TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

revengeofthedirty47 Archive

View 2 posts and 323 comments by revengeofthedirty47 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Still waiting for /u/Baba-Vanga to answer this post.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 03:32 PM
0

I’ve just come to the realization that the excessive double standards where it pertains to relations between the sexes is nothing more than an generation of social engineering by the collective demographic of women.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 02:59 PM
5

Any New York MRA redditors want to stage a male raid with me at the wing
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:55 PM
1

New York men are a different breed. You’d be surprised how much men would go in there
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:54 PM
2

Honestly, I think men as a group would benefit a great deal by ceasing from pointing out society’s hyper empowerment and patting on the backs of women, and just creating their own counter cultural messaging that is entirely male centric. I’d love to rock a t-shirt that says the “the future is patriarchy” as a troll, just to frustrate self important women who support phrases like “the future is female”. Instead of cleverly pointing out cultural inconsistencies where it concerns women and men, con…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:32 PM
5

Probably the best comment here. We need to stop acting like all of those things are not connected.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 12:38 PM
4

Exactly. Black men don’t benefit from this either. In fact, there’s a growing narrative within the black community pedaled by black women and woketeps that black men are “essentially the white men of black people”. So, I agree with neverserve. The term POC often means people of color who are women or queer, and children.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 12:37 PM
3

Alright, relax buddy. If you don’t see how this gets at a very toxic double standard that exists within our culture, then this thread is not for you. But don’t say it doesn’t have anything to do with men’s rights. This has EVERYTHING to do with men’s rights and men’s place within society. There is an obvious double standard for women within culture and within the justice system. “Believe all women” is a product of this toxic double standard. This strikes right at the core of how society views wo…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:00 PM
12

The biggest sin to me by women culturally, and I use culturally as to not paint the entirety of women with a broad brush, is selling the narrative that men are overvalued in society. In other words, “male privilege”. Taking the experiences of the, what, 10 percent of men who wield the power of productivity and influence, and making that the experience that all men enjoy, in my opinion, can never be forgiven by men culturally. Enough “average joe’s”, which, in my opinion, is the vast majority of …
/r/MensRights09/10/19 01:24 PM
1

Exactly. Your comment is exactly what I was thinking throughout the listen. Hardly intellectual dark web types, but just pretending and regurgitating things they’ve heard from that sector.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 03:00 PM
7

The best comment in this thread.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 01:19 PM
1

I'm a black guy in NYC with a small podcast. I'm interested in boys' experience in the New York Public School system. I'm really concerned there is a generation of boys who needs are being wholly ignored and that further concerns me for the future. Don't know if you'd ever be interested, but I'd definitely would like to correspond and hear about your experiences
/r/MensRights22/08/19 12:33 PM
1

I'm interested in your experience as a High Schooler in a coastal city like New York. Mind if I pm you?
/r/MensRights21/08/19 12:33 PM
7

Shut up you intellectually dishonest twit. You are condoning it by being critical of the lesser violation. The man in the photo only reacted to her barbs. Where's your criticism of how she approached the situation? Where's your request for her to be responsible in dealing with prospect dates so she doesn't offend someone by asking them about an appearance feature they cannot control, and therefor yield the response it the post? You are a liar.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 12:29 PM
4

Came here to say this. Haha. Can I ask you something? How can we be the first to construct a narrative? Presently in our culture, women seemingly get to paint narratives first, which results in an healthy amount of narratives constructed that depict toxic things, from my experience, that women typically do in the image of men.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:07 PM
7

This is rape. This is grooming. Stop with the double standards.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:51 PM
2

Guarantee you she didn't do this to any black dudes in NYC
/r/MensRights06/08/19 12:53 PM
11

She obviously generalizes. Who is this address to? Where is it posted? Come on, its hard pressed not to view this woman as a virtue signaling, attention glutton. She sent a capped tweet demanding women stop being killed because they rejected "you"; who is "you"? Who is this addressed to? Who is she even talking about? This didn't raise awareness, it didn't pinpoint a specific wide spread issue -- its essentially a look at me post.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:25 PM
1

The Dirty secret is Lesbian DV is the most common.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:18 PM
6

That's exactly what it means. This amounts to "men, emote like women if you want any sympathy or attention or empathy. You want support? Emote like women" Men emote differently and the message should be we need to be more accepting and accommodating to the various ways men emote and express their troubles.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:11 PM
1

No, when women fail, they enjoy the privilege of being able to attribute said failure to their gender and evoke "historical opression of women" as proof of this. Or, or, when women fail, they just get men to engineer their success through various social means.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 01:04 PM
3

I'm a part of the "single mother" generation of black men and this is the most accurate thing I've seen.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 01:03 PM
6

This cop is amazing. That was probably the first time this girl received a lecture about consequences, something she likely has been insulated from for most of her life.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 01:27 PM
6

do you mind providing a source? I'd like it for safe keeping.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 01:44 PM
1

Where did you find this quote?
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:28 PM
3

What is this notion that it's okay to take a position like this after generations of women whining and complaining to men to fix their issues.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 11:46 AM
5

WHO THE FUCK CARES? Dude, are you really serious right now? Nothing he did in his youth should give you pause especially since a lot of the evidence exonerates him.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:13 PM
8

Thank you so much fro correcting him. ITS HARVEY. Brett's a hero.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 12:50 PM
1

Bro just reject that shit. Why are yall allowing women to define anything for you?
/r/MensRights16/04/19 01:11 PM
1

Here's brittany simon doing it. A feminist btw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsT1TB0nuJM&index=56&list=WL&t=0s
/r/MensRights30/03/19 12:56 PM
14

This is a tactic. They are controlling the narrative. I've seen a lot of women hip to this tactic and have been deploying whenever they want to hijack a new victimhood. I've seen lots of women as of recent trying to make the epidemic of suicide in the west about solely women and their victimhood within suicide.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:49 AM
1

Man. This era is really more about narratives than truths.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 12:44 PM
7

Care to give a brief summary
/r/MensRights16/02/19 01:39 PM
4

Its funny the desire is for us to view women as equals. How are we when things like this exist? If you're my equal, why am I expected to split what's mine with you? Why am I still expected to support you?
/r/MensRights13/01/19 10:08 PM
2

a hero.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 11:59 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 02:31 PM
1

False equivalency. Mushrooms are not People
/r/MensRights25/11/18 01:24 PM
1

I don't need to know you. You need to understand that you're within a space that is FOR MEN. Where men ENGAGE in way MEN FEEL COMFORTABLE. Instead of focusing on the plights conveyed by men in this thread, you decided to take exception to someone using vaginas as a descriptor. Not only that, you couldn't resist derailing attention from men to yourself. Even highlighting that you don't know why you're here as a woman. Even saying "just browsing". But yet, you had to make it be known that as a wom…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 01:20 PM
3

What are you talking about? The woman in the video repeatedly calls him white trash. she made it a race thing
/r/MensRights09/11/18 02:25 PM
3

Great reply that totally encapsulates why some women can't understand the plight of men. Their constantly searching for something that'll place them right back in the center of victimhood.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 02:12 PM
1

It was her 2009 matchup with Kim Clijsters. She verbally berated a lineswoman and made threats at her.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:33 AM
4

Ramos is a respected Umpire on the tour. In all of my years of watching Tennis, he's upheld a noble standard. He did not target Serena. Serena got one violation for COACHING. She then, purposely, conflated this warning as an accusation of cheating leveled against her by Ramos. This was done strategically. Notice, not once does Serena say "I was not being coached". Instead, she racked up her outrage and began yelling about "I am not a cheater", when this was never accused or implied. She then exh…
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:37 PM
-2

Uhh, no. You won't be getting off that easy friend. Yes, words mean something, but in order for earnest and intelligent discourse to flourish and permeate between two efforts, a certain amount of critical thinking and inference is required. In other words -- reason. That's how conversations move fluid, when people aren't too literal and are capable of being reasonable enough to infer based on context and conversational evidence. Even I was able to infer what /u/THEAdrian was implying by his rema…
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:27 PM
4

She is NOT in the conversation for being the best ever. I can name 10 men who are more skilled and are more apt for the discussion of best ever. Sure, she is the best female ever, but it's important to note that the best female ever couldn't hang with the no man in the top 15 ever to do in the sport. Especially if it's man rules with best of 5 sets and heavier felt balls.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:21 PM
8

Want to know? She actually got into an altercation with lineswoman at the US Open in 2009 where she makes a threat against the lineswoman in the same way she did with the Umpire in 2018. This is not new and anyone defending serena is defending the right for women and minorities to behave poorly and get away with it without consequence.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 12:18 PM
2

I think people like you are what's wrong with this label obsess culture. Things are more nuanced than straight up black and white. But you keep pedaling that understanding, darling.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 12:39 PM
3

perfectly said.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:26 PM
5

Context is important, darling. This isn't sexism, but I do agree it is discrimination. Though, this does not mean its inherently bad. I'd consider this good discrimination as it would keep him away from the risk of any trouble.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:25 PM
2

See, here's the difference between cultures that surround men and cultures that surround women. I'm a major believer in the notion that things like Honor are absent in cultures that surround women. Here, we see someone characterizing shapiro's challenge as a strategy du jour of sexist men. We see giant assumptions pedaled about the intention of men when a challenge such as this is proposed to a woman. We see said intentions then rooted in another assumption that "men believe they are entitled to…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 02:13 PM
1

A new wrinkle in the narrative.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 02:25 PM
5

Difference between men and women highlighted in this comment
/r/MensRights05/07/18 12:14 PM
0

Can't believe we call ourselves a men's rights forum, and essentially sat back as a man was convicted merely on the word of a woman.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:28 AM
7

So basically "bad when you do it, but something else when i do it"
/r/MensRights20/04/18 02:16 PM
1

Lets hear some.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 02:04 PM
8

No, not double standards. He just explained to why it was racist. Not it's existence, but the actual content.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:56 PM
7

Lol, you still highlighted a double standard with this video. Look at the reactions to the guy as oppose to the woman, and thats telling alone. The dude had physical violence threatened against him at times lol.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 02:36 PM
0

Die in a ditch.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 04:27 PM
2

Great! Good for you! You're way of working through your problems is being catered to. Great! Keep using the resources that work best for you, but at the same time, realize that the OTHER MEN would rather emote and share in different way.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 04:21 PM
0

None of what you said made any sense and I pity myself for even trying to engage with you.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:34 PM
1

Congrats, you're an outlier.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 11:33 PM
0

What were you expecting? You have no intention in engaging in dialogue in good faith, so why should I extend any courtesy to you? People like you are the reason why it's seemingly difficult to start up objective dialogue on men's needs.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 08:14 PM
0

No needs to explain anything to you. Your purposely being obtuse. You asking such a silly questions already reveals that you have no understanding of male nature.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 03:53 PM
1

It's simple. Men, on average, don't enjoy "talking through their problems" in the same way woman do because men are proactive individuals. In order to feel like whatever is happening to them is not controlling them, they actively seek to solve it. Now what we need to be doing is creating resources to aid that process, not come into male spaces and tell them then need to emote this way or that way.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 03:52 PM
1

Lmao. This comment highlights your gaps in understanding here. You're parading around this thread like a headless chicken asking "well how is this going to help a male rape victim"! You don't understand male nature.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 03:36 PM
2

Sounds like you're mad that the vast majority of men aren't wired to emote in the way you want them too. It's definitely how we operate on AVERAGE. Men work through their problems, women talk through their problems.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 03:32 PM
45

Say men are not marginalized people while marginalizing the voice and opinions of a man.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:34 PM
1

I wager a grand majority of the people posting in that thread are white women --- the most protected and privileged group in human history.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:23 PM
10

Shit, I won't deny it. She's a thug and black. So fucking what? What are you going to do about it besides parade around like a headless chicken trying to smear MRAs for using an apt term that describes this woman's behavior? You're apart of the problem, dick. Matter fact, suck my whole dick.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:37 PM
6

Giving every white male permission to slap black female back into her place whenever she acts in this manner. Sincerely, a black male.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:00 PM
1

It discourages other women too, they just have different provisions. Also, some provisions don't explicitly discourage marriage, but rather discourages strong and long lasting marriages. I.E. Alimony.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 12:16 AM
8

There's just way too much provisions for black women that totally discourages the need to get married.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 02:50 PM
0

Why? Because of some ill perceived notion that the adult should know better? How about they're both to blame. She shagged an older married man at 17. 17! She's equally as culpable.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 01:23 AM
2

I live in NYC, and I can assure you -- they'll never find the guy. Which makes me happy. This isn't the first instance of a white woman essentially telling a black man that she needs more space than he does.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 05:10 PM
8

Well the way you respond to comments has me thinking otherwise. You may be damaged intellectually.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 04:34 PM
3

When you hear this in a school setting, especially if it's from a ideologically driven female teacher, it often just means that little girls are willing to sit still for long periods of time in comparison to boys while she rambles on about god knows what and never once conveying a more in depth and hands on learning experience.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 01:07 AM
10

I'm sorry, I didn't know all lives matter implied that all lives face concentrated government sponsored efforts against them; i thought it just meant, well, that all existence matters and is precious. If you want something that'll convey "concentrated government sponsored efforts against us", maybe try a slogan more accurate to your situation.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:18 PM
9

biology only when beneficial.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 09:06 PM
1

Is there a Prince experience?
/r/MensRights31/08/17 03:17 PM
1

Perfect response. People are so low on self awareness.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 02:57 PM
-10

They should be focus on the floods as oppose to cutting baby dicks.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 07:35 PM
4

Bravo, friend.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 12:13 PM
1

Oh, so you're basically saying privilege in reality doesn't exist? Because it typically cancels itself out since it's not an all encompassing thing? A person can be privileged in this realm, but someone else can be privileged in another? Everyone has privilege, you say? So no one can possibly stand at the top as "most privileged", correct? Seriously, grow up and stop these mental gymnastics. The privilege argument is losing it's edge the more and more you get people to explain their true positio…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 11:53 AM
1

Can you find a contemporary instance of this happening to women of the West?(WWI and beyond). Also, do those instances exceed the lives lost by men on the front line when you combine all of the West wars? Also, your logic is screwed. "Richer and more powerful men". What does that have to do with anything? Men are still, BY AND LARGE, objectified as tools of wars -- typically for the benefit or gain of a society.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 11:49 AM
1

Those government aids exist in the first place to make up for systemic and cultural disadvantages that black people and women have faced in this country since before its inception. Exactly. So in this time, she wouldn't be less privileged. In fact, she'd be more privileged when factoring in the same upbringing. More privileged because the aids that help her, wouldn't help a white lowerclass-middle class male who was brought up in the rougher parts of the pacific northwest.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:42 PM
2

Actually, what he said was you should inspire to be someone LIKE Bill Gates. And within the context in which he was speaking, that meant someone who is trying to reduce the suffering in the world. He used Bill Gates setting out to cure certain diseases as an example. At any rate, even if he did say that, that's not a reason to not take the man seriously -- especially after you just said his observations were interesting.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 12:33 PM
1

You need not answer anymore as you've already solidified your position pretty soundly. I'm just interested in how this person would reply to what you said.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 05:12 PM
1

No you must disgree with the model(endorsed and pioneered by feminist) that inform police retaliation against male's when reporting DV, but of course that'd mean going against your feminist thoughts and theories.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:17 PM
1

Well, one factor can be that men, for centuries, have been objectified as tools of wars to protect societies that the other gender typically enjoys in peace?
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:14 PM
1

Also; would you be so kind to respond to you /u/AloysiusC post please.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:12 PM
2

Yeah, but what if that black person is a black woman? Would she still be less privileged with the same upbringing? Or would she be more privileged given that there are so many government aids directed at her solely because of her race and gender in realms such as education or health? or even social? You can't blanket statement this man -- especially after JUST saying this privilege thing is situational.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:10 PM
1

See, I think /u/Mr_MRAnarchist has a specific problem with you because you dared to utter the words white privileged and express the notion that he has certain privileges over the Obama Sisiters, but FAILED to mention the privileges the Obama Sisters enjoy over him -- simply for being black. Yes, I'm not talking about economical privileges -- I'm specifically talking about privileges like Title IX or the increasing demand for women in engineering, programing, and overall STEM. The Obama Sisters …
/r/MensRights19/08/17 01:05 PM
2

Actually, this is quite false. A great deal of the black community know their specific heritage, particularly those amongst the caribbean and African communities. The notion that the opinions, experiences and struggles of black people are monolithic are brought about by the monopolization of the narrative by groups like BLM who honestly represent a fringe perspective in my opinion.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 12:37 PM
2

Lol, "ruffled your swastika" -- you're such an obvious troll.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 12:27 PM
1

Can this subreddit actually be started without being censored?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 02:21 AM
1

Really now? Is there evidence you have that you can cite?
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:36 PM
1

But you're alternative perspective was bashing -- and when you were met with someone who went against your preconceived assumptions about what MRAs are like, you quickly changed your tone -- and narrative.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:20 PM
2

While I agree with you about the state of the nuclear family in the black community, don't for one second think what has happened to the nuclear family of the black community won't happen to the nuclear family of the white community. The black community is a crystal ball for whats to come and what's already occurring in the white community.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 11:14 PM
2

How about...no? Shut up.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:34 PM
23

It's all apart of the modern progressive white women's MO. White women claim oppression and victimhood through the identity of women. They do so by constantly sacrificing their while male counterparts(fathers, brothers, sons, etc) as emblematic for all things evil on this planet.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 09:08 PM
8

You really sound like an idiot, and I mean this in the kindest way. You are misguided, and ill informed. You've constructed a world view where all things bad equates to men for you, and everything good equates to women. I wager this doesn't startle you, but your naive line of thinking is not healthy.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 03:43 PM
1

Yeah, and I assume you're of the notion that classifying what I said as hypocrisy is not "harping". We don't deem any separation necessary or appropriate. That's why we're having this discourse. Give everyone a private space or don't. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:38 PM
1

Point it out. My statement was merely one of objectivity. No where did I negate the abilities of women or their accomplishments. Just merely referenced history as an example of the conveyance of male ingenuity all the while embellishing a bit in an effort to convey how ridiculous all of this is. You see, you harp on my comment about male superiority, but fail to see how this screening wreaks of female superiority, placating, and special privilege. The mere notion that women somehow need an all w…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:21 PM
1

JebberJabber doesn't understand that what MLK went up against starts with small and benign occurrences like theses. But of course they'd be devoid of such a notion. I wager one devoid of this notion is one who holds the "historical oppression of women" in the same regard of the persecution blacks went through historically in the west.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:45 AM
1

I find quite ironic that you're here lecturing us about what women had to go through historically while simultaneously condoning the very same sentiment that fueled what they had to go through historically now that it's applied in a different direction. I agree with the post above. If this is allowed, then lets just release the limiters on it and allow everyone and anyone to exclude. I mean, women aren't the only ones who want to enjoy things in places that exclude people who do not share the sa…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:38 AM
3

That's incorrect. The majority of gender neutral bathrooms in the states used to be mens room. and guess what, women's rooms have been left untouched for the most part. Most places now have a gender neutral restroom and a women's rest room. Guess women are more equal than some, huh
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:28 AM
6

This is certainly what oppression looks like. or rather, a resemblance that leads to one big slippery slope. You can't spend decades nagging men to enter THEIR spaces, finally do so, but still advocate the need for places that exclude men for yourself. I.E advocating for gender neutral bathrooms, but unwilling to give up their spaces. I.E advocating against men's groups on campuses, while advocating for all other groups. The list goes on of circumstances of segregation and discrimination that ha…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 11:26 AM
2

You haven't concluded your exchange with /u/DevilishRogue.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 07:52 PM
2

It's troubling to say the least. Are you familiar with Jordan Peterson? The discourse you promote is within his realm as well. He's essentially been embroiled in all of this stew in Canada and serves as another example of someone who at the very least can tell which direction the wind is blowing.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:47 PM
5

As an african american, this is discouraging. With the rise of progressivism, sentiments made by people like this are seemingly taken as a sentiment that is held by the entire group.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:44 PM
0

If there's anyone on this sub who has their finger on the pulse of things and knows how to articulate it so well, it's more than likely you, Citizen. I'd wager you have a very objective understanding of history(non-centrist) and the human condition.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:35 PM
1

Which sounds like excuses for murder.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 12:34 PM
16

The poster said we need to address issues that affect men and boys. That other user responded with "there are none of those left" implying there are no issues that affect men and boys.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 07:32 PM
11

keyword, previously. Once she began to learn and become aware of the actual reality of things, she dropped the label like a bad cold.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 01:35 PM
3

Organize. Honestly, just organize. Organize a group of men who feel the same way in your state, and just use the women's bathroom. Go in groups. Take your time. and if anyone says anything, send them into a spiral.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 01:27 PM
1

You don't oppose the advancement and care of men, but you're not really an important feminist. You're just a feminist on reddit who seems to be ignorant of feminism's origins and it's philosophical underpinnings. I'm not concern with your personal beliefs, i'm concerned with ideology you subscribe to.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 12:13 PM
1

Who cares if she did or not. Is he not a human? Does he not live on planet earth? Can he not occupy space without having the cops called on him?
/r/MensRights15/05/17 10:42 PM
0

Honestly, I see nothing wrong with what you did, and I'm saddened with the comments in this thread. It really shows that some people here are a bit gynocentric.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:51 PM
1

He was parking in a lot overnight for a job he had in the morning. Shut up, you imbecile.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:47 PM
9

or their freaking turds, cmon man. have some respeck'.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 03:04 PM
3

Well, no. But you can put them on the registry and subject their reputation to mud. I think THIS is what needs to be done. If we're not going to throw the book at them, then we need to create a registry that irrevocably affects their reputation. It needs to affect all the things being on the registry affects.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:52 PM
0

How is her mother curbing her sexuality to be a prude mean that her mother is an enforcer for an organization that is male dominated with its purpose to shape girls personalities for the desires of men? Do you hear yourself right now? Men desire prudes? See this is the issue with the whole Patriarchy theory. It absolves. It gives people like you a go to thought so you don't have to exert yourself critically thinking. Sounds like the mother was projecting the spirit and energy of the devouring mo…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:43 PM
1

Like who? Is there a majority of shoplifters that shop lifts for thrills? I
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:21 PM
1

How about NO?
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:18 PM
1

Dude, really. Get a life. You're not cool cause you can come here and take a shot at young boys.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:16 PM
2

Dude, I can do one search and find a ton of false accusations reported by the media that was posted on this sub. You probably still think " false accusations are raaaare!". Useful idiot.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 01:14 PM
26

White women are exempt from the original sin of "white privilege" by sacrificing and then making their white brothers emblematic for all the ills in the world.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 03:03 PM
7

I'm not quite sure. Whenever I ask feminist why they subscribe to an ideology that fundamentally opposes the advancement and care of men even though they claim to be for equality, i just get pointed to buzzwords like "historically oppressed" or "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:39 PM
3

What support would you want to see from the women in your life? I hear from almost every women in my life how men should be more expressive with their emotions. It would be nice to have this sentiments be actually true. Most of the time, when this is said, it typically means "emote like me" or rather "emote like a woman because that's appropriate". Whenever I'm expressive with any emotion, and express it my way as oppose to crying or "talking about it", I'm treated as dangerous even though physi…
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:38 PM
9

Because, even if you don't know it, you subscribe to an ideology that fundamentally opposes the advancement and care of men.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:23 PM
1

Person is probably a white women.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 02:19 PM
2

Of course you do. /s
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:29 PM
2

BECAUSE WE ARE NOT CONCERN WITH FIXING THE ISSUES, ONLY CONCERNED WITH VIRTUE SIGNALLING AND THE MORAL SUPERIORITY THAT COMES WITH IT!!!11!!
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:22 PM
3

Just one question. Why do you believe that MRM is a backlash to feminism? Why do you think this is bad? Why did you classify said backlash as a "movement bred from fear of change"
/r/MensRights10/05/17 12:01 PM
3

Well if that advocacy group for cancer patients lobbied to thwart funding for alzheimer patients, I'd say so. Which is the case for feminist with many MRA issues.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:55 AM
3

Well men being viewed more competent than women isn't the fault of men. It's not a special privilege that was given to men, but rather earned by men. What do you expect a society to think unconsciously think when the culture develops a safety net so big for women, no other group has anything comparable. Really, think about all the legislation and resources with the sole purpose of helping women and making sure they succeed or fulfill their desires. Socially, what kind of thinking you think that …
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:53 AM
4

Then feminism isn't an equality movement and is strictly a movement seeking special advantages. Phew, glad we can agree on something.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:45 AM
2

Definitely would love to pick your brain some more and see if you have some reading material. Expect a pm from me.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 04:35 PM
6

Bravo. This is coming from a black male -- i have never witnessed the times we are in more accurately articulated than it was in your comment. Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/05/17 01:52 AM
3

I'd actually argue the coffee shop feminist is just as bad since they enable the extremist.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:34 PM
2

THINX is a feminist company. They have the same campaign running on NYC metro. Interesting nugget, the owner of this brand who is a feminist woman was recently accused by her employees of lewd acts, amongst other things. Things like unwanted groping and her answering video conferences naked were mentioned.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:28 PM
2

You must be daft. Yes I believe those things but that doesn't make me a feminist; it makes me a human being. I don't subscribe to feminism nor will I ever subscribe to feminism. As a black male, what substance would I find in an ideaology that was fostered and cultivated by privileged white women who had nothing better to do with the their time but scream oppression through the identity of woman? I'll pass. I'm a MRA AND a WRA. I don't need an ideological machine behind me to state this.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 10:00 PM
1

Also, if you want to know the rights that women enjoy in the west that men have yet to enjoy, I suggest you do some research before you get on your virtue horse and start lecturing people. You can start here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/34qhvx/7_more_legal_rights_women_have_that_men_dont/?st=j2btwbba&sh=8593c22f
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:42 PM
1

None of what you said held an ounce of substance. all you did was irrelevantly lecture me. Feminism is not important, women are. Feminism didn't obtain the right to vote for women, women did. Feminism didn't secure the right for women to enter the workplace, EVERYDAY WOMEN DID. Feminism is just a stupid left-wing ideaology with philosophical underpinnings in Marxist Theory and Post-Modernism. It's hardly done anything. Women have done it. Everyday women. Women of the civil rights movement made s…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:34 PM
3

Is there anyway to combat this from happening? Like a counter petition?
/r/MensRights04/05/17 09:12 PM
1

I had pretty much the same conversation with this person -- the user pretty much either talks in circles or pass you in an effort to refrain from conceding that in this society, we have different standards, rights, and responsibilities for men and women as it pertains to reproduction. He asserts that the rights and responsibility are equal, but never proves it. You are not at fault for the discourse abruptly ending, he just had nothing left after you exposed gaps in his thinking when you shed li…
/r/MensRights04/05/17 04:08 PM
1

None of the sources you cited refuted any of my claims. And that "debunking" was soundly picked apart in this very thread. You seem quite determined to talk pass people, which is why i just wanted to leave you to your very narrow views. There's plenty of evidence and experiences here in this sub to support my very benign, but true, claims. You can run to the roof of your building and yell out that i'm wrong at the top of your lungs, but it doesn't change the reality of things. Quite the contrary…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 03:02 AM
1

You're intellectually dishonest by stating that. Especially when one considers that women more often are deemed the primary caregivers or considers things like the tender years -- custody has always been in high rates among women. Gee, I wonder if that's the case, who in turn is paying child support? Fathers. Options of women who don't want to be parents: Abortion. Adoption/Safe Haven. Options for men who don't want to be parents: Can you list them? You are arguing with a reality that does not e…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 02:08 AM
1

Yeah. This is why i didn't want to continue this exchange further. I knew you'd talk past me instead of looking at the gaps in your thinking. Let's walk this back slowly. The link you posted didn't refute my claim, but you did do a pretty good job framing it like it did. The major distinction in that link is CUSTODIAL PARENT, which is typically the mom. A father can't surrender his parental and financial obligations through safe haven because he'd effectively need the permission of the mother un…
/r/MensRights02/05/17 01:10 AM
1

Except that, a mother with an alive child can surrender parentally through means of adoption or safe haven; whereas a father cannot and is directly tied to her decisions. There is a double standard. Until there's an option for Fathers to surrender their parental rights and financial obligation, women and men do not have the same rights and responsibilities when it comes to reproduction or even living children.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 12:51 AM
1

There isn't much to respond to, frankly. It's been established in our previous exchange that you hold different sets of standards for men than you hold for women; I believe they call it a double standard.
/r/MensRights02/05/17 12:45 AM
1

It's honestly just a liberal buzzword that all sectors of the left loves to level without really understanding the meaning of the word or even the claim being made.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:27 PM
3

How about you actively do something to make that movement better since you're so eager for others to accept it. You've been given proof as to why a lot of MRAs don't mesh well with feminist, yet all you have to say is thank you for the links, those people are doing no good for the feminist movement. And this after you complained about a generalization earlier in the thread. How about this, if you don't want feminist to be generalized, how about YOU, a "true" feminist, do something to combat the …
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:26 PM
2

Whenever feminist tries this, just switch up the words on her by saying things like, "oh would you disregard issues facing the black community because they're majorityly killing each other?" and then call her an alt-right racist pig. it'll expose the gap in thinking.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:14 PM
3

Jordan Peterson just did a good talk on this. It was about the devouring mother.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:06 PM
3

Wow, I've read most of your comments in this thread and if this feminism's best example of a "true feminist"; i'm glad i don't subscribe to such an ideaology. Your ideology is parasitic as evident with your attempts to appropriate the term egalitarian. i will never be a feminist and it's funny that you actually think it's an ideology for women's rights.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:01 PM
5

Name a few legal responsibilities women have in western society. Once you do this, name one right that western males have that western females do not enjoy, because I can name up to 5 right western females enjoy that western males have yet to enjoy. Historically, women in the west actively agitate and advocate for the same rights as men, but always neglect advocating for the responsibility that allows those rights to be enjoyed. One example that comes up is the right to vote. Female suffrage was…
/r/MensRights01/05/17 11:54 AM
13

Big difference is that feminism is always trying to equate itself to equality. I've heard people respond to the question of defining feminism as "literally equality". When a movement whose entire schtick is riding on this, you think you'd see more agitation and advocating for males.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 11:44 AM
3

I expected as much. People typically don't realize their double standards or gaps in thinking. Would you force a pregnant woman to carry a child to term that she didn't want? You'd force her to be a parent even if she didn't want to be? If not, can't the same be afforded to men who don't want to be parents? Why is this so difficult to grasp?
/r/MensRights29/04/17 05:57 PM
3

Being forced to bring a child you got impreganated with to term. Truly the civil rights issue of our time. See what i did there? I exposed a gap in your thinking.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 01:43 PM
3

It's exactly what passes off as american education. Black male here, and Oz's perspective on history is a common one here in America. Especially liberal states. It's seemingly being taught and believed that white men are the overlords of history being the only group to do bad things.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 01:30 PM
1

Ay fool, you own this subreddit? Oh, you dont? Well shut yo concern troll ass up. We don't care how you think we should go about our daily postings. if it's so bad to you, how about you become the change you wish to see and start offering threads of substance as oppose to this bs thread that's nothing but finger wagging disapproval.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:22 PM
1

Convenient that you can't prove a claim you asserted.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 12:13 PM
2

Well, that's where you went wrong. Most men's PoVs are often informed by logic and empirical data.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 12:31 PM
3

well, our men are either locked up, being gunned down by police or even themselves, failing in every section of education, checked out of society or poor, etc etc. There are many things that hamper the black male. No, I am not a father.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 02:33 PM
3

Well, here's what I believe. After the triumphs of the civil rights movement, the black community was on it's way to experiencing a time of unity and progression, especially as it pertains to the family and the social realm. The wrench that was thrown into those plans came in the form of Gloria Steinem and Feminism. Essentially, feminist leaders at the time including steinem who was the head of Ms. Magazine at the time(magazine was funded by members of the CIA) sold minority women, black women s…
/r/MensRights23/04/17 01:46 PM
1

There was no problem except for what you perceived. Someone made a comment about a concern troll and you characterized it as a person telling you to leave because they disagree with your opinions, to which I came in and explained to you what a concern troll actually is.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 09:09 PM
1

I just told you what we consider a troll and someone disagreeing with me wasn't in that description. Lol, I don't think there's anything to disagree with when it comes to the OP, so fiddle with that straw man?
/r/MensRights22/04/17 09:03 PM
1

He's saying anyone who has enough time to waste to come here and concern troll in hopes of cherry picking one inappropriate comment that can then be extrapolated to be emblematic for all MRA's POV and opinions should just leave because their time would be suited best elsewhere
/r/MensRights22/04/17 08:53 PM
8

My generation of boys(Generation Y and later), are the boys that were raised by single mothers. Especially being a black male, i grew up in a community that was essentially headed by single mothers and devoid of fathers. With that experience in the forefront of my memory, I'd choose two adoptive parents over a single mother 10 times out of 10. What i would give to be taught how important i was as a man growing up or how to facilitate and hone my abilities as a man instead of just getting a manua…
/r/MensRights22/04/17 02:35 PM
2

Maybe once you develop an opinion that's worth devaluing, I'll consider it. 'Till then, you should probably consider leaving people to their discourse if you have nothing of value to offer. Shaming and then invalidating people's gripes and concerns isn't the way to conduct civil or even intellectual discourse. If you can't realize that invading conversations YOU don't agree with just to offer a " hur hur, wimps. no relevancy to men's rights", then you're far from reasoning with.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 03:53 PM
2

It doesn't speak to YOU as men's rights, but again, here you are passing off your opinion as a means to police because you don't like that these people consider this relevant to men's rights. This is the men's right subreddit, not the Liv47 subreddit. just because YOU believe there's no relevancy to men's right here doesn't mean it's a fact. Actually, furthest thing away from it. It's relevant to men's rights because it highlights a double standard and precautionary provisions that are being giv…
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:52 PM
4

you're expecting too much of western women. Western women actively advocate not to be treated like adults through feminism.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 01:41 PM
3

Man. Western Women must be really entrenched in that victimology. everything that deters women from doing anything can just be blamed on men. You can literally find studies dedicated to absolving women of responsibility of their shortcomings and relocate that and the blame onto men. It would honestly be a breath of fresh air to hear the actual reality as to why women give up on things and not just the finger point to men. Man. I wish we could do that. You know how useful it would be as a man if …
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:23 PM
0

Dude. Stop characterizing you coming here and scolding people because they're not having discourse the way YOU would like it an OPINION. It's not an opinion. You hardly ever give an opinion. Instead, you just complain about how these people are engaging in their discourse and finger wag in their faces like "man up". This is not an opinion. This is you policing. Please. What you do is hardly dissent and is more like derailing. I'd be more apt to agree with you if you added anything of substance t…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 12:10 PM
4

Which brings me back to my first comment ---- You've been living under a rock.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:11 PM
1

So you're basically here to police how people vent their frustrations about male sexuality being seen as pathological and predatory? You're upset with the confusion as to why male sexuality is labeled this way while female sexuality isn't and has been liberated to boot? You don't agree with the pursuit of changing these standards? Are you not a supporter of discourse in manners like these to sort it out? What are your suggestions? Please tell us how we should convey our frustration that is align…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:10 PM
2

Well, technically it has. Prior to it being challegened, your perspective was devoid of the notion and understanding that women typically date up. It took Mey and I to challenge your perspective with research, to which you adjusted. Hey man, i'm not slighting you. you can melt the bravado now.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 03:02 PM
4

Hey, i thoroughly enjoy being sassy -- thank you very much. But no, all jokes aside, i thought it was common knowledge. It's where terms like "women choose, men pursue" come from.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:59 PM
3

Thanks for the reply, Mey.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:54 PM
2

I love your replies when your perspective has been challenged and adjusted.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:53 PM
1

Why are you so peeeved by people venting their frustrations about double standards?
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:52 PM
3

By evolutionary psychologist, and for quite sometime. Perhaps you've been under a rock? Here's a few: http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/denisiuk.html http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/228878.php(http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/879760 - i believe this article cover that study.) Granted, with the recent rise of women entering the work force, another thing women look for in a mate is father qualities or kindness, and these things are reaching parity with things like wealth and ability…
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:44 PM
3

Well it's been proven that's how women select partners. Equal or higher on socioeconomic status. Many studies have show that women typically date across(on their level) and up the social ladder while men typical date down. This isn't revelation.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:14 PM
3

Well now, hold on. Let's not go tarring him with that brush before we've entertained the discourse. I think what he's saying has some validity. In society, we hardly ever tar women with the black brush of cowardice. Women in fact can't be seen as cowards in the eyes society, and i believe, in my opinion of course, that has a lot to do with the concept of honor not being a central concept amongst women. Men are typically socialize with some code or honor system that often informs their character …
/r/MensRights15/04/17 02:10 PM
3

Even I don't agree that the two issues she picked are a result of "toxic masculinity"
/r/MensRights14/04/17 10:55 AM
7

yeah we'll go with your assessment /s
/r/MensRights11/04/17 07:42 PM
4

and you're desperate to derail. lol. your gaps have been exposed. you can make the assertions you want about me, but i just really wanted to dig a little deeper in the way you view these things. I love how when pressed, you devolved into "well, it doesn't matter how much gay men suffer in comparison to lesbians, all hate crimes are bad" -- well, duh. but we're talking specifically about this concentration camp. at any rate, have fun derailing.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 07:38 PM
7

So, again. You're stating that since team killing occurs, we're not allowed to discussed issues that affect the gender because since the other team aren't the ones killing us, it's not gender discrimination. If this is not gender discrimination, why isn't the concentration camp riddled with lesbian occupants? isn't lesbianism homosexuality? so why just gay men? It's because men are held to a different standard in that culture and therefor subjected to different and much harsher punishment on the…
/r/MensRights11/04/17 07:34 PM
8

That's based on your warp assessment, but this assessment is far from reality. If it was sexual orientation that was being targeted, then surely lesbians would suffer the brunt of it as well, but alas, this is not reality too. It's gender discrimination because we treat homosexual men differently from homosexual women. Gay men have become emblematic for the stigma that surrounds homosexuality, while gay women are actually romantized and fetishized through the tune of "lesbianism". Sorry, gender …
/r/MensRights11/04/17 07:26 PM
6

I have strong feeling that the gaps in your thinking when it comes to stuff like this has been exposed. I didn't know the world was split between two teams, men and women, and that "team killing" negates genuine complaints. You people amaze me.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 07:18 PM
2

Are you saying it's okay to slap someone? Maybe if we deal with the start, it won't get to the end -- ever think about that? Realize the gaps in your thinking at the moment. You're trying to move the goal posts by addressing only one end of the problem, when you have to address all of it. Once again, I urge you to open your mind.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 01:41 AM
2

http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020 This study explains gender symmetry in DV. Sorry, but the times where the study of women's culpability in DV endures a thorough thwarting are over. We now can see, factually and statistically, that it's NOT a gendered issue affecting only women but rather a issue that grip anyone even children. Here's another one for good measure: https://web.csulb.edu/%7Emfiebert/assault.htm Open your mind.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 08:44 PM
2

Feminism is anti men. Let's run an experiment here and now. That's true. Feminism would like to see gender equality, including paternity leave and unbiased visitation rights and parental responsibility. Just because it's called feminism doesn't mean that feminists are anti-men. Oddly though, MRAs on this subreddit seem very anti-woman. Not all MRAs, but those on this subreddit at least. Alright, can you find me a feminist organization that has advocated and lobbied for default shared custody in …
/r/MensRights10/04/17 12:37 PM
2

He's saying that your premise that feminism is what got women the right to vote and work is incorrect and false. Stop creating straw men to pick at.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 02:28 PM
2

yoooo feminist think they're clever by naming the things they engage in and then characterizing it as something males do by creating a trendy buzzword. Y'all ain't low -- I see y'all.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:33 PM
1

Custodian Parents should not have disposable cash, let's refrain from implying that it's the payer parent's resonsbility as well. I agree with an itemized receipt detailing every purchase with the payer parent's payments. payer parents responsibility is solely to the child, not to the custodian parent. If the custodian parent wants disposable resources for frivorlous and self centered endeavors, said parent must work for it themselves. Once again, it's not the payer parent's reponsibility to sub…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 01:17 PM
3

CONSUMER GOODS not ESSENTIALS
/r/MensRights01/04/17 01:03 PM
7

He doesn't have one. Just showing off his bigotry and sexism.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:52 PM
1

Sounds like someone's sour that trans people are getting the spot light in their movement and that their intellectual laziness is coming back to bite them in the rear. Oh, and blaming "liberal men" for it.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:48 PM
6

Well being critical of feminism is essential precisely cause a lot of it's thoughts and theories casts the male role in an irremovable position of "oppressor"(or as i like to put it; "the boogieman"). Things like the Duluth Model and the ever expanding definition and/or identity of "Patriarchy" need to bare scrunity as they are not adequate lenses of examination for Western Society. They're misnreprenstations of reality, to put it bluntly. A more nuanced and objective examination of society is i…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:35 PM
11

You don't believe there's a social war against white men? and this coming from a black dude.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:01 PM
1

A very fine day would be the extinction of parasitic intellectuals like yourself who only know what's fed to them and what they subscribe to in pursuit of masking their intellectual short comings. But of course, you keep thinking that you have anything of merit to offer the discourse, such as sports being a male priviledge, you parasite.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:48 PM
1

Honestly, don't bother with /u/uyoos2uyoos2. He thinks sports are male priviledge and honestly talks in circles despite reality being right in front of them -- talk about mental gymnastics. He also thinks there isn't much difference between male and female biologically and glosses over things like body mechanics. Just leave him in his narrow world view.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 09:54 PM
3

But all of the sub groups you mentioned ARE BOYS. The cisgendered boy doesn't want to change infront of a bio-female who says she's a boy. There's a difference.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:51 AM
13

Dude. This is huge. The THINX campaign has been all over NYC subways. She'll forever be a sexual harasser for me now cause i have to listen and believe.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:31 AM
3

Not to mention this person thinks sports is male privilege lmao.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:39 PM
5

Sports Male Priviledge y'all.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:59 PM
3

Please explain to me how the structures and modes of society are likely to favor someone like me, a black male, than, let's say, a white female?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:54 PM
4

Seriously. Don't even bother. This person has yet to cite any statistics for us to debunk and has instead relied on buzzwords to get her argument across.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:52 PM
5

You suggested two propaganda pieces , so that honestly tells me all that i need to know about where this conversation is heading. We don't have "a patriarchal society" and it's not an effective lens of examination and criticism of society. Since the definition of patriarchy is ever changing amongst feminist, why don't you give me yours, and i'll debunk here for you. Documentaries you suggested pedal the notorious stat of 1 in 4 on campus, a statistic that has been debunked by Christina Hoffman S…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:19 PM
2

Well, there's nothing to provide sources on as these are just theories. Actually, since you're so eager -- you said patriarchy has been "backed up", right? How so? How is rape culture backed up as well while you're at. Do you have sources proving patriarchy is real? Do you have sources proving rape culture(for women) is real?
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:56 PM
5

The theory of patriarchy. The theory of Toxic Masculinity. The theory of rape culture. The appropriation of intersectionality. The Duluth theory cased in the Domestic Violence. These are just a few, but each theory is a misrepresentation/mischaracrerization of reality.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:47 PM
4

Feminism is oppressive to both men and women because of the thoughts and theories it promotes. Not only are most of it's thoughts and theories misrepresentation of reality but they are exceedingly divisive and unhealthy for culture.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:24 PM
2

Nah. That won't happen because of what alimony is historically. I feel like that's one thing men won't allow a narrative to form around.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:14 PM
1

I've been telling people of this sub that, historically, we already have the tools to discredit things like trying to remove due process in college campuses. Historically, we can literally show what it was like when we listened and believed as it pertains to black men and white women.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 12:07 PM
13

Nah. I agree with last half of your comment. We shouldn't be against it because of explicitly that. The more female breadwinners go through this, the quicker it gets done away with.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:59 AM
2

Wow some of these comments are sooo backwards. As long as your okay with a middle aged man seducing a 14 year old girl, and then screwing her; i guess you can your stance is across the board.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 11:32 AM
2

Lol, and you think this is good on your part? Are you a child? And who said we were arguing? i've already dismissed(rightfully) your opinions as misinformed and invalid to the discourse. To which you answered with internet meme. Love how you're now trying to reference Dr. Strange since you've been categorically decimated and made to understand how much a fool you are. =D
/r/MensRights22/03/17 10:12 PM
5

Yes. Both are unconsenting agents. We're not here to be debate which one is more gruesome. You are, it seems. The fact of the matter is, in both scenarios, there are unconsenting babies.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:22 PM
2

Absolutely. Your opinion offers nothing valuable or substantial to this discourse. So yes, you will be told you're an idiot and you will be told to exit the discourse -- and no internet meme will change your shortcomings.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:20 PM
2

Says the user who compared anti-circ to HAES as a means to refute our supposed position on health benefits, when the actual argument is about whether or not it's okay to pedaling this procedure on unconsenting babies. For some reason, I doubt you'll be able to comprehend the above as you've shown some serious gaps in your thinking. Please, just remove yourself from this discourse cause you absolutely do not know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:01 PM
6

Honestly, if you think our examples are outrageous, you haven't done enough research on this subject to be even talking about. Your opinions isn't valid at all and you've displayed ignorance many times during this dialogue.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:54 PM
1

Yes, yes indeed. But creating straw men as analogies is indeed the mark of a naive child with a narrow world view. can't win em' all, kiddo.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:48 PM
5

Talking specifically in the case of Rabbi. But of course you'd nit pick at the doctor since it supports your narrative. I don't even think you even have much understanding with this issue for me to even consider your opinion worthy in this discourse, let alone valid. With that said -- metzitzah b'peh
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:46 PM
2

You betcha. and here I am telling -- child, you iz crazy. But in all seriousness, you really sound dumb.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:29 PM
6

Narrative? So advocating for unconsenting baby boys is a narrative? You sound absolutely absurd. Especially never citing or linking to your research that supports your uneducated opinion.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:27 PM
4

No dude, lol. You just sound supremely dumb. You're analogies and logic are way off base.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:19 PM
3

It's not a proven health benefit.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:16 PM
5

I mean, without a consenting individual, what's that under the law if a doctor/rabbi puts a baby dick in his mouth? Cmon. Stop acting like you guys wouldn't be clamoring if we had people cutting off parts of the clitoris on baby girls and then sucking that region to stop the bleeding.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:08 PM
37

None of that matters, to be honest. When we're talking unnecessary cosmetic procedures on INFANTS, please don't bring up cosmetic procedures on ADULTS -- you know, the consenting, fully evolved form of an infant.
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:03 PM
1

Dude. I don't care about the initial claim. It has nothing to do with me. I didn't make it. If you want to jerk yourself off in victory because you rebutted a claim on the internet, by all means do so. I mainly wanted to vet your claim and see if it were a norm or outlier.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 09:55 PM
1

or you're preventing me from vetting your claim and ultimately finding out that it's an outlier and not a norm.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 06:26 PM
7

Hardly any females were hung? Mostly whites females initiating hanging with false accusation.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:29 PM
2

Lmaoooo. So you presented your anecdotal evidence as some sort of truth that dismantle what the lead comment said, when it actuality, it's an outlier experience(i.e, Christian based Shelter not government). I don't think your experience is common enough.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:05 PM
1

Because /u/rouseco knows you're real closing to proving her "facts" and revealing that they're nothing more than outlier experience, or as everyone has been saying -- anecdotal.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:02 PM
2

Do you have a similar article that discusses the options for single men in that area? As well as statistics for single women who are homeless and single men who are homeless?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:59 AM
2

Actually. you're incorrect. Nevermind that you misrepresent how feminist truly support the liberation of gender roles, but you also displayed the ignorance most feminist who peddle the meme of "oh i care and actively support men being emotional and crying" have-- you apparently think that men in large part deal with their emotions and convey/express their emotions in the same way women do, when that's furthest from the case. What you're doing with your little feminist friends is called paying li…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 03:28 PM
1

Your partner must be one lucky person.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/17 03:17 PM
6

Here's a perfect example of why they use boogieman terms like "trolls", "alt-right", or "white males". Comment from the article: I’m conflicted. On the one hand, I’m 100% on her side and 100% opposed to the alt-right. On the other hand, her special was not good. I’m a fan of her show, and I liked her movie a lot, and I liked her previous special, but this one sucked, frankly. Even when this poor soul knows the special was trash, she is still forced to deliberate through her prescribe idealogies …
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:05 PM
1

This just further proves that your incorrect. lol.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:52 PM
1

Driving with a suspended license make its 100% her fault. You are wrong.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:50 PM
2

Can I have to school's information? lol. I don't mind pushing buttons.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 12:18 PM
1

Men are emotional. It's just the ways men emote have largely been cut down, and now we're being told we need to emote like women or we're monsters in waiting. Honestly, what it all boils down to is controlling the molds that a man can fit in. Which is why you often hear that men need to cry more(basically "emote more like women!").
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:40 AM
2

DO NOT GET DERAILED BY THE "GLASS CEILING" ARGUMENT. Feminist are catching on that pay gap is being disproven more and more in the mainstream, so to combat this, they've adopted a new theory in which they can filter the myth of the pay gap through and that theory is the glass ceiling. Make sure if that comes up, you lay the burden of proof on your opponent.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:18 AM
1

That makes you dangerous. I think this is the biggest problem i have with Marxist.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 12:09 AM
2

Yes, and then many modern white feminist appropriated the idea as a means to monopolize minority women voices and issues under themselves. It doesn't matter what Ms. Crenshaw intended for this to be, it only matters what it is doing now -- which is essentially serving as white women's tool to keep their voices at the top of the food chain.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:46 PM
4

Marching should be reserved for legitimate issues that hamper a society. It's a resource in which awareness can be brought to issues that often are not spotlighted or highlighted. No, i don't believe women of the west are oppressed in any way, and where they are disadvantaged is not the fault of the entire male population of the west consciously or unconsciously. This is my point. There's a difference between marching for abortion rights and marching because you believe western women as a whole,…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 11:34 PM
8

Like the other one, you're fundamentally missing the point. An anti-war march is sure to be diverse; men and women alike. The sentiment anti-war is a sentiment against the ESTABLISHMENT. Now onto the women's march, here's why i think you and devinejoh are talking to straw men -- the women's march is a march celebrating woman and how far they've come but also how much further they have to go. The premise of the march is that women, let's not forget the distinction of western women, are disadvanta…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 10:30 PM
1

And why is that bad in a society that believes women can do no wrong? in a society that believes women are so good that we actually entertain the idea of making female prisons more therapeutic. Honestly. if this bugs you, then leave. It's that simple. if you can't take seeing woman in horrible light majority of the time, then you need to go back to the real world where men are more often portrayed in a horrible light. You need to understand that for some users, this place is an escape from that …
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:51 PM
9

Keep fighting those straw men. Yeah, you must be a white woman.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:38 PM
7

Definitely will extend that courtesy to intellectually sound individuals. I guess you can figure out where that leaves you.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:37 PM
6

clever. take your L and smoke it my friend. you don't look any better not properly explaining your position.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:25 PM
2

Oh, excuse me. I thought your position was respect doesn't need to be earned. My apologies.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:21 PM
10

Lmao. says the guy who sitting here literally trying say a minority marching for their rights is the same as an INSULATED MAJORITY marching for theirs. Again, i say to you my friend; there is straw in your hair from all the tussling with that straw man.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:18 PM
4

But even in your example, that person earned your respect by exhibiting respectable traits and attributes.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:13 PM
5

I actually know this person. This person makers her money by what we call a "thirst-trap". She's one of those girls who uses sensualism, fitness, and yoga to sell sex. She has an invested stake in changing the definition of respect. People have to understand that men and woman work on different codes. What's respect to a man, isn't respect to a woman.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 02:12 PM
5

Honestly, the evil white male stereotype can be attributed to white women. specifically white women like Lena. by creating the evil white male meme, white women as a group were able to weasel there way into victimhood through the identity of woman. Essentially sacrificed the white male identity by making it emblematic for the boogieman.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:54 PM
19

More like a call for actual equality.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:51 PM
1

You have statistics on how many of those woman went through training with the required score to be on the front lines? or do you just like painting history as the menz oppressing to wyminz by keeping them safe?
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:45 PM
16

i didn't know gay people made up HALF OF THE POPULATION. Bro, you're over there talking to a strawman.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:21 PM
4

Because there are intellectual sheep hurders who prey on the weak. Those aren't "individuals", those are sheep. likely with a very narrow world view of the world, thinking things like "white women are oppressed because they're women" or "you can't be sexist to a man and there's no institutional sexism that men face." That's why discussing the head of the snake's motives matter.
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:19 PM
25

Actually. You're so far from right that you didn't realize the smug on your face. Yes, homelessness is a male issue. Let me guess, you're a white women aren't you?
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:11 PM
20

honestly, so what if we're mad that women are marching. you know what, that's the damned point. A privilege group of people marching for more privileges under the guise that they're oppressed when others who are literally suffering beneath them at the hands of oppression can't even get a leg up for their voices to be heard and their issues to be fleshed out should be absolutely criminal. To make matters worst, this women march bs is always led by white women. the most privileged and protected gr…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 01:09 PM
1

Lol, MAN! I love how you think women are some puppets that can only be acted upon and don't have brains to think for themselves. Well done.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 03:33 AM
2

Picking and choosing to fit your answer; he said all the liberals HE knew. Like someone so eloquently put it already, i'm sure he doesn't know all liberals.
/r/MensRights08/03/17 01:01 PM
1

He certainly can't. To busy leveling unfounded claims and cherry picking parts of the situation to construe in favor of his, once more for the back, UNFOUNDED CLAIMS.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:37 PM
-2

this is the second time i'm asking for that source. lol
/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:34 PM
5

You are correct. Before the "Tender Years", which was pushed by feminist essentially on the basis and notions that what's best for the child in their infancy is to be with the mother, the breadwinner was the default custodian because it was understood that they had the most resources to support the child. So yes, men's issues with custody battles can be attributed to feminist's efforts.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:53 PM
3

do you have a source for that statistic? would love to add to my archives.
/r/MensRights06/03/17 11:42 PM
5

Definitely think homelessness is a men's right issue. Especially considering that it disproportionately affects males in the Us, with hardly any resources to help them and a liberal led hive mentality that thinks refugees are more important than them.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 01:31 PM
1

That's exactly the case.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 02:54 PM
1

Because that wouldn't be rooted in any form objectivity thus allowing for the same kind of construing on trivial things -- the same kind that serves as a foundation for victim and grievance culture. Oppression doesn't retain it's meaning when anyone can construe a situation to "resemble" it.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 02:51 PM
4

Once you realize all feminist talking points like this are just projections, you'll never have to as questions like this one. Masculinity is so fragile is an obvious projection once you factor in the fact that many feminist were up in arms over a shirt depicting scantily cladded women or that they believe video games can make someone sexist or how triggered they get of a poster depicting a villian who happens to be male strangling a hero who happens to be female.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 10:47 PM
5

What's the story on that male only golf club?
/r/MensRights05/06/16 10:30 PM
1

are you shaming me right now for living my life the way I WANT TO? you're such a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:40 PM
1

LULZ. why u mad for? cause u wrong? relax little girl.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:28 PM
1

Yeah, a post that was forcing your opinion on others. So, you're a slut AND a hypocrite? Wow. that's a double whammy there pal.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:25 PM
1

Lmao. I love how willfully blind you are and how obviously reactive you are.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:24 PM
1

Lmao. Yeah. you're saying this to the user who originally responded to you trying to tell everyone that being a slut isn't a bad thing in a thread where majority of the comments are about why sluts are bad. who's forcing their opinion on who again? Nice straw man.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 03:40 PM
1

yes. we can. we can most certainly live the lives we want, but please don't construe this notion. I'm allowed to have my opinions; never once was it implied that sluts are made fun of by me, but kudos to your straw man. I find it very interesting that you stated you're not desperate to change my views on sluts, yet you continue in your quest to do so by passively saying /So neither of us needs to shame other people for how they want to live lol. Listen. the same way you shame creeps and stay far…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 03:33 PM
0

you can have that study. I have studies that says otherwise. Judging from your response, it seems your quite uninformed about what men consider to be a slut. Let me just say this: I don't care about your lived experiences as they do not hold any validity in my life. so please, keep that bullshit to yourself. and no, ma'am, it isn't slim pickings, but rather a nicely curated selection of partners after all the sluts have been filtered out. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:46 PM
0

Why are you so bent on changing my opinion on sluts? if you guys really don't care about the word slut or being a slut, why are you all so bent on changing people's opinions on sluts? I stay away from sluts because of the facts. who wants to be with someone who's going to be a nusance to satisfy? who wants to be with someone who is on average(statistically) unfaithful? who wants to be with someone who is on average carrying an STD? and then there's microchimerism. so no, no thanks. no sluts for …
/r/MensRights30/05/16 02:15 PM
0

Dude. shut up. Being a slut doesn't magically become ok because you said so, lmao. We'll still shame you for your very gross and very poor sexual decisions. hell, if we're following the facts, women will do it to you more than men will.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 01:14 PM
1

Please provide more info. You can PM me.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 02:00 PM
2

WHERES YOUR PROOF?
/r/MensRights21/05/16 02:37 PM
2

But this doesn't address how adamant you are in believing the notion that "males are genetically modified women", despite the evidence given to you in this thread.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:50 PM
2

You reallllly want that to be true, but it isn't. One cannot be female with out male.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 10:35 PM
3

Exactly. What the hell is demi-sexual
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:19 PM
1

Of course. Evidence can be clearly found in the infamous 1 in 5 stat that plagues campuses at the moment. A study that has been used as evidence for "rape culture" on campuses used very broad actions to define sexual assault and/or rape. Consensual Drunk Sex can now be construed as rape. Regret sex can now be construed as rape. Awkward sexual interactions between college students can now be construed as rape. The lines of rape continue to get blurred and blurred. I just don't understand why the …
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:43 PM
2

How about when it's explicitly determined that the women was lying? Like the Ghomeshi case? or Jackie Coakley? or any college sports star recently cleared? In those cases, the lying was pretty black and white. And perhaps rape rates are low because anything today can be construed as rape? and therefor creates a culture where no one really knows what the hell rape is because it can literally be anything nowadays? Maybe rape rates are low because that's one of the hardest crimes to prove?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:01 PM
4

Found the idiot.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 12:42 PM
1

I agree with a lot of what you said here. I've been using the word Heterophobia as well to counter the term heteronormativity. Living in NY, that's a big tag in queer circles. What I typically do is ignore them, and subtly remind them that with out "heteronormativity", they wouldn't exist. As long as you remember that, none of these clowns can touch you.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 11:11 PM
3

This actually has been floating around the internet for a while, so I definitely don't believe you did this.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 12:09 AM
1

You can get ticketed here in NY for it too.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 02:20 PM
1

That's exactly what they're talking about. You found the troll!
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:59 PM
2

exactly, lmao. and that's an actual wage gap.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:35 PM
9

Gaming is one of the last bastions where male spaces thrive and overall male attitudes and behavior are free to be expressed. It's all comes down to the colonization of male spaces, you couple that with the fact that gaming is a more interactive medium as media, and you get feminist targeting gaming.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 11:55 AM
1

As a fellow black male, I weep for you brother. I really hope things work out..I don't know what else to offer but my good vibes and intentions. It's not hopeless.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 10:38 PM
1

Jackie? from the UVA rape case?
/r/MensRights09/04/16 01:06 PM
3

Mirror link?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 10:51 PM
2

I totally understand on a cellular level what you're going through, lol. When your taught certain views over and over, refusal to revise and question them become embedded on a subconscious level. But when that realization hits, man, does it hit.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:36 AM
1

MensRights and Feminism are like water and oil. Feminism's thoughts and theories are wildly rooted in misconceptions and misrepresentation, whereas MensRights seems to be rooted in factual, empirical evidence and critical thinking. These two things cannot joined because on a fundamental level, they are far apart. In the guise of Feminism, no matter what, Men will always be second class citizens. As in, their issues will either be used to prop up women's issues or entirely be ignored.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:28 AM
5

Welcome to a real world view.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:20 AM
3

This happens often. They usually get their way if they cry "creep" enough.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:17 AM
3

Dude, you're digging yourself a massive hole. You're an apologist for kidnapping.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:14 AM
2

Ganna have to disagree here. If they were capable, they would be playing best of 5. Me, personally, I don't find women's tennis as interesting as men's because for literally years it's been dominated by the same woman, Serena. Men's tennis has been growing through an amazing time these past few years with the rise of the new rivals Rafa and Fed, followed by he rivalry of Novak and Nadal, then Novak firmly taking the reigns and having a nice and firm rivalry with the other three of the "Big 4". M…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:51 AM
11

You missed the point of this entirely.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:37 AM
3

Lmao, you kinda' did. By stating "lets not pretend the entire world instantly believes the woman every time", it seems like you're taking the de facto position of rape victims not being believed.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:07 PM
1

bruh. How is rape culture contextualize any other way besides this way?
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:31 AM
1

ee4m, i'd like to talk to you more about this. ganna pm you.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 11:32 PM
3

Yeah bro, why do you think majority of the homeless and bums you see out in NY are male. Don't get it twisted bro, those aren't men's shelters. Like, it's not the same facilities as a women's shelter with the admission being males only. They're homeless shelters equipped with the absolute minimum. It's nothing comparable to women's shelters.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:02 AM
0

Yeah, yeah. and you're any better? Seriously, eat a dick fuckboy.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 10:49 PM
-5

Now was that so hard? Buck up, fuckboy.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 04:28 PM
-3

You didn't answer my question, but thanks for wasting time.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:31 PM
1

What kind of question is this? Okay, ask yourself, can a woman can? If the answer is yes, than yes, a man should be able to terminate parental responsibilities. But that isn't the case, which is why this person is getting no sympathy about his story because there's literally no options for a man when it come to reproductive rights. and I swear, if you suggest "keep it in your past" or "get your tubes tied", you'll get down voted to hell
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:24 PM
-1

Cry a fucking river dude. No one cares. Tell your sister in law to "man up" and step up to her responsibility. She brought the baby to term in face of a slew of options for her to opt out of her obligations. I don't feel sorry one bit for your SIL.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:21 PM
-2

How is he wrong? Is there a go fund me page? Because i'd like the link. I agree there's a lot wrong with his comment, but for real though, who's starting a go fund me page for this guy? Is that Mens Rights of reddit? Shouldn't be going to bat for things like this instead just paying it lip service?
/r/MensRights27/03/16 02:14 PM
4

Man, how can it be sexual assault if the women is okay with it? Just call that shit rough sex or anything that fits into that category.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:26 PM
1

Yeah, you can, but don't expect it to be protected. Especially when that opinion pales in front of all the evidence.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:16 PM
2

Nah bro, you lost. Take that L and smoke it.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 12:13 PM
3

So apparently, the players she accused is guard Jordan Clarkson and forward Nick Young. She apparently posted pictures on instagram that went viral claiming to the two leveled lewd gestures at her and her mother and that it was sexual harassment. She posted the photo prefacing it by saying she didn't know who the men were that she had just photograph, which was a lie, since she follows and was following Jordan Clarkson prior to events. Since then, the Lakers and NBA has offered to meet with her …
/r/MensRights23/03/16 12:35 PM
1

It takes a village to raise a child.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 01:07 AM
0

hey ee4m, can you pm me that paper when you find it? the one on post modernism and neoliberalism.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter