TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tremenfing Archive

View 3 posts and 128 comments by tremenfing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
770

tremenfing/r/MensRights28/05/13 04:02 AM
23

Red Pill Exampletremenfing/r/TheRedPill06/09/13 12:28 AM
9

tremenfing/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:43 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Everything in the subway cars is in on camera anyway. Though probably shittier quality.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:40 AM
1

Oh, those people harass everyone, not just women. And primarily they want to ask you for money, drugs or to sell you drugs, and they get pissed if you aren't polite to them. If you don't feel safe there, don't worry, no one does. Tourists often don't anticipate the streets to be a humanitarian disaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/14 07:34 AM
3

No you don't. What if someone said they were uncomfortable around muslims or homosexuals?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/14 07:18 AM
3

Marxism and feminism have had historical links that can still be seen today. At least, academic feminist theorists have been at times heavily influenced by Marxist ideas. Most people bring it up because Marxism is a snarl word for them personally and/or that it insinuates that feminists are really socialists in disguise. Though these are components of stupid arguments, strictly the premise is not completely wrong. Marx came up with the idea of history being fundamentally a great struggle between…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/14 06:58 AM
1

Perhaps. It seems to me like she does have the ability to pick and choose. Then again, we're both debating over what another person thinks, which is probably not the most reasonable of discussions! I agree, I should have said "OP felt she could". I agree that should could pick and choose whatever she wants from anything she wants philosophically, but it seems that she felt she could not do that within the social groups of these people that she encountered I find the whole premise of a "consensus…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/14 11:04 PM
1

RP is overly toxic and negative. Women vary more than RP says they do but less than BP says they do. RP engages in too much mental masturbation, circle jerking and ego stroking, and this is a waste of time. Alternatively, RP is often deeply dark and depressing. Feminists tell women they're supposed to want things that they don't actually want. Women aren't interested in becoming computer programmers, so women need to be told that they want to be computer programmers. Women shouldn't just try to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/14 05:48 AM
1

My reading of it was not just participation but that of ideological conformity. OP could take and choose whatever she wanted from RP but feminist groups wanted everyone to act and think in agreement with the consensus view. Which is something you see a lot in feminist forums/subreddits.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/14 04:51 AM
0

Are you sure TRP makes guys bitter or are bitter guys are drawn to TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/14 04:41 AM
1

Here are two statements: (a) Men are misogynists (b) Some men are misogynists. If you're philosophically literate, you'd get that (a) implies that all men are misogynists by nature or nurture. That's just wrong. On the other hand, at least one man is a misogynist in order for (b) to be true. But are we making categorical syllogisms here or making political claims about mass psychology? If I were to say that some X are Y in a political argument and I knew that the few cases where X are Y are extr…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/14 03:18 AM
0

I don't have to defend it because it's patently true That's exactly it – it's patently true but may be technically true but may be irrelevant. Just because you can find one person somewhere is not identical with what you were trying to imply. You are trying to imply this is a general trend with enough number of people to be relevant when you throw around "some" a lot, not one person somewhere that can eventually be found. That's not the image that the statement suggests. But when asked to defend…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/14 10:58 PM
1

It makes you sound like you're making some kind of statistical generalization knowing you don't have to defend it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 06:17 PM
1

The idea of young girls being married off to hairy old men is more excitatory folklore than reality. One thousand marriage certificates from 1619 to 1660 in the Archdiocese of Canterbury show that only one bride was 13 years of age, four were 15, twelve were 16, and seventeen were 17 years of age while the other 966 brides were at least 19 years of age at marriage. And the Church dictated that both the bride and groom must be at least 21 years of age to marry without the consent of their familie…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 03:50 AM
1

And this is the problem with the feminist epistemology: scientific-sounding words and claims strewn about with weasel words ("some, some, some") with no evidence other than introspection
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 02:55 AM
2

Nah, if that were true, women would, say, masturbate as often as men do albeit only thinking of the top 20% of men when they did so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 02:31 AM
2

I asked first. Your answer is no, is it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 02:17 AM
2

Is this your way of saying you would not in fact like to be "accepted" but not attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 12:09 AM
2

they are also good looking, successful, famous and rich
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/14 08:54 PM
2

accepted doesn't exactly equal attractive... but it's in the same general ball park. Would you like to be "accepted" but not attractive to anyone?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/14 08:48 PM
2

didn't make it, found it somewhere. don't remember where.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/14 08:46 PM
25

http://i.imgur.com/J5L4Ien.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/14 06:24 AM
0

Fucking statistics, how does it work?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/14 07:42 AM
2

When they do choose casual sex, they're going to make damn sure it's someone that can get them off. Note the assumption that women are to be passive during sex, and sex is a matter of the man doing things which may or may not please the woman. the woman is sort of like an audience to the performance and takes no role in its direction other than showing up.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/14 03:44 AM
1

trick may have been the key word to google for is "reliability". Though it is a type of correlation
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 06:29 AM
2

http://jonathanstray.com/papers/Langlois.pdf Table 3, r =~ .9, which is as close to perfect correlation as you're going to get
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/14 08:57 PM
2

I think the guy you're replying to is being unfair, but I think perhaps a more pertinent difference is women like to see themselves as or give themselves credit for being empathetic, which makes it more frustrating when it really falls down
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/14 06:14 PM
6

MRAs are entitled 20 something dudes who don't have a sophisticated enough analysis to realize that feminism isn't responsible for workplace accidents and the fuckin draft. MRAs blame feminism for a few things such as family court issues but I've never heard of an MRA that believes feminists are the cause of workplace deaths, though perhaps it can be found if you look hard enough. I think that accusing MRAs of blaming feminism for some things which they usually don't is a common straw man agains…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/14 03:43 AM
1

"that creepy guy over there" - is that some unheard of phrase? It's just a general insult.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/14 05:29 PM
-1

In almost all cited instances of creep shaming, it seems to be more of an issue of violating personal boundaries and societal norms, something that both genders face repercussions for, not just men. "Almost all"? What statistic did you get this from? Are men called creepy when they DONT violate people's personal boundaries according to generally accepted social norms? Yes. It's just a way to say you think someone is disgusting. They don't have to be "violating people's personal boundaries". They…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/14 07:56 AM
1

more specific
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 03:02 AM
0

Where the hell was that?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/14 02:58 AM
1

Her victim wasn't the rapist
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:58 PM
2

I just find it impressive that It's not some fringe site 50 upvotes It's a heavily moderated forum and NYTimes sees no need to moderate this
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:22 AM
1

Publication bias is a thing that exists, yes
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 05:17 PM
2

It's far, far harder to get any result with a large sample size. It's much easier to get significant result because even tiny effects may be significant at that size. with a small sample size, it's a lot easier for noise to complicate the sample and show a result where they may not be one, for there to be a lack of random sampling, for there to be unknown confounds, etc. If it was possible to get a result due to randomness, you were using too small a sample. Unknown confounds and lack of random …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 02:58 PM
2

(nitpick) Small differences in large sample sizes are way, way more significant than big differences in tiny sample sizes. No, actually they're exactly proportional. sample size is one factor, another is effect size. If you have a large effect size a small sample is sufficient. If you have a small effect size then you need a large sample to show it at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 06:22 AM
1

If it showed that men were better leaders the study would not have been published If you were writing this study and your results showed that men were better leaders, what would you do? Rush to publish it? Maybe not... maybe there was something wrong with the results, maybe we can find something that women are good at and add that to the study...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 05:29 AM
4

a private investigator can do a lot with that though
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:04 PM
2

Male vagrants are homeless because they deserve it. Female vagrants are homeless because society failed them (... patriarchy, inequality, lack of empathy, whatever excuse under the sun). I have never, literally never heard someone say or even imply this. The people I know of the "fuck homeless people, they deserve it" school have never specified that only the men deserve it, and the people on the other end of the scale have never expressed greater compassion for female vs male homeless people. D…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/14 02:42 AM
4

True believers in gender equality only listen to women and not a bunch of mansplainers
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 07:17 AM
3

so, it's confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/14 07:12 AM
1

I think that if there's something you're not willing to make fun it makes it look like you're just being a dick and that makes it less fun. Anger, bitter, contempt. It could still be called satire but it's only "funny" to a people with the same bitterness and others would might instead call it a poor attempt at satire. I think snark is a better word for it, because of its contempt. Did you think the anti-global warming article was good satire? I suspect not, for the same reasons why people would…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 08:42 PM
1

I unsubbed circlebroke when I felt like it had become itself a circlejerk. There's a joke in that somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 04:21 AM
2

I would compare it to this type of "humor": http://www.ideasinactiontv.com/tcs_daily/2005/06/time-for-action-on-global-warming.html The author would also say he is just doing satire. But it's not funny I think because it's full of contempt. He's saying that these people are wrong and his perspective is right. But a satirist would be willing to make fun of anything. Is there anything that The Onion wouldn't make fun of? Is there anything that this guy wouldn't be willing to make fun of? And is th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 04:12 AM
-1

Language is important, and far from arbitrary. It shapes and reflects our thinking, at the individual and societal level. This is not controversial, and there's tons of evidence for it. I conjecture that it is plainly obvious that it is controversial, even if you believe there is tons of evidence for it. This idea has had a very very long, checkered history in academia and the only reliable effects have been small and regarding things like color and direction of objects.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/14 09:04 AM
7

I see this attitude on Jezebel all the time: Post #1: Women understand men, men don't understand women!! Post #2: Puzzle over men's behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/14 11:45 PM
1

"Basically everything ever done" is a strong claim. As far as I can tell that's nearly the only study on the subject, at least using that phrasing token resistance is also not quite the same as last minute resistance, for whatever that's worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/14 09:50 AM
1

pink blankets or "congratulations! It's a girl!" cards from the bedside table). see, but those pink blankets and congratulations cards are speculation. We have no way of knowing. It is certainly not a strength of the study. But to say the contrary was proven is unfounded.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/14 09:33 AM
1

what research, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/14 09:03 AM
1

This is interesting, except that we find that this difference disappears when the person holding the mechanical device (normally a mobile) or showing their face, doesn't know the sex of the baby. That is, the responses of the babies change, and the sex differences emerge, as a direct result of the person interacting with them treating them differently. In other words, the studies that find the differences are not blinded. I believe you have misheard. That the experimenter really knew the gender …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/14 08:54 AM
2

One example is the notion of "last minute resistance" being common in women - science tells us this isn't true (and in fact is probably more common in men, which refutes the whole reasoning behind the initial idea as well since men aren't often worried about being viewed as sluts). What's this now?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/14 08:39 AM
0

Because I've seen some really back-asswards generalizations on their sub which they defend, even in the face of counter evidence. If you can think of generalizations that they would disagree with, then this should convince you that do not believe in all generalizations. Or is it only generalizations that they come up with are correct? This question relies on generalization to be meaningful. "They" don't believe everything that "they" come up with assuming any debate happens therein at all, nor d…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 03:37 AM
1

And here I thought you guys loved generalizations! This does not mean that they think all generalizations are correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/14 03:25 AM
6

Girls are attracted by status/power/money and guys are attracted to looks. It's an even barter. Difference is guys don't deny this, but girls put on a level 4 mental gymnastics show
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 04:25 AM
2

dress basic assumptions up as averages what does that even mean? doesn't mean one should worship averages No one "worships averages". If you can't/shouldn't use averages of populations, throw out all of your social science textbooks. doesn't understand why they are using them, let alone how. I have no idea what this is supposed to mean
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/13 09:45 PM
1

So you're conceding this point, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/13 08:43 AM
2

If it's to better understand a specific individual within that group, I disregard the average. I bet you don't. I bet you start with basic assumptions that you've learned over time from experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/13 03:30 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyx1U9QjWVQ
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/13 08:05 AM
8

If this is a fallacy, then you basically can't make any generalization, such as "many members of TRP don't want a specific woman, they want a woman" or "People want to be loved for their individual traits". The average person doesn't exist, the average red piller doesn't exist, etc. How can you say TRP will always lose when there is no average red piller?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/13 05:48 AM
0

I'm not suggesting that "hey want to have sex" is a good opening line. It is, for women. Or that its pure statistical error he failed. I'm saying it's unlikely that he was just always a little off and still be 0/100. If he were just a little off it's likely that some woman would care a little less and it would work and since that never happened it's unlikely that he was just a little off. Have you ever read "what do women want" by Daniel Bergner? It discusses this exact study and suggests that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/13 05:47 PM
1

It shows the hypotheticals you suggested are unlikely. If it's been replicated many times, it's not likely that it was reliably always just a little bit off every time. If it were usually slightly off, chances are it would still happen off. It were "slightly" off every time, then it's not chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/13 08:56 AM
0

this experiment has been replicated probably hundreds of times. I'm never seen one where even one woman has said yes. http://www.elainehatfield.com/79.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/13 07:23 PM
1

compare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxyySRgrYsU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JJFBtHcBnM
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/13 05:34 AM
2

TBP calls TRP discussion of "rape strategy". not some random commenters, it's right there in the sidebar. Do you think that's healthy?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/13 04:45 AM
7

some genders need to be more equal than others
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:58 AM
9

that's the point – it's supposed to sound like it means something specific and important when it is neither http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM-64UzKKZ0
/r/MensRights17/12/13 10:00 AM
8

not like critical theory is any better
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:22 AM
10

it's a 30-year-old, non-peer reviewed survey conducted by a feminist magazine
/r/TheRedPill19/10/13 12:54 AM
55

In other words gynocentrism
/r/MensRights21/09/13 07:06 PM
2

hardly the horror story it could have been
/r/MensRights24/08/13 07:13 AM
1

I gave up on him during elevatorgate when he said that social misjudgment or unfairness is literally impossible for women.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 06:20 AM
4

Talk to MEN. What do you do if you get stuck talking to a weirdo? Last time I tried this the guy kept rambling about some conspiracy
/r/askTRP11/08/13 04:01 AM
1

it's like this “This is so stupid!” she sighs at Target, about the pink rows of dolls and the blue rows of Lego. “Why don’t they just put a penis or a vagina on every toy so you can be completely sure you’re getting the right one?” Seems like a good thing to teach a nine year old to say
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:43 PM
29

I want to hate him, but this isn't fun anymore.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:50 AM
2

If you think that's bad, you should see rationalwiki: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_activism
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:39 AM
12

The problem with patriarchy is that it is an unfalsifiable, pre-scientific idea that is about as useful as believing in any other pre-scientific idea that doesn't make any hard predictions about anything about the world
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 03:18 AM
2

I think is a better answer
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 03:53 AM
2

I don't think that's a sufficient explanation, considering that probably no one that you could sleep with is watching your voting behavior. This theory might predict that men would only downvote when they think women are watching
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 11:35 PM
4

putting a label on something doesn't mean you have explained it
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 09:41 PM
4

I clicked on the link. It was just normal social justice warrior stuff.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 12:00 PM
2

I don't know what the statistical difference is... there's probably an okcupid post about it
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:49 AM
31

A female friend once advised me that it would be a "red flag" for women that I didn't list my income on my OKCupid profile, something that wouldn't have ever occurred to me...
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:39 PM
1

objectification = attraction + disapproval (not necessarily by the person attracted to)
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:38 PM
2

The average person doesn't know or care to know about falsifiability, and will just go for confirmation bias instead
/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:52 AM
4

Also you can sometimes find attractive girls at Marist, something much more difficult to do at Vassar
/r/MensRights02/07/13 10:49 PM
2

Use only your very strongest arguments. If you use a mix of strong and weak arguments, she'll distract herself with the weak ones and pretend she never heard the strong ones. Don't disagree on every single point. Let some things pass. Don't quibble. Don't appear antagonistic or make it a contest of wills. Don't make it so that she must accept shame or loss of face in order to accept your point of view. Use arguments of the form, "if that were true, wouldn't we expect to observe X?" Accept a weak…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 09:22 PM
0

sounds like victim blaming to me
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:39 PM
15

Women are the primary breadwinners 30% of the time but pay alimony 3% of the time. This doesn't stack up.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:23 PM
2

It's stupefying how dramatically girls' personalities can changes when they're no longer in mixed company
/r/TheRedPill17/06/13 05:32 AM
5

rationalization, mental gymnastics
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 01:39 AM
2

How was this person able to see something coherent in thebluepill?
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:40 PM
3

There is a point where they will acknowledge that that were wrong - when they see no way out of group rejection unless they do so. Then all of a sudden OMG I AM SO SO SORRY WAAAAAHhh
/r/TheRedPill11/06/13 01:41 AM
1

Televangelists figured this out a long time ago
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:23 PM
1

It's cause you only notice it when it's bad. If it's good it's hard to detect, by definition.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:14 AM
2

I forget where I read it (I think I heard it in a few different places) but there was the story of the family that gave their daughter a toy truck to play with and later found her carrying it in her arms, wrapped in a blanket, gently rocking it back and forth saying "poor little truckie, it's going to be okay" or boys turning pieces of fruit into toy guns
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:29 AM
2

She described what her idea of the ideal gender neutral lego should for boys and girls as being about relationships and characters with feelings and lots of female characters, in other words basically describing something like lego friends except for the pink and purple color choices which she didn't like.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:20 AM
1

Emotional Kickstarter campaigns profitable you say?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 07:08 AM
8

"Patriarchy" is bullshit. If you say patriarchy causes X and not Y, and I say patriarchy causes Y and not X, there is no way to resolve the disagreement. It's an unscientific idea, a type common to perhaps all pre-scientific ideologies.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:55 AM
1

Original thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1fgjip/reddit_what_is_a_ridiculous_taboo_that_you_would/caa3293?context=1
/r/TheRedPill03/06/13 03:53 AM
3

"rape culture" is an idea that can be used to attach the moral warrant of "stopping rape" to anything you don't like. Sexy pictures of women in magazines? Don't like them? It would be petty to just say that you personally don't like them and therefore it should be stopped. But some blog told you about rape culture – sexy pictures like this cause rape. It doesn't really matter how – just cock your head back and think of the first chain of causality that would explain how sexy pictures could cause…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/13 05:33 AM
1

A more charitable interpretation is that they are not necessarily incapable of debate, but they see their point of view as not debatable, at least not with you, the enemy.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/13 05:22 AM
23

poster probably not a native english speaker; they use . as a thousands separator in some countries see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_mark which indicates poster may be from either: Brazil, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, Slovenia or Greece
/r/MensRights30/05/13 04:29 AM
0

Reading comprehension! Those comments say women do not have it worse to varying degrees, but not that men overall have it worse!
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:49 AM
-1

zero of those comments say men have it worse two of them say women shouldn't complain about hurt feelings or having doors held open in comparison to this
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:29 PM
2

I'm pretty sure that the person being killed or maimed really does suffer more than someone who prays against it
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:34 PM
0

This post makes no such claims
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:27 PM
3

that's kind of the joke
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 05:47 PM
6

http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/ziegel.asp
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:11 AM
3

There are two kinds of people in the world: those that separate all people into two groups, and those that don't. I belong to the second kind.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 04:14 AM
0

It's valenced biased now. Women don't have agency for negatives but do have agency of positives. Men don't have agency for positives but do have agency for negatives.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 03:27 AM
-2

Is it the same in Denmark or the other Nordic countries?
/r/TheRedPill28/05/13 03:25 AM
3

not my point
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 11:24 PM
5

The republican party is really just for freedom! Why are so many people against freedom!!?!
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 10:06 PM
6

Maybe it's because it's something men do that they don't. So there must be something wrong with it. Men marrying Thai women? Must be something wrong with it. Boys like to play with toy trucks instead of dolls? Must be something wrong with it.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 08:44 PM
4

Naturally enough crotch-shots of men will solve the problem, of course
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 08:42 PM
1

I think it's because they idealize and remove the agency of immigrants much as they idealize and remove the agency of women Immigrants riot only as a reaction to society, much as women only act hatefully as a reaction to men. Society and men are the ones at fault.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 08:41 PM
2

The rest of Scandinavia considers Finnish people to be weird and off-putting socially
/r/TheRedPill27/05/13 08:14 PM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleonasm
/r/TheRedPill24/05/13 06:21 AM
1

If she were faking it I would think she would choose a more attractive type of British accent 'ere ah some tips feh owlda gois
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 07:08 PM
3

Ugh, that accent. freshen yeh drink, govnah?
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 02:46 PM
4

That type (in my experience) stays with the guy for a week or three before moving on to the next one There's another type that bones 2-3 guys a week. They're a distinct set
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 02:10 PM
1

Often it seems to me that female critics of feminism are wayyy more articulate, which is kind of sad....
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 02:02 PM
2

Japan suppresses masculinity but is also rather less-than feminist
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 02:00 PM
2

Where did the author claim to have explained "all of the issues in modern relationships"?
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 01:49 PM
1

I don't Randian heroes would care about that distinction
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 07:31 PM
1

Then it would be not wrong to accept any government service because you pay taxes, which would render the moral rule of never accepting government aid meaningless.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 06:14 PM
3

When women feel bad, their minds always explain it to them as someone else behaving immorally. always.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 03:39 PM
2

That's totally unfair. It's a book for 14 year olds to feel smart about.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 02:23 PM
1

Ayn Rand preached that accepting government aid was hugely immoral even if it's otherwise in your self-interest to do so.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 02:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter