TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

7wap Archive

View 33 posts and 1,193 comments by 7wap on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
936

7wap/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:18 PM
492

7wap/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:25 PM
193

7wap/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:19 PM
144

7wap/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:43 PM
112

7wap/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:20 PM
84

7wap/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:44 PM
54

7wap/r/MensRights21/05/13 07:00 PM
53

7wap/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:17 PM
49

7wap/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:38 PM
42

7wap/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:46 PM
37

7wap/r/MensRights26/03/13 12:03 AM
35

7wap/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:29 PM
25

7wap/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:10 PM
23

7wap/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:03 PM
21

7wap/r/MensRights10/05/13 09:04 PM
20

7wap/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:45 PM
15

7wap/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:18 PM
13

7wap/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:44 AM
12

7wap/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:19 PM
12

7wap/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:07 PM
11

7wap/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:08 PM
9

7wap/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:48 PM
8

7wap/r/MensRights22/03/13 08:58 PM
6

7wap/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:30 AM
6

7wap/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:13 PM
6

7wap/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:30 PM
1

7wap/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:34 PM
0

7wap/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:08 PM
0

7wap/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:28 PM
0

7wap/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:21 PM
0

7wap/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:02 PM
0

7wap/r/MensRights07/01/13 08:25 PM
0

7wap/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:40 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,193 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

None yet, thankfully! And yet I know that I'd be screwed in a messy divorce, or if DV accusations were made, or rape allegations, and educational discrimination if I had boys. This fear influences decisions, and is a crime against us all.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:59 PM
3

I think Zimmerman made some bad choices, but he deserves a fair trial. She remembered “rioting” in Sanford during the uproar over Trayvon’s death. Doesn't the defense help select the jurors? How do you end up with that juror? Did the defense intentionally end up with 6 women on the jury? Why are there only 6 jurors rather than 12? So many questions. I thought trails were supposed to eliminate doubt if the guy's convicted, instead I have more than before.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:57 PM
1

That's the idea. Haven't actually done it yet.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:52 PM
1

All that I'm asking you, redditors, is to stop blaming everything on the women. We usually call people out when they unfairly blame a whole gender. You can find exceptions, but most of us don't like that. If you spent more time here, you'd realize that.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:41 PM
10

Wow, that guy really crossed the line. I'm glad she's okay (except for a black eye) and not suffering PTSD. I think your outlook on life has a lot to do with how well you survive things like this. If I have daughters, I want to teach them to be like this!
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:28 PM
3

I thought Cracked was supposed to be funny. Who's going to click through to the second page after the first wasn't funny?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:13 PM
5

Sensational title aside, I think it's good to train police on what is and what is not normal. It's to everyone's benefit that real rapists are caught and innocent men aren't harassed. Well, everyone but rapists and false accusers I suppose. Still, I can't help but think that the real goal here is to train police not to question the accuser. The accuser absolutely must be questioned, and ridiculous accusations should certainly be ignored or even prosecuted. If you train police to silence their sk…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:05 PM
2

Ask your accountant which status leaves more money in your pocket. If it's marriage, get married (with prenup I suppose). If it's single, get divorced that year and keep the tax money.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 09:01 PM
4

Try this script instead: M: I consider myself an egalitarian. I want equal rights for both genders. F: You're a feminist. M: No, I don't hate men. I'm an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:48 PM
1

In small claims court? Probably because the other side lacked competent legal advice. You surely can't bring multiple suits over the same incident in the same jurisdiction (e.g. state).
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:45 PM
3

Should I get married symbolically and avoid signing any government papers saying I am married etc? I stay married or divorced on an annual basis based on advice from my accountant. It's just government forms to me, doesn't change our life together.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:44 PM
2

Any press is good press. Spread it.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:41 PM
1

That was a great bit of PR for us. Spread it around if you like!
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:40 PM
1

Seems fine to me. It's your final decision, but as a couple your decisions will surely be influenced by the conversations you two have. You're wife's Doctor wants to remind your wife that she has an interest in the decision, and that she should consider her plans and speak up if she has concerns. It's good for both of you to make a decision that you'll be happy about in years to come. If your wife hits 32 and suddenly really wants kids, and your vasectomy is irreversible, you may be in for a div…
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:31 PM
0

Great advice. At least you're more mellow than you were pre-ban.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:24 PM
8

Look up your state laws. There's usually an easy way to avoid the trap.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 08:15 PM
3

I'm glad she's dead. (AMW, I look forward to being quoted!)
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:57 PM
3

PAYWALL! Would someone liberate this article for us?
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:51 PM
1

How is it failing boys? There's an increasing gap between male and female students in University. I expect this is because we've been trying to help girls succeed in education for decades, while neglecting and even harming boys. I think boys get the message when teachers discipline them more than girls, imply or even say that boys are worse students, and assign lower grades to boys. Several studies have shown this behavior in teachers, and it needs to stop.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:12 PM
1

he can use the judgement from the small claims victory to go to real court Wrong. You only get one award per grievance, and you don't get to break one incident into multiple cases. You basically get one court case for the post she made, so don't waste it in small claims.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:07 PM
2

That's such a friendly way to talk about it. Really it's pure gossip, with all the problems that come along with gossip. Since the victim doesn't hear the gossip, they can't defend themselves. Women who dislike the victim can say whatever they like with little risk of being corrected or called out. Of course they'll say awful things about men; the system encourages it.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:06 PM
1

There's a large distinction between rape shield laws for public media, and rape shield laws for the courtroom. I don't want either name mentioned in public (second best: mention both names), and I want all relevant facts admissible in court.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 06:04 PM
2

We need to stop defending these people Wow, you think I'm defending Surly Amy. For the record, I view Surly Amy as a brat.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:57 PM
1

Sure, I agree.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:55 PM
1

We were already at this point in the discussion several posts back. He can go after this person but he probably can't attack people who pile on. If a campaign really gets going, he could be damaged for much more than small claims court can compensate him. If he's not considered for one job then his damages will far exceed a small claim. At that point, he'd need to hire a lawyer and go to real court (not federal court).
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:54 PM
13

Feminism is about equality, except for the many ways it's not Where is Feminism advocating for actual equality? Maybe I'm too MRA but I can't think of a single instance. Before you cite something like the pay gap, please remember that I'm asking about actual equality, not make-believe talking points.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:33 PM
10

He posted Amy's address, and certainly not by accident. I have no idea how he can claim it was an accident. There was some other tit-for-tat bullshit going on too. I recall that she used some copyright claim against him, and he used her corporate logo as an avatar on some forum. Probably a lot more happened as well. This other person, apparently not Amy, posted what you saw there. Looks like more information, and encouragement to send letters. You're welcome to argue that's upping the ante, but …
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:28 PM
1

legal proceeding can began against the author of the letter Who was presumably kind enough to write their return address on the envelope. What about the other 99 letters which were anonymous?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:02 PM
1

somebody who receives such a letter only has to refer it to the person the letter is about and then the legal proceedings can begin. Legal proceedings can begin against who?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:51 PM
1

Wasn't this posted yesterday?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:47 PM
5

I'll just choose one item. Our education system is failing boys, and discriminating against them. This one problem will hurt more boys and men than any other issue we face. These boys will achieve less their entire lives because of the discrimination they internalize and the education they lack. And Methax, that's a good question even if you are one of our resident trolls.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:46 PM
2

A lot of good data can be had with this approach - how to use it is another story entirely. How to use information is always the harder problem, but until we gather information we haven't done anything to help.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:42 PM
3

I think they're both disgusting, but they say nothing is wrong until it happens to women. If one exists, they should both exist.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:40 PM
1

Right, he can fight there. Other anonymous harassers may be harder to track down.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:37 PM
1

I don't follow you. Could you elaborate a little?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:36 PM
1

So true.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:35 PM
1

Naming the accused in an effort to drum up more allegations isn't justice. That's a great way to encourage false allegations by unstable women, especially if there's a suggestion of civil suit payouts like the Banks case. Beyond that, other allegations don't prove that the accused raped any other woman. Finally, the irreparable harm to the reputation of a presumably innocent man is a cost too high to bear.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:35 PM
1

COTWA advocates ending the antiquated courtesy of keeping rape victims' identities confidential -- a courtesy that treats women as children and rape as something to be ashamed of. Short of that, there should be a national dialogue about granting anonymity for men accused, but not convicted, of rape. Sounds like two different and separate answers.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:30 PM
3

I think the problem with what Canseco did is that at this point we don't know that he was falsely accused. What we do know is that Canseco was accused. Because he was publicly named. We don't know 100% that he did or did not do something wrong, and we don't know 100% that she had malicious intent. He wasn't found guilty, but his name is destroyed. I don't think either party should be named publicly before a conviction, but if one party is named it's only fair to name both parties. If you're goin…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:22 PM
12

Women born in 1975 were roughly 17% more likely than their male counterparts to attend college and nearly 23% more likely to complete a four-year degree, according to data in Wayward Sons. Let's talk about this. What can we do today to fix the education system for boys? My idea: mandate per-teacher reporting on: average grades achieved by each gender, number of reprimands per gender, and future performance of students in that class (reported later). This will really shine a light on which teache…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:17 PM
8

Looking at those born just after World War II, some 1.2% of white men and 9% of black men had been to prison by 2004 We should look out for our fellow men here. The main action we can take is to end the failed war on drugs. These incarceration rates are the shame of our nation.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:13 PM
3

How would the Tender Years Doctrine affect female employment rates?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:11 PM
6

We're having a little gender war here. Perception matters, and this sort of crap sets the tone.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:06 PM
14

I totally agree that having a gendered term for being wrong and being an asshole about it is bad. Full stop. Stop there! The word 'mansplaining' does have a place, though Whoops, you went too far. Either support it or don't. I suggest don't.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 08:35 PM
15

Sure, but he's decrying the very same doxxing he did too. There's plenty of hypocrisy going around here, and this guy isn't as clean as he seems in the video. It's a bunch of anti-heroes fighting.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 08:32 PM
10

How do you stand up to anonymous internet harassment?
/r/MensRights19/06/13 08:31 PM
5

Justin published Amy's address in a forum (the other month), now she's published his address. Alright, apparently she ran a business and her information was public record. Well Justin publishes his name online too, and his address is probably public record as well. I have a hard time feeling too sympathetic to either side unless something is taken further. Remember guys, this is one reason we don't dox.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 08:26 PM
-1

So she told the police she wanted them to stop. Or someone told the police that, we don't even know that much. We certainly don't know if anyone told the boy before the police told him.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:00 PM
-6

For all we know, police intervention was the first notice. Also, he's a teenage boy. They're not known for their powers of perception.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 05:58 PM
3

Those are very good points. Oprah magazine currently links this article from the main page I linked to. I consider wedding dresses sexy in a very traditional sense.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:37 PM
-19

I wonder who's brigading this comment thread. I'm down to -4 for pointing out gross assumptions, which isn't natural.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:02 PM
3

Is it a good book to suggest to friends? Most people need a gentle introduction.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:42 PM
6

Wow, I'm floored. That woman came across better than any MRA I know. She's articulate, knows the issues, and isn't hateful. Does anyone know if her book is this good?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:21 PM
2

Equality, or making up for past inequality somehow. It's their MO.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:07 PM
4

I can't see the video, and there's no transcript. Anyone have a mirror?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:02 PM
1

My source is just the news I've heard. I don't have a reliable source. If you can prove it wrong, go for it.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:01 PM
5

Frankly, if any part of my post made sense to you then you need your head checked. My entire statement was the exact opposite of reality. Click on those links and compare my statements to what you see on those pages.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:56 PM
1

I don't see how you figure homosexual boys are more vulnerable. Just because they have more suicides. Not good enough? was stating that teenagers generally are not as emotionally stable. Okay.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:54 PM
5

Indeed.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:53 PM
3

Oh, I don't explain that at all. You should read my post with a more critical eye, because you may have missed the overall meaning.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:35 PM
2

It's not uncommon for teenage boys to commit suicide due to harassment or perhaps future harassment. Gay boys are especially vulnerable. Based on that, why assume that he's exceptionally unstable?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:32 PM
-2

even though she asked him not to I've seen no evidence of that claim.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:29 PM
-24

We don't know that she hadn't expressed interest before, or that it was reasonable for him to know that his texts were unwanted. We don't know that she was younger than the boy. You're assuming far too much.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:28 PM
0

We covered this story the other week. We don't know what the content or context of the texts were. Without that we can't say if the boy was a creep or the girl fickle and dishonest. We do know the boy wasn't charged, but the police had a chat with his parents. We have indications that the boys mother flipped out, but even that's not clear. What we do know, by empirical evidence, is that most people on reddit assume the worst of the boy and the best of the girl. That last part is the real story h…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:26 PM
13

I'm not sure you can really assume anything from this. Other publications aimed at women (1 2 3 4 5 6 7) do not have women in "attractive" poses right on the front page. They certainly don't have sections on dieting (to look sexy), exercise (to look sexy), or sex tips (to be sexy). When you look at those publications by women and for women, it's clear that this Sims example is a one-off aimed not at women, but at the male idea of what a woman wants. The whole idea that women want to look sexy co…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:16 PM
2

Wow, you went right to Nazis. That doesn't reflect well on your conversational skills :-(
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:03 PM
2

That's a better example, but it's still important to note how the men are afraid to apprehend this thief because she's a woman. They're well aware of the potential consequences.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:46 PM
2

Yeah, hard to avoid comments like that considering the video.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:33 PM
40

This Elizabeth Hanna Pham has real talent. She's able to speak common sense in a way even Feminists can understand. I especially like this quote: What would a woman think if one day, after critiquing her husband for having “no idea what I went through in my thirty hour labor,” he replied, “well, my friend’s wife was in labor for forty hours, so you really shouldn’t be talking.” It's really true that most people just don't understand until you put them in a situation. It's kind of strange that th…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:31 PM
9

No need for insults. I'm aware of the implications. I'm not convinced that there will be more women than men at "ladies night" events. I'm further not impressed by jam-packed places where I can't even hear myself talk. If that's your "game" then you're welcome to it, but I find the whole thing insulting.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:28 PM
2

Yes, if we're not exploring the issues then what are we really doing here?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:20 PM
14

TL;DR: The Ontario Human Rights Tribunal believes that only women and minorities can be discriminated against, because men don't suffer "prejudice or stereotyping". For example, the idea that men should pay (more) money to date is not a prejudice or stereotype. In other words, the human rights tribunal is run by Feminists.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:11 PM
9

Ladies nights exist for the sole benefit of the establishments taking the money. Is there a benefit for guys? Maybe, but not worth the $20. I walk from any place where the entry fee is gender based, because it is discrimination.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:07 PM
1

She broke your legos? Is that even possible?
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:36 PM
5

Apparently he's a popular columnist. Not that I know WTF he's on about.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:29 PM
2

The "swedish timetable" is presumably the time table to remove civil rights for men. Yes, her election will help there.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:28 PM
1

What? Did you just call me a rapist? Go fuck yourself buddy.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 06:21 PM
4

Yeah, that's why we're happy you guys are in your own forum. We consider comments like this angry and rather hateful.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:55 PM
1

That would be funny except you're serious :-(
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:53 PM
6

It's a demonstration of how easy and natural it is for women to call for help, because everyone assumes that women are innocent victims. It's a demonstration of how men are afraid to touch women even when they're stealing. These are gender issues we're fighting against.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:49 PM
5

A fair question. Did you notice how all the men were afraid to touch her? Even though she was stealing? Did you notice how she called for help when other men walked by? It's a perfect example of the gender issues we fight against, where women are always assumed to be innocent victims, and men are somewhat powerless to stop them.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:47 PM
4

I don't think that's a fair assessment of libertarians. And I don't even like libertarians.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:43 PM
1

I wish I had a link myself. I've only read summaries elsewhere.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 05:38 PM
0

Men are more susceptable to disease. Why? Meh, it must be because they are men. From what I've read, the hormone testosterone is not good for the immune system. The fact that you yet live is proof that your immune system was strong enough to live through that disadvantage, much like a male peacock with bright feathers. Which is to say, there has been research on this topic. Maybe you'd like to read it?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:42 PM
9

How exactly did that discussion result in: Resolved: Feminism is justified as a means to solve gender inequality.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:37 PM
2

I suppose you see a lot of anger. The important thing to note is that we're angry with Feminists because they constantly attack us. We're not angry at women (except for a few people, who I didn't see in this thread). If you acknowledge that men have problems, how do you propose we solve them without getting angry? How do you run a civil rights movement without anger?
/r/MensRights17/06/13 10:32 PM
0

This comment is linked by AMR in a top thread.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 09:23 PM
5

“Watch out! Hit piece!” It doesn't have to be a hit piece to look bad. AVFM writes some good articles, and a lot of bad articles. I'm sure that will come out in the documentary. I expect a mixed message.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 09:04 PM
3

Mentally.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:56 PM
1

HOW is it a net good to aid a criminal, harm a victim, and harm innocent bystanders? It's (presumably) a net good to do the opposite. Sorry that was unclear. I'm mostly on your side here.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:20 PM
2

There's one thing you can say about women who make lists describing who they'd like to date. Those women will end up dating someone completely different than they described. A dating list is a sure sign that a woman doesn't know herself at all.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 06:14 PM
1

petition for a rule change if you don't want us here. Until then, get used to us :D You're allowed to come talk with us. What you're not allowed to do it brigade us and bury our stories.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:57 PM
0

So, I guess because one unbalanced boy with incredibly poor decision-making skills shot himself you insulted a boy who committed suicide I did what now? When did that happen, exactly? Do you not recognize an insult when you write one? I get that you want to be angry and you want to feel as if your gender is being victimized. A boy shot himself to death, and you assume the boy is deranged and the girl is an innocent victim. That's sexism. We don't know the truth. You just assumed. That's what we …
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:54 PM
1

female rape victims should marry their rapists. In this case they're harming the victim, helping a criminal, and depriving a child of his actual father. Right, so you can't say there's no downside at all. You can say it's a net good. Exactly the problem your statement had. you're saying that lack of fathers' rights have absolutely nothing to do with paternity fraud? Some women will cheat. That's life. Even if the laws changed, it would still happen. It will take a very long time before evolution…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:36 PM
1

I agree, but we need to stay honest here. He can say that informing men is a net good, but there certainly are costs to that action.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:34 PM
0

You've got to be kidding. He absolutely said that it's nobody's business if teachers sleep with students. If you're going to come here and critique us, get a clue first.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 05:29 PM
5

You AMRs are like fleas. The voting pattern makes it abundantly obvious what happened. You're welcome to ask the Admins for further evidence. Please stop downvoting our threads, including this one.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:10 AM
5

You abruptly changed the subject to the apparently objectionable fact of my presence here when you couldn't counter my argument I'm not going to ignore the elephant in the room. The original subject was interesting, while your forum brigading us and downvoting even the most reasonable comments is inexcusable. Your origin would be much less of an issue except for your downvote brigade. hysterical doesn't look good on you Shaming attempt. I don't know what you mean by "my" forum I have no desire t…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:54 PM
7

You came here via AgainstMensRights (the name says it all) as part of a brigade to silence our voices in our own forum. For a long time your top level comment was +7 when every other comment was +1 or below, even ones that previously got to +5. You're a bad person, and you should feel bad.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:42 PM
13

Jackie doesn't plan to tell her father what she knows. There's no point in hurting him, she says. If they were closer, maybe they would need to have a conversation; but then again, if they were closer, the truth might be more painful still. For now, she's decided not to bring it up, and she won't mention it again to her brother Alex or her mom. Yeah, that's awesome. Tell everyone but the guy who got cheated on. Let's just say it: the Author (Daniel) and the subject are horrible people.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:41 PM
0

if men had any sort of social support on these matters to begin with, then women would stop pulling this crap in the first place. Unlikely. There would he nothing wrong with informing men. Well, in this case they're harming the father, helping the mother, and arguably helping the child. So you can't say there's "nothing wrong with informing men" exactly.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:38 PM
7

while it's often said that 10 percent of fathers are raising someone else's child, this interpolation isn't quite supported by the facts. (they present no direct counter facts) Just assume that cheating is somewhat common and protect yourself. Peace of mind is worth the price of a hundred paternity tests. Having said that, a paternity test might cost you $170 while 2 23&me tests (you and baby) cost you $200 and gives you the information you need. Consider the upsell :-)
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:29 PM
5

Thanks. I was beginning to despair that everyone here supported teachers sleeping with students.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:54 PM
3

Any press is good press, when your movement is ignored by all.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:36 PM
1

Could you find a better link? Maybe with some explanation of motive and rationale?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:33 PM
7

Hilarious. Did you know I was banned from your forum for asking a simple question? One as inoffensive as I could manage? You can't be called on your shit because you live in a "safe space", but we can be called on our shit and that's great? You've brigaded this post into oblivion, effectively censoring our speech in our own forum. And I very much believe in what I said. There's a severe anti-male bias in those worldnews comments, probably because your Feminist forums have been brigading on all f…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:30 PM
2

You were done growing by 15? Damn, that's young for a boy.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:24 PM
3

I'm not arguing against such rules, though the rules should be the same for both genders. The power imbalance makes it entirely wrong in this situation.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:19 PM
8

Why do you think it's alright to brigade our forum and downvote our posts?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:16 PM
4

The post currently has +16/-11 (effectively buried), our regulars who did find the story are effectively buried (highest comment is +1, previously got to +4). sea_warrior (from AMR) has the top comment at +5 with his comment insulting the boy who committed suicide. Their post which links to our post is +25/-2 (top post in their forum). The worldnews story is +1871/-643 and a hot topic full of anti-male sentiment, in a forum with 3.5 million subscribers. This is a perfect example of AMR brigading…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:13 PM
2

So you think it's fine for teachers to sleep with teenage students? I'll just say, I think most of the first world strongly disagrees.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:03 PM
10

Sure, but I'd rather not have teachers sleeping with students. The power imbalance combined with inexperience is bad news.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:52 PM
5

Pedophile means pre-pubescent children. He had probably hit puberty by 15.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:52 PM
11

Based on their responses, many of them do. When they're far more concerned about defending the girl than about why a boy committed suicide, it's clear that they just don't care about him. And why shouldn't we care about this? We're here to advocate fair treatment for men and boys. Of course, you're an AMR. You're here to advocate against fair treatment for men and boys.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:48 PM
1

Can We Blame Men for Menopause? What in the actual fuck? Just as much as we can blame women for everything men are and do. It's a pointless discussion. Men tend to prefer younger females as mates. They have for thousands of years. When Singh and his colleagues added that factor into their computer models they suddenly saw an increase of mutations that harmed the fertility of older women. Riiiight. That preference didn't just appear out of thin air. Men prefer younger women because there's an adv…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:17 PM
6

They're espousing a Feminist perspective, namely boys bad sex fiends, girls good.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:04 PM
6

Click the link at the top, or view my list of upvoted comments for examples from the top level replies.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:03 PM
17

The folks in worldnews just assume the boy is a total creep who deserved to die. That's an issue. And teenage boys are just young men, we need to look out for them too.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 09:02 PM
36

My post in worldnews. They're really assuming the boy did something awful to that girl, and they're downvoting anyone who suggests otherwise. I really think #1 is far more believable and likely than #2, but that's bias for you. Note: there are now more AMRs in this thread than MRAs. The link to this post is now #1 in AMR, the troll brigade. See the main thread here Everyone here is reading their own bias into the story. We don't know most of the facts. Let me illustrate by re-telling the story w…
/r/MensRights14/06/13 08:57 PM
2

I thought you both had valid arguments. Keep it respectful guys :-)
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:44 PM
9

the criminal “justice” system in the US disproportionately targets [...] queer people. Is that true? I've never heard that before.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:19 PM
-2

You're not really listening. Imagine you said don't want to hurt Bob, and then you spend a minute describing in detail how you fantasize about hurting Bob. What do I hear from your monologue? That you do want to hurt Bob. If the board of directors said this, what would you think? I don't want to break any laws, but we need to figure out how to use our insider information to maximize our personal profits. Is he advocating that they break insider trading laws? Yes he is. Does it matter that he cla…
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:11 AM
2

This forum has become far more moderate in the last 6 months. Why are you so worried about our fanaticism? We're on a good path, we just need to get out into the streets.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:23 PM
15

TL;DR: Women are more likely to suffer assaults, but most victims are men because there are more men. Women tend to suffer worse assaults, and women are more likely to report assaults. Seems about right to me. Why aren't we reaching out to the male victims of assault?
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:08 PM
-4

I'm aware, thanks. When I talk about how I'd like to beat the shit out of you, it doesn't matter if I claim I'm not advocating violence. Especially when his statements aren't in the same part of the recording.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:32 PM
-2

Why are people downvoting this comment? Bills comments really do go off the reservation near the end.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:29 PM
-6

Right, and I'm not insulting you, asshole.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 06:17 PM
3

To be fair, 17 downvotes is probably 0 actual downvotes. The reddit system inserts fake votes for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 11:43 PM
1

People really need a dating website to cheat?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 11:09 PM
21

Pay up, Mister man-wallet. More seriously, why do children have rights to break contracts between adults? A disabled adult can't break a contract between two other adults, so I don't understand why a child can.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:02 PM
3

The generally accepted percentage (of children who are misinformed about who their father is) is 10%. This survey shows 25%, because methods matter in statistics and the source is a dating website. It's best to get a paternity test. Do it for the peace of mind, if nothing else.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:44 PM
20

That's giving them the benefit of the doubt. She probably meant to injure.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:40 PM
1

The situation
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:38 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:36 PM
3

Doesn't the link say the opposite? More men that women are employed? Do you still believe the things you said in reverse, if your facts are backward?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 11:46 PM
9

That's a valid point. On the other hand, we advocate against naming people accused of sexual crimes. We can't have it both ways. If you'd like more information, this is a better source. Again, they're not naming names.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:59 PM
1

Remember, you're not here to convince me. I'm on your side. And it's nobody's fault if they aren't already on your side. You're just trying to convince them. I'm trying to help you make a better argument. How about this? There is no pay gap. Men and women with the same experience doing the same job receive equal compensation, including benefits. If you compare the average man with the average woman, there is a 23% gap, but this gap evaporates when you consider career choices, experience, hours w…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:40 PM
1

Right, so you're arguing a bunch of technicalities. And maybe you're right. But if you say there's no paygap and don't mention the technicalities, you're actually just wrong.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:15 PM
1

Sure, I posted on that today actually. I mostly agree with you, but you shouldn't say there's no pay gap when there is one, even if it's small. You're much better off saying that there's only a small pay gap once you account for experience and career choice.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:09 PM
2

Yeah, stress eventually in my post. If you have any evidence for what you've mentioned, you should share.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 10:00 PM
-1

I think you're mistaken. I haven't seen any reputable source claim that there's no paygap. Gap numbers range from 3% to 23%, depending on who you ask, but there is a pay gap.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:58 PM
39

Seems unethical.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:51 PM
8

The photo developer doesn't know the customer, so that makes sense. What about the police, or the prosecutors?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:55 PM
9

Men don't act like women. Why won't they grow up and be women, already? Immaturity does have an upside though, with four in ten people saying that it is important in a relationship because it ensures the partnership stays fun and keeps things fresh. One in three people think a bit of immaturity helps in bonding well with children. Phrased another way, people undervalue immaturity in relationships. Another word for immaturity is fun. Immaturity can make you laugh. These are qualities women value …
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:55 PM
16

Violence isn't the answer to a cultural problem. We have to change the fear culture.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:50 PM
2

NSFW motherfucker. What's wrong with you, OP?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:44 PM
10

the employment rate for men fell 0.3 percentage point to 69.8 percent in 2012, while rising 0.1 percentage point for women to 58.6 percent So more men are employed than women? Unless you can show some other factors, such as more men want to work, then I don't see how men are discriminated against.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:40 PM
10

Oh, I'm pretty sure you can. I'm pretty sure there's a lot of bias out there, and that plenty of people think men are rapists.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:38 PM
6

In my view, these are top issues: Equality for child support and custody Fix the incentive to fake allegations of abuse in divorce Fix divorce in general Help boys succeed in education In sexual crimes, victims and accused should not be named before conviction End Title IX kangaroo courts on campus "His body, his choice" - men should have every right to choose not to have children Stop police and court discrimination in domestic violence situations Stop portraying all men as rapists Thank you fo…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:35 PM
12

The defense lawyer was probably working for money. The police and prosecutors are serious bad apples. I'm glad the judge is sane at least :-)
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:16 PM
2

Some might decide that the risks of discrimination are worth the rewards The risks of hiring mostly women, right? That's the financial incentive we're theorizing about. legal and social disincentives Which are what? Just offer a lower wage and be willing to hire anyone regardless of gender. If women are discriminated against, you'll end up hiring a lot of women. Everyone wins. In fact, this may even be a factor in why male unemployment is disproportionately on the rise. Because men expect to get…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:11 PM
4

Williams, the Hastings law professor, says the pay gap should not be framed as a matter of choice. "Women choose to have babies; they don't choose the discrimination that goes along with it," she says. Here we go again, choice without responsibility. Am I really going to spend the money to put this woman into a training program? She's just going to leave me, after all. I have mixed feelings on this. I can't imagine that any employer would be blind to this issue, especially if they expect to inve…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 08:09 PM
18

Link that story :-)
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:57 PM
3

Right. So there's a lot of unintentional discrimination (in your theory). My answer is, an enlightened businessman comes along and takes advantage of the situation by hiring cheap but high quality labor (women). The term for this is arbitrage. If there was really a disconnect between productivity and wages, smart businessmen would thrive by hiring smart.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:53 PM
12

I've heard stories too. I'm sure it happens. Do you think it's equal and there's no bias?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 07:51 PM
65

Here's another case where everyone assumes the guy is a sick pervert over some innocent photos1. The system is primed to prosecute these cases. Nudity is not abuse. Men have innocent fun with kids too. 1 I assume they're innocent. They let him off. It's not like I've seen the photos after all.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:28 PM
1

Interesting. Where are you going with this argument?
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:17 PM
2

is this not at least a useful and compelling argument? It relies on the idea that the wage gap is a result of conscious and intentional discrimination rather than an unconscious and systemic bias. Then you, and enlightened and informed businessman, start a business and make a killing hiring cheap female labor. If one group was generally paid less than a fair waged based on their productivity, the smart businessman would hire them in a moment.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:16 PM
2

If Feminism and MRA eventually give way to a moderate form of egalitarianism, that's great.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:11 PM
1

Well you got voted down, though not by me. I think you have a valid and important point.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:51 PM
5

Recorded: IcarusLived bets $5 that she gets a fraction of the sentence he would get. oskArtists bets against, with his entire savings account.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:18 PM
7

Thanks, I didn't know that.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:15 PM
10

Thanks. I agree that you can't blame all women for the actions of some. This woman carried things way too far, but the main problem is systemic. Divorce really matters to people, and the divorce system encourages false allegations. Far too many women take advantage of that tempting system and claim abuse, which doesn't reflect well on women's ethics. Still, this is just a minority of women (less than 1 in 5 even in the worst districts), so it's unfair to smear all women that way. We can't teach …
/r/MensRights07/06/13 09:09 PM
31

As proven in court. They still tried it.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:57 PM
41

Ugh, you're probably right. The battered woman defense, in what situation doesn't it apply?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:37 PM
13

I think you could have won this argument, but you lost. You got derailed into the middle east and Bachelorette parties. Completely off topic. You started with the moral high ground and ended up on the moral low ground. I have no idea why you brought up other women behaving badly, because it's irrelevant here. What are the strong points? Violence is wrong. Violence wasn't justified here. She responded to a joke with violence. He clearly posed no threat. Stick to those and your position is nearly …
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:32 PM
97

Wow, just wow. To send poison letters to the President and the Mayor of New York as part of a divorce plot. I'm shocked. Women do pretty well in divorce, probably even better in Texas. Why did she feel the need to go so far beyond the usual child abuse / domestic violence allegations? Are Texas divorce judges wise to those lies? I feel this is an indictment of our system of marriage, that someone would go this far. Mostly I'm just shocked. More sources here.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:24 PM
1

There must have been more evidence presented in court. The article is brief.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:55 PM
-2

She doesn't deserve to be shot. She deserves the same punishment they faced, and maybe a little more for good measure. They weren't up for death.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:54 PM
6

Maybe when she's 2,500 years old she won't lie about rape anymore.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:53 PM
2

Apparently it's a known thing so that's fine. Thanks.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:56 PM
1

Quoting Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:53 PM
2

That would be a huge readiness/cohesion problem. I guess we're going to find out by trial and error :-) Not much need to theorize when we'll get actual results within a few years.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:39 PM
0

You're right. I'd rather have initiation. Constant questioning is just stressful for life.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:37 PM
2

I'm a regular, not a troll. Or you're saying that guy's a troll? I think he's genuine.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:36 PM
3

Okay, not sure why you used that phrase. Let me fix those for you, so they're more like the phrase I complained about. "He's now a man because he's good with kids" That phrase reduces manhood to being good with kids. This is a phrase I would complain about.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:35 PM
2

Of course, none of us know exactly what was said or why, so we can't judge what was or was not appropriate. Agreed. Not enough information.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:32 PM
3

Yes, men are more than that. But a male not willing to fight is not a man. We're talking about glorification of fighting here. I don't argue against fighting when it's really needed. We don't need to encourage boys to be soldiers, and we sure as fuck don't need to tell them that's how they become men. Sez you from the safety of your society protected by men. Go say it to their faces. Those children aren't men. If they've killed and been shot at, and they're hard as little pebbles, they still are…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:31 PM
1

Citation for what exactly? Well, you sound like you have good information but I'd rather see a source for it. Specifically, the prosecution had dropped the case - and you know they didn't want to the accuser had been shown to lie about every single thing she had ever said about everything recorded telling her boyfriend in jail that she had hit the jackpot seen taking male prostitution clients after she pressed charges on DSK I guess I don't know many of the facts of the DSK case. I also don't un…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:12 PM
3

Howso? It reduces manhood to just fighting. Men are much more than that. Men are willing to do whatever it takes. Boys are not. Someone posted this image. Looks like boys can do whatever it takes too. This doesn't make them men.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:07 PM
4

Bravery is good, and we need warriors in times of war. I just hate to see it glorified because it reduces men to warriors. Men are so much more than that.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:05 PM
7

How terrible for the women left behind. They're the real victims.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:02 PM
4

War and warriors are sometimes required, but that title denigrates all men. Boys do not become men by killing and dying, nor is that the finest thing they will do in their lives.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:02 PM
2

You... don't really know reddit. It's possible to sock puppet and manipulate, but not using that technique.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:00 PM
0

This is reddit. It doesn't work that way here.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:52 PM
4

+700, top comment reads, He's a corporal. That means he shows more leadership, responsibility, and strength characteristics then the majority of those guys. Baby face, but by no means unprepared. On the positive side, most of the comments criticize this awful post in some way.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:30 PM
8

How do you respond to vampvincent's argument? As it's been proven, women get paid just about as much as men ((About 97 cents on the dollar, a 3% difference.)) while working 9% fewer hours. Meaning if anything, they might be getting paid MORE these days for the same jobs with all the leave available to them.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:03 PM
1

/r/mrref this please.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:01 PM
4

Apparently heckling poor arguments is part of the competition, and apparently they used Feminist talking points to argue on the topic, "That this House regrets the centralisation of religion". I would heckle them too.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:56 PM
1

Citation please.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:46 PM
12

If the IRS won't help, complain to the Judge. Tell us how it goes, because that plan should work.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:56 PM
1

Good or bad, it is what it is. We can't take the choice or control away from women. Women have the most control over both pregnancy and contraception. Are you saying that men should have less responsibility, or more choice? Yes. Less responsibility, or more choice, or both. Responsibility without choice is a big burden, especially considering what it takes to raise a kid.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:00 AM
1

Responsibility follows from control and ability. Women have most of the latter, thus most of the responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:38 PM
2

Agreed. Most abandoned babies (and abortions) in parts of Asia are ONLY because it's a girl. The definite proof is in demographic gender ratios.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:38 PM
4

I expect she didn't enjoy flushing her baby down the toilet. What I do expect is that she use some form of birth control, up to and including abortion, if she isn't going to keep the baby. The father doesn't have this control. Only the mother has control, and only she is responsible.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:58 PM
6

Feminists, take note. Abandoned baby girls1 is actual misogyny. Not that the government doesn't punish fathers, but that parents abandon baby girls. The hardships in your life can't compare to real misogyny. 1 I know, baby boy.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:31 PM
8

Why should the father be accountable? She has almost all of the birth control options, where he has one that's not 100% reliable.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:29 PM
1

Yeah, one fight at a time. There's no way we can win that fight in the current climate.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 11:11 PM
1

Sounds like good fun. If I had been there, I'd collect all the feathers I could, and compete with my friends. I'd also not die in the war, at least not voluntarily!
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:00 PM
6

Great insight. You're quite right, the "problem" with black men is they're "too masculine", or even animalistic. That's how they've been slandered for hundreds of years.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:10 PM
12

Is it sexist for these women to pursue low wage jobs with the assumption that their future husband will pay the bills?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:03 PM
1

It's so easy to understand we don't bother to mention it.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:01 PM
32

What do they expect when schools turn our sexually active "kids" by the bushel... schools nowadays do not have morality courses, so they are in no position to teach sex ed. OP, your title is fine but the content of your articles always suck. Stop taking these baseless pot-shots at whoever you dislike on the given day. Step up the quality. Your article is horrible compared to the video source.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:35 PM
1

Yeah, the article is more about criticism than finding the real truth.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:30 PM
2

Normally I have a lot of sympathy for teachers. When you send the no-evidence-required CPS who can take away my kids on a whim, you may as well have sent the inquisition. Sometimes CPS is reasonable, sometimes they're insane. Zero sympathy from me in this situation.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:13 PM
1

Brigades have targets outside of the immediate forum.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:11 PM
1

When my family is directly threatened, I can't afford the benefit of the doubt. CPS are the worst.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 06:08 PM
6

You're arguing statistics? If 25% of women were raped at college nationwide, what are the odds you'd find 3 colleges with only 1 rape each?
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:57 PM
-2

Holy ugly screenshot.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:55 PM
108

Do you have money? Hire a lawyer, hire a PI, and destroy your accuser. This isn't a game, and the system isn't fair. Play to win or expect to get fucked over.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:09 AM
5

Cracked pretty well hates us, or the loosely affiliated cracked writer corps does. This is also at least the 3rd repost of this today.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:54 PM
2

The government can only be sued in ways they allow themselves to be sued. I have no idea if they'd allow this suit, even if it had merit.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:42 PM
5

Wow, she gets her own house where she's lived for 3.5 years? I was sure the title exaggerated, but while she doesn't own the house that's a very long term freebee.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:39 PM
1

there are no gay male athletes, and every female athlete is a lesbian People think gayness has something to do with femininity when really we just need to erase that stereotype from our minds Am I wrong to think that there are fewer gay men in sports, and more gay women in sports? Tell me if I'm off base, but it seems true, aside from weightlifting. If that presumption is true, then this article is arguing against an exaggerated view of reality. Well, that's over-exaggeration is wrong, but the a…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:18 PM
2

Comments like that get people shadow-banned around here.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:20 PM
1

Staff at New to the Sault identified a need within the Muslim female community. Tenets of their faith encourage modesty around men. Practicing Muslim women would not feel comfortable exposing their bodies in a bathing suit in the presence of males. You know, I supported the woman only English classes at the Australian University (directed at Muslim women) because those women need learn English to integrate with society and (maybe) escape an oppressive lifestyle. You do not need to swim to integr…
/r/MensRights31/05/13 09:01 PM
5

More details here. I really don't see how his submission was appropriate, but if the teacher gave these instructions then she should live up to her word. students in the English 380 class were told to write honestly and that no topic was off limits. If you set the rules, don't punish people for following them.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:50 PM
4

Was this the student who recently asked us who he should interview? Just started listening, but so far Paul is giving very reasonable answers. Is there a transcript available? I'd like to discuss some of these answers.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:13 PM
8

I don't even know what the right answer is, but ruining this boy's life is not right. Destroying this boy as misguided vengeance for Rehtaeh Parsons is wrong. At least they didn't post his name.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:03 PM
8

Is that a setting?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:51 PM
3

Maybe. againstmensrights works us pretty hard too.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:50 PM
4

We've been brigaded, as usual. The admins don't mind, of course.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:33 PM
25

Over-criminalization combined with selective prosecution is the worst problem facing our country. It allows the government or any prosecutor to silence anyone, because everyone commits felonies every year. It's just a matter of investigation. It's a MR issue because men are almost always the target.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 09:57 PM
3

OP lives in Virginia The Virginia legal Age of Consent for sexual contact is 18 years old. eleven states have set their age of consent at 18 years old, the highest legal age of consent in any state. A close in age exception to the Virginia legal age of consent allows teenagers aged 15, 16 and 17 to engage in sexual acts, but only with a partner younger than 18. Consensual sex where one partner is 15, 16 or 17 and the other is over 18 is a class 1 misdemeanor. Stupid law, but it's best not to bre…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 09:33 PM
0

I see that for comments, but I haven't actually seen that for submissions.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:30 PM
4

Yeah, welcome to psychology. Of course, linking to this article isn't going to get the discussion going.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:28 PM
0

How can you tell if a submission was edited?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:18 PM
0

Thanks
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:10 PM
0

You're saying that TED entices the unemployed to volunteer for a solid week of work for the promise of exposure? And that's immoral. Got a few problems with that. I can't think of a single TED talk where the speaker was unemployed. They're always doing some very impressive thing for some sort of company. If they want to work for a week in exchange for exposure, that's great. They're not helpless victims. The "work" you speak of is all networking. This is solid gold for most businesspeople. They'…
/r/MensRights29/05/13 08:10 PM
0

Not available on Amazon or my local library.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:27 PM
-1

Of course
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:24 PM
-9

Speakers volunteer for their own reasons. They're not children. If they don't like it, they can leave. Don't impose your morality on others.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 07:24 PM
-14

I do support TED, despite their flaws. I don't ask how the sausage is made, but if it tastes good. They make a lot of tasty sausage.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 06:06 PM
5

Luca Steffenoni, expert of crime, computed in a book that accusations are used in 86% of the divorces. A research by Prof. Camerini et al. showed that in Italy 80% of persons accused of child abuse are fathers, and they turn out to be innocent in 92.4% of the cases. That's all you need to see. I think America is heading down the same road, because we reward false accusations instead of punishing them.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 06:05 PM
2

Care to share this historical knowledge?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:34 PM
-30

Doesn't matter. The TED talks are still good. EDIT: Speakers volunteer for their own reasons. They're not children. If they don't like it, they can leave. Don't impose your morality on others.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:26 PM
1

Must be awful.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 05:13 PM
3

Honest question here, when university professors write hate speech in national media, is it wrong to protest? Actually get a group together, make signs, and protest this kind of hate?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:22 AM
2

Just for fun?
/r/MensRights29/05/13 12:19 AM
6

Nobody bothers asking because they have no methodology, or even a sample size greater than zero.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 11:10 PM
16

TLDR: Treat boys like little troublemakers, and they internalize that message. In non-Feminist countries, the teachers don't dislike boys and the boys do just fine. Our education system tells boys that they're trouble, which they internalize, then we discriminates against them because they cause trouble and won't sit still. We further discriminate against them because their fidgeting is amplified by any preconceived notions a sexist teacher has. In other words, misandry hurts boys and men.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:13 PM
177

TIL a lot of women enjoy good, sensual rape. I assume this person never has straight sex, since all straight sex is rape. This really plays into the angry lesbian Feminist image.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:01 PM
1

Read a few of his articles. He's an angry firebrand radical. Angry man is the worst image for MRAs, and allows others to dismiss us easily.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:40 PM
1

People should be allowed to do what they want, like you said. Maintaining two houses or apartments is going to be more expensive than shared housing, so I doubt these open couples actually save any money.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 09:39 PM
3

You're terrible at fishing for downvotes.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 10:49 PM
0

This is the best answer. A recognized leader who's not extremist.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:54 PM
0

Please, not Paul Elam.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:54 PM
0

I'm ambivalent about this change.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:51 PM
3

I let Samsung feel my displeasure with my recent non-Samsung cell phone purchase. Actual dollars, eat that Samsung.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:48 PM
21

“I can cook better than most housewives and I’m not afraid of housework either. I’m also pretty good at my job. Bringing someone into what is essentially a more or less perfect lifestyle is simply unnecessary.” (56, IT) Gold, pure gold.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:40 PM
-1

Yeah, I haven't heard the term "social study" in about 2 decades.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 09:36 PM
1

Could you add more quotes?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:33 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_science#History_2
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:30 PM
8

Yeah, but they pretty much brigade all our hot topics. They're a bit limited by their small number of crazy fanatics.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:58 PM
-1

History is also a social science. What's your opinion there?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:56 PM
1

The electoral system in Canada is very different. The American constitution inevitably leads to a two party system.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:53 PM
5

You seriously underestimate what it would take to make a third party competitive in America. The very best you can hope for is to influence the major parties through your third party votes.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:57 PM
6

Yeah, it's a problem. I think we should all attend primaries and work to kick out the Feminists. What do you think?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 09:13 PM
2

Hey, I hope you can get over your trust issues with women. Life isn't always easy, but it's worth it. When you're ready, find yourself a good woman and be happy.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:05 PM
9

Why do you keep bashing the political left? We probably have more left leaning MRAs than right leaning.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:02 PM
2

Begone, troll.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 11:54 PM
1

That's the stuff :-) Play to your strengths, which might not be the same as a woman would have.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 10:18 PM
1

Keep looking, every city has people who appreciate good strong massage.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 08:36 PM
1

Okay. A woman accuses a man of rape. What first reaction do most people have? Violence against the man. Nobody knows if the accusation is true, or what happened, but people cry out for blood right away. That's misandry. A man takes his child to the park, then sits on a bench. A woman calls the police to report him as a pedophile. This happens commonly enough that most men are afraid to visit parks where children might play. That's misandry. Male teachers are terrified of false accusations. If a …
/r/MensRights22/05/13 08:35 PM
1

That's your closed mind again. You really should try looking from another perspective. You might be surprised.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:37 PM
3

Male MTs are awesome. Strength really matters in massage, and most female MTs are just a tease. A few female MTs know how to massage too, but I'd put my money on a guy every time. You need to find a place where real massage is appreciated, rather than a spa.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:35 PM
0

Where did I say that MRM is about hating feminists or women? In the very next sentence you wrote, for example. a large portion of the movement is characterised by mysogeny Misogyny. We try very hard to keep the misogyny out, and most of us aren't about that. Neither of our opinions are valid for Wikipedia. Encyclopedias need to be unbiased. On the other hand, we're very much against Feminism. That isn't misogyny at all. A lot of the people that are seen to lead or represent the movement are Who …
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:31 PM
1

If you come here with a closed mind and sympathy only for women, we'll never really be able to communicate.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:12 PM
1

Their tactics can be very effective. Poor women can't afford to spend time out of state to get the treatment they need.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:03 PM
0

You think Feminism is small? There are Women's Studies programs at most big Universities, I think. I also think Feminists have strong political influence nationally.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:02 PM
1

If someone assaults you, I enthusiastically defend your right to fight back. The risk of injury is the reason people don't attack other people. This risk needs to be real to act as a deterrent. Just keep the response within reason.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:01 PM
1

Your logic is flawed. Less violence is the goal, remember that.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:58 PM
-1

MRM is not about hating women. Feminism has major factions who very clearly hate men (radFems, reddit Feminists, Tumblr Feminists, Twitter Feminists, University student Feminists). The Wikipedia article on MR calls the MRM misogynist in the lede. The Wikipedia article on Feminism briefly mentions misandry way at the end. That is bias. That is misleading the reader.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:57 PM
0

You have no concept of how large a number 1% is.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:50 PM
2

She apparently hit him for no reason. She probably hits men regularly. If 10% of men did this, there would be much less casual violence.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:04 AM
2

So using violence to stop someone from using violence is wrong? I think it's just fine. It's not like she's injured.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 12:03 AM
3

There's a whole word of difference between "not wrong" and "neutral and unbiased". Compare the treatment MR is given to the treatment Feminism is given.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:57 PM
1

You just don't appreciate small victories :-)
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:55 PM
0

Okay, let's have a discussion. In what ways in Feminism like a cult? In what was are they unlike cults?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:50 PM
2

If most Muslims went along with the Taliban, I'd say they de-factor represent Muslims. Since most Feminists go along with the VOCAL man-haters, the VOCAL man-hating Feminists are the true Feminists.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 10:24 PM
2

Modern technology trumps biology in this case.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 10:23 PM
6

Quite true. We have to start somewhere. If you want to know other MRAs, why don't you organize some local bite-sized activism?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:48 PM
9

That's not how an encyclopedia works.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:47 PM
0

Would you settle for a 3 year jail sentence?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:37 PM
-5

1 news article doesn't disprove a 1% argument. Stop upvoting these comments guys.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:36 PM
2

“There was no crime because the age of consent is 16, and he was not in a position of authority over her.” I love how they have to spell that out. People just assume men are criminals. It really sucks for men that these accusations are so easy. I do wonder about the other man though. Were these two operation some sort of extortion scheme? Is this guy the first victim? Which person was the mastermind?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:33 PM
3

We're all people, we can have opinions on anything. No need to silence people because they're the wrong gender.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:30 PM
13

Yes, Wikipedia editors can be banned for bad behavior. If we can dig up the dirt on them, we can remove biased editors. This will give us the opportunity to turn this anti-MRA article into something neutral or positive.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:17 PM
2

Men sought more help because of a soap opera? Men don't normally watch soap operas. Theory: So few men seek help that even a niche event will triple call rates.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:11 PM
7

This post is an example. If we get a handful of people to spend a few hours looking at the editors who mediate disputes on the Wikipedia MR page, we can get the problematic editors booted. Failing that, people can add the references they know and improve the page. Pretty small stuff. What else is bite-sized activism? Students putting up posters on campus. Sitting in on local divorce court or preliminary proceedings and reporting any bias. A few hours work with no major risk or expense.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 09:06 PM
6

I think you should read this post.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:58 PM
7

has to be 100k. thats the only way whitehouse petitions will be reviewed. Yes, but 100K is lofty. That's fine if it's your mission, but I think it's better to get people started with small acts of activism.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:57 PM
1

The Wikipedia "Men's Rights" article.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:55 PM
1

I think the US media is to blame there. The US Justice system has problems, but not like Japan.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:55 PM
2

she did not have any power over him. That... is probably not true.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:54 PM
1

You're right. That's why he's not in jail now.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:52 PM
3

Mainstream Feminists din't denounce VOCAL Feminists. They've ceded control. VOCAL Feminism is the real Feminism now.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:50 PM
5

100K is a lofty goal for 30 days. Let's start with bite-sized activism and build from there.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:49 PM
11

No way. The page on Feminism should describe the important aspects movement using a variety of sources, in a balanced and fair way. Just like "our" page should be. By the way, the pages really aren't "ours" or "theirs".
/r/MensRights21/05/13 08:47 PM
26

Feminism article for comparison. Note how favorable the lede is. The MR wikipedia page, in the first few paragraphs, calls us woman haters and traditionalists. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and unbiased. It's an encyclopedia, not a hate platform. We need to shitcan the editors who allowed this. Find their misbehaviors, bring them to light, and get them out. After that we can actually push for an unbiased page without privileged Feminist editors interfering. Edit: adding some Wikipedia/MR c…
/r/MensRights21/05/13 07:04 PM
3

Chinese and Russian communism were very different, and I haven't heard anyone claim that Chinese communists were Feminist. I'm not sure what to make of your comment.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:55 PM
2

That article really is subject to tremendous attacks.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:48 PM
1

You believe that this shouldn't be a crime regardless of gender. Okay, but this is a parent having sex with a child under her care. That's more than just sex, that's an abuse of power.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:39 PM
1

I agree, but countries that punish men for breaking laws must also punish women for breaking laws.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:36 PM
1

As you know, only men can be criminals. The only crime here was child pornography. Please extradite this war criminal to a civilized country where he can be executed without trial.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:35 PM
0

Certain regressive states in America really try to force women into motherhood once they're pregnant.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:25 PM
6

You're not responsible to anyone if you don't consent. Sex is not consent to have a child.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:23 PM
7

Please. I get insta-banned from all Feminist subs the moment I ask a question. The Feminist hate I see on mainstream websites isn't any better. If you, as a "Feminist", believe that men should have equal rights, you're just not a Feminist. You're going against party doctrine and the vast majority of Feminists.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:16 PM
-2

That's a strong argument, but people may think you're pro-life given your phrasing.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:13 PM
3

I posted on this topic last week. The short version is that people will have sex, and nobody should be forced into an obligation without explicit written consent. Having sex is consent to have sex, not consent to have a baby. Our technology has separated the two concepts, but only women see the benefits. We need to be fair to our men, too.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:11 PM
15

The "Woman in distress" tactic sure ends arguments quickly. Few guys have the courage to stand up to that tactic even when the situation is ridiculous like this video.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:05 PM
2

Does HuffPo know they published this article? I doubt Octavia will be allowed near their website again. But just who is this Octavia? Octavia is a first year Philosophy student at Queens' College, University of Cambridge. Is Philosophy the strongest academic group against Feminists?
/r/MensRights21/05/13 06:01 PM
1

This article was better than those "branding problem" complaint articles.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:58 PM
3

India is fucked. Situation normal.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:54 PM
3

Citation needed isn't an insult, and doesn't necessarily mean I disagree. It means I'd like a source for that claim. Which I still would.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 05:48 PM
2

That's sad. You oppose any law to help men gain equality, because you distrust the system so thoroughly.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:52 PM
1

Poison pill, apparently.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:52 PM
8

Looks like you've been hoodwinked. They lost Women's Studies so they just made a new name. It's still a how-to-hate-men degree.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:50 PM
13

Another hate department from the people who brought you Feminism.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:49 PM
5

This is just a snarky right wing post. The fact that the right also doesn't like Feminists doesn't make me feel much better. There's no real content here.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:48 PM
2

Those parents did wrong because they're afraid. Let this be a reminder for us, we need a fair and balanced justice system to convict the guilty and free the innocent. The alternative to real justice is mob justice, and nobody wants that. (copied from the other highly voted thread on this issue)
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:45 PM
3

Like or not, his site has achieved real world results. Which achievement was your favorite?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:41 PM
-2

WARNING This thread has been invaded by Feminists. Try to be civil, and don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:39 PM
-4

Are you saying that rape is worse than eating babies?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:34 PM
2

And... was that a good thing for his cause?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:33 PM
6

The average Elam article alienates a lot of people. He's occasionally a good author, but usually a terrible author. He has poor judgement.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:32 PM
0

You're such a racist.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:14 PM
0

White hetero males were never a majority.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:13 PM
2

Amazing how similar extremists are, both left and right.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 11:10 PM
6

Here's the unsaid meaning behind this rant. Feminists have built an intellectual castle full of everything that's fair, that's just, and that they deserve. They can't birth this castle into reality, because it's built on fantasies. So Feminists constantly have conflict between what they deserve and what they actually want. If their theology was based on reality, they would certainly have considered the actual, no bullshit, honest needs of both men and women. Instead, they deny their real needs, …
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:59 PM
3

Quite true.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:35 PM
10

Those parents did wrong because they're afraid. Let this be a reminder for us, we need a fair and balanced justice system to convict the guilty and free the innocent. The alternative to real justice is mob justice, and nobody wants that.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:34 PM
3

What if you're a Judge?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:32 PM
3

This still isn't a MR issue. The issue this time is that the Japanese justice system is trash. If you're accused of anything, regardless of gender, you'd better run because they have a 99% conviction rate. No prosecutor is right 99% of the time.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 10:27 PM
8

Freedom isn't free. One of the costs is constantly educating people on our protections and why they matter.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:53 PM
2

It took me a long time, but I finally found this. You actually made a valid critique! Could you do more of this, and less of the closed minded trolling?
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:27 PM
1

Stop feeding the troll.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:21 PM
2

No, the problem is that Feminists like you project your idealized situation and expect reality to obey. Communication is very imperfect, and women are notoriously difficult to understand at times. Stop really can mean a bunch of things during sex, and "you're raping me" is the least common of those. If you're not actually going to consider the other argument, just stop posting here with this alt account.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:20 PM
2

Yes, she's our resident Feminist troll. Check her history.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:15 PM
3

Some of the other news stories have a different narrative, that the witness received death threats. It seems that Feminists cry "death threats" constantly, but nobody goes to jail. Is that because... there were no death threats? I'm beginning to wonder.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:08 PM
-6

As a Feminist you're welcome to participate here, but we'd all appreciate it if you'd at least try to keep an open mind.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 07:03 PM
2

Why not compensate the family so they can take care of the disabled miner? Those dollars will directly benefit the guy who's disabled, and it's only fair to pay the person who's helping him survive.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:58 PM
5

Why not compensate the family so they can take care of the disabled miner? Those dollars will directly benefit the guy who's disabled, and it's only fair to pay the person who's helping him survive.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:58 PM
1

... for a much higher price. No, compensating the family is a good idea.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:56 PM
3

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:54 PM
-6

Despite this story being fiction, we can discuss it. The fact is, they were both drunk, but he did stop. He just didn't stop right away. Let's have a more frank discussion though. You, of course, know that sex is mostly about instinct. Instinct to reproduce is very strong. Every one of your ancestors reproduces, for billions of years. So if you're having sex and you'd like the guy to stop, it can happen, but it won't happen easily. You have to be very insistent because all of his instinct tells …
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:43 PM
18

For sure. You don't achieve a 99% conviction rate by pursuing justice. No prosecutor is right 99% of the time.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:10 PM
5

They're probably trying to be welcoming to women, and professional. It's tricky to denounce Feminism at the same time, at work.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:09 PM
7

And they'll interrogate you for a few months until you agree.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:59 PM
19

TYL: RadFems are real.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:56 PM
3

Copy it yourself, but it's just a troll.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:49 PM
1

That's the Traditionalist perspective. We've managed to separate sex and pregnancy in modern times, but we only give that control to the woman. Your view is badly outdated.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:48 AM
2

Here's the list. I support most everything on there. The rape, DV, and divorce related issues are most important to me, because I might someday be in those situations. You never know.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 12:44 AM
2

I'm so glad someone pointed out the glaringly obvious before I got here. Not to say this isn't a problem; it really is.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:51 PM
1

You're not entirely wrong, but we don't condone rape in the civilized world.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 05:27 PM
3

Your response is exactly what I just laid out. Feminism is for everyone including men! We are not against the concept of men's rights Your sidebar quote and my statement above agree. The point is it's not anyone's goddamned business but the victim. If I feel like I was assaulted I was assaulted. It's that simple. When some sexual assault happens, you're only interested in the opinions of the "victim" (presumably female). You have zero interest in the facts, or the opinion of the accused (presuma…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:25 AM
3

Yeah, I suppose you wouldn't know. When we accuse Feminists of something, the usual response is that we're attacking a "Straw Feminist". We observe, however, that many of the Feminists we see have exactly these traits. When we see a Feminist with one or more of these traits, we call them a Straw Feminist. Only a Straw Feminist would fight against men's rights, because Feminism is for everyone including men! You, a Feminist, fight against men's rights. Thus, you are a Straw Feminist. I label you …
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:49 PM
3

As usual, you're projecting your hate onto others. I almost never see racist or anti-gay comments in here. As for sexism, that's you. As for the Straw Feminist, that's you. You fight against men's rights and claim to be our hero.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:28 PM
9

Naw, most of the industry is rotting meat already. The good, creative works all come from small studios. There will always be small studios who don't give a shit what Feminists think, and I'll be there to buy some of their games.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:03 PM
9

The story is alright. To be fair and honest, some women do dress that way, but no guys walk around in just their underwear. I suppose over-exaggeration for the purpose of parody is fair game though.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 11:01 PM
3

Majority of UK women would prefer to be a housewife than to have a career And we shouldn't let Feminists take away their right to choose for themselves.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:55 PM
3

It's cute when you try to use big words. Like most Straw Feminists, you continue to fight against men having any rights while claiming to be our savior. You continue to call us a hate group while you're a member of the largest hate group on Reddit, the Fempire.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:46 PM
3

I really like how you avoided all of my arguments; way to communicate. By the way, I am and have been talking down to you, if you're wondering why I chose simple terms.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 10:11 PM
1

There's no question it's ridiculous. Just sayin' your criticism isn't on solid ground.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:30 PM
1

Fine by us.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:26 PM
12

The story is literally laid out in that comment. Rebecca Watson, a Feminist blogger and Atheist (Atheism+; a group of crazies) was asked out for coffee in an elevator. She blogged about it and called it harassment. It was a big deal.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:13 PM
2

I don't hate all men, just misogynists and predators. It's funny how you only hate "misogynists", "predators" and "MRM". You have extremely wide definitions for each of those, I'm sure. Are there any men you don't hate? Do you mind if I compare your little hate-hub with /r/MensRights? You hate MRM. Says so on your sidebar. We pretty much hate Feminists. Sound the same? It's not. We regularly try to reach out to Feminists, and we're quickly banned or ejected. Do you reach out to us? Do you try to…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 09:09 PM
1

I like your approach, but your logic falls when you realize that some women get raped multiple times over the years. For reasons Feminists can't understand, some women seem to attract trouble.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:52 PM
11

You missed his veiled reference to elevatorgate.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:49 PM
8

At least you'll already have assault rifles to pass out.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:48 PM
3

Yes... but not for the reasons you might think. The reason we know we're on the right side is that the freedom of speech folks are almost always right. That's doesn't prove that we're not jerks like the WBC, who they also support.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:48 PM
4

You couldn't be more wrong if you tried (and judging by your comment history, you try pretty hard). The law exists to lay out a fair line between what's criminal and what's merely distasteful. Talking people into sex has always been just fine, even if some people cross into whining. On another topic, why do you hate men? all PUAs are rapists
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:27 PM
0

Are you joking? You actually think that whining for sex or whatever people do is rape?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:31 PM
-3

What do you mean by coercion? Badgering someone into sex doesn't sound like rape to me.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 06:09 PM
0

Yes. Our goal as advocates is to convince others. Petty sexist insults (even when deserved) don't come across well.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:33 PM
1

So you're saying the most common form of rape involves no violence or threats?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:31 PM
12

This idiot tax won't pass, but it disgusts me that they're even talking about it.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:15 PM
2

under pressure to live up to "pornified ideals", with Viagra becoming a party drug, she will say. ... male cosmetics ... British culture was becoming "increasingly pornified" ... Viagra and Jack Daniels culture" - with men buying the drug as a performance enhancer rather than for medical reasons Yeah, because those are somehow the main issues men face today. Real glad to have her on our side. At least there's one bright point here: she will call for a strengthened role for fathers in family life…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:13 PM
1

Why is such a reasonable post on a woman's website, and how long until Feminists tear it down?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:02 PM
8

Rape by violence or threat of violence is probably the most common form, but you can't ignore rape by drugs. If the person taking the drugs doesn't know, then they're not a willing participant and not responsible for the outcome.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:01 PM
15

Seriously strange.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 09:49 PM
5

I don't know what "reported their rape" means. Reported to the police? They still could have lied to their friends and family.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:52 PM
4

Great lessons, but not for a 4 year old. Try teaching that to a 14 year old instead.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:44 PM
0

Going a little too far there.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:41 PM
6

You have no reason to lie, but the human brain doesn't work that way. If you've lied about something, you're likely to keep lying even when it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:40 PM
2

Student Gillian Love wrote: "The horrible thing is, these people don't even remotely understand what that means. And they wouldn't care if they did. So, no remorse from them." Well I didn't even remotely understand that paragraph.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:18 PM
1

I think it's even worse. It's Feminists themselves who can't tell the difference.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:42 PM
1

Is the justice system going to charge her? If not, are internet activists going to harass her? She deserves it, and without impartial justice we have no better option.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:42 PM
2

Faced Trial. He has a penis so he's clearly still a rapist on that graphic.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:40 PM
6

Originally satire, now party policy.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:12 PM
8

You know a group has gone insane when they can't tell the difference between their positions and satire.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:12 PM
2

Voting first party is how you really throw your vote away. Third party for federal elections.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:09 PM
1

Hopefully reduced ER costs for the uninsured will lower our rates within a few years.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 10:07 PM
-1

Ron Paul is simply unelectable. I even like some of his opinions.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:49 PM
9

The only other option was even worse than Obama, because nobody could figure out what his positions were. Run a real candidate next time, because I for one would appreciate having some semblance of choice.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:48 PM
1

Why would insurance rates go up? I thought we were mostly adding healthy young people, so shouldn't rates go down?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 08:47 PM
0

Perhaps, but the perception is that police form a "blue wall" and block investigation. Also that police won't report misconduct. Not reporting police misconduct, and stonewalling IA are both serious police misconduct in my book.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 07:47 PM
0

Police have refused to comment, citing an ongoing investigation that could take years to complete Someday we'll import a professional police ethic from Europe.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:24 PM
0

Over 99% of the officers in any given year are not even accused of any sort of misconduct But do they turn a blind eye to the misconduct of others?
/r/MensRights14/05/13 06:22 PM
0

Can we vote in Sweden as "Worst of the First"? What a shithole.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:53 PM
1

Nor are they trumpeting them. This number was found in a document.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:27 PM
1

Evidence of sex doesn't prove much. You really need more than he said/she said and proof of sex. It's supposed to be "beyond a reasonable doubt" after all.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:26 PM
-2

Our government invades our privacy constantly, but not like 1984. Yours is just a pithy comment with no basis in reality.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:45 PM
5

No... most people don't know about the history of Feminism.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:44 PM
1

Since they have a popover ad, I say no. I really hate that shit.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:41 PM
2

That's not what I've heard in recent years. They're getting a lot of flack over the rape problems.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:46 PM
1

Maybe we (and they) shouldn't convict without convincing physical evidence of a rape?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:45 PM
6

Which cult?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:35 PM
32

How much can we trust these numbers? The military is in a strange position of being biased in both directions at the same time. I expect that some parts of the military will just throw the book at the accused, and I expect that some parts will cover things up.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:34 PM
1

Your comment really illuminates the meaning behind those numbers. All stats are lies, proven again.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:01 PM
1

Really? More invisible than a motocycle without hi viz? How the heck does that work?
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:47 PM
1

Look, that's great in theory but these outbreaks are happening in anti-vac hotspots like California and Washington. I'm going to stick with the simple conclusion until there's more evidence for something else.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 11:25 PM
1

Based on outbreaks of previously eradicated (on the national level) diseases such as Whooping Cough. These outbreaks would not have happened if we still had herd immunity. This can only mean that fewer people are vaccinating.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 11:20 PM
1

Is it just me, or is that hash tag not actually popular on twitter?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 10:13 PM
1

News stories like this play into people's preconceived notions. Go lend a little sanity and balance to the discussion, please.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 09:07 PM
1

So, what do you propose as a solution?
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:25 PM
1

You have a lot of good points, but unless people defend themselves, we'll all be left with the idea that it's wrong to defend yourself. I advocate for vigorous self defense.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:31 PM
1

If I get sick, it matters to me. The vaccines may or may not have made me immune, and non-vaccinated people are far more likely to be infected. We've already lost herd immunity.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:29 PM
0

The Onion usually isn't funny.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:47 PM
2

Fucking awful infographic. Let's count the major problems: You have the wrong guy making the joke You actually made the joke worse than it was You misrepresented her positions I couldn't find one honest thing in there This graphic will offend any neutral party, alienating the very people we want to convince.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:39 PM
1

Both idiots and wise people have chosen not to vaccinate. Not so much. Vaccines are very well studied, and studies have looked into the allegations you hear people talk about. They really are good, and you really should stick to the schedule. I personally won't allow anyone in my home if they're not properly vaccinated.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:36 PM
3

Collect any vaccine records you can find. Each child should have a permanent vaccine record card, if your ex didn't trash them. Consult a doctor on how you can "catch up" with all the vaccines they need. Document the problem for use in court.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:33 PM
2

"It just shows there's some big racket somewhere, some big guys driving everything, but they are in the background and using these ladies," said Ruparanganda. I'm glad somebody could find a way to blame men here. It doesn't even make sense as a theory. If I were the sperm kingpin, and I'm going to use that line sometime, I would send out the strongest people to steal it. The fact that it's always women suggests that they're running independent businesses by themselves.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:29 PM
1

Yeah, but mostly because he didn't try to defend himself at all.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:22 PM
2

I'm not sure why people keep linking to salon. They suck, and they will continue to suck. More ad revenue doesn't help them stop sucking.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 10:14 PM
7

Now that was a helpful summary for those of us who haven't followed the case.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:40 PM
-3

Even as an MRA, the prosecutor is so aggressive that the witness comes across as sympathetic. It also takes so long to get anywhere that I lose track. I have to say, I'd be better served with excerpts.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 06:48 PM
2

Look at the actual postings. I think we can agree with quite a lot of them.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 08:56 PM
16

In Norway? Both boats could sink!
/r/MensRights08/05/13 06:15 PM
2

DV? No, this is every bit as bad as rape.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:32 PM
1

Allegedly killing, but sure. Black matters, but do you think a black woman would be in this situation? I sure don't.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:28 PM
1

Great news, the execution is stayed and the FBI will perform the DNA tests properly.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:28 PM
1

I could cite, but I'd do both you and the research a disservice. If you have an interest, start reading about rape from the evolutionary biology field. They have an interest in real understanding. Anything you read from the psychology field is, in my opinion, highly suspect. I think the latter field is due to collapse entirely, similar to how the old field of chemistry collapsed and was rebuilt by physicists to form the modern, scientific, and useful field of chemistry.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:59 PM
1

I've created a new drinking game. Drink every time Bohica69 uses any word derived from "wit". This game may be fatal.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:55 PM
2

I'm afraid your one and only strategy has failed here, because I have a thick skin. I hope you grow up sometime.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:16 PM
4

People do not have a "horniness gage" in their brains that turns the rape switch on when it hits a certain level. You're probably correct there. The only problem with this is that psychologically healthy people do not rape. Rape is a learned behaviour, learned from having been raped or otherwise severely abused. What do you base that opinion on? The research I've seen suggests otherwise.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:07 PM
0

Rape is about power Might be true in prison rape, and in cults of personality. Not true in general.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:05 PM
1

Not a lawyer, makin' shit up. The ACLU, who have actual lawyers, seem to think the school is responsible. A college or university that receives federal funds may be held legally responsible when it knows about and ignores sexual harassment or assault in its programs or activities. Does that inevitably result in Kangaroo courts? I don't know; I'm not a lawyer. I'm sure there's a reason why every University seems to do the same thing though.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 06:01 PM
2

You're the worst sort of person. You think you know everything, you insult everyone else, and generally act like a dick. You seem to insult people in about 1/3 of your recent comments. That might be almost okay if you actually brought knowledge to the conversation, but you seem unable to grasp the difference between ego and knowledge. Having lawyers on retainer does not make you an expert. You are not a lawyer.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:40 PM
-1

Because... you're a lawyer? Leave the law to the real lawyers.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:39 PM
1

As required of them by Title IX. Again, you're not a lawyer and you're making shit up.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:32 PM
2

Would you trust the justice system? I'm not sure, but it's worth a try.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 11:09 PM
5

Overturn Title IX. It's about time.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:20 PM
1

Are you a lawyer? Because I think you just made that up on the spot.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:19 PM
4

The opinion essentially argues that it's fine to punish more innocent men, because they'll probably receive lighter punishments with less evidence. Do we really need to drive more men from Universities?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:16 PM
2

What about women who disparage Feminism?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 10:13 PM
1

Sexual assault is bad, but drunk medicine results in death. She won't get a pass on this one.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:37 PM
3

The defense attorney has an obligation to do what he can. His client has to give the go-ahead, and she's to blame.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:09 PM
5

You have a strange idea of paradise, friend. Think of all those frustrated men.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:05 PM
5

I'm sorry the situation in Sweden sucks, but on the positive side anywhere you move will be better than Sweden.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 09:04 PM
7

Yes, girls never fight by saying mean things behind people's backs.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 06:45 PM
1

I know we've been calling for more good news stories, but this doesn't count.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:21 PM
4

I wondered at the time it must have taken to erase her from every frame. Of all the rapid-fire images of death and destruction in the video, I found this one the most chilling. That's what we need in the CIA, morons who find sexism the "most chilling" aspect of terrorism. No wonder we didn't catch OBL 15 years ago.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:19 PM
9

So the article calls MRAs extremist twice, parrots radfem accusations, and casually mentions that MRAs are free speech and didn't threaten the crazy women. Textbook example of biased writing.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 10:02 PM
7

Nice post. Is it your blog?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:59 PM
3

I read your comment, but I couldn't distinguish between that and sexist propaganda. Honestly, I think it is sexist propaganda.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 08:31 PM
9

I feel like everyone wonders if I'm a paedophile every time I'm around kids, which isn't very often. I think society has made me paranoid that everyone else has been made paranoid by society ;-)
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:48 PM
21

I've seen some complaints about this sort of writing recently. I personally find it mildly annoying, but I also recognize that women (probably) and children (most likely) aren't fighters. So I read the quote as, "killing at least 50 people including apparent innocents.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 09:18 PM
1

I am a practitioner in the field. What is your job title or specialty called? While some of what you said made sense, some of it really didn't. I'm unconvinced that you're any sort of expert. Back to the actual point, The Guardian is biased because they were blamed. They did have a key role in leaking the information to the public. You may notice that I've carefully avoided absolving anyone else of blame.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 09:24 PM
2

Nobody can accuse you of that.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:05 AM
1

Sigh. A few points, in order. The Guardian still didn't like the heat they took, and they're still highly biased on the issue. The details of the leak don't effect that. I happen to have an interest in cryptography. I read events as they unfolded, at the time. I actually do know what I'm talking about. Why don't I clear this up for you? I'll try to be civil, to boot. the symmetric key would work for a small amount of time only. That doesn't make any sense. That's not how cryptography works. That…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:53 PM
2

Well at least your responses are consistent. Not much content though.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:42 PM
1

You're such a troll. By Feminist rules, 99.9999% of all sex is rape. Here's a standard we can all live by, that works fucking great: If you didn't drug 'her' without her knowledge, and you're not threatening her, and she's awake, and she didn't make it really clear that she doesn't want sex, it's not rape. I'm sure you'll scream about that one for a while.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 10:31 PM
9

Yes, but Feminists have no shortage of double standards.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 09:15 PM
8

My honest opinion is that women do have it worse on this topic. I think they're naturally insecure about their looks because looks are a woman's main asset for finding a man <sup>1.</sup> I think male body image issues are a much more modern idea. Some people are pushing these ideas. You can see this every time reddit Feminists say "neck beard". <sup>1</sup> I personally think personality is more important than looks though. Still, nature wins.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 07:53 PM
6

Feminists believe anyone who disagrees with them is full of hate. It all started as a smear tactic, but the new generation actually believes it.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:12 PM
2

Yeah, good point. Small problem, Patriarchy is mythical while Feminists are real.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:05 PM
10

Charges of torture and mayhem Did anyone, for one second, expect any other defense? This is by the playbook.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 06:05 PM
2

Feminism has a huge cultural influence and an outsized influence on our justice system. As for police motives, they have every motive to run obvious tests like this. They want to know if they're holding a guy who will easily beat the charges, while the real guy is still out there.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:49 PM
2

it is hilarious how much you guys don't understand consent. You guys deny human nature and the delicate dance that is consent and human relationships. Feminism a general theme of not understanding. Look at how Feminists mock EvoBio for a blatant example.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:46 PM
1

You're confused by what Feminism claims and what Feminism does. Look deeper and you'll see, the new human rights movement is MRM. Feminism is just a twisted form of traditionalism now.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:44 PM
0

Man, I don't know what to tell ya. You're reading things I didn't write. I don't assume any such things about all Christians.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:40 PM
0

The Guardian released the crypto key and made all of those unredacted leaks public. They didn't like when everyone pointed that out. Their opinion is highly tainted.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:38 PM
1

180 days is considered a speedy trial? Wow.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:36 PM
2

This has nothing to do with feminism. Well the rest of your post was mostly reasonable.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:35 PM
12

I would be paranoid too. He has powerful and ruthless enemies.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:50 PM
5

Sarcasm?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:41 PM
5

Have an upvote. I have no idea who's downvoting this, since their wiki has more info than ours.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:38 PM
18

He's not even accused of anything we would consider rape. Or anything that his "victims" did consider rape. The state of Sweden made the accusation. His case was more about politics than "rape".
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:12 PM
7

Is the journalist responsible when his source is discovered? You're asking a lot there. This is also a man who has caused chaos in the international community. Our government needs a lot of healing-through-truth these days. They've really gone overboard with government secrecy.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:09 PM
4

You're probably from a community of moderate Christians. It's a big country, and a lot of communities aren't moderate at all. Just look at how big a deal the "gay priest/pastor" issue has been. Or gay marriage. Look at how many gay hating politicians turn out to be gay themselves, but were pressured to repress. They aren't atheists. I'm afraid I don't have the wrong crowd, but remember that OP called out Fundamentalists, and I likewise don't smear all Christians this way. And by the way, if I we…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 11:03 PM
9

He accused Fundamentalist Christians. Most Christians wouldn't do this, but they're more likely to send their kids off than non-believers are. I'd put Mormons and Muslims in the same boat as Christians, though the Eastern religions are probably different. Why? Because way too many Christians (and Mormons and Muslims) hate gays. If you're a good Christian, how can you deny that there's too much gay hate in your wider community?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:26 PM
8

Why don't you track those people down?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:21 PM
2

You appear completely unable to comprehend simple messages. You continue to ignore major points and argue against trivialities. Please learn how to discuss and argue productively.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:03 PM
4

You continue to not address any of the evidence, despite my criticism. I'll help you out by getting you back on topic. Here are the accusations you linked to: He made a mean twitter comment He linked to her address He mentions her a lot in twitter He changed his avatar to mention her Considering that she (apparently) used a DMCA takedown request to censor his blog post, I think #1, #3, and #4 are entirely justified and completely expected. I'd make fun of my censor, too. That leaves #2, posting …
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:52 PM
3

I think you're going too far here. The A+ crowd downvoted you, and for once I think they're right.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:15 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/atheismplus/comments/1dc8qg/justin_vacula_who_doxxed_surly_amy_and_is_a_huge/ Don't let them control our conversation.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:14 PM
0

The downvote brigade from A+ really hated your comment. It's like they turn their brains off for these discussions, because girls are more likely to fight through gossip, lies, and deception. This isn't dehumanizing, it's everyday reality.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:09 PM
2

Yes :-)
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:07 PM
9

Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:06 PM
4

I spent the largest paragraph talking about her "evidence" which is entirely lacking. I threw the ad hom in as a cherry on top because I knew you'd bite. It shows that the facts and the truth aren't your true intention in this conversation. I consider you discredited.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:05 PM
-3

Ah yes, "Atheism plus hate". Who ever thought that was a good idea?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:02 PM
4

Did you really just cite Rebecca Watson as evidence in /MR? Also that evidence is laughable. The only real allegation in there is that he posted her address on some unnamed "hate site". I can't seem to find that post through Google so I have no idea what the context is, or if it's even real. Overall a shitty argument from a shitty person (Rebecca Watson).
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:52 PM
1

You think? Maybe you're right. I see three contributing factors: Girls are less interested in "machines" and video games Girls tend to be smart enough to go outside sometimes ;-) Girls tend to have weaker 3D skills than boys. The first two are just gender preferences, the third is a disadvantage depending on the game.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:38 PM
6

Edit: Formatting. I think you need another.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:35 PM
1

Devil's Advocate here. Could it be that she really had a mental problem and she's really cured? If so, what purpose would punishment serve? If so, hasn't society done what we should?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:33 PM
17

Did he waive his right to a speedy trial? Would he have been out earlier had he not waived his right?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:29 PM
97

Feminism pioneered rape hysteria and continues to push the issue very hard. What happened to this child was terrible, and that's all the more reason to investigate without hysteria.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:28 PM
1

I get that the "man up" culture is ridiculous and needs to end, but don't blame feminism Feminism is part of "man up" culture. Far from solving our problems, Feminists add to them.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:26 PM
1

Cool. Let us know if it's any good.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:56 PM
15

He was killed because culture expected him to man up. That's the cause, and that's what we need to fight here. The Feminists claim to be our salvation, and say that MRM isn't needed. When they get around to this story I'll consider retracting my remark. Be fucking human. Wow, did you really just dehumanize me?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:55 PM
1

This is our wiki from the sidebar. It's so empty right now :-(
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:48 PM
2

LET'S GO FUCK THEIR SHIT UP Could you please not use language like that? We don't want someone to interpret that as a call to violence.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:45 PM
112

This is what happens when Feminists demonize rapists so severely. Rapists are bad people, but they're still human and still have human rights. But when you think they're the devil incarnate, you're quite ready to ignore all the evidence and get on with the punishing. I'm sure this Sheriff would have skipped the trial if he could.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:38 PM
2

Everyone look! CrossHook made a really good point here. MGTOW and radFems are both extremists, but only the Feminists advocate murder.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:35 PM
14

Their hate makes them look bad. I wish they'd show more hate, so they'd look even worse.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:27 PM
6

More stories link link. Main discussion. I think we'd better all wait for the Feminists to solve this problem for us.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:20 PM
1

120 months, damn. Hope you don't want kids ;-) Alternately, hope you met her at age 20!
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:09 PM
1

Sounds like you are advocating rape We don't project like that in here. In no way am I advocating rape, just self improvement and getting out there.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:07 PM
1

No, I'm very familiar with this. If people really want to get laid, go hang out with the PUA crowd. They're strange, and you shouldn't stay with them for too long, but they help people get out there and get laid. It really is a matter of putting the effort into it. Effort to improve yourself, and effort to meet women. And if you don't do these things, I say sex isn't your priority.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:03 PM
1

No, I'm very familiar with this. If people really want to get laid, go hand out with the PUA crowd. They're strange, and you should stay with them for too long, but they help people get out there and get laid. It really is a matter of putting the effort into it. Effort to improve yourself, and effort to meet women. And if you don't do these things, I say sex isn't your priority.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 06:03 PM
-3

He was a virgin at 36. Regardless of his religious beliefs, he would have made sex happen long before that if he had much sex drive. At some point, he would make it a priority and figure out whatever needed figuring in order to get laid. That's what most of us did. Then he tolerates sex once per month. Were sex his priority, he'd do whatever it takes to get more sex in his life, starting with his wife. He may be quietly desperate, but not desperate enough to make change happen.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:49 PM
2

I don't know if I'd even recognize the signs myself. Someone should write a "guide to not marrying the wrong woman".
/r/MensRights26/04/13 10:02 PM
2

Well she's not entirely wrong. I do think she undervalues her husbands genes, but he's kind of a dumbass too. The main problem is that she's a bad person, a deceiver, and a liar.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:47 PM
2

Uh, yeah this guy doesn't know that his woman is crazy. I was talking about not marrying a Feminist. I don't know that this hardcore lying woman from the story is a Feminist at all. She didn't use Feminist language, and her justification was all self-interest and biology. She also doesn't see herself as a victim.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:40 PM
12

Any guy who wanted the best for his kids would never marry such a woman.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:31 PM
3

Finding a guy who's a good husband and makes cute babies is one strategy. Of course, there are only so many of those guys out there. Some women will have to either settle for less, or try to split those roles between two guys through cheating. I guess marrying the hunk, making some kids, then marrying the stable guy is another strategy.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:30 PM
-6

To be fair, sex is obviously not his priority in life.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:27 PM
0

Winning and losing in life isn't based on how he feels, or if he thought he won.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:27 PM
2

The best part is that she doesn't even acknowledge that some woman could pull the same thing on her kids. That's always a risk. Faithful couples have that risk too. Do you think her actions make that more likely?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:26 PM
4

Well the government has created a "moral hazard" with their child support system, but it takes a long time to change culture. There are still good women out there. After our culture changes completely, everyone will adapt. You're right, men will probably adapt by avoiding marriage amongst other things.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 09:23 PM
3

I look forward to the day when I write a perfect post.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:52 PM
25

“I love my husband.” She says. ” He has given me a comfortable and stable life. Because of his great job and his ability to provide me and my children with resources, I will never divorce him.” This is called "being a stereotype". My husband is a sensitive caring man with soft features. The men who fathered my children are much better looking, more masculine, and healthier than my hubby. If you were to ever meet my husband, you would agree that he is not the ideal man to mate with, but he would …
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:08 PM
7

They obviously have a lot of good points, which they stole from the real thinkers in Evolutionary Biology.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:03 PM
3

My personal experience, and the experience of several of my friends is that women are the violent partners in relationships. Occasionally they use deadly violence, though fortunately they have terrible aim. Yes, this is all from my experience and that of my friends. Why? I suppose that most of the time, female violence is truly harmless. Maybe they learn that violence is okay because nobody minds, because they're usually harmless. Honestly I tell my GF that if she's ever attacked, don't try to f…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:57 PM
1

We could advocate (if we could ever get past our differences), but most people don't give a rats ass about our issues. Americans love hard work and hate "giving away" vacation to people at the expense of their employer. It would be a serious uphill battle against the majority, because of culture.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 06:26 PM
1

That makes sense, but calling it a "minority market" gives the wrong impression.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:45 PM
3

Just as a funny story about strange dates.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:44 PM
0

Oh, thanks. That's a great video. Was this local coverage?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:43 PM
-2

Since PH stole this thread with his great comment, let's take a tangent. As if naïveté is a rapeable offense. You know, it's funny. If a squirrel is too slow to escape an owl, we don't ask if slow animals deserve death. It's the real world and predators exist. We have investigations and police to help catch predators, but we can't just imprison everyone accused. The accused aren't animals, they're humans. Even the guilty ones. Jailing an innocent is even worse than letting a rapist go free. So w…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:38 PM
9

You're doing a great job promoting your blog with comments like that.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:27 PM
0

that's considered a minority market You mean, a majority market? Last I heard women dominate the field.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:22 PM
1

Amanda has a point about splitting women from the "American Novelists" list, but comments like these piss me off. It’s probably small, easily fixable things like this that make it harder and slower for women to gain equality in the literary world. Women dominate the field of writing. By Feminist logic, these changes are good because male writers need a hand out. Of course, Amanda probably isn't so much a Feminist as a Victim.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:21 PM
0

I'll take your word for it. It's blocked by my privacy software, probably for good reason.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:15 PM
1

The country is run by the world's only openly lesbian prime minister, while 65% of Icelandic children are born outside marriage (more than any other country in the OECD). Children are given extensive sex education in schools. Mini-vibrators and condoms are sold at supermarket checkouts. Along with Norway and Sweden, Iceland has one of the highest rates of female enrolment in higher education (women outnumber men 3:2). Salary gaps between men and women are some of the lowest in the world and the …
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:14 PM
2

Okay, to each their own. I hope you don't mind if I use your story someday (without your name).
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:10 PM
4

Two sentences in the local news?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:09 PM
4

Ad-hominem attack. There may be a bit of truth but it's really flinging poo. Anyone but the MRM will see that right away; this only plays well to the choir.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:04 PM
4

Just resubmit this with a fixed title.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:02 PM
8

Paul really had to go out of his way to explain his comment. If you have to spend 11 paragraphs setting the stage before you even get to "the comment", you have to admit it was a bad comment. PR ammunition for the other side. I'll just say it. Sometimes Paul Elam really helps the Feminists with his stupid comments. If you're a "public face" of the MRM, please don't make PR ammunition for the other side.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:59 PM
3

Women and Feminists have a lot of lobbying power and PR pushing for children to live with their mothers. We need voices on our side. If you want to be neutral, that's fine, but you're not really on our side anymore. We need dedicated voices to balance the other side.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:53 PM
3

You should do this. Use wordpress, and expect to spend a lot of time and effort marketing your blog for a while. I really like SRSLG's suggestion of his & her perspective on issues. Each post should have a topic or theme, and you should bring in guests when you can. Crazy guests should be fun if you don't treat them with kid gloves. Have some radfems and MGTOWs on, (not at the same time). That should be entertaining.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:48 PM
2

Last evening I went on a first date. She wanted to go see the movie Miss Representation. You have got to to be kidding me. That's the worst date idea I've heard in a long while. I hope she paid for her own ticket at least.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:45 PM
5

attracting mainstream attention I haven't seen this yet. It's attracted attention from Feminists, but the mainstream?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:40 PM
2

Is that really a gender issue, or more of an issue of our culture?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:36 PM
6

Feminists see gender issues as a zero sum game So true. Then they make protest signs like "My Rights =/= Your Oppression".
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:26 PM
2

If you're good at public talking, try this. Shane Murphy, VP Student Engagement, is a sexist pig. He thinks women aren't good enough to get elected on their own. He thinks our students are sexist pigs. He thinks we won't vote for women. He thinks women need "special help". He thinks women want "special help". I say, women are good enough. I say, women don't need "special help". I say, we do vote for women. I say, we take a unanimous NO vote to show we don't tolerate bigots here! VOTE NO
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:47 PM
1

This is /mr. We're aware of the issues here, but we prefer other solutions.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:53 PM
1

Well they're entitled to their opinions, but I think MGTOW is an extreme over-reaction that doesn't meet the needs and aspirations of most men. They also bring a lot of "hate all women" baggage with them.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 10:53 PM
14

Not a surprise. Figure out how to make a poster campaign out of this.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:45 PM
9

Okay, jump in next time people say Norway doesn't have problems. Like, here.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:37 PM
1

Sexual assault includes trying to give your partner a "welcome home" kiss when they don't want you to, even if you've done it consensually, but without asking, every day for the last 10 years. So crazy. Malice is not necessary; violence is not necessary; threats are not necessary; miscommunication or misunderstanding is sufficient. Guys, if you misread my emotions you can GO TO JAIL! What a crock of shit.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:33 PM
30

Folks from Norway keep insisting it's just Sweden.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:17 PM
14

Yeah that all sounds great, but where were you when the real debate happend? Hmm? Lotta good you're doing now.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:14 PM
3

I've really appreciated the mass exodus of MGTOW ideas from this forum over the last few months. If that's the approach the OP wants to take, he should join you guys in your forum.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 09:00 PM
5

Read your actual state laws. Usually you have to "present yourself as man and wife" but the laws vary.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:56 PM
1

Who cares? I don't even know which post you're talking about.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:54 PM
4

She used violence to create fear and force political change. Isn't that a "terrorist attack" even if the direct victim was herself?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:53 PM
1

The spasm of violence unnerved a pair of British tourists more used to the staid scene at Wimbledon. By the queen, this isn't soccer!
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:50 PM
3

Please quote the offensive posts directly. I can't find them or I lack context to see the problem.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:26 PM
3

The gimped men project can't hide their hate from us.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 08:23 PM
10

Obviously.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:45 PM
3

I really respect the writing quality on Jezebel. They hire only the most talented investigative journalists.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:36 PM
1

Maybe private companies should be allowed to discriminate, but in a world where every male only business was forced to accept women, fair is fair.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:35 PM
1

I remember that story. I wouldn't take down Feminist posters, but add to them. The irony is that Feminists think we're a hate group, while in reality they're just projecting their own hate. I think the "angry feminist" is exactly how we need to portray them.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:14 PM
5

The stories in the Bible are interpreted so many ways. I think it's a pretty fucked up story in a fucked up book. Why bring it into the conversation?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:43 PM
2

I'm really leery about false flag stuff, and that skirts the edge of it Those slogans lie somewhere between parody and criticism. I think they're effective because they reveal the hidden truth. They're the slogans the Feminists would use if they were 100% honest. This is the line of attack that would push Feminists into changing their behavior lest they play into it. Would you prefer another slogan like "HATE GROUP"? I bring this up because confronting Feminists is what everyone tries, and it do…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:37 PM
2

Will he know how to tell if a girl cannot give consent? Check her ID to see her age Check to see if she's awake Check to see if you put drugs in her drink Otherwise, you're good to go!
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:29 PM
16

Are these Women's Studies majors deranged by the schools, or do they choose the major because they're already deranged? Does anyone graduate with that degree and a healthy mind?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:19 PM
3

Yes, angry women shouting down calm men plays out well for us. I think we have the same weakness as blacks have had with the civil rights movement. Both men and blacks are seen as beastly and violent, so we must never play into that role. We can't shout like angry idiots, but women can. Of course, they look bad doing it but we'd look like the devil himself. What do you think about passing out stickers on campus with lines like, "attend your local hate group!" or, "HATE MEN with us". Encourage pe…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 10:14 PM
3

mothers get full custody 44% of time [...] does this prove that judges are biased against men? Mathematically no, in practice yes. It shows that judges clearly think the mother is more important to the child. Have you seen the study showing that the education gap between a family with and without a father is the same as the gap between middle class and poverty? Fathers are very important and the system rejects them.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:59 PM
4

In a real court, there's a chance you'll have an unbiased judge. In University, you have no chance at all.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:53 PM
2

Yeah, that sounds good. I think some alimony (or your suggestion) can be appropriate, but not automatic just because you were married.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:49 PM
2

Do you have other ideas on how we can convince people to join our cause?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:47 PM
6

the women are hateful misandrists, sure, but doxxing is a big no-no It's one thing to DOX someone for their anonymous comments on some internet forum. They expect to remain anonymous. You wouldn't complain when some politician was named and shamed for some stupid thing they said or did. Once people are convicted of a crime, or publish an article under their name, or speak at a protest without a mask, they've put themselves into the "public sphere" and are fair game.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:46 PM
2

You've made some good comments recently. Did you recently switch from your main account?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:41 PM
3

Have you ever heard a feminist say that we live in a murder of young black men culture? That's so true.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:38 PM
0

proves nothing more than men are in a position to be more generous with donations. FTFY
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:14 PM
20

People have made financial decisions presuming that they would receive alimony. To change that would be unfair. Hahaha, fuck you Carin Porras. Women can earn their own way in life. They're allowed to have jobs.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 09:05 PM
7

Completely agree. We need solid proof because that's gold. We'll get so much mileage out of this opposition to this bill.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:58 PM
2

The program creates 25 internships for women (only) across 10 companies. On one hand, this is discrimination. Men need not apply. On the other hand, these are merely internships. Yes, they can lead to real jobs with real salaries, but they're probably not paying much directly. The community could also benefit from from having more women. What do you guys think?
/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:16 PM
1

Make sure you don't violate any wiretaps laws. You don't need that trouble. Second, go request 50 of those fliers. Post them everywhere, right under signs that say, "attend your local hate group!".
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:06 PM
6

Was there another video? I'm surprised the one you linked to went viral.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 05:58 PM
4

If Mr Vince fails in his attempt to strike out his ex-wife's case, her maintenance claim is expected to be heard by a family judge in June. I expect a completely fair trial in family court. ;-)
/r/MensRights23/04/13 12:09 AM
2

am i allowed Ask in /r/AskFeminists
/r/MensRights22/04/13 11:54 PM
4

A lot of women visit tropical places to get laid by the locals. It's a pretty common thing. Just ask the local 20 year old guys, they're successful players and they're not even good at it. I just don't see how the Jamaican guys convince them to pay for the privilege.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 11:47 PM
2

Was this widely published, or just their in house crappy pamphlets?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 09:57 PM
1

My god, that's awful. I appreciate that you guys try to remain neutral. IMHO the professionalism of law enforcement varies widely across the USA.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:55 PM
10

Yes, women who consented. They bragged about it. Later they found out he slept with the other woman too, and went to the police to force him to get an STD test. After that it snowballed and the police decided it was rape. What a joke.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:45 PM
4

The whole idea of putting people in jail for the crimes they commit is to keep them from committing more crimes. We'd also hope to reform them.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 08:08 PM
1

That doesn't help me understand anything.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:59 PM
1

She should use the buddy system to help her not rape. Just don't rape your buddy!
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:58 PM
0

Not entirely, though Sweden really looks bad after Assange.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:39 PM
1

My rule of thumb: whenever you use words like "it", ask yourself if someone will know what "it" means.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:35 PM
1

Of the cases believed to be rape (not a gray case), how many do you think really are rape? The Innocence Project has shown that we have a lot of false convictions.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:34 PM
3

It's far worse than that. Let's break this down. (1) Accusations not brought to the police. (2) Accusations brought to the police, who believe it false. (3) Accusations brought to the police, who can't decide who to believe. (4) Accusations brought to the police, who believe it true. Of accusations brought to the police, where the police find clear guilt on one side, 1 in 6 are believed false. Of those remaining 5 cases, the Innocence Project has shown that the police help convict a lot of innoc…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:32 PM
8

We need balance. If the police automatically believe either the accuser it encourages false accusers to take advantage of the situation. If the police automatically dismiss the accuser it encourages actual rapists to take advantage of the situation. The police need to be critical of both sides and perform a balanced, detailed investigation. If thorough investigation shows that a crime was committed, prosecute. That's the only way.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:52 PM
7

She was scared of being called easy, so preferred having men jailed instead. Why not? It's so easy!
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:46 PM
5

I'm so glad to hear positive news out of Norway. From this sub, it so often sounds like Norway is Feminist crazy.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:45 PM
3

We don't dox on reddit. People listed on that site were not exposed by reddit.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 11:00 PM
3

Make the sites, but make them very subtle.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:59 PM
2

Germany's parliament voted on Thursday to reject a law that would have created legally binding gender quotas for the supervisory boards of domestic companies. What a stunningly bad idea. Germans should be embarrassed this was even considered.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:46 PM
2

They better squeeze extra hard.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:42 PM
49

They should start a Men's rape crisis hotline too. With helpful tips on how not to rape.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:34 PM
6

The general population has a double standard, which you can see from the comments.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:24 PM
2

Whose fault is that?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:14 PM
15

How to tell if you're having consensual sex: YES YES YES YES YES. Oops, she stopped saying yes. You just raped her. YES YES YES YES YES not there YES YES Oh god, why do you keep raping her? YES YES YES. That was great! What the hell is wrong with you, rapist?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:07 PM
16

Surprisingly good article published in a complete rag. I guess that's the best MSM coverage we can get these days. Still, I am glad they're willing to publish for our cause.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:00 PM
1

Yes, I'm asking a "should" question. Do you think it's morally right or a good practical thing to allow such agreements in other situations not involving a baster?
/r/MensRights19/04/13 05:51 PM
2

Should their agreement waiving parental rights be valid even if they had regular sex?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 11:17 PM
1

A well sourced article on the topic. Taking a step back from this discussion, it behooves all of us to keep our critical thinking skill sharp. I hope you realize I'm not arguing just to be a dick. The original statement really was untrue and unfair towards men.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:57 PM
-2

Not cool, 5th.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:45 PM
4

Yep. Nobody seems to quote that site unless they're busy smearing the MRM.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:44 PM
3

Suicide attempts are serious and cause for concern. Actual suicide is much worse. I think the suicide stat is cited so often is to show than men aren't all invulnerable super-men, and that we're not particularly stronger than women emotionally.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:06 PM
0

Over and over again. And they feel so justified.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:51 PM
1

I agree with your sentiment, but that's not exactly true. Men typically have more skill in some areas. I'm pretty sure plenty of members of both sexes are capable though.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:19 PM
1

OK, you can be pedantic, and even engage in semantics Words matter. This isn't some grammar or punctuation issue. That reason may be that they drive more slowly, or may be less likely to engage in risky road manoeuvres, but really who cares? The answer you missed is that women drive less than men. Men cause fewer accidents per mile traveled.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:17 PM
1

Well, male is a good guess most of the time. For this sort of crime.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:11 PM
1

I wouldn't bet on it. Would you?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:09 PM
1

Women can do anything men can do. Girl power!
/r/MensRights17/04/13 10:09 PM
1

This is a satire of a satire. It works quite well, when posted next to the original.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:50 PM
1

We need a high quality version suitable for printing. Suitable for posting right next to the original poster, when found in public.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:49 PM
1

Sure, except that the English test statement is false. So it's a sexist lie attacking men.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:29 PM
1

there's a reason insurance actuaries rate women as a lower risk. True. Women drive more carefully than men. False. I trust that by now you understand the difference between those statements.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:28 PM
1

Like most stereotypes, it's based in fact but exaggerated.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:25 PM
2

Don't women get better rates than men for car insurance because data shows that they are in fact safer drivers? They get better rates because they get in fewer accidents. As an exercise, I'll let you figure out the key difference between those statements, and why the English test was wrong.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:24 PM
16

it's a statistic that men get in more accidents than women. It's also a statistic that men drive more than women. It's also a statistic that men get in fewer accidents per mile driven. So explain to me how you support the statement that "women drive more carefully than men".
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:22 PM
3

The Feminists love this shit until they find themselves (their families) on the receiving end of an accusation. As usual, a dose of reality is a good treatment for Feminism.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 06:16 PM
1

Well you might get lucky with a jury trial. I might be your juror. You never know.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:49 PM
27

I disagree. Facing your accuser in court is fundamental to our system of justice.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:47 PM
4

Clever name. Very apt.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 11:18 PM
6

We do not need to negate these facts to contend with them, but instead, must place them in an accurate political context, that of capitalism, patriarchy, and white supremacy. Yes men have problems, but it's because of the conspiracy. The patriarchy! Guys, as you read these ridiculous articles, keep one thing in mind. The way these issues are framed makes a huge difference. Our opponents know this, and we have to understand frames just as well.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 10:27 PM
2

Yes, no doubt they have institutional power.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:22 PM
59

goodmenproject -- holy fuck these guys are broken. I'm so sorry for their children.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:16 PM
3

Q&A time. If forced to choose, would you date a Feminist or an Actress?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:13 PM
1

What I meant is that this article isn't going to convince any Feminists that they're not oppressed. Most of the article explains theories of why Feminism is required in law.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:09 PM
1

How different. What caused the decline?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 09:03 PM
1

Yeah, death really sucks. I think most of us have been there.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:11 PM
12

Gender, feminists say, is created socially, not biologically. That quote was just too perfect. Overall that article doesn't say what you think it says.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:10 PM
5

Meh. This is how you should treat anyone who's no kind of threat. Man or woman.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:08 PM
14

men’s rights activists need to acknowledge root causes – namely patriarchy – and work toward healing, rather that simply blame women or feminism. Yeah, don't blame Feminists for attacking us. They're just women! This article made it so very clear. Our feminist opponents are intellectual midgets. The best example was in the backlash section. Compare these quotes: “It's not true. It's simplistic, it's easy to understand, but when we look at a more nuanced version, we see that in fact there are adv…
/r/MensRights15/04/13 06:43 PM
2

Cracked is an interesting site. You should learn how their submission process works. Most of all, when you see some anti-MR bullshit on ad supported websites, where they track page views to figure out what's making them money, don't drive more traffic to that page. They'll just make more hate for more money (like Jezebel).
/r/MensRights15/04/13 06:01 PM
0

Dude? At any given time, many groups worldwide are dehumanizing some other group.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:52 PM
1

Most teachers used to be men? When?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:49 PM
3

Totally. I'm going to use my freedom power to get laid.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:48 PM
3

TL;DR: At first I was offended, but then I remembered to be insecure. "I'm afraid of dying alone and I don't know why that scares men so much."
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:44 PM
1

Completely crooked. Still doesn't hurt to write a bad review.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:37 PM
4

It's exploitation to offer them a job?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:36 PM
4

Look at that, reasons why men wouldn't want to choose the field even though we wish they would. I wish articles on women in STEM looked this way.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:31 AM
2

So, um, without any information or details your post isn't really helping the conversation.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 12:30 AM
2

ddude, ffixx your kkeyboard.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 09:37 PM
2

Same goes for any other crime except police brutality.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 09:36 PM
1

Jezebel is full of lies and hate. I for one am sick of hearing about them. Wake me up when the mainstream media picks this story up.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 09:32 PM
4

Sure, I tease my wife. To her face. To me, that's not mean the way talking behind her back is.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 09:24 PM
2

Will a public defender be able to help me? That's your last possible resort. These guys can have 1000+ clients at a time, and they mostly show up to help you plead guilty.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:40 PM
6

I can't say never, but I really can't recall the last time I heard someone make fun of their wife or girlfriend. Maybe because we all have decent wives.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:38 PM
13

There's always someone using this tactic.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:36 PM
6

Wow, $1000. They really mean business.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 08:03 PM
20

nobody knows what would have happened to him Yeah, nobody knows. It's a big mystery what happens to men accused of beating their wives. Mostly because nobody has ever made a false allegation before, not even once.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:50 PM
4

Those folks are able to figure out who you are, and sue you.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:24 PM
1

Let me get this straight. You plan to use "belief without evidence" to piss off the Church Lady crowd? Are you trolling?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 10:18 PM
9

You can believe something, AND proselytize that belief, without a shred of evidence. Far too many people do this. Stop doing this.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:00 AM
3

The short answer is no. The long answer is yes [...] Does that drive anyone else crazy?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 11:59 PM
4

Fucking terrible user name.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:27 PM
7

That sounds like a constructive comment, but without a citation I don't know if it's true.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:26 PM
3

Did you really just misspell pseudo-intellectual? That has got to sting.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:25 PM
5

Bullshit article aside, if they want to help men then they're welcome to it. We don't hold a monopoly on helping men. Of course, that would mean getting off their high horses and actually trying to help men. Rather than just talking about how they're helping men.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:17 PM
13

Dr. Pepper, heart detective. Nice work buddy.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:26 PM
7

Come on. Seriously fringe material here.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:25 PM
21

Too much effort. Just report it as is and say it makes you uncomfortable. Bringing racism into it (publicly) is inviting well deserved criticism.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:22 PM
4

I'd like to agree with you, but this one's clearly over the line.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:08 PM
51

Well worth getting suspended.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:06 PM
0

Check your local wiretap laws. Do not go to jail over this. If they're called Hollywood Chicks they probably can discriminate. You'd do better to check your local coffee shack where (for some strange reason) they only have women on staff.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:25 PM
1

I'm here as a reaction against laws and attitudes against men. The feminists pushed things too far, and now we need some balance.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:16 PM
2

Is that your personal opinion, or do you have facts to go along with it?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:38 PM
2

TL;DR: According to the article, SLPC is a fundraising charity concerned only with the appearances rather than actually helping. Basically they're a shitty charity that does bad work.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:38 PM
5

nearly all pedophiles are men Is that because women don't seem to get charged for molestation?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 07:29 PM
-2

God damn it, let's boycott this news outlet. Foxnews.com God damn it.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 06:06 PM
30

If women are paid 23% less, wouldn't some upstart company make a killing hiring the most talented women for 10% less than what men would make?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:59 PM
1

There is some truth to that.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:52 PM
1

Do politicians normally respond to your criticism?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:51 PM
1

That's a good anecdote, and I do believe it's true too. I just don't think it gets to the core question about men being naturally as healthy as women.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:47 PM
2

Bigger victim? Who cares? Use it as a third party citation, like so: Thank you for explaining why men are always privileged, but I concerns. Hatebase.org shows that your post used two known hate phrases, and I see regular use of hate speech in your comments. You can't be for equality if you use hate speech. Why are you against equality?
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:43 PM
1

Yeah this guy has a point.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:23 PM
0

Why are men in control of every single industry and institution? Do you have any idea how hard they had to work to get there? Do you think for one moment that it was worth it? No. They have a particular form of insanity that drives them to want more, more, more. Some men have this insanity because "being in charge" was very good for men in the past, and a few men take it way too far. It's rare for a woman to have both this form of insanity and the ability to get to the top, but mostly the former…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 10:05 PM
3

I don't have time to mansplain how helpful it will be to cite the hate index of a given post, user, or website.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:35 PM
2

Yeah, that's how the police see it. They really love their traffic fines. In reality it depends on the situation.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:24 PM
2

No kids? Accuse him of beating you. Wait, sorry, feminist moment there. Seriously, you can't expect a bunch of MRAs to know the law well enough to advise you. Even if there are California lawyers here, they're not giving you legal advice.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:22 PM
2

There's a meme in this community that men are just as fit and live as long as women. This goes against the scientific research I've read (summaries only), and goes against what we see of animals in nature (except birds). Here's another paper talking about how males are more susceptible to disease and more sensitive to social stress. There's no indication that the author is a feminist. This isn't feminist science, it's real science. The kind we can use to make our case as MRAs. Let's hash this ou…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:19 PM
2

Thank you for this informative answer. So helpful I upvoted the GP as well!
/r/MensRights08/04/13 09:05 PM
4

Meh. You can't compete for someone who's not interested. Not even a contest.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:48 PM
2

It's just not funny anymore, cumshot_monster.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:35 PM
3

Rape by deception? Come on. "Yeah baby, I'm a famous rockstar, and rich!" That's fair play in my rulebook.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:34 PM
10

50% of your DNA was taken from a used condom? The other 50% came from someone who would steal DNA from a condom.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:32 PM
5

The article seems good. I really couldn't watch Mad Men because it focused on playing up sexism.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 07:14 PM
17

I really hate the tradition of saying only nice things about bad, dead people. Why can't we be critical of the dead? They don't care anymore.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:25 PM
0

This is why we need MRAs.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:19 PM
3

I hope this is thoroughly investigated, and that no names are published before a conviction.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:18 PM
1

I agree. You could probably get feminists to actually say something like that if you just cross post the story. Putting words in their mouth is just sloppy.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:16 PM
1

I suspect that once computers replace all HR personnel, men will be so much better off in finding employment. Nope. In every company I've worked for, the hiring manager has the largest say in new hires. HR just acts as a (dumb) filter, and I suppose a computer can do that just as well or better.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:13 PM
3

It's in the recruiting companies best interest to only present qualified candidates Not really. These companies get paid if one of their candidates gets hired. It's in their interest to push at least one qualified candidate. Sometimes they send along terrible candidates to make the qualified candidate look better. It all goes back to incentives.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:11 PM
5

It's always going to be the wrong woman grabbing.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:08 PM
1

I love good news! I thought this was always the way it worked though.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 06:07 PM
6

98 MPH isn't reckless. It could be reckless, depending on the situation (other cars, road, weather, etc). Of course the police may think differently.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:56 PM
7

In the right most frame, the middle guy can't see. He shouldn't be cheering (see the small kid in the first frame).
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:45 PM
1

If they still had a voice.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:09 PM
2

So... did the rest of the PTA even see this message?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:29 PM
3

Apparently some women are brought from overseas, locked up and kept under guard while they work as whores. Johns demand whores, which funds the whole operation. Of course, it's far easier just to legalize the second oldest profession on earth. The war on whores hasn't worked any better than the war on drugs. Once it's legalized and regulated, nobody will bother to smuggle in whores. I have no idea how common this human trafficking is.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:23 PM
2

I knew people who owned a company. The talented employees made more than the owners. I guess it was the patriarchy hurting men and women again.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 10:19 PM
1

Right on. Some women are strong, but IMHO most women like to give really gentle massages. Most customers prefer it that way, but I don't think it does any good.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:11 PM
1

I don't disagree that overpopulation is a problem. I will say that we may lose population and instead get the demographics problem.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:39 PM
1

Yes, there's an overpopulation problem. How is that related to the demographic problem? If you have a solid understanding of economics, why don't you understand the demographic problem? In the USA, 47.6% of the population are too old or too young to produce<sup>[1].</sup> They're retired, or kids, or going to University. We call them dependents. They rely on those who do work. As people live longer, there are relatively fewer producers per dependent. If the population is shrinking due to low bir…
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:33 PM
1

But when people wait until later in life to have kids, the annual birth rate goes down, but the lifetime birth rate stays the same. So the ratio of workers to retirees really stays relatively steady. What are you on? Many first world countries are losing population these days (USA is still an exception).
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:10 PM
1

No, but it can shrink for a very long time. Since people are also living longer, we'll have a whole ton of old folks to care for that entire time. That's why it's an alarming fact.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 06:01 PM
2

Social security? The number of producers (working age people) versus consumers (too old to work)?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:52 PM
-3

It's based on the quack-science assumption that men must inherently live shorter lives and therefore closing the gap by any amount is by definition misogyny. No, that's not feminist science. That's just a fact of nature. It's well accepted by mainstream, serious scientists. Testosterone isn't healthy. Among other effects, it weakens the immune system. It's essentially evidence that your genes are so strong, you can thrive even with that much testosterone. Finger length and a deep voice are indic…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:40 PM
3

research shows men are HALF of DV victims so women get ALL the federal dollars for abuse while men get..JAIL for BEING abused. Jail's far more expensive. Men once against getting all the privilege/s.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:38 PM
2

It's a joke. In my post, mm is millimeters.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 10:35 PM
12

No, she was awarded 1.5mm. Be glad they didn't award more! If you give a woman like that an inch, she'll take a mile.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 08:51 PM
3

Yeah, okay. Pro athletes are a select group, and can handle any bad behavior in the locker room. I guess we agree.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:25 PM
0

I think we can convince the barely-feminist crowd (maybe). I'd love to have an audience, once I master persuasion through practice. We should all aim for that.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:12 PM
1

Yeah, I don't think we can convince anyone who's that into feminism. Most feminists (like any group) aren't that into it, they just go along with the basic arguments. Every time we convince a mild feminist, that's one less person arguing against us and one more arguing for us.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:10 PM
1

That's one strategy. Would it work better? I want to be effective.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 10:07 PM
1

We should help each other to become more convincing. We need to convince the mainstream, and convincing our foes (when possible) helps even more. Trying to convince people without sounding like a jackass to the uninitiated is tough. Especially when it's an emotional issue like rape. Please give me some advice on how I make more of these opportunities to convince. How can I best take advantage of bullshit claims like "the prevalence of rape in the US is about 12 times higher than India"? Is it be…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:21 PM
9

Not a problem. They're welcome to try the course, and they're welcome to pass if they're good enough. Equal standards, fair treatment, unequal results. Again, not a problem.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 09:00 PM
1

Actually I care more about lowering the bar for firefighters.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:59 PM
1

Legally speaking, there are plenty of ways to "get raped" with consent. I'm not creative enough to figure out a way to rape yourself though.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:58 PM
3

I like your style.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:55 PM
12

There's no point in reporting such posts. They're only mildly discouraged.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:54 PM
2

I have no idea. I'm not Canadian.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:39 PM
1

The point is, people intentionally didn't link to the place they mention.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:22 PM
6

Maybe that is their motive, but the point remains. Why is it wrong for opposite sex heterosexuals to shower together but fine for same sex homosexuals to shower together? Why is one parties objection alright, and the other parties exception wrong?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:03 PM
6

I hope those women were publicly corrected in their behavior.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:00 PM
2

I don't think the bot has ever corrected me. It's just adding noise to the conversations. We don't need it, it doesn't help, and it's annoying. And it has no feeling to hurt when we ban it.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:56 PM
4

Let's work to redefine "rape culture" to mean this sort of shit. This really is rape culture.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:57 PM
2

A bot does not have free speech rights. What are you thinking? I hope you've disabled all your email spam filters too, so that the bots can freely inform you about Viagra and Nigeria.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:54 PM
3

the CFS passed an un-debated motion which proactively prohibited groups focused on men’s issues from existing as any campus in Canada. Hate group. Are the American student groups nearly this bad? It's been nonstop hate-sanity from the Canadian side.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:51 PM
0

Whatever happened to debate? Do you realize that Universities are just part of the education factory? They don't need your ideas or free thought, they just need to make Doctors and Lawyers and Social Justi Social Scientists.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:39 PM
1

Well she's right. Men will be extinct in 5 million years. Correction, 100 years. No way we're going to survive ourselves. Of course women won't survive any longer.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:37 PM
1

You might think it helpful, but out of the two dozen "corrections" I've seen it make, nobody appreciated any of them. People intentionally use broken links because they don't want a blue link in their post.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 05:25 PM
0

A formal study? Not that I know. However I've been to a lot of places and boys seem consistently more rambunctious and energetic than girls. A formal study will just solidify what's already known.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:01 AM
1

These differences have been seen literally as early as 24 hours after birth. Or well before birth with scans.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:59 AM
3

I'd like to mention that Salon is feminist rag, when they're not busy trying to make their readers angry like Fox. I say this as a moderate leftist, I just hate that magazine in particular. I used to pay to subscribe to it, too. The point is that feminists who were (unintentionally) responsible for these anti-male changes to the school system have been drawn in when their sons are hurt. Family trumps ideology for most crazies, thankfully. Oh, did you think she's just a normal non-crazy staff wri…
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:12 AM
15

I love how the police search their entire database for any match on a shred of evidence (semen in this case). DNA testing is nowhere near as exact as you'd think, and requires interpretation to determine a match. I'm sure they'll start finding evidence against the new guy now. Question. The statute of limitations already expired, can they really un-expire it for him?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:04 AM
23

meh. I fear you're all being wee bit sensitive on this one.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:57 PM
2

It's hard to concentrate on those who passively oppose us (aka 'the system') when we're being attacked by those who actively oppose us. If we manage to defeat our vocal enemies, I think the passive enemies (who haven't dedicated their lives to feminism) will be more easily convinced.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:02 PM
8

Mods, could we ban this bot already? It's awful.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 09:52 PM
1

Like a lot of social problems, it's not a conspiracy of people who hate boys. There are only a few of those people. It's just a bad system that doesn't help boys learn, and everyone else is just doing their best to help. The doctors certainly aren't prescribing pills to hurt you. It's actually worse this way. If it was an evil conspiracy then you could expose it and end it. The status quo is much harder to end.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:37 PM
1

The word is cite. That should be obvious because I used that word in both previous comments. At this point I not only doubt your research claims, I doubt you attended any university and I doubt you could identify research if it bit you on the ass. In the future, cite sources for big claims so that you don't end up looking like a fool.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:29 PM
1

You still didn't provide a citation. You're making a big claim and you need a link to support it.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 04:52 PM
1

This is one of those issues where you can't exactly blame individuals but as a society we're really fucking up.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 11:02 PM
5

Take your misdirected anger back to SRS and subRedditDrama. Nobody here respects crazy people.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:43 PM
1

A sane feminist would believe that women were disadvantaged, and would aim for a practical equality. This is opposed to the common feminist (or as they call it, the straw feminist) who just hates men. You couldn't make an analogous KKK story because whites were privileged. The closer analogy would be a sane Black Panther. This discussion is pointless so I'm ending it here.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:41 PM
1

Sounds good. I wonder if these boy friendly schools are common.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:31 PM
11

EDIT: this user is a troll who baits then posts to SRS and SubredditDrama. Do not talk to the troll. What? They compared sexist messages to racist messages to make a point. The implicit presumption behind the whole argument is that racism is wrong, this sexism is the same, thus sexism is wrong. I'm sorry that racism is your hot-button form of discrimination, but that doesn't mean the rest of us can't fight other forms of discrimination.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:30 PM
3

The existence of this product is only mildly offensive. However I would immediately dislike anyone who owned such an item.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:28 PM
3

I'm particularly interested in alternate education systems. Which have been shown to work well for boys?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 10:16 PM
1

Thanks for sharing. As an adult you can decide to take drugs. Kids aren't ready to make those informed choices, so I have a lot more concern about drugging them. Do some people have real defects and need these drugs? Probably. Is there any reasonable explanation for drugging 10% or 20% of high school boys? Hell no, something's very, very wrong.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 09:54 PM
-1

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights01/04/13 09:51 PM
1

If those issues were ignored, then they actually would be valid MR issues.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 09:51 PM
27

Upvote for entirely appropriate level of offensive comment.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 09:38 PM
6

If you don't provide any context, you haven't actually added to the discussion.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 08:43 PM
3

I think we both have valid interpretations of what she said. Since feminists seem to think that drunk sex is always rape, I'm going to stick with my interpretation.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 08:34 PM
2

My my, you are hateful. A sane feminist we can agree with not impossible, just unknown to modern man.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 08:21 PM
-1

a rape case can be successfully prosecuted even when the victim was drunk and flirtatious [...] is a victory for justice as well as women’s rights. What a disappointment. The author was so likeable until the very end of the article. A woman who goes out, drinks until she's tipsy, flirts, and has consensual sex was not raped. She went out to get laid, she drank to get laid, she flirted to get laid, and she had sex to get laid. Mission fucking accomplished.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 08:20 PM
0

their inattention is a powerful tool for noticing anything that might be wrong. ??? it is important we address this issue without the mantle of sex on anyone's shoulders. Referring to something as a "War on Boys" might anger feminists into working against it. A decent argument, but someone needs to champion the issue. I don't see anyone else working the issue, even though it has broad support and people know about the issue. I think we need to take up the issue because nobody else is.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 08:03 PM
2

Thank you. I can't say I agree with them but at least I know the position.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 07:50 PM
3

If there are sane feminists, we should probably reach out to them. We can use friends.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 07:47 PM
-2

Okay, then we're just arguing over definitions. More importantly 10% of HS boys are taking these mind altering pills.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:39 PM
-4

If it's hurting people, I think it's an attack. Even if nobody means it that way.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:27 PM
4

Okay, but if it mostly hurts boys it's a MR issue.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:25 PM
6

Discussion in /r/news. If 1 in 10 boys are medicated, and as many again have been diagnosed as ADHD, aren't we just diagnosing them as boys? A disorder just can not effect 19% of an age group without some significant cause. Alternately, are we somehow raising these children "wrong"? Is there some correlation between ADHD and, say, single parent households? Let's talk about it.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 06:15 PM
5

If not a war on women, what term do you like? There is a clear anti-abortion trend in red states in the USA. Obviously men are effected by this, but women are more effected.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:33 AM
3

Okay. Usually only the pro-life side uses the term "pro abortion". Regardless, will this do for stats?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:31 AM
1

Ever is a big place. Probably somewhere.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:29 AM
1

Were this a 'real thing' targeting women, the post would be just fine by me. Warn the likely victims. Since it's an urban legend linked to rape hysteria, give them a mouthful.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:28 AM
3

USA. Sorry I just assumed :-)
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:26 AM
5

To quote another comment, If you get a woman pregnant, and she wants to abort but can't, you just got fucked over by the system. Enjoy paying for 20 years for a child nobody wanted.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:18 AM
4

And the MRM is only about discrimination I can't say I agree. MRM, to me, is pushing for the rights men should have. In some cases it's in our interest to help women keep their rights too. (And generally women should have equal rights, but biology isn't exactly equal.)
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:17 AM
2

The country, distinct from the country side or 'rural America' :-)
/r/MensRights30/03/13 12:16 AM
4

Nobody I know is pro-abortion. The majority of the country is pro-choice. Even if we disagree here, at least we can agree on some things.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:56 PM
2

That's cool. I meant that she didn't intend to hurt that guy, but the police found him in the end. Thus her plan failed.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:52 PM
3

Financial abortion isn't real today. If you get a woman pregnant, and she wants to abort but can't, you just got fucked over by the system. Enjoy paying for 20 years for a child nobody wanted. Thus abortion rights are an MRA issue too.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:44 PM
1

People should be allowed to do what they want so long as nobody gets hurt. At least, nobody who doesn't ask to get hurt a la BDSM. He had enough documentation to get out of jail free. Not a total moron.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:36 PM
2

Her plan to hurt nobody backfired when the police actually investigated.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:33 PM
1

I've only read a few of his articles (a while back). They seemed okay. Do you have examples to back your assertions?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:31 PM
2

Any particular reason to believe one side over the other?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:27 PM
4

This issue may be the only issue on which MRAs agree with Feminists.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:21 PM
10

I admire his writing style. Writing articles that mock the people you want to listen to you is not going to get them to trust you. It will only make them resent you more because you are showing how little you respect them. I need to take lessons.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:02 PM
-2

Great article. This is the type of well reasoned, factual, non-hateful article we need here. Well worth the read!
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:27 PM
8

Strange story. Abortion isn't allowed after 26 weeks, right? A child born at that age has a poor chance of survival even with very expensive intervention. Furthermore, you'd have to really botch the surgery for the child to just pop out alive. This is just a strange story about a completely hypothetical situation.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 10:10 PM
2

So... um... did the anchor just ad-lib that bad line or what? Sincerely boring news story.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:50 PM
2

I'm scratching my head reading your comment. I'm not arguing against your main point because it's valid. I am arguing against one detail because you were wrong. One counter example does disprove an "everyone" statement. I have no idea how your response makes any sense at all.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:14 PM
0

You're right when you say "most people" do, but wrong if you say "no one" doesn't. Some people really will fight for what they believe, that's all.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:12 PM
1

Thank you for sharing. Why don't you see rape as being wrong? The way I see it, violating the law isn't closely related to "doing wrong". Many laws are terrible, and the rest are flawed. What about it makes you feel that way? As a guy, rape accusations are a threat that could appear at any time. A very dangerous threat, because more than half of the "innocence project" acquittals were originally convicted of rape. It's an emotional issue and a lot of innocent men are convicted. It's also an easy…
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:49 PM
1

I'm afraid not. He's saying that it will actually create animosity towards MRM because the "one beer is rape" bit is a lie. Alternately he's so vague there's no way to know.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:28 PM
4

Article is just bait. Don't bite.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:21 PM
3

no one wants to "equalize" something that would result in a downgrade for them. Counter example: white Americans fought against slavery. Even in the south.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:20 PM
2

Loran said she has a problem with groups like NCFM because they often see rights for others as a threat to their own. I swear, so many groups project their own problems onto others. Isn't it the feminists who fear Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:27 PM
2

So how many beers can a woman have before it's rape? Zero? One? Ten? Depends entirely on who you ask?
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:18 PM
2

Emilie Loran, co-director at the UM Women’s Resource Center: “I think that idea is insulting to women to say you need a babysitter, and it’s insulting to men. I would argue that that’s a certain way that feminism can help men much more than any men’s rights group” Yes, the laws are very insulting towards women, and dangerous to men. I agree that feminism really could help with those problems, if they'd stop being the problem.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:13 PM
3

Exactly right. People don't subscribe because they don't want to.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:07 PM
3

Friend, I like your turn of phrase. I think we should use that phrase more, "professional feminist".
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:15 PM
6

It's probably best to avoid the friends too.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:41 PM
0

I washed her car, forget the bucket in her driveway, she called on the phone and demanded I "get the fuck down here and pick this up" I'm glad you grew some balls. That's instant break-up material unless she sincerely apologizes for it.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:40 PM
3

That's an interesting topic. I'd like to talk about it, and maybe you can help me see the problem. So there's a couple, and they have sex. Many times. One time, one partner (let's say 'she' for simplicity) doesn't want to, and the other partner ('he') forces the issue. Now my problem with rape isn't "rape is wrong"; I just don't see the world that way. My problem is when people get hurt when they didn't want to be hurt. The main damage from rape, I think, is psychological damage. Help me to see …
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:43 PM
3

Why are we talking about the latest trash from Huffington? They're a rag; ignore them.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 08:30 PM
8

So is this a false-flag twitter account or not?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:59 PM
1

That's the main question about this story.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:58 PM
1

If she'd testified that they had sex and she liked it, but later realized it was very wrong, that probably would have worked. Instead she testified they were estranged over the issue. An obvious lie.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:48 PM
6

The lawyers took it.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 05:47 PM
1

/r/fvf has 56 readers. It probably had 30 before this article. HuffPo, stirrin' trouble as always.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:04 AM
1

Yeah sure, but mostly it's about the sex.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 12:01 AM
1

find me an example where freed slaves immediately became slave owners? There's not much modern slavery in the news, but then again slavery is just your exaggeration. How about a few examples of "slaves make the worst masters"? Jews in the ghettos compared to how Israelis treat Palestinians today. Hutus and Tutsis in Rwanda and the genocide. Blacks and whites in Zimbabwe Most colonies rules by the British, who often elevated a minority into power. After the British left, guess what?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:56 PM
1

There's probably a limit to how far the pendulum can swing against men. If young men can't find work or some way to feel useful they'll turn to violence, and eventually revolution. It's the same everywhere, women may protest and complain but men overthrow governments. If you think this is sexist or demeans men, I humbly ask that you take a moment and consider whether it's not the honest truth.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:44 PM
3

I wonder what kind of person pays for any dating site.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:34 PM
12

This is an ESL class for shy foreign women, likely from Muslim nations. Australia gets a lot of these immigrants and they really do need these classes. You realize they might not even be allowed to attend normal classes?
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:31 PM
5

Now that is something I have a problem with. This ESL for shy foreign women course is just fine.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:30 PM
5

I agree.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:29 PM
9

I don't have a problem with this one. Why? It's a remedial English (as a second language) class for shy foreign women. Many foreign cultures teach women to be very shy around men, and Australia certainly gets people from those cultures. So what? Let them have their safe space because they really need it.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 11:28 PM
1

You linked to the daily mail. That site is a rag and nothing they say deserves our attention.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:23 PM
11

Fair enough. In this case Feminism means exactly what you would expect from the origin of the word. The movement always has been and continues to be about women.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 10:22 PM
1

I like your idea. I'm not Canadian though :-(
/r/MensRights26/03/13 09:55 PM
1

Good idea, but only if you hate your job.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:24 PM
23

My point is that this [men slouching] is part and parcel of the kind of oppression that leads to women being raped, getting lower salaries, and being exposed to violence in relationships. Do you know the #1 thing I think of when I think of Swedes? Married couples on vacation to Cyprus. Honestly, it's famous. He'll get plastered and she'll fuck the locals. Actually young guys seducing tourist women is a common occupation in most beach resorts, but the Swedes are just plain eager for it. I have to…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:13 PM
55

The horror dates I had to indulge for the simple sake of a meal. Yeah. [the] majority of my girlfriends thought it was a brilliant idea whereas my guy friends thought I was the lowest of lowest. Rampant female sexism right there. Looking back, I truly didn't see the harm in my actions. God, she really makes me angry. She has zero empathy for men (or anyone?) He called me a low-rate prostitute Hey, at least both parties agree to those deals. She's lied to and stole from over 60 guys. Yes, worse t…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 10:36 PM
2

George's statement was too short to have a clear meaning. It's all in how you interpret it, and it can be interpreted as MRA positive or completely feminist if you so choose.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:52 PM
0

Isn't this against rule #2 over on the right? Does taking a screenshot of Gawker make it alright?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:50 PM
3

I learned he was 'blackout drunk' but I couldn't tell - he seemed pretty OK walking & conversation; you could tell he was drunk but it didn't seem terrible. That's probably a good lesson for everyone. You might not realize how drunk they really are.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 09:12 PM
1

A valid argument.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:51 PM
1

Abortion is a politicized issue. Both sides are talking right past each other, and nobody listens.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 06:47 PM
4

This isn't /r/politics and I don't like talking about politics in here too much. H.C. is obviously bad for MR so I think that's fair game. Since you asked, I despise the GOP only slightly more than I despise the DP. If you can't find bountiful reason to despise both parties, I'm afraid you're not looking critically.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:59 AM
4

I believe that our system has guided parents into making worse choices for kids. I'm not sure if welfare enables single mothers to stay single, but I am sure that state mandated child support does. If mothers can afford to be a single parent, some of them will choose to be a single parent. Children without a father do far worse in school and in life. If everyone knew that they'd have to earn<sup>*</sup> financial support for their children, we'd have fewer single parent children and fewer stepch…
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:57 AM
2

Why do you assume any of us are one issue voters? That's insulting. This is one of the issues I care about. I also dislike her record on censorship and I.P. There's plenty of time this far before the election to focus on one issue at a time.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 12:13 AM
4

Good article. Not directly MR related but worth the read.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 11:04 PM
2

Who is the NSPCC and do they matter?
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:23 PM
6

I fear it will take the male victim pulling a gun and killing his spouse to prevent the assault before journalists finally take these incidents seriously. I very much look forward to the wailing and gnashing of teeth when the police refuse to press charges on the man after such a clearly justified homicide.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 10:15 PM
8

Everyone I know who "thought that way" has died of old age. I'm not even sure how much they believed it. The feminists are fighting an imaginary enemy, which they project onto all men.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:40 PM
8

Well I've got to hand it to those feminists: it's tough to be more offensive than an anti-abortion crusader, but they managed. They really managed. Last week at the University of Toronto, for example, someone pulled a fire alarm to try to stop a lecture by a men’s rights activist. A few months previously, another speaker invited by the same student group drew such a large protest that police intervened to protect a classroom. That's pure desperation.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:35 PM
3

The age of this post aside, the IMF has been pushing terrible policies on countries for decades. If there's one thing they've proven, it's that their monetary policies don't work.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 06:29 PM
1

Is it still Ladies' Night with no men around? Sounds more like hate-group night.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 07:52 PM
1

Come on guys. Think this one through. A lot of homeless veterans come from past decades when women were very rare in the military. If they're currently 14% of the military, and currently 10% of homeless veterans, then it's entirely plausible that women have more problems dealing with military stress. [women] are now the fastest growing segment of the homeless population Of course, the answer is to help all veterans. I have no idea why we don't.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:27 PM
2

Do you think they even have $60,000?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:10 PM
3

Police said, "there wasn't enough evidence either way" to charge them with making a false report. Bull fucking shit, what typical lazy cops.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 07:09 PM
2

Too damned repetitive.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:08 AM
1

Anyone who wants a divorce should get one. Misery is not the goal.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 12:02 AM
2

Slate's debut of a new advice-for-men column called the Gentleman Scholar Men's advice from a feminist rag. Oh yeah, count me in.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:48 PM
16

Crazy woman is crazy. Fortunately these incidents are very rare.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:45 PM
1

I'm only responding to what you said. "sexy teacher sites" and "banging hot teachers" sound like porn sites to me. Those people don't care about her at all, but they want the search traffic and hope those people are looking for sexy teachers. Just a sleazy money making scheme.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:40 PM
3

they celebrate her They make money off her name.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:00 PM
1

Okay, I'll keep this brief. He says they didn't have sex. She says they did. Police ask her friend, who heard they had sex. Police ask his friend who says he looked happy and maybe he got laid? Now he's branded a liar and has no credibility. It pretty well looks like he's a rapist. Best to keep quiet.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:02 AM
1

Yeah. Looks like someone came through to downvote this discussion. I think it's good to have a non-hateful but phrase to insult crazy feminists with.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:57 AM
3

Quote from another discussion: The gist of it is that people attending this conference were expecting it be about computer security. One of the invited speakers decided to make their talk about drug use during sex, and didn't let anyone know about this until a few hours before they were scheduled to present. The conference organizers asked the Ada Initiative what they thought about this, and they told them it would make the women at the conference uncomfortable, so the conference organizers canc…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:54 AM
10

"He" in my post refers to the conference organizer.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:52 AM
1

I would expect to see news items if rape quintupled in Sweden.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:29 PM
1

I'm afraid that the practice of justice is far more complicated than that. He really shouldn't say word one and give the police nothing to base a case on.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:27 PM
0

Yeah. I had a hard time because the obvious insults like slut or whore just aren't appropriate. Shrew is pretty good.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:25 PM
0

Good suggestions. I guess I'm looking for something with around 5 syllables because I can really bite into phrases around that length. Just like women can do with "male chauvinist pig." What do you think of this one? (you) man hating harpy!
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:21 PM
2

Good topic, too brief to be worthwhile.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:14 PM
3

Yes, I have a penis (i.imgur.com) I'm not clicking on that link.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:09 PM
1

I've heard, anecdotally, that you're correct.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:08 PM
2

There's no excuse not to hire women for those jobs, if she's able. Food service actually does have an excuse.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:07 PM
1

IMHO, they did you a favor being so honest. Restaurants have a legitimate reason to hire certain people. This restaurant probably wants male customers, and you'll do far better working where they want female customers. Really, you'll earn better tips. I think the more shitty (and more legal) thing would be for them to take the application and just never consider you. At least they're honest.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:06 PM
1

That's great. He should ask the manager to respond with, "No problem. More than 50% of the women in managements positions are women, in this department."
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:02 PM
1

Your comment can be interpreted... badly. In fact I'm not sure what the non-offensive interpretation is.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:00 PM
0

BCC yourself. If you CC yourself it's not anonymous.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:58 PM
3

Correct, it's a hostile work environment. They're asking to get sued. Document and make official complaints. If they're actually dumb enough not to stop, then you're left with a case.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:57 PM
16

Nope. A real psychopath would have made it look believable. This women is just a terrible liar and a bad person.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:55 PM
1

Somewhat related, what's the female equivalent to a "male chauvinist pig"? Something I can use without looking like an ass, so no hyper-offensive words please.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:50 PM
11

Stolen quote: Discussing sex creates a “sexualized environment” which many people take as a signal to treat women as sexual objects rather than as fellow conference attendees, resulting in a higher incidence of harassment and assault of women. Too many women have been raped at technical conferences; we should do everything we can to prevent future rapes.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:44 PM
6

Well, feminists have nothing to add to any situation where the truth matters. I think they have a lot to add to psychology, though it saddens me that I couldn't write "abnormal psychology."
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:35 PM
37

A "feminist organization" didn't have her talk removed, a man who wanted to avoid conflict did. After a feminist organization pushed and threatened him. He caved, and that's sad, feminists threatened, and that's bad. Bad is worse than sad.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:33 PM
10

As twisted as your comment is, I think you have a point.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:32 PM
2

Not funny man. Her punishment is prison, not rape.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:14 PM
4

This just highlights the need for rape shield laws, to prevent the defense from bringing up this unrelated baggage at trial. It's truly wrong to question your accuser, and should be allowed just because it's been a part of our justice system since the British ran things. ^<sup>/s</sup>
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:12 PM
7

I admit, the vandalism made me question the speaker. Is the accusation true?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:17 AM
3

Why do you think it'll get easier?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 12:09 AM
1

I'm likewise uninterested in all the rape stories from third world countries, because that's not where most of us live. We can't change other countries; they must change themselves.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 11:56 PM
1

Well the story is 95% about racism rather than gender issues, is about South Africa where I doubt many of us live, and generally has little to do with the issues we struggle with.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 07:36 PM
1

Some states have laws that require prosecution of accused rapists. Why don't we have laws requiring prosecution of false accusers? Seems ripe for abuse.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:30 PM
3

so, who's really lying? Ask /r/legaladvice. No really, go ask them.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:29 PM
1

soi-disant: self-proclaimed, so-called.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:20 PM
1

That would be valid, except your post didn't sound that way. Why did your author name get deleted?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 10:18 PM
1

intensely_human, this is a dishonest post. Most of the comments were along these lines. This is a response to the one comment about telling authorities before telling him. Any new comments are from SRS and should be disregarded.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:28 PM
0

This story, while disturbing, doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:10 PM
2

Okay, now what's the response gesture the article mentioned?
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:00 PM
2

At first I wondered why this article was posted, but now I get it. Belittling men is psychologically damaging. I just have to ask, what's the gesture he refers to in the article?
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:12 PM
2

Pleasure or pain, depending on the girl. Women vary greatly.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:10 PM
1

Do those drugstore tests work reliably?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:44 PM
0

This fact is generally accepted in biology, though he got it slightly wrong. 10% of children are misinformed about who their father is.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:44 PM
1

The court acted within the requirements of the law. From the quotes, I think the Judge would have sided with the poor guy if he could find a way. I'm glad we still have some good Judges, but the laws need to change!
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:42 PM
1

Nice! I'll show this every time someone tells me to control my kids.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 10:48 PM
1

Fuck off, religitard! You presume much.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:17 PM
1

Where truth is irrelevant to our movement, solidarity is clearly more important. Atheists vs Christians is irrelevant here.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:14 PM
-1

Case 2? I don't know. Sometimes argument is helpful, but I wouldn't want to see MRAs hate each other because of a troll.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:53 PM
2

Really, I never knew that. It seems a big thing with some of the Christians I know, and it IS in the Bible, so I'd expect regular Christians wouldn't like that post either.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:49 PM
2

lol, I'm pretty sure everyone knows of some crazy radical Christians. I even know some personally. It's just that some less radical Christians take it personally and that pisses 'em off when they were on our side.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:48 PM
-6

Maybe, but the subject is brought up pretty often in comments. The price we pay as we drive others away is far higher than any benefit we get from the discussion.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:37 PM
0

We shouldn't discuss it here because it divides us. We need to work together to achieve our goals. In an academic setting where honesty is paramount, I would encourage this discussion. In this setting where Men's Rights are paramount, I discourage it.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:18 PM
0

wouldn't it be better to treat posts and comments on their merits and abandon concern with the thoughts of others, except in so far as they are willing to share them with us for our benefit. In a purely academic setting, yes absolutely. But we're trying to change the world, and we need friends to help us. We've come together over one issue, and it's easy to divide us over the issues where we disagree. Divisive issues are how political parties break other parties and keep them from power, and Rel…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:16 PM
0

Okay, your question was: Is it normal for a Christian to believe in the War on Christianity? I have no idea. Honest answer. Every group has enemies though, from the NRA to Feminists to Christians to Democrats to fishermen to the nuclear power industry. If some Christians feel they have enemies, well I'm sure they do. I answered your question, now I'd like to stop talking about this divisive subject on r/MR, except for my point that it IS a divisive subject.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:09 PM
-4

Naw man, I post quite a bit here and I don't troll. You don't believe me, so go post the image in some Christian forum and see what reaction you get. A man should know when he's being played.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:01 PM
0

Is it normal for a Christian to believe in the War on Christianity. Don't care, not my fight. This is r/MR. I'm afraid of MRA turning into an echo chamber as senseless and outrage-loving as feminism I can agree with you there, but think about this: what better way to ensure an echo chamber than to drive out diversity? If we're all the same, who's left to call us on our bullshit? And we do have some bullshit at times :-)
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:55 PM
-2

These may be two perfectly good reasons [but] they have nothing to do with trolling. Those are reasons we shouldn't have "a discussion about the similarities between fundamentalist christians and radical feminists" here in r/MR. It's trolling because a new account posted some very divisive topic to make us fight. I assume you concede this point. Sure, Christians and Atheists aren't my fight.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:53 PM
1

The success of a troll is the degree to which people liked it? Naw man, the success is when it pisses people off and they argue. Like how you just downvoted me. Aren't we on the same side here?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:45 PM
-1

You've got your opinions, as do I. But do you really care about Men's Rights? If so, take those opinions elsewhere.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:41 PM
-4

Why should we not have a discussion about the similarities between fundamentalist christians and radical feminists? Two reasons: It doesn't help us achieve the Men's Rights we sorely need. It divides us and drives away our allies.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:39 PM
0

I'm talking about MRAs. We have goals; let's work together to achieve them instead of failing because we can't get along.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:36 PM
-4

If the post removed the word "radical" it would still make sense. It's a little troll trick. You think you're talking about radical Christians because, y'know, the post said that. Christians see that it applies to all Christians and take it personally. Both sides are right, and now we're arguing with each other.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:36 PM
-3

the post ringed true. To you it did. That's the beauty of a good troll. And maybe you're right, but you're hurting the cause by saying it. Let's focus on one issue here lest we get divided.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:34 PM
0

Our activism won't succeed if you alienate everyone including your fellow activists. You're digging our grave instead of helping us achieve equality and basic rights.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:28 PM
1

I'm glad you have thick skin, but some people were put off by it.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:25 PM
1

Sure. Your choice of language is offending people who agree with you, and that's the problem.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:35 PM
1

That's not the message that comes across to me. Rather, it's the inescapable brutality of the male nature and the inevitable consequences. I think you have an defensible but minority interpretation. Most people would see an ad against domestic violence. I think the implication that men beat women (and nothing said for the opposite) is this organization trying for emotional impact for their intended message.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:31 PM
1

If they're pressing charges, yes.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:23 PM
1

Well, they tried. It's hard to see your own cultural bias.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:21 PM
1

Yeah, this is the top voted post in the sub right now. Really face-palm worthy. We need moderation here.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:56 PM
1

Inappropriate.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:54 PM
0

More likely any trolls would upvote this post, because it's divisive.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:53 PM
4

Stop doing this. You've just insulted any Christian MRAs. We're here because we agree on one thing, not because we agree on everything. And we need all the help we can get right now. Don't divide us.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:52 PM
9

Yeah, compare the original and your version. The original had very short sentences making it quick and easy to read. I suggest you mimic them there. I further suggest you don't use the word 'and' in the middle of any lines, because that usually means your sentence is too long.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:53 PM
-2

I doubt they switched it because they're going for effect. I do appreciate that they don't imply which parent was abusing.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:19 PM
1

The articles quote the police. The police insist he's guilty. This is normal. The important detail is that they didn't name the accused. This is a big step up from what American news outlets do. It's hard to slander an unnamed person.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:16 PM
1

Who's avazz and do they matter?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:08 PM
7

I think he overreacted. Everyone cares about appearance, and the poster didn't seem hateful to me.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:04 PM
1

I think you posted this in the wrong forum. If you’re a woman that premature balding is a turn-off and guys, they wonder what they can do to avoid this same fate. WTF does that even mean?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 11:01 PM
6

Good idea, awkward wording. I think you could do better.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:59 PM
6

It states that the boy in the picture will grow up to beat his wife. Yeah they're exaggerating for effect, depending on how you view the ad. The "twice as likely" is a baseless statistic. Twice as likely as what? Twice as likely as children who didn't grow up in an abusive home. If they had another ad about a girl beating her future husband, would that balance things out? I don't think so. It would just make it twice as bad. You know they're trying to give abusive parents a reason to stop domest…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:56 PM
1

Downvoted because it's been posted too many times.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:52 PM
-18

Honestly I don't like cutting but Africa has serious HIV problems. This probably improves their quality of life overall.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:51 PM
14

I'm really proud of France. They're really showing us the path<sup>*.</sup> <sup>*</sup> <sup>The</sup> <sup>path</sup> <sup>to</sup> <sup>avoid.</sup>
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:49 PM
8

This feels like 10% of the story. How did they manage to cancel the conference? Who did they complain to?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:45 PM
5

Tests can be very discriminatory. SAT tests, for example, have been shown to discriminate against those who aren't middle class white kids. These tests assume certain cultural knowledge in the questions.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:45 PM
2

Test scores... they’re absolutely not the end-all, be-all. She's right about that, test scores aren't everything. The problem comes when you discriminate against one gender when you select other things grade on.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:43 PM
7

I've seen this story a few times in the last month.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:36 PM
3

What's the problem with the ad? Do you think they're lying? If they had another ad about a girl beating her future husband, would that balance things out?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 09:31 PM
1

I expect a lot more than 5% will become abusers. Abuse victims will likely need therapy and you probably can't really fix kids until they're older. Placing these kids in a situation where they're likely to abuse others makes life worse for both the original victim and the new ones. Victims of abuse are fucked over, and the likelihood that they'll become abusers is a big part of their problems. The answer isn't to let them abuse because they're victims, the answer is to take reasonable steps to h…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 11:12 PM
1

Sample size of 1? Thanks for that. Even if just 5% of abused children turn around and abuse others, that's cause for concern from the parents as shown in the article. I happen to know two people who were abused and became abusers. I also know one who (presumably) didn't.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:11 PM
0

First off, Anarchists such as yourself should call others bad names. Second, no country in the world is both industrialized AND self sufficient. Super powers even less so, as using resources from other places is a core part of being a super power. You want to abolish government and turn the USA into a mediocre power. Good thing you won't find many Americans to help you stroll down Stupid Avenue.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 12:31 AM
1

Please. Abuse begets abuse. Look at the effect of spousal violence on kids. Look at children who were directly hit. Look at conservative homophobes. Hell, look at Israel. Unless you have good studies to refute these claims, you have no basis to reject them out of hand.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 12:26 AM
2

O...K. Run that by /r/askLegal or whatever and I might believe you have something.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:44 PM
2

If you don't serve, you can't stop any official lynch mobs. Were I able, I'd serve and always vote innocent. Let the police handle real investigation and punishment.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:43 PM
1

Wow, that is a good list. Makes the OP list look... inadequate.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:10 PM
3

Adults can consent to violence. They can also decide you're a bad person and leave later. What they'd better not do is consent to play violence and then call the cops.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:09 PM
4

Access to natural resources (globally) does affect the safety and security of the United States of America.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 10:01 PM
0

To be fair, they did ride the bicycle at least once...
/r/MensRights04/02/13 09:58 PM
2

Victims of sexual abuse are likely to become predators. The girl was probably abused, and she brought that on the boys. Now the boys were victims but at least a few of them are likely to turn around and continue the chain. It's very sad, but the victims become the predators. That's what the parents in the article are saying. They realize that their poor son might cause more problems at another daycare, and they're very concerned.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 09:56 PM
0

Sure. I'm telling others :-)
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:49 PM
1

You forgot the link OP
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:50 PM
2

Don't downvote the femi poo posts. They're quite well upvoted right now. Leave them for posterity.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:48 PM
1

He's using a clever ploy. He works for a trash paper. In contrast to their regular shit articles, his look very reasonable even if they offend feminists.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:46 PM
2

Yes, quite the correlation but let's not jump to conclusions. There are several unknowns on the list. Perhaps women are more deliberate when planning their crimes, and less likely to be caught? Perhaps the police just catch a man and railroad him through the system. Perhaps there's a difference between America and Americas. Perhaps female killers just aren't effective enough to make the top 100+ list. Perhaps females just prefer to kill people closer to them. Perhaps some of these were female pr…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:44 PM
-1

You're at least the 3rd person to post this here. Others pointed to the original over in r/guns.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:23 PM
4

The more of us who check new, the less power they have.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:30 PM
1

Where's the double standard? She's as good as fired, just as a man would be.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:55 PM
2

Racist SaelPalani aka DianaBoston: Proof that a Public Radical Feminist is RACIST One instance proves nothing.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:54 PM
2

That's probably good advice. I doubt any other country will enforce family court rulings.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:50 PM
1

This keeps getting submitted but nobody cares. So I ask, what does this mean for the MRM?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:36 PM
2

This keeps getting submitted but nobody cares. So I ask, what does this mean for the MRM?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:35 PM
11

while what you describe was cruel, it probably did not cross into legally punishable physical or sexual abuse. I doubt it would count as sexual abuse even if the child was a girl, unless the babysitter was male...
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:34 PM
3

aVFM is run by college students?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:27 PM
6

Agreed. It's also a hate crime and should be recorded that way.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:46 PM
7

Feel free to forward it, but I think they'll need a subpoena to track down the perps. Police are very lazy.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:24 PM
12

This fraternity was chosen at random. All fraternities are sites of conscious self-organization for patriarchal power 2/3 commenters support this random act of violence. They blame all fraternities for their own fear. Real crazy people, those man haters.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:23 PM
1

It's clearly an overreaction to victim blaming. In decades long gone, people half-way believed sayings like, "you can't rape a slut". An overreaction is also wrong. Here's a few comparisons to put things in perspective: "You parked your Lexus THERE? What did you expect?" "You walked through THAT neighborhood at night? What did you expect?" "You walked your drunk-ass self home alone from the bar in THAT part of town in a miniskirt? What did you expect?" A bad choice is a bad choice, and the predi…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 07:18 PM
19

Dunno, better check what reddit we're in.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:34 AM
2

That was a pretty fucked up post and I don't think your image really captured it. I do, however, like your image on its own merits.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 12:33 AM
1

I'm not sure homophobia will ever be fixed, certainly not in my lifetime. In the first world we can at least hope the churches pull back on their rhetoric. Plenty of groups oppose their hate, and that's good. I personally chewed out some anti-gay church protesters some months back. Thing is, I have problems closer to home that effect my life, just as you have problems that effect your life. It's priorities, not hate.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:46 PM
8

I'm not sure that having Fox on our side will help us.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:17 PM
2

You know what? You can largely avoid stupid churches by moving to a real city where gay men are accepted. The rest of us rely on luck to avoid discrimination in divorce, and we'd better get rich to avoid discrimination for our sons in public schools. We have zero traction on these issues so I'd like to focus on these things that effect most of us.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 07:15 PM
19

Title IX requires that a school which receives federal money permit a member of an excluded sex to try out for a single-sex team only if "the athletic opportunities of the excluded sex have previously been limited" That's great news for me. I had no idea Title IX worked both ways. California schools have volleyball leagues for boys and men, but Washington schools (where I have family) have no leagues for boys, only for girls. I look forward to some boys on the girls VB teams!
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:42 AM
0

Honestly we can't afford to fight against the enemy of our enemy.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:35 AM
4

Studies have shown that the average person commits 3 felonies per day. If that doesn't build a healthy disrespect for the law, I don't know what will. I hope someone will link to that study.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:27 AM
3

Sexual compatibility is key to any relationship, especially marriage. Problems in bed can kill a marriage. Your best bet IMHO is working to get her more interested in sex. Figure out what she's into, what turns her on. Your second approach is to make sure she knows how important it is to you, so she can help too.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:25 AM
4

God damn it, you finally made a good post and I have to change my RES tag for you.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 01:17 AM
-3

You don't have a ton of privacy from your SO once you're living together. It's slightly wrong to go through their mail, but it's far worse to continue suspecting them or to not know that they are cheating.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:05 AM
10

Does he try to turn the children against you? Seriously? I know, it's pure projection. The woman who wrote this thought back to the shitty things she'd done and wrote those in.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:51 PM
5

Does he go through your purse or open your mail? Why is this always on the list? I personally caught a cheating wife (who I suspected already) by checking her email. I'm glad I did! What's so bad about that?
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:48 PM
4

The current law arguably creates a welfare-type state for the recipients, also killing their desire to work hard ex-wife never even bothered to get a job This is a perverse incentive all around.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 10:19 PM
2

I'd be ashamed too had I defended SRS. Admitting you have a problem is the first step.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:12 AM
2

They can at least do discoveries to get police reports, statements of witnesses and accuser Heaven help you if that's not enough to win the case :-(
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:53 PM
1

Yeah, depends on the situation.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:52 PM
1

What, it's okay to hate so long as it's a joke? Seriously, that's your argument? And you're a high school teacher? Well easy to disprove that argument: What do you tell a woman with two black eyes? Have you heard that joke? I won't spoil the punchline for you. It's offensive enough by itself. It's far worse to see a thread full of people talking like that. Worse still if most of them aren't even joking. But a whole forum dedicated only to those hate threads? That's a hate group and you're part o…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:48 PM
18

Great work, you've submitted evidence which can be used against you in a court of law. Proving you had sex is probably the biggest hurdle in the case against you. You've neatly removed that obstacle. Don't fucking talk about this at all. Don't even talk about women at all. Don't talk without a real lawyer. Public Defenders often have 1000+ cases at a time, and exist only to help you plea quickly. Remember that your text messages are saved for a while by your provider. If you want them, notify yo…
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:31 PM
15

Public defenders are worthless. Do whatever you can to get a real lawyer.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:26 PM
2

OP, I really love the tips. I think you should arrange with a coworker to screen each others calls. Especially any calls from within the office. I'm sorry Mr. Manager, I can't put you through to wasd because you might say something discriminatory. Also call the DV hotlines listed and ask if they accept male victims. If not, complain to HR.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:11 PM
4

Between 75% and 90% of all hostage taking in the U.S. are [sic] related to domestic violence situations. 99% of the rest are bank robberies gone wrong. And I hear about so many of those. A real scourge on our nation.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:06 PM
1

Just tear it out. Much more reliable.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 11:03 PM
0

Talking about the top story in SRS. This isn't about you except that you frequent SRS. I guess I'm glad SRS doesn't just hate men. Why do I think they're a hate group? That top voted story on SRS is a good example. Someone posts something said on Reddit. (yoga pants and leggings are not cool for teachers) 1 voted comment says, "dirty old man" 2 voted comment about how men can't control themselves 3 voted comment about how men can't control themselves 4 voted comment about how men barely control …
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:12 PM
0

Are you wearing your SRS gynofascist uniform while calling us a hate group? <sup>SRS</sup> <sup>really</sup> <sup>sells</sup> <sup>those.</sup> <sup>No,</sup> <sup>really.</sup>
/r/MensRights25/01/13 08:18 PM
0

Circlejack actually. Female biology and all that. Anyway, to your point, SRS exists to: Discuss perceived slights against women. Insult men for those remarks. Ban dissent for a perfect echo chamber. It's a pure hate group. Talk about the bad things men say, and if you disagree you're banned. How can you not understand that's a hate group? Look at your top voted story. A teacher complains that students in yoga pants sucks for teachers. OMG how awful, men are such pigs. How could they possibly be …
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:59 PM
2

Yes. Also, divorce rate is ~50%, and that includes divorces after the kids are grown and divorces with no kids.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:48 PM
0

r/MR is a reasonable reddit with some extremists who sometimes get upvoted. r/SRS was founded as a hate group and bans dissent. That's a big difference.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:47 PM
4

Great news! I'd like to see similar stories from the US.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:38 PM
2

We study monkeys to better understand ourselves. She quoted the bible 12 times if you can believe it. Still I don't assume they're Christian.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:32 PM
16

Yeah it's mostly not an MR issue. My main complaint is that the clerk didn't call the police. He suggested the victim wash his eyes out.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:26 PM
8

Please. People deserve a ribbing when they're so sensitive like that. She's the person who started being unreasonable. The guy was 100% in the right the whole time, and the woman was 100% crazy from about 5 seconds in.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:22 PM
0

I find it difficult to understand why reasonable people would frequent SRS.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:00 PM
1

He already told them he'd had sex with her, so you're way off base there. The first rule of criminal defense is keep your mouth shut. That part is true. And considering how quickly he was fired, what's the downside to shutting up?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:20 AM
5

The feminists who occasionally comment here (NOT the SRS crew) seemed in favor of it. Why assume they'd hate it?
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter