TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

kizzan Archive

View 22 posts and 1,589 comments by kizzan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
109

Storykizzan/r/MensRights28/06/14 10:40 PM
83

Questionkizzan/r/MensRights28/09/14 12:15 AM
49

Opinionkizzan/r/MensRights03/03/15 06:17 PM
35

Social Issueskizzan/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:35 PM
15

Feminismkizzan/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:43 PM
15

Storykizzan/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:01 PM
11

kizzan/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:31 PM
9

Opinionkizzan/r/MensRights17/03/15 11:12 PM
9

Analysiskizzan/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:45 PM
7

Social Issueskizzan/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:21 AM
7

Questionkizzan/r/MensRights04/01/15 10:18 PM
5

kizzan/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:13 AM
4

Questionkizzan/r/MensRights14/08/14 05:33 AM
2

Opinionkizzan/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:47 PM
1

kizzan/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:53 PM
1

kizzan/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:36 AM
1

kizzan/r/MensRights16/08/14 10:30 PM
1

kizzan/r/MensRights17/11/14 01:55 AM
0

Discussionkizzan/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:06 PM
0

kizzan/r/MensRights28/07/14 01:45 AM
0

Questionkizzan/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:48 PM
0

Opinionkizzan/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:32 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,589 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That does seem like something they would say. I wish they would follow their own advice though. Lol
/r/MensRights19/12/15 08:20 AM
1

So basically we all need to guard ourselves, whether man or woman. I wonder why this is such a novel concept to some people?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:48 AM
1

Did a feminist actually say that?
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:44 AM
2

Yeah I definately agree that feminism has played a large part in changing some women's expectations to set them up for bitterness.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:43 AM
2

No I think you are dead on. I actually feel sorry for people like this because they will go thru life very bitter.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:41 AM
2

I think the big difference is women have had decades of feminism and as such believe they have the right to do this.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:39 AM
1

Haha! Exactly.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 06:38 AM
1

Yeah the fact that we have not provided that to her is proof that patriarchy exists.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:20 PM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:19 PM
1

Harm meaning something done to her that a reasonable and prudent person would consider wrong.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:19 PM
2

I saw this somewhere earlier today but I forget where. Was it on this forum? Except the names weren't blocked out. Rachel and Nicholas? Maybe I am remembering the names wrong. Adjust your fb settings so that ppl need your approval before tagging you.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 09:36 AM
1

I don't think that should be decided by the mother.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:53 AM
8

By the actions of the law, we can conclude that it is morally wrong to kill a baby in the womb and it is murder if the mother wants the baby. If the mother does not want the baby, then it is not a baby, it is just a fetus, not a human being, and can be destroyed like any other property. Pick a lane people! Are unborn babies humans or property?
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:46 AM
4

Women always want plausible deniability. That is why they wear clothes that they know men will like yet get mad when they action get attention because they claim they didn't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:31 AM
1

Wow thanks for the insight. I think I will steer clear of that.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:27 AM
2

Wait, you mean we shouldn't be bigots and not assume that all men are this way and it is only men? Wow what novel concept.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:21 AM
1

Yeah I agree.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:19 AM
3

I am not part of hookup culture so I don't really know what goes on.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:18 AM
5

I couldn't agree more with what you said. I have always said that taco bell would be dishonest with itself if it concluded that all people are cheap. Taco bell needs to conclude that it has decided to market itself to cheap people and therefore shouldn't be surprised when cheap people show up to buy it's food. Taco bell can work to change that if it wants or accept it as it is. So it is with people in our lives. A woman should not conclude that all men will want to rape her, maybe she should con…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:37 AM
2

Really? Wow.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:33 AM
1

That is the 21st century version of "sticks and stones can break my bones but names will never hurt me."
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:31 AM
5

Yeah how is it that guys just show up at her house and try to force sex on her.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:11 AM
1

Yeah I would agree with you that she is expecting something she shouldn't. I think that is her point. Even though men need to protect themselves against thing women do, nevermind that, she should be able to expect to go out, be carefree, and not expect anybody to harm her. If that doesn't happen, then msyogny and rape culture.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:09 AM
1

I had considered archiving but it wasn't from one of the nasty top sites. Sorry.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:51 PM
7

For those of you involved in hookup culture, I am wondering how much truth there is to this. I realize that changing the name to rape culture is false. I found this link on Facebook and two of the comments from Facebook friends were women saying this applies to all women.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:38 PM
3

This article is a half truth. It is true because there are trolls out there that do harmful things to women on the Internet. It is a lie because this article leaves you with the impression that it is mostly women who are negatively affected when in fact the opposite is true. Men are attacked by Internet trolls more than women are.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 11:17 AM
1

Oh because they abandon girls. I think that will change going forward though because they just changed the 1 child policy to a 2 child policy.
/r/MGTOW15/12/15 07:51 AM
2

Haha! Yeah I know it is not much. I was just being analysis sorry. It is nature's way to account for the fact that more boys and men will dies sooner.
/r/MGTOW14/12/15 01:47 PM
7

Look at her life and you will see why she said that. Her relationship history is on a wiki page. She is talking about her own failures.
/r/MGTOW14/12/15 05:52 AM
3

Actually I think it is 52%.
/r/MGTOW14/12/15 05:49 AM
1

I see what you are saying but the risk is that if you are successful, the women's only places get banned along with the men's.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 01:59 PM
4

I know I am gonna get negged for this, but this is why I have set up my account so that if you follow clues from my username, you will find the identity of someone who is not me. You will think you have found me, but you wouldn't have. And I will never say anything on Facebook.
/r/MGTOW11/12/15 09:48 AM
2

Yeah you make a good point.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:42 AM
0

I believe in people having personal liberties and how they manage their assets, whether that asset be a TV, a house, or, in this case, a business. I think the bigger problem is how society views men and women.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:42 AM
2

Hilary was part of the Yale research group that led to the legal recognition of the Tender Years Doctrine, which is the cause of the mother getting custody by default.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:26 AM
4

It is a lie because they put the same job. If they left that off they would be telling the truth.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:21 AM
1

While I disagree with the message this video is sending, I take solice in the fact that the person who made it really believes it and lives a life of bitterness. While I wish I could change their view, I know that effort would be futile and I just let them live with their bitterness.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:20 AM
6

This is how I like to see change. Amazon shouldn't be required to call it Family as opposed to Mom, and at the same time customers can make their voice heard.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 05:17 AM
7

Get out of here with your facts and logic!!
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:14 AM
1

I would agree with you. If I can't have that, though, I would at least like things to be fair. The libertarian in me also says business owners should be able to do what they want to do and only to be beholden to their customers and the free market.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 04:09 AM
3

I don't think things will get more fair though unless the men's rights movement gains more influence.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:23 AM
9

Personally I have no problem with it as long as things are equal. Women should either stop protesting men's only barber shops or they should get rid of women's only gyms. Either one.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:11 AM
1

The only thing I don't like about it is if there is a place that gives men a better deal, women are all, "patriarchy and oppression!"
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:09 AM
3

You can get a woman's haircut at the 15 dollar chain. It does not have to be a men's buzz cut. The person, however, is not gonna be someone who spent 100k going thru school and like you said they are not gonna use product. But they will give the exact same quality for the exact same price as a man and it will be a woman's cut. My wife goes there and personally I think it makes her look great.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 07:06 AM
1

I think this post was meant for OP, not me. (Hey, that rymnes!)
/r/MGTOW04/12/15 06:46 PM
1

That sucks. I wish we could finally ebeter the 21st century and remove our sexism against men.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:44 PM
1

I see your point but I still think it best to talk.
/r/MGTOW04/12/15 06:43 AM
1

I thought that changed?
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:42 AM
1

I don't think so. He might not feel comfortable to talk to OP.
/r/MGTOW03/12/15 09:13 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 09:13 PM
1

Sure. No problem.
/r/MGTOW03/12/15 09:11 PM
2

This makes me mad. Both were drunk. Why, then, wasn't she also charged with rape and expelled from school?
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:16 PM
4

1) tell him 2) when he says no, tell him that you hope that you are wrong, you plan to be part of his life with the kids as a friend, and if, by chance you are right, you will be there for him to help in anyway possible. The reason why this is important is because men going thru divorce / break ups with kids or assets, feel alone. You are opening the door to be there for him if and when that happens.
/r/MGTOW03/12/15 03:48 PM
2

I think since society has moved so much, while her beliefs made her a feminist decades ago, she is actually an mra now.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 04:09 PM
-5

He should have punched her when she was on him. Once she left, he lost his right to defend himself.
/r/PussyPass30/11/15 01:36 AM
183

She also calls herself a feminist too. She became a feminist in the 70s and feels that as the movement's opinions have changed, she hasn't.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 01:32 AM
1

Yeah you have a point they could have been nicer to him.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 04:28 AM
1

I apologize if you misunderstood my post. Maybe I should have been more clear. I don't think the call should have been made at all. I further think the caller wouldn't have called if OP was a woman. What I was saying was that from the point of view of he police, they got a call and they should act on it because they don't know which calls are real and which are from sexist people who think a man with a crying toddler must be harming the toddler.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:52 PM
2

Yes I agree that the call should not have been made. I think it would never have been made if OP was a woman. However, from the point of the view of the police, they got a call and should act on it.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:48 PM
-5

Yeah I would agree with you then that female abductions should be taken seriously. Maybe you should go down to your county or city and ask them what their policy is.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:24 PM
2

Please help me to understand what this has to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:20 PM
-2

Hmm I think every call of an abduction should be taken seriously. What was a minor inconvenience to you will be a life saver to the son or daughter next time who was really being abducted. If it is true, the only problem I would have with this situation if they wouldn't take a call of a female abducting a child seriously.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:11 PM
1

Nice catch.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 07:04 PM
4

Yeah and I love stormy and dark days as long as it is dry and the sun is out. People can make up a defination of gender equality all they want, but it is still women's privilege unless it is truly equal.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:59 PM
21

I emailed them the following and can't wait to see what they say: Hi, I am doing a research paper on the help and support women get when they have a problem vs the lack of help men get. There are lots of data and statistics out there, but I am also looking for stories from organizations that do it. I was hoping you could explain why your organization only helps women with cancer and not men?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 04:53 PM
9

Many people (feminists) believe we are msyognists. If that is true, then fighting what we are doing is fighting for women's rights. Of course it is not true though.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:49 PM
1

Oh yeah I definately see the same thing. I really wish the equality police actually cared about equality because if they did, they would be all over this issue.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:18 AM
2

Oh yeah, female only networking events, female only groups, female preference in hiring, changing the workplace to make it better for females at the expense of males, and the like. Whoever says women are being pushed out or disadvantaged in tech either is uninformed or is intellectually dishonest with themselves. It is the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:16 AM
12

I am in the tech industry and can tell you that the whole industry is about putting female candidates ahead of male ones.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:12 PM
1

I don't think the bible is red pill. My understanding of red pill is the philosophy that what women offer is not what what they cost, therefore, men should just hook up with women and nothing more. The only way to be mgtow and follow the bible is to also be a virgin, not red pill.
/r/MGTOW16/11/15 07:47 AM
2

Yeah I would agree. I really like the culture of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 10:10 PM
6

If #yesallmen were used, that would be a greater argument for saying you.are sexist because you are trying to say that every single man and there isn't one man alive that is this way. #notallmen is not the same thing as it is in fact the opposite of sexism. I find it ironic that #yesallwomen was fine but not #notallmen. I guess this is yet another example that can be filed under #femaleprivilege.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 10:03 PM
4

The logical part of my brain says that if I look at the data, there is a greater chance that my children will be abused if they are in the care of a female, albeit it is small no matter the gender, it is still greater for women nonetheless. Still, I feel that I needlessly need to be more causious of a man than a woman.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:56 PM
2

Yeah I wish they were like that. Personally I think there is a reason why most people, including women, do not identify themselves as feminist. Most people want what is fair and right and any reasonable person who studies them would conclude that they are after female privilege more than what is fair and right. While some people may not agree with all of the mra points, I think any reasonable person can conclude that we do want what is fair and right for most people.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 09:53 PM
10

I got banned from /r/askfeminists about a year ago for simply stating in a respectful way that the logic someone used to formulate their point was bad. I took it as the literal of, "get out of here with your facts and logic!" The are creating an echo chamber. Don't be upset, it is not you who have been harmed, but the people in that community because, after continually reading a lot of the stuff in there, many of those people lead bitter lives.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:34 PM
10

We have three kids and are on our second nanny. When hiring the second nanny, a male applicant applied who appeared to be very strong in terms of references and experience. I identify myself as an mra and strongly agree that men need to have rights too. Yet at the same time, I felt very hesitant hiring this man. I realized that the stigma that society spreads around about men was in my brain. All of this was inside of me and I did not act on it. I had set up the interview, but he called back to …
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:14 PM
5

Yeah anything bad can only be men's fault.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:44 PM
1

You make a good point.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 05:55 PM
7

Yes women do commit less murders and violent crimes. That is because they realize they are weaker. But they often get men in their lives to do their bidding for them (thus skewing the numbers as that then counts as one less woman doing a violent crime and one more man in each case). The reason for this may or may not matter on a personal scale. However, knowing this makes it obvious that the statement that there would be fewer wars if women ruled the world is false.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 02:46 AM
30

I like the comment that can be read from the archive page you posted. That says it all.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 03:28 PM
6

If you were making pro feminist claims, they way you wrote it would be great because people just naturally believe any stat that makes women victims and men perps. Since, however, you are saying something that is counter culture, you have to show more facts and evidence behind your claims. Side note: thank you for sharing the ted talk.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 01:54 AM
6

Yeah that may have been the reason for the judge's ruling.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 12:13 AM
13

It was thrown out because it was one sided according to the judge. That violates one of the tenets of a valid contract.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:53 PM
1

Because women are the oppressed class. /s
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:48 PM
18

Wow super cool. I think I might create one for Huffington post.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 06:19 PM
2

I agree with you. But eating bad food is also not so good. In fact, that reduces the quality of life and kills more people than keeping the toilet seat up. So if we are gonna require the toilet seat up by that logic, then we should go big brother on what ppl can eat.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:50 PM
1

WTF! The author is telling us the half truth that there are more stupid men, but of course they left off that there are smarter men so they can leave the impression that men as a whole are stupid.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 12:14 AM
1

I don't get how it was a staring contest (so both were staring to see who could stare the long), but that was intimidation of the black male?
/r/MensRights07/10/15 12:01 AM
2

To open additional shelter space, in order to ensure that all homeless women in Portland are also indoors by the end of year. Why is it homelessness of women is all that matters?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:24 AM
1

Imagine saying that to any business that notices that the equal amount of toilets they built results in more female lines? "We need to focus more on getting male customers."
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:53 PM
1

You do have a point about aids work, thanks for bringing it to my attention. This is, however, only one program? Which type of cancer do you think gets more funding, breast cancer or prostate cancer? Because roughly the same amount of men die from prostate cancer as women breast cancer. How many federally funded programs are out there to help male victims of domestic violence? Because according to the cdc, 40% of domestic violence victims are male?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 08:51 PM
1

You don't have any right to judge him. If you feel he is violating the law then call the police.
/r/PussyPass20/09/15 04:59 AM
5

Too few toilets. Solution? Focus on hiring more women and minorities.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:41 AM
1

I am not sure if a feminist could do damage or not. But I will refer back to what I said, any reasonable and prudent person...
/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:23 AM
1

Yes. Like all technologies from the typewriter to the car to the computer, the older generation will have a harder time to accept it.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 11:17 PM
0

I don't think any reasonable and prudent person would think of you as a child molester if you give the adult (parents neice) the candy for the kids. I have 3 children: one of them 9 and two of them 2 y/o. I also have a neice who is 23 years old. If you gave candy to my neice (the 23 year old) and told her she could give it to the kids, I wouldn't think anything of it. If you went up to my kids while they were alone (no adult), that might be a different story.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:52 PM
3

The idea is that they are life like. The bot would be about 5'7 with human looking hair, skin, and features. When they are finished, it might be very similar to having sex with a real woman but without all of the headaches that women bring.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:45 PM
2

+1 this guy so he goes to the top
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:39 PM
2

What did they remove?
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:38 PM
1

You make a good point. I do not know much about hpv specifically. Your point would be more valid if the gov spent about as much on things that helped women and girls as it did on men and boys. But the fact is the gov spends a lot more money on things for women and girls and I think it is reasonable for people here to hear yet another thing and be discouraged about that.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:32 PM
0

I think most here don't like the double standard. If they charged $300 for girls too then we wouldn't even be talking about it.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 06:48 AM
2

If you are 25 and never had a relationship whatsoever with a woman you are a rare breed.
/r/MGTOW18/09/15 03:24 AM
4

To all of the haters on here, the pope is simply misdiagnosing the problem. You cannot really blame him because the main media tells us a false story of gender relations. The only way all of us know of the real problem is because of our experience with women in relationships. Remember, the pope does not have these experiences. I don't blame him for his thought process. I blame the lies that our media and culture put out.
/r/MGTOW17/09/15 08:05 PM
10

This kind of comment would blow up in her face if we lived in a patriarchy of male power. However, since we live in a female privileged society, it will not.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:21 PM
3

The court of opinion really sucks for men but one place where it is still fair is civil court (although not family court).
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:14 PM
1

I guess we will see.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:33 AM
1

Lol nice.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 02:10 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:10 AM
1

Lol!
/r/MensRights12/09/15 05:09 AM
2

Lol
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:57 PM
19

Never in recorded history was a society ever okay with rapists. If a real rapist only lost the ability to go to one school, she would consider that a victory and not a big deal. Meanwhile and innocent person would be devastated. Rapists should be tried in a court of law.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:17 PM
3

Thus statement would not go over well if we lived in a society where women were oppressed. But since we live in a female privileged society, it works for her.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:19 AM
1

Okay that makes sense.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:49 AM
1

Their statement of real men don't... implies the opposite. I am happy that they want to help people in need like this. I also believe that many people see this as a womans issue. I do wish that people cared more about mens issues but that isnt about these movers specifically.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:31 PM
3

The idea of chivary is religious in nature and the one aspect of it that people think of stems from one of chivary's tenets of caring for and protecting the weak. At that time, women were considered to be different than men and weaker. Seems crazy to me that women would still even want this. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chivalry
/r/MGTOW06/09/15 07:27 PM
1

Yeah I understand. I just wish things were fair. Either don't price discriminate against men or allow places to price discriminate against women.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:05 PM
2

You bring good facts but if there were good facts to price discriminate against women there would be hell to pay.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 04:02 AM
4

Yes. If all you are trying to get is the value of the paper out of your wife, about 2 cents, all you have to do is tell her you have a prenuptial agreement and you will fight in court but we can settle for 2 cents. She will most likely accept.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 03:47 AM
1

Yeah you are right there are downsides to marriage and you have the right to believe that those downsides are greater than the upsides. While I agree with you when we add in the risk of divorce and the unfair laws against men, I disagree with you in that if we take that out then I believe the upsides of marriage outweigh the downsides. Someone to share life's pleasures with, someone to bring out your strengths, someone who does things for you, someone you get to do things for, kids, the ability …
/r/MGTOW06/09/15 12:43 AM
2

I imagine that someone who is smarter at the affects of laws than me can think of a way to make a law like this that would discourage women to send these photos yet not put them in this situation.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 04:26 AM
1

Yeah I guess you make a good point. But with this law in effect I imagine it would turn the tables and be worse for the women.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:59 PM
1

Yeah but imagine the situation I just described. If the parents of the boy turned in the photo I would like it to be illegal for her. But that is not how it usually goes down. I imagine her felling trapped by everyone looking at her photo and making fun of her along with potential punishment of the police. I imagine suicide rate of girls in that situation would skyrocket.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:57 PM
0

Interesting. For once a law that mainly is against women. Although I don't know if I like it though because if a girl sends a risqué photo to her bf and they break up and he starts sending it around the school, she is gonna feel powerless to go to the police about it because she will be charged.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 03:10 AM
-5

Lol I expected to get negged but I had zero response. Maybe that is good?
/r/MGTOW02/09/15 11:54 PM
-8

Hmm. Okay, I am not a mgtow because I married before I even know how messed up the laws were for men, and I have been happily married for 13 years. If I were unmarried right now I would be a mgtow. The reason for this is because of the laws and how they favor women coupled with the high divorce rate. That all being said, she makes the argument that marriage is a bad deal for both genders because you have to compromise. I am gonna have to disagree with her there. While the benefits of marriage do…
/r/MGTOW02/09/15 07:12 PM
-10

I agree with you that I am highly unimpressed by your reading skills. Please reread. Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:49 PM
-4

The post asked if any of us had instances of being paid less BECAUSE of being a woman not HAPPENED TO BE a woman. Your first word in response was, "yes". So that is not exactly what you said.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:33 PM
-9

It sounds like you were bad a negotiating, not because you were a woman.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 07:52 PM
5

Oh my gosh. Do you think this will get better over time or worse over time? (Hint: worse) Leave her now! EDIT: I see from your other comments that you did in fact leave her. Good on you. There is a good chance she will try to come back like a stray cat. Please don't go back to her.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:20 PM
2

Lol
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:10 PM
0

I feel sorry for her too.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:57 PM
1

You are better off not reading that stuff anyway if they dont slow you to voice your opinion.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:28 PM
3

I have never commented in /r/feminism, but I got banned after a similar amount of comments in /r/askfeminsts
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:27 PM
3

I get downvoted all the time when I talk about circumcision because that is the main point I disagree with mras. Further, I have seen many feminists coming in here looking for a fight or just a debate. Nobody gets banned for those reasons. While most ppl here are mras, you cannot say we are in an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:26 PM
1

Lol!
/r/MensRights01/09/15 05:24 PM
11

Lol yep
/r/MensRights01/09/15 03:01 AM
154

They live in a bubble because any naysayers get banned on the feminism boards. Natural result is that they believe we eat babies.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:36 AM
2

Lol
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:30 PM
3

Wow that is a great point. I falsely made that assumption too.
/r/MensRights30/08/15 11:29 PM
6

Hmm they wouldn't be a mgtow. I am not a mgtow because of that reason but it doesn't mean I fully understand and respect the mgtow way.
/r/MGTOW09/08/15 05:13 PM
8

It is very important to note that her can of peperspray is pink.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:08 AM
21

Here let me fix the title for you: Is anyone watching anything on TV? It's basically a feminist propaganda piece.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:04 AM
1

Trump says something bad about or attacks a person who happens to be a man. crickets Trump says something bad about or attacks a person who happens to be a woman. Trump must hate women because he attacked a woman
/r/MensRights09/08/15 03:18 AM
1

I think you meant to post that here: /r/politics
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:21 AM
1

You obviously didn't read the article because we are not talking about the same thing. Women->sandwich makers is something you brought here.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:59 AM
2

Except most women dont do that so he is forced to accept a lower quality woman.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:39 AM
6

I am sure she is saying that he is not lucky to have her when she is on the roof fixing a leak, mowing the grass, or any handy project throughout the house. Because she shares those chores with him like all women should. Right? .... Right?
/r/MensRights08/08/15 04:28 AM
0

Dont be scared. The best way to not have problems is to not have sex with women before marriage. If you must do it, then dont do ot wjile in college and dont do it when she is drunk. A false accusation will not land you jail time because the burden of proof is on the accuser. Except in college. They can kick you out of college with a lower standard of proof.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:33 AM
1

I don't think this really happened.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 03:21 AM
30

Prosecutors say they were tougher on Caballero because he previously served eight years for cocaine trafficking.
/r/PussyPass07/07/15 12:11 AM
2

I am not the OP. But I would say that this was definately influenced by decades of feminism.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 10:34 PM
3

I don't know about his story but he should sue the woman that made these false claims. Not like he would ever collect, but he could at least send her into bankruptcy.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 08:47 PM
1

Oh okay. Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 04:06 AM
1

Can someone please explain what happened with Victoria (whoever that is) that many subreddit went dark?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 12:38 AM
1

"I got banned from /r/feminism" "What? Why?" "Feminists were in there making arguments using logical fallacies. I pointed out their lack of logic. I got banned." "Oh so nothing new. 2 + 2 still equals 4 and the sky is still blue and feminists are still trying to silence opposing views."
/r/MensRights03/07/15 10:34 PM
1

48 minutes is a bit long for me. Anyone want to give a tl;dr?
/r/MensRights03/07/15 10:23 PM
0

I am not suggesting that Finland reduce its defense capability. I am only suggesting it stop being sexist. Surely there are many positions that can be taken in the army other than front line positions that women can do just as well. Women can be trained to run just as far as men. But I think you agree with that. You started your argument that women should get the sexist pass because we need to reproduce (which left one to infer that women are the only ones needed to reproduce). All women dont ne…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 12:30 AM
7

You are still risking your assets, whether she keeps her job, and her strong desire to have kids would could turn into child support payments for you if and when it goes bad. I am not saying your plan cannot work out, but you must consider that even that plan has some risks.
/r/MGTOW04/05/15 04:05 PM
0

You missed my point. Surely there are women who are very strong getting a pass while there are men who are weaker who are being forced in against their will. This is the inherent nature of a sexist policy like that in Finland.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 04:02 PM
1

If you were really concerned about national defense, wouldn't it be better to have voluntary enrollment? That would also include women who meet standards. It seems kinda ignorant to say men should go to the army because they are stronger, so you force the 300 lb diabetes and blind fat man in the army, but you don't get the lean and strong woman in.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:15 AM
1

But why aren't women compelled to do the civilian service which doesn't require physical strength? I mean other than sexism. Because if you didn't want the next generation to die you would compel half the women and half the men into the military so that the other half could procreate incase of your huge war. Because clearly men are needed to procreate so that cannot be used as an excuse (I mean it can be used as an excuse just not a valid excuse).
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:00 AM
2

Okay so better phrasing is that in Finland men are forced to join the military, not because they are stronger or because it is necessary in any way (because they can choose civilian service), but solely because they are men. Meanwhile women get a free pass.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:19 PM
2

If we are gonna have debtor's prison then ppl who file bankruptcy should goto prison. The only difference is some bankruptcys are filled by women.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:49 PM
2

So you saying it is not a duty in Finland? That men have a choice? If that is the case I misunderstood you.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:44 PM
6

If it is a duty then you are being forced. That is not erroneous. You are saying that men get respect for it, but that doesn't change that men have to and that women get a pass.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 08:08 PM
6

You misunderstood /u/PeteyMax 's point. We cannot claim an evil system of patriarchy that causes men to have certain privileges in some areas and forcibly seek to get rid of those in the name that men and women are equal, and then on the other hand, say women are different because they can give birth and therefore should have a privilege over men of not being forced to die in a war. You are saying that women are different and deserve that privilege. That is fine. But you would be hypocritical if…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:12 PM
1

I didn't say you broke any rules. This video belongs here. There is definately a double standard againdt men in discussion of issues.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 09:20 PM
7

This is what a court of law would call proof by preponderance of the evidence. I think you pretty much proved they are feminists.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 01:53 PM
29

"For every case like this, there are 100,000 women being harmed." ~rough quote from the NOW Feminist So false rape claims make up 0.001% of rapes? I wonder what her source was? #echochamberstats
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:55 PM
7

TL;DR: It's okay to violate the human rights of another so long as it's a man because the ends justify the means.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:44 PM
10

Society values what women do more than what men do. That is why. There was a time when society valued what men did more, and now that the pendulum swung the other way, I am thinking, why can't we have a balance?
/r/MensRights01/05/15 01:19 PM
2

If the roles were reversed it would be good fault because he didn't treat her right.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:02 PM
1

Okay good. It sounds like you love your kids a lot. I hope you get the child support you wanted so you can afford a better place.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 09:08 PM
1

No I mean talking good about her to your kids. If there are things you don't like about her that us fine, but your kids need to constantly that the fact that you aren't together with her has nothing to do with the kids and they need to hear you say only good things about her. I am sorry that she left you.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:18 PM
3

A woman is entitled to bring a pregnancy to term even if the man objects. Feminist logic: an embryo is not property it is a human. It doesn't become property until it is in my body.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:21 PM
3

Except karma doesn't feel so sweet when you are the one doing wrong.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:16 PM
1

Well I really hope that she does it for her kids. If she does do it make sure you tell her the only reason why you are making it legal is because you don't want to be in a position where it gets adjusted back and you already signed a lease at the more expensive place. Also when you are in the more expensive place, depending on how old your kids are, you should praise your mother to them for doing things like this. It may or may not help your relation with your ex, but your kids will grow up resp…
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:13 PM
3

Oh my gosh! Here is a divorced mother who actually thinks about her kids as opposed to herself. In all seriousness, this forum is more about advocating a change in family court law than knowing how to do specific things in specific cases. I hope someone here can help you. If not, I would suggest you try in /r/legaladvice.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:53 PM
2

People still feel the effects of the recession. In theory it could all be applied to that. The onky way to know for sure is to see if it goes back up when the jobs come back.
/r/MGTOW30/04/15 01:27 AM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 01:26 AM
3

Accidental justice maybe?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:46 PM
2

It is also the norm to have to pay for car insurance. If that is what the market demands then so be it
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:29 PM
3

I realize that this article is true for the mgtow community. I wonder about the other men that are coming up in these stats.
/r/MGTOW29/04/15 06:28 PM
1

It never ceases to amaze me.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:16 PM
19

I am hoping thus trend agaisnt marriage is not just because of the econmy.
/r/MGTOW29/04/15 01:57 PM
3

I personally don't see a problem with dowry. If the family doesn't wish to pay it they can move on to the next family.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:42 PM
1

Yeah that too
/r/MensRights29/04/15 01:20 AM
3

You could be right. I don't know. I would imagine a father beating his kid to that exteme would be arrested for child abuse.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:14 PM
3

But if yo did it the same way she did it in public, what do you think the public reaction would be?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:53 PM
1

She has to believe he deserves something bad, however misguided that may be. That is the only way I can comprehend her actions.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:51 PM
3

Thanks
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:49 PM
5

You comparing it to the actions of an angry child do not make that example correct.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:49 PM
3

It is a feminist myth that MRAs live alone and can't get a girl. This is easy for you to believe because it helps with the cognitive dissonance of your beliefs which most certainly cannot be wrong. Many times when someone accuses someone else of something, it is usually them who are experiencing that. And it appears that thus is the case here with you drinking the flavor aid. You say you don't have time to explain but that you only have time to make bitter comments. If you do not wish to explain…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:34 PM
2

I am not telling you to do this, but if it were me, I would answer these questions the opposite of what they consider the right answers to be
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:22 PM
5

I am not telling you to do this, but if it were me, I would answer these questions the opposite of what they consider the right answers to be
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:22 PM
3

Are you trying to shame my intelligence as an excuse to not explain yourself?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:20 PM
1

You do in other states. One party of the conversation has to know about it (you). http://www.diligentiagroup.com/legal-investigation/private-investigator-tips-is-it-legal-to-record-a-phone-call-or-conversation/ You will see that Oregon is listed undet the one party consent states.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:31 PM
1

Oregon is a one party consent state for recording. I have recorded my tenants here with only my knowledge and used it in court.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:01 PM
3

Please explain
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:53 PM
1

I refuse to listen to koolaid man. I hope he just starts talking like normal people.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:50 PM
1

I couldnt hear the sound? Did anyone else have that problem or is it just my phone?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 02:08 PM
1

It is a shame that our society lets people like her flourish.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:10 PM
1

Oh my gosh that is horrible.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 03:02 PM
1

That is what I am saying. I can't even understand how someone could do this.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:52 PM
3

Feminism is nothing more than a political movement that I don't agree with.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:13 AM
9

Well at least I liked the comments.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:56 PM
0

I have been a part of this subreddit for about a year. I don't know if that is considered new or not.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:51 PM
1

I agree with your frustration. I also believe that private property and business owners should be allowed to use their property or business the way they want even including sexist and racist rules. I think this is a symptom of a bigger problem. Women feel entitled and men let people exalt women above them.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:54 PM
3

Yes those are all reasons to tell a lie. But she want SO far with this lie.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:47 PM
2

Great points
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:25 PM
2

Yeah I guess that is a possible explanation. However, there would have been no shame if she didn't start all this. So why even do this if it is a lie?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:03 PM
2

Lol
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:01 PM
1

I fully hear what you are saying. I just cannot understand how someone can go say far with a lie that hurts someone so much.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:01 PM
2

But the institutions probably believe she is telling the truth. She knows she is lying.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:00 PM
7

But you would have to have a really hard heart to not only file a rape charge, but to proceed with this whole charade with the matteress thing.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:27 AM
13

I am trying to wrap my head around this. It is obvious there was no tape there. But why would she go so far on this lie?
/r/MensRights26/04/15 06:13 AM
1

That is an entirely different point which I could see why you would say that. But whatever is agreed, even if it is just 5%, fidelity is not a party of that agreement and cannot do anything.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 03:03 AM
2

I don't think this person understands how the law works. Fidelity was not a party of their divorce agreement. Fidelity cannot give his money to her without his consent or a court order. If Fidelity did give half of his money to her, he could sue them and make them pay him the money back. She needs to take her ex back to court and force him.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:47 PM
1

I didnt know that. I will have to check it out when I am at my computer. Thanks.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 09:21 PM
3

You might. And North Korea might become capitalist one day. The problem is most of society has accepted the feminist position and will only dismiss you as a whiner complaining about your first world privilege. You would have more success talking to people in person and defriending that person.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:46 PM
10

Youtube search: misandry in the media. A guy did a whole series with tons of examples.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:27 PM
2

I think feminist groups had it right in 2008. They picjed obama over hillary because they knew obama would spread their femaganda more than hillary would. And I believe they were right.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:23 PM
3

Luckily I have only had to defriend one person for spreading femaganda. If I were you, I wouldn't argue, just defriend.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:16 PM
3

She claims that the question if machines can be raped sounds ridiculous. I do agree with her there. To the center of her thinking: she wants to, like most feminists, define all of the rules of our society to give women the upperhand at the negotiating table. Since sex robots would increase the supply of available sex and therefore lower the demand of women giving sex, she has to come up with an argument that she even agrees is ridiculous to prevent this from happening.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:25 PM
5

It went too fast for me to read. I think I am a slow reader.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 03:24 PM
2

The truth: for every dollar a man makes, a woman makes 78 cents. The lie: for every dollar a man makes, a woman makes 78 cents for the same job.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 10:06 PM
1

I totally agree with you here. Everyone in that audience had a stature about them that this steve guy what he was saying was so right almost to the point that these men are doing something morally wrong. I'll bet they would feel differently if he told them that it is a woman's job to cook a man dinner whenever he wants it.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:41 PM
1

I am not familiar with him but it did appear to be mostly women in the audience.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:55 AM
3

He says he don't care if men don't want chivalry to be the deal or not, it is the deal. I say that when women said they don't want to be bound to their societal expectations solely because they are women, that is when the deal changed and it is women who changed it. Men are just acting rationally. In regards to a senior citizen getting a seat, I am all for that (male or female NO DIFFERENCE). But that person doesn't look 70 to me, she looks really fifties. And she looks healthy enough she doesn'…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:35 AM
0

Well that is good to hear.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 12:38 AM
2

I really like your sub. I subscribed to it and are looking at and commenting on other posts (not this one though because since I found it from this link it would be against reddit's rules).
/r/MensRights14/04/15 09:28 PM
4

So are you saying that the only people that are supposed to respond are people trying to change the OP's view (and therefore convince them the mom shouldn't legally be allowed to leave town)?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 08:43 PM
5

It seemed to me that the first couple of comments were fair.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 08:41 PM
2

Thank you. I appreciate it.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 08:28 PM
2

This board is great for talking about these cases in general and some try to seek and change how things are with the legal system. For your specific case, you might be better served in /r/legaladvice. Good luck, I hope things work out for you.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:53 PM
9

You marry because society does a great job of warning women of the evils of men but a horrible job warning men of the evils of women. Men grow up hearing how there are other bad men out there and think well I am not one of them so I don't have to worry, but they usually dont be as careful as they should in protecting themselves. In short, most men don't even know they are taking a risk when they marry.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:35 AM
3

Really? Is there a study on that I can quote?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:12 AM
5

Yep never heard of him. I am also guessing you have never heard of what an antecdotal fallacy is either.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:11 AM
9

The difference between the law for men and the law for women is more extreme than the law between the rich and the poor.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:54 PM
3

Adultery is the main reason for divorce.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:27 AM
2

Legal penalties are financial in nature plus potiential loss of kids. Yes you can go to jail for not paying alimony.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:25 AM
2

I am so glad this judge did what she could.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:19 AM
1

NSFW
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:13 AM
1

The best lies are half truths. Here is the truth from the census bureau: women earn less than men. Here is the lie: women earn less than men for the same job.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:09 AM
-1

While I agree with you, I will grab some popcorn on this one...
/r/MensRights11/04/15 04:39 AM
0

Agreed
/r/MensRights10/04/15 02:09 AM
2

Well I hope they help you
/r/MensRights09/04/15 10:00 PM
2

I agree with the other guy. Don't block her. Just don't respond. Maybe consider asking /r/legaladvice what they think you should do.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:46 PM
3

Oh my goodness. That is crazy.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:44 PM
10

I wouldn't tell her to abort it. That would only hurt any case you may have. This is going to get legal so remember that you will never be talking to her, but a judge. Everything you write or not write, imagine a judge reading it. I would call CPS as that may help your case if they end up taking her kids away. I would NOT tell her about it. For the future, do you feel it is worth it to have this happen to you every 20 women you have sex with? 18 years of child support payments plus college plus …
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:36 PM
1

Surely she could have worked. Even at min wage. You might say well that would cost more for childcare. And it might, but if you are having to pay child support and make up for that you are double paying.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 04:17 PM
6

Wow I couldn't finish reading because it was making me angry. I am sorry you are going thru this. It makes me so mad that society does a great job warning women of the evils of men but does not do the same for us. As a result, we grow of age hearing about all the evil men and think, well that is not us, I am gonna take care of my wife. And we go in with our guard down thinking everything will be fine. Then the court system doesn't protect us, but rather protects her no matter who is the evil one…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 03:59 PM
17

Ran by an mra? Really?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:43 AM
1

I am sorry for your experience. While I am glad you are aware now, I wish you became aware in another way.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 02:19 AM
26

Are those all bans? I don't get it?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 01:23 AM
3

Before I found this sub I was unaware of these issues. It is such a shame that society (1) does a great job warning women of the evils of men whole not warning men of the evils of women. As a result some men walk into relationships (not saying you) without being emotionally guarded and checking this person out. And (2) we don't help men (either physcially or emotionally) who are going thru these hard times but we are quick to pour millions to help women.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:16 AM
0

It is not the prosecutor's job to check, but the defending attorney's. If the defendant knows he is innocent I hope ge would insist it to his attorney.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:24 PM
1

It is my understanding from the research I have done that the majority of cases where something goes wrong is after the first 10 days of their birth, as more blood vessels and the like find their way down there. Therefore, if you are only looking at it from a safety standpoint and you really want it done, the best time to do it is right at birth. I have more of a problem that the baby's first day, they are already exposed to their first vaccine.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:21 PM
2

I haven't read this book yet. From what I hear from a lot of mras is that there is this really high risk of death and (here is the real reason I hear from mras) that fgm is illegal but not circumcision, which of course, implies that this is yet another thing that women have it better than us. To address both of those, I don't know anything about fgm to have an opinion on it, maybe this book will go into it or maybe not. I strongly feel this is the main reason most mras are against it even though…
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:03 PM
1

Oh okay lol
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:15 AM
2

Yeah these are powerful questions because a coffe shop feminist can't just say that they believe in these things. The movement devotes its resources (time, energy, money, etc) to the causes it believes in.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 01:15 AM
2

Those look fake. Also there is a way to tell if a picture had been photoshopped which I am sure would be looked into before any jail time happened.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:24 PM
1

Okay that is the only website I can think of. Do you have another?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 09:04 PM
6

Okay it said it is downloading. I will start reading it tonight. Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:54 PM
10

Interesting the user that posted this, /u/bikus, no longer exists. Edit: I am thinking this user was a troll. Here's why: (1) she used the word feminist in the title but the subject had nothing to do with feminism. Almost as if that word was used to try to stir up hate for this fake woman just by that name. (2) she said she went along with it because she wanted "intimacy". Women more often use this word in place of sex. While it is not a be all end all, that is a red flag. (3) the user deleted h…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:27 PM
3

I am sorry for your experience. I am thinking next time you should really make it more clear. "Maybe this isn't a good idea" could be interperted as I want to stop, but it could also be interpreted as I am thinking about stopping but I haven't decided yet, which could then prompt her to convince you to keep going. Again, I am very sorry for your experience. Now that you know you don't like this kind of sex, you should make that clear berfore you start next time.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:20 PM
3

It is only free if you have kindle unlimited. Is there another way? I was actually looking forward to reading a logical and factual book that might convince me to either change my views on circumcision or to be more strongly for it. While I agree with almost everything else in /r/mensrights, everytime I have brought up my pro circumcision views here I get negged and people yelling at me.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:12 PM
3

Even though you didn't like it, up until the point you asked her to stop you can't really blame her, as it was consensual. When you asked her to stop, how did you do it? I guess what I am asking is did she physically force you to keep going or did she just say something like come on this is fun, and then you agreed because you wanted "intimacy"?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:03 PM
1

Yeah I think you are right to have a plan B. I can't think of a better place, can you?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:59 PM
7

This is very crass but I actually think it is true. Years of hating men and seeing them as inferior to women, but they are only lifted up because "patriarchy" probably makes them believe men are sub human on a sub conscious level.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:48 PM
0

I am thinking that people who have non normal brain function try to describe us by saying the word normal, but only the word cisssssssss can come out of their mouth.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:46 PM
1

Oh okay. I don't know much about it. While I have felt a need for men's rights since the 4th grade due to things happening to men around me, I didn't even know that men's rights was a thing until I accidentally found this subreddit last April.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:43 PM
20

7 women represented, 3 guys. Of course even in a marriage video, when talking about politics, the word "women's rights" comes up.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:40 PM
1

AVFM website?
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:25 PM
2

5 Questions Feminists Can't Answer: https://youtu.be/x4m-WQbUGdQ
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:11 PM
1

Awlful
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:34 AM
3

I've never worn a shirt before so I can't tell where it goes.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:22 PM
39

That black guy at the end had a stature about him like he was the one fighting for what was right and just. He actually thought his actions were moral.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:49 PM
2

Why is no one talking about the race pay gap? I am getting cheated because they pay Asians more than whites. Darn racist employers!
/r/MensRights06/04/15 02:28 PM
23

It's actually more likely that the sexism in this story is the help she got from the male ceo was only because she was a woman.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:21 AM
1

Warning: this is Christian based. Dr. James Dobson is popular in the Christian community for his book Dare to Discipline. His co-speaker, Meg Meeker, is the one who is in the podcast. She talks about how feminism has crushed men and made women and children the center of the family while dad is orbiting on the outside of that center. Edit: here is part 2 of that talk: http://drjamesdobson.org/Broadcasts/Broadcast?i=0245a6c7-52f1-46dc-ad24-754257e3aa30&sc=FFB
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:50 PM
2

The national organization of women is one to give you an example. They are the one's that pushed for lower standards of proof for rape on college campuses. They are the one's that have lobbied and shaped family court. The idea of tender years doctrine meaning it us better for mothers to be with their children than fathers resulting to today's standard that only 10% of cases the father gets the child is a result of this. But almost all feminist organizations do damage.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:47 PM
1

He wouldn't have the right after the fact? I realize he wouldn't be allowed to have the firearm if there is a restraining order and I understand why, but from a property ownership standpoint, it is still his property.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:40 PM
1

Men who realize that women are not worth pursuing. Search mgtow on youtube.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:38 PM
9

I found this sub a year ago and same thing. I am really glad it exists also. Although I made the acct sooner than you. Lol
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:25 PM
1

You mean another crime that he has committed? They could if he committed another crime. Usually you see this kind of drama on tv when they know he committed rape but can't charge him till they get more evidence and he coincedently committed another crime they caught him on and they deem him as a flight risk. I don't think OP is a flight risk.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 05:01 PM
1

Yes they are legally obligated if there is enough evidence besides a person's testimony. Many another witness?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:58 PM
2

I was thinking that too but I didn't know if that was against the law. I don't own a gun so I don't know that kind of stuff.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:49 AM
2

Maybe I should define rain as wet matter that falls from the sky when it is 85 degrees or above and then conclude it never rains here in Oregon. Lol
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:35 AM
10

I would if I were you. I would put it in a safe place in your house and the ammo in a completely different room.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:20 AM
2

I bet you are hoping for world peace too. Lol
/r/MensRights05/04/15 02:07 AM
13

Good. Please don't. If they come tell them you don't answer any questions, tell them you don't consent to any searches, and if they are not charging you then you would like them to leave (and if they are charging you then you want a lawyer). If they search you want it to be clear it is against your will. Be advised that the police are legally allowed to lie to you and say things like it will go better for you if you are just upfront and tell the truth. Even if they admit to lying to you later in…
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:57 AM
2

Does water put out fire?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:29 AM
6

No they need more evidence than just her testimony. They may try to get your confession. Please watch the video I linked to about not talking to police and if they charge you let them provide you with a free lawyer.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:28 AM
14

I really wish that you didn't let the police take pictures. Please watch this video from a criminal defense lawyer talking to his class why to never talk to the police. PLEASE watch it: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
/r/MensRights05/04/15 01:26 AM
1

This appears from reading this that Kellogg was a proponent of circumcision to prevent masturbation but it doesn't say that is what started the circumcision movement in America.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:02 PM
1

Going ahead and acuse me what you are gulity of. Classic.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:58 PM
3

Women are used to being treated special offline so when they go online when you can't tell if it is a woman or not they don't like what they experience.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:57 PM
1

Thanks. I wasn't going for that but I am glad you noticed. I was actually hoping you would provide non opinion based, but factual evidence with links. I was curious why mras are so admentely against it. But instead I was met with trival attacking and bitterness.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:31 PM
1

Okay that makes sense. Btw I didn't downvote you.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:28 PM
1

If they cited sources it would have been much better. Since I don't fully accept what they are saying, I would want to research it more. Thus is the first I am hearing that circumcision furst started to prevent masturbation. I don't agree that women think curcumsized penises are weird, I think it is the opposite. If they are going to challenge my belief it needs to be backed up. I don't expect feminists to believe and accept that 40% of domestic violence is against men and the number goes up to …
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:28 PM
1

All I noticed was people getting rushed in starcraft.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 09:23 PM
1

This is from College Humor. Not really the best video to show people you are trying to convince. Further, I disagree with what women think is normal in that video. They showed antecdotal evidence of three women which calls me to question the entire credibility of that video. I think this video is just meant for humor (college humor I guess), not to show people evidence. If you have another video I would be willing to watch it with an open mind.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:55 PM
5

I like how they are offended that she made up a defination of feminism and just calls herself a feminist.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:38 PM
1

I don't get what the issue is? It seems like someone playing video games?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:32 PM
10

He sounds more mra than mgtow
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:27 PM
2

Why do you think that is? Couldn't someone day hey, I like republican views and women are oppressed and patriarchy and all that?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:20 PM
1

It seems there is a difference between this group and normal firefighters, which are also men. Firemen seem to have a good gig: relaxing at the station most of them time, 3 days on 4 days off, lots of respect from the community.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 06:19 PM
2

How is this mensrights?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:34 PM
1

I don't follow politics enough to agree or disagree with your statement that typically it is the conservative media that is the only one talking about things like this (although it feels that way from the links brought in here). But why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:29 PM
1

OP wants to discuss the content of the issue (which is mensrights) instead of Fox (which is politics). Considering the sub we are in, OP has a great point.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:22 PM
1

Yeah it does sound like you realized I had valid points and didn't know what to say so you switched it up to attacking me. The ironic part about that is usually people feel clever when they do that but they don't realize that everybody who loses an argument does the same thing.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:15 PM
1

The problem is he didn't use his emotion too much. I think he might do better if he changed it up.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 02:12 PM
1

Okay that is good to hear. Well the story is not good to hear... You know what I mean.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 01:37 AM
1

How do we know that isn't fake?
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:26 AM
1

You should make a fake profile.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 12:05 AM
1

Lucky it is kinda a common last name so hars to find you.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:23 PM
10

When I commented it didn't have the edit. I apologize for getting it wrong.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:21 PM
2

Sorry. I edited out last name from my last comment if you want to go blur the other the last one.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 11:19 PM
1

So you say I am going down a slippery slope but then say that you agree with large government controls (I think most would consider forcing parents certaib diets to children a large government control). I don't think you are advocating a mens rights issue. I think you are saying government should have more power to decide what is best for their children than their parents.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:51 PM
6

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:39 PM
5

I am glad you got out. Congratulations on being strong.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 08:37 PM
1

In your ranting rampage, you may have misunderstood what I said. 1) I didn't say anything the family considers beneficial. 2) I already told you that I don't know anything about fgm so I am not gonna agree with you or disagree with you. I don't know the risks are associated with it. Since you like government control so much I bet you also want mandatory immunization, forced public education, mandatory healthy diets, and the like. Maybe we can talk about all these benefits as well that those nast…
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:10 AM
2

Victim blaming makes women and men wrongly believe that we can prevent rape from happening to us. If this person locks their doors they are a hypocrite. And if this sentance makes you mad you are a thief apologist.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 05:01 AM
1

Unless good marriages end too.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:24 AM
1

Steve's main fault: he thought he could debate and reason with a feminist. Did he not even see the misogynist word coming?
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:54 AM
5

This response sounds trollish, yet in a crass way, it is true.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:30 AM
5

Thank you for your understanding. It is very appreciated.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:27 AM
1

There is benefit to the family or they wouldn't do it.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 03:11 AM
1

You are allowed to do reasonable things in the care of your child and the government should not be allowed to tell you what to do.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 02:10 AM
1

You are not allowed to do anything. Children are under the care of their parents.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:52 AM
1

And that is the whole point of a slippery slope. Cutting off foreskin =/= cutting off a person's head
/r/MensRights03/04/15 01:45 AM
1

Lol I think this is a good place to posted it
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:59 PM
1

Please look back at my response. I said that you are using a logical fallacy called the slippery slope.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:59 PM
1

Parents are not forced to enroll their kids into school. Mcdonalds comparison does work if you want to bring up the issue that some kids die fron the procedure. I don't know enough about fgm to have an opinion on it I imagine since you are in the camp to take away parents rights and give then over to the government, you probably wish immunization was mandatory.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:57 PM
2

I agree with everything you said and I think it isn't for everyone. But this should be the parent's decision.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:49 PM
1

You did not respond to talk about it, only to spred you hate.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:45 PM
1

And =/= means tgat analogy doesn't work. Jeez.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 07:44 PM
-7

Slippery slope
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:23 PM
-9

Slippery slope.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:23 PM
-8

Accusing with baseless accusations in an attacking way. The last straw when you are losing in a discussion. Now that you have brought your hate and ignorance into this discussion, it ends here. You can leave now.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:22 PM
1

Skinny =/= woman
/r/MensRights28/03/15 10:19 PM
1

But there is a difference between skinny dude and bro and a situation of man and woman. Man will feel like he can't fight back.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 09:24 PM
4

A woman feeling entitled to treat men like objects would be a mens rights issue.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 09:20 PM
-15

Wow I looked back at my post and I still have the standard 1 point. I am syrprised it is not -50 by now. I am okay with circumcision just like I am okay with parents taking their kids to McDonald's, even though more people die from obesity related diseases than circumcision. It is an accepted part of our culture, and as such, people choose to take their kids to eat there. A parent's decision how to raise their kid(s) is none of my business. So it is with circumcision. Further, while I am not Jew…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 09:17 PM
1

Okay that makes me more ignorant. I have spent most of my life in California and Oregon, which are both 18.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 09:00 PM
-26

Meh. I am okay with circumcision. I don't have an opinion on fgm because I don't know if it is more dangerous or the same or what the process is. I know everyone in here hates me for it.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:39 PM
1

But a guy saying to a girl on the street that she is beautiful is harassment and he is less moral of a person for doing that?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:24 PM
1

Really? I didn't know that? Where is it not 18?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:12 PM
1

Wait do now feminists don't like how we clap? What?
/r/MensRights28/03/15 02:53 PM
11

⬆this is the problem. Please imagine your rude comment applied to this person if the genders were reversed. The irony is you kinda helped OP make his point.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 06:45 AM
1

That is a good point I didn't think of that. Reading other articles that give women a pass, it wouldn't surprise me if it was in an area where he was underage. But it may have been in a 16 consent area.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:55 PM
1

Good point. Since I am from 'merica I assume eveything revolves around me. It might not have happened here.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:54 PM
5

Wow there's no strawman fallacy there. \s
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:22 PM
23

I think you messed up. Where is the rest of the article? I wanted to read the part about the girl going to prison and registering as a sex offender for having sex with an underage man. \s
/r/MensRights26/03/15 05:18 PM
5

When you are driven by hate, I am sure she really believes that
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:28 PM
1

Yeah that makes sense. I don't think the problem is an epidemic. But even if it gappens to one person I think it is too much.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 02:17 PM
2

The risks are probably high for them too. When I say high, I don't mean above 50%. Since the consequence is so high and the reward is relatively smaller, a small percentage is high. If you like to speed on the freeway, for example, and the was a 5% chance there was a cop clocking around the corner (1 in 20), that is very, very high.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 04:31 PM
3

If you can show with 51% certainty that these are trunped up charges you can sue her for your damages (lawyer fee, defamation of character) in civil court. Let her know you are planning to do that and hope she drops the charges.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:46 AM
2

You've got to (as in you've got to do it)? Or you've got two (as in you've got not one, but two lawyers lined up)?
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:44 AM
5

I personally think the risks are too high.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:41 AM
3

How did they calculate that education and experience brought it down from $11k to $5100? I notice they didn't factor everything like how many hours avg worked, which is very important in this industry, and how well each person negotiated their salary, among other things.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 03:32 AM
1

Strawman again
/r/MensRights23/03/15 10:04 PM
1

The term means what most people decide not what any one person decides and it can change over time. Victim blaming is not special, this is the case with any word or phrase in English.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 09:03 PM
2

Good point. Although I didn't know that reddit was liberal land.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:48 PM
1

Feminists do not own that word. What matters is how most people use it. As mentioned, feminists don't even agree on what it means.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:47 PM
1

Please don't use the strawman fallacy on me. Replace what you said with victim blaming. There, now it works.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:27 PM
3

I would imagine there are some liberal mras, but this place is definately not the liberal infested place that /u/MattClark0995 described.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:25 PM
1

By your logic anyone that uses the word gay to mean anything other than happy is not using the correct meaning. Meanings are fluid and change as more people use them to mean different things.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:20 PM
35

This belongs in /r/pussypass. She used her female priveliage to escape from her burglary. Luckily she left her cellphone there and the cops were able to find her but if she didn't then that would have been the sole reason she got away.
/r/PussyPass23/03/15 05:39 PM
2

From talking to many mras, my guys is that many are not liberal. Edit: my *guess is that...
/r/MensRights23/03/15 05:28 PM
2

When /u/TRPACC says correct understanding, TRPACC means TRPACC's understanding.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 01:16 AM
1

How exactly would you expect me to do that?
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:34 AM
1

I would agree with you. I never thought of it before. I think he is thinking that he wants to protect women as I think that us our nature. But you are correct. I was more talking about how that line of thinking is hypocrital if it is not applied in other areas.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:02 AM
9

No because it is for women.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 12:18 AM
5

I don't know what others do but when I post a link I usually hit the suggest title button which just makes the title of the post the same as the title of the article.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 11:58 PM
2

I know I will get negged for this, but I don't feel comfortable doing it. People looking down on other people standing up for men's rights. I see people post things on fb lifting up women at the expense of tearing down men and I don't even feel comfortable enough to say anything.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 10:51 PM
2

They must not really be trying to sell baked goods. Human psychology, if I know I could have gotten something cheaper I am not gonna buy it. These people are displaying a big sign to remind me of that fact.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 08:36 PM
11

You may be right but he needs to be compensated for his damages.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:35 PM
1

Interesting way to look at it.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 08:36 AM
31

To anyone that believes that way, they are hypocrite if they lock their did to prevent theft. Edit: *lock their door to prevent theft
/r/MensRights21/03/15 06:08 AM
6

Laura Addy, for Earles, said her client had severe mental-health issues and was under Teale’s spell. Yeah, it was the man's fault (Teale) for getting tortured because he had the woman (Earles) under his spell.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:04 AM
1

Wow. Some people make their life's work out of this. I just frequent this board to find gender news. I use to belong to the asking feminists sub but I got banned for a reason I feel I had no fault, but I just moved on.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:45 AM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:43 AM
1

Oh interesting. I would have thought it would have been the opposite.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:59 PM
3

I cannot help your current situation, and I hope it turns out to be nothing, but in the future, do this: 1) make a fake email address with a fake, but real sounding, name. Something like Jim Whitman. 2) with that email address, make a fake facebook account. Set the account to private so they can't see that you have no pictures except your cover. For the cover photo, find a pic off of google that looks like the kind of guy you want to appear to be when talking on HuffPo or wherever else. Put in t…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:58 PM
1

Oh I thought feminism was bigger than the men's rights movement?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:41 PM
2

I wonder why they wouldn't be open to opposing beliefs?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:10 PM
2

So /r/feminism is the place where nobody is allowed to disagree and /r/askfeminists is a place where people are allowed to question them?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 07:37 PM
2

So are you saying /r/feminism has a stated policy they only want to hear from people who confirm their beliefs?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:03 PM
1

Except that isn't really the case for a lot of gyms. Generally speaking, women are paying the same price and getting more for their money, with an entire section of that gym being entirely devoted to excluding men(which could also have been used for other things). I agree with you. If you look back at my original comment, I am against coed gyms that have a women's only section or a university that has women's only hours. I am against this because men are having to pay the same price as women whi…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 05:00 PM
1

I am one that believes in the free market and if women are willing to pay the same price for a gym that is smaller and has less services than one of the big guys, then they are using their own money to do that and they are voting with their dollars that this is of value to them. It is not the same as white only gyms because there can be a valid case for it. What if you were a muslim woman and your religion forbids you to take off that black suit thingie in front of men? Kinda hard to work out at…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:36 PM
1

I would venture to say we trust women more than men. I have heard of mobs starting in India from false rape claims. Of course, the accuser is always a woman.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:23 PM
1

Well I will know to go to archive.today in the future. Thank you.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:15 AM
2

Lol sorry.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 02:12 AM
5

I would have asked why wanting men to have rights makes me a filthy pig and furthered that with a gyess that she doesn't want women to have rights because that would make her a filthy pig according to her logic.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:55 AM
2

Thank you. I didn't know not to use donotlink. Is there a way for me to change the link now that I already made the post? I an thinking it is too late. Sorry.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:44 AM
2

This was my first time using another site to avoid giving hits to the orginal site. I didn't know that donotlink does that. No, I am not a bot.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 01:42 AM
6

Women only gyms are fine. But if a man is paying for a gym, either thru tuition at a university or thru a monthly fee, he should be able to use all parts of the gym that women can use and he should be able to use it all hours women are allowed to use it. Why is this a thing? How can this not be obvious to every single person?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:18 PM
40

Men are lectured about their all around suckiness so much that it’s practically become a national pastime I could not have put that better myself.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:45 PM
1

Sometimes I wonder how she could even think that.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:15 PM
2

Oh most definately. But the people she affects with her words will believe what she says.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 05:52 AM
1

I would have stayed too even if I didn't have to because I like to see not only what I'd being said, but people's reaction to it.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:12 PM
25

Well that is good to hear people's reaction to her nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:29 PM
1

Wow I thought everyone knew about that. Maybe just in my world they do. Lol
/r/MensRights16/03/15 05:28 PM
5

I am sorry this is happening to you. I would complain and when that didn't work I would lock the bathroom door by jamming wood in there or something. I would wait to get fired and then sue. But that is just me I am not telling you to do that.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:48 PM
231

Because "women have always been the primary victims of war." (Hillary Clinton)
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:44 PM
4

This article brings hate through logical fallacy.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:35 PM
1

I don't read Swed.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:09 PM
1

A lot of women are like that and it tells me that they don't respect their partners because they only want what they can get. Luckily they are vocal about it usually. Probably best to avoid these type of women.
/r/PussyPass16/03/15 02:09 PM
2

Wow good point. And I love the irony there. Lol
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:52 PM
1

I agree. Some people look down on other people that take welfare, wic, etc. I don't understand why. If you qualify for it without lying you any rational person should take it. I blame rhe government and the corrupt voters for giving it.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 09:01 PM
1

This is the one I wss gonna like. My trick is hit like and then refer back to it thru my liked posts.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:29 PM
3

That is ridiculous that even one guy would be okay with that.
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 11:28 PM
3

Even if he were guilty he doesn't deserve death.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 04:51 PM
2

When you said defending rape culture I assumed you meant you are arguing it exists. So you are in the other side arguing it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:01 PM
5

So you are willing to pay $125 just for the possibility of a good ratio which may or may not translate into the ability for you to pay more money (drinks?) so that you can hook up?
/r/PussyPass13/03/15 02:59 PM
1

I have thought this way too and this is definately a good thing to get out there that your wife knows. But when it comes down to it, be careful exercising that. I am not saying this is your wife but imagine this scenario. Wife decides she has had enough and wants to leave husband. She knows about the husband's hit back policy so she decides to hit him during a fight. She lets him hit her back to which she calls the police. Who do you think they will take to jail, the one who hit first or the man…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:55 PM
1

Agreed. It is theft. People, however, think it is moral to have the government give to the poor and they vote accordingly, which is why I said what I said. I always tell people that giving to the poor is a noble cause and it would be noble for the government to do so if it weren't for the other side of the equation. That is, having to rob others to get the money to pay for it. If money magically appeared on government's lap and we had to figure out a way to use it (I mean so much that we didn't …
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:47 PM
4

The government SHOULDN'T BE a charity.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 07:15 AM
5

If men had the right to terminate parenthood like mothers do, this would not have happened.
/r/MGTOW13/03/15 07:02 AM
3

By her logic when the U.S. was attacked on 9/11 they should have just taken it because since we are stronger than them we should never hit them back.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 02:49 PM
31

File a complaint against that teacher. That is what I would do.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:10 AM
-2

If the judge did not rule that way then he wouldn't be a fair judge. Our opinions on circumcision don't matter. At this moment in time, it is legal. Therefore, he has to force a consensual contact made between the mom and dad. That would be like a single mom signing a contract saying she would pay a painter $800 to pay her house. After the job is done she changes her mind and says how dare you force a single mom to pay you money.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:52 PM
2

I have no problem with discrimination in hiring. If, because of you prejudices, or hers in the example you proposed, you hire a less qualified woman over a more qualified man, you are already paying for it in your business on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:19 PM
0

I personally think it is disrespectful to Andrew Jackson. Make a $15 dollar bill or $25 dollar bill and do that. Or, wait until the U.S. inflates its dabt away and put a woman on the $100,000 dollar bill.
/r/MensRights07/03/15 03:15 PM
3

How dare you! This article is misogynist! \s
/r/MensRights06/03/15 07:09 AM
1

Nice to see a second ted talk address men's issues.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 07:02 AM
1

I am sorry to hear that :(
/r/MensRights05/03/15 10:34 PM
-1

They can get scholarships wherever they transfer to.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 10:34 PM
1

Sorry to destroy your faith in womankind.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:32 PM
2

Haha! It is similar. Except he dealt with it instead of crying about it.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 04:32 PM
1

If the genders in this article were reversed (the wife stayed home and the husband went to the restaurant), when they booted him out of the table and offered him a seat at the bar, he would have just taken it and that would have been the end of it. I believe this lawsuit happened as a direct result of the entitlement attitude that women today have.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 03:57 PM
2

Before I click into your example and read your text, from only reading your title I assume you must mean gender biased to the exteme agaibst women, right? \s
/r/MensRights05/03/15 06:32 AM
1

Most prostitutes are not victimized. They choose that as a profession and consider it empowering. You might want to do more research. Of course if the prostitute was part of human trafficking then that would make her the victim. But that is not as common as you would think and we cannot use the minority example to justify the majority.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 05:56 AM
3

If it is illegal, it should be illegal on both sides. If it is legal, it should be legal on both sides.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 11:05 PM
1

management has great responsibility specially about the students and everyone connected to the Sweet Briar College Community. Yeah because even though when a company is doing bad, it could be losing tens of thousands per day, the inconvenience of having to transfer to another school even though your transfer will now be given priority is much more important. So the management has a great responsibility, "specially" to these poor women victims.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:16 PM
9

Well a feminist would say that just like they think prostitution should be legal for a woman to sell and illegal for a man to buy, it should be illegal for this man yet perfectly legal for this woman to do.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:09 PM
16

For feminists the world over, the term idenifies those of us who simply want men and women to be regarded as equals and treated as equals. Nothing more and nothing less. If that is the case, show us some good faith by working on issues that oppress men while you work on issues that oppress women and stop manshaming us.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 03:06 PM
3

Well this obviously is false because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 02:43 AM
4

Unfortunately you shouldn't talk to people about politics. And by the way, feminism is politics. It has no more to do with women's rights than democrats care about the poor. It is all political. Okay I am not a dem nor a republican so let me make a point reps so nobody fights with me: feminism is no more about political rights than reps care about free markets and enterprise. It is all political. When people talk about politics they lose their sense of politeness and respect for their fellow man…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:47 PM
8

I wonder if they really think men have the privilege to murder and rape and all that. Are they being dramatic or have they followed the path of bitterness so long that they actually believe this?
/r/MensRights03/03/15 05:18 AM
1

Thank you. I don't think I could take 1.5 hrs of feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 11:17 PM
0

Maybe you are right that it is not white privilege. But it is racist not sexist.
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 08:34 PM
-3

Thanks.
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 08:33 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/MensRights02/03/15 08:31 PM
-9

She called him a terrorist. She is judging the content of his character based off of his race. I would argue this is white privilege being racist than gender related. That girl could have easily been a boy and the same thing could have easily happened.
/r/PussyPass02/03/15 05:14 PM
1

Seems interesting. I just can't invest over an hr to watch it. Can anybody give a tl; dr?
/r/MensRights02/03/15 04:20 PM
1

Have you ever been to Japan? Cameras would catch groping. They don't have to place them on the ceiling. Giving women only spaces when it is not needed is an example of creating a second class citizen. Just ask the woman that is suing the barber right now because they are only serving men.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 10:18 PM
-7

Haha! I know they all look the same to us. Lol
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:54 PM
-2

Yeah that is the reason.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 08:54 PM
9

Instead of treating men like second class citizens, wht not videotape the area and arrest and prosecute all gropers, both men and women?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:13 PM
4

The issue of groping in Japan does not just affect females but males as well. So where is the male only corner then?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 06:07 PM
3

Men naturally want to help and protect women at our own expense. It is a noble aspect that men have. The problem is not that men wear pink, but rather, that women are not as noble as men are, as they also think about women even at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:21 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:50 PM
3

Oh okay. Got it.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 05:17 AM
5

Wait what? How could you not having sex make you a rapist?
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:39 AM
55

The images don't appear that well on my phone but it appears that the problem is they want to delete violence against men page but have no problem with violence against women page.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 04:31 AM
2

Tip five: don't sabotage your career by taking years off to stay at home with your kids.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:00 AM
-1

Yeah because I really have a hard time to listen to that.
/r/MGTOW27/02/15 11:26 PM
2

Why can't he just talk?
/r/MGTOW27/02/15 04:09 PM
1

That is what antecdotal means.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 04:07 PM
4

The only difference I notice is people are more apt to complement my daughter's looks than my son's. I think more changes will happen as they get older. They are only 14 months old.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 07:58 PM
4

I know this is anecdotal, but as the parent of twins (one boy and one girl), my boy is exploring the world more and climbing and figuring out ways to get things he wants for himself more than my girl is.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 05:51 PM
6

I can't listen to computer talk. Sorry.
/r/MGTOW26/02/15 06:14 AM
1

This serves as offical notice for your summons to court as you are being sued by me.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 06:01 AM
1

*ad The title actually confused me until I realized you meant ad instead of add.
/r/MensRights26/02/15 05:45 AM
2

I can't watch this video. This type of thing makes me frustrated.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:27 PM
2

But women are more important silly.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:09 PM
4

#yesallfeminists accuse men of rape.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:03 PM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:37 PM
4

Wow that escalated quickly. I don't understand why she got do mad.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:20 AM
46

To which you quote Albert Einstein: "If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself."
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:02 AM
1

There are certain sites that this subreddit doesn't like links from. I don't know I'd this is one of them, but to be sure you could goto donotlink.com or one if those other sites that take an image of the site and people read it like that.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 03:18 PM
0

Their conclusion is correct if they believe that feminism is synonymous with women's rights.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 03:36 PM
1

Oh okay. It makes sense why he would get arrested under those circumstances.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 09:06 PM
1

Where did it say he had a warrent? Maybe I missed it.
/r/PussyPass20/02/15 07:08 PM
0

I beleueve we can given the other examples I gave along with many other examples I didn't give. But you are right, there is no male equalivant.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:09 PM
1

Considering most of humanity did without them for thosuands of years I would agree with you.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:07 PM
6

You may have a good reason for that but I take issue with the fact that it is only cared about because this is a woman's hygiene product. Just like breast cancer is cared about more than prostate cancer, just like heart disease wasn't as big of a deal until more women starting getting it, just like the unfair practices of alimony laws weren't being talked about or cared about until they started affecting women, this is what I take issue with.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 02:59 PM
7

“Buying menstruation products is non-optional,” says Jill Piebiak, who set up a change.org petition lobbying the federal government to stop taxing feminine hygiene products. Therefore all non optional items should be exempt, right? I am sure that is what their intent was.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 02:55 PM
1

Oh you have a choice. I didn't know that.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 02:38 PM
3

I notice you don't post in green anymore. Are you no longer a mod?
/r/MensRights19/02/15 04:02 AM
2

Wow good point.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:08 AM
1

Please reread what I wrote since you did not understand. If you still can understand, please refer to the comment you made with three fingers pointing back out you: you are dense.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:04 AM
1

By your logic he shouldn't care if the mother is physically abusing the child, as long as it happens during the time that the child is in the care of the mother.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:32 PM
1

You have a point about the caregiving thing. I am only thinking that since it is not common here, OP has a right to know about it and talk about it with his baby mama.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:37 PM
1

By your logic he shouldn't care if the mother is physically abusing the child, as long as it happens during the time that the child is in the care of the mother.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 04:34 PM
1

Hmm I would say the sleeping arrangements of his son are certainly his business.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:55 AM
1

1) I apologize for not being clear. Differe t areas of the law have different standards of proof. For example if you get a speeding ticket the judge will probably believe there is more chance that the cop is telling the truth than you. Since the standard of proof is lower, that is sufficient to give you a ticket. If they had to use the same standard of proof to give you a ticket as to convict you of murder, they would have to step up their game: find witnesses, establish motive, destroy your ali…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 09:16 PM
3

Yes, OP, what this guy said. If you are considering talking to police because they suspect you of a crime go on youtube first and search dont talk to police. You will find a 45 min lecture from a college law professor explaining why not to talk to the police.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:35 PM
1

I am sorry for your experience. 1) Men do get the short end of the stick on campus trials. They lowered the standard of proof to proof by preponderance of the evidence, meaning there has to be a 51% chance thay she is telling the truth that you committed a crime. But she still needs to bring up that proof and the only punishment you can get from that is no longer allowed to go to school there. If you already graduated that is not an issue. If she pursued anything with the police, the higher stan…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 08:33 PM
1

If you are Christian consider contacting this group: http://www.purelifealliance.org/men/for_men_only They setup men's bible groups throughout churches nationwide with the focus on stopping porn. It is basically the alcoholics anonymous for porn.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:52 PM
2

Imagine how things would be different if he were a woman. Sidebar: for investiagtive stalking, he should have created a fake profile.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 06:16 AM
3

Why does the /r/askfeminists subreddit want to create an echo chamber?
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:47 AM
1

That is true. I guess it is better in her eyes if it is a celebrity.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 05:25 AM
2

If I understood the article correctly, the posters as a whole objectifyed both men and women. Did I read that wrong? Because the complainant's sole arguement was that it objectified women (only).
/r/MensRights11/02/15 05:27 PM
5

The idea of patriarchy as feminists define it is no more real than rain should be called dry matter. Feminist groups, like every dominant group in a civilized society, has a lot of political influence to change laws and how society is run. Therefore, the dictionary defination of feminism or the coffee shop feminist does not really matter, but the extreme feminist groups.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 04:44 PM
1

I knew most of my life that my mom and dad's divorce was because my mom cheated on my dad. I found out last year that my mom was egged on by her coworkers telling my mom all of the feminist mantra. I think it goes with out saying that growing up in a broken home is negatively impacted.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 06:10 AM
3

Wait what? Women like rape more than men?
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:41 AM
1

I don't think this will ever stop. Unfortunately almost every country is like this.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:06 PM
1

Haha! Which is the exact opposite of the meaning of equal. Lol
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:10 PM
1

Yeah because it hurts men too which is why it must be called the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:10 PM
0

Feminist groups knew that and supported him over hillary during the 08 elections.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:09 PM
1

Haha! That must be it!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:08 PM
3

In the past men had respect from women and didn't mind this. It becomes a problem when you take that respect away and have that "my job of watching our one kid for a few hours after he gets home from school and watching Opera the rest day is more important than the tough 50 hr a week job you have" attitude.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:03 PM
3

At least you are consistant in your beliefs. To the women who want traditional roles and have no problem doing their expected part of those roles, more power to them. To the women like you who want equality and that means throwing off the roles that give men expectations too, that is awesome. I really just hate the double standards though.
/r/PussyPass10/02/15 03:56 PM
1

Yeah that must be it. Lol
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:50 PM
27

Wow I wonder why that is?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:30 AM
182

So everybody gets to pay for the amenities thru tuition and women get to use these amenities more than men? How is this fair?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:49 AM
4

Okay makes sense.
/r/PussyPass09/02/15 11:27 PM
17

I think his attack on college guys is worse. But yeah he is a screaming feminist.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:19 PM
2

I am no accountant by any means but it is my understanding that if they withhold this money and it is eventually found that was wrong then they have to pay you interest from the time they should have paid you to the time they actually do.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:59 PM
4

but it will be a tremendous timesuck and hassle. You can say that again.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:57 PM
90

Why is it that women want traditional roles at times like this and then want "equality" when an expectation comes upon them?
/r/PussyPass09/02/15 04:54 PM
2

Maybe I read the article wrong.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 04:12 PM
1

It doesn't seem like they are doing it because they feel that the holiday oppresses men in some way like pressuring them to wine and dine their gfs. They are anti capitalsim.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 06:46 AM
4

One of the comments: did Obama say he was boycotting "50 Shades of Grey" .....the latest anti-women film to come out of Hollywood. ?
/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:55 AM
1

Should a quota be set that a certain percentage of homeless should be women? Why do people look at the top and not the bottom? Men's success deviate from the mean more than that of women and that means both ways. On a non gender poltics note, it is immoral for the government to force consenting third parties from forming agreements.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:42 AM
7

Women are objects. They cannot do anything for themselves unless they are given a handout by society. Men are subjects, they are stronger and can do things on their own. This is the message given to us by campaigns like this.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 10:42 PM
2

This is awlful. I feel sorry for the victim. As I am writing this maybe some people might think the victim us the wife, I just want to clear that up and say the victim us the husband.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 09:08 PM
9

I am wonderng how this applies to mgtow?
/r/MGTOW08/02/15 07:45 PM
14

I am sorry to hear that happened to you and I hope that you don't break down and go back to her. Abusers don't change. I would use this to help your parents see mens rights issues. Not now, but in 6 months when you talk to them about what hapoened. At that time whatever you say will have more credibility.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:16 AM
1

I am sorry that happened to you and I am so glad you left her. If my mom is any representation of abusive women, the abuse doesn't stop, it gets worse.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:54 AM
1

No I have never talked to her about it. She doesn't get many boyfriends now that her looks have gone away due to natural older age. I don't feel there is any point in bringing it up to her. "By the way I feel you did some awful things when I was younger..."
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:49 AM
1

That sucks.
/r/PussyPass08/02/15 06:46 AM
1

If you look at my profile and how many points I have from the mensrights subreddit you will see I have no angle. Look at my past posts too.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:45 AM
1

You are right and that is a horrible part of the law. But surely we can both agree that you can vastly reduce your chances but not having sex.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:44 AM
1

Oh wow. Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:43 AM
1

And I saw another that showed it on the right. Both are antecdotal because neither are a representative sample. Sidebar: libertarians are not left leaning.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 06:41 AM
2

This is a great analysis. I saved your comment so that I can refer back to it later. Thank you.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:25 PM
1

Me, I lean to the left politically. I am being respectful here so please no abuse. I think your political views is why you have concluded that most MRAs are at the left side of center. I would venture to say based off of the poltical survey posts I read that we are diverse and there is no correlation to MRA and political stance.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:09 PM
1

I do not post about that on facebook and almost never talk about it in person. Oppressed classes throughout history usually do not feel comfortable talking about their oppression. It wasn't until blacks got more freedom that they felt more comfortable to complain that they were oppressed. It wasn't until women got more freedom that they felt they could complain that they were oppressed. We have to get more rights and society will have to accept us more if we as a whole are going to feel more com…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:49 PM
0

What happened with Ray Rice?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:46 PM
0

This leads to what I have been saying for a while now. Feminism is nothing more than a political movement.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:45 PM
0

What about just making a decision to not have sex?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:34 AM
4

You are right but you are thinking like an adult.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:01 AM
7

I think we don't like feminism in this sub. Like I said before that being anti-feminism is not the same thing as being anti-woman. Unfortunately, that is what our society makes us feel though.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 07:42 PM
1

That actually is a great idea!
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:35 PM
7

I experience the same type of thing on my newsfeed. Sometimes a woman will post something sexist and I will always check to see who liked it. Yep, it is usually the case that 90% of the likes come from other women.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:18 PM
20

No never did. She was a lot of fun to be around and was very nice to her boyfriends otherwise. But I have never seen her fight with her boyfriends in a way that was calmer than that. It was either what I described or no fight at all. Come to think of it, whenever we did something bad, she would yell at us very loud. But she never touched us.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 05:13 PM
655

You are going against your peers at a time in your life when peers mean the most to you. I have a lot of respect for you.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:59 PM
157

I am kinda new as an MRA and my feelings don't represent the MRM as a whole. My first feelings that men needed more rights, although I wouldn't have worded it that way back then, was back when I was in 4th grade. My mom would get into fights with whatever boyfriend she had at the time, she would be very abusive, hitting, kicking, throwing things, etc. And I would watch her boyfriend just hold up his arms to block whatever she was doing. Then after a while of that he would push her away once and …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:20 PM
9

Something becomes important when it negatively affects women.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:33 PM
1

Wow thanks for the gold. I never had this before and don't know what it is.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:42 AM
1

Thank you. I further believe that society does a great job warning women of the evils of men out there who want to date them. And rightly so. But many men get sidelined by evil women because they weren't cautious because society does not warn men the evils of women.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:39 AM
1

I agree with you. I was being sarcastic when I said that feminism helps men because I have heard so many feminists say that but I don't believe it is true.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:36 AM
1

I am sorry for your situation. I wish I could tell you what to do to help you, but I can't. Unfortunately if the baby mama is successful your fiance would fall into the statistics of deadbeat dads who do not see or care about (implied) their children. Whenever you hear those stats don't beleieve them because they are not representative of reality because of so many cases like this.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:57 PM
3

Both men and women think and say evil things. Our society, however, has done a great job teaching men that this kind of talk against women is bad so thank goodness men usually feel uncomfortable saying things like this. Unfortunately, society has not taught women that this type of thinking is wrong.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:51 PM
1

Men cannot do anything better than women because women can do all the same things men can do. However, there are things wonen do better.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:45 PM
1

I had thought you misread it and they said 1 in 3 women have heart disease and I was gonna correct you. But you are right. Wow. Just wow.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:44 PM
2

Wait what? This is a movie women like. No men?!?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:37 PM
24

I was being scarcastic. Many feminists say that. I do not believe it.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:11 PM
3

I didn't like those signs either. I felt that it implied that most men would do something like that. Of course I am just used to seeing offensive things against men in ads, movies, and the like, so I would not have said anything. I guess it was different for this woman.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:34 PM
1

You would have a great point except I never said that men are worthless because they are men. Why would an mra think that? I used the context of the image, that doesn't mean I agree with the image.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:27 PM
37

Feminism helps men too!
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:47 PM
1

I don't watch football except for the superbowl. Do they really do this on many normal games?
/r/PussyPass05/02/15 04:46 PM
3

Sorry for the confusion. I was using the context of what was said in the image. I see what you are saying. Someone can be prejudiced and not sexist if their form of prejudice is, say, ageist.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:42 PM
93

Reasons like this are why normal everyday women think feminism is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:40 PM
3

Prejudice against a sex is sexist. Prejudice against a race is racist. Please read the image again.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:19 PM
3

So if a woman is prejudice against men, she cannot be sexist, so what would you call it?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:06 PM
0

Haha! What's the matter? Can't stand to see the sight of a strong Nord woman? Lol This is what feminists used to say (well not the nord part. Lol).
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:18 AM
3

Good point.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:48 AM
65

I started hitting him. What's the matter? You can't handle the sight of a stong, independent man?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 03:01 AM
5

Do change.org thingies ever accomplish anything?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:58 AM
14

I find it funny they say you can be prejudiced but not sexist or racist. Sexism and racism are both subsets of prejudice. I guess according to their logic it is impossible to prejudge someone because they are rich but you can prejudge a poor person.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:50 AM
0

What is it?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 10:57 PM
13

Everyone knows this ad was not for little girls. It was for feminist women. There are fewer little girls watching the superbowl than one might think. The ones that do watch it won't understand it as it went really fast.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:41 PM
1

Were previous superbowls like this? I became an mra last April so I didn't notice things as much last year.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:36 PM
1

Oh okay. I didn't know that. Then don't follow what I said op. Service is required in small claims and landlord tenant which are the only two areas of law I am familiar.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:08 AM
1

You beat me to it! Yes! Cut them off permanently!
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:18 PM
-2

I am sorry to hear your situation. I am also sorry that I cannot give you any legal advice as I have never been in that situation. If it were me, I would change my number and email address. I would post on facebook that I am moving to California (disinformation), then a week later delete my facebook account and then move to somewhere that is not California. Then I would take cash only jobs where they don't take your social secirity number. If she cannot serve you then she cannot demand child sup…
/r/MensRights03/02/15 05:11 PM
3

"We live in a world where women get paid less for the same job." That has already been factually disproven but who cares about facts when they get in the way of our opinions.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:57 AM
1

Haha! Like the mafia.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:34 AM
1

Oh definately I agree.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:32 AM
1

At least they wouldn't value one gender over another.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:31 AM
2

I think it is more likely they made it ambiguous so that feminists can love the misandry and the rest of the world can think it was not that.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 03:30 AM
0

Well it doesnt affect the jocks. The feminist agenda is at the half time show and on the commercials.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:50 PM
2

No need for insulting. Thank you.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:49 PM
1

But it is ironic that tmobile did that because while women make a lot of the purchase decisions of the house, since a cell phone has a big impact on both men and women, I would venture to guess that this is a mutual decision usually made with a nominal amount of research. I haven't studied thousands of couples. But all of the couples I have known shop together and make a mutual decision.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:48 PM
2

Feminism: let's pretend we want equality and equal rights for both men and women so we can use that as an excuse to push female entitlement and misandry. MRM: we want equality for men and genuinely support anyone who wants equality for women. Feminism: oh look, there us a group of people just like us that is claiming that want equality. They are misogynistic!
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:36 PM
-1

It could be interpreted as sorry I am talking on the phone, it is a boy.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:30 PM
1

I wish I lived in a different time.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:25 PM
0

Haha!
/r/MensRights02/02/15 07:23 PM
3

There was a comment on that video that said that ad agencies do not care about hating men. That having an opinion is bad for business and they will quickly stop sjw stuff as soon as people stop buying.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:52 PM
1

I heard that from a Korean in my family. Just so you are not confused, a South Korean. The reason for that is because there are so few North Koreans here thanks to communism.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 03:41 PM
1

Yeah I know. I said I agreed with you. I feel if feminism really wanted equality they would work on these issues too because it would not only help equality, but it would add a great deal of good faith.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:26 AM
1

North Korean* Usually when people say Korean, they mean South Korean. If you are talking about North Korea, you really should add the north.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:16 AM
1

I don't see anything wrong with it per se. But I am so disappointed with society working really hard to get rid of sterotypes against women and not caring about stereotypes that are against men. Maybe this isn't the right forum to talk about it though.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 04:07 AM
1

Guess I must have missed the troll post. Lol
/r/MensRights01/02/15 09:55 PM
1

Yeah I figured you had no sources other than the bigot that lies in your head.
/r/MGTOW01/02/15 03:20 PM
1

I agree with what you're saying. But you are just explaining the logistical reason why benevolent sexism exists. I am sure there was logistical reason why every benevolent sexism exists.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:19 PM
1

Really? Wow. I thought getting your stuff stolen was punishment enough. Apparently the Australian government thinks it is not.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:16 PM
1

Can you give a TL; DR?
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:26 AM
2

You and your wife are taking on two different planes. She us talking from the macro perspective and you are taking from the micro perspective. The macro perspective, or victims as a whole, shouldn't have to help the police do their job, get victim blamed, etc. The micro perspective, in order for this one specific person to get justice and survive ib this world, she should have done this. Sidebar: I victim blame my wife all the time. I get mad at her when she goes places and forgets to lock the c…
/r/MensRights01/02/15 03:24 AM
1

Yes it is. I am sorry to hear that.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 02:56 AM
5

This is called benevolent sexism. I think girlwriteswhat did a thing on that once suggesting that all sexism against women started out as benevolent sexism.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:34 PM
2

You said that male feminists were more attractive than mgtows. Please cite that source. Now you are going further and saying that there is a postive corelation between the attractiveness of a celebrity and their self identity with feminism. Please cite this source. I would love to read how this type of study was done to avoid bias. You also claimed that women are more attractive than men. I am gonna have to ask you to cite a source on that one too. I am very curious to find out how a study shows…
/r/MGTOW31/01/15 05:47 PM
4

You definately take a risk taking her to child protective services. You also take a bigger risk not taking her to child protective services. Accusers (whether they are male or female), don't stop. There are calm periods in between the abuse, but if she really did abuse your daughter, it WILL happen again. Let me say this again... This type of abuse is never a one time thing. If I were you and my daughter showed me a physical mark and said her mom hit her, I would have immediately taken her to a …
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:40 PM
2

Please cite your source that make feminists are more attractive than mgtows.
/r/MGTOW31/01/15 05:32 PM
2

The avg woman makes 72 cents on the dollar and the avg person has one testicle and one ovary.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 02:49 AM
2

You are right. Just most are like that.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:26 AM
2

Women in Saudi Arabia think their way is better and women here are oppressed.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 01:00 AM
2

Can I proposition you for sex... Right there, that is where you are doing it wrong. Asking a feminist for sex.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:46 PM
1

I understand what you are saying. I just wish the people would look at things in a fair way instead of looking at isoleated incidents and thinking this is oppressive to women.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:44 PM
1

Haha that's funny! I have no idea why 3. I am not Mormon. But I am pretty sure that is the reason.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:13 AM
4

I don't think it is because they view men as bad. Actually I believe that religion has held its ground against feminism very well. Women in churches tend to have more respect for men than your average feminist and would consider issues like"manspreading" ridiculous. It is more because they feel it is above reproach to not be alone with someone of the opposite gender. Same type of rule applies to men not wanting to be alone with women.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:02 AM
0

I have already told you the circumstances under which I would have a conversation about that. What we have here is you are figeratively sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling la la la. That is okay with me. But it appears this conversation is over.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:55 AM
1

You like to think that I cannot be convinced by facts and evidence but it is quite the contrary and based off of what you told me I would say the same about you. I hope your faith suits you well.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:20 AM
1

Paying 18-24 years worth of child support is a lot more painful.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:56 AM
1

I didn't finish reading what you wrote when you jumped to the conclusion that I shot myself in the foot. "Appears to be correct" would be called proof by preponderance of the evidence in a court of law. If you are unfamiliar with that term please google it, as thus is the standard of proof that courts use when there is no potential of jail time. My point is that this is an accepted way. The circumstances under which the bible was created and evidence outside of the bible proves by the prepondera…
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:54 AM
1

I think you missed my point. I am not trying to say that we should adjust auto insurance premiums. They are based on costs. So was health insurance. Women cost more money than men which is why their premiums were higher. Obama made the ACA and public padded himself on the back that he helped eliminate the discrimination against women and niw men and women pay the same rate. Adjusting health insurance premiums so men pay the same as women would be the same thing as adjusting auto insurance costs …
/r/MensRights29/01/15 02:42 AM
1

I believe she is a murderer, but I believe it is murder to kill any unborn baby. I think that feminists did society a huge disservice by making us think abortion is all about a woman's body (sidebar: but the man has no rights because he should have thought about it before having sex, but apparently that same logic doesn't apply here to women).
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:43 PM
1

I said that things are disproven all the time. In fact, that is the scientific method. You come up with a theory and then try to disprove it. When you can't, then you say that this appears to be true.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:40 PM
1

The earth is not flat.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:58 AM
1

I thought that the orginal blogger's conviction to protect guys hearts was very admirable. I respect her for it.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:21 AM
1

Things are disproven all of the time. I am thinking that you want to call your faith by a different word so that you can feel better than others.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:28 AM
1

The bitterness was implied by her statement. If you do not have proof that people don't have souls, then you have faith.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 04:20 AM
4

Obama felt it was an awlful thing that women have to pay more for health care than men. It's too bad he didn't look at gender inequalities in car insurance.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:25 AM
4

Yes you can pursue them legally. Whether they offered the job to the public or not had no bearings on their responsibility.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:16 AM
1

"I had an abortion because I would have given the baby a poor life" seems to be okay with you. "I had an abortion because I would have given the baby a poor life because I am bitter towards men in general and I would have hated the child" seems to not be okay with you. One sentance is just a suvset of another. You have faith there is no such thing as a soul would be a better statement of what you believe.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 03:11 AM
1

Like I said I do not wish to debate whether it is wrong to get an abortion, but I am gonna have to agree to disagree with you here about this logic. This is a logical fallacy. You cannot say that it is not murder if you are having an abortion because you feel you are too young and then say it is murder if you have an abortion because it is a boy and you cannot see yourself raising a boy. Murder is only murder if you are killing a living being, no matter your intentions. You cannot murder a car b…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 02:24 AM
1

I would like to politely say that you have a logical fallacy here. You might want to examine why you are pro choice. Maybe you want to feel accepted by other people? Maybe you don't want to be grouped with what you might perceive as religious nuts? Maybe you were a party to an abortion and are now experiencing cognitive dissonance? Whatever the reason, if you feel this person is now a murderer than you have to believe that they are killing a human with a soul.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:45 PM
1

I am trying to say that you are either killing a person or destroying your personal property. If you are killing a person, you are a murderer no matter your reason. If you are destroying personal property, it is no different than destroying your car because you don't like the color. The issue of men being valued less than women is a completely different issue.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:41 PM
1

You have more self control than me.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 05:37 PM
9

If I lived there I would write on it saying this is offensive. But I am not not trying you to do that.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:19 PM
2

But that figure is misleading. Especially if you are comparing it to the 77 cents on the dollar thing, because that is comparing all women to all men.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:08 PM
0

If you believe she is a murderer, then you have to believe that all people who have abortions are murders. I am not trying to start a political debate about abortion, just pointing out a logical fallacy. Either you believe that the babies inside the belly are not human yet or don't have a soul until a certain point and therefore it is okay to kill it before that point or you believe that all babies have a soul or are human and it is murder at anytime. It sounds like you believe the former. If th…
/r/MensRights26/01/15 04:06 PM
2

Women receiving child support 97% of the time (if that is true? Maybe it is) is not the same thing as 97% of women receive child support (which is the way you are adding it). Same thing with alimony. One you adjust that, and you should also add in government entitlements received, I would love to see that calculation.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:56 PM
8

Women are the primary victims when their sons die.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:44 PM
2

He probably would be arrested because she is underage and therefore it is statutory rape. Unfortunately, being drunk and not being able to consent only applies to women.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 03:41 PM
10

Feminism had no real issues to work on so they need something to do.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 12:18 AM
1

Wow good response. +1
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:42 PM
1

I don't understand what you are saying and both your post and the post you linked are walls of text. Can you give me a TL; DR?
/r/MensRights25/01/15 08:40 PM
1

I hate that. It seems to be a common thread.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 12:37 AM
1

Okay that makes sense.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 12:37 AM
3

Thank you for the video. I like it.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 12:36 AM
6

Can you go further in your assertion that women were not oppressed throughout history? Any facts you can provide would be great.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:26 AM
1

Haha! That's funny!
/r/MensRights23/01/15 10:22 PM
1

Haha! I agree. Lol
/r/MensRights23/01/15 10:21 PM
2

1 in 5 stat has been disproved.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:34 PM
1

Persecuted groups of men is the only focus of mras. I believe most mras will support you on what you are trying to do.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 08:33 PM
1

You kinda proved OPs point.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:06 PM
1

You did say a top focus. That is the same thing as the top focus though because of the word top. Top means there is nothing else above it. I haven't read nor care to read the responses between you and others, but I will assume what you say is true given that you haven't raged against me in any way. Gay men's rights I am sure most MRAs are in support of, but they are, as you say a minority. According to okcupid, gays make up 8% of the couples they match. I don't know how common being gay is, but …
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:48 PM
2

Even though this post seems trollish, you are right. Rape victims of any gender deserve recognition, sympathy, respect, and justice. Currently women victims already get that, as they should, while male victims do not. Let's fight for equality!
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:41 PM
2

You said to make this the top priority. That means number one. Please take a minute to look back at your own writing. It is a known fact that men are discriminated against women in family courts, in dv cases, and the like. But I don't think you care about those men nor do you care about gay rights. I think you are just trolling.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:38 PM
4

So you are saying we should not put our efforts into represting most men and let most men be discriminated against by women and society just incase maybe a minority of men might possibly maybe might be discriminated? Your question seems like it is not trying to seek what is right or learn anything. But rather, it appears to be very trollish.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:09 PM
2

Reverse the genders and give the men in the picture a phrase that has a double meaning so that it can imply he is violent towards women and see what happens.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:59 PM
2

The top focus, eh. Even though there are other issues that affect more men than this?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:53 PM
8

So if a woman interupts a woman it is also manturupting? Because it says usually by a man. Usually means not always.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:33 AM
8

Funny cuz usually women interrupt people more than men interrupt people. Just another way to demonize men.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 06:29 AM
1

We address issues concerning men. One out of many issues we talk about, one is domestic violence and the court system with it's unfair laws and practices regarding this issue against men being treated unfairly. Someone with an angry heart my see this and say this helps white men. But the answer to that is both yes and no. It does help white men, but not because they are white, but because they are men. This issue further helps black men who go through this. And asian men. And latino men. And nat…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:35 AM
2

Yeah I saw your post the other day. As I said there she was obviously a jerk from a profile and confirmed it in her responses to you. Unfortunately any class of people that are really oppressed cannot speak up and say they are oppressed and expect to get support. Case in point, if a black person were to speak out a hundred years ago about their oppression, they would get flogged or killed for it. Nowadays, while some people might argue whether or not blacks are oppressed, most can agree they are…
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:29 AM
1

I personally believe it is because society does a good job warning women of bad men out there but does a horrible job of warning men of the evils of women. We grow up subconsciously thinking to put our guard out on men but not for women.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:55 PM
7

A man is untrustworthy until he proves himself. A woman is trustworthy until she proves herself not. I am not trying to rant. I am talking about society's impressions of people.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:13 PM
1

Going to the bathroom is seen as not manly? What? This is something only men do.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 04:45 PM
2

Woman: Hi, my now ex-boyfriend got me pregnant and I am 21 weeks along. We were gonna have the baby but now that he left me I want to get an abortion. Doctor: You cannot have one unless you have been raped and reported it to the police. Woman: Okay. I will be right back then.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 03:57 PM
0

This post seems very trollish.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 05:11 AM
2

People have in the past faslely said things like that to make us look different than what we are. I don't know if that is or if it is something different, I really can't say. Maybe the person is coincidently trans but got banned for his actions? I don't know. You'd have to ask that person for more specifics.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:11 AM
1

Okay. I don't follow politics enough to agree or disagree with that. My point was that feminists saw obama as more of a feminst than hillary.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:50 AM
4

I don't know of the user you talk about to comment on their specific situation. This subreddit, like the mens rights movement as a whole, is very diverse and accepts all opinions and ideas about equality, even if we disagree with them, which is saying more than the feminist echo chambers on reddit.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:35 AM
3

There is a reason why feminists groups backed obama over hillary in 2008. He is more of a feminist than even than the WOMAN that thinks that women have always been the primary victims of war, which is saying a lot.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:32 AM
2

So if the patriarchy only hurts men why is it called a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:18 AM
6

Because giving women free birth control won't change women who trick men into getting them pregnant.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 11:44 PM
3

Is he the sole owner of the guns (and not her)? If so, he should be the only one responsible.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 03:01 PM
3

I wonder if this is real? To someone who is mgtow, This is their life and they see it and experience it everyday. But I wonder if it is big enough that it is actually affecting women in any material way?
/r/MGTOW20/01/15 07:40 AM
6

Who said mgtows hate all women? The idea of mgtow is that women are not necessarily worse than men, but that the state laws and practices have effectively given women a loaded gun to use against men should they choose to use it (some will some won't), so why be a part of that system? There is no hate in there.
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 03:43 AM
1

They said it in the beginning: this is not a representative sample. Has anyone else noticed that feminist statistics, articles, studies, and "facts" are not peer reviewed? (Peer reviewed is the normal process for studies to undergo so they be looked at by educated people in the profession and they criticize the way the study was done and say that it should have been done this way or that way in order to have valid results).
/r/MensRights18/01/15 03:40 AM
1

We support issues of equality, which in this society, is usually something men need. If what we support happens to be an issue that the feminist political machine supports, then so be it. But we are not here to support that poltical machine per se
/r/MensRights17/01/15 06:08 PM
2

I don't buy paid apps.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:22 AM
1

Haha! That is what I was thinking because you had warned me once!
/r/MensRights17/01/15 01:07 AM
1

That is what I figured. Thanks for the insight.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 05:02 PM
2

Ever notice that male victims of sexual assult are quick to want to protect their attackers? I don't know if this is representative of what is normal, but when I read case stories this seems to be a common reoccurance.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:35 AM
1

I love how they say 99% of rapists are men. That is like defining rain as perception falling from the sky that is only 70 degrees or warmer, and then claiming that it has almost never rained in Antarctica.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 07:44 AM
1

The participation rate is usually defined as the percentage of the working age population participating in the labor force. I don't think the age at which a person lives after retirement affects these numbers. However the participation rate has been dropping for years now for both genders. My concern is why do people care about the female participation rate but never that of the male? I have seen this rate segregated by age, class, race, parts of the country, and now, for the first time gender.
/r/MGTOW10/01/15 07:40 AM
1

Both I guess?
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:34 AM
1

I know. The stats I have been able to find in my research have all been women.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:34 AM
1

Okay thank you.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:33 AM
1

Okay thanks.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 01:33 AM
7

What you are doing is great. Facebook is good for keeping in touch with people you would otherwise lose contact with which can be accomplished easily by checking facebook 1-2 times per week.
/r/MGTOW04/01/15 05:54 PM
3

I persoanlly don't like it because it implies that boys don't hit women and that it is learned as they get older. Ask any second grade teacher if that is true. This video is feeding you a lie and using music to hit your emotion.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 05:51 PM
6

He deserves to be punished. But what about the woman?
/r/MensRights04/01/15 05:36 PM
7

Nah, those meals are too small for her.
/r/PussyPass03/01/15 03:44 AM
0

Wow that is a great point.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:58 AM
-1

Because it is not morally right to not force women into parenthood but to force men into it.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 06:56 PM
3

For some reason it is okay to say that Asians eat rice. But it is a little suspicious if you say black people eat fried chicken. Now racism is judging the content of someone's character based on their race, so neither of these comments are racist, but clearly there are some races that are protected by society more than others. There is also one gender that is protected more than another.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:59 PM
1

Didn't think of that. Yes that is a troll. Appears to be a feminist making stuff up to argue with mras.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 08:37 PM
1

No its good to talk about. I think I speak for most MRAs that male accusers of rape deserve punishment as well. The accusation of rape ruins a person's reputation and, depending on their career or position in college, their livelihood.
/r/MensRights01/01/15 07:47 AM
2

This post sounds trollish, but I am gonna assume it is real. If those rape claims can be proven as false (not enough evidence does not equal false rape claim no matter the gender), then those boys should be punished.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:41 PM
1

Oh my bad. Thanks.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:23 PM
1

Medicaid? Isnt that for old people? Why would they be paying for circumcisions anyway?
/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:54 PM
1

I said IF you did. I say that because it is not too far fetched that you would if you were both smashed.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 04:55 AM
1

If you did have sex you could be charged with rape. Be careful.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:53 AM
2

Yeah I understand what you are saying.
/r/PussyPass30/12/14 02:39 AM
1

Okay that makes sense. The timing of what I said is details. The practice of giving men the same rights was what I was talking about.
/r/PussyPass30/12/14 02:38 AM
1

Oh that is wierd. But okay.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 02:38 AM
-12

Wow that was mean.
/r/MGTOW29/12/14 03:25 AM
16

To mirror the right of the woman the man she have the right to terminate child support payments, along with any parternal right through the end of the second trimester. Or, if he was never told about the pregnancy, some time (30 days?) after he finds out.
/r/PussyPass29/12/14 03:20 AM
3

Why would people think that men wouldn't want birth control?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:15 AM
1

I think some people call that the earnings gap.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 10:41 PM
5

You could take it a step further and hit the gym and work on getting a good job. Then when women pursue you, you can reject them.
/r/MGTOW28/12/14 09:33 PM
0

Yeah you are probably right. I wish we had some stats on it.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:04 AM
2

I think some of it is exaggerated. Sometimes women like to think they are so good that they can manipulate a guy (the cop).
/r/MensRights27/12/14 07:45 AM
1

I don't think there should be mandatory leave but I dont think there should be mandatory leave for the mom and not the father and then further complaint that employers pay men more.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:14 AM
1

I don't know. It says video unavailable on my phone?
/r/MGTOW26/12/14 02:12 AM
4

I hope it never comes to that but I will keep it in mind. I am too opinionated of a person to have that happen to me but you never know.
/r/MGTOW26/12/14 01:34 AM
2

It says video unavailable?
/r/MGTOW25/12/14 05:26 AM
1

No it is not double dipping. If the recipient had to pay taxes on it then it would be double dipping.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:25 AM
1

Because the theory is if you were together you would be providing for the child and it would not be tax deductible. The exemption you get for the child if you two were still together you would also qualify for when you pay child support depending on your agreement with your ex.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 04:23 AM
2

I believe that society does a great job warning women of the evils of men but doesn't warn men of the evils of women. Many men don't understand the importance of being careful.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 09:48 PM
1

I am sorry to hear about your situation. I come from a divorced family. One thing I appreciate about my dad is that he obviously had a strong conviction to only say good things about my mother when I was younger. It wasn't until us kids were older until he told us that the divorce happened because my mom cheated on him. I think you are right not to taint your son's view of his mom now. I don't see anything wrong with telling him when he is 18+. He will already have an opinion of his mom, good or…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:56 PM
3

I know nothing about this to help you but I wanted to say I am sorry to hear what you are going through. Might I suggest making your son an email account that you will give to him on his 18th birthday. You can email him Christmas letters and let him know your struggle and how you really wished he was in your life more and you can write him about experiences you had with him and how you felt about it. I think he would really appreciate that.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 05:05 AM
7

I am married. I am very happy to be with my wife. I also believe in mgtow because i believe that my marriage is the exception rather than the rule. Further, if I were to get a divorce, the law would be against me. I believe that the world does a great job warning women of the evils of men but a horrible job warning men the evils of women. I didn't know the risk I was taking when I got married. I am so glad I took the risk. On the same token if I were young again and I didnt know my wife I would …
/r/MGTOW24/12/14 03:32 AM
5

Well what happens is they are in an echo chamber. They actually believe they are so oppressed and all of life's woes is due to the patriarchy and they have a lot of people they talk to that feel the same. Further, they only read news that supports this belief. So when they come out of their echo chamber they act as if that is the reality.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:34 AM
1

I think it would be nice to have a place were we can all talk. Something like /r/MRAsandfeminists. Where everyone can be assured they will not be banned unless they are over the line vervally abusing, but never for their ideas.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:32 AM
2

There is a need for mrm because feminists don't care about men's issues. They only want to make things better for women. Feminists look up on the career later and are upset that a larger percentage of men are ceos than women. They don't want to look down and see the vast majority of homeless are men. If gender equality were really there thing then male homelessness would be just as big an issue for them as lack of female ceos. Feminists care about domestic violence victims of they are women. If …
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:29 AM
67

You were banned because you don't agree with them. They are working really hard to create an echo chamber and you were ruining that. I realize what I just said is crass but it is true. I, too, was banned from askfeminists. I was banned because I was explaining to someone how they had bad logic. I wasn't even saying their conclusion or feminism was wrong, just explaining a logical fallacy. The problem was the person was pro feminist.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:38 PM
1

Why do ppl care about reddit karma? It doesn't do anything.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:23 PM
1

Thank you for sharing. This is the exact reason why I don't talk about men's rights issues with people except for my wife (who is also an mra). I believe that if an oppressed class went around talking about their oppression, they would get a lot of hatred in response. If they get support in response by the average person, they are probably not oppressed. Other than some issues that all races have to deal with, fortunately, blacks are no longer an oppressed class. You may or may not agree with th…
/r/MensRights23/12/14 05:17 PM
1

Sweden seems to have moved in the right direction with the introduction of a father's month requirement that compels fathers to take at least 30 days of parental leave. By directly reducing the gender asymmetries in the allocation of parental responsibilities, this policy decreases the potential for statistical discrimination that leads to gender inequalities in wages.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:37 AM
1

Oh okay I misunderstood. Usually people will like the post and but an "np." On the front of the link (meaning no participation mode).
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:37 AM
1

Haha! I was not saying to marry the bot. I was just joking.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 12:35 AM
3

Horrible. Just horrible.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:13 PM
1

What happens when that sexbot wants to divorce you though?
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:03 PM
1

as does the legal system, and society in general That is what he meant when he said "and society backs them up".
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:00 PM
1

An economist would tell you that lulu exists because that is what women want. If men wanted a similar app where they could gossip about women, there would be developers ready to make it. I think the fact that it exists and is so successful speaks against the 'male predator/female victim' mindset and speaks towards the fact that society does not respect men.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:52 PM
1

It us against reddits rules to call people from one subreddit to another to talk about something.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:28 PM
1

Personally I think one of the best things a man could have to decrease his desire for women is a lot of women friends in purely platonic relationships.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:24 PM
1

Something to consider: it can be easy to assume that sexual appetite is constant and being with a woman or watching porn is like eating"food" to feed that appetite. However, I would suggest that porn increases sexual appetite and can make men more desperate to find a woman in real life than if they didn't watch porn.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 04:11 PM
4

Thank you for sharing. While what you are describing is a result of a pussypass, I am thinking this particular post better belongs in /r/mensrants. I found these subreddits back in April and I was so grateful because now I know that what I see in society I am not alone in thinking that women have it easier.
/r/PussyPass21/12/14 08:19 PM
4

Please stop talking to me. You are becoming rude. I said okay thanks as a polite way to end this conversation. Thanks.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:39 PM
5

Okay thanks.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:11 PM
7

"A true gentleman doesn't..." The gentleman left this society about 2 decades after the ladies left.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 09:41 AM
1

Haha! So true.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:31 AM
2

Agreed
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:26 AM
2

I was only talking fron the perspective of the parents financially hours after their bit is born and they are told the procedure costs nothing out of pocket. Yeah everybody pays it thru increased premiums but that doesn't mean anything in the decision making process.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:26 AM
1

You know that makes a lot of sense.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:17 AM
2

From the financial perspective, mst insurances cover the cost if it is done on the first week. Cost to the parent = $0
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:10 AM
8

OMG that is awlful.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 03:51 AM
7

What do you mean all men are pedophiles policy?
/r/MensRights21/12/14 03:00 AM
2

I had a very negative view of women most of my life and still and am guarded. My plan was to never get close to one. Fortunately when I became a Christian in college I believed that women in the church were different and was more open to them in a hesitant sort of way. I ended up marrying one of them and we have never fight like that in our 12 years of marriage. Both my wife and I are MRAs.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:56 AM
4

Okay. Personal attacks. I read the first two sentences and didn't read the rest. This conversation is over.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:51 AM
3

Growing up (starting when I was in 4th grade thru passed high school), I would watch my mom get in violent fights with whatever boyfriend she had at the time. I would watch them let her hit them holding up thier arms to try to block whatever they can. Usually (but not always), he would eventually push her away and that is when she'd call the cops and they would take the boyfriend to jail. Have you seen other cases like this? Or do cases like this never hit your desk and the guy gets out if jail …
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:22 AM
1

Oh okay
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:06 AM
4

Feminists get more support from the left. They tend to identify themselves as liberals (sidebar: liberal is not an accurate word for the left. No insults here. Just that a "liberal" would want to liberate citizens. Liberate markets. Liberate society. Wanting more laws, whether that is a good thing or bad, is the opposite of liberating.) Anyway, more rules for feminists are made from leftists. The last two presidents from the left, Obama and Clinton, made big strides for feminism. In my person be…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:05 AM
1

I was just giving OP a warning of what happened elsewhere.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 01:57 AM
2

I don't see anything wrong with uber's decision. They are fosting a marketplace. It sadens me that men are worth less than women.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 09:34 PM
5

I am glad that our justice system is founded on the premise that it is better to let 9 guilty people go free than to put 1 innocent person behind bars. Apparently feminists don't agree.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 09:28 PM
2

This makes a lot of sense.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 09:26 PM
11

You lost me at feminists are conservatives. I don't want to turn this into a political debate. Just starting a fact here, not a political opinion, feminists tend to be leftists. I am not saying that because I am a rep. I am a libertarian. I am just stating a fact.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 06:45 PM
1

But once we have already taken that step and violate the constitution and our "God given rights", as our forefathers put it, then it is easier to ally that everywhere.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 06:41 PM
1

Ugh that is sick and disgusting.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 06:40 PM
15

Be careful of being named a hate group. It has happened here in the U.S.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:11 PM
1

If they believe that, why are they with their husbands?
/r/MensRights20/12/14 03:04 PM
13

Something I don't understand is why a feminist would want to end due process? If they (as in the feminists) are successful as a country to end due process for laws against the other gender, do they not know that it will hurt then as it happens to their husband, brother, it soon? Further, do they not think that this puts the powers that be on a road to end due process in other areas that might affect them more negatively? I would think that everybody would want fair and equitable justice.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:54 PM
3

Oh okay. Shows how much I know about the reddit hierarchy. Thanks for clarifying. And I appreciate that you live up to your handle name, nicemod.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:42 PM
5

What are you talking about? This was a man's fault somehow. Probably her fifth grade teacher from years ago talked to her too harshly when she didn't do her homework.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:21 AM
5

Oh sorry. I read the first sentance and you are a reddit admin so I figured... thanks for the clarity.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:17 AM
13

You are right. Just like when someone spits in your face and your saftey isn't affected so it doesn't matter, so it is with this.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:13 AM
2

Why did you shadow ban this guy? It seems like a legitimate post.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:07 AM
0

You are not an important part of the family so you don't count.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:11 PM
1

A long time ago, they thought that ice cream increased your chance of catching polio. Now they realize that polio cases happened more in the summer heat, which coincidently is when people want to eat ice cream. Showing a corealtion does not imply causality. What about the decline in the value of women (women used to value their husbands more and expect less)? What about the increased chance of divorce? What about the increaed cost of divorce? Do these not play a factor?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 10:09 PM
1

Haha!
/r/MensRights18/12/14 06:10 AM
3

We need to legalize rape. ... It's time for some common sense. Am I the only one that sees the irony here?
/r/MensRights18/12/14 02:09 AM
1

So the sign should say men if any gender. But my assumption is it id's just a violent game.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 12:44 AM
1

My message was too long: so this is 2 of 2. There are penalties for false rape claims, and I'd love to see an example of feminists trying to lessen the gravity of rape. As mentioned above, the UVa example is a good one. A study done by the Air Force showed 60% of rape claims were false. Many reasons cited for the false claims were, "confusion, outside influence from therapists and others, habitual lying, advantages in custody disputes, financial gain, and the political ideology of radical femini…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:53 PM
1

My message was too long: so this is 1 of 2. I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. It is not all that common that I find myself by a computer with some time (which is ironic because my whole work day is on the computer). Anyway, here we go. The issue is that the shirt is a symptom of something bigger I agree with you here that there is something bigger, but not on what that bigger issue is. The bigger issue is not misogyny in stem fields. As someone who works in stem, I know first hand …
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:52 PM
5

Agreed.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:49 PM
3

Is the violence in that game disproportional towards women?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 06:48 PM
19

I have never played that game. Isn't there violence against everybody? Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:50 PM
27

If the genders were reversed I am sure they would not be thinking if the woman was maybe possibly abusive. Yes I am glad we are finally getting our act together.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:47 PM
3

On dating websites, where traditional means pay for the date, many women specifically day they are looking for a traditional man. It is only oppressive when traditional means women have to do something they don't want to.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:54 PM
72

Yeah let's speculate that the man could possibly be abusive so that we don't speak out when we see she is obviously cheating.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:51 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 05:38 AM
1

I don't know. But in this case, she doesn't want it and in the comments she was saying he was traditional like it was a bad thing. That got me to thinking how women love to say they are looking for a traditional man on dating websites (ie pay for me), but being traditional here is bad simply because I don't want your name. In this specific case, she doesn't want his name because she doesn't like the name itself, not because she feels belittled by taking it our anything like that. She said the na…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:34 AM
1

I think you misunderstood me. Sorry I wasn't clear. The first traditional = xx was what it is when being traditional benefits women. But then when a man wants women to be traditional in a way that doesn't benefit them, then it is the second one. I was trying to say that there is a double standard here. Nevermind.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:25 AM
1

When in the dating arena, women want a"traditional" man. When they need protection, they want a"traditional" man to man-up. But when they want things to benefit them, where did the expectation of traditional go? "Traditional" = beneficial for the woman. But also, traditional = archaic, caveman-ish, and sexist.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:04 PM
104

TL; DR: Woman has two kids with a guy then breaks up with him (or divorces him?). Then she marries the guy in this article and then divorces him. He is left homeless for a number of years. Meanwhile she marries another guy who cannot support her two kids. She sees this guy has become rich and wants some of his money.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 10:16 PM
12

I don't think that your size or her size should matter. If we are going to live in a society where we expect men not to abuse women because men are stronger, then a man's size us a moot point if the woman is the aggressor and we are going to expect him to not hurt her.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 04:38 AM
1

Oh okay. Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 11:12 PM
1

Is there a place thay says who won these cases?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 03:00 AM
1

Where is part 2?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 02:58 AM
1

People with real power don't need to say it.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 02:58 AM
1

I don't understand your question?
/r/MensRights04/12/14 05:30 PM
-2

Do you and your wife work at the same company? In the U.S., companies are not required to give leave, it is by choice, as it should be. But if the same company offers maternity leave and not paternity leave in the same way, that is different.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:20 PM
1

I see they are trying to make a point that women should get paid the same amount as men for the less work they provide. However, they are not going to sell that much. Almost no men will buy and I would imagine some women would be offended by that.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:13 PM
1

The thing is basing feminism off of what I am reading about in news articles about what they are doing is the best way to get an idea of feminism. The actions of anyone is more important than their words. On a side note I saw this video from a youtube science blog that I would like to share with you. It has nothing to do with gender politics but more talks aboit the way we think and our biases. I thought it would fit this conversation. The video can be found here: http://youtu.be/vKA4w2O61Xo By …
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:22 AM
1

I don't see anything wrong here. Now that they found out how it is harming men they are trying to ban it. If they didn't care about what it does to men then there would be a problem.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 03:40 PM
1

I base my perception on feminism on internet feminists and from the actions of feminists I read in the articles that are brought here. Both the actions and what I read here seem to align (of course they don't align with the defination of feminism). I also talk to people but only when gender things are brought up, which, by women, is more often than you'd think. So far I have brought three people to the MRM camp: my wife, my sister-in-law, and a friend's girlfriend. I have learned that it is not …
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:16 PM
1

Oh well that is nice to hear there are penalties there. MRAs believe that women have all the legal rights as men and so do feminists, well at least the feminists in /r/askfeminists. Back when I had the priveliage of asking questions there and someone in here made a rant that women have all legal rights men do but not the opposite, I went in there and asked. The only thing they could come up with is that men can take their shirts off in public and women can't. Now they believe (falsely in my opin…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:02 PM
1

It's true I am ranting to you. When I had the priveliage of asking questions in/r/askfeminists I was a lot more careful about what I said and did nothing of the sort. I think the day I got banned I realized how evil this group of people can be. I think feminism could go much further if they took on men's issues too. Instead of denying male victims of domestic violence, why not fight for them as hard as they do female victims? It sure would show a lot of good faith. I know you think MRAs purposel…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 08:40 AM
1

What's the context?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 06:23 AM
3

Wow. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 06:17 AM
6

Can you link it?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:57 AM
6

She admits to it because she knows there will be no repercussions for doing so.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 01:44 AM
1

We do not silence feminists. If you said what you did (but the opposite side), you would be banned in the feminist subreddits. That is not so here. I would welcome friendly disscussion with feminists, and I don't feel that I am alone here. There was a time I used to talk to feminists. I became an mra in April when I found this subreddit. People would say things in here and I would goto /r/askfeminsts and ask what they thought. I was careful not to say or do anything against their rules because I…
/r/MensRights01/12/14 01:22 AM
1

But what about, "that's awesome, man!"
/r/MensRights29/11/14 08:20 PM
0

Yeah some men do want to stay home. I was more speaking to your comment about how society expects then to stay at home. Feminism was never about equality. It was always about entitlements. The only group that was was the sufferagettes looking to vote. The men back then were okay with that but they had to fight other women groups because those women groups were afraid that if equality were achieved, other laws would be lifted like laws capping how many hours per week a woman could work and matern…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 08:13 PM
1

I think you are reading into expectations too much. Many women dream of being stay at home moms. It's like something magical happens when their clock starts ticking or they get pregnant. That is what they want to do. But I realize that most feminists do not want women in general to feel that way so they claim women are expected to do it. I used to feel angry at feminism because of all of the hurt it does to men. As I have looked into it more and more, my anger has turned to sadness because I rea…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 03:35 PM
1

Sorry you took a beating. I didn't read other's comments. I am glad to see you putting in effort to furthering the cause.
/r/MGTOW29/11/14 12:43 AM
1

I know but one could add up everyone's salary that is single. That is how they get the misleading wage gap figure when they are adding the full time make with the stay at home and/or part time mom.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 10:46 PM
1

Oh but it is because if you compare 10 single men to 10 single women, you'd have a great point, but that all but disappears if you added up the salary of EVERY single man and EVERY single woman.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:34 PM
2

Someone might read this and conclude that this applies to cis men and women. There are other things at play here than you might think: the level of confidence change a trans might get after their surgery, the stigma they may get from employers, the effect of the constant amount of drugs they have to take, to name a few. It is better to compare single men with single women who are both further along in their career and factor for types of jobs worked. A study like this would most certainly be use…
/r/MensRights28/11/14 02:14 PM
4

Good catch.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 03:44 AM
2

Where do you see the future of the Men's Rights Movement and men's rights in general going?
/r/MensRights28/11/14 01:44 AM
6

Wow that is crazy.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 12:59 AM
2

As much as I agree with your research, Throw59 is right. You are wasting your time debating with internet feminists. If feminism was worse than Hitler and you could show them proof, they would never listen to you. Feminists could be on TV eating babies and they would still believe in feminism. The people you have to target are the people who say that yeah they like feminism because they hear that women would be oppressed without it, as these women or men don't now much about it.
/r/MGTOW27/11/14 08:31 PM
6

You cannot win in that forum. Either they are right, they delete your post, or you get banned.
/r/MGTOW27/11/14 04:28 PM
1

So it is sexist.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 05:13 AM
3

I see what you are saying. It just seems more like a racial issue than a gender issue.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 05:08 PM
2

Based off of what you are telling me, it seems like more of a racial issue than a gender issue. Am I reading it wrong? If that black man were a woman, it would probably be a gender issue. I don't know if this is true or not, but someone told me that the Ferguson police is mostly white while the community is mostly black, and therefore, people feel the police dept doesn't represent the community.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:33 PM
24

Did I read the article right? It said the police haven't charged him with anything? That tells me there is no case which makes me think the only evidence there is is women saying he did it. Now he has to pay for legal counsel and be kicked out of his poet's community on that evidence alone. This is sad.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:29 PM
1

I don't follow the news. What happened?
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:17 PM
2

I wish people would take off their political blinders. I mean, an otherwise normally intelligent person refuses to see logic when gender politics come into play (or any form of politics for that matter). I don't understand it.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 10:55 PM
1

I guess I was trying to say that chivalry lost its purpose in today's society.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:34 PM
2

That is not a legal right. It is chivalry. Unfortunately society forgot two things about chivalry: (1) the other half of chivalry was the expectation that women act like ladies, and (2) chivalry was never about doing things for women, it was about protecting the weak. Women are no longer weak and do not need to be protected. One can be chivalrous by the real defination and not do these things for women.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:25 PM
1

Exactly. Since we can't agree on that we should stop oppressing parents.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:57 AM
3

Oh it's not the apartment, it's the roommate. Unfortunately that is legal.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:38 PM
1

Why do you think you are being discriminated against?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 10:16 PM
2

I was more talking for the future. Even if you made the mistake now you still don't deserve it. But if you've seem those videos you probably know why not to talk to the cops even if you are innocent.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:51 PM
3

Never talk to the police ever again. That was your real mistake. If they decide to arrest you, talk to the judge, never to the police.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:41 PM
2

I stopped reading. I couldn't finish. Heartbreaking. He just wanted a relationship with his son. :(
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:04 PM
2

I thought my sarcasm was obvious. I think making abortion about a woman's right is ridicious when comparing taking a human life. A couple should have the right to destroy their couch and get it out of their house, but a human life supercedes their right.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:01 PM
0

Parents should have the right to kill their children. It is their house the child is living in so they should choose and you don't have a say. Why are you oppressing parents?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 06:52 AM
6

Wow a post like this in /r/feminists or /r/askfeminists would get you banned (opposite sides of course). Good thing you are in a place that accepts all ideas.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 04:06 AM
5

Almost all 20 year olds must be domestic violence victims because many of them get lots of personal calls at work.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 02:42 PM
1

Link invalid
/r/MGTOW22/11/14 01:18 AM
1

Exactly
/r/MensRights20/11/14 11:57 PM
9

The woman gets all three boxes and the tall man gets held down somehow.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 03:57 PM
0

I think his accusers should have come forward when it could have gone to court. I don't think that Cosby should have to suffer for this. Imagine this for a second. Let's pretend he is innocent and women are falsely claiming rape against him. This is not unimaginable considering many of the false rape claims we see here and also considering the fact that he is famous. If this is true, this is a travesty and I feel so sorry for him. If this is not true, as in, he is guilty, then I wish these women…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:18 PM
3

The family court is slanted to women just like landlord court is slanted to tenants. But that doesn't mean that landlords, or men, can't be successful. Like that other poster said, document everything. Date: Time: Event: 11/11/14 3:32pm wife and I had dinner at Red Robin and she told me, "xxx" 11/12/14 on or about 10pm - wife filed for divorce Etc Keep a spreadsheet of everything that happens that may person to your case. I would ease off on any sort of physical punishment of the kids. She will …
/r/MensRights20/11/14 06:06 AM
0

Haha! Nice!
/r/MensRights20/11/14 12:21 AM
3

Your offense to this post offends me. Please ban it.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 12:18 AM
3

I would just say she is a jerk if I didn't know anything about society. Unfortunately society is on her side.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 06:12 PM
15

Men kill themselves more than women... let's make this about how women are oppressed.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:44 PM
3

It is up. I just clicked on your link and see the website.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:30 PM
2

So you had to top for her and pay her tax? And she is still mad?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:28 PM
4

Summary of the article: Blah blah blah women make sacrifices too so I am gonna try to steal this day from men and make it about women.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:52 PM
2

That's true. She ambushed you into a meal when you were trying to just provide a drink. And of course an expensive drink at that. I am sure she will count this as one of her worst dates ever and tell her friends how cheap you are.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 02:42 PM
2

I think women wanting equality when it benefits them and roles when that benefits them is b.s. That being said, I don't know if telling her at the last minute she had to pay is reasonable. As much as I don't agree with this norm, it is a norm, nonetheless. Therefore, if you don't want to do it, you should make your intentions clear beforehand. Don't you think? Otherwise you are wasting your time with these type of women.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 06:57 AM
5

Except there is no patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:43 AM
0

I don't know if I agree with that reason for validating rape but I don't agree that those women should shut you out and shame you for have a debate like that.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:10 PM
1

Many feel that way. And many I'd or laws reflect feminist beliefs, such as child custody laws, domestic violence laws, society caring about female victims more than male victims, etc. Goto youtube and search for girlwriteswhat. Watch some of her videos. She is an anti feminist and explains about a lot of the evils society places on men.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:53 PM
2

Of how many posts? All year long or only a smaller sample size?
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:52 AM
1

Okay sorry I didn't know.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 07:11 AM
1

I felt it did because it perpetuates the stereotype that all men are evil.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 03:29 AM
2

The image is gone?
/r/MensRights17/11/14 02:00 AM
1

It is. The only problem is they errounously believe that women are the oppressed in all curcumstances.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:29 PM
2

I agree with you. Thank you for defending him and I hope he moves on from your ex-friend.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 09:01 PM
5

Because we all know it is quute acceptable for boyfriends to tell their women to do the same. Lol
/r/MensRights16/11/14 08:16 PM
8

What is wrong with defending people who cannot defend themselves (which is what the laws and society took away from him)? Surely I hope if you saw a baby getting abused you would want to help that baby too. The difference between that and white knoghts is many of these sjw's defend the wrong person. I would be offended if you saw a baby being abused and you started attacking the baby tobdefend its abuser.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 08:14 PM
15

How is that not selfless? You were thinking about Mike?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:27 PM
418

Thank you for standing up for what is right.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:09 PM
3

I don't think the average woman would even support this.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 08:04 PM
0

In all seriousness you would think feminists would be outraged because if you take concern for issues that affect others, they will do the same. And it would add credibility to their claim for equality.
/r/PussyPass15/11/14 03:23 PM
2

Try posting: What place, if any, does feminism have in modern society?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:12 PM
25

Like every area of life outside of gender politics, the choices you make have consequences, especially when your choices affect other people. I agree that a woman should be allowed to choose who she lets put seed in her body. But a man not liking her decision to put another man's seed in her body, and so leaves her, is a natural consequence of her actions. Everybody would agree with this in examples outside of gender politics. But blinders to reality come on with politics of any kind, and people…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 02:37 PM
29

The sword cuts both ways.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:10 AM
2

Context?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:48 AM
1

Nothing was wrong with the post but yeah that reply chain was a bit much.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:35 AM
1

That was said here? I agree with you there. I don't think we should be doing that because it alienates people when both sides agree that we need to be doing something about men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:21 AM
1

I don't know the facts behind this, but did the leftists flip out? If they did, that is stating a fact and I don't see anything wrong with that. If someone said the leftists are stupid because they want the Mexicans to come here, that would be a political opinion and shouldn't be mentioned here.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 03:38 AM
1

Hmm I don't feel that way. Maybe it is because the dems have sided with feminists? Can you give some examples?
/r/MensRights15/11/14 01:13 AM
2

I sure hope you are wrong but think you may be right. She sounds like a tumblr feminist.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:30 AM
2

SJW to the rescue. Lol
/r/PussyPass13/11/14 04:13 AM
3

I am not picking a fight, but let me verbally punch you first and then I will call the fight off so I can feel like a big person.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:41 AM
1

I sure hope these men don't start losing these cases. For some reason I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 09:16 PM
1

Maybe that was my misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:23 PM
2

I thought the stat was 1 in 3 women get raped in a lifetime. Wow I thought that was high. 1 in 3 women get raped in college! That is crazy!
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:20 PM
3

Of course! If more men are dying on the battlefield than women, we need to make sure we put more and more women in infantry until this problem is rectified.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:41 PM
3

Yeah but aren't they saying 1/3 of women get raped in their lifetime whereas .34% got raped that one year? Did I misunderstand?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:16 PM
4

Women already blame the small number if mgtow men that are doing that. They say these men are immature and losers.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:05 PM
2

I thought his arguments were clear, concise, and were not rude.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:46 AM
1

Yeah I agree with you. Too bad there isn't anything that can be done about it.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:27 AM
4

This shows 3 people. Not hardly a representative sample. And guy #2 looked like he was trying to help to me. Maybe I am mistaken. If it weren't so culturally taboo to show women's nasty side, we'd have plenty of material for that too. The bigger problem is the moral decay of our society. Where have all the good people gone?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:26 AM
0

Why would you bathe in his tears? That's gross. Are you saying you feel sorry for him?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:43 AM
6

Wow he is on to something. Why is it socially acceptable to talk about all the things men need to do to treat women right but not acceptable to reverse the genders?
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:13 AM
2

I am bombarded with things like this on facebook and other places. I never see the opposite of what women should do for men.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:40 PM
2

Good catch. I didn't notice the irony there.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:39 PM
1

Maybe it was because you started with why the agm was mad at you because she wanted her soon to be daughter in law to get the position. I am sorry this is happening to you. :(
/r/MensRights11/11/14 05:15 AM
2

Wow because of consensual sex the make student had to bring his father into the problem (embarassing) and withdraw from college. All for a case that wouldn't stand up in a court of law. I hate to hear stuff like this.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:23 AM
0

Who is gg?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:16 AM
1

Unless I am missing something this sounds more like nepotism than sexism.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:15 AM
1

Do women show up on Mondays?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 03:22 PM
4

Oh gosh. Another hashtag?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 03:21 PM
0

Lol it does sound like that.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 02:06 AM
0

Oh wow that sucks.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:37 PM
0

I have never heard that term before. What does it mean and why is it insulting?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 09:09 PM
-2

Didn't we just talk about this a couple days ago?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:21 PM
1

Oh okay. Sorry.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 05:39 AM
1

No I am saying society accepts us being oppressed and doesn't accept black people or women being oppressed.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:24 AM
1

He seems mean. No doubt there are men out there that abuse women and people like him need to be dealt with and the victims need to be taken care of and comforted. However, these women deserve and get the care they need while these men deserve and get the trouble the should get. Meanwhile male victims are laughed at and female predetors are respected. This is why I am an MRA.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:22 AM
2

That is because we are white males. For sone reason we are allowed to be oppressed and it is okay.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:57 PM
6

A reasonable and prudent person would not have a reasonable fear of bodily harm from those have a nice day comments. Those comments may be made because the person is hoping to get her number, but there is no reasonable fear of harm. Period.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:18 PM
0

Interesting. I have never heard of that term. But I don't talk to feminists.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:08 PM
2

I think the link is broken? 404 message.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 05:59 PM
1

Wow he seems amazing.
/r/MGTOW08/11/14 05:53 PM
2

Oh I understand now. I thought you were saying he says something specific about mgtow. Ok cool. I will watch it later today when I have more time.
/r/MGTOW08/11/14 03:10 PM
1

What is the video about or is there a certain part in the video that I should goto?
/r/MGTOW08/11/14 02:56 PM
2

Don't do anything. It can only bring trouble to your life and there is nothing the cops can do anyway because there are no victims reporting it and no proof.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:51 PM
1

You are definitely more noble than me. If it were me, I would raise my hand and tell the teacher that I refuse to be stuck in a class where some unhealthy extreme feminists spew their political beliefs (because feminism is political). I would ask that I be excused and sent to the principal's office until the teacher is done with that topic.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 08:23 PM
5

That is a good point.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 03:36 AM
6

If feminism just focused on women like it used to we would be fine. Getting women to have self confidence, believing in themsleves and getting the most out of life. In the beginning feminism had nothing to do with men. When it changed to today making men to be evil and giving women entitlements in society, how can an mrm accept that?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:12 AM
4

I was tempted to just respond with the word, "no". Lol But I think it is important to talk about the evils of feminism.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 10:48 PM
3

Reading this stat makes one think that 49% of moms in a two parent house work. That is not true. Over half of marriages end in divorce and most of the time the mother gets the child. In this case the single mom with works and that is counted as part of the 49% even though the dad works harder, longer, and at riskier jobs statistically while paying extortion support to the mother.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 07:34 PM
1

I think the op is talking about eating at home and the lack of expectations resulting in nobody cooking. I am willing to guess that in these countries they still eat at home no matter who cooks. Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:39 AM
1

They say they want to be paid the same as men while working less than them. They want it to be acceptable for them to get men's attention by wearing whatever they want but make it illegal if men actually show them attention and they want men's groups to be banned from campuses around the country. They are working on lots of stuff.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:39 PM
7

When I was in college whenever I got a teacher that was very extreme on a subject I would purposely write the opposite side and I would spend extra time to make sure it was an A+++ paper with references, etc. with the hopes they failed me. Nobody ever failed me but I got a D once. I was so excited (seriously) to get this grade and I immediately went to the head of the dept (teacher's boss) and complained. I had something put in her file and my grade changed (this wasn't about feminism but rather…
/r/MensRights05/11/14 03:35 AM
2

We went that route too. Our daughter has autism and has iep services. Mult. county servics SUCK! At the other place she was learning stuff all the time and with the county it was just a waste of time.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 02:46 AM
2

The problem isn't the school. It is society. I wish I could just magically change the way society thinks.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:47 PM
1

Yeah I guess that makes sense. But isn't that the case with your example? Maybe a parent might get the impression that they usually help girls and not boys. Maybe that is true?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:42 PM
2

You are probably right. I was only asking because 5 years ago, a speech therapy organization (also in Portland off of Macadam) that I took my daughter to, took a few pictures of her. Her and one other boy is on the front page of their website. The speech therpist took the picture and there was no marketing person involved. This place helps any kid before kindergarten with speech problems and they are almost all boys. But they put my daughter up along with one other boy because they thought she w…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:34 PM
1

I agree with you that boys aren't fairly represented in the pictures. Do you have experience with this school? Do you think it was done on purpose or do you think it was an innocent mistake?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:16 PM
2

Why do you say the focus is on girls? Is it just because of the pictures? Everything I read on the homepage doesn't jump out at me?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 10:04 PM
7

I think the mother should pay for it if it is negative and the d ather should pay if it is positive.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:56 AM
5

This benefits men and women. It benefits men because it gives them more control of preventing them from being a father. It benefits women because they don't necessarily have to be the ones to get on birth control with all of the challenges that brings. I don't see how anyone can be against this?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:51 AM
1

Oh okay. Thanks.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:46 PM
2

That is why I suggested OP to post it in /r/legaladvice.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:29 PM
8

Try posting this in /r/legaladvice.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:03 PM
2

Sorry to hear about your experience. I don't know who Warren Farrell is but maybe I can search him later. I wish you success in your video channel. I am glad to see someone on who is able to construct intelligent arguments and use their own face to create videos that the public might want to see.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 03:16 AM
1

I felt injustice towards men starting in 4th grade when I would see my mother get into a fight with whatever boyfriend she had at the time. She would get violent. After a while of holding up his hands to defend himself he would push her to get away and boom, the cops would be called and him arrested. Ever since then I would feel things were wrong but I thought I was alone in my feelings and that if I hated feminism that meant I was in favor of women being oppressed. I joined reddit back in April…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 02:23 AM
2

Well thanks for joining the fight!
/r/MensRights03/11/14 02:03 AM
1

I am personally against their version of harassment because I feel it is against both men and women. It is against men because society tells men that if they want a woman they need to initiate. Yet if they do and the woman doesn't want it (which a reasonable and prudent male reasonably picking up on a woman would not know if she wants it or not until he tries), it is now considered harassment? Yet in other instances, women will call men losers for not picking up on them because they have been wa…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 02:02 AM
1

Thank you! I love to listen to thought out anti feminist stuff that is not a kool aid jar in the video talking in a computer voice.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 01:36 AM
1

Thanks. I hit subscribe.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 01:28 AM
2

But you don't have any videos yet? How week I know if you're stuff is good?
/r/MensRights02/11/14 10:43 PM
1

Oh wow that sucks.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 05:41 PM
1

I said should, not could.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:09 PM
7

Just like any business will taylor its product to the liking of its customers, this is what society wants to see. Society cares about women and not so much men. That is what needs to change.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:29 AM
3

Then society should force women back into traditional roles if men can get out of them.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:26 AM
0

Well any one particular person can decide what they want to do. But society has expectations. Try taking a woman out on a date and not paying for her. She will tell all of her friends that you are cheap because she has the expectation that you have to pay $$ in order to be honored with her presence. This expectation was generated by society.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:23 AM
1

At least that is the case for me I wonder what will happen over the next couple of generations.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:20 AM
2

Haha! Nice.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 03:19 AM
2

I admire your guts to post that on fb. I would never do that. I have a female fb friend that posts sexist things about men. I just click the "I don't want to see this" button.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:14 AM
3

Supply and demand. If you lowered the demand for women while keeping the supply of women constant, the "price" of women will fall, or, the value of women relative to men. Women would lose power not gain it. The opposite effect would happen if you made half the women lesbian while keep the maale supply the same.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:14 AM
8

Quitting his job to work as a social worker.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:03 AM
6

Yes he could. I would do that and sure her in civil court if it were me.
/r/PussyPass02/11/14 12:29 AM
3

I agree with you on the double standard. The fair thing for society to decide would be: either get rid of gender roles on both men and women or keep gender roles on both men and women. Anything else would be unfair.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 12:26 AM
0

I didn't read the article, only your title. I know I am gonna get blasted for this, but I don't think I would have a problem with that if men got respect and dignity back from women in exchange for that role of protecting.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:57 PM
-17

This is not pussypass. Wal-Mart doesn't prosecute anyone, male or female, for theft that small. When posts like this are made, it drowns out the effectiveness of true pussypass posts.
/r/PussyPass01/11/14 09:52 PM
2

Too bad marriage didn't hurt girls more than boys. Then something would be done about it.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 09:22 PM
1

I did 5 years. I don't know what to say but I never had problems.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 08:47 PM
2

I am out of college now. Maybe I got lucky. Wow that sucks.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 06:25 PM
2

Oh maybe they automatically signed me up. I don't know? It is a moot point now. I am older than 25.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 06:24 PM
3

I didn't sign up for it. I lost my right to vote but whatever. I got fafsa help. They just ask if you have signed up for the selective service and I always checked yes. I am sure I an gonna get blasted here for doing that but that was by way of protesting that descriminatory law.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:55 PM
6

This is a success! And I am glad to hear it.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:01 PM
3

We should create another subreddit called MRAsandfeminists where both sides can go to debate things.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 10:47 PM
1

Theives should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, even if they robbed somebody who set all of their cash on the front porch. That being said, it is wise to protect your valuables by hiding them and locking them up to avoid trouble. If you don't do that, the police should still help find the thief and put them behind bars, but you should be wise too. Way is it that everyone agrees with that but they don't apply the same logic to women on the street? "Let's stop teach people to hide and …
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:36 PM
1

The YouTube video was making the argument that she was wearing tight jeans which are designed to get men's attention.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:06 PM
2

There is definately a lack of consideration of these things. They are not being pointed out by mainstream media because for some reason men do not have representation on the issues while women do. Any injustice women face, whether perceived or real, will be made known.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 08:04 PM
2

Yeah they should make a video to teach ppl not to catcall. I agree. I think it is for shame they included people who were probably trying to pick up on her, but were nice and said hi or something and didnt say anything else when she showed mild disinterest.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:50 PM
0

Because the way of life is that the nonvictims usually whine about them being victims while the true victims never get to have a voice. This is not just about women, unfortunately that is how life is.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:40 PM
1

I think a feminist's cliché argument against this video is that we shouldn't teach women not to be oppressed and not be able to dress the way they want to, but rather teach men not to be rapey.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:30 PM
4

This video teaches men not to pick up on women they are interested in. Men are creeps if they do and pathetic losers if they don't.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:17 PM
6

Women make up 51% of the population. They are not a minority. Mainstream society loves to tell us that women are oppressed and men are not, but it is simply not true. Just because you don't hear about the struggles and oppressions that men face, it doesn't mean they are not real. Men have more health problems than women (probably due to many men eating so poorly and less exercise), yet there are more federal programs to help women's health. The vast majority of homeless people are men, yet signi…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:47 PM
1

Thanks. Lol
/r/MensRights30/10/14 01:55 PM
1

You made what meme?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:28 AM
37

Yeah women are so oppressed. We are in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:01 AM
3

No we haven't and there is nothing new under the sun.
/r/MGTOW30/10/14 01:15 AM
1

Dang it. I am no longer a Ducks fan!
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:17 AM
7

I say to people all the time that our society loves to warn women about how there are a lot of bad men out there. The bible gives us a different message. I think it is said that men need this warning morn than women yet they do not get it. I posted in /r/mensrights about the false rape claim in Gensis 39 (Potiphar's wife). Unfortunately nobody there cares about the bible.
/r/MGTOW30/10/14 12:05 AM
0

I read the first sentance where you decided to insult me instead of talking about the issue and then I stopped reading. For that action, you do not deserve to have your opinions expressed to me. I am sure you will respond. I won't read that either. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:52 PM
1

Society tells men who want women to pick up on them and for women who want men to passively seek that. Sometimes a woman wants it, many times she doesn't. There is no way to know or to meet a girl without picking up on her. I think you are right that these guys weren't just trying to make conversation. I further think that they did nothing wrong in the context of this society. Relatiinships have to start. Men need to pick up on women and women need to passively seek it. Perhaps if society norms …
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:28 PM
1

People typically aren't coerced into working for somebody else.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 03:13 PM
25

When I first discovered mens rights and this subreddit, I found value in the feminist bashing for the very rain we are talking about here: because we grow up brainwashed the feminism equals women and to hate feminism means to hate women. Joining this sub and reading the feminist bashing has helped me. Now that I have matured in my understanding of the issue, I don't need it anymore but perhaps it helps others as they first come here.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:50 PM
1

It looks like it would be good information, but I can't watch 3 hours of a monotone voice. I would sure appreciate the cliff notes version.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 01:45 PM
1

CEOs don't typically do that though.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 11:13 PM
2

Well that is good news. I don't know how one could argue that, but sometimes people do ridicious things.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:34 PM
2

Is the article basically saying that a fb message isnt isn't comsidered notice and the mother didn't have the right to give the child up for adoption?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:16 PM
1

If they agreed to work at an agreed price then the ceos did pay them.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 08:53 PM
5

If a system hates both men and women, you cannot call it misogyny. That would be like calling rain "dry matter". If you choose to call it that, you would be incorrect. I don't agree with what that person is saying, but if they want to make that argument, they have to change the word misogyny into something else. I don't know, hatred?
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:07 PM
1

Wow thank you. Exactly my point. You paid them. They don't deserve anymore. The ceo paid the car designers. They don't deserve anymore.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:01 PM
1

One view is definately harmful and immoral. It is the one who cannot have a simple conversation with judging and attacking. Feel free to get your last word in. I won't read it. I won't respond to it. I have determined that you are a troll and I will not feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:48 AM
0

Many ppl in this country have created their own job. They are called self-employed. That is how most ppl worked throughout history and that option is still available. If those car designers worked for free and paid for everything as they worked, they would be called investors instead of employees and they would share in the earnings of those designs. But most would prefer not to do that because lots of times those deals go bad. The CEOs, rather, the business owners, paid for them and took the ri…
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:31 AM
1

It isnmorrally wrong to have a few ppl decide what is best for the masses. Instead, it is better to let masses decide what is best for them (which is the effect of a free market). If this were communist China and rhey forced ppl to work at a certain job than that would be completely different.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:06 AM
1

That would be a good one.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:03 AM
1

Most people derive their morals fron either culture or religion. Both of these say it is morrally acceptable to circumsize. Just because you have a different moral system than that, you have to admit that it is kinda ignorant to assume someone's mental stability based off of this alone. If you cannot continue this disscusion because your emotions are getting in the way of logic, then we cancertainly end it here.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 01:03 AM
2

It's nice to hear that men have an advantage somewhere. I find it funny that our one advantage that we have, women try to shame us out of it by saying men these days lack committment, are immature, etc.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 03:12 PM
2

I don't think this is wrong. KKK symbolizes hate. Maybe the men should walk in there covered in another way and then we can talk.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:58 PM
1

But it is not morally wrong. It does not hurt them and makes it more sanitary.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:55 PM
0

A big piece of iron 5000 feet under the ground is worth very little to the average person. That piece of iron is worth a little more one it is dug up from the ground. That piece of iron is worth even more one it had been turned into the shape of a car and attached to a motor. You are not forced to get a job. You cab create your own job. Before large companies came around this is what people did to avoid starvation. You still have this choice today. Nothing was taken from you, but a choice was ad…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:53 PM
-1

Haha! Yeah why shouldn't they be allowed to do that?
/r/MensRights27/10/14 02:38 PM
2

Pay should not be based solely on experience. Teachers should be paid less than engineering jobs or whatever because that is the free market signaling people to stop becoming teachers because we have enough of them and to go get an engineering job, or a programming job, or a biotech job, or whatever, because we need more of them. On a side note, if she is making herself the victim (doing the housework and taking care of the kids and how that is so much work for her) when she is not even in that …
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:11 AM
1

It seems like you should do some more research of your own. Go to a hospital and watch the operation be done. I have seen hundreds of them and watched the baby boy just play while it happens and he is none the wiser. This is all within the first week (yes, things you were not told in here can be true).
/r/MensRights27/10/14 07:04 AM
1

It is safe if it is done within a week off childbirth. Your statistics on bad things happening were after one week. The child doesn't have a reasonable choice because if you wait until he is older then his choice is make surgery or nothing. At birth it is standard procedure that doesn't even cause pain or nothing.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 05:04 AM
1

If you were forced to work for your employer you would have a point. You are under the false assumption that resources are fixed and just magically appear on this earth when in reality the majority of resources are created, not by government but by entrepreneurs on a large scale because they use leverage and by people in general. The employer creates the job (it is theirs).
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:43 AM
-1

Employees have an obligation to society and the structure that enables them to exist. I know it is easy for a socialist to say for the rich guy to take care of everyone's problems, but that is immoral and it also doesn't work.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:39 AM
2

They don't tax you. The government does. They also tax employers.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 04:35 AM
-1

Yes. Many people use their resources to influence politics. Most people wouldn't want socialist laws impeding the rights people have to their property yet some waiver when it comes to things owned by others. The error in reasoning here is the false assumption that the job is owned by the employee. This false assumption causes them to think that employers shouldn't be allowed to fire them for what they consider to be stupid reasons. When in fact the job is owned by the employer, not the employee.…
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:36 AM
-6

An employer should have a right to do whatever they want.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 11:31 PM
2

Okay makes sense.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 09:41 PM
2

Okay how about this: Approximately 85% of the victims of domestic violence are women. That implies 15% of the victims are males.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:30 PM
1

You and I agree that no one owns a child. A child is a human being that needs to be cared for but not owned. You have to factor out circumsisions done a week or more after the child's birth because it becomes a major surgery then. It is safe. It is sanitary. Some religions call for it. And the child doesn't have a reasonable choice to do it when they get older. If fgm is just as safe as circumcision then you and I agree there should be equal laws (but probably not agree on which way those laws s…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 07:02 PM
3

Is it this: Each day .....3 children die as a result of abuse. Children includes males and females.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 06:42 PM
3

I don't think it would be an asshole response to say: They are providing shock value, but it is not the fact that little girls are swearing, but that little kids are swearing. Little boys doing the same thing would privide the same shock value. So they are doing a great job at proving ageism, not sexism.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 06:38 PM
0

You are using the argument that parents make a circumsion decision that they feel is best for the child equal to the parents "owning" the child. I was using that same logic. I understand you don't agree with their circumsion decision.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:52 PM
-3

Name calling is usually a response when someone cannot infuse enough logic into the conversation. I was more than happy to talk to you up until that point. Take care!
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:34 AM
-3

Many reasonable and prudent people are glad they are circumcised. Start asking people outside of this forum and you will see it is not me doing the mental backflip.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:39 AM
-3

It is usually the dumb one that calls others dumb. In this case the dumb one can't paraphrase properly without changing the meaning. You are a troll and you should move along now. You probably won't so I just won't respond to your hatred.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:36 AM
-5

You support child abuse?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 12:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter