TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

speedisavirus Archive

View 1 posts and 799 comments by speedisavirus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm honestly not sure how they knew. He had a small entourage with him. At least one appeared to be security because when Sinbad got tired of their shit he stepped in and blocked their access to him. It's possible these young people are watching "retro" shows. His sitcom might still be on BET or something late at night.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 06:57 PM
1

Maybe 2 years ago. He had done a show somewhere in Baltimore and went bar hopping afterwards. Stumbled in the bar I was at.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:57 PM
5

The more autonomous equipment usually means soldiers get to carry more equipment and strength becomes more important.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:55 AM
2

Sinbad walked into a bar was at and they flocked to him. And that's just Sinbad. Doubt they were even born yet when he had a career
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:39 AM
2

Because it would be boring as fuck
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:49 AM
7

I'm guessing you don't go to school in California. You would probably be banned from campus for this...
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:00 AM
25

It's the norm
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:59 AM
1

They are gendered versions of the same word though.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 02:10 PM
14

They really aren't though. They are essentially the gendered versions of the same word. The gender neutral would probably be something like "spousey"
/r/MensRights12/07/17 02:08 PM
6

In some Western nations it's now illegal to say mean words. Often countries with insanely feminist policies at a government level. There's actually a chance however small that wifey could get you in trouble. At least some day if their freedom of speech keeps getting eroded.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 02:05 PM
1

Uh, sorry, but anyone that took linguistics 101 is going to know that the definition of a word is more complex in a language than some combination of noises
/r/MensRights12/07/17 01:55 PM
1

Except there wasn't. Source: I've lived in both liberal and conservative areas during each of his elections. Nobody was afraid someone would destroy their car, house, or attack him in the streets for wearing an Obama shirt. Meanwhile people are having their shit repeatedly destroyed or personally gang attacked for supporting their president. This is just shit people on the left say to try and defend their unprecedented violence.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:13 PM
4

Except that's not the norm. That's just Reddit. In the real world if you differentiate between illegals and immigrants or think just maybe there are some things that could be different you face physical or property harm. You aren't old enough to even comprehend what the norm used to be. Let me guess, you took gender studies 101 and now think you know everything there is to know about everything.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:43 PM
1

I know all about that. Being anti communist is far different than the hate and vitriol mostly from the left against basically everyone in the country that doesn't live in a city or that believes in rule of law. You used to be able to support a candidate without facing risk of being violently assualted or having your property destroyed. You used to be able to disagree with people without having them physically try to assualt you. People were literally afraid for themselves and their families to c…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:31 PM
27

I don't know how old you are but I'm old enough to remember actually being able to talk to people about opposing political positions without being called literally Hitler.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:54 AM
2

Oh it's quite normal in countries over there to really have people think this and elect people to power that agree
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:06 AM
48

It's basically any SJW's way to dismiss any argument just like this woman's like to just call you a sexist if you aren't on board for their policy. Literally the tactic if the new left to stop any conversation. Demonize the opposition.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:59 AM
4

Yes, they really are like this. You can find hundreds of examples of rampant SJW behavior and policy.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:58 AM
2

I mean, I prefer they find another one.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:55 AM
-1

And I hate people too dim to make a connection between these two issues.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:54 AM
2

Yet most of Reddit still circlejerks countries like this
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:52 AM
2

It's almost like most people wouldn't understand if I went in detail about electrical matters so I fail to see your point. I doubt you would either. And you couldn't fix this.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 02:16 AM
2

I mean...it's a possible outcome.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 02:08 AM
5

If you have a vagina you can. To fill the quotas.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 02:05 AM
-6

I'm pretty sure you have no idea what you are talking about and are really mentally disturbed based on your reply. There are many documented incidents of men killing their children over custody disputes. They just happen to kill themselves and sometimes their children's mother because they aren't pussies. They actually commit suicide after. Women do it more but puss out on the suicide. Doesn't mean men don't.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:39 AM
1

I'd be up for a botched execution as well
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:38 PM
14

Based on the mug shot being with the arrest she probably didn't even give herself a paper cut
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:35 PM
-17

To be fair a lot of men do this as well. I think the men's rights aspect though is that she probably shouldn't have even had a shot at custody and men rarely get a shot even with heavily disturbed women like this. Also if she isn't locked up for life
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:33 PM
1

No surprise here. Unfortunately.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 04:52 PM
0

They aren't that wrong rape is extremely common there despite the narrative. Not to mention it's not more than a simple speeding ticket if you rape your wife.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:00 PM
1

It's either showing they are less competent or they aren't applying in approximately the same numbers. Looks like in this study they were less competent or at least had shittier applications.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 01:07 PM
17

If we are regarding the US? No. Not all men could vote in 1917. Native American men could not vote. Residents of DC could not vote. Chinese immigrants couldn't vote until 43. Minorities faced adversity in voting up until 65 or so. Wasn't until the 70s that 18 became the voting age despite men being drafted at the age of 18. It wasn't until the mid 80s that military members stationed overseas could vote. Guess what, the military is majority men.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:18 PM
1

Yet, when "muh manspreading" there are almost always open seats so I don't understand what you are getting at.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 04:20 PM
6

And who wants power over a 300 pound 5 foot 1 inch bull dyke? Like literally 1 person on earth.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:17 PM
1

It will never happen because the cuckery level of the admins here. They already try and silence us.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 02:48 PM
14

Who the fuck would rape that hog. She deserves two rape sentences max.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 02:47 PM
2

Except the part where it does matter because the people who have had their minds polluted by their toxic rhetoric will have undue levels of influence
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:53 PM
13

You say that until the demonstrably leftist toxic feminist taught generation comes into power and it gets worse.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:22 AM
25

Thank fucking God. Why won't the US start taking those fucks to task
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:12 AM
3

If you are even moderately sexually active they cost more than the pill. Next.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 03:49 PM
1

Most did even before the mandate because it hardly costs them anything. The pill is usually $30 or less without insurance.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:37 AM
3

What birth control that men have is cheap?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:30 AM
13

Except for the whole part where Viagra for erectile disorder is not covered by most health insurance and you need to stop listening to feminist (lies) propaganda.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:27 AM
1

Not to mention they are flat out wrong. There have been many female terrorists.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 10:43 PM
1

You are the one that needs to get over yourself. How about you go get some military experience like me and actually believe that. If they pass the same standards as men then they will except they don't have to meet the standards of men.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:59 PM
4

This was going to be my assumption. There wasn't any way toxic feminists were not going to cough up the money. Doubt they even needed it
/r/MensRights02/06/17 01:49 PM
1

Yeah, totally. Lets leave them with less water, less suitability protection, less radios, less bullets, less basically everything they need to keep US casualties so low.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:18 PM
1

It's almost like you don't always have a vehicle. For numerous reasons. Including they don't fit where you are going or that if you are actually going after someone sometimes a loud ass HMMV isn't the best way to approach them. You don't get to call time out to go get shit out of the car a few miles away.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:50 PM
1

And I think you are an idiot too unintelligent to realize you have no idea what another person is thinking.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 02:49 PM
1

Ah fuck. NPR had the audacity to interview her this week. I almost smashed my car radio in fury over hearing her talk. At least the host had the balls to pose the question why she thought she belonged there more than him when he was just working out and she was creating a scene.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:02 PM
1

I recommend you do. Heavily recommend.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 04:00 PM
2

just make them do it Yeah, that's how physiological limits work. Yup.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:56 PM
3

Your ignorance on warfare is astounding.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:55 PM
3

It's almost like modern soldiers have to carry a significant amount of gear and armor. Trigger pool is far from the only valid measure. Those 117 lb Vietnam males are far stronger than the 117 lb woman.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:55 PM
2

Female standards across the board are too low. I was in and worked with women that supposedly passed the requirements that couldn't pick up an aluminum ladder.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:53 PM
7

Too bad more people didn't see this episode. I think she is a real twat but this is something she does that is positive and I haven't ever really go off message on it. She thinks men have as much a right to parenthood as women do and is vocal about it when she sees it not happening.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 03:42 PM
4

Fuck that cunt whore. Maybe she should ask her sister since she raped her.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:02 PM
2

Then why is it never enforced? Why aren't both parties charged for a drunk hookup instead of only the male?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 11:17 PM
7

Not really when a drunk woman can actively engage in sex with a drunk man then claim rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 02:07 PM
1

What if I'd rather be a druid?
/r/MensRights03/05/17 02:06 PM
1

Why am I not surprised at all...would what he did to piss her off all that time later. Probably turned her down or started dating one of her friends.
/r/MensRights03/05/17 02:00 PM
2

Is there a men only class?
/r/MensRights01/05/17 11:48 AM
6

Sign up your male child and sue the fuck out of them like what happened like that bullshit b girl coding shit here when they denied a man
/r/MensRights30/04/17 01:05 AM
-1

You need to learn grammar. Political can be descriptive of a noun. The noun bias. Which she possesses.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:38 AM
1

Based on this? Yes, I know her to be a cunt
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:37 AM
2

Unsure? It's called fucking doing it.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:26 AM
28

I'm sorry. I have ptsd. But I'm not a cunt pussy. Everytime I see someone shot on TV or listen to the local news which has people shot every day in my city I don't feel shot. She is an ignorant weak attention grabbing cunt
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:23 AM
7

There are dozens of reasons feminism is flawed
/r/MensRights28/04/17 02:22 AM
1

These people destroyed the meaning of the word rape
/r/MensRights27/04/17 10:13 PM
2

Suppression of personal rights and freedoms for the "greater good"?
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:48 PM
0

I think the perversions that use it as an excuse are vile. Not so much Title IX itself. Blame things like feminism for twisting and perverting it.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:48 PM
41

Just a wild guess but a $50,000,000 judgement might make them think twice about their bullshit system
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:34 AM
1

False. In New York that can simply be having a gun you legally purchased in another state that you either didn't go through their communist regime of registration or a perfectly normal gun they decided looked scary.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:20 AM
3

Which will probably send him to prison for 5 years given where it is
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:15 AM
3

You don't understand the communist regimes of California or Maryland if you think you are allowed to defend yourself from a deadly attack without becoming a criminal. Didn't check where this is but I can think of three states where this guy becomes a convicted felon for defending himself.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:11 AM
5

Title IX isn't vile. It's what it's being used for is. It had a place when it was kept to its original scope.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:03 AM
51

Hopefully his family sues them into the ground
/r/MensRights11/04/17 02:00 AM
1

Hopefully you would have knocked her the fuck out beforehand so you couldn't get domestic violence charges
/r/MensRights10/04/17 01:25 AM
8

I caved in the same way but luckily I had a decent lawyer so I only spent a day in jail, the day I was arrested.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 06:51 PM
0

Even if government employees were involved that does not mean the government sponsored it. You know, like Iran does.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:15 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umar_Farouk_Abdulmutallab Would have killed close to 300 people if he didn't have a shitty bomb
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:13 PM
1

Several, as in 0.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:11 PM
1

What part of saying men are needed means that women aren't?
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:11 PM
1

The first amendment has literally nothing to do with immigration. Secondly, it's not a Muslim ban. It's a ban on terrorist hotbeds and state sponsors of terror, Obama's list. The president literally has itemized power to control immigration for national security reasons.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 10:10 PM
2

Trump historically has been a firm supporter of the gay community. No reason to think he would lean different on trans gender.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 09:05 PM
1

There is nothing unconstitutional in that travel ban
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:59 PM
1

It's almost like there have been a lot of attempts that have been thwarted
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:57 PM
1

That is absolutely false. Without even looking I can think of one.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:56 PM
0

There is no evidence yet to show the Saudi government endorsed that act in anyway. And let's ignore that the person that coordinated it was in Afghanistan. Not Saudi Arabia.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:55 PM
0

Jack the ripper was British. Therefore the British government supported him. Now see how stupid it is when you say that?
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:53 PM
1

There is no reason to believe he isn't
/r/MensRights01/04/17 08:41 PM
5

If you really believe any of that you may need to seek help.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 06:47 PM
2

Just because nobody wanted you doesn't make it false
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:42 PM
13

Let's be fair. Most of the things this sub is about were caused by Democrats
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:35 PM
14

Not sure why you think is an attack on men. It could just as easily be interpreted that men and boys are being alienated by rhetoric and they are needed in the solution to these problems
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:34 PM
2

I'm sorry but their and they are not implicitly plural. There are perfectly grammatically correct sentences that use them in singular reference
/r/MensRights01/04/17 02:09 AM
1

Bigly is a real word. Use it correctly.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 01:58 AM
1

Fucking disgusting. It's a gender neutral term.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 01:54 AM
6

I'm not a student there. I'm nowhere near there. I didn't witness it. Why the hell would I do it?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:52 AM
11

And did you send this in for a gender discrimination report?
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:38 AM
3

It is and in some states bars were sued and gone forever was ladies night discount. Still legal in most places though I believe.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 01:16 PM
3

I would wager that most people that have killed multiple people in multiple separate occasions outside of combat are black, african, or from the middle east. How many thousands and thousands of people are alive right now in Syria or Iraq that systematically and slowly killed a 3,4, or a dozen innocent people? Probably more than all white people ever deemed to be serial killers in all of recorded history. Between Baltimore and Chicago I bet we have gang related criminals that are quite the match …
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:31 AM
2

I'm glad the employee heading the student paper permitted this to be present...was it a man? I find it unlikely to be a woman. Some 17 years ago when I was in high school we could publish somewhat controversial stuff that showed the plight of men but I think it was only because we had a sort of hippy stoner guy running the paper that believed in full openness. He was sort of anti "the man" so it probably was a factor.
/r/MensRights19/03/17 03:09 PM
3

More or less. There is a reason outrage culture is even a thing and it's these people.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 12:40 AM
10

It's not lacking in the curriculum if you read the post about changes teachers have seen over the generations but a fear of taking risk and the willingness to think for themselves
/r/MensRights09/03/17 07:42 PM
2

Well she was probably fucking a bunch of them.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:19 PM
12

I would love an easy source to mine for data honestly. I've encountered judges that I would love to prove were on the take but there isn't easy access to their ruling history and that of others to compare that I have found. It should be easy to find and access. We should be able to hold judges accountable.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 09:15 PM
1

Name use? I find this not to be true in my observations
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:17 AM
1

You absolutely do not have to "agree" in all states.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:16 AM
2

I make more than several lawyers I've met so yes
/r/MensRights05/03/17 01:14 AM
13

This happened to me to a lesser degree because I always did well but when I started making serious money the ones that were "a league up" whatever that means were suddenly very interested.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 12:32 AM
3

She isn't even that attractive. I mean, I'd have contributed $100 but she would have to return value in service.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 01:30 PM
8

Not nearly enough...
/r/MensRights22/02/17 08:17 PM
1

Lincoln Republican. Teddy Republican FDR Democrat Point? They where paying less then minimum wage because of the labor involved was risky(aka illegal False. Risky labor gets more pay when you are ... you know ... not illegal and suppressing wages. But its ok, I'm sure none of your ancestors where migrants at any point Some were, some weren't. You know what the ones were though? Legal immigrants. Not fucking illegals.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:58 PM
1

It's almost like because they didn't have people they could pay less than minimum wage. If you are libretarded enough to support a $15 minimum wage you also can't be for illegals.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:31 PM
4

In plenty of places they don't. If more states were like Arizona and levied heavy fines against companies for each illegal then there would be a lot less of an illegal problem. In fact Arizona should triple their fine per employee.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 05:30 PM
2

No, because people didn't want to pick fruit for less than minimum wage. It's literally called the difference and the reason why people are anti illegal. They suppress wages. And there are legal visas for transient farm workers. If they aren't doing that then they earned what they get.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 04:35 PM
10

Hence you don't experience it. I never imagined such a thing was possible in a number of states I lived in including Indiana. Then I lived in Maryland and other blue states. It's literally government enforced norm. It's disgusting how they force public opinion to create a feedback loop to make sure they maintain power.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:07 AM
5

Yeah, you know, the jobs that have wages suppressed by illegals. That white people would do for a fair wage. But no, lets allow illegals to run wild and raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Retard talk. I've picked fruit for a day you prick. I've done manual labor since I have memory and never stopped until my mid 20s. Fuck off. They are illegal. Illegals suppress wages and introduce crime.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 10:05 AM
5

http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/fashion/daily/2017/01/11/11-men-womens-march.w710.h473.2x.jpg' Oh I don't know. Implies most men are shit. http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/GTY-womens-march-washington-4-jt-170121_12x5_1600.jpg Identified one here http://i0.wp.com/truepundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/trump-protester-racist-sexist-homophobic-getty-640x480.jpg?resize=640%2C480 Considering he hasn't said anything to fit those categories. Totally not sexist http://www.unapologeticallyus.com/wp-co…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 09:08 AM
11

It's almost like women can get away with gendered hate speech and that they were among the same movement that vandalized entire DC neighborhoods.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:48 AM
3

is not mainstream Let me guess, you don't live in a predominate democrat run state.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 08:46 AM
-15

You apparently haven't passed novice in Google skills then.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:53 AM
1

You really have no idea what was going on in DC within that time frame do you?
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:53 AM
-30

Learn to google.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:34 AM
2

It's almost like there was a massive law enforcement presence there to keep the peace because it was expected to go violent just like all the assholes just the day or two before that were burning down and destroying DC businesses.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:34 AM
12

economic woes on immigrants Most people aren't blaming economic woes on immigrants. They are blaming them on ILLEGAL immigrants. You know, the people that shouldn't be here and are taking blue collar jobs. The work visa for tech workers has some abuses but it is minor in comparison. I've personally worked very hard to make sure some of my former H1B coworkers could get employed when they were let go because they were great workers and love living in the US. There is no parallel really. The diffe…
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:23 AM
11

This kind of signage was much more the norm than not.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:15 AM
9

This could be any feminist/women's gathering but this is this stupidity that is the aimless pointless marches against Trump despite the fact he has done literally nothing to strip rights from women.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 07:15 AM
2

Found the person that doesn't realize that same doctor would likely make more in the US than there.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 11:58 PM
36

How would anyone interpret it usually way. A judge can't proceed over their own divorce
/r/MensRights13/02/17 11:29 PM
2

But... They aren't engineers yet... They are students... And based on what I hear on Reddit it's not the most employable type of engineering...
/r/MensRights11/02/17 04:21 PM
4

They aren't being taken away and no one has acted to take them away
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:18 AM
9

Then don't get pregnant when you get raped. The body has a way to shut it all down, right?
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:38 AM
1

He gets nothing.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:23 AM
2

It almost certain is a violation of code to do street construction without proper signage. I definitely could see this as an OSHA violation as well that could lead to large fines.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 04:20 AM
19

Must be nice living in isolation or wealthy conditions devoid of minorities.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:34 PM
6

Found either the person with a micro penis/nuts or someone lying about their gender.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:25 PM
33

So is wifey. Point?
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:24 PM
-22

Especially since it sounds like she acted like a twat...and assuming the ex part she may have been.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 07:14 PM
13

There should fucking be walls.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:06 AM
4

Honestly nothing about his cabinet says corruption.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 06:44 PM
2

You aren't a particularly intelligent person as is evident but well here we are.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 10:06 PM
1

Uh, how about come up with a solution that doesn't hurt men?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 07:05 PM
1

You actually can and people that choose to procreate anyway get to deal with that choice alone.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:59 PM
7

And if pregnancy is hidden he can still abort his rights
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:51 PM
1

No because only one has a say
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:44 PM
3

The solution does exist. Allowing men to opt out
/r/MensRights01/01/17 06:44 PM
21

So less than 3/4th? To you that sounds reasonable? It's not a stupid generalization. Plenty of women happily collect child support, live with the new boyfriend, and "can't" find work meanwhile drawing blood from a turnip that was their child's father. That's a men's rights issue because the court refuses to acknowledge when women do this.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 07:06 PM
10

Would have been better to get out before reproducing
/r/MensRights31/12/16 05:00 PM
9

I would go for it just as a lesson because she is probably a vile person based on that request from her
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:59 PM
3

See, our taxes our taxes are way lower and general costs are way lower. She doesn't need 100k to afford that here.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:58 PM
2

Unlike Canada we aren't taxed to fuck. Plenty of places in the US you can live comfortably on 35k a year.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:57 PM
8

Chances are she has qualifications and just leeched most of her life
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:55 PM
9

Oh I know, I hired an employee that has a weekly deduction that will potentially be his whole check some weeks as he is paid as a percent of his work. Courts said to me take it out and it's up to him to renegotiate. I was like, well, I might not have enough to take out some weeks and they were like lol.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:54 PM
-33

For women? That's really radical.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 04:52 PM
2

In the US some states allow you to choose how you die.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 05:19 AM
2

She looks like the offspring of a retarded elf that bred with a grey skin.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 05:16 AM
1

No
/r/MensRights28/12/16 05:12 AM
5

I'd go but expect A LOT of people flipping out in this SJW stronghold.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 08:38 PM
2

Damnit
/r/MensRights17/12/16 05:08 AM
12

No Baltimore or DC? Guess they are worried about SJW terrorism.
/r/MensRights16/12/16 09:00 PM
1

Gender definition erasing/altering movements tend to demonize men and masculine traits. Not sure in this case but it's certainly common.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:38 PM
2

That's how we really will get WW3.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:35 PM
1

I'm assuming this is something you would only see in degrees with hyper PC culture if it does exist. Like gender studies, art, and the such
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:35 PM
2

This sounds pretty dangerous...
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:22 PM
2

Shitty. They can't even choose between spelling out letters and using numerics.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 05:02 PM
4

You could have uh said no thanks. This isn't harassment.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 06:24 PM
9

This is what I tell people. It's not just the parroting she did in regards to women but also when it comes to race. You can't marginalize the majority and not expect an eventual backlash.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 06:21 PM
9

Just maybe these complaints don't exist?
/r/MensRights28/11/16 06:19 PM
1

Says the person who has actually been in fights and have had my life in danger. You know, me.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 02:10 AM
2

Yes, the person that starts the fight should understand that the person they hit may turn around and beat them into a coma
/r/MensRights28/11/16 12:54 AM
43

I'd put money on the kids seeing it at least this bad at home. If this is her in public...just imagine.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 12:26 AM
3

Well there is the fact he wasn't convicted of rape so there is that. It should be taken down.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:38 PM
1

But she wanted Trump to win his primary and the media helped it because "she thought she could beat him".
/r/MensRights11/11/16 07:44 PM
3

As soon as Clinton scammed her way through the primary he was the only candidate that should have won
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:06 PM
5

Yup, much to my surprise when I was listening to an analysis of the vote they said a large force of Trump winning was Democrats that voted Republican because they did not want a Hillary Clinton presidency. I voted Obama twice and had no choice to vote for Trump after all the fucked up lies and SJW shit the left was spouting. I'm glad he won.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:29 PM
5

I'm hispanic and her and her running mate's pandering was enough to alienate me and most of my family.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 05:08 PM
1

Yeah, I'm hopeful in the upcoming case
/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:18 PM
1

Even 3 mil won't fold them unfortunately.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:24 PM
1

Didn't know that. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 03:23 PM
19

No. She is a real delusional fuckwaffle that tried to destroy the lives of many men.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 01:21 AM
18

The magazine is only on the hook for 1 mil right now. The author of the article for 2 mil. The magazine folds under 1 mil? Any judge that oversees that bankruptcy to assets sheet will tell them to fuck off.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:33 PM
3

I mean the magazine is only liable for 1 mil. The have enough to cover that though it's going to hurt profits in the next quarter. Now, if the frat case goes the way I hope they could be ended.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:31 PM
63

Why the fuck are they still using her anonymized name...at this point she is a criminal. Not a victim.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:29 PM
5

Shit, does this author even have $2 mil? Hope they take everything she has in the attempt to recoup that.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:26 PM
24

They are feminists. What do you think?
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:24 PM
6

They should have put heels out for the comparably small number of women for impact
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:05 PM
1

I was hoping for suicide
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:03 PM
1

All numbers and facts support what they said. Especially the education.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 11:02 PM
5

Michael Moore is an enormous cunt and seeing him post this is no surprise
/r/MensRights03/11/16 10:55 PM
11

With current culture, at least in the US and Canada, a huge chunk of the unknown is false accusation
/r/MensRights03/11/16 10:50 PM
1

M'patriarchy
/r/MensRights03/11/16 10:47 PM
8

Uh trans people are absurd. They have a mental illness, it's in the diagnosis manual, and the last step in treating it is body mutilation as we haven't figured out a better way yet. And based on suicide stats in that community it's not a particularly effective treatment.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 12:42 PM
3

If their mother is a whore she should suffer meeting their standards. Not be subsidized by the man that met the social contract
/r/MensRights29/10/16 09:07 PM
26

Problem is men are usually told to fuck off if their situation changes which being practically bankrupt by child support often causes
/r/MensRights29/10/16 09:00 PM
8

This is extremely important. Caps skid be default. Raising a child will costs $X.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 08:57 PM
-1

What's the booze on her counter to the right. It may influence whether I like her or love her. Her points stand on their own but love is conditional.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 09:43 PM
3

The first part is a murderer trying to spin. The second part is the sad part.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:52 AM
1

Chances are he called the police and like usual they charged him
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:45 AM
0

I'd like to think the pulse of america isn't too stupid to realize someone with a French accent and different color eyes isn't the person they haven't seen in a while.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:31 AM
1

Yeah, like the side that didn't commit strong arm robbery and try to kill a cop of Michael Brown?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:30 AM
1

So we are stuck between "they went full retard" or "they killed him and whichever one of them did it didn't say anything. No body, live guy, no murder." I like to think number two is more likely than number one.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 11:29 AM
2

If a woman tried to walk away from a child and stop financially supporting it, yes, it would happen. It actually would not and does not in the majority of cases.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:41 PM
1

She sure as hell knew it was a good chance since she was the one taking all those dicks.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:36 PM
3

Because even if visitation is ordered the courts rarely punish women for not complying.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:28 PM
1

Should be the mother's for being a lying cunt. No one is guaranteed to grow up with lots of money. In every other scenario the difference from being poor or wealthy as a child is up to the birth lottery. You grow and suffer with the consequences of your parents. In this case her mother being a lying cunt leads to consequences.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:26 PM
0

Getting paid a lot != Having a lot.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:22 PM
2

Maybe they looked at it, saw you stood no chance, and that you wouldn't be able to pay them after being faced with crippling child support.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:22 PM
5

Really though the judge should have been open to reviewing the evidence and rehearing if the process is followed rather than just shutting him out.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:18 PM
2

Where I live? They are shot at or have an attempted assault pretty often.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:17 PM
2

The only shithead is the woman that lied to the man fooling him into this scenario to begin with.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:12 PM
1

And in this scenario he wouldn't either.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:09 PM
1

Might be interesting because she might handle proving he isn't the father for him
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:08 PM
2

Most civil cases...you don't sue the poor because it's a waste of money since you will never recover anything. Family court though...
/r/MensRights26/10/16 03:59 PM
2

I'm unsure who I want to win this one. I guess if I pick I want the associate dean to win. The rolling stone really made this a problem. However the school should have done something about the pleas by the victims of false accusations also.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:45 PM
2

I personally donate to the National Coalition for Men. I wish they had more uptake so they could be more active in causes. I've been on the wrong end of injustice against men and from that moment on I make sure I contribute to organizations that fight that.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:10 PM
8

See, this is why men's right's movements need to coalesce so we can afford to throw lawyers at things like this when they come up like the NAACP does.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:15 PM
11

This is old. She was sentenced to 8 months.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 01:39 PM
22

It's protected in the US too but good luck getting prosecution based on prejudice against white people. BLM was literally trying to burn someone in a dumpster fire for being white yet there will be no hate crime charges.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:58 PM
-6

This is pretty basic boolean reasoning. If someone is presumed innocent, the opposite of innocent is guilty, then being found not guilty deems innocent is the appropriate term. Our system is supposed to presume innocence and have a burden of proving guilt.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 07:22 PM
6

It is if the board hired her for being a woman to show they are "diverse". Not sure if that was the case.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 01:46 PM
1

Both my last HP laptops have been excellent but I buy from the premium lines. Far less bloatware in those models too. All their cheaper stuff belongs in a dumpster fire.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 01:43 PM
2

Uh, what she did definitely was illegal and there are definitely criminal penalties available that could have landed someone else in a cell.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:46 PM
1

It hasn't changed that much from what someone else posted. It's basically the same message but then "oh by the way if you are abused you can call too"
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:54 PM
74

So an oh by the way is supposed to make the difference in approach OK here?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:48 PM
3

I hope people living there write their local government officials and file an official complaint against that service. This is disgusting. In Maryland it's about the same. The courses women have to go to when they beat men are called relationship skills classes and are more like therapy which they have talk of how to recognize men trying to indicate a fight. Men go to abuse prevention classes where they are demonized and told it's all their fault. I wrote a letter to the appropriate authorities …
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:45 PM
1

I've been shadow banned on all my accounts. For nothing but factually backed statements that don't fit their agenda
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:25 AM
2

Sorry for the delay. The lady came over early yesterday and I got tied up in auto maintenance as well. False alarm :P Based on what I see there doesn't seem anyway that these things could remotely track an impression for the sponsored listings. Only tracking potential I see is google analytics but that seems to be google analytics for archive.is which most people run analytics on their site anyway.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 03:42 PM
2

Yeah fuck those that think I'm provoked violence is OK
/r/MensRights01/10/16 08:44 PM
1

So, YouTube terminated this account or the individual...this is an important question I would think.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 05:30 PM
2

You are the problem. People like you are why there is a men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 05:29 PM
2

In this case sure. It mostly caught my eye because it seems most encouraged to use archive when it's a site life jezebel. The more outrage posts we see here.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 02:44 PM
6

If they are hijacking and injecting markup it's clever. I'm out tonight but I'll look at it in the morning
/r/MensRights01/10/16 04:05 AM
20

She isn't wrong. As an aside, I noticed that archive.is still keeps ad tags (sponsored links on the right) in their archived sites. This is probably still generating impressions for the site and thus revenue. If I wasn't on my phone I'd look at the code and verify but that's the feel I have right now.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 12:06 AM
2

Same here honestly. I did not expect to see numbers like this.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:51 PM
1

Forgot to adjust for inflation. One movie was actually good enough to start a franchise and the other was a dumpster fire so I would expect this. And yes I know this is a /s post.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:51 PM
1

You realize that's way higher than the standard right? At least as I remember it.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:21 AM
1

She sounds mentally disturbed
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:20 AM
1

People say that until a female officer shoots a large cracked out man
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:18 AM
1

I'd wager 90% of women in that field can't meet that based on my time working in a hospital and handling our with first responders in my social network at the time
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:17 AM
2

Uh...how many times have we seen them do exactly that when it's a male offender?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 11:32 AM
2

How kind of them to not refer to it as rape
/r/MensRights28/09/16 02:56 AM
2

It really irritates when people talk about black poverty line it's in a vacuum. They ARE more likely to commit crimes. Which in itself limits future earning potential. They also smoke weed at higher rates which will eliminate their eligibility for higher paying but lower education requirement positions. There are lots of factors but some of them are self imposed.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 09:58 PM
1

Teaching him this perpetuates the issue
/r/MensRights24/09/16 04:18 PM
0

It's almost like you didn't watch the video. He tried to disengage.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:46 PM
1

She physically attacked him without a weapon. He retaliated without a weapon sufficient to stop the danger he faced. It was proportional
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:44 PM
1

You are a part of the problem
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:43 PM
2

I wish I could remember where I saw the source but whatever study it was showed women typically instigated the incident with verbal abuse like 60%of the time. I hope someone replies to you with actual numbers.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:40 PM
10

Always press charges. As you now know.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:37 PM
4

Not sure why you are down voted. You are correct. He had a credible risk to his life and was within his right to use a concealed weapon if he had it. Not likely since it looks like they may serve alcohol though.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:34 PM
2

No. It's a good example because almost always if a man retaliates even with restraint it will be more powerful. Fuck with an NFL football player that benches 300+ pounds and even with restraint he will level her.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:31 PM
1

Make her listen to what Whoopi said admit the ray rice thing. Not just the little popular clip. She has a lot more to say about it along the lines of what did she think would happen acting that way.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 03:28 PM
3

Good. She didn't do it because she was a woman or Asian. They did it because she is a dumb cunt.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:38 PM
1

Seems like her explained it fine to me.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:33 PM
5

I'm going start making up hash tags so I can become one of these thirty people
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:31 PM
1

It mostly sets men back because her beliefs and policies are against the premise of equality
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:04 AM
1

So I can get brigaded harder by feminists and m'ladies? No thanks.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:59 AM
2

Her not being elected for her compete incompetence, corruption, and lies would not be enough for these types even if she murdered someone personally.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:54 AM
2

NDAs preventing you from disparaging your employer are pretty common practice in business.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:48 AM
2

He did not. He said not to use personal email outside government servers plus when he was in office faxing that kind of data was pretty much more the norm. Source I was in the military with a clearance during his whole time in this position.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:46 AM
4

Someone that doesn't comprehend technology at all, ignores policy for convenience. and still after over a decade handling classified data doesn't know anything about it's labeling is the most qualified candidate?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:43 AM
4

I'd rather not have one that minimizes the hell I went through in a war she approved of
/r/MensRights10/09/16 01:40 AM
2

She is the most corrupt politician since Nixon if not worse yet people are willing to ignore it because *
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:06 AM
5

Precisely. She actively spreads that as a good enough reason and so do numerous of public figures supportive of her
/r/MensRights09/09/16 11:43 PM
1

The media portrays that but history does not.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 11:25 PM
0

People did the same with Obama
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:40 PM
2

I know the UCMJ had laws. No idea if they retracted them when the military went more gay friendly recently
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:04 AM
2

I'm not so sure. I see this a lot. Maybe it's more representative of people that post on twitter/news sites/Reddit/Facebook but I can't go a day if I actually look at comments that i don't see hundreds of these types of posts if I broaden past gender equality issues
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:02 AM
8

Hopefully succeeds. If he does all I can say is about fucking time
/r/MensRights03/09/16 08:51 PM
1

Good luck. It's almost like you don't understand how insurance works. But I wouldn't expect some C grade amateur porn wanna be to understand that.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 01:17 PM
1

Or you know, doctors routinely refuse to do this surgery for males without children especially under a certain age.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:02 PM
1

Failure to notify should be the same as consent to forgo support.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 06:52 PM
2

What annoys me about that quoted text is not once do they say that it creates a hostile environment for men or that men suffer in any specific way due to it.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 06:55 PM
2

It might not be all that hard to sue if a cash payout is expected. A lawyer is sometimes apt to just take a share of the payout as his fee so you really don't have to front much. Assuming he believes he can get a payout.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 06:50 PM
15

Their last report is 4 years old and their last paper is 3 years old. They also don't seem to record detailed demographic data.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 01:42 PM
1

That's a really interesting question as it depends on whether they only calculate poverty based on household. Regardless though I don't think it's a far stretch to relate the fact that there is a smallish difference in gender poverty gap but an overwhelming male biased gap on homelessness that you can clearly say that males are by far more impacted.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 08:42 AM
1

4% really isn't a significant difference when you consider almost all homeless people are men which means they are far more impacted by poverty than women.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:49 AM
5

As per the US breakdown by gender men either break even or win in that one. Not by any significant amount though. http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/adult-poverty-rate-by-gender/?currentTimeframe=0&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D
/r/MensRights28/08/16 11:49 PM
58

Like most of those stats it seems a lot harder to find them for Canada. Like homelessness is hardly even tracked there.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 11:46 PM
20

They really don't at least numerically. Children are definitely more often assaulted by female caregivers. I doubt even if you took the ratio it would be different than break even.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 12:34 AM
11

She could easily be put in a facility that has a signer and can handle pregnancy. Maybe if she didn't want to be in prison and risk sub standard care she shouldn't have spent years raping a child. They don't just throw their arms up in prison when a potential inmate only speaks Swahili
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:52 PM
-9

Maybe you should be reported. This comment is little different than most of the rest here
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:50 PM
1

I would if it kept getting me paid like him...
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:21 PM
3

Feminists only need to imagine it happened
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:18 PM
1

It does a lot when they are accusing someone of rape that they had consensual sex with
/r/MensRights18/08/16 09:16 PM
12

We already know feminists are not
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:32 PM
21

At least the article uses language to suggest there are a lot of false rape allegations
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:29 PM
3

Because is are a lot are false accusations
/r/MensRights13/08/16 10:43 PM
-2

In the US it's either they are trained by them or they are getting kickbacks. They will let the state fund them then send you to programs they back and run at the mere accusation of abuse thus making you pay for the place as well.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 10:42 PM
5

One doth smell horse shit
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:59 AM
3

It's almost like the US has different laws in different states like Europe has in different countries.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 04:29 PM
3

Ah, missed the then 17 part. Hope she doesn't get away with it.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:43 PM
14

Nothing at all in that article makes it sound illegally obtained
/r/MensRights11/08/16 04:05 PM
1

I wouldn't have gone with Chris Rock but why not. Either way, all three of those people are considered more funny and successful than the people they threw into this movie. It would have been worth millions and millions for two factors. These people are actually funny. The other being they wouldn't have alienated anyone that was on the fence by calling them sexist if they weren't excited for the movie.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 11:52 AM
1

I don't know. I said it didn't look good to someone I went on a date with and she never called me back. When I said that she went on about the patriarchy. Guess I dodged a bullet.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 03:47 PM
1

Which needed to by WAY higher if they were going to break even if that is even the right number.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 03:17 PM
2

What's going on empty theater! Honestly this movie didn't need help to fail. It was horrible but the feminazis doubled down on making sure no men would go.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 02:54 PM
10

Get rid of "domestic" enhancements on crime. It almost unilaterally is used in a punitive way against men. Make it punishable for universities to run tribunals on criminal matters. Perhaps revoke funding or do something. More support for homeless men and men that are victims of abuse by their partners.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 12:44 PM
2

And you learn almost no fighting skills in basic training
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:39 PM
2

Here is to hoping for a competent lawyer and a non corrupt activist judge
/r/MensRights05/07/16 09:41 AM
0

If the world was just
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:39 AM
2

Doesn't negate their statement.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:36 AM
3

Happily with another person's money
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:33 AM
6

Women more than men. Some reason they feel entitled to not work.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:31 AM
2

Sounds like someone needs a lawyer and a new judge
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:28 AM
0

It's almost like it's possible that chemically active liquids can damage carved stone.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 08:54 PM
1

They better fucking throw her in prison. This is intolerable.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 08:53 PM
-1

You mean the brand owned by Budweiser?
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:58 AM
2

It's owned by Heineken. Not much better.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 03:54 AM
1

Not much because she didn't remember anything that happened...
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:20 PM
2

And she may not have been passed out when that happened. They were both drunk, made out earlier, and she agreed to go back to his place. She could have passed out before or after but there is no evidence to support one over the other.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:34 AM
3

So if I was 21 and banged the chick I was dating since she was a freshman in high school I should be on the sex offender list for life? Not all crimes are equal and it needs to really be reevaluated.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:30 AM
4

He did not rape her. There is literally nothing to support that he raped her. Which is why it's idiotic TwoX and SRS are allowed to continuously parrot this.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:26 AM
5

She has literally no memory of what happened. Her only trauma is hearing people say something happened. If anything we should be talking about people at colleges getting passed out drunk at parties and not thinking bad things can happen as a consequence. Hell, she probably would have fucking died if someone didn't see him doing this. She was out for 3 hours and puking. With medical attention she was still out for 3 hours. She could have choked to death.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 04:23 AM
42

I just think people have started to consider it a crime
/r/MensRights22/06/16 08:09 PM
2

Your idea of civil disobedience is fully pointless. Bottom line. You are not hurting those you wish to impact and when you don't pay you will be demonized. Not to mention they will just lock you up or take the money by force.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 10:30 AM
7

Not really. It's telling a lot of people to be in contempt of court. Raising awareness and changing public perception is. Not following a court order by not paying child support is not going to win any hearts and minds.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:45 AM
8

Then start an organized movement and start protesting. Not paying is going to get them fucked and not make any point.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:33 AM
11

There are plenty of judges that will have no problem trying. This seems like a really poor way to attempt to get results. The court isn't getting hurt by this. Not to mention if you stop payment they have the ability to forcefully take it from your paychecks in some cases. All it will do is hurt your chances filling complaints for her violating custody agreements.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:00 AM
15

Hopefully not people in states that will lock them up...
/r/MensRights15/06/16 11:05 PM
2

/r/Eyebleach
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:54 PM
6

That explains the sentence.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 07:54 PM
3

refuse to sterilize a woman without spousal consent. I have NEVER heard of this happening.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 10:55 PM
4

They are pretty common and play out exactly how you said it.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 10:48 PM
1

I was banned for a very similar question in a post about someone asking if they should get an abortion. Someone got very hostile at the question and I expressed my position that as a male I have almost no reproductive rights. Ban immediately.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 10:41 PM
6

She could have done the shooting herself and they would still vote for her because woman.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:33 PM
6

This is it. They are defending a culture that generally devalues them on a human level yet feminists do the exact same to men.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:32 PM
2

They, the one I suspect you are hinting at, was doing it at the exact same time and they were doing it together. The difference is one almost completely stopped and the other just did it and evolved to use new more dangerous methods.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:23 PM
6

My head almost exploded reading that. The guy proclaims allegiance to ISIS before doing it but it's totally a masculinity problem.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:20 PM
0

You can't really be that stupid can you?
/r/MensRights13/06/16 10:21 AM
2

How is it unchecked. There is still a trial by jury of their peers. If you say that then you must concede to the inverse which is allowing the accuser to remain anonymous invites false accusations.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 10:54 PM
3

It's people not realizing you can't compare pay of a software engineer to a house keeper then claiming injustice. And yes, hourly men will work more hours so yearly too...but because you work more hours.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:59 PM
2

Why you are being dv I don't know. You are correct. If you weren't going to vote for her anyway then vote for someone who can't win then it just helps Hillary. Johnson is good for the people that would vote for Hillary because she isn't Trump. If he absorbs votes from her that's great but not voting for Trump encourages her victory.
/r/MensRights09/06/16 01:25 PM
25

The research that calls it a mental disorder?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 02:54 PM
1

I've met pretty high levels of crazy. Lucky to make it out alive.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:28 PM
9

Almost certainly. It's happened in the past.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:08 PM
5

district and community are dealing with her as the sexual predator that she is lulwat. If she was a man she would be rotting in a prison cell with millions in bail over her head and not on administrative leave.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:06 PM
19

I unfortunately find her very attractive. That's unfortunate since she is a rapist scumbag.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 04:01 PM
1

90% sure I replied to that guy and I don't see my post. Censored? Maybe... My point was just because it may be statute doesnt mean it wasn't punitive. Just that the anger was misdirected. It's not his fault but there could be plenty of reason for outrage.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 10:04 PM
1

Not very surprising. It's still about the equivalent of a speeding ticket to rape your wife in India.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 03:57 AM
1

At the least it could be a sign to Hollywood to not make shit movies with such blatant agendas. Maybe they will start realizing you lose money when you make shit movies to fill some bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:23 AM
13

Hope they all get max sentences. They are the perfect cross section of BLM and feminist fucktards and they deserve everything they get.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 07:20 PM
2

Black Lifes Matters One mispelled. Two a scam. They should be a threat because it's a scam used by opportunistic parasites to make money.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 04:42 PM
1

And she might truly make me have to vote for Trump
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:16 AM
2

How do you know it was against his will? How do you know whatever led them there didn't also include discussions on topics of suffering?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 06:57 AM
6

If he was in hospice care he was going to die anyway. I've seen some horrible terrifying deaths in hospice and if I'm there id prefer someone do this. Assuming assisted suicide isnt legal. I guess if you still want something it probably isn't going to be an FBI matter so probably call your state police desk and ask how to proceed.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 11:31 PM
6

It seems he wants the controversy. Isn't that how feminists have been getting it done for a while now?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 05:22 PM
6

I can't even rely on them so I guess I am one of these people
/r/MensRights30/04/16 02:39 AM
17

But women are the primary victims of war
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:08 PM
39

Don't forget that men almost always get longer sentences for the same crime
/r/MensRights29/04/16 05:41 PM
1

They aren't the only one that gets tips. Bartenders and hostesses get tipped out. Nearly everyone getting tipped makes more than they would if it was some flat pay system.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 02:42 PM
0

Food is better than Hooters and the women are equally slutty if they think they will get a tip from it.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:33 PM
1

What is exploitative about paying someone for the quality of their work instead of just the fact they are working?
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:29 PM
2

I wouldn't say really good but it's definitely better than hooters.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 01:28 PM
1

She either did or her mom made enough money to afford an illegal maid.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 02:51 AM
1

What a dumb ignorant cunt. Especially loved that his parents are from Cuba. Chances are he is more closely related to anyone that has ever been persecuted than her. I'm Puerto Rican and can guarantee I am.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 02:47 AM
5

What fucking candy land do you live in that most natives in Mexico aren't basically trace genetics with barely even remembered of their language and culture
/r/MensRights24/04/16 06:19 PM
5

Being thin makes you average. That face doesn't get her over average. Guess that means I'm a god then.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:44 AM
1

Considering she will not be a doctor any time soon I hope so.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:43 AM
2

So this twunt was out partying while her dad was dying and she was broken up with. Then she acts like this. Wish more happened to her.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:41 AM
5

Do I feel badly she has experienced a major set back and possibly ruined her career from one night? Seriously go fuck off. Your whole diatribe is apologist bs. She deserves nothing more than a man and that means med school being a waste.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:36 AM
0

If it was gender reversed the driver wouldn't have to. The state would.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:32 AM
2

Had the same thing happen. I "threw her" even though she blind sided me and my friends grabbed her while I was leaning against the balcony railing. Luckily I had over 30 statements to the opposite and it still almost wasnt enough.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:30 AM
4

Except you can't know when a feminist twatwaffle, white knight, or sjw is present.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:27 AM
8

Men have lost their jobs for just saying a man did this with no evidence. She deserves much worse.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:25 AM
1

Only if the world is lucky
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:23 AM
3

I mean I don't blame the driver for having some compassion You fucking should. Doing so perpetuates this behavior.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:18 AM
3

lulwat. She is below average but happens to not be fat.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:16 AM
8

Women get preferential hiring in most fields.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:15 AM
4

Good. Fuck that bitch. Hope she never practices again. Suffering the same accusations of what would happen to a male.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 01:13 AM
9

If lying twats are blind the world will be a better place.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 04:09 PM
5

Whatever respect I had for Kesha is now gone. You had respect for her? She is a scumbag.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 01:46 PM
5

I mean rape is just another type of breaking and entering /s
/r/MensRights22/04/16 01:44 PM
1

If you don't see a point you aren't someone that is worth trying to discuss this topic with much less the weather.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:34 PM
2

I do. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:32 PM
3

Yes, men never face microagressions like being suspected of being pedos or rapists all day. Forget it if you are a white guy living in a minority neighborhood.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:30 PM
2

Are you completely unaware that a woman can make any choice, including sabotaging birth control methods or rape, and the man still has no method to opt out of the result?
/r/MensRights14/04/16 03:28 PM
9

Posting a trump video isn't hate speech.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 02:35 PM
2

I didn't bitch and moan. I called you on your lies
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:54 AM
3

You like to spread misinformation don't you
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:43 AM
3

The justice department != all courts. If you took a second to even read that then you would see it absolutely has to be below 93% because every other high rate state listed is significantly below 93% and the state courts process far more cases than the justice department.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 01:21 AM
1

If it was a real Corey court, yeah
/r/MensRights07/04/16 12:05 AM
-1

US courts are infinitely better and less corrupt than Russian courts.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:51 PM
-1

One Guantanamo is not representative of the Justice system. Two there is almost nobody there anymore.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:51 PM
0

Source. Highly improbable that the courts have a 93% overall conviction rate in the US.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:49 PM
1

Or how Russia still works.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:47 PM
4

The difference is MRAs don't typically want women to wear burkas while feminists regularly say what is posted in the OP.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 08:49 PM
13

I've never heard an abusive male partner brag. I have however heard many females do it
/r/MensRights31/03/16 04:09 AM
1

None of this says a statute was used in a charge against a white person. I was pretty clear in my first question. This states that the crime was racially motivated. Not that there were charges with hate crimes attached.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:46 PM
8

And that states nothing about how many were convicted under hate crime statutes. Only that the agency determined the motive was race.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:28 PM
1

I almost want him to win the election on hopes that most of the SJWs out there will go into cardiac arrest or have strokes.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:12 PM
15

It was both a race and gender driven crime. If this doesn't qualify for hate crime statutes I don't know what does.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:09 PM
2

And having a latin name.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:04 PM
5

The victim's race is irrelevant Find me one instance of a hate crime statute being used for a crime against a white person.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:03 PM
25

The victim is white. There is no way this will be looked at as a hate crime. There was a bicyclist here in Baltimore that was kicked off his bike and beat by a group of black teens while they were slinging non stop racial slurs at him. All on camera as he had a gopro running while riding. No hate crimes. Not sure any of them actually even saw jail time.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:02 PM
11

Society accepts racism from blacks and sexism from women. She had a power combo on free passes. At least people are investigating it.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 06:00 PM
26

Difference is they hate us for being men. We only hate and rang to see false accusers suffer. Not all women.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 07:19 PM
1

You realize that even if it's not the some $145 million they are now in for it will still be near 9 figures right?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:21 PM
8

Don't have much to worry about when they pay out the $115+ million they will be bankrupt
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:41 AM
2

Their benefits are great. Not sure if you can use them or are treated well while working there. Source: had an offer with full benefits description
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:02 AM
3

"Possible". His lawyer should have been able to pick this apart by showing raw numbers. They don't lie.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:06 PM
-2

Damaging means of livelihood in multiple states is dependable by deadly force. Not in pussy ass states like Maryland but in any state that values rule of law and the right of it's citizens to earn a living permit violence up and to death to defend your livelihood. In the most immediate sense. Castle doctrine extends to vehicles in some states.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:25 PM
2

She always is the logical one on that show. Source: I work from home too often. I've been hit by women and never will sacrifice my sense of safety. If I'm attacked I'm defending myself. I will stop defending myself when the threat is neutralized. I've been shot at. Had people try to stab me. Numerous other things. Self preservation is something I have. Problem is every time I've had to knock a bitch out I've had to hire a lawyer. Though udder dude, talking about the door guy, I've been a door gu…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:22 PM
13

She probably is the most well known woman that actually stands up for men's rights. And it's not like she intends to. She is just an egalitarian and doesn't play their bullshit game. Never has.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:14 PM
3

A marine level woman is still probably weaker than most men. Source: been in the military. It also don't change how we should perceive their violent actions.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:12 PM
6

Whoopi was about to go down that road. That what if it was a small man hitting a larger man but they went all cunt waffle and yelled over her.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:09 PM
8

if he was spit on He was. I've seen the footage a thousand times since it was played basically around the clock in Baltimore. It was about the last thing she did before he clocked her. Of course she already had been hitting, yelling, and demeaning him for a long time before that even happened.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 03:19 PM
5

Yes, it does. He was being physically assaulted repeatedly. He stopped the assault with a minimal amount of force.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:01 PM
3

Does anyone know what episode this is from? Is this from around the time of the Ray Rice thing or did this come up again? As a fan of Ray Rice, being in Baltimore, and being a Ravens fan that whole thing left me furious. The video shows her repeatedly going after him and spitting on him yet people are surprised she got knocked the fuck out? Come the hell on. To top it off he lost his damn job over it. It's ludicrous. I caught an incredible amount of flak for taking Whoopi's position. It's the ri…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 12:40 PM
2

Teaching degrees are typically a joke compared to an engineering degree for instance. It's what women that drop out of engineering degrees do.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:27 AM
4

Anyone that likes her music isn't likely to be that bright anyway
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:17 PM
5

It's not right to assume the man is always guilty when accused of sexual assault - but it's also not right to assume that every woman is lying. Uh, you are supposed to work under the assumption that the accused is innocent until proven guilty. If you don't think that I really question if you should be practicing law at all.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 06:23 PM
1

Except it probably did happen. It's common enough that female military members either fuck everyone they can or sell the puss for money. I personally observed prostitution tents being formed. Lets not even start to talk about short tours in Korea. They are called Kunsan queens for a reason.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:39 AM
1

I was in the air force. There were women literally whoring themselves out in empty tents during deployments.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:38 AM
1

Except that number is imaginary and false rape accusations in the military are easily 3x that in the civilian world.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:36 AM
1

army branch The marines are not in the army.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:34 AM
1

As a feminist Shut the fuck up and eat a dumpster of dicks. Feminism has literally no place anywhere in the western world other than to oppress men which are already suffering innumerable disadvantages. Feminists don't care about men unless it involves oppressing them. Egalitarians do.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:33 AM
1

Basically, any woman that joined the military in the first place is probably cray cray
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:26 AM
1

Absolutely. Was completely sober when a fight broke out. I didn't do anything but authorities showed up and I had to contest an A15 over it. Not charged with anything...just happened to be there.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:21 AM
1

Confirmed. Been out of the mil for over 10 years now and had more sexual assault briefings in the mil than I probably will have in the next 30 years of employment. Was in for 6.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:16 AM
2

Maybe you should quit being a nonner.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:15 AM
7

And as a veteran I dare say the women being sexually assaulted is far over played and the men being sexually assaulted have been completely ignored. I personally have experienced it and honestly I knew of several others that had someone making severely unwanted advances on them. There have been absurdly obvious instances of women using their position to either punish someone or corner them in my time.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:16 AM
2

Yeah. It is good though. Even though my boss is female she has NO patience for this female sense of entitlement or privilege. None at all. In fact it pisses her off.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 06:25 PM
1

It really is.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:31 AM
2

And I appreciate your skills. Keep coming up with bad ass ideas and I'll keep figuring out how to make them fit into resilient production code. It takes all types.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:19 AM
2

You sound insulted. I don't know too many applied developers that would disagree with me. Hell, not too many humble PhD types that would. There is a difference in concept and application. I work with plenty of PhDs that have great insight in our algorithmic portions of code. Our application is highly profitable thanks to them. However, if they were in charge we would either never ship or we would ship brittle code. Similar tune in all my jobs really. I have the utmost respect for those types. Th…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 10:46 PM
2

Good god, don't get be started on code I've seen PhDs write. It's never anything any real and practical developer would deploy. Fuck me with the stuff I've seen the naval observatory using. Used to date a developer there (horrific developer) that would constantly come to me to help them solve a problem. Good god. I also spent my side time to write them an email alert job to let them know if their scheduled job failed, of course expecting no credit and hoping she would benefit from my work, and t…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:45 PM
4

I do and it's documented in our vcs. Also repeatedly addressed with my boss. I speak to my boss in private once every other week and when incidents occur I tell her.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 09:07 PM
2

lol wat. Do you even program, bro? I do. Affirmative action for women in the field almost certifies who you work with is the lowest common denominator because they simply showed up for the interview and get hired.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:29 PM
1

Because the side effect of them being given affirmative action means there are a lot more shitty ones but no one can talk about that. I work with a few fantastic female programmers but the majority are shit and they are ones that I interviewed and gave a staunch do not hire feedback. Yet, hired. Now they are literally the weakest links and destroy our productivity. Yet, everyone feeds their egos and now they are not only horrible at their job but they feel like they know what is right even if se…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:27 PM
2

Thus showing there is no sexism. But teh womynz!
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:25 PM
10

I decline pull requests from one of our female programmers all the time because she can't handle feedback and tells people to shutup when they tell her that her code is either not doing what it should do or that it's just shit. I have been talked to about it by management. I'm not changing my behavior. I will continue. I care about quality and I don't have to answer or believe in quotas.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:21 PM
3

could be complete crap It is complete crap regardless of level.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:20 PM
8

Except they don't. If anything, now, women that are fully incompetent are getting hired to fill quotas. We hired one that couldn't even fucking write a for loop which I assume was to fill a quota. Despite her utter incompetence day in and day out she still gets high grades in reviews which has now inflated her ego which is harder and harder to deal with when we point out the shit work she is doing in code reviews. Refuses to accept feedback from far better developers. I'm far better than her but…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 06:19 PM
6

If God had mercy upon the US she will be hit by a bus before she can do too much damage
/r/MensRights13/02/16 05:01 PM
13

You don't need evidence these days apparently in this world of false rape allegations. On the other hand there could be cameras.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:54 PM
5

They would likely launch an investigation under hate crimes.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:52 PM
1

I'd report whoever posted that to the organization on campus dedicated to making people feel welcome.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:50 PM
9

Woman starts fight gets her man attacked. He then goes on to talk about how ghetto black chicken heads (think he used chicken head at one point. If not some other derogatory similar term) don't know what a man is and that black women are the first one to try and ruin a black man's life even though they are always blaming police and white people for all their ills. That the problems of black men face largely come back to how black women act and how black people treat each other.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:56 PM
20

I'm glad he addressed a secondary issue here. That this is so ghetto trash type of shit to do in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:55 PM
1

"I'm a career politician. I'm not in the establishment" - Hillary Clinton Read more in The Most Stupid Things Said by Politicians available on Amazon.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:23 PM
1

What are they going to do when disclosure of pay rates by gender show that men are getting discriminated against?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:13 PM
3

Having said that, I'd like to see Intel's data and methodology. "Here is job title. Here is pay. Here is experience. They are equal" I'm betting it looks a lot like that with a little talk of margin for error.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 03:10 PM
9

Given what she did I have no problem with her going to jail so either way I'm happy.
/r/MensRights30/01/16 05:29 PM
6

Not just consent but volunteering and seeking people out for this
/r/MensRights25/01/16 06:15 PM
9

This is correct. Not that I expect him to work much at his age but I do hope that these people are held accountable for their lies if in fact they are found guilty of perjury.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:50 PM
2

Considering more white people are shot by police than black men and many of the black men shot are in the act of a crime, often violent, I would like to see their coverage as well. And many of the white men shot are also in the act of a crime. I want to hear them talk about how Michael Brown was a violent criminal. I want to hear them talk about Freddy Gray's multi page arrest record. The media coverage on police shootings is horrendous and almost purposely charged.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 02:49 PM
-8

I'm sorry you are a 40 year old overweight virgin with a neckbeard.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 01:14 AM
2

It's already criminal to make false charges. Nobody is enforcing it when it comes to rape.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:53 AM
0

Wouldn't you cry if you were reduced to fucking her?
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:51 AM
2

She isn't alleged anything other than a liar. CPD investigated it already and determined it to be a false allegation.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:09 PM
1

Her own stupidity
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:07 PM
6

perpetrator of a hoax I'd call this a lot more than a hoax honestly.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:07 PM
1

How do these people have enough brain power to function in society. Reading this shit makes me wish for nuclear war. Your dean’s demands recite nearly every false argument made to undermine victims of sexual assault, Yeah, it's not like you would want to undermine false accusers either. exactly this kind of victim blaming and shaming that fosters rape culture She isn't the victim. She is the offender. re-victimizes those brave enough to have come forward She can't be re-victimized as she was nev…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 07:06 PM
-10

God help us if Bernie isn't nominated Then I guess you will need a lot of god help. He is completely unelectable and would be an unparalleled disaster in office. Only Trump might be able to exceed his potential for disaster.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 04:40 PM
0

If mortality is declining and suicide stays the same then is mortality staying the same or is it declining? If its declining and one cause of mortality stays stable what does that mean? Oh, it's growing in proportion to causes of mortality. This is really really really fucking basic. Get some graph paper and draw it out a couple times and maybe you can understand it.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:49 PM
-1

Fuck you and the bag of dicks you eat daily. Maybe you should learn what hardship is and quit being a fucking pussy. Even before, and after, the military I learned you have to fucking deal with life instead of crying about your feelz. OMGZ SOMEONE SAID A BAD WORD! Toughen the fuck up and worry about yourself and what you are doing. Instead of being a bunch of whiny cunts. http://news.yahoo.com/millennials-weak-skills-threaten-americas-competitiveness-120000913.html http://www.businessinsider.com…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:47 PM
2

Uh...sorry this is so hard for you to understand. If mortality declines yet one cause of mortality declines at a slower rate then it is statistically growing as a cause of death. It's pretty damn simple. Higher percentage of deaths are attributed to something. The charts shift. Its pretty clear. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_10.pdf http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db178.pdf http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/levelsandtrendsinmortality/Changing%20levels%20and%2…
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:30 PM
2

And I very specifically highlighted you don't need to be a pussy to dye your hair.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:22 PM
-1

Please explain how being a "huge pussy" is somehow worse than having men, boys, dying by the thousands. Please point out where my reply indicated anything like that. I very directly pointed out that "dying hair" does not address the pussification that is happening. I have actually been to war. How about you? I wouldn't wish that on anyone. It doesn't mean that there aren't too many people enabling the pussification of young men and women in western society.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:30 PM
0

When it changed from "sticks and stones may never hurt me" to "OMG YOU VIOLATED MY FEELZ I AM SO HURTZ LAWSUIT" that is what happened over the last decade. Sorry to break it to you but I'm not the only one stating this is the pussification of America. There are entire empirical studies and well regarded sociology people that agree that people need to grow the fuck up especially in the college setting.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:27 PM
0

Death by non natural causes are declining. If suicide is not declining proportionately it is an increase in rate. I don't know if having a background in mathematics here matters but if this is the case it absolutely indicates an increase in the suicide rate statistically.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:25 PM
2

How the fuck does dying your hair compare one way or another with being a huge gaping pussy like too many young people today are. Were you into punk culture? Plenty used to punch each other in the face for fun and plenty of them had dyed hair.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:20 PM
1

Please compare this in relation to other causes of death.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:19 PM
-2

So? You seemed to have missed the point of what I wrote above. There is no point missed. The generation behind me needs to stop expecting to be coddled and actually realize they are not entitled to shit they don't work for.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:18 PM
-2

Pussification of America isn't a gender related issue. Other than made up shit like "rape culture" and "gender earning gaps" if you want equality men can show emotion and everyone needs to stop being little bitches over spilled milk.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:16 PM
-2

And it's perfect symbolism for what's wrong in society. Pussification of America. Signed: A veteran.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 09:15 PM
0

Glad she is locked up but its a bit ridiculous to think that a jury of 12 women and 3 men is a fair and balanced jury.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 04:46 PM
17

I wouldn't be surprised if he still is at the top
/r/MensRights14/12/15 03:28 PM
8

I think they forgot to realize that not everyone accused of rape is guilty...
/r/MensRights09/12/15 06:41 PM
1

Israel doesn't just have a draft. They have compulsory service. Right wing nut jobs chop that video that way to make it sound like that is what he is doing. It is not. If you listen to the whole speech, I did, it's not about making anyone joining the military. It's one of several options that he thinks would be appropriate for the youth to do such as civil service, volunteer work, and yes the military would be an option as well.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:12 PM
1

but how sustainable is it? Very considering it ensures global peace and free shipping of goods around the world which the US benefits more than any other economy from since we are isolated from almost all other first world nations. Look at the state of the world right now I have looked at it. Open a history book. Its fucking fantastic. How different could it be if instead of focusing on our military we focused on scientific breakthroughs Well, energy costs could quadruple. The US economy could s…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:31 PM
1

You realize US global hegemony gives the US it's prosperity, right? You realize if the US stayed out of countries Germany and Japan would be crippled shitholes to this day? You realize the middle east was fucked up by the British and not the US, right?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:58 PM
1

Wow, talk about WIIIIILDLY out of context and being used by the right wing to stir up fears. I can't believe people have latched onto this one. Find a clip that runs over a minute. In no way is he stating conscription will or is planned to occur.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:50 PM
1

People forget that prior to Desert Storm Iraq was one of the largest militaries in the world. According to Michael Knights, the Iraqi army fielded one million men and 850,000 reservists; there were 53 divisions, 20 special-forces brigades, and several regional militias. The Iraqi military was able to field 5,500 tanks, 3,000 artillery pieces, the country had a strong air defence and could employ 700 combat aircraft and helicopters.[118] By 1990 (according to Keith Shimko) the Iraqi army fielded …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:56 AM
1

Most of the douches of this generation were 10 years old when that happened. It's the people born since the 90s that seem to think the world owes them something. No idea why. For people that were born in the early 80s and prior the general consensus was if I want something I have to work hard for it. Now it's I deserve that, give it to me. Broad sweeping generalizations but the attitudes have clearly shifted.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 07:28 AM
1

Sometimes country leadership does stupid shit. Never know. It would be a death wish but you never know. Georgia thought war with Russia was a good idea. Argentina thought war with Britain was a good idea.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:46 AM
1

Guam to China: 2107 miles. Guam to US: 5985 miles. Hawaii to China: 5971 miles. Hawaii to US: 2471 miles Alaska to Russia: 62 miles Guam and Alaska could be reasonably easy targets to attack. If there is enough drop they might even land and entrench. No way they would hold it but those would be wars on US soil none the less. We would see them coming but it would have to be fast acting. Luckily the US has forces on every edge of the planet.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:41 AM
1

LOLWAT? Yes there is. Guess you haven't decided to get a driver's license or go to college.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:34 AM
1

Cross the Pacific and invade us Exactly. It would be seen coming and with the size of the Pacific fleet and the ability to use long range bombers to plink each ship off it really isn't even likely at all.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:30 AM
1

Who would invade America? Canada? Please. Mexico? You realize that Guam and Hawaii are pretty far out...in the Pacific? Invading them is invading the US. More than small enough for a landing force to occupy it if they can take. Sure, no one could take the mainland but there are places small and far away that could be threatened.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:28 AM
1

ICBMs and low flying cruise missiles are very hard targets to hit. Especially en masse. China does not have the ability to do either in enough numbers to matter if the US decides to nuke them.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:23 AM
1

You really say that with the self entitled twunts that are growing up today?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:20 AM
1

there's no reason for us to be in another country. You realize there are a lot of countries that want the US in their country right?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:18 AM
1

The US wouldn't use nukes if someone tried to invade, unless they used nukes, the US would just obliterate them conventionally as the US has done in every war against a standing army for a few decades now.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:17 AM
1

at least 1 gov. official has already announced Government officials say a lot of things that could not and would not ever happen.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:11 AM
1

I really want to see the quote where Obama says that there will be mandatory service.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:09 AM
1

there is a permanent domestic military presence I have no problem with mandatory 2 years if it makes the whiny twats of this latest crop grow up and stop thinking the world owes them something.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:07 AM
1

And? There are men fleeting as refugees, or you know, getting horribly maimed/killed.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:06 AM
3

Im not sure why the women dont have packs You aren't?
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:02 AM
2

He wasn't saying they were more white. She had been blaming white males and she led on that scandinavian countries have better systems. He then pointed out that those countries are far more white than the US. That is a reasonable counterpoint in my opinion to someone blaming white males for the way the US is.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:39 AM
1

rocks and rock stars There are far more rocks than rockstars. That is what happens when you are not willing to pay the hardworker talented person more than the lazy slob that does practically nothing at all.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:35 AM
2

I doubt he really meant everywhere but there are plenty of countries where it is either illegal to not wear some degree of covering or their husbands are allowed to impose it.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:34 AM
1

Comes off a little right wingy but he is basically right on all counts. I don't even know if he fully believes everything he said or he used it to make counterpoints but he did the job. She was a weak opponent though.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:32 AM
1

He shouldn't be let outside at all.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 05:18 AM
1

It says he believed she was 16. She has proven to be a liar through the fake allegation and lying about the location. I have no problem believing that she lied to him about her age as well.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:43 PM
1

Oh I totally agree. It is a bit of a balance though isn't it? Election can make the judge make judgements fit the desires of the jurisdiction which he serves. On the other hand it makes it hard to be full impartial in my opinion as he has to sometimes follow through with any rageful people on more highly controversial cases. I personally prefer appointments.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:58 AM
0

As a judge I would find it hard to carry through a conviction/sentencing if I honestly believe he was deceived which may have been the case here.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:53 AM
1

Well, they can at times lose their job. There are places where judges are actually elected believe it or not. States with elected judges: Nonpartisans Election: Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Washington, Wisconsin Partisan Election: Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana, New Mexico, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia I believe this list is up to date.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:52 AM
1

That doesn't negate my statement. It will destroy his life. It also is a middling issue if she was lying about her age. Given she lied already about what happened I tend to believe him when he says she lied. Regardless of what one thinks of the actual law itself.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:37 AM
2

he had not broke such an obvious law in the first place It is not obvious if you don't think you are breaking it. If his claim that he thought she was 16 was true he did not believe he was breaking it.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:35 AM
2

I wouldn't. I actually did when I was in high school. My birthday was shortly after graduation and I banged a 14 year old that had been all over me all year. I don't find it weird at all. These teens are socialized together in the same building for most of the day and people don't expect these people to end up with relationships that can lead to sex? At that age? Come on now
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:34 AM
0

Problem here is the judge would have protesters outside his court if he didn't charge him depending on what backwards state it is in.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:32 AM
1

They are also very inconsistent. There are states where this would be legal as well if I'm not mistaken.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:30 AM
7

They shouldn't have been downvoted but not for the reason you stated. They didn't say they agree or disagree with the law but states that it is infact against the law as it stands. You on the other hand should be downvoted because you are saying stupid shit.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:28 AM
3

Not sure why you are being downvoted. You don't seem to be supporting the law but just pointing out that it is still against the law. Its not legally ok. The question is should it be. I don't think someone that was essentially frauded into it should be convicted of a crime.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:25 AM
-4

It's still going to destroy his life.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:22 AM
4

Depends. Is that job out of state? In his case, are there underage employees or a job that would promote contact with minors? Terms of probation can even just be wacky at times.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:22 AM
1

Many states have Romeo and Juliet laws as well that allow for an age range. Such as 18 year olds can still bang 16 year olds as they fall in a close range.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:20 AM
8

Yeah, its totally impossible for her to lie about her age! He should spend life in prison! /s
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:18 AM
-8

Of course none of that would have happened if she didn't lie about the rape to start with. Just sayin'. Also 18 to 14 is an odd distinction. There are plenty of cases where they would be in school together. This guy, really, needed to learn a very important rule. If you are a suspect of a crime you don't say shit without a lawyer present. He almost entirely made himself impossible to defend when he told the police he had sex with her so matter of factly if the article is describing this correctl…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:17 AM
1

It wasn't so much laws of morality...which I would think this category would be.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:13 AM
1

The overwhelming majority of public schools receive 10%+ of their funding from the federal government but you are right. If it's a rare exception it wouldn't apply.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:15 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_IX No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. If the school is receiving federal funds, most do (usually 10%-20% of their funding), they can't descriminate against students of any protected class in services which federal funds are spent on. Most receive funding to assist…
/r/MensRights26/11/15 01:13 AM
75

Sounds like a good time to file a title IX complaint. This is sexism. EDIT: How the fuck was this downvoted? It is a violation of Title IX. And it's clearly sexism.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:54 PM
0

Didn't anyone consider...just maybe...the name is too fucking long?
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:39 AM
81

She wouldn't want him to be found innocent
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:37 AM
65

Declaring him a rapist with no criminal proceedings is pretty good grounds to start. General destruction of his reputation.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:23 AM
1

We can still provide said hegemony if we cut the military in half No. No we can't. We need a large blue water navy and the ability to deploy large scale force anywhere in the world while maintaining a technological edge. We can not do that with half the funding. We don't even spend that much of our GDP on our military. The US must protect shipping lanes. If you haven't noticed the water is how shipping from Europe and Asia is done. You're reaching at extreme examples Its ok you are 12 and all bu…
/r/MensRights17/11/15 12:32 AM
1

So not even try? If you want to continue to create hostility in congress so you can have a President that can't get any of his desired policies through, sure, do it. I'm tired of our country having 10X the military as the next guy. Already said it. US prosperity and global peace exists solely because the size of the US military and the hegemony it provides. Prior to WWI, the U.S. was the largest producer in GDP and had an army of 100,000. The world has changed a lot since then. Let Iran blockade…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 11:10 PM
3

I have no idea who I would ask. All of my close friends have either died or became assholes.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 06:28 PM
0

Manned air to ground aircraft are far from obsolete. Especially in a possible scenario with a nation state that can destroy satellites (both China and Russia). That cripples much of the drone fleet. Drones are also completely unable to defend themselves. If they are seen they die from any possible threat. There is nothing they can do. Manned aircraft have to means of self defense and the ability to evade threats. We also have no widely used drones that can fly at near cruise speeds of any of our…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 05:41 PM
-1

Cutting the F-35 is essentially the same thing. I have actually worked on the jets its supposed to replace. They are falling apart. Not only that, its already a sunk cost and scrapping it would be much more costly than not. The F-22 isn't as advanced as the F-35 in a multitude of aspects. There is no reason to replace the F-16/F-15? They are way over their expected life flight hours. By a lot. And they are essentially obsolete. That is reason. The loss is ability to actually fight a war.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 04:34 PM
2

Genuine doesn't mean he isn't nutty. He has ideas like instantly doubling minimum wage. Healthcare shit that even though it sounds good would never ever ever pass congress which would be required. His ideas with military funding would put US interests around the globe at risk as it includes cutting fundings for all operations outside the US. US thrives on its global hegemony. It's where prosperity and global peace comes from. Again would never meet muster. Free tuition but no real way to pay for…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 03:45 AM
2

If it was hillary and rubio...I would vote republican for the first time in my life. Or sanders for that matter. Both are nutty and far nuttier than Rubio.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:31 AM
5

Your last bullet statement is why I simply can't vote for her. Men are already losing in every facet of life in the US yet she seems to think they should be losing even more.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:28 AM
-6

The only way I can vote for a democrat is if its not clinton or sanders. They are both scary. The only other way would be if Ben Carson wins the republican nomination. I'd take the scary on the other side than a person that has no understanding of science, human rights, or the world. edit: So either votes are being manipulated or Reddit grew a fuck ton of religious nutbag zealots out of nowhere
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:27 AM
0

So what. He doesn't believe in the pyramids. He thinks humanity started 3000 years ago and dinosaurs are the devil fooling people. For instance he is a bigot. CARSON: I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that. His lack of science understanding will be devastating for research: “carbon dating and all of these things really don’t mean anything to a God who has the ability to create anything at any point in time.” His opinions on abor…
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:23 AM
2

As much of a mental retard he continually proves to be this is very true.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:10 AM
2

What is the point of recording it if it is either criminal or inadmissible.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:59 PM
3

Its not eavesdropping to record something meant for public consumption. Such as a class lesson. The only way this would be a problem would potentially be in a two party consent state.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:58 PM
5

If the school retaliates against him for filing a Title IX complaint or for filing civil they would face yet another lawsuit for retaliation. Federal law explicitly forbids retaliation for raising these issues. If anything they will dance around him to avoid being accused of retaliation.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 06:57 PM
6

Don't listen to this person. Gather evidence and either report it was a title 9 violation or for a civil lawsuit.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 04:58 PM
1

Take notes then report it. It's a violation of rules and laws in place to ensure gender equality in education. At least in the US
/r/MensRights14/11/15 04:54 PM
2

Because maybe you just generalized an entire half or more of the world's population.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 03:43 PM
1

Unless it is premeditated in many jurisdictions it is manslaughter. The prosecutor did not see a likely conviction for more. That is why she is charged with it. Her argument would be hard to counter without motivation which the prosecutor apparently didn't have enough to seek a conviction for it. You don't go for the charge you have a slim chance of getting a conviction for. You go for the highest conviction you are likely to win.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:54 AM
0

The bail was $200,000 cash only. Reduced from $250,000. I don't see the pussy pass here. There is no way she is covering that.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:36 AM
1

The bail was reduced from $250,000 to $200,000 cash only. She almost certainly doesn't have $200,000 laying around. The defense attorney even had reasonable justification. But defense attorney Frank Gonzalez told the judge, "That may true, but that means the bail should be set at the upper end of the guideline and not exceeding it." Manslaughter is the appropriate charge if they can not prove or hint at premeditation.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:35 AM
1

Not seeing the men's rights issue here. She is being charged to the fullest extent of the law. Judges hate elderly abuse.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 03:08 AM
1

online dating is the answer How is increasing your pool of potential candidates a bad thing. Most would argue finding "the one" is a numbers game. You could never meet them if you miss opportunity. You can use online dating in conjunction with building social circles in your life.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:23 PM
0

Because she hit and killed someone that had the right of way through carelessness and recklessness. She deserves her days in jail and not a $500 fine. I hope the motorcyclist's family files an enormous civil suit against her. Don't know if its a gender issue but this sort of slap on the wrist is not acceptable.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 05:14 PM
10

I have no idea why you are being downvoted. Most feminist backed STEM movements have nothing to do with getting women to actually study STEM educations but instead to allow them a shortcut into the fields.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:24 PM
69

I'm sure the language would look a lot like PHP.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:22 PM
11

In desktop. I would heavily bet that the numbers skew significantly if you include servers.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 04:21 PM
0

They were confused when a venn diagram was mentioned. Thought they meant a fem diagram
/r/MensRights22/10/15 10:08 PM
7

He really won't in the end. I'm sure the settlement will be weeeeeellll into the 6 digits. If not 1+ million.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 09:16 PM
2

How about the state step back and say no then. You make dumb choices you get dumb prizes. Take the child and leave her to live under a bridge for being an ignorant asshole.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 04:52 AM
0

Apparently whatever alphabet soup identity you want to have doesn't make you any smarter.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:21 AM
1

No it doesn't. The mother shouldn't have it if she can't support it.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:15 AM
1

Then she has no rights to support. He is either notified or she is on her own.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:15 AM
1

Then she has no rights to support. That was easy.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:13 AM
17

There should be rights for men. A man should be able to say "if you have this child you are on your own". Its completely unjust that the woman has the final say on the potential financial ruin of a man.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 03:11 AM
1

Exactly. Being a cock to a cop ends like this. https://youtu.be/dwp2pPkXUac
/r/MensRights18/10/15 09:16 PM
1

DUI check point. Checkmate.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:45 PM
1

If he wasn't resisting he wouldn't be on the ground. The cops don't want to be rolling on the ground any more than most people and its quite apparent if you actually watched the video he isn't laying peacefully on the ground.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:44 PM
-1

He already encroached showing he is a potential danger while their back is to him. They didn't mean step back two feet. They meant back the fuck up and give them room.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:59 PM
-2

You can't assume what is claimed to happen just like Michael Brown. DC has extensive street cameras. We will see he was being an ass from the start. It's not perpetuating anything. BLM is perpetuating it by showing propaganda like this with no context. Dc has tons of street cameras. You will see I'm right Here just like I was right about Michael Brown.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:57 PM
-6

Please tell me where in the video that is I saw him encroach during an altercation
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:49 PM
0

Why, for pointing out that these officers were using proportionate force to arrest someone that was clearly resisting arrest? Of which you have no idea why they were even on the ground to begin with because the video conveniently leaves that out? That this is likely another Michael Brown and "HE AIN'T DO NUFFIN" but he actually did?
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:32 PM
-1

Resist arrest and let me tell you what I will do to you
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:31 PM
2

Exactly. I don't go to an ATM and linger for who knows how long "deciding" if I need to use an ATM.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:30 PM
3

You don't know its unwarranted because you don't know how he was acting when the police showed up to speak with him
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:29 PM
1

Show me where this happened. I assume you are spreading Michael Brown misinformation again.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:29 PM
4

Neither of those are particularly reliable looking sources.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:27 PM
1

Then this can happen to you when they think you may have committed a crime. Congrats.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:26 PM
-1

It wasn't the filming. He was close enough that he could be considered an interference or a threat to an already hostile situation.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:25 PM
-1

It's neither unless you count a racist possibly sexist woman being involved. Or maybe, he actually did intend to mug her. We don't know but if police show up and tell you that you shouldn't loiter near an ATM and you act like a douche this is what could happen.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:24 PM
1

You don't need to break a law to be legally detained for a limited period if there is suspicion of a crime. Especially if you are uncooperative. This person almost certainly was from the start.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:23 PM
-1

Like hell it is. This wouldn't even have happened if, I can almost be certain at this point, when the police showed up to evaluate the situation he didn't be like "FUCK YOU MAN I CAN DO WHAT I WANT I AIN'T DO SHIT YOU AIN'T GOT NO RIGHT TO MESS WITH ME FUCK YOU I'M NOT GIVING YOU MY NAME AND I AM NOT LEAVING HANDS UP DON'T SHOOT BUT DON'T TELL NO ONE THAT MICHAEL BROWN DIDN'T HAVE HIS HANDS UP OR I'M GOING TO LOOK STUPID" Its not a race or gender issue. Its people that are young have no idea how…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:21 PM
1

Loitering by an ATM would make me look over my shoulder too.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 01:19 PM
0

No shit. They still have every right to mitigate that risk. I know you don't have a job but some people prefer not to die at theirs
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:23 PM
-3

Good question. Maybe the video should have included it instead of only including what they wanted to reach their agenda. The police were called there for someone acting like they are going to mug people. The only reasonable reason they would be in this situation is if he became hostile. Police almost never jump out of a car and tackle someone. So close to never you could probably win the lottery.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 06:20 AM
-6

Police tend to apply force when someone is resisting arrest. He was resisting arrest and they were attempting to detain this person for some reason that is unknown because the video only starts when it shows you what they want for their narrative.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:03 AM
0

Everyone could always be attacked And the probability is a lot lower when its not your job to respond to potentially volatile situations. That should be common sense but on reddit it isn't. Fewer police officers are shot and killed each year than are children under the age of 6. Maybe, just maybe, it might be because there are around 30 million children under 5 and under compared to 765,000 for police. Its a quote designed to be taken in a way to imply something the way it isn't. That is 0.00003…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:01 AM
0

The video doesn't show anything. It shows them after whatever provoked this incident happened. Whatever happened to provoke it, he is resisting arrest which may or may not be an appropriate arrest. We don't know though because the video conveniently starts when he is resisting arrest. Things like this are why BLM are such a joke. Police were called in for an incident. The call was for someone that may be attempting to mug people at an ATM. Suspect was likely hostile in regards to the accusations…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:53 AM
2

By admitting its her fault. Which I guess I can get behind.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:58 AM
3

What the fuck? Who says she deserves more? If she asked for more they are well within their right to be like "fuck it, we will get someone else". She wasn't even a lead. She was like 5-6 down in the credits. Amy Adams had a bigger role than her.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:01 AM
9

paid 77 on the dollar Except this is imaginary in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:58 AM
1

Not even just different parts. There is also a degree of how much you can just plug someone else if they don't like the pay.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:56 AM
2

Uh...ok?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 03:50 AM
3

I wish she wasn't on some unknown to the US Canadian show and saying this on a US network.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 05:02 AM
2

Especially when they are all captured, slaughtered, and raped by a third world nation's military. Or ISIS.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:17 PM
1

They probably were given a lot more time to do each of those tasks that's why there was that answer.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:16 PM
3

When they get to enjoy selective service then maybe.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:15 PM
1

They definitely are. They don't seem to acknowledge it and they were well within the ability to reject it and they didn't
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:10 PM
1

I agree with with the poster above that I don't care that they practiced. I suppose anyone could do that. The real beef for me is that they were allowed to practice the actual course.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 03:06 PM
12

They did change the requirements. They were allowed practice in advance. That is a change in requirements.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 08:10 PM
5

Doesn't surprise me one bit. Most women couldn't even meet the general male standard much less the Ranger's male standard.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 08:07 PM
9

I fucking hate her guts and she is pretty much a hugeantic retard but at least just once she is right.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 08:04 PM
1

false allegation If there is no evidence that any rape occurred its pretty easy to call it a false allegation. If a rape occurred then that's a court deciding someone is innocent. If there is no evidence of rape then its a false allegation.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:50 PM
3

Who would confirm it anyway? I doubt it was ever even said otherwise they would have just flat out forced it in instead of stopping when she said "it hurts. lets stop"
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:15 PM
3

She clearly wasn't told she could not leave otherwise they wouldn't stop when he couldn't get his dick in her. Even in your own paste they left each other amicably. Not a sign of forced violent rape. Especially since there also was no penetration on account of either party.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:11 PM
2

Before she withdrawals consent apparently.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:09 PM
2

If he was actually sentenced to anything its complete horseshit. The fact its in Maryland does not surprise me. The amount of literally retarded amount of judgement against men with little proof or evidence and complete blindness to crimes by women is an every day thing.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 04:08 PM
1

So you are saying there are only ~100 times this happens a year in the UK?
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:26 PM
1

Not just fired, he could have faced criminal charges that could have resulted in being jailed.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:11 PM
1

That happens to have a child which will also be raised to be a mental defective person as well.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:09 PM
1

I would love for her to get a prison sentence even if its a short one. Chances of that happening...probably like 5% at best.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:07 PM
1

Far more aggressive doesn't mean aggressive.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:58 AM
1

aggressive When its barely 100 and there are thousands of false allegations destroying lives I don't think that is all that aggressive.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:57 AM
2

This sub wouldn't exist if women weren't doing bad things. The fact that a woman can falsely accuse a man of rape, abuse, and even the topic of this story is the reason this sub exists. You know what happens when a man was ACTUALLY raped to the person that committed the crime? Less than what happens to a woman falsely accusing someone of rape. That's why this sub exists and this story is very similar. She was going to destroy some guy, that probably makes little over minimum wage, for some delus…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 11:55 AM
2

There has to be a lawyer in our midst that we could start a class action lawsuit or simply fund to take this to court...or any other form of this. I'm willing to donate to the fund.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 02:16 PM
1

You clearly have not been to Maryland. They prop up organizations that actively attempt to destroy men. Judges are on board. They force their funding with forcing men to attend these same places that also turn around and give free lawyers to women making claims. Woman makes false claim, this place gives them a free laywer. Judge requires man to go to that organizations "abuse" intervention. If they don't go or want to go to an independent entity they are threatened with 6 months in jail.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 02:36 PM
3

Yes, please let me know where men can back out of anything in regards to women much less pregnancy. Can't back out of that or a relationship without facing severe consequences.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:52 AM
-5

No, I'm seeing it as guilt because I have seen a lot of people die suddenly or horrifically and been with people that have seen family die suddenly. People aren't just "not perturbed". Emotional trauma has both short term and long term side effects that a trained professional should recognize. Even someone close to them (her husband for instance) should identify.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 02:27 PM
6

I would like to think those on the scene would have been like "She don't even look upset, bro. Something isn't right here".
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:54 PM
1

Depends which jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:53 PM
5

That should have been enough to raise suspicion from the start.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:52 PM
1

Pretty sure it doesn't unless there is a potential danger from doors.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:45 AM
14

You may. I signed in and noticed it pretty quickly. Also came across this gem... Change the name of the Amazon Mom program to Amazon Family https://www.change.org/p/jeff-bezos-change-the-name-of-the-amazon-mom-program-to-amazon-family?source_location=trending_petitions_home_page&algorithm=curated_trending Didn't know that amazon had that but it sort of pisses me off for some reason.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 05:10 AM
7

How does one flag it
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:59 AM
12

Maybe its because they are all choosing shit paying degrees if the degree even leads to a job.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:22 AM
93

“Plaintiff’s allegations, taken as true, suggest that W&L’s disciplinary procedures, at least when it comes to charges of sexual misconduct, amount to ‘a practice of railroading accused students,’” stated the judge, citing precedent. I like this judge.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:56 PM
6

Attempted murder. I really hope she gets charged with this. Would be nice to see her get 10 years in prison. $75,000 bail tells me it wasn't a trivial charge.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:51 PM
0

Because in the western world there aren't any already opposed by the majority? Its literally reproductive rights and that's it. Most people are already on their side on average but there are states with right wing nutjobs that are trying to fuck with it.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:32 AM
0

This is one state that is widely accepted as a wasteland when it comes to equal rights...the rest of the country largely is a lot more respectful.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:30 AM
1

Basically anyone within 500-1000 miles of the countries that are a threat for this sort of thing. Don't forget that in desert storm Iraq was lobbing scuds into neighboring countries where US personnel were.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:27 AM
1

Passing the chamber (we had to go in mask free anyway at least once) is one thing. That won't kill you. Something like VX or sarrin definitely could if you couldn't get a good seal.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:26 AM
1

The uniform codes definitely have clauses for dress in regards to religion, culture, and necessity. Jews are allowed to wear their yarmulke. I see no reason why a Sikh couldn't maintain this as its deeply ingrained in their beliefs and culture. The hard sell was probably that MOPP would be completely useless to him with that beard, headgear, and the hair under it. I feel like I remember this guy not having a particularly easy time getting this granted but I am glad he did.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:24 AM
2

There is no way this stands with the supreme court issues regarding muslims and beards. Didn't seem as the court was too keen on forcing them to shave from what I recall.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:19 AM
1

I think this is complete bullshit. Especially since men's prisons tend to be much worse off in general and this is a complete disregard for their cultural beliefs. Beyond that its a rare occasion where a post this sub breaks 3100 ups. Good job OP.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:17 AM
1

Well, I'd like to see the fight. She might actually stand a chance. Probably will lack the strength but if she is more skilled she will win. Don't know if she would beat a top tier bantam but there are men in that weight class she probably would wreck.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 04:05 PM
1

She makes a shit ton of money without much experience and not nearly the viewership as the more popular names. I think she is happy. She probably makes more than some of the bantam weights just because of her novelty. I couldn't name more than a couple male bantams.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 04:03 PM
2

He actually was very effective at deflecting punches. That was a main differentiation...he would have been wrecked by a solid direct hit. He deflected blows effectively and was able to exert control when it mattered most. Working into that arm bar was pretty fucking awesome. Was worried about him a couple times.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 04:01 PM
5

Only way to settle it is for her to fight male bantams.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 03:53 PM
2

The source of much of this isn't exactly acting very mature themselves so I'm not sure I believe all that they are saying. Dictator or not she was a completely incompetent CEO. That will very likely now sue reddit like she did with her last employer that found her incompetent.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:36 PM
1

I didn't look at the link but if its archived by a different host we are not giving Gawker impressions and not helping them monetize their garbage.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:17 PM
2

They are both also Chinese and dictators so it seemed like a reasonable meme to me. Its not racist as it doesn't imply anything in particular about her race or her race's abilities.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:48 PM
3

It is. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/26/students-develop-nail-polish-to-detect-date-rape-drugs/
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:46 AM
0

I do but for most its feels over facts
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:50 AM
3

Because he is a rapist clearly...all men are rapists or potential rapists. /s
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:35 AM
-1

You expect anyone to care.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:32 AM
3

There is a clear shot that was posted in the last week without the stamp and it looks legit. Could be a scam but this is legitimately how it works so it wouldn't surprise me if this was real.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 11:31 AM
-3

Yes, that is how I know. It's an echo chamber where any descent gets you banned like askwomen
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:57 PM
-5

Because it's full of man hating third wave feminists?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:12 PM
9

SRS? TwoX?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:34 AM
7

I agree. Most of the MRAs I've seen tend to be in support of both gay and straight men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:28 PM
1

Chances are most of them just got over whore spouses until they stopped being whores, divorced several, or they embraced the lifestyle. It was so common that anything stable would by far be the minority.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:56 AM
7

His logic was that she was a skank True statement
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:53 AM
1

You mean if you can afford to fly you appreciate your plane not crashing due to the many veterans that have impeccable attention to detail involved in maintaining your aircraft?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:53 AM
2

When its worth it I just pull out my dd214 and usually have no problem. I keep one folded up in my wallet. Not sure why other than the last time I wanted to get one of those veterans day meals.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:48 AM
2

Honest enough and I mostly agree but I worked flight line and have been shot at. Last year I went to california pizza kitchen. Was better than Applebee's and no wait.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:44 AM
11

In my experience it was mostly the women. Wives and those in the military. For instance there was essentially a brothel tent while I was in the middle east where military women were fucking for cash. I knew several to be married, engaged, or seeing someone. Then there were the wives who actually had the balls to try and get me to fuck them even though I worked with their husbands or wanted to cheat on them directly in front of me and expect me to say nothing. Far more of the men I knew were fait…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:36 AM
3

Man, seriously fuck that bitch. As a veteran myself I've never seen as many men married to cuntwaffles in my life. So many would cheat repeatedly. Empty accounts while their husbands were deployed. My advice to future military members...don't bother marrying unless you are going to do 20+ years.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:32 AM
1

She has. More than a few. That is how she got where she is.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 03:35 PM
1

I mean we have a black guy...they are still minorities right? And we did have a wheelchair bound president... MUH INEQUALITY!
/r/MensRights05/07/15 03:35 PM
26

Except those that would be considered the absolute pinnacle of this sport are still generally men. Why are they even making this a gender issue other than to be assholes.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:29 PM
3

No naked pictures and picture of some guy's bare torso, Ok then... steal and publish nude photos not sent to them and publish nude photos sent to them by their intimate partners, when the expectation of privacy is clearly reasonable Uh this is covered by numerous laws and it also isn't any different than your previous point. Both involve posting pictures by a party that did not receive consent to share the images.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 02:22 PM
5

After the scandal at the Baltimore prisons this is no surprise. Women were having sex and children with gang members in exchange they helped them with criminal enterprise. Women are no less scummy than men. Equality and all that. What is really disturbing is we have a rash of women committing what would be statutory rape if the genders were reversed yet not a single woman has ever been in the news for this, presumably not brought to justice either.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:00 AM
21

I didn't bother even clicking the link. This one may be clickbait but there was a very real story that wasn't much different than this. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/08/women-sex-assault-man-toronto-police_n_3036885.html http://news.yahoo.com/man-kidnapped-raped-three-women-101335888.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3071749/Man-raped-gunpoint-THREE-women-collect-semen-cooler-box-steal-South-Africa.html http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5a1_1431029157&comments=1
/r/MensRights07/06/15 11:46 PM
3

Sometimes in the ass.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 11:41 PM
0

I was banned from /r/Baltimore for pointing this out when everyone was freaking out over that criminal Freddy gray. They announced some mod nazi new rules and I asked if it was racist. Banned immediately. It's stupid because I never say it without sources that show in that city over 90% if homicides are by black males
/r/MensRights29/05/15 12:18 AM
1

Talk about a genuinely misleading click bait title. Shitty yes. Calling it organized mafia like crime is another. Source: Disabled veteran
/r/MensRights28/05/15 02:14 AM
1

In Qatar they were literally running prostitution rings in tents that were being rotated. A few were married.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 05:07 AM
0

That judge is just mentally retarded. Once someone is legally an adult the obligation to support them is over. Anything beyond that should be a choice. Somebody fucked up hard in this for that ruling to stand.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:56 PM
3

It doesn't say they have to pay. It says their income should be counted as household income which isn't incorrect.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 07:37 PM
7

Well maybe some. Not 3rd degree ones though.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:36 AM
-3

She did but she was also an air head if she didn't get this. She really didn't deserve any compensation.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:35 AM
3

Rape. Its always rape. Its the next level of escalation.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 04:33 AM
4

Wow, what a despicable person.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:30 PM
5

I wish more men would do this.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:45 AM
1

Why you were downvoted I don't know. You are making a valid point that one is willful and the other is not.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:47 PM
12

However, if you are a single, childless, under 30 woman living in metropolitan areas you are likely to be making the same or more than your male counterpart Because they are more likely to be working similar hours and haven't taken a year+ out of the workforce thus losing experience. There is no such thing as income inequality other than that women impose on themselves.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:44 PM
1

Except if you are going to apply the same criteria for "rape" to men as you do women then the men's rape rate is on par with the women's rape rate. At least.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 12:43 PM
6

There is nothing cleaner about it and I've never had a partner dislike or disapprove of not being. If you are cleaner you aren't that clean to begin with and need to learn how to clean yourself.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 03:58 PM
2

I care about having the person in charge of the armed forces value the suffering of those in the military.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 10:11 PM
2

To me it's not a dumb quote. It's demeaning to my experiences and my suffering
/r/MensRights19/04/15 03:18 PM
2

No but I'm male and a war veteran and she doesn't seem to place any value on what I went through
/r/MensRights19/04/15 01:26 PM
1

Compared to Palin anyone would look good. I really can't believe this is the best they could come up with though.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 11:58 AM
2

Not a chance in hell is Rand Paul winning the primary. He says too much completely stupid shit and that makes him completely unelectable.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 07:27 PM
5

not at a feminazi rally Does it really matter? When you are a public figure that she was giving a public speech that speech is to be of consumption for everyone.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 07:26 PM
27

If its Hillary and a republican...as long as that republican isn't Ted Cruz I'm probably voting republican for the first time in a presidential election.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 07:21 PM
1

Hate to think how long 25 guys with whisky dick would take...figured she would sober up by then.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:05 AM
1

Well he did have a thing for whores.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 01:04 AM
5

stopping my vehicle with a non-moving vehicle Known as crashing into a parked vehicle.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:29 AM
2

But if you have a toddler it shouldn't matter your gender.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:28 AM
0

I'm glad you told her to go eat a bag of dicks because this is retarded.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:23 AM
19

So...1? For every 1 there is 10 or more that couldn't. Source: I've been there.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:38 PM
1

They tend to weigh less than a heavy set of leather steel toed boots, which to me would symbolize the extra burdens men face. I like the boots more than the dress shoes though neither is exactly pleasant to wear for 10-14 hours in a day.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:54 PM
6

You just have to market it as some kind of physical fitness challenge like the warrior run or whatever it is.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:52 PM
21

Women serve and carry packs and go on long as fuck ruck marches too. Uh yeah but no. They are given a pass and have it very much physically easier through the whole process.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:50 PM
21

And when they throw a fit they should get locked in a cage for the duration of the rest of the walk to symbolize the extreme prosecution of men in comparison to women for the same behavior.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:49 PM
1

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/96/FASkid.gif/1024px-FASkid.gif Looking at this she is sort of the poster child. Except the small circumference head thing...that looks like a large melon.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:31 AM
2

Because it probably is. Something has to be wrong with someone to think this was acceptable.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 02:16 AM
9

No reason to think this person would apologize. They already exhibited they are a scumbag by doing the article in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:37 PM
5

This is entirely true. I know I couldn't even when I was in the military.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:50 AM
38

They delete everything that doesn't fit their radical feminist mindset.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:04 AM
5

Especially PJs. With what they do? How can you allow someone's life to be on the line because the even the more fit female military members couldn't drag around an injured male service member to get them to the medivac. I was in training at the same base a lot of them go through their first stage of training. I don't know that I ever met a woman that would be able to sustain that.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:08 PM
21

If you look at the requirements they are definitely in the upper physical capability ranges for men. Maybe 1% of all women on the entire planet could honestly meet that and most of that 1% don't want to be in the special forces. They are begging for people to die if they force some lower standard for them.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:05 PM
11

They should fear lower standards. Its their lives on the line. Most women can't even meet the minimum bar for military entry that men have to meet. Much less the much more rigorous special forces requirements.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:02 PM
3

She is the perfect example to point to when people say women can't be sexist.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:03 AM
-1

20% I think this is the real problem...
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:21 PM
0

And why didn't you? Toughen up.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:19 PM
15

My boss definitely is. She fucking hates this "mo womyn in tech!" and all that shit. Her words are something like "I don't care what you are as long as you are good at your job".
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:25 PM
9

There is no unfairness for women in Silicon Valley. If anything they are given more free passes than any other class of people.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:23 PM
2

Probably is. The Bloomberg article on it flat out calls her a victim. Sorry I don't have the link. Came in on my phone. It was basically "Pao loses but its because of brogrammer culture". Fuck that shit. She didn't have a case at all from the very beginning. This brogrammer shit is moronic as well since it really isn't a thing and certainly not the way they used it.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:23 PM
0

I don't know whether to upvote or downvote. She is a real cunt and you point that out but you don't realize that there is a Jewish ethnicity.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 12:43 PM
2

I couldn't imagine looking at my buddy and saying "Why don't we take this one back". Just looked at the article and I don't think there is enough liquor in a bar for this one and I'm not proud all too proud of some of my past adventures.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 12:35 PM
4

This is a common thing with military members...falsely accused of rape and domestic violence in huge numbers. I've seen it happen. I have no idea why. The women if they are in the service get a massive scarlet letter for false accusations. The men that don't prove their innocence, if handled by the military, lose their livelihood. People say rape/sexual assault is rampant in the military. I say false accusations and prostitution is more prevalent. When I was deployed there was an unused tent whe…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 10:21 PM
1

You should absolutely redo this with the username in place of "Adolf Hitler". Would make it a little more obvious. The first few really could have been Hitler quotes but even Hitler wasn't as bad as some of the ones towards the end.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:40 PM
9

With less FBI red flags!
/r/MensRights27/03/15 02:38 PM
8

Yes. I had someone kick me out of our shared home and apparently I had no legal recourse. This left me homeless sleeping in a park. There isn't anywhere for men to go. She changed the locks while I was at work. According to the Duluth model she was abusing me because she was taking my money and controlling me financially. I had $50 to my name when this happened because she demanded my paycheck to stay there. That wasn't the agreement we had when I had been paying most of her bills and she wanted…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 04:16 AM
6

Its petty complaints until you are completely destroyed financially in a mutual divorce, have your children taken, have a false claim of abuse, or any other number of ways you can be discriminated against.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:41 AM
5

Are we sure we are seeing what we think we are seeing? Looking at the chart in your comment makes it look like their readership increased a lot while people were talking about this but more or less returned to normal levels after the buzz was over. Guess I would need the top one out for a for more months in the past. If its true, awesome. EDIT: Wooo a downvote for wanting to see trend data for more time to show that its actually what happened.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 12:33 PM
2

If he is a really fast walker maybe about 4.5-5 hours each way
/r/MensRights18/03/15 06:12 PM
4

It also doesn't really give any basis she should get $50,000 for the apartment. Sounds like its just a money grab.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 06:10 PM
3

Nice of them to include men. I do remember seeing statistics in a study suggesting socioeconomic variance at one point though. Wish I could remember what the study was but it showed domestic violence to be more prominent in low income low education homes. Not causal but correlation.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 01:26 AM
2

His parents should have pursued charges as well. Everyone would have probably walked away without criminal records. I feel like I've even heard of this happening because the prosecutor didn't want to take the girl to court. Wouldn't even know how accurate I am on this because its only a vague recollection.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 02:35 AM
1

I didn't get this far in life by being a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:40 AM
1

they just have less chances to take advantage of it Fact. Does make identifying this type harder however so there is a chance you could get honey potted.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 03:42 PM
0

Ever heard of sexually transmitted diseases? You might have one.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:48 PM
14

That they don't value intimacy or relationships? Most women with high partner counts have low self esteem or issues with their parents. Generally leads to people not worth investing in a relationship with. Not until they are old enough that they either come around or the hookups get harder. Probably goes for both genders but I only bang chicks so I can only speak from that experience.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:43 PM
3

women with a high partner count are more likely to divorce It could be that they are just sluts and don't value committed intimacy of others in the same way. Losing interest in them quickly after the shine wears off. Couldn't point to a study but its no surprise to me based on experiences if this was proven to be true.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:29 PM
-2

It very much can.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:27 PM
10

I agree. Being like "You are a dirty who ore fucking all them cocks" might be but not being into a chick that hops dick like she is running the hurdles in track and field is not someone I'm attracted to and isn't shaming. It says a lot about their personality and what it says is not something I want.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 12:25 PM
5

The point is this shouldn't be happening and its gender discrimination which is illegal. Not that he could learn it on his own.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:13 AM
3

Canadian law usually isn't that far from US law. Its probably illegal there too.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:11 AM
3

It sort of looks like a Pascal derivative which not that long ago would have been considered a great learning language. Still think they should be using Java, Python, Scheme, or Ruby but its not unheard of. I agree that if they covered loops in most languages variables had to at least be touched on though.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 10:11 AM
2

Most TV judges are real judges. Some are technically retired though so that may have some impact on the binding status of their ruling.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:44 AM
3

She had plenty of years she could have worked while you were at school.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:40 AM
3

Uh, no one said she had to stay home. Or that they had to have children.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 02:36 AM
1

I was largely referring to the case where there is both a vagina and a penis being the case and one is malformed. Either way unless it was really bad it probably should wait for the child to develop some gender identity.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:08 AM
2

I think for me it would depend on the degree of functionality of each genitalia. If its more of a functionally equal split nothing should be done until the child could make that decision for themselves.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:43 AM
6

This is very much a real thing. Its uncommon but real. The chance of having to deal with this or encounter it is small but the topic of what to do at birth is something that should be discussed because it is a serious decision that will impact that child's entire life.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 04:41 AM
1

It doesn't matter if it happened honestly. Its a feminist den and publishing something like that is advocating for those actions. How about if the title was "why I wanted my girlfriend to abort our girl child"
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:30 PM
1

Maybe its not in context but the graham quote seems fine to me. There is a definition problem with rape. That's why men get charged for rape while drunkenly hooking up with a woman but, she also drunk, isn't charged with rape.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:26 PM
1

If it wasn't she very likely wouldn't see a day of jail...
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:22 PM
1

Jekyll offers a blog format. It can be used for more complicated sites as well (doing it now) but its certainly not ideal. A big perk definitely is free hosting on github though. Wish I had time to take this on but between work, my masters, and a startup I'm slowly getting involved in I just don't have the free time.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:51 AM
4

Yes, the western world would be better without any feminist organizations. They are irrelevant now. On the other side if we didn't have them we wouldn't need a men's rights movement at all either. We would just have people looking out for the rights of people.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:58 PM
1

I don't particularly think it was sexual harassment unless she was trying to take pictures of his junk but he certainly should not let this go. This is violence in the work place and is completely unacceptable how he is being dismissed.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:28 AM
3

In the US it would. He is in Israel though so maybe not there.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 02:25 AM
-1

Not even going to click on anything...but let me guess. All muslims?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 12:16 AM
2

I don't need to be taller than her. I'm significantly stronger than her and definitely stronger than anyone that doesn't regularly lift. Any man relative to a woman is capable of offering her strength and protection barring a physical ailment.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 04:21 AM
4

People seem to think it is if the genders were reversed. Assault is essentially unwanted touch and having some bitch throwing things, clawing, and smacking me is assault and she should suffer the same consequences I would if I did the same.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:11 PM
1

Its definitely a good reason not to vote for Hillary after her "women are the real victims of war" bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:15 AM
1

I'd be curious to hear it. Whoopi always seems to be very even keeled and neutral on topics of gender and race when I hear her speak so I assume its Biden being the fucktard.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:11 AM
15

I hope the answer was yes and she is an ex
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:06 AM
3

Not pressing charges furthers the problem. You are supporting injustice by reinforcing the idea that women can get away with this behavior and that falsely accusing men is ok.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 04:03 AM
-7

Please let me itemize the symptoms of dehydration. No, they wouldn't. I understand you are 10 but the world and human body are very complicated things. In the most serious cases, delirium or unconsciousness http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/dehydration/basics/symptoms/CON-20030056
/r/MensRights14/12/14 04:47 AM
2

Exactly. Even though they were crossing the line in some ways they immediately noted this as wrong and took action themselves.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:46 AM
-3

The CIA was not using it for medical purposes. That isn't what the report actually says. It says that it was in response to short hunger strikes. Hydration is important. If they refused to drink for a short period they would die. The need for the feeding is questionable but depending on the length of the hunger strike possibly valid.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:42 AM
0

Yeah, ok. I'm going to take the word of some random wordpress site on this. This isn't "News". Anyway, reading the actual report I'm not sure the claim stands up if this is an actual medical practice. That I don't know. It appears to always have been in response for hunger strikes. The real question is medical necessity and if this is the appropriate way to treat that. I don't know. If it is this is better than having people die under their watch. If it isn't then its awful. Everything I read in…
/r/MensRights14/12/14 03:41 AM
2

They are too stupid to realize that the wage gap is a myth and that they are discriminating. Let me guess...they are all studying liberal arts so they won't make as much as men...because they didn't study what men studied. I like the idea of taking a bunch of homeless men up to them. Good luck finding a homeless woman. There are a lot less of them.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:19 PM
2

My real issue with it is this is a way that would be easy to fake someone else doing. Now if a woman wants to fuck a man over all they have to do is upload a few pics or something and "HE DID IT!". God help you if you have a judge that is too stupid to understand something like IP logs or even care they exist.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 06:39 PM
0

Funny thing about Rice is he isn't even really that big a guy. His is jacked as you have to be to play at his caliber but he is pretty tiny compared to a lot of his ex teammates.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:16 PM
1

It will definitely hold up when you compare men and women in the same fields that pay hourly though I don't have any studies off hand simple logic dictates that if you spread it over a career or find any studies (which there are plenty) that show that men are more likely to put more effort in to their career. At least earning more for working more. I don't know about the hourly rate.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 01:47 PM
-1

Why is she entitled to any of it. She didn't make the company successful. He did with his hard work.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:40 PM
1

Unfortunately most of the time the best male rights candidate is also bad for everyone. Not really helping but also not further destroy male equity.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:51 PM
-6

The insanity of this reminds just shows one more reason alimony shouldn't be a thing.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 12:46 PM
1

And do that stupid whistle call in stores to gather their people.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 04:12 AM
2

Exactly. Most of that video is shot in more poor areas where this would be fairly common in the first place just because shitbags live there. They are making it out to be common but if you roll through the hood with your shit hanging out someone might just think you are down to fuck and lack the tact to not ask for it. No more than I would walk would flaunting an iPhone 6, a hand held game system, and a bag of deblumes in the same neighborhood.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:56 AM
1

I'm sure its not accepted as a real thing outside of the circles that intersect with the beliefs around here. It exists though.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:53 PM
4

Ah, the wheel. This is a common prop in "abuse prevention" classes. Any time someone brings up "she does X right here in the wheel" they get told then they shouldn't have done whatever it was to piss her off in not so many words.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:59 AM
1

I never said he shouldn't be released if he is a threat. That is why I'm glad he was tried as an adult so he wouldn't be turned loose when he turned 18.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:22 PM
1

He still murdered his family. He should be punished while receiving therapy. And I'm a vet. Homeless guy goes to jail while being medicated. This kid probably would have been let out way early but he killed himself before that happened.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:03 PM
2

Personally, I'd like to see eligibility for parole come a lot earlier for many sentences. I'm sorry, double homicide isn't on that list for me.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:50 PM
2

No, it means he plead to a lesser charge which allowed him to escape a trial where a jury almost certainly would have convicted him of two counts of first degree.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:49 PM
1

That was the option exercised. Instead of being charged as an adult for 2 counts of first degree murder he was charged to lesser charges which would allow him to be eligible for release before he was middle aged.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:48 PM
2

Exactly, it could have been a good message but it wasn't. Its basically a rallying cry to get men to ensure they are more oppressed. Wouldn't be the first time people do things against their own interests though.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:39 PM
-2

Because he is a cold calculated killer and shouldn't be released at 18
/r/MensRights24/09/14 01:36 PM
4

Oh give me a break. People at 13 know killing their grandparents is not right.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:44 AM
32

Because they had mercy on him. There is nothing about this that isn't premeditated. His lawyer probably sold a hard "so abused" story and played to sympathy. Maybe an "expert" had testimony that swayed things. EDIT: It was actually a plea deal. I have no reason to doubt a jury would have convicted him of 2 counts of first degree murder if it went to trial given what he did without some seriously shady court work by the defense.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:54 AM
3

You don't fix this level of fucked up by time he would have been 18 if its even possible. He had to be charged as an adult to keep him secure. He killed himself and his grand parents. He is the one that did all this.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 06:14 AM
15

Are you daft? This was a well staged and planned double murder that took great effort to perform. It spanned a pretty long span of time. He had to break into the gun safe. Then he put headphones on and bumped some music while sneaking up behind his grandmother and assassinating her. He then called his grandfather that had been shopping and when he was bringing in the groceries he took the pizza in one hand and shot him to death with the other. The kid was a fucking sociopath.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:58 AM
106

No, he isn't just a kid. He is a kid that committed two counts of premeditated murder. He had to go seek out bolt cutters to get into the locked guns. Then he decided to listen to some music, sneak up to his grandmother and shoot her to death. He then called his grandfather, when he showed up with pizza he took it, then grabbed the gun and shot him until the gun jammed. This isn't some quick crime of passion. This is psychotic horrific behavior.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:53 AM
14

Did you even read what he did? He committed two counts of premeditated murder.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:51 AM
5

Uh, I'm not exactly upset about this. He brutally murdered two people. He deserved to be charged as an adult. If he wasn't he would have been out in 5 years. For the people that don't think or read. This was cold and calculated premeditated murder. He killed one and wasn't even phased by it. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/09/14319183-police-13-year-old-killed-grandparents-after-they-called-his-mother-a-whore?lite http://www.post-gazette.com/local/region/2012/10/09/Oil-City-13-year-old-c…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:51 AM
4

Trauma victims should deal with triggers by learning to deal with them That's what myself and others said in the thread linked above. Your trauma is yours to deal with. I have my own and I don't expect anyone to change their lives to accommodate me. I had to change myself and I did with therapy and exposure to things that cause anxiety. I'd feel like a real dickhead if I made everyone accommodate me when I'm the one with the problem.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:24 PM
3

If there was a federal law then the states could cry all they want but in the end they would have to fuck off. That's fine by me in this case.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:50 PM
7

Yeah, even if they have to be given a state/fed run debit card to charge child items to so there can be some oversight. I've seen plenty of single mothers abusing their child support and insane.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:50 PM
2

Signed. We need a lot more exposure on this if it hasn't already been addressed. Its absolutely ludicrous a man should have to pay child support after being raped or even someone using guile to get pregnant.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 11:48 PM
3

Having been to war, she can eat a massive bag of dicks. The real victims are the people that die, the people that have to kill, and the people there having to deal with the shit at home while still doing their job abroad.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:46 PM
8

If the gender roles were reversed there would have been officers dispatched and he would have been charged with assault for it.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 01:49 PM
0

Machines that would be considered "computers" in a pre defined turing definition existed. He didn't invent them but he did define a lot of what a programmable computer should be. The Turing Machine was predated by Babbage by a looooong time.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:01 PM
1

Yeah, there really is little evidence to support she actually was. It seems to be convenient to say she was though. I don't care one way or another. Women definitely were more prominent in the field at one point but I'm not sure if it was more along the lines of data entry or actually deriving algorithms. Instincts tell me it was more of a data entry role due to the general structure of the field at the time which was largely based in mathematics and electrical engineering which women were typic…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:42 PM
2

M denotes the Roman numeral for 1000
/r/MensRights21/05/14 07:21 PM
162

I think its incredibly sexist. Context would be determine if I ended up getting pissed over it though. Who the person is and their personality. Completely different if its a comedian or a radical "feminist" for example.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:24 AM
0

Most of which were white males. I get it. I think he sort of gets it but he had a very long winded prelude to getting to it. Being a white male I think puts a lot of people at a disadvantage. He isn't one of those on the front described however as he comes from, at least, an upper middle class family. His family history is rough but he experienced none of it. Its not to say he won't face race or gender bias but I still think if he tackled it from a different angle that his story would be so ill …
/r/MensRights05/05/14 04:48 AM
6

Reading the end of the article he pretty much says its not his struggles but the struggles of his parents and grandparents and their choices that got him where he is...not so much his own. So technically maybe he should check his privilege since he is privileged through the struggle of his parents.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:43 PM
-1

The opinions in some of the responses are innocent and others are downright oppressive in that they minimize what men go through.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:00 AM
1

Seems reasonable to do it given her attitude and circumstances though. Doing it early seems like it could mitigate some of this should it not be yours and the relationship was obviously troubled or this wouldn't be going on right now.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:26 PM
3

Don't forget to evaluate work place value of women that take time off related to bearing children. In my opinion people ignore this a lot in the big picture. Men spend more years in the work force than women. Seniority tends to come with pay.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 03:53 AM
2

Probably advisable to get a paternity test...
/r/MensRights15/04/14 01:09 AM
12

I would have stopped first...
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:59 PM
30

Female violence is often justified as "he deserved it" This literally just happened to me. I have been dating someone for a while now and she was asking about my past relationships and when I mentioned some of the violence she asked what did I do that these kinds of things have happened to me. I had a strong desire to kick her out of the car.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:14 PM
120

Don't go to /r/relationships because you will enter a rage you will never return from.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 07:11 PM
17

I've never heard of a man working out at curves. In fact their tag line is "Curves, a gym for women". Considering its women we are talking about I doubt there is a law against it...if the gender was reversed though they would be shut down.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:22 AM
11

This is a new level of stupid. Chances are, if they are so insecure to be in the weight room they wouldn't even be overlapping weights with an average male. Chances are no one would give a damn if they were in there as you have learned. That is a whole other issue. Why can women have women only gyms but men can't have men only gyms.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:20 AM
6

There is not any special room for women in any gym I've ever been to except the locker rooms and it should be legally impermissible.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:19 AM
15

Most might be a stretch. I always find gaggles that stand around the equipment I would like to use running their fat greasy hair topped mouths.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:14 AM
15

Planet Fitness isn't restricted to female membership. They just tend to have shit for weights. You left out Lynn Bricks
/r/MensRights06/04/14 04:11 AM
14

Cats are vile creatures so if he is doing ok with them I'm sure its safe to say your son is in for a treat.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:47 AM
-8

He is a traitorous asshole. Recognizing that he isn't a whistle blower but a treasonous asshole is a good thing. If he was a whistle blower he wouldn't have sold classified information to Russia and China. It was but just a few years ago we had a whistle blower. He didn't sell secrets to foreign nations or reveal more than was needed to make his point.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:46 PM
1

I have one but I don't ever see that interaction though her peers, she calls them idiots etc openly.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:44 PM
-9

Being anti Snowden actually redeems her for me. He is a scumbag.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:19 PM
4

What the fuck do they think making a demand like that makes them? I've had a lot of bosses in my time and women are consistently the worst I've had. Its like they are complete assholes just for the sake of being assholes. Like they have to prove a point.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 11:01 PM
1

How old is the child? I was just thinking we could be talking a decade at this level. Plus, if your career fortune turns you will be stuck at this level until you can get back into court to reduce it. Its better to have the required amount and give more where you can than to be at the top of your ability to give and have something happen that limits your ability to pay. This is where the lawyer comes in.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:10 PM
1

Thinking about the period this order would apply I'd think the cost of a lawyer would be minor.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter