TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alfalfaman Archive

View 6 posts and 28 comments by alfalfaman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I do read lots of red pill material and have a strange interest in it, even If I am strongly against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/14 09:17 AM
1

I never said that my entire concept of game was negging, simply that the majority of people agree that the behavior shown in field reports is negative and ridiculous. Leading to the outcome that it is difficult to believe such methods work without making the story up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/14 06:25 AM
5

I never said that getting sex was difficult or fictitious, I've also had people plainly offer. I do however struggle to believe women would respond to TRP treatment with sexual desire. Insults and a demeaning attitude don't make me want someone and women are exactly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 11:10 PM
11

Theres also the fact that the stories sound massively unlikely and like works of fiction. That isnt just to blue pillers by the way but to the general population TRP stories come across unbelievable. As a blue piller I have seen what could be called red pill behaviours pay off in some cases. These however were rare so unfortunately your suggestion that insecurity in our positions is at play you are wrong. The reason the stories arent believed is that they are unbelievable.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/14 09:50 AM
3

I find your response beautiful, a million up votes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/13 11:46 AM
0

Not blue pill as in the satire sub, blue pill as in not red pill ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/13 01:23 AM
7

I'm absolutely with you on everything you just said. I'm trying to get a feel for/ understand why redpillers feel the way they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:56 AM
3

People tend to be polite to me, but there are plenty of others that can support my claim but I'll agree that was off topic of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:54 AM
3

I'm really glad you had studies for the other question. Would you be able to provide studies/stats to support that claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:43 AM
2

I don't know what WRT means :P
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:35 AM
2

Actually I do believe in some innate differences, It's just that people are far more similar that they are different. Also of note is that even if the vast majority of relationships do have red pill tendencies, why is it that those that don't are attacked?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:21 AM
2

Fair enough, I'll accept that, however the traits red pillers want are still seemingly concerned with sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:15 AM
1

It did support that men desire more sexual partners, however the results don't support the concept of hypergamy. Also of note down in the discussion section is that as society became more equal, women also desired a greater number of partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:04 AM
2

relative chastity > sex indicators of fidelity > sex loyalty > presumably sex
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 04:02 AM
4

We could start a whole new debate about how that study doesn't actually support red pill assertions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 03:23 AM
5

Ok, going on that premise: Why are men considered more attractive for having had more sexual partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 01:50 AM
3

So in other words is still entirely based on sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 01:32 AM
4

How can men be the keeper of commitment if commitment requires effort from both individuals? Also men cheat more often then women, not by much but still more often. Also you just mentioned that here is a statistical correlation between number of past sex partners and divorce risk but you didn't mention any division between male and female statistics. By many men do you mean the trp community? because a large number of men are willing to marry women with prior children. Of note as well is, Should…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/13 01:17 AM
3

Fair enough, I'll accept that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/13 12:24 AM
4

t woman/supplicant male relationship works exactly the same way that a traditional alpha male/supplicant woman one does. If the claim has absolutely zero evidence for it ( as shown by your refusal to provide even basic evidence) then it cant be made as a factual claim and serves only as an opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/13 11:55 PM
-1

That's still a very vague introduction but thank-you anyway.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 11:51 PM
0

Fair enough, would you be able to link/paste it?
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 11:40 PM
0

May I ask why If a blue piller asks for brief explanation of red pill theory you are unable/unwilling to provide? not specifics, just a brief explanation.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 11:19 PM
7

What is good husband material? and why are males with good husband material reacted to positively and females negatively?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/13 11:08 PM
9

You made the claim, Its your job to provide the evidence for it.Why does it not work the same way? , If you choose to go the " its biology route" then provide evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/13 11:05 PM
3

Well just showing up one day and asking everybody to condense theory for you is also trolling. Lurk. Hang on, What? Imagine I go onto a physics sub and ask someone to condense the laws of thermodynamics for me, It can be done in three neat sentences which can then be expanded on. If I need more proof they can offer experiments and many many studies to back their claims. Now imagine we applied your logic and simply called them out as "trolls". The fact is that if your " theory " has little framew…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/13 10:05 PM
0

und. It is not a place to be insulting redpillers, or not providing arguments. I understand but the blue pill is routinely used by redpillers to start arguments and anyone who disagrees with a red pill philosophy is labelled blue pill. I'm simply stating that a blue pill philosophy isnt a thing. It is a place to satire red pill and doesn't provide material to debate against.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/13 04:49 AM
21

So you utterly deny that red-pillers have the very same traits they complain about in women? this is a yes or no question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/13 04:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter