TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AManAlone Archive

View 2 posts and 829 comments by AManAlone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Pook! Haven't seen you around in forever.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 10:33 PM
1

Preach.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 01:54 PM
2

Maybe. But if I were writing that bill, I'd make sure that there were provisions in it for not being labelled 'father' without their consent, and at the least not presumed to be the father because the mother says so.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 12:26 PM
–

Nowhere in the citation does it say anything about her proving a thing., It says that if the father refuses to sign the paternity form, they'll pursue him as the father.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 02:32 AM
–

No, it isn't. It says that if he refuses to sign a paternity statement they can still come after him for child support. So, as an example, if a woman names me the father of her child, and I refuse, it is up to me to prove that I am not the father of the child. Which requires a DNA test, but in some jurisdictions, IIRC, can only be accepted within 30 days of the original notice of paternal obligation. Meaning, they send me a letter stating I am the 'father' of a child, and I have X amount of time…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 12:21 AM
–

Legal Disputes Over Paternity Legal disputes over paternity commonly concern a father's responsibiity for paying child support. A father’s refusal to sign a paternity statement will not get him off the hook for paying child support. If a father doesn’t voluntarily sign a paternity statement, the state will go to court to establish that he is the father and collect child support. From further in the document you cited.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 01:15 AM
0

If they are focused on the lady, why lesbian porn doesn't pay more? They are focused on heterosexual sex; And you can't have heterosexual sex without a man, therefore, he has as much importance to the final product as the lady does, even if he doesn't know that and accepts his supporting role. Lesbian porn doesn't pay more because there isn't as much of a market for it. The man is quite literally there, mostly, so the fan can imagine themselves in his place. That's literally it. Again; he doesn'…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:26 AM
0

but I have everything against the legitimation of male exploitation by saying "this is the way things are". Logically speaking, this SAME discourse has the potential to legitimize, for instance, alimony laws, which harm men. If this is about MRA, we have to take every symptom of discrimination and be thorough, applying analytical, logical, rhetorical and statistics methods in order to disentangle the condition men are subjected to. But that's my point; it's not discrimination. Men don't get paid…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:43 AM
0

Pardon, the average guy made $300 and I edited that part out. Fans are also there to see the girls, not the guys. Granted, some fans follow dudes just as much as the gals, but mostly fans are after the ladies. Equal pay for equal work. It's like the gaming industry. If there were enough fans out there that wanted more female roles that it could make money, the companies do it. They don't. Conversely, in porn, the dudes are less important than the women. Hazard of the beast.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:04 AM
-1

Well, you also get the opportunity, generally, to transition as well. I've seen and heard more guys go from performing to directing, photography and producing than women, which takes them away from the 'risk'. Also, it doesn't matter how dangerous it is. You know that going into the business. You choose to work in a dangerous environment.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:02 AM
-1

Horseshit. Saying male talent make an average of $300 per scene is horseshit. Maybe if you include gangbangs, or super-high numbered scenes. Maybe then. But as of 2013 the going rate for new male talent was a free scene or two and then pay as low as $200. New girls in the industry made $600-800 depending on how hot they were and what they were willing to do. Also, they usually don't have health insurance and they must pay for their monthly STDs tests. It's their choice to live like this, I'm awa…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:24 AM
0

You aren't paying to work. You're paying to be on set. It means that if you bring money, a big dick, or girls, they'll let you be an extra on set.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:04 AM
5

Well this is all horseshit.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 06:48 PM
3

Holy shit. The actual blog detailing this is so cringe-worthy. I'm enjoying a six-pack and just reading. Got to that link through the vidya, so thanks!
/r/MensRights20/08/14 05:49 AM
-7

Women weren't allowed to stock shelves with the rest of us replaceable grunts. They had to stand at Customer Service, and operate a register. Horrifying. Then! When I worked in porn, they got paid twice as much as men did, sometimes more! WAGE GAP ANYBODY AMIRITE?! In my office, we fired 4 men for being 'too gregarious' at work. They spent all their time outside of their offices bullshitting with each other and not working. Then, we kept on a woman for an extra 9 months of full-salary work when …
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:49 PM
1

She, and they, are referring to the shooting of 6 people at Santa Barbara a few weeks ago. Apparently, since the perpetrator posted on anti-pua forums, that makes him a 'men's rights activist' who killed 4 women and 2 men; oh no wait, 2 women and 4 men, because 'misogyny'. In this day, apparently, anything is misogyny. FML.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 10:35 PM
1

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhh. He did the same thing a few years back; forget the girl's name. From all the scuttlebutt in the industry, he was very prone to violence, even attacking people without provocation. Am I saying I 100% believe everything Ms. Mack stated? No. But someone beat her fucking ass. I'm more inclined to let the investigation prove what it may.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 11:00 PM
2

I'd say I saved you $15, but I didn't. Go see it. Great movie.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:27 PM
5

Overarching relationship between men and women I believe in equality. I believe there are differences between men and women, but I believe in equality between the sexes. I think the suppression of women across the span of history was a travesty and I'm glad that we live in an age of equality. I have female friends, female co-workers and have worked (successfully) under female management and direction. I love my female friends, I have genuine affection for them and I would hate to see them curtai…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:42 AM
–

Potentially the most pants-on-head-retarded thing I've read all year. 'Let's get upset because the assassin in the movie gets called a whore, and an extra on the film IS AN EXTRA. Let's make a whole sub-plot involving the one night stand Peter Quill has because FEMINISM!' Let's outright ignore the fact that the two main characters that are recognizably humanoid do fan-service. Quill has a couple of scenes shirtless as well as a few close-ups of his crotch as he pelvis-thrusts, and Dave Bautista …
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:22 AM
7

AFAIK the company she shot for here in Florida won the case. The lengths the girl went to to get a VALID ID was ludicrous.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 08:15 PM
1

Fem-dom by definition is pornography. There may not be any sex, but it's still pornographic in nature. There's definitely male-dom porn out there, where the woman is treated like an object and dehumanized, but they're not the exact same. Different strokes for different folks I guess.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:36 AM
–

Actually, they banned anyone with even a hint of a pornographic background from working for them. But yes this is stupid.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:04 PM
1

The 'art' is how the industry gets around indecency laws and statutes. It claims to be 'art', which since everything is fucking art, is technically true. So if you were to try and regulate it more than you would, say, the Museum of Natural History that has fertility idols with exposed breasts, you would be opening yourself up to a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:34 PM
1

No. You were not 'abused by porn'. Pornography is an art-form. Would you have been assaulted by the Louvre? Maybe groped by MOMA? Porn didn't just magically show up on the computer screen while you were trying to play Solitaire. You searched for it, you found it, then watched it. It didn't force you to do anything. Did it potentially effect your self-confidence? Sure. But you chose to watch it.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 06:27 AM
3

I took a look at the things Rodger was saying in MRA forums and the like. Not MRA forums. The Men's Rights Movement/Activism(MRM/MRA for short) are concerned with legal and societal injustices that men, as a group, face that women do not. Several examples are the erasure of sexual/domestic abuse, child custody and the PSA campaigns that paint men as evil. The forums he posted to were Pick Up Artist Hater forums. There is a difference. Elliot Rodger had a sick agenda and I know it's not the same …
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:11 PM
2

If a person wishes to censor themselves, that is their choice. Your question was whether 'discriminatory comedy is acceptable under any circumstances'. As far as people stealing, I don't know about that. I have a feeling that were you to rob an actual thief, he would be quite upset at you for robbing him. You are also still appending 'right' or 'wrong' values to things or concepts that are amoral.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:20 PM
–

You ummm don't need to support the assertion that comedy is amoral. It is. Do you support the Sun for being 'good' because it gives us light everyday? I believe others before me jave described this as appropriately mocking people (or categories of people) for behavior and choices rather than attributes acquired from birth (such as race or sex) where those atreibutes do not actually equate to the given bejavior being mocked. Do you see a relevant distinction? No. Because the joke I used did the e…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:50 PM
–

Comedy is comedy. It has no morality. The reason people laugh at horrible jokes is because of the shock value of it. These things are normalized as horrible things in our society, so being able to laugh at these concepts in a setting where you won't be judged can be liberating. If it is wrong to apply this form of insulting generalization to individuals, then it seems we (as a larger society) ought to discourage such forms of humor. But we're not. When a comedian is on stage and says 'How many c…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:59 PM
3

There isn't a single state in the Union that has banned abortions. They have restricted them, as is their right through democratic process, but they have not banned them. As to the next point(usually) of 'well many states make it difficult to get an abortion! Some women need to drive 5-6 hours to reach a clinic, and that's just not convenient!' to which my reply would be 'well if she has the kid, men can be on the hook for upwards of 21 years of labor.' If you want to get the procedure done, the…
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:43 AM
1

What exactly is shadowbanning?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:23 PM
2

'Buying condoms is like having a girlfriend; sometimes you just have to buy a new one.' What? How is that offensive?! /s
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:46 PM
2

That's almost a life-sentence. For a case in which all the evidence(other than her testimony) which is circumstantial.....
/r/MensRights28/03/14 01:39 PM
0

Ummmmmm only always! What other type of rational discussion is there. Keep on with the gnomegating. They're hilarious, and as someone who was in the porn industry, it's awesome to see someone make something like that. Hysterical.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:49 PM
–

Accuracy is very different from hate. You can be accurate and hateful. The two are not mutually exclusive. Two different axis. I prefer accurate and loving. You can speak harsh truths in love and care, especially if you want other people to hear you. I did get the anger vibe from TRP. I can agree that they aren't mutually exclusive. Saying otherwise would be incorrect, but I think that truths are universal, and it's only our interpretation of them that alters. So, par example, we both think the …
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:33 PM
–

The 'tone' argument only addresses the 'truth' of an argument, though. Tone is irrelevant to reality, or the accuracy of what you're saying. It 'is' relevant to other things, such as an assessment of the emotional aspect of things, whether or not the person feels love or hate. Yes, but in your video you explicitly called TRP a 'woman-hating group' when you just said what they claim is accurate, and you 'feel anger' from them, which somehow requires a re-assessment of TRP in general. I don't know…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 09:17 PM
–

But doesn't that just degenerate into a tone argument? 'You may be correct in what you're saying, but I don't like the way you're saying it so you're evil!' Not that I am putting these words in your mouth, but it's how I've seen it portrayed in the past.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 08:57 PM
–

Your welcome! :D Nice video though. Mucho hilarious too because it's not expected.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 08:48 PM
–

'Which is proven by men wanting women and y'know, everything ever' made me laugh. Edit: In case you read this Aella, it's 'tum-ult-you-iss' tumultuous.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:21 PM
–

Dude that was fucking hysterical.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:56 PM
-1

You're missing the point. Check out the town this was produced in; it's listed at the bottom of the graphic.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 12:11 AM
1

In the context of how scary she looks.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:18 PM
–

To be fair your mother looks like a voudon. Like she'd sacrifice a chicken to murder you and raise you as a zombie. So there's that.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 02:36 AM
3

The Jotun that rips your lungs out will have black on it's nails.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:58 PM
2

Craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab-people; craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaab-people
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:01 AM
1

hahahahaha. Nice. And yes; it does.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 02:22 AM
1

It's a bad argument to begin with. If what we're paying for is for the girl to become interested in STEM, how can we ever truly determine if we've accomplished our goal? How do we decide what demonstrating "interest" looks like, and how can we decide what $24000 worth of interest in STEM looks like? No, the Kickstarter was explicitly to 'have the girl make the game and get interested in STEM'. She's no longer making the game. We don't know whether she is, or ever will be interested in STEM. So o…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:16 PM
1

What I'm saying is that she can still be interested in other aspects of STEM even if she's lost interest in making her game. Your knitting example doesn't appear to be like what I'm saying. Well I guess this argument will have to wait 11 y ears until she attends college. /s If people gave their money because they wanted the 9 year old to make the game all by herself, then they didn't get what they wanted. People on this sub apparently think all 9 year olds are prodigious talents, but I don't. I …
/r/MensRights08/03/14 05:40 AM
3

of course a person going through this needs as much care as someone who was raped, if they are truly traumatized by the situation and are feeling the same things Sounds like you're putting qualifiers on receiving care. only because i am now in the middle of an awkward situation where a good friend of mine was raped and started acting a little more than erratic and she was starting to blame one of our mutual friends for assisting in the act. we all know who actually did it and there is proof and …
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:32 AM
11

Waitaminute; have you ever been the victim of a false accusation? Cuz otherwise you have no idea. It's like a scarlet 'R' on your chest. You need just as much care as someone who was raped, combined with people libeling you with something you are not.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:08 AM
1

That's like saying I watched 10 minutes of a TV show about knitting, so now I'm interested in it. The point was to have someone who's interest was peaked by the subject make the game they wanted to make and igniting a creative fire in this girl. Which apparently lasted for a month or so, then she moved on to something else because it was 'too hard'. Granted, the product portion of it is satisfied by her family finishing the game. But it wasn't phrased or posted as 'Help my daughter raise money s…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 07:10 PM
2

I agree. Ultimately; they will get their product. But. It won't be done by the purpose that the project was started for. Which was to get a girl interested in STEM or games or whatever, and they won't get their money back.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:21 PM
0

They're not releasing it to the press. The judge has ruled that the video is evidence in the case, and therefor must be in the public domain. The actual phallus in question is being 'redacted', or having a black bar placed over it. So if a woman were to undergo the same thing, and the video is used as evidence, it would have her doing the same(I would think). But I don't know, I've never looked into how often women are filmed urinating for their blood tests.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:41 PM
1

It's not that. He was drunk and high on Xanax and weed when he was pulled over for drag-racing. So when they brought him to the hospital for the piss-test, they have to film you actually peeing into the cup. Since they have to watch you, apparently they also have to film you down here. If they film it, it's public record by law.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:47 AM
7

Agreed, but charity was the only instance I could think of in which people give away money to other people they don't know.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:50 PM
14

Well; I look at it like this. If I give money to a charity that ostensibly opens homeless shelters, and then 6 months later I find out they started building one, then said 'fuck it it's too hard' I would want my money back.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:33 PM
2

Hey Gieger. There is exactly one woman in coal mines. It means there are WOMEN in coal mines. Just like how here in the states, there's no more racism against black people because Obama is black! Durr. /s
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:16 PM
2

Because it's not about 'admitting that'. It's about the same thing being done, but somehow being completely different. When it's women in comic books or media, it's 'objectification', which is the worst thing ever. When it's men it's 'male power fantasy' or 'physical ideal', meaning it's something you want because I say so or is harmless. In essence, when men do it to women, it's bad, evil and patriarchal. When women do it to men, it's just for fun, it doesn't hurt anyone and is a male power fan…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:20 PM
1

Brah-fucking-vo.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:06 PM
15

God I love JudgyBitch's articles.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:55 PM
2

OR successful psychological rape capital of the Patriarchal Universe(patent pending)!
/r/MensRights03/03/14 05:09 PM
1

Yes but the difference you don't seem ti get is that if it is marketed towards women, it's objectification or oppressive. If it's marketed towards men, it's a male-power fantasy, thereby NOT oppressive. /s
/r/MensRights02/03/14 06:19 AM
1

Came back to say this. Horseshit. Fruit is VASTLY cheaper in the city it had to be trucked to than in the boonies where it can be home-grown? $650 a month rent? Where do you live, in a crackhouse in Newark?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:35 PM
0

Right, and a 1BR in Manhattan is a helluva lot more expensive than $500/month, not including other minor inconveniences that are also more expensive in NYC.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:12 PM
2

Wait wait wait, she's not wealthy, she's well-off. Having a net-worth of 3 million can mean she makes 100k a year and has stock options in something worthwhile(right now). Wealthy is the ability to never work if you don't want.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:09 PM
6

There was also an instance where she remarked something to the effect of 'we shouldn't be looking at history, but look at where we are now' and then goes on to say 'historically:' motherfucker WHAT?!
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:07 AM
2

I have a friend that lives out there who rents a 3 bedroom house to the tune of $500 a month not including utilities. Where the fuck are you going to find an apartment for that cheap in NYC? Especially Manhattan. This is true; but wouldn't that count as to what 'she' can afford? Because he's paying for her, she can do whatever the fuck she wants with her money
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:58 AM
45

Oh yeah. I noticed. I also particularly liked how she kept citing her own anecdotal experiences but demanding citations from everyone else. 'NOW opposes shared parenting?! I WANT A CITATION!' 'All my friends in NY get divorced and totes have 50/50 custody! LISTEN TO MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!' NinjEdit: Beeteedubs, totally love how she can afford to live in NYC, but isn't well off. I've worked there. The amount of money paid for a normal apartment would feed two whole families in the Midwest.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:15 AM
62

Anyone else notice how GWW introduced herself succinctly and what she was about, and NW spent 2 minutes fiddling the crowd's collective asshole?
/r/MensRights28/02/14 12:26 AM
4

Oh god I know. I hate that damn team. Why does their sex matter in the context of something professional? Can you beat the other teams? All that matters. Nobody cares what you're packing sexually. Win.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 03:54 AM
94

I am on fucking board for this.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 11:08 PM
1

This says it all really. Men minimizing rape. [1] Using the word "hysteria" is a "nice" touch. It looks like the fact that men were being mutilated and killed in the Congo was a secondary consideration, merely a prop for the real issue: minimizing rape against women so we can get back to discussing what's important, men. Because clearly, the lesser crime in this instance is being murdered. Let's ignore the 'no cure for that' and 'fucked' and focus on something that a person can recover from! And…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 04:03 PM
-1

The exploitation of women involved in its production It promotes dominance, humiliation, and coercion of women: "Pornography is the theory, and rape is the practice." Robin Morgan Apparently, men aren't exploited. And apparently there aren't any wildly successful lines of pornography that involve men being dominated by women and "humiliated and coerced". /s
/r/MensRights14/02/14 11:34 PM
1

I liked the Archangel tie-in. 10/10 would read again.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:10 PM
7

I swear to Cthulhu every time I read one of your comments it's like a Christmas present.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 02:22 AM
2

As a fellow Ner-Jerseyian; it's not all like that. I got a lot of the same hate as OP.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 04:05 AM
1

Didn't you check the electrical outlet?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:48 AM
3

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA. Right up til the end, full disconnect. Head cocked tot he side, muttering 'whatthefu-'. 10/10 would fap again hahaha
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:47 AM
0

You too? One of my detectors broke reading this...
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:37 AM
3

Oh man. If I was free tonight I'd love to call and discuss my old job with you guys lol.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 09:03 PM
3

Nope. Not a chance.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 02:28 PM
2

Good luck!
/r/MensRights11/01/14 02:28 PM
11

Don't even get me started. I know the guy who performed in the video and texted him about it. 'I mean, don't get me wrong people should learn to defend themselves. But the video says 'hey if someone bothers you, you should choke them unconscious instead of saying 'no' like an adult.'
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:16 AM
1

I did NAZI that coming...
/r/MensRights07/01/14 09:40 PM
1

If you'll allow me to oppress you for a minute; it's incredibly attractive when a woman can cite her sources. Please don't call HR. /s Thanks OG.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:28 PM
2

Do we have any way of identifying their 'experts'? Other than Mary Koss of course.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 08:10 PM
3

I've seen this quoted, but do we have any documentation for it? I'd love to show that to some smarmy assholes I know.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 07:48 PM
-3

There is nothing to be proud about down here. SHUT YOUR DIRTY WHORE MOUTH /u/JUSTCALLMEADDIE!
/r/MensRights12/12/13 05:00 AM
-1

Well, unless you are personally on the committee or know the person that made this; claiming that it was an 'accident' is incorrect. The colors of the text imply they're for a specific gender, yes, but no actual pronouns are used. Were they made with specific genders in mind? Yes. Did they use actual language to claim 'men rape women'? No. It could be impossible legally for a woman to rape a man in Ireland. I don't know I don't live there. As far as the names of the files, if they've been put up…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:06 AM
0

I saw the file names; but when if it were printed out in public, the only 'giveaway' would be the colors.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 06:19 AM
2

There is nothing in those two PSAs that infer gender, simply a perpetrator and a victim. The colors are different, that's about it.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:46 AM
9

I engage other people I know in conversation about current events and slip in factoids everywhere. I proudly raised $1000 for donation for Movember. I have signed petitions and written letters in my state. Like the other guy who responded said; just because you haven't done anything doesn't mean everyone else is lazy.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:43 AM
3

They're not contradicting themselves. The NISVS report was conducted by the CDC, and the DoJ statistics utilize different samples, different objectives and using different sources. Personally, the reason I cite the CDC report is because it uses bias toward the feminist side of the spectrum, but still shows parity of numbers in many areas. This site you've linked seems to be the result of fact-mining. I mean c'mon, 92% of domestic violence is male on female? I've seen a hell of a lot more women s…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:52 PM
5

That's because on that site it claims that 25% of women are victims of domestic violence which is a ridiculous figure. And since it quotes a recent study, the one we usually look at is the NISVS 2010 Report which says on page 48 that there were 4.741 million women victimized by an intimate partner, and 5.365 million men were victimized by an intimate partner. Furthermore, the numbers for men would be higher if in the study men were capable of being victims of rape; which they explicitly state th…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 08:57 PM
2

Sorry this happened to you. I've known a few feminists who act as you've mentioned, though many just want what they've been told they don't have, like equal pay, equal opportunities and equality in general. I look forward to seeing your posts around.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:17 PM
1

I mean I know this is kind of off-topic but fuck me I have a boner right now. I need to go have a cigarette; and I don't smoke. Nice post GWW.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 05:55 AM
2

That was good.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:57 PM
2

I disagree. There is measurable and demonstrable harm that feminism has done to men. Sorry if that offends yo, or you find it irrelevant, but you've already said you know you're a minority. Make your own sub.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 04:10 PM
6

I like this article. 'Brian Wood sexually harassed me and it has colored all my interactions since!' 'Ummmmmmmmmmm I hit on you at a bar, you shot me down and I left.' 'OK! Maybe you were ignorant of your oppressive misogyny SO I'LL FORGIVE YOU BUT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT THIS STUFF'.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:41 AM
1

Resistance is futile. Prepare to be assimilated 7 of 9.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:41 PM
0

Just wait until the third movie when men die in droves resisting.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 03:41 PM
1

Hey, that's why I asked. Thanks for the info; main reason I asked is because in the article it states that the original lyrics to Girls was 'sexist'; and I wracked my brain trying to think of how they were sexist or objectifying and drew a blank.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 06:05 AM
1

Waitaminute; they identify as feminist? Really?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:39 AM
11

'I meant to stop, but I didn't stop in time so I ran him over!' -Acceptable excuse for attempted murder 'She was stabbing me, so I threw her off, I didn't mean for her to fall down the stairs!' - Domestic Abuser Life in prison
/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:01 AM
10

Must be nice. You know, to get away with attempted murder.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:13 AM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA. That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 08:53 PM
1

No no no, you're getting it all wrong. See. 'E-kwahl-uh-tee' to us CIS-Gendered hetero-normative caucasian privileged males means an even division of whatever the subject matter is. STEM fields, for example, would be 'equal' if 50% of their student body consisted of both student bodies! But to feminists, it's not 'equal' unless they DOMINATE; see? So the fact that there are 3 male and 3 female protagonists isn't EQUAL because there aren't MORE women than men. Which would make it UNequal. . . . .…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 06:30 AM
1

/u/Anachronic had asked when 'having a fat bottom was a flaw'; I pointed out, as politely(if not concisely) as possible that she was 'portly'. Now, being on the larger end of body types is not a flaw; in regards to personal preference. But in terms of health being overly large is a flaw.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 05:39 PM
2

The issue isn't that it's 'fine by you', the issue comes about that society finds it acceptable to label 'Father's Day' as a secondary 'Mother's Day' but not vice versa. Not equally as it were.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:15 PM
3

Hard truths.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:03 PM
2

Powerful.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 06:04 AM
2

I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm saying the song points out that the woman is bigger, and also taking advantage of him at a young age because she's his babysitter. I call that a flaw. Personal preferences aside.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:36 AM
1

Eh the rest of the lyrics kind of point to the babysitter being.........portly.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 03:25 AM
45

I also liked Far Cry 3's rape scene:s:. Cuz there are a few. But they're all of male characters, soooooooooo nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 03:31 PM
0

The Republican Party is taking the worst of conservatism and not enough of the positive parts.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 08:11 PM
12

Yeah, I read the article and was shocked. Society oppresses some of it's men?! Holy shit.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 05:33 PM
2

Yes. Let her make that self-same point, then point to the Duluth Model, the Primary Aggressor Policies, Selective Service, or the fact that with the Affordable Care Act single men are forced to pay a small premium for 'maternity costs'.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:43 PM
2

Flipping the gender roles actually doesn't do anything for your argument, as there has been no legislation, law, or procedures implemented by any Men's Rights Organizations that are anti-female. Feminism can't claim the same.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:41 PM
2

'This thread again' is vicious and angry? There's a search bar in the upper-right hand corner of your browser. Use it to find articles. There are links on the sidebar. People are anti-feminism when feminism has shown itself to be anti-male. Prior to the claim of 'but that's the fringe feminists', it's a bullshit claim. There have been demonstrable anti-MALE, note, not anti-MRA, biases and legislation passed with the aid and full comprehension of feminist organizations.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:25 PM
8

Men;s Rights Movement.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:35 PM
1

As someone who has argued with people over this before, on reddit, on facebook, outside of the internet, you did fine. You determine your goal, form your strategy and implement it. You brought awareness to these views with that argument.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 10:52 PM
1

I was only saying that her fanbase may become more MRA-laden, but it's not something that has occurred yet. I definitely liked what she said, and if she continues to endorse issues like that, I plan on sharing her stuff and getting friends involved.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 02:53 AM
1

Because people have opinions that may not match yours, or the MRM. Look at general society, many men feel something may be wrong, or acknowledge the double-standard, but they don't necessarily take that next step.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 08:24 PM
0

But a large majority of men would favour a MRs cause, and a majority of her fanbase are men... Ummmmmmmmmmmm what? By no means are 'a large majority of men' MRAs. Nor would they necessarily favor the MRM.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 08:15 PM
7

You sure about that?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 05:18 PM
0

Ehhhh. I wouldn't put MRAs as a large enough group to be a 'demographic'. It's like writing a book to cater to african-american lesbian conservative single-mothers; I'm sure they exist but are small enough that that target audience isn't worth it.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 03:18 PM
3

Thank god we're all women now, or that could have constituted rape!
/r/MensRights20/10/13 04:54 AM
61

That is a fucking ballsy move. I like this dame. She's got Moxy.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:32 AM
6

Notice in the list it doesn't specify what constitutes sexual assault. 'Sexual Assault' could be as simple as 'have you ever been at a party dancing with a girl and placed your hands on her hips or buttocks?'
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:43 AM
2

Oh the biggest. They don't bring the feminists to the yard though. Saving the post for future reading.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:54 AM
1

Is it odd that these walls of text made me fully turgid?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 04:35 AM
5

Ask specifically which laws and 'norms' she is talking about that directly benefit men and directly harm women.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 03:12 AM
1

SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:37 AM
1

Seriously; first thing I said to myself was 'bitching shirt!'.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 03:51 AM
7

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 03:12 AM
4

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA awesome.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:03 PM
3

It's........beautiful.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:55 PM
12

At most its just destruction of property. Animal cruelty at best.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:57 PM
5

Seriously; I may hate the guy. But the fucking BALLS on him.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:48 PM
6

Don't listen to her! I did this and ended up in prison for 'Lewd Exposure to a SlutWalk'. :D
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:41 PM
1

Well there you go. Fix it! :P
/r/MensRights10/09/13 02:00 PM
2

You left the guy in Green's name in one of the pics. Other than that, fair job! Hate arguing about 'male' and 'white' privilege.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 01:30 PM
5

I just shared this commercial on FB. Thank fucking Christ someone with money is taking the opinion that men aren't all stupid, savage rapists who need to be shot.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 12:30 AM
2

O.O
/r/MensRights06/09/13 06:09 AM
1

Even if the woman maintains the average standard, she still could not join up until recently. I believe that she should be required to be just as good as the men and if she is, let her in. Yes, because it's almost impossible for women to maintain the standard. Prior to the new 'bar', very few women could attain the physical standards required to serve in near frontline duties, such as Combat Engineers. There's even a letter from a former Marine Captain about how difficult it is for women to serv…
/r/MensRights28/08/13 08:42 PM
-8

Your opinion matters less because of bullshit. Also, you spelled 'opinion' wrong. Who fucking does that?
/r/MensRights27/08/13 03:34 PM
1

Like i said, i want to be a fighter pilot. It is EXTREMELY difficult for females to become fighter pilots, seeing as it was just allowed last year. I don't understand why on earth it wasn't allowed earlier, if a women can do it and meet all the standards, she should be allowed to do it. I want to work towards causes such as this one. I want to be able to do what i want to do and not have just my gender hold me back. Its just not fair. I believe in fighting for what is right and i am a feminist b…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 04:20 AM
4

Who is "they"? Women? or feminists? Because like i said, there are crazy radical people everywhere, and stopping black men from voting has nothing to do with women's rights so I'm not sure why that was even brought up. Men have also advocated some fucked up things as have women, so its the same thing. No group is perfect. Feminists. They protested when the government was deciding whether black males would receive the right to vote, as 'If we can't have it they can't either!' Why it matters? It's…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 04:09 PM
8

Tender Years doctrine originally propagated by Caroline Norton, an early British suffragette. The Duluth Model is the most accepted, famous, and taught methodology on how to 'deal with domestic violence', but it only deals with male on female violence. Primary Aggressor policies take into account 'height', 'weight' and 'who is physically larger' when replying to a domestic violence call. Statistically, those are going to be men. Making laws and such that throw men under the bus is NOT feminism b…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 03:02 PM
5

You're absolutely right. Except when you account for the fact that the feminist initiatives and lobbying groups have pushed for gendered legislation that may help women, it throws men completely underneath the bus. They may be radical feminists, but they're the ones getting shit done in the name of your movement. Handle your shit Fabious.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 02:07 PM
1

Just the tip. FTFY.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:50 PM
1

I wouldn't go that far. I'm perfectly happy living here in the States, for now at least. Plenty of ways to make good money, then retire somewhere out east. Europe's been awesome; maybe try the Asian countries.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:56 PM
5

true moral of the story is do NOT get married in a western country. FTFY.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:18 PM
2

It's also tough to "do things" when a metric fuck-ton of government money is given exclusively to feminists, and don't like to share their resources or to help men. FTFY.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:48 PM
4

Sooooooooo, let me make sure I understand. society assumes women dressed 'sexily' is for attention and she then goes on to say: What if it's for the attention of women? Well, then society was right. Dumbass.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:53 PM
8

I Enjoy /r/MensRights because... For the second time in my life(the first being watching GWW's 'The Disposable Male'[cliche I know, but true]) I found a place where other people understood that men have issues too. The best way I have of framing it was not surprise, or a change of view, but of shock; that I wasn't the only person who saw things through this lens, and that there was scientific proof to prove it. It's like a second home. I appreciate many of you. Thanks.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:31 PM
1

It's not a minority policy; even the judge stated that they 'indirectly targeted minorities' implying that it was not it's purpose, but they may have done so in doing their duties. Regardless, Stop N Frisk isn't unconstitutional; potentially their implementation of it might have been.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:22 AM
1

Incorrect. What they've done, frisking people 'without oversight' or 'reason' is unconstitutional. That's why they're still doing the stop n frisk, only with oversight and a meeting with the community. From the article: But the judge, Shira A. Scheindlin, found that the Police Department resorted to a “policy of indirect racial profiling” as it increased the number of stops in minority communities. That has led to officers’ routinely stopping “blacks and Hispanics who would not have been stopped…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:15 AM
1

I mean, any business is going to lose money in it's first few years. But in 2011 they had one team that made money? Seriously? AND THEY'RE CELEBRATING THIS?!
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:55 PM
1

Finance[edit source | editbeta] So far the WNBA has not been able to support itself. During the mid-2000s, the NBA spent more than $10 million per year to keep the WNBA financially solvent.[19] In 2007, teams were estimated to be losing $1.5 million to $2 million a year.[20] In 2011 it was reported that the league had its first-ever "cash flow positive" team (Connecticut Sun).[21] From Wikipedia. I'm sure you could find news articles talking about it.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 03:15 PM
6

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:07 AM
3

Oh I know. Crazy times.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 07:39 PM
30

Or would that be..... /puts on sunglasses Schwyzenfreude? YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAH!
/r/MensRights10/08/13 06:34 PM
12

You literally can't. I just found out the only reason there is a WNBA is because the NBA subsidizes their costs.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:57 PM
-2

Holy shit! Posting this here got me banned from /r/Feminism! HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:11 PM
3

'C'mon guys, let's be tolerant. They only want us to wear an armband that has a golden Star of David on it. You wouldn't suffer that to be safer?'
/r/MensRights10/08/13 02:20 AM
1

This happens all the time. Move along sir/miss. /into wrist-mike Amenable Eagle has flown.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 01:24 AM
10

The show that leads into mine is puppets making crank phone-calls.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 01:03 PM
-11

'Suggestions'? So what you're saying is that there's no proof anywhere that the judge's verdict may in fact be not some misogynist plot to let a pedophile get away with molesting a child, but backed up by evidence? Age of consent to smoke and age of consent to sex is only 2 years different and like the judge said: HE KNEW she wasn't of age. No excuses. The judge claimed he knew, even though she claimed to be a different age. All I am saying is that there is lots of evidence we are not privy to, …
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:40 AM
0

I'm sorry! I didn't mean to shame you into doing anything! You are a special little snowflake and can do whatever you want! Seriously though, I was just joking.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:29 AM
-17

Yeah, well what evidence did they have to say she was sexually promiscuous? It's not noted in any of the articles, so presumably is pulled out of someone's arse. No, it was stated by the judge. Not pulled from someone's ass. From the article in the link: In sentencing, Judge Nigel Peters apparently accepted the suggestions that Wilson’s teenage victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was complicit in the abuse; despite her being well below the age of consent. The girl was accused in court…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:34 AM
-22

I didn't read it in the actual article; but inferred it from the fact that the judge ruled she was 'sexually promiscuous' and ruled against the 'paedophile'. I mean seriously; how much evidence do you think they actually had to convince a judge to publicly declaim that the girl was an enthusiastic and willing participant? Don't get me wrong, knowingly having sex with someone underage is sick(provided you are 5+ years above the age of consent), but when that person lied to you? Hell I dated a gir…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 09:54 PM
2

It's cool. BE A SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE. SEE IF I CARE /sobs quietly
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:42 PM
2

Don't be a hipster fan. 'I liked GWW before she was cool and all commericalized, and added stickers to the side of her computer. When she was vlogging in her living room. Gosh she's so mainstream now!' DON'T BE THAT GUY /u/regular_guy.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:05 PM
1

I forget his reddit username; but there's a minor celebrity named 'Wil Wheaton' who has a reddit account and appears if you say his name 3 times.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 09:42 PM
4

Well that's not delightfully offensive.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 06:01 PM
2

Maybe if we say his name three times; he'll appear like Wil_Wheaton?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:17 PM
0

'I want a citation that says you're wrong because everyone is exactly the same! Except me, I'm a special snowflake.'
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:29 PM
-1

Exactly. 'I want a citation to know whom is propagating these false statistics backed up by science and reason!'
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:49 PM
3

Oh yeah; I saw that. I meant at the actual event. I WANT A FUCKING CITATION. I DEMAND A CITATION. Bitch look it up on your phone. It's called 'google'.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:50 AM
2

I don't like your word; it's Mayorapes.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:26 AM
11

'This is atrocious I want a citation!' You have a smartphone. Use it for something other than Gawker or Jezebel pageviews.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 12:21 AM
1

Well, if I say I like a woman, I ensure that it's not in a sexual nature(if that's the nature of our relationship of course). It doesn't mean anything bad, just clarification.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 02:21 AM
1

Wow was there seriously a poll done that I missed?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:37 AM
1

I mean I do, but not y'know in a gay way. 'WHAT'S WRONG WITH BEING GAY NECKBEARD?!' Nothing, I just y'know I mean I'd like to have that body cuz it seems ideal to me. 'STOP OBJECTIFYING HIM SHITLORD' OK, I don't like his body, I like my own. 'WHY ARE YOU SHAMING FIT PEOPLE?! MISOGYNIST RAPE-APOLOGIST!' Dat Theory.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 07:57 PM
4

hahahahahah yeah, I never wanted to look like that my whole life... Definitely a healthy standard.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:45 PM
6

Well-fucking-done.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:44 PM
4

'How dare you criticize my Ponzi scheme! I didn't take your money, so shut up and sit down!' Yeah that works.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 03:47 PM
2

Same. IIRC, I saw a video of GWW's, who mentioned in the video either about her blog or straight MR.reddit. That brought me here where I lurked for a month or two before finally making this account. Prior to this I understood that men were given a shitty deal in some respects, but was never able to quantify it to other people.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:34 PM
2

I've heard that, don't know whether it's true or not. Kidney stones fucking suck.
/r/MensRights01/08/13 01:09 PM
22

There's animosity because it is an experience men are biologically incapable of feeling. So we are other. I think we all appreciate your sentiment; but you should probably tell the instructor and school about it. Get it changed.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 06:16 PM
2

An Aunt Tammy as it were?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:35 PM
3

I'm already retired.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 02:44 AM
3

I'm tired of someone being tired of everything.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 04:00 PM
2

Nicely fucking done.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:52 AM
1

Firstly; half of these sources are articles citing other articles you've already cited as sources. But fine. Floyd, et al vs NYPD Ongoing case that someone outside of an apartment with a key ring trying to get in was attempting a burglary. Ourlicht was searched along with other people after a complaint about a weapon being in the area. As well are the more serious charges that these cops were told they had quotas to arrest or detain people for crimes. Your 'report' states that blacks and latinos…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:55 PM
1

Excuse me, it is a responsibility thrust on the PD by society at large. They combat it any way they can. Well, legalizing robbery would also get rid of all crimes related to robbery wouldn't it? Which I'm assuming is a lot. I don't believe it's societies ultimate demand. I think that society has kept demanding more and more protection, potentially the way laws have been changed and pushed forth in the past few decades, with no regard to the eventual outcome. No it's not. If I targeted people who…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 11:42 PM
1

So even after being shown that they arent above fudging numbers you still believe their numbers? Is that correct? Fudging their numbers that felonies has declined 2.7% instead of 2.4% =/= making it look like most black people are criminals. Furthermore, a 'begging the question' argument doesn't make you right. I've acknowledged that some of the precincts may be fudging some numbers; but again there is no evidence that they are doing so in this instance. I am making the assumption that the NYPD d…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:34 PM
1

Huh? But in your last post you just said that it's not a cops job to prevent crime. Also there are other ways to prevent crime, that really doesn't involve policing. One is to legalize drugs (note I don't want to get in to a legalization debate, just stating that stop and frisk isn't the only/best way to solve our problems) That's because it isn't. It is the police department's job to respond, investigate and arrest crime and criminals. Preventing it before it happens is a methodology that's bee…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:32 PM
1

The whole article and its larger article series is about how fast and loose the NYPD is with their numbers to make it appear they are meeting whatever goals that are set, completely regardless of the reality of the situation. While youre right it does not specifically mention that the specific set of numbers you are referring to, what it does is show a lack of statistical rigor on an institutional level. That alone should give you pause when citing their numbers, any of them. The level of corrup…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:14 PM
-1

I'm not sure what you mean by this. By numbers down do you mean stopping less innocent people? I also don't know why those last two sentences are referring to. My solution is to stop people when there is evidence of crimes being committed instead of suspicion. If that doesn't work then they're not very good at their job are they? I'm saying that stopping people who have committed crimes is reacting to crime, not preventing it. These frisking measures are a preventative measure; much like the sea…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:18 PM
1

Are 75% crimes really commited by black males, or are black males simply such an easy target for police? I'm with you. It's possible that there is confirmation bias here; maybe they've been sending cops in to black neighborhoods because it's 'common knowledge' that there is more crime there'. If you send 90% of your cops into black neighborhoods; 90% of the crime you hear about is going to be involving black people, but the data is worthless because you are basing the results on the hypothesis. …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:40 AM
-1

Considering the job of the police is not to PREVENT crime, but respond to it; how do you propose that they get their numbers down? Which is what society demanded? What society still wants? It makes sense. It's just unpalatable. An airport and a public sidewalk are not any different. They are both sovereign territory; the only difference being one happens to be near planes and buildings, the other only near buildings. Myself, I think that if an officer comes up to me and asks to frisk me because …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:36 AM
3

You mean when a whistleblower accuses them of cooking the books he gets committed and silenced would I think something was amiss? Original Youre right this is far worse than simple confirmation bias. This is just racism. Actually nothing at all in the article talks about what statistics are being manipulated. I've heard, mainly from LEO friends, that they will 'skim', or charge offenders with lesser crimes, so that their stats appear to go down. None of that has anything to do with the claim tha…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:30 AM
1

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/commissioner-kelly-defends-stop-and-frisk-targeting-african-americans-article-1.1332840 Is that confirmation bias? I apologize; earlier I said 75% of crime. It is 70-75% of violent crime is committed by people who are african-american. You would think that stopping people who meet this demographic and frisking them for illegal weapons would be met with thanks, as if it lowers the crime rate as the Commissioner says it does, I think it's justified. Maybe undese…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:45 AM
20

Why do you think men are disadvantaged or lack any real power in society? It is a fact that men posses most of the wealth therefore they have the power to influence and shape other peoples behavior (You work for money). Hey look at that. Women have more than 50% of the private wealth in the USA and make the greater majority of all purchases. They're also more likely to donate money to charities explicitly for women and girls, rather than everyone. What are MRAs doing to better the situation for …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:29 AM
1

If 75% of the people committing the crimes are 'purple', stopping 'purple' people to inconvenience them for 2 minutes isn't a big deal. Like I said elsewhere, I look middle-eastern. I always get searched when I go through the airport. I don't bitch about it, or cry 'racism', I fucking go through with it because people who happen to look like I do are trying to bomb our country. If I have to stopped for 5 minutes so that the authorities can try and prevent an attack, I wait 5 goddamn minutes.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:53 AM
0

Exactly. I get 'randomly stopped' every time I go through an airport. Whether I'm flying out, it's a connection, whatever. I get stopped and searched. Thank you Persian/Greek Grandma and Cuban Grandpa. I look super tan, my hair is thick and coarse, and I never seem to remember to shave before I travel. I get stopped. They go through my carry-ons, question me incessantly and generally delay my travel. It sucks. It's because people who kind of sort of look like me keep trying to bomb planes. Guess…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:48 AM
2

On the one hand; I agree that people need to see that men can be discriminated against by society. On the other; there was an article about this. In it, the NYC Police Commissioner stated that 75% of crime committed in NYC is by black males; and that that is why they are stopping them particularly. If that is the case, then it makes sense. It sucks, but it makes sense.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 11:16 PM
5

I gotta say; I think it's too long, but it's spot on.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:40 PM
1

Actually it is. If girls do inter-racial scenes, they gain some IR scenes, but lose a lot of regular work.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:59 PM
1

Yes, but even there it's less work. The guys can't work with regular companies after they start doing gay porn. Or it's at least very difficult.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:51 PM
2

No, I mean boy/boy. Technically, porn is supposed to be done with condoms. It isn't because they finagled the ability to test talent to equate with a 'safe working environment'(even though the industry is still fighting OSHA over that in Los Angeles). And no, girls don't get paid more for condom/bareback. Though condom porn does pay cheaper(I've heard) as it doesn't make as much money.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 11:25 PM
1

I actually see that paragraph in the article as linked.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:26 PM
4

30%. Most make 30% of what the females make. Then again, if you're willing to do B/B guys can make 1500-2000 a scene standard(which is more than the girls generally).
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:15 PM
1

Because the security guards at friends' schools growing up were in charge of patrolling the halls; checking the entrances, breaking up fights, etc., etc.. No, that is the claim that is made. That incidents are down because they treat the students like 'human beings' and not 'offenders'. My point was that if the security guards are the ones who normally keep an eye out for contraband, and they're not there anymore; they could have just as many issues going on and not know about it. I mean c'mon, …
/r/MensRights22/07/13 02:23 PM
2

I would consider any type of mind-altering substance on school grounds in the hands of a minor a major offense. A minor offense that happens daily would be walking around without a hall pass.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:35 PM
1

So let me make sure I understand, instead of having police officers on hand to deal with unruly or violent students, and a plethora of security guards, who's job; assumedly; is to watch the kids and report drug deals and violent incidents has gone down by 90%? Does anyone else just think that nobody is CATCHING these kids anymore?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:44 PM
1

???
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:14 PM
3

Dude fucking tell me about it. 'He's hispanic; not white.' 'Well the guy looks white, and hispanics are listed under whites anyway!' Oh. Oh ok. So calling him 'white' because he 'looks white' is acceptable; but so is calling Trayvon Martin an 'innocent black child'. Uh huh. Where is this bridge you would like to sell me; I am so interested!
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:18 AM
2

No; they know I'm racist. They've told me so.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:21 PM
10

Dude. These two are insane. The best part is I look middle-eastern or hispanic(thanks Cuban grandpa) but somehow I have white priviliege but this Columbian atheist who is whiter than Helena Bonham-Carter is a 'person of color'. Fuck me, right?
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:17 PM
17

Oh even worse; they're rabid feminists who are also 'atheist' and don't understand why I ask them to stop being religious.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:39 PM
28

Was speaking with friends about the Zimmerman case; got told 'you don't get to talk you live your privileged white life you don't get to have an opinion'. It was lovely.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 02:16 PM
5

I can always spell her username. I don't know why.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 05:25 AM
2

Well, that's because there are a few cultures out there that spread normative lies about rape. Just not really Western ones.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:57 PM
3

I faved oneirosgrip. I am not ashamed to admit it.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:56 PM
4

I can't speak for the movement but I would LOVE having people here to talk about it. Furthermore this sub is for anyone; so even if I personally didn't want you here, it wouldn't matter! Yay freedom to hold opinions!
/r/MensRights16/07/13 11:51 PM
1

Boooooooooooooooooook? What is this word; 'book'?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:12 PM
2

Yes. Because you lower yourself before others, you're a borderline slave. No one has any right to tell you what to do so long as you aren't harming another person. There are plenty of instances in which this is wrong. Shitty laws should never be followed or obeyed. "Using established methods to change something" takes far too long and results in people being harmed in the process while you sit on your hands hoping that your benevolent rulers take your opinion into consideration. So just rise up …
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:11 PM
1

I don't suppose you have a link to that? I'd love to read it.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:00 PM
1

Right. And I'm sure that after engaging in the exact same behavior a dozen times you are just as likely to spend 2 hours in a cell and not be slapped with a more serious charge. Thanks but no thanks. You go on believing what you'd like.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:59 PM
2

100% agreement. I still think that violating a rule or law that you know of, regardless of it's morality, means you forfeit the right to complain about it, but I can understand at least pointing out the hypocrisy of it.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:53 PM
2

Worst part is, there's no clear-cut rule stating that. /u/sonja_newcombe linked me to their subreddit. There's nothing clear cut about it, so he couldn't have technically violated any rule; but was still banned. It's fucking ridiculous. I think that's a fair assessment. Now it may be redundant since that's pretty much how feminist forums operate. But it is necessary from time to time to verify to make sure they haven't opened up and decided free speech is a positive thing. HA! I'd have a better …
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:49 PM
2

Ah; so apparently I have to be willing to go to prison and therefor be unable to actually aid in the good fight to have 'conviction'. If that's your definition of the word; you're welcome to it.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:48 PM
1

I actually apologized twice in this thread, because there is no rule about posting anything about a 'woman's right to choose' or however they phrase it; at least not a clear cut rule. It's ludicrous. I agree that any rule keeping dissenting opinion away isn't a rule worth having, but I'm not one of these people partaking of the group. They're entitled to their beliefs and rules in their spaces. It may suck; but what're you gonna do?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:46 PM
2

My apologies MidSolo. I claimed you broke the rules from your pic you shared; but there isn't any clear-cut violation with that subreddit. My bad.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:33 PM
2

Wow. The only thing I can actually find that remotely looks like OP broke the rules is 'promoting regressive agendas is not permitted' without even citing what would be considered 'regressive'. Sorry OP.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:32 PM
2

Oh I see. Because I advocate going through the established methods to change something, I lack conviction. Right.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:25 PM
0

It has. But when one of the duo's core beliefs is financial responsibility and the other's is 'YOLO', it doesn't sound like a match that would last for 9 years.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:18 PM
3

I agree with you. I was pointing out that OP's apparent surprise, or showing the sub this banning isn't anything special and has happened many times before. Furthermore, if you know what the rules are and then get punished for breaking them, there is nothing unknown or new here.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:17 PM
1

OK. Would it make everyone happier if I edited it to say 'Someone posted a meme and got banned' instead of violent protest? I mean honestly, the point is rule-breaking, not what rule is being broken.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:58 PM
-3

Nah, I'm good. I enjoy have a relatively violation free police record. Want to change the rules? Attempt to do it via the legal avenues available. Break the rules? Enjoy, but if I don't agree with the rules beforehand, I don't partake.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:52 PM
0

Nope. Mostly not. I'm simply saying that in their spaces, they make the rules. They don't want to embrace the truth? Fine. But OP can't act like he didn't know what was going to happen by going in there and giving his opinion.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:51 PM
2

I actually haven't claimed 'that no true feminist believes that'. I said 'Comparing an online forum with a movement as a whole is why we get feminists in MR claiming that we want to subjugate women because some people say these things and also identify as MRAs'. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Again, the rules are posted on the sidebar. That'd be like getting upset that some person who came and posted a meme was banned for violating the rules. I see where you're coming from; they should embrace trut…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:47 PM
0

No, I'm using the first rule I happened to see in the MR sidebar; no advocating for violence and utilized that. It's a rule, it was broken, if I had honestly said those things I would be warned or banned. That was my point.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:07 PM
21

Hilarious clip. I think one of the main reasons it's relatively unknown is because it was released exclusively through Netflix, and hasn't been on TV at all(though apparently it's now downloadable through his site). My favorite line: 'That guy at Home Depot wants to bang just as many broads as a celebrity; but whores don't care about lumber.'
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:03 PM
-4

Conflating the online subreddit with a movement as a whole is why we get 'feminists' in here comparing crazy people talking about some 'MRA thread' they found on a forum somewhere and us. That thread is a circle-jerk at best, or an indoctrination camp at worst. If they are not open to truths or other points of view; that's on them.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:02 PM
-1

I disagree. If you know going into something that there is a rule you disagree with, work to change it. If you just break it, nothing occurs.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:40 PM
6

Be fair; your argument wasn't invalidated; you violated the rules. They probably also deleted your comment. If someone came in here and said 'AW MAN WE SHOULD JUST GO DOWN TO CAMPUS AND SHOOT US ALL THEM FEMINISTS MMHMMMM' and was banned, it doesn't mean their position is invalid(though crazy), simply they violated our rules by being crazy in and among us and was shown out.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:33 PM
6

Might be fake. Check out the very beginning; My 23m partner is bullying me (28m) into getting married and I think its a bad idea right now. He says that its about time I propose to him (he's been saying this for over a year now I guess + We've been together for 9 year So they've been 'together' since one of them was 19 and the other 14?
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:30 PM
5

I don't. I know some gay married couples; and I've told a friend he really needs a pre-nup as his spouse is unemployed, unschooled and labor-averse.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:28 PM
2

I'm not missing the point. The association also has to be responsible for the safe conduct and health of the riders during the race. My point being that if it's observable that female cyclists can't bike further than say, 30km, then their competing in a race for 45km is ludicrous. Discrimination on the basis of gender? Sure. Unjustified or institutionalized? Prove it.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 04:33 PM
2

This isn't a thing. There aren't hard and fast physical laws of the universe which say a female can't do stuff, because of her gender. So where does this information come from? Really? So women are exactly as physically capable as men? I wholeheartedly agree with you. They should be allowed to compete. My only point in replying was that we have no proof to automatically indicate that it is gender-discrimination that has the UCI stopping the women from competing.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:13 PM
2

I would think that having an institution set up a rule which limits what members of one sex can do would be a pretty obvious case of institutionalized sexism. It doesn't take into account the actual stamina of the athletes, because it's not a rule about the athletes, it's a rule about the gender. At best, it could be based on the population statistics of athletes at the time, or maybe on the performance of the top female cyclist, at the time. Or it could be based on how far an athlete could cycl…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 02:42 AM
2

Technically we don't know anything about 'institutionalized sexism'. There may be discrimination, but that could have to do with the stamina of the athletes. There could be all sorts of reasons that the ruling is so.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:40 AM
4

Well, you posted this 4 hours ago and you have upvotes; so yes.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:34 AM
0

Exactly.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:18 AM
6

NAFALT!!!!!! Oh wait...
/r/MensRights09/07/13 12:10 AM
1

Don't apologize. Free speech! Plus I chortled at someone looking more effeminate than Orlando Bloom.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:54 PM
3

Exactly. 'I want a new car! I want a house! I want to get married! I want a baby!' These all screamed in the same shrill manner receive the same treatment if you do not acquiesce.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 03:50 PM
45

Tell her 'I wish you were more like [Sofia Vergara's character].' Then just watch your own personal Chernobyl in slo-mo.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 10:36 AM
7

Dude. As a guy from South Florida, you're exactly right.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 09:26 PM
2

How I honestly felt after reading these comments. /internet bro-fist
/r/MensRights29/06/13 05:02 PM
2

Are you fucking kidding?! This is ridiculous. Not the fact that I just read a story about using humans as toilets; but that this woman thought it should be acceptable to piss in someone's mouth against their will. Fuck me running.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:52 AM
1

Oh I know. But obviously Caroline Norton had just 'internalized the patriarchy' therefor her activism wasn't actually feminism, but patriarchy being pushed forth under the guise of feminism. It's like Feminception.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 04:29 AM
1

That is fucking hackery bullshit at it's finest. You do not report someone for stating an opinion you are opposed to. We do not silence fucking discourse.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:30 AM
1

/shudder P-please, don't say '50 shades' of anything. That fucking Twilight fan-fiction abortion of a book-series ruined it for me. Fucking written porn. But yes. 'So if patriarchy runs everything, and you guys understand this and push against patriarchy, then apparently Tender Years Doctrine, Duluth Model, Primary Aggressor Policies, Gender Earnings gap and everything you guys have pushed forth and complained about in the past what; 50 years is either indicative of Feminism being the 'Patriarch…
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:25 AM
2

Tell me about it. I love hearing from people who argue this stuff with me about how 'patriarchy hurts men too' until you say 'prove patriarchy' at which point I just turn into a monstrous tusked woman-hater.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:53 AM
1

They're chess players. They're just also pigeons.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 03:02 PM
1

'Oh no! LUN-TZU! LUN TZU NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! THAT MALE PANDA IS RAPING LUN-TZU WITH HIS ENGORGED PHALLUS?' 'Yeah, but she sure does seem to be enjoying it.' 'PATRIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARCHY!'
/r/MensRights17/06/13 02:59 PM
3

Exactly; they're all for choice, as long as it's their 'choices'.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 03:04 PM
3

Yeah. Cue 'Useless Shit I Learned When I Worked In Porn'. The stuff they're referencing is niche kink stuff; not everybody watches it. Hell, Facial Abuse would make the girls vomit during the scene; but the girls were informed of it beforehand and could back out if they didn't want to do it.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:39 AM
8

LOL. Down here that's a colloquialism for 'date her if you're able'.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:14 AM
3

This shit drives me nuts.All 'gonzo' porn is is porn without a script. It's cheap, and there was a niche for it about 10 years ago. Now the industry is going back to gonzo after having production value shoots be the big thing.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:04 AM
4

Wife that up.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 02:42 AM
2

There can be only one!
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:31 PM
6

Yes, but you're talking about legalities; which is all about splitting hairs.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:09 PM
4

Where is this link when people point out that women are non-violent?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:06 PM
3

Could be that it was an original law that stated that men and women have to serve 2-3 years in their armed forces. If they have to serve; it's not conscription; it's adherence to the law.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 05:00 PM
2

Sometimes Tianeman Square.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 09:07 PM
7

Yes, they had to enlist in war. It's not like they could, you know, remove the fucking feather from their vest and move on with their lives. You are cannibalistic. Giving so much power to these women with their feathers while denying that the people at the top (men, to be clear) pulled the strings when it came to war, media (and therefore common perspective), and the idealized form and actions of each gender. Yes you're right. We're giving them too much power. We should allow men to walk around …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:22 PM
2

Bet they followed us down here. In 'MURICAH. /spitoon
/r/MensRights12/06/13 04:31 PM
-2

I disagree with your views on the media being produced by society at large. But I upvoted you because you at least furthered the conversation.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:53 PM
1

It's beautiful...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:29 PM
2

This has nothing to do with the person being either black or male. It has to do with the fact that he is in court slapping his lawyers ass. In a courtroom; the judge is god; and you act appropriately. He did not show his 'contrition' for his crime by slapping his lawyers ass in front of the judge; who was offering a plea-deal much less than what the law mandated.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:07 PM
2

It still manages to stupefy me to think that people want to subdue rational discourse anywhere. I particularly liked that 'there is no scientific data showing men are stronger than women. Zip. Zero. None'. That's why world Olympic records held by women in weight-lifting are much less than the men's right?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:26 PM
1

Actually if you read the article he references that reddit quote. I'm not saying he didn't write about it, but he cited it as a source with a good idea; so presumably this reddit post came first.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:24 PM
1

This is exactly what I said. Upboat.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:54 PM
2

A bit of googling actually shows this: http://www.reddit.com/r/Equality/comments/cp35h/feminism_of_the_future_relies_on_men_nytimescom/c0u6hw8 There is no PUart in there; it is observation. What you're saying is that the historical 'facts' he presents aren't true?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:46 PM
1

I don't know, did pants de-incentivize men from creating families? If so; then maybe.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:06 PM
0

What PUA misrepresented research to support pseudoscientific claims? As of the first century AD the family unit in Rome fell out of usage and it kept getting worse until the entire empire collapsed. Did I say feminism was the downfall of the civilization? No. But those who ignore the past are doomed to repeat it, therefor I think at least it's worthy of study.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 06:06 PM
1

I wouldn't hold it as gospel; but the same thing happened to the Roman Empire; IIRC. They started arguing amongst themselves about the rights of it's women(even though they held a decent status in society) and it was about this time the Empire fell.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:35 PM
4

When Jane, Mark, Kyle, Alice, Kelly, and Kim Kyle is a gendered male name? That's odd; I know more women with the name than men. I never claimed to 'understand sexual dimorphism'. I understand that it states there are many differences between the two sexes, some of them physical. All I have to do is point to a female bodybuilder, and your entire argument fall apart. So pointing to a female bodybuilder negates the fact that on average, a man is stronger than a woman? So elite athletic women lifti…
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:54 PM
2

I read your argument. Hunting involved many different activities, both from accuracy(bow/sling/javelin), strength(spear/axe, carrying weight) and endurance(outrunning, or running longer than an animal, traveling distances weighed down with your pack or wounded huntspeople), all of which are physical activities. Would a female have just as much skill as a male hunter? It's possible, maybe even probable(but that's another discussion). But do women have the capacity for brute strength or endurance …
/r/MensRights10/06/13 05:10 PM
2

While it was an exaggeration, claiming that because they didn't have access to statistical measures doesn't mean much. It's not hard to determine who the strongest people are when you normally have celebrations that involve physical contests.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:13 PM
3

'Hmmmmm when Jane goes out to hunt; she brings back 3 squirrels. When John goes out to hunt; he brings back deer. Hmmmm.....'
/r/MensRights10/06/13 03:09 PM
10

Not giving a fuck. I've had 'friends' tell me I'm a misogynist who wants women to suffer, that it's ok because men have had it awesome for so long(y'know, being forced to fight for a cause you don't believe in, die, build society, knuckle down and work to provide for a family), and that 'feminism is fighting for men's issues too'. Apparently all we have to do is take a back-seat to women forever, and wait for them eventually to get to us. Ain't nobody got time for that. REVOLUCION!
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:52 AM
2

Well I mean yeah. Cuz god knows, if I have sex with a girl and lie to her about what I do for a living; it's rape. But if she lies to me about her age; I'm a pedophile who likes little girls. Fuck me, right? PATRIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARCHY!
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:43 AM
2

Oh don't even get me started. Apparently not only were women powerless chained up in bed for birthing; but also all men they ever knew were all sociopaths. Since none of the men did anything but treat women horribly like chattleand broodmares, that's the only conclusion that we could reliably draw right? Not, certainly, that it was a societal pact to further each tribe/clan's special interests? Or that while they may have had certain 'rights' that never really get proven, just pointed to, that w…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:29 AM
2

Tell me about it. Still an unsuccessful unpublished writer. Anyway, enough dwelling on retards(oh no wait, that discards feminists, this particular one then). I think you're right that if women attempt to dominate society, there will be violent resistance. I don't think men would tolerate subjugation any more than women would if it were, over the course of the next few decades, inflicted on us. Makes logical sense to me at least. I mean; women rose up and threw off patriarchy oppressively violen…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 02:05 AM
8

This is a good one GirlWritesWhat also has a blog, here it is.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 12:33 AM
1

See I wasn't that convincing. Earlier I had made the point that the reason women make less money; on average is because statistically they tend to choose less financially rewarding careers, or getting degrees in gender studies or philosophy and them being exactly worth less than the paper they're printed on to get a job. Found out about 10 minutes later he was an unemployed writer and his PhD? Philosophy. I proposed that if women tried to push in that manner, you could expect men whom; with noth…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:40 PM
2

Yeah, I had a party at my house about a year ago that had several people talking about 'gender issues'. Aside from being told that 'I am the definition of a misogynist and I want to see women suffer' because I said 'rape victims who are going to report have a duty to themselves and society in general to undergo a rape kit, because it leads to better evidence, which leads to conviction' and a man with a PhD arguing that 'men have oppressed women for so long that it shouldn't be fair; they should …
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:27 PM
1

LOL I thought everyone already had one of those. I don't have the link, but I've seen the argument made that male suicide is a form of abuse of one's closest family or companions - spouse, kids, etc. It's one of those things that makes it really hit home how out of touch feminism is. This is how reading this sentence made me feel.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 06:27 AM
1

Thanks - that is really encouraging :) Well I'm sure I'm not the only one. But I'm sure if we had a commiseration to see what we think about you guys(the ones who do the lion's share of hypothesizing, debating, and explaining) we would be dubbed a cult by the SPLC. Nope - No dying allowed. I'm sure that's a violation of the rules of effective debate. Besides, you've got to at least stick around until we've made enough headway in gender relations that you can socially be considered the primary vi…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:57 AM
1

You're blind to your own privilege. Having you or GWW tagged is a blessing because the arguments you make are always logical and well reasoned(which without any collegiate training, I need some learnin' in) but a curse because there's so godsdamned MUCH material to read. And I have to read it all because it's fairly interesting and helps me to debate better. Rain poncho? I fully expect to die the first time it happens.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 05:42 AM
5

20% of single parent households are male. I personally have never heard of a case like that; though I'm sure it's happened; it's just a chance that it is almost approaching 0. I think that just locking people up for petty crimes turns them into harder criminals, because it makes them more desperate (can't find a new job, ect). Oh. So say you rob my store of several hundred dollars worth of merchandise, pawn it then get caught after you spend it, I should take the hit to my credit with the insura…
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:15 AM
11

See I disagree. It's not acceptable. Because it fuels the mentality that if you commit a crime; and you are a mother; you will get away with it. You know what community service is? A fucking joke. You know what isn't? County for 45 days because you stole something.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 02:07 AM
3

Well, duh you're a socialist! <3
/r/MensRights08/06/13 01:25 AM
11

Yup.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 12:28 AM
2

Fourthed.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:40 PM
13

Same thing. The second it's made evident that 'Women are to be treated no differently then men when it comes to sentencing; unless they're pregnant' you will see a RASH of women inviting gangbang orgies so they don't go to jail. Those are no fun. Too much mess.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:40 PM
2

Oh I know, you've been friend-tagged for a while; which is a fucking blessing and a curse. The nickname is amazing, I will use it in future endeavours of making feminists bleed out their eyes and bite through their lips in rage.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:36 PM
2

Oh I know. I'm an '82 kid. I hated those rags that printed that stuff for girls. Beeteedubs; totally stealing 'Pampered-Ass Princess Butthurt'.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 09:00 PM
2

Is the name of the band 'Grrrrl P0wyr'? I will not be purchasing this album. Edit: I was also going to say 'magic-wand' but that would be soooooooooooo phallic-centric, and who needs to be oppressed more?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:17 PM
3

'Why yes; I am conditioned to be a rational thinking being only because of patriarchal norms, therefor I think there's nothing wrong! It has 0% chance to do with the fact that rational logic is how we got from rabid hairless gorillas to dominating the planet. That's just propaganda. Gaea appeared and waved her magic vagina around and knowledge fell out!' Fuck me running it hurt to think like that.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:17 PM
3

Damn. Foiled again. Breasts are part of a 'woman's way of knowing'. It's evident; men don't have breasts. Duh. /s
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:15 PM
1

Nope. That's because you're being oppressed with stereotypical gender roles! PATRIAAAAAAAAAAAAARCHY! Every time I say that; I envision those battle scenes from 'Braveheart' with Pictishly-armored women with tablet and smartphones screaming and charging an old man in a wheelchair. .....I'll see myself out.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:44 AM
1

3) Oneiorosgrip contends that wanting there to be repurcussions to men who expose women to STDs is "revenge." I thikn it's a little fucked up if you agree with him on that. /u/factorygrrrl said 'him'.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:35 AM
1

It better be feels for feminism class. If it's not feels, it's not acceptable. Oh wait, my bad. They also accept 'a woman's way of knowing'.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:04 AM
4

Yes, but they have to be charts with feels represented on them. TOXIC MASCULOGIC!
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:02 AM
10

Still, gaming is viewed as a primarily male... er... sport (do we call it a sport now? Or is it still just a hobby?) and most games are geared toward them. I don't especially have a problem with it, personally, but I see where people are coming from with their complaints. That's the thing. It's capitalism. The majority of gamers are male; young males. Why would you potentially fuck up your revenue stream for a much smaller percentage of gamers? Let's say there's 1 girl for every 2 boys. You make…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:24 AM
15

They don't realize? Did you ever play Mass Effect? The entire damn franchise had a gender neutral tone so that you can pay as either. There were love interests, even gay love interests in the first game that came out over 6 years ago. So then feminist gamers should make their own games. Maybe an MMO in which they fight the mmyssssssssssssstical patriarchy(/cue scary music).
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:14 AM
3

I liked it. It got a little Nazi-ish at the end with the chanting, but you can tell how upset the blonde infiltrator was. Her hands were shaking the whole time. More power to them.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:50 PM
2

This KiteTales is fairly intelligent. I like it. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:16 AM
1

Dude you gotta say her name three times. Like Wil Wheaton.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 06:13 AM
10

Favorite part was when the mouth-breathing dunce who was teleconferenced in claimed she had no power. She has a national platform; she communicates with the masses, but she has no power. Yeah that makes sense. Definitely passes the shit-test.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 05:57 AM
3

How exactly does one get kicked out of a movement? Waitaminute; did they send out ID badges?! I NEVER GOT MINE.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:43 PM
7

men shouldn't take away women's right to decide what to do with their bodies etc.) I believe you meant 'society'. Also; it's difficult to 'criticize the negative things that arise from feminism' when their own lobbies attempt to push forth gendered legislation.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:19 PM
1

So feminist lobbies pushing forth gendered legislation isn't relevant or related to the MRM being somewhat anti-feminist?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:41 PM
0

That's fine, but then how do you explain feminism's lobbies pushing for distinctly anti-male legislation or laws?
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:54 AM
2

Ugh. What happened?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:24 AM
2

I saw her post a few days ago; I liked it. Makes me wish some of my feminists 'friends' would have the epiphany she had.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:14 AM
6

This is true. 'Came from fucked up' is a NE saying.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 01:49 PM
1

Single moms and adoption? I have not seen these; they in South Florida?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:47 AM
2

Damnit came here to say this. Curse you GWW!
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:03 AM
2

Dude I saw those ads all the way to Tampa a couple weeks ago. Definitely made me laugh.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 03:36 AM
2

This guy is awesome.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:26 AM
17

That was a beautiful video. Thank you for posting it.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 03:54 AM
13

Aaaaaaaaaaaaand again. "I was one of htese people holding a sign saying "rapists shouldn't rape" like we're all in Dora the fucking Explorer and that is gonna help anything."
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:01 AM
6

Thanks. It wasn't enough I was listening intently to the video; and now snorted Budweiser all over my keyboard.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:58 AM
1

Well put sir/madame.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 03:55 PM
2

Mer MAN father! Mer MAN! /runs off sobbing
/r/MensRights12/05/13 03:45 AM
2

Thank you sir. You are a scholar and a gentleman. Disclaimer: The poster is not implying that those who are not scholarly minded, or gentlepersons are in any way less or bad, it is just a common colloquialism ohpleasedon'tkillme. /s
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:59 AM
3

Holy shit. I need to find this podcast. THE TED IS A LIE!
/r/MensRights12/05/13 01:19 AM
11

Hahahahahaha. I'm bitter. I bring up the point that it is the best option available to a subset of people that don't have any, and somehow I'm bitter. That's cute. Who's a special wittle snowflake knight? YOU ARE! When the time comes, what makes you think the mother explaining to her child 'Well, I wanted to have a child, which turned out to be you. So I got your father, who didn't want that responsibility yet, to impregnate me by lying to him by omission and stopping my birth control. Which he …
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:57 AM
14

This has nothing to do with women who choose to 'spermjack' as it were. Women are the arbiters. They choose to have sex; and they choose to have the child or not. So long as there are no alternative options or choice on the behalf of the father; this is the best option. Also; stop caterwauling about children 'being abandoned'. Do children who's mothers took sperm from a bank get the same speech? That their fathers abandoned them and they're horrible people? I mean; aside from the fact that the d…
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:43 AM
2

What happened on the Joe Rogan Podcast?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 12:26 AM
1

LOL. Not really germane to the discussion, but they all think they're famous; whether they really are or not. Some of the most awesome ones are the ones who appear crazy. Edit: Just realized I didn't answer the second part of your question. I worked as a Production Manager, kind of a glorified office manager but in charge of everything. I stopped because our collective boss; the owner of the company was a fucking moron. They axed our end and set everything up in a way that was better for them; w…
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:38 AM
1

Ugh. For days. Everything from women offering to blow me to give them more work to women threatening to tell my boss I attempted to rape them if they didn't get more work. Having to eat shit(metaphorically), shit that had been fucked out of their ass most days. Working conventions, hanging out with them outside of work. It was insane.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:33 AM
2

One of the content providers for Mofos/Brazzers.com.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 06:27 AM
1

What company did I work for? Is that what you're asking?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 08:18 PM
2

Exactly. This is for regular people though; not those potentially going to war. Hence the troubling part.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:22 PM
4

What are the things you see in your life that challenges mens rights? The ridiculous gendering of laws, the application of debtor's prisons to aid women and disadvantage men, the usage of people who make policy being without an ethical compass, the way the government cares more about who shuffles the money their way rather than what is best for their citizens. What are your reasons for joining this group? When I was sexually assaulted and went to a family friend who was a local LEO; I was told i…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:22 PM
2

A buddy of mine was(is, sorry) a Marine, and he told me something interesting. The marksmanship of the Marines in battle went up markedly once they started using targets with a human silhouette. In other words, this is kinda troubling.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 04:19 PM
3

Well that was 5 minutes of my life I'm not getting back.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:39 AM
1

Be careful. I have 2 friends of mine that are rabid feminists. I've tried speaking to them a few times about it(when they bring it up, not I) and it doesn't seem to work. Their version of 'patriarchy theory' revolves around the idea that 'everyone is privileged' 'men are just privileged more in all ways' and there was no convincing them otherwise. Anything good women had were in retaliation for 'patriarchy' and anything bad against men was 'patriarchy revenge'.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:35 AM
2

Not a goddamn thing. She only had a fake driver's license proclaiming she was 18, and she was super shady about it. I told her booking agent we couldn't use her. He was freaking out for no goddamn reason.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:20 PM
5

Dude. Preach.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:01 AM
3

Dude or Lady; you are awesome. Saved!
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:04 AM
3

Seriously? Do you have any handy links? It would be awesome to have that tucked away for my next argument.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 02:52 AM
1

I disagree with your last point. What I use to rebut is 'Oh, so when he had sex with her he was implicitly consenting to the potential of another living being growing inside of her, therefor he is forced to do things that are in it's best interests, not his? Where exactly did she not consent for the same act? I mean, if that's your argument; then technically abortion should be illegal because it's not in the best interests of the child, and she knows where babies come from.' Doesn't go over well…
/r/MensRights03/05/13 02:49 AM
2

Dude the entire way the checks and balances for the industry are fucked like that. So many laws broken regularly(though they are improving now) that it's insane. My company almost hired that girl too. I remember the night my boss came bursting into my house crying saying 'We're going to prison AManAlone, we're going to jail they shot an underage girl.' 'Ummmm, you mean you're going to jail; it's your company so you're liable for everything. I'm just gonna need to find other work.' Never felt so …
/r/MensRights03/05/13 02:11 AM
11

SHUT UP YOU NECKBEARD MISOGYNIST SHITLORD! FTFY.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:54 PM
12

I'll drop you this quote by Bell Hooks: “I am writing this essay sitting beside an anonymous white male that I long to murder.” Because the airline fucked up and sat her friend in this 'anonymous white male's' seat. Soooo...
/r/MensRights29/04/13 10:25 PM
5

Realize it's the internet; people revel in their autonomy and anonymity. They will often evince opinions they don't think out or wouldn't dare say because they feel they can do so.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 06:53 PM
12

I would've gone with 'Number Two; Make it so.' /boioioing.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:36 PM
1

You're a what?!
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:36 PM
1

/slowclap
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:03 AM
1

Nicemod, you're so nice!
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:56 PM
2

Permanent alimony; sure. That doesn't mean they couldn't assign you alimony for a set amount of time; no?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 09:40 PM
2

God I wish. I worked in porn and those girls weren't as mercenary as the locals down here.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:10 PM
2

Every time I read something like that happening in South Florida; I think to myself 'Why do I live here again?'
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:15 PM
3

STOP OPPRESSING THEM WITH LANGUAGE THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND! /s
/r/MensRights21/04/13 05:39 AM
1

Seriously. I really need to find a posting or article debunking this 'masculinity is toxic and bad mkay' theory I see everywhere.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:34 PM
2

Seriously. I mean obviously no men work for AAUW, therefor they aren't able to get their patriarchal rape-digits(that's fingers for you non believing rape apologists) into the data to force it to conform to their oppressive narrative! Oh god. My head hurts from typing those things.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:53 PM
3

Like I said, it goes both ways. If you are citing that my source is 'biased' because it's done 'by the government or a company that a man works, or has worked or may potentially work in ever', how is your source which is definitively labelled as having an agenda acceptable? Oh, what's that, because it agrees with you? My bad; you right.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 06:19 PM
2

Love bringing that to bear. 'Oh my source from the CDC NISVS survey is problematic? Please, let's go with your 'peer-reviewed' study done by the 'Association For Putting More Women In Power'; it's obviously agendaless. No problems here.'
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:47 PM
2

LOL. If they're collecting alimony, doesn't that mean that they actually liked a man enough to marry him? Also, you can't really get mad at 'gold-digging'. It's a natural hard-wired response in their search for a mate. Actually, you can get mad at it, but that's like getting upset over the tides.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:45 PM
5

I don't know, why, but remember feminists have jobs too. They're 'reporters, 'professors' and 'activists'. Those are all paying gigs.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 03:35 PM
1

I'm just exhausted from arguing with 3-5 different people at once. I have no interest in ignoring facts. If you know that bill was drafted with a sexist, exclusionary mentality, and you have a justification besides that it focuses on women, let me know. Because that, in and of itself, is not sexist. It could have turned out to be myopic, but not sexist. I'm sorry, drafting laws that EXCLUDE one half of the population from receiving aid from the government is sexist. Not myopic. Myopic would be '…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:05 PM
1

The idea is that males were given more advantages more easily because society was set up to encourage masculinity in males, which included leadership roles and positions of power. Whether or not men wanted that place, they were put in it, benefited overall, and perpetuated the cycle. The same applies to whites; growing up white offered many advantages in the past, and still does today. Do you deny the privilege of whites as well as that of males? No. Society perpetuated this 'cycle', not men. Wo…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 04:27 PM
2

That's exactly what I meant. No, 'Patriarchy Theory' is fairly adamant that the primary prerequisites is your sexual equipment for your 'privilege level', not your wealth or power. Because if you are rich, that's fine, but if you are a MAN, you are oppressing women. At a certain point in history, yes. But go back far enough and its origins are physical ability, biology, force. Yes. Because men were better able to handle(and still are) defending the homestead. When the Other People were a 2 day r…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:02 PM
1

You portray white males as some sort of victim throughout history, forced to do hard work for little reward. You are partially right. The White Man's Burden can be analyzed in many, many ways. To be brief, white masculine males prospered greatly throughout history, and they propagated this privilege because it benefited them. Noooooooooo. Fuck a bunch of that. MEN. Men went out at 14 to kill or be killed. Men who did not fit the paradigm of what was 'manly' died, and quickly. 'They' did not prop…
/r/MensRights08/04/13 05:25 AM
2

THANK YOU. I thought I was the only one thinking that.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:24 AM
7

Wow. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 08:19 AM
3

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing." FTFY.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:49 PM
2

Of course. It's an amazing experience.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:47 PM
1

Hmmm. Any useful app or website that shows you where they are in your area?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 01:30 PM
1

I'm glad we can agree Yitzach. /commencechortling
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:43 AM
12

LOL. No. I know that. I meant 'people hold MRA events?'
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:43 AM
1

Hey I never said that. But I make jokes about everything. Either everything is funny or nothing is :P
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:39 AM
3

MRA events?
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:31 AM
1

Do I think women belong in the kitchen? No. Did I enjoy dating and living with a girlfriend who wanted to be a home-maker? God yes. Home made meals when I got home from work? nomnomnom.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 03:10 AM
5

Blinded me with sciiiiiiiiiiiiience.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 05:37 PM
1

...but there IS. It's been documented so often and so many lawsuits done that I can't even bother to cite sources. I assume you know how to Google. No. There isn't. Those same studies also show that men work more hours and take less paid time off. You can't cite only ONE PORTION of a study. Except not get paid as much if they DO decide to have children? So they're essentially forced to choose. It is a choice. They choose. If they want to focus all their energy on a career; then they will get as …
/r/MensRights16/03/13 05:33 AM
1

Keep in mind that not every situation looks like this. In fact, many situations look just like what one you proposed above but with the gender switched, and it's very likely that the woman who works more STILL gets paid less than the man who works less. Ummmm no. In one of the studies cited for the '77 cents to every dollar a man makes' debacle it states that on average men work more hours in full time positions than women do. As far as women who do the same amount of work and been with the comp…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 11:40 PM
6

Men can never be 'single fathers'(or as close to never as to matter), but women aren't punished for having children. If a woman can manage a family and her career, her salary doesn't suffer. It's capitalism; and it makes sense. There is no reason my business should pay you for work you haven't done or time you haven't been there. Women aren't paid less for taking a day or two off here or there, it's statistical. They work less hours and take more vacation time. If I have two people on salary wit…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:21 AM
2

hahahahaha that was hilarious. 'My eyes are up here. I'm not a piece of meat' /opens door 'There ya go.'
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:31 AM
1

Hey man, my feels. That shit sucks.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:39 PM
7

Dude seconded. I wish they would teach courses like this. I might have actually stayed in school instead of leaving in disgust.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:01 PM
4

That's the issue? I thought it was the "To destroy my entire family for the simple thing that I raped him and bore his child without his consent and it would emotionally and physically scar him, that's a very selfish thing to do." FTFY.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:26 AM
1

What in the fuck is USWAM? And yes, if they're over the age of consent, they are no longer minors and cannot have someone else press charges on their behalf, as is the case with statutory rape. In NJ, a minor cannot give consent because they are a minor, the right or option to press charges is on the parents. Goddamn did you reply to all my posts?
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:48 AM
1

Excuse me, telling people that statutory rape isn't rape can lead them to believe that it actually isn't, which can influence their decisions to committing illegal acts. Governments may not own languages, but they enact and enforce the laws. If they claim something is a form of 'rape', until the populace rises up and demands the laws to be changed; it will be an illegal act. Whether it's 'rape' or not is decided by the people involved, or should be.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:46 AM
1

The conspiracy theory comment was based on the notion that our governments 'control' us, or that our thoughts or reasoning is directly controlled by said government.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:41 AM
1

Asking 'Bro do "you" think' is insinuating that I have no concept of how to think critically, or at it's simplest, use my brain to form coherent arguments. It's not directed at a group, or at the discussion we're having, or at my 'position' that the law states having sex with people who are 'underage' is illegal, it's aimed at me. The implication being that if you don't agree with the legal definition of rape, then it isn't rape. If you believe that having sex with someone who is legally defined…
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:40 AM
1

I wouldn't necessarily say 'testing', but a class taught to students on the dangers and likelihoods of procreation, diseases, etc., etc., instead of the 1 hour lecture and handing out of condoms I saw a few years back with my little brother. And that was at the highschool level, I believe junior year.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 01:35 AM
0

Wow. Having sex is equivalent to jail? Do I think? Talk about straw-men and ad hominem. Breaking the law can lead to jail, among other things. Having sex with someone who the law states is unable to give consent; is rape within the law. If you want to change the law because you think it isn't fair; then do so. Don't just wantonly break it because you disagree.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:35 PM
-1

Oh my god, you're one of those conspiracy theorists. It's odd how by pointing out 'hey, that is against the law' it makes me somehow sympathetic for my 'captors'. It is against the law. It may not be just; but it is in place so that young people don't get taken advantage of. If it needs to change; then it will be changed, or not. Either way, you reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:16 PM
0

Well, seeing as I'm not threatening you with anything, nor is the law, I don't agree that it applies. Nor is it the same with 'paying protection money to the mafia' because that isn't the law upheld by the government. I can evince the opinion that if a person breaks into my house; I have the right to shoot them; that doesn't actually give me the right to do so(depending on the state of course). If you know that something is illegal, and engage in that activity anyway, you deserve whatever conseq…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:07 PM
2

I agree. I don't think this girl was raped at all. Is there anyone who thinks a 19 year old man shouldn't be having sex with a 16 year old woman? Anyone? I think that people having sex should have some basic knowledge of the possible repercussions of it. After that milestone is achieved, it's on them. That being said, where I grew up, this case would be considered statutory rape. What I think doesn't alter what the law is. I want the law to change; that doesn't mean I advocate violating it while…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 10:02 PM
-1

Right; go have sex with an underage person and admit it to the police. Let me know how that goes.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:45 PM
-1

I don't know; maybe? What I do know, is that telling people that 'statutory rape isn't rape' can get people arrested. Again, you can disagree all you'd like, but what the law states goes. If you want to change it; then campaign for it. Until that happens, if you commit statutory rape; it is rape.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 09:37 PM
-2

Ok. I'm not 'moving goalposts'. You have stated it isn't rape. The name of the crime; is 'statutory rape'. You can have your opinion all you'd like, but in the eyes of the law, it is RAPE. Whether you or I agree with this matters not when it comes to the law.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:59 PM
1

Noooo, that's like saying it's ok if I fuck a child because they said it was ok. I understand consent laws for children. As well, legally speaking it is rape, or sexual assault if you're male.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:44 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:16 PM
-2

Nope. It's statutory rape; meaning the one who is under the age of 18 isn't technically an adult; so their 'consent' is impossible to give. If the other person is within 2 years of their age, then it's a lesser charge; but not against the law.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 08:16 PM
8

In the ones I've lived in,(mainly the NE US) it has to be within two years, and 18 and under. Meaning if the girl is 17 and the boy is 19, it's illegal. If the guy is 16 and the girl is 18, legal.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:19 PM
43

Depends on the area. State I grew up in, this was rape of the statutory kind.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:36 PM
1

Indubitably sir.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 07:58 PM
2

My feeling is that Men's Rights is for people of all colors, FTFY. Also; I agree with you. People are entitled to their opinions whether we agree with them or not.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:18 PM
0

No it's not. Forever after he would just be that weird guy that wouldn't join because 'whatabouttehmenz?!'
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:34 PM
5

See I disagree with that. Not joining isn't going to change anything. Joining the gym closest to your house and trying to effect change is a path with convenience and activism on it's side.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 03:18 AM
15

No, what we are saying is that for a movement to stand for something, it has to stand. You can't claim those women aren't feminists, and that you are, or that it is a personalized experience. Because if it is, then it's a religion or moral code, not a movement. Again, I've said this quite a few times here on MR, it's not about feminism. It's about the women who claim the moniker then abuse their power to put men down and raise women up. The Duluth Model, Family Court by laws, Tender Years Doctri…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:27 PM
5

I realize that "sexism" isn't about oppressing women anymore, but that it's more about pigeon-holding BOTH sexes. Sexism is the negative reaction to a person based on their gender; it was never about oppressing women. Men were equally 'oppressed'. Yes, there's rampant objectification of women in advertising and cinema, but it's also a pretty publicized issue. You know what we don't talk about? How Abercrombie and Fitch and other companies love showing off half-naked men with perfectly chiseled a…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:11 PM
6

The issue I see in what you posted is, you don't define 'equality'. Do you mean 'equality of outcome' or 'equality of opportunity'. Also, this realize that 'this disconnect' isn't a disconnect. It's society, or parts of it, recognizing actions instead of words. Ever heard the old saying 'If one person calls you a duck, call them stupid. If ten people call you a duck; see if you can quack'? Same concept.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 05:18 PM
6

I disagree. My girlfriend has let me know that I have "Issues" that I need to work out with women. Blames my mother and ex-girlfriends. Banned me from using gender specific words to prove her point. I'm considering just avoiding the topic from now on. Sounds fairly controlling.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:10 AM
5

FINE THEN BLUEOAK BE RIGHT ALL THE TIME WHATEVER PSHT. /S
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:49 AM
10

No, fuck a bunch of that. The edit wasn't up there earlier. Nor does it matter. The second any woman tells me, regardless of the level of our relationship that I am not allowed to use certain words, it is done.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 02:47 AM
48

I would say leave the relationship(EDIT DUE TO BLUEOAK9). She can't 'ban' you from doing a goddamned thing.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:05 PM
3

The issue you have with the enforcement of policy within the industry is that it doesn't work. People will weasel their way out of it unless there are actual consequences in place. Hell, there was a potential HIV outbreak that showed the entirety of the industry all the laws the individual companies were breaking regularly, which have now been rectified.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:20 AM
1

I don't see it as playing the victim, or whether or not they are true. I think that it's a good example of small pockets of misandry in society at large. Look at the Bus Story that was posted here earlier. Did it legitimately happen? We don't know. Do we know that it COULD happen? Definitively. I personally like the little vignettes of misandry, as it helps me stay focused on the goals.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:22 PM
10

I know those feels.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:34 PM
8

Hear hear.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:33 PM
1

Powerful, Bert Kreischer. Powerful.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:19 PM
1

Yes there are. And if opponents would stop sending people in for ninja edits, I'm sure the amount would decline.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:39 AM
1

Agreed that it could even be considered a reward, but at the same time; when you have kids that don't want to be in class and don't care about doing the work or disrupting the lessons, putting them in the corner is going to get exactly nothing done. They don't care about learning, they care about being humiliated in front of their peers.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 05:24 PM
0

I never claimed that. If he's joked with students as such it can be seen as inappropriate, which I said above. No, I didn't accuse you of being a troll, I said you sounded like one, which I still think you do. Has nothing to do with disagreement. I sound like SRS because I said he may actually be things that are technically inappropriate? Alright. Then I guess I sound like SRS to you.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:26 PM
3

No, forcing a student to sit in a corner while the rest of class goes is, in fact humiliating. In my highschool they sent you out of the class so you were no longer disruptive. Whether it works or not, I can't say. I haven't 'succumbed' to a thing. I've put forth my opinion on the topic; because that's exactly what it is. As well, purporting to touch the students in a potentially in appropriate way is not the way to stay out of the public eye. If a female teacher told a male student she would 's…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 03:12 PM
3

I mean, if what you claim he's saying is true; he is doing something wrong. From what the caller said he's humiliating students, offering to place hands/lips on a student(whether it's a joke or not) and 'saying inappropriate things to the girls'. Now, she may not have specific evidence, but that doesn't make this a baseless claim.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:52 PM
6

Well considering that the man in most cases is paying child support to the woman AND having to keep his 'standard of living' EQUAL to what the mother of his child has so as to keep visitation rights, it would probably come down in the man's favor.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:32 AM
5

I've been posting in there as well guys. I hope some minds change when they see how their arguments can be turned against them.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:46 AM
-2

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA. I particularly liked the part where she fell off the side of the car.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 10:13 AM
1

I also remember back in grade school; when we were taught not to assault other people because they made fun of us. When you're a child, you can do some childish shit like that and apologize, because you are a child, it is expected of you to be a child. She was not a child. Was he partially at fault? Yes; as most of the comments on here I've read have admitted. Does that equate being maced in the face? No, nor does it mean you get to do whatever act you referred to for the other guy applying ice …
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:55 AM
2

Is that where you support them because they are children?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:52 AM
-1

No, she carries around the muffin factory in the back of her pants. /rimshot
/r/MensRights26/01/13 05:51 AM
2

To the first paragraph, the woman is saying(albeit in a pedantic tone) that you can determine whether someone cares about the opposite gender based on the rights/privileges that they do or do not have; and that both 'sexes' have been oppressed by government since time began.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 03:26 AM
2

No. No I can't. I tried that shit for a few months. I was completely fucking useless at work the next day. The first time I was in the fetal position the next morning and took me 10 minutes to get out of it, grimacing with pain.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:13 AM
1

I'd prefer to live in Washington state where two gentleman can engage in fisticuffs WITH POLICE OFFICER OBSERVING without intervention.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:56 AM
1

Unless we migrate to washington state, it is illegal in most others to hold a fight club.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:29 PM
2

Well, it's pretty obvious when you take the condom off. That's a milder case. I agree about male birth control; but I still think there needs to be a provision put in place for a waiving of parental rights and obligations.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:42 PM
0

Methinks you protest too much. Like a bitch. /superuppercut FTFY.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:39 PM
6

So if a girl pokes holes in a condom explicitly to get pregnant, and then does so and takes me to court for 'child support' for a child in which I did not want, that's acceptable and somehow not coercive?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 11:23 PM
18

By your logic, the mother would also inform the child that the child was birthed against the father's will, and she has been having the government rob him at gunpoint until the child is 18. Will that harm the child?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:30 PM
1

Well, considering I am a Yank, you'll have to forgive my spelling :P
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:13 PM
3

Burritosandbeer needs Mint Julips STAT!
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:28 PM
1

What's wrong with them? I don't know, nor will I cast aspersions. But that's the reason we have the mensrightsbot.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:13 AM
4

Touché salesman, I too have an uncle. FTFY.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:10 AM
8

No, it's because people will come here and say something along the lines of 'You guys are all rape apologists and I hope you all burn in Hell for being fucking neckbeard shitlord misogynists.' And then when people reply with anger, they ninja edit their post to say 'Hi, I'm a feminist interested in MRM.' so the members here look like insane assholes. They then screengrab it and tell people we're insane.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:09 AM
1

We're just gonna go ahead and BAM kick this up a notch with a SuperUppercut. (BTW, every time I read your name I see this in my mind)
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:47 AM
6

Agreed.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:42 AM
5

You may not be, but feminism sure likes to quote it at 2%. But I digress. Concisely, if the Kanin study is incorrect, I can accept that. But I know just as many guys with a demonstrably false accusation or claim of false accusation(and I do mean demonstrably false, for a few of the occasions I was there for the deed) as I do women who claim to have been sexually assaulted(I say claim because since I was not present, it is hearsay).
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:36 AM
5

The same world that uses the demonstrably false statistics of '1 in 4 women are raped in their lifetime', when in the study, they combined two sets of data from 'sexually assaulted' and 'attempted sexual assault', while in the study 49% of rape 'victims' didn't consider it rape. I appreciate you coming forth to tell all of us that the Kanin study is incorrect, I do. But at the same time don't act like every statistic and study done and touted by feminists are not being misrepresented for politic…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:18 AM
1

While I agree, money greases the wheels. It's how feminism rose.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:24 PM
21

No white man will ever know the frustration and hurt that wells up in those relegated to the role of outsider or spectator. It's like being erased, invalidated. At its most fundamental level, exclusion is not about political correctness or quotas or ideology. It is not ultimately a political matter, but a human one. Do you think they've realized that when they force men out of their gatherings it affects them the same way; or are we just relegated to the status of beasts?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:22 PM
1

FEMINISTS think having sex while intoxicated is rape. By intoxicated I mean able to make decisions, make purchases, and drive(albeit illegally). And yes. There was an article in England a few months ago about two professional football(soccer) players picking up a girl, bringing her back to their hotel room and having sex with her. She 'didn't remember anything' and they were convicted of raping her and sentenced to prison.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:22 PM
1

Of course it should be investigated. That isn't the point. No. Holding someone for something THEY MIGHT HAVE DONE is not just. If that's the case you will see a rapid increase in the amount of money going to our prison system. If someone is hurt by the actions of another, it is a crime(barring feelings). If these two are actually guilty of rape then throw the book at them. BUT. Outing people for what they are ALLEGED to have done, especially with a crime such as this is unacceptable. It is an al…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:47 PM
1

They've been suspended while the alleged assault is being investigated. ALLEGED. Granted, it can be unequivocal that they broke curfew, and are being punished as such. Hell even further in the article it states Further, the two students being investigated are Texas football players. Again, you do the math here. As if being from Texas or playing football make you a boner-werewolf.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:12 PM
8

Fourthed. I saw GWW on some youtube link I was watching, and here I am.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:07 PM
4

MISSIONARY POSITION WAS IMPLEMENTED BY MEN TO OPPRESS WOMEN BY BEING PHYSICALLY ON TOP OF THEM. /s Stay classy /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:28 PM
6

I brought up that same point; somehow that person thought that civilian deaths automatically equalled female deaths, and that no male civilians were harmed in the prosecution of war.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:28 AM
9

The argument I usually go to when something as this is brought to my attention is this. Going back to the early 1900's, women asked for the right to vote and were given it, without obligation(unlike men; see selective service). That is fine, if women are just as much citizens as men(which they can be) they deserve the right to vote(as well as the responsibility, but we won't go into that). Feminism achieved that. Feminism has pushed forth initiatives in the past few decades that directly harm SO…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:48 AM
9

I'm not being condescending. I would honestly love to see that. The difference between the two is that if genital mutilation happens to a woman, it's 'debilitating and humiliating' whereas if it happens to men it's a 'medical procedure, have you ever seen an uncut penis? Gross!'. It's a double-standard that stands because feminism does not care about men outside of the scope of their belief structure.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:45 AM
8

Check the links to the sidebar. This place isn't necessarily anti-feminism. This 'place' is anti-feminism because it needs to be. What specifically doesn't sit right with you?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:42 AM
2

I would honestly love to watch you, or another feminist bring up female genital mutilation in comparison with circumcision as 'it's a personal choice'. It would be enlightening. And amusing.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:38 AM
6

Just as there are many people who are pro FGM, right? So I guess you should just let women's clitoral hood be nicked with a needle.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:34 AM
10

Am I being upvoted for not knowing something? Stop it.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:53 PM
1

Actually; it asked 'what's wrong with WHITE MEN'. Since apparently white men are entitled to wealth and sex, when they don't get it they go crazy and kill people. /s It has nothing to do with the fact that these people are INSANE. Just their gender.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:48 PM
3

You tell her you believe that women belong in the kitchen. When she gets offended, you explain that that doesn't matter. Your statement, and hers has no basis in fact. If people are unable to open up their minds to the possibility they are wrong, then they're beyond convincing. As far as proof, check the links on the right side.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 07:42 PM
30

What.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:48 PM
44

Wait what? Seriously? I've never seen it or spoken about it. What's the premise?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 05:36 PM
3

You..../wags finger in face You're good you.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:33 AM
2

You've never seen Apocalypse Now?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:17 PM
1

Oh ok. Sorry, I thought it was a double-entendre with the 'plumbing the depths of human experience'. What with SlutWalks and all.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:32 PM
1

The links in the article are to Manboobs' site; which links to several comments from people in MR who advocated a man getting a lawyer because of a crazy scenario the 'poster'(discovered shortly thereafter to be a troll) posted about how his girlfriend is pregnant and screaming at him she's going to keep the baby and fuck him over for 18 years. At one point ONE poster stated that he should lie about punching her; once. Several other people sympathized with the poster and suggested lawyering up a…
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:46 PM
1

By They hire hot, angry women who, because of their liberal art degrees have plumbed the depths of human experience, Do you actually mean 'taken lots and lots of dick'? Just a clarification.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:36 PM
1

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA good post. lol.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:07 PM
1

Dude/Lady, have all my upvotes.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:02 PM
3

Apologies. I forget my diction lol. You are correct.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:46 AM
1

LOL. I never got that vibe from any of the girls who worked for us.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:00 AM
7

I love the smell of fear. We had an argument once, for 12 hours. When it was all over, I went over it. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' feminist. The smell, you know, that rancid fearful stink, the whole internet. Smelled like..... .....victory.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:14 PM
2

I would be interested in watching as well.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:24 PM
1

Any recommendations? I purchase a surplus of reading when I go visit home for the holidays.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:43 AM
2

During the act one should be able to withdraw consent. Implying it can't be withdrawn retroactively also removes that option. Hahahahaha 'pilots told not to crash planes'. It's funny cuz it's accurate. Also, enjoy an upvote so I didn't write a response sir!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:17 AM
3

The stimuli for it is completely autonomous. It can happen anytime anywhere. So say you're asleep. Your girlfriend comes back from the bar and is drunk and horny. If she starts playing with it, it'll probably get hard without you even waking up
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:36 AM
3

No. I looked at the first ten pages, and in them it showed that. I stated that. I am not making the claim that the majority of the people who died are women and children.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:33 AM
-3

I thought that at first, but I don't know. The people that live down here can be awful dumb. I mean, it wouldn't surprise me if it was in earnest, but if it was a hoax, I actually would be surprised. Pleasantly so in fact.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:19 AM
3

Preach.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:11 AM
0

Hahahaha that's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:56 AM
3

I agree with you, but they are victims. When you sign up to serve, you sign up to do whatever it takes to complete your orders. Maybe die. So while they volunteered to potentially die, that doesn't mean they are any less of victims. As far as women 'getting a few under their belts', I don't quite understand what you mean. If you mean women starting wars, there have been a few started by women, it doesn't matter who starts them, it always ends badly for some people. As far as prosecuting a war, i…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:54 AM
8

Actually; if you check the body-count from your site, of the first ten pages of casualties, only 46 of 250 casualties are verifiably women. That's not anywhere near a majority. Even including the 'unknowns', it only rises to about 96-100 of 250. Still not a majority. The post isn't ignorant, as it's not as if Hilary Clinton said 'Women are the primary victims of war, but we honor the sacrifice the people who died make. They marched forth for our countries interests and did their utmost duty in d…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:48 AM
3

No, victim implies some harm was done to you because of the act. Nobody says women don't suffer because of war. But to claim that people who were historically(in reference to the USA) conscripted, and forced to fight in wars, whereas otherwise they would have been killed as traitors, and their families shunned by any they met after having their belongings taken, are the worst victims. I can point this out because they usually ended up dead. War may not be a 'good' act, but it appears much worse …
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:39 AM
-6

OK. In regards, to the first paragraph in it's entirety: You don't get to decide the penalty for posting something that was arguably a 'tasteless' joke. The school(barmy as that might seem) or the POLICE do that. Second: THE ANARCHIST COOKBOOK HAS BEEN POSTED FOR FREE ON THE INTERNET FOR DECADES. YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT. Third: Your reputation has NEVER been stellar. Any school down here is reckoned to be a party school, not necessarily without merit. Fourth: Fuck the what? You want to erase his…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:27 AM
1

Who said that? I blame FEMINISM for pushing through gendered laws that affect men. That's about as far as it goes, and that wasn't even stated here. Just that with the new laws, women can accuse a man of rape, and if he had 20 minutes to do it with no witnesses, like taking a crap, or ran back to his dorm room, he's going to be suspended for the semester whether he did anything wrong or not.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:47 PM
1

I'm sorry, women's fault? We are talking about a situation in which an enthusiastic and willing participant in repeated sexual acts up and claimed rape the next day correct? That is THAT WOMAN'S fault. Not all women. Making it so boys can be ejected from schools on the say so of a woman is NOT attempting to control women. I never said it was solely in their character. You may be projecting a little bit here. I said that the schools WILL NOT CHARGE A GIRL AS THEY WOULD A BOY ACCUSED OF THE SAME C…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:37 PM
16

Agreed. Thanks for your service fellas. And ladies.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:34 PM
1

Have a tear from me. I mean upvote. Didn't bring a tear to my eye. No sirree Orcasmic.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:30 PM
7

My Yaya. She was a hardened old Greek bitch in her 80's, and would still rap my shin with her cane if I did not act politely in front of company. She was a wrinkly battle-tank when she went loudly into that good night earlier this year. She taught me arguably the two most important lessons I may ever learn. She taught me the value of self-worth, and giving exactly zero fucks what other people think about you. If you have the wherewithal to continue a course of action when nobody else thinks you …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:28 PM
1

Well then you would be running into the situation of convincing a(likely feminist-leaning) 'court' that you were forced to penetrate a woman against your will, which doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:14 PM
2

Internet shorthand for 'btw', which itself is an acronym for 'by the way'. So it's 'You can't come in, and by the way we're not giving you your money back.'
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:12 PM
1

Yes! Nice and clean. Elegant. Just like a bold typeface saying Thank you for not being a douche. ___________Signed, ________MRA Redditors
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:58 PM
5

Not going to happen anytime soon. The feminist mindset is entrenched in academia. Hell, look at what happened a few weeks ago at the University of Toronto about Warren Farrell. There's a few links on here about it, it's crazy. Take what they were protesting and change 'men's rights' with 'iranians' and 'rapist' with 'camel fucker'. But they haven't truly been censored by the university.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:18 PM
1

Huh. I must have made a mistake; I distinctly remember my Dad and his buddies talking about how Brandon died like his Dad... My apologies Clamhurt_legbeard you were correct.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:17 PM
7

There are two options to get really good data. Check out the right side of the sub, for the articles and wikis for the movement; OR, at the very top on the right hand side there is a search bar. Search for what statistic you're looking for and you can generally find a post with it.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:50 PM
1

So did Bruce...
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:44 PM
1

Sorry, I may not have said it clearly. Putting GWW in a verbal debate with Sarkeesian or Kilstein would be like pitting Bruce Lee in a grudge match against a paraplegic.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:28 PM
8

My only recommendation is to realize that while not everyone here is going to be nice, it doesn't necessarily invalidate their views or opinions. We TRY and be polite with our discourse, but check out the sub and the articles. Welcome.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:23 PM
7

Definitely check out the one with Jamie Kilstein; as Joe Rogan tears him a new asshole, and it's in the vein of gender politics(somewhat).
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:17 PM
48

HAHAHAHHAHAHAH Btdubs no refunds Perfect. Flawless Victory.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:01 PM
1

I mean don't get me wrong, I've gotten several 'yes'es, but I've gotten plenty of 'no's. The one that made me the most enraged, and where I snapped; was the 'I need feminism because my opinion means less than a womans, or a trans-person, or a person of color, and feminism reminds me of that.' What in sweet merciful zombie jesus-fuck?! Seriously? Your opinion is worth less because of anyone else? Did you not LEARN about free speech, or our inherent rights and freedoms? It just enraged and simulta…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:45 PM
3

Preach.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:38 PM
2

Grand Theft Auto is racist because it shows minorities living in POVERTY!
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:46 PM
2

A friend of mine complained that 'there weren't enough Redguard(black people for those of you who aren't nerds like me) in Skyrim'. Really? Black people are known for being native to fucking Scandinavia. Thanks. Obviously racist.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:27 PM
1

hahahahahaha this is pretty fucking funny. I like it.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:25 AM
2

Like a lemon to lime, Or a lime to a lemon, She sips feminist kool-aid With ALL the fine WOMYN!
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:23 AM
1

All some schools need to expel a student on sexual assault charges is the OPPORTUNITY of said student being able to commit the act and they can expel HIM. I say him because c'mon, women aren't going to be charged with this shit.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:14 AM
3

Bullshit. Not just your family are supportive. There are other people out there man. There are others like us that had their lives ruined like this. I know where you're at. It's like the world is a fucking black hole and nothing is good or worthy of enjoying, and everyone is abandoning you. It's bullshit. People are remarkably fucking dumb. It will pass. You will find other friends. If they didn't even bother to ask you about what happened; then fuck them you didn't need them. Here is what you a…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:10 AM
2

Because of the 'Dear Colleague' letter, the only evidence level needed at a school is whether the student COULD HAVE committed the rape.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:04 AM
1

Dawwwwwwwwww. That was just rage talking. Rage and my 2 book a week habit.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:26 AM
4

Hey. What if; and this is crazy, we wrote a thank you card, or something like that for a situation like this? It'd be something that could show appreciation to people who actually utilize critical thinking and common sense simultaneously in academia. Crazy or crazy....LIKE A FOX?!
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:56 AM
10

No but you don't understand! HIStory has the word 'His' in it which is a MALE-GENDERED PRO-NOUN! OBVIOUSLY IT'S PATRIARCHY!' 'Buuuuut 'Feminism' is 'female-centric' and-' 'NO IT'S NOT IT'S ABOUT EQUAAAAAAAAAAAAALITY! PATRIARCHY!'
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:54 AM
11

Not only is it considerate; I'm sure she'd appreciate the irony.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:52 AM
1

Danke. I wish I knew how to spell the full word, but I speak French. :D
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:26 AM
2

YOU'RE MAKING IT WORSE CID420!
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:21 AM
2

0.o what?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:20 AM
1

You may have misconstrued my last comment, or I may not have elucidated it as I thought. As a counterpoint to men choosing to be home-makers, I think that while men can be home-makers that it is more nature rather than nurture for women to be. I would 100% support full paternity leave equal to maternity leave. This is true; but that would be because statistically, women are less likely to enter less human-oriented fields than men are. I don't agree with affirmative action, it seems more outcome …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:19 AM
1

That's not fair man. C'mon, you're better than that. That'd be like having a paraplegic fight Bruce Lee(pre-death-by-gunshot-wound).
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:30 AM
2

:O Holy fuck. That would be amazing.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:29 AM
2

Dude, totally. Fuck I just quoted Bill & Ted. >.<
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:28 AM
3

Nail on the head. You are not only a big personality in the movement, you seem more approachable than the others. Plus, it's kind of like what I think of when Warren Farrell was a big time feminist. He was touted as this amazing feminist who happened to be a man.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:27 AM
1

Upboat for being congenial enough to call him 'boy'.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:25 AM
2

I think it's more of a specialization issue. When she is speaking about a subject in which she knows much; she is confident and assertive. When she has nothing to say, she is slightly less so. It's not like Joe Rogan is going to be asking her inappropriate things(often), probably more about the MRM. At least I hope.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:25 AM
7

This will be HUGE for us. Tons of exposure and an audience that will listen to what she has to say. I hope she does it FTFY.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:23 AM
3

Lots of her 'lingo' are terms that she outlines in earlier videos. Agency, as a simplistic example, is the extraordinary ability to realize that you have control over your life, and to take responsibility for your actions.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:23 AM
5

Powerful GWW, powerful. Ya maschinu.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:19 AM
1

Indubitably miss/sir.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:00 AM
9

Exactly. Disregard the facts; things like 'I've had a part-time job since I was 12', 'I raised my little brother because mom had to work and almost got left back two years for it', 'I've been sexually assaulted multiple times in my life(not by men)', or 'I get paid more than the women at my company because I work harder than them and cause less trouble'. Nope, it's all because I'm white and have a penis. Hate me.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:21 AM
9

She might; she may even be a dreaded SRSter..... /cue scary lightning crash .....with a HOOK FOR A HAND! /s
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:18 AM
5

Seriously bro. She sounds like a classy lady.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:17 AM
3

You can edit your original post(I think) to change humanist to egalitarian. I personally think your post was good, my little brother is in college now and is supposed to be taking a 'gender studies' course next semester. Can't wait to find out the Claptrap they spout in that.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:14 AM
1

True, most people don't take it back that far. It's easier for feminism to convince women they have been oppressed for thousands of years than it would be to expose them to the objective truth; that life sucks for everyone, learn to deal with it.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:33 AM
0

Biology. We don't birth children, so our bodies don't need to recover nutrients like women do. That being said, once the habit of taking care of a child forms fully; it is difficult to break. It's not a good or a bad thing, men and women are different. What studies state men are more likely to be hired? Do we not have affirmative action which requires companies to hire a specified amount of women? I think it would be attributable to men asking for higher pay and statistically being the ones who …
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:32 AM
1

True story; friend of mine in Vegas in the army studied graphic design or someshit. Originally wanted to go for business or someshit, but his Top convinced him to take 'whatever the fuck you want choad, take fucking basket-weaving as long as the piece of paper says 'bachelor degree".
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:20 AM
1

Ow. Shit. Fuck OThomson. You forced me to pull my relative muscle. Showing my age I guess.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:28 PM
3

Well yes C0CKPUNCHER, but that's patriarchy and white-male privilege! /s
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:17 PM
1

But the freaks /waits a beat come out /one more beat AT NIGHT!
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:15 PM
3

I wish the need to use them wasn't there. But it is.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:13 PM
1

I can agree with that, but it's mainly a case of perspective. The woman stuck with kids(we're talking industrial revolution, as rural families would have had the woman working with the men when she wasn't pregnant or rearing the kids) thinks her husband has it so good, he gets to go out all the time, and meet other people than those near the house; etc., etc.,. The husband thinks how good his wife has it because she doesn't have to deal with the rampant nepotism, disposability and aches and pain…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:07 PM
0

I completely agree with the first two paragraphs, but they are choices. Those women you know CHOSE to have children, then CHOSE to stop pursuing careers. That is not social pressure it is CHOICE. If women want to be CEOs at the same rate as men, take as little time off and risk as much as they do. I think it's more of an inherent trait; a woman will want to pro-create with men who can provide for their offspring. That's not societal, it's natural. Politics are not gentleman's clubs. You have to …
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:53 PM
3

I can agree. One should always comport yourself with dignity, mercy and intelligence. That being said, ours is not a legal system set up to aid those who won't fight dirty.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:38 PM
4

The rightsbot does that because people have come in, posted inflammatory shit, and then edited their post to make it appear as if they are being nice and all the 'dissenting opinions' unjustified.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:31 PM
5

You say that with glee and admiration right?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:29 PM
6

Hey guys. My name's AManAlone. Some of you may have seen me before, some not. I'm in here somewhat often; usually just checking everything out. I needed to come in here and rage at some of these things, so here goes. How does being a white cis male mean you need feminism!? WHAT IN THE ACTUAL FUCK. Being 'yourself' is easy you jackhole. You just do what you want that doesn't harm anyone else. IT'S NOT FUCKING ROCKET SCIENCE. Oh that's a good reason. You need feminism SO YOU CAN WEAR LEGGINGS. UMM…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:25 PM
17

No. Getting 100% on a college level test IS noteworthy, especially in a scientific field. NOBODY IS DOING IT BECAUSE YOU'RE A WOMAN.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:04 PM
7

THAT'S WHAT I SAID. 'Well dumbass you took a college degree in a USELESS SUBJECT. Next time try for something a little bit more useful like, I don't know, UNDERWATER BASKET WEAVING.'
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:00 PM
0

See, I don't even like that. People going around and banging whomever they want is how we got into a mess like this in the first place; the number one determiner here in the USA of whether you are likely to attend a stay in your closest internment camp, errr I mean prison facility is whether you were raised by a single mother.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:54 PM
1

I would beg to differ. The mothers I saw growing up didn't sacrifice careers for their children, and I daresay that that attitude is no longer prevalent. Is it statistically more likely that women will voluntarily give up their careers and raise children? Yes. Assumed? I don't think so. It could be one of the contributing factors to it, yes. Considering that that income will also have to provide for two households if the wife decides to initiate divorce proceedings, I'd say it's justified. Women…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 08:53 PM
1

Men work the majority of overtime, as well as majority in full-time employment. Men are also statistically more likely to ask for raises and promotions, women are statistically more risk-averse. Women are the majority of voters, if they vote for male candidates that is equality. As well, men are less risk-averse, and it is risky to get into highly placed positions in a company. None of these things are things that men can do that women cannot. I can definitely agree with your first assertion, th…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:27 PM
1

I was looking through it earlier; mainly her responses. It's got some interesting stuff in it.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:28 AM
1

No I realize that. I meant the OP already signing out of the convo. I don't understand what the OP(of this post) meant. In the linked thread the OP answered questions; so...
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:00 AM
2

Like how we americans call them 'french fries' when they're actually Belgian? I didn't know that. I like the hobbit eating schedule; I've always liked visiting Europe, maybe I'll stop in Denmark this summer. Also, Aquavit or L'Eau De Vie is for ANYTIME. Love that stuff.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:10 AM
2

I don't understand what this is here for?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 05:10 AM
9

Oh you mean like our 'socialist' president?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:53 PM
8

They created DANISHES. Duhhhhhhhh.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:24 PM
19

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck me. Can you clone him and send him to the States?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:24 PM
2

I understand bro; I've said it before and I'll say it again. The one thing men have in common is being hurt by women(No I am not a misogynist, being hurt by a significant other is the norm and part of growing up. One could say the same thing about women, and it would be just as true/untrue.). So I know what you're going through. Think about it and remember, ultimately you have to make sure that YOU are safe and happy at the end of the day.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 04:13 AM
7

I would say it sounds like someone needs to grow the fuck up and put on some big-girl panties.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:16 AM
1

When women risk their lives for their wealth, THEN I'll believe I'm privileged. Show me the picture of women dying en masse on Utah Beach. #MRM Stop the government and society from treating men like an ATM, and I'll watch your video. #MRM AND they're both 140 characters, it'll fit in a Tweet.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 10:13 AM
7

He did indicate the MAJORITY of people. I for damn sure don't identify as a feminist.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:52 AM
0

I wouldn't say what you are proposing is likened to doxxing, unless your effort includes the intent to ruin her life by calling her work, and her home, and generally making another human being's life miserable because of her views. I agree with you that people need to be held accountable for their actions, regardless of their gender. But submitting other people to the same hate that we, or people we empathize with receive is not something I personally would find acceptable. Which doesn't really …
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:03 AM
5

You don't. Move on. If you really want to try and have her understand, utilize things that have nothing to do with the other. Such as 'If you go to a store and steal something, it is wrong. If I go to the store and steal something it is wrong.' Once she understand you are actually two separate people, and that what you BOTH do matters independently from what you're relationship is, you move it to the target point. 'You not liking that I go out with the boys one night a month and get shitty drunk…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:53 AM
2

I would have a problem with it as it's been elucidated to me by women in my life who happen to be feminists that 'As a person, there are differing levels of privilege. We all have privilege, there are just different levels of it. We aren't recognizant of it. But that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. What it boils down to is if I am complaining about something with which you could have NO IDEA what it is because of your privilege; you are oppressing myself by not allowing me to have my say. So you,…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:41 AM
2

I'm not racist, but Mexicans are hard workers. /s
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:34 AM
1

I will disagree with you on your bullshit calling. It's called empathy. Just as we can understand how women are prejudiced against, they can do the same. That being said, I *WHOLEHEARTEDLY agree with your second point. You do NOT get to tell us that it isn't your responsibility to fight for the other gender and then claim you're about equality. That is an outright lie.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 01:22 AM
1

I agree with entire first half of your post. Then, you lose me. We should still be respectful of lived experiences, safe spaces, etc. Really? Further in your post you state that MRA's >don't even bother to read upon what the fundementals of feminism is and they brush it off. The funny thing is, one of the CORNERSTONES of feminism is the BELIEF in 'Patriarchy Theory'. A theory that states that while the people in power throughout history OPPRESS EVERYONE, men have it better. Therefor, men are opp…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 12:58 AM
4

Manatee, calm your humors. I think we needs must summon an old priest and a young priest O.O
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:38 PM
5

Motion seconded; motion passed.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:37 PM
3

Don't play with my emotions loose-dendrite!
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:23 PM
8

Whoa; errrrrrrrrrrrrrr. Pump the brakes. Let me head this off for you here; porn is NOT degrading to women. Pornography is an art form, it is the art of pleasure, both giving and receiving. It is also a business, the people who make it direct it towards a distinct audience. It is there to satisfy a base impulse; to love oneself. These people in the videos are simply aiding in that. For every video in which a woman is 'degraded', there are videos of men having their genitalia mutilated or being r…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:26 AM
4

No, he's not. We don't infer that feminism is a united force oppressing men. We do posit; however, that the women who utilize funding to push through legislature that genders violence and lessens the inherent rights of men ARE feminists. An example. If there are 1 million Men's Rights Activists, and one MRA who has 100 billion dollars and uses that money to oppress women 'in the name of the Men's Rights Movement', does it matter that it's one person? Or does it matter who's name it's done in whe…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:19 AM
5

Holy shit did they approach the marriage situation like grown-ups?! Fuck fuck fuck where's the action plans?! SOMEONE GET ME THE ACTION PLANS THIS IS NOT A DRILL.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:05 AM
1

Upvote for the writing; 1,000,000,000 downvotes for making me remember Navi >.< <3
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:03 AM
0

I've actually heard it's a champagne bottle. The enema that is.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:46 PM
1

Yeah, but SHE didn't. So she pressed rape charges against me because I preemptively emotionally manipulated her into signing the contract, which is rape by COERCION. Then the witness was silently judging her whilst remaining 'impartial', and she's being charged with accessory to rape AND rape; because by being a witness she was forcing ME to penetrate the OTHER girl, the 'survivor'. FML. /s
/r/MensRights06/12/12 12:14 PM
6

Then change it to 'black people' and 'mugging' or 'robbery'.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:31 AM
1

Whoa whoa whoa. You're ALSO forgetting the witness. You need a witness or else it's just he-said she-said. They're probably also going to have to watch the actual act to ensure consent was constant.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:30 AM
2

Every time I see something like this, I hear Samuel L. Jackson's voice a la 'Boondocks' screaming 'EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY IS NOT EQUALITY OF OUTCOME!'
/r/MensRights06/12/12 09:09 AM
15

Don;t joke around, remember those furry kids who think they're lycanthropes.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:38 PM
-16

Haha, nice! Burn!
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:38 PM
-3

Yo we got you dawg. And cuz I heard you like upboats, I put some upboats on an upboat for you with CHROME. Nizzle.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:36 PM
6

That's terrible. My sincerest condolences, the forcing to act against one's own's desires by another is about the most evil act a person can commit.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:59 PM
0

Oakland is nice. Got my license when I lived in LA for a year. You get to read the test after you're done with it, they write down the correct answers for you, and then you get to study the right answers and re-take the test 5 minutes later. FIVE MINUTES. No wonder there are so many fucking accidents on the 405.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:01 AM
2

Well, keep on keeping on, and as a random aside; this is the main reason I come to MR. I was able to have a lucid, heartfelt conversation with someone I don't know about a traumatic event without ever being told that women have it worse, that what happened to me wasn't rape because I'm a man, and that I'm probably gay for not consenting.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:00 AM
0

Oh god you live in Cali? My condolences. Getting my driver's license there was ridiculous. But they're super-liberal; you should be fine.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:29 AM
0

I'm not 100% positive, and I'm not a lawyer; but I know they share information. Hell, go on your state's DMV website and investigate yourself; it would take you like 10 minutes. If anything, call the DMV and ask what you can do or if that is the case. But AFAIK; they do share information.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:25 AM
0

Not true not true! Little known fact; the other government agencies share information. So say, go to the DMV and apply for a renewal of a driver's license and they will forward your info on.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:19 AM
2

To be fair, I think any man that's been in more than a few relationships can say the same thing. I'm not trying to downplay your sorrow, just a light-hearted attempt at humor here. I will definitely go ahead and agree with that, HA! I agree it can be a traumatic experience. For myself, I withdrew into a shell. I only ever left the house for work or necessary expenditures. My 'trauma' came from my life falling apart and being forced to do something I didn't want to, and that I had elucidated that…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:06 AM
2

But that's the thing; it affects everyone differently. Was it bad? Certainly. Did I eventually get over it? Yes. I don't trust women as much as I did, and I don't know whether I'm capable of it, but I'll give it a try. Otherwise I might as well be dead if I refuse to go live. I used those as examples you grump. Whatever it is that makes you happy or gets you through a rough patch. I guess all I'm trying to say is that in terms of emotional trauma death inflicts zero on the victim. The emotional …
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:39 AM
3

You can define men without defining women. When we say men are 'strong', it doesn't inherently mean women are 'weak', biologically a man is statistically stronger than women. Self-reliance may be nurture more than nature; if it were empirically proven then you could strike it off the list. Men ARE more logical, or tend to be more logical than women do, women tend to be more emotional. NEITHER OF THOSE are bad things. It is the way human beings are. You could make the claim that the ambition and …
/r/MensRights05/12/12 08:12 AM
2

No, I'm not. One can recover. It takes time, attention to the problem and honest work to get through it, but it can be done. Yes, I've been 'forced to penetrate' before which resulted in the loss of my significant other and friends for a period of about 2 years. Not to enter oppression olympics, I'm truly sorry you've had to recover from trauma; it's never fun. Yes, being dead is 'easy'; because you don't exist anymore. There's no more pain of life, beautiful sunshine, children laughing or enjoy…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:39 AM
6

I'll disagree with you. Rape is a terrible thing, but you can recover from rape. One cannot recover from death.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 07:26 AM
3

Not going to happen. The percentage of population who serve in the armed forces is way low as is.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:32 AM
0

picsoritdidnthappen.org
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:20 AM
-2

No it was the PATRIARCHY keeping her brain activity to a level of dyslexia YOU ABLEIST PIG!!!ELEVEN!
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:15 PM
2

Yo I'ma let you finish, but I just wanna say that JakalDX spelled privilege right before Faryshta. I'm OUT!
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:56 PM
3

Generalizing a movement that seems to have no cohesive goals or values(as they apparently vary from member to member) is NOT hate speech. The history of feminism may be rooted in equality, but current feminism is not. They have actively fought against men's issues because they are men's issues; and the proponents and 'leading' feminists(I call them thus because they appear to be pushing legislation through) are attempting to make women themselves 'more equal'. Yes. But we don't fight for women's…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 10:51 PM
0

nowkiss.gif
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:53 PM
2

I'd love to hear about it; as any knowledge I have is second-hand. Do you still have a copy of the speech?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:14 PM
5

It's like seeing a little kid realize they aren't getting that candy before bed. They cry, they scream, they rage; but damnit they're not getting that candy. The only difference being; actual kids grow up from this experience.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:12 PM
7

Actually I think it'll be a little different. "Dear Enemy Combatants, We're sending an fully-X chromosomal squad in your area of operations. IF you engage them in combat, it is recommended that you retreat; as if one of those soldiers die; our country will place an overly large amount of guilt about it, and force us to prosecute a total war campaign against you. Also, remember they aren't as strong as you (may) be, so you'll need to utilize 36% less effectiveness, physical strength training, spe…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:11 PM
6

I loved this letter.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 08:06 PM
3

I work at a Hooters as a waiter, and I don't make NEARLY the same amount of tips as the girls. It's OBVIOUSLY sexist discrimination in nature; I'm suing the franchise AND the customers for not tipping me as much. /s
/r/MensRights04/12/12 09:34 AM
1

Not only did I google search, I even did this new-fangled thing called 'reading' to try and understand it. It helps people, but it helps in particular a woman, via Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., and as such was expanded to help ALL people. No, you said hundreds of feminist organizations are helping men without citing any specific organization, law, act, or bill. And yes, I would call a person deciding to get married as being a life choice. Gay or otherwise. You have not provided "sever…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:37 AM
2

You haven't listed a single thing. Claiming there are hundreds of feminists groups that are 'doing things that help men' is not actually citing anything. Pro-choice legislature doesn't help men, it helps women absolve themselves of responsibility if they aren't ready or are unwilling to have children, and force a man into his 'responsibilities' regardless of what his opinion on the matter was. Queer rights? Voting for people who have chosen a specific life choice and ensuring they have the same …
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:49 AM
-1

Have an updote; I haven't read that on a computer screen since Prodigy.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 06:06 AM
3

'I Need Feminism Like I Need A Hole In My Head'
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:21 AM
2

Please; cite 10 instances where women helped men. The Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is a wash; it was instituted to help women who 'do the same job for less pay' which statistically is horseshit. That's fine, it's been passed, and if a woman works as many hours as I do, and does just as good a job, she should get paid as much. This was not an issue men were having. I'd love for you to pick 5 examples of legislation that feminists brought into action that would somehow combat the Duluth Model, PAP,…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:37 AM
2

$112 MILLION THAT COULD HAVE GONE TO SOMETHING THAT MATTERS LIKE WOMYN'S BREAST CANCER. THIS IS JUST PROOF OF MALE PRIVILEGE AND A CULTURE THAT DOESN'T CARE ABOUT WOMYN. MEN ARE ALL MONSTERS. FTFY.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 07:07 AM
1

Hear hear!
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:48 AM
1

TIL 'Barstarp' is an actual curse.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:24 AM
2

Does it say 'barstard' on the hood?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:01 AM
3

The first point: Laws have nothing to do with social construction. They are things that are moral and universal, and they are things that are not acceptable. Every law is about what PEOPLE can't do. What law states women can't anything? Men fought for the right to vote and received it in (IIRC) 1870, women fought for it and received it 50 years later; with none of the responsibilities or expectations that men have to give up. The law against physical assault is telling PEOPLE what they cannot do…
/r/MensRights01/12/12 06:15 AM
5

Was it sexual assault because I'm not clear on the definition of rape wherever it is you live? Yes. If he's handling it fine; leave it alone.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 09:52 PM
1

You want to go into fucked up, there was a post here about a male student who had a sexual relationship with a teacher at like 14 or something. Teacher was fired, went to another school. Now the boy, who is like 17 or something is being forced to pay child support.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:51 PM
1

Well, technically if they're still a minor they don't have the 'capacity' to consent to anything. Other than you know, a car, leasing contracts, etc., etc.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:47 PM
1

Yes. If a girl is under the age of consent and has a resulting pregnancy, she needs her parents signatures to get the procedure done as it is a 'potentially life-threatening procedure'.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:44 PM
1

Also have to do with the age of consent in Canada. I know in Montreal it was like 14 for a number of years. The reason this may be significant is because in the USA, if a girl gets pregnant underage, she needs her parents' signatures to get the abortive procedure done.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:31 PM
2

Dude; it's fine. Notice that person is at the BOTTOM under all the comments; and nobody is paying attention to them. They're watching you and your compatriot ENGAGE IN CIVIL DISCOURSE. Go do it bro!
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:29 PM
2

Oh yeah. That asshole got downvotes for not contributing to the conversation and being a complete asshole.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:25 PM
1

My Sex-Ed was exactly like Ikirys. Plus, it's an issue that it's taught too LATE to be of any use. When you are a senior in highschool; being taught about sex when statistically most of the class has already engaged in said activity is, well dumb.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:18 PM
2

I replied to a comment or two in there; it was good to see people getting on in a sensible way.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 08:17 PM
1

What correlation is there between gender and salary?(Other than computer programming, where you get paid more than men for simply being a woman)
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:43 PM
1

I understand your viewpoint; as you've seen studies stating the wage gap is not a myth. My question would then be this; in studies that are done where the jobs compared are VASTLY different with different opportunities; how are those comparable? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html In the article, one of the things explained is that the researchers, or the people interpreting the data have overly broad categories; suchas a sociology major and economics maj…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:46 AM
1

It's shitty.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:29 AM
1

After making a complete idiot of myself, I dub this a worthy endeavour! /commences chortling
/r/MensRights27/11/12 07:08 AM
1

Whoawhoawhoa; sis brings us the sammiches mom MAKES. So Mom + Sis.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:31 AM
1

In poker terms; I will see your self-edited wikipedia article, an online journal and an article written by politicos and raise you the thirty or so articles from non-partisan sources that oneiorosgrip linked above
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:18 AM
1

Depends on the severity of the crime. If we're speaking about violent, physically assaulting rape, good riddance.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:12 AM
2

The stereotype of bad-guys is hard to argue with; they have a bitching wardrobe, awesome villainous moustache and lots of money. Honestly; to answer your question it depends. If we're talking about violent men, who utilize violence without restraint and for little or ludicrous reason; then they belong separate from the rest of society. Study them under a microscope in a cage; but they should not be with normal people if they're going to muck it up for other people. BUT, if we are talking about a…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:11 AM
1

VAWA, Duluth Model and Primary Aggressor Policies actually. They are examples of feminist lobbying for gendered laws. VAWA was actually declared unconstitutional because it specifically forbade helping men. This also doesn't include how little resources are available to men in a similar DV situation. If you want 'specific published works', I'll see about pulling all the crazed workings I've heard of and seen, but some authors I can think of off the top of my head would be Andrea Dworkin, Mary Da…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:41 AM
1

Actually I claimed that their ideas are disseminated, they are published, and they push forward gendered laws. You didn't respond to a single aspect of it, just attacked character. I did bring up that assertion; because it's true. They are being published. I then brought up several feminist-directed policies that are gendered(regardless of whether they're being changed now to minutely aid men). And yes, when there are certain things that are proven to be so, and someone comes in shouting 'NO IT'…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 01:52 AM
0

Does Bitch Magazine emphasize the wholesale of men? Do the book-club recommendation lists teach about domestic violence from the role of the male constantly being the abuser? The Duluth Model, Primary Aggresor Policy and VAWA aren't gendered policies? They were pushed forth by feminists to make a dichotomy of the sexes where men = bad and women = victim. The recent push by feminist lobbyists in the UK to lessen the amount of time women spend in prison? I've never claimed to be an expert on femin…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 11:19 PM
1

So if someone were to say the 'crazy radical feminists who hate men' are the ones being published; having their ideas disseminated and pushing forward gendered laws as has been done in the past; your reply would be?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:26 PM
1

Removing traditional gender roles MIGHT be good. Ending domestic violence AGAINST WOMEN is not ending domestic violence. Rape culture is not real. It has never been acceptable in civilized society to rape anyone. People have choices; they can do whatever they want regardless of what society thinks; the issue is that Feminism works to garner all the rights for women yet none of the responsibilities. Is it bad for men to work towards equality? No, because if women are seen as disposable as men; th…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:17 PM
0

I don't think it was justified; IF she called them. The threat is completely different as it's an event that HASN'T HAPPENED. That would be like getting mad at all women because they COULD commit false allegations or being mad at men because they COULD all be rapists. TL;DR If it's a threat, that's fine. It would be different if she called the police and told them that. Next time she should head back into the store.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:24 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/CarletonU/comments/13nk6r/why_is_there_no_mens_centre/c76plp0?context=3 Goddamnit am I new to reddit.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 01:09 AM
1

Thank you. I am currently engaged in a debate with a feminist who keeps telling me I am a feminist because I believe that women should have the same rights and responsibilities as a man 'whether I want to call myself that or not'. It's infuriating. Edit: Just watched the video; holy shit this woman is crazy. Was anyone else put in mind of a pentecostal bible-thumper when she was evocatively sucking feminism's teat?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 06:50 PM
0

Yes, it would be a Bollywood porno; starring Jenna Jameson and some random young Indian man. Though I think 'Pi Does Dallas' might be more comedic; like Road Trip or Hangover.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:16 AM
19

Let me make sure I understand; we ALL have privilege; but if I have MORE privilege than you, in YOUR EYES, you can basically say whatever you want, act however you would like, and I just have to take it? That's insane.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 07:15 AM
2

The first paragraph is a bad comparison. Manhood 101 does not have laws enacted that deliberately fuck women over. 'Radical feminists' leaders conversely, do. As far as reclassifying yourselves, I've always understood feminism to be a society that believes in putting female issues first, and working on those. Which is completely fair; people are entitled to do what they want with their time. Call yourselves Unitarian Scientologists, it doesn't matter. Where it does matter, however, is when an en…
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:47 AM
2

HAHA. But maybe they just couldn't figure out what chicken tasted like; so that's why everything tastes like chicken.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 09:27 AM
5

SRS tag in your RES? It sounds like you live in the Matrix.....
/r/MensRights24/11/12 06:02 AM
1

Yes, and that is also illegal; the victims of said crime can seek financial reparations for the filming.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:33 AM
1

Look at it like this; the differential between resources available for female as opposed to male rape victims. There are none for men, and plenty for women. NOT saying that women shouldn't have those available; but if some men are victims of it, they should also have some resources available to them.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:21 AM
1

That is why it is so crucial for victims to go to the hospital and have a rape kit done. We all know(not condescending) that it is an incredibly invasive procedure, and it is NOT something most people want to go through at that time, but if there is NO physical evidence it becomes very difficult to prove, and it is a hideous crime to be falsely accused of.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:18 AM
4

Whoa whoa whoa; most legitimate pornography has each and every person on camera agreeing to do it. They have to sign a 2257 form which states that they are of sound mind and not under the influence of any mind-altering substances(difficult to do at times in LA) and that they are giving all of their inherent rights to that production to the directer/studio. Ninja Edit: I know this as a former Production Manager with a fairly large company in the industry.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:06 AM
1

My thoughts would be that we don't watch porn to endure deep, heart-string provoking internal monologues. We watch porn to get off. So porn has modeled itself after what the consumer wants. So in most porn, we see a man(the bigger his horse-cock the better) have consensual intercourse with a woman(different varieties of women, because different strokes for different folks). It's not MEANT to be entertainment. I wouldn't compare 'Debbie Does Dallas' with 'Pi'.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:04 AM
9

That's exactly what I popped in here to ask.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:02 AM
1

The post itself was about WGM, but the links posted also dealt with(IIRC) the other issues men face; such as DV.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 10:34 PM
-1

There are some good links on the side-bar, and from the top of my head Shady8x made a good post a few weeks back about the 'wage-gap myth'. As far as advice; I have none. Keep your chin up, go forth and do brother.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:12 PM
9

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA. 'Now available in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Cleveland!' HAHAHAHA. Awesome poster.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:52 AM
2

It might be, but also remember that since they aren't showing you the study; they could make the same mistake as the '1 in 4' study. The issue with that was they took two categories and just added them together, I believe it was 15% of women polled had been raped, and 12% of them had had unwanted sex BUT DID NOT CONSIDER IT RAPE. Considering in the study those women went back and CONTINUED SEEING THE MEN WHO "raped" THEM, it's disingenuous.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:51 AM
4

My personal favorites; Motivating more women to join the community is a national security issue: Yes, because since there aren't enough already; let's give the job to someone NOT QUALIFIED to bring in more potentially UNQUALIFIED people. Plenty of women are qualified for this role Apparently no men are. 2) The November 6 elections showed Americans want to see more women in senior government positions. Women make up 20% of the Senate, a historic high. Overall, the next Congress will have almost 1…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:07 AM
1

Good on you; have an upboat!
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:02 AM
3

I agree. Except on the issue of reproduction. If he has made it clear he desires no more children, his wife lies to him about taking birth control and gets pregnant; he has no recourse. There is nothing that can be done to punish her, and if it gets serious enough; she can divorce him and he'll be even more fucked than he currently is.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:57 PM
2

Correct good sir! If a it's a female-only scholarship! Woohoo! Progression! If it's a male-only scholarship; GRRRR! PATRIARCHY!
/r/MensRights21/11/12 11:46 PM
3

Why do you believe that? Is that ALL cases? Of course it is. But considering that any anti-female or anti-feminism discrimination is misogyny and clubbed with the law; somehow I doubt it highly. I think it might be more to do with the fact that there are 66% more scholarships for women then there are for men. Couple that with the affirmative action initiative would probably be a better statistical start. Considering that the 'male dominated trades' aren't being infested with women, those being m…
/r/MensRights21/11/12 06:09 AM
1

I couldn't really tell if you were calling me racist or people in the sub; but it doesn't really matter. People have opinions, which they are entitled to, worthy or otherwise; and none of what you just said rebuts any of the points I brought up, so thank you.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:27 PM
3

We don't silence people for having opinions.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:56 PM
7

I'd like to counter if I may. The bread-winner role is forced into a role that gives him more power and responsibilities. Lost your job? Find a new one; now. You make the rules in the house? Congratulations, we are going to war in some abbatoir of death and misery, here's your third class ticket! My wife went out and stole valued supplies, resources, or luxuries? Well, looks like all of us are eating half as much and I'm working more to pay that back! But honestly, men face issues when they want…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:43 PM
2

Actually; traditionally in the past voting was not a right of anyone save maybe nobles(which the vast majority of men were NOT).
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:19 PM
2

Thank you for posting hte link, I was combing my history looking for it. Enjoy an upboat.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:56 AM
2

I'm sorry, I'm inferring that because it is a 'male perpetuated issue' that it doesn't matter. Seeing as people are raped by other people, I consider it an issue. Placing gender in there does exactly nothing, much like the current campaign on campuses to 'teach men not to rape'. I can deny it, and do so vehemently. If you go back in history, WOMEN were not oppressed. 99% of the world was oppressed, with 1%(most of whom throughout history happened to be male) who were OPPRESSING. The 15th amendme…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:34 AM
4

Yes, but if you were to look at their funding, it could be said that it would be in both of those organizations self-interest to show women being victims.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:58 AM
4

Excuse me, I mispoke. More resources were available to you. As you have shared, I can respond in kind I guess. It was my 21st, blackout drunk(as most are wont to do) and woke up 6 hours later with wicked alcohol poisoning and the room stinking of sex, figured it was my ex. Started getting kicked in the stomach by my ex because I had 'cheated on her'. I didn't remember anything, but was told by the police that it wasn't rape, as men couldn't be raped. That if I were to try and pursue a case for s…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:58 AM
2

Damn you I was going to link that!
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:41 AM
2

Yes, and from the discussions I've endured with feminists the situation I presented is 'discriminatory'.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:41 AM
6

I think he was responding to the fact that the study was done 'by the Institute for Women's Policy Research' and 'American Association of University Women'. A study done by CONSAD on behalf of the Department of Labor: http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf TL;DR: It states that the pay gap, or at the least the overwhelming majority of it is due to choices not prejudices.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:40 AM
2

I agree there may be a disparity; as I've said above. I just don't agree that it is prejudicial. Sources if you'd like to read through it(It is QUITE long[http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/11lsrw/feminist_myth_of_women_earning_072_to_a_mans_1/c6nmfiv]). While I am sorry that you aren't reading the other comments in which people actually debate and discuss, I disagree there is an institutionalized incentive to NOT hire women, or hire them for less. Again, if that was the case, business-…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:36 AM
2

I'm willing to be there is a wage gap. It's simple. If I have 10 employees, and 5 are female; statistically 3-4(66.7%) of them will take off from work to have children. Even if I continue to employ them, at the end of a five year span, they've taken off on average of 6 months to have children. So now, I have a workforce of 10 people, with a combined 48 years experience after a five year span. I'm supposed to pay these women the same wage for someone who has more experience than they? More time a…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:06 AM
1

Why would you show yourself out? The issue with averages, especially as done on such a broad scale is the categorization of different jobs. Such as, classifying 'secretary'(pre-dominantly female position) with 'banker'(pre-dominantly male position) as both being 'other white collar career'. They are nowhere near the same, and their salaries shouldn't reflect that they are. Same with 'waitress' and 'oil rig hand'. Those are two examples in the studies I've read of that make that same mistake. Eve…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:02 AM
13

Agreed. Print out a couple of articles that dissect the wage gap, namely the ones that state that the ACTUAL gap is between 3-6% of income that cannot be accounted for. Then present them to him in class with the opening salvo of 'Just keeping up with MDA guidelines; here is my source material.'
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:46 PM
1

Yes, the CC I'm speaking of did have a program like that. However, we were warned that the regular universities were trying to make it so that the more difficult pre-requisites for majors were NOT transferable. I don't know if it went any further than that though.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:38 PM
3

Well, did they ask you to stop, as in stop talking to her, or stop talking to her because she complained? I worked for a company that monitored employee activity and if people were talking about stuff unrelated to work on the company computers, they would discourage it.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 12:53 AM
2

Pics or it didn't happen. /s
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:29 PM
3

Well there are a multitude of variety when it comes to personal beliefs, the sheer amount of choice means nobody could ever describe someone else's goals perfectly. Everybody ISN'T on the same page. That's why I come here. There are people who think women should do whatever they want; shouted down by people who think that traditional gender roles being eroded are what put us all in this situation in the first place. Conversely are the people who think we should tear down current gender roles, an…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:05 PM
3

What you see as a generalization of feminism is the concerted attempts to talk to the ones that matter; those feminists that orchestrate 'discourse'(HA!) and create policy. 'NAFALT' arguments are what got the United States the TYD, Duluth Model, and VAWA. Here in the States, I've myself spoken with intelligent women, IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS ASIDE FROM FEMINISM. I actually got into a heated debate with a couple I am friends with about homelessness. Because the claim was made that 'most of the homel…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 09:34 PM
3

Be careful with community college. When I attended(a decade or so ago) the big colleges in my area were trying to invalidate any 'higher classes' that went towards your major, so that you would have to repeat the class at their university and invalidate some of your time in community college.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 04:12 PM
10

You explain that your moustache is helping other dad's overcome their cancer.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:15 PM
1

I would like to upvote you for your intentions to open a Male Domestic Violence/Sexual Violence Support Center, but I can't. I can only give you my sincerest gratitude and hope that you make it happen.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:29 AM
1

I have a much easier time dying for my country than a woman does, and I'm more likely to do so. It's also easier for me to die in general, as evidenced by the fact men die sooner than women, with less fucks being given, and less research being done to combat these causes.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 04:29 AM
12

Look at it this way; if they re-instated the draft, do you really think they would NOT conscript you based on you failing to fill out a little paper square?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:20 AM
15

The MRM as I've seen is infinitely more likely to resort to logical or provable arguments, and allow for the fact that women do face hardship. Feminists however(or at least most of the ones who speak up), seem to believe in a religion named feminism where men are all in a club that oppresses women. As far as the 'fringe radfems' they are the ones who are heard, whom policy is made because of, and whose cause receives funding. To quote Edmund Burke "All that is required for evil to prevail is for…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:21 PM
2

But working at the company is, a privilege. You sacrifice time with the family to put in work, and as such you are rewarded for it through pay(extra if you put in long hours) and the admiration and love of your family. Whereas now, 'privilege' is meant as a derogatory term for intangible aspects of ideas that 'men', specifically 'cis caucasian' men have, and women don't. EDIT: Wording. By the above I mean that the admiration of the family is the privilege, as that is what is given and not inhere…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:51 PM
2

Honestly, I think when this 'idea' was first coined, it was meant as a serious idea. As in, 'men have these privileges that they have to sacrifice something for, that women don't have access to'. But it was then taken and twisted into the fruit of the poisonous tree it is today.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:49 PM
2

Unconscious? Arrest the man. FTFY.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 12:10 AM
1

In that case; I had a couple of questions if that's alright. Did you attend college, and if so did you apply for financial aid? Was curious if they actually even checked whether you are registered. I know it was when I attended 10 years ago.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:53 PM
1

All that is necessary to prove a 'willful failure to register' is NOT registering. The DMV send you documents in the mail. All that is required is to fill it out and send it back. Also considering that your financial aid, ability to apply for federal loans and grants, US citizenship, any government benefits and eligibility to work for the federal government are tied into each man registering, I would do it. Sources: http://www.sss.gov/FSwho.htm http://www.sss.gov/FSdrivers.htm
/r/MensRights08/11/12 08:16 PM
0

Yes, but that doesn't mean that it still isn't a crime. It's like a guillotine hanging over your head. They might not prosecute you; but it's not the same thing as not committing the crime.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 04:30 PM
1

That would be because they are not rights, they are privileges that can be taken from you. But women don't have the privilege to vote, they have the RIGHT to vote, because men have the RIGHT. /s
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:50 PM
-2

I didn't claim that YOU had said it, I said it. I was using 'solidarity' to mean they gave you support by NOT fucking with you, when they easily could have.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:49 PM
12

Waitaminute; so there was a solidarity in prison because you had been screwed over by a woman?! ME don'believe it. /s
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:43 PM
1

AFAIK if you have not filled it out and submitted it by your 19th birthday, it is unlawful. 'Ignorantia juris non excusat'. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. If you are 12, and you smoke weed, you can be arrested for doing drugs whether you knew it was illegal or not(though at that point it's up to the officers on the ground). So, and I'm not a lawyer, it would seem whether you openly admitted to knowing anything about it privately or publicly doesn't matter. As to how many people haven't signe…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 03:45 PM
4

NAL, but it is a felony, and can be met with up to a year(?) in prison or a fine of up to $250,000. It also means that you will NOT be allowed any financial aid when applying or attending universities, meaning you must pay semester either on a payment plan or up front depending on the university.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 02:30 PM
2

I wasn't going to listen to you, but you did say Boom!, so I just had to take notice. :D
/r/MensRights07/11/12 01:14 AM
2

I didn't even know you could make a Movember account; but after a full shave as of the 31, it's growing. It's a little bit longer than George Michael, but not quite a Tom Selleck.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:20 AM
4

Upboat for you good sir. Jeph is probably one of the nicest people I've ever met. My signed QC Book 1 sits in a position of honor.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 04:56 AM
1

That was hilarious. Sending to everyone I know.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:04 AM
-1

I want to upvote; but it's not to the discourse. So just have my regard instead <3
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:58 AM
1

I will join you in this, though I do agree with /u/memymineown in that the picture will be of the lower half of my face; almost like a moustache bandit!
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:17 AM
1

Ah. That makes sense. Apologies for the misinterpretation. My opinion on the matter is different; I think it's just a game developer taking responsibility for enforcing the terms of the agreement between consumer and company that don't make them money. Which I like. It'd be nice if companies actually started to become responsible entities.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:53 AM
1

No, that's not a problem. It's the company covering their ass from sue-happy customers. It also allows them to refuse a customer service when necessary. I understand that you see no reason why, my counter-point to that is that I don't see a reason why things like that need to be said. They're not honest, or logical; or most times even make sense. It's an angry invective being spewed forth by an idiot because they are losing, or even worse winning at a game. I think you just stated that women are…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:08 AM
1

Yes it is a specific game. It's also in the online licensing agreement for just about any online game you can mention that if you harass other players, you will be banned. Example: If I'm in vent with friends playing whatever, WoW, CoD, BF, whatever; I will smack talk and curse because I know whom I'm playing with and what they can take. I don't do that when I play in public; as I don't know the people. Every business has the right to refuse people service; and that is all that is happening, the…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:42 PM
1

As long as it the banhammer is applied fairly, I see no problem. The fact that people are trashtalking so horrendously while playing online is unsettling; if there are consequences to your actions, hopefully people will learn.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:19 PM
2

As the POV from behind the camera; I feel the need for a disclaimer: you can run into asshole crews and saintly crews. It's a roll of the dice.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 04:42 AM
-5

You guys are also not mentioning the fact that women get paid a disproportionate amount of money in comparison to the guys to do essentially the same job.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 04:37 AM
1

The argument actually cannot be made. What is polite for you may be onerous to me. What is vexing in my worldview may be enjoyable to you. As far as 'uncomfortable behaviors', if I want to ask a girl out, and decide NOT to do it because I don't want to make her uncomfortable, then I'm never going to ask her out. As far as the 'skepchick' nonsense, yes she was within her rights to be uncomfortable. That being said, all that was necessary was a polite 'no' and things go no further. To pretend that…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 12:50 AM
8

My opinion would be that your 'feeling' safer with other people is not based on rational thought, and therefor can't be proven to be correct or incorrect. I don't find myself particularly attracted to certain women. It's not a bad thing, it's just an individual preference. As far as 'unfair' or 'unequal', no. It's the way people feel. The offense comes when they try and project their feelings on other people; ie making it illegal to walk behind a woman at night because they don't feel safe.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 07:16 PM
1

So then you admit that their style of life has to change? By math, if you're supporting your own household and >aiding another household in getting established, yes. then they wouldn't have as much money as they would otherwise. Soooooo, by being married for FOUR YEARS, she was entitled to half a billion dollars? Man I sure hope Tiger got anal. Cuz he was on the receiving end when the divorce terms were ruled on.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 04:50 PM
1

So to aid me in understanding, the person who was working in the marriage now has to support two households(alimony & child support & their own household; which has to also be at the same level of their ex-spouse if they want to be able to see their children) and that person's standard of living 'doesn't change'? That literally makes no sense. You're right, honestly in that it wouldn't be fair to that person. So why don't we say they get.... 12 months? 18? No. USUALLY, and this is up to the judg…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:53 AM
1

Alimony may be necessary, but there are entirely too many instances of it being abused. It does not matter what is put into a marriage. If I have a business partnership, and the business partnership ends, I am not bound to continue to support the other person. I sound bitter? I'm replying with sarcasm to what I could only assume was a joke. As well, my bitterness or lack thereof doesn't apply to the argument at hand. A working parent makes the necessary sacrifices for others well-being to bring …
/r/MensRights24/10/12 03:18 AM
1

Yes fathers also kidnap or injure their children, as much as mothers I'm sure. The difference being that mothers are awarded custody on a much greater basis than the fathers. If I had a job that paid me $40,000 a year, and I was told by a court to pay my ex $12,000 a year in child support and $12,000 in alimony; you're goddamned right I'm going to ask to be paid under the table. I just said goodbye to 60% of what I earn per year AFTER the marriage is no longer applicable. It doesn't matter what …
/r/MensRights23/10/12 03:53 AM
1

Yes, a father can do ridiculous things to keep his children. Which doesn't really work, considering that the majority of custody cases are given to the mother. You're right, child support is for the child. Except for the fact that the government taxes the person who pays the child support. Also that the custodial parent can have the family live in a trailer while they spend the money on crack; which is going to be fun to live with because the courts will do nothing about it. People should be abl…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:32 PM
1

Wait wait wait. A man spent 3 months in a solitary prison cell, on an accusation. The prosecutors even wanted to go through with the case, and also refuse to prosecute her even though she wasted thousands of dollars in time and effort on a frivolous charge. And he got custody, after he got everything expunged from his record; which isn't the easiest or cheapest thing to do. She made the story look good? She mutilated herself and the authorities took her at her word and almost ruined a man's life…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:31 AM
1

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/27/local/la-me-accused-20110628 It's from a post here a few days ago; the TL;DR version is 'ex-wife burns herself, strangles herself, rips her own hair out, and ties herself up to falsely accuse her ex-husband of raping her to keep custody of their child.' The father spent 3 days in a solitary cell on an ACCUSATION. With no physical evidence; the timeline for the POTENTIAL crime didn't even match up.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 04:00 AM
12

He really gave it to her. Props to our cousins in the UK.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:02 AM
2

LOL. GJ MRA0165, I was about to suggest the same thing. My family is in Central NJ, and my little brother is attending college. Gotta make sure he isn't getting hosed in school.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:46 PM
2

My favorite part was Where is the discussion of prevention, of consent, of positive sexuality in popular culture?< I'll tell you exactly where it is; in the fact that I've never forced myself on a woman, I allow the woman to do the initiating, and sex is awesome. We don't need time-wasting initiatives to teach people not to rape. Good day sir.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:22 AM
1

Considered. The continuation of the species has nothing to do with my business' bottom line. If I hired a man and a woman at the same time; and in 5 years of employment the woman takes off a year total for two pregnancies, and the man doesn't take any time off(which is the norm), I am not going to pay them the same. The woman has 4 years of work experience(not including any potential shoddy work as a result of the pregnancies, pre and post, and the level of stress families are under) and the man…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:59 PM
0

This 1,000 times.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:09 PM
28

Not only will he narrate your book; he'll also get you preg-nant.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 05:05 PM
2

There IS a pay gap, but it is much more minuscule than 28%. And even with that, many studies done on the subject say that it's almost impossible to accommodate all teh differing variables to figure out what is 'pure discrimination'.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 04:55 PM
13

Actually, it's easily arguable. When you go in depth with the study, it states that it is based off of MEDIAN income. Meaning, if you are a secretary, with a high-school diploma, making $30,000 a year, and I, am an oil rig grunt, with a high-school diploma, making $55,000 a year, it is not discrimination as to why you get paid less. It is the fact that I work in a dangerous field, and as such collect a higher rate of pay because of that hazard. Hell, it compares 'equally' male and female doctors…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:22 AM
1

Somehow I doubt she just started ranting with no earlier insults being thrown. I do agree with you though, if she had not hit him, the upper-cut wouldn't have been necessary.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:56 AM
4

I have to admit; it makes sense. Living in Las Vegas and overhearing a woman state 'Jews give birth to litters I swear' was so PRIVILEGED. Having kids in highschool call me 'kike' was also so awesome I don't have words. Oh, and the middle class upbringing I received? Totally privileged. Working since I was 11 so I could afford my own money to buy anything because my parents didn't make enough money to give me an 'allowance' like the other kids made me realize that I had been given EVERYTHING. Al…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:13 AM
1

It's not needless. He is the operator of a vehicle responsible for transporting a large number of people. To have someone distracting him, whether through alarmingly violent verbal vitriol or with a physical assault, endangers everybody on that bus. If anything the rapid de-escalation(is that even a word? Help!) of the scenario AFTER he punches her and forcibly removes her from the bus is commendable.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:40 AM
0

Sooooooooooo if I'm Jewish, that's +25 on the privilege scale?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 03:32 AM
1

But you're not. The only one. What?
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:29 AM
1

A study I read on here several weeks ago stated that statistically, not only were women less inclined to vote for a female candidate, and more likely to vote for a male candidate; they were less likely to run for office.
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:28 PM
2

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:11 PM
4

Hey now. All that says is that feminist propoganda WORKS. We all already knew that. Count this as a victory towards truth.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 11:10 PM
21

I would alter the viewpoint a bit; as in when he speaks about 'patriarchy' he doesn't mean the feminist definition of 'patriarchy', that of an all-encompassing societal system that blesses white, CIS, males with all the privilege their little hearts could ever desire(/s). He means 'patriarchy' in the true sense of the word, a system called such because men acted as the primary authority figure in their communities; based on the fact that violence was only ever 10 minutes away, and that women wer…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:22 PM
1

I often wonder. Is it truly that "that many" women are out of touch, or if it is the few that are - are so vocal that it makes them all look crazy. Something to be said for the old saying "one bad apple spoils the bunch". When those people are oppressing the views of dissenters, and people whom they do not like, it puts me in mind of Nazi Germany.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 10:50 PM
-3

It looks like they're utilizing the court case to establish paternity for the child for the purposes of deciding his child support payment. Regardless of circumstances, if he's going to have to pay for this child until it's 18, the least that can be done is allow him to see the child.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 06:01 AM
2

It sounds like you need to have a serious sit-down talk with him. Not necessarily about his opinions, because he's entitled to them. But emphasize the fact that he can't go around and ACTUALLY do those things, as it is against the law and morally reprehensible.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:53 AM
1

Yes, but if these oligarchs are so interested in money and power, and they already control everything, why not do it and save more money?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:53 AM
18

See I've been told that that doesn't happen because patriarchy. I almost wish I could put an '/s' after this, but it has happened.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 10:49 PM
1

No. That's like telling the victim of a home invasion to own a gun and install an alarm system. Regardless of what's done, whether you educate PEOPLE(men are the victim of rape as well) about the particulars of the act. That if the victim wants their accuser to be convicted they need to submit to a rape kit, and document the assault with the proper authorities. I understand it's not an easy thing having to re-live an experience like that but it's better having done that than live with potential …
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:43 PM
2

Rape itself is difficult to prove. Violent or not, many rape victims do not go and have a rape kit done, which takes away a good majority of the physical scientific evidence. Drug/drunk rape is difficult to prove, as most people who are in those situations are already imbibing a mind-altering substance. As far as fighting back, remember our gender roles. Women aren't taught to fight for what they want, and there's always that small microcosm of your subconscious that just wants it to go away as …
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:18 AM
1

Unfortunately that also happens to be life. If I got rear-ended by a car late at night, I'm in panic mode. My adrenaline is spiking, I'm afraid for my life, I'm thinking about what might have happened and shaking. I still call the police to come document what happened rather than just take it to a mechanic and be fixed. I understand that my metaphor doesn't encompass what it means to be physically violated, but at the same time that's why we have the legal system.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:04 PM
2

Somebody comes by it seems weekly with this. That being said, check the external links over on the right, and you'll find the basis for most opinions felt here.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 03:39 AM
1

Lots of southern italy; it's where the Moors raided.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:06 AM
2

From what I've read(and I am by no means an expert statistician) when occupation, education, experience, time worked and time taken off are taken into account, it is less than 5%. A gap which can easily be explained by negotiating. An aggressive move, men are statistically likelier to barter for a higher pay to start, and larger raises. They are also more willing to risk 'bothering the boss' about advancement. Anecdotaly, I would hire a woman to every job at my business if it meant I could pay t…
/r/MensRights08/09/12 02:18 AM
1

Most of the things I'm hearing on this video aren't any different than the altercation she got into with an older guy a few weeks ago, in which it was rebutted stating that many items weren't accounted for and she had no answer. What is the basis of the discrimination for this? You do the same job and get paid less? Does it take any other items into account, or simply pay?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 01:28 AM
6

LOL.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:21 AM
1

Yes, it would be a good idea. But in the climate nowadays, all a jilted woman has to do is cry 'rape' and a man is demonized and ruined. Lord knows I've dated women who would be sorely aggrieved if their partner left them because they didn't want to have kids. Also, with today's 'hookup culture' it's kind of difficult to know much about your partner when you've probably only known them a few hours or weeks, it makes an 'oops' baby a kind of determining factor, and lessens the likelihood of any t…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 02:03 AM
4

I agree with a lot of what you said, however there's several factors you haven't accounted for. Short-term relationships nowadays enter the sexual phase quite quickly, and if a man presents a woman with a document stating 'hey if we have sex and you do get pregnant, I'm out like NKOTB' the relationship will end. Probably fairly quickly; not necessarily because of differing viewpoints(ie women may also not desire offspring) but because they're offended. As well, you neglected to mention when wome…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:47 AM
4

Well you sound relatively balanced mentally. Thank god kids never lie or you would be in for some serious apologies to his or her family afterwards. /s
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:37 AM
1

My only regret is that I have but one upvote to give.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 11:20 PM
12

So wait a minute, if one of your children accused someone of raping them, you would murder the accused without regard for anything else than your child's say so?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:23 PM
4

That's fucking hysterical lol.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 10:22 PM
3

More than five questions were answered, but none of them dealt with feminism or men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 01:04 AM
1

Honestly? I would go about your normal college-life and see about starting a club or society, and then advocating it on campus. Raise awareness, inform other men about things that are going on in the movement. Hopefully grow. Make sure to put up posters about the local laws about sexual assault based on consent. Not necessarily the 'Don't rape mkay?' posters we've seen, but more a synopsis of what they SHOULD know.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:37 PM
3

I was not mocking you, I was saying, in another comment, that I agreed with GWW about the motives and history of the feminist movement, and that the debate about it's morality wouldn't be germane to our discussion. You're right. However, anecdotal evidence from myself, says that if men's issues are brought up in a discussion of oppression(with a severe emphasis on the feminine), there is an enormous backlash of 'What about teh menz?' whereby the ladies involved(or white knights[hate that mangina…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:40 PM
3

Then I may have misread your intent in your post. In it, I read, from my perspective of course, that it's dumb that we don't work together, followed by feminists don't want to talk about your issues, because they're your issues, which then goes on to say that if these 'issues' are put nicely, then feminists might advocate for their awareness. I won't get into the whole patriarchy debate as it's already here, but please don't attempt to shame me or put words in my mouth. I don't think this space …
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:26 PM
6

LOL. I agree wholeheartedly, but I didn't want this to devolve into /r/circlejerk over proof of x which equals y but doesn't QUITE mean z.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 06:29 PM
9

I disagree. I think the disconnect is with the fact that it seems radical feminists run the movement. Most feminists who come to this subreddit(that I've seen, at the least) are constantly egalitarian, and always ask 'why can't we be friends?'. Granted, none of them have equated asking after men's rights in feminism as I wouldn't try to join the fight for equality between races but demand that, as a white person, we address why people think I can't dance first. It is NOT nearly the same. Which i…
/r/MensRights13/08/12 05:45 PM
25

There are links on the sidebar that can explain the inequalities that men face. Another example would be http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/e60uz/antimale_legislation_roundup/ Also listed is this California legal code: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/HSC/1/d106/2/6/s124250 Which states that men can NOT be domestically abused(or at the least provides no rights or services for them). There are many more, simply browse.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 11:00 PM
3

100%.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:34 PM
0

Damn yoooooooooooooou. Living in South Florida now. I'll be there in spirit!
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:09 PM
3

Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:29 AM
3

I got no problem doing any of that. I more meant earlier you had mentioned that they didn't do paypal, so you had to get a credit card. I could just send the money to a paypal. Same thing.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 03:53 AM
2

As an SA survivor myself(my state didn't, and I think still doesn't, consider it legally plausible for a woman to rape a man, it's delineated as sexual assault) I would say to understand something that most women(in my experience) don't. Sex isn't ONLY about YOU. He has needs as well. Meaning if he turns you down for it, it's not because you look like a hippo today, but a million potential reasons. Don't get hysterical. When he DOES want to dance the horizantal lombada with you, if you're of a m…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 10:09 PM
3

Excellent, logical recap. Let me know about your next drive; I would be more than willing to chip in.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:59 PM
1

I read this and saw this scene in my head http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGo8L56Sa7I LOL
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:57 PM
1

These are examples of real discrimination, where there is literally nothing you can do about it. Not "discrimination" where women do more housework. It seems that it's implying that women do not face discrimination, when they clearly do. You're belittling the woman's rights movement. For a group that says they want to see feminists acknowledge men's issues, you certainly don't seem to want to return the favour. This blatant hypocrisy is unsettling. I think you may be taking this the wrong way. A…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 03:51 PM
2

Another representative of the terrible values down here in Florida. Thank god I'm not from here.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:03 AM
1

No, I gathered that. But you've already advanced your viewpoints earlier, I figured with my rebuttal you would now discuiss them.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 08:34 PM
2

There's no hostility. There was a response to your opinions you referenced in your earlier post. These are my views on the questions or statements you put forth, to show where I believe we disagree. Furthermore, I haven't threatened you in any way, or even made myself seem hostile(in my PoV). That being said, I do look forward to a response, because I'm not here to drive people off, I simply saw myself as answering your question on where we can agree. In light of that, please, advance my viewpoi…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 07:13 PM
3

Now on to the fun part I'm wasting my lunch hour with: Men are the people in positions of power (government, companies, you name it) and therefore decisions and policies that ensue with such a disparity are likely to benefit men and not women, whether it is intentional or not. Bullshit. Not the first 8 words, but after that. Yes men are in positions of power, but at that level of it, their view is genderless. They don't care WHOM they hurt, as long as they stay in their same, relevant or an elev…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:40 PM
2

I think that men should have equal custody rights. However rights does not necessarily equal effect. For example if a parents of a child with a stay at home mother divorce, it may make sense for the woman to get more time with the child to keep the child's life more consistent. However that also applies with a stay at home father. Furthermore I think equal custody rights for men also helps further the idea that men and women should take an equal part in raising children, which as a future workin…
/r/MensRights27/07/12 06:39 PM
2

No what you want is a Dutch Rudder.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 04:00 AM
2

100%. Women aren't forced to do anything like it, definitely discriminatory.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 12:30 PM
5

As far as I'm informed, rape is not the name of a crime, sexual assault is the legal name of the crime, rape is just the laymen's term for it. Criminal sexual contact is legally defined as "intentional, non-consensual touching by the victim or actor, either directly or through clothing, of a victim's or actor's sexual organs, genital area, anal area, inner thigh, groin, buttock or breast, for the purpose of degrading or humiliating the victim or sexually arousing or sexually gratifying the actor…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 07:34 PM
8

I would like to preface this with the statement that I am not a legal professional in any state. The answer I am giving is based off of conversations I have had with legal professionals, one of whom is a lawyer, the other two law enforcement officers. By law if two people are inebriated, meaning their BAC is above the legal limit, they are unable to give consent as they are considered to be not in their right minds. This includes contracts(former job event TL:WW) and sexual consent(that I know o…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:50 PM
2

Firstly, I'd like to ignore the issue I take with 'will you actually deny it' because men are not pussy-hounding maniacs. In a situation like that it's just as likely the man is a bit intoxicated and looking for some action as much as the girl is. Personally I would deny it, for the simple fact that it would be LEGALLY considered rape. I'm of the opinion that if you drink underage, have fun. But if you get caught, you knew the hazards of breaking the law beforehand; now you reap the consequences…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:41 PM
6

Technically you do not have the right to vote, and if you DON'T sign up it is against the law and you COULD be prosecuted. Though I've never heard of a man being brought to prison for this, it is an illegal act. Oh and don't forget you are UNABLE to receive financial support or loans during college if you do not apply for Selective Service.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 06:28 PM
3

As much as I would love to see a double-standard, offenders who plea bargain with the prosecuting attorneys are given more lenient sentences because it saves the taxpayer money as well as time and effort, and it looks like Mr. Sandusky did NOT pursue a deal. It's kind of like being pulled over by a cop, if you go out of your way to cut down the time that the cop has to spend with you, they tend to be more lenient on you. But if you floor it when you see the flashing lights and force him to catch…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:15 PM
11

I agree wholeheartedly. I had this argument a few weeks ago with a mutual friend, and Louis CK encapsulated all of that into a 30 second blurb. That's why he gets paid the big bucks I suppose.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:06 PM
0

Ummmmm, there is a petition running around currently about to have his show taken off the air. Regardless of how successful it is, it's terrible were it to happen. I'm not painting him as a victim, as I stated to a friend who brought this up, George Carlin did the exact same thing, albeit with a slightly more smooth delivery. That being said, if Anita Sarkeesian(I think I spelled that correctly?) wants to author videos about how women are typecast or marginalized in video games, she has all the …
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:29 PM
1

Regardless of private or 'celebrity/public' figure, trying to ruin their livelihood because you disagree with them is wrong. It may happen often, but that doesn't make it any more 'right'.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:00 PM
0

I'm not saying he would be, just that the attempt to do so is wrong. He works for Comedy Central; they're probably going to get a LOT more people watching his show(at least temporarily) just to see what the hype is about.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:37 PM
0

Provoking organized action against them I understand, but attempting to put someone out of their career/job because they hold a different position on anything from someone is entirely too harsh. Using their tactics(as mentioned above with the right-wing Catholic group) against them isn't the way, in my opinion to win any fight in a moral sense.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 06:16 PM
1

I disagree. I think it's our choice on how we feel about this(I personally feel that he was a comedian exercising his first amendment right to free speech), and we all have the ability and right to complain about something we don't like(ie the things you listed above). But in the same sense, none of us are organizing to put the feminists out of business. They can believe what they want and we hope to change their minds(at least I do) but I do not aim to make them homeless or unhireable afterward…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 03:20 PM
7

I've tried having informed conversations about the ways things are unfair for men and women. I was told I had no idea how to read a study and that I was reading a summary(which is ironic, because HIS next point was how you can skew a study any way you want), and that I 'hate women and want them to suffer'. I threw the party, so it did feel quite good to respond 'Well then, I guess I hate half the people that are here, and if you hate me so much you can just leave'. Nonetheless, I'm tired of sham…
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:53 PM
1

It's a shortening of 'Fuck Off And Die'.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:35 PM
9

Commented, about halfway down. 'It's oppressive if you don't give us what we want, wait what? you want the same thing?! WELL YOU CAN'T HAVE IT!!!!' FOAD.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 01:31 PM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA I didn't even think of that HAHAHAHAHAHAHA-oh shit, boss wondering why I'm in here laughing like an idiot. MRA, AWAAAAAAAAAY!
/r/MensRights26/06/12 06:50 PM
2

I know the feeling. Somehow I think that if approached with the fact that this is SEXIST(not misandric, because that's not a word /s) her reply would be 'But it's funny.'
/r/MensRights26/06/12 01:57 PM
18

The remaining 20% of lightning strike victims that are female could have been avoided had they been inside making their husband a sandwich.
/r/MensRights26/06/12 02:02 AM
1

The thing that REALLY makes me mad(wait, not mad, upset, if I'm mad than I could be a danger to women eveyrwhere /s) is when people lambast me or others over this. YES, we should be able to live in a Utopian society where no violence happens and everyone is happy! Unfortunately we do not live in that place NOW. So you have to deal with the realities of NOW. I've had women harass me at work. Do I report them? Yes. Did anything get done about it? No. I don't bemoan my fate and support some giant c…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 02:15 PM
5

It's not as clear cut as that. If a woman is assaulted and/or raped, rapists don't simply break into one's house on the assumption that there will be a woman there. As well, it would seem likely that most rapes are more crimes of circumstance; ie some guy takes advantage of a girl while she is in weaker circumstances that normal(not saying that a pre-meditated rape case doesn't occur, because I'm fairly certain they have). The point is that saying a woman should be able to walk around asshole-na…
/r/MensRights24/06/12 04:06 AM
6

Actually; he's not generalizing feminists, he's simply saying that this one particular bad apple contributes to the ruination of their 'good name'.
/r/MensRights24/06/12 03:58 AM
5

I agree that if people are being retards towards anyone somebody should step in. But don't make it because we're men. That's just idiotic. It's the decent thing to do, that's why it should be done.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:54 PM
0

I can understand the feeling of betrayal from the wife, even the knee-jerk want to initiate divorce proceedings. In her mind, she's been lied to since the first day they met, what else could he have lied about? That being said, some of the comments there are retarded. 'Asking OP to not jerk off to other naked women isn't an unreasonable request'. Ummmmm, yes the fuck it is. If he wants to masturbate to images of plastic Barbie-women being railed by some donkey-man hybrid, enjoy. Considering it's…
/r/MensRights19/06/12 07:17 PM
1

The law is still the law and needs to be upheld, the people in this case(aside from the FRA) were simply doing their jobs.
/r/MensRights19/06/12 03:32 PM
-2

Sweet merciful Zombie-Christ. I can understand not prosecuting the case(though I don't agree with it) but wow. 83 days in lock-up over a story that was falsified AND HE DOESN'T SUE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT?! That is a man.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 05:28 PM
18

It's not ridiculous. Read any article about men by themselves being hassled by authorities for speaking to teenagers/children. It is 100% possible to get in trouble over this, I can't count the amount of times my little brother's tae-kwon-do made me wait to pick him up because 'I could be a pedophile'. Aside from the fact that we look alike, share the last name and he was 12 years old; I would still have to wait; sometimes upwards of 30 minutes to take him home. So a parking lot outside the gym …
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:53 AM
6

Male or female; I've offered my bed to guests. They are my guests, and are to be treated with the utmost care(as I see it), so I offer it to to my guests and it's on them to accept or decline. Gender doesn't come into it.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 04:22 AM
0

LOL. If that story is true I'd buy that man a beer if met.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 05:53 PM
9

Is that link a joke? Please let that link be a joke.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:31 PM
19

Free speech, 100%. I'm going to commission shirts that show the outline of a woman on the floor in the fetal position. Under this amazing graphic is the sentence 'I Punch Women'. It's so liberating to exercise my freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:27 PM
2

The Marines just lifted their ban on women operating in infantry roles. I'll see if I can find the article.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:25 PM
1

They may not enforce it, but it's still breaking the law. If the shit hits the fan and they reinstate the draft, please believe they would also go after people who dodged their Selective Service.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:24 PM
7

I don't want to live on this planet anymore.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:10 AM
0

100%. Unfortunately we have a kind of Chinese court system if you're male. And a married woman can still be raped, but really? In this day and age that's what leads to divorce, or I guess I might want to call it financial imprisonment.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:52 PM
3

I couldn't even read the entire article. This sort of misandry makes me want to be violently ill.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:40 PM
0

I utterly loathe these campaigns. My particular favorite was 'my husband forced me to have sex last night.' Really? So he tied you up and forced himself on you? Oh, you meant that you weren't really in the mood, but when asked you assented to the act to get it over with/make him happy/have him shut up? Please, tell me about how terrible your rape experience was.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 03:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter