TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ppd_FrameEnforcer Archive

View 5 posts and 300 comments by ppd_FrameEnforcer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Can you give examples of threads you liked that got removed?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/18 03:45 AM
2

No personal attacks. You've already been temp banned once. Your next one will be anywhere from a week-long ban to a permanent one. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/18 07:35 AM
1

No personal attacks. Final warning. You've already been temp banned recently. The next time will be longer term or permanent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 06:33 AM
1

Please repost it under auto-mod.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/18 03:55 AM
1

Quit being obnoxious. This is your final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/18 12:33 AM
0

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/18 02:26 AM
1

She said clearly it doesn't come with perks. She's showing appreciation. It's personal, from her. She didn't have to distinguish the comment to do it, but the worries about that are disproportionate. Feel free to contact us if you have questions about how things work here or even PM me. You don't have to speculate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/18 11:53 PM
3

Avoid making personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 07:34 AM
1

You're writing a reply to me. If you're already looking at a post, the filters are not going to hide it. The purpose is to hide "Advice" posts from the front page of PPD for people who don't want to see it. In the future, people may want to hide controversial new topics. The new filters can help with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/18 05:41 PM
3

I don't see what was removed or what the arg was about, but I personally thank you for being gracious to the mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/18 06:11 AM
2

men have significantly more legal obligations, List them on that subreddit! I could just be ignorant.
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 09:14 PM
1

I don't even believe gynocentrism. I believe in phallocentrism. I say outright that men will almost always be dominant at the top, and most of the girls in that subreddit agree. If you want to argue about why we should be concerned about gynocentrism, I welcome it on our subreddit. Who knows? Maybe you're right and we have cause for concern.
/r/MGTOW13/04/18 08:03 PM
5

Include a summary of points in your own words, not just copy/pasted excerpts. What are the main points you wish to discuss? Don't leave it to people to read through that wall of text and interpret.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/18 07:17 AM
2

Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/18 07:13 PM
1

That tldr makes your comment a personal attack. Let me know if you've decided to remove it and I'll approve your comment. Otherwise it stays removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 04:24 PM
1

You double posted this. Next time you notice a post of yours got removed and need answers, please send me a PM. It got removed because you're a new user to the subreddit and your posts need to be approved.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/18 05:21 PM
1

Be civil.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/18 08:07 AM
3

No personal attacks. This is a final warning before a temp ban.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/18 08:06 AM
2

This isn’t a subreddit where you can dump all of your bullshit conspiracy theories. At some point people are going to need more substance from you than what you simply pull from your ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/18 08:40 PM
1

If conservatives want to push back against these people... doxx them back We understand that you're responding to the subject matter at hand, but as a reminder: doxxing under normal context is discouraged and under no circumstances endorsed by purplepilldebate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/18 12:04 AM
0

OP replied to you, but I still have to ask you to remove your first sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/18 07:49 AM
1

No personal attacks and circlejerking. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 09:21 PM
3

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 07:21 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 07:19 PM
–

OP, you've been shitposting and consequently reported too often. Increase the level of effort or subsequent posts will be spamfiltered.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 08:49 PM
1

Final warning for incivility.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 04:22 PM
2

Too many off-topic shit comments coming from you. This is a warning. Adjust accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 12:07 AM
0

Just report him next time he compares you to a postwall woman. That's a personal attack. You're encouraging it by responding the way you did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 09:34 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 08:32 PM
1

I'm cutting the passive aggressive chain here.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 08:32 PM
4

"Take it to modmail" wasn't a suggestion. I'm nuking this chain. And if you would rather avoid PMing with people you're curious about then you're out of luck because personal attacks are against the rules. I'm not here to argue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:40 PM
3

From what I understand your assumptions aren't even correct. Take it to modmail or to PM with her directly if you are genuinely curious. This isn't supposed to be an argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:30 PM
5

Calling the spouse of a person names is a personal attack. It doesn't have to be direct to be personal. Calling women AWALT whores doesn't single out a single person. Calling TRPers "wannabes" isn't personal either. Making personal remarks like "loser", "faggot", etc, against the spouse of a specific person is personal. Appeal in modmail with other concerns.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:09 PM
3

No race baiting. I'm giving you a chance to remove the first few paragraphs as a courtesy. Do that and I'll reapprove.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 11:27 PM
1

All right, this circlejerking has gone on long enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 08:30 PM
1

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 07:41 PM
1

No harassment. You've been warned.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/17 06:49 AM
2

There's only one type of spook I care about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/17 12:20 AM
1

No personal attacks. You've already been warned. This one is final.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 06:53 PM
1

Try to keep it impersonal wont you
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/17 06:52 PM
4

They didn't respect his sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:42 AM
1

Don’t make it personal. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 02:55 AM
1

No personal attacks. That was unambiguous. Final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 06:20 AM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 03:54 PM
1

How do you know how tall the people in that picture thread are?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 05:11 AM
-1

Plastic surgery exists.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/17 01:04 AM
1

No personal attacks. This is your final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 11:48 PM
1

The mods generally act as fairly as they can as mods. They're allowed to have their opinions while commenting as users. If you suspect rules violations then bring them up with the mod team. If anything there are more active bp mods most of the time. ARS and I are the only clearly "red" ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/17 08:37 PM
2

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/17 03:29 PM
1

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/17 07:37 PM
3

Posting is not the same as reading through every comment on every thread. I skim through every thread. I don't bother reading through every comment. I don't see anyone crying "conspiracy" -- the complaint I see (and that's been brought before) is that the established rules aren't getting enforced consistently. Consistency, when you're expecting it from 5-7 active mods, requires a bit of collaboration or conspiracy. The mods act independently unless someone brings up an issue to mod mail. There a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 05:29 PM
2

I can't comment on what other mods are doing, because, as I've told you, I only pay attention to topics I'm personally interested in and stuff that gets reported. A lot of people here are grossly overestimating the amount of collaboration and conspiracy there is going on. at least a few of whom are among the more active users on this sub -- don't read through comments just like everyone else. No. I'm willing to bet most people don't read through all the comments. Not even half.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 05:10 PM
1

You earned your battle scars already. If you truly think your reports are being ignored (and they likely aren't, just disagreed with), just PM us for an explanation or reversal. Or even PM me personally for anything important.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 02:06 AM
1

The above user, /u/ProbablyBelievesIt , is someone whom I fought against publicly as well as in mod PMs due to a couple of misunderstandings from both ends. We were both conciliatory. It does not help things when users automatically jump to the conclusion we're biased instead of giving us the benefit of the doubt and working with us. Guys: If you're looking for an enemy, you'll find one. This isn't just PPD subreddit advice. This is general advice you can take offline.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:27 AM
2

They skim through this stuff just as much as the rest of us. No, we really don't. No one wants to sort through the personal shit being flung.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:18 AM
2

I try my best but I hit back when attacked. Besides, a good dust up is fun now and again. This is why you keep being told to be civil by the mods. It's great that you want to be a strong, independent PPDer who don't need no mod, but can you see how it will make it more difficult for us to be "unbiased" when you're being reported and you don't report back during your "dust ups"? Report, and explain why you're reporting like other members do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:13 AM
2

None of you see the private messages we get when we decide as a group who is trolling or just disruptive. You see each other on your best behaviors, partially because we remove the worst comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/17 01:06 AM
1

Be civil. Final warning given.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 01:28 PM
1

Did you notice the CMV in the title and flair? Please see the rules on that under section "CMV Posts". https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/wiki/rules I'll give you opportunity to change your post to at least attempt changing OP's mind on one or more of his points. Let me know if you do and I might re-approve.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/17 10:33 AM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this another warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/17 01:05 AM
1

No personal attacks. Take this as your first warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/17 09:57 PM
3

This is OK: "Women deserved to be raped." This is not OK: "Women like YOU deserved to be raped." One of these is personally directed. The other cannot be censored, because if offensive statements are all censored, then it'll be impossible to have discussions on ppd. Just try to avoid making personally directed statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 08:55 AM
1

Consider this a warning for incivility.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/17 08:47 AM
1

Yes, and since that's how it's interpreted, I was wrong and the report was wrong. She made that appeal, and I reapproved her comment. This wasn't a big deal at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/17 04:51 PM
3

All right. Thank you for the explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 07:55 PM
2

No. End of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 07:53 PM
5

I am telling you flat out, the mods aren't perfect and might not be completely consistent. It's beyond the scope of our work to collaborate over every report we get. People have the option of making an appeal or changing their comment. This explanation to you is supererogatory on my part, not obligatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 07:46 PM
7

This is how that sounds to me: "Law enforcement isn't perfect, so why do we have laws at all?"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 07:31 PM
7

"Be civil" is the rule, and I'm making a subjective call. If you want an explanation, I just found her particular snark ("Did you not have friends growing up?") to be too personal. It's not just snarky, it was an implied personal attack.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 07:25 PM
4

No personal attacks or snark.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 06:15 PM
1

This is Q4RP. Please move your comment under the automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/17 06:09 PM
3

But doesn't this sub have "weekly incel Megathreads"? That's there to corral all the incel discussions so we don't end up with threads like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/17 10:01 PM
1

I'm assuming you're RP now, as many of your views are close enough and you felt like answering a Q for RP. I'm leaving your response up. As a friendly reminder, you might want to flair yourself and make it easier for us mods to determine whether to remove or not on future Q4X threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/17 09:46 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 07:15 PM
1

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 06:10 PM
1

Massage How does a knowledge of anatomy and how to work it NOT relate to sex? Chad The study talked about being attractive. You know how many men interpret that. Consider this a warning for trolling. This is your final warning. You've already been banned before by other mods, so the next ban will be double the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 04:52 PM
2

Was the advice you're talking about after the snarky Chad Thundercock reference? Or the Trump reference? The advice where you tell virgins not to be misogynists and be better at massaging women? As a mod, I'm using discretion to call it off-topic. The argument ends here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 04:27 PM
3

This is completely unrelated to the topic and is also a circlejerk in a science-tagged posts. Put this under the auomod.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 04:16 PM
1

Copy and paste this under the automod. No circlejerking under "Science" tagged posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 04:14 PM
–

Reminder to responders: https://www.reddit.com/r/purplepilldebate/wiki/flair#wiki_discussion Science Science posts are moderated strictly. Off-topic replies, sloganeering, jokes, etc. will be removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/17 04:14 PM
1

Question for Men. Put your comment under the automod.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 03:45 PM
3

I can't believe an incel is going me platitudes. You truly are blue pilled as fuck. Keep it impersonal. No insults. Consider this your final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/17 06:35 AM
1

You have got to be the angriest mod I've come across on any sub on reddit. No. I'm definitely angrier right now. No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/17 07:22 PM
2

Somewhere around 60-70. As for "appropriate" n-count, the type of girls I date I would guess prefer it be under 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/17 03:29 PM
2

You don't have to. Even so, follow the rules going forward or you won't last.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 12:39 PM
2

Be civil. Don't escalate or bait attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 12:32 PM
2

Knock it off. Don't respond to personal attacks by escalating. Just report. Consider this your warning too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 12:30 PM
2

Knock it off, both of you. Consider this your warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/17 12:28 PM
1

Consider this a warning for incivility.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 07:06 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/17 07:05 PM
1

That just means the propaganda arm of the mod team has been effective. I'm giving /u/cuittler a raise and promotion for her efforts. It must be her feminine wiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 09:30 PM
2

Let me know if you find any evidence of the mods being compromised so that I can swiftly dispose of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 06:52 PM
2

GroovyEFS isn't a mod. No personal attacks. You haven't been warned in a while, so you can consider this your first warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 09:47 AM
–

OP, what is the main purpose of this thread? Was it to get to know the community? (First half of your post) Or was it to preach or give advice? (Second half) Advice is better suited for TRP or possibly some other advice subreddit. Going forward, posts like this can be removed at our discretion. If you would like to leave us less room to exercise this discretion, then be clear on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/17 08:56 AM
2

Don't call out and link specific users. Don't encourage harassment. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/17 11:39 PM
1

Don't respond to personal attacks. Just report them next time. It saves us trouble of removing entire chain, and saves you from wasted effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 11:27 PM
2

No personal attacks; passive aggressive or otherwise. Consider this your first warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 11:26 PM
1

Remove that last part and I'll reapprove.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/16 12:32 AM
1

Your comment was removed for circlejerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/16 09:21 PM
1

Pathetic. You've been warned multiple times already by other mods. You'll be temp banned. The duration will length each subsequent ban.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 05:10 AM
1

Stop being personal to other users. Take it elsewhere. This is your final warning. You've already been banned once, recently. Your next ban will be for an 4extended duration.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 04:52 AM
3

The fuck are you talking about moron? No personal attacks. Consider this your first warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/16 10:29 PM
3

I don't care if someone's waxing poetic about fucking horse carcasses, so long as it's civil and not intended to derail conversation. It may offend your sensibilities, but it's not explicitly against the rules. Personal attacks are explicitly against the rules. Thank you for understanding and being cooperative though. Greatly appreciated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/16 09:47 PM
3

The rules are against personal attacks. If you make a sincere observation like "men are creeps and inherently rapey" or "women are hypergamous whores", and you sincerely believe that, that is not against the rules. It's extremely difficult to create an objective ruleset that bans such statements because of the nature of "purple pill" discussions. If you say "you are a psycho creep", you are directing an insult against an individual user. Do you see the difference? If you have further questions, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/16 09:38 PM
2

She's not a man. She's a verified female user. And you can cast doubt her personal experiences without calling someone a "psycho weirdo creep".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/16 09:35 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/16 09:33 PM
0

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/16 09:33 PM
0

No personal attacks. Try to be civil. Consider this a warning. Note that her general observations/opinions don't count as personal attacks. Your attacks are specifically directed at her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/16 09:33 PM
1

Read the rules in the sidebar.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/16 05:46 PM
2

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/16 03:30 PM
1

You're a ... People like you ... it's disgusting. No personal attacks. You've been warned before. This is your final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/16 10:43 PM
2

Thanks for the prompt correction.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 07:12 PM
2

Get rid of the first line, and I might let your comment go through. As of now, you're still getting a warning for personal attack.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/16 06:50 PM
1

Be civil. You escalated from passive aggressiveness to full personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 08:01 AM
1

Just report next time to save us the trouble of having to nuke the chain of comments. You also run the risk of being flagged or warned by engaging. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 07:59 AM
1

I'd tell her "no please don't touch me" and step away from her. It isn't that hard. This is what he wrote earlier: I'd tell her "no please don't touch me" and step away from her. It isn't that hard. You responded, What if she was bigger and stronger than you? which implies that she's going even beyond grabbing his package. She is actively preventing him from leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/16 04:27 AM
3

Regardless of whether sublime is ok with it or not, it's an IRC squabble/drama and it needs to be left in IRC.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 10:09 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/16 07:44 PM
1

Don't respond to personal attacks in kind. Just report. Final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/16 06:26 PM
1

Don't make this personal. Final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/16 06:25 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/16 07:17 PM
1

No personal attacks. Consider this your final warning before a temporary ban.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/16 03:36 AM
2

Thanks. The wall has never looked more pleasant for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 03:45 PM
9

An attractive woman in her 30s has less time to stay youthful looking and definitely less time to have kids. A large subset of men who care about both factors would be eliminated from the pool of options.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/16 03:31 PM
–

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/50ecka/why_do_men_belittle_stereotypically_female/ Dragoness's. Highly upvoted and generated a lot of discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/16 07:59 PM
1

Knock it off. Both of you. Consider this your warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 08:29 AM
3

Knock it off. Both of you. Consider this your warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/16 08:28 AM
3

Actually I posted in the joke section of a thread to make a joke and them posted a funny videos. Its your fault for taking me so seriously. Mmmm those 10 minutes of your life are so delicious. Yummy. Do not troll. You'll be temp banned as a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/16 06:00 PM
2

What is the argument or point of discussion? If it was a MALE friend who came to you and your friends claiming that he had just been jumped by a bunch of assholes, bro code demands that you go and support your friend. That's the "alpha" thing to do. No questions asked, go and kick some ass. Vigilante justice is fine, straight up confrontation and beat downs are okay too. But if your friend happens to be female (I know, RP guys do not actually have any female friends)... "Not until proven guilty …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/16 05:12 PM
1

You sound like you never mentally matured past 7yrs old.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 08:26 PM
0

No personal attacks. Consider this your warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/16 02:26 PM
3

Don't respond to people who are going to be banned. Consider this a warning for yourselves. Just hasten the process by reporting them. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/16 04:49 AM
6

When /r/MyLittlePony sends its bronies, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems to us. They’re bringing degeneracy. They’re bringing /r/ClopCop. They’re furries. ... And some, I assume, are good redditors.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 08:58 PM
5

We love our furries! Don't we love furries? We have the BEST furries. You wouldn't believe the furries we have here!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 08:55 PM
5

For the 1st time in PPD history, PPD's 7,728 members have issue a presidential primary endorsement—me! Thank you. @realDonaldTrump
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/16 08:44 PM
2

This is a CMV thread. Save these kinds of comments for the AutoModerator. See its comment on guidelines/etiquette.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/16 05:48 PM
1

Are you serious about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 11:12 PM
2

No personal attacks. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/16 05:32 PM
1

I'll let you guess which part of your post needs to be cleaned up. Hint: It has something in common with the other post of yours in this thread that needed to be removed. Clean it up and let me know if you want it reapproved.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:03 AM
1

You might want to include a TL;DR or a summary of what views you want people to change. It could help in getting responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/16 03:30 AM
1

No need to waste time responding to personal attacks. The entire chain is just going to be removed anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:46 PM
1

No more personal attacks. Final warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:45 PM
1

Spam and circlejerks are removed in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:43 PM
2

I can't believe how stupid some of you people are. You don't even think about basic biology before you make these paranoid claims. The rest of your post is constructive. Why was this necessary?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:39 PM
1

Posters can't see which of their posts have been censored by mods. This is reddit's policy, not ours.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 12:58 AM
4

You're that racist I was just arguing with. That's not relevant and afaik is an ad hom.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/15 08:06 PM
1

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 01:24 AM
1

I see that now after reading it (e.g. "But anyway, here's why you retards are completely wrong"). You're right, and that's why I removed it. You can just report the OP though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 08:27 PM
1

Just report posts like that instead of responding to them. You're wasting your time, because I'll just be removing them. I'm surprised that post stayed up without anyone reporting for so long.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:49 PM
1

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:48 PM
7

For clarity, the OP is asking what you'd prefer to see from men, overestimation or underestimation. Not about your own estimations. I just want to make sure others are clear about the question in case people get confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 01:14 AM
1

These things are better said in PM. Let us know in modmail if you are interested in these policies or enforcement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 04:54 AM
3

You can let the mods know in modmail if you suspect something is up. I'm just here to enforce and disseminate the rules in case there's confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 12:54 AM
3

Downvoting is against the rules of the subreddit. Don't encourage it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/15 12:18 AM
2

Can you explain why he is a stalker? Is this a serious concern?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 10:59 PM
2

Just an FYI. We'll be removing your top level (direct) responses to the OP if you are RP and the OP flailed his post as a question for BP.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 10:31 PM
1

Are you BP (flair badly colored by our CSS)?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 08:54 PM
1

The best "exception" would be if you were calling out a user to the mods, in PM. But you're right, strongalfalfa. Thank you. I shouldn't have allowed that ambiguity slip in.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 06:44 AM
1

He grossly misinterpreted the point of the video Gross misinterpretation of videos is not a crime. From his link in your thread that I see, he wasn't even laughing at the male rape victim. Posts aren't meant to be your platform to rail against other individuals. And even if they were, in this specific case, it would take an odd interpretation heavily biased in your favour to come to the same conclusion you did. If CisWhiteMaelstrom is a local celeb then it shouldn't be difficult finding rule-bre…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 06:38 AM
1

I'm talking /u/ciswhitemaelstrom laughing at an emotional video of a man recounting his rape story among others. When has he done that? We normally don't allow calling out of other individual members of the sub, especially if you're making stuff up or taking things out of context. Please take that to TBP and/or TRP. Also: However, 3 days after the fact, I looked back and saw that responses to my post were universally from Red Pillers. FYI, all responses to a CMV post have to be an effort to "Cha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/15 03:31 AM
1

Please do us a favour. Put some more effort into formatting your post if you want people to read it. Paragraphs could help.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/15 07:47 PM
1

If it matters to you, you can make a logical argument or add some food for thought to the discussion. You may not convince him (he is just expressing an opinion, and you do not know his personal standards of judgment), but others will have your alternate point of view to consider.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 09:03 AM
1

We wouldn't ban you for something as mild as that. At least I wouldn't. At worst, one of us may have removed your comment if it was reported. A pattern of such behavour would get a warning. My point is that we have a rule against personal attacks. We don't have a rule against expressing unpopular opinions. The point of the subreddit is discussion and debate, not shit-flinging and grudge matches between individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:51 AM
1

FYI, you were temp banned there for violating a rule that exists here as well. He wouldn't be violating any rules by making such a comment here either, regardless of how much you disagree with him. Your comment made it personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:46 AM
1

No personal attacks. This is a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/15 03:39 AM
3

The question is for RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 11:36 PM
1

Question is for BP.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 11:19 PM
2

After you've become aware and continue to make personal attacks, the mods will ban you for a week. After that it's permanent. The mods had decided on harsher policies. I'm giving people warnings as a matter of courtesy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 01:03 AM
3

No personal attacks. This is a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:39 AM
1

OP flaired the thread as "Question for Blue Pill".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 08:14 AM
1

No personal attacks. This is your first warning from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 08:13 AM
1

Report them. And if you think the mods won't understand the context of why it was reported, then send us a message too.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 06:46 PM
1

Don't call out individual members only to insult them. Consider this another warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 05:16 PM
2

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 03:35 PM
1

Don't reciprocate personal insults. Just report them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 05:15 PM
0

I agree with your point, and would have still agreed without that insult. No personal attacks. Be civil. Easy rules. Consider this a warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 05:12 PM
1

Looks like you are new to the sub (but it's not a new account), so I'm offering a courtesy warning. Please read the sidebar for the rules. Don't insult other users, even subtly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/15 09:38 PM
6

You're new so you might not have heard this rule before. The mods will remove your post if you respond directly to the OP if it's "Ask RP" (and you are not RP) or if it's "Ask BP" (and you are not BP). Here, you explicitly say you are not RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/15 01:36 AM
4

I'm not a HB 8-9 but I do get some benefits from being an attractive female The question was for RP males. It doesn't make sense for an attractive non-RP female to be answering as a top comment. /r/AskMen would be more lenient about these matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 03:09 PM
1

You can tell someone they are wrong or even accuse them of lying, but no personal attacks. You post crossed the line too many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/15 06:29 AM
3

Don't try to fish for personal information.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/15 06:24 PM
3

I've removed a series of your comments. Consider this a warning. Don't try to bait people into flame wars.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/15 06:23 PM
5

Please add a point for discussion to your post. You're allowed to tell your fantastic stories, but you need to make your point more clear. This applies to both this post and posts going forward. New posts like this from you will be removed without warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 08:54 PM
1

This post was removed for personal attack. Consider this a minor warning.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 06:21 AM
3

If you indent your paragraphs, reddit auto-formatting will assume the text is code. Get rid of the indents if you want your text to be readable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 03:50 PM
2

The question was posed for BPers. As per sub rules, all top level responses (such as yours, which was addressed directly to the OP's post) will be removed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 07:53 AM
2

no personal attacks. You can remove them yourself and let me know if you want them reapproved.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 08:22 PM
1

The comment is missing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 06:03 AM
1

You've been shadowbanned. Contact the admins if you want to figure out why.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 06:01 AM
1

Downvoting isn't allowed in this sub and any admission or evidence of downvoting results in at least a temporary ban.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 05:57 AM
2

What is the discussion topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 05:57 AM
1

Thank you. Reapproved.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:56 PM
1

Thank you. Reapproved.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:56 PM
0

Don't bother retaliating to personal attacks, especially with your own personal attacks. They're just going to be removed anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:51 PM
1

No personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:50 PM
1

Disagreed strongly on the last sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 07:47 PM
2

No, the ratio hasn't changed because it's referring to ancestor population. Over twice as many of our ancestors are women as men, most of whom died without legacy. That's unlikely to change in the near term. The part that is a wild ass guess by the researchers are the exact percentages (80% and 40% -- it could have been 60% and 30% for all we know). The ratios are still supported. Your 80:75 ratio is just a snapshot of how many today might have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 07:40 PM
4

The fact that 80% men are descended from 40% of women show women are inherently deceptive (...) That might be a misreading or a typo. It looks like it was taken from another stat: twice as many of our ancestors were women as they were men. The 80% was a reference to the fact that many women passing their genes on vs 40% of men. It was actually a wild ass guess. All we could say from the studies this came from was that women were considerably more successful at reproduction. The causes of this im…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 07:31 PM
0

Top level comments in CMV threads need to be an attempt to change the OP's mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 03:41 AM
2

You're under no obligations to report anything. My point is that you might be seeing bias where none exists. I removed some comments in threads directed at RPers because I happen to be an RPer myself and they were relevant to me. Those threads also happened to have a lot of activity, so violators of the rules are more likely to get attention. This thread was directed at BPers, and it also has less attention so it was unlikely to have been reported. If anyone perceives bias and it bothers them th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 04:15 AM
1

This thread was addressed to BPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 04:01 AM
1

Also, where are the mods to delete the comments by Red Pillers on a BP thread? I see them all over the RP threads making sure no Blue Pillers comment, but I somehow always miss them on BP threads. This thread had 1 upvote and 2 responses. It doesn't have visibility and no one has been reporting any of the comments here. If you cared, you could have PMed the mods about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 04:00 AM
3

Awesome, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 12:23 AM
5

So how'd I do, bluepillers? OP, your thread was a question to RPers, and I assumed this last part was more frivolous than anything. However, if you wanted serious opinions on your attempt from bpers, then in the interest of keeping things organized, I'd recommend you move your own attempt into the comments (as a root comment) to get responses from BPers. That would the neatest way to go. Otherwise you could start a new thread with a less misleading title.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/15 12:14 AM
4

You need to follow the rules. 1) You're clearly BP. You can respond to comments made by others here, but don't respond directly to the OP's post which asks for answers from RPers. 2) Be civil and don't make this too personal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 11:43 PM
2

A root comment. A comment made in response to the OP. My comment and your comment were both responses to comments, not the OP's post. The OP wrote a question to RPers, and her response was an answer to his post, but she is not RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 11:40 PM
3

OP's question was directed at fellow RPers. As per subreddit rules, I'm removing top level comments that are not from an RPer. If this was in mistake, and you are RP despite your colorless flair then please let me know. I'd also recommend you change your flair color to avoid future confusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 11:32 PM
3

Can you add a discussion topic, or are you OK with me adding a CMV tag to your post?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 11:58 PM
1

Cause we can't resist their cuteness. I can.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 08:55 PM
1

It would be better if people could learn how to chill. Then we wouldn't be getting subtle threats in modmail and getting our queue flooded by hundreds of frivolous/malicious reports just to make our lives harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 03:11 PM
1

Thanks for the vote of good faith, and feel free to PM the mods with concerns or suggestions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 04:43 AM
4

Hello. How is it going?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 04:39 AM
4

Just an FYI: root comments from BPers will just be removed in threads that are tagged as "Question for RPers" as your thread is.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 07:40 AM
2

The thread was tagged as a Question for RPers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 07:39 AM
1

I just read yesterday about a person getting kicked out of their house at 18 For reference: http://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/2zrmyz/im_18_being_kicked_out_with_800_a_car_no_places/
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 04:24 AM
1

I'm not sure. Please direct your questions to modmail not me. Send a message to /r/PurplePillDebate to contest.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 01:58 PM
1

Can you repost this thread? Without this part: (not mentioned: thanks to feminism) Neutral titles. Rules are rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 03:11 AM
2

This was a question directed to red pillers, as tagged. See the mod guidelines that are stickied in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 09:12 PM
3

Your post was removed because this was a question for Redpillers. Please see the stickied, mod-flaired guidelines.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 08:38 PM
1

You should report these kinds of threads to modmail if they actually bother you. If it's important or ambiguous then explain your concern. The thread you're linking has been up for about a day without a report. Commanding me now to remove a post isn't productive, because I don't care about thread titles and only intermittently deal with complaints to modmail with other mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 07:20 PM
1

Nah. I've been conversing with a mod who just accidentally revealed to me the true reason this place really exists. I'm leaving, and I encourage other actual TRPers to do the same. What happens here isn't "debate". What happens here is "wait for a TweRPer to say something controversial so I can link it back to /r/thebluepill for a hahaha moment". /u/cuittler basically just told me that if Bloopers don't have this ability, they wouldn't come here at all. The mods don't work closely enough for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:47 PM
2

You can just copy and repost this and put your conclusion in the title in the body of the post, "If it isn't shame, then the only other logical reason is pragmatic deceit and selfishness." The mods will have less reason to remove it. This title should fine: Why do women lie about their sexual past? Also, there's no rule against linking back to this post from your new post, in case you're concerned about lost effort in this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:15 PM
4

PREACH IT SISTA PREACH. Are you colored red or writing from an RP perspective? This thread was a question to RP. If not, please see the newest mod post for guidelines.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 07:50 AM
4

What does that have to do with this CMV thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 07:37 AM
8

Lol. Nah. I didn't link to said user's personal information. Nice try though. Not a direct link, but it certainly facilitates a connection being made. Your post was removed by a mod. I think it was for good reason. Fair warning was given in OP's post.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:26 AM
2

Most women I know don't go around dropping their panties for a guy just because he's hot/buff/popular/whatever. Most women I know would never be okay with being a "plate" for some dude for the hell of it or because he's tall or rich, etc and I certainly don't know a great many girls who actively lust after abusive, Dark Triads. A confounding factor would be that women act differently around men than they do other women. It takes social maladjustment or poor info management for a woman to be infa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 04:14 PM
10

My main problem with feminists is that they, much more often than MRAs, are using censorship as a weapon of choice. Even on reddit, sites like AVoiceForMen are hard censored, site-wide. Posts here with AVfM are auto-removed and need to be approved by mods. I've never have to do that with Jezebel, Cosmo, etc, or even odd ultra-feminist blogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/15 09:51 PM
1

Your comment was reported. You put a lot of effort in that post. I'll reapprove it if you just remove the last sentence which isn't necessary for your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 04:22 AM
3

Proof of that would be nice I'll vouch for her. The post wasn't approved by cuittler. We later looked at the thread again as a team and decided to remove it. Mistakes happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/15 06:28 PM
1

Has being a mod changed how you act on-line? No. That's why I used an alt. Has it changed how you think of people? People in general: No. I'm already a bit of a cynic. Individuals: No. Nothing on TRP/TBP/PPD could make me like or dislike people I know in the real world any more or less than I already do. Are you more understanding? Less understanding? I have slightly more insight on other mods (positive) as well as certain users who get their comments removed often, which I would have not caught…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 07:40 PM
1

I am RP. What makes you assume I am not?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 06:58 PM
1

I am a perfect AF and perfect BB. I am assuming she cares about the BB part more because she's already planning out the divorce rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 06:48 PM
2

If you think about it, all of my choices were perfectly rational. I don't think you have room to disagree. idontwantomarry She recently claimed not to want to marry. I would not be ruining her by fucking her. cuittler You and I are both mods. I judge actions, not just words. You have more credibility towards fairness built up than most others in modding history. It would also be a very diplomatic and favourable marriage. A mod power couple. You would like me. I'm a perfect beta bux that doesn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 06:36 PM
4

idontwantomarry / cuittler / HighSchoolJockBully
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 08:17 AM
1

No, you're both misunderstanding each other. Namru thinks you're referring to him. Now he thinks that you're telling him not to contribute in this thread, just because he's not a regular contributor. What you mean to say for more clarity is, "Op meant 'out of the people on this sub, who would you fuck/marry/kill?'.. "
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 07:31 AM
6

You didn't need to delete your last thread. Hyperrreal was just suggesting you flair your post with CMV. In the submenu options, there's a "flair" link. comment share save hide give gold spam remove approve report nsfw flair hide all child comments
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 12:55 AM
2

He and CODY are less active at the moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/15 07:44 PM
1

No. There's no strict, technical standard for this, so I'm asking for you to cooperate and show some good faith. Try again, one last time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:27 PM
1

Please remove the personal attack on another ppd member from your post. It wasn't necessary to make your point. I'll re-approve your message afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/14 06:23 PM
12

Woo, more fuel for redpiller anti-intellectualism and pseudoscience. It's not redpiller anti-intellectualism I'm seeing right now. Let's try to cut down on the circlejerking here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 07:16 AM
1

Refrain from personal insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/14 07:13 AM
2

I don't like it and disagree with his/her opinion, but that commenter actually did disagree with the OP. The OP is talking about men's bio clock. The commenter there disagrees that either gender has a bio clock.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/14 12:00 AM
2

The rules had recently been changed for CMV threads. See here. Top level comments on CMV responses/comments should disagree with the OP, in some way. Please attempt to change the OP's view on at least one point in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 09:39 PM
3

Going forward, no personal attacks. Even mild ones are not permitted in CMV/Debate threads. See here for version 2 of the rules (as well as the version 1 linked there) for any further questions about Debate Week.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/14 09:36 PM
4

All right people. You can circlejerk and ridicule individual RPers in TBP. Don't do it here. It's not even relevant. EDIT: Correction, it is tangentially relevant, but it's inflammatory and just inspired a lot of attacks and ridicule, not discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/14 07:42 AM
4

I'm not going to go into details about our actions with/against specific individuals. Needless to say though, if you're wondering why you may have gotten a warning so soon after starting your 1 month account, then perhaps you should wonder why you've gotten more attention and reports than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 10:13 AM
6

You've banned me for three days for "complaining", and consistently dismissed my pointing out blatant RP circlejerks, because god forbid Redpillers stop circlejerking in a sub that's supposed to be about open debate. You were temp banned for engaging in an insult war with another user in a convoluted mess of a thread. The mod who banned you cut your ban soon after you PMed us explaining your side of the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 09:47 AM
6

Of course, there's no guarantee that said behavior will actually be modded, and it is extremely unlikely that an offender will be reprimanded if he is a RP moderator or endorsed contributor. (See e.g. /u/We_Are_Legion and /u/homo_homini_lupus and their long history of trolling directly under the watch of the PPD moderation staff) We've fairly listened to and addressed complaints, including yours, which were plentiful. We removed many of the posts you reported. Know that you are one of the prime …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 08:46 AM
4

To address a few common concerns in this thread: Re: Passive Aggressiveness Please report, and if you are concerned we might not get the nuance, then PM us. Mods may miss comments here and there especially if they're not being reported. Keep in mind that people are posting from all over the world. "Bless her heart" might be a non-issue to someone from Europe or Asia, but for an American Southerner, it may be an obvious slight. There also may be contextual insults between two individuals, not cul…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 06:05 AM
3

I think that the problem is that the mods don't recognize nuance. They don't understand how women and TBP do personal attacks. They use snide language and little fake endearments like "dear" when they talk down to us. For some reason, if a person doesn't come right out and say "fuck you" then it isn't a personal attack. We understand the nuance. I admitted my own opinion twice in this sub that rules/laws have an inherent bias in favour of people using passive aggressive attacks as opposed to ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 04:38 AM
4

Just report. If you think it's extra important, then send /r/PurplePillDebate a PM. We always respond, whether we agree or disagree with your concerns.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/14 04:24 AM
2

Yea, we wouldn't want BP posts disturbing the nice RP circlejerk we have here. Refer to CFRP's post about upcoming Wednesday change to rules. Also, I just asked people to take this kind of shit elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/14 03:20 PM
1

And in that thread the post that agreed with the BP was the lowest voted post, compared to this one where three of the top four posts are all 'You're so right' followed by more 'yeah, he's totally right' That was not the case when you first posted. They were both top posts. But he put effort into the exact opposite of the point of CMV. If you have a suggestion to make do so to the mods. If you believe that should be against the rules then message /r/PurplePillDebate . Keep these threads free of …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 08:45 PM
15

What a marvelous attempt to change their view by agreeing with everything they said. That is not against the rules, even during debate week. Commenters are allowed to agree with the OP. This applies to blue pill CMV posts as well, as shown here: http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2n9ymu/rp_advice_is_just_as_generic_as_be_yourself/cmbpf5g Arguably, derpyRPlurker's is less circlejerky and higher effort than most agreement posts. Your post, however, is snarky, and subsequent examples…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/14 07:00 PM
1

You too. Don't circlejerk. Read the rules for this week.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:57 AM
1

Next time, just report personal attacks. Read the rules for this week. Don't waste your time responding, especially with more retaliatory condescension. We're just going to remove them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:57 AM
1

Your first snarky comment was already overreaching. Don't behave this way, especially in CMV/Debate threads this week. Try to limit yourselves to serious comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/14 07:56 AM
2

No, I'm not removing it. It's a borderline case. We barely decided to let it go in light of the fact that it already has a lot of discussion on it and we did not notice early enough. I would have removed this had this been given a more serious tag (debate/cmv) and judged more harshly as per debate week rules. This is mainly a warning and explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 11:51 PM
7

Just an FYI, your title is editorialized. No where in that article do they use the term "brown people". As per rules for posts, titles should be opinion-free.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 06:20 PM
2

But I need to insult somebody to kick my brain into high gear so I can continue having this conversation with you. No, you do not. Keep it in your head or do it in other threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 01:25 AM
1

I could tell you more, but I hate you all. All of you red morons with your 20th century understanding of global economics. Yeah! Let's keep following neoliberal ideas! Those guys never steered us wrong! I bet you jerks think "neoliberal" means "socially liberal" don't you? IT DOESN'T. "Neoliberal" basically means "economically liberal" and its ideals often run counter to socially liberal ideals. Bush and Cheney are neoliberals, but they are not social liberals. This is a debate topic. As per deb…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/14 01:20 AM
1

As such, TRP views do get special protection on here from ridicule (as opposed to criticism which such views receive plenty of). Individual posters have protection from ridicule. That's how it's meant to be. The only person I've banned in this sub was someone who was attacking you. PurplePillDebate needs to operate like a very light version of TRP in a way so that members of TRP have incentive to debate here. There have been no such discussions. The mods have been accused by both sides of coddli…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/14 07:02 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2j20qy/minor_updates_to_subreddit_style_taking/ She has both "Red" and "Blue" in the flair label, the color of which is based on those keywords (along with some others). Red took precedence in the stylesheet. She hasn't asked to change it. Nothing is really stopping her from doing this, just like nothing is stopping a very anti-BP person from taking a blue label.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/14 01:23 AM
3

She does not sound like she is circlejerking in that post.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/14 04:05 PM
3

It's supposed to discourage upvoting and downvoting for some subs. Here is a post on it with details. http://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/comments/1r2bs6/whats_with_npredditcom/
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 07:41 AM
2

What do you mean? Are you referring to the blue highlight over the OP's username? Red is not a default highlight for OP username. EDIT: I checked again and you are right. For certain browsers, OP's name is red. That has been fixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 07:28 AM
3

Adding the "np" prefix to your link in place of WWW. E.g. "np.reddit.com" enters the site in no-participation mode. It's common reddit etiquette to remind people not to brigade. In hindsight though, your link appears to go to a year-old post which can't be voted on anyway, so I'm not going to let frivolous technicalities get in the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 07:24 AM
4

Your post was caught and removed automatically. Change the link to an NP link and I'll approve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/14 07:05 AM
3

Done.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/14 07:18 PM
1

This is like banning self-defense, but not banning assault in the first place. "Not banning assault"? No, this is merely like "not banning passive-aggression". Subtly provoking or insulting comments don't usually get people tossed into jail. Even borderline harassment is usually ignored if the perpetrator has plausible deniability and stops after being told to. Reacting violently in a way that obviously breaks the law does not have the same benefit of plausible deniability. In your case, the equ…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 09:14 AM
3

Don't worry about it. The discussion was philosophical and between me and him. I only sympathized slightly because I've dealt with a lot of passive-aggression in this sub and in PMs. I was hoping I could reason with him about controlling his reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 08:52 AM
2

Capitulating to this kind of fuckwittery can only destroy the very point of a debate forum. I don't claim to know precisely the value of debate or how to manage the perfect forum, but I am certain enough that capitulating to your style isn't conducive to one. I've tried my best to be reasonable with you, and gave you the benefit of my doubt under the wild assumption that you might be on drugs for your pain. I will discuss the details of granting you your "victory" though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 08:41 AM
2

Laws that govern human behavior by their very nature benefit passive-aggressiveness. They favor the side that has enough plausible deniability. Meanwhile, overt retaliation that obviously and explicitly breaks the rules are more easily dealt with. This is true not just in PPD. This is true everywhere. The world is not fair. Rules are not always fair. Rules are made to maintain order. But you know that already. You can call out "fuckwits" to your heart's content on TRP. Blue pillers can do almost…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 08:18 AM
1

Two TBP posts for a single thread, after he responded to the meta_bot of your first? You're abiding by the strict letter of the law, but I'm starting to suspect a bit of passive aggressiveness. I advise you to quit wasting your time, because I'm going to be nuking this chain of comments if it goes further. This will include yours since you're merely aggravating him.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 05:35 AM
3

That thread passes. He NP'ed the link and didn't invite brigading. I do think he may have been passive aggressive later, and I have acknowledged that. If you feel that certain individuals are deliberately aggravating you, just report it and move on. The main violator of rules in this thread has been you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/14 05:35 AM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/14 06:40 PM
1

If there was a point to discuss in this thread, then make it more obvious. Even minimal effort by adding a point-of-view that people can change. Until then, I'm removing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/14 05:12 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/2j20qy/minor_updates_to_subreddit_style_taking/.compact Tl;dr - the flair coloration currently changes depending on the flair text. If you have "Red", "RP " or a few variations of that color (like Crimson or Infrared) in your flair title text (case sensitive), then your flair color will match it. The same goes for Purple/PP and Blue/BP. For example, if your flair text was "Evil Red" or "Evil Red 2", then your flair color would be red. You can al…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/14 02:50 PM
1

I'm talking about your suggestion, the one about using the "choose your own flair" purple style. It wouldn't go well with the purple upvotes. That is, unless we made it a very light color. I will try some ideas when I next get the chance though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 03:43 PM
1

The problem with that would be the upvoted threads in your Recently Viewed Links. Those threads come with a little Purple Pill Upvote, which will look bad/hidden with a purple background. A dull Yellow might work though as that contrasts with purple.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 06:22 AM
1

What would you suggest?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 01:09 AM
1

Done.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/14 01:08 AM
2

I actually had similar idea, only to make these strikes public. For egregious violations, I'd add a strike somewhere near their name so people would be more cautious about trolling. Such a thing requires considerably more manual effort, but if the idea is well-supported and well-defined, then it's up for consideration (but still not guaranteed).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 10:51 PM
1

Are you referring to the sticky boxes? edit: Nevermind. You are referring to the bright green boxes at the side for Mods and Recently Viewed Links. This is not a ton of work, but is a significant stylistic change that I'd like to hear input from others on as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 10:47 PM
1

I was going to go with #ffeee3 which will have a more significant impact, but I wanted to give time to adjust and also to get others' opinions first.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 10:46 PM
1

I meant for it to be limited to style, but you're free to voice other opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/14 10:45 PM
1

What's most important? The very discovery of what's most important.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 07:59 PM
2

For future reference, try to avoid making these things sound too personal to spare us from making difficult decisions. It's technically passable to me because your pluralization of hamster which makes me assume you are referring to trp in general. You also explained and resolved this matter later which simplifies things. This is just a friendly reminder. I know it's easy to forget but many of us are ESL.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/14 07:57 PM
1

Areligious ignostic theist.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 10:08 PM
1

A healthy lifestyle for me would be one in which we don't have to use bp intuition to help us guess how much trust we should have in various relationships. It would be as close to being measurable as possible for all sides, and we'd plan accordingly. I believe such a thing would be especially helpful to people who think similarly to you and share your struggles.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 05:01 PM
1

Next time, just report and we'll remove. Retaliating to passive-aggressiveness is just going to waste your time because I'm removing the chain anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/14 04:05 AM
3

Quantified trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/14 07:01 AM
1

It is within bounds to me. He's not insulting any particular individuals. He may be saying some offensive things about particular groups of people, but let's be real, it's not more or less offensive than what we usually see given the subjects discussed at ppd. Consider how often SMV is discussed and how certain people may feel about their own attributes being described as "low smv traits". That being said, we'll certainly discuss it among ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/14 10:00 AM
4

I'm not even a fan of making posts like this, mostly because I don't think it will stop anyone. But this is the third time this has happened on PPD. Most the time we bury it. I agree that the person who actually put in the initial effort is most likely irreconcilable. I got the impression though that some people who engage in this behaviour, second hand, think it's ok. "Someone else was the one who put in the effort. I'm just writing what others should already know." Even well-meaning people wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 04:19 PM
4

This isn't simply the PG crowd. There's just no room for it here. A million other offensive things exist for you to say, this one is against the rules, just as personal attacks in general are against the rules. Don't incite suicide in suicidal threads. There's no discussion on this matter. If you want to talk about something more abstract and less personally directed, then feel free to start threads on that instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 11:40 PM
4

Calm down. Besides insulting him, you are misunderstanding his point. His point is that if the buddy was a good beta, then the girl should have stuck with him while banging alphas on the side. That is what AF/BB implies would be the normal course of action for this situation if you take it to its logical extreme. It's pedantic, but technically he is not wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/14 08:17 AM
4

That's fine. But you don't have to fill in the silence with just plain insults.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 06:51 PM
3

There's a fuckload of context behind it being added in the left. I understand perfectly what a reactionary movement is. MRA's and TRP, fall within that to pretty much everyone outside of thos small angry groups. Also, nice insult chief, clearly you've kept frame throughout all this. If you're just going to keep calling him delusional and insulting groups without providing explanation of your point of view (besides "fuckload of context, too much work"), then there's no point to continue this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 06:49 PM
2

Going forward, you should report instead of retaliating in that manner. Your post was fine until the final sentence. That was unnecessary. You can either remove that or I will remove the post.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 06:40 PM
4

This was a needless remark. The most respectable course of action here would be to explain what you think was wrong rather than attacking him.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/14 06:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter