TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

flawless44 Archive

View 0 posts and 370 comments by flawless44 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

If a soldier intentionally injures themselves to avoid combat, that is a court marshall offense. Same situation with pregnancy.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 07:56 PM
3

Lol they're negging you, and not in a funny way but just insulting.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 06:43 PM
219

Strength is not being argued here. If he hit her with the same amount of force she hit him with, he'd still get white knighted half to death.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 06:12 PM
3

Its a benefit to parents to encourage growth, so is discriminatory against non parents by definition. For example, subsidies for electric vehicles are discriminatory against people who only want gas vehicles, for the same reason.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 05:23 PM
2

Honestly, a man is entitled to know whether a child he is supporting is his or not. There should be no question of that. It is not an offense to do the test.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:13 PM
4

A lot of people have had legitimately bad experiences, one after the other, or watched it happen with people they know, and have real personal reasons to think that way. His viewpoint, while generally 'wrong' is still legitimate and genuine.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:10 AM
4

A lot of these common things are blatantly demeaning.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 02:25 AM
6

It is completely your choice, even if that choice is 'No'.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 02:23 AM
13

Lmao. I want to upvote and downvote at the same time.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 02:21 AM
5

/s right?
/r/MensRights07/09/20 10:56 PM
3

You seem lost. MensRights != Right wing
/r/MensRights02/09/20 06:15 PM
3

I believe it was left leaning, but well distributed.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 08:13 PM
2

This is exactly the kind of work we should support. This guy needs a patreon page or something because I'd pay him to keep doing this.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 10:26 PM
1

Or just another human being... talking doesn't require any credentials.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 10:54 PM
1

Not sure what you're getting at.. he put the building up and she's providing the service. It would have been a more interesting headline if it was the other way around and not blatantly stereotypical, but there's nothing wrong with it. Personal choices all around. Are we supposed to be hating something for some reason?
/r/MensRights20/08/20 10:48 PM
1

I think your right. I'm just wondering if the reaction would have been the same with all the genders reversed. Like a dude coming in to a female dominated work environment and making hr complains about the workplace inappropriate behavior. I bet he would be treated the same or worse.. aaand then also be labelled the asshole.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 11:09 PM
2

There are no riders currently attached to this bill.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 04:27 AM
-1

/s right?
/r/MensRights19/06/20 04:24 AM
1

Lol no. If a teaser is a deadly weapon, then Rayshard was justified in using it to fight for his life after having been shot by it already. And Rayshard did not fire the teaser, it was not capable of firing, and even if he did, that's not a reason to shoot him to death. They should have let him run. The police are not your friends. They don't give a shit about you, and will shoot you whenever they feel it's remotely "justified".
/r/MensRights19/06/20 03:24 AM
3

You might be having a stroke.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 05:07 AM
11

Lesson for people in their homes: don't open your doors for the police. Don't speak to the police. If you insist on speaking to the police, you can do so with a closed door. Any insistence of the police for you to open your door just leads to the above video.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 01:21 AM
1

I don't even think I like whiskey, but I want one.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 06:52 PM
6

It is anonymous.. even so, these kinds of things usually need to be approved to be released.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 05:34 PM
1

You can double down with her friends. I would put money down that her friends would get it before she does and embarrass her.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 08:28 PM
2

What section of the bill is the relevant section?
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:32 PM
2

You could try doing the opposite and reply with humor. Agree and amplify. Every time they compare you to a girl, tell them something like, I'm getting ready for my sex change operation, btw can I borrow your lipstick?. It will drive them nuts. Do it everytime and they will eventually stop. Meanwhile you can enjoy pissing them off. Also criticize their lack of respect for you as a woman. These are basic techniques for how comedians deal with hecklers.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:27 PM
2

I don't know what else to say than to just express my personal opinion. Simply that if I saw a sign like that show up in a place i frequented, I would stop going there.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 09:06 PM
1

Dayyym
/r/MensRights13/03/20 08:15 PM
1

Meh... it's kinda offensive like... "Women, some things are better thin.. Thin Mints. " It's just not humorous in the same way your OP isn't. It's just throwing your assumed inadequacy in your face.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 07:31 PM
4

The idea is not without merit. But you still have to prove that any one case actually has merit.
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:39 PM
2

Yes but also the correct term would be sexual assault. The size and placement of the dump could result in different charges. You could be guilty of grand dumping, or dumping with intent to distribute, or whatever. The point is details and context matter, otherwise all crimes would just be "You did a bad thing, go to jail."
/r/MensRights21/02/20 11:33 PM
3

Certainly not a healthy relationship though What an understatement. This behavior should immediately result in the relationship ending.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 06:11 PM
5

Honestly I saw the trailer and it looked kinda interesting but now im gonna double check.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:06 PM
2

You're literally watching a woman hit herself with a hammer.. It's either an awful prank, or what OP says.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 05:44 PM
1

I never said they don't care about their family. Just they their manual/mental labor responsibilities are separate.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 12:43 AM
1

I've met several who believe in traditional values.. As in, they actually live by those rules. The guy will be the breadwinner and his wife the homemaker, without intrusion into each others responsibilities. He would not try to change a diaper any more than his wife would try to perform one of his futures trades.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 11:41 PM
6

Very few men ever become cognizant of the fact that they too are human beings. What you want, what you need, food - shelter - safety - sex - respect - success - self actualization, matters, especially, if not only, to you. If you allow people to convince you that your needs don't matter or that their needs are above yours.. you will never have a fulfilling life. All the "happy wife, happy life" people fall into the above trap.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 09:09 PM
16

Here's the primary difference in how men and women are treated. Men are held responsible, even, and especially during -- difficult times. She however.. I was the one who was abused, rather than this man. It was a time in my life when I was very vulnerable, I was experiencing burnout, mental health challenges, I'd had a miscarriage, and I wasn't doing a very good job of myself," she said. She is an adult woman. There is no excuse for her actions. There is no excuse for having sex with her elderly…
/r/MensRights31/01/20 09:02 PM
0

I don't understand. Conservatives generally think women should take care of the children. Supporting mens ability to take care of children, by providing these changing stations, goes against conservative values. This is therefore a liberal idea. Maybe we're just using different definitions of what liberal/ conservative is. Far right, as I understand it, is just really conservative/bordering on nazi'ism, white supremacy etc. Is that what you identify with? And if so, why would you support men tak…
/r/MensRights31/01/20 06:27 PM
6

Yeah but there's what they say and then there's what they do.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 05:56 PM
0

Since when does conservative mean no changing tables in the men's room? If you could go 60 years back in time and show this picture to conservatives.. you'd probably be called a queer, and a communist out of spite. This is either liberal or progressive.
/r/MensRights31/01/20 05:54 PM
4

They can ask you to pay anything they want. Manipulating that is not the point. The point is it can't be forcibly garnished or removed from you without your explicit compliance (If you do it right). This allows a determined individual to flee with his money secured and start a new life in another place.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 08:16 PM
19

There's a saying that suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem. That's true in almost all cases. There are others who have problems that can't be solved. Ultimately it is a choice everyone has.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/20 08:04 PM
2

Nothing. You may report it if you think it should be removed.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 09:47 PM
2

They would go to daycare, and interact with the parents in the evening and on weekends. Plus vacations and holidays. Kids normally spend most of their time in school anyway, unless you want to homeschool them too.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 09:46 PM
42

It does not pretend to be anything but a simple anecdote.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 07:45 PM
3

Trump won because the democrats fucked up and didn't bring out their base. People also just didnt like Hillary. I don't think those will be factors this time around.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:50 PM
3

What difference does it make if they fucked? If nobody gets pregnant, you don't magically gain responsibilities after fucking.
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:34 PM
2

Probably mean removed from that subreddit.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:05 PM
1

It is what you make it.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 09:05 PM
13

What... the fuck.
/r/MensRights20/12/19 07:51 PM
5

It is reversible almost immediately with another injection.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 03:11 PM
3

You haven't actually said anything though. You may aswell have done a "this".
/r/TheRedPill17/11/19 07:18 AM
5

Maybe it's cultural... but when is proposing ever a solution to anything?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 12:27 AM
2

The first one works both ways, the rest are shit.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 08:29 PM
1

Growing up, yeah I saw that happening too. That doesn't really continue as an adult.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 08:40 AM
0

Because our society kinda values women irrespective of their height. Kinda how you can't make fun of promiscuous men. It simply isn't an insult.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:00 AM
1

Would she support you if you expressed that yippy really wanted to be a stay at home dad while she works?
/r/MensRights31/10/19 07:52 PM
1

Nonsense. I'm an AK47 wielding liberal socialist. I'm also an MRA.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:17 PM
32

That may be the logic but it isn't true. California outlawed it, and yet men and women still go to bars and clubs. This is just a way of getting more money from men since they're more likely to pay.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 07:27 AM
1

Well.. yes. Why do you think flat earthers are considered trolls? Alternatively, you need to be capable of making a rational and convincing argument for why you are correct, to challenge a largely accepted views. Write your argument down and publish it. Let it be subject to actual scrutiny and not internet food fights.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 07:08 AM
1

You're allowed to disagree, even welcome to. Disagreeing about women being individuals with their own merits and competencies, to be evaluated on an individual basis, and simply asserting that they are all, as a class, not suitable for any skill based position, makes you a troll.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 12:35 AM
1

Lol now you're just a troll.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 12:22 AM
1

I'm not aware of a non invective adjective to describe that kind of behavior/thinking. If you know of one of like to know it. One of the ways people communicate disapproval is through that kind of invective language, as saying "I think poorly of you for your views." just doesn't do it justice.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 11:48 PM
1

You're only proving op's point that you're an asshole. Women aren't incompetent. That specific woman, however, absolutely is.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 11:37 PM
1

Not all generic information is actually good. That particular one is awful.. unless you're already awesome, which describes so few people it's barely worth saying, yet so many are fooled by it. Good generic information are things like: prioritize yourself, looksmax, minmax, take the center of the board etc.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/19 11:28 PM
10

That's... retarded. Some of the most valuable things you will ever know are generic. They provide near infinite value as long as you apply them.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/19 07:24 PM
2

Or to meet requirements for government contracts.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 08:23 AM
6

There lots of stories like his. Mine is rather similar. Didn't want to live anymore. Decided that meant failure or embarrassment didn't matter.. so i threw away most of the life rules I've been following, and after some googling found myself on the seduction reddit and eventually here through a commenter complaining about how terrible this place is. The sidebar articles and links really resonated with me and I felt like the questions I had actually had answers. 4 years onwards I'm a completely d…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/19 09:25 PM
2

I think it's meant as murder by words.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:51 PM
1

Yes but poe's law and all..
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:28 PM
15

Lol "abuse" ...
/r/MensRights19/09/19 04:35 PM
2

When dealing with someone not completely stable, they can behave erratically. Like for example, saying they want to have sex with you, but being stand off ish and push you away when you get intimate, while continuing to say you should keep going. That's a dangerous situation to be in. If you have sex, did you commit rape or not? Best solution is just to leave. It's not worth the risk of dealing with any kind of accusation, false or not. Have sex with people who want to have sex with you and dont…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/19 08:49 PM
1

If they could stay with a family member, it would be a lot easier if their father was there aswell.. to like.. take care of them.. instead of the family member.. cause that's a job, especially with 5 kids..
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:24 AM
-1

He's right but for the wrong reasons. You need to improve yourself in every way that that a person can. Find a role model and emulate them. Hit the gym, take a dance class, get a better job, haircut, lower your body fat etc.. Could take years. Once you get there, not only will this question seem silly, but you'll have the opposite problem of being in a relationship and wondering what it would be like to just do whatever you want with the other girls who are interested in you..
/r/MensRights10/09/19 05:03 AM
1

What... who would he lose the children to? His wife ditched...
/r/MensRights10/09/19 04:53 AM
33

It should be approved in India quicker, though you may need to travel there to get it done.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 04:05 PM
14

They might not need it but they every right to throw one.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:07 PM
9

Phimosis is not diagnosible until almost puberty btw. The foreskin is not retractable at all until then.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:20 AM
1

You're making several different arguments at the same time. The rider is optional because it must be added to the legislation, which then needs to be voted on in order to pass. If the ERA wouldn't pass without it, so be it. It won't pass. Men need to be responsible and not get taken advantage of. Some feminists might not be for it without that rider, but there are plenty of people who actually want equality. I don't know who Lucy is but she doesn't dictate the Congress or the Senate, or who I vo…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 05:58 PM
2

this belongs in r/seduction, not here
/r/MensRights22/08/19 09:31 PM
1

The rider is optional. Just like any other modification that can be introduced.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 08:36 PM
1

The Hayden rider is optional. It is not the ERA. They are separate. It is an addition that was intentionally added to prevent the amendment from passing. I would support the ERA, but not if that rider modification came with it.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 08:34 PM
7

If you ask OP, you've got like 8 dicks up your ass right now.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/19 10:05 PM
1

Your job might be too demanding of you.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/19 10:03 PM
1

Women with mild symptoms are taken less seriously than men with mild symptoms in the same way that a black woman bleeding out after delivery is taken less seriously than white woman bleeding out after delivery. Do you really see this as casually related? That doctors who see shortness of breath caused by heart attack more in men than women would be less sensitive to shortness of breath caused by heart attack in women? My example was a bit off. What I meant to say was: Women with mild symptoms ar…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 06:54 PM
1

No. Meaning, given the higher number of male heart attacks, there are probably more men who have those symptoms total than women who do. This does not mean men are more likely to have those symptoms. It means doctors are more likely to see men who have those symptoms more often simply because they see more men with heart attacks. If a doctor saw 100 patients of each gender, they would more often see women with mild symptoms than men. Because on an individual level, women are more likely to exper…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 04:32 AM
0

Yes I did. Here is the original statement: As with men, women's most common heart attack symptom is chest pain or discomfort. But women are somewhat more likely than men to experience some of the other common symptoms, particularly shortness of breath, nausea/vomiting, and back or jaw pain. Here is OP's reply: Somewhat more likely. Meaning, given the higher number of male heart attacks, there are probably more men who have those symptoms total than women who do. And it spreads a dangerous myth t…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:14 AM
2

Women should be put at the same risk as men to gain the same benefits. That's equality.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:08 AM
-1

He has not repeated myths. For example you point out the "myth" regarding heart attack symptoms. His statements that women are more likely to have milder symptoms is true. That is true on an individual level for women, which was the topic. The other things you mention are also true, and don't refute the previous point. These ideas should have no problems coexisting. It isn't an attack.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 08:26 PM
-4

He isn't saying that they are more disadvantaged, he's just pointing out issues with women's health care. Its just like pointing out areas where men are disadvantaged isn't an attack on women. Testing on men as a baseline would disadvantage women. Does it mean it's a huge problem that needs to be resolved right the fuck now before anything else gets done? No. It's still an issue to be resolved. And don't forget the other important aspect mentioned, which was race and how bias affects outcomes, w…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:37 PM
12

Sometimes it's just not worth it. Especially when encountering mixed signals, and a girl with a boyfriend. You're wading into moderate mental health issues territory and placing yourself In danger.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/19 11:46 PM
22

3 years later in his Google search history "how to tell if your child is not yours?" All the luck to him though. Hope it works out..
/r/TheRedPill09/08/19 12:32 PM
26

He's not giving her shit for not wanting to fuck a bunch of random guys. He's giving her shit for saying that men only want sex and want it fast. She thinks that because she has filtered the men who are willing to wait, out of her mind. Presumably, because she doesn't think they're good enough. The men she does think are good enough, aren't willing to play games and wait. Hence, her predicament is a result of her own selectiveness.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/19 09:18 PM
45

Nobody is saying it only happens to men. It is being said that when it happens to men, it's not seen as a problem worthy of sympathy.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 06:53 AM
34

Unless you already have that kind of rapport..
/r/TheRedPill24/07/19 05:46 PM
1

What? The ERA is current. It is now. Literally only one more state needs to pass it and it is law. Democrats widely support it NOW.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:40 AM
1

Your main point is that you hate liberalism because liberalism stripped men of their rights. My question addresses your main point. When did men have these rights you're talking about. Which rights? The easiest way for you to answer is to pick a year. Then I can look things up and see if it makes sense. My assertion is that things were not better for men in the past. Maybe better for some men at the top, but not better for men as a whole.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 01:23 AM
1

The biggest thing is the push for the equal rights amendment. It would have made any gender based discrimination illegal. That would include things like the draft, genital mutilation, affirmative action. Everything. Democrats widely support this amendment. It was stopped by conservative women. It actually can still be passed. I believe only 1 more state needs to ratify it.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:53 AM
1

There's a lot to unpack there and can't possibly reply to all of it. Yes some of the problems were the fault of democrats and the left. Similarly some are also the fault of conservatives and the right. It seems like you think things were better for men in the past. Is there a time period you can point to as being the best?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:27 AM
1

Conservatives don't support mens right in any way either. That's why I'm saying its not political. There is no candidate that explicitly supports mens rights. Closest social Democrat is Andrew Yang who is openly against circumcision.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:02 AM
46

Please don't make this needlessly political. Mens rights is a mens issue not a left vs right issue. I consider myself a socialist Democrat. Yet, magically, I support mens rights and believe forced circumcision is genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 07:29 AM
13

I've personally met people who have fringe mindsets. They exist and not just on Twitter. Example: man on flight who 100% believed Obama was not going to leave the presidency after his second term, and there would have to be war. Example: I was at jury duty. Got selected and we were being asked questions by the defense. Question: does anyone think this man is guilty just because he has been charged? Old lady: well if he's charged he has to be guilty of something. Example: another woman on the jur…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 09:17 PM
5

There's dozens of us! Dozens!
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 09:05 PM
16

He can improve. The question is whether he will ever realize that he can or should do that.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 12:03 AM
1

Man, way to dismisses all the content and insist on insulting someone... Good work there Lou.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:03 PM
1

Whay about when taking prison rape into account? Afaik that is a much higher number.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 10:06 PM
2

There are other reasons. Both genders tend to treat attractive people better in almost all situations. So fixing an isolated issue, like a really crooked nose, or receding chin, can arguably really not be targeted at specifically men.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:33 AM
4

Eh that's a stretch.. If someone dropped a "Women don't find this attractive" somewhere, it would be completely reasonable to respond, "nobody gives a shit" You're allowed to be offended by anything, so that's not really an argument.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 06:30 AM
-4

Colder temperatures negatively impact your immune response.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 05:03 AM
1

Dance class is better because you have to interact with women. You will need to communicate, and be in contact to partner dance. And you rotate every minute or two to a new partner, so you start breaking out of any anxiety pretty quick. It's like your own personal exposure therapy.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/19 07:56 PM
1

Get a social hobby where people go to meet eachother. Dancing is a really good one. Like salsa/bachata/kizomba. Worked for me. Go take a class and you'll keep coming back.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/19 11:19 PM
1

Ah. Capitalism' s a bitch.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 11:32 PM
1

A carpet what?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 10:55 PM
2

The last part I don't mind so much, regardless of if you call it communist, fascist, socialist, class warfare, baby puppy murdering universal income.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:43 PM
2

Walking through Dallas yesterday all the MAGA hats have been replaced with red hammer and cicle flags.. shame.. saaaaaaaddd.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 08:25 PM
1

Lets not make this political. I'm a leftist. I do not love deleting or rewriting history.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 08:06 PM
1

White male is a protected class. Two actually. Gender and race.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 11:35 PM
1

Got it
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:28 AM
1

I see your point.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:28 AM
7

That's why that is a bad retort. Preemptive mastectomy is an actual treatment for women with a high risk of breast cancer. As is removing any other body part with a high risk of killing you. There is, however, absolutely no reason to treat an infant for std's. An infant is not at risk for contracting an std.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 02:54 AM
54

Babies don't have sex. They don't need std protection. When he's old enough to have sex, he can wear a condom, and it won't involve surgically cutting off parts of his penis. Thats the retort to the std thing.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:24 AM
1

But that's not the list. Add "Listen to women" to the end of your list, and now it's kinda wtf ish.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 11:56 PM
1

It seems to happen in waves. Just report it as violating rule 0.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 11:44 PM
6

Or that they're sexually attracted to you vs your wallet.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 12:55 AM
5

Its illegal in California... and surprise the girls still go to the same clubs. Its just a way to get more money out of the people who were more likely to spend it anyway.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 07:44 AM
11

Some guys just want to opt out. That's entirely their choice. Let em have at it. More for me. Win win.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:05 AM
2

Soo... doesn't that make it worse since then he's almost certainly immature compared to her? That would definitely make her a pedophile, and not just based on age. She's having sex with a child. That's indefensible.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 07:18 AM
2

I agree with this, but at the same time if you're even remotely in favor of Men's rights I don't see how you could vote for the Feminist candidates coming out of the left, I mean did they really expect me to vote Hillary Clinton? I would've voted in a ham sandwich before that awful man-hating bigot. Yeah there's that too. Women have always been the primary victims of war. How the fuck do you get on top of the graves of millions of dead men who charged machine gun nests, got turned into pink mist…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 04:52 PM
3

I don't even understand how that makes sense. Getting pissed off at something is completely unrelated to being against warnings that tell someone that something might piss them off.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 05:50 AM
4

Thank you. I consider myself a liberal/democrat, high taxes on the upper brackets, etc. I support mens rights. Trying to make mens rights about being conservative is kinda bullshit. Men's rights is about men. Not politics. It should unite men across political ideologies.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 09:11 PM
1

Trigger warnings and safe spaces != being triggered by something. I've never seen anything against being triggered.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 09:02 PM
3

In the sidebar, there is an FAQ that directly addresses this. 5) If r/MR is not anti-female, why are there "Women Behaving Badly" articles? Western societies seem to believe that women are not violent or do not commit crimes. Reduced sentencing for women as compared to men and overwhelming evidence for gender parity in domestic violence with higher police records of male perpetrated domestic violence indicate that there is very much a view that men are "bad" and women are "good". Society accepts…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 07:01 PM
10

Nobody is denying that people, including men, can do shitty things. Shitty things should not continue to occur. The argument is that this commercial incorrectly places the focus on men as being solely responsible for bad things happening, and being solely responsible for stopping it. And that is all it shows. None of that is true.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 02:19 AM
15

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ag2qab/gillettes_new_commercial_but_with_women_instead Take a look at that and tell me if that would be demonizing women or progressing their attitude towards men.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:58 PM
24

The ad is hated because it demonizes men, not because men don't want to be listened to and be able to express themselves and their issues publicly. The hypocrisy is that the people who agree with the ad, when faced with men who are disagreeing with it publicly, are shaming them in exactly the kind of way the ad refers to as toxic.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:39 PM
32

He's pointing out the hypocrisy of the original comment.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 11:16 PM
13

It has nothing to do with cooler heads. It's about enforcing your will. I will not allow my child to be taken from me against my will. If that results in a shootout, so be it.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 12:31 AM
5

It is not a men's rights issue per se, but it segways into a mens rights issue. Feminism supports equal rights supposedly. Women have the right to decide whether or not they want to be a parent after conception. Men don't.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:48 PM
13

That sounds like a great relationship..
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:30 PM
20

She could literally have run away with his child and he would never have seen his baby again. That's an extremely reasonable situation in which to utilize deadly force to prevent harm from coming to you and your child and is a legitimate use of deadly force in self defence/ defence of others. It would have been a justifiable escalation.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 10:29 PM
4

Smell and taste also depend on the people involved. The taste when you kiss is your immune systems signaling how different they are from one another. The bigger the difference, the more pleasant the taste.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/18 07:02 PM
0

Wear boots and put inserts into them. It'll get you up 5'10" atleast. Try it and see if there's a difference. If not, you got other problems.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 04:13 PM
8

This is so true its stupid. The quality of life difference is insane. Its like going from poverty to someone making 100k a year. You can't have everything you want, but you can get some really nice shit.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 04:00 PM
1

That will damage your skin. Easiest way is just a pill once a day 5000IU of D3 once a day and it won't wrinkle your face or anything else you care about.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 03:54 PM
5

Modern medicine is concerned with preventing disease. That is very different from maximizing performance. Example: the difference between an adequate testosterone level, and the level you really want to have.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/18 03:42 PM
1

Jesus Christ did you actually read any of your own links? The first one presents absolutely no lies. Just a bunch of speculation about maybe she lied about the second door in her house so she could make an extra room in the house? That makes no goddamn sense. If it's a code violation, there's no excuse for it and it would be removed. Bringing it up in a public hearing would just be stupid. The second link about "significantly changing her story"... Are we on the same planet here? "She said it ha…
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:56 PM
1

He could have requested for a proper FBI investigation to take place. He chose not to for political reasons. I mean we already got that he shoved a pipe up his ass and had someone pour in beer, and that was just from his yearbook! I imagine it just gets worse from there. A proper investigation would ruin him.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 06:43 PM
4

With that logic you could post literally anything that applies to both sexes, as long as it is somehow related to an environment were men are discriminated against. I think this could be okay on a case by case basis. This post is a bit close to the cutoff though. Other good examples would be a post about how Florida has voted to return voting rights to felons who have served their time. It's gender neural, but it is a men's rights issue because most of those whose rights are affected are men.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 05:00 PM
17

While you're kinda right in that this post is overly eager, it's worth pointing out that this disproportionately affects men due to how they're discriminated against on the basis of their gender when it comes time to award custody.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 04:40 PM
2

You can even agree to pretend to be married externally for her to get the social benefits she wants and have a nice wedding, and brag to her friends with her giant diamond (Moissanite, cheap and even shinier) ring. Just don't get legally married, have paperwork showing that neither of you have agreed to legal marriage, to avoid accidentally getting common law'd.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/18 08:43 PM
-3

That's a rather big jump between "erasing fathers from homes" and "feminism was a mistake". It's possible for partners to be equal and share responsibilities that don't confirm to traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 06:47 PM
3

Lol. I did call it an exaggeration. If you want to consider it lying, you're welcome to do so. Though honestly, things like this are known exaggerations that aren't meant to be taken seriously. Like if someone gives you permission to full on punch them in the face, or shave their head if they lose a bet. Yeah you could do it, but you really shouldn't. https://youtu.be/Hsz8GjxzFx0
/r/MensRights08/12/18 08:16 PM
8

I do agree that it happened due to patriarchy. After all, men earned all the money and went to work, women worked at home. Men had to pay for the first date because they earned external income. But now that is no longer the case. Men don't earn all the money, and don't want to pay for the first date, but women still expect it. Although this is actively changing. It's funny you mention voting rights. The 100 year anniversary of men getting the right to vote recently passed for many countries too.…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:25 PM
0

Well, yup. That's one. As tragic as it is, that's equality and I wish the best for that couple they obviously care about eachother a lot. While you won't be seeing me eat socks (a fatal exaggeration on my part), you have shown me that women are perfectly capable of taking equal responsibility, even if it means potential death. Maybe we'll make the draft gender neutral in 10 years? On a personal note, I've also been seeing more things like this in my own life. Just women generally being more proa…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 07:07 PM
14

I don't think that's because of patriarchy. Women are a part of society, and society shapes expectations. There have been studies done which show that when men are benevolently sexist towards women, like paying for the first date, women like that and see those men as good and not sexist. When men don't do those things, women see that as sexism.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 06:38 PM
19

No like having people put their bodies infront of yours in a shooting? Or risking their lives to help you? Show me a story of a woman taking a bullet for her adult male partner, in the U.S., and ill put my socks into a blender and eat them. Women want equality right? Because you can find tons of stories of men dying to save their partners. There is no greater form of privilege than having people believe they are obligated to literally give their lives to protect you. That is a privilege women ha…
/r/MensRights08/12/18 05:29 PM
1

There are many feminists who hate the patriarchy but want their boyfriend to be daddy.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 09:39 PM
1

The word value is in there. And I'm not talking about changing market conditions. I'm talking about intentional legal deception. Like lying about your GPA, or your degree/ work experience for extra compensation. You're not creating any more value, but you are being compensated more.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 07:48 PM
2

What I'm getting at is that the market place can be manipulated to believe that your item is worth a variety of different values. The "correct" value ends up being dependent on who was more convincing. That's how you can end up finding a bargain, or getting ripped off, and this is something that is readily taken advantage of by market players. So you can produce value all you want, and then get ripped off. The end result being, that you produced something, and were not compensated accordingly, w…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 07:11 PM
3

Producing value does not mean that you will be compensated accordingly. There is a lot of work between production and compensation. How you handle that work will make the difference between having everything stolen from you (legally) or making far more money than your product is worth (also legally)
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 06:36 PM
4

That's not really true because not all costs and benefits are accounted for. For example, disposing waste normally has a cost, but with some creativity you can dump it in the lake for free without breaking any laws. You moved your cost over to someone or something else. The same can be done with revenue. You can get people to pay you more than what your product is reasonably worth by taking advantage of their lack of knowledge, gullibility, and also just outright lying to them about what your pr…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/18 06:11 PM
1

There are plenty of ways to perceive someone as more qualified. Most common way is looks. Good looking people get better jobs and make more money because they are generally perceived to be more competent.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 06:51 PM
1

You can get shoes that have a bigger heel, as well inserts to go in them. That can raise you 4 inches easily and you can see if it makes a difference.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/18 06:37 PM
6

If you're actually an average guy, yes you can do it in a year. If you're worse it's going to take longer. It took me 4 years. 4 surgeries + invisalign + working out the whole time.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/18 06:35 PM
62

I think this subreddit also functions as a support group for men, and this is a "you dads are important and your children care about you" post. Which goes part way in helping men feel like they, and their lives, actually matter to someone.
/r/MensRights30/11/18 05:56 PM
2

Now name another form of birth control for men.. (abstinence doesn't count)
/r/MensRights30/11/18 12:34 AM
2

To be fair, id also jump off a bridge if there were no consequences. Admitting this does not make me suicidal.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 11:49 PM
2

Most polygraphs are limited in scope and are only for counterintelligence. The won't ask you if you're really gay or not. It would be extremely inappropriate. Not to mention, you're allowed to lie, just not to them. And they don't care you got your job pretending to be gay.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 04:44 PM
2

Maybe get her long form birth certificate?
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:53 PM
7

Men do protest. They just do it when it's really necessary, and they bring their guns with them. It happens often enough historically.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 07:01 PM
1

Yes it is. I've had several surgeries. After nerves are cut, you will lose sensation. Then, over the course of about 6 months, nerves will grow several millimeters, potentially reconnecting, and if not, extending their reach just a bit giving sensation to scar tissue.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 05:29 PM
4

After circumcision, nerves will grow into the scar tissue so there will still be some sensation, and orgasm can still happen, but you do lose sensation. Its the same reason that women who have undergone FGM, such as clitoral removal, will still have sensation and can orgasm. You can look up videos of them saying this. They say exactly the same things circumcised men say. It's kinda disturbing.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 08:45 PM
1

Because there are some amazing women out there who are rich and pretty, and would never abort. Getting one pregnant is as much a meal ticket as a woman marrying up to a man of equally higher caliber. It basically bullshit flowing the other direction.
/r/MensRights26/11/18 07:32 AM
-3

Politics will always have stupid shit that has no place or meaning other than to defame someone while deliberately omitting favorable information. Just turn on fox news for 30 seconds. You need to be capable of defending yourself, pointing out fallacies while making them sound powerful and meaningful, while making your opponent look small and a liar. Kavanaugh had the opportunity to do that. He failed, and his appointment will always be marred by it.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 07:47 PM
3

It also riled up democrats who took back the house with a large majority. But you conveniently left that out. Also, Kavanaugh's performance at the hearing was awful. He had an opportunity to present himself as a capable justice, cool under pressure, honest and well educated, and capable of handling politics. What did we get instead? Him ranting about beer. I LIKE BEER. I'VE ALWAYS LIKED BEEER.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:37 PM
5

? Female circumcision is traditionally practiced in a number of countries for reasons that are similar to the ones given for male circumcision. The most common form of female circumcision is cutting off the top part of the clitoral hood, which is basically the foreskin of the clitoris. Everything else remains intact. Even though in the West it's considered mutilation, it's less harmful than male circumcision, since male circumcision usually involves cutting away the frenulum, which is the area m…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 06:54 PM
21

This need to be the motto of something.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:57 PM
9

No its not. Female circumcision is considered genital mutilation, and so should male circumcision. (especially since the male version is more harmful)
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:54 PM
10

I don't believe there is a medical issue for babies that can be resolved by circumcision unless they're literally born with foreskin cancer or something. The most common of uncommon problems, phimosis, is not diagnosible until puberty.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:51 PM
0

Ah, a Trump fan who read 'The Prince' last week. Good luck.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 08:23 PM
0

Unless you're claiming to know for a fact whether he did or didn't sexually assault Ford, you literally can't know whether it was a lie or misinformation. Though it was definitely a shitshow. That shitshow was entirely Kavanaugh's fault. He was put on trial in the court of public opinion. He had an opportunity to present himself as a capable justice, cool under pressure, honest and well educated, and capable of handling politics. What did we get instead? BEEEEEEEEEER. I LIKE BEER. I'VE ALWAYS LI…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:09 PM
1

Can you provide some substance to your accusations that the left is built on lies and misinformation?
/r/MensRights12/11/18 05:49 PM
9

It would be optional once you are an adult or have a diagnosed medical condition for which circumcision is a treatment. Similar to how a labiaplasty is female genital mutilation if done on a minor, but a simple cosmetic procedure when done on a consenting adult.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 06:58 PM
5

Those are the same thing. You treat people for their injuries even if they were the result of the commission of a crime.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:23 PM
4

Because we don't live in an eye for an eye society. Now, it's possible she could get the death penalty for her crime, but that is for a court to decide. Not you or i.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:53 PM
5

I'm not arguing about consequences. She received her consequence. Stab someone, get shot. Fair enough. I'm arguing about treating someone for an injury, while you're suggesting she not be treated and left to die . She should be treated and criminally charged.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:58 PM
6

That's just barbaric.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 05:43 PM
2

It's partially a men's issue because it largely impacts men. Its also a few other issues.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 05:30 PM
1

That's why UBI is a good idea.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 05:02 PM
5

Which is basically what he said... doing that for the ladies. I dunno. I enjoy foreplay and flirting because it's fun. I'm not doing it for someone else. Dancing is just a medium for it.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/18 09:18 PM
11

Lol. You have no idea what you're missing out on. Look up sensual bachata. Its basically foreplay right after you lead the girl out to the dance floor.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/18 08:08 PM
-1

I think he's saying that the Google doodle was an advertisement. It was meant to advertise Google. Representing the reality of the actual participants is unattractive to their targets in the same way that representing the reality of people who wear swimsuits (which would include obese women) would be unattractive. Which kinda makes sense. Doesn't mean we can't bitch about it on the internet though.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:35 PM
19

Technically correct. However, I think the intent of men's rights is not just legal rights, or equal enforcement of laws. It is also equal treatment and accurate representation in our society, and although that is not a right, it is something to work towards.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 04:00 PM
2

Its technically battery, which is a crime.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 05:15 PM
3

You should be able to hold your finger to the screen over the text and the "copy" button will show up. Or, a highlighted selection will show up. Then expand it to over the text you want to copy, let go, and press copy.
/r/MensRights17/10/18 05:26 PM
10

You should ask this question on r/legaladvice
/r/MensRights17/10/18 04:40 PM
1

The reason she waited was because it was a political move that was coordinated to cause the greatest amount of harm to both the Republican party and Cavanaugh's confirmation. She probably came to a democratic party representative months ago, and this plan was set in motion. Why do that instead of going to the police? Because of the statute of limitations, no criminal investigation/prosecution can take place. So it wouldn't matter. This was the best way forward for her. And besides, the FBI inves…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 04:10 PM
1

What makes you say it was a false accusation? It seems like a legitimate accusation.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 07:27 PM
1

Ah, you're right about that.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 03:21 AM
1

If the United States ratifies the treaty the ROTC has to go away because it is a government paramilitary organization that trains in drills, rifle actions and partakes in field trips to military installations, who's ultimate goal is military recruitment. This would violate the treaty's provision against training/using child soldiers. Children are gullible and don't understand what they're signing up for. The ROTC makes it easier to recruit soldiers when they've already been trained into it as ch…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 09:56 PM
1

As you can see in the table, the first convention was not ratified.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:24 PM
1

The U.S. never signed the treaty. Partly because they would have to get rid of the ROTC.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 04:17 PM
2

It depends on how well the nerves heal afterwards, but it will still be worse.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 04:03 PM
1

Yup those would be ones that have a place in an article. Honestly, those dont seem like anything you can drive a truck through. Lots off people are afraid of airplanes, but fly anyway. Or say hi/ wave to people they want nothing to do with for the sake of politeness in public.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:51 AM
1

If quoting the rules doesn't do it for you, nothing will. Good luck to you too. Here, you can have your passive aggressive questionmark back. "?"
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 02:42 AM
2

Man. The idea of not insulting people you're conversing with is not something discovered recently. It improves quality, content, and let's people take you seriously. You don't have to listen to me. You're welcome to rant about libtards and snowflakes and dick-whatever's. It just makes you look like a fool, and violates rule 5 of this subreddit. Do not insult or harass members. Posts & Comments Debate the ideas, not the person. If you have a point to be made, make it with well reasoned rationale.…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 12:22 AM
2

This article makes fantastic claims about how Ford's testimony had holes you could drive a truck through and then does a great job of NOT MENTIONING ANY OF THEM. It just talks about how outraged the author is. Great. I don't give a flying fuck about the author or their opinion of the media. What are the actual holes in the testimony? Bueler?
/r/MensRights03/10/18 06:16 PM
2

Lol. You're the reason we can't have mature discussion.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/18 04:54 PM
1

You're right, but there's no reason to resort to name calling. In a no bullshit forum, that's just bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/18 06:07 AM
6

5.5% is the amount of confirmed false accusations where evidence shows it to be false, like In this case. So the actual number is higher. In March 2017 a new study on the prevalence of false rape allegations in the United States, for the period 2006–2010, was published on the Journal of Forensic Psychology. The goal of the research was to obtain recent figures of the prevalence of unfounded allegations of rape and compare to unfounded allegations of other crimes. According to the data provided b…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 04:17 PM
0

It definitely is political manipulation. However, having watched the hearings, he was lying. He did it, and he's upset that it has come to bite him in the ass now.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/18 05:12 PM
1

See: https://www.reddit.com/r/announcements/comments/9jf8nh/revamping_the_quarantine_function
/r/askTRP28/09/18 09:27 PM
3

It's been quarantined. You can still get to it but have to jump some hoops. You have to enter it directly in the browser bar.
/r/askTRP28/09/18 08:31 PM
2

Well said. Just to add.. It is entirely possible to have a mentor style friendship with an older person. Its also possible to be actual friends if the maturity levels are similar even if the ages aren't. The problem is also that a lot of people can't seem to separate friendship and sexual relationship. You say, me and this 27 year old are friends, or me and this 16 year old are friends and all anyone seems to hear is "we're fucking, and I'm telling you about it"
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:36 PM
1

He can sue the woman for defamation, damages, and legal fees.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 04:10 PM
1

Stay alive to be tortured and have a chance to escape? (Lets equate it to getting 5 lashes per day (lashes are pretty brutal btw)) Or be killed immediately.. What would you choose?
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:30 PM
5

Women behaving badly posts are here to show that women are also capable of doing bad things. This counteracts the idea that only men are, or can be, villains.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 05:00 PM
1

Another zinger! Pew pew.
/r/MensRights21/09/18 12:08 AM
1

Dude you have to learn when to stop talking. It is not meant to be an insult. It is an important skill. You can be right and still lose because you are not in a situation where people are willing to listen to you or acknowledge your arguments for a variety of reasons. Social, political, religious, cultural etc.. Learn to recognize when it's better for you to say nothing and allow the situation to be forgotten.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 10:20 PM
4

Ooh FBLie! Haha good one... reminds me of when I was 12 again.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 09:50 PM
1

deadly steroids That's an unnecessary exaggeration.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 05:18 PM
1

You're right. It is not for certain that this is gender discrimination. I wonder what made them think there was a hygiene issue though? Time to wait and see how it plays out.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 03:45 PM
0

Not that aspect. Even among male sex workers most of their clients are other men. I mean if the genders were reversed and most of the clientele were women and not men, I recon this seisure would not have taken place. The raid took place over moral outrage at men expressing their sexuality towards silicone. Which is the same moral outrage expressed at men who use sex toys. This moral outrage does not exist towards women.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 07:36 PM
1

I think it's a partnership of equals and my relationships reflect that. Its so pleasant to be in a relationship when the other person does half the work and you alternate taking each other out on dates.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 05:31 PM
0

Because it wouldn't be happening if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights17/09/18 05:18 PM
29

This is somewhat of a meme at this point. Like if you go to r/motorcycles and see a video of a car backing up into a stationary motorcycle.. the top comment will be a sarcastic reply about how obviously the motorcycle driver was going way too fast and is the one at fault. Its a meme. The origin of the sarcastic reply you're replying to is an ad about how 25% of the homeless are women and urging immediate action to help them. Obviously ignoring the demographic that is in much greater need of that…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 05:11 PM
2

Have you seen that "25% of homeless are women! We need to help them!" Yeah. That would cause anger. Many women's programs tend to be like that. Domestic violence, rape, suicide. Help women. Don't give a fuck about men.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 04:05 PM
1

The problem is that workers have very little power on their own. If they don't have a job they will ultimately starve, and will do it much quicker than their employer. So the idea of not accepting employment contracts you don't like is valid, but is also very one sided. Someone who needs a job can't afford to be picky. That is something employers have taken advantage of. Sometimes to their own detriment, like high turnover, theft of intellectual property, whether it be production methods or cust…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 04:10 PM
2

Now we're into government mandate territory. There's lots of things that are mandated which can really be optional. Health insurance, overtime, right to unionize, safety standards. Why should they be mandated? Why not let an employer decide? Those things are mandated because they are considered essential. I believe parental leave fits that category and should be mandated. An employer should not have a say in it in exactly the same way they don't have a say in the other cases.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:56 PM
-5

Honestly, I would expect a mature woman to call you out and make fun of you for it by treating you like a teenager too. Maybe you'll get your lunch packed in a brown paper bag. Consisting of a ham and cheese sandwich, an apple, and a note .. "Enjoy Sweetie! Love you! "
/r/TheRedPill21/08/18 06:33 PM
6

That's a very hard line reply. Women aren't children. If you treat them as such they will act like it. If you treat them as adults, where actions have consequences, they tend to actually act like adults. (Keeping in mind that all adults make mistakes, and nobody is perfect)
/r/TheRedPill21/08/18 06:03 PM
2

This is the wrong approach. Having children is essential to humanity. Firing people, specifically women for doing it, just shifts the burden of working to men, and places women at home to raise the kids. The correct approach is parental leave for both men and women when they have a child. This mostly equalizes the burden and lets both parents spend time with the child and get back to work quicker. If someone is child free, then they should receive benefits for never having taken their leave.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:22 PM
1

Would you support censorship of a comedy show where a woman has her vagina cut out and everyone is laughing at it? Like.. lol sucks to be you lady.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:11 PM
2

Disingenuous is not a magic word that makes you right. And you're still using it to avoid the question. You're actually being the one who is not honest or sincere, and pretending to know more about something than you actually do.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:13 PM
2

Don't avoid the question. You're communicating nonsense. Disingenuous is not a magic word that makes you right. You know exactly what I said. Admit you have no idea what you're talking about, or answer the question. What does socialism have to do with this?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:29 AM
2

What does socialism have to do with this? You may as well have referred to it as fascism or nazism because it makes just as much sense. Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. Now please tell me what the fuck rigging test scores based on sexist assertions has to do with socialism.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:23 PM
5

The question regarding female circumcision is incredibly relevant and not disingenuous. You are attempting to weasel out of a difficult question. By your logic it should be legal. Do you agree? And while it isn't the parents doing the cutting, that does not change the unnecessary nature of it. It is barbaric and I can't respect professional doctors who perform it. And yes, homeschooling, and private schooling, can yield diplomas. It is just the free public schools that become off limits.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 07:04 PM
3

You believe that citizens have a right to unnecessarily cut their baby children for any reason they like? Because that's what male circumcision is in nearly all cases. Additionally, female circumcision should also be legal by your logic. What if I don't like the clitoral hood on my baby girl? Should I just have a doctor cut that little piece of skin off? Regarding immunization, I don't think people should be forced into it, but given the risks to others, the current methods of preventing access …
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:38 PM
1

There are some things that should be strictly legal or illegal because they are irreversible or have affects on others. Immunization is a good example. And circumcision is another one. There are limits to what you can do to your children after they're born. They are not your property to do with as you please even if a lot of parents think that's the case.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 06:18 PM
2

Aww crap.. Dawkins wrote that one.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:33 PM
2

I noticed that too. I like a lot of his stuff, even have a book he wrote, the god delusion, but he was not able to answer difficult questions in debates sometimes. Which is okay. The problem is how he went about it. Most times, admitting he did not know would have been acceptable but he had to try and weasel out of it. Everyone noticed.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:43 PM
2

Wait did that actually pass?
/r/MensRights09/08/18 05:35 PM
2

But you don't get banned for disagreeing and having a conversation. Anyone is welcome to come here and argue their point without personal attacks.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:22 PM
2

A lot of people don't understand the concept of debate the idea, not the man. That actually supports your point, but it's important to note that the idea would still be the same even if Hitler said it, and you should be capable of addressing it without resorting to personal attacks against the individual.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 04:16 PM
2

It means we hate women more than we hate blacks! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
/r/MensRights01/08/18 05:08 PM
8

Not if the kid isn't yours.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 08:28 PM
17

You cannot be forced to put your name on a birth certificate.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 08:09 PM
2

He is In a sense just by noticing that the situation is fucked up when nobody else seems to. I'd say that counts for something.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/18 05:36 PM
0

That's because it's all they have left. That doesn't make it the meaning of life. Just the meaning of most human's end of life years.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 03:07 PM
2

The meaning of your life is what you make it.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:49 PM
1

Have you tried reading the sidebar? Challenge your assumptions one day.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 07:43 PM
6

Depends on how good you want to get. If you go all out, it will teach you a lot more than just leading on the dance floor. But it is expensive and takes time and practice. 500/month and about 6 months at a ballroom studio. You can do street style studios and be alright though for about 1/5 of the price. It doesn't matter if it doesn't come naturally. It becomes natural and fluid with practice.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/18 06:26 AM
42

Try salsa/bachata clubs. The women there tend to be better but you need to know how to actually dance.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/18 08:31 PM
7

Disable wifi calling on your phone though, as it sometimes screws up with those and won't record those calls.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/18 07:03 PM
2

Have you considered filling a police report? She committed assault and battery with plenty of witnesses.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:28 PM
79

It helped his grades.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 03:20 PM
14

Seems like it was covered in a humane and sensible way. (Though I have not seen much of it) I look forward to future coverage being equally clean and unbiased.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 08:51 PM
3

The view you have of yourself, justified or not.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/18 04:52 PM
5

By some other people, yes, but they're not usually the successful type.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/18 07:00 PM
6

There is a contraceptive called vasagel which will be a gel injected into the tube leading from the testicles. The gel hardens and prevents sperm from passing. This lasts at least 10 years. When the man decides he wants to have children, an enzyme is injected which dissolves the gel, and returns his fertility. This has been successfully tested in apes for years and is moving to human trials.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:47 PM
2

That's just a reasonable person view. Nothing to do with mgtow.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 05:55 PM
3

Why do they make a claim of reverse discrimination instead of just discrimination? That's just strange.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 03:11 PM
7

They were granted amnesty and returned.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:44 PM
7

So gun ownership causes suicide?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 10:11 PM
1

The harder part is mental. Not eating is a physically easy task. Bodybuilders who are leaning out call it a fork put down.. as in put down the fork.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:40 PM
2

It can be mentally difficult to start and continue. There is no argument there. Genetic and medical conditions can impact the difficulty. Ultimately it is a measure of willpower and how badly you want to be healthier and more attractive. Some people have it easier than others, but it ultimately comes down to you.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 04:24 PM
6

You literally provided less than nothing, responded with nothing, and then claimed to be a righteous winner. You should run for president.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:37 PM
1

Nothing which isn't reversible with diet and/or exercise. Even disabled, metabolism handicapped people have no excuse to be obese. Put the fork down and you'll lose weight.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:26 PM
2

You made the claim. If you know of a condition, state it.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:16 PM
3

There is no medical condition where eating less than what your body needs will cause you to gain weight. You only gain weight by eating more than what you need.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 03:08 PM
1

Lol an n count of 40-50 is plenty high. The vast majority of people will never go past 10.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/18 03:37 PM
6

A theory is something that has a metric ton of evidence behind it, and is accepted as a result. There is no higher lever of acceptance. Gravity, evolution, basic Newtonian physics, are all theories.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/18 03:35 PM
1

Assets belong to their in individual owners.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/18 05:04 PM
1

Only for criminal stuff. CS is a grey area.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/18 04:58 PM
17

I would say it is also a men's issue, since these kinds of occurrences shape mens perceptions of right and wrong. But it's also a womens issue. This is probably a good example of "toxic femininity" if there is such a thing.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 03:34 PM
2

Why doesn't he file a police report with the actual police and not the university police?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 06:28 PM
3

Isn't part of the fee calculated by how long the trip takes? Or am I making that up..
/r/MensRights23/03/18 03:25 PM
1

It is a barrier to entry. If you can't make it past, nothing you do matters. If you can, that's when the fun starts.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/18 10:17 PM
5

No excuses needed. I thought you were as eloquent as needed to be to make the point. He might be butthurt.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/18 10:16 PM
2

If you're still in high school and gonna go to college you need to fix that. It will not work there. Waaaaay too mad by people learn this the hard way. Concepts are less intuitive, less time is devoted to them, and there are a lot more of them. You cannot just pay attention in class and get away with it. Maybe for the first year if you're really good at it, but as you start getting into 300 lvl classes, you will start failing and won't graduate in 4 years. Trust me, your GPA will thank both of u…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/18 10:13 PM
1

There are network engineers that basically do that after a company completely fucks up.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/18 10:04 PM
0

There is a reddit about a man who just did not acknowledge a woman at a bar and she glassed him causing grievous bodily harm. Whom do you suggest we teach what? I left the gender ambiguous because my suggestions apply to both. Men and women can both get into these situations. Socially, women don't tell men what they want, they don't respond to direct questions about what they want, and this non-verbal clue stuff is requirement for mindreading. This relates to my second point. You are inexperienc…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 09:43 PM
1

Not really. Have you ever been in a situation where an aggressive salesperson got you to buy something you weren't that interested in even after you declined one way or another? Yeah, you should have known better but you didn't. You were immature and unprepared for the real world and got taken advantage of. That's why laws exist to allow you to return these kinds of items within some time period. Unfortunately there's no way to "return" sex, so were stuck in this grey area of not knowing the bes…
/r/MensRights22/03/18 08:59 PM
1

Yes it would. What you consider to be average and what is actually average are not the same. Your average man or woman is overweight and on the verge of obesity, for example. And makes 30k per year. So imagine their living conditions and how they look. Next time you go to a DMV, that is an accurate representation of the pool of people you're choosing from.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 12:03 AM
1

To be fair, next time you're in a room with at least 20 people, count how many of them you'd be willing to have sex with.. especially the men. Only about 20-30% of people are palatable.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 09:48 PM
8

They don't stab your dick. The needle goes into your nutsack and into the tubes going from your testes. There will be something for the pain but I imagine it will still be like getting vaccinated but into your balls... ill take that over 18 years of child support.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 08:43 PM
1

Controversial opinion incoming... it's not fatherlessness... its weakness in parenting. Both genders can fall victims to being passive in their approach to life.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:37 PM
6

Linking reality would be more insulting I think.. Cora Miriam, Cora Segal or Cora Gales.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 07:19 PM
15

Aren't most of the people on this sub pro rape? What could possibly give you that idea? Or is that just the once who are also into red pill / seduction bullshit? Men like and want to connect with women and vise versa. There is no traditional way to learn how to do this when you want to besides trial and error. Even the desire to want to learn to be social with women/men is somehow seen as there necessarily being something wrong with you. This naturally degrades into a lot of suffering and confus…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:26 PM
76

There is a difference between disagreement and a bashing. If I call Donald Trump a dumpster fire, that's bashing him, and would not be any better. If I call his policies a dumpster fire, and then point out what the actual problem is with them, that's a disagreement. The OP criticizes and points out problems with feminism and SJW's. That's fair game and they should be criticized when they're wrong and hurting people/society as a whole. The problem is that their tactics are working, they are hurti…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:51 PM
64

Not the part where an organization opened called the girl scouts which does not allow men into the group while simultaneously campaigning against the boy scouts becoming a men only group again. Apparently girls need a space with only other women. And boys don't need a space with only men. They need to be inclusive.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:43 PM
43

The boy scouts in the US
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:26 PM
188

Because it points out problems with a movement that wants to eradicate men's rights. Feminism is not, and has not been a friend of men's rights. There's nothing wrong in pointing that out.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:24 PM
4

I think OP meant rights that to mens benefit
/r/MensRights16/02/18 08:57 PM
6

I wouldn't say that's the best part. The best part is that men got to spend time with their newborn children, just like their partners have been getting, finally. Their partner being happier because of that is a great side benefit.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 01:30 AM
1

Title IX I believe.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:49 AM
1

Can you link the original source? I would like to save it along with the links in the image. That took a lot of work to put together.
/r/MensRights16/02/18 12:46 AM
-2

It wasn't really an exchange, more of a prompted delivery on his part, but I maintain that it was great regardless.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:18 PM
-3

Call me insane, but i thought that was an awesome interview that was well handled by both of them. Her questions did not always seem sensible, especially when she would try to misconstrue his words, but they did seem like feminist talking points, which was good because it allowed us to all see him skillfully beat them back. Lastly, she wasn't an idiot. Her talking points and segways weren't the best partially I think because she is trying to represent her viewers perhaps, but she is a skillful, …
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:54 PM
2

But it didn't hinder any either. The only reason this is newsworthy is because their flight path resembles a human sexual organ and that is a taboo thing in U.S. society. If it resembled something unrecognizable, it would not be worthy of discussion.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:53 PM
3

OP, you were off topic. If someone posted a fantasy where a girl cuts both her legs off for her boyfriend for kinky sex, it would be a legitimate topic for that sub, despite it being a bad idea in many ways to cut both your legs off just because your boyfriend wants you to.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:12 PM
2

They were training and flying regardless. They could have flown in a straight line, a circle, or penis.. they chose the penis.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 04:07 PM
1

Generally.. Rape involves penetration/intercourse with a sexual organ utilizing the penis and vagina. Sexual assault is any other unwanted touching of a sexual nature. So if you grab her pussy? Sexual assault. She grabs your dick? Sexual assault.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 03:59 PM
14

It is absolutely not illegal to take pictures of people in public. You have no privacy there. It is also not illegal to post them. EDIT In the U.S.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/17 11:41 PM
1

I just want to add that you don't have to be a narcissist because you're probably confusing narcissism with a healthy focus on your own goals and priorities. Focusing on yourself, pursuing your own goals, and making decisions that benefit you at someone else's expense (just not drastically so) is not narcissism. It is healthy. It's just that many men have been raised to be selfless and see any amount of focusing on yourself as being narcissism.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/17 03:01 PM
1

As far as attraction goes, there is a gray area where she doesn't go either way, and the attraction will depend heavily on what you do. This is usually the case if you are a 6/10 in her mind.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 10:39 PM
4

She may have made her mind up in terms of being attracted to you, and physically wanting to have sex with you, but there may be other issues keeping her from doing it, like loyalty to her bf, or other principles.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 03:55 PM
1

If you offer commitment... yes.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/17 03:10 PM
1

Wouldn't that be a good reason to give them the vaccine either way?
/r/MensRights04/11/17 10:04 PM
1

I got one myself. Totally worth it. Next one will be for lowering the hairline and having a densely packed front. Also, look into Caboki. Great product.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 08:58 PM
1

The bald look is not for everyone. For every guy who can rock being bald and jacked, there's 2 more who look like white supremacists. You have to find what works for you.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 08:55 PM
1

He isn't even lean. His cheeks are full. Probably 20% body fat. His looks would improve a good amount once he hits 13%
/r/TheRedPill23/10/17 07:02 PM
3

Talking to women != constant validation and orbiting. Believe it or not, some of us actually have rewarding platonic friendships with some women, rewarding sexual relationships with other women, and sometimes both. None involving any validation or orbiting. Work on your social skills, your sexual/physical desirability, and put yourself into social settings with other people once you're worth a damn, and you too can have friends and get laid... by talking to and hitting on women!
/r/MensRights19/10/17 03:30 PM
1

Yeah, his friends love him, and others think he's a douche.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/17 03:49 PM
9

The way to make it more attractive to women is to make it a place that attracts high quality men. You don't attract high quality men by making them pay to get in.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 05:01 PM
14

This is illegal in California... and yet the women still go.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 04:44 PM
9

But he can head butt you from across the room!
/r/TheRedPill02/10/17 08:22 PM
1

What is your body fat percentage?
/r/TheRedPill29/09/17 09:16 PM
3

Do you go to people's archived Facebook pictures? Or archived anything else? This is about removing traces from casual observers.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/17 06:28 PM
13

Watch the complaints go through the roof once vasagel comes out. It will be an interesting time to watch.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:25 PM
4

I don't think you understand. The punchline is supposed to be a joke.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/17 05:31 PM
3

I honestly want to print it out. It's eloquent too.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/17 05:01 PM
2

Having a nice hairline vs awkward balding at 17. Maxing out at 4'11''. Being obese. Showering once a month. Are worse than having crooked teeth. Having said that, you should work on all your issues at once and min max yourself.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 06:05 PM
19

Best place ive found is sala/bachata venues. Its a place for the sole purpose of interacting with others, because you have to dance with a partner. Things like solitary groups of friends, girls who only dance with each other, and couples are at a minimum. And you can usually identify couples by how much one of them is clutching on to the other. Find a girl, dance. If you still like her a minute or so in, tell her nonverbally by squeezing her hand. If she signals back, you're good to go. Make you…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/17 03:55 PM
2

Don't know why you're being downvoted. Maybe it's an unpopular opinion? "Friend zone" is just "I like talking and/or hanging out with you, but even though I'm available, I don't find you sexually (Physically) attractive enough to fuck you" zone. Girls get friend zoned by guys too, for being sexually unattractive. It is not at all a men's issue. Its more of a society/sexual education issue.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:26 PM
4

11.) If you take a hit of acid and then stare at the clouds long enough, they clearly form the words “78 CENTS ON THE DOLLAR.” Seems reasonable to me..
/r/MensRights05/09/17 05:06 PM
7

Yeah.. it'll put me off from eating at this Wendy's.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 09:02 PM
79

That's a big part of what bathrooms are for.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 08:15 PM
5

Many men do that too. They will be fat, balding with no potential, spending all their free time playing video games and think women should like them for who they are... but only pretty women.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 01:26 PM
1

If you can manage to eat nothing but beans for protein for 3 years up to 130g of protein per day i will eat my shorts. Otherwise i will stick to my multi flavored protein shakes which will be cheaper per serving that your likely mixed protein diet. I actually tried incorporating beans into my diet.. it didn't last long. Otherwise, i just use 2 or 3 protein shakes per day to get up to the number i need on any given day.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:32 AM
1

go over to r/fitness and ask there, they will be more than helpful.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:06 PM
1

Protein shakes are for protein. If you can find a cheaper source of protein that you can distribute, go start your company and make millions.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 08:44 PM
22

Yes. Because, and correct me if I'm wrong here, although the poster itself no longer exists, the idea that it communicates is still the majority opinion in popular media and even law. That men are always responsible, and women are always victims. As such, it should be discussed to death.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 08:44 PM
29

How is it interrupting the circlejerk? The link just says that, yes, it was a legitimate poster that was actually distributed for a short period of time.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 08:00 PM
-1

There's a reason he's a beta. He is incapable of actually doing shit and following through. Those 38's are gonna stay exactly where they are while he jerks it at home to his white knight fantasies. The only thing that's gonna get triggered are his suicidal tendencies.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/17 06:58 PM
9

You're more likely to get hit by a car when crossing the street. But that's not gonna stop you from crossing it.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/17 06:39 PM
7

Didn't she only sure for 1$? How is she a gold digger here?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 01:51 PM
10

Just like the pirate bay.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:51 PM
1

Partners are usually provided and are rotated every few minutes. Its a really good social activity sand a way to get comfortable touching people you don't know. Be aware, there will also be women there who are doing the same thing you are. That is, women who are just there to "touch boys". Because boys otherwise don't want to touch them for reasons they don't understand, but which you will. It is an oddly humbling experience.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/17 03:29 PM
1

You set a fine example of what the uniform represents. Now I understand.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 10:18 PM
1

Oh boy, bringing out the big guns and calling people names on the internet. When I grow up, I want to be just like you. So you think the "attraction" is based on the realization that the person has valuable personality traits, based on the uniform they are wearing? And that attraction is not sexual?
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 05:21 PM
1

I picked a girl up at Wendy's once when I was working as a cashier. She told me she likes guys in uniform. Do you really think a girl looks at a uniform and says "Damn that guy really works hard to help people, why don't I suck his dick so he knows I appreciate him.." ?
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 05:02 PM
7

Your skin is a protective barrier that stops many things. Your insides are not nearly as well protected. The stomach acid and enzymes will digest you from the inside out just like it does the meat you eat.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 06:12 PM
3

Therefore we should expect it from feminists and criticize feminists for it. No need to convolute the topic further by adding additional groups.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:06 PM
5

That's just feminists ignoring men's issues as they always do.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:54 PM
5

Truly insightful comment.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:41 PM
4

What does this have to do with liberals? Let's not make this political.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:36 PM
4

She's not interested and has demonstrated that she doesn't know how to respond properly and reject you. Pushing the issue will not give you any answers. Move on to other prospects.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/17 08:31 PM
1

I don't think he's saying it makes him alpha by association. He's saying that the drama lures people here, and as a result, more people are exposed to the actually legitimate topics discussed, which results in faster natural growth of the community. It's a bait and switch.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/17 06:56 PM
15

Also keep in mind that there are things you can do to change your looks. Regardless of if your looks are gimped because of nature or nurture, don't discount cosmetic procedures to improve your looks after you've done what you can by upgrading your style and your body. If most clothes don't look good on you after you're 12% bf ... It's probably your face and you're in denial.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/17 05:15 PM
3

Dancing is great and you skip the middle man and go straight for the girls.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/17 07:47 PM
5

Help me out here because I missed the part where they talk about how a change gender effects the perception of the accused. Seems like they're being treated similar to how a man would be when accused of rape. People just seem to accept it without reading past the headline.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:15 PM
6

He also wanted to burn off the clitoris after birth. But that little tidbit didn't become tradition.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:01 PM
–

And sometimes they try to touch you and make sexual jokes... Lady you're fucking 400lbs, I'd be flattered but I'm distracted by the fact that you're sweaty after a 2 minute walk. Now I feel compelled to wash this shirt.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/17 06:01 PM
2

So your retort is to insult him without addressing his point? Nice one.
/r/MensRights20/06/17 03:33 PM
8

Do you know about the downsides of circumcision? Here's something I wrote up earlier. https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/6fzsvx/feds_up_to_100_girls_may_have_had_their_genitals/dimmrov
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:57 PM
5

To some extent, there does need to be some focus on directly going after what you want. Being qualified is one aspect. You still need to apply or be seen to be approached. I definitely agree that self improvement is an absolute prerequisite. You need to be good enough first. Otherwise you're just the creepy guy that makes all the women uncomfortable by virtue of them knowing you exist in a 20 ft radius.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/17 03:27 PM
8

Just in case you're not being sarcastic. What you just said is hamstering that doesn't address or invalidate anything I said, but it is unfortunately common thinking that seems like some sort of answer, that in reality is actually meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 03:59 PM
22

Dude, that other guy has no relationship to you, or any responsibility to help you maintain your relationships. That was you and your partners responsibility and you both failed and she is the one who betrayed you. Blaming some other guy makes no sense.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/17 03:35 PM
9

What is the difference? There are types that are equivalent, so which are you talking about?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:18 PM
2

Presumably, it is ultimately in their best interests to be conscripted, fight and potentially die, or fight and potentially survive and rebuild, than it is to be conquered. But that really depends on what the consequences of being conquered are. If the consequence of being conquered is death, then enslavement under conscription with the above possible two options is a better alternative. You would think in that scenario people would rise up and fight, but you cant always trust people to act rati…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:48 AM
2

Conscription is always needed. If there is a large war, and the sovereignty and existence of a country is at stake, and is dependent on having combat capable troops, where volunteers are insufficient, those troops will be drafted from the civilian population. That is an inevitable need that cannot be ignored.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:00 AM
3

But then it isn't ghosting. She's just continuing to reach out after you've notified her that you're out.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/17 02:51 PM
8

Don't forget maximizing your looks. Lifting gets you muscle, but you still need to lean out to not be fat. And ofcourse all the other aesthetic changes like haircut, clothes.. etc.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/17 09:45 PM
8

Ive actually made it a point to check the google pictures a of restaurant to make sure they have side by side seating if i haven't been there before.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/17 03:31 AM
19

Dude.. ballroom is awesome, and salsa is a ballroom dance! If you want to be truly good, and be a fantastic lead, ballroom is your friend. I've been doing it for 6 months and honestly it deserves it's own post. The ways you can apply being a good lead to things outside of dancing, like leading a girl to the bar, or to kiss you, or to your bed, or any damn else where you want is awesome. Leading is like asking without asking. If she wants to go, she will follow.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/17 03:57 PM
2

Unless they're either literally trying to kill you, or so incompetent that they may aswell be, in which case better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6 applies.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 05:14 PM
6

Nobody is saying that it's not true. Rather, why is it relevant to the discussion?
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 05:49 PM
2

As I gain more experience, I find this more and more to be true. People's personalities are all different, but there are still a lot of AWALT traits. It really shouldn't come as a surprise that high value people, like other high value people. Guys want pretty, sexually adventurous, sociable women, and girls want handsome, fit guys who are socially capable and dominant when necessary. Everybody likes these people. They are desirable and get what they want, and can do what they want. That's where …
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 08:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter