CaptLeibniz Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
6	How do submissive men utilize this information?		CaptLeibniz	/r/seduction	22/12/16 07:05 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Just a reminder that according to reddit admins. Hate against men (which includes trans and minority men) is not against the rules of reddit. *still are biologically female FTFY	/r/MensRights	19/12/24 11:32 PM
-2	Stop making the patriarchy a thing. It’s not a thing. I agree with the sentiment behind this post. But I'd also like to suggest that we stop diluting the language with inane phrases like "stop making ___ a thing. Its not a thing." You sound like a valley girl.	/r/MensRights	30/11/24 10:02 PM
1	Women Transitions Into A Man And Doesn't Like Being A Man White imperialism 🙄	/r/MensRights	19/07/22 07:12 PM
1	This is what modern feminism has come to. Most of the things it stands for is seemingly petty and trivial. Fair enough. But I think a lot of people are willing to concede a difference between slightly overweight and morbidly obese.	/r/MensRights	06/08/18 01:47 PM
2	Woman rapes boy multiple times. Prostitutes him. Posts nude photos of him and provides him with drugs. Seems prosecutor is trying very hard not to charge her with a sex crime. Soon to receive a pussy pass. Oh your right. My bad!	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 01:54 PM
1	Woman rapes boy multiple times. Prostitutes him. Posts nude photos of him and provides him with drugs. Seems prosecutor is trying very hard not to charge her with a sex crime. Soon to receive a pussy pass. should be spared no mercy. I think you mean we should have no mercy on her. If we spare her no mercy than we're being gratuitously merciful (:	/r/MensRights	21/05/18 09:26 AM
6	Stop Mansplaning the Moon. In parliamentary debate now in college. This is exactly right. Policy ftw tho, can't stand value res's.	/r/MensRights	07/07/17 07:02 PM
2	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change Oh, the reason I didn't address your question was because it is rendered irrelevant by my analysis. Probably should've made that more explicit, my bad. If Christ sacrifice functions as our substitutional atonement, it's impossible to not keep part of the law; as it has been kept already by Christ. Did you think I'd enjoy a sermon? If you don't want to answer simple questions, you can fuck right off. No need to be unnecessarily disparaging; just makes reddit a worse place. My response was an hone…	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 09:12 AM
0	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change God believed Man could fulfill his law. Read my other comment for an explanation of this.	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 06:55 AM
1	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change You say yourself, the "Midianites were good people." When I say that, I should clarify. By that I mean they were, apparently, in keeping with ancient Israelite practices for quite some time. The only way one could 'curse' is from a false god, correct? Something that should be irrational to true believers of the one God right? Yup, There is only one God, correct. First thing to note; read the story about the curse. See what happens, then come back to me. You'll know what I'm talking about after y…	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 06:53 AM
2	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change The law was, put simply, a contract between God and man. Man: Keep certain commandments God: If the law is kept in it's entirety, I will not let you die; you will live eternally. Since nobody keeps the Law in its fullest, everyone is due to die in torment as punishment for violating the Law. Christ came to the earth, lived his entire life in complete accordance with the Law, and willingly sacrificed himself for all of the other lawbreakers (i.e., us). He rose from the grave three days later to p…	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 06:14 AM
1	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change Right on; thanks for helping illuminate Christ as the source of our substitutionary atonement (:	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 06:09 AM
1	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change God gave the Law. It was hard to fulfill. Jesus came to fulfill it for us because it was so difficult. God was wrong when he instantiated the law, not realizing how difficult it would be. This appears to be your line of logic. By what logical rule of inference can you necessarily conclude premise 4? There are numerous reasons why the Law might have been given. Perhaps it was difficult so as to demonstrate the holiness of God and the utter depravity of man; that man could never, despite his best …	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 06:07 AM
1	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change Have you read the whole story of what happens with Israel's encounter with the Midianites? Maybe it would help to explain what exactly happened here. The Midianites are the descendants of Midian (Gen 25:2), the son of Abraham and his wife after Sarah died, Keturah. For quite some time, the Midianites were good people. Jethro, Moses' father-in-law, was a Midianites priest (Ex 2:16; 18). After a while, relations between Israel and the Midianites started to deteriorate. This culminates in the Midia…	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 05:58 AM
2	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change Ah, yes, I'm familiar with that passage. Here is the entire paragraph of that scripture: 17 Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. 19 Therefore whoever relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but …	/r/MensRights	06/06/17 05:33 AM
13	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change Yup, also true. This is meant to say that the law didn't change, but was fulfilled in Christ. It was merely our orientation to the law that was altered. At first it was an insurmountable obstacle to communion with God. Now we practice it out of thankfulness for God's grace in having elected us to salvation.	/r/MensRights	05/06/17 09:02 PM
7	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change Hi, I'm in seminary at present. Thought I could provide insight. wasn't seen as a bad thing Just because it doesn't receive explicit mention in the Torah doesn't mean it isn't flagrantly opposed to it (e.g. Masturbation, cocaine, other things). If the second greatest command is to love your neighbor, such that their best interests are of maximal priority, then rape definitely violates the law, as it is the prioritization of your own interests beyond the well-being of the victim.	/r/MensRights	05/06/17 08:49 PM
1	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change You're thinking of Jacobs daughter being raped. Yeah Jacobs sons, sans Joseph, murdered the entire tribe of the rapist while they were recovering from circumcision.	/r/MensRights	05/06/17 08:44 PM
30	A bit of a lighthearted post for a change Hi, I'm currently a seminary student and thought I could explain this a bit better. The old testament law, or Torah, is comprised of three parts: ceremonial, civil, and moral. The ceremonial and civil portions of the law were only binding on the actual nation of Israel before the covenant of grace that is ushered in by Jesus. This is because under the Mosaic covenant, the favor of God would only be granted on the condition that the entire law was kept. However, the covenant of grace, as prophesi…	/r/MensRights	05/06/17 08:42 PM
1	Tumblr feminist defends a woman who raped an 8 year old boy. (x-post from r/CringeAnarchy) This is actually evil. Blows my mind how politically-motivated ideology completely blinds people to their conscience. I got the same thing once when talking to an old friend of mine who decided to minor in womens' studies. He came back telling me that black people were incapable of being racist. They could be prejudiced, but couldn't be racist. Racism and sexism are exclusive to the oppressive demographic, i.e., white people and men. What a disgrace.	/r/MensRights	02/06/17 06:13 AM
2	Do this quick exercise if you experience approach anxiety when you go out. Skip to 2:25.	/r/seduction	16/04/17 04:58 AM
1	How do submissive men utilize this information? That's totally fair. Never thought of it that way.	/r/seduction	23/12/16 05:18 AM
2	How do submissive men utilize this information? It's not a fetish thing, really. I have no desire to bend to the will of women in the way that you might initially think. I simply tend to prefer a 'role reversal' in the sense that I'd rather be pursued. Whether that is bourne of my laziness or not is pretty indisputable; it as, at least in part, due to the apparent ease of doing so. It isn't as if I don't enjoy being dominant at all either. I'm just not as attracted to that as I am submission. I definitely have streaks of dominance - it tends …	/r/seduction	23/12/16 05:18 AM
1	How do submissive men utilize this information? Obviously not. That's why I'm here. If it's necessary that I drop my submissive aspirations then it seems like it'd be important that I consider doing so sooner rather than later.	/r/seduction	23/12/16 05:12 AM
1	How do submissive men utilize this information? A good amount of women are not into submissive men. This means you need to learn how to find the ones that are. Yeah if I really want to (ironically) pursue a dominant woman, it seems like I'll need to frequent places where they reside. Problem is, they're so few and far between that they don't really have places where they're commonly found.	/r/seduction	22/12/16 08:19 PM
1	How do submissive men utilize this information? That all seems to make sense. Maybe doing the approaching more often will teach me to appreciate the dominant side of dating. As it is, it seems like I can either a: wait for someone who is very likely to never come, or b: get something which isn't ideal but which I'll probably learn to love anyway. Thanks ^ ^	/r/seduction	22/12/16 08:18 PM
1	How do submissive men utilize this information? Right, that's exactly the sort of 'advice' I was looking for, thanks /s	/r/seduction	22/12/16 08:14 PM