TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

A_Nihilist Archive

View 22 posts and 1,504 comments by A_Nihilist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
718

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights18/12/11 07:48 PM
507

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights16/05/11 04:45 AM
284

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights08/09/12 09:48 PM
189

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights23/05/11 01:07 AM
151

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights03/07/12 05:36 AM
103

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:59 PM
93

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights05/09/12 10:51 PM
68

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:34 PM
26

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights04/10/13 03:40 AM
19

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:58 PM
19

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights17/06/11 09:23 PM
18

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights16/07/11 07:57 AM
17

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights07/08/13 11:22 PM
12

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:03 PM
9

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:14 AM
9

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights08/07/12 05:32 PM
6

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights12/05/11 02:06 AM
6

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:28 AM
4

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:32 PM
4

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights24/11/11 01:22 AM
1

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights21/10/12 04:28 PM
0

A_Nihilist/r/MensRights17/05/11 06:42 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,504 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Guarantee she has a dozen dudes in her DMs. Also wtf is "wrighting"?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/20 06:29 AM
6

Guess I'm a disgusting degenerate derelict. Pregnant women are sexy as hell.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/03/20 04:54 AM
12

Same. I'm at a point where I question submissions where the woman is not fat, doesn't have kids and has a coherent profile.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/09/19 03:04 AM
15

I'm in a state of perpetual disbelief that people can look like this and still have the gall to have high standards. If I get any more blackpilled I'm going to turn into something out of a Lovecraft novel.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/06/19 03:26 PM
5

I love to laugh When did this become a statement worthy of putting in a profile? It's so intensely vapid I can't even figure out what it's supposed to mean. Like "I like to have fun". What?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/19 04:46 PM
8

What kind of clown-ass country do we live in where you can look like that and still legitimately believe you're entitled to have standards. And that's before mentioning the bastard children...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/06/19 03:06 AM
-9

Speak for yourself, thin pregnant women are smoking hot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/06/19 08:50 PM
-1

Married with Children isn't so bad.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 02:28 AM
37

There are few things more pathetic than a 47 year old woman using Tinder.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:28 PM
513

"Person who gets punched in the head for a living says something stupid"
/r/MensRights04/10/15 04:00 PM
1

This is the funniest fake field report I've read in months.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/14 01:23 PM
-5

Actually I'm here to read the laughably fake field reports.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 07:08 PM
0

Is this you?
/r/TheRedPill13/11/14 05:48 AM
12

Laughing at all the dipshits that actually believe this nonsense.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/14 04:26 PM
4

I have a lot of strong dark triad traits, I feel for them because although I can turn empathy off
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 02:57 PM
5

That male douche on the left was clapping very queerly as well. If you look on the right you see a black man looking around incredulously at the concentrated stupidity in the room.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:33 AM
8

A dishonest political cartoon? ...That can't be right.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 03:44 PM
12

Every field report reads like erotic fiction. That's why this sub is so hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 02:06 AM
1

Marriage being about romance instead of business is a pretty modern concept.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 01:23 AM
1

I don't see why not. Whether the allegations are true or not, it'll make him look awful in family court.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:35 AM
1

Alleged by his wife trying to get sole custody of their five children.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:02 AM
1

I think history has shown what's good for white women has never been good for black men.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 09:28 PM
1

You have people that far brainwashed in HIGH SCHOOL? That's actually pretty scary.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:24 AM
8

Men not only have to play more sets, men's tennis has far more viewership and thus brings in far more revenue for the tennis organizations.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 02:16 AM
8

The trick is to send them to a school that doesn't require a "well-rounded education", AKA liberal arts gravy train.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:46 PM
2

He doesn't represent all feminists. There are plenty of examples of feminist organizations and groups using "man up", "real man", etc. 1, 2, 3 They could do something like this instead, which is basically just "don't be a dick", but that wouldn't be taking advantage of the "patriarchal" gender roles they claim to be fighting against.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:14 AM
19

Funny how "MsNixxy" whines about sexism but challenges his masculinity for allegedly reporting harassment. She probably then logged into her Reddit account and started commenting about how feminism helps men too.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:12 AM
3

I don't know what stable has to do with dirty and dangerous More dangerous equals higher likelihood of injury. Bottom of the barrel labor jobs will fight tooth and nail against reimbursing you for any injury, or even holding onto your job. One could argue that this is partly due to benevolent sexism Yes, you could argue that any privilege women have is actually sexism against them, but then you'd see groups of people become disgruntled with feminist thinking and seek out alternatives.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:21 PM
5

Men are also overrepresented in the vast majority of dirty and dangerous jobs. Seems like women have a monopoly on safe, stable fields.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 09:44 AM
10

Disparaging the "Other" is a common cult tactic.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:00 AM
1

Why be a scientist when you can get a degree in womyn's studies and write about how there aren't enough female scientists?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:56 AM
1

Because the same system that fucks him over isn't going to take pity on poor men.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 06:07 AM
2

Men generally don't infest politics and academia and pretend they're being oppressed by the matriarchy and that any privileges they have are actually sexism against them.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 06:57 PM
9

Being attracted to a 15 year old isn't pedophilia, but it's a pussy-pass nonetheless.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 06:27 AM
1

But you probably enjoyed them at one point, right? I know I did. Growing up is a real eye opener.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 03:46 AM
1

By realizing men making up 93-97% leaves women making up 2-7%, and if 1/20th of the population is experiencing rape more than the other 19/20th you have a huge problem.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 07:14 PM
1

All events/groups are responsible for their own security Is this a university thing? I've never heard of other protest groups having to pay for police presence in the US or Canada.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 08:43 PM
13

Is that even really necessary though? They already have dozens of batshit feminists showing up to MRA talks. There already IS a militant feminist movement.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 03:18 AM
1

When you sit like that your balls are under the raised leg, not squished between it and the other leg.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:08 PM
4

They've really hit rock bottom with their shameless pandering haven't they.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 03:00 PM
7

One interesting thing about the gang of 88 is that most of them were women's and minority's studies faculty. Shows how credible these departments are when it comes to critical thinking.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:33 AM
5

My body is ready
/r/MensRights10/09/13 12:30 AM
5

Their size might explain why they hate themselves and subsequently others.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 04:35 PM
7

Minority men are simply seen as "minorities", that way they can fall under the social justice umbrella of protection and have their problems co-opted by middle class white women.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 07:30 PM
10

SRSers wouldn't say that. There's plenty of valid criticisms for them, no need to fabricate stuff.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:56 AM
6

What gets me about these pictures is how ridiculously smug some of them look. They really think they're sending some profound message but nobody in their movement wants to tell them how stupid they look.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:17 PM
6

Wasn't being thin historically seen as a bad thing in general? Using their logic skinny people should still be seen as oppressed, shouldn't they?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 07:08 PM
52

That's not logically consistent, forcefully removing an appendix would be a crime against the person, not the appendix. Not comparable to someone getting a murder charge for killing a fetus.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:36 AM
2

Same with most religious adherents like Christians and Muslims. When your ideology is the status quo you don't really need to know anything.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 11:46 PM
3

I'd say evolutionary psychology is more related to psychology, in the same way chemical engineering is more related to engineering.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 06:01 AM
8

Well the equal pay for equal work movement has pretty much been synonymous with the 70 cents spiel, so I felt mentioning both would be redundant. When shitty statistics are used for political brownie points and nobody blinks an eye, there's a problem Kieuk directly addressed the idea of women working for less (while doing the same work) But he didn't. The first studies were about women being hired in orchestras and single mothers being hired in general, neither of which have to do with a wage. T…
/r/MensRights13/05/13 02:06 AM
7

PZ Myers is an SRS brand of feminist, I wouldn't put much stock in anything he says outside his narrow range of expertise.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:17 AM
13

None of which are related to the "70 cents on the dollar" wage gap argument that is generally repeated by feminists, where they imply a woman working the same job with the same experience for the same number of hours makes a fraction of what a man would. Hiring rates in orchestras and of single mothers, for example, are completely unrelated. They're evidences for a secondary interpretation of the phrase "wage gap" when the primary one is called out. It's called equivocation.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:07 AM
32

And even 30 years later we still have feminists thinking women make less for equal work. Are they ignorant or dishonest?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 11:14 PM
1

Realize that 99% of feminist theory is hogwash used to justify their paychecks and don't bother conversing in their terms.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:37 AM
74

Imagine a male MRA yelling in a female feminists face and telling her to shut the fuck up. Something tells me they wouldn't be so accepting of it in the feminist circles.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:00 AM
0

15 on 35 is another example in the article. I'll grant there's a bit of leeway when both parties are adolescents only a year or so apart, but for a twenty year difference and a father who's barely through puberty, "taking responsibility" is completely out of the question.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 08:37 PM
0

It's not a cop-out when the father isn't capable of consenting to the sex in the first place. Your situation may be a bit different, if you gave birth at 18 but were impregnated at 17. Not the same as a 15 year old getting a woman in her 30s pregnant.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 07:01 PM
0

Not sure anyone wants to hear from the mother who essentially got teen pregnant. Double entendre intended.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:22 PM
2

That's like saying we should only teach reading to people who want to learn it. Basic algebra is something you're going to end up using unless you wash dishes your entire life. It's not a specialization.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 06:44 AM
1

Algebra is basic knowledge required for almost every scientific field. Change it to bullshit calculus and I might agree.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 05:57 AM
11

I've never seen a "what about the menz" argument that isn't simply someone calling out a feminist for pretending a particular issue (rape, DV, etc) is exclusive to women. I guess it isn't surprising religious ideologues would react poorly to logical criticism though.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:16 AM
1

Ah, I was under the impression it was a yearly payout. 157k is still ridiculous but 10k would definitely be too low.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 07:11 PM
1

People can survive on even 10k with a roommate or two. Anything over the bare minimum is completely unjustifiable.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 08:41 AM
2

What about hygiene during extended missions? I recall reading a piece about women in practice ops being allowed to go back to base every few days due to hygiene concerns. This will not translate well to a real situation.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:51 AM
28

Most self-described feminists are completely ignorant to what feminists do in the real world. For 90% of them, their exposure to feminism came solely from a propaganda-filled college course. This is where you get the morons whose first reaction to anything critical of feminism is "b-but equality!"
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:05 AM
22

Equivocation is a logical fallacy. When MRAs talk about false rape accusations, they're talking about the ones where the accuser KNOWS the claim is false; not when they've been raped but mistakenly accused the wrong person. Leave bad logic to the feminists.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 10:10 PM
0

Why do I have you at -5? Are you an ex-SRSer?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:01 AM
8

Rational Wiki's pages on feminism on MRM do a great job of highlighting how biased they are. Really, compare these pages to other topics on the wiki. They read like blogs. Edit- Actually I just took a look and almost all of their pages read like a butthurt liberal's blog. Oh how far it's fallen.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:56 PM
-1

As of 2009, first marriages which ended in divorce lasted a median of 8 years for both men and women Given the rarity of lifelong marriages and the prevalence of very short marriages, I'd imagine divorces on the 10+ side of things are shifting that median.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:18 PM
9

Don't get me wrong, both men and women have been shit on throughout history, to different degrees in different areas. I'm talking about the modern female privileges feminists like to minimize; like saying female criminals getting off easily is ACTUALLY oppression because the evil male patriarchy is essentially saying their crimes don't matter because they're women.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:40 AM
3

Patriarchy theory IS feminism.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:39 AM
12

MRAs and feminists can't reach a common ground, since feminism is based on an apex fallacy and the idea that any benefits women have are actually oppressions.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 03:11 AM
3

2050: Japanese geneticists create tentacle monsters capable of impregnating women. Men are rounded up and euthanized.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:33 AM
2

Feminists don't mind if men stand up for them. They cleverly disguise it as "privilege checking" instead of the patriarchy they claim to despise.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:15 AM
4

She's blaming MRAs for making it difficult for men to receieve DV services or custody of their children? Not the feminist groups who've published propaganda for decades portraying women as the primary victims of violence, and passing legislation like tender years and VAWA? War is peace, freedom is slavery, please give me page views.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 12:13 AM
4

Sorry, not literally, it was a joke given my experience driving past construction sites and only seeing women ever holding the signs.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:34 PM
26

There was the single token woman holding the SLOW sign.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:01 PM
2

Only on issues that effect them because they're both men AND gay. Feminism tries to co-opt these issues so it always has an excuse to stick around, you don't want the MRM going down that road.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 05:33 AM
10

Notice the girl saying she's there with her women's studies group. These are the people who come on Reddit and say their programs are fair and balanced.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 11:22 PM
2

Modern socialism allows feminism to redistribute wealth from men to women without the transfer being "patriarchal" in nature. The idea is kinda the same for feminist anarchists, where men can create but they don't really "own" any of it.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 07:36 PM
1

It also doesn't preclude anyone from believing women who kill men should get the death penalty, or women who kill women, or men who kill men.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 12:08 AM
1

Obviously the solution is to convince our enemies to use more female combatants, thus weakening their military and allowing us to lower our standards.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 06:02 AM
3

I was under the impression it was just some kind of white aerosol. If that was actually tear gas those cunts got the beating they deserved.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:45 PM
1

I didn't say they didn't exist, I said they're so rare I haven't seen any lately.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:19 PM
-2

I don't think I've seen a "legitimate" homeless woman in over a year, only the ones who sit on busy intersections and fake limps to make hundreds of dollars a day. Meanwhile, men sleeping in doorways in cold and rainy weather.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 09:28 AM
4

The sex wouldn't be worth testing wishy-washy laws meant to pander to feminists. Maybe she doesn't know if she was raped until she's angry with her boyfriend? Schrodinger's rape victim.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:17 PM
11

If feminists have their fingers in every pie it's harder to make them go away.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:39 AM
4

Fair enough, but it still reeks. How do you know they're staring because they want to fuck you? You're not attractive by your own admission.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:31 PM
4

I'm not attractive but every guy I see wants to piledrive me Come on, that reeks of narcissism.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:19 PM
5

I can't walk down the street without some creep staring at me like he wants to fuck me... And I'm not even very attractive Maybe you're just full of yourself?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:03 PM
2

If the man aborts then a women now has a child she previously could support with his help, but now cannot God forbid women have to make tough financial decisions like other adults without the government holding their hand.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 01:05 AM
5

It's effectively gender specific. Whoever poses the "bigger threat" gets removed. People who are bigger pose a bigger threat. Therefore...
/r/MensRights30/10/12 08:26 PM
6

And completely ironic that most feminists embrace it, only to complain later about the "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights29/10/12 02:45 AM
1

Problem is, fabrication isn't implied by the statement itself. "I'll just tell them you raped me" is a threat either way but whether it's true or false is unknown.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 07:05 PM
3

It's not the fact that they "defend" minorities that undermines their position, it's the fact that they'll simultaneously tell other straight white people, as straight white people themselves, that they can't have an opinion on minority issues. It's like they feel they don't need to check their own privilege simply by virtue of being in the SRS club.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 02:38 PM
1

The CONSAD study, among others. The various 70-80% of man's wage figures come from comparing overall wages paid to women versus wages paid to men without taking into account job type, hours worked, overtime, etc. When these are taken into account, and wages are compared between a man and a woman working the same job, the same hours, with around the same experience, the gap disappears. Feminists used to claim there existed a wage gap where a woman made less for the same work. Now they're saying t…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:36 AM
12

Who said anything about hating on men? It's just another example of debunked feminist lies being repeated ad nauseum.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 05:27 AM
2

It's a problem in Norway
/r/MensRights20/10/12 11:50 PM
2

I bet she argued her job was community service so really ended up doing absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 08:20 PM
16

But you see, men are only sent into the grinder because they're considered strong enough to potentially survive. That's a privilege. Check it.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:52 PM
9

Feminism has turned into a religion. Religions don't care about facts, they care about "facts" that increase their legitimacy. Self-described feminists and other "women's activists" only retain their power in the political arena by making up new oppressions and lying about old (even disproven) ones.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 06:43 AM
15

Of course it will. Nobody gives a shit until it happens to women.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 04:09 AM
3

If you end up draining the abscess be sure to videotape it and post to /r/popping.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:27 PM
1

I think it's about time for a "If you're a feminist new to /r/MR, read this first" link put in the sidebar. All the feminists making selfposts thinking their ideas are new and exciting are getting a bit irritating.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:41 PM
18

Well, that's just, like, your opinion man.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 03:20 AM
0

It comes from government. If the government had its power in check all the lobbying in the world wouldn't grant individual businesses special privileges.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:12 AM
40

100% of big oil executives think off-shore drilling is a great idea.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 02:07 AM
1

Corporate welfare can't exist without a government willing to give them handouts at the taxpayer's expense. No government, no taxes, no corporate welfare.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 07:25 PM
1

Corporate welfare isn't a product of capitalism.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:05 PM
4

Forced wealth transfer is a common factor between socialism and feminism.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 03:32 AM
1

The rate at which a submission is upvoted also determines whether it reaches the front page. Given that the submission only had 24 votes at the time, a few people coincidentally voted on it around the same time.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 02:46 PM
5

This "top post" has only 24 votes. Quit being a moron.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 11:49 PM
4

Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, whiner.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:13 AM
20

I don't think it's an ego thing, but rather to save face. When women are taught that men only think with their dicks, but are rejected when they freely offer themselves, it's a major hit to their self-esteem.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 08:28 PM
2

Not sure what weight an internet comment would hold in court, but I'd be careful about posting potentially identifiable information and stating you'll leave the country.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:37 AM
3

Sad thing is, that person was actually right. A female-only conference may imply the school believes only women are victims, but it doesn't imply women can't be perpetrators.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:20 PM
0

It's also speculative to assume they're irrational. The fact is: The point of a mugging is to steal valuable goods. Flaunting valuable goods will make it easier for muggers to choose a target. The point of a rape (let's assume male-on-female here) is to stick the penis in the vagina/other. Being female is all that really matters in that case, and they're going to know the victim is female even if they're wearing a burka.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:02 PM
2

There's a cost-benefit analysis to mugging. You have to weigh the potential gains against the chance you'll eventually be caught. These potential gains become definite gains when the target flaunts the goods. Thus, an increase in benefit for an unchanged cost. Rape isn't the same. A backalley rapist isn't going to back out of a rape because their victim has As instead of Ds. A roofie rapist probably already has an idea what their victim's body looks like. The cost-benefit analysis just isn't the…
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:19 AM
1

The difference is that a seat belt is a statistically significant variable in whether accidents cause death or severe injuries. There's no such evidence that provocative dress increases the chance of rape.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 04:35 AM
12

5k for the unjust detainment, 145k for the city to do it right next time.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 07:58 PM
3

No. Shut up.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:55 AM
1

Holy shit that was irritating to watch. At least the metrosexual guy made an effort to explain his point of view. The white guy standing behind the camera making dumb noises is a complete doofus. Edit- When I say white guy behind the camera I mean the guy behind the cameraman in the blue dress shirt, not the cameraman himself.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:16 PM
2

Yup, the "if there were more female politicians birth control wouldn't be a problem" line was particularly telling. Do they want a pat on the back for outright admitting they'd just throw freebies at women? Who do they think pays the most in taxes? I thought feminists didn't like patriarchy?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 05:05 AM
3

Everyone back in the pile!
/r/MensRights08/09/12 04:45 AM
13

Seriously, if they're not Democrats they're batshit Republicans like Michelle Bachmann or Sarah Palin. Bipartisan cooperation my ass. This is what happens when nobody calls out the "girl power" rhetoric that invariably implies some shortfall on the part of men.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 03:23 AM
1

Of those men, what percent either A. Don't care about what they want due to gender roles or B. Don't care about what they want because feminism tells them they're already privileged When you discount both you end up with a tiny group of men who don't want to vote for the Republican warmongering, or the Democratic feminist pandering. They have no voice.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 06:01 AM
5

Feminists are incapable of rational argumentation without throwing buzzwords like "patriarchy" and "privilege" around. They've so normalized this language they don't even have to justify how they apply anymore; they just do, and if you disagree, you're obviously a misogynist.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:14 PM
1

Ah, I see. I thought he was saying the deer runs from the dog, but realizes it's bigger, so stops running and turns around.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:36 AM
3

they will turn on you quicker than a deer running from a dog I don't get it. Because deer attack dogs?
/r/MensRights04/09/12 04:02 AM
-1

Read the history section. Your precious "patriarchy" actually favored fathers getting custody. Tender years doctrine flipped custody sexism on its head, and though it's no longer codified law, its effects persist to this day.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 04:05 AM
2

Tender years doctrine was a feminist invention you imbecile.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 01:06 AM
1

Not really. Men benefiting from female front line troops, in that fewer men equals less male deaths, is a secondary effect of opening up a completely new job type for women.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 09:13 PM
1

Redditors are pretty dumb, I don't know why I bother.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:31 PM
2

That's called lip service. "See men, we tried to help you 32 years ago! Feminism is for men too!"
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:30 PM
1

You could bring up the fact that it's a feminist/minority studies definition that almost nobody uses.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:23 PM
-1

What presumption? That he's innocent because he hasn't been proven guilty? It doesn't apply in the legal sense if he hasn't gone to trial, since the entire point is that the prosecution must prove the accused's guilt. It still applies with respect to the opinions of individuals outside the courtroom but that exists outside the courtroom context I was speaking in. And really, the context you were speaking in, The presumption is innocence. Therefore, if the legal system doesn't prove guilt, he rem…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:10 AM
0

No, you're confused, because the context is specifically within the courtroom. Three comments up, but its he is so innocent that there is no point even going to trial. No, he's not demonstrably guilty enough to support going to trial. Just because they didn't take him to trial doesn't mean he's innocent, and doesn't mean the criminal justice system has found him innocent. The system hasn't even considered him "not guilty", because if he's not going to trial the system hasn't made any ruling what…
/r/MensRights29/08/12 07:36 AM
-1

No, "not guilty" does not mean the same thing as "innocent". Very, very rarely will a court actually find someone innocent.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:18 AM
5

He's found a niche in the market pandering to the incredibly butthurt self-righteous types who frequent websites like Jezebel and subreddits like SRS. He's a businessman holding out for something better, nothing more.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 04:14 AM
2

because many women will blindly follow anything they slap the label "equality" on Now which persons of a certain career choice, heavily dominated by males, happily pander to those dumb enough to vote on words instead of actual issues? Hint: "many blood sucking creatures"
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:29 PM
-2

Oy vey, I've reported this comment to the ADL!
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:20 PM
2

I was joking.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 08:33 PM
1

Here's a quick feminist guide to identifying feminists: If they did something good, they're feminists. If they did something bad, they're not real feminists
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:36 PM
0

Men don't get their "abortion" even if they are raped. Fucking feminist Romney.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 04:19 PM
0

Because FGM isn't a first world problem?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:02 AM
1

Qualifications don't matter, capitalism is evil you stupid republican.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 05:00 AM
5

12:38 is hilarious "You giggled, you just contributed to rape culture"
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:18 AM
5

It's not a matter of having experience, it's a matter of using an accurate metaphor.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:38 AM
3

Feminists opposing the state makes zero sense fiscally.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:25 AM
3

Femanarchists conveniently ignore the benefits women have in society, both socially, and, to a greater degree, governmental. That "oppressive government" is the primary player in the massive wealth transfer between male tax payers and female social welfare recipients.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 08:23 AM
1

Implying I'm going to grace your stupid comment with anything more than ridicule.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:43 PM
22

I love all these feminists new to /r/mensrights who think they're doing some groundbreaking shit by telling us we actually don't know what feminism is.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 07:27 AM
1

It's not enough that they dislike it. Everyone else has to dislike it as well. How's the saying go? You don't ban steak just because babies can't chew it?
/r/MensRights18/08/12 07:43 PM
2

It's what happens when starry-eyed liberal arts majors come out of school crushed with debt and almost nobody will hire them. They end up working in an unrelated field for minimum wage; a metaphorical attack on their ego as they'll now be working for years to pay off an education they'll never use professionally. They attempt to validate their degrees by whining on the internet and using all the buzzwords they learned.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 03:37 AM
15

Yup, they'll then proceed to whine about gender roles seconds later without recognizing their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 09:29 PM
0

This is a moving of the goalpost. It was crystal clear that when feminists discussed the wage gap, they were referring to women making less than men for the same hours and the same job. They've been lying for decades and need to be called out.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:20 PM
2

Basically any statement that attacks the speaker and not the message/idea the speaker (or writer) is producing is an ad homine It's not just an attack, it's saying their argument is wrong because the arguer has done/believes X.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:49 PM
4

brbrbr i report u huehueuheuehue
/r/MensRights14/08/12 03:42 PM
0

MSNBC would have a debate between three liberals who hated them and three conservatives who love them. FTFY
/r/MensRights14/08/12 08:05 AM
0

And a whole puberty.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 07:55 AM
1

highering
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:07 PM
9

There's a pretty big difference between 13 and 16.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:03 PM
2

I agree, but that logic is pretty weak.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 08:15 PM
12

Using this logic, shouldn't alimony be abolished? There's no guarantee the dependent spouse would've made anything of themselves career-wise.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:51 PM
4

Shouldn't the "check your privilege" crowd be all over the people opposing the test? Women will always know whether the child is theirs or not.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:51 PM
6

Leftism isn't identical to feminism but feminism can't survive without leftism. Remove the parasite or be barred at the door.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:38 PM
1

Dat blobfish
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:36 PM
1

Petty, but fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:36 PM
5

I started noticing feminists in real life act like liberals on /r/politics. Circlejerk about fabricated oppressions, always have a boogeyman to blame problems on, censor/slander/libel those who you disagree with, or who present evidence that weakens one of your positions.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 11:44 PM
29

I agree with the people saying he should give his wife a pass. Hormones are powerful things. Which is why I think we need to start giving men passes when they're violent. Damn testosterone.
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:25 AM
4

Only five lines and you couldn't even respond coherently to one.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 03:06 AM
3

Vote libertarian. Feminist bullshit has plagued the government for too long.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:40 PM
2

Are definitions not up for discussion?
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:35 AM
7

If it all boils down to love, why did no women die sacrificing themselves for their boyfriends/husbands? Assuming they would've given the chance, why did the men react more quickly? Maybe because sacrifice is expected of them?
/r/MensRights04/08/12 01:48 AM
10

This is the very definition of lip service. Release a little poster every now and then to keep gullible men convinced feminism has their interests at heart.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 12:20 AM
8

I will love my kids, and will do anything to ensure they are successful as human beings. That includes nourishing them, clothing them, housing them, and cutting an extremely sensitive piece of skin off their dick for no reason. FTFY
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:13 AM
2

As expected, 2x is having a nice circleshlick over it. Where do they think tax dollars come from?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:20 AM
6

He needs to work on his perception.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 09:16 PM
3

Patriarchy: Men voluntarily pay for women because women aren't allowed to work. Modern liberalism: Men pay for women through taxes or they go to jail. Looks like a Hitler-esque Big Lie to me. Feminists have seriously convinced women they're empowered and independent.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:50 PM
4

Preventative healthcare doesn't lower costs
/r/MensRights01/08/12 01:00 AM
22

Sounds like what the ACLU should be.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 11:53 PM
8

"I need men's rights because I don't want to be raped if I ever go to prison"
/r/MensRights30/07/12 08:17 PM
17

Don't take a cop's word for the law, they're not lawyers.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:58 PM
2

I think a bit of introspection would help her realize why nobody wants to fuck her; bcause she's already fucking nuts.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 07:49 AM
10

In the future, don't take anything on Conservapedia at face value.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 12:16 AM
20

This sounds like a long walk from hoping that they were “worthy,” a statement that, on its face, is loaded with judgment and misanthropy, with a possible sprinkling of misogyny. There's that buzzword again. Even if you believe his comment was completely out of line, there's nothing misogynistic about it.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:23 PM
2

The wife didn't have the privilege of going to war so they judge wanted to even things out a bit.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:00 PM
0

No, really, you're missing the point HARD.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:23 AM
0

I can't imagine how you're missing the point this badly.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 11:57 PM
2

Looks like she did it alone in 1932 though. Too bad, would've made a hilarious TIL.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:16 PM
1

There's no carpets to pull me together.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 04:58 PM
5

The morality of birth control isn't on the same level of abortion.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:22 AM
9

Marcotte probably sees it as a slap in the face to the idea that women can't get anywhere without feminist-influenced legislation putting them there.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:18 AM
2

Bad ideas can't survive dissent. ALL women must be oppressed, ALL the time. PERIOD.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:14 AM
4

Agreed. Cake is best when there's just a thin layer of frosting.
/r/MensRights23/07/12 07:29 PM
-12

Nice bio-truth, cis scum.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 09:56 AM
4

Of course it's not. I spoke of leftism because 99% of Reddit already opposes the right. Unfortunately, many of them take the /r/politics position and start salivating over anything liberals do.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 04:58 PM
3

Now repeat after me: Feminists want equality.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:35 AM
4

Liberals have to pander to feminists for votes. Remember that leftism isn't your friend, men.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:34 AM
11

It's usually only petty crimes where the victim can choose whether or not to press charges. Rape isn't a petty crime.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 08:38 PM
2

I wouldn't risk it. You'd think tenure would protect you but they'll slander you with something unrelated, like calling you a rape apologist or saying your "misogyny" keeps your students from having a safe learning environment.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 06:21 AM
1

Are you sure you're not thinking of dental hygienists? I've seen about equal male and female dentists but the hygienists are almost invariably women.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 09:22 PM
1

Feminists don't really want to get rid of "patriarchy", they just want to rearrange it so they can keep the benefits while pretending they're independent. Patriarchy - Men provide for women Feminism - Government provides for women after it steals money from men
/r/MensRights16/07/12 08:33 AM
3

Go to Harvard Find the banking students Date one with "Gold" or "Silver" in his last name (Goldstein, Goldberg, Silverstein, etc) ????? Profit!
/r/MensRights15/07/12 06:05 PM
-4

A man is suspicious. A man smells a troll.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 09:07 PM
2

It's a religion. Once you accept all the grandiose, unfalsifiable claims, the only way to retain a facade of rationality is to automatically discount all logic that would reflect negatively on that world view. It's essentially the Overton Window, except the Overton Window is supposed to apply to ideas, not facts.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:39 PM
9

I agree that society tends to push women one way and men another. I was just pointing out that this wasn't the original feminist position on the issue; they only jumped on it so they could plausibly deny they weren't full of shit for the past few decades.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 10:44 AM
10

All it says is "full-time". This doesn't take into account that full-time defines only a minimum number of hours, and it doesn't take into account overtime. As Hardwarequestions brought up, you also have to be wary of job titles. For example, the blanket title "surgeon" would include both neurosurgeons and general surgeons, the former of which is more specialized and thus makes more money. I'm not sure who "you guys" are Typical feminists. since I've been arguing on my own Indeed you have, but y…
/r/MensRights13/07/12 10:34 AM
18

Will you guys ever stop moving the goalpost? First women are payed less for the same hours at the same job. This gets refuted in all but a few areas where there's an unexplainable gap. But instead of admitting you've been wrong all this time, you simply jump to another claim that's similar enough to the original one that you can pretend it's what you've actually been fighting all along. All in all, not a great way to convince anyone of your claim, or your credibility.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:50 AM
10

I'll give you the thought process of the typical liberal feminist: > Learnliberty.org > Liberty > Libertarian > Hates women and minorities > Therefore, discount
/r/MensRights13/07/12 08:47 AM
2

Group that wants to mutilate their babies' dicks angry at ruling that bans mutilating their babies' dicks. More news at 11.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 06:54 PM
4

You looked at every single one? You're quite diligent.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:37 AM
3

If you feel that this man is capable of and intending to rape someone, when he has company, is it really wise to assault them as a lone female? No. But she didn't actually think they were any trouble. She just wanted an excuse to act morally superior and brag to other womyn on the internet.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:25 AM
2

It's not like feminists don't believe this shit anyway.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:44 PM
1

EPIC TROLL FOR THE WIN AM I COOL YET GUYS?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:41 AM
2

Even better, I was implying the armament escalation was a bad thing.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:39 PM
6

Don't worry guys, I'm sure plenty of feminist groups will let the government know expecting the same of men and women isn't sexist. Yup... any day now...
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:22 PM
1

The problem is that if those standards are lowered, the police department's rely more on non-lethal weapons like mace and tasers FTFY
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:18 PM
3

Yup. Sorry liberals, police unions are corrupt pieces of shit.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:17 PM
5

To be an officer, you need to be in good shape Correction: To be hired as an officer, you need to be in good shape. Once you have a bit of seniority under your belt you can start getting a bit of fat under there too.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:15 PM
6

Dictionaries are products of patriarchy and thus invalid.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:13 PM
1

"Kim Kardashian is sexy as hell"
/r/MensRights05/07/12 06:54 PM
4

Them being hypocrites wouldn't surprise me in the least.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 08:42 AM
39

They specifically said "misogyny" instead of just "sexism" for a reason.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 03:15 AM
8

Jezebel is a feminist website with a feminist following. They eat this bullshit up.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 06:43 PM
3

When is Cenk NOT a complete moron?
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:59 AM
-3

In hentai, the women say no even when they want it.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:57 AM
27

Feminists employing the gender shaming they whine about so often. This is nothing new.
/r/MensRights04/07/12 07:33 AM
8

Steven’s face dropped and tears welled up in his eyes when he saw its contents: dried banana chips, cassava chips, caramel popcorn and salted peanuts I laughed. Am I a bad person?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 09:48 PM
6

Saying "real" anything is gender shaming. I was under the impression feminists were opposed to that.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 09:41 PM
12

"This is feminism 101, go educate yourself"
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:27 PM
14

To be fair, /pol/ pretty much hates everything.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:35 AM
18

Ralph pls go
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:35 AM
5

Seriously, who are womyn's groups going to nag and whine to when a logical person inevitably tells them to shut the fuck up?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:15 AM
8

It is a zero-sum game. Equality with respect to children: less custody, less child support Equality wrt divorce: less alimony Equality wrt DV shelters: less funding for women's shelters The list goes on.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 10:48 PM
18

Feminism thrives in a nanny state, which libertarians oppose. Good luck getting them to buy that tripe.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 10:45 PM
0

Anything can be compared, but you have to be careful not to make a ridiculous comparison. Men used to work in factories and mines for 12+ hours a day. Would you accept someone comparing this to slavery? Would you accept this comparison being used by men to justify co-opting of minority issues? Everyone faces problems, but some are far worse than others.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:09 AM
1

A free economy trumps a nanny state in my opinion. Illogical feminist drivel doesn't get far without government forcing various institutions to accept it.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 07:06 AM
2

We should defer to their knowledge on indoctrination, they being cult members and all.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 05:12 AM
2

these people can't even rationalize the existence of an MRA who genuinely knows what feminism is and doesn't like it Yup, they're showing more similarities to religions/cults every day.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 05:12 AM
0

Jesus, relax buddy.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 03:24 AM
2

Yup, feminists are seriously succeeding in convincing privileged middle-class 1st world white women that they're so oppressed.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 11:43 PM
31

Same reason the DEA head won't admit heroin or cocaine are worse than marijuana. The gravy train is too sweet.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 06:19 PM
1

Thank you sir, I'll take that into consideration.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 05:11 PM
-3

It was exaggerated for the sake of humor. I'm gonna let you off with a warning this time. Oh lawdy.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:54 AM
2

They'll never say it outright, but their constant co-opting of minority issues under the umbrella term "oppression" speaks volumes.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 08:52 AM
151

It always gives me a good laugh when Western women compare their plight to what black people faced. "Being forced to be a housewife and not getting to work in coal mines is literally just as bad as being a slave and getting called a nigger".
/r/MensRights29/06/12 01:26 AM
5

"Hey I found a great way to fight patriarchy and establish ourselves as strong, independent women who don't need to rely on men" 'Really? How?' "We'll legislate government for special entitlements funded mostly by men, but it's the government doing it, not us, so we're not hypocrites."
/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:35 PM
-2

That's called lip service. Republicans don't get the feminist vote anyway, so they don't have to pander to them by pushing flawed or sexist legislation like the fair pay act or female entitlements in Obamacare. If you've been here a while, you may have noticed most of the time those politicians pushing for alimony or child custody reform are Republicans. Take that as you will.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 05:19 PM
1

If obamacare gets struck down I and at least 6.6million others will get dropped from insurance. How is this relevant to whether it's constitutional or not?
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:20 AM
-5

Given that Democrats pander to feminists for the female vote, MR must necessarily be political.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:19 AM
3

The top comments on the Youtube video are hilarious. "Obama for equality, Romney for the 1%" "Yes we can" Fool me once, shame on you... fool me twice... you uh... can't get fooled again. Stupid liberals.
/r/MensRights22/06/12 06:02 PM
2

I was referring to the feigning concern over the fact that double standards are pointed out, not how they're pointed out. I'll concede the point now that I've read the comment again.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:04 PM
5

Because in all likelihood it's true. Quit concern trolling.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:07 PM
2

Jizz in my pants
/r/MensRights21/06/12 07:45 AM
-1

If you're going to point out fallacious logic, just do so; don't say "fallacy". This isn't /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights20/06/12 10:20 PM
-1

They jump the shark during shark week.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 08:45 PM
2

Thanks Doc
/r/MensRights17/06/12 11:43 PM
8

If you're going to click the link, make sure you have an adblocker activated. Websites like Gawker and Kotaku purposefully spew controversial shit for page views.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 03:00 PM
5

MRA page Feminist page
/r/MensRights11/06/12 03:36 AM
3

Pic related
/r/MensRights09/06/12 12:37 AM
6

Why can't you into sarcasm
/r/MensRights07/06/12 04:05 AM
3

Your hear that?... ...That's the sound of you not checking your privilege.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 03:28 AM
17

Women already know if they're the mother of their children. Thus, they're incapable of understanding this male issue and need to check their privilege.
/r/MensRights07/06/12 01:40 AM
3

Keep at it? Organize protests? They've been harping about their wage gap for decades. They send out action alerts whenever there's a possibility of legislation passing that would harm women, even if this harm is the simple revocation of female privileges (custody). I don't think they're sincere when they bring it up once or twice every few years. More like they know its a contentious issue and don't want to look like hypocrites.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 11:45 PM
8

Lip service doesn't count.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 03:48 PM
1

Switch men with blacks and you're a racist.
/r/MensRights05/06/12 12:02 AM
12

B-b-but hopey changey!
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:19 PM
5

LOL LE MEMES SO FUNNI XD
/r/MensRights29/05/12 05:40 PM
4

If Brad Pitt cornered me in a dark alley I'd be fine with it
/r/MensRights26/05/12 04:26 PM
6

Hurr please pay attention to me and my platitudes Nope, downvoted.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:16 PM
-5

Yup, society's ideal female body can be achieved by most women by a lot of running and some light weight manipulation. Men require a lot more work. Of course, attraction occurs outside these extremes, but the absolute ideal is more easily achievable by women.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:16 PM
10

> Please pay attention to me ladies FTFY
/r/MensRights24/05/12 05:11 PM
1

Why is a man responsible for it either way? One justification for abortion is that fetuses are not "real" babies. A man and a woman share equally responsibility in the creation of this fetus. But the woman is solely responsible for the transition to babyhood via birth.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 10:44 PM
2

Meh, I like getting a face full of tits when I go to the dentist.
/r/MensRights22/05/12 03:19 AM
9

Dirty console peasants.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:40 AM
2

40 is 33% less than 60, but 60 is 50% more than 40.
/r/MensRights21/05/12 04:34 AM
5

We only want a men's center that will work with other social justice activists, like the women's center Straight from the horse's mouth. You're only allowed to have your center if you do what the feminists tell you. ROFL.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:59 AM
1

Why is LGBT DV any more important than "normal" DV? I mean, an LGBT in a relationship is probably with another LGBT, so it's not like a hate crime.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:46 AM
2

Not much that can be done about that, Democrats pander to feminists, and there's no real 3rd party.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:44 AM
1

Flicking your clitoris really hard might mimic the pain, but won't give you the sinking gut feeling.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:42 AM
-1

How long's your dick? You can convince her to have sex with you and bump into her cervix. I hear they're comparable.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:40 AM
4

That first guy looks like he popped straight out of the "Dear Woman" video.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 01:38 AM
2

Having a sense of humor doesn't necessitate being funny, only that you can see the humor in things. A top comment about sexist female jokes on a feminist forum would be whining; the top comment here is typically that sexist jokes can be funny, for both men and women. Therefore, a sense of humor.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 02:07 AM
3

One anecdotal example, you'll notice the top comment in threads about jokes sexist against men is that sexist jokes are funny, and we shouldn't get butthurt like feminists.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:22 AM
2

Government social programs make minimum-wage-making men pretty irrelevant. Healthcare, welfare, food stamps, subsidized housing...
/r/MensRights14/05/12 03:01 PM
-2

AmericanGoyBlog So you're saying the Joos are behind it?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:58 PM
1

Well, this one If you want child custody, remember not to lie about being abused! Can be easily rationalized that you're doing it for the greater good. You're obviously the better parent, so accusing the other of abuse and gaining custody is obviously in the best interest of your child.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:17 PM
1

Unless you've blacked out and they're fucking your limp carcass, sex is something both parties do.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 11:16 PM
1

do you not support the idea of universal healthcare I generally don't support the idea of government forcing person A to pay for anything of person B's, period.
/r/MensRights07/05/12 03:18 AM
5

Nazis had the best intentions too. They wanted to get rid of what they considered parasites.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 07:19 PM
4

If you don't like what your health insurance provides, find a different insurance provider. If Walmart doesn't sell frozen carrots, do I whine to the government to pass a law forcing Walmart to carry frozen carrots? Or do I go to a different store?
/r/MensRights05/05/12 04:25 AM
2

Of course it is, but tough decisions come with agency. Women should be afforded both, or neither.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 06:21 AM
2

Making tough decisions is part of being an adult.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 09:24 PM
1

A man doesn't make a child, he makes a fetus. Women make a child by giving birth.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:34 PM
3

Ya'll niggas postin' in a troll thread.
/r/MensRights29/04/12 08:29 PM
3

Actually, the man only had a role in creating a fetus. The woman is the one who decides if it's born, and therefore becomes a human child. I wish pro-choicers would be more consistent.
/r/MensRights28/04/12 06:19 PM
4

Somebody needs to pay to support children Why not you?
/r/MensRights28/04/12 05:53 AM
4

Because it didn't just end at "don't ask women out on an elevator at 2 in the morning", it segued into ridiculous whining about "rape culture" and "misogyny".
/r/MensRights27/04/12 05:44 AM
19

Dawkins is related in that he was one of the few prominent atheists to come out against Skepchick's bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 04:39 PM
13

Wasn't there a radio program linked a while back where a university feminist club said they opposed a men's club unless they were allowed to see their discussion topics beforehand? Anyone know anything about that?
/r/MensRights21/04/12 09:18 PM
0

My GF and I were watching Toddlers and Tiaras
/r/MensRights20/04/12 02:43 PM
3

Why OR? Maybe I'm trolling AND stupid.
/r/MensRights19/04/12 01:01 AM
-6

Well, as a black man, he probably committed some other crime in his life. Might as well punish him for it now.
/r/MensRights18/04/12 03:12 PM
1

... Like laws that were put in place by Women's Liberation advocates? You're comparing an economic system (capitalism) to a group of people (women's liberation advocates). A more apt comparison might be between capitalism and nanny-state liberalism, where a business isn't just a voluntary exchange of goods between two parties, but must also serve some other "good" to society. Lobbying government for more entitlements is central to nanny-state liberalism, so it's not really a critique of the ideo…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 12:22 AM
2

I'm guessing if they can't get hard sticking a Q-tip in their urethra keeps their dick straight.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 05:51 PM
1

Remember the caveat: the logic only applies if the problem is actually capitalism's fault. Special regulations that introduce monopolies are a product of government overreach and corruption, not capitalism. What they attribute their actions to is irrelevant. Remember how this exchange started; I stated that feminism is a monolith when they do good, but isn't when they do bad, thus absolving itself of all potential criticism. Your argument implies that those who would shed poor light on the movem…
/r/MensRights09/04/12 01:43 AM
-2

You're a sick fuck, Manboobz.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 09:21 PM
1

Jesus, do you think cops should shoot guns out of criminals' hands too?
/r/MensRights08/04/12 09:17 PM
2

Whether someone "deserves" something is opinion. I was simply stating I believe he was within his right to defend his well-being with physical force.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 09:16 PM
4

I feel being forced into indentured servitude for two decades falls under "physical harm", and thus agree that a punch is justified.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 10:18 AM
0

No, it's perfectly logical, as long as the problem you're blaming capitalism for is actually capitalism's fault.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 04:01 AM
5

Funny how feminism is credited with how far women have come, but it "isn't a person or conscious entity..." the second it faces criticism.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 05:50 AM
12

Mitt Romney is a millionaire. Mitt Romney is white. You are white. Therefore, you're as rich as Mitt Romney. Hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:41 AM
2

Welp, I guess I just noticed your recurrent anal devastation and assumed you were from SRS. Sorry for accusing you.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 12:10 AM
2

My butt is pain-free, and you're not right at all. And I consider SRS to be even worse than the content I see posted here When did this happen? You have a change of heart? Now, if you want to talk about something that actually matters in the MRM... There are plenty of other relevant topics likely relevant to you on the front page. Some felt that venting about a marriage was relevant. Why do you care so much?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 11:43 PM
9

Your opinion is appreciated, SRS troll.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:03 PM
1

I just got raped in a hard-to-believe way Reddit what should I do Shitthatneverhappened.jpg?
/r/MensRights03/04/12 12:19 AM
3

That thread in a nutshell: "I'm a guy and you're a bitch" For all the feminist whining about patriarchy, it seems they prefer men who eat shit without complaint.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 04:00 PM
5

I just got raped Reddit what should I do Shitthatneverhappened.jpg?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 07:31 AM
13

Homeless men... IS Plural, then singular? That's awkward. Perhaps it should be "Homelessness among men IS".
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:53 AM
3

Action <-> Consequence When you take away consequence, equilibrium shifts to the right.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 07:24 PM
5

Ask your husband is he would want your daughter cut if you moved to a country that still practices FGM. Does he believe "fitting in" would justify it?
/r/MensRights01/04/12 07:22 PM
2

A for-profit alimony racket only exists under a government too large to be held accountable. If the government is big enough to give you everything, etc.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 09:48 PM
2

Nanny-state liberalism is the problem, not the solution.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 09:36 AM
3

Not relevant to men's rights. Music will only take a minority of people anywhere. How do we know he's not sitting in his room all day, being completely unproductive?
/r/MensRights28/03/12 07:16 PM
3

"SRS subscribers"
/r/MensRights28/03/12 08:14 AM
5

Because they generally don't have a better personality, they just pretend they do because they want to get laid.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 06:09 AM
13

That's too bad, your opinion really tied the room together.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 04:11 AM
5

getoutfrog.jpg
/r/MensRights28/03/12 02:04 AM
-1

A Nice Guy typically doesn't have many of the "general" attractive features in men; tall, athletic, good-looking, confident, etc. They cannot (or don't want to) improve these features to compete with other men, so they must bring other men down to their level, by being "nicer" than them.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:54 AM
2

Indeed, this is why I feel sorry for SRS subscribers.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:50 AM
2

True, I'll jump on a bandwagon to make fun of a Nice Guy, but I'm not a Nice Guy 2.0. Based on what I see from male feminists like Hugo Schwyzer (typical shitting-on-other-men behavior), I'd posit being a vocal feminist is also a requirement.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 01:50 AM
6

The "Nice Guy" routine is inherently related to male-female relations, so, yes, it is all about gaining female attention.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 07:10 PM
24

I call them "Nice Guy 2.0"s. The original Nice Guy attempts to garner female attention by debasing the stereotypical "jock", "asshole", "fratboy", "douchebag", etc. This doesn't work for some, so they move to level two, and start debasing Nice Guys. This usually occurs in-tandem with a conversion to feminism.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:18 PM
6

They know it's bullshit, they've just changed what they mean by "wage gap" so they can pretend they've been right all along: Old wage gap: Women get paid less than men working the same hours in the same job. New wage gap: Women get paid less overall because duh patriarchy forces them into lesser-paying fields. I wonder if they'll ever admit they were wrong for so many years. Fat chance.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 09:00 AM
2

Yeahno. It's not SRSDiscussion, it's SRSIndoctrination, and if you don't accept what they say you get banned.
/r/MensRights22/03/12 06:34 AM
2

Patriarchy- Men were generally the "head of households". HURR DURR PATRIARCHY- Men are sexist pigs, we womyn are so oppressed, our hypocrisy is excused because men are privileged, etc.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 11:00 PM
7

That's what happens when society normalizes hitting men in public.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 03:47 PM
1

There's a difference between "patriarchy" and "HURR DURR PATRIARCHY".
/r/MensRights21/03/12 07:08 AM
1

Explains why the field is so popular for feminists; opinion and "interpretation" supercede reality. It's all about how you feel, not what is true.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 05:51 PM
14

"I got an English degree so I could write about how not enough women get engineering degrees"
/r/MensRights20/03/12 07:43 AM
2

Okay, find me a quote... I don't need a quote, it's a central tenet of the ideology. Patriarchy is a system where men are in charge. Men and women are both oppressed by patriarchal gender roles, but women more so, which is why the attention is on them. Next, tell me what issues men in Sweden are facing... There's the infamous affirmative action controversy. Women start taking over universities, men start benefiting from affirmative action, feminists start whining that women are being shut out, a…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 02:27 AM
4

On the contrary, I think the fact that it's Sweden validates my point even more.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 04:45 AM
2

Really I was meaning that both should be based on what each gender is statistically more likely to cost I agree. Insurance companies aren't charging people more or less because they're "racist" or "sexist"; it's because some "groups" have greater risks than others. Are men more likely to get in car accidents? Charge them more. Do women generally require more expensive care? Charge them more. I really don't think that nationalizing health care has meant losing rights for men in any other country,…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:06 PM
3

I wonder why health insurance has forced equal premiums, but car insurance does not Because men typically pay more for car insurance. If equal car insurance premiums were forced, they'd raise women's premiums, instead of eating the cost of lowering men's premiums. This type of equality would not benefit women. Thus, it doesn't happen. If America had public health care system like every other western country Yes, giving our feminist government control of our healthcare is an excellent idea.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:43 PM
30

Oh, but it is. Feminists often say, to back up their claim that they're an equality movement, that women have too many problems, and they simply don't have "time" for men's issues. Thus, calling them out for whining about armpit hair when men face much greater problems is completely valid.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:12 PM
-50

I got a useless degree and can't find a well-paying job. This is obviously the fault of straight men. I am the 99%.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:10 PM
9

Why are you only talking about some ambiguous "size"? How about: Whether it's actually an organization -government or recognized as a private non-profit- instead of just some guy running a blog. Whether it's related to an actual business that hires people
/r/MensRights18/03/12 08:48 AM
0

Meh.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 08:45 AM
-1

The second is run by a single man, and the third is a blog. Are you seriously comparing these to NASA? Downvoted for being an imbecile
/r/MensRights18/03/12 08:41 AM
1

Jay-Z conspiracies: Interpretation of videos. SA Redditbomb: Text in the link. Are you really comparing the two?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 01:46 AM
2

You're disgusting Manboobz, I'm reporting you to the FBI.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 01:42 AM
1

If anything hosted on this website was child porn, why was Reddit never forced by the government to take it down? They only did it voluntarily, after much deliberation. Checkmate.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 01:39 AM
2

Troll post. Downvoted.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 06:22 AM
1

More people watch male tennis because they're better. Thus, they should be paid more. I recall a top female tennis player stating she probably couldn't even beat the 100th best man. Maybe someone can find that quote.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 05:21 PM
2

It is important. It's not comparable to men originally supporting feminism, as men are supposed to care about women's well-being, not the opposite.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 07:10 PM
1

Figures. The article screamed "college feminist" when I was reading it.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:50 PM
2

Did you get banned or something?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:50 PM
3

So what, they did a complete 180 and are MRAs now?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:48 PM
3

Pretty sure women have to do the same to get their tubes tied.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:45 PM
10

Do or do not, there is no wish.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:58 AM
2

anti-competitive legislation This reads the opposite of what you probably meant. But it's correct, so leave it.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:32 AM
12

Might as well just leave the country.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:15 AM
21

SPLC is just another bullshit liberal organization like the ADL. Anything they disagree with is "X-ist".
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:30 PM
6

Let's make the TSA to protect us from these spooky terrorists
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:10 AM
7

I think you're looking at it the wrong way, OP. Instead of trying to get MR off their list, why don't you think about why it was put on in the first place? Read the first paragraph on their misogyny page. They cite Manboobz. They have no credibility.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:07 AM
2

Feminism cannot survive without a nanny state stomping on those who reject stupid ideas.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:04 AM
-2

That isn't leftism. That is state religion. Oh god, my head hurts.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:02 AM
4

Women have the privilege of having their well-being taken seriously, even under your precious patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:01 AM
3

I have a degree in political science Bwahahaha
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:51 AM
1

Equal rights is something the government has to grant you, not the private sector. I believe in freedom of association. Do you think WalMart would stop servicing minorities if the laws were repealed? Not a chance. Even if they did, other businesses who didn't discriminate would rapidly overtake and put them out of business. If we post the same thread in any feminist subreddit, but with reversed genders (i.e. an employer saying that will always hire a male instead of a female) and I'm sure that n…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:33 AM
2

but you have the right to have a fair evaluation when you're applying to a job and be hired based on your skills, not big boobs That's where people are disagreeing. I believe employers should be able to hire or not hire anyone they want, for any reason.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:35 PM
1

Unemployed liberal arts majors.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:28 PM
3

Gotta keep the money flowing. If you run out of problems, just make up some.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:06 AM
1

If sexism against men is impossible, women get all the funding.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 05:07 AM
2

I don't really disagree with anything else you said.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 08:27 PM
2

Pointing out that the criminal is a woman, no matter how irrelevant it is, is not misogynistic. Stop diluting the meaning of words that should have impact.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 08:21 PM
-2

Weird how that works out It makes perfect sense that liberals would choose fields where facts don't matter; where everything is "opinion", or how you "feel".
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:49 AM
12

Ron Paul has been accused of having connections to white nationalist groups. But while he publicly denounces them, he has accepted campaign contributions from them. Whatever his own views are, it is clear that he is the candidate that these groups support. What kind of non-argument is this, Ignatius? The New Black Panther party supported Obama, does that make him a Black Panther? No, they just wanted a black president. Maybe white supremacists want lower taxes?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 03:25 PM
-5

It's not a problem many Harvard kids would face. Even if the claim were true, their parents would hire them the best lawyers and get the charges dropped.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:40 PM
2

I rate her argument 0/10, so I didn't bother bringing it up.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 04:22 AM
5

I think it's good he voted against it. Why would you trust the government that almost passed SOPA and PIPA to come anywhere near your internet?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 04:45 AM
3

Not a fan of the shirt or the hair style. 7/10, she used to be cuter.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:46 AM
4

he voted in favor of net neutrality What?
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:44 AM
1

Because it's not in the wom- ehem the child's best interest.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 02:30 AM
-15

You aren't a man
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:34 PM
2

You're a physicist, right? Think in terms of Le Chatelier's principle. Action ---> Result + Consequence What happens when you take away consequence?
/r/MensRights25/02/12 07:17 PM
2

Given the rape rate in prisons, I'd say it's probably worse.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:13 AM
3

Evopysch is bullshit until it can support a feminist argument, apparently.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:05 PM
8

Be nice.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:56 AM
2

HAVE AT YOU
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:23 PM
1

> that feel when no mod
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:23 PM
1

As expected, the entire thread is full of second year college students who just got through their first year of brainwas- errr women's studies.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 05:12 PM
3

Hentai.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 06:22 AM
15

Feminists: Never realizing the old rich men they hate are the ones footing the bill for everything they feel entitled to.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 08:55 PM
-16

It's a nice way of calling her a fat pig. Oh wait he meant "now". Haha.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:50 PM
6

Really, a 15 year old isn't an "adult" but they're not children either.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:14 PM
-26

sow What a polite young man you are.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:13 PM
28

Feminists typically prefer to "virgin shame" males they disagree with, actually. Anyone who isn't a feminist is a "fat neckbeard (implied socially awkward virgin)", "can't get a girlfriend", "bitter", etc.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:25 PM
0

Fake, I've never seen a female construction worker do anything but hold signs to slow down cars.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 02:45 AM
0

It is about gender. This entire event is only relevant because it was a female being abused by a male. Was Tiger Woods' wife vilified for going after him with a golf iron? No. Being attacked by a woman with a weapon can put her on the same level of danger as a larger man. But somehow people only care about the latter situation, and only when the victim is female. The "what did you expect" attitude is exactly what I'm talking about. Men expect to be hit back if they attack someone else. Women don…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:14 PM
0

Nobody would blink an eye if a small man started a fight with someone twice his size and got knocked out. This isn't about size. You're just rationalizing your sexism.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:42 AM
1

No, what's wrong is that saying the same thing about a woman is unacceptable. A joke is a joke.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:22 AM
1

You can get one of those mini spy cameras for under 100 dollars.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:08 AM
4

Anyone with at least half a dozen brain cells realizes "it's a circlejerk" is just an excuse to deflect all criticism.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:11 PM
3

His girlfriend goes to another school.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:09 PM
3

"It's just a joke" is only an acceptable excuse when SRS does it?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:06 PM
3

I'll bring the sense of humor if you bring the pics.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:38 AM
27

Something Awful, Adrian Chen, Saydrah; the "butthurt feminist" niche seems to be the new place for making friends when nobody else likes you. SRS is their clubhouse.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:27 AM
5

Feminists love madlibs. "Children's playgrounds breed [orientation] [buzzword] [buzzword] hierarchies of male [buzzword] (give us money please)"
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:20 AM
5

fat bitter privileged white cis-male heterosexual neckbeards
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:49 AM
5

Reddit is a great example of this. MRAs are just a bunch of "fat bitter neckbeards", why would someone on the fence want to associate with them?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:03 AM
3

It's almost like alleviating a consequence makes the action less disagreeable. Le Chatelier's principle in action.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:47 AM
-1

Wow, how many pages did you sift through? My opinion on the matter has changed a bit. It tends to happen when evidence for a claim is provided instead of generic whining about [insert useless social science term here]. Why are we talking about me, though? I thought we were discussing how bigoted Manboobz is.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:44 AM
-2

Have fun being wrong and supporting a disgusting bigot.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 03:37 AM
4

How is it childish? Teenagers generally don't give a shit what their parents think. Shaming them in front of others is a pretty good strategy.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 07:18 PM
-1

A _ does not a troll make. Whether I'm A_Nihilist or ANihilist, I'm responsible for what I say. That's called being responsible. Is Manboobz a child?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 04:47 PM
1

TAA joked about raping a rape victim further down, he's sitting at around -1000 last I checked.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 04:43 PM
8

Female privilege checklist
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:08 AM
-1

Shutup moran. He said something stupid and now I'm calling him on it. Why don't you? Do you agree with what he said?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 07:01 AM
-3

Nice try asshole. If you really regret saying it why don't you just delete the comment?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:27 AM
-6

You can't prove it's different. A _ changes nothing. Whether he's Manboobz or Manboobz_, he's a revolting monster.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:27 AM
-3

Yes he is. He's the one that said it. A _ doesn't change anything.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:45 AM
-1

Haha, yeah. "Impersonating". Nice attempt at backpedaling you sick fucker.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:45 AM
2

You're a sick fuck, Manboobz.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:37 PM
6

I wasn't talking about cheating, just bringing up a fetish that's typically looked down upon.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:35 PM
2

Two points: 1) I don't think bringing women down to our level is the right approach. On the other hand, 2) Nobody will care about these injustices until women start getting fucked over too. I'm not really sure what direction I would take it, if I had the power to.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 07:02 PM
20

Reverse the sexes. Woman gets full custody by bringing up the fact that the father is into BDSM.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:37 AM
3

You might want to start rethinking your life. Beer is for the uncouth.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:13 AM
14

This really isn't a victory you should be supporting.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:05 AM
1

Should I just hook up with some old rich broad and have her pay everything? Why not?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:52 AM
-1

"Psst, I subscribe to /r/manhoodacademy as well. I'll pretend I'm angry and sentence you to some community service. Show this bitch who's boss".
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:37 AM
5

A picture with what they deem a shitty comment. Screen + scat. Their lingo is pretty lame and unoriginal, but they find it hilarious. Pity them.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:31 PM
10

I'll jump on this bandwagon
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:29 PM
1

I think all sports should be co-ed, providing feminists don't bitch when less women are able to make the cut. Except wrestling. That's just awkward.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 05:50 AM
2

Spot on. To pretend the situations are analogous is to pretend feminist theory has a foundation equal in strength to the modern sciences.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 02:11 AM
1

Circumcision in Africa is the same as circumcision in the US. The only difference seems to be whether you get anesthesia or not.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:22 AM
2

Meh, you're boring.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 03:49 AM
5

I doubt she was angry, she was playing her part Her part was to antagonize them, not physically assault them. She got mad that he kept his cool and slapped him. Note the privilege: she thought she could get away with slapping him. it was still no reason for him to retaliate So we see your bias already. That's like a child slapping a grown man and the grown man slapping the child back So women, even when they're of similar size to men, are as weak as children? It's weak, shameful, and it makes th…
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:14 AM
5

The show is about being humiliated, not slapped in the face. She overstepped because she was angry that he was not. He retaliated. He got beat up by white knights. Feminists say the problems men face do not invalidate male privilege. Thus, the problems women face do not invalidate the privilege I'm describing.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 03:40 AM
7

We're not talking about bride burning, we're talking about a woman who slapped a man in the face but still had a dozen white knights rush to her defense.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 03:00 AM
6

I think this case in particular shows what privileges women have even in countries with ass-backwards 3rd world gender relations.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:47 PM
2

I think it is. It's not like he has a great size advantage over her. Pretend she's a man and look at the situation again. Mouthy guy A gets in B's face. B tells him to back up. A gives him shit and pushes him. Nobody would blink an eye if B beat A's ass.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:45 PM
3

Divorce laws usually favour women, domestic violence laws usually favour women These two are actually pretty traditional. Weak women need protecting. Feminists don't seem to have a problem with traditionalism when it benefits them.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:23 PM
1

Feminists seem to have no problem appealing to the "patriarchal bias" to jump to women's defense that men still have.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:20 PM
6

Also she has had a brain tumor not checked on since 2001 Well. Uh... yup.
/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:13 AM
5

Of course they will. They take the "better ten guilty go free than one innocent be imprisoned" and flip it on its head. Better 10 innocent men go to jail then a single woman be abused.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 10:16 PM
2

Big government is the new patriarch. All the reward, none of the responsibility. Pop out a kid and can't find the father? Enjoy your welfare, food stamps, medicaid, and subsidized housing!
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:05 AM
2

That's exactly what happened. You jumped straight to an insult because you realized I was right about your lack of reading ability. This clarifying comment further proves it, actually.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 02:04 AM
8

Who cares.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:54 AM
2

Thanks for acknowledging you were wrong.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:51 AM
4

"Stifled" as in "you're only allowed to talk about what they want to talk about". Maybe "monopolized" would've been a better word.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:56 PM
4

It's actually a bit more nuanced, but I wouldn't expect any measurable level of reading comprehension from an (huehuehue) SRS subscriber.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:52 PM
12

As if a subreddit whose sole purpose is to post links to get collectively butthurt about is going to care about a "no-downvoting" rule. It's like waltzing into /r/niggers and seeing a rule "no racism allowed".
/r/MensRights24/01/12 04:04 AM
9

Wouldn't want the men to think they're human or something, getting to stand in the street holding a sign while the sub-humans work their asses off all day.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 03:58 AM
2

Mental gymnastics better than any I have ever seen! Irony in that you'd have to perform some pretty intense mental gymnastics to rationalize away your experience as an SRS subscriber.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 03:55 AM
4

Anything can be rationalized as misogyny or misandry. The former is the norm because feminists have stifled the gender debate.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 03:52 AM
8

The difference being posting and downvoting other comments isn't the entire point of /r/MR.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 03:50 AM
1

Adults and children have the wherewithal to comprehend their own existence.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 10:49 PM
2

Why allow aborting a fetus with down syndrome and not euthanasia after birth? What is the ethical difference? One's a fetus and one's a baby?
/r/MensRights21/01/12 10:48 PM
2

I wonder if NOW is going to fight this one too.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:03 AM
3

Shit white feminists don't say, but mean: "I'm incredibly privileged but I still know what's best for unprivileged minorities".
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:01 AM
20

You forgot the polygraph test.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 05:49 PM
-1

Selectively? Jumping a bit quick to accusations are we? I simply recall reading "go back and count the number of people" and "tell me how many women and children there are and if they need help".
/r/MensRights19/01/12 05:24 PM
2

What does he teach?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 07:21 AM
19

The English translation of the exchange between the captain and the coast guard included the latter telling him to go back and "count the number of people" but then "tell me how many are women and children and what help they need". Guess they leave all the evil penis-owners to their own devices from the get-go.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 04:06 AM
3

They're probably afraid they couldn't tell you apart and would ban you by accident.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 01:15 AM
1

Feminists say feminism is about equality, and that it just focuses on women's issues because there are so many of them. Imagine what they could accomplish if they spent half as much time discussing male rape, DV and family courts as they did stupid shit a company puts on a t-shirt.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 12:23 AM
2

They get a better pick of the women, they probably don't care.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 12:18 AM
2

I fixed it in the two places I saw it.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:39 PM
3

Derp
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:59 PM
5

You make things sound very black & white "Middle class white man offended at the notion of white male privilege" Lol.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:32 AM
5

I think it was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:24 AM
5

The occupy movement pretty much lost my support when they let the nutters co-opt them.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:14 AM
2

The rich are notorious for being blind to the reality around them Well, in that case, I'd say it fits quite well.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:10 AM
4

deluded = defining, according to you. How they're defining it is deluding the term, yes. Look at the sex offender registry. Sounds great, right? A way to identify people who have committed heinous crimes? Not anymore. You get put on it for sitting on someone's face as a stupid kid. That's just one example. My condescension is completely warranted, on the basis that you lack the skill to explain, and defend your argument. I think I've defended my argument quite well. Though this is the second tim…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:07 AM
2

Eh, but that would make them outright liars as opposed to just ignorant about the subject.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:08 AM
8

I think you should read the comment again. I was comparing the fact that both terms are being diluted, not that rape is directly connected at all to telling someone to check their privilege. I wasn't making a claim about how rape is prosecuted either, simply how the studies feminists love to cite are defining it. Your condescension is completely unwarranted, and also unjustified, given your complete lack of reading comprehension. Run along back to SRS now.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:06 AM
6

I'm assuming you mean elaborate instead of extrapolate. I'm talking about what they've been throwing under the term "rape" lately. Blackout sex is rape, no question. But drunk sex? Tipsy sex? And everything they're claiming is "coercion"? You'd have to be Professor X to avoid raping someone.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 04:35 AM
9

I think its use is legitimate in some circumstances, but the vast majority of the time it's simply a method to silence opposition. An example of a legitimate use would be toward a politician born into wealth telling those in poverty to pick themselves up by their bootstraps. When used properly (almost never), it's essentially "you have no idea what you're talking about".
/r/MensRights16/01/12 01:10 AM
10

The silencing effect is a result of the phrase being deluded. It's like the difference between pointing out genuine racism and just calling someone a racist because you want to shut them up. The former may help someone see they're speaking from a position of "privilege". The latter just helps you escape criticism.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:53 AM
9

There are a legitimate reasons for telling someone to "check their privilege". Unfortunately, feminists have, along with the act of rape, completely diluted the meaning to uselessness.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:31 AM
4

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take it all away"
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:34 AM
7

That she's a coke addict is another reason.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:29 AM
10

Gay isn't an MR issue. At least, not by itself. Example: "Get out of my neighborhood, faggot!" - LGBT issue "Get out of my women's studies class you filthy male" - MR issue "Get away from me you male faggot" - Both
/r/MensRights14/01/12 06:28 AM
31

Same for programs like DARE. If they're told weed is the devil, and they try it, and see that it's not, what's the likelihood they're going to take the warnings for cocaine or meth seriously as well?
/r/MensRights14/01/12 03:01 AM
2

Let's take a generic rape case: Female student claims she was raped Rapist is in her class or lives near her dorm Kicking the alleged rapist out of the class or dorm with no evidence may be extreme, but if they don't feminist groups will whine about how they're supporting "rape culture" Kick the alleged rapist out to avoid controversy. Some may be generated by kicking out one who has not been found guilty of anything, but nobody gives a shit about men anyway, so it's nothing compared to the femi…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 04:53 PM
2

Ron Paul on men in the military. Not really a GOP insider, but a Republican candidate nonetheless.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 04:13 PM
3

That's because he was specifically asked about the issue of gender equality. Remember that most male discrimination is rooted in government. Vote accordingly.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 07:21 AM
11

He's capable of speaking the truth because Republicans don't get feminist votes anyway.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 03:03 AM
2

Laughing at the fact that nobody will hire your basket weaving degree?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 05:53 PM
-1

I'm sure many women who've undergone FGM at birth don't have problems with it either.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 05:51 PM
1

Men can go weeks without bathing, where women would get yeast infections. There's one reason.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 05:47 PM
3

Not sure if it's what he's thinking, but I'd call it the trend where we put all the blame on men. They're not refusing to marry because there's nothing in it for them, they're refusing to marry because they're dirty otakus.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 05:38 AM
5

Don't bother with the mods, use this.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 03:58 AM
1

Agreed. No reason they shouldn't be subjected to the same danger the men are.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 03:57 AM
3

Because they know female officers couldn't do shit in a riot situation. If tasers and stun guns didn't exist they wouldn't even let women on the force. Hell, they'd probably force the men to stay in shape too.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 07:12 AM
1

Oh, we will continue doing so.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 05:04 AM
1

mandatory arrest policies where the male is always removed from the home Oh, but you see, this is wrong. Primary aggressor laws don't say to remove the male, they say to remove whoever is bigger, stronger, and poses the greater threat. That's not sexist at all. Nudge nudge
/r/MensRights11/01/12 05:01 AM
2

If women were frontline troops the wars would've been over years ago.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 04:51 AM
1

Oh, they'll get to it eventually. Search "MRA" on Urbandictionary and Rationalwiki.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 04:44 AM
5

Chicago Tribune syndicated advice columnist Amy Dickinson believes the increase in no-fault divorces and tougher child support laws are two reasons behind the falling popularity of married life in America. Yup, pretty much. Used to be people stuck together and got over their problems to put the child first. Now one just leaves and has the government steal money from the other's pocket.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 06:31 AM
1

Men have issues that are not being tackled by feminism, and in some cases are being made worse, even though feminism claims it's an equality movement. Think of some of the issues men face and ask yourself: how is government lobbying by feminists and "women's groups" involved in this? I think it will surprised you. An edit: I was going to make a dumb comic but I suck with paint so I'll just explain it. Let's use quotas as an example: Scenario 1: no statism Feminist: Corporation X, you should inst…
/r/MensRights10/01/12 03:40 AM
1

Hurting her would hurt the child. That's probably the rationale. Funny how "think of the children" always seems to coincide with "think of the woman".
/r/MensRights10/01/12 03:34 AM
5

MR exists because of feminist statism. Paul is the anti-statist.
/r/MensRights09/01/12 07:17 AM
3

Do you have a blog? You're pretty damn funny.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:19 AM
2

Will you volunteer your womb to produce more men's rights activists? I snickered.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:18 AM
2

Pretty consistent comment history.
/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:17 AM
2

Not bad for me, I'm psychic.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 09:34 PM
2

Squirts of blood would probably turn you off right quick.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 09:13 PM
2

A mannish woman is different from a strong, independent woman. Unless you're taking the "strong" very literally?
/r/MensRights06/01/12 10:04 AM
1

Are you saying violence against women doesn't occur and is not a valid issue? Nope, I'm saying it doesn't occur anymore than violence against men and thus doesn't deserve a separate "priority status". Thanks for citing something from a commoner without any scientific training whatsoever Social science training? Is that like hamburger flipping training? Because random youtuber is more knowledgeable than a government agency The government agency that only exists if it pretends women have it oh so …
/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:22 PM
1

That has nothing to do with the fact that violence against women is an endemic in 3rd world countries. As opposed to violence faced by men? I think this video does a good job of dissecting "endemic violence against women". Not in the slightest. Your original argument was that the statement itself downplays violence against men. In the slightest. Your argument would make sense if I was criticizing the women's office for not discussing men. I'm criticizing the entire State Department. Might as wel…
/r/MensRights05/01/12 12:28 AM
2

1) Irrelevant to what I just said. Does the State Department have a section making known the violence men in these 3rd world countries face? 2) Irrelevant to what I just said. 3) It does. "The statement" includes both the statement itself and the implications of a non-existent statement directed at men. "Women are the priority, don't even bother bringing up men".
/r/MensRights04/01/12 07:13 PM
1

Feminism is too far gone to ever make a comparison to "equality" again.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 05:43 PM
2

What establishes this priority is their lack of a statement of a violence against men ...That's what I just said. They're prioritizing violence against women without a word about violence against men. By only focusing on women, they're essentially arguing that the hardship they're facing is more important. I think you just enjoy arguing.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:59 AM
1

Your concern has been noted.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:12 AM
5

I'm more disgusted by how shitty the show looks.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 09:39 AM
3

Ah, didn't catch that part.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 02:49 AM
1

Hitchens made plenty of money. If he didn't care if his wife worked or not, why is that any of your business?
/r/MensRights04/01/12 12:26 AM
2

That's not either. Just because feminists don't understand the definitions of words doesn't mean you need to follow suit.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 12:19 AM
2

Well, not exactly. If I say "All humans have one thing in common: they're mammals", I'm not necessarily discounting that other animals like chimpanzees are mammals too. In this context, though, they're definitely ignoring, and I would argue even minimizing the damage caused by, violence against men.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:20 PM
-1

this is a FEMINIST subreddit Lolwut?
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:04 PM
12

The title: Ending Violence Against Women Is a Foreign Policy Priority This isn't just "ignoring" violence against men; this is actively putting the violence committed against women above them.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:04 PM
2

Nice save.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:16 AM
2

Let's make sure it stays that way, eh?
/r/MensRights03/01/12 01:59 AM
2

Fixed.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 01:52 AM
1

An example, if you would?
/r/MensRights03/01/12 01:46 AM
2

They are readily accessible for your use.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 01:43 AM
2

I've seen you in /r/guns. That frightens me greatly.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:13 PM
2

Feminist Robin Morgan (later editor of Ms. magazine) demonstrated for Solanas's release from prison. Ti-Grace Atkinson, the New York chapter president of the National Organization for Women (NOW), described Solanas as "the first outstanding champion of women's rights" and as "a 'heroine' of the feminist movement", and "smuggled [her manifesto] ... out of the mental hospital where Solanas was confined." Another NOW member, Florynce Kennedy, called her "one of the most important spokeswomen of the…
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:12 PM
2

I have nothing but a huge stink-eye for white feminists that exploit issues surrounding third world women (and women of color in the first world) in order to further/justify their beliefs So essentially every first-world feminist, ever? The second they realize you're privy to how full of shit their statistics are they'll fall back on pointing out that women in other countries are still oppressed.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:00 PM
3

You said: I think these dudes only care about the violence affecting foreign cultures as long as they can use them to support their agenda, sorta like those people who demonize Islam for how it treats women while at the same time doing and saying sexist shit themselves You're calling them hypocrites because they use Islam's sexism to criticize it but are "sexists" themselves. I'd only find this logic convincing if the levels of sexism were equal. It's equivalent to criticizing a Russian gulag an…
/r/MensRights02/01/12 10:57 PM
5

I'm not saying they're not both wrong. I'm saying the treatment of women in Islam is far, far downfield from the "sexism" that happens in the US.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 10:09 PM
10

The dishonest part is knowing the other person wouldn't have sex with them if they knew, and therefore not telling them.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 10:08 PM
4

I'd say you're the minority, then.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 10:07 PM
10

I believe that's more something you guys need to figure out. Every time I see a comment with someone saying they wouldn't have sex with a MTF transsexual, they're immediately called a transphobe.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:22 PM
8

Seems to me he's more worried about the dishonesty factor above all else.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:17 PM
4

Your last sentence was irrelevant to the comparison I'm disputing.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:07 PM
5

You could care less?
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:05 PM
7

You're seriously comparing Islam's view on women and their treatment therein to people saying sexist things? You people are delusional.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 09:03 PM
3

This thread is a great example of SRS being a downvote squad.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 02:02 AM
-1

Self-mutilation.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:46 AM
1

Sure, but they're so few and far between it's negligible. That on top of the fact that if it's what women want (after being fucked over in court) versus what those men want (after benefiting in court), the former will win every time.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 01:16 AM
10

if we support men in that same position we will look extremely bad and biased Not if you explain said support. Most are not supporting him because divorce payouts are a good idea, but because the laws will only be changed when women start suffering from them as well.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 08:16 PM
5

It's rationalized by stating they're let off easier because they're seen as weak and not liable for their actions. Thus, they're still victims.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:20 PM
3

So i can kill a newborn? If you're a woman, you'd probably get off on a weak infanticide charge.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:35 AM
4

Because it's in her body, and she's the one carrying it. I will note, though, the hypocrisy in the mother having 100% "custody" over the fetus, only to suddenly throw 50% on the father the second it's born.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:34 AM
3

141st place? Fuck this gay earth
/r/MensRights01/01/12 07:18 AM
0

That's a pretty pathetic attempt at playing the victim. You asked why they're bringing up feminism. They told you. Acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 11:11 PM
6

I'd sooner masturbate, but thanks.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 11:09 PM
1

The actor of one of the rapists ends up playing the new DA. Confusing as shit.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:31 PM
5

You did take the time to respond though. Thanks for caring!
/r/MensRights31/12/11 09:26 PM
25

Feminist Robin Morgan (later editor of Ms. magazine) demonstrated for Solanas's release from prison. Ti-Grace Atkinson, the New York chapter president of the National Organization for Women (NOW), described Solanas as "the first outstanding champion of women's rights" and as "a 'heroine' of the feminist movement", and "smuggled [her manifesto] ... out of the mental hospital where Solanas was confined." Another NOW member, Florynce Kennedy, called her "one of the most important spokeswomen of the…
/r/MensRights31/12/11 07:05 AM
3

Feminism is a religion itself.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:28 AM
3

Who cares.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:18 AM
39

I'm sure some of them were feminists. They just had no problem with throwing out their rhetoric about equality when it benefits them. Because, uh, patriarchy and stuff.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 03:16 AM
8

> Walk into SRSdiscussion > Look at all of the top comments > Just a bunch of SRS subscribers circlejerking > Do a 360 and moonwalk out
/r/MensRights31/12/11 01:17 AM
14

Not really. People like Chris Rock, George Carlin, and Ricky Gervais have a wide variety of fans. TRBO is more like Lisa Lampanelli.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:37 PM
1

You need to relax.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 10:00 PM
3

The connection to the word is almost religious. Take Girlwriteswhat's video posted to I believe /r/videos the other day. Most of the comments are something along the lines of "I agreed with everything she said, but then she brought up feminism". It's like counting off all the atrocities Christians have committed through history; as long as there is no attribution, Christians will agree that these were horrible acts. But the second you name Christianity as the culprit, they jump to the defensive.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 09:55 PM
12

How's it feel to know only a very specific niche of people find you funny? If I was a standup comedian and only one person in the audience laughed I'd probably kill myself.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 09:47 PM
1

I'm not disputing whether they've done it elsewhere or not, I'm simply saying this study didn't do it.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:29 AM
-3

I wish my girlfriend was a pony
/r/MensRights30/12/11 03:40 AM
-1

Are you trying to say that male college students are more likely to report rape proclivity than the general population? No, I'm saying the entire study is in all likelihood inaccurate and thus proves nothing. Perhaps they can redo it with a decent sample size and more than just one demographic. If you want to know how rapey colleg students are, compare their data to that of the average.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 07:34 PM
3

If the study is supposed to be representative of men in general, 109 men isn't nearly enough, and pulling them all from the same demographic (students) would completely skew the results.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 01:35 AM
8

They're just afraid that people aren't buying their snake oil anymore.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 11:51 PM
2

Islamophobia? I was showing parallels between feminism and religion. Islam is just the religion I chose to make this point. You have now been confirmed for a complete joke.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:27 PM
1

If you had thought about it rather than immediately pulling the phobia card you might have understood.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 08:23 PM
0

The only reason you're not a Muslim is because you don't know what Islam is.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 06:23 PM
1

I commented before reading the article. The rest is still relevant though.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 04:54 AM
19

While I decry the lack of free speech, I find it hilarious that their own weapons are now being used against them. We might find the word "misogynist" used correctly in Australia's coming days. They'll have to find a new way to shame men.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 01:43 AM
2

How the hell does a fetus survive an abortion?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 11:19 PM
3

Discrimination exists everywhere. You fix it by correcting misconceptions through education, not by setting quotas, shaming, or using ridicule and censorship like SRS does. I find the idea of a non-white person being an MRA to be a really mind boggling idea Why's that? I'm guessing you feel that, because MRAs don't unthinkingly accept feminist rhetoric about "privilege", that they therefore pretends blacks weren't oppressed? Your folly is in comparing two incomparable situations.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:11 PM
1

Please quote the relevant section that describes "structural white male privilege".
/r/MensRights26/12/11 07:47 PM
4

My good sir, let us differentiate between the words "can" and "will". You "can" get a job at Goldmann Sachs with a women's studies degree. You "can" get a job at Goldman Sachs with no degree. But "will" you? Probably not. Unless you're going into academia or joining a think-tank, your choices will be severely limited, because, let's be honest, most of the information is useless outside of these areas. Does the guy paying for an overpriced coffee at Starbucks really care what you have to say abou…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:51 AM
3

I think SRS really got its start on Something Awful, so this supports your hypothesis quite nicely.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:42 AM
8

It's depressing that they believe their snark is humorous or clever. I just feel bad for them.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:34 AM
1

Too long, didn't read. This is the third SRS-related submission on the front page. Their lives revolve around getting attention on the internet. Ignore them.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:31 AM
14

Fake?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:17 AM
-3

Whatever you say honey.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:07 AM
3

Am I being hysterical? Quick, give me an orgasm!
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:48 AM
-1

I've been hanging out in IRC all day, as usual FTFY. Haha.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:47 AM
4

However, we know that manly guys can be be attracted to men too Case in point: Billy Herrington
/r/MensRights25/12/11 09:33 PM
4

OneY: Feminist women pretending to be men and men using feminism as their last-ditch attempt for female attention.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 09:13 PM
3

Some of those responses are hilarious.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 08:16 PM
1

I read "icide" as "icicle", looked at "pesticide" and thought you made a funny.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 06:06 AM
4

Don't get butthurt over constructive criticism.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 06:03 AM
1

Many don't see it as unethical, but their right. We live in "entitlement" culture; you're poor, therefore you're entitled to aid from the government, who takes it from a wealthier person. Not to mention there seems to be some Latino cultures on the west coast that celebrate teen pregnancy, at least in my experience.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 02:03 AM
1

Doesn't seem too bad to me
/r/MensRights23/12/11 06:53 PM
1

It's all relative. Some families that are still together don't make enough either.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 06:51 PM
4

We're going to get married and live with each other for the rest of our lives! But look at these divorce sta- You don't know her!
/r/MensRights23/12/11 09:19 AM
3

you guys so often sound like beaten people That being one of the reasons this subreddit exists, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights23/12/11 09:18 AM
3

True, but you might get lucky and have a Valenti or two.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 07:20 AM
6

So basically you want a study that read women's minds? Good luck. Let's just use logical analysis: Assumption: Women, as humans, want to maximize their gain Choices: 1) Single with children 2) Single with no children 3) Married/engaged/otherwise together with or without children Pros: 1) WIC, section 8 housing, welfare, food stamps, medicare (or state alternative), social security if the kid is disabled 2) No kids 3) Possibly section 8 and foodstamps, though if the father brings in income they g…
/r/MensRights23/12/11 06:37 AM
2

I'll appeal to patriarchy and say feminism had the easier fight because women were already considered needful of protecting. The "oppressive" system actually worked in their favor. Men not only have "patriarchy" to deal with, because they're supposed to suck it up and deal with their problems, they also have feminism to deal with, who pretends men don't face DV situations so that they can give all the funding to women.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 03:39 AM
7

No two feminists agree on what feminism is anyway They agree when it does something good for women without cost to men. If it hurts men, suddenly nobody knows what feminism really is.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 03:28 AM
11

Because people don't support terms like "egalitarian" with the religious fervor they do "feminism", because it's the entire foundation of their sociological pseudotheory full of conversation-ending buzzwords like "misogyny" and "patriarchy". Say/do/recommend something sexist? If you say it as an egalitarian, you can be criticized. If you say it as a feminist, anyone who criticizes you is a misogynist, [something something] patriarchy, [something something] rape apologist.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 03:26 AM
11

implying that all prejudice is 1:1 Which is why I laugh my ass off when women actually pretend they're anywhere near as oppressed as blacks.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 11:34 PM
15

He's slept with his students This is probably all he's after. Reminds me of the how-to for getting laid in college: 1) Join women's study class 2) Stand up the first day and say "I'm not here for HIStory, I'm here for HERstory" 3) Drown in pussy Hugo does kind of fit the definition of an alpha. Shits on other men to increase his cred with feminist women, thus getting laid. Only now do they seem to be wising up.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 11:32 PM
2

From what I understand, some of these women hold influential positions. The only thing SRS subscribers will ever have influence over is the mocha machine at Starbucks.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:35 AM
10

Thank you.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:18 AM
7

They kinda remind me of the guys that get picked on in high school so they become cops to shit all over everyone else.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:17 AM
8

Feminists have trained me to hear "safe place" and think "safe from discourse and criticism".
/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:06 AM
14

No I'm whining that Ron Paul will never touch me, hating rapists, masturbating to women and defending illegal immigrants. Not a bad position imo.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:04 AM
1

Forgive me for not remembering the name of the submission. I simply read a comment wherein the poster had sex while drunk, and not a single comment called rape. It's not like I'm claiming I saw Bigfoot here.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 02:38 AM
1

That entire thread could be summed up as "Feminism is an equality movement. No, I won't provide evidence for this claim. Yes, I'll ignore all evidence you bring".
/r/MensRights21/12/11 11:35 PM
1

I didn't say I didn't like 2x, I just said they're hypocrites.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 11:23 PM
2

It was just a comment I saw the other day with 200 some upvotes. Typical story about getting drunk and having sex, not a single comment calling it rape. Thought about it, saw a trend. I'm not going to look for it.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 06:35 PM
4

Did anyone see this thread before OP deleted her comments? Did she actually think she'd get alimony if they split up? LOL
/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:45 PM
2

2x's feminism tends to be more tame but they're still a bunch of hypocrites. Look at the difference in their reactions between "I got drunk and had sex" and "I got drunk and got raped"; the former is always some variation of "you go girl!", while the latter is the declaration that you cannot consent while drunk so all drunk sex is rape. Facts don't matter, it's apparently what you feel.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:24 PM
2

No, you're still the misogynist, because they're only refusing because they want to save themselves the possible embarrassment of you refusing.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:20 PM
2

No, I still think the analogy holds. I think a woman's right to choose whether to abort something that isn't part of her body is just as important as a man's right to choose what he does with his semen.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 03:08 AM
9

When you have feminists saying refusing period sex is a sign of misogyny, what do you expect? They feel their sexual liberation entitles them to a penis.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:29 AM
1

rape should be a criminal offense that releases you from the marriage contract Oh boy
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:02 AM
2

Notice how it took happening to a woman for you guys to give a shit. That's his whole point.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:01 AM
3

WHAT ABOUT THE WOMENZ
/r/MensRights21/12/11 02:00 AM
6

I believe something like 30% of married women are breadwinners. It has nothing to do with the wage gap.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:58 AM
2

I think the difference in biohazard-icity between a dead fetus and a load of jizz is enough to warrant different interpretation under law.
/r/MensRights21/12/11 01:53 AM
2

The same argument could be applied to abortion. The fetus isn't "part" of the woman's body, so she has no say in whether to get rid of it. We don't use that argument there, so why here?
/r/MensRights21/12/11 12:28 AM
2

Probably not, but there'd be outrage over bodily autonomy in that case.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:39 PM
1

Feminists-for-equalityTM outrage in 3... 2... 1... ... ...Guys? Ladies?... ...Anyone there?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 06:10 PM
2

Did someone say Ron Paul?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 02:05 AM
1

Thank you, sir.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:17 PM
3

Gronkdonk definitely falls into the troll category. Though, it's probably some SRS subscriber who just wants to make MR look bad.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 08:00 AM
3

Welm Hosenfeld was a good Nazi.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:39 AM
2

I found this only slightly humorous until I looked at your name and imagined some dumbass caveman sitting in front of a computer.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:33 AM
2

There are plenty of radfems that come in here to tell us how wrong we are. They're allowed to do so, because they're expressing opinions. Others just come here to troll and spam, they get the banhammer.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:32 AM
7

Calm down.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:28 AM
3

What if my religion says I need to exterminate Jews?
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:28 AM
0

Ah, well, I'll leave that to someone more creative than I. I simply found it on /pol/.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 04:41 AM
3

I... what?
/r/MensRights19/12/11 02:42 AM
-3

No I was stuck on /pol/.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 02:42 AM
38

I'm a Pikachu. Pika!
/r/MensRights18/12/11 07:54 PM
5

Take solace in the fact that it's essentially a religious argument designed to shame or instill fear in you. It's no different than "If you're not a Christian you're going to hell".
/r/MensRights18/12/11 06:12 PM
0

Well, yeah. Two is more than one, so one is less than two.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 06:06 PM
1

IN THE PAST A LONG TIME AGO is now a meme.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 06:01 PM
2

I can't find the source, but I recall a table comparing tiers of strength between men and women. A woman with "olympian" tier strength was comparable to that of an "above average" man. This doesn't answer your question about specific instances, but laws typically deal in generalities.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 05:13 AM
1

I'm guessing you're Wildfires. Keep up the good work!
/r/MensRights18/12/11 04:15 AM
3

This shit is why no one can take this subreddit seriously Your concern has been noted.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 04:05 AM
2

well if women would just not do Thing Has anyone ever...
/r/MensRights18/12/11 03:53 AM
3

Don't let the bluntness get to you, men aren't allowed to vent publicly in any socially-acceptable way so it tends to happen here. This is all regardless of whether their venting is justified.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 03:51 AM
-18

Men are physically superior. It's sexist, but logical.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 03:49 AM
14

Bitter man = 9 year old boy herp derp
/r/MensRights18/12/11 03:45 AM
1

Who gives a shit?
/r/MensRights17/12/11 07:04 PM
5

And here I actually took your first comments seriously.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:18 PM
20

Their definitions of "hatred" and "bigotry" specifically exclude their own actions.
/r/MensRights17/12/11 06:15 PM
1

It just looks so smooth and nice.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 10:10 PM
5

Funny use of "we", troll.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 06:26 PM
1

I think there's something to be said for the difference between accidentally touching a stove and purposefully getting drunk.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:10 PM
3

Slapping an ass is equal to brutal rape?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:07 PM
0

Ah, I guess their posting criticisms of feminism was just my imagination. I'll check myself into the closest mental health clinic.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 04:25 AM
2

This snake oil is more effective than the last batch!
/r/MensRights15/12/11 01:27 AM
-1

Ignatius defending SRS, this is great.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:41 AM
5

I like you more when you're being funny-troll, not dumb-SRS-troll.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:40 AM
4

Dude, go sit in their chat Hah, I've done this a few times. Fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:29 AM
2

I'm sure you could find a better source than Infowars.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 06:06 PM
0

convince governments, corporations and the public to put first world countries on 2nd/3rd world social and economic systems They're liberals?
/r/MensRights13/12/11 10:04 PM
2

comparative literature grad student with these beliefs have a mental breakdown and end up making sandwiches at Subway So basically what they'd be doing anyway.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 09:54 PM
0

Because feminism can only exist with a nanny state.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 09:05 PM
1

I love the opening.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 07:50 PM
2

With a 30-70 male-female distribution at many universities, they would have to kick many women out As I recall, they saw this happening in Sweden so they scrapped the affirmative action.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 07:40 PM
30

Why not? Construction for a woman seems to be the easiest job in the world, all I ever see them do is stand in the middle of the street with signs.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:57 AM
5

Why are they bimbos?
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:51 AM
6

As if destruction has ever stopped feminism before.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 05:50 AM
1

cointelpro messiah Barack Obama NWO Child Support Slavery White Supremacy Men WIC How To Make A Slave Mandingo Jesus Christ Fathers Family Mangina BFF Black Gloria Frankenstein Female Feminists Feminism Lost Sheep Israel Ethiopian Afromerican African American world Crucified Black Male Baby Momma Dramas Thugt1cian Komic Genius Willie Lynch Racism Sexism illuminati What's with black men and conspiracy theories?
/r/MensRights12/12/11 06:00 PM
-12

Opposing prostitution is their own brand of slut shaming.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 05:42 PM
6

Evulushun is a lie by dem goddum athems
/r/MensRights12/12/11 05:41 PM
3

Agreed.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 08:26 AM
4

To be fair, they probably wanted to torch the Gypsy camp anyway.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 06:56 AM
-3

And now they're taking away people's rights and choices, because of a choice they decide they can make Liberalism in a nutshell. There's a reason the vast majority of feminists are statist.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 05:31 AM
1

It's not disagreement, son, it's the simple fact that you guys just can't formulate rational arguments when it's truly necessary. That's what the circlejerk has done to you.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 07:09 PM
3

Your folly is an expecting an SRS fan-boy to understand logic.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 07:32 AM
1

Feminism was reactionary.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 09:32 PM
1

You only have 7 na's though, should have 8.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 06:41 PM
2

I'm trying to sing the text in my head and it's just not working.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 07:27 AM
5

Because... uh... well... um... T-there just is!
/r/MensRights09/12/11 02:58 AM
4

Yes, but this only occurs due to patriarchy, so it's still your fault, male.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 11:48 PM
15

How very typical that the very first thing they do is play the victims and make the man look like the bad guy. SOMEONE'S FILMING ME WITHOUT PERMISSION
/r/MensRights08/12/11 11:36 PM
1

That's where the praise for single mothers comes from. Before we had so many entitlement programs, it was actually difficult to pull off.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:48 PM
-8

Any liberal who posts in this thread is going on my hit list.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:37 AM
2

If it's about money, the father's love is irrelevant. I'll also add free state healthcare for children to that list of great social services the daddy state supplies.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:30 AM
2

Maybe, but when money's tight he's better than a minimum wage worker.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 06:12 AM
1

There's a difference between acknowledging male privilege and ONLY acknowledging male privilege, troll.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 01:14 AM
1

"Single mothers" don't really exist, unless they're rich. When you get welfare, food stamps, and subsidized daycare/housing, your husband is the taxpayer.
/r/MensRights08/12/11 01:10 AM
0

I think it's about time to initiate our final solution for these liberal commie scumbags.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 06:17 AM
2

This whole thread
/r/MensRights07/12/11 03:42 AM
1

Cool story, but you missed the point. Instead of having dumb students pull out tens in thousands in loans for degrees with no job-prospects, thereby forcing the government to pay it, you've simply cut out the middle-man and force government to pay for it. That doesn't make it a better system, that's just giving up on solving the problem. Here's a better idea: your loans are proportional to the job prospects typical of the degree. If a chemical engineering and an underwater basketweaving degree c…
/r/MensRights06/12/11 10:32 PM
1

Lol.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 09:02 PM
13

Cutting off the lips of the vagina doesn't alter its function either.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 08:40 PM
2

I always knew Imperialism was a lie made up by the Joos.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 08:39 PM
-1

an entire masters degree costs me nothing costs me nothing me
/r/MensRights06/12/11 07:57 PM
2

Balls are on the outside, probably easier to deal with them.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 05:19 AM
2

Most people don't understand the implications of giving government so much power. Just look back at 911, even the liberals were calling for blood. Now we have shit like the Patriot Act. Never underestimate human stupidity.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 05:14 AM
-15

If Harvard wants to give you 200k to get a bachelors of arts, cool. If you want to pull out 50k in loans to get a bachelors of arts, and then whine about said debt, fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 04:49 AM
2

How can you prove a man poked holes in a condom?
/r/MensRights06/12/11 04:28 AM
6

SRS: Where we pretend we think everything's a joke because we're too embarrassed to admit how butthurt we are.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 12:26 AM
3

I'd agree too, it was more noting how they flip flop whenever it suits them.
/r/MensRights06/12/11 12:22 AM
2

Because you're a filthy feminist double agent.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:26 AM
3

They're just jelly they can't compete with Watson.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:23 AM
11

Patriarchy: Men should shut up because real men don't complain Feminism: Men should shut up because they're privileged due to patriarchy Wut
/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:20 AM
3

The retarded girl is obviously wrong about men being pigs solely driven by sex, but the OP isn't right about feminism being an equality movement either.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 04:24 AM
2

Why you gotta make me sigh, Demonspawn?
/r/MensRights05/12/11 02:19 AM
2

Nice try you filthy feminist.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 02:18 AM
0

Both wrong.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 12:24 AM
40

Twenty bucks says this is where feminists will appeal to liberty and cry that we need to keep big government out of our lives.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 12:21 AM
34

A few things to note: They're never referred to as just "customers" but "female customers" The worker didn't "fight back", the women were "attacked" They only name the man I suppose they're just covering their ass, though.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:27 AM
8

They probably think they're just as oppressed as blacks.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 05:22 AM
13

No, when feminists discussed the wage gap, they were talking about wages for working the same job for the same numbers of hours. When people started calling them on their bullshit, they pretended they were, and are now, talking about women choosing low-paying fields. If you need any more proof feminists are intellectually dishonest, there it is.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 12:02 AM
1

World Star Hiphop isn't a community feminism is going to infect any time soon.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 11:58 PM
1

Liberal status: Told [ ] Not told [ ] Toldasaurus Rex [x]
/r/MensRights03/12/11 06:40 AM
1

Doesn't matter. She shouldn't have a right to the money anyway.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 02:42 AM
10

Here's how I see it going: "Your honor, I'd like my wife to provide receipts for what she spends the support on. I see her buying material wants yet constantly complains about money issues" 'Well, she'd have no money issues if you paid more child support. I'm raising your rate'.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 02:39 AM
1

More Drew's problem.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 02:37 AM
2

Because it's not. There's limit funds; if male homeless shelters get a greater share, female homeless shelter lose money. If more money is put toward prostate cancer research, breast cancer research might lose money. The list goes on. They keep their money by pretending nobody else needs it.
/r/MensRights03/12/11 12:25 AM
1

SCUM calls for the eradication of males. University feminists can support it without backlash. You're really comparing this to a dumb subreddit on the internet? Seriously?
/r/MensRights02/12/11 08:06 AM
2

Funny how they've backpedaled into the latter definition without even acknowledging it. It's almost as if they don't want to admit they've been preaching bullshit for decades.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 04:12 AM
1

How is that one so unbelievable? SCUM is a subset of radical feminism. It has a place in feminism; it's not just some made-up parody. If I recall correctly, a few of them run feminist groups at their universities.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 04:08 AM
1

Actually, "butthurt" comes from people sticking stuff up their ass because they enjoy the pain. By analogy, SRS gets butthurt over dumb shit because they enjoy being butthurt. If you didn't want to be butthurt you wouldn't be butthurt.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 03:30 AM
1

What conclusions have been drawn?
/r/MensRights02/12/11 01:53 AM
1

I'm not calling it inaccurate. I'm simply saying that you can't say it's misogynist, because the culture is supposed to be very medieval in nature. On top of this, women in the book are also treated better than they would be during that time. If anything, feminists should be praising Martin.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 01:24 AM
1

Historically accurate, no. But it's a "medieval" fantasy.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 01:09 AM
3

Haha, well played. You'll note a slight difference, however, in that /r/rapingwomen and /r/beatingwomen are just troll subreddits, whereas the nuts in that video are SCUM cultists. The former only exists to make feminists butthurt; the latter actually believe the shit that comes out of their mouths.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 01:08 AM
1

People didn't even post illegal things in the jailbait subreddit, they traded CP through PMs.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 12:14 AM
6

GET SUPER ANGRY AND USE HYPERBOLE LIKE ME OR YOU'RE DEFENDING THE RAPE AND BEATING OF WOMEN Can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 12:11 AM
4

TIL troll subreddits incite violence. You realize they only exist because their doing so makes your butt sore, right?
/r/MensRights02/12/11 12:09 AM
1

Misspell of fortunately in the eighth paragraph.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 09:24 PM
1

Seriously, given the time period and intended culture, he's making the women more powerful than they should be.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 05:36 PM
1

Even Sansa is a reasonably intelligent person My face
/r/MensRights01/12/11 05:35 PM
10

Of course, I wasn't saying there still weren't situations where you'd be completely justified in leaving, I was referring to the petty shit that usually ends relationships today. "She talks too much", "he's not around enough", "I'm not emotionally fulfilled". Now, instead of dealing with their problems like adults, one can just run off with the kid and siphon money from the other's wallet.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 05:26 PM
19

Getting self-righteously angry about "evo-psych bullshit" seems to be all the rage with feminists these days.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 11:14 AM
27

Relationships (marriage) are supposed to be about compromise. A thousand years ago, there was no nanny state to give you welfare or take money out of your spouse's pocket for you. You had to take into consideration that your leaving might leave you worse off than simply dealing with certain problems.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 08:24 AM
8

As per usual, it seems feminism thrives on censorship.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 08:16 AM
3

Men are socially pressured to ask, though. Isn't feminism about fighting gender roles?
/r/MensRights01/12/11 06:03 AM
1

No, you're not elite until you're too good for Harvard and are contacted by aliens.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 05:53 AM
1

I was speaking on what's typically considered acceptable, not what you've said specifically.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 04:51 AM
0

I don't really care one way or the other, but you'll notice a funny little double standard there. When a woman faces an injustice by a man, it's completely fine to wish death or torture on him. When a man faces injustice by a woman, the same isn't okay.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 04:03 AM
8

Because being put on the sex offender registry for ridiculous reasons is primarily a male problem, and there are no large lobbying groups for men. Of course, there is one group that claims to be for men, but we all know that's just talk.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 01:36 AM
6

Parents are typically held responsible for damage their child does.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 01:34 AM
2

OH GOD I'M SO OPPRESSED THEY WON'T LET ME WORK IN THE COAL MINES I wonder where feminism was then. LOL
/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:51 PM
1

Too bad, he/she was one of the funnier ones.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:51 PM
0

Though I wouldn't put it past an SRS subscriber to doctor screenshots, notice that all but one of those comments are negative, and that having only two upvotes.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:50 PM
16

My religion says I need to kill all Jewish people. ...Why are you running away? This is my religion we're talking about!
/r/MensRights29/11/11 04:20 AM
1

Stop using stereotypes and shaming tactics you fat ugly neckbeard! FTFY, typical SRS subscriber.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 02:00 AM
2

The guy posting that (Nevadawildfires) is a troll and always ends up downvoted anyway.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:58 AM
6

They say the same thing about this sub-reddit A moot point, because they're wrong. MR doesn't exist solely to link comments and get collectively butthurt about them.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:58 AM
2

A bunch of downvotes, but not a single response. What a bunch of cowards.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:32 AM
2

Sure, but the lack of evidence that I'm a dinosaur also doesn't rule out the possibility that I am one. Kudos for staying surprisingly calm and rational.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 06:20 AM
2

That's too bad. ...But I guess that means you have no evidence to support your position. Are you going to acknowledge this?
/r/MensRights28/11/11 05:05 AM
2

I'd think, given that you hate MRAs so much, you'd relish the opportunity to metaphorically slap my face with some examples. I have trouble believing you'd just delete them.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 04:59 AM
-3

Indeed, which is hilarious because feminists claim to be against patriarchy, which says women need to be coddled because they're weak. Patriarchy: Coddle women because they're weak! Feminism: Coddle women because patriarchy says they're weak!
/r/MensRights28/11/11 12:50 AM
7

What's in a woman's womb is none of your concern, but what's in your wallet should be none of their concern either.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 10:32 PM
-1

A decent point, but I can see feminists ignoring the first half and simply saying "there is no female Jack the Ripper".
/r/MensRights27/11/11 10:24 PM
2

"Bigoted opinion" isn't very specific for an SRS subscriber. You guys think potato chips are white supremacists.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 10:21 PM
14

Well, let's compare fantasy to reality: Fantasyland: Court realizes mother cheated, rules joint custody and doesn't require father to pay child support to the mother. Reality: Father continues raising daughter, mother leaves, court gives mother full custody, fists father for 20% of his paycheck for 8 years. It was a hard decision, but the right one.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:22 PM
3

Wut
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:25 PM
3

You should write a book, this shit's hilarious.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:50 PM
2

I have no argument, better start calling names!
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:49 PM
39

Man questions paternity B-but think of the children! Man finds out kid isn't his and woman has to pay back support B-but think of the children! Woman doesn't pay back support She can't afford it, think of the children! Notice how children are always a proxy through which the government can coddle women.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:46 PM
2

Specifics?
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:34 PM
3

Probably has more to do with society's willingness to simply point out that a man is a prick.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 04:07 AM
-3

LEAD ON SIR, I'M RIGHT BEHIND YOU.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 04:06 AM
1

I don't think I've ever seen the claim that "women are out to make false rape accusations against all men". Come back after you've grown a brain and thus become capable of formulating a real argument.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 02:27 AM
1

Save the mods for the real imbeciles, this guy's hilarious.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:58 PM
2

> Brown University > Elite My face
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:49 PM
6

No, they really don't. That's why it's so sad.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:30 PM
1

I started seeing a bunch of banana jokes and looked at the username. I Lol'd.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:28 PM
1

Are those not all completely possible within the lore of the Matrix? The robots created a system where they can essentially trap a human's mind in a computer simulation. Their conscious is linked with the machine. Is it not then possible that a virus from the simulation could go the opposite way, from machine to mind? As far as Neo is concerned, yeah, he pretty much had magic powers, but the movies never really went into whether the movie's reality was supposed to mimic reality anyway. Take The …
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:20 PM
2

2 shots and a pint of Sailor Jerrys Rum Work on your reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 08:54 PM
1

Sure, but I'm asking specifically what implied the reality was just under the illusion.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 07:47 PM
2

When did the sequels imply reality is a simulation? Also, what is the point of this argument?
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:01 AM
5

I think you're taking it a bit far, brah. It's implied that there's only two realities; the Matrix, and real life. They come out of the Matrix. Thus, they're in real life. The creator probably just pulled a word of god to prevent pseudo-intellectual jerking-off about infinite regressions.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 05:46 AM
1

Careerists have a tendency to be nightmares in any field, tbh. True, but most careerists work in fields that have competition. A Democrat careerist competes against Republicans. A pro-life careerist competes against pro-choice careerists. In the gender politics arena, feminism has a monopoly. Notice any attempts to create some type of men's group is met with accusations of misogyny/non-checking of privilege? It very much is, unless your view of feminism is restricted to microcosms of western soc…
/r/MensRights26/11/11 05:07 AM
10

The fuck are you rambling about? Of course people can take anything out of context, or stretch the analogy far enough to suit their needs. A conspiracy theorist could say truthers "took the red pill", but the various 911 conspiracy theories are easy to debunk. That feminism does nothing for men, on the other hand, is incredibly obvious.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 04:27 AM
18

Because they're relevant? People are indoctrinated from birth to believe that feminism is the only gender lobby both men and women need. They continue believing it even when it's crystal clear feminism does nothing for men.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 02:46 AM
3

Troll harder honeybuns.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:51 PM
3

Why you being so hostile, man?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:39 PM
5

bitch From someone earlier whining about gendered insults. Haha.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:33 PM
5

Nobody wants to hire subpar trolls.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:29 PM
3

"False rape accusation" refers to when the claim can be proven false or the accuser admits she lied. Why do you feel the need to pretend a simple "not guilty" fits in either of those categories?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:08 PM
2

Enjoying Thanksgiving break, son?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 05:58 PM
-1

Haha, what the fuck are you rambling about? He said you ripped the source to shreds. I stated that it read like a typical NOW hit-piece. Backpedaling? Vague arguments? What?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 09:58 AM
6

Sorry, http://www.reddit.com/r/occupywallstreet
/r/MensRights25/11/11 09:42 AM
-1

By "ripped to shreds" do you mean "subjected to NOW's typical shit-throwing"? I don't think I've ever read a single NOW action alert that didn't appeal to fear by bringing up big bad violent boogeymen or whine about some vague oppression women could possibly face as a result.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 09:40 AM
6

I tried posting this in the OWS Reddit, but met with marginal interest You'll notice about half of the mods of /r/OWS are also mods of the feminist /r/anarchism. Might explain who the subreddit is attracting.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:37 AM
3

He cited his information. You replied with "herp can't even defend your worldview". Only the morons in SRS would upvote such stupidity. I honestly feel sorry for your collective lack of intellect.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:31 AM
2

Oh look another SRS invasion.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 02:29 AM
4

Government-enabled spermjacking FTFY.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 11:31 PM
3

Talking about real issues =/= getting butthurt over comments on the internet
/r/MensRights24/11/11 09:51 PM
10

I don't think anyone really buys the whole "we think it's funny" shtick anymore. It's incredibly obvious that you guys are extremely butthurt, you just don't want to admit it.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 05:27 AM
10

Some women don't mind that they underwent FGM. Doesn't mean it's not an issue.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 04:58 AM
2

Statistics > anecdotes
/r/MensRights23/11/11 04:33 AM
1

Is your name John, and do you hate every single one of us?
/r/MensRights23/11/11 04:31 AM
4

HE'S HAVING SEX WITH FEMINISTS GET HIM
/r/MensRights23/11/11 04:29 AM
6

There are more female college graduates because they work harder and aren't lazy Only in feminist America could something as stupid as this be stated and not be called out.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 12:23 AM
4

I'm asking him if he is in MensRights because he is a bigot, or if it is because he is acting in the interests of equality Asking one what action they would take right now is a fundamentally different question than asking them what action they would take at this point in time if event X didn't happen in the past, which was your first question.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 12:11 AM
-1

If the feminist movement had never happened, would you be advocating their rights? If the answer is no, then you are a bigot Holy non-sequitur Batman.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 11:06 PM
2

Because deciding whether to cut off part of a baby's penis is dependent on whether you find that part important or not.
/r/MensRights22/11/11 03:39 PM
0

I'm mostly referring to "full-time feminists", those whose paychecks come from feminist activism. Bloggers, academics, think-tanks, etc. They have a clear financial incentive to keep feminism important, even when it's not. To address the rest of your comment: uninformed views of feminism "You need to read more feminist literature!" Feel free to educate me by pointing out some of the things feminism has done for men in the, what, over half a century it has existed? holding "Men's Rights" back fro…
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:29 PM
0

SRS: "Facts! They hurts us! They HURTS US!"
/r/MensRights20/11/11 05:11 PM
1

True, but the point is you can't punish a six year old as you can an adult, regardless of whether you told them to refrain from taking a specific action. They don't have the mental faculties to understand the logic of the situation as we do.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:53 PM
1

You could try asking if it's okay to videotape it.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 05:32 PM
6

I think I'm going to just take your advice and impregnate a bunch of feminists before killing myself. Goodbye, cruel world.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 05:31 PM
24

It's easy to see why feminists try to co-opt every popular issue: Think about what doors a women's study degree opens. Yeah, maybe if you graduate from Harvard you might find something special, but the average person is only going to have three or four choices. In order of required intellect: Think-tank > Academia/"celebrity" > Starbucks. Dumb feminists end up working at Starbucks, but still think their degree will get them somewhere one day. Feminism in academia survives because they get a dece…
/r/MensRights19/11/11 05:29 PM
1

Not at all. I, as an adult, known it's a big deal, so can take proper steps to end it. Putting a six year old on the the sex offender registry is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 05:10 PM
1

A 6-year old doesn't know it's a big deal.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 09:25 AM
6

Number 1 cause of birth rape: sexy babies.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 09:23 AM
2

Feminists have already co-opted the patriarchy by removing all the bad and keeping all the good (for women).
/r/MensRights19/11/11 08:31 AM
3

Teefs? Is that you?
/r/MensRights19/11/11 08:30 AM
15

The term "mansplaining" is just ad-hominem pretending it's real social science. It's essentially saying "it doesn't matter whether you're right or wrong, you're a man, so your opinion is unimportant". Doesn't surprise me that feminists hold their own religious beliefs in such high regard.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 04:53 AM
10

If his penis was small, how could she not stomach it? BUDUM TSH
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:42 AM
7

There's a stigma associated with it due to feminist spamming herp derp about "misogyny" or "neckbeards" or what have you.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 05:23 AM
1

I lol'd.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:56 AM
2

No, it just says you're not guilty.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:55 AM
8

As far as I know, it comes from a anonymous phone survey. Not very credible.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:28 AM
7

You'd think they'd realize how intellectually stale their comments are by the fact that they can be written like mab libs: "_____ goddamn neckbeard ______ straight white male ________ *patriarchy *__________ *privilege ___________* fuck you!"
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:25 AM
2

How convenient that the label of "human" doesn't come until after women have had ample time to make their decision.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 06:21 AM
1

Libertarian think-tanks won't sway nanny-state feminists.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 02:13 AM
2

Men were burned as "witches" or "sorcerers" too. Also, are you really comparing "not speaking unless spoke to" to working in coal mines and dying in wars?
/r/MensRights17/11/11 01:17 AM
2

Men weren't allowed to vote at some points either, unless they owned land. Women also didn't have to work 14 hour days in coal mines. Or run off to die in flavor-of-the-month wars.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:55 AM
2

Cookie-cutter response: "Women only get off easy because society thinks they're weak. Men get hard punishment because society sees them as strong, so even though they end up in jail longer, they're actually privileged." Yeah, it makes absolutely no sense, but remember who you're arguing with.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:53 AM
2

by definition feminism is the belief that women are equal not men not superior IJustFound/r/Mensrights.jpg
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:46 AM
2

Take solace in the fact that most of them are probably required to take the class, and thus don't care about batshit feminist ranting either.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 06:43 AM
2

It's funny the other way too. It's called the "bucking bronco", when you're doing doggy style you grab her tits and whisper in her ear that you have AIDs and/or aren't wearing a condom.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 05:20 AM
9

WHAT ABOUT TEH WOMENZ
/r/MensRights15/11/11 05:16 AM
3

Just get married in Skyrim. Goodbye real life.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 01:54 AM
1

smashed a phone on her head when she tried to call 911 Solution: Leave house Use different phone ?????????? Profit!
/r/MensRights13/11/11 06:12 PM
4

Why not? Feminists are always whining about how hard women had it. They weren't the ones working 14 hour days in coal mines.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:20 PM
2

but completely uncheckable facts have no place in the court of law They do in family court, where whoever manages to make the most shit stick wins.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 07:17 PM
2

Should've known better than to let that hobgoblin near his jewels.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:12 AM
1

You guys forget that men are, on average, larger and stronger than women. This makes them magically immune to sharp objects. ohwait
/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:05 AM
1

English professor
/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:03 AM
1

Likewise.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 05:49 AM
1

You probably got linked to the butthurt squad. And here I thought you were man enough to concede defeat Oh come on.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:38 PM
4

Paste the definition and ask for them to justify their accusation. Good luck getting one.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 03:18 AM
0

We both know I'm talking about you whiny SRS subscribers upvoting each other and pretending you're not buttmad.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 01:33 AM
7

You've yet to link any of those traits to genetics. Do you take this line of thinking to its logical extremes? What do we do with the children of psychopaths?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 05:06 AM
6

Implying being a greedy cunt is necessarily an inheritable psychological problem.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:10 AM
4

You think the act of accusing a celebrity of being the father of your child because you're a greedy cunt is related at all to one's DNA?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:06 AM
0

Guess it doesn't stop them from having field trips though.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:03 AM
1

/r/worstof doesn't seem to be a feminist shithole yet.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:53 AM
0

At least they're honest.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:52 AM
6

Shitty DNA Come on bro. Come on.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:51 AM
4

I think they're talking about "life" as in "enjoying your life", not the opposite of death.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 01:29 AM
3

Sounds like Tsoukalos logic
/r/MensRights08/11/11 01:19 AM
1

Then why even bring it up in the first place? Do you feel he is more biased than is normal?
/r/MensRights08/11/11 01:15 AM
1

Why you being so hostile man?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:20 AM
6

Maybe not a troll, but definitely a moron
/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:19 AM
0

Note the "dismissing it" part. False rape accusations hurt women in that they may not be believed in the future, but the primary victim of a false rape accusations is still the man being accused. MRAs acknowledge that both men and women are harmed by this situation. The feminist response, on the other hand, is typically "false rape accusations don't happen very often, it's a non-issue, [some variation of "check your privilege"] you neckbeard." Edit- Also note this comment, where he says "Unlike …
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:58 PM
-4

So feminism isn't about men then? If it was, bringing up men wouldn't be changing the subject. Really, I don't understand why you guys feel the need to deny that feminism is solely a movement for women.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 06:29 PM
2

I think it's more that simply by disagreeing with them you're physically and socially unattractive. Yeah, standard feminist nonsense.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 05:34 PM
0

Feminism: say you're for both men and women, whine about "what about teh menz" when somebody brings up men.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 05:31 PM
8

I doubt you'll get a response, Aerik usually just throws up a few sentences and scampers off. He's not even a troll, he's just too dumb to justify his comments.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:53 AM
6

Not kneejerk, I thought it through. Shitredditsays subscribers are anything but rational, so I couldn't label this rational feminist commentary.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:03 PM
12

Upvoted for rational feminis- So, I was discussing with some of my venerable r/Shitredditsays Colleagues Nevermind.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 10:35 PM
-3

Biebz is a millionaire and that's the best he can do?
/r/MensRights04/11/11 10:14 PM
7

As usual, it takes a woman getting fucked over before anything changes.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 05:04 AM
11

Indeed, but if it's not going to be allowed the other way around at this point in time, it shouldn't be allowed this way either.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 01:16 AM
1

It's definitely women's liberation. Women liberating money from your wallet.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 11:40 PM
2

Whiskey and an Exacto knife.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:56 PM
4

Nobody's claiming he should have gotten away with it. The point is nobody should get away with it, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 08:08 PM
3

we [still] live in a gynocentric society I've always found it fascinating how feminists managed to pull this off. We went from a society that was gynocentric because women were seen as "weaker" than men, to a society that is gynocentric because we used to see women as weaker than men. Turtles all the way down.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:25 AM
1

I honestly came to MR because I thought it was some anti-women's rights troll subreddit Probably based off all the whiny comments by feminists outside of the subreddit, I'm guessing?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:16 AM
4

You're sure becoming reasonable lately Manboobz. Something happen? Do you want to talk about it?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:08 AM
33

Smells like feminist concern trolls in here. Let's just clear this up: Being a misogynist asshole isn't against the law Splitting someone's head open with a purse is against the law
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:48 AM
2

Well, "intelligent" feminists won't bring up rights, just social trends, which is what I was referring to. But to answer your questions: Women do lack some rights, but ones feminists are completely uninterested in rectifying. Women don't have the right to die at the same rate as men in wars, or the right to have their genitals mutilated at birth. I think we need to get on these issues to bring them up to our level of privilege. A decent indicator of one's lack of intelligence.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:59 AM
2

There is no "feminist organisation" Hahahaha. Oh god. Hahahaha.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:29 PM
9

Don't fall into the trap of thinking in black and white. Socially, men can't do some things, and women can't do some things.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:27 PM
0

That's not good enough for feminists, because for all you know they're just saying it under duress. You need the ability to read minds, just to be sure.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:56 PM
1

I didn't say I wasn't sexually attracted to them. Women are attracted to a nice chest on a man, but society as a whole doesn't sexualize it.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:35 PM
1

Lol, appealing to a TOS? That's for Reddit's protection, not yours. Nice try trolling me though, I know you're not the real Manboobz.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:34 PM
0

I'm not sexist, so I believe a woman's breasts are just as non-sexual as a man's chest.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:15 AM
1

That's pretty much my point. A few decades ago you'd hear "sex offender" and think child molester or rapist. Now all I think when I hear "sex offender" is "did she take naked pictures of herself? Did he have a naked picture of his girlfriend on his phone? Did he fuck his 17 year old girlfriend?"
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:13 AM
2

I'd agree.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 04:11 AM
7

I'm seriously incapable of understanding how making a "get back in the kitchen" joke means you hate women. Do feminists really not understand that by diluting the definition of misogyny they're shooting themselves in the foot?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 06:05 AM
0

What's the difference? Either way, it's an inappropriate sexual action taken without consent. ...You realize this is a hypothetical scenario, right?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 03:39 AM
2

Lee Doren? Did I travel back through time a few years?
/r/MensRights31/10/11 03:35 AM
3

Impersonation is not a bannable offense.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 04:54 PM
-2

Hey, if I grabbed her tits you'd be completely for her whining to the bartender and calling the police. If I didn't do the same that'd make me sexist.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 04:42 PM
1

Imagine this situation in reverse. Male victims getting all the funding, and female victims being essentially told to fuck off. Feminists would throw a collective shit-fit and we'd have diplomats in the respective countries on it in an instant. Hell, feminists keep telling me feminism helps women and men, so I'll hold my breath while I wait for feminist outrage to fix this problem. ... ... ...hhhhn... ......HNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGG...
/r/MensRights30/10/11 04:07 AM
2

Take my upvotes!
/r/MensRights30/10/11 12:40 AM
4

I'm mostly just curious about the animal. Was it "normal" beastiality, or, like, a komodo dragon?
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:05 PM
8

Wait so how did the beastiality occur? Was she getting fucked? Was he fucking? Were they forcing the child to do it? What kind of animal was it?
/r/MensRights29/10/11 05:08 PM
-2

And to be fair, a number of feminists are open to this too (knowing it will never happen) FTFY
/r/MensRights29/10/11 05:05 PM
-1

I'm sure a 12 year old can say "X grabbed my ass and the teacher did nothing. I'm not going back in there until you [principle, maybe] do something about it".
/r/MensRights29/10/11 08:46 AM
0

...Which makes it even worse, because now you're defending the stabbing of children for doing stupid shit.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 08:44 AM
0

Sometimes you guys on r/mensrights take it a bit far Says the one who supports the stabbing of a dumbass teenager for grabbing another teenager's ass.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 01:12 AM
0

A child can leave the classroom and refuse to go back in.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 01:09 AM
-2

Indeed. But I told the bartender and he didn't do anything. Therefore, I should've been allowed to stab the shit out of her. ...Or I could've went above the bartender and called the police. Just like she could've gone above the teacher to the principle, or higher.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:57 PM
2

You've claimed to support circumcising babies because you prefer how a circumcised penis looks. If someone supported FGM because they liked vaginas without labia minora you and the rest of the feminist community would throw a shit-fit. Quit being a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:22 PM
6

Making my overpriced coffee at Starbucks.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 11:15 PM
2

I completely agree, but society usually doesn't. The last time I was at the bar a drunk woman grabbed my chest. I wanted to stab the shit out of her, but I knew I'd be sent to prison. Feels bad man.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:55 PM
1

They're pretty much the same in terms of opinion though, so I like to pretend they're the same person.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:50 PM
1

But good job making yourself look crazy and irrational Says the person who hallucinates about god and likes how a circumcised baby's penis looks.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:52 AM
2

As a concern troll, your opinion is pretty worthless anyway.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:51 AM
2

YOU'RE A SICK FUCK FUTRELLE YOU'RE A SICK FUCK
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:50 AM
0

Define misogyny.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:10 PM
7

Quit watching shitty Lifetime movies, moron.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:43 AM
1

Social rules aren't all-encompassing, but they still exist. I don't know exactly what you're arguing against.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 03:15 AM
5

Sounds like the Gary Oak method to solving problems. Stab first, ask questions later.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:40 AM
1

douchebag Isn't that considered a gendered insult?
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:38 AM
6

It's hard to tell the difference.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:37 AM
3

Questioning them would be considered "mansplaining".
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:26 AM
1

Not really. Dildos aren't vilified the way male sex toys are. You can even appeal to your precious "patriarchy" if you want. Men are supposed to get pussy. If they use a fleshlight, they probably can't get pussy, so they're failures. Women aren't supposed to have casual sex. If they use a dildo, they're not having casual sex, and therefore are not failing.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:25 AM
1

Unless you're a straight white cis-man, then you just need to be quiet right?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:16 AM
4

NOW has too much time on its hands IMO That's what happens when you throw funding at someone who has massively exaggerated their problems.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:06 AM
4

The solution is to get this bullshit applied to women. Only then will people (and feminists) start caring.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:02 AM
3

Here's an example. Here's another. I'd link more, but I really don't feel like proving what you already know and just don't want to admit. It usually occurs when SRS invades smaller/less active subreddits. To your credit though, SRS seems to be moving away from just being a butthurt anti-MR feminist downvote squad to just a general butthurt downvote squad. Kudos are in order, I'll go get some wine from Walmart.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 05:29 AM
4

MR has 9 times as many subscribers, so it makes sense it'd have more influence in what crossposts do occur. You'll notice, however, that SRS usually takes over the comment thread being linked.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:53 AM
4

If he says it's rape, it's rape. Quit being a rape apologist you filthy misandrist.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:16 AM
1

Because one incident by the dumbasses at the TSA equates to a trend.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:08 AM
7

A straight man sticking a vibrator in his ass is even more socially unacceptable than a fleshlight. You should work on talking less and more on understanding the actual argument being made.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:07 AM
0

Touche.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 03:50 AM
3

I don't believe someone has to "explain" anything. If I walk through the park and some paranoid soccer mom sneers at me, I'm not going to explain that I'm just taking a walk and I'm definitely not looking to rape her kids.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 03:49 AM
4

SRS seems to think so. They don't apply it to themselves though, they're special.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 03:47 AM
3

Ignoring it isn't "excusing it away".
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:26 AM
6

The normal, social thing to do is mind your own business and not "disapprovingly stare" at people.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:16 AM
3

I was wondering why the comments started to make logical sense FTFY
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:10 AM
4

That said, SRS is not a gender debate club Haha. > Open SRS thread > "Lol fucking neckbeards" > "Fucking straight white cis-men" > "Bitter virgins* > Close tab
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:10 AM
11

SRS logic: Comparing one crosspost to a subreddit designed to do nothing but crosspost. You are the 99%.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:07 AM
3

Who is cheering for his rape?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 01:06 AM
2

I've never read Rand. Don't be a moron.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 12:43 AM
2

That's why you vote for Ron Paul /b/
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:42 AM
2

You lack reading comprehension.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 03:07 AM
1

I was more referring to the "unfortunately" part. I think it's quite fortunate that we prefer evidence over "truth", since "truth" is whatever authority decides it is.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:58 AM
2

You're hopeless.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 02:57 AM
2

By still using percentages you pulled out of your ass, you are ignoring an incredibly obvious point I already made. I'll leave it to you to use your brain and find it.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:24 PM
2

I'm not asking for anything. I'm simply making logical connections. Feminists like big government because it's easy to lobby, and we live in a time where any dissent can be labelled misogynist/patriarchal/oppressive. Liberals support big government. Therefore, liberals, albeit indirectly, support feminism. The irony is that feminists have only come so far thanks to a government that bends over for them because they're women.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:13 PM
1

I value my food stamps and welfare more than not engaging in half a dozen wars and torturing POWs. Fuck Paul, I'm voting for hope and change.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 11:07 PM
6

Nope. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:55 PM
2

Liberals support the nanny state that feminists use to pass their legislation.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:52 PM
1

Unfortunately, it's never about truth, it's about evidence and what you can prove That's a pretty dangerous thought process.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:46 PM
2

They were made, you just chose to ignore them. Lol at trying to apply economic principles to abortion using made up numbers.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:31 PM
2

You've taken a half-assed shot at, or ignored, all arguments made You've pulled a childish "No, you're X!" with no evidence I'm afraid I can no longer take you seriously.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 06:54 PM
2

Oo, looks like you're getting a little angry! Unfortunately for your argument, game theory rarely applies to real life, because percentages are typically puled from anuses. Men would have "0% burden" in the same way that women who sleep around have "0% burden" when it comes to people calling them sluts. Not to mention low-income women would have the state bending over to lessen their burden. I wish I lived in your dreamworld where complex problems can be solved with ad hominems and made-up numbe…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 02:27 AM
1

From what I'm seeing, the arguments are being formulated just fine. You simply don't want to accept them, based off "And I disagree that a man should be able to opt out at anytime".
/r/MensRights23/10/11 01:16 AM
1

If the owner feels hiring women will get her more business, it's only logical that she would do so. The fact that you think "misogyny" has anything to do with this is laughable. Just goes to show feminists have turned it into a useless buzzword.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 08:43 PM
3

Does feminism cure cancer too? Also, it's funny how you immediately start whining about "sexist men" when you don't even know the manager's sex, simply based off their actions as described by OP. You're essentially the "fucking niggers" comment in a submission about gang violence.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 08:42 PM
1

...What are you arguing about then? That's essentially the entire premise behind financial abortions. Man either opts in or opts out, depending on how the "baby contract" works, during the time in which the woman is still capable of making a decision to abort.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 08:40 PM
5

By believing in "patriarchy", feminists turn all female privileges into oppressions. ... So yes, they really believe this shit.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 08:33 PM
1

This would never fly for a "non-marginalized" group and you know it.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 08:31 PM
1

What about it? What? You're not even making sense. You said "What if the man opts out when the baby is born and she can no longer abort?" Most agree that financial abortions would take place before birth.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 06:42 AM
1

What if she has to get an abortion because she cannot afford the child? Making hard decisions is part of being an adult. Your second paragraph is completely irrelevant because we're discussing financial abortions that take place before birth.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 12:36 AM
1

Did he really think MR would make an exception to its ban policy just for him?
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:28 PM
1

If the man opts out, and the women decides, rationally, she cannot support the child on her own, and aborts, that's a 0% burden too.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:21 PM
3

Feminists apparently don't believe women are capable of making adult decisions.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:20 PM
2

What's even more shocking is the arguments feminists use to oppose financial abortions. The most typical one seems to be "if a woman knows she won't have financial support she might be "forced" into an abortion." ... In other news, adults expected to be capable of making tough financial decisions.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:15 PM
1

Feminist weasel badger just doesn't give a fuck (about facts)
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:09 PM
1

The wit, it burns!
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:13 AM
3

You are responding to a troll.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:02 AM
4

This just in: NOW lobbies for regulations forcing taxi drivers to pick up young women. The spokeswoman for NOW was reported as saying "this whole trend with taxi drivers not picking up our young women just shows how misogynist our society really is." In other news, feminist outrage when state considers harsher penalties for making false accusations. Dohohoho
/r/MensRights19/10/11 11:58 PM
3

That's probably where rape-shield laws came from.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:40 AM
16

1) A culture where an accused man is considered guilty before even charged, and, by extension, nobody blinks an eye when laws are passed to make it easier for the accuser and harder for the accused. 2) The above definition does. 3) Probably happens sometimes, but it's not endemic to the justice system. More often, tips for preventing a crime, good or bad, after the fact or before, are considered victim-blaming. "You shouldn't be flaunting your vagina then" - Victim-blaming "You should watch how …
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:18 AM
2

Then they tell you to check your privilege, and use their political influence to create regulations forcing them to be paid the same for less work. And then claim they're for equal rights.
/r/MensRights19/10/11 12:03 AM
2

But then they'd whine about the wage gap.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 10:45 PM
3

Admins wanted all the underage girls for themselves.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:57 PM
3

They'd throw a shit fit to make sure they were included, but only with caveats. Look at the fitness requirements for the military.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:42 PM
1

Nah, I think I'll just ignore you.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:39 PM
2

Are you talking about Reddit?
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:36 PM
15

Many times, women who commit violence — most often interpersonal violence — have been victims of trauma and/or abuse. Statistically, women are more often victims of intimate partner violence. Even when they're the abuser, they're still victims. Bawwwwwwww
/r/MensRights18/10/11 09:34 PM
2

I thought it was just a bruise. I squeezed it a few times and nothing happened. One day I squeezed he just popped out. Fucker was pretty big.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 08:08 PM
1

Makes sense. Women can get away with having sex with the underage here, they don't need to go to another country.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 05:49 AM
1

Cool bro thanks for sharing.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 03:04 AM
3

Might work, PMS has been used as a defense.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:34 AM
-3

I lol'd
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:28 AM
2

I had a blackhead on my penis once. True story.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:27 AM
1

Ask what feminism has done for them lately (if they're men).
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:25 AM
2

Cool story Glenn.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:24 AM
2

Do you also question why police don't shoot the guns out of peoples' hands? Come on.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:20 AM
3

You don't know if they're unarmed. You don't know if they're weaker than you. There's a reason some states have castle laws instead of this liberal BS where you have to run away if a burglar "doesn't pose a threat". Are you really going to give your attacker the benefit of the doubt?
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:18 AM
1

Oh, he definitely went too far. The first hit with the rod probably put them in their place. His anger obviously got the best of him.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:16 AM
1

So Wikipedia bans scientologists from editing their own articles, but not feminists? That makes no sense.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:33 PM
7

Not defending how far he took it, but "restrain"? You don't "restrain" anything when acting in self-defense.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 02:24 PM
1

Probably all the Joe Boxer briefs I'm buying.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:14 AM
3

I didn't dismiss anything.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:07 PM
1

I lol'd "I went tens of thousands in dollars in debt for a useless degree, knowing I'd have no job prospects. I am unemployed. I am the 99%"
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:52 PM
1

Aerik isn't a troll, just a moron.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:46 PM
15

Or the fact the vast, VAST majority of women don't have scrotums. It's like a teenager without any teeth. You'd be pretty shocked to see that.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:45 PM
3

BIBLE STUDY TIEM!?
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:25 PM
3

Surprisingly accurate insight from Umadbros.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 12:14 AM
0

You could vote for Ron Paul /b/
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:23 PM
0

I'm not on the right, but to answer your question: Considering it was the Right who [did a bunch of shit] i don't see how we on the Left are much worse Because you disagree with what they're doing, but elect those who will never do anything about it.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:06 PM
1

You didn't address the point I just made.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:53 PM
1

Liberalism: Where food stamps and free abortions are more important than ending wars, torture, and corporate welfare.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:13 PM
2

mantelligence Haha. You feminists are good at thinking up stupid new terms to use.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:53 AM
3

I don't want to make a "think of the children" argument, but that's really all there is, and the vast majority of people find that good enough.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 03:58 AM
-2

I don't think it'd work. Women who can't afford children wouldn't stop having them, they'd just leave them in the woods or smother them if there were no social services.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 03:33 AM
3

It wouldn't be a problem if feminists admitted their movement is simply to help women. Instead, they claim to be against "patriarchy" and "gender roles" while conveniently ignoring all social norms that benefit women.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:58 AM
3

The argument is that their advantages are actually disadvantages. Because patriarchy.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:36 AM
4

Someone has spice in their vagina.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:21 AM
2

If you incentivize something, it's going to happen more often ...Which is good for abortions, or else you get providing welfare to dysfunctional single moms
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:16 AM
22

lol you're literally a retard Downvoted
/r/MensRights13/10/11 11:16 PM
-4

Ban anything I call transphobia FTFY. Moron.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 09:12 PM
2

A frontpage post will garner more attention from the subreddit's actual subscribers than SRS trolls.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 09:05 PM
2

Look, I've been a huge MRA for a long while now... but... Sure is concern trolling in here.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 09:01 PM
7

Hah, what a load of shit.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 08:45 PM
0

I'd actually be preventing rape by volunteering my ritual material.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 02:09 AM
3

I would actually be consenting by signing up. They didn't sign up, therefore what happened to them was rape. Not entirely sure where you're going with your comment.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 12:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter