Women are essential for reproduction and breast feeding. Men are essential for maintaining and advancing civilization. Men are also essential for reproduction and women are also essential for maintaining and advancing civilization.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:36 PM
1

...What? Daycare is funded by the state? What country do you live in because it certainly isn't America LOL. And who are the ones taking care of the kids in school and daycare? Men?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:28 PM
1

How about this? When you get in an accident, who's going to be taking care of you? I don't see road repairmen giving people stitches and administering IVs. When you're depressed and need a therapist, is a roof repairman going to be the one doing that? No. Your logic is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:27 PM
2

So telling someone to fuck off for calling out misogyny is okay, but saying that that response is overly emotional is antisocial personality disorder? 😂
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:18 PM
1

Women are prominent in fields such as nursing, teaching, social work, therapy, counseling, medical, etc, all of which are incredibly important to society. You could reverse the genders and make jokes about how comedians are just as important as nurses.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:09 PM

It's misandry to say that men shouldn't hit on women at work? LMAO.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:05 PM

He was misogynistic. Who in here is being misandric? I'm honestly not sure how I've upset you so much. You seem to be quite emotional.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:04 PM
2

This is YOUR logic I'm going off of. Not mine.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 10:04 PM
3

You know what else is significant? $80-$100 a month. You know what's more significant than a 21% increase in car insurance? $80-$100 a month.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:52 PM
2

And I'm still waiting for that source.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:50 PM
2

Masturbation is not medically necessary. Plus, those men can also do prostate masturbation.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:49 PM
1

It's unprofessional and inappropriate to hit on women while you're at work. How do men even need this to be explained to them?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:46 PM
2

I don't know how women deal with males. Having to put up with constant misogyny is exhausting.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:44 PM
1

Where did I say that personal experience trumps facts? I never said that. Don't make up lies. Still waiting for a source that all women cheat.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:44 PM
1

Sex isn't necessary though. There's no reason for viagra to be covered when birth control isn't. Childbirth is also not necessary - it's a choice. Vasectomies are also not necessary, so why should any part of them be covered by your logic?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:43 PM
1

Anecdotes are not data. Still waiting for a source that all women cheat.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:41 PM
0

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:40 PM
2

What? No, if you're confused, I asked for a source on that person's claims.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:40 PM
1

Women still pay for car insurance lol. Men only pay 21% more than women on average. That is not an $80-$100 difference.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:39 PM
1

Should viagra be covered by healthcare? Or vasectomies? Or tubal ligations? Or childbirth?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:38 PM
1

Where's your source that all women cheat?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:38 PM
1

Millions of people.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:37 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:35 PM

Because he's at work and his behavior is unprofessional.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:30 PM

Wow, this is super misogynistic. I thought this subreddit was about equality? Seems like men aren't interested in equality much at all, and would rather attack women.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:29 PM
1

Not all birth control brands are $15 per month. Many can be $80-$100 per month. Not all women can use the cheapest brand of birth control without side effects.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:26 PM
1

Clearly you don't support universal healthcare if you think women should pay for birth control lol.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:25 PM
1

Women's work is just as valuable as men's work.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:20 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights07/10/17 09:19 PM
1

And he's still going. Look at him go!
/r/MensRights13/09/17 04:26 AM
1

Still throwing that tantrum. Lmao!
/r/MensRights13/09/17 01:07 AM
0

Trust me, I know lol. You resorted to childish insults because you didn't have any logical response.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 12:02 AM
1

Uhh duh lol. I was being sarcastic when I said your response was logical. Can you not figure it out?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 06:55 PM
1

Great logical response.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 04:19 PM
-1

Did you do a twitter search like in the OP?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 01:11 PM
2

So what's your point?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:36 PM
1

No, I didn't miss it. I literally JUST SAID that others are surprised he got any time at all. Are you having difficulty with reading comprehension?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:18 PM
-1

Yes, I read the caption. Some people are shocked that the sentence was only 3 months. Some people were shocked he got any time at all. Those are two different groups of people. Where is your confusion coming from? I found the caption very easy to understand.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:10 PM
0

Source?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:08 PM
4

Because 3 months is a VERY short sentence for rape (or any sex crime). Once again, why is "only" in scare quotes? Btw, downvotes are not for disagreement. You seem to be very trigger happy with that downvote button!
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:05 PM
2

Why is "only" in scare quotes?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:03 PM
-2

Search for "punch feminists" and see how many more results come up lol.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 11:55 AM
2

People tell women they should have used protection all the time. Have you never met a pro lifer?
/r/MensRights11/09/17 10:36 PM
1

YOU FUCKING MISANDRIST!!!!! IM NOT MAD, UR MAD!!!!!! 😡😡
/r/MensRights11/09/17 10:35 PM
1

This is actually not true. The most common type of FGM is removal of the entire clitoris.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 09:59 PM
1

Are you seriously asking why people encourage men to wear condoms? Um...
/r/MensRights11/09/17 09:58 PM
2

Aww, someone's throwing a little tantrum :(
/r/MensRights11/09/17 09:52 PM
1

Why would I answer it? You don't own me. What you're asking is not relevant to the situation.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 06:08 PM
1

Ohh, so you brought up a completely and totally unrelated scenario that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand as some sort of "gotcha."
/r/MensRights11/09/17 01:42 AM
1

When did I tell anyone, male or female, "too bad you should have used a condom"?
/r/MensRights09/09/17 09:24 PM
0

Because you literally changed the subject, blamed it on me, and then made up a bunch of lies about what you claim I said. Lmfao. Quit while you're behind. Just admit that you were wrong.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 08:52 PM
0

Where did you address it? Copy and paste please.
/r/MensRights09/09/17 02:47 AM
1

No, I didn't change the subject. You changed the subject to telling a woman who wants an abortion that she should have used a condom. No one is talking about that here. I never said that men who get a woman pregnant should have used a condom. I responded to someone who said that sterilization is men's only birth control option by telling him that men have condoms as well. YOU changed the subject. YOU went off on tangents about telling a woman who got pregnant that she should have used a condom. …
/r/MensRights08/09/17 09:18 PM
2

Copy and paste the line.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 09:16 PM
1

That's biology. It's just biology that it's easier to manipulate a woman's reproductive system in a safe and reversible way than it is for men's reproductive systems. Above this comment. Copy and paste the line exactly please.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 09:16 PM
1

If women get to die because of childbirth, shouldn't men be forced to die as well? That was the message, not an exact quote which is why it wasn't in quotes. Where did I ever even imply that we should limit men's birth control options? It's weird how men will just make up blatant lies like that.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:57 PM
2

No, you didn't. Please copy and paste the line where I said "I need a man to protect me."
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:57 PM
0

You said that male birth control methods "aren't secure enough." Properly used condoms + pull out method is 99.92% effective. That's pretty fucking secure.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 05:56 PM
1

It certainly could be. Equal treatment means just that. If you want preferential treatment for women then just say that. Okay, as long as you believe we should kill men whose baby mama's die in childbirth because of equality! :) You literally stated this as an excuse for why it's ok to limit men's options. Please copy and paste my quote that says "it's okay to limit men's options" with that sentence bolded.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:38 PM
1

No, that's not the stance I have taken with men. You seem to be confused, so I'll lay it out for you: A man said that men's only option to prevent pregnancy is sterilization. I said that men have condoms as a birth control option as well. You reacted emotionally and made up a bunch of lies and equated me saying "Sterilization is not the only birth control option for men, they have condoms as well" with "You can't get an abortion because you should have used a condom." Please read the posts next …
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:36 PM
3

So why is she responsible for killing the "other woman," but the man in the article isn't responsible for breaking into the "other man's" house?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:33 PM
1

That's not what I was responding to. I was responding to someone who said that condoms are ineffective. That is a lie. Condoms are 98% effective.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:32 PM
1

So you don't want equality? Equality is not "take away birth control options from women because vasalgel isn't approved yet." Besides, you defended taking options away from men with "just use condoms lol". Wait... what? How on earth is saying that condoms are a birth control option for men "defending taking away condoms"? Why do you keep making up lies? Why do you think women should have multiple options while men have "condoms lol" and nothing else? Because that's the technology that exists at …
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:31 PM
1

If a woman said her only option to prevent pregnancy was sterilization, yes, I would absolutely correct her because that's a blatant lie.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:20 AM
1

No, she's not responsible. If a woman catches her husband cheating on him and she stabs the other woman to death, is she responsible?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 01:02 AM
1

No, he said that men's only contraceptive option is sterilization. I told him that he had other options as well. It's not cool for men to spread lies like that.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:34 AM
1

Once again you admit that men don't catcall when other men are around. Glad you've admitted it twice now :)
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:33 AM
1

Lmao why would you want to take options away from people instead of giving more options? You've spoken in the past about how you want vasalgel to be approved. Why do you think men should get birth control options but not women?
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:32 AM
0

Please copy and paste the post where I said "I need a man to protect me" bolded.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:57 PM
1

Condoms are 98% effective when used correctly. If you combine them with the pull out method, it's almost impossible to get a woman pregnant.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:56 PM
1

Women have multiple options to prevent pregnancy. So do men. Sterilization is absolutely not the only option for either gender.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 10:55 PM
1

Or just use condoms lol.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 06:20 PM
0

And still waiting for your source that I said that I need a man to protect me.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:38 PM
1

No, we don't. Most doctors will refuse to perform a tubal on young women or women without children.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:30 PM
1

No, she's not. Women aren't responsible for men's actions. Breaking into someone else's home is illegal.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:27 PM
-8

I hope he doesn't. He broke the law and should serve time for it.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:26 PM
1

Uhhh he broke into the guy's home and harassed him. Of course that should be illegal.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:25 PM
0

Well, you just said that it isn't true that men commit the vast majority of street crimes against men. It's not a straw man, you said it. Please provide a source to back that up. Still waiting for a couple of sources here! I'm also waiting for a source on where I said that I need a man to protect me. Please send me these sources whenever you're ready.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 05:21 PM
1

Which men's tribes are better at the things you mentioned? The one in the link you sent me? What about other men's tribes? Do you have a source to prove that men's tribes are "consistently better" at the tasks that you mentioned?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 11:45 AM
1

I'm not dodging the question. All-female teams on survivor have worked well together far more often than not. Why would 1 bad instance of teamwork cancel out 3 instances of normal human interaction?
/r/MensRights07/09/17 01:22 AM
0

Can you please point out any statistics that show that women commit most of the violent street crimes against men? This is a big accusation, and you better have evidence to back it up. Otherwise you're just a false assault accuser. Are you really pretending you didn't admit that I was right? Super embarrassing on your part! Looks like you talked yourself into a corner.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:08 PM
1

Uh, considering the person I responded to admitted that he lied about the women's tribe "almost dying," I don't think I'm the one posting nonsense here.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:07 PM
1

And how would you know? If a man reports a woman assaulting him, he's more likely to be arrested than she is. NIH Probably because men commit 90% of all violent crime. If you have any stats showing that women commit the vast majority of street crime against men, I'd like to see that. Ah... you realize you can't win an argument by being honest. Well, at least you know your strengths. Be dishonest, troll, feel like you've made an intellectual point. What? You admitted I was right earlier. I'm conf…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 08:30 PM
1

Well, did they get their ass kicked? Many do. Men are much more likely to assault other men than women are. You mean where I pointed out that's what you were saying? Yep, just saying that I'm glad you agree with me that men are less likely to catcall when other men are around!
/r/MensRights06/09/17 07:41 PM
1

Just like a man walking alone? Gay men have been known to catcall men who are walking alone. And, from what you've said, they aren't waiting for her to be vulnerable... just unaccompanied by a guy. Because they don't want to get their ass kicked. Why do you need a man to defend you? Can you please point out where I said I need a man to defend me? A link to the exact post with the line bolded would be great, thanks! Of course it is. I'm glad you agree! It's good that you admitted earlier that men…
/r/MensRights06/09/17 07:35 PM
1

It's not agreeing to disagree. You're ignoring basic facts that can be proven by just looking at which episodes have tribe swaps. There are plenty of women's tribes on Survivor that have done just fine. Panama, Amazon, Vanuatu, etc.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 07:30 PM
1

Vulnerable? Yes, vulnerable. A woman walking alone is vulnerable. So, you mean women are catcalled when the guys don't have to deal with another man defending her honor? Imagine that. Yes, women are catcalled when the guys don't risk getting their ass kicked by another man. This is why men think catcalling doesn't exist... because guys don't catcall when other men are around.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 07:26 PM
1

You can deny it all you want but the footage that tribe swaps happen within the first 1-4 episodes (and 4 is pushing it) of every single modern season of survivor is there. This case is no exception.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 03:49 PM
1

They did not rush the process prematurely. Most tribe swaps happen by episode 3 these days (sometimes sooner). You are literally making shit up because you didn't watch the show lmao.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:56 PM
1

Really? They "very obviously mixed the teams up"? You're right, a tribe swap has literally never happened in the history of survivor ever 😂 And by "never" I mean "1 or more tribe swaps in every single one of the 34 seasons of Survivor except the first two." Was that your only season of Survivor?
/r/MensRights06/09/17 01:31 PM
1

Lmao you just made up that entire post. No, they did not have to do the merge early and no, the women were not near death. It's kind of sad how you guys will make up blatant lies out of blind hatred for women.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 12:27 PM
1

As a woman, it's because we usually get catcalled when we're alone. Men who catcall and harass women do it to women who are vulnerable, which most often means alone. I've literally never gotten catcalled when I was walking anywhere with a man.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 12:22 PM
1

Equal rights, equal lefts, right? Don't hit a woman if you don't want to be hit back.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 11:59 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 12:36 PM
3

Lol I didn't even downvote you. That's the doing of your own kind. Even the rest of /r/MensRights thinks you're ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 01:48 AM
1

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights17/08/16 01:47 AM

Abusive? You shouldn't be throwing around false accusations like that. I thought she was innocent until proven guilty. Or is it just men who are innocent until proven guilty?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 09:29 AM

Amber heard is innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 11:27 AM
1

Maybe you should look up what the word "anecdote" means since you clearly don't know.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 12:55 AM
1

The study didn't conclude that they can't reconcile with their former rivals as much as men can. The study literally said that women hug their rivals less often than men do. You're drawing your own conclusions from that.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 04:55 PM
0

Anecdotes are not data, buddy. I could make anything up about men with no source and just say "well I have experience with it so I'm right!!!"
/r/MensRights08/08/16 03:41 PM
0

And I still agree about my experiences. You can't accept our (/u/Criket 's too) about women backstabbing each other. What source should I give you? Because they weren't sources saying that women backstab each other? It was literally a source saying that women hug each other less often after sports.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 03:28 PM
1

You yourself agreed that women are backstabbing bitches. If you think that, you better back it up with a source!
/r/MensRights07/08/16 01:31 PM
1

Do you have a source for that?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 01:09 PM
1

Once again, I'm asking you to prove that most women wouldn't hesitate to stab their best friend to save their own ass.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 09:48 AM
1

Where does this say that women are backstabbers?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 05:35 AM
1

You said that women are more likely to back stab than men. Do you have any proof of that, or is that just your opinion?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 04:43 AM
1

It says that men hug each other more after sporting events. Lol.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 04:18 AM
1

Do you have any proof that all women are backstabbing bitches, or is it just opinion?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 03:50 AM
1

I've had many situations in which I've fought with a female friend and then made up with her later. Doesn't that disprove everything you've just said?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 03:38 AM
0

That's not half the facts, that's all the facts. Men commit the vast majority of violent crimes. Doesn't matter the victim - men commit the vast majority of crimes against men, and the vast majority of crimes against women.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 11:42 AM

They do commit the vast majority of all different types of violent crimes. I'm sorry this wasn't clear to you, but it should make more sense now.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:56 AM
-1

So, not about equality then. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:16 AM
-2

What on earth are you talking about?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 10:41 AM

Lol, just bring up the fact that men commit the vast majority of murders, assaults, and pretty much all violent crimes. Even though it's a solid fact, it'd get downvoted like crazy here because it doesn't fit the hivemind.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 10:40 AM
-6

So this sub is about male supremacy, then?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 09:26 AM

Do you see the upvotes and downvotes, or are you having difficulty understanding them and what they mean?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 09:17 AM
-5

So this sub is about male supremacy, then?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:38 AM
-9

It happens to men all the time too. Way more often. Men commit the vast majority of violent crimes, murders, assaults, etc.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 04:54 AM

So this subreddit is not about equality, then?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 04:53 AM

I thought this subreddit was about equality, not misogyny?
/r/MensRights05/08/16 12:16 AM
1

I don't think you're lying, and I appreciate the job you're doing, I really do. This is something called anecdotal evidence, but Society as a whole doesn't blame the victims, and more importantly, neither does the government. Not every single person in society blames the victims, of course, but not every single person in society does anything. Fact of the matter is, if you believe that victim-blaming isn't widespread, you have your head in the sand. Because you see far less MRAs than Feminists d…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 02:46 AM
0

Never claimed that I spoke for them...? Oh well, strawmanning IS your forte, and you haven't actually brought up evidence that society blames the victims of rape. ...My line of work? I honestly don't understand - do you think I'm lying when I said that the rape victims I've worked with have been victim blamed? Those MRAs are still part of the problem. The fact this demographic exists as freely as it does is the problem. So then why are you vocally whining about feminists and not MRAs? sigh Clear…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 05:02 AM
0

How does Society blame the victims of rape? I fail to see this, because most of the time, it's very fast to through due order out the window(Rolling Stone, Ghomeeshi, Mattress Girl, etc.) Once again, I've worked with rape victims, I've known that they've been through, I know that they suffer victim blaming. On the other hand, you haven't worked with rape victims, yet you're pretending to know what they have been through and are speaking for them. Disgusting. The FBI definition did specify it was…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 04:01 AM
1

Society does not blame the victims of sexual assault, we hardly ever see that happening. Society does not normalize rape, and to suggest it does is an insult to many Middle Eastern women. As someone who's volunteered on a rape crisis hotline, society absolutely blames the victims of sexual assault. To suggest it doesn't is an insult to women (and men) all over the world. Obviously I can't provide a percentage of feminists that think men can't be raped, but up until recently, the FBI definition o…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 06:33 AM
1

Where does rape culture perpetuate the idea that all men are rapists? What percentage of feminists think that men can't be raped? Once again, do you have proof for any of this, or is this all opinion?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 11:57 PM
1

Uh you realize that rape culture includes male rape victims too, right?
/r/MensRights05/07/16 11:23 PM
1

You didn't have any important points lol. You can't even name them.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 08:53 AM
1

You haven't really brought up any important points that I haven't already responded to.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 11:53 PM
1

You didn't bring up any valid points. You're touting how logical and full of facts and "points" you are, but you're reacting emotionally, not logically. I don't care if you block me, but honestly it's probably in your best interest if you're this angry.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 09:59 PM
1

Neither have you. You just seem frustrated and angry.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 09:50 PM
1

What? No need to get so upset and emotional. And they say women are the more emotional gender...
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:41 PM
1

Really? You think there are less than a thousand misogynistic MRAs? Hmm...
/r/MensRights01/07/16 02:03 PM
1

Kind of like how MRAs say misogynistic shit and it's just one in a million, and then another one, and then another one, right?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 10:26 PM
1

So if a feminist says something that upsets you (such as "all men are rapists"), that's only one in millions of feminists, right? So why are you upset?
/r/MensRights28/06/16 06:07 PM
1

Oh yeah no one on this sub defends convicted rapists. Lmao. Not a single one. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4nv6ha/i_think_brock_turner_is_being_unfairly_treated/ Yeah, men clearly don't know what rape is and need to be taught what to do it when they talk about how forcing a foreign object, dirt, and pine needles into an unconscious woman's body is not rape and "just regret sex" and "she consented."
/r/MensRights28/06/16 05:03 PM
1

lol men definitely need to be taught what rape is and not to do it. Plenty of men, including on this sub, defend and support rapists. That's not okay.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 09:00 AM
1

So do you have any proof that most feminists are man-hating, or is that just opinion?
/r/MensRights27/06/16 04:57 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 10:04 PM
1

You are literally going off on a tangent that makes no sense whatsoever. The person I'm talking about made comments that were sexist and misogynistic. I honestly have no idea why you're so confused or why you're going off on tangents that are not related to anything we're talking about.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:10 PM
1

So then what do you think about feminism? If there are only a few man-haters who identify as feminists, then they shouldn't matter because there's no where near as many man-hating feminists as there are non-man-hating feminsts, right?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 08:09 PM
1

He's certainly not a misandrist. Did you not read his posts? I don't understand why you're so confused over this. This is so incredibly basic.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:57 PM
0

I see you've ignored my main point. Male nipples can also be sexually stimulated, and some can even orgasm from nipple stimulation. That being said, why shouldn't men have to wear bras? I mean, I don't understand - do you think women don't find the male chest attractive? Not only that, but male forearms are extremely attractive to most women after puberty when muscle tone begins to develop. Should boys be required to cover their forearms so girls don't get distracted or aroused during class? Btw…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:55 PM
1

All misogyny is sexism. Not all sexism is misogyny. What are you so confused about? If you don't understand, you can just, you know, look at a dictionary.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:51 PM
1

Nah, I've seen plenty of anti-woman comments get plenty of upvotes.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 01:50 PM
1

Do you believe that this is appropriate attire for a school? That wouldn't be appropriate for school even if she was wearing a bra, so I don't understand your argument here. You are correct that she was not being sexually harassed, nor should she be. However, the school has an interest to take reasonable measures to prevent sexual harassment or the appearance of sexual harassment. They weren't doing it to prevent sexual harassment. Seriously, did you read the article at all? "Mr. Smith was looki…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:47 PM
1

Is facial hair considered indecent? Can beards be sexually stimulated? Can male nipples be sexually stimulated? Absolutely. So why shouldn't men have to wear bras too? You already knew the answer so why did you draw that particular comparison? Ah, it's because you wanted to be dishonest. If it's all about attraction then we ought to cover feet and hands because people get off on those too. We don't because of more reasons than just the category of sexual characteristics. You yourself said that b…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:45 PM
1

When misogynistic comments are upvoted, it's not a minority anymore.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:42 PM
2

It's not women's problem that men are attracted to them. Not wearing a bra is no more sexual than not wearing a bra (and some men in this thread have even argued that wearing a bra is more sexual than not wearing a bra), so I don't see why women should be forced to wear bras when men aren't. That seems sexist to me. Also, if you think that women choosing not to wear a bra is all about attracting male attention, that shows just how little you know about women.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:41 PM
1

He literally admitted himself that he's sexist. What more do you want?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:39 PM
1

However, you are correct that the school's dress code did not specifically mention that bras were required attire. Nevertheless, it can be surmised that if the student wore a different top that did not make it obvious that she was not wearing a bra, then the lack of bra would not have been an issue. Why should she have to wear a bra for any reason? Of course, whether a student not wearing a bra would do any of the aforementioned is up for debate. However, school administrators are often provided…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:14 AM
1

Actually the article was sarcasm saying that 'no bra day' was probably the worst way to make the point. Realistically speaking, outside of professional environments (including school) most guys have zero problem with women not wearing bras. You, again, don't read very well. Nobody was upset or offended about it. Think it's a little absurd and amusing, sure. Yes they do. Look at all the men in this thread; they are completely and totally up in arms about this. Seriously dude, take a look around y…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:11 AM
2

How about the dress code of a golf course: http://www.golfthefox.ca/contact-us/polices/ - hmm. Mesh shirts not allowed. Would have to change shirts. Not any different from this issue. Are both men and women bound to the same rule? No, she was cautioned for wearing clothing that didn't meet the dress code. The 'nipple outline' thing is entirely you, at least as much as I have read. Biologically speaking though, since you keep asking about men and bras, have you noticed that men have smaller, much…
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:09 AM
0

Because he's being misogynist...? I'm sorry, are you confused? Do you not understand that you can be sexist and misogynist at the same time?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:06 AM
1

So basically, just by having breasts, women are deliberately trying to attract male attention? If we're wearing a bra, we want attention, but if we're not wearing a bra, we also want attention?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:05 AM

Male facial hair is also a secondary sex characteristic. Should all men forced to be shave their hair if they're going out in public?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 02:05 AM
-1

What on earth are you talking about? This subreddit says what it says regardless of whether or not I have an open mind.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:24 PM
0

Lol. Keep living in your dreamland and imagining that all the written articles aren't by feminists. Lol what? Look around you in this thread. Look at the article that has been linked to in this very post. It's men who are most up-in-arms about this and who are the most upset and offended by a girl organizing a no-bra day. Of course women don't need to wear bras. In combination with certain other clothing, in certain situations, bras are necessary, or other clothing is necessary. If a woman doesn…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:24 PM
1

What are you talking about? No where did I claim that misandry is not sexism. I'm not sure what's wrong, but you seem to be making things up. Weird.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:19 PM
1

If you read the article, you would know that the dress code did not have anything stating that women have to wear a bra. However, if a student chooses to dress immodestly and if this student believes that someone else is spending too much time looking at him/her, then he/she has no right to claim that he/she is being sexually harassed if someone examines him/her with their eyes. How is anyone here dressing immodestly? Furthermore, where is anyone claiming that someone is spending too much time l…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:18 PM
2

You're being purposefully obtuse. A man wearing an off the shoulder shirt drawing too much attention to his chest or torso would be cautioned about his apparel as well. She was dressed in appopriately. A bra was an option that would have made it appropriate. It wasn't mandatory. She could have stayed with no bra and put on a different shirt. Can you show me literally ONE article where a man was told he had to wear a bra? Men don't have to cover their nipples I thought it was pretty obvious that …
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:17 PM
2

Then would you agree that wearing no bra is even less sexual than wearing a bra?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 09:14 PM
-1

Lol what? The outcome is the same regardless. I have no reason to listen to misogynists.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:14 PM
1

That's a different conversation. I pointed out that she wasn't "unfairly discriminated against for not wearing a bra", she was addressed for inappropriate choice of attire. You responded with a non-sequiter about "reading the article". When I pointed out that that the article agreed with what I said, you have changed your argument. My argument is the exact same. She was unfairly discriminated against for not wearing a bra. Men don't wear bras, why should women be forced to? How many boys are shi…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:55 PM
0

You aren't too good at reading comprehension? Or perhaps are too rushed and emotional to grasp the point. More likely, you have decided in advance that there are no valid arguments against your viewpoint and don't even stop to think. What are you talking about? Yes, he is objectively sexist. I'm not sure where the confusion is coming from? Conversation, yes. Productive? I doubt it. It's a tempest in a teapot. It gets feminists stirred up, No no no buddy. It gets men and men's rights activists st…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:52 PM
2

Yes, I have explained it. This woman has gone without a bra multiple times, which nullifies your "just doing it for one day isn't going to do anything" argument. This story has also made national news, so once again, your "this isn't going to do anything" argument is once again invalid.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:48 PM
2

The point is, women shouldn't have to wear bras if they don't want to. This girl organizing the no-bra day generated national attention. I highly doubt her school is going to keep telling female students to wear bras with all of the negative press and attention they've caused. Of course this no-bra day is going to cause them to stand out - because they shouldn't have to be told to wear a bra in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:19 PM
3

The student who organized this had worn shirts without a bra numerous times before. Your argument that "If you only do it one day, it's not special! One day out of the year isn't a lot" makes absolutely no sense in this context.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:10 PM
3

I did. Why should she have to cover her nipples or wear a bra? Men don't have to cover their nipples or wear a bra.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:08 PM
1

I mean, he could be pointing out how those girls are holding society back by holding to stereotypic interests instead of generating a discussion about societal expectations of clothing and how to address that in society appropriately. "All women talk about is clothes because that's all that matters to them" is not sexist? Hmm. What if I say "all men care about is pussy and booze"? Is that sexist? Just screaming "you shouldn't be able to tell me what to wear" isn't a valid viewpoint. Of course pe…
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:08 PM
3

Oh, okay, so you didn't read her actual article, you just read a bunch of lies and selective comments about her article. http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jun/17/no-bra-day-helena-high-school-kaitlyn-juvik?CMP=share_btn_tw
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:00 PM
3

You do that. Still waiting for an explanation as to why everyone's upset with this or why this is relevant to this subreddit. I ask you again and again, and yet you still cannot to save your life explain why a high school girl organizing a no-bra day at her school is relevant to men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:56 PM
3

No one has explained what this has to do with men's rights. No one has explained why women not wearing bras is upsetting. I'm still waiting for an explanation.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:53 PM
3

Looks like someone didn't read the article.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:52 PM
-2

Why should I go in with an open mind to a subreddit that constantly upvotes misogynistic comments? Are you open minded about subreddits with misandrist comments?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:51 PM
2

Did you read the article or no?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:50 PM
2

This still doesn't explain why this girl's no bra day is offensive and upsetting to MRAs. So far, no one has been able to explain why this is so offensive or what it has to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:44 PM

Why? Women's breasts shouldn't be seen as sexual. She was unfairly discriminated against for not wearing a bra, and women shouldn't wear bras if they don't want to.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:31 PM
2

What's absurd about women not wearing bras? I'm confused.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:23 PM
-8

Oh, yeah, I figured this subreddit attracts a lot of misogynists. What I find weird, though, is that most users talk about how this subreddit is about equality, when it really seems like it's about hating women.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:20 PM

Can someone explain what is so upsetting about this to MRAs, or what this has to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:12 PM

What's wrong with a woman posting this to Facebook? I thought this subreddit was about equality, but now you're just making sexist comments. Hmm.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 03:11 PM

Accused sexual assault? He was proven guilty in a court of law. This isn't simply an accusation.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 05:14 PM
1

You asked for a source and I gave you one. Why are you complaining?
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:42 AM
1

I'm not mad that you didn't know what happened. I'm confused as to how on earth you thought it was appropriate to defend a convicted sex offender, assume that the victim is a liar, and post about how it wasn't really rape without reading a single article on the subject. It's your responsibility to educate yourself on a topic before spewing complete and total lies about how "it's not sexual assault" "they were both drunk so it's fine" and so forth. You need to take a long, hard look at yourself a…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:32 AM
2

...Are you trolling right now? You literally haven't read a single article on the subject, not one, and yet you're talking about what happened as if you actually know what you're talking about, instead of just admitting that you've pulled every single word you've just said out of your ass? Wow. Just wow.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:09 AM
0

It's not domestic violence because Amber is innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:43 AM
1

Maybe read any article on the subject before talking about something you know nothing about? Also, you're not really doing a good job about trying to dispel the idea that all men are rapists, considering you think it's okay to sexually assault an unconscious woman. If you want to see rape culture, just look at your own posts. It's kind of scary to see how many men out there will defend sexual assault.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:39 AM
1

So to be clear, you don't think that a man forcibly fingering an unconscious woman and shoving dirt and pine needles in her vagina to be rape?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 06:40 PM
1

It's at +1 now, but it was at around +8 earlier. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4ms73q/rape_is_bad/d3y5rh5
/r/MensRights07/06/16 04:13 PM
3

It's not trolling. You can look at the responses here yourself.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 10:58 AM

I'd actually say the same about this thread. There are several men here supporting this man and saying that what he did was not sexual assault, all upvoted. If you want to see rape culture at its finest, just check out this subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:16 PM

Isn't this subreddit supposed to be about equality, not making misogynistic insults towards women?
/r/MensRights22/05/16 06:40 PM
1

No shit. The statute of limitations has run out on most of these cases and he will never see a day in jail. We're lucky this woman got any jail time at all with this happening over 30 years ago.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 12:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter