TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

glad-way-637 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,741 comments by glad-way-637 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,741 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Why is it that you literally only exist on this sub to be a contrarian dickhead with far less media literacy than you claim to have?
/r/MensRights06/08/26 02:14 AM
8

It was actually attempted during standard metoo. Women in general and feminists specifically lost their shit, and categorically denied that women could be similarly abusive.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/08/26 01:27 AM
1

Then you'll continue to reward the exact bad behavior you complain about, and do nothing but contribute to the issue yourself by enabling it. Good luck with that. Oh no, we say to not support a bigot? This must be why feminists hate these spaces, wowie you are just so smart.
/r/MensRights06/08/26 01:23 AM
3

Seriously, I was even helpful enough to explain the distinction in the comment you just replied to, how could you possibly be this inept?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 01:15 AM
3

Yes buddy, they call it "made to penetrate" when women do it, not rape. Look at the past-year prevalency, less time for victims to rationalize away their own abuse. Do fucking try and keep up, hmm?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 01:13 AM
6

Lmao, they are not "the manosphere" as described by feminists, they are the absolute most negative examples one biased dickhead could dig up to claim every men's group on the internet is a rotten hive of scum and villainy. "The manosphere" as described by feminists includes this very subreddit, dingus.
/r/MensRights06/08/26 01:07 AM
3

She knows exactly what she's doing, don't pretend otherwise no matter how tempting it is. I suggest you cut her off entirely when it comes time for the old folk's home if legal in your area, and cite this as why.
/r/MensRights06/08/26 01:06 AM
2

Yup. Really ought to be suspicious about these obvious concern trolls with little to no activity on the sub besides their pet issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 12:24 AM
3

I'd like it noted that this all started because OP got in an argument where they threw a prolonged fit that people were acknowledging the fact that as many women rape men as vice versa. Not exactly a worthwhile ally in general. They are "the tools of the gender war" themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/26 12:07 AM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/BR3DIhIWsS Here's a helpful correction to the blatant misinformation parroted by OP 👍 The vast majority of men who are raped, are raped by women. It happens about as often as the gender-flipped version, according to the few CDC surveys that actually ask men about their past-year victimization stats.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 11:50 PM
3

You're welcome for the full and accurate description of your lukewarm and less than useless advocacy, best wishes to those unfortunate men 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 11:49 PM
2

Ah, so you did. That's my bad, I saw this thread after that and misread the comment post dates. Well, the snark should at least drive likely insincere "allies" unwilling to listen to facts like yourself away, which I consider to be a major benefit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 11:40 PM
1

You've been provided that exact source previously, and failed to read it then. Why should anyone assume you'd grow some English literacy now? https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/BR3DIhIWsS
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 10:51 PM
3

You've notably failed entirely, same as the person you just replied to, to produce actual examples of this happening. You've been given evidence for why exactly the second statement is wrong. If You've failed entirely to internalize the reasoning, as I said previously, men are better off without you as an ally.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 10:49 PM
2

Do you have any examples of "people talking like that" or are you just desperate for an excuse to complain that women aren't the center of every discussion in the world?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 10:30 PM
4

She wanted to make claims about women being 90% of rape victims and then not be called out on it, lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 10:28 PM
4

Has anybody here made those excuses, or is this just another baseless and quite vague "criticism" on your end?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 10:27 PM
6

I never claimed you did, bud. Re-read the comment if you gotta, that was just thrown in because it was part of the standard spiel I have saved. They came from the... I think it was 2011 NIPSV survey, which was coincidentally the last time they recorded the past-year prevalence of "made to penetrate events" which they use to describe women raping men since use of the actually true terms are discouraged by people like you. That specific survey was, coincidentally and probably unintentionally, made…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 10:14 PM
3

"Some links below" doesn't cut it at all, tbh. I'm not looking through the other 65+ comments on this thread to do your digging for you. The prevalence is equal. Here's a source for that, among other things. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.202…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 09:33 PM
1

Must've been quite a feat, yeah lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 09:05 PM
1

It's not exactly a complex one. iirc from last time I found a free version, they just grabbed the age of some thousand dead monks and nuns from a particularly successful cloister, and noticed there was nearly no difference in average age at the time of death.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 08:24 PM
2

Could be. Always ought to cite these things though IMO even if they are "common" knowledge, in case someone nearby isn't aware.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 08:23 PM
54

Link the evidence of people doing what you claimed they did, or this is all just worthless vague-posting. Also, fun fact, women in controlled conditions live less than a year longer than men on average. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00647.x
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 04:05 AM
1

Someone with no experience interacting with feminists as a man, clearly.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 03:58 AM
1

Lmao, it was a female dem politician who just took away what little choice US men had in draft registration by making the process automatic. Why are you people so desperate to infantilize every woman alive, both today and historically when it comes to accountability for their actions? Hell, ever even heard of a white feather movement?
/r/MensRights05/08/26 03:57 AM
1

Could be true. I'm obviously biased as a smoker myself, but just comparing my friends who got addicted to the wacky tobaccy to the ones who went for alcohol, the comparisons in terms of health and mental well-being are quite stark.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/08/26 03:07 AM
1

Lmao, "feminists" /= "all women everywhere" looks like someone is a touch defensive between that and the standard "uhhh uhhmmm user you uhhh... have trouble dating women!!!!!" go-to insults 🤭
/r/MensRights04/08/26 11:41 PM
1

You've asked this question several times, now. There a reason for that, out of curiosity?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/26 10:34 PM
19

Even in context it's awful, because you and I both know for a fact none of the fuckers who do end up going or speaking will bring up anything like the actual discrimination that results from gendered conscription.
/r/MensRights04/08/26 12:21 AM
9

Democratic Representative Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania. "Democratic Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, who sponsored the automatic selective service language, told CNN in a statement, “Making registration automatic, not only saves taxpayer dollars by eliminating the need to advertise but finally ensures that young men are not unknowingly penalized.”" What a fuckin' joke. Apparently she was in the army for a bit, so less of a hypocrite than most women on the subject, but certainly still a wretch with lit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 10:30 PM
11

Shouldn't, really. Greats response to the "and uhmm, whooooo sent those men to war???" schtick, they never know how to reply.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 10:26 PM
20

Pushed through by a female dem politician, btw.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 04:19 PM
5

The problem is getting every man to do that, you know this, right? Anything less than almost everyone won't do shit beside get dissidents shot/jailed/sent straight to a front, and your country's historical conditions probably aren't that similar to the modern US.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/26 04:19 PM
1

I mean, I've never heard of weed killing anyone. Nudity though, that's a fast track to skin cancer if you ever go outside.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/07/26 11:19 PM
1

Yeah, heard about that being the case in Germany, because women were freaking out about violent crime, despite being a tiny, tiny minority of victims. Even the police dude they interviewed in an article I read about it said there were for nothing more than peace of mind, and didn't help shit in reality.
/r/MensRights31/07/26 01:01 AM
3

It is evidence that your own study is less than useless however, prick. Please keep up. "They" (you just posted the one, bud) don't notably confirm it either, which is my point. It's not "being chronically online" to make one comment and then stick to it. Kinda the opposite tbh, deleting the old comment after it was replied to and making a new one presumably out of embarrassment for a very minor spelling error is not something I'd describe as grass-toucher behavior.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 10:07 PM
4

Dumbest motherfuckers I've ever met in my life congregate there in droves, and the website doesn't seem very much built for these kinds of conversations.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 09:52 PM
4

Lmao, why delete the previous comment? It had been 10 minutes, all you had fucked up was a minor spelling mistake. That's a bit pathetic. Within the irrelevant sample that can't be trusted for shit, given that it was an online survey where people would be admitting to things that most are embarrassed of? Things that people, women especially, avoid admitting to in similar studies, especially when the real answer that describes their future behavior makes them look bad? https://scholar.google.com/…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:49 PM
4

Reading your comments and responding to them directly is trying too hard? Not surprised you assume that based on your actions so far, but wow. Woml womp yourself, lmao. How do you even typo that?
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:45 PM
4

I explained it in the original reply bud, please keep up. How to read, apparently, though I wouldn't lump any "we" here in with you, since that'd be an insult.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:33 PM
4

Buddy, again, that is literally just a self-reported survey with anonymous internet wackos as the only studied population. That's exactly what I told you it would be, and is less than worth considering for exactly the reasons I so helpfully explained. You're welcome 🫶
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:29 PM
5

The study? The one you neither named, nor linked? Feel free to respond if you ever grow the mental capability to respond to what I actually say. Otherwise, don't expect anything more. Especially not me doing your homework for you, prick.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:22 PM
6

Lmao, if you think women's survey-reported porn consumption is accurate, you may be genuinely stupid. Romance novels are the most popular genre of book full-stop for a reason, and those people use visuals too quite often. I have an aunt that admitted outright to getting an AI agent to generate her nudes of famous actors by feeding the system pictures of them and prompts using the wording from her books, for goodness sake.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:09 PM
9

Your assumptions on this front is based on... what, exactly?
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:00 PM
1

As the second guy in that link describes, you can still quite easily tell which papers are fake. Mine are not. Do keep up? Lmao, like gell there is. Every country in the European Union, Canada, and the US all give women more legal rights than men have. All male-only drafts. Not quite, no. The US is not nearly Jewish or Muslim enough to explain the historical 80% male infant genital mutilation rate, and the mother's decision is the one that actually matters, going by my own history. Father told t…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 08:47 PM
4

You failed to make that point, as that is not what anyone involved said. Please do better, or buzz off and don't come back. Oh no, 9 months of discomfort and possible but not guarnetted long-term medical complications, totally comparable to the occasional lifetime of slavery for a crime that was never even commited. The horror. Pregnancy sucks, but the shit you say trying to equate it to the actual topic at hand is, as I said, fundamentally disgusting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/26 08:34 PM
4

If you can't buzz off, re-read your original dumbass comment and kindly explain how that's relavant to what you now say it is, also. Thanks. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/qhoPy0z9Pt
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/07/26 08:30 PM
3

Then the vast majority of people calling themselves feminists aren't feminists, which is ridiculous. Accept that the definition was either innacurate from the start or has changed, is my advice.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 02:18 AM
1

Mostly just a matter and Bailey, tbh. "Uhmm, akshually, not all feminists!!! Those people are fringe! Ignore how more feminists than not support them, and how feminists throw massive fits whenever men say anything remotely similar to this for their demographic"
/r/MensRights30/07/26 02:16 AM
6

Wrong about that, among other things. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). B…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 02:13 AM
4

So would calling nagging a "woman problem" be generalizing women and ignoring all the men who act the same way, or would you get huffy when people criticized that statement, too?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/26 09:12 PM
2

Women are not more often abused in that way, as per the CDC. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%2…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 01:59 AM
3

It being about "safety" is not in fact "one thing" considering women are the safest demographic in existence, realistically speaking.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 10:08 PM
2

Every accusation is a confession, and all that.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 10:07 PM
4

That "feeling safe vs being safe" thing is one of the biggest points, lmao. So many folks convinced that their perceptions and feelings matter more than the actual facts of a given matter, and far more than how those "perceptions and feelings" are either exactly the same as or at least shockingly similar to every kind of bigotry they decry otherwise.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 10:06 PM
5

I agree with the other person. The implications in this comment are so fundamentally disgusting that it doesn't deserve a response.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/26 08:15 PM
3

Same reason that minor male rape victims of adult women are forced to pay child support. Mostly comes down to wealth/social status of the man in question, really. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support#:~:text=More%20recently%2C%20in,A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 07:33 PM
13

You don't need to be reverant of shit to simply notice this particular double standard, get off your high horse ya geriatric.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 10:16 PM
12

I assume you feel the same way about the people upvoting it?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 08:35 PM
1

Holy sliding goalposts, batman. Which is it, are you arguing that one is used more, or that no woman ever uses one? It's astonishing how confidently ignorant you are on how men in general categorize these things or react to them, really. Yes, visually masculine women. Ones who actually express attraction towards other women sexually get hit with the "no better than a man!!!!" Schtick from their routinely misandrist peers. Besides, straight women use it to denigrate themselves and even men all th…
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:43 PM
1

Weird, I don't feel particularly embarrassed. Oh well, maybe it'll kick in after another month 🤭
/r/MensRights21/07/26 02:11 AM
7

Good for you. I find yours detached from reality, with you ironically falling into the same "to the privileged, equality feels like oppression" pitfall feminists use to complain so often. Abortion should be legalized, but let's not kid ourselves about what the former US legality status was on an objective egalitarian level.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 01:06 AM
7

It's a correct way of looking at it. You're welcome for informing you that your perspective on the issue was lacking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 12:40 AM
8

So first of all, you're describing the US, not the west in general. Second of all, that was a right (to terminate parental responsibility or consequences) afforded to women that men have never really had, either pre or post birth. As much as I think abortion should be legal, it was objectively a case of women having more legal rights and privileges than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 12:24 AM
4

I also strongly believe that the lowest hanging fruit and the best issues to confront first are indeed the ones that reform and realign modern feminism back into a movement that is focused on gender equality and away from the blame centric gender war contempt that plagues it today. Even you know that's never actually going to happen, right? Can't reform something back into a state it never occupied in the first place and is violently and presently opposed to occupying in the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 12:06 AM
10

Women are not living in a system that is any more fundamentally oppressive to women than it is to men. Not the ones in the west that make up the majority of feminists, at any rate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 11:30 PM
1

Women will absolutely say "like a man" to denigrate... basically anything they want. Lesbians on the internet very commonly use the phrase to get mad at other lesbians for not performing attraction to the correct "feminine" standards.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 11:25 PM
2

Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identi…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 11:22 PM
13

Nah, that's giving them too much credit. This subreddit hasn't made you hate women just like the internet didn't make those women hate men, those women are just hateful people. The internet just gives them a more mass-media option to broadcast their hatred.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 09:39 PM
3

More cases like that than not, just ask Erin Pizzey. She was run out of her country with death threats for suggesting one. The only reason there aren't more stories of feminists opposing the practice is because it doesn't really ever get so far that they have to.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 09:17 PM
16

I agree with you completely. But all the woman-only and woman-catered subs end up that way eventually. Odd how that turns out.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 09:31 PM
1

My experience and that of the vast majority of this subreddit, despite your eagerness to paint them all as sheeple influenced by social media alone and with no personal IRL experiences. And yet, the vast majority of feminists IRL and online stand with that subreddit, and takes like those in the post I linked. Again, see the relative popularity (yes, even IRL) of Mary P. Koss' talking points among feminists. Sounds like you simply stopped agreeing with the rational and reasonable people when they…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 08:53 PM
1

Yeah, should've figured you'd fail to respond to most of that. Oh well. In the future, might be for the best if you don't bother interacting with this sub, it really seems like men are better off without someone like you failing to advocate for them and instead condescending to them as if you know more about their situation than they do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 08:46 PM
1

Oh wow, glad to hear my decade or so of experience as a man trying out IRL feminist spaces existed entirely within the bounds of my own mind or those of social media. Whatever would we do without someone like you to tell us our own lives better than the evidence of our eyes and ears and faulty minds? I have. Per capita, it's pretty much the same. Besides even if I didn't have extensive IRL experience, places like askfeminism with their thousands of subs are not algorithmically incentivized to po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 08:29 PM
1

Again, just look at the actual funding received by any given feminist academic, and how much control their specific narrative is given both in the space and over other resources, like Duluth Model-based training for police officers. Look at how often Mary P. Koss' "findings" are repeated by modern feminists today, around "98% of rapists being male and 99% of victims being female." Look at how wikipedia calls her "a renowned expert on gendered violence" and actively removes information about her …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 08:16 PM
1

Lmao, considering that those "loudmouths" are the ones writing the actual academic theory, the ones who control most of the funding feminism receives, and never actually pushed back against by "regular" feminists, your whole comment falls apart. For every bell hooks that attempts to give a shit about male issues (and fails, notably, that woman was awful despite trying her hardest), there are a half dozen more respected and better-funded Mary P. Koss', and a half million people agreeing with the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 07:14 PM
1

Why is that you idiots always assume that men's near-universal negative experiences with feminism come exclusively from social media?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 07:10 PM
1

If only you could feel that way more often, I get the feeling everyone involved would be better off. Have the day you deserve, world's least convincing wannabe egalitarian.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 11:32 PM
2

Yeah, I don't think it is these days, I'd need to go through a 3rd-party application or one of the archiving sites for it. Then you weren't paying much attention to the repeated posts on this sub to the contrary. Again, frankly your ignorance is meaningless considering that you yourself acknowledged that the sources you used previously (conviction rates) were obviously biased. Good thing I'm free to doubt that, because I absolutely do.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 11:21 PM
1

If that's true, then my apologies for assuming otherwise. It'd be nice if reddit gave an edit history for any given comment, just having the "edited" tag with no context often makes me suspicious of what was originally said. No, you just insist repeatedly that you think less of them do it, and that it is less impactful when they do... which is just as bad IMO. Maybe worse, because then it's bigotry that can't even bother to be honest with itself. Why is it that you perceive all that, when no evi…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 10:35 PM
2

Mm, either I misread the original comment, in which case sorry, or you edited out the egregious lack of the word "not" which seems likely given the fact that the comment was edited. Funny how you fail to answer my question too, ain't it? The specific comments actually wasn't on this sub, my bad for misreading otherwise, but it's your rather regular parroting of brainless "uhhhmmm, misandry hurts, misogyny kills, misandry is just a fully justified reaction to the actual sexism and violence that m…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:40 PM
2

Oh, you're very aware... of all the men who are victimized, and why all of them feel that way? Are you a man or a woman? The answer to that question drastically changes my response to that ridiculous assertion. All the ones you've made on this sub, largely minimizing men's issues and arguing against actual equality. Please keep up.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:55 PM
7

All the ones women have. Judging by your comments on this sub, something tells me you're very against that actually happening.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 12:31 AM
3

I'm not criticizing victims of rape, I'm criticizing people who are off-kilter enough to cite the low conviction rate as an abysmal problem that must be fixed, since surely all those tossed-out accusations are true! It does! Not really what you're failing to talk about at the moment though, please keep on topic.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 09:13 PM
3

"The abysmal conviction rate" is abysmal in what way? It only reads that way if you believe the vast majority of accusations are true, which is ridiculous. Iirc some 10% of accusations are found to be false, same as the % found to be true. The rest simply have not enough evidence to decide either way, so the accusation is tossed, which is how the justice system should work.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 08:56 PM
3

Not to people living in places used to it. People living in places where it never previously got this hot, though...
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/26 08:49 PM
2

And yet, it happens. Provably so, in fact. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560 Even just in hiring decisions, sex-based discrimination is rampant. what makes you so convinced it's absent from other areas of the workplace?
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:39 PM
4

The goalposts ain't shifted, look at the comment again and do your best to read it this time. It has direct CDC-provided evidence against your ridiculous claims on the proportion of male vs female perpetrators of these sorts of crimes.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 09:37 PM
12

Then I suppose it's quite odd that every single job I've ever had has had different dress codes for men and women. Hell, I've seen men fired for wearing the same things the women around them were wearing. Where do you live that it's universally illegal?
/r/MensRights09/07/26 09:02 PM
6

Yeah, sadly people like you who deny statistical evidence are allowed to stick around. What a shame. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20sho…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 08:40 PM
15

The women in the HR department who write the dress codes.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 08:16 PM
2

Accurate username is accurate.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 11:37 PM
8

That's because you aren't paying attention. We don't live in "some (decades) ago" we live in the modern day. "They" that is to say feminists fought for women's bodily autonomy, all the while claiming to be fighting for true gender equality, and talking about how they totally will help men too if men continue to help them, just after this next women's issue. The draft and infant genital mutilation? Sure, if you ignore abject government-backed combat slavery and the mutilation of those too young t…
/r/MensRights06/07/26 08:42 PM
10

So the best you have, is lip-service in an attempt to "ease the load on poor innocent mothers" and a basic "hurrrrr army bad" bit of lip-service? Not working to extend the draft to women, or even to get rid of the draft itself, just general anti-army sentiment? I'm sorry, but your examples are awful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 02:59 AM
15

It's not going to happen at all. When the other side categorically refuses to budge, meeting them in the middle just results in nothing but lost ground.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:19 PM
18

Lmao, like hell we will. Men have tried that for as long as feminism has existed and promised that they cared about male issues too, and that they'd totally help out once women's more pressing issues were sorted. Well, decades on and feminism has only really worked against men's interests, and towards increasing female privilege when they're already ahead. Meeting them in the middle is impossible. I've not found those supposedly good-faith feminists IRL either, and do trust me when I say I've lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:09 PM
15

They do? Well, I'll see how much I believe that when your country decides to turn male Ukrainian refugees back or not, I suppose. Honestly, I bet it depends on your geographical location, but around where I live? Yeah. The billionaires ain't the ones making the school system provably biased against men, they ain't the ones manipulating stats to try and fear-monger around men and those who advocate for them, and they ain't the ones insisting that even more funding needs to be diverted away from i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:07 PM
27

Not every idiot who shares a political "side" with you is evidence of a psy-op buddy, that's ridiculous. If those good faith feminists existed in any real numbers, we wouldn't be here right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 08:59 PM
23

This, among many other reasons, is why you should be wary of trusting female therapists as a male.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/26 10:58 PM
1

Oh, the 70s. Soooo, 50 years ago and entirely irrelevant? Should've figured. Not gonna go through a big list of studies and comb through for the few that make your statements less silly 🤭 You really can, though, and probably should in instances like this if you dont want to waste anyone's time/injure anybody. The thing with black people is racism because being black has no realistic impact on ability to complete a given job. People being male or female, in a job that requires strenuous manual la…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 08:11 PM
1

Sounds interesting. Have any of those studies? Also, when were they conducted? Bias, maybe, but one that is correct in the vast majority of instances. There's significant overlap between men and women when it comes to strength, but that overlap is rarely if ever occupied by men who do physical labor professionally.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:43 AM
1

You vastly overestimate the "hardships" of female asylum seekers in modern EU nations, tbh. They practically are on vacation, in comparison, and in some cases literally are on vacation, though that last bit is reserved for only the wealthiest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 01:54 AM
2

Not really a bias if it has to do with their physical capability to do the job at all tbh, in the case of manual labor jobs.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:40 AM
8

I mean, it is? Lmao, if they live in the same city there's not gonna be that many specific groups. And it's real easy to tell who these pages talk about, they give ridiculous amounts of identifying info amidst the outright slander, thats rather the whole point.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 11:47 PM
1

You'd think so, wouldn't you? Strange how that sort of thing works out.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:33 AM
1

Because they're half the population, you likely interact with some, and they'd most likely be happier if you didn't. Just a parting insult, really. Have a good one!
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:28 AM
1

Thanks, wishing those men in your life as speedy an exit as yours from this conversation 👍
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:24 AM
1

You're always free to simply stop talking. You have my thanks in advance if you take me up on that.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:17 AM
1

Mmmhmm, sure you have buddy. So many truly hideous things that you failed to come up with more than a single example of a generalization at all.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:13 AM
1

The implications... that you admit to making up so you can get mad at an otherwise innocuous statement because a man had the gall to be the one making it, yes. We've been over that much. Legally speaking, in most of the west, men literally are second-class citizens. Crimes against them are punished less harshly, they have fewer legal rights than their peers (especially towards bodily autonomy), and places like Italy actively make new legal definitions for crimes against women so they can be puni…
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:12 AM
1

You had one good example, you were doing so well. How did you fail so completely on every other point?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:07 AM
1

Have you genuinely never heard of playing the victim olympics? I had a feminist tell me this was the case outright, they even had a list they made of where they think every major demographic sits in the oppression hierarchy. This one certainly doesn't speak negatively about women in general.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:06 AM
1

Where are women negatively generalized here at all? From where I sit that comment is no less ridiculous than insisting we live in a patriarchy. Heck, it's even more likely given who has notably more legal rights, in the west.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:04 AM
1

Again, feminist =/= women and treating a complaint about feminists specifically as an indictment on women in general is quite ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:03 AM
1

This one doesnt make any claims about women in general, seems to be talking about feminists instead.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:02 AM
1

Fair enough, that one could've done with a qualifier.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:02 AM
3

Hah, that's funny. Anyone with a comment as inane as yours in a feminist sub would just be banned, especially if they had the gall to be male while making it.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:00 AM
1

You are unaware of very much, as I said. Can you link to any specific posts or comments on this sub that lead you to believe that was a plausible conclusion, or did your dog eat those too?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:58 AM
1

You, and your insistence that women as a whole are being generalized when nothing indicates this in the slightest.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:54 AM
1

That would require reasonable people to discuss it, and you are not one of those. There is no real argument I'm trying to win here, I'm just informing you of how wretched I think that you are given the things you talk about and how you talk about them.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:43 AM
1

The discussion at hand... that you've failed to engage with for the past several comments? That you've tried to "uhhmmm like, we both just assumed whatever makes our stance look better" your way out of having twice now? Frankly, I've got a long slow shift going, so taking a trip to the internet zoo to see what the wackos with delusions of moral superiority think is a passable use of my time.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:36 AM
3

I don't really agree, no, and I think it would take me literal years to stop finding things about you that are worth insulting, going by another skim of your hidden account history through a third party app that allows that.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:22 AM
3

No, because my "assumption" required me to think the person in question was talking about the post they commented under, while yours was completely and utterly ridiculous. The sort of self-aggrandizing mental sewage that could only leak out of a mind poisoned by the worst sort of victimization complex.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:13 AM
2

Frankly, given your utter inability to not read that first comment in the worst-faith way possible... no, you probably don't know some of the people in this subreddit. You seemingly know very little about anyone or anything, yourself included. That isn't plausible at all you catastrophizing quack. And yes, you are absolutely being huffy and ridiculous.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 01:00 AM
2

First of all, you're thinking of the "they" in that comment, it doesnt have a "we." Second of all, fucking obviously it refers to the psych journal people. Y'know, the ones described in the post? The fact that you get this huffy and start claiming that women as a whole are insulted the second there is even the slightest perceived ambiguity to a statement is an exact example of why your reply is ridiculous, and so are you.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 12:46 AM
2

Oh, so you didn't even read the original comment, either? Nobody involved said anything like that you illiterate, you're making a guy up to be mad at here.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 12:38 AM
3

As I said, just search your name on the sub for more examples than anyone could ever want or need. There are no "blatant lies" present, Psych Today and many other similar rags generally don't care much about men's mental health. Mmhmm, and as I explained, you're vastly overestimating the actual prevalence of the reddit janitors. If you criticized feminists anywhere near as often as you criticize MRAs, you'd have at least one relevant example to show for it. You don't. There's a reason for that.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 12:22 AM
5

Oh, so is that why you have such a long comment history on this sub of criticizing people and their ideas, even when no insults were made? Like you did in this very thread? Lmao. You know that link isn't even relatively close to what I asked for.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 12:06 AM
5

Oh yes, but by no means all of them. Heck, feminist ideas are mainstream near-universally on this entire website, if you weren't more full of shit than the average backed up woodstock porta-potty you might be able to come up with an example of you criticizing one even on a non-feminist subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 11:28 PM
3

Mhmm. "Ummmm, like, you guys!!! I totally criticize feminists and feminist ideas!!! I just can't provide even a single solitary example of it happening because... the criticism goes to a different school!!!!"
/r/MensRights01/07/26 11:08 PM
8

Oh nothing, egalitarianism is ideal. You just play-act at it without actually practicing it in any meaningful way, though, and it's quite obvious from your lack of criticism toward feminists or feminist ideas for just about any reason. Feel free to provide an example of you making the sort of comment I originally replied to on a feminist sub or talking point if you'd like to prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 11:01 PM
10

It's always the wannabe egalitarians that are convinced of their righteousness that are the most annoying ones. If you need a reminder, just go ahead and search your username in the sub. You notably hide it on your profile, so that's the simplest method.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:46 PM
15

The position of someone with more empathy than sense, or ability to look at historical precedent for femist actions and stances on men's rights issues? The position of someone who thinks they know more about men's issues and the way feminism treats men than men do? Besides, if that was your goal, then literally every single recent comment from you on this sub wouldn't be trying to shout down men describing their issues, or at least something along those lines.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:40 PM
15

Who is we, here? You and the other feminist brigaders on this sub definitely are. You even admit outright in other comments that you "used to be on our side" so why bother sticking around, much less categorizing us the same way as yourself?
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:25 PM
5

Funny that the best that can possibly be expected from these people is still just lip-service. Not even calling out bad actors in her movement, just... talking about how they exist. This is some good lip-service though, all things considered.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:19 PM
16

Lol, difference is that feminism is a group you join because you agree with prevailing feminist opinions, while "men" is a group you join by birth. You cant even be bothered to be consistent for the duration of a single sentence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:43 PM
17

Not only are you a massive outlier (at best), you spend longer here fussing about us talking about the article than you do criticizing it. She just said the quiet parts out loud, we both know most feminists are roughly this bad. Those "many feminists" are coincidentally completely and utterly silent whenever it comes time to actually call out the bad actors in their movement. That would tell you something, if you had the basic mental capability to listen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:42 PM
22

You're thinking of most of feminism tbh, but radical feminism especially.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 10:09 PM
1

Nope, not at all. It was a theoretical one, hence the questions, but the amnesia was very specifically due to a French interrogation drug that Strauss sourced.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:04 AM
2

Annoying people are always bothersome, and people who make confident claims with little experience are annoying. You didn't say anything hateful, just obviously incorrect, and then you got fussy when told as much. Not that complex. You aren't knowledgeable, though, is the thing. If you haven't bothered to speak to people on the subject, and clearly haven't been bothered to read up on it, then you're not knowledgeable. You just came quickly to an opinion and stuck with it, thinking it was knowled…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:57 PM
5

"I rarely ever talk about these topics" is you saying that you have a metaphorical white belt, outright. Are you high, buddy? You didn't even say it was your observation, you just made an incorrect and frankly silly claim about how "most people when they talk about it" act.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:51 PM
6

So... you have little experience on the subject, had one unpleasant experience, and decided you knew enough to generalize about how most people use the word?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:41 PM
1

I disagree that this is how "most people" use it. I think you've mostly been spending too much time around Tumblr tweens, tbh.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:36 PM
4

I agree with basically every part of this. I ain't that much of a leftie, but I hang around enough of 'em to see that you're correct.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:18 PM
-1

There are plenty of sane people on this sub. Sad that many of the less-sane ones crawl out of the woodwork for posts like this.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:59 PM
3

Your reply to me seems to have been deleted. If it still shows up on your end, feel free to open an incognito tab and check the thread, it ain't there for the rest of us.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:58 PM
4

That lasted for like... 2 weeks, and ended up the way it did due to very, very specific forum cultures and stereotypes about those cultures. The same thing would be impossible to have happen with the word cis, considering it describes over 95% of people.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:54 PM
4

Hey, hey, just checking, no need to get so immediately defensive, I didn't even claim anything 🤭. You gotta admit though, the wolf-related username with an 88 at the end doesn't paint you in the best light. What trouble, specifically, is created by calling trans people by the pronouns they wish to be called by? They're less than 3% of most western societies anyway, I doubt half as much trouble has popped up as you catastrophize about. Women's sports? What sporting events have trans women actuall…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:53 PM
-2

The unscientific and homophobic gender theory... that there is a difference between cissgender and Trans people, a difference worth noting with a verbal descriptor? Out of curiosity, is that 88 in your username a reference to anything specific?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:34 PM
0

The context of... indicating that a given man is not trans? I've never seen it used any way except neutrally outside of Tumblr tbh, and if we let those overly dramatic tweens decide how language is used we're all fucked in the end anyway.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:32 PM
-17

Nah, not in any way. No more than straight male is, it's a simple descriptor.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:21 PM
1

Not quite. They didn't plan to give anyone else the amnesia, the coma was to deal with isolation murder issues. The amnesia was a Grace-only solution to the significant problem of his free will in the situation.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:37 PM
1

No reason besides not wanting to die quite so subjectively quickly, perhaps. I wouldn't call Strauss any smarter, just less careful with Grace's life than he was.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:36 PM
4

Oh dear, let me get out the actual math again. Poor thing, you've entirely failed to read the part of the comment where I inform you why that is an incomplete way of looking at the stat, I see. https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021 .06 * 17,970 ~= 1,078, the number of men murdered in a year by their wives. .34 * 4,970 ~=1,689, the number of women murdered in a year by their husbands. Unless my math is notably worse than I think, of course. Keep in mind, …
/r/MensRights26/06/26 07:25 PM
5

Someone who makes unfair and innacurate negative generalizations against an entire demographic, or more applicable to you, someone with an unfounded prejudice against people of that demographic. Often due to ill-informed paranoia and a general deficiency in backbone at best, or actively bad-faith assumptions even more often than that. In the US, 2 women kill their husbands for every 3 men that kill their wives, and that's as recorded by an extremely biased legal system. A similar amount of men a…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 06:07 PM
1

I know that. In the universe in question, space travel is a pretty damn big deal, not like they're in a drought of qualified astronauts. Yeah... like the thousands if not tens of thousands of other biologists who were working on the issue? C'mon. Mm, another detail they may have left out of the movie? Could've sworn they mentioned it, but perhaps not. The amnesia was absolutely a side effect of the drug, if not the main reason they used it. You really ought to read the book or at least listen to…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:39 AM
1

I mean yeah, but c'mon, there's other astronauts out there with enough general biologist competency to do the job just as well. You wouldn't need massive amounts of training, and even if you did, that'd just make drugging and amnesia-ifying the guy so he forgets all the training even more silly. It's the only major plot-hole introduced by the movie, IMO.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:12 AM
2

Well, to be fair to OP, the movie doesn't explain exactly why those millions will die without grace, they leave out the entire coma gene subplot.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:00 AM
3

There's one particularly deficient person on this sub who was walking around saying exactly this earlier today. Is this in reference to them?
/r/MensRights26/06/26 01:47 AM
1

"Uhhmmmm, OP!!! You're a big lying meanie-pants!!!! People aren't directly advantaging the already-privileged population just because they want to, they're like, soooooo totally doing it because they want to reduce birth rates instead!!!! Which is great and totally justifies all blatantly unfair policies in regards to these grants!!!! It's also the main reason, the enhanced female privilege is totally just a byproduct and not the whole point!!!!!!! It's good for the economy!!!! We can chew sidew…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:22 AM
0

Because you're a brain-broken fool with a pathologic need to downplay men's issues and catastrophize about women's inconveniences? It's quite obvious considering that is literally all ypu ever do or have done on this subreddit. I don't need to misrepresent anything, you hide your account history like a coward but a simple subreddit search of your username shows it all. Glad you think so! Youre incorrect, though.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:19 AM
2

Simply an irrational one, then? Does it count as you having a brain if you simply choose not to use it? 🤔 My argument is correct, and helps explain the actual facts of the matter. I'd rather resources not be wasted further assisting the already-privileged population, obviously, and you'd feel the same if you didn't have the comically visible-from-space bias that you do. The man-focused legislation can only come about when people stop seeing women's slight inconveniences as more impact full than …
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:16 AM
0

My argument against the first claim is to copy and paste the same spiel I so helpfully provide to all the other brainless feminist brigadiers on this sub. It has the info in question if you feel capable of reading it, you're welcome, go forth and be less ignorant 🫶. While IPV may be more severe against women on average as recorded by a biased legal system, it is absolutely not more prevalent against women. Quite the opposite. You absolutely do though, looking at all available evidence. Better th…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:10 AM
0

And yet, the constantly yap about how IPV is a predominantly female issue, when the majority of victims are men. By a slim margin, but still. Coincidentally, when actual egalitarians like Erin Pizzey try and help male victims of IPV, they get ran out of their country with death threats by all those feminists you breathlessly defend. There's a reason for that. Anything more is either lip-service spent on male issues with no intention of actual assistance, or merely helping men as an unwanted bypr…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:01 AM
2

Maybe if you're a biased politician with a hammer of "increase funding toward women's education" and are on the lookout for nails. My argument is one based on actual material conditions rather than a brainless defence of feminism and unequal advantages for women, which after looking through your participation on this sub, seems to be the only thing you're mentally capable of producing. And yet, you still defend them refusing to do so, and instead making the imbalance actively worse. There's a re…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:43 PM
1

Feminism doesn't do even half of that shit in practice, and you'd know that if you were an actual worthwhile human being who could have a sane discussion on this sub rather than spending all your time sucking up to an objectively sexist movement.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:37 PM
1

That first claim is complete bullshit btw, in the US as many men are raped per year as women, and all claims about it being less severe when it happens to men come from nowhere but your ass, or the assumptions of some feminist you took as gospel. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfo…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:34 PM
2

Ah, poor thing, guess not, then. It's not manipulating shit, just to give the actual reasons for why something happened and the exact reasons why it is bad, namely that women are already ahead. Dropout rates are the part they actually care about, and it's quite obvious by the fact that decreasing birth rates would just as easily be accomplished any number of ways without privileging women further in an area they're already privileged in.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:26 PM
3

What do you think a lie actually is, dolt?
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:16 PM
51

Usually after that they start blustering about how there are more male elected officials than female ones, and they really don't like it when you point out how more women than men vote in just about every country with a vote.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/06/26 09:27 PM
6

I'm correct. Seriously, buzz off. We have no use for people who are both ignorant and bigoted, we insist on at most one or the other, not both.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 09:10 PM
6

And you're seemingly illiterate, since this comment doesn't reply meaningfully to a single thing he said.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 09:08 PM
4

Nearly as many men are murdered by their wives every year as women murdered by their husbands. Nearly as many women kill men as men kill women. Be less shit.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 08:34 PM
5

Identical reported rates of loneliness... and men making up 80% of those who suffer the actual consequences of chronic loneliness. It's hilarious that you think the "egalitarian" part of your profile description is fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 09:14 PM
70

It is, unfortunately, the best you can expect from them. Even the ones who genuinely try to understand male issues... fail completely. If they weren't the type to no-true-scotsman their way out of having to push back against misandry from feminists, they wouldn't call themselves feminists at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 06:45 PM
1

No problem, have a good one!
/r/MensRights24/06/26 02:02 AM
4

That the person I replied to makes a whole hell of a lot of rather unsupported assumptions.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 01:15 AM
1

Meh, "catcalling" is a remarkably broad term, and do you truly think the cops care all that much about strict accuracy of that sort of thing when pandering to terfs is on the line? It's not the only context, but it's the main one. Again, as I said, I don't feel comfortable making a definitive statement one way or the other on SH laws, and your inability to reference the specific one you were talking about in your comment doesn't exactly fill me with confidence. Holding anyone accountable for act…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:58 PM
1

There we go, now we're getting somewhere! I still doubt it's nearly as prevalent as you make it out to be, but that's actually something almost approaching evidence for the things you say, which is a huge step up from all of yesterday, good job buddy!!! Never said it wasn't real, just that it wasn't as prevalent as you claimed. Still a failure to respond to most of the comment in question, just FYI 🫶
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:55 PM
1

Not at all what I wrote. I consider many sexual harrasment laws to be unfair oversteps of government boundaries, like the British police officers who make it a priority to fine any men they see romantically approaching women, rather than trying to police actual crime. Laws like that which are less about sexual harrasment since they don't target female-on-male harrasment even when obvious, and more about pandering to a TERF-y constituentcy. Others are perfectly fair and valid. As I said.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:47 PM
1

It also doesn't actually mention anything like evidence of real life people holding those views. For someone allegedly interested in this conversation, you're real quick to ignore the lion's share of what I wrote, ain't yah?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:43 PM
1

Yeah, you would be "done" with a conversation in which you utterly failed to respond to any of the points raised in favor of making a bunch of idiotic accusations because you're desperate for me to be easier to argue with. Who said women should not have civil rights, exactly? All I've claimed is that their "civil rights" shouldn't extend to unequal privileges like feminism regularly fights tooth and nail for. You don't have a "right" to being advantaged over your peers due to nothing but their g…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:35 PM
1

They don't negate it entirely like you fussing claim in the previous comment though, do they? Please keep up. Hey, what do you know, all those things people allegedly tried are extraordinarily rare in comparison to MGM, and far more catstropbized about even when the consequences are similar... hence your comment. Wow, almost like that's exactly what I said 🤭. You've still failed to source your comically overdramatic claim that they're all always worse forever!!! (Totally because it's actually wo…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:33 PM
1

Eh, I suppose I see where you disagreement comes from now. I just think you need to take into account more context, but getting you to come this far was like pulling teeth, so I can't be bothered.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:28 PM
1

Oh hey, I'm un-blocked now, lmao. Someone really can't stick to what she says she'll do. I'll respond to this momentarily if I have time before being blocked again 🤭
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:27 PM
1

So... you brought things closer to gendered equality? Cool, bit different than what OP describes, which is women voting in ways that put men into government-backed combat slavery while nothing remotely similar is on the cards for women.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:10 PM
7

Some more than others, though... like when dating a person who already has kids. Your first comment made a bunch of assumptions about what OP thought about step-fathers, no? They never said they were anything like bad people, but you took that assumption and really ran off with it. Also, not my post. Try and read usernames, please.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:49 PM
1

I mean, the claim in the title is just a correct one. Men in general do not have power over women in general, and women in general have notably more legal rights (especially toward bodily autonomy) than men do.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:39 PM
7

They might not have known how grim the outlook can really be though... hence the post, letting folks know it ain't likely to be all sunshine and rainbows, no?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:38 PM
8

This does not necessarily equate to them having the best time in their relationships with single mothers.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:14 PM
1

Again... where did I state that? Are you getting me mixed up with someone else? I don't think men in general have power over women in general, certainly not in the US, but that's a very definitive statement I don't remember writing. Is the alcoholism finally getting to me, or what? Nothing you've said has been particularly relevant to that conversation either, now has it?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:10 PM
20

Yeah. It's so weird, the presence of the "gay accent" is the determining factor for these women more than the presence of a boyfriend, in my personal experience as a bi man.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/06/26 09:52 PM
1

Now that might be the most insulting thing you've managed to say so far, good job bestie. Thing is, I'm correct when I say it. In what way are men and women even equal, at this point? What advantages do you think men have due to nothing but their gender? In the US, women have more legal rights to bodily autonomy, more federally funded social and financial aid, and general privilege in terms of all legal consequences for crime. If that's what feminists think is equality, they're wrong. My perspec…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:41 PM
1

Now that might be the most insulting thing you've managed to say so far, good job bestie. Thing is, I'm correct when I say it. In what way are men and women even equal, at this point? In the US, women have more legal rights to bodily autonomy, more federally funded social and financial aid, and general privilege in terms of all legal consequences for crime. If that's what feminists think is equality, they're wrong. My perspective comes from actual statistical evidence, something you seem to lack…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:37 PM
1

Now that might be the most insulting thing you've managed to say so far, good job bestie. Thing is, I'm correct when I say it. In what way are men and women even equal, at this point? In the US, women have more legal rights to bodily autonomy, more federally funded social and financial aid, and general privilege in terms of all legal consequences for crime. If that's what feminists think is equality, they're wrong. My perspective comes from actual statistical evidence, something you seem to lack…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:36 PM
2

My sex Ed teacher was a very conservative woman who actually said the opposite, that the labia had many nerve endings, so just chalk that one up to a rural American education. She didn't even mention anything about male anatomy, so she might be even worse than the average on that department in hindsight. Regardless, that "mouth on the outside of the body" thing is far more similar to men post-circumcision than you pretend. So, you're saying that... gasp that sort of surgery might make sex less p…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:30 PM
1

Did I? Where did I ask that? Now you're just making shit up 🤭 An entire country's voting patterns, ones that are shared by most of the world... are anecdotal? M'kay.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:23 PM
3

Where someone else said that. You're getting usernames mixed up again. Women should absolutely be doing that if they feel entitled to men pushing back against misogyny, though if not then fair is fair. Do you have a link to any of those posts? I checked your account to try and find it, but someone is too scared to have their digital footprint be easily searchable. Are DEI initiatives and the hiring bias favoring women not already formal sex discrimination? All those other totally real guys you t…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:21 PM
2

My US sex ed told me that the skin around most of the labia isn't anything special. Removal would, of course, be wretched and immoral mutilstion, with many possible side-effects. Sound familiar? But fine then, simply removing or deadening most of the nerve endings in some theoretical surgery. Still illegal. Because the mother is the one who decided to fuck the guy at least once, and again, the mother is the one with the final say, after all. I haven't heard that "thing" no, care to provide an ex…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 05:06 AM
5

Only when I see someone who deserves to be insulted. Congratulations on being one of those! Did anyone ever claim that there were no examples of laws men can influence, albeit no fewer women than men, that affect women? Even in the post, that seems quite absent to me. They may vote that way, but when the time comes to form a white feather movement and socially enforce the draft, who always shows up? Besides, that's just in the US, in places like Germany they actively vote to keep the draft, and …
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:54 AM
2

You're right, I don't think much of that person. I also attribute most of that bogus "girls develop faster" schlock to a similar bias as was found by this study. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/R1VmOxo3ea "The tip" part was actually a mistake on my end, left over by an incomplete edit. I mean the skin of the whole thing, nerve endings and all, as that's roughly equivalent to what happens to men during MGM. The lifelong complications are the massively decreased sensitivity, the d…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:47 AM
5

When "all men" are generalized incorrectly, why the hell shouldn't that issue by corrected? What is more wrong with saying "not all men" to misandry than saying "not all women" to misogyny? Do you have actual examples of that "crazy misogyny?"
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:39 AM
2

In response to the edited-in last paragraph, you see everything that would bring men's rights up to par with women's as rolling back women's civil rights, because you see them as privileges when men have them, but inalienable rights when women do.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:36 AM
1

Okay, testing testing, did these replies go through?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:34 AM
2

I have found multiple. I even linked them to you. They may not see that as the entirety of the problem, but they all see that it obvipusly contributes. You are welcome, go forth and be less ignorant. Our of curiosity, are the researches you supposedly follow all women in the teaching industry? Ah, I see what you mean now. Damn current admin restructuring most .gov websites, makes it incredibly hard to cite my sources. That's my bad, sorry. Oh well, feel free to read the rest of the many other li…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:27 AM
2

And I know for a fact that the only way you'd read it that way is if you were actively looking for something to be mad about in an otherwise defensible statement. You assume similar bull from others based on similarly flimsy pretenses of personal victimhood. If men don't register for the selective service, that is a felony. Do you know what people with felony charges can't do (at least in my state)? It serves basic equality, even if only by being wretched to both gender equally. The men and wome…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:18 AM
1

If there is, let me know, cause I ain't DMing you. Especially not to call you a... aunt (I hate self-censoring), I'm not Australian and you're more unmoored from reality and with a ridiculous notion of your own expertise on all matters gender than you are dick-ish. Because you know for a fact that your stance doesn't hold up to actual scrutiny? Predictable. I never dismissed it as any of that, or said anything like it. The subtext of what I said, is absolutely not that you victim-complex wannabe…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:02 AM
3

And that's the thing, in the 2020s, we (that is to say, those of us paying attention rather than mindlessly seeking to absolve women of all sins due to nothing but their gender) also understand exactly where the gap comes from. Again, read the studies I so helpfully provided. One of them. A single one. I posted two, on this subject alone. What study di you fail to find there, exactly? Only one of us has personal experience with the topic at hand though, unless you'd like to share some medical in…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:57 AM
2

Also, this doesn't really respond to the rest of my comment, but that pretty much goes without saying at this point.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:47 AM
4

If you knew the claim was ridiculous and innacurate, why did you still make it? Well, that's the policy position the US government takes towards men. I don't agree with it, but hilarious that you fuss more over people saying that than the actual draft that does exist. That seems like a reasonable position, it'd be great if you held it in anything except theory and as a limp-wristed gotcha for when men talk about their issues on this sub. Well, when the only other realistic alternative is a male-…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:42 AM
2

One is universal for the gender and enforced at gunpoint. One is only a problem for women who decide to have PIV sex despite the risks, and even then, only a fraction of the time. Not the same at all, and not particularly comparable, poor critter. The comparison between MGM and abortion is much closer, though still not exactly even.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:32 AM
3

Hah, knew it. Yeah, similar to the current gender-education gap that is just as strong as the one from the 70s, just flipped, that largely stems from female teachers hatred towards male students, conscious or not. I've already linked you to the studies buddy, please try and keep up. You didn't even link any studies, besides one complete and total guess arrived at from cherry-picking multiple conflicting sources. Yeah, and in a lot of versions of FGM, their bits work too. If it isn't 1 to 1, what…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:30 AM
3

Tragically predictable lack of response. Had to change it a bit, the standard tone kept getting the damn comments shadow-deleted.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:10 AM
2

You're the one who keeps comparing the draft and women's lack of abortion, buddy. Thats the whole conversation.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:09 AM
1

Glad to hear it.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:09 AM
2

Lol, just trying to get through the weirdly restrictive auto-mod we have these days. Trust me when I say I'd call you something that disparages your intelligence a bit more harshly if I could. An area of policy people vote on... like all the woman-only financial, social, and legal aid that was given when women were behind the gender-education gap? M'kay. The causes are simple, and quite well-studied: female teacher's misandry. Paying teachers better would probably drive up competition, which wou…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:06 AM
1

Did any of those replies actually come through, in the end? Auto-mod is being a bit odd atm.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:30 AM
3

I don't think that what you describe isn't slavery, I know for a fact that it isn't at all comparable to actual slavery. Please keep up. Not really, no. That's what you wish it had been about so you'd have a more defensible position. It isn't though, and so you don't. There are people in this thread arguing that women should have the same responsibilities men do in order to keep their vote, those responsibilities largely being conscription risk. Are you being like this on purpose or by accident?…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:29 AM
2

Ah, so complete guesses, cherry-picking sources from multiple unrelated (and often poor in terms of accuracy, by their own admission) datasets, and estimating on the high end in order to further fear-monger a gullible reader like yourself? Yeah, that tracks. Lol, you failed both to respond accurately, and to keep the comment short. Again, predictable. The government pays those teacher's salaries and noticeably does not care when the gender-education gap has men disatvantaged, so it's very releva…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:20 AM
7

You'd be wrong to do so though, considering nobody enslaved those women at all. Just restricted them from one specific course of action, a bit different than actual slavery. Lol, more history from long before either of us were born, used in a feeble attempt to defend your own modern bigotry and blindness towards other's issues. Predictable. The draft may pre-date women's suffrage, but many cases of the draft being used certainly do not, not even in the US. You can't even accurately verbalize the…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:00 AM
6

Huh, the source I originally used to get my numbers gave me 53% of voting men voting for Trump. Most that I look at now lean more towards 55% though, so you're probably correct on that front.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:53 AM
3

Yeah, the US, where all of the examples of systemic misandry I already helpfully explained to you are prevalent, in addition to the draft that becomes more likely every day trump is in office. I'll append my comment to the end of this one, here's hoping you read it this time 🤭 Nah, I don't think women should wait till marriage. I think they should do what they want, but be at least a little cognizant of the risks. Especially since non-PIV sex is so easy and fun to start with. You "oppose the dra…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:49 AM
5

Meh, it's like 29.5% or so, I just rounded up. Where did you get the math from that 35% of men voted for trump?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:38 AM
17

Women getting to vote and decide that men should be enslaved for warfare purposes is a bit different than what you describe, and certainly an argument for women's legal and social advantages/privileges over men.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:36 AM
6

Don't worry, the things you genuinely believe are hilariously ill-informed enough without intention on your end! Meh, abortions due to rape were so incredibly rare even when abortion was federally legal that I fail to see how it compares to the massive history and current practice of conscription. Especially considering a (female dem) politician just made registration automatic in the US, removing what little choice men had in the affair right as we got the most war-mongery president we've had i…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:35 AM
12

Lol, poor thing. Hears one inconvenient truth and immediately jumps to shaming people over made-up dating issues, this girlie is not at all ok 🤭
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:22 AM
15

No, buddy. That's the percent of people who voted, who voted for each candidate. I gave the percentage of the total populations who voted, taking into account that some 30% of people never bother voting at all.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:20 AM
17

33% of men voted for Trump, compared to 30% of women.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:06 AM
29

Why are you obvious brigaders always hiding your account history? It'd be easier just to make a seperate account for you to say this dumb shit on. Not really when compared to the government policies that disproportionately privilege women over men, no. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.…
/r/MensRights22/06/26 11:42 PM
23

You dont seem to think much at all, abortion (that is to say, unconditional abilit to avoid the consequences of an unplanned pregnancy) was never a right that men had that women did not, and almost exactly as many women voted for anti-abortion parties as men.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 11:38 PM
18

Did you just... fail to read the post beyond the title, or what? If you're gonna turn off account history and go brigading, at least put in a little bit of effort.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 11:12 PM
1

No, I think you're 4 because you post dumbass "girls drool Boyz rule" shit on the subreddit for discussing men's rights. Women work too these days, just often not in the most dangerous/physically strenuous jobs, stop acting like a child.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:55 PM
18

In real life I do see people "just spout misandrist stuff" quite frequently. Not so for misogyny. Maybe you just ain't paying much attention, dipshit?
/r/MensRights21/06/26 04:18 PM
17

I mean yeah, but hopefully you at least pay basic attention to the stereotypes of the name, if nothing else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 11:59 PM
1

Yup. Sorry if I came off a bit hostile in the last reply, just re-read it lol, my bad.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:55 PM
38

It's really unfathomable the utter lack of thought that certain people are paid to put into these movies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 09:59 PM
2

It's saying that 70% of non-reciprocal DV in hetero relationships comes from women, yes, which is exactly what I claimed. Reciprocal DV has equal perpetration from both sexes in hetero relationships, for reasons that should be obvious. This means more women are domestically abusing men than vice versa.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 09:36 PM
4

I did, buddy. Please read the rest of the comment. The CDC sexual violence surveys show that ~80% of male victims have women as their perpetrator.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 02:30 AM
7

Women rape men more often than men rape men (and women rape men about as often as vice versa, in the US), among other things. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%2…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:54 AM
15

"In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17395835/#:~:text=In%20nonreciprocally%20violent%20relationships%2C%20women%20were%20the%20perpetrators%20in%20more%20than%2070%25%20of%20the%20cases. In the reciprocal cases, the stats are even, for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:52 AM
6

Who said that, how did they say it, and how downvoted were they?
/r/MensRights16/06/26 08:08 PM
4

All that citation that you gave for your own "points" is... where, exactly? Poor dolt, if you didn't have double standards you wouldn't have any at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 02:31 AM
2

So, you're saying that the vast, vast majority of people calling themselves feminists simply aren't that? Weird, why do you supposed egalitarian feminists never actually speak against the much more common misandrist version? Do us a favor and cut the lip service, jackass. You group each other together all on your own.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:53 AM
2

Ask Erin Pizzey, who was ran out of her own country with literal death threats, directly from her feminist peers, for suggesting a men's DV shelter.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:51 AM
2

Women are never encouraged to work male-dominated? Lmao, you should've just said you were posting in bad faith to start with, could've saved us all some time reading your idiotic bullshit. What system did "men" set up, do you think? Did the men today make that system, or is this more sins of the father schlock, your poor braindead fool?
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:49 AM
2

A term that is *these days, entirely gender neutral, used against anyone and everyone. FTFY Feminism does not equal "equality" like you claim, quite obviously. Just ask Erin Pizzey, chased by feminist death threats across half the globe, or Mary P. Koss, given a very lucrative career and much acclaim by feminists due to her constantly claiming (and even manipulating data to support these claims) that it's impossible for men to be raped, and "laughably absurd" to think they could be raped by wome…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:47 AM
6

Lol, you and I have different definitions of "many."
/r/MensRights15/06/26 09:31 PM
18

Can you specifically point out what you think is misogynistic or non-factual here, or are you just throwing a little fuss that someone is accurately characterizing history and acknowledging systemic misandry, Ms. Hidden account hidtory brigadier?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 07:43 PM
7

Founded by a man... but conveniently entirely staffed by women, and criticized by very, very few of them? Mmmhmm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 07:38 PM
1

Criticism of your confident lack of sources... doesn't get any actual justification for your beliefs beyond your half-baked anecdotes and personal insistence on only seeing activism as genuine when women do it? Again, that tracks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:17 PM
1

So what you're saying is that you don't have sources for your claim, much less any personal experience, then? That tracks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:15 PM
2

Lmao, only if that "genuine advice" was worth a rat's ass. Very often it ain't. Even when it is, most often that sort of advice is meant to make the speaker feel good, not actually help men they way you feel entitled to men helping women. Do you have a source for any of this women are wonderful schlock, or is this more "activism outside of that done by women is nonexistent!!" historical revisionism? All of these claims read as complete bullshit to anyone with first-hand experience being a man. L…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:53 AM
1

1920 is the year women got a (universal, iirc land-owning women could vote before then same as men for a long while) vote, in the US. Feminist movements in the west were far more popular than you paint them as, and you'd know that if you paid any attention to history. Lmao, you'd say that literally no matter what happened in a men's movement, because to you, like most feminists, any progress for actual equality in areas women are advantaged is regression. You're just flat-out incorrect on the "w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:48 AM
1

Yeah, sure you could've. It would've been a stupid thing to do though, considering the success of women's liberation movements in the 1920s in most of the west. Men's movements? Conveniently treated as hate groups universally by feminism, even when they come from feminists. Just look at Erin Pizzey, who was chased out of the UK by death threats for wanting to start a men's DV shelter. Those death threats followed her to the US as well, for all of her life, just btw. Certain groups with a lot of …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:56 PM
1

Do you think women in general have enough of a moral compass to try and help men they don't know... basically in any situation at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:41 PM
1

The latter isn't ever going to happen while women still hate men more often than the opposite going by survey data.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:38 PM
1

Well, we know for a fact that your ass won't be putting yourself in anything even resembling danger to try and protect any men, so why should they do anything similar for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:37 PM
8

No, no you are not. You're claiming that the people on this sub are any worse than the ones on those subs... like an idiot who doesn't pay any attention to what the people here or there actually say. Keep up. This sub does not "mostly comment negative and controversial thing" controversial maybe, not mostly negative though. Do ypu have any actual examples of people on this sub pretending that and not being soundly mocked by all the comments?
/r/MensRights13/06/26 06:17 PM
6

Keep it coming! Soon we'll make it to tin foil, I can't freakin' wait.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:10 AM
8

Now we're getting somewhere! Most relevant and worthwhile thing you've written in weeks.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:07 AM
8

Write something worth reading, for once.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:03 AM
2

Would that suspicion be misplaced? IME those people are often way less sincere than they appear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 01:58 AM
10

No, but it absolutely does correct the misinformation your brainlessly parroted. You're welcome 🫶 Edit: lol, and there's the respond-and-block dance. Guess some people can't handle being corrected ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:54 PM
2

Ok buddy, let me be more direct: if there's specific comments you have problems with, link them. I don't know why specifically liking the game destiny is bad, or what specifically the other person has said in that (admittedly, quite often shitty) subreddit, and I'm not inclined to go digging through account history on a "uhhmmm, he said problematic things at some point in his account history!!!!" Comment. You may well be correct, but it's considered very rude not to give specific examples when m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:53 PM
1

If you're gonna say something like that, at least pull out some specific examples. It's impolite not to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:46 PM
10

Women commit more DV than men do, among other things. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:45 PM
9

Hence why more and more young men just aren't voting at all, bud. You've got the party that hates you, specifically, while claiming to be egalitarian and the one that hates everyone (with fewer than 7 digits in their bank account) as options. Hypocrites who can't even be bothered to pretend otherwise and outright evil people, what to do? I still voted for the dems myself, bur I can see why many wouldn't.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 11:36 PM
5

You give the mods of feminist subs way too much credit, and massively and unrealistically catastrophize about people in this sub in the same breath. Go home teenager, you've never said anything worth reading in this sub or any other as far as I can see.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 11:33 PM
20

That's not a person who "thinks straight" it's one who thinks men are the perpetrators of 99% of rapes. That is to say, a complete and total dumbass. That guy isn't working with anybody, just search the sub for some of their other fantastic contributions (since they're too cowardly to show their account history normally), such as the standard "uhm, akshually, those aren't real feminists!!! No True Feminist!!!!!" Schlock they semi-regularly spout. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/HV3deYq8vA
/r/MensRights12/06/26 11:11 PM
24

Also, women are more likely to joke about men being raped than men are. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34978934/
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:44 PM
20

Among other things, men are half of rape victims, and women half of perpetrators. Do better or buzz off, bigot. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20Am…
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:44 PM
52

Here's some examples of institutional misandry, along with a source stating that women are half of perpetrators, and men are half of victims. Educate yourself and get your head into the modern day instead of centuries neither of us were alive for or buzz off, bigot. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1…
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:42 PM
6

If it's prejudice based on sex, for one reason or another, it is sexism. Weird how y'all are desperate to call that toxic masculinity when women spread it more often than men do by most studies, ain't it? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34978934/
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 08:05 PM
1

Ah, so you know that, do you? Whatever would us poor hopeless men do with only the evidence of our eyes and ears to go by, without one such as you to guide us? 🙄 Stats about women's misfortunes that coincidentally up-play them massively, while ignoring the fact that men are either just as affected or even more affected than women are for most of the listed points. It being "chock value" is immaterial, most online misogyny is hyst the same and yet we wouldn't find your ass condescending to women …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 07:58 PM
22

The fact that the statistics are presented in such a blatantly biased way and that some of them have already been disproven, mostly. I can't help but notice your account history is hidden and you only have one other low-effort comment on this sub, are you a bot or a brigadier?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 12:51 AM
1

Hidden account history, nothing of substance to say, unwilling to acknowledge objective reality... bait, bot, or brigading? Call it here, folks. My bet is on brigading, personally.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:47 AM
12

Russia is doing amazing. You really think that?
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:14 AM
1

Total crock of shit, there's nothing that makes woken any less mentally competent than men, even if they tend to have slightly higher in-group bias (and that may well be socially driven for all I know). Get that misogyny outta here, just because sexism isn't targeted at men doesn't mean it isn't indefensibly stupid.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:14 AM
3

It's backed by historical evidence, though I understand that people like you aren't really the most prone to caring about such things.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:45 PM
3

Actual experience interacting with feminists as a man is a big source, but besides that, the mere fact that misandrists like Koss are literally always supported and funded by even the supposedly egalitarian feminist movements, historically speaking. Same shit like with the feminist groups that sent Erin Pizzey running from her own country because she had the gall to suggest a men's DV shelter. They all either directly or indirectly support actions and people like that.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:31 PM
3

I'm telling you exactly why she is not the exception, she is the average feminist of they were given the leeway to be as academically honest as they all so desperately crave. Keep up, dolt? Thanks 🤭
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:15 PM
6

Ah see, there it is. Calling an entire half of cases "the exception" and claiming they're less common despite all evidence. You can't even be logically consistent with stuff you said mere minutes ago 🤭 "She" (that is to say, Koss) was given a well-paying career teaching gender studies at feminist universities and significant acclaim among feminists for her outright lies.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:12 PM
4

And yet, they try and do so frequently, often by literally lying outright about the genders of those affected in order to make themselves look like bigger victims. See Mary P. Koss and her claims about it being impossible to rape men that she used to get federal reporting definitions changed, or UK feminists' long career of making absolutely certain that male victims of women get categorized under "victims of violence against women and girls" and to make sure that rape against men doesn't count …
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:59 PM
6

Women very often say "more important" when talking about issues that affect them, even when theyre a minority of those affected or less affected than men are. You'd know that if you listened to them. See: "a million men die in foreign war, women most affected" as a statement said by multiple politicians over the years.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:50 PM
7

And all of them show... that's right buddy, that men's issues are just as important, and it isn't "lowering" women's often catastrophized issues to acknowledge reality there.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:44 PM
3

You... goggled women? How do you goggle a woman? Besides the easy joke, are you seriously using the first set of Google search results as an example for why you think men are "taught to take it (sex) from women?" I hope you're just young and not honestly this stupid.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:43 PM
8

You literally don't though, especially since both groups experience rape (from the other group!) at roughly equal rates, as per the CDC. Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challeng…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:31 PM
3

Oh, I absolutely do. Probably just not in the same way that you think they're treated differently though, going by these comments.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:30 PM
5

Are you high? I dunno if I agree with the guy who started this chain, but men are not at all taught to rape, and "liking women" isn't even slightly equivalent to that either.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 08:06 PM
3

Okie dokie, I'll take your word for it on that one.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/26 07:57 PM
1

Do you know why people pick bangs? I've always been sorta confused tbh, it never seems to look very good compared to not having them. Is it just some convenience aspect I'm too bald to understand?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/26 07:48 PM
16

In places like the US with slightly more balanced laws, as many claims are found by the court to be definitely false as claims that are found definitely true. Iirc it's in the 5-10% range for both, woth some ~80% being unprovable. In a place like the UK with their backwards laws, where they'll literally just jail you over a woman's "heartfelt" words? I dunno, but it seems likely.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 06:25 PM
3

Thanks for being understanding despite my accusatory tone, and I hope you have a good one too!
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:25 AM
3

Ah, that seems reasonable. We've all been there, sorry for being a bit aggressive. Fair enough, maybe I'm being a bit harsh in general.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:57 PM
1

Buddy, I'm not erasing that role. I'm explicitly agreeing with you on that front. Repeatedly, in fact. That's what the whole "feminism does good for women" portion of the comment is about.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:22 PM
0

It's not the participation, it's the participation combined with the complete lack of practicing what you preached. I can't help but notice you edited the "I don't even go to feminist subreddits!" portion out of your comment, too. You only ever make the above "why do we need to make it a competition" point to men talking about their issues. That's the whole problem. Nobody asked you to dislike women. Just to be honest with yourself and us about what your actual views are on the subject and who y…
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:21 PM
2

And I think you must not have paid much attention to historical evidence. As I said, they do a lot of good, exclusively for women, and no small amount of harm toward men and their issues.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:11 PM
-1

I wasn't looking for anything to attack. I was curious about if you practiced what you preached. You don't. You've commented on r/feminism only slightly less often than you have here.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 10:49 PM
-1

20 bucks says we won't find your ass on a feminist subreddit saying literally any of this. checks account history I should've bet more money, wow. Usually you people at least hide your account history before saying shit like this.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 06:47 PM
5

A lot of good... for women. Historically, they've actively made things worse for men whenever given the slightest opportunity. See Mary P. Koss who was given a career by these people, them running Erin Pizzey out of her country with death threats, and how they react to areas women are substantially over-privileged by trying to increase that privilege (like in education in every western nation).
/r/MensRights04/06/26 06:45 PM
1

Oh, and now you're here speaking for women in general? That's patently false, look up who's been behind historical white feather movements.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 06:16 PM
4

Nah, the government just ain't willing to draft them. For reasons that are quite obvious to everyone else, but which you seem to have issues with. I'm sorry about that, it must make things hard for you not being able to use much reason.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:12 PM
6

"Won't be penalties for not filing a selective service form after the end of this year" ... because a certain female dem politician just made it so draft registration is automatic for all men (and only men) when they hit 18? Lmao.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:32 AM
9

Is there anything like a source that this actually happens, or are you just another woman coming in to make ridiculous claims about men and male experiences without expecting to have to back those claims up? Those "manosphere" people woth fewer youtube subscribers than northernlion don't claim to even be MRAs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 12:52 AM
10

Lmao, like clockwork you people show up with hidden account histories and a massive bias against anyone giving even a single rat's ass about men's rights. If you must brigade, at least go the extra mile and make a new account? Do you ever call out feminists for the misandrists I their ranks?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 12:50 AM
3

Probably to leave an abusive relationship if I had to guess, seeing as women are responsible for 70% of nonreciprocal DV.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:49 PM
25

Lmao, the average woman did play a role in creating those issues. Why are you infantilizing historical women, when they've been the majority of the population gendered standards to children since forever, and a majority of voters in my country since the 80s? If you must fail to engage with peoples points on this sub, at least don't be quite so disingenuous about it. Because women got the benefits of having signed up for the draft (in this case, the ability to vote) without even an ounce of the e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:22 PM
7

Do you have any actual examples you can provide of you doing so? Not like there's some drought of misandrist feminist subreddits, if you're the type to loiter here already.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:16 PM
7

And when such inhumanities are only ever applied to men, in a way that men call prejudicial, again I ask who you think you are to try and "correct" them?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 11:08 PM
8

What do you think gives you the right to decide what men should count as prejudice against men, regardless of the source?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 10:47 PM
11

When a woman is prejudiced against women, that's internalized misogyny, no?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 10:38 PM
20

Well, when the context of "it" is a bad thing forced upon one by the government, that does make it misandry, that is to say prejudice against men, when men are the only ones affected. Pay just a little attention to the context before being a pedant?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 09:32 PM
2

You'd have known better if you read the damn things you reccomended before brainlessly parroting them when men point out how feminists treat men in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 08:17 PM
2

You are an utter stereotype of a feminist woman who claims to care about men's issues without actually paying even a lick of attention to what men tell you about them. Do better, or get out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 08:10 PM
3

Mmhmm, so you just reccomended it without so much as reading the shit she said, or looking into any of the historical context around her? You just know she was an extremely rare feminist writer who didn't hate men outright, and decided that you'd reccomend it based on that alone?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 08:08 PM
1

And nothing of value was lost 😊 Also darn, guess you weren't shadowbanned.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 02:13 AM
1

Oh hey, I think you finally got shadowbanned, your most recent comment isn't showing up for me, or when I open an incognito tab. Wanna try and make it again?
/r/MensRights30/05/26 02:04 AM
1

Accuse you of nonsense? Bud. Your comment history on this sub is public, it's quite obviously not nonsense. You haven't even "pushed back" on shit, to do that you'd have to give examples of you not being a contrarian and condescending prick on the topic of men's issues in general, not even just on this sub. You've failed to do so, likely because there aren't any examples to share. Oh no, and now the bigot is irritated by how I talk? The horror. However shall I cope. 🤭
/r/MensRights30/05/26 12:05 AM
1

I don't know about your actions, just the words you say. And those words tend to need defence in order to be taken as anything except the usual misandrist brigadier this sub gets. You insisting otherwise is not helping your case, at least in the eyes of the internet strangers here 🤭 Your original message was actually among the more tame examples of dumb shit you say in this sub. It was only enough to tip me off to look at what else you say.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 11:53 PM
1

Your best example of "genuine engagement" is a slew of insults followed up by, at the absolute best begrudgingly agreement when proved objectively wrong, and more often not even that much. I think we could do without engagement by someone like you, frankly. If this was any of the feminist subs and you were a man giving even the lightest criticism, you'd already be banned. You wouldn't have to defend yourself if your actions weren't quite so obviously in need of defending ¯\(ツ)/¯
/r/MensRights29/05/26 10:26 PM
4

She's the most obvious example possible of "woman who has never so much as had a close male friend who she treated like a mentally equal human being still thinking she knows more about how it is to grow up and exist as a man than men do" in these discussions, just as a start. Second of all, she fucked her students while yapping about how awful power imbalances are in relationships. Third of all, she claimed that male slaves were treated significantly better than female ones. Theres a lot of prob…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 07:52 PM
2

You don't have to defend yourself like this, though. There's always either genuine engagement in good faith or fucking off, as options 👍
/r/MensRights29/05/26 05:39 PM
3

No, I know for a fact that your engagement in this sub is all negative. You'd know that if you read my comment. You could tell me why you're here at all, despite being the way that you obviously are.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 04:04 AM
4

No, you don't need one for anything. Your lack of literally anything except negative engagement makes me curious why you bother showing up at all though, enough so to ask at least. What do you think my argument is?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 04:02 AM
3

No, because your account history on this sub is literally nothing but you being a contrarian and condescending ass, who can maybe be argued over into the objectively correct position after much argument... just to continue being a dipshit in the next post. Again, I don't agree with OP much either.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:59 AM
6

Then they aren't "turning into the people they hate," now are they? Because "the people they hate" are the ones generalizing based on gender, and unless I'm less literate than I thought, OP ain't doing that. You do know that's the issue we have with feminism, right? Actually, why are you even on this sub to start with? You just seem to want to nothing to do with any actual discussion of men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:44 AM
8

Pretty rarely? Bud, it happens as often as the reverse going by CDC stats. You're not exactly disproving OP's case with that dumbass assertion, and I don't even necessarily agree with them. You're taking convictions from a biased legal system as the whole of the facts, which is silly. the bias in the legal system "A 2020 study shows that women receive 33% (15 days) shorter prison sentences than men, even when controlling for all observable characteristics – including a very precise description o…
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:35 AM
7

So I'm assuming "no real feminist" gave Mary P. Koss the social standing, lucrative career teaching gender studies, and influence over US Title IX policies she has, then?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:33 AM
9

You understand that generalizing a movement that people join as competent adults is not the same as generalizing an entire gender, right? I don't even necessarily agree with OP, some feminists just aren't particularly observant and really do buy that "feminism is for equality for all!" line, but c'mon.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:32 AM
0

I could ask you the same question, no? I'm just killing time tbh.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 11:12 PM
0

No, but it certainly takes one when you're claiming that some 2/3rds of male responses to an anonymized survey are liars.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 05:06 PM
0

You don't just get to decide all your assumptions are reasonable while whining about everyone else needing sources, lmao. That's silly. I do agree with your first sentence, but I don't know if I agree enough to state that it adequately explains the gap when it's also reasonable to assume that men just like women more than vice versa.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:36 PM
1

Yes, but I can't exactly look up your opinion, can I? I like getting the opinions of wackos on the internet, it's usually interesting. Kind of boring this time, but what do you do?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:27 PM
3

Well, it seems that men are some 4 out 5 people killing themselves over it, so maybe the whole friendlessness thing is more gendered than you at first assume.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 10:58 PM
5

Yes.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 10:41 PM
7

An option, sure. Not a particularly effective one though, going by historical context, unless you're willing to hurt a lot of people, and/or get massacred in droves like a few of those union protests were. Calm down, christ. No need to get so fussy, the comment wasn't even that provocative. I never tried to "liken all feminists" to anything, you might be thinking of a different person.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:30 PM
5

... I don't know your answer to whether or not the movie is any good. That's why I asked. Are you new to the whole "conversation" thing?
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:27 PM
3

Yeah... after reading that I'm starting to think that might just be a kid. Sometimes I wish internet age verification was ever a thing that actually worked.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:26 PM
5

Huh. Out of context, that scene seems simply silly. Is the movie any good? Your comment seems less disrespectful and more petulant, tbh.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:07 PM
3

Oh, it was a conversation on that whole shitstorm? None of my business, frankly, though that does seem like a dumbass comment on their end. Do you have any examples that support your claim that he doesn't actually care about male victims, and instead only wants to "whine about women?" You clearly don't care much yourself one way or the other, going by your contributions to the conversation.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:04 PM
5

Is that what the kids are calling it, these days? At least take me out to dinner first.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:01 PM
3

Oh hey, I'm in this one. Yeah, that sub has very clearly just been colonized by misandrist women at this point. They dunno how men work, and don't wanna learn.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/26 07:27 PM
0

Bud, you're the one who made the initial claim that it was a strong enough phenomenon to affect this survey to the degree you assumed.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 07:02 PM
1

Do feel free to present it.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 06:18 PM
1

Mm, I'm not at all convinced that this would have enough of an effect in context to make up for the truly massive difference in both stated and revealed perceptions of the opposite gender from both sides. You're welcome to believe otherwise entirely without proof, though, it's a free website.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 06:08 PM
15

If you're going to pull a quote from somebody's account history out and present it without context, it's considered impolite not to at least also drop a link to the source comment.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 06:01 PM
5

Does this look like positive social change, to you? The bombers did not exist in sufficient quantity or competency to convince anyone of anything, they certainly weren't the determining factor in earning women the right to vote.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 05:59 PM
2

That would obviously have the same effect towards women, making it cancel out for comparisons sake, no?
/r/MensRights25/05/26 05:41 PM
15

Too much microplastic, lmao.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 02:42 AM
2

Thing is, you're vastly overestimating how egalitarian the definition they changed it to was. It still did (and does to this day) entirely ignore women's victimization of men, and simply included only men's victimization of men in the definition written by feminists. There's a reason they wrote it like that, dumbass. They want to continue pushing the narrative that rape is "90% male perpetuated" beyond all reasonable sense. the bias in the legal system "A 2020 study shows that women receive 33% …
/r/MensRights23/05/26 06:13 PM
0

The word of which women? I've met plenty of cis women who are perfectly supportive of trans people. Do people believe unrelated and pointless asides help their argument? I called you a dolt because you quite clearly are. Sorry you had to find out like this, bud 🫶 Of course you're afraid of trans people to an irrational degree, you'd have given me a source for your claim that they're more likely than not to victimize cis people by now otherwise. I need to seek help... because I require actual sta…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 04:29 PM
3

This is according to literally nothing bit conviction stats from a provably biased legal system. The CDC records near-identical rates of victimization and perpetration between genders. the bias in the legal system https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders society's unwillingness to call it rape when women do it to men, despite the CDC finding that this is as common as the reverse. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 04:23 PM
1

I can't help but notice the complete and utter lack of money where your mouth is.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 07:21 PM
5

Oh, I wouldn't know. I'm just going by what I've seen and the studies I've read, which tell me nothing about folks from the other half of the world. I have seen guys get with women who were traveling from over there to the US for college though, and it seemed surprisingly successful despite most of them marrying early for green-card reasons. I would've thought that'd put a lot of pressure on the relationship, but I guess not.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 04:02 PM
4

You're the one who keeps insisting women have it worse, despite all available evidence. Well duh, you clearly haven't been reading any of the comments that laid out how provably incorrect you are, with cited sources. I imagine that has something to do with your general illiteracy issues. Men are victims of violence far more, and make up 80% of murder victims. Want more sources?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 01:08 AM
5

Lmao. "I'm not even gonna engage!" engages anyway That's pathetic. You simply can't fathom having the holes in your faulty arguments pointed out. If you hate it here so much, as I told you earlier, buzz off. Nobody is making you stick around and keep saying dumb shit. You're right, that isn't correct. More men are victims of DV than women. "In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17395835/#:~:text=In%20…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 01:06 AM
5

If you can manage, do try and keep your interaction with those men to a minimum. They'd thank you if they knew what type of person you really were 👍 You really think that we'll never be in a disaster situation, and that we've never personally faced discrimination for being men? And yet, you constantly try and insist that women have it worse. Your ass literally started the competition, and then threw a fuss when you were corrected 🤭
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:45 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/4MxyILTOSi
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:43 AM
7

According to a provably biased justice system? Hilarious. If you use convictions as the be-all-end- all measure in these sorts of discussions, shit gers weird fast. Did you know, that as many women are convicted of falsely accusing men of rape as men are convicted of rape, for example? It's about 5-10% of cases for each category, with some 80% of cases not having enough evidence to convict in either direction, in the US.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:42 AM
3

You think it exists, ypu just thoughtlessly assert that it is lesser than women's. Yes, we all read the thread. If you can't manage to buzz off, at least keep up? Thanks. Women literally do not have higher victimization rates of either of those things. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped”…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:40 AM
1

🤦‍♂️ Not at all, no. I think you're just too honest-to-god stupid to understand what the conversation has actually been about from the start. Feel free to say whatever you want as a response, don't expect me to reply unless it's particularly interesting, though.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 11:52 PM
1

No dumbass, that conscription is slavery and that women have more civil rights than men do, by most reasonable metrics.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 11:49 PM
1

Eh, some sympathy for women is warranted. It ain't all sunshine and rainbows being turned into a paranoid wreck by consistent fear mongering. Glad you stick around here despite idiots like the one I replied to, though.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:04 PM
5

I've been living in the present, rather than millenia ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 08:02 PM
6

Lol, your first comment calling me a dork was somehow less empty-headed than this one. That's what is expected of men, largely by women. I don't think it's all that amazing, it's pretty dehumanizing, in fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 07:13 PM
-1

Women are more safe than men in the vast majority of scenarios, going bu the actual statistical facts. Agree with the rest well enough, though.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:59 PM
0

Thing is though, are trans women men? In any really meaningful way? Not from what I've seen. Why are you advocating for gendered rights distribution anyway? It absolutely is just a women's privilege over men, considering the factual reality of how seldom women are victims of just about every crime, compared to men. They are already safe, dolt. If they decide to feel uncomfortable because someone else has decided to exist in their vicinity while having a gender identity they dislike, that's a "th…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:31 PM
11

So then why are you constantly parroting shitty and reality-divorced misandrist talking points on this sub? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/nUJ3zwTIYR
/r/MensRights21/05/26 04:38 PM
10

So, why didn't that work for you?
/r/MensRights21/05/26 04:13 PM
5

Learn to hate everyone equally. We're all about as shitty to each other on average, regardless of birth-decided demographic.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 04:11 PM
36

That women in the west hate men more often than the opposite, obviously.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:46 PM
9

That's not an answer, now is it? Seriously, name a western country, I'll tell you what rights women have there that men do not. Those women have been the largest voting population in the US every election since the 80s, take it up with them for voting in male politicians.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:33 PM
9

You say, as you routinely minimize men's oppression and catastrophize about women's. Buzz off, nobody wants you here.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:32 PM
5

Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for i…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:31 PM
10

If men are so privileged, why are they the vast majority of homeless people? You're engaging I the apex fallacy, dolt. The vast majority (some 70%, let me know if you want a source) of non-reciprocal DV comes from women towards men. Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:28 PM
12

If that second paragraph is true, why do they have demonstrably more rights than men everywhere in the west?
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:27 PM
5

What do you mean by "trans ideology" exactly? I've met plenty of non-misandrist trans people, if whatever gender you like. Frankly, the trans women are slightly less likely to be misandrist than cis women IME. The worst aspects of feminism are cultural I think, not endemic to women as a whole, that's just misogyny.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:26 PM
17

I think you may in fact be genuinely stupid as hell if you think that the deaths of women and children are worse than solely the deaths of men. Buzz off with that shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 02:45 PM
123

Believe it or not, the same study found that the majority of men aspouse positive views towards women in general.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 02:09 AM
2

Safety concerns that are massively overblown? Lmao, women are a minority of victims of all violent crime, and only half of all sexual crime victims.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:18 AM
1

Yes. It's an idiotic law made for amoral reasons, without even any attention paid to historical cases of banned medical procedures and what actually happened post-ban. It's a publicity stunt for some of the worst politicians available.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 10:04 PM
1

I am not OP. I was more curious about ones women lack that men have, tbh, since your statement implied that there were some.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:00 PM
1

Mm, the US usually puts it as less than 21%, that's interesting. Wonder why the top end of that range is so hight for the UK? Regardless, 1 in 5 is pretty rare, comparatively. Not quite as rare as I thought though, to be fair.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 09:50 PM
1

Bad news is, they probably only actually changed their minds in regards to trans men. Whole different thing from convincing them to be less sexist towards men in general. Good on you for your optimism, even if it doesn't seem particularly realistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/26 04:25 PM
1

Then you haven't interacted with many leftist groups IRL.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 03:39 PM
1

Oh thank goodness, your most recent comment deletion makes it seem like you were shadowbanned. Glad they're deciding to actually take out the trash for once in this sub.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:33 PM
1

So, no response to the actual things I said? M'kay, you know nobody is forcing you to comment here, right? If you have no response, you're welcome to just... not say anything. Oh, just more usdefaultism, then? Hilarious.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:32 PM
1

You learned this definition in school, wowie, must be more valuable in describing reality than actual experience, so true bestie. You were misled, and it doesn't seem to have been particularly hard to mislead you going by these comments. And yet, per fact, the vast majority of feminists are that way. The definition changed. Tough shit. We've been over this, in all the comments where you claim to know more about misandrist feminists than the men with experience interacting with them.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:51 PM
1

No, dumbass, I'm annoyed because you refuse to see the difference between "less dangerous" and "more deserving of empathy." You don't have to blame women at all, but removing all accountability for the situation from them entirely is ridiculous. Where? When? Anything like a goddamn source? Without those sorts of pesky little details, yeah, you're full of shit. Oh no, however shall I cope. This is the internet, we're all nothing.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:30 PM
1

Mmmhmm, per a definition... that's innacurate in the vast majority of cases. As you've been told. You're welcome for the correction 👍 Desperation is a sad, sad thing. What I can't stand is you idiots coming in and confidently explaining men's experiences to them, while being entirely ignorant yourself.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:21 PM
1

Compared to women who chose to give birth? Yeah, abortion was quite rare, even when legal.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:17 PM
1

And much to do with government-backed slavery. Abortion does have quite a bit to do with whether a given person is forced unwillingly to have responsibility for a child they didn't want, too.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:16 PM
3

Are you high, or simply illiterate? You keep putting in those "little" asides about how supposedly all of women's privileges are just because of misogyny. That's contrarian. Besides, the court doesn't view them as less competent human beings, it just thinks of them as inherently better and more deserving of empathy ones. That rape was mostly or even commonly only originally illegal due to property laws. Don't worry, we all know you're familiar with being full of shit. Hey, be nice to yourself! Y…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 04:21 AM
2

"Where do you find those feminists? I've never talked to one." The statement does imply that, true. It does so in an effort to maintain plausible deniability, and is only slightly more common than "yes all men" in my experience. Y'know, which I have, and which you completely lack. Please try and keep up? Thanks! As I said, yes. The men in your life are better off without "advocates" like you. Obviously you don't actually speak up that often as you don't pay much attention, so there won't be much…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 04:18 AM
3

In your first comment, when you confidently claim to have never seen these types of feminist, and then go so far as to say that you know how "real feminists" treat men, better than anyone with actual experience talking to feminists as a man. Do keep up? Thanks! Oh, but I thought you said you've never met these people at all? Careful, don't change your story now. Wouldn't want anyone to see you for the lying hypocrite that you are, now would we? Frankly, I think the men in your life are likely be…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:42 AM
3

Bodily autonomy isn't the same as... bodily autonomy. M'kay, you're clearly not serious. Do you think that it's "overwhelmingly majority commited by men" because you treat stats from a biased legal system as gospel? https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:27 AM
3

"This other thing" being the exact same civil right, but to a much more lethal (on average) degree? Mmhmm, so different. Women lack abortion access. A procedure that is quite rare, even when legal. Men are on the hook for child support even when raped, and are liable to be enslaved by their government's whims, and many people support that. You can say that... and coincidentally maximize women's problems and minimize men's, when you claim it as if men have bodily autonomy either.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:23 AM
3

And yet, you quite obviously fail to do it. You even go so far as to pretend these people don't exist, and claim you've never met them. That's the whole problem. You're not "educating" anyone, lmao. That's hilarious. Oh no, you have to... defend the stupid things you say??? Deal with pushback when you minimize other people's experiences? The horror. Nobody said "everybody is the same" genius.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:21 AM
2

No, I'm making a very mild joke at your expense. Good for you that you saw the rare non-hypocrite feminist in the wild though, wish I were so lucky.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:13 AM
4

"You people" are contrarian idiots who come to this sub with hidden account histories. Where you claimed that it was because the courts see women as less capable of harm, when really they simply have more empathy towards women like most of humanity, as shown in every study on the subject. You agreed with me, then tried to twist things with slightly ahistorical takes about legal misogyny. You can be right about some things and wrong about others, bud. Is this your first exposure to the concept? T…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:02 AM
2

It's wrong to assume that they're feminists just because they're women. Some people actually care about gender equality.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 01:59 AM
3

Mmm, so college, then? That tracks too. You definitely wouldn't say a damn thing though, because they wouldn't say that they "hate every single man" in as many words. You've met people like that, they just say "not all men, but always a man" or "I'd choose the bear" or "98% of rapists are men" or any other such shit. "Kill all men" may largely be isolated to the internet, but the people who say it are not.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 01:58 AM
5

Christ, you people even try and make women being treated demonstrably better than men by the legal system out to be misogyny? Hilarious. Meh, I only ever saw a single source claiming as much, while all the others show that women get significantly reduced sentences for the exact same crime in pretty much every scenario. You might be mislead by the fact that only the worst offenses from women are punished at all, compared to even lesser offenses from men.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:48 PM
5

And you were wrong to do so yes, that's what the whole comment was about.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:44 PM
7

... duh. It's the internet. Nobody knows you. I do know how people like you act, though. The way you talk about this makes it seem like you're a high-schooler. Is that the case? "Standing up for men in isolated scenarios when other men are victimizing them" =/= "standing up to feminists who say wack-ass shit about and clearly hate men in feminist-majority spaces"
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:43 PM
2

A definition written by someone who knows for a fact they're part of nothing but a women's empowerment movement, but who want to sucker as many men as possible into thinking feminism as a whole will ever do anything to help them when women are advantaged.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:25 PM
3

It certainly is when they ain't trying to do that at all.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:23 PM
6

Ah, and there's the rub. When you speak to men, those people "aren't real feminists who've for equality." In my experience though, people like you don't exactly stand up to them or even treat them particularly differently when you see them in person. "Supporting women" ain't at all the same as "supporting feminists" and surely even you know that?
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:23 PM
9

I dunno about the punishment being "exactly the same" when you take into account the pervasive and all but universal bias towards treating female criminals with more leniency than male ones.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:17 PM
2

The lack of abortion sucks, but I dunno if you can really call that specific inability to make decisions about your body a right men have that women lack considering what happens to male victims of rape by women who conceive, and that whole thing with the state-mandated combat slavery. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us…
/r/MensRights18/05/26 06:20 PM
2

Yeah, I was also too harsh, it's not like you don't have a point. I just read that specific comparison made really, really often.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 06:58 PM
3

👍
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:40 PM
2

Is that why you breathlessly defend places like witches vs patriarchy? https://www.reddit.com/ilm6n3w?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=2
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:33 PM
2

Oh yeah, because places that are simply "bigoted for satire reasons" always stay that way and are never just a thin veneer people place over their actual bigotry, just ask 4chan and the donald subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:24 PM
2

Daily reminder that you can kindly buzz off and make everyone involved better off for it 👍👍
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:23 PM
12

For the 1000th time, generalizing a social group that someone chooses to be in for how that social group consistently acts is not the same as generalizing half the human race based on circumstances of their birth.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:21 PM
5

I sincerely appreciate your optimism, even if I agree with the other guy and his negative outlook on the current specifics of the protests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/26 10:58 PM
7

Sometimes society incentivizes treating them like that, but that doesn't mean they actually are like that. Sometimes they even insist that they be treated like that, but you shouldn't let that diminish your view of them as fully competent human beings. Kindly be less of a sexist piece of shit, please? You make us look bad.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:21 PM
8

Men are historically and systemically marginalized too. In the west, they're actually marginalized more severely than women, at the moment. If you're so focused on history that you actively ignore modern reality, you are a truly useless person. Erin Pizzey was alienated from feminism, and then from her whole country, as she was chased out by death threats from feminists. All for the crime of daring to suggest opening a men's DV shelter. There's a reason for that. Many feminists have directly adv…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:50 PM
7

You support it... verbally, and will never actually do anything about it while loudly insisting that men should March and donate to assist you with women's issues. Like most feminists, actually. Thanks for the example, historical revisionist.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:48 PM
1

There's the new draft registration being automatic that the Dems recently pushed through, but it was sponsored by a republican too, to be fair.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 01:14 AM
2

Based on what examples would you say this is the likeliest case?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:07 AM
3

Then, "all you've heard" is the sound of you shouting and plugging your own ears. Lol, first of all women are more likely to be injured in accidents because they drive less on average. They simply have less practice, and so crash more per mile driven and crash harder when they do, on top of being slightly less sturdy on a structural level (which you certainly aren't fixing with modern medical or engineering knowledge). I suppose we'll see if the dummy makes any difference in crash severity or ca…
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:44 PM
2

Can't argue with that one, tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 12:24 AM
1

"Admirationally" lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/05/26 12:09 AM
3

The funding of different gendered illness research programs sure as hell ain't fake. What do you mean "nothing ever comes out of it?" How do you think we came up with cures/preventative measures for every other disease we've figured out at this point? Cancer is a particularly tough problem, but so were all the others. Bud, be honest, are you trying to sell me on snake oil? I'm hesitant to believe they'd actually leave a promising cure by the wayside, considering just how much money there is in a…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 09:50 PM
8

Ah, then in that case I think we agree. The cult shit is something I can't properly identify the cause of, wish I knew though. I don't think it's the sole reason or anything, but I sincerely do believe that it was a contributing factor. I wouldn't be surprised if you're right about the Gaza thing, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 10:24 PM
1

None of your comments on this sub make it seem like you particularly care about men's rights. Why are you here?
/r/MensRights09/05/26 07:16 PM
1

That's not the same generalization at all, dumbass. The difference is that one generalization is about someone based on their inherent traits, while the other is about someone based on the job they choose and the trends with regards to how shit people in that profession usually are on the subject.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 07:14 PM
1

The problem comes when we have current population levels of old people, but only 30% of today's workforce attempting to support those old people. Social security will go directly into the dumpster, seeing South Korea as an example. Population importing works great, to a point. Past that though, why would those people want to immigrate to a country that'll be imminently worse-off than the one they came from, where they'll have worse odds starting a family, and where laws will increasingly discrim…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:54 PM
9

If you genuinely think that women-specific medical and safety issues aren't taken notably more seriously than man-specific ones, you haven't been paying any attention.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:12 PM
1

Least convincing assertion I've seen in months.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 05:53 PM
8

"Main driver" behind the rise of MAGA. It doesn't have to push men toward the right, all it has to do is push them away from the left. Iirc both parties lost votes in the last election, dems just lost more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 05:48 PM
23

Thing is, it doesn't have to lead you to support them to contribute to their rise. All it needs to do is drive you away from the left, which voting polls show us happened in the last election. Both parties lost votes, the dems just lost more, especially among young male demographics that traditionally voted blue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 05:46 PM
1

And coincidentally, a female Democrat politician just made it automatic for men to be registered, removing what freedom of choice we had. Coincidentally, historically women have been social enforcers of the draft through shaming campaigns. Besides, does it have to come from women to be misandry? Does it have to come from men to be misogyny, IE prejudice against women? Women are allowed into every branch of the armed forces, but never forced in. No, I didn't mean that, because mothers are the one…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 05:32 PM
1

Serious question, do you believe you aren't misandrist? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/dJlosE610Z Or do you think bending over backwards to minimize and defend misandry makes you anything different? You're wrong in this and every other comment you've made on the subject by the way. Here's some examples of institutional misandry that're all more than the mere reaction to misogyny that you claim: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers …
/r/MensRights08/05/26 10:29 PM
6

In this case, "haters" are the vast majority of women who use the term incel, so...
/r/MensRights08/05/26 06:27 PM
9

Funny how the young feminists say the exact same shit to applause from their own peers, then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 05:55 PM
0

Yes, I know how you feel and are based on the comments where you explain your stance repeatedly, glad we got that sorted out. Actively interpret... you laughing at misandry and downplaying it on this sub with a holier-than-thou attitude the whole time? M'kay. It was two days ago. This doesn't really mean much, the fact that you were really eager to throw it at me is what makes me think it was a token effort on your end exclusively to try and deflect from legitimate criticism, combined with how w…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 05:00 PM
10

Ugh, another twoxchromosomes addict with a comment history of basically just being a contrarian dumbass on this sub? And you don't even have the good grace to acknowledge that you're not being fully truthful, and that many HR departments do have a large measure of control over both hiring and firing? Sometimes I wish we were like the feminist subs just a little bit, so we could ban obvious bad-faith commenters like you. Why is it that women always feel entitled to decide what "real things" men s…
/r/MensRights08/05/26 03:40 AM
0

Mmmhmm, sure you would, bud. Totally. Well, you're also clearly also capable of being a smug dickhead, if it helps. You're allowed to not be angry at blatant sexism as well, but again, maybe read the room? You "minding your own business" is a very consistent pattern of minimizing misandry on this sub. I respond this way to everyone else who does the dumb shit you do, if it helps, you just think I'm hounding you because you keep doing it. Oh, lmao, really? You had to make a comment after the orig…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 03:00 AM
–

Enough for you to claim you have any sort of insight into what men talk about "very often" when women aren't around? If I used social media comments to make similar generalizations about women, I'd have some very negative and hopefully innacurate views, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 01:39 AM
2

And I personally like having the things I claim be generally agreed upon by those who are experts on the subject, but I suppose that's a disagreement rooted in how much you respect and acknowledge the "experts" in a given field. Fair enough.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 12:40 AM
1

I respect plenty of things you seem to have to say. Just not your stance on gender-based combat slavery. Your stance on abortion for example is a morally consistent and respectable one for example, even if I do not agree. If it was as "plainly obvious" as you claim, it wouldn't be so hotly debated even by people with anything like actual population-wide representative data on the subject.
/r/MensRights08/05/26 12:30 AM
1

The thing about the word "rude" is that it all relies on what a given person thinks is a justifiable response to a given action or comment. You just said that in the event of a country being invaded, that men have the natural duty (I believe that was pretty much your original wording before the edit, do feel free to correct me) to be enslaved for the meatgrinder while women should have no equivalent responsibility. Seems like advocating for gender-based slavery to me. And feminism was right abou…
/r/MensRights08/05/26 12:23 AM
4

Then where is that respect and care for those people who are enslaved due to nothing but their gender, exactly? Those people who you've previously insisted should still be enslaved due to their gender?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:50 PM
1

That's probably because I'm insulting and judging you for your wack-ass opinions, yes. Coincidentally, the fact that I can do this is another facet of this sub's commitment to actual discussion. I understand that you are trying your best. This does not make "your best" anything except advocacting for gender-based slavery, which deserves a bit of internet ridicule IMO. You'll survive, unlike many of the people you think should be sent to war in your place should the state decide the need has aris…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:31 PM
1

I wish I could say I was surprised, but I'm not. My issue is not with your tone, but with the actual content of your messages, specifically when ypu think it is "acceptable" for the state to enslave men for combat while placing no real expectation on women to do anything they weren't doing already. Which men should be deciding this, exactly? That's sorta the crux of the whole issue. That... you know that's just a post on psych today, not anything like actual proof, right? Even their linked studi…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:19 PM
1

Well, when your "opinions" tend to be largely either ahistorical or conjecture on gendered attributes un-backed by actual study on the subject, I can understand why.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:56 PM
1

And I told you that this was a stupid comparison to make in the first place even with your clarifications about specific activities they were "conscripted" for, yes. Where is the disconnect, for you? Not in WW2, again, obviously. The realities of trench warfare are far different than the realities of modern warfare, and strength (the only real measure where men consistently out-perform women from the studies I've seen besides "a lack of in-group bias") actually mattered quite a bit more back the…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:51 PM
1

Did you make this account specifically for this comment?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:13 PM
1

Don't worry, this place ain't like the feminist subs that ban men for daring to voice their opinions, this place is determined (to a fault) not to be like that. We even let the most obvious bad-faith trolls stick around, here. If anyone is going to be enslaved to fight for their country, everyone should be eligible equally. Obviously. Don't act like there's even half as much danger being a nurse as there is actually fighting. The insinuation that having to get a normal job was anything like comp…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 09:24 PM
3

Why are you asking if you can ask a question? Just ask.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 06:34 PM
1

They edited Mary P. Koss' Wikipedia article to try and hide her controversial statements, too.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 04:43 PM
0

You don't have to be malicious to be a contrarian prick, for some people it seems to come quite naturally. If a man were "having a laugh" about a misogynist joke, neither of us would be particular fans. You don't need to be in the midst of "incandescent rage" to read the room, Einstein. What bullying, exactly? Frankly, I didn't notice it was 4 months old. It was reccomended to me the day I replied. That's on me for coming to a dead thread, though, very bad internet etiquette. I didn't ask for wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/26 04:27 PM
2

Why are you always like this? Is there an explanation, or do you just have nothing better to do than downplay and make excuses for misandry all day?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/26 09:52 PM
6

Sometimes the paragraphs don't show up if you open the post a specific way. It has them on my end though, I think it depends on if you click the "comments" or the "image" part of the post first.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 09:44 PM
17

The red/blue version works just as well for the colorblind, no? And besides, if that was the case the FGM maps would be the same. They ain't.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 09:42 PM
26

As an example of something that's happened multiple times in the US: "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support#:~:text=More%20recently%2C%20in,Arizona%20Republic%20newspaper%3A
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:58 PM
12

Wow. That's sexism against everyone involved through most of history and pre-history, wrapped in a bullshit pseudoscience package. I'm sincerely impressed.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/26 08:39 PM
1

Tell the mental health workers trying to take care of you that they have my condolences.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 10:21 PM
1

You are aware that you can just... not reply if you don't have anything worth reading to say, right? Lol, you people are hilarious.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 10:18 PM
1

Everyone has a limit, I suppose.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 10:16 PM
1

Why delete the rest of your comments, out of curiosity?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 10:13 PM
1

Yours was passable. Managed to kill a bit of time on my shift, at least. Thanks for making the rest of us look less stupid by comparison, eh?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 09:42 PM
2

I provide sources that look at the factual reality of the situation. What about this "favors men" in your opinion, exactly? And evidently not in backing up the dumb shit they say on the internet, to take a page from your book and genericize a gender from a single dipshit. And you have been presented with a reasonably iron-clad study showing women being more weird about men's victimization than men are. Wowie. You know this, huh? I don't suppose it's from either personal experience being a man at…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 09:38 PM
3

I'm glad you're amused, at least. "All wars" have not been created by men. That's so monumentally ahistorical, I don't even know where to start, but a female US Democrat politician (the party I personally favor) was just responsible for making draft registration automatic and fully non-optional for US men. And the over 70% female teaching population has been shown to markedly discriminate against their male students. Do you have any sources for your "girls r smrter" talking point, or are you beh…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 09:27 PM
4

So, when a man is forced to have sex with a woman against his will, that is not rape, in your eyes? Simple yes or no question, even someone like you should be able to answer it, right? Also funny how you ignore the murder thing in favor of using dumbass cherry-picked rape numbers yourself, while accusing me of doing the same.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 07:36 PM
7

Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for i…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 07:11 PM
6

80% of murder victims are men, and men are also about half of rape victims as per the CDC. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that d…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 07:11 PM
2

In theory, absolutely. In practice? Nah, won't turn out that way, going by all historical evidence. I respect the optimism, though.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 01:38 PM
5

Dunno about the EU, but in the US when we have definitive proof that a man was raped as a minor by an adult woman, the courts still rule in favor of the woman. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support#:~:text=More%20recently%2C%20in,Ariz…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 09:21 PM
2

Yeah. I like this sub much more, personally, but that one ain't quite as bad as it's made out to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 03:09 AM
1

Is China really the shining example of economic policy that we should be following? They're a bit of a special case on the subject anyway, due to the unfortunate gender breakdown of the country as a whole and their rather... let's say lax regulations for businesses allowing production to skyrocket as quality of life takes a hit. I do hope you're right, though.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 02:54 AM
35

They don't even claim to represent MRA stuff. Feminists just can't help but paint every bad thing some guy somewhere does as evidence of inherent male sin.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:43 PM
1

That's... that's not happening either, where did you even get the impression anyone expected that?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:25 PM
9

Women sexually assault men more than men sexually assault men. Did your dumb ass not even read the title? Brigadiers used to at least try, FFS.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 11:05 PM
1

There is no way to evolve any economic system so that a society with significantly fewer young (that is to say, working-age) people than old ones will not face significant issues. Maybe if we get more automation and UBI, but if you genuinely think that's gonna happen in this lifetime or even that of the kids people aren't having, you're dumb as fuck, sorry.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:03 PM
19

Meh, those stats seem to use the conviction numbers from a provably biased legal system. "A 2020 study shows that women receive 33% (15 days) shorter prison sentences than men, even when controlling for all observable characteristics – including a very precise description of the crime. When pairs of mixed-gender offender are convicted together the gender gap is even higher - men receive 38.7 additional prison days and 10.7 fewer suspended prison days. From a procedural point of view, when contro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 08:34 PM
19

Not the CDC ones. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that 12 months the number of men who were forced to penetrate someo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 08:12 PM
1

Source for that second sentences claim? Also, I highly doubt any sort of impact on that front would be immediate, population collapse is a slow thing and people rarely care before they notice how it personally affects them on issues like this, IME.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:36 PM
1

Has it? And by how much? I remember reading at some point that birth rates in Korea would need to quadruple in the next 5-10 years to pull them out of a very unfortunate population pyramid and the resulting economic collapse.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:32 AM
1

Agreed, great for them. Fucking awful for the economy, and those among us who plan to be alive some 30 to 40 years from now.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:31 AM
1

The vast majority of humankind is not doing that pollution, though. Do you really think nations like China and large corporations will just... stop doing things in the most economically optimal (and worst for the environment) ways if populations in the west decline?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:29 AM
5

No worries, I see where you might have gotten that idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 03:23 AM
5

I don't disagree, and I haven't excused anything, quite the opposite for modern feminists. Just said that they had more of a leg to stand on back then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 02:54 AM
1

Because you were genuinely correct in the DMs 🙄
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:56 AM
7

Well, they didn't get to vote, just to start with. Besides, I'm not quantifying it in comparison to men's issues, just saying that women's issues used to be far more dire than they are today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 01:49 AM
1

Someone with eyes to see the fact that you call any criticism of feminism "stupidity and blatant misogyny." You're right, and I never argued that you didn't fulfill that request. Again, gold star for you.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:44 AM
1

Because it wasn't what you originally claimed you did the other day (push back against misandry). Do keep up? Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:29 AM
1

And I was impressed with you, yes. It was far more than I thought you were capable of producing, even if it was some cookie-cutter shit from the past couple days. Want a gold star?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:20 AM
1

And then failed entirely to respond to any point I made about the change, yes. I was there, lol. You're the only one insisting that I give you my phone number to do something that Reddit DMs do perfectly well.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:19 AM
1

Because you claimed that you had, specifically, pushed back against misandry. I looked into your account now that it's visible, and I still haven't found anything except you repeatedly insisting that generalizing feminism (a specific social advocacy group) is equivalent to generalizing men (half the human race). ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:10 AM
2

At least you also acknowledge how irrelevant most of your comments are, may as well write the rest as "blah blah blah" and save us both some time?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:05 AM
1

Do you know what "projection" actually means? I "came at you" because you repeatedly claimed to try and push back against misandry, and failed to provide evidence at every turn. You haven't "done" anything either lmao, you made one limp-wristed post echoing a common sentiment.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:04 AM
1

Yes. It was hidden when I did. Now it is not hidden (at least not entirely), likely as a result of that conversation. Then, you asked me why I was hiding posts that I have not made, much less chosen to hide.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:01 AM
1

Again, absolutely not. Starting to get a bit creepy with how insistent you are, when the reddit DM function still allows images AFAIK. Instagram is for idiots who want their data scraped and children, anyway.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 01:00 AM
1

Thing is, I don't expect that at all. You're the one who asked where my account history was ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ And again, you still have yet to show any examples of pushing back against misandry in your end.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:58 AM
1

Comments exist too. Or are those also supposedly hidden?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:55 AM
1

Then I suppose you'll have to live with being wrong without an audience ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:47 AM
1

Oh wow, I do? Glad we have people like you to explain what we're thinking, always a treat to have a psychic on the sub 🤭
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:46 AM
1

Lmao, absolutely not, weirdo.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:43 AM
1

I'm not. Anyone else present can feel free to chime in if I'm incorrect.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:43 AM
1

At least I have actual points to go with the insults 🤭
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:43 AM
1

I feel sorry for those people who evidently failed to teach you how to read, that must've been quite difficult for them.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:40 AM
1

Why is "uhhh ummm urrrr you're acting like a [noun]!!!!" your only response to genuine and correct criticism? You've done it more than once in this very comment section.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:40 AM
1

I actually haven't made any posts on this account at all, and I'm certainly not hiding any. Did you read the actual message carefully? It uses the same icon as a hidden account history, but the words are different.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:32 AM
1

I know you're spiraling a bit, but please try and take a deep breath? You just claimed in the comment before this that "no, it wasn't hidden (at the time of our pervious conversation) and that you had unbidden it a good bit ago (presumably meaning yesterday)" and now you're admitting that it was still hidden during that conversation? You can't even keep your story straight, much less comprehend anybody else's.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:31 AM
1

Visible? At least, it's showing as set to visible on my end, and I've never hidden it.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:28 AM
1

A good while ago... being between the last conversation we had a couple days ago, and this one? Lmao, poor critter.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:28 AM
1

So.... what you're saying is that you've never actually pushed back against misandry like you claimed? Yes, this subreddit would let you post about female issues. Give it a shot. You likely won't get much traction since society already hyper-focuses on women's issues, but you won't be banned for being a "pick-me" like in feminist subs that claim to be egalitarian.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:27 AM
1

Because you had it hidden at the time, dolt. Do please try and keep up? Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:25 AM
1

Give an example. Even one, solitary example, of you speaking favorably on a men's issue. Preferably in a feminist space where you hold more sway than a man doing the same thing would, but I ain't picky.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:03 AM
1

Lmao, being stupid and sexist by... not saying the dumbass things you straw-man us as saying? Lol, poor critter. This subreddit is really quite friendly to women who can put their money where their mouths are. Still waiting on that example of you pushing back against misandry that you claimed to have the other day.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:02 AM
4

Sure, feel free. Probably won't respond as quickly, but I'll get to it at some point 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:58 PM
3

That's probably not going to do anything. It's being auto-modded out, more than likely because of something you say in it being filtered by either the wider reddit auto-mod or the sub-specific one (though it is possible this is just another example of Reddit's shitty web design eating the comment whole, in which case a repost will work). Maybe change the wording somewhat? That sometimes helps when this happens to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:42 PM
1

Again, you're making shit up to get mad at. Nobody said anything even approaching that.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 10:40 PM
3

I think your most recent comment may have been deleted. If it wasn't you that did it, it could still show up on your end, I reccomend opening the thread in an incognito tab to see it ain't there if that's the case for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:36 PM
4

Well, when we live in a world where men's taxes largely go to supporting women (look it up, they make more from social security funds than they ever contribute towards them), where women hold control of some 85% of US consumer spending, and where they, again, have provably greater rights than their male peers, I dunno. Seems to be working out fine for them. More men than not in the US have thought the same things as those Norwegian boys, for quite a while iirc. Doesn't seem to have slowed femini…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:26 PM
2

Are you a man, or a woman? Pretty important distinction here, when you're advocating for men to lose from the moral high ground. Because that is what'll happen.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 09:41 PM
5

Frankly? Feminist's "stated goals" were the empowerment of women over men in every scenario possible, from legal to social to career matters. And what do you know, it worked. Women have more legal and social rights and privileges than men do in every single western nation. Weird how that works out, ain't it? I wish it didn't have to be that way, but it seems that policing bad actors within your own social movement is counterproductive, going by historical examples. Those egalitarian-minded boys …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 09:28 PM
2

Do you know why science supposedly focuses on men? It's because men are the only ones volunteering to be studied, genius. Look it up, women almost never volunteer for that kind of thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 09:19 PM
6

Why would that be a pre-requisite for MRAs, when feminists happily celebrate the sexist shit-stirrers in their ranks and are roundly rewarded for doing so?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 09:08 PM
1

If you think that second paragraph would do anything even halfway helpful, the first paragraph about you trying to "moderate" this stuff IRL sounds more like a lie than not.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 07:58 PM
6

If you think that this isn't the case worldwide (or at least in the entirety of the west), you're more stupid than most of us expected based on your previous comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:50 PM
17

You know that's never happening, right? Not in our lifetimes at least, and probably not in anyone else's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:45 PM
16

I mean, feminism has always had serious and generally accepted misandrist undertones. It was just that back in the day women actually were substantially disadvantaged, so people were willing to let more shit slide, and that's why we are where we are now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:08 PM
1

Don't fuss about being called a dumbass when you were acting like one, maybe? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You can engage if you grow enough of a spine to engage with a single one of my points. Good luck!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 06:14 PM
1

And I personally think your unwillingness to put your money where your mouth is on the claim of pushing back against misandry is even more hypocritical by every definition of the word, but who's counting?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:21 PM
14

Did anyone claim that feminism was a "male-extinction" movement, dumbass? I'd they're not for female supremacy, they wouldn't work to widen every single gender gap where women are already ahead, such as in academics or legal rights toward bodily autonomy. What the hell has you so convinced that tyrannical mothers and teachers don't do the same shit, and worse? "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 07:19 PM
1

And Christianity as a whole is not monumentally biased towards those "un-chridtian" idiots. Christianity as a whole doesn't claim to work for gendered equality while actively working against it whenever the oppurtunity presents itself. There's a reason for that. Because the vast majority of feminists agree with Koss and those who chased Erin Pizzey out of her country, in my experience. The vast majority of Christians are not MAGA dumbasses, in my experience. L
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:13 PM
1

Nah, I give people shit for their opinions, not the dog-whistles they stumble into. I see where you'd get the wrong impression, though.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:11 PM
1

Answered here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/CJgTMvUpPf
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:04 PM
1

Weird how they're widely celebrated by feminists, call themselves such, and you're literally the only person I've ever seen try and deny them a place in the movement. "No True Scotsman," much? Yet again I ask, do you have even the slightest example of you criticizing feminists at all, much less standing up to them when they repeat sexist talking points about men? To answer your question, no, not all Christians are bad, at least not in the modern day. They have the good grace to roundly argue wit…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:04 PM
1

I know, that's why I said bad luck rather than a bad choice. People can't be expected to know all the weird dog-whistles the nazis have come up with these days.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:01 PM
1

Are all women feminists? If not, your comparison is a dumbass one, for reasons I pointed out above.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:44 PM
1

I've done about all I can, which is donate. Also, when "feminism as an ideology" actively encourages the exact behavior I brought up, well... Just look at poor Erin Pizzey. Literally chased out of the UK by death threats from her feminist peers for daring to suggest a men's DV shelter. Look at celebrated academic feminists like Koss, who actively deny the possibility of male victims and female rapists, but who get lucrative careers teaching gender studies, having their wikipedia scrubbed of thei…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:42 PM
1

Bad luck then, I suppose, given the recent symbology.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:40 PM
1

Also, out of curiosity, is the 88 in your username a nazi thing or just the year you were born?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:42 AM
2

Do you have anything like a source for that first sentence? It's an easier job than some 9 out of 10 "normal" jobs, so I fail to really feel all that bad for consenting adults who choose it. They can have the website delete their nudes iirc, but you're right that anyone who screenshotted them will still have them. That's simply the price of doing business on the internet.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:41 AM
2

I said women's empowerment in general, not the empowerment of every single woman. Besides, what's your issue with sex work? I don't see it as inherently negative like that tbh.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:16 AM
1

Thing is, "men" is a gender that makes up half the population, while "feminists" are a social advocacy group that claims to work towards equality while never actually doing so, and instead working exclusively towards women's empowerment, even and especially when women are already ahead. I can't help but notice your account history is private, do you have any actual examples of you criticizing misandry among feminists, or even feminists at all?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 02:51 AM
1

Because that strays dangerously into "if you aren't in constant agreement with us, you're literally hitler" tumblr-tier reasoning, and is how people like us lose elections? I'm more inclined to put that one down to ignorance or apathy than malice, myself.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:38 AM
1

Does refusing to vote make a person "maga" in your eyes? That's an interesting stance, ngl, coming from someone who voted blue down the ballot.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:33 AM
1

No, it didn't. Do you know what "a majority" even is, bud? You're looking at voter numbers, and there were about as many men who didn't vote as voted for any individual party. Same for women, though to a lesser degree as they've out-voted men in every election since the 80s.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:07 AM
6

There is a trend towards them being unwilling to work towards equality when women are advantaged over men, though. Not just a trend really, more of a statistical fact that they never do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 01:07 AM
1

It's a normal position for feminists in my experience, and when that label is self-applied by so many, well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 11:32 PM
7

And yet, under this administration, women still have more legal and social rights and privileges than men. There's a reason for that, I think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 11:30 PM
2

Have you tried to do the same thing with women as the target? AI doesn't even allow it, which is a frankly quite funny demonstration of society's general bias on the subject of when it is entertaining for someone to die.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:05 PM
1

Nobody is being forced to enslave their own citizens. Enslaving people "for defence" is still enslaving them, go fuck yourself. If the government didn't have the support for a volunteer army, it doesn't deserve to remain, IMO.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 10:03 PM
10

Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for i…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 09:22 PM
9

Women have more "basic human rights" and control over their body than men in every wester nation. Misandry is more than just "being laughed at." Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 09:22 PM
2

Actually talking about it, despite how eager you are to stop people from doing so. Please keep up. There's only so much activism I can do from a different continent, but people routinely, even in this very sub, deny outright that this is happening at all. I can at least correct them. Why are you here, if even discussing men's issues raises your hackles this badly?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:47 PM
6

Because the person you replied to is the exact type to use that "bad narrative." Search their contributions on the sub if you like, you can still do that by searching their username even if they hide post history.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:40 PM
3

Good lord, first being a dick to everyone who answers your questions, then swapping back and forth between English and French, now expecting us to dig through an unsorted pile of links to find your stats for you? Again, yuck. Buzz off.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 03:00 AM
3

Yuck, french. Even disregarding that, care to give a source for like... any of this shit? Y'know, the thing you asked me for and I provided? As for a country where sex-selective abortions are practiced against men, all of them that have legal abortion? The only reason you hear about the Chinese example is because they did it way more than everyone else, to the point of causing a demographic collapse. The majority of the west is like this. Heck, spain has legally codified their higher penalties f…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:47 AM
3

Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for i…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 02:37 AM
1

Thank goodness, I was so sure I was about to get ligma'd with a "dogma balls" or something, lol.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:18 AM
10

https://youtu.be/KXhC8WREVKM?si=hBQ07exo7GxvY_hz https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz994d6vqe5o There's videos of reporters even doing ride-alongs in these vans, though obviously the vans with the reporters in them are careful not to be too zealous in chasing down those men they see who are unwilling to show them conscription status papers. What's so unbelievable about this, to you? Edit: lmao, they blocked me for giving them exactly what they asked for. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:03 AM
12

Why would Ukraine report on their own enslavement of their citizens? At least, why would they do it with videos that paint them in a bad light? Because they have been reporting on it. They just say that the conscription efforts are going well. Did you think this isn't what conscription is for an invaded country? They can't exactly lock up draft dodgers like the US did when they enslaved their men for a foreign war. So the draft dodgers get put into the vans, and shipped off to war whether they w…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:59 PM
14

Okay, now you've got me curious. What "certain duties" do you think women should have that men should not? Personally, I don't agree that anyone should be forced into anything on account of their gender.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:34 PM
43

Why do you come to this subreddit just to downplay the harm against men you see here, and make horrid faith arguments like this?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:29 PM
18

It's not disinformation if it is true, though. Ukraine really is doing this shit.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:24 PM
25

Plenty? Lmao, they're like 7% of the army and 20% of officers, in positions that never even have to touch the front lines. That's not "plenty." What does being born a woman require? Nothing? They just get handed the same rights as men (more rights than men actually, in the US), with no expectations placed upon them as well? Interesting, interesting.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:23 PM
9

Do you really think those economic systems didn't engage in conscription?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:19 PM
15

Even you acknowledge that the burden of proof is on you. Why do you still fail to provide any?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:18 PM
14

Should men not have the right to avoid enslavement? This is a very important men's rights scenario if you ask me.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:17 PM
19

Weird how this government-backed "heroic" slavery only ever applies to one gender, ain't it?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:16 PM
18

But when a country is only willing to enslave one half of its people and let the other half flee as refugees, we can call out the hypocrisy, no?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:16 PM
1

Might've been an error? I'm not seeing any dragons dogma at the moment.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:15 PM
19

It's no less awful when Russia does it. Should we just... ignore men being kidnapped and enslaved because it might be seen as pro-russian to point it out?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:14 PM
49

Are you in Iran?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:04 PM
62

Feminists say exactly that quite often, or bring up oppression that ended decades before their birth as examples of why women are oppressed today.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:04 PM
1

Depends on the playing field in question, to be honest.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:35 AM
20

Not only is academic feminism only a part of the movement, it's one of the more sexist parts, considering that academic feminists are the ones who gave Mary P. Koss a lucrative career teaching gender studies at feminist universities and substantial power over US Title IX legislation all on her bogus claim that it's impossible for men to be raped, and impossible for women to rape.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:36 AM
20

Mmmhmmm, sure bud. You can't "disprove" feminism or any other advocacy group anyways, what a silly thing to think. Feminism isn't an attempt at systematic analysis, it's an advocacy group for women's empowerment. Not even for gendered equality, going by how they ran Erin Pizzey out of her country with death threats at the mere suggestion of a men's DV shelter. Not going by how they work to widen the gender education gap in the US either, considering that this gap is currently as bad as the one f…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:28 AM
10

Probably because you've failed utterly to respond to what I or anyone else with actual data says. Not our fault that you're evidently illiterate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 12:06 AM
23

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/oY9DpHFaEm Ugh, you're all over this subreddit, too. Do you really think you have anything even slightly relevant to add to the discussion, when the only criticism of feminism you can manage to fathom is that society is "a little mean to men sometimes, in isolated incidents?" Someone this desperate to deny the existence of systemic misandry is not someone that men are safe to be around. Wishing you a swift exit from the lives of those men unlucky enough to k…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 11:51 PM
28

Ugh, another hidden account idiot here to educate us on how we need to interpret scientific findings in such a way as to never find women at fault for anything? At least be original about it, 🙄 Besides, women report committing more IPV than men, too. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/MensRights23/04/26 11:43 PM
20

As many men are raped per year in the US by women as vice versa, as per the CDC. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 08:00 PM
36

Only feminist groups give their "terrible minority" actual systemic power and lucrative teaching positions, though. See Mary P. Koss and her entire career built on coveing up for female perpetrators and minimizing male victims. Cut it out with the No True Scotsman shit, bad-faith commenter. Toxic women hurt and kill men all the time. Hell, it systemically disatvantages men in the educational system just to start with. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:59 PM
23

You're only using the convictions from a biased legal system again, bud. In addition to what the other guy posted that shows the CDC measures as many male victims of women per year as vice versa, you simply must remember that the legal bias exists and is quite well-studied. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with hi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:53 PM
9

Yes, I did assume that, as it was the only piece of information I was given, and quite likely given my own personal experience with what women have said directly to my face. Welcome to having a conversation, first time? Notice your bias in assuming that those women simply must have dropped me for other teasons? Lol. Well, it's a bit unavoidable when your personal experience is all of 5 women in your entire life (outside of the mutually acknowledged shitty dating apps). As for the study, first of…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:51 PM
10

Did you date them as a man, or as a woman? That's extremely important to the conversation, before even considering how pitiful a sample size of only 5 is. Plenty of women who will go on a handful of dates with you and then drop you if you don't pay, and maybe one willing to still make a long-term relationship out of it if you do pay for her sometimes? Mmmhmm, sure bud. Must be geographic differences, somehow I doubt IT work specifically attracts the sort of women who use dates as free meal ticke…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:24 PM
28

"The police" in my area also recognize an "epidemic of black people's violence against white people" so that doesn't mean much. The legal system is biased against men in the US, so take anything they say with a hefty handful of salt. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders Feminism has disregarded male victims, and actively worked to cover for female perpetrators of crimes like rape. Who do you think wrote the FBI reporting definition th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:16 PM
9

Most women are not attracted to "men," going by recent surveys that state the majority of them have no intent to actually date, and only something like 30% hold anything approaching a positive view of men in general. They may be attracted to an individual man's wealth, status, or body, but I don't think it's all that correct to genericize this to them being attracted to men in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:11 PM
24

Lmao, how many women have you dated as a man, Mr. Hidden Account History? The last several I did still expected me to pay, despite being in the same industry as me and making shout ad mucu. I didn't pay more than half, but none were happy about it. There's a reason that only some 15% of US women are okay with dating (much less marrying) men who make less than them.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:01 PM
1

Why are you here if you "hate men so much" exactly? https://www.reddit.com/r/FeminismUncensored/s/63bxlIYfH3 Seriously, just fuck off. You're happier not interacting with the men in your life and the ones you find online, and I promise they'd be happier if you did so as well.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:31 PM
2

Mm, sure, I suppose I see your point on the "not washing their hands and giving everyone e coli" front. Almost definitely not a gender issue, too.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:56 PM
1

Okay, that joke in the first paragraph is actually really funny. Credit where credit is due on that one. As for the second paragraph... maybe? Do people even eat these meat sculptures? I guess we'd have to ask OP, but even if it has been sitting for a couple hours it ain't gonna do anything bad to you just from standing in its vicinity. Maybe it's a health-risk to that one person in every office who constantly steals food.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:34 PM
3

How does merely being in the vicinity of ground beef put anybody's health at risk, lmao? As long as it wasn't actively rotten or anything, that's a bit dramatic. I do agree that this likely isn't a men's issue though, I doubt a woman who brought in a beef sculpture would be treated any less like an axe-wielding maniac.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:13 PM
2

Source cited: "I dislike men, so like, uhhhmmmm, men bad, and every bad thing people say about them is true teehee I'm so smurt."
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:59 PM
3

Misandry was always prevalent, people only started talking about it now. You're an actual idiot if you think that's "the only time men's issues ever get brought up" I mean you are right fucking here after all. You can't point out systemic inequality without comparisons, and feminists subs constantly talk about men as well.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:57 PM
6

You've literally never commented in this sub or any other that I can find in a way that actually supports men's rights. You just constantly whinge that we aren't catering to you enough in this sub. You are exactly the person this comic is about, just FYI.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:55 PM
1

Nothing I said was illogical, and neither was it off-topic. Either attempt to keep up or stop replying, please.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:47 PM
1

The context of how it's said does change the practical meaning, though. Is this your first time interacting with the concept of a conversation? Poor thing.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:26 PM
1

In your case? That you're throwing a fuss over having your misinformation corrected and don't want to meaningfully respond to criticism.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:39 PM
1

Because I expected you to be mentally capable of either coming up with a reply, or correcting the misinformation you attempted to spread. Not quite rocket science, bud.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 08:06 PM
1

And this comment is not really a reply.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:39 PM
3

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. Every boy experiences this, at the hands of the over 70% female teaching population.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:29 AM
1

Jesus christ, practically everything you say in this post is incorrect. Men are the majority of murder victims by far, and at least half the rape victims, just to start. Are you mentally capable of discussing the rest? If so we can engage on your other points. https://www.consumershield.com/articles/victims-of-violent-crime-by-gender "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270…
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:26 AM
2

The data supports the opposite, actually, counting paid work. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/modern-parenthood-roles-of-moms-and-dads-converge-as-they-balance-work-and-family/
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:19 AM
2

Generally, most feminists oppose women being drafted on the grounds that they work on average much more than men without being paid, Lmao, like hell they do. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/modern-parenthood-roles-of-moms-and-dads-converge-as-they-balance-work-and-family/ Some feminists wants men to be drafted and punished otherwise, but they're a small minority among left-wing activists, so far as I can tell. You are not paying much attention to how feminists in general int…
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:13 AM
4

Those lifetime stats are bunk, as many men are raped per year every year by women as vice versa. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states …
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:01 AM
3

I didnt get what you asked me exactly Where is the confusion? It's a question so simple even someone like you should be able to answer it. exactly but someone calling themselves "feminist" then saying insult and disrespectful shit dosent tarnish for me the movement She isn't just calling herself a feminist. She's one of the most widely-lauded academic feminists around, and has gained a very cushy career and much renown among feminists for the shit she says. feminism wants equal rights Simply inc…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:59 PM
0

There we go. Knew you had some self-awareness in there somewhere. As for your first comment, do bad actors among feminists, ones that get profitable careers teaching gender studies at feminist universities like Mary P. Koss on claims that it's "laughably impossible" for men to be victims of rape at all, much less rape by women, also tarnish your view of that movement, or is that a standard you exclusively hold men and those who care about their rights to?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:51 PM
1

I'm aware that it's not "about" this sub, but c'mon. Even you must see the irony.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:02 PM
1

Had to check. We've been getting a lot more randoms showing up to say dumb shit like that than usual, lately.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:47 AM
2

Sarcasm or bait?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:24 AM
11

If you're going to brigade the sub, you could at least have the common decency not to label yourself as an intruder? It's like hunting ducks covered in running Christmas lights, it aint as fun.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 11:53 PM
1

Oh fun, I fan do quotes now. The fact is that... hiding account history for reasons of SA victimization is something that happens? Nah bud, you have to provide evidence to consider something a fact. If you don't see anything wrong with that, especially as to how that exploit could be misused (victims of rape, main account or not—is just one example) then I have nothing to say to you. Your one example is a bad one. Sorry you weren't able to come up with anything better as a reason why this should…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 10:07 PM
1

That "warding" does not functionally work, as I previously mentioned. Besides, what makes you think this is an actual relevant and common practice? It'd be easier and more effective for those people to make a separate account for victimization-related posts anyway. I'd support it for reasons that would be obvious, if you paid any attention to this sub. Every single post without fail has 3 or 4 brigadiers with hidden account history in the back saying sexist shit against men. I'm interested to se…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 09:34 PM
1

My sibling under Satan, this is the internet. There is nonsuch thing as sanctity of information that you choose to publicly comment. It's all visible right now if you use the main reddit search bar and search their username iirc anyway. Please, explain the irony to me. I fail to see how reddit comments factor into the equation.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 08:56 PM
1

I'm sure you don't need me to tell you that you can remain polite despite being an obviously disingenuous ass, considering you've mastered the art. If you're going to make claims about yourself, you should have the common fucking decency to be able to verify those claims, on a platform where it's as easy to do as reddit. I'll let you know if I work anything out on the app front, probably won't be very soon but the idea is sorely tempting. As for ethical constraints: it's already all on the inter…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 08:02 PM
1

Without even a single solitary example, even you have to see why nobody here is actually going to believe that, given the fact that feminists repeat the "MRA is a hate group" talking point constantly. It's no less specific than the "criticism" you insist on regularly spweing in places like this. I've looked through the search bar with relevant keywords on your account, and I can find literally 0 criticism of feminism or feminists for any reason. Unrelated, but that's actually a solid idea for an…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:43 PM
1

Please answer the "one more question," if you ever want to have anyone even halfway believe the shit you say about being an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:09 PM
3

Then they shouldn't have called it the body positivity movement, if the body positivity is only applied to those with female bodies. Many of the biggest proponents claimed the movement was egalitarian too, while simultaneously turning around and showing their hypocritical asses at the first opportunity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 06:55 PM
4

Do you know what "brigading" is in a social media context? It's when people en-masse anonymously show up in a sub to say stupid shit in order to try and derail conversation. Often organized, but not always. Hallmarks of the practice are your exact variety of dumbass contrarianism and hidden account history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 06:54 PM
1

Generalising people of ANY group like they're all the exact same is toxic and false. Then why do you only criticize when people generalize one specific group? Oh wait, you didn't even do that, you criticized people for being in the same room as people who allegedly generalized that one group. Again, is this a double standard on your end? Examples are required, if you say it is not.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 06:46 PM
1

I keep my account history hidden because I've had people stalk and harass me in the past, if you're that desperate to know. Mmm-hmm, that's what the other brigadiers usually say, too. Y'all have a script, or is this more disorganized? I'm not ignoring that women can be toxic and awful people like everyone else, my point is that there is a difference between criticising those bad people and talking about a group in general. And has that line been crossed here? No? Then you're just vague-posting a…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 06:44 PM
4

You know what, fair enough. Usually, I'd ask for more relevant studies on the subject before taking someone at their word for this kind of statement, but that's a very convincing explanation as to why this wouldn't reasonably exist. Thanks for the info, interesting to consider for sure!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:45 PM
5

Because your questions were fucking stupid, even by the standards of all the other hidden account history brigadiers we get on this sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:31 AM
16

Men are sexually assaulted as often as women, in the US. What equality movement? Never was one. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:30 AM
4

If you replied to me, the reply ain't showing up any more. Maybe try again?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:17 AM
2

Did anyone say "all" of anyone does anything?
/r/MensRights17/04/26 03:57 AM
8

I was mostly asking about your confident assertion that women find their attraction to their partner's non-physical attributes increasing over time in non-OLD contexts, but I still have issues with the study you've given. It falls into the exact same stated vs revealed preferences trap as most other studies on the subject: it assumes that women won't tailor their answers in order to appear less shallow, especially under a prevailing cultural narrative that tries to paint them as inherently so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 01:47 AM
2

Actually, one more question. Do you ever make that "blanket statements about ideologies is bad!!" talking point when feminist call anyone who dares to advocate for the rights of men a hate group? If so, can you give even one single example of you doing so?
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:32 AM
3

Not the same. Just similar enough that there are prevailing threads, in this case of bigotry despite claims towards egalitarianism. And nothing of value was lost. You didn't defend her directly, but feminism sure as hell has lionised her at every oppurtunity. Kindly never come back, we don't need any limp-wristed "oh male victimization is surely bad... buuutt haaaave you thought about how woommmmeeeen have it sooooo muuuuuch woooorssseee!?!?" types here.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:31 AM
2

Sure I am, bud. The best you could come up with for the entirety of gendered oppression was a blatantly biased study that made some faulty conclusions about male vs female SA victimization. Then, you accused me of goalpost-shifting when I corrected you. Others sure as hell have, though. And you have, predictably, failed. Please keep up.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:16 AM
2

Women are the ones who wrote the damn definition. Well, unless men were part of the Women's Law Group, which seems unlikely. Who the hell else am I supposed to attribute it to, bud? Besides, I never said that only Women contribute to hostile gendered norms (a far better term than the dumbass "patriarchy" considering its upheld by as many women as men and seems to benefit women far more, at least in the US), where did you read that? "Non-radical feminism" does all the same shit. Don't forget the …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:14 AM
14

Lol, "the people who have fully researched it" think every single fantasy fetish video on the internet is equivalent to a snuff film. They're blatantly trying to rile you up into even more misandrist fervor than you seem to constantly exist in, and it quite clearly worked.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:55 AM
2

It's all feminism, all the same. There's a reason that Mary P. Koss was able to make a profitable career teaching gender studies at feminist institutions and influencing US Title IX policy despite claiming on multiple occasions that SA of men is impossible, and SA of men by women is "laughable." She's even called "a renowned expert on gendered violence" by wikipedia and near-universally accepted by feminists across the spectrum to this day, they bury her more controversial statements in a sub-fo…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:51 AM
1

Not an opinion, just a simple fact. Frankly, sometimes I wonder why we don't ban the most obvious concern-trolls and outright liars such as yourself like most feminist subs do with men entirely, but I understand that would be bad for optics. Some people deserve hostility for their blatantly biased and bigoted statements and stances. You've dragged your feet and reluctantly provided sources... that are almost always either misinterpreted, or blatantly biased in both your reading and the original …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:47 AM
1

They do that because according to US legal definitions of rape re-written for the FBI in the early 2010s by the Women's Law Project, it's only rape if the offender has a dick. It wasn't great before, but they very specifically worded the reporting definitions in order to minimize the prevalence of male victims of women. Look into it. You're only looking at lifetime victimization rates, dear Unconvincing Egalitarian. There's a reason that my linked paper used the 12-month victimization rate. The …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:43 AM
22

Never said it was, but if you want to make confident and quite frankly ridiculous claims about why people are going to the porn website and be believed about them, you've gotta do better than this. Hundreds of thousands of comments? Really? Poor thing, not even you believe that, surely. It's fantasy fetish content, do you think the men in latex tied to their beds on pornhub were all kidnapped off the street, too? But they have comments about how to properly tie knots so the submissives victims c…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:53 PM
9

Also, why is your account history hidden? Are you another birgadier? I swear, for how often the feminism subs complain about this stuff, y'all are real fuckin' eager to do it yourselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 11:30 PM
1

Why do you people always hide your comment history, by the way? None of you contrarian dipshits who are so eager to cite biased reporting stats ever seem willing to give a concrete answer.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:15 PM
1

The FBI uses only conviction stats from a provably biased legal system. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders And beyond that, their rape definition requires penetration, handily ignoring the rape that women most commonly do to men. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:14 PM
24

If you think the body positivity movement actually helped any men, you might be dumb as hell, sorry. I mean, just look at how utterly blasé and even cheered on it is to insult men by some aspect of their physical characteristics. "Small dick, balding, fatty" all insults regularly used towards men by the same exact men and women who freak the hell our about body positivity when men decide that they're not attracted to fat women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 10:59 PM
8

Anything like an actual source for that last paragraph?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 10:56 PM
24

How many of those videos do you think didn't actually have the women's consent? It's very difficult to make porn without that, and you've failed utterly to convince me that they did so.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:54 PM
2

Hidden account history? ✅️ Every comment you've made on this sub is either being contrarian and ignoring actual facts so you can disagree with OP, or just accusing them of misogyny outright? ✅️ Lots of claims towards being an egalitarian, but you have no actual egalitarian talking points anywhere I can find? ✅️ Seems incapable of separating criticism of feminism from criticism of women? ✅️ Bot, bait, or brigadier folks, call it.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:45 PM
1

You have failed utterly to thoughtfully address the concerns of more than half the people who replied. You just confidently assert statistically unprovable shit and pretend it's proof. Do better, or buzz off. Meh, your comment doesn't do shit for the discussion either, especially since it's deliberately without anything like actual sources for your claims. I'm frankly not convinced that people like you are fully capable of learning at all, going by your account history and historical complete in…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:25 PM
1

My own experience as a bi man, to start with. Do you have any sources that show that lesbians are in any way actually as put-upon by society as you claim? Maybe source your own shit to start before asking other people to do the same. That same survey in previous years has found complete parity in perpetration and victimization between men and women. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it s…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:22 PM
1

Just gonna ignore the response to this comment? Seems like you aren't mentally capable of talking about it, so sad 🤭
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:33 PM
3

What gender makes up 80% of homicide victims?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:32 PM
3

Straight women fetishize and harrass gay men. You've never been a man dating another man, and it shows. Source on women not being as oppressive? Why are you pretending every man who dares to speak up against mistreatment of men is ignoring reality? Why man-splain men's own experiences to them?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:31 PM
5

"Most most most" of those crimes that are convicted have men as the ones punished. You're failing to see the legal bias and it's affects on the stats you think you know. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-abou…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:28 PM
1

This is monumentally sexist against basically every gender identity I can think of in one way or another, lmao. Sorry you're stuck with shit for relatives.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 09:11 PM
13

Mary P. Koss made a career teaching gender studies at feminist institutions off exactly that claim, and has gotten quite a lot of praise from mainstream feminists. Never anything even approaching genuine criticism, the best is limp-wristed hand wringing about the optics of her repeated claims that it's impossible for men to be victimized.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:05 PM
–

Source cited: "uhhmm uhh mmmm I saw a mean comment on the internet, once! They're like, not directly centering women in their lives??? Must be because they're bitter about being rejected, and so that must mean they're all entitled rapacious bastards! I'm so smart 🤭"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:58 PM
1

Yup. Shame we live in a world that works the way it does, but we do. Not much to be done about it really, I think certain issues like this are fundamentally unsolvable, given the differences in how both halves of the population see each other.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/26 09:29 PM
15

Do you care to elaborate on what, specifically, those percentages mean in this context?
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:31 PM
17

This isn't about biological attraction, it's about basic goodwill and empathy towards half the population.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:24 PM
23

The UN Women's group decrees that a country is equal, but only if women are equal or advantaged over men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 09:34 PM
1

So now anyone who disagrees with the dumb shit you say is mentally impaired? Interesting interesting, very progressive of you ✍️
/r/MensRights14/04/26 12:08 AM
2

You don't. You wait to actually read and form your opinion before commenting. This is basic internet etiquette stuff, bud 🤭 If this is what it looks like when you attempt to have a discussion, I feel bad for the people who know you IRL, men especially. You have quite repeatedly proved me correct in my assumptions about you, sorry you're unhappy about that.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 11:29 PM
2

You asked me for sources. You seemingly have not read them, and your claim that you plan to is flimsier than the average tissue paper. This is what I mean when I tell you you've been making a concerted effort to be ignorant. You do not deserve grace, not after your performance in this comment section. You can improve though, at least in theory, so there is that!
/r/MensRights13/04/26 11:02 PM
7

I can see why you'd feel that way, but please don't generalize that hatred to all women when you can instead keep it aimed at the assholes? It's not good for you, or for the ones who might otherwise find their way out of the sexism they were taught as children. Best to treat people like people regardless of their gender I think, even if you won't be given the same grace, someone out there might be just as glad that you treated them fairly as you yourself would be if others treated you that way.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 10:20 PM
1

No no no, friend. You don't get to walk that one back now, that was a response to me asking why you didn't substantiate any of your claims 🤭 Eh, not with the wording we were given from your article. Especially since they don't actually bother to source the message exchange itself, as far as I could tell. Bud, what, exactly is the non-sexual reason that anyone would be invited to anyone's hotel room that they aren't currently staying in? Again, seems to be that there was no coercive expectation o…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 09:40 PM
4

You are biased, and it is because of your inexperience and general concerted effort to stay ignorant on the subject, yes. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ Women have an extreme in-group bias, and men actually have a small out-group bias. That's why the gendered sentencing disparity exists too, btw. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 09:28 PM
2

I think this app (and the whole website, for that matter) is a piece of shit held together with duct tape and hope, and not enough of either IMO. You assumed... people would do the digging to prove your own accusations for you, or just believe you outright because the person you accused was a man? Interesting stance, though in line with your others on the subject. Mmm, the details on Schachners accusation are extremely vague, and I refuse to use a second-hand inconclusive text conversation as th…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:57 PM
2

Unfortunately, the reddit app has stopped allowing me to directly quote comments I reply to. Assume paragraphs correlate directly in order, not counting this one. See, there's the same unsourced accusation I was talking about, yet again. Do you have any links to accusations of him doing this, or are you keeping those to yourself since the accusations are obviously not credible? Yes. If I had just gotten done with a night of schmoozing around with some guy and he took me up to his hotel room, I'd…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:28 PM
3

Yeah, the CDC has been regularly trying to shift their reporting definitions and data collection methods to prop up unrealistic narratives about male victims. It's inevitable given the gender bias of the space they exist in generally, sadly.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:18 PM
2

Re-replying since the last one seems to have been deleted for some reason: Looks like brigadier is more likely at this point, rarely are bots so limp wristed in their own self-defence. It's not predatory behavior to ask for consent and then act on the answer that you receive, and it isn't "disagreeing with predatory behavior" to repeatedly and completely without any sort of source accuse predatory behavior, which is what you've done. Please keep up, most obvious plant I've ever seen. The issues …
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:15 PM
37

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. That's what happens when this rhetoric is given special importance by an over 70% female teaching industry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 07:49 PM
5

Hidden post history? ✅️ All the comments I can find from them on the entirety of this sub amount to basic unsourced opposition to whatever OP is saying? ✅️ A username that's clearly trying to make them seem less sexist? ✅️ Stating outright that they think women should get more sick days than their male coworkers for having a period? ✅️ Bot or brigadier folks, place your bets now.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 07:35 PM
8

Lmao, if you think this is functionally the case in practice, you might just be stupid. Sorry you had to learn it here, but when HR is dominated by women, they're not going to hold women to the same standards they hold men to. It's just a simple fact of life, women have a statistically massive in-group bias for gendered matters, especially compared to men. Want a source? It's quite well-studied.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 07:27 PM
2

Here's a link if anyone wants proof. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:44 PM
2

Women commit some 70% of non-reciprocal DV too, which is... something. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:42 PM
8

They make up about half the offenders, when you use gender-neutral definitions of SA. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:37 PM
1

That guy didn't even mention Trump? What's the deal? Do you think him merely acknowledging the existence of false accusations is him claiming that every accusation is false?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:36 PM
3

Are you "most women?" Besides, if you live in the US, what privilege does a man have that you lack, seriously? Women in my country have more legal rights, more public aid and gender-specific financial assistance, they make up a minority of the homeless population but have the most shelters, etc.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:34 PM
6

Even the most common cases people use it for are utterly divorced from reality. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/26 06:08 PM
3

The amount of sane-washing people do for sexist women on the internet is insane, tbh.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/26 06:01 PM
8

Funny how the countries consistently called "most gender equal" by the UN Women's groups are all ones that deport Ukrainian men and only men back into the meat grinder that they managed to get refugee status when leaving.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 07:18 PM
7

Give us your takeaway Einstein, not the one from the bot that's algorithmically encouraged to find women to never be at fault for abuse of men, and to repeatedly claim that the abuse of men is less severe than that of women, even when the stats obviously do not support it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 07:14 PM
6

Wow, legendary crashout. I didn't even accuse them of using dogwhistles lmao, just of failing to recognize the one they were defending. Poor thing had a whole tantrum about it too, that's impressive. I've said way less stupid shit on this sub and gotten a temp ban over it, it'll be genuinely hilarious if they let that comment stay up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 02:52 AM
4

Yes. The UK does that, and the US actually does it as well for the FBI's rape reporting definition, while the CDC's surveys show that rape victimization and perpetration is basically identical along gender lines. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give relia…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 10:38 PM
10

Why do you people literally always bring out the "okay but like, it isn't at all as bad when it happens to men, obviousl6" shit whenever you feel like someone has shown you that you're being hypocritical? Is this your first time interacting with the concept of a dogwhistle? Edit: lmao, and there's the respond and block dance. Oh well, anyone who has read this far, please let me know if anything they said is worth opening an incognito tab to look at.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 10:33 PM
20

It was funny seeing this posted in the different psych subs and seeing people predictably try and spin this to be men's fault (or deserved, because husbands allegedly kill more wives than vice versa), lmao.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:29 AM
3

Can't explicitly name it for reddit "no brigading" reasons, but it has to deal with bookshelves and detectives, I think.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/04/26 01:31 AM
10

Any examples from here you can link that are half as bigoted as the ladies in the screenshots?
/r/MensRights10/04/26 12:18 AM
1

Are you really so insecure about your grammar that you think every insult on your intelligence is due to your (admittedly, poor) grammar, rather than the many other ignorant things you say? That's honestly hilarious.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:52 PM
1

Bud, if you want to start throwing stones over minor grammatical mistakes, you should at least take into account the glass house you live in, given this comment and your serial butchering of the ellipse. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/DlpsXT7TSF
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:46 PM
2

The ignorance was obviously about gender. Female victims are not this consistently ignored. Are you high? Simply deciding not to be an organ donor is not declaring war for peace, that's a dumbass thing to say. And some people have shit intentions and refuse to think things through, such as yourself. 🤭 Edit: oooo, think I got a respond-and-block for that one. Anyone reading this lmk if they said anything interesting enough to open an incognito tab and check.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:36 PM
1

When those overworked and incompetent agencies provably act more "overworked and incompetent" when someone has the gall to suggest a boy might be a victim, it isn't jumping to conclusions to see this through a "male victim" lense, especially considering that the victim was male, and these people would absolutely not be equivalently likely to victimize girls.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:34 PM
1

Who failed you during your education? You vastly and regularly over-state they existence.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:33 PM
13

Hidden account history? ✅️ Absurd double standards? ✅️ Accusatory tone? ✅️ Bait or brigadier, call it.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 03:13 AM
2

Not particularly practically. Laws that would make it impossible to descriminate against a female applicant due to her gender never really come into play when male applicants are discarded due to theirs.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:43 AM
1

Oh fun, an unsubstantiated accusation that this subreddit is frequently regressive. Haven't ever heard that one before. 🙄 Notably, only one gender is immediately suspected of pedophilia should they attempt to step into those roles. There's a reason for that.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:36 AM
7

Free choice is the important part of this comment, that is importantly not present in the above parenting strategy.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:33 AM
1

5.5/10 pun.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 05:54 PM
1

Being incorrect /= having ever been incorrect. Learn to read, please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 01:06 AM
1

I've admitted that I was wrong several times in the past without issue, but m'kay. The shame is only in being wrong and continuing to spread the ideas you are incorrect about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 01:01 AM
1

Do you know what the word "everyone" means?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 01:00 AM
1

A woman who did most of her activism in America? As an example of the communist feminists being less misandrist? Really?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 01:00 AM
1

You pointed to commodified feminism as the reason that feminist writers are awful at discussing male issues with anything but derision and condescension. If you can't even be bothered to read your own comments, much less mine, don't expect any more responses unless something you say is really interesting. Oh great, you are a "that's no true scotsman feminist, only perfect examples are actual examples" idiot, yikes. Again, feminists are perfectly capable of just being like that of their own volit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:55 AM
1

There's this fun thing called "quotes" maybe you should learn about them? Gosh, talking to you is worse than talking to a brick wall, at least walls are only passively stupid rather than actively so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:51 AM
1

Nah, maybe I would if I were wrong, but luckily I'm not, so no reason to be ashamed. I'll admit that I'm wrong the second that I am though, as I've informed you 🫶 Are you one of those people who calls anyone to your political right "literally hitler" as well?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:49 AM
1

Not in the US, no. As we've been over, most of the people mutilating their children in the modern day are not doing so for religious reasons. Why should I bother? There's more of them than religions that do hold to the practice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:48 AM
1

Any examples of feminist thinkers from those countries and time periods that were not shit in their depiction of men and male issues? Give specific examples with translated quotes, please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:44 AM
1

You failed to defend the concept of commodified feminism as the reason for feminism's incompetence when it comes to advocating for actual equality rather than simple women's empowerment. Please keep up, you're about as educational as the drunk madman who shouts "the end is nigh" outside my local waffle house.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:44 AM
1

I do care about the truth quite a lot, hence why I've sourced everything you've requested a source for, with specific quotes. Perhaps you should do the same?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:42 AM
1

Read the post. The context of what that comment replies to matters quite a lot, poor thing. I'll admit I'm wrong the second I am wrong, and no sooner, no matter how much of a fuss you throw over it 🤭
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:42 AM
1

Lmao, "basically trump" for disagreeing with you and having the gall to be correct about it? You're a stereotype so stupid that I wouldn't use you even as a strawman, as it'd be too ridiculous and unlikely for one person to be so foolish.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:41 AM
1

If the root cause is not relevant to modern practice, it is not relevant to any solution. Oh, so it needs to be an organization for it to count? Not even going to consider all the religious sects and wholesale schisms that have involved a dislike of the practice? Interesting, interesting. I'm able to see the problem because I'm a functional human being with eyes to see that abuse of one gender is legal while the other is protected. Gosh, your worldview is so feminism-centric that everything must…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:39 AM
1

Because you describe it as if it is that way repeatedly and can't come up with anything like a specific defense, so... Why should I do the research required to make your point for you, when you can clearly barely be bothered to even read my own comments, much less the things I link? Lmao. "What right were worse there" is not a functional sentence in English. Besides, both China and Russia were very communist for at least a while by most reasonable definitions of communism, and both still provabl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:36 AM
1

And the "personal discomfort" in question is putting up with people saying sexist shit about men in general and without the slightest qualifiers, if you bother to read the post. Do please keep up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:28 AM
1

Deny deny deny, poor critter. Someday you'll grow the requisite spine to actually stand behind the words you say, I'm sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:27 AM
1

Aww, thanks for admitting that I'm always right, I'm flattered. Have fun laughing about the "human scum" position of being correct in an argument 🤭
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:25 AM
1

And the roots matter on a discussion of the motivations for the modern practice... how, exactly? People who didn't condone the mutilation of infants boys, for one reason or another? Are you high? Meh, you have yet to actually prove the "it started with women and was primarily aimed on an effort to reduce women's choices" talking point you continuously repeat. Besides, Russia is a damn large "specific region." Your argument that it isn't the same is comically, if you'll forgive the pun, flimsy, f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:24 AM
1

Not every historical country though, unless you're a "real communism has never been attempted" idiot in addition to every other kind of idiot you are. And you have failed to accurately describe her, evidently. All I'm going off of is the words you've used. 🤭
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:14 AM
1

"As it stands, there is no way to communicate carefully and precisely enough that it will change their minds... so we shouldn't have to bother not being sexist."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:13 AM
1

Did you edit this comment? The notification I was sent has you saying something entirely different. Regardless though, yes, you did in fact say that when talking about the replies made by that sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:12 AM
1

Meh, I'd be more ashamed about being incorrect than being petty 10 outta 10 times.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:07 AM
1

Again I ask, are you a child? The definition of mutilation was not expanded by feminists, and there have always been people who are anti-circumcision. Most feminists don't even call it mutilation when it happens to people with a Y-chromosome. And yet, in modern practice, it's largely aesthetic choice on the mother's part. Educate yourself. Not quite, no. Some of the largest hunts in places like Russia primarily killed men. Besides, there weren't witch hunts in the US during medieval times for re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:58 PM
1

So if capitalism is the reason that feminism is awful at engaging honestly with male issues, why is it that they're just as bad in countries that didn't use a capitalist economic system? And I'm telling you that you're more than likely incorrect. Again, what country is this? If it's the UK, land of the "let's close all women's prisons and move to rehabilitation over punitive measures, but only for women. Also, it's legally impossible for women to be charged with rape," that'll be the funniest po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:51 PM
1

Your summarization sucked and distinctly left out the most major parts of each comment you attempted to summarize. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/s/S1YNgqHX65 Again, that poster has this as their only comment on the sub that I can find, and they were one of the most controversial comments in the entire section, on my end.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:46 PM
1

Sure, here you go. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/x3142h95bc You claimed that those same "yes all men" statements were "criticizing sexism" in your categorization of both the post and it's comments. Do keep up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:44 PM
1

Shame is for people who are not correct. Substantiate your accusations, or don't bother making them, please 🤭
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:31 PM
1

The US is the country I live in. I do rather substantially care about the state of it, yes. Regardless, male infant mutilation is legal far, far more often than the same for girls. I'm able to call it a mutilation because that's a word with a definition that fits the scenario being described. Is this your first time interacting with the concept of language? Thing is, the state only allows religion to enter the equation when it comes to men. Besides, it ain't even religious in nature most of the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:25 PM
3

So, the above comment was correct? There was an uproar over this, and you acknowledge it was a bad thing? Christ, you tried to dodge the point so hard that you accidentally completely agreed, lmao.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 11:10 PM
1

Good thing the things I'm saying are not "wrong" then, yes? Lmao. A right that men are fundamentally denied from birth and then again in adulthood, yes. Over 70% of US men are mutilated as infants for aesthetic reasons, and a woman has to both be pregnant and then want an abortion to have anything like her bodily rights infringed upon, and this was never particularly common. Keep up. I have not taken out any sort of objective reality. Are you a literal child? That's comically ahistorical, for mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:53 PM
1

Oh no, Mr flimsy thinks I'm weak. However shall I cope. Then you and I have different definitions of what "working towards equality" actually is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:38 PM
1

And the post I linked sucked, yet it still failed utterly to get through to feminists, yes. That was rather the point, please do keep up 🤦‍♂️ The wording being criticized by the post was not "criticizing sexism" you dolt, it was the "not all men, but always a man" or even "yes all men" shit. Please learn to read.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:36 PM
1

If it sucked just as much in the early days too, they can't exactly have gotten much worse due to your supposed commodification of feminism. Please keep up. No, just everything that obviously disagrees with the reality of the situation. Not quite what you implied. Also, genuinely hilarious to accuse me of that after your previous response paragraph fails utterly to engage with any of my actual criticism of your argument. If there exists a feminism that is "nice and intersectional" it is in the m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:34 PM
1

You clearly didn't read the comments. Seriously, how could you get that from those responses? The first comment is trying to deflect onto a different issue entirely, and the second is stating that they think its impossible to communicate with men entirely, so why bother not being sexist? You're clearly reading that shit in deliberately bad faith. The comment you quote directly is not one I can find using the search bar. Is that a direct quote?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:30 PM
1

Look at how feminist thinkers treat SA. Or have you never heard the old "98% of rapists are male, with female victims" chestnut? That is only around because feminists manipulated federal reporting definitions for SA in the early 2010s so that female on male SA is functionally impossible, despite victimization survey stats painting a far different picture. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC repor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:26 PM
1

Frankly? Yes. If you think feminists are advocating for equality in cases where women are already ahead, I probably do know your neighborhood better than you do. Nah, but here's 5 bucks, buy yourself something nice. 🦌🦌🦌🦌🦌
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 01:58 AM
1

Seems like a stretch to call the things you brought up evidence, too, but who's counting. We'll see if I end up getting around to reading the Luxemburg person. Your "commodification of feminism" point would hold water if any early feminist literature on the subject of male issues was worth the paper it's written on, but it ain't, and so it don't. You experience a very positive feminism because you are evidently very comfortable ignoring male-specific issues. It's not rocket science. Your perspec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 01:16 AM
1

And the comments all hated it, is the point. They all see it as wretched policing of women's right to express their Comfort Bigotry. Like seriously, not a single actual participant of that sub agrees with OP, the only assenting voices are ones that aren't there often, and they're all downvoted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 11:59 PM
2

Granted, it's only by comparison, but feminism does still have substantially more power in every advocacy space than us (and all the legal ones, considering that groups like the Women's Law Project are responsible for writing criminal reporting definitions that minimize women's SA abuses of men), and since they call us a hate group at every single oppurtunity, well... Besides, you give your group too much credit. Going historically, the files would be released... with Ghislaine Maxwell's name co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 11:56 PM
1

I agree there, but calling it something that men should be out and about protesting for when feminists call any movement for male issues a hate group is fully ridiculous. Not only do men have arguably bigger issues of bodily autonomy, feminists ain't ever going to help us with anything other than lip service. I promise in your area women are only fighting for equal rights half the time at best.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 11:41 PM
1

I won't deny being petty, but the accurate username is still accurate. I don't hate you, but a performance as poor and extensive as yours in this comment section does not deserve politeness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 10:16 PM
2

"She can't be misandrist, she has a husband" ain't the statement you think it is, and besides that a single man does not a varied perspective make. Granted, I haven't read anything by Luxemburg. Not surprising you can't figure it out, but still a bit disappointing. I've never once seen any genuine criticism towards feminism from feminist literature that takes into account a (non-doormat) male perspective, just a lot of lip-service.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 10:14 PM
1

I mean, last I read something around a percent or two of the population is trans. In what way is that being shoved into anyobody's face? It's just acknowledged as a possibility, and historically speaking there have been quite a few examples that suggest the phenomenon ain't new.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 10:09 PM
1

Ghosted comment. Might be best to move to a DM chat, yeah.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 10:06 PM
0

Direct quotes? You mean... the things I've asked for from you a dozen times, all for naught? The things I've already provided to you, multiple times? M'kay. You've claimed repeatedly that I'm sexist and an "incel hate cultist" without anything like evidence. "I do not present" is what you said outright. Poor thing, already forgetting what you said less than an hour ago? The orderlies at the dementia ward must have a real handful from you. I told you that you're likely unintentionally presenting …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 09:28 PM
0

You "literally" did say that on the post, actually. Do you need the link again? Why should I dig it back up, it's already been provided, and you've ignored every attempt I've made to ask you for the same. Everyone presents themselves. Some people do it consciously, others unconsciously. Just because you don't know that you're doing it doesn't mean that you aren't. I assume you mean you stick to comfy clothes? Even what you find comfortable is used for people to determine what kind of person you …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:58 PM
9

That sub is just the worst, literally everything on a bookshelf is evidence of misogyny to them, if the shelf might theoretically be owned by a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:53 PM
0

The one that you made with no experience in either direction, yes. Going by singleness stats, it's very obviously harder for men. The context of this comment chain is in response to your comment on the gnome post, where you say outright that dating must be easy for men, if God's most obvious plant was okay with it and the community of people who think the only reason men could be lonely is conservatism/nazism (depending on how popular a post is) say as much. Please keep up, I beg, I plead. Ah, s…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:47 PM
0

You then claimed that the first hurdle is the only one that matters, and that friendships are fundamentally similar enough to relationships that you can mansplain at me about the male dating experience. The "stranger danger" phase is fundamentally different for you as a woman, too. The conversation is about the male dating experience. Keep up. If you're not a woman, do you present as more masculine, or more feminine? It's very important for the discussion at hand and your claims to any relevant …
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:16 PM
0

Okay, then what are you saying when you try and explain to me how "easy" it is for men to find dates, while never having been romantically active yourself, much less romantically active as a man? I'd give you specific quotes, but I can't be bothered to copy it all over from the image, so here's the image again. https://preview.redd.it/vl0w7fq5a8tg1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ea270d20ede4d27a0d0f86ba43fbc10e97add807
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 07:50 PM
0

Bud, you stated outright that you think dating as a man is "extremely simple," because you can get people to tolerate your presence for long enough to call them friends. You then admitted to having 0 experience dating as a man, and 0 experience dating at all, for that matter. It's all in the image that you yourself commented with.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 06:58 PM
0

You stated outright that you think you know more about finding romantic relationships as a man than men do, despite you never even having had any romantic relationship experience as a woman. There is no fabrication, here. I don't have to make things up for you to look crazy. If bigots like you were capable of learning at all, the world would be a much nicer place. Again, give an example of something sexist that I've said if you want to accuse me of acting like a sexist. I will wait.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 10:17 PM
0

Sorry, sorry. Either "incel hate-cultist" or "absolute idiot who knows less about the male experience dating than an asexual woman" status, so much better 🤭 The point was never to convince you. That's demonstrably impossible, as from what I've seen far kinder people than I have tried and failed to do so in the past. Just to help expose the type of person you really are to a subreddit that likely gives you more credit than you are reasonable due. Ahhh, so you mean that you're using "terrible, che…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 09:42 PM
0

And what I link of the things you say, as well? Hell, you've assigned me "incel hate-cultist" status without having the common decency to even give one example.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 08:20 PM
0

Or, alternatively, when I pointed to opinions which you expressed outright, the most commonly applauded sentiments in the places you frequent, and again, your own literal behavior, with links. Claiming what is there, exactly? The sentiments expressed by all the most popular posts of the past year? This ain't a communication issue, dummy. It's a "you're a sexist prick who repeatedly claims otherwise despite direct evidence to the contrary that you attempt to hide" issue. I'm autistic too, that's …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 07:12 PM
2

Really? Could've sworn last I checked the stats had something a bit north of 40% of modern US marriages ending in divorce, when counting even the non-first-time marriages. Granted, it's been a while since then and I might've misinterpreted the data, though.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:25 AM
1

Comment ghosted, again. I've started replacing swears with words like heck, crap, and fudge. I hate it since it makes me sound even more stupid than usual, but I haven't had a ghosted comment in a bit. Maybe that'll help you?
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:55 AM
1

Your comment was eaten by the reddit monster again. I really think it might be a swear-counter or something in the automod, that kills any comment with more than like, 3 or 4 swears total.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:46 AM
0

I pointed out several distinct comments where you were objectively incorrect. The gnome post is saying that it is that easy, there is a difference. You're directly agreeing with the guy you responded to, and claiming outright that you think the response of a blatantly sexist sub that will say literally anything to "own the incels" is 100% God's honest truth. Poor addled creature. Stop ignoring opinions that are expressed, outright and loudly. Not strawmen, literal exact examples, with links. Ple…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:45 AM
0

Nothing but specific links to the things you've said, and examples of the company you keep. FTFY. I haven't assumed you were non-genuine, I've shown you to be, with examples. Something you haven't managed to do despite claiming the same for me. Again, if simply linking the things they say is spreading hate, well... maybe they shouldn't say such hateful things? Just a thought 🤔 Assination is a hilarious word, thanks for that. Seriously though, yet again making a claim based on something I never o…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:36 AM
1

Funny way to say that you simply aren't correct, but m'kay. Ah, you're unable to formulate an argument... because my points are bad? That'd surely make them easy to respond to, no? 🤭 The post with the diagram showing the main reasons they think that men can't find a datw? That post? How about the one claiming that you'd have to be republican to have trouble dating as a man, and claiming that morally upright and virtuous progressives always have an easy time? Lmao.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:33 AM
0

Because I finally made a mistake, dolt. Normal people do that when they realize they were incorrect. You should try it some time. Are you kidding me. Genuinely, honest to God, are you making a joke? They're pointing at the only reasons they can possibly see for a man not being able to find a date. even the dang gnome-post is declaring outright that if men can't find a date, they must not have tried anything, because the scripted video shows a lady being receptive to the gnome outfit. I have, tha…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:30 AM
0

Did I ever say it wasn't? What you do is not "make a stand." It is "disagree as mildly as possible, and immediately either soften your words or back down entirely, depending on who you are disagreeing with." And coincidentally, you're always universally disagreed with by that sub. Should tell you something about them. I do say so, yes. Never made that claim, bud. Just said that you definitely don't treat it the same way you treat misogyny, which I've proved repeatedly. Then please, provide the e…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:26 AM
1

Not the most popular ones from the past year, I provided those. Please keep up. I don't hate you, just think that you're a bad person and a massive hypocrite. It's only hate-mongering if I attempted to spread that hate around, anyway. I've only given you literal, exact examples of how that sub is, repeatedly. If that makes you hate them, well, perhaps you shouldn't have been so quick to defend them 🙄 Never said that all feminists were bad people. Quite the opposite in fact, if you look at my com…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:16 AM
0

Proof that you... claim to know more about dating as a man and the standards men are held to than men do? The comment I initially linked from you on that sub is exactly that, bud. If you're unable to form a coherent response, you can always just ignore that part of the comment, y'know. Not like it'd be the first time you've done it in this thread 🤭 The hate-cultists... that they assume every man with trouble dating is, going by the most popular posts, yes.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:13 AM
0

Actually, fair point on that first paragraph. I should've been more specific, I just searched the term "subhuman" on the subreddit in general and grabbed the first thing I saw, not the posts I was talking about. That's my bad for being unclear in the comment you were replying to, and then misunderstanding what you meant by "not seeing anything." Look at the linked posts. They call any man with trouble dating an incel, quite clearly, and the comments regularly spew the same "any man who can't fin…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:10 AM
0

Nobody said that, just that you vastly overestimate the malice most of them hold. The argument is only pointless due to your own unwillingness to compromise even slightly and see that the subs you regularly contribute to tend giving the most attention and applause towards the exact sexism you claim to call out. No, you've been saying that "sometimes they get a little overzealous, and paint with slightly too broad a brush." There is a difference. And yet, you only go out of your way to make massi…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 01:07 AM
0

Yes, those people are awful, I agree. You said there were no examples of folks on that sub calling incels subhuman though, so I gave you one. Don't move the goalposts now, they'll break if you do it any more 🤭 Calling "incels" (who, again, the top posts of that sub call any man who has trouble dating) subhuman is not "calling them out" and you'd agree with me if someone called sexist feminists subhuman for saying the same "men should have even fewer rights than they do now, compared to women" sh…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:51 AM
0

Proof of what? That the people on that sub agree that "incels" are "any man who can't get a date" and that they say that incels are subhuman? I already provided some, before you even made this comment. Soooo, you acknowledge that your ignorance in moving past the "friends" stage means you aren't a competent source for any romantic advice or standards held by either gender? Tracks. Take it from someone with experience on the subject, people expect substantially more from romantic partners than th…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:48 AM
0

Still ignoring the fact that the most popular posts in that sub are consistently the most sexist ones, then? Tragic. Tell me, who do you think I have monged hate for, recently? Please be honest.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:44 AM
1

Because my links are the most popular things on that subreddit, and yours is to an image post from a website that is exactly the way I described it. Christ's sake. Again, that's taking screenshots from the most obviously bot-filled and unmoderated website and claiming that any man who has romantic trouble thinks the same way. Pure lunacy. I can find similar websites with feminists saying all men should be killed, with far more engagement and approval from far more people than the one you linked,…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:43 AM
0

Heck, here's a recent example of an upvoted comment on that sub saying that incels "make themselves subhuman" https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/z5f1wRo2cS
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:33 AM
0

Oh, so because there were no men speaking about their experiences present at the time, you confidently and incorrectly stating that you know their experience better than they do isn't speaking over anyone? Sure, you got me on a technicality, why not. Not quite, no. People have different standards for friends than they do for romantic partners. You don't have to take me at my word on this one, feel free to ask literally anyone else who isn't asexual. Clicking these links shows... nothing, on your…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:30 AM
0

"What's posted frequently" is the same exact stuff, with even worse said in the comments constantly. It's not complicated, the majority of that subreddit think the same way as the most-upvoted posts. They wouldn't be the most upvoted posts, otherwise.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:27 AM
0

Oh, so you're just talking about some bot-filled website with 15 human users that nobody has ever heard of then, that tracks 🙄 You pardon the sexism... because you agree with it, and make the faulty assumption that it's only applied to the bad people totally not the ones it says outright that it's applied to? That's a new level of cognitive dissonance, even for you. The primary reason nobody takes male issues seriously is because people are massively misandrist. If a few bad actors were enough t…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:26 AM
1

So you don't even have experience dating men as a woman, and you still think that gives you a good enough grounding in the space to talk over men when they speak of their own experiences on the subject? Holy mother of fudge, bud. Getting someone to like you is not the same as dating them, what an ignorant thing to say. No, they're the sub's words. Check the comments on those posts I linked, y'know, the ones that are both in the top 3 the most popular posts from the last year.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:15 AM
0

Again, incorrect. The majority of that sub agree with the top posts from this year, some 9 out of 10 of which are massively sexist. How could you possibly claim otherwise? It isn't cherry-picking to take what is literally most popular on that sub as an example of the sub's character.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:13 AM
0

Well, then why are the posts that do what I say universally the most popular ones? Come on, dude. Even you have to see it at this point, click the links if you gotta. That isn't "occasionally overzealous" it's the most popular things on the platform, and regularly repeated in every single comment section. Why does sexism from women get to be "simply a reaction to misogyny and perfectly acceptable if slightly overzealous" in your eyes, while sexism towards women is always evil? Even you ought to …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:08 AM
0

Okay then, have you got any experience attempting to date women as a man? Please, let's hear it. I'm a bi man, so I've probably dated more men and women both than you have. I just happen to not think that those men who do have trouble dating are subhuman scum, like yourself and the people you associate with. https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/VDDoBgNLam https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/MjK3odu7xV
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 12:00 AM
0

What do you think inceldom is, seriously? Do you, like the entirety of that sub, simply classify any man who struggles with dating as an incel? https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/VDDoBgNLam https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/MjK3odu7xV I've never seen anything like that, even on the worst misogynist subreddits. Have any linked examples?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:56 PM
0

https://preview.redd.it/63rxu5838vsg1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=99a66532d0f90e349952afe76968b8a469fb764e https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/VDDoBgNLam https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/MjK3odu7xV
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:55 PM
0

"Ignorant at worst" is not the flex you think it is 🤭 Again, you have no experience dating as a man. What makes you think you're so much of an authority on the subject that you can man-splain the process to those who actually have experience?
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:53 PM
1

Hell, just look at the most popular posts from the past year. These are number 2 and 3 respectively, doing the same "if a man has trouble dating, he must be a literal nazi subhuman piece of shit" stuff you claim to criticize. https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/MjK3odu7xV https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/VDDoBgNLam
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:48 PM
0

Are you kidding me? That sub is so regularly misandrist that it's a miracle it hasn't been banned yet, even with reddit's extremely lax stance on sexism coming from women. Your comment is more ignorant and naive than hateful (seriously, those people will say literally anything to claim that the bar for men is in hell, they certainly would not act like the lady from the obviously staged video did), but many of the others in that same post's comments are extremely hateful towards men, with not a p…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:39 PM
2

The one where you take the bigots of that sub at their word immediately when they say they'd totalllllly do what the obvious plant for the video did. They'll say whatever they have to in order to claim that dating is piss-easy for men, and you'll agree easily since it conforms to your ignorant expectations on the subject as someone with no experience dating as a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:37 PM
0

The fact that you stand around in obviously misandrist subs saying shit like this says a whole hell of a lot about you. https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/jzELGxbOCL
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:34 PM
0

In case anyone is wondering, the world's least-convincing ally hides her account history because she continually says dumb shit on subs like r/inceltears , like this comment I just happened to find on a post that was reccomended to me from there. https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/s/jzELGxbOCL
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 11:31 PM
2

More like podcasts in general having pretty thin margins if they aren't uber-popular, I'd guess.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 10:57 PM
8

"I'm not spreading hate, just saying that I agree with that hate and explaining why other people should feel the same way!" Lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 10:49 PM
0

If you weren't awful, you wouldn't have anything to hide 🤭
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 09:29 PM
5

I think any guide that doesn't acknowledge the reality of the situation and ignores how something like half of marriages end in divorce (overwhelmingly at the woman's behest) would be a damn shitty guide. Haven't watched this video yet, though.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:58 PM
1

How could it be only about personal relationships, when women feel so entitled to protection even from men they aren't romantically involved with? Please keep up 🤦‍♂️ It seems like you're closing your eyes, plugging your ears, and shouting "lalalala" to avoid acknowledging the systemic misandry inherent to your society, as you've done repeatedly in the past on this sub. Of course you don't see them as sexist, dolt. It never looks like sexism when you agree with it.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 10:01 PM
1

Ah, it wasn't? Someone should tell OP that you know the topic of their post better than they do, then 🤭 Nothing here gives such strong indications that they were exclusively talking about personal relationships, especially when the largest examples are state-enforced, such as gendered combat slavery. Lmao, we both know you said far more sexist shit in that comment than just criticizing the post's title. Don't play dumb, you can hide your account history but all the comments are still there for a…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 09:36 PM
1

Because it entirely ignores the many, many ways men protect you daily and which you take for granted. Honestly, it doesn't even touch the top 10 most sexist shit I've seen a woman say in this subreddit, but it did prompt me to look at what else you've had to say on this subreddit. Poor thing, you clearly still don't see the problem. Oh well, lord willing any men unlucky or stupid enough to interact with you will see the type of person you are eventually.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 09:09 PM
1

Nope, but you certainly act entitled to their work, at a much higher rate than men act entitled to sex from women. Please keep up, if you're mentally capable of doing so 🤦‍♂️ Not really, no. That protection is enforced at legal and societal levels, see the draft and women collectively agreeing that men should speak up on their behalf against misogyny. I didn't have to scroll very far at all, it was one of the first results when I searched your username, bigot. "I can't be misandrist, I have a hu…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 08:20 PM
1

Oh wow, I'm so honored, a person with a hidden account history claims that they made their first reddit comment in a while just to disagree with me. I totally believe that. If my feelings were hurt by every dumbass who comes to this sub with a hidden account history and the intent to say sexist things, that would be tragic, yes. Not the case, though I do enjoy pointing them out, as you can see by your own situation. No one even brought up the loneliness epidemic, poor thing. You're spiraling int…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 08:15 PM
0

Not according to the Olympic shooting records (especially considering how much less often women compete in those sports, the medlas they have gotten are relatively impressive), and not according to the experience of anyone I've ever spoken to on the subject who actually went through military basic training with women. They're a bit less able to handle automatic fire when unsupported by something like a bipod, but they consistently do a bit better than the average man for precision sniping work, …
/r/MensRights01/04/26 08:05 PM
1

No, they haven't. They fought for the option to serve in combat roles, and very conveniently ignored any sort of advocacy on the front of which gender has a legal obligation to serve in combat roles should the state deem it prudent. It makes plenty of sense. They may be able to carry less, but they're just as capable of shooting a gun or manning an artillery position as men are. Modern warfare has largely moved past the need for exceptional physical strength, especially with regards to interesti…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:54 PM
2

Bud, it doesn't really count as a disagreement if they can't even be bothered to verbalize why they disagree. It's just simping for some sexist lady on the internet, and trying to deflect with meaningless buzzwords whenever anyone attempts to engage with them. Lord willing, you'll actually put your money where your mouth is on the bear front and save anyone else the unpleasant experience of having to interact with you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 07:52 PM
1

Ans women also do not want women in combat roles, as you can see from the widespread female flight from Ukraine while their male peers are fed into the meatgrinder at gunpoint, even if they got out and sought refugee status from supposedly egalitarian EU nations. That would be the case... if women actually also protected the vulnerable in cases where they have the upper hand, such as the educational industry or in social activism spaces. This does not happen, the expectation for the strong to pr…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:44 PM
4

Men working the jobs that cause them to be some 80% of serious workplace injuries could be considered to be protecting you from both the consequences of those jobs not being done, and having to work those jobs yourself. When you claim to have "had a lot of sex" like this, do you understand how unconvincing it sounds? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/nuCpPLvtuK Yuck, you're the kind of woman to claim you know more about dating as a man than men do, too. Just a reminder to everyone, when an i…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:31 PM
5

Thing is, the phenomenon is not exclusive to partners. Just look at shit like the draft, and the general sentiment among women that if you aren't actively going out of your way to protect women physically and emotionally as a man, you're a sexist pig.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:21 PM
1

And yet, you still assume you know anything like enough to make such a confident assertion of their feelings towards sex and relationships. You think that generalizing based on your limited and likely incorrectly identified personal experience is anything but the idiocy that it is. There's a reason for that, and you certainly will not be doing the self-reflection necessary to figure out what it is. Do better, or get out, but certainly don't try and explain what men's rights are to men as a woman…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:19 PM
2

Mostly made me feel like I wasted some time arguing with a person too stupid to do anything but attempt the shittiest Kafka trap since man vs bear, but that's marginally more entertaining than the nothing I would be doing otherwise, so thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:50 PM
1

You can't win a game that the other person is mentally incapable of playing, so I'd agree with you on that point alone, actually.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:47 PM
1

"Uhhhmmmm, don't you know??!?! Any sort of disagreement with me when I can't even be bothered to argue my points is like, so totally evidence that I'm right??? What's a catch-22????" Grow a spine and defend the words you say, or slither back into the dirt with all the other worms, please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:39 PM
2

Meh, maybe I would if there was anything in your comment except simple deflection for the purpose of giving a sexist woman far more credit than she is due. I swear, some people who come to this sub really think that the sexism is "like, so totally different when women I agree with sometimes do it!" It's always the ones with their entire account history hidden too, do you think it isn't obvious what kind of person you are?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:34 PM
1

So, what you're saying is that you know I'm correct, and you'd prefer to try and deflect from the actual conversation at hand rather than defend your obviously biased statement? Predictable. You would've at least linked the video if you thought you were correct, and you know it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:22 PM
0

From your experience... not being a man, and simply assuming shit about the random men unlucky enough to exist in your life? Tracks. Christ, what is it about some women that makes them think their inexperience makes them an expert on men and how men feel?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 06:20 PM
1

I haven't watched that one, but 20 bucks says she's still notably misandrist in it, and only self-reflects in a vain effort to be less critical of women who get into age-gap relationships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:12 PM
–

This video (and none of the others I've seen this person make) does not contain any examination of biases on the part of the creator. Are you high, or just stupid?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 05:59 PM
33

Nobody has "whipped" anyone, even metaphorically. Simply showed how shitty and sexist their talking points are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 04:35 AM
0

Why shouldn't people be able to change their gender, should they so choose? We have all the technology and they by definition could only possibly harm themselves (which they don't seem to be, most studies I've seen show better mental health outcomes post-transition) in doing this, so why not?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 01:53 AM
1

Well, the women who are really desperate for kids should theoretically be able to divorce the poor schmucks who married them, and get all the financial support without any of the shitty marriage, so it probably sounds like a good idea from where they sit.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 06:51 PM
1

Your reply got ghosted again. Is there some specific swear word they filter out in this sub or something?
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 05:55 PM
1

Well, when you say those things a thousand times, I'm forced to pick the only reason that applies to each action. Perhaps you shouldn't be awful? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The things you say matter a whole lot. That's why the hidden account history is so telling.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 05:55 PM
1

You literally have a search bar. It's like searching through a neatly categorized haystack with needles and hay helpfully sorted. It ain't malicious to simply respond to the words you write rather than the ones you wish you did.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 05:53 PM
0

Ah, so previously it was just a week or so ago, now there's thousands of comments between you and the last time you criticislzed anyone who isn't a man? Boy oh boy, you are so bad at sticking to a lie. I'm glad though, makes it less likely that you'll successfully sucker anyone into believing you're a good person IRL.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 01:36 AM
0

The words you use matter quite a lot when trying to communicate to other people, yes. Funny how people like you always try and insist otherwise. Mmm, whatever you say, bud. Seems more like boarding up a window while your door is still fallen off its hinges to me, but what do I know? I'm just a professional in a related field who has to deal with cyber security a lot. I haven't back-tracked anything, lmao. You just weren't paying much attention to what I said the first time, thats my bad for expe…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 01:34 AM
0

Again, are you a native english speaker? "Misjudged things" is a really funny way to spell "been a sexist stereotype who tries to talk over men at every available oppurtunity while claiming allyship." Do you have even a single, solitary example where the OP was actually wrong? Feel free to link it, I'll wait. I did entertain the possibility otherwise, on more than one occasion. You always showed me that I was wrong to do that with your actual actions, though. Woe is you, having people call out a…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 01:30 AM
0

Mmm, I haven't? I've also told you when you got the grammar incorrect, if it helps. Perhaps you should make comments that are less deserving of criticism, if you can't handle criticism with explicit references to the things you've said. It's your right to disagree and assume you know more about the subject than men while (incorrectly, by all available evidence) claiming to do the same to feminists, yes. It's also my right to call you out for that. Hope that helps! You may not be trying to be one…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:48 AM
0

Mmmhmmm, I'm sure that's the truth. As we've already established, you're as far from a good judge of sexism against men as it's possible for a person to be, so not surprising you ignore most of it. No, you don't. If you did, you'd have something to show for yourself to seem less hypocritical here. You don't. I assume the worst because you have repeatedly demonstrated it to be the most likely outcome. Again, do keep up, I beg, I plead.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:35 AM
0

Here, let me try and re-comment it: That's what I'd like to do, yes. That's also what hiding your account history stops anyone from doing. Again, please keep up. Your past words are important context to determine whether or not your present ones are hypocritical. Besides, who the hell stalks anyone based on reddit? Odds are good there's a far easier way to stalk you for anyone determined enough, either via an easier social media website or public records, depending on country Oh, bud. I'm not tr…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:32 AM
0

Ah, so it isn't "on the regular" that you criticize feminists for misandry, then? You can't even keep your story straight for 2 comments in a row. It's the flimsiest story in the world, and yet you still lost track of it so fast.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:30 AM
0

Lmao, if that was what you posted in those subreddits, you wouldn't be in them for particularly long. They tend to be quite strict about banning dissenters of that type, which you would know if you ever actually criticized feminists like you do men. Hey, I'd be happy to assume based on your actual words, but again, you hide your account history explicitly so people can't do that 🤭
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:20 AM
0

Yours about being in feminist subs did as well. I can only read the first line, but I already disagree. People likely use the things you say in feminist subreddits to categorize you negatively, not that you were in them in the first place. Keep up.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:16 AM
0

Are you a native English speaker, out of curiosity? In no way is that something that can be reasonably inferred from that sentence. Mmm, maliciously misrepresent you... by showing the things you've said previously, and accurately linking them for further reference? Using your account to see the things you've said is exactly judging you by your words and actions 🤭 Lol, poor thing. You don't have to be "militant" to be a sexist shithead, I assure you. Mostly was just curious if I remembered your u…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 12:06 AM
0

Ah, so what you're saying is yes, that's exactly who you are? Presumably that's why you hise your comment history from this sub then, as you don't want people drawing the connection correctly? Gosh people like you are fuckin' weird.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:57 PM
1

"Then society should be striving for a world that discourages it, rather than enforces it." Did you mean to say "encourage" in this comment or something? Also, answer the question, are you the person always downplaying misandry and trying to gatekeep what counts as misandry on this sub as a woman? I tried to check your account history, but you have all your comments from this sub hidden, presumably so people won't recognize that it's you when you repeat the same shit you always do.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:56 PM
13

By manipulating the power structures around those men, usually either the educational or legal system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. Same goes for the legal system, which p…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 11:49 PM
0

Also, are you the one always commenting on this sub as a woman about how a given post "isn't really misandrist" as if you wouldn't lose your shit at a man gatekeeping what is and is not misogyny?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:45 PM
2

A society that discourages the type of human connection in question is a very short-lived society indeed, doomed to die out within a generation or 3 as people stop having kids. Again, I might be a bit of a hypocrite on this front as I never want anything to do with having or caring for children of my own, but why would you say that this should be how it works? Seems ill-advised in the long term.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:43 PM
1

Discourages... what, exactly? Sorry, having a bit of trouble understanding what you mean in context.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:35 PM
16

What institutional power does the average man hold, exactly? Women have voted more often than men in every US election since the 80s, so surely they're just as much to blame for those men being in power as the average man is. Again, fuck do you mean "control money?" Women literally control 85% of US consumer spending, as I've informed you. Lmao, in what way is the average man dominating economically? Proportionally speaking the gap between male and female homeless people is larger than the one b…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 10:17 PM
18

A group doesn't have to "dominate almost all spheres of life" to substantially effect society's treatment of other groups, you absolute dust rag of a person. Besides, on average women do have more economical power than men, they make up 85% of US consumer spending, after all. Brother, you're the one who repeatedly insisted that men's issues are never caused by women. Just one single example to the contrary and you already start frothing at the mouth? I'd call it hilarious if it wasn't so disappo…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 08:28 PM
31

Men in general do not have any systemic power. Are you high? Also, are you ignoring all the problems perpetuated and caused by women, such as the women in control of the 70+% female teaching industry? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshl…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 08:04 PM
18

Meh, it's integrated enough with all the EEA stuff, and it's not like EU countries haven't also done this or worse to male Ukrainian refugees.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 06:44 PM
3

Is there something about the show specifically built to draw in the worst kind of people, or is it just a coincidence? Been curious since I noticed the phenomenon, but not quite enough to watch what sounds to me like the least interesting television imagineable.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 05:01 PM
4

It's the closest anything like a modern mainstream feminist writer has ever gotten to not being sexist as fuck, and it's still pretty damn awful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 04:57 PM
12

Why is it that like, 95% of that show's fans in my experience are extraordinarily sexist?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 04:15 PM
2

Feminists are a powerful group in the west that frequently claim to be oppressed by the less socially and legally privileged (on average) male demographic, though? How are you so close to understanding, but still unwilling to do so?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 04:08 PM
3

Books all written by women who coincidentally seem to never interact with men as if they're intellectual equals, much less actually ask them about the subjects at hand. Books that are still near-universally disagreed with by modern feminists even for the limp-wristed criticism they gave.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 04:06 PM
1

How is a lack of abortion unequal? Don't get me wrong, abortion should be legal, but when it was in place that was objectively a right that men were not afforded, that is to say the right to abstain from responsibility for a child. Hell, if you're in the US, women have far more right to bodily autonomy than men, considering things like the draft and widespread male infant genital mutilation for aesthetic purposes while the same is illegal against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 03:45 PM
1

Funny how accurate that "flimsy" username is, couldn't respond to any of the genuine criticism of this comment. Completely typical, yet still disappointing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 03:41 PM
5

Not morally, obviously. Gonna do weird things to the age demographics of many nations going forward though, and there are economic consequences of this. Just ask the South Koreans.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 07:42 AM
1

Yeah. This post is the closest either of us were able to find in all their account history to anything like criticism of feminists to their faces. So, that's says something about them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 02:15 AM
6

I didn't dismiss shit. Just said that they've always happily accepted male assistance, promising the same in exchange but never actually delivering. Quite the opposite, in fact. Things sucked for women in the past, that's why feminism, a movement exclusively for women's empowerment, was necessary to work towards equality. Now that women are ahead in the west in every measurable way, however? Not so much. Getting them to acknowledge male issues is like pulling teeth. Getting them to care in a sub…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 02:13 AM
1

Like clockwork. This wasn't even one of the specific ones I was thinking of when I made the comment, lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/26 12:45 AM
2

Hah, ain't that the truth. I made the comment in the hopes of riling multiple of them up into replying, so shhh 🤫
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 10:29 PM
8

Bud, your username is a hunger games reference with a misspelling. That ship has sailed. Looks like I was correct on the bait front, then, at any rate.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 10:21 PM
10

Sometimes, the people who write the dictionary are simply correct. If you live in the west, you do not live in a male supremacy. Tell me your country, and I'll tell you what legal rights women have that you do not, and you won't be able to come up with anything for the reverse. Promise. As for the last paragraph, are you an idiot? Please be honest. The entire history of feminism is just them taking all the male assistance they can get, and using it exclusively for the furtherment of women's stat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:20 PM
2

The newer feminism take is this post. Basically the lightest possible requests for them to be less sexist, and the response to it, with the person who made the post still having the gall to come here and call themselves a feminist after seeing the shit they are agreeing with by doing so. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/s/Cfmadaf96V If the best you can do under a feminist framework is tell men to ignore all the work men have done to help women and fix their problems themselves, you are wors…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:16 PM
5

Please, your comments ain't neutral. Anyone with eyes can see that, stop pretending otherwise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:12 PM
5

Hah! Listen to criticism? Here's how the mildest of them interact with the most limp-wristed criticism of their terminology around male issues possible, not even asking them from a place of morality, just of optics. They still lose their shit when informed that it probably isn't a good idea to say directly sexist shit. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/s/Cfmadaf96V
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:09 PM
3

Can't wait to see the one dumb fuck who always comes into these comment sections to try and claim that these "aren't really sexist you guys, you can tell by [misrepresentation of the things on their screen so major that you wonder if the commenter is a bot or a lobotomy patient]."
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 10:04 PM
7

Go to r/teachers . Or just, y'know, interact with the average teacher. The majority of them are like this, and it informs their bias agaisnt boys in general. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easi…
/r/MensRights28/03/26 10:01 PM
6

Hidden account history? ✅️ Deliberately inflammatory and honestly stupid comment? ✅️ First comment on the sub? ✅️ Bot, brigadier, or bait. I'm guess bait, for this one.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 10:00 PM
1

You might be a bit daft if you think every other economic system ever attempted hasn't had the same (or worse) problems. You overestimate the true availability of resources, and vastly underestimate the entrenched nature of sexism within any system that would replace capitalism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/26 05:45 AM
1

Bait then, that tracks. Thanks for the answer!
/r/MensRights26/03/26 05:52 PM
3

Ugh, I hate that "no, we were just jooooking! Obviously it doesn't count when we say sexist shit, we would never do anything bad! Yes, it is totally different when we rehash fucking 4chan arguments!" talking point. So annoying. It's sexist no matter who does it, IMO.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 04:59 AM
3

Did my other reply to this post get deleted? Am I the only one who can see it? Sorry, the message for it just showed up a bit oddly on my end.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 03:39 AM
8

Something becomes misogyny when it stops being a criticism of a specific woman or group and starts being a sweeping insult/generalization of women as a whole. Same as misandry, tbh. For example, saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote is very obviously misogyny. Saying that feminism frequently provides space for women to air out their misandrist opinions with a thin veneer of societal critique is not. The abortion thing is a very, very entrenched argument, more about when someone becomes …
/r/MensRights26/03/26 03:12 AM
8

Accusations of lies where there are none? ✅️ Hidden account history? ✅️ "I totally agree, but..." ✅️ Is this bait, or are you a bot? Please be honest?
/r/MensRights26/03/26 01:15 AM
3

Presumably that's why women get all the man-hating content? You're really not helping your case with that particular argument, tbh, especially when the actual things said are so different between misogynist and misandrist videos. You won't find shit with men wishing death on all women, just as an example, at least nothing that will stay up for long. How much of that content is actually posted by men, and have you looked at the comments? Seeing a video where some lady claims that men hate women i…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 07:26 PM
3

I simply do not believe you. Even if you did, the public response to these videos is absolutely and entirely different.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 07:16 PM
2

You've clearly never tried to do what you're telling OP to do by registering for tiktok as a man, and it shows.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 11:02 PM
0

Oh, so the comments of one video weren't expectionally shitty, must mean the entire example is wrong 🙄
/r/MensRights24/03/26 01:34 AM
2

Huh, for some reason the app isn't letting me quote you anymore. That's inconvenient. Whatever, I'll just respond to the paragraphs in order: To you, maybe thats true, if we're being unrealistically generous. No legal system in the world sees it that way, in practice. Why shouldn't they gender their claims? It's a gendered phenomenon, since women are not generally punished when accused of such things, at least not compared to men, and they certainly aren't punished when they're the ones doing th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 10:19 PM
1

Yes I used the word “believe”. Yes, and I criticized you for that entirely unfounded belief. Is this genuinely your first time interacting with the very concept of a conversation in which someone disagrees with you? I think male victims of rape should be believed when they go to the police instead of ridiculed. And that female ones should be believed even in the absence of anything like actual evidence, yes. I read the post. What am I doing wrong? Honestly? So, so much. The main thing at this po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 08:58 PM
3

Yes, women can. It's an advocate for men, not an advocate who is male. And you're not being attacked for your flair, you're being attacked on your hateful ideas. Look at their comment history, they always make that ridiculous claim the second they get any pushback, lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 08:38 PM
1

Check their post history. This person is literally always like this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 08:32 PM
2

And I still believe that to be true. Despite yourself declaring that this is impossible to conclusively prove, or even reliably source, yes. That's sorta the whole complaint. What do you want? To kill time by throwing scorn at someone who I think deserves it, mostly. That, and to let anyone else reading this thread for some reason know that you ain't half the ally you claim to be. Feel free to stop responding if you stop being able to come up with a response 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 08:21 PM
2

Very telling that you were corrected on this front a half-dozen times in the comments of that post, but you're still out here insisting on the same bullshit. You can just say that you're wrong y'know. You stated outright that false accusations were less common than true ones with no punishment for the accused, after 3 and a half paragraphs of saying that this is impossible to know for sure. Also very telling that this is the only part of my comment you felt mentally capable of responding to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 07:34 PM
–

Sexist commentary towards men largely doesn’t involve implying that men shouldn’t have rights or bodily autonomy. Really? Now a woman is lecturing me on what sexist commentary towards men is like? Not only are you wrong, not only did you fail entirely to answer my question, but you're also a massive hypocrite, seeing as you'd flip your shit if a man did the same thing to you. "All men should start in chains and work their way out" "Men should be rendered infertile at age 13 until they're married…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:28 PM
–

Because surprise surprise, the demographic provably biased against boys are also the demographic most inclined to make life harder for any men unlucky enough to work with them. Are you genuinely stupid, or just acting that way, out of curiosity?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:22 PM
1

Nothing I said has to do with feminism. Who do you think the debate in question would be with?
/r/MensRights22/03/26 05:44 AM
5

A debate requires a supported claim. It also requires that the other person be capable of actually acknowledging that supported claim. Feminists typically are not.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 07:02 PM
3

I wasn’t downplaying any impact. That might be the most disingenuous way you could possibly frame what you said in that post, tbh. The entire thing was basically nothing except downplaying the harm that sexist statements from women do. I was just not mentioning it, and bringing it up from a different angle. When that angle isn't a critical one in the slightest, you really shouldn't try and tout that post as evidence that you're also critical of feminist ideas occasionally. If that's the best you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/26 06:51 PM
2

Fun, learn something new every day.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 06:39 AM
2

This is a pointless semantic correction, but I think the word you're looking for is "empathetic." Not a big deal at all, but I think "empathic" might imply a (possibly psychic?) enhanced ability to sense the emotions of others, lol.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 12:31 AM
12

Just as an example, in most countries with a pension, women receive that pension earlier than men despite living some 10 years longer on average.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 12:27 AM
1

Another impact that patriarchy has had on the world. Jesus christ, you people blame everything on your boogeyman, huh? Did that evil patriarchy also make them provably biased against boys, too? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:10 AM
1

Call out sexist behavior and commentary about women if you hear it. Have you ever, even a single time in all your life, called out sexist behavior from women towards men? Why should they do that for you, if not? Because the word itself is associated with maleness I think it’s easy to take offense to it and believe that it’s an affront to men That's the way the term is most often used. You're kidding yourself if you think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:08 AM
1

Did you mean for this to be a reply to me, or someone else? You accidently made it as a top-level comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/26 12:01 AM
5

Misandry: dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex). It's male-only conscription. It's the provable bias against boys in school. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:06 PM
6

Hidden account history? ✅️ Denying the possibility of misandry existing? ✅️ Asking dumbass questions clearly in an attempt to do nothing but waste time? ✅️ Bait, bot, or brigadier, call it here fellas.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:00 PM
2

I think it’s wrong. Not what you said in the post. But do you think other feminists will listen to me when I say it like that? "Oh, I totally didn't meeeaaaan to minimize men's issues on the subject!!!! I was only downplaying the impact of misnadrist rhetoric because I thought it would go over better in the moment, and it would be personally inconvenient for me to try and seriously advocate for men even on an anonymous internet post!!!!! I still totally care, and definitely criticize women's mov…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/26 06:53 PM
7

Femininity is awesome, masculinity is toxic. Well, at least you're honest about being a bigoted shithead. Breath of fresh air compared to all the ones that try and deny it.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 01:21 AM
2

I made an entire post one the AskFeminist sub criticising the language feminists use when they speak about men and violence. And the closest you got to actual criticism was spending 5 and a half paragraphs talking about how that language isn't actually wrong, just bad for PR since men interpret it differently. I read the post. Keep on deciding for me who I am, what I would and wouldn’t do. It's easy enough when all of that is fully visible to anyone willing to look. All based on my user flair “f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 11:27 PM
2

Oh hey, I can comment again. That's fun. Most feminists disagree with such narrow definition of the word “woman”. And most of the same feminists use the word "patriarchy" how I've described it, rather than how you have. Please keep up. Because the least intuitive ones are usually the most intellectual ones and the most true. I've met enough bigoted "intellectuals" especially in feminist spaces that all I can really do is laugh at this one. Another prejudice against me: I don’t You do. You might …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 11:24 PM
12

Nope. That'd be the answer to my first question, then? Well, sorry I have to be the one to let you know, but it isn't 12,000 BC anymore. There's these neat things called organized society, societal norms/expectations, drugs, and firearms that can all be used for coercion even by those of inferior physical strength. Edit: lmao, they did the respond-then-block shit because of this comment. Oh well, nothing of value was lost.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:31 PM
16

Most male abuse happens by other men though. In the US, as many women rape men as vice versa, as per the CDC. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the r…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:23 PM
16

It usually is, there's just relatively regular feminist brigades on the sub, sadly.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:23 PM
19

leads to the man freezing in a situation they would easily overcome since men are far physically stronger than women. Is this the first time you've ever thought about the possibility of firearms, or like, social coercion? At all? Misogynistic women exist, women who groom exist, but both are still created by men in a Patriarchal society. Oh, so you're just fucking stupid. Never mind, carry on.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:22 PM
2

Could it be that you have nothing against the concept of patriarchy? Just the name? Like if I gave it a random name like “the … system” that you would accept? No, bud. Please at least attempt to keep up. It's the fact that people like you exist who insist that the term has one relatively mild definition, while using a word that means many different things to many different people. You do this while your definition is obviously the least intuitive one, which allows you to happily nod and agree wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 02:00 AM
2

I’m not an active member of the feminist movement. "You people" in this context refers to people who use the term patriarchy despite (presumably) seeing the obvious problems inherent in doing so, then. You certainly fall into this group. Sorry for claiming it was "your movement" based on the flair, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 01:30 AM
1

You take that out of context entirely and I corrected you 3 times already. As I told you the last 3 times, that "context" does not particularly mean shit. It's a worthless throwaway line that does not make it any less abhorrent when you blame men for the prevalence of misandry among feminists. It implicitly blames men for not being lovable enough, to people who are already directly sexist towards them. It's like the people who generalize an entire demographic but ohrase it as "And I know it's no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 01:28 AM
-1

Glad to hear it, you have a good one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 01:18 AM
1

what she actually did was acknowledge that men also face sexism and rigid gender roles. And then minimize that sexism, and go to bat by claiming that the women who perpetuate it simply weren't loved enough by the men in their lives. Please keep up. You are definitely attempting to protest someone with empathy and support for men as some kind of vile villain. I don't think "protest" is the word you're looking for, here. Regardless, your bar for "empathy and support" is utterly subterranean.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 01:17 AM
2

How? Can you explain that causality? So that's a yes, then? Fuck's sake, you'd rake a man over the coals for even implying that misogyny on the right is simply (and ENTIRELY) a result of men not being loved enough by women. It's unironically an argument I'd expect from a 4chan wacko. If I were I wouldn’t be on this sub surrounding myself with men constantly to talk about men’s issues. Meh, there are at least a dozen recurring usernames on this very subreddit, usually with hidden account historie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 01:15 AM
0

I am a person. A real person behind a phone screen who you are insulting. I'd feel a bit silly for insulting a bot, so that's nice. I’m here on this subreddit, engaging hours into the night because I care enough about men’s issues to dedicate my private time to it. We're honored by your very presence, I assure you. Go on and call me stupid one more time. Say something stupid, and I will do so if I see it, no worries.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:57 AM
0

She gives you reasonable, good faith, and, let's face it, very tame commentary about an author's ideas and your first and only recourse is to jump to random personal insults completely devoid of any substance whatsoever? I mean, if you ignore the rest of the thread and the minimizing of sexism when women do it that she keeps repeating, sure. If you straw man everyone into a villain, all you have are enemies. Good thing I did not do this, then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:45 AM
8

And she has a career teaching gender studies at a feminist institution, too. Way more relevant to feminism than fuckin' Tate is to any of us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:39 AM
2

You know what, fair point. I do fundamentally disagree with you on the difference in funding between men's and women's cancers, but I was very insensitive and unkind in the way that I accused you of doing what you were accusing other people of. My apologies, that was wrong of me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:35 AM
-2

Why do you call a feminist who engages with men’s issues an idiot or a numbnut? Because, first of all, it seems to be factually true after reading all your comments on this post, and I can't resist using a demonstrably correct insult on someone who I think deserves it. And second of all, because your attempt to engage with men's issues is an obviously bad-faith one, hence the "it's not the misandrist's fault that they're a sexist prick" rhetoric. The ones who are actually taking you all seriousl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:23 AM
1

Well I did’t give it that name. It’s called that by oncologists. I'm aware, bud. It has a snappy nickname, which means that at least someone is paying enough attention to try and raise awareness/advocate for sufferers of it. Was I not abundantly clear when I said this the first time? And where are you getting that I’m turning it into a contest? Where your first response contained the repeated insistence that women "won" this particular contest. Your attitude is rather inconsiderate and rude. The…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:50 PM
1

Misogyny takes on a different flavor but its just as bad. "No decent women exist" is not actually that far from incel rhetoric and they spout stuff like "women should be sex slaves" and that sort of yikes. And how often do you think that actually happens? How popular do you think that rhetoric is, even in dedicated spaces, compared to the widespread popularity of sexism by women both on social media and IRL? I try to be sympathetic to everyone. Obviously more sympathetic to the people posting th…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 11:46 PM
-1

That wouldn't be as personally entertaining, though, and not everyone deserves polite responses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:16 PM
1

I didn’t say “they were never loved by men” I said “they were never loved by men AND they never loved men themselves” I'm aware. This still makes it abundantly obvious that you fundamentally blame men for sexism from women. Please keep up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:15 PM
-1

This post is about bell hooks and she uses it that way. Nominally, maybe. Not really in practice IME, though, from what I remember of reading things she wrote. I’m not a native English speaker, I tried to find this word in the dictionary but I don’t know what it means. Sorry about that, I'll make sure to use more easily translated insults from here. Basically, that one is a marginally more fun way to call you an idiot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:13 PM
6

And yet the most misandrist feminists in the movement are not called out by feminists... They simply hand wave it away with "Oh, they aren't 'Real' feminists" Or give them lucrative teaching positions like Mary P. Koss.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:02 PM
11

So the mere existence of men saying dumb shit is enough to discredit the movement? Why give a rat's ass, then? You can't eliminate every male idiot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 10:56 PM
–

How is it men’s fault they never loved men? I said “never loved by men and never loved men”. Which is a mutual statement. How does that translates to “men’s fault”? Please be honest, are you genuinely stupid or just acting that way for a laugh? If you can't see the way that "they were never loved by men, that's why they're sexist shitheads! Totally not their fault for being dickheads bigoted against that which they are not while claiming to advocate for equality, same as every other bigot to eve…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 10:52 PM
2

The opposite is also true. You won't find any dudes saying the shit above about "never trusting women" and there being "no decent women in existence" receiving even a quarter of the positive attention as the shit in the post, though. Seriously, every single comment you've made on this sub that I've seen is just some contrarian bullshit where you bend your back to the point of breaking minimize something sexist that a woman said or did. What gives?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 10:21 PM
1

I don't know what you mean about the 'snappy nickname' "The Silent Killer" It shouldn't be a competition of which has it worse anyway. And yet, you felt the need to try and win that competition at the very first opportunity presented. Funny how it always pans out like this when someone responds to people like you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 10:11 PM
1

Oh no, paragraphs and citations as part of a serious discussion. However shall you cope?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 10:09 PM
4

Does that make it any less factual? Like it or not, a great many of the least morally attractive traits in a man are the most romantically attractive to women. Everyone who knows any number of men knows some real jackasses with a lot of romantic success.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 03:30 AM
1

It's true that breast cancer is a highly funded cancer, but I definitely disagree that this is a case of women's health being valued over men's health. And all that shit about ovarian cancer is awful and all... but no worse than the many kinds of under-funded man-specific cancers. The very fact that you're able to point to Ovarian cancer having advocacy and a snappy nickname should tell you something, when you see that men's cancers don't have anything like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:24 AM
1

you are the system in question Meh, depends entirely on the location you live in. It sure as hell ain't great, but it's a damn sight better than any time anarchy or anything like it has been attempted in the long term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:20 AM
6

So men and women have this same right (bodily autonomy) As long as you're willing to ignore the entirety of male genital mutilation, which impacts some 70% of US men, sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:09 AM
9

You were intentionally being misleading dude. If that misled you, I'm sorry, but you seem like the kind of person to get misled by the maze on the back of a cereal box. If you think misandry and a desire to put as many men on the hook for kids that ain't theirs as possible didn't factor into the decision, you're a fool.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:07 AM
1

If this is coming From a Marxist then you are really one to talk 🙄 I've never been more insulted in all my life, lmao. Good job with that one, but no, I'm not a Marxist, thank God I don't have quite enough brain damage for that. I'm the type of liberal that the rest of the political spectrum means when they say "damn libruls" for one reason or another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:53 AM
2

Like the fact that, even accounting for means (that is, comparing gun suicide of men and women, hangings of men and women, etc), men still exhibit a higher intent to die. For every method except drowning, strangely enough. That might have more to do with physics and buoyancy than intent, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:49 AM
2

Pretty much word for word, yeah. I remember that passage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:47 AM
3

Interesting cause anarchists always reccomend her to beginners about what a fictional anarchist society might be like That's largely because anarchists are almost universally dumb as rocks, tbh. Edit: though not as dumb as the Marxists, as I've been reminded above.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:38 AM
5

Then let’s work to end the draft People who are not subject to it will never actually bother to give more than lip-service to ending it. You'd know this if you were paying attention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:35 AM
8

Feminism responds to inequality by trying to level it. Unless, of course, that inequality puts women as distinctly advantaged compared to men, like the current educational system. Then, they will fight tooth and nail to widen the gap further.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:26 AM
1

Feminists didn’t make up patriarchy models. The model with the name “patriarchy” was already used in anthropology before feminism existed. Not the way feminists use it, numbnuts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:23 AM
4

I’m the type of feminist that likes to make observations about society. Extraordinarily large red flag. Isn’t the issue with misandrist feminists usually that they were never loved by men and never loved men? Good sweet lord, you idiots always make something out to be a man's fault somewhere down the line, huh? Surprised you don't blame a patriarch for the damn weather.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:20 AM
5

She did her best to give half a shit about men, and she did far better than just about every other feminist whose work I've read. She still did a remarkably shitty job, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:16 AM
12

I've only seenn the first 10 minutes so far And yet, here you are bending over backwards to defend it anyway? Christ, I couldn't make someone like you up and then write you into a book, people would call the characters unrealistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 12:54 AM
7

The bias from the over 70% female teaching population against males is, though. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. So is the fact that as many men are raped by women as vice ver…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 11:36 PM
3

The problem is that these jokers only ever really come out of the woodwork in these numbers when someone in the disposable gender is murdered. That's why they're posted.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 09:12 PM
1

Good point, now I feel bad for asking if they were stupid. Edited my own comment, hope they see it.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 06:57 PM
31

But they weren't, which is the problem. As far as I can tell, the officer had sustained no major injuries, certainly nothing like a gunshot wound.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:52 PM
1

Figured, you as well.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:50 PM
1

Aaaaand there this godforsaken website goes again. They just "nerfed" (not sure that's the correct term, but it's the one you used) your most recent reply as well. Ah well, feel free to DM me if it was anything interesting.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:48 PM
14

That just proves that, again, men's rights advocacy needs to be centered on men as victims, regardless of who the perpetrators are. When the gender of the perpetrator matters significantly to the punishment they receive (or lack thereof), and a certain subset of people keep using that lack of punishment as evidence that "93% of rapists are men," then the advocation necessarily has to take into account who the perpetrators are. It's just burying your head in the sand otherwise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 11:47 PM
2

Oh wait, now your own reply isn't showing up. I got a notification for a reply starting with "I didn't ignore..." but that's all that the notification shows me, and looking at this thread in an incognito tab shows that the comment ain't there. I hate this website's shitty design. Maybe try again?
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:45 PM
2

If a woman literally says "i hate men" in a meeting and there are witnesses that can be objectively seen as misandry by HR. If HR were frequently objective, maybe. You've never interacted with an HR department IRL, have you? They're almost always made up exclusively of either women who say the exact same shit, or people willing to go to bat for the first demographic.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:43 PM
15

Because, yes, if you take the stats of men being murdered by women, yes, those numbers are practically miniscule. Only if you conveniently forget that you're using conviction stats, and that the legal system is provably biased against convicting women for anything. Besides, most often the conversation seems to center SA over murder, and women SA men as often as the reverse in the US, as per the CDC: "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summariz…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 11:34 PM
0

Why are you lying about what happened? I'm not. What value are you provided with intentionally fabricating the events of the video? None, hence the fact that I ain't doing it. We are done, And nothing of value was lost.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:27 PM
1

do you not see the hypocrisy in claiming i’m lying about good faith with exactly no substance to that? Except for, y'know, your completely ignoring my linked comment. That's some pretty substantial evidence that you ain't here in good faith. Is it just not showing up for you, or something? i simply said you’re using the substance to gain some sort of egotistical high ground rather than participating in a good faith discourse like you seemed to want in the beginning. Do you always freak out about…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:26 PM
1

Assault is generally defined as an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. Which, y'know, simply walking by a woman does not do. The keyword here is reasonable, but I bet you frequently have trouble with that one specifically, don't you, poor thing.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:22 PM
3

For example, I recently made a post there to celebrate some of the women who have advocated for men, and encouraged other people to weigh in with more examples. They removed that post, smearing nearly all of the women on it as grifters and worse, citing dubious, cherry-picked examples, associations with people they don’t like, and even pure guesswork. That also blocked any discussion of other women advocates. When I pushed back, they muted me. Do you have the modmail for that? I'm curious to see…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:18 PM
0

I didn’t delete anything… Oh wait, this one shows up! How fun, looks like you werent shadowbanned. Yeah, you don't have to have deleted it yourself, reddit us a badly made website and sometimes it'll happen entirely by chance. the post has been deleted and that messes with notifications. I'm telling you, it ain't just the notifications. Anyone except your own account can check your user page, and see the comments ain't there. That's the point of the "open the thread in an incognito browser" thin…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:16 PM
0

Ah shucks, the new reply you made about "not using incognito" (lmao, you can open the thread in a guest account too, it's simply an easier way to do it), is also deleted. I can only tell you made it because I can see the first line in my notifications bar. Looks like you might be shadowbanned, good riddance.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:14 PM
1

Is the reply showing up for you at all, actually? For some reason it isn't showing up when I open the thread in an incognito tab, reddit's shit infrastructure may be deleting it by accident.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:12 PM
1

Tell me, did you delete your comment calling me "far too stupid to engage in conversation" or did Reddit do that for you? It isn't showing up at this point, even in an incognito browser. If it's still showing up when you're logged in, feel free to open the link in an incognito browser yourself and check.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:07 PM
1

Begone, obvious day-old account.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:00 PM
0

No any person invading anyone’s personal space uninvited is considered assault If a man attacked a woman like this for doing the same thing in the video, you would not consider that justified self defense because of the assault. Poor thing, you're just completely addled. it’s fucking stupid and little worms like you trying to shape an agenda out of two people in the wrong is why this movement gets shit on so much. Oh, so now it isn't justified self-defense? Lmao. Be better, be smarter and maybe …
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:59 PM
3

out of interest of a conversation in good faith, like you seemed angered in your claim that i didn’t want. but you told me you like to argue with “idiots” and are now suddenly averse to good faith. Lmao, it isn't "good faith" for you to completely ignore an in-depth reply on another thread and instead come over here and ask me to spoon-feed you reality again. Get outta here, nobody is fooled by this "I'm tooootttaaaalllllyyy someone who cares about men's rights!!!1!" act. while the actual substa…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:53 PM
0

It’s also a demonstration of what happens when you invade someone’s personal space uninvited like that, which is (by the definition) assault, so she was defending herself. Oh, so you simply agree that any man who has the gall to exist in a woman's vicinity in these cases deserves to be assaulted. That tracks, just tell people this next time so they know not to bother to engage with you.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:50 PM
2

You failed to reply already. Why would I do it again? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/L2AIgoZlvO
/r/MensRights13/03/26 09:42 PM
13

saying it exists “because people like doing it” is like saying people hate abusive parents “because they like it”. Not quite, no. Why does racism exist? Because xenophobia is an inherent part of the human experience, to some portion of the population. If it ain't color of skin, if it ain't religious differences, if it ain't a half dozen other lines humans use to divide themselves, it's quite often expressed as a hatred for the opposite sex. Like it or not, some portion of the population will alw…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:32 AM
7

immediate rage response lol. "I posted an inflammatory and obviously incorrect statement on the internet, and someone called it out as such! Hah, truly I am the winner in this interaction." I couldn't make you up if I tried. but patriarchy has existed for literally millennia. it’s ingrained in the text of ancient literature and in our modern expectations. it’s characterized by things that hurt you today such as stoicism and feats like “body count” or an intense and childish rage response like yo…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:22 AM
2

It's evidence of those rights being continually and explicitly ignored by everyone around them.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:04 AM
8

arbitrary expectations on men set by other men Lmao. So eager to absolve women of anything like responsibility for their actions that you give them about as much agency for their role in society as literal toddlers, despite them making up half of that society, and well over half of the population actually teaching these expectations. this is from someone who actually does support men’s rights. You really think anyone here is stupid enough to believe you? That's almost more insulting than the dum…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:00 AM
24

Because people love to be sexist, and women are people. Misandry is: dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex). I can already tell you aren't even attempting to engage in good-faith from your comment history, but I'll bite anyway.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 01:58 AM
4

I don't think it's the case here either, but do be aware that those detectors rarely if ever actually work, if you aren't an idiot about how you do the prompts. I've had friends put in their own writing from before 2018 and get it flagged by these systems, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 12:46 AM
1

Someone who spent 4 HOURS yelling at me for not being willing to subject myself to one of 3, sensory overloading, ads filled, useless fluff pieces, and all around being an abusive jerk, instead of 30 seconds to send me a direct link, or even a searchable name for a study both him AND OP had. Wow, that's dramatic. They're internet comments bud, are you aware of what yelling actually is? Looks like I agree with your consideration of the study, but this seems a wee bit overdramatic.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:28 AM
1

Well, since neither OP NOR his flying monkey Who are you even referring to, with that flying monkey comment?
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:26 PM
3

The truth is men commit most violence or at least most more serious violence. Maybe if you only count it as violence if the perpetrator is convicted... by legal systems that coincidentally convict women at a tiny fraction of the rate they convict men who commit the same crimes.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:11 PM
2

The statistics show that men are most often sexually assaulted by men. The other person told you why, dumbass. It's because it isn't considered SA when the man isn't penetrated, and most female rapists dont have the equipment for that. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same …
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:09 PM
17

1 is more about empowering women than hating men Are you stupid? I'm sorry, but please be honest. Edit: ah, not stupid, just a little un-perceptive. That's totally fair, happens to the best of us.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/03/26 10:59 PM
2

we absolutely should push back on the hate, just not become walmart Andrew Tates in the process. Mm, I can agree with that much, at least. No worries on the misreading, happens to the best of us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 10:26 PM
1

First of all, if you don't want your comments to look like shit, you need an extra line between paragraphs. Nobody wants to read a poorly formatted block of text. Please don’t lecture me on stats, I’ve known about them for years. They are partly what swayed me away from your side. If knowing that men are substantially discriminated against at all levels of education drove you away from caring about the rights of men, then kindly keep on driving right out of the lives of any men who know you, ple…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 10:25 PM
17

Ms. "Calling men stupid and worthless in as many ways as possible is the key to making good music" is a bit of a man-hater?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 10:10 PM
4

If we count only pregnancies from rape, we would expect a much higher tally of female victims. For the simple reason that female perps wouldnt be reporting it. For obvious reasons. Not so in the US. Female rapists who get pregnant are perfectly fine reporting it, as they know that even if they raped a child, they'd still be not only protected, but actively assisted by the legal system. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 10:05 PM
9

This would simply be playing right into the stupid gender war and perpetuating it even more. It's seemed to be the strategy that worked for them. Turning the other cheek and trying to help anyway is exactly what got our asses to this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/26 08:22 PM
2

Can you elaborate on which stat you mean here, exactly? "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that 12 months the number of …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 08:13 PM
1

I never mentioned gender at any point. I think that you might be inventing things that I said That's not an answer to any of my questions and you know it.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 07:45 PM
1

By what the definition of what brigading is in a reddit context. Mm, fair enough. Have a good shift, and thanks for helping me kill mine.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 04:52 AM
0

because you said it's not going to happen anytime soon. "Any time soon" is code for "ever, at least in the US." My bad for not making that clearer.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:53 AM
0

But here's my question for you, why should I read your sources when you don't even read my entire comment? Because I did read your entire comment. I just think that even in context, that paragraph is pretty disgusting (on top of incorrect, 0 financial assistance for both genders is still equal financial support). Not too complex. You're welcome to read those sources or not do so as you prefer, it's a free website.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:50 AM
1

Someone who is active as I am is by definition, not a brigadier. By what definition, exactly? Though, you are correct on one front. After I finally went through and searched the sub like you said, you are not the type of person I immediately assumed you were on reading that string of comments and seeing the hidden account history. I'm sorry, that's completely my bad.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:48 AM
0

Same when it comes to eliminating bias without a third party. Eliminating? True. Mitigating? Not so impossible, that can be done much more easily. If you truly wanted to see my post history, you could go to my profile, click search and hit enter and it will show it to you. I already tried that, lol. They patched that one out a couple weeks ago, I think.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:29 AM
-1

So me asking people to provide what OP explicitly asked for makes me a brigadier? No, but you being a dick about it and having an extremely suspicious account in general sure as hell makes you look like one. As far as the biases of teachers go, making grading anonymous is the easiest way to bypass that, and with the move of adding technology to learning environments, it's going to be easier to do. Oh come on. A teacher that's been interacting with a class of students for over a month can tell wh…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:21 AM
0

Actually I'm quite active on this sub, and have been subscribed to it for years. Mmmhmmm, totally believe that one lmao. Let me just check the post history to validate, oh, wait. Besides, plenty of the regulars to this sub are what I'd consider to be brigadiers as well, simply being around doesn't mean much. OP explicitly asked for a solution that didn't disadvantage women. Which is, unfortunately, impossible. Women no longer getting preferential treatment at every level would be a disadvantage …
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:12 AM
1

Meh, that's not gonna happen any time soon, and we both know that. Especially when the educational field in general is as anti-male as it is. Equality of funding is about the best we can hope for. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly fo…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:06 AM
8

You tend to argue a point for the other person and then knock it down, And you seem unwilling to actually argue for yourself. If you can't be bothered, I'm more than happy to speculate about what you're attempting to allude to. You're always welcome to speak up for yourself should you find the mental capacity 👍 It's not worth our time for either of us to pretend you're persuadable. Now who's making shit up about the other person to feel like they won an argument 🤭
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:04 AM
1

For anyone wanting context to that "slavery-defending shithead" comment towards the world's least convincing "egalitarian," see this conversation: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/hs0pkaBFj1
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:57 AM
3

It’s not that I’m posting personal stuff, it’s that I’m in a variety of small subreddits where the overlap is literally just me. You underestimate the amount of people on the internet. Besides, the only way someone would know that is if they knew you specifically and decided to stalk your account, and I can almost guarantee nobody cares enough about you to do that unless you're a slavery-defending shithead IRL, too.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:17 AM
11

In cases such as Ukraine, where Ukrainian citizens risk being annexed by pro-Russia forces, I am less opposed to internal conscription in principle, but I still agree that expatriated refugees should be left where they are. What's your justification for being okay with government-backed gendered combat slavery in any circumstance? Please, explain specifically why it's less bad when men are fed into the meat grinder while women are evacuated if the government is scared for its own existence.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:15 AM
3

If you're posting enough personal info to be doxxed, then you might just be a bit stupid, sorry. There's always just deleting the current account and making a new one that won't look so much like a bot account or have personally identifying info on it.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:07 AM
13

Are we discussing Ukraine or not in this example? 99 out of a 100 historical cases of conscription functioned the same way, but sure. Unfortunately, Ukraine is in a position where it has become a global war, and it is no longer about the government ‘fighting its wars’ which it didn’t even start but more so about retaining global order. And this justifies the enslavement of one gener and one gender alone how, exactly? This is a completely different case to oil wars, in which case I agree with you…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:05 AM
4

What does keeping my account private have to do with me holding both sides of the coin to the same standard? Easy, it shows that you most likely do not hold "both sides of the coin" to the same standard. If you did, you wouldn't be too scared let people see for themselves. As to the spamming of the subreddit, sometimes I get bored and do things like this. Yeah, figured that part out from the account description. Still seems like bot or brigadier behavior, though. I also try to do it in the femin…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:57 PM
4

Yes I do say the same thing when women say that about men, No you don't. If you did, you wouldn't have to hide your account history whenever you decided to spam this sub with inane questions, as I now see that you're currently doing after opening a few other threads from today.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:44 PM
23

If the government must enslave people to fight its wars, it should *not discriminate based on sex. You know, they're actually asking other countries to round up male Ukrainian refugees to send them back so they can be drafted. Disgusting, frankly. *edit: somehow autocorrect ate the word "not" in this sentence.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:40 PM
19

Because men are the only ones willing to work those dirty/dangerous jobs, duh. Especially when you take into account the provable discrimination they suffer during education (which is the most common path to jobs that don't kill you one way or another), is it really that surprising? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:37 PM
4

Honestly I could make a similar claim about you. No you couldn't, my account history is perfectly visible. Not beating the bot allegations with that one 🤭 The point that BowtiepastaMasta was insinuating was that women often blame men for their shortcomings and I was asking for concrete examples that can be used in debate. Do you do the same when women say the exact same shit about men? I already know the answer, but I'm curious what you'll say. As for comment history, I prefer to keep myself pri…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:34 PM
9

Are you a bot? There wasn't a point that they tried to make in that comment, much less one that requires proof, and your comment history is hidden.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:19 PM
1

However, I don't agree with the idea of giving men equal financial support, because the entire reason why young adults need financial support is the root cause of the problem. Wow, that's just plain disgusting. Get outta here with that shit.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:11 PM
-1

And that right there is zero sum thinking. Hmm, hidden post history? Overly negative comments? Insisting that there must be some way to help men without causing even the slightest increase in competition for women? Ignoring the causes of the issue? Being overly aggressive when their rhetoric is questioned? Why do people like you always seem to show up in this sub? Almost seems like brigading, if you ask me. Regardless, reducing the provable discrimination against boys and towards girls by the ov…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:08 PM
9

More and more boys feel as though the system is rigged against them They're right. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:04 PM
11

What I'm saying is you don't even get that. I'm not willing to converse with about what i do or don't think. Then you are functionally useless, and your contributions to this conversation effectively do nothing more productive just waste space on some server rack somewhere. Much more likely alternative is that you saw the post, wanted to start getting fussy about how you disagreed, and immediately moved to vague-posting about people going "mask-off" without actually reading the comments. Because…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:25 PM
15

Sooooo what you're saying is that you see any opposition to unfair hiring practices like this as "mask-off?" Because there's one or two people in here posting conservative opinions, but they're not exactly highly upvoted, and they are related to the issue even if I don't necessarily agree with them.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:03 PM
16

Care to be specific with your complaints?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:05 PM
1

Did you delete your reply to my comment, or did Reddit do it for you, out of curiosity? It isn't showing up anywhere but my notification bar, not even on an incognito browser.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 07:47 PM
1

Did you delete the reply to me, or did Reddit do it for you? It shows up in my notifications bar, but it ain't there when I click the link, even on an incognito browser. You can leave your account and look for yourself, if it still shows up when you're logged in.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 04:48 AM
3

Of course, I think that is pretty sensible. Slavery is never sensible.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:46 AM
1

When your country's safety and borders are at risk, you have the obligation to protect it. Like hell I do. Countries get the support from their citizens that they earn, and not a lick more. Judging by how many men had to be literally enslaved to fight this war, their country did not earn their support. It shouldn't matter that women for now aren't, because virtues like your freedoms and your right of Self-determination are being challenged by a foreign entity. And yet, it very much does matter. …
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:45 AM
3

it's not a matter of gender, it's a matter of conquest and imperialism. It becomes a matter of gender when only one gender is fed into the meatgrinder at gunpoint, and barred entirely from leaving the country. When only one gender is for all intents and purposes enslaved for combat purposes.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:39 AM
1

but they really need do what they have to for the country and its people to survive. Hah! Thing is, they ain't "doing what they have to." They're making the disposable gender do what the government wants them to do (fight and die against a larger force) at gunpoint. If the country doesn't have the will to fight, they're more than capable of simply evacuating anyone who wants out. The Russian idiots will eventually hit a nation where the inhabitants give enough of a shit to volunteer to defend it…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:38 AM
2

I literally listened to your point and said thanks and it changes my perspective on things. Pretty sure that's showing empathy and basic statistical understanding. Oh dear, you stopped reading halfway through the sentence. Read the rest of it: "a basic statistical understanding of the things you say before you say them." The fact that you would make such confidently incorrect claims in the first place makes it obvious that you deserve all the scorn I put into that comment. And if you read all of…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 03:06 AM
2

And everyone already has the option to do civilian service instead. "Everyone" isn't forced to either do that or pay extra, though. Only certain specific groups. Odd how that works out, huh?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter