TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AcidJiles Archive

View 38 posts and 666 comments by AcidJiles on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
205

Activism/SupportAcidJiles/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:48 AM
172

DiscriminationAcidJiles/r/MensRights22/10/15 10:20 AM
143

DiscriminationAcidJiles/r/MensRights15/04/24 12:45 PM
101

Social IssuesAcidJiles/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:42 AM
94

Social IssuesAcidJiles/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:01 AM
94

DiscriminationAcidJiles/r/MensRights28/02/18 04:06 PM
74

IntactivismAcidJiles/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:08 PM
60

AcidJiles/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:37 PM
57

GeneralAcidJiles/r/MensRights22/10/25 02:33 PM
54

False AccusationAcidJiles/r/MensRights22/12/17 01:53 PM
45

FeminismAcidJiles/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:40 PM
40

AcidJiles/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:27 PM
37

Activism/SupportAcidJiles/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:03 AM
34

FeminismAcidJiles/r/MensRights01/09/15 10:41 AM
27

AcidJiles/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:45 AM
26

Marriage/DivorceAcidJiles/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:32 PM
24

Social IssuesAcidJiles/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:56 AM
23

Social IssuesAcidJiles/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:33 AM
23

AcidJiles/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:32 PM
23

Social IssuesAcidJiles/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:14 AM
20

Edu./Occu.AcidJiles/r/MensRights13/12/18 11:29 AM
18

AcidJiles/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:44 PM
14

QuestionAcidJiles/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:01 PM
12

DiscussionAcidJiles/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:13 AM
11

GeneralAcidJiles/r/MensRights21/03/16 10:45 AM
11

AcidJiles/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:06 PM
9

QuestionsAcidJiles/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:50 AM
9

Edu./Occu.AcidJiles/r/MensRights26/10/15 02:16 PM
9

QuestionsAcidJiles/r/MensRights19/05/17 02:47 PM
8

Social IssuesAcidJiles/r/MensRights26/02/18 02:56 PM
6

DiscussionAcidJiles/r/MensRights18/08/14 06:47 PM
6

AcidJiles/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:07 PM
5

QuestionAcidJiles/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:43 AM
2

AcidJiles/r/MensRights15/09/14 09:56 AM
1

AcidJiles/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:11 PM
1

AcidJiles/r/MensRights22/09/16 04:05 PM
0

GeneralAcidJiles/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:15 PM
0

AcidJiles/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:44 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-5

It's the UK, race means way less than Americans think it does or our media would like to present it by co-opting it from the states.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 10:37 AM
3

Anyone not able to see the first part of this has a closed mind. Sometimes relationships just don't work and handcuffing one person to it under sanction is medieval. That doesn't mean not a fair accomodation after the marriage particularly when it comes to kids, money etc but it often isn't anyone's "fault". Life is complicated, we need to have laws that acknowledge and accept that. I say this not just from common sense and common decency which should be enough alone but also personal experience…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:49 PM
5

Indeed, his views are just dipping the toe in the water of issues. A bit of truth to some of what he says but without getting to the heart of the issues and where the damage is coming from. A bit more resilience and independence would be good for all kids nowadays but I don't feel that is limited to boys.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 08:46 AM
7

Most femicide as generally considered isn't femicide. Men killing their partners the most common form isn't actually femicide. Their partners are women so when they kill their partner they kill a woman. They don't choose to have a female partner so they can go ahead and kill a woman the woman is already in that position. There is no choice being made to kill because she is a woman they kill their partner who so as it happens is a woman. A gay man who kills their male partner isn't committing and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 03:55 AM
27

I don't understand how they can't realise this completely breaks dating. You are no longer dating one woman who might tell a couple of her friends something awkward you did or a personal story showing weakness or a secret that they may unfairly take to be a red flag that information could be shared with dozens, hundreds or thousands. You have no ability to correct lies, misinterpretions, misunderstanding or slander. Just their version of the interaction with all the biases that may come with it …
/r/MensRights25/11/25 01:19 AM
5

Yeah, whatever change was needed should have been specific to the issue rather than a large alteration to the pro contact clause.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 02:52 PM
3

There seems to have been some level of change needed to provide a bit of additional child safety to children if there is clear evidence that a parent may cause harm but this seems to go too far. Not sure why they couldn't have just reduced the level of presumption slightly with additional flags or options if risks are raised. That children need both parents as a standard to a relevant level should be self evident. This could lead to mothers who coax children to dislike their fathers having more …
/r/MensRights22/10/25 02:38 PM
29

She seems very happy to separate male and female offenders based on likelihood of committing crimes (as flawed as those stats are) but seems unwilling to do that same actions for men and particularly white men. Her classic misandry and racism coming to the fore again.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 08:04 AM
3

“Liberal feminism has been rejected for good reason – it has failed to deliver gender equality, so it makes sense that you’d want to find an alternative. But just because something is the enemy of liberal feminism, does not necessarily mean it’s good for women.” Lol what. How can they possible imagine that it has not delivered? It has over delivered to the point of significant discrimination towards men and there only being rights that men don't have that women do but none that men have that wom…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:30 AM
23

Misandry. Women know if a child is theirs. Only men can have doubts. Paternity tests should be done at birth mandatory to ensure clarity and fairness on all sides and reduce issues later on. It is unfair to children to be raised thinking someone was their father and then finding out later that was not the case particularly in disagreeable circumstances. So beyond men's obvious and unassailable right to know children have a right to hence why it should be mandatory.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 07:17 PM
2

Agreed althought thats an entirely separate issue. It being associated with this is unnecessarily muddying the waters.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 12:09 PM
3

Why does anyone care. Unreasonable and clearly somewhat crazy women removing themselves from the dating market seems like a plus. That the top 2% of men on the dating apps have a flew less people to swipe past or spend a night with seems to be the least of first world problems ever.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 02:00 PM
7

I was there too. This is very accurate and so much better than the false rewrites of what actually happened pushed by activist journalists and corp backers.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 01:08 PM
-14

This isn't evidence for or against female rulers. Female rulers were seen as weaker and so were more likely to face challenge internally or other rulers seeing what they could get away with. This lead to additional wars unsurprisingly but not at the fault of female rulers. Female rulers were just like any other rulers with good and bad ones. This stat has no modern day bearing and we should be better than to try and make this mean something now.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 08:11 AM
5

She is a TERF. They dislike Trans because they hate men. TERFs are fundamentally misandrists.
/r/MensRights02/08/24 01:20 PM
-2

This is very US centered. Do you have UK sources? Thanks
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:32 PM
5

"Part of the reason this dearth of empathy exists is that too many men have abdicated their responsibilities. The men who are wounded by this brand of toxic messaging don’t speak up because they are afraid of the backlash, especially of being “canceled” or widely attacked on social media. They fear being labeled (unfairly) as extremist “Men’s Rights” apologists. And the men who do speak up rarely do so in a productive way. Too often they shrug and pretend not to care, and instead take their grie…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 12:12 PM
-6

Indeed so many trash opinions whenever Ukraine is posted here. Gender discrimination is never good but when under existential threat from a racist, genocidal and warmongering opponent you can never trust and only hope for any semblance of a future is a bloody war it is lower on the priority list.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 09:55 PM
58

It is almost certainly more than 1 in 12. It will not be a majority but it is far more than anyone in media would ever want to admit. This is the damage it does and it should be taken as any other serious crime. It hurts real victims of rape by wasting police and legal time that should be focused on them and it destroys the newly created victims who have been falsely accused.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 10:12 PM
5

"We are all seen through the lens of Harvey Weinstein et al. And I can feel that the opportunities are shrinking, as they should do." No men should not be viewed through that narrow lens and opportunities should not be shrinking. "he has said that he is “quite rightly” considered a “dinosaur”. To suggest believe he is a dinosaur within the context of white men viewed negatively certainly seems negative to one's self. He sort of highlights issues men face in the industry but also isn't really cha…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:47 PM
0

That is an impressive amount of self hatred. Has he considered therapy.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 08:49 AM
6

The whole concept is flawed. I am highly pro-abortion rights but have the right along with anyone men or women to have a view on the issue. In the same way women have a right to a view on circumcision and I can have a view on trans gender issues. That is the nature of a democracy, my opinions and right to vote on such are not just limited to my gender or sex or life experience. To suggest that this is in anyway linked to alleged control of women by men or otherwise is flawed, sexist and anti dem…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:13 PM
2

Plus the men have to stay to continue to earn/protect property etc so the women and children are able to flee while the man cannot. That's not a positive for the man and is a terrible misuse of statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/21 11:45 AM
2

Schrodinger's refugee. Loads of men flee they are cowards who should be sending their wives and children first. It shows how important it is to support women and children in these situations. If women and children are the majority of refugees then this only shows bad the situation is for them and we need to focus on the women and children. This is how the media poorly treats men.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 06:50 PM
2

Indeed, over egging an issues without evidence is just poor form regardless of the political arena and something we hate feminism doing. Not sure where the upvotes are coming from as such silly statements are usually not given this much attention.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 12:38 PM
41

Look I think it is clear false allegations are way more regular than the 2% nonsense pushed from flawed studies and biased interpretations of data and may be a significant minority of accusations (eg 10, 15 or 20%) but they will not be a majority. Rapes occur more than anyone would like and while there is a lot of nonsense put out around it false allegations are not anywhere near as huge as you suggest. To suggest so really gives a bad name to the genuine push back against false narratives that …
/r/MensRights13/07/21 10:19 AM
1

You have to always question the safety of any convinctions delivered in this way. I know if I was on a jury regardless of the sex etc of a defendant I would have a hard time being convinced away from reasonable doubt without harder evidence. Especially with what we know about the unreliability of witnesses even if the event happened recently.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 11:10 AM
3

It's always sad to see the executive class screw over men lower down by aligning themselves with such unnecessary schemes to maintain their high paying role until they can retire. They almost certainly don't believe it in but also want to make sure the shit rolls down hill not up.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:16 PM
3

Your preference for a male voice clearly shows how much you don't like taking orders from women. Such a clear demonstration of misandry is concerning. /s
/r/MensRights12/04/21 01:43 PM
15

He killed 4 men and 2 women though. So in his act of femicide men were the primary victim. Was sexism etc part of this for sure but it would seem odd label it as femicide given the discrepancy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/21 10:29 AM
1

The end result is a pay reduction to equalise salaries. This isn't one where a rising tide raises all boats. This will hurt capable men and women. I work with female colleagues who earn more than me with no issue, they have more experience and are more capable. I have no view that they earn more because they are women as I am capable of not seeing everything through a gender lens.
/r/MensRights21/10/20 10:36 AM
3

What is Botez doing that leads to mischaracterization which would break their terms?
/r/MensRights29/09/20 10:07 AM
1

Because finding and changing the actual problem is key. The problem is police behaviour, tactics, escalation and mentality not that the police force is institutionally racist. If you attempt to fix instructional racism which isn't a widespread issue then you fix the wrong thing. Finding the route cause of issues is key especially if you want people to not find hypocrisy or areas to criticise in a movement.
/r/MensRights05/06/20 02:43 PM
2

Racism plays a role and I did not question that but in the particular area of police shootings it seems to be a minor one which makes sense given studies have shown police are less likely to fire on black suspects due to the additional scrutiny those cases receive so it goes both ways. Many of the protesters and the way the narrative is presented would suggest police are out hunting black people to kill which just isn't backed up by the data. The Police lack deescalation skills, are not communit…
/r/MensRights03/06/20 10:33 AM
2

Look at /r/publicfreakout and see the shit cops are doing. Hence why I said police reform needs to happen and that I am supportive of the protests.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 05:18 AM
3

I certainly don't watch CNN and my comments would not fit with their narratives so I find your comment a little odd. My comment was directly on police shootings not the justice system as a whole which excluding police has far clearer evidence of sexism and racism within it although often due to the nature of the processes which need reform more than explicit person on person discrimination. So no I don't believe they are appropriate but I wasn't commenting on that.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 01:57 AM
21

There is a current narrative which is easy to promote and sounds right within the modern news and discussion cycle. Aspects of it have merit but its core (black men being killed by the police disproportionately. Too many black men are killed of course, they are just not alone) is misguided and narrow even if the end result is something everyone agrees on which is reform of the police and fewer deaths including of black men. More accountability, more community policing and less militarisation etc…
/r/MensRights03/06/20 12:58 AM
0

Because it is the primary factor. If you are doing an analysis of soldiers deaths in world war 2 for example those who had been in combat would be the primary factor in dividing death rates with significantly higher death rates than those who had not and only died from accidents/disease etc. In this case the in combat is interactions with police. Almost all deaths caused by police occur within the course of their normal roles and hence the greater amount of interactions a section of citizenry ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 12:34 AM
0

I wasn't commenting on the Justice system which has far clearer sexism and racism statistically along with far more relevant analysis much of the time. I wasn't justify the police's actions in the least just demonstrating that disparities are not useful without relevant context. Indeed it is multifactoral which is why flat statistics are very misleading. I am not suggesting applying crime rates and types explained everything and never would but when it changes suggested disparities from multiple…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/20 12:17 AM
0

The majority of the disparity for both gender and race disappears when you align it to crime rates and types. Men commit a huge amount more crime and violent crime than women which in turn leads to significantly more scenarios with bad outcomes as possiblity due to police interactions. Black men commit disproportionately more crime and violent crime than white men which again leads to more police interactions with bad outcomes being possible. I did the calculation 1 or 2 years ago and based on c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/20 11:14 PM
124

I said this elsewhere but this shouldn't be an identity issue. More men are killed by police because they have more interactions with police because they commit more crime especially violent crime, black men disproportionately commit more crime especially violent crime again leading to more interactions above white men with more chances for bad outcomes. This doesn't justify police's bad actions in anyway but the key issue is a police force focused on Enforcement and Control not Protecting and S…
/r/MensRights02/06/20 11:00 PM
4

I think getting this drawn into identity is the greatest flaw of the movement that has come out of this. There is no evidence race or gender were factors in the murder and even if it were a larger movement should be focused on the significant flaws many law enforcement departments have for citizens of all races and genders as evidenced clearly by their actions against those taking part in peaceful protests and statistics which show terrible police treatment generally. Police in many cases enforc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/20 09:44 PM
5

So this study likely measured people's view of female empowerment politics not their view of women as women in a equal opportunity world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 04:28 PM
59

There is a place for child support and some form of temporary support for a partner who is returning to the workforce after time as a stay at home parent the issue has been the level and the flawed concept of "as they have been accustomed to". Without those it is possible to come a very reasonable fairer position that does not hold one side of the ex couple financially hostage for a decade or more.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 07:02 AM
2

There are a small number of female leaders who go hyper masculine in their behaviour as they feel they need to to succeed who most certainly come off as bossy because they are which therefore wouldn't be a mischaracterization but as you say beyond that I have never seen a genuine assertive confident female manager taken as bossy. This is to just below C suite level of a very large multi national.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/19 06:30 AM
10

Janice does a job here summarising a huge amount of the significant and overwhelming flaws with modern feminism. When she talks about feminists in the piece however I wish she specified it is only a minority who are actually part of the cult. The majority of feminists call themselves feminists more out of a sense of misguided sense of purpose rather than buying into the majority of the cults viewpoints. A great number would reasonably be called egalitarians but have just been told the relevant e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/19 06:02 AM
4

This always frustrates me about the discussion, women are making better decisions about work life balance and yet this is apparently a problem. A problem that women are less stressed, live longer and spend more time with family and around leisure activities. That doesn't seem like a problem to me.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:51 AM
47

/r/news is always a mess. The flow over nonsense from /r/politics is often too much to hold back.
/r/MensRights24/02/19 11:45 AM
5

This. People have preferences, those concerned by that need to get over it.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:15 AM
1

This is fine, pay gaps are not evidence of anything other than a gap in pay. They are not evidence of discrimination or anything much else.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 04:20 PM
1

More women go to university -> women choose professions on average which mean they earn less over their career -> takes longer to pay the load off -> this is a choice/preference but affects women more -> in feminists minds although the situation is equal because more women are affected therefore women's issue.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 06:59 PM
2

Indeed and given that abuse in relationships is usually a two way street are we just going to end up with only those whose abuse was less obvious going free while those whose abuse was more obvious staying in prison. A bit like how men who once hit their wife hard after years of abuse get DV convictions while their wives get nothing as the abuse is less obvious.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 10:35 AM
25

I thought the same. It seemed odd to seen to present natural birth stats as a gender issue when it is just nature at work. The non existent patriarchy isn't going around making babies male more often to go and oppress women.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 04:57 PM
22

That isn't the right way for them to go. The policies themselves are flawed and are what created part of the issue by distorting enrolment and reducing confidence among the white working class of having a fair shot at Uni along with the tuition rate increases which have hit the poorest most. What is needed is a solid look at Boys needs in education are rather than them being regarded as the lesser sex for so long along with a significant reduction in tuition for all as it is and will be seen as …
/r/MensRights21/12/18 10:45 AM
14

There seems to be a rouge editor working at the BBC who has managed to actually publish a reasonable article on male DV. Interestingly as opposed to articles on female DV there is no questioning of why women are abusing men nor challenging the lack of support with strong language beyond "they have been unable to access funding". A reverse article would be claiming sexism left and right in the lack of attention being paid to the issue and support levels. That this isn't hysterical like that seems…
/r/MensRights20/12/18 10:47 AM
3

The ONS data from 2015 on-wards has 22-29 year old women earning more than men on average. There was another report a month or two ago that showed even in the same roles women under 30 earned more than men (although that didn't multi variance it with hours worked etc) which I can't find at the moment.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:45 PM
2

Interesting although what a flawed way the article understands the differential. This just demonstrates that women's preference for childcare is so significantly strong that even with serious societal support the preference does not change.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 12:11 PM
3

The papers exist for the US so they should also for the UK. Plus reports on women under 30 earning more than men are available. It is just the whole picture that seems lacking.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 12:00 PM
4

While some fathers blame the feminist movement for this bias, Baer points out that the feminist movement works to oppose gender bias saying, “Actually, those who believe in traditional gender roles are the ones who tend to believe that women are better parents than men. If you are going to let a judge make a decision on your case, you are subjecting yourself to whatever biases that judge holds. This is less of a problem in mediation because the final decision makers are the parties themselves.” …
/r/MensRights11/12/18 11:20 AM
297

I wonder if she is equally concerned that instagram's top stars will mostly be women?
/r/MensRights10/12/18 04:51 PM
7

Isn't it really sexist of the phrase to diminish the huge part women have played throughout history? The phrase seems to come from a very traditionalist place to be honest.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:14 PM
12

Just because most feminists who only call themselves feminists because no one told them they can be egalitarians and care for women's issues the same are not misandric doesn't make what feminism has become not misandric.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 04:16 PM
12

Most normal women who call themselves feminists are not really feminists. They are egalitarians who have been missold modern feminism but as moral and upright individuals want to help both women and men. The only real feminists are those who see themselves as activists and buy intersectionality and the tyrannical patriarchy as genuine concepts. Eg. I am an egalitarian first with an interest in Men's Rights second. The normal everyday feminist is an egalitarian with a focus in women's rights. The…
/r/MensRights04/12/18 04:11 PM
10

I am certain nothing bad will happen to you if you start filming women's private areas in public /s
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:36 PM
10

20k not 200k
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:06 PM
3

He is pretty good on calling out culture war bullshit from SJWs as much as you can without being labelled an alt-right misogynist incel given his own experiences of the witch hunt mobs and ideological journalists.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 12:49 PM
1

Indeed people need to watch the video first.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 12:02 PM
1

That makes her strategy of appealing to that demographic even more idiotic because the people who would do that were already voting for her. So she specifically chose to promote a sexist agenda even though it wouldn't gain her any votes and is likely to have been a part of why she lost the election as many would not want to get on the identitarian bandwagon. So she basically sexistly virtue-signalled her way to defeat.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:09 AM
1

Behind the Scenes
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:06 AM
60

I think the Last Jedi must have broken him. He was still strong then and spoke out so they must have taken him to a back room and tortured him and this is the shell that remains. I feel sorry for him.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:24 PM
3

I agree at a low level with you but you are putting way too much responsibility on lots of separate actions that for anyone are hard to be consistent on. Mistakes are indeed made and more responsibility is needed in this space by women but I think you are pushing it harder than is fair and has lead to fudchucks reasonable comment.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 04:22 PM
1

The most sexist comments I have heard in my working life have been from women. Men have been far more careful with saying anything in case someone takes offence to it. So women have discussed the attractiveness of strippers, the good looks of a presenter and complained about men's behaviour in a generalised way. I take no offence to this and it is part of normal behaviour and was not done offend or malign anyone so no action should be taken. That a man saying "not bad" is then fired is utter mad…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:19 PM
2

I have a 5 minute commute (I live round the corner), when I move roles soon starting to actually commute is going to be hard.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 03:04 PM
1

The selfishness if you want to define it as such also has created the overwhelming amount of progress, science and achievement in the history of mankind. Without direction is it a negative, quite possibly but when directed it has been the primary force behind the creation of the modern world. That doesn't mean it wasn't also the cause of huge amounts of suffering along the way but it did get us here. Progress is sometimes painful and without that progress is a lot slower.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 04:54 PM
7

Especially given 20 years later there is absolutely no chance of anything approaching a fair process not that internal HR process are fair but 20 years will only have made the situation even less fair given the likely he said she said nature of the circumstances.
/r/MensRights18/10/18 09:12 AM
1

Wikipedia has the US as 78/22, worldwide is 79/21. Europe is 65/35 mainly while Central and South America is 90/10.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:40 AM
9

I don't know what the true figure is, pretty sure no one does but along with the figures on DV they are important to show that whatever the balance maybe they are not as ridiculously different as people have presumed. Maybe it is 55/45 or 40/60 or 35/65, in all those scenarios they are not gendered enough for it to be a particular concern. You have victims and you have perpetrators, regardless of gender there should be support for victims and justice performed on the perpetrators. Focusing on th…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 03:10 PM
19

A much higher proportion isn't true, yes there are more male than female rapists most likely but not enough to split hairs over especially given that male underreporting will almost certainly be higher than female underreporting. This shouldn't be about men or women, it should be about perpetrators and victims. Whereas for murder when it is 80/20 splits then gender is way more relevant. When it is 50/50, 55/45 or 60/40 gender doesn't need to be a part of it in the same way.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:47 PM
30

That isn't true, CDC figures put sexual assaults and rapes at about equal between men and women when you include made to penetrate. They aren't tearing down the patriarchy as there isn't one. They are just installing their own dictatorship of control over what to think. There are lots of real victims male and female who have not had justice and are suffering. We should do better by them but not in the way metoo or feminists are leading us where accusation is guilt.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 02:36 PM
15

Well not gendering it would just be 1 in 5 in people are the victims of DV etc. That would be the best way of proceeding. We don't discuss murder normally in a gendered way for example even though most victims are men. It is just 1 in 100000 people for example.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:36 PM
1

I only mean in a situation where there is a tumor there or something like that. I am not aware of any other medical reason to FGM.
/r/MensRights14/06/18 08:47 PM
-2

Is untrimmed flaps a particularly serious medical issue that really needs attention when children rather than a choice they can make when they reach majority age?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 03:15 PM
7

I am not sure the people who were downvoting me were feminists but more the regressive sort who hangs out on r/politics and thinks it is unbiased. How have feminists message on this expanded so far to the mainstream that people's ethical position is so out of whack?
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:50 PM
17

I would imagine that also extends to FGM (although that is of course rarer as a medical necessity).
/r/MensRights14/06/18 02:15 PM
130

Why would her full story matter, if she has been raped that is terrible for her etc but doesn't make any difference to what she has done.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 04:02 PM
11

Because you are better (or should be better) than the small percentage of women who wield their victim power as a weapon. This boy being instructed not to touch them is slightly questionable but understandable in the current climate but has nothing to do with attractiveness or anything outside of the risk to him and the squad.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 12:19 PM
27

Dude comeon, this is unnecessary and the touching in this form is not related to attractiveness as it is non sexual.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 11:01 AM
10

There seems to be this idiotic cycle when it comes school shooters and how various aspects of their lives are then taken as supposedly shining a light on cultural issue. I mean seriously are you telling me that someone who is willing to shoot up a school might be somewhat insensitive to others and have had issues with other people? Wow, call me shocked, I am pretty sure that that would almost be a prerequisite to being a school shooter. Of course there was something off about them in some form, …
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:30 PM
0

The only correct level is the occasional sex you receive when your feminist partner decides she is in the mood for you once every couple of weeks. Of course you have to accept and be happy she is finding pleasure when she goes out and finds some Studs to provide her with some real loving on a weekly basis as you are not quite enough man for her most of the time.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 11:36 AM
1

Not in the UK.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 07:11 PM
2

When it comes to men, I believe they are guilty until proven innocent, because if I do not see it that way, I am putting my health and safety on the line. Lol, I don't hate men but I am happy for them to be lynched if a woman says they did something. Sure dear, sure
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:37 PM
6

The only issue here is the information she was willing to share. If she wants to have monetary arrangements with men then that is up to her.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:34 PM
2

Why is this a goal, if women had a significant preference for IT I would have no issue with their being more women than men in IT. When did this nonsense idea of parity enter peoples heads. Equal opportunity is what is important not outcome.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 01:15 PM
8

I feel sorry for this mother, she has naively and stupidly bought into all the lies being pushed in MSM and online about the conditions and situation for women. It is going to be a hard awakening if she has a son and then realises that the world is a whole lot more complicated than has been presented and women are not the underclass in the West she has been told.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 12:26 PM
6

The same applies to the BBC, they rarely have explicitly fake news but for social justice issues always play to that slant on the issue. Never portraying the counter point completely fairly, always pushing the narrative in a particular direction they have decided is accurate. I agree on finding it worse than explicitly fake news as for those not in the know it is easier to be drawn to that presentation of an issue.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 12:06 AM
5

I agree to an extent as there is nuance as you highlight in the issue I just think falling on the side of supporting victims is generally better when not giving a full description of the nuance.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:58 PM
63

You do NOT deserve to have justice You still deserve justice but do not be surprised if you do not receive it.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:15 PM
2

I am copying my answer from a similar post above: I would agree the spark was solid but the response and evolution of it became unhealthy quite quickly. Rather than turning into a pro-report and non-gendered support movement (which is something everyone would support) it became an anti-men pro-post whatever your accusation is on twitter and people have to believe it movement. Sexual harassment and assault for both genders is hugely under-reported and misunderstood, I am not sure MeToo has done a…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:54 PM
1

I would agree the spark was solid but the response and evolution of it became unhealthy quite quickly. Rather than turning into a pro-report and non-gendered support movement (which is something everyone would support) it became an anti-men pro-post whatever your accusation is on twitter and people have to believe it movement. Sexual harassment and assault for both genders is hugely under-reported and misunderstood, I am not sure MeToo has done anything to really help it be less misunderstood. I…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:52 PM
8

My only point in this matter is whatever is applied here is applied equally. Either all barbers shops must now serve members of the other sex and have no ability to refuse service or the status quo will continue with barbers making decisions on who they serve genderwise dependent on their skills and ability. Interestingly this would set a precedent that while barber shops could for example refuse service to someone of their suggested gender with a horrible quality hair that hasn't been washed or…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:55 AM
3

I think to an extent that defines a decent subreddit on a political subject. If there is only one viewpoint expressed, severe censorship of opinions and no outlet for frustration then a subreddit becomes horribly stagnate, uninteresting and stifles debate. It also enables a space to be an echo chamber never being self critical of the more extreme aspects of a political viewpoint which is very unhealthy and doesn't lead to progress. The top comments on the occasional extreme generalisation etc on…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 09:14 AM
7

This pisses me off no end, the early bit of the recording is him talking about trying to get close to a celebrity women and he did everything he could do and it failed. So he hit on her etc etc and she didn't want to be with him. It is a description of his own failure to get with a woman. It doesn't end with him saying so I raped her, it is an acknowledgement of failure and accepting her lack consent to be with him. So he is clearly aware of consent and accepted it in the first section so why pe…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:59 AM
114

It’s possible someone could have been uncomfortable at some point, but did not voice that to me in the moment. If that is the case, I am truly sorry and I’ll be even more communicative going forward. He doesn't need to second guess himself like that. He clearly received solid consent from the women, if they didn't make feelings opposite to those expressed to him clear that is on them not on him. Sexual encounters turning into back and forths not believing the other partner vigorously consenting …
/r/MensRights06/04/18 08:36 AM
4

Only in very specific circumstances that they could no longer get away with. In other areas where they can get away with it and no one cares they will continue business as usual.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 01:25 PM
189

What seems to be lost is that it is perfectly possible for these players to be assholes but for them not to have committed crimes. So they have over-inflated egos are overly aggressive when it comes to picking up women. They may even think not very much of the women they take home but as long as the women consent they are not committing a crime as occurred here. The regularity with which feminists seem to want to confuse (ironically) cuntish behaviour with criminal acts is disturbing. Being an a…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:33 AM
10

She is only half way there, she still views things through aspects of the flawed feminist lens trying to make up for the past rather than just focusing on a fair future. She is making good steps towards it but until she sees more fundamental issues with feminism and that it is the cause of so many of these issues she still has a distance to go.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:53 AM
4

Men are socialized to be condescending toward women, and even the few who check themselves often fail. Who do you think is raising men? The overwhelming amount of hours men spend as a child is with women whether it be their mothers or teachers. So who exactly do you think is socializing them to be condescending to women?? (They aren't raised that way in reality and even then if they were is condescencition really that bad on the list of things to be??) The only way to tell if a man is a sexual a…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:11 PM
2

The issue I have is with the double standard, either it is ok for both men and women to do this or it isnt. I lean on the side of allowing it with perhaps a low level of criticism as I don't want all physical engagement between the sexes to be stifled but I can accept it not being accepted as well.
/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:40 AM
4

I am highly for many of the issues highlighted in IWD (especially those in non-western countries with serious genuine gender divides) but struggle to be behind the day while men's issues are ignored, separated from the same issues women face to make issues gendered when they are not, pushed to make issues out of myths such as the wage gap etc along with how IWMs day is regarded. It could be a great day to highlight the significant issues many women face around the world, unfortunate that it ofte…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:38 AM
3

There is nothing wrong with objectifying someone who you have no engagement with.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 11:12 AM
12

Corrected title: "Music festivals pledge gender equity". This isn't equality whichever way they want to present it. This seems to encapsulate everything that is wrong with how this issue is view all neatly tied up with a bow. Bizarre claims made about a demand driven industry which has women as some of the largest artists and earners - Check People not understanding what equality means - Check Festivals open to all and look to show the most popular acts - Check Commercial opportunity for more fe…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 03:06 PM
2

Same here, I didn't leave the Left, the Left left me.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:45 PM
1

Indeed, I am an Egalitarian MrRA, Egalitarian first with an interest in men's issues second. If feminists were Egalitarians first feminists second feminism could be a positive movement. Unfortunately feminists are mostly feminists first and if they are egalitarians that second hence their distorted world view.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:42 AM
6

I would guess that those who claim concerns about being regarded as sex objects often put themselves out there as sex objects. Now there is nothing wrong with women wanting to be looked upon as sex objects and nothing wrong with men enjoying that and visa versa so the issue is the hypocrisy or lack of nuance around how they present the subject. Still I agree it isn't particular pertinent to mensrights especially without an explanation.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:48 PM
68

An easy answer is that women maliciously make false rape accusations, perhaps to cover for a consensual sexual encounter or to exact revenge against a man. But research suggests that only four per cent of cases of sexual violence reported to the UK police are found or suspected to be false, and in the majority of these cases no specific perpetrator is named. I went through the linked study and it's own data suggests the number is significantly higher than 4%. The police's own data has the number…
/r/MensRights25/01/18 12:05 PM
8

It's breach of contract so a civil matter.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:04 PM
3

My point is there never should have been a trial. This just proves she is lying.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:22 PM
4

Not just that, this is evidence that should not have overturned the case, by that I mean it only overturns her word which should not be taken as truth anyway rather than overturning any solid evidence. Solid evidence of actual rape could still cause a conviction even with this evidence as her state of mind could have changed later. Therefore this was brought to prosecution without any solid evidence of an offence just her word against his which should never go before a jury in the first place. R…
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:47 PM
3

Well given convictions keep on being given without any hard evidence the requirement for softer evidence to ensure innocent men are not sent to prison in terms of all a persons communications becomes even more vital.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 11:53 AM
28

None of this makes any sense. This type of evidence shouldn't clear him if there was any actual evidence of a rape therefore this was a he said she said which was going to end in a conviction which is scary as fuck. If the parties disagree with no other evidence that is an acquittal so both the CPS and juries seem be unable to understand a requirement to prove guilt and reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 01:11 PM
3

The UK to be honest doesn't do much better, some of Europe does however and I understand is seeing good results from it.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:53 PM
7

And also hurts more victims as the less help pedophiles get the more are likely act on their desires leading to more victims. The more pedophiles are helped the less victims there are which is the most important aspect of all of this.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:48 PM
16

pedos no matter Not pedos, child molesters. Those with that proclivity who have not harmed children need help and support to ensure they do not harm any potential victims. Those who have however acted upon their desires do deserve the book thrown at them.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 02:01 PM
5

Another rape accusation that turns out to be at least false and possibly maliciously so. The most disgusting part of this is that this evidence should not be regarded as evidence needed to overturn the conviction. This only further demonstrates the likelihood that he is innocent and provides evidence to convince the accuser. Given it was a he said/she said the fact he was convicted at all is scary as if there was any other solid evidence of rape then messages before or after the act would not be…
/r/MensRights22/12/17 01:54 PM
2

I agree, that is my point this shouldn't have gone to trial regardless of the messaging as there is nothing beyond her testimony as evidence. The messaging just confirms she is lying or seriously delusional and that he is definitely innocent rather than what the result of the trial should have been which would be innocent due to lack evidence and no evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 04:13 PM
4

With the push for a increase in cases going to trial which is likely what led to the lack of resources on this case (along with the lack of viable case in the first place) as well as cuts to legal aid which reduce the quality of the defence this seems more and more like the only reasonable thing to do unless the evidence is utterly solid and overwhelming (Strong physical evidence/video footage of the offence).
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:05 PM
6

The most ridiculous thing for me is that this evidence is being regarded as important enough to overturn a possible conviction. Messaging unless with the parties explaining what occurred after the event to each other (and even this could be challenged) will only show the mindset going into and after the event. That is not evidence of what actually occurred. So unless the accused in messaging actually admits to rape nothing within it would confirm beyond a reasonable doubt that the rape occurred.…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:56 PM
7

Imagine if women had to pay for the medical treatment of the man who had raped them because they had damaged him while acting in self defence. That would genuinely be a rape culture and yet here we have a similar situation in reverse.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:57 PM
3

So he is a bit of an asshole. That photo is no different than pranksters who put two fingers behind a drunk friends head or put some silly clothing on top of them to take a photo. Just because it isn't a funny prank doesn't make it more than it is.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:00 PM
4

Oliver stating that she has no reason to lie is one of the most naive things I have ever heard someone say. I have no idea if she is lying or not but the idea that alleged victims have no reasons to lie is just utterly preposterous beyond belief. People lie about anything and everything, not all or even most of the time but people do lie and therefore that is always a possibility from any accusation without other evidence to support it.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:50 PM
2

Most aren't sexual assault. A crime requires malice. Unwanted sexual actions are not always sexual assault. A misunderstood or slightly forward kiss as long as it doesn't continue when it is clear it is unwanted is most of the time not sexual assault and it should not be treated as such.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:36 PM
5

There are cultures where a kiss on the lips (a peck) is a way of saying hello to say a close relative, are we saying every time that is a little bit unwanted that is sexual assault? Everyone will agree a full on prolonged kiss with attempted tongue and a negative response by the kissee is sexual assault but saying every unwanted peck on the lips is sexual assault is too far.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:47 PM
4

There will be Grans kissing (peck kisses) little boys under Mistletoe completely innocently this Christmas, are we really saying they are all committing sexual assault rather than just a bit of family fun.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:44 PM
8

knowing they’re ok with it Do you expect full verbal consent for every minor action with every sexual partner or even non sexual partner (eg a gran kissing you or a friend giving you a peck on the cheek)? Context is key, if someone is on their own under the mistletoe and someone just walks up and kisses them fully without any communication etc sure sexual assault but two nervous people under the mistletoe engaged in a low level of conversation and there seems to be a moment and one or the other …
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:12 PM
1

Did you manage not to laugh in her face? I think I would struggle to contain myself.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 08:37 AM
9

That doesn't stop it being most beneficial to all affected to come forward asap. It stops other acts occurring and it is the most likely way to secure a conviction as evidence etc can be collected thereby enabling the best chance of justice. We need to encourage a culture of coming forward quickly with an understanding that not everyone is always able to. But if that is the standard response it makes it easier for the next victim.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:03 AM
2

Well if it is going to be public it needs to be illegal for people to lose positions, jobs or roles in organisations until they are found guilty. If we have to reveal identities then they should have the same protections victims have.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:59 AM
1

Well then they need to be changed. If a 16 year old (where the age of consent is 17 or more) girl who looks 18+ gets a fake ID and goes to club and has sex with an 18 year old who perhaps even asks her age which she lies about then there is no intent and he should not be punished for that and that society would is insane.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 05:30 PM
11

Did she lie to him about age or did it never come up?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 08:24 PM
1

That always frustrated me as it is presumed he is unaware of consent and yet in the preceding sentence talks about how he tried to get with another woman and failed. So he understands consent from the preceding woman but then him talking about women who are interested in his power the presumption is his action is without consent.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:44 AM
3

Allegedly, he doesn't remember (of course he could be lying) but are we now taking individual accusations of serious offences as truth?
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:35 AM
6

I am wondering at what point just a rumor of an accusation will be enough to end people's careers. This reaction just off of an accusation is going to get lots of people caught in the crossfire.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 10:29 AM
2

Indeed, I do not dislike feminists, I dislike feminism. Most feminists are actually egalitarians who have no hatred towards men but the minority who push the narrative, hold positions of power and control public discourse are often misandric and represent the natural end result of feminism and it's flawed thinking.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:56 AM
10

I also wouldn't want necessarily step in even though I would want to because of what might happen to me. What if I need to restrain the girl and then my actions however necessary get me in trouble. What if a passerby misunderstands what is happening and thinks I am assaulting here and white knights for her. Women are the ones who can intervene most easily as they are least likely to experience a blacklash upon them.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:49 PM
1

Unfortunately if you read through the data on all the stages of rape accusations through to trial and people going to jail with the reasons for the drop outs at various points weighing up the balance of probabilities you get about 20%-40% of accusations being false, whether that be knowingly false or not is another matter but false accusations are far more numerous than anyone puts out there. That still leaves 60-80% being true accusations and therefore accusations must being taken seriously but…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:34 PM
5

Well also only if it is actually taken as seriously as Day of the Girl and receives anywhere near the level of attention and cultural push. There is a still a struggle for International Men's day to be allowed to be about the issues men face and taken seriously so I have serious doubts Day of the Boy would not turn into something similar.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 09:23 AM
1

Oh I agree with you completely just added the end comment to put perspective on the whole thing. There are great many victims on both sides of this.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 04:20 PM
7

If you go through the figures it looks like about 20-40% are false on balance of probability on why they were not continued etc. Still a lot higher than official statistics but highly unlikely a majority are false.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:11 PM
7

From going through the stats the last time I came to the conclusion the most likely actual percentage was about 20-40% were false in terms of where the balance of probability lay from the breakdown of why the cases didn't progress and who made the decision etc. That still importantly leads to 60-80% of accusations being truthful in intent so not dismissing claims just because some people lie is incredibly important. It just means skepticism at all stages and requirements for actual evidence need…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:09 PM
24

How is this all so fucked up in reverse that men need witnesses to demonstrate they didn't do something as opposed to a requirement for there to be evidence that a crime has been committed for an accusation to be leveled.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:06 PM
6

and the judge should have thrown it out for lack of evidence. Why are people in the law not fulfilling their roles?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:03 PM
2

I like how the articles on his accusation get thousands of upvotes are on the home page while the reality it was bullshit gets the most upvotes here and all of 60 at that.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:40 PM
8

It still amazes me that a parallel (lack of) justice system is allowed. How does it not infringe upon personal rights?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 12:53 PM
5

You mean she actually respects the hard work her husband does because she genuinely understands and loves him. Wow it almost seems like they have a genuinely loving and appreciative relationship where things will not always be shared in a precisely symmetric way due to the nature of life and because they are mature individuals they are able to manage that "highly" difficult task of being decent human beings to each other. Now if only some of those commentors could gain a small amount of respect,…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:27 AM
1

Nothing, given the primary bullshit that BLM is built on (that the police as an organisation specifically target black people because they are black in a different way when statistics show in many cases the reverse of this) then the use of the phrase has no power to claim "All Lives matter" has a response in some ways racist. Do Black people experience some specific issues, yes, are most of these due to location, culture and class, yes. Are there racist people who should be ashamed of course but…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:19 AM
4

"I don't think anyone can say a 14 or 16-year-old girl has performed these sex acts and enjoyed it - they just go along with it. You keep fucking telling yourself that, she is definitely projecting and trying to force her ideology onto them. I have my doubts that it's anywhere near as bad as what she is suggesting, had she heard some of the stuff I heard about when I was younger she'd probably think there was some kind of sex ring going on. Indeed, how does she feel about 15 year old boys going …
/r/MensRights05/10/17 09:07 AM
10

What are you guys thoughts on this? It seems to be framing many boys as criminal masterminds who using their enhanced guile are tricking loads of innocent young girls into committing sexual acts with them. Now I am sure there are some less scrupulous individuals who may be pushing boundaries in ways they should not but there seems to be a significant amount of denial of the girls agency here. Given that girls on average often mature faster than boys are we really accepting of a view that these g…
/r/MensRights05/10/17 08:19 AM
2

There always have been, it is only now there is an increased awareness of it. They are still not being treated equally with the sentences being lacking compared to how men are treated for equal or lesser crimes but it is a start that they are being punished in some form.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 06:58 AM
126

A university student was raped by a friend after she woke up at her halls of residence after an evening drinking beer and prosecco to find herself on top of him, a court heard. You cannot start an article like that, even as a quote it is prejudicial to start with an allegation phrased in that way. That is just bad journalistic practice. In her videoed statement, the woman - who denied being drunk "I was a little bit drunk but ok," Erm so which is it? Plus how did this even get to trial, there is…
/r/MensRights20/09/17 03:44 PM
3

Wouldn't that cultural disconnect just be huge amounts of bigotry. If I went to Nigeria and felt unrepresented by all the Black people on television I am pretty sure I would be called a racist. Or refused to watch a TV channel not for its content but because most of the hosts were women, a cry of sexism would follow closely. Do individuals such as Tom Watson and the BBC believe huge swaths of the country are bigoted towards whites and men and the only way to correct it is discrimination on those…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 11:41 PM
5

Wanted to post it here as the discussion elsewhere unfortunately was pretty terrible as usual with people intentionally misunderstanding people saying that boys will often express themselves different from girls and should be encouraged to express their emotions in the ways that are right for them with wanting hard gender stereotypes to remain. The first half seems pretty good but the 2nd half he gets into his family and his girls already being lied to at 6 that the patriarchy is out there to ma…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:36 AM
1

Indeed, I am certain you can find alternative searches that could be viewed as sexist to women (although they would not be).
/r/MensRights21/08/17 02:31 PM
2

Do you have any evidence for any of this regarding the car?
/r/MensRights18/08/17 05:10 PM
2

I do not know any woman or man who has been sexually assaulted so your friendship group is not an indicator of society as a whole.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:47 PM
8

I looked for the Stats on that and none of the official press releases even cover that. It is complete nonsense to present it as a percentage of total.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:45 PM
1

Right on with the that's OK, sometimes you will get on really closely with colleague other times less so. My team is also quite a lot older than I am so there is another divide but it doesn't stop me doing my job or make me feel left out. They are just in a different stage of life and I accept and appreciate that. Does the OP have too high an expectation for how engaging friendships inside an office environment are? Could that be a female trait that affects how some women view lot's of solo work…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:43 AM
10

Plus missing the big shocker, if women wanted to be engineers or scientists in the numbers needed they would do the degrees relevant to it. There is huge pressure and support for women to do STEM courses and yet they still don't, can they stop for a moment and consider maybe women are making choices and they don't want to do STEM in the same numbers as men.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:43 AM
1

So would giving female programmers assistance relating to men help? From your comment that seems to be the issue. I have many female colleagues and have no issue relating to them as a man on a day to day basis and certainly don't feel I need allies of a specific gender within my team which is majority female.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:36 AM
-1

Lol the comments there arguing this is good science. 163 games is fuck all of a sample size and although I would not be surprised if the result was somewhat true this small scale study is not a shining example of feminist research to blow away all the regular issues that feminism has with more serious science.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:42 AM
3

At what point do we get to collectively stop hitting our heads against a wall? This is all so much nonsense with so much bigotry and stupidity involved, when will it end?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:44 AM
1

I think she is more genuine than that but she still needs to apologies for some of the nonsense she put out before and presumptions she was OK with presenting. That will show she has really grown and matured out of the previous sphere even if for her not much has changed.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:34 PM
1

It's no explicitly that it is more that school is not designed with boys in mind, it never was in the past but less girls went and boys were the ones who had to take it seriously to succeed. Now girls also take it seriously but it suits their style of learning a lot more so they can achieve while boys are increasingly left behind and yet no serious changes to teaching styles are being implemented that might actually help boys learn.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:26 PM
1

Within the context of the discussion he makes it clear he still thinks it should be and is right to be illegal for men to have sex with boys. I think that makes his position abundantly clear. He is expressing a nuanced view that there are benefits to those relationships for the boys and found that in his experience but even through that doesn't think they should be legal. For example I think many 15 year olds are capable of consenting to sex with a 19 year old and it not be rape in the personal …
/r/MensRights14/07/17 12:10 PM
1

He didn't say that, the comment was taken out of context. At the very most he said he was ok with what happened to him, he was not making a larger conclusive statement about how it should be for others. He most certainly was not saying it is ok to have relationships with little boys.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 08:13 AM
2

They also completely overhauled the stats so it is now impossible to get a fair comparison with previous years which is hiding the reality of the changes.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:49 PM
12

I love how it is phrased as "lack of men" when there are plenty of men just not enough the a very specific education and career that are demanded by certain women. I wonder if professional men were concerned about there not being enough hot women for them the headline would be "lack of women".
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:00 PM
3

That 3rd quote is my view exactly we need an egalitarian gender neutral movement for genuine progress, but until mens issues are taken as seriously as womens a separate mens movement will be needed to highlight the discrepancy.
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:23 AM
4

I would imagine some sexual dysfunction for men stems from that. Always concerned if they finish first they might upset their partner and therefore deny themselves gratification unnaturally. This would link in with porn where the partner makes the woman finish multiple times before finally at they end they are able to finish. It seems odd porn is seen primarily to be about male dominance when women's pleasure seems to be placed above that of men's so often.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:34 PM
5

Do you have any research papers or evidence for that? It would be very interesting to read.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:30 PM
1

I am only taking a bit of issue as I feel they as it is hardwired to some level they aren't making the decision to be that way. Feminists are making the decision to be assholes about all of this so should condemned but ordinary women just need to be shown that things are not the way their preconceived notions think they are.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 04:00 PM
1

Oh for sure fuck the feminists as they push that the opposite is reality, but not all women are within that. If your first comment was "If you aren't worshipping feminists then they think it is hate" I would of had no issue.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 03:05 PM
-1

I think it is somewhat unfair to label all women as being like that when they won't even know they are especially while men were shown to be just as likely to feel the same. It is a grand cultural issue and the women and men who think that are an issue but it is not something that women should be condemned as a gender for.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:41 PM
-2

That is a little too generalising, clearly too many women are like that but too many men as well. Given that this a cultural norm those who tacitly accept it are not the primary issue, only those who try to claim 2+2=5 and think reality the opposite of the way it really is. Defeating the push for change in the wrong direction is more important then moving in the right direction.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:11 PM
1

Indeed but the most important aspect is how women view it as some of them through feminism are claiming reality is different than it is. Men accepting the bullshit so as not to be slammed as a misogynist themselves is therefore unsurprising given where the power balance on a societal level really falls.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:09 PM
1

I have to explain this far too many times and people still don't seem to get it. It was shit for everyone, for women it was slightly differently shit in certain ways than than men but it was still horrible for all.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 02:05 PM
13

With what evidence? She said so? I don't understand in a he said she said case how juries are convicting people. It's one persons word against another, nothing more. One or both of them could be lying. How is that not reasonable doubt?
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:22 PM
5

She didn't change her mind about gender equality, she just saw that feminism was not for it. That slander keeps on coming up and is just biased as fuck.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:17 PM
2

It seems like a weird soft bigotry of low expectations. The presumption that individuals of a different skin colour or culture would be unable to sympathise or understand others of different skin colours or cultures seems bigoted. I mean there are 5 year old boys who idolise black NFL players so much they want to dress up as them, they are clearly able to get behind them without thinking about their skin colour so why do ladies like this presume all other kids are some kind of racists by default…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:40 AM
2

Which I think is the only bit of his comments with merit, when you have the court system taking circumstantial and questionable cases (he said she said) and putting them forward then other circumstantial and questionable evidence should be available to be used since that is the context that case is then within. Now I disagree with having cases in such a context in the first place so I am not for the use of such circumstantial evidence but if the courts continue to bring circumstantial cases then…
/r/MensRights04/06/17 11:07 PM
2

Depends within which context, are they sexually promiscuous often while drunk for example. It's not about sexually promiscouity on it's own (hence why I dislike his argument) but that is a part of it and could lead to important context regarding their character and behaviour if relevant within the context of the trial.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 06:50 PM
2

Well it depends, is the entire case entirely centred on he said she said which is far too often the case, if so I don't see how the reliability of the witnesses (he and she) would not be of relevance? I mean I agree that cases should not be centred upon that with no additional evidence but if they are then surely that comes into it. Not that I agree with his phrasing of the argument or terms used. I am only arguing a part of it.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:26 AM
12

He claims it was to stop the abortion and was found not guilty so odds are the accusation was false/wrong but as a hypothetical what level of threat (non-physical) is needed for any sex conducted after it to be counted as rape?
/r/MensRights30/05/17 09:48 AM
1

Well the candidate was not limiting the criticism to only him individually. The argument was that rich men should not have a say. Of course if an individual guy is an asshole and goes back on a position people were voting for then fine he is an asshole, but he is not an asshole because he is a guy or rich.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:40 PM
1

I agree, when watching I felt I was watching part 1 of a 2 or 3 part series to follow up on many areas that are only briefly covered and provide more detail and statistics on the more serious claims of feminism.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 08:37 PM
5

That seems a pretty large generalisation there. From my experience both death and divorce have effected both the men and women in my life quite significantly. I would not be surprised by a trend of women bouncing back from divorce faster than men due to how often men are screwed over and have to give up to see their children but not when it comes to death. That I think is a different matter.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 09:35 AM
18

This does seem like a "we will acknowledge that men are also raped and give you (puts finger in the air) ....... 1 in 16, as long as you accept that the 1 in 5 figure for women is correct and that issue is therefore far more pressing".
/r/MensRights17/05/17 08:31 AM
3

There is no way she was charging 500-1000 an hour. One, no offence to her but she is not pretty enough to be commanding that, second she was working in a brothel where the costs will be lower than what high end girls who do outcalls will be charging.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:20 AM
4

"Internalised Misogyny"
/r/MensRights28/04/17 09:32 AM
2

In the UK and the US the difference which is unexplained is about half that between 2-4% but that does not mean it is sexism. Negotiation for example is suspected of being a lot of the differential but is very hard to prove as well as other factors. So maybe 1-2% is sexism but then at the lowest level and likely not intentionally in the majority of cases.
/r/MensRights25/04/17 03:14 PM
1

Why does it even come into decision making at any point. At no point during my life have I made decisions based on being better or receiving more than women. To defines someones life like that is the epitomy of sexism.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 02:48 PM
3

Shouldn't some men go claiming they identify as women?
/r/MensRights04/04/17 12:17 PM
1

Indeed, most of these aren't actually racist in the least unless you specifically want to distort them to be. Plus that youtube comment section is the purest form of cancer I have seen. Pointing out most of those things arent racism gets you accused of diet racism.
/r/MensRights25/03/17 11:34 AM
40

Well if a man has not been officially informed of the pregnancy then the man should have a choice after the birth of his involvement.
/r/MensRights05/03/17 10:45 AM
1

I still don't understand how did he ever get convicted, we have one witness who is the victim from 35 years ago. That is it no additional evidence just one persons word against another. At that level of lack of evidence it shouldn't even go to trial let alone the time gap which lessens even further the validity of any evidence presented from a witness especially given that the defendant is unlikely to have any specific memories from the period (eg what were you doing on this day 35 years ago ("F…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 10:03 AM
5

Indeed and how far does it go, how long until we have regular trials where the accused does not know who their accuser is let alone is unable to have them or their lawyer interact with them?
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:36 PM
14

I complained to the BBC about the language on attackers but missed that one. I will try and edit my complaint.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 03:02 PM
1

Oh I absolutely agree, I think Bill's position on this is worse than Milo's. Milo's had some nuance and did not apply to all and didn't want to actually change the law, Bill thinks rape of 14 year old boys in general is not an issue.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:19 PM
45

attacker They mean alleged attacker right, because at that stage nothing proven, it is all alleged and the court process is there to determine whether the allegation is true. This seems like a genuine slipperly slope, how soon is it that people wont even be told who their accuser is let alone face them in court which is a key tenant of the legal system. I understand why some people might think this is a good idea but it undermines justice which is what the court system is about, not safety nor s…
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:17 PM
4

Milo's position is far more nuanced than that and you give it a discredit that the smear campaigners wanted. For sure he did not present it in the most flattering terms with his experience clouding it but hes not wrong to a certain degree. Discussing whether there are early teenagers who are able to consent is a valid thought, if this led to him wanting a change in the law only then does it become questionable but he was explicit in the associated discussion about his opposition to that. It can …
/r/MensRights23/02/17 02:06 PM
1

Touch is very important but the hyperbole is unnecessary and only makes it harder for people to understand the issue.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:58 PM
1

I don't disagree, I just dislike ridiculous levels of hyperbole as it undermines a real issue.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 07:50 PM
8

"Speaking at a British Psychological Society conference on touch in schools and children’s services he said denying physical contact was akin to “denying a child oxygen.” No it is not, not even fucking close.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 05:11 PM
1

Don't forget tech support.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:40 AM
3

Liberal here too who is very disappointed in the left for it's hypocrisy and sexism when it comes to men and men's issues.
/r/MensRights02/02/17 03:09 PM
5

Indeed especially given they were clearly in a relationship, do I have to wake my wife to check for consent before snuggling up to her which may involve my hands being in positions that could be regarded as groping? Does my wife have to wake me for consent to wake me up with a blowjob or anything sexual. This criminalizing of normal sexual and relationship behaviors is scary.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 11:49 AM
1

Wow so much wrong in that image. So two-thirds of the women are sexist?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 04:37 PM
1

I think glassing anyone under any circumstances expect the serious possibility of imminent physical harm explicitly does not make someone a "decent member of society" unless this is a new definition of the word decent I was unaware of.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 04:18 PM
1

I think trying reasonably to verify the age of someone should be enough. If they look over the age of consent and tell you they are and/or show you what looks like legit ID there is no malice to it and they are not knowingly doing anything wrong.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 11:37 AM
1

Pretty sure she is a remainer.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:09 PM
10

She is in fact going against the [Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union] something I am sure she has used to defend her positions previously. Article 23 states: Equality between men and women (1)Equality between men and women must be ensured in all areas, including employment, work and pay. (2)The principle of equality shall not prevent the maintenance or adoption of measures providing for specific advantages in favour of the under-represented sex." Given that men are in fact the u…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:35 PM
1

Wtf, it doesn't break the statistics out at any point to show how many men and women. I can't even imagine a general statistics on say rape not being broken down into men and women yet for suicide the BBC is utterly gender neutral. The title is fine and the gender difference not showing up for a few lines would be fine but not mention at all let alone the first half is just stunning. I will be writing to them later.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:04 PM
9

Every man at university should apply for the team as non-binary, if they question it they are clearly whatever sexism applies to non-binary individuals.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 11:31 AM
2

Not just historical is needed, but current too. The damage is the same whether from historical or current.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:09 PM
3

Then are you are making huge presumptions on a turn of phrase. If he had said directly about an individual woman who did not want it and he did it anyway then fine we have an issue. He did not so to presume bad intent on his part from only a part of a longer conversation is just unfair.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:06 PM
1

What utter nonsense, quite clearly jokey on some level and while slightly beyond a group talking about how hot people are (something both men and women a lot) it is at most immature but not something worthy of punishment and is not an example of misogyny, sexism or hatred.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 10:48 AM
5

And yet is heavily downvoted because of said sexism. A few sexists does not a sexist place make.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 05:02 PM
1

Well it is untrue, unless she leaves all her privacy features on open for all which is on her. With a locked down Facebook etc unless she decides to friend him he can't see shit. "I was posting my daily routine and current location every half hour on a view able by all twitter and then was concerned if I didn't change my name he might be able to find me."
/r/MensRights28/10/16 11:27 AM
3

Indeed, I did not know they were all men for example until now. It was just reported as university students.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:26 AM
6

I think there is space for a law firming up when the disclosure happens (which should be early on so you can prepare a defense) and who gives it but the removal of the right is fundamentally against a key tenant of the justice system to know your accuser. The story given of the woman in this case sees her doing all of her actions only through fear with no actual action having been taken by the defendant to do any of the things she imagines he will do. If this is the best example of why this law …
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:55 PM
1

"assholes everywhere" that should be an egalitarian motto. 95% of the issues for both men and women come from people being assholes regardless of gender (in the western world at least). If there weren't assholes then neither feminists nor MRAs would have anything to talk about.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:03 AM
1

I do somewhat wish it had a different name, it becomes too easy to smear the film (by lying) with the red pill subreddit for people who are not familiar with what the film is about and what the title means in context. But obviously fuck VICE and their complete lack of journalistic integrity or ethics.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 08:23 AM
1

Not sure if they do, I have commented there recently and I am not banned. It would more be to expose the hypocrisy of their position. A feminist (well someone who was a feminist) is being silenced and there is silence from them.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 01:29 PM
1

Additionally There are serious issues that both men and women face, some faced more by one gender than another but all deserve attention and to be looked at fairly without biasing them with gendered thinking.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 09:56 AM
6

We should try and enlist twoxchromsomes in this. A major claim from feminists is that MRAs do not do enough activism. Where here is a film about that being censored from a feminist. If they truly want us be activist and have a discussion about the issues and believe in freedom of speech they need to stand up and get behind the showing of this.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 09:38 AM
7

This is true. The issue is not directly so much CEO pay but the lack of wage increases that have been passed to lower level workers. If a company is so successful that a CEO can be paid 50+ times a normal workers salary then it should have no issues paying its workers reasonable wages. If it does then it is not as successful as it claims to be.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:29 PM
3

Plus created the overwhelming majority of the cultural and technological advances that have to led to be a better quality of life for all. But fuck men right.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:15 PM
1

True, but then with so much nonsense are there really any fair comparisons.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 09:44 PM
5

That 98 out of 100 stat has to one of the least useful I have ever seen. I don't regularly hear how many accused of murder or robbery etc were not convicted because it isn't hugely important due to the wide variety of things that stat breaks down too. That it is pushed as evidence of anything is retarded.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 08:05 AM
30

Thing is she found it unusual enough to write a facebook essay about. Her claim that this wasn't unusual is disproved by her very actions.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:09 PM
9

Equality for women is one of the greatest social advances of the 20th century in western countries but thinking about what they could do women didn't stop to think about what they should do. I only mean this in the sense that feminism thinks every women would be happiest independent and pursuing a career when I think the evidence suggests this is not the case and many women realise often too late that the dream that was sold to them is not the reality they hoped it would be.
/r/MGTOW29/09/16 02:37 PM
0

I do not doubt that male reported rates are lower and that women would be more likely to overstate (I mean 13% of 16-24 women have PTSD? This must be an expansion of the term) but I would not be surprised if women had more mental health problems. Women are naturally (as much as feminism would like us to believe otherwise) more emotional than men and if not given the tools through childhood due to the coddling nature and lack of difficulties modern kids often do not face (especially girls) they a…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 02:28 PM
2

Geez 9% is a really high rate of pregnancy for something that is supposed to make getting pregnant almost impossible. Makes an IUD a lot more attractive.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 12:28 PM
2

I keep finding amusing that they try to present it as that, it is quite clearly in the dictionary definition women becoming equal to men which presumes that men have the greater rights etc. That is not an equality movement as it would (as it does) never consider where women have greater rights etc than men. Women equal to men is not and never has been equality for both genders.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 12:23 PM
3

or remaining silent. So if my wife if annoyed with me and refuses to speak with me until she has calmed down (which could be several hours) she is committing DV towards me? Just as an aside how the fuck would any of this be provable? Would I need a 5 hour video of my wife not speaking?
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:15 AM
3

To clarify I meant the figure I have read in several studies is that 70% of DV is reciprocal, 70% is also the percentage of non-reciprocal where a woman is the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:29 PM
1

70% is reciprocal right?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:11 PM
1

Plus the number one rule, Be attractive. If the guy whistling or calling out "Hey Girl" at that woman is a 10 then it will be take as affirming her status and beauty and therefore is a good thing.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 02:16 PM
28

Male tennis a lot more popular than female tennis.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 03:19 PM
2

Inconveniently for the partners of the super-rich, it is Monaco which follows this idea most assiduously. Inconveniently? Really BBC. Marrying someone wealthier than you means of course you deserve loads of the money they made.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 04:09 PM
2

A gender gap is not a problem without evidence of why it is a problem. The retarded presumption that any gap where men have a higher ratio than women is sexism at its finest. They do not presume when women have the higher ratio there is an issue but the moment men are OMG so much sexism. No where do they explain why the difference is a problem. "subtle blend of cultural expectations". So basically we can't prove it but wink wink nudge nudge it must be true right, I mean all men are misogynists. …
/r/MensRights21/09/16 02:22 PM
8

So the leadership of universities while being seriously misogynistic continue to take more and more women in as students as a cover for them being able to discriminate against women becoming professors? Where is my tin foil hat?
/r/MensRights21/09/16 01:57 PM
1

I have no problem with this as long as they would be equally happy with a MGTOW production or a "The world would be better off without women production". They all would be terrible but then it would be fair, I know they wouldn't allow the reverse plays therefore this one is also unacceptable.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 08:52 AM
2

So much of this is double standards which are then claimed to not be. I think most of us would be ok with womens only hours if male only hours were also acceptable, the same with women only clubs and therefore no problem with male only clubs. The one rule for one sex and another rule for another is the primary issue and obviously is even more serious when it comes to DV, homelessness or violence towards men in general.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 08:50 AM
1

Well also the focus on the Jews ignores the 5+ million other people of various "base" races and "sub humans" that the Nazis killed. People always talk about the 6, they should talk about the 11+.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 08:33 AM
1

And that needs to be overt not just a vague insinuation which requires mind reading to know whether that was the intent. The presumed intent by people such as this professor is bad without anything to back that up.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 08:31 AM
2

because women have already achieved far more than he will ever face. Wow just wow.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 10:48 AM
16

MPs were debating research by Women’s Aid which revealed that between 2005 and 2015, 19 children in 12 families were killed by violent fathers who had been allowed to see them through formal and informal child contact arrangements. Horrible that this occurred but this is a minuscule issue, why even bring it up. 19 deaths in 10 years so 2 a year does not a serious issue make.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 12:25 AM
1

Indeed, it is only an issue if it effects a persons actual interactions with the individuals. Eg Model in a poster, objectifying her is fine, meet her in real life, should respect her like any other person (although could still find her very sexy etc)
/r/MensRights16/09/16 12:22 AM
1

To find walls filled with pictures of men offensive is straight out sexism. Imagine if I entered a basketball hall of fame and there were only black men on the walls, if I find that offensive I would be a racist.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:18 PM
7

" the kinds of things men’s rights activists " Wanting equal treatment for men, such a thing to be a pejorative.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 12:46 AM
9

How the fuck is the Hunting Ground 93% on Rotten Tomatoes???? The fuck is wrong with these people.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 12:38 AM
2

That doesn't make them any worse. I am still confused why there are discussions on this. Cutting childrens genitals for both sexes is wrong, don't do it, it should be illegal with severe punishments, end of.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:52 AM
1

To be sure. Which is why you need a fair justice system to ensure bad women and bad men are punished appropriately.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:08 PM
-2

Bad women are bad women, ban men are bad men the world over unfortunately.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 09:49 PM
3

His co-host didn't want to believe it even when her colleague had looked into the data. The presumptive narrative is so strong and women trust other women so much on men the truth is hard to hear.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 09:38 PM
1

It's like arguing who is king of dump, yeah they may be on top but they are still sitting on shit.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:36 PM
8

Everyone had it worse off, if you want to rate the pros and cons there will be times when men had it worse and when women had it worse throughout history with women probably coming out slightly worse overall. This idea that ordinary men had it so much better off than women ignores all the responsibilities that men had in the role they played and what therefore was required of them (to die in war, work themselves to death etc etc.). Life was hard for all, it is unnecessary to play the oppression …
/r/MensRights26/08/16 09:14 AM
2

The crazies are at least being challenged but yes everyone needs to prepare their eyes for the cancer before going there.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 09:31 AM
4

The people "against" rape, hoping he gets raped /killme
/r/MensRights23/08/16 05:35 PM
8

This is quite frankly obscene, the police have no place in moralizing individuals consensual activities which is exactly what they are doing here. Why are the women involved not required to report their sexual activities to police? They were involved in the BDSM and would be likely to continue with it.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:50 AM
8

The problem with that is it encourages future suits which is bad news for everyone.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 07:29 PM
3

There is a similar thing with sexism, who brings up most children, women, therefore if they turn out sexist as is claimed who should we look to blame (if someone wanted to be like that), no it's men, not the women who raised them, it's mens fault. I don't think we should blame women per say, apart from the fact that the sexism is far lower than ever presented, not much of an issue in others and just as common if not more so in women.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 02:50 PM
2

Although officials have been noticing this trend for the last 10 years and yet as far as I can tell fuck all of significance has been done about. But then atleast the officials acknowledge the problem.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:55 PM
5

You are right, but they do like to under play it. There is no "tend" about it, primary schools are dominated by female teachers let alone other levels of schooling. Plus to stop talking about it there is strange, it is the start of a paragraph which should go onto the different way boys respond to types of schooling and the need for male role models and interactions which many do not get a home. It is almost like they know what they should say but then fail to follow through.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:38 PM
14

$1.5 million claiming the campus wasn't a safe environment for one accusation, how the fuck did a jury award that.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 12:00 PM
50

I mean Mattress Girl didn't get a parade but receiving an award from NOW is pretty close to a feminist parade.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:56 AM
35

Not one word on the different ways that boy learn than girls, nothing on how a lack of male teachers might affect boys apart from vague suggestion. The closest they come to an explanation is blaming boys for not being forward thinking enough and "wasting" their time on computer games and not reading enough. Failure of children to engage is the fault of schools and parents, not the children.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 11:48 AM
1

Good lord that is a ridiculous law. I hadn't read it recently and I had forgotten it.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 04:02 PM
2

Autocorrect keeps regarding it as a spelling error which is ridiculous and therefore oddly enough misandric.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:32 PM
1

Objectification also is also not wrong most of the time. If I met a beautiful woman my reaction would be entirely different than with friends if I saw her on the TV. People seem to confuse the two. I can objectify her in a momentary "I would like to be with her" way and there is nothing wrong with that. If I did the same in a business or personal scenario and treated her as such is horrible and without any respect etc.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:44 PM
1

"The CCTV did not conclusively prove there was any form of physical contact between the two strangers" And we are done, this is point the CPS should stop and not progress with the case or any case. There was no other evidence, no witnesses and no forensic evidence. We actually have video evidence of the lack of evidence and yet because every man is a potential rapist they must continue. WTF is wrong with the CPS.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:13 PM
4

The CPS really has gone to the dogs, he said she said cases in most crimes will not go to trial, but because it is rape well of course in their eyes it needs to without there being any additional evidence. It is scary to think just with a bit more competence the daughter could of guaranteed a conviction.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 08:46 AM
3

"Health watchdogs said more women needed to be brought into the boardroom in order to improve the quality of decision-making" Wow, not sexist at all, oh wait. Replace with the word men and that would be the end of that minister etc.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 09:56 PM
1

I still do not understand, how do these even get charged? There is no collaborating evidence, it is he said she said, that is it, in what world would this ever lead to a conviction in the first place?
/r/MensRights26/07/16 03:13 PM
6

I dont understand it's he said he said from 35 years ago, how did it even go to trial?
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:51 AM
2

This. The double standard is the issue not the action as with many of similar news stories.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 09:17 AM
0

It's not so fuck'em.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:29 PM
201

Not just rumored, the leaked emails show they were threatening legal action.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 01:33 PM
7

Let alone that it ignores misandry.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 12:07 PM
4

This is a good set of data but the presentation is pretty horrible and could be improved significantly to improve how easy it is to understand. I have been talking about this since the shootings in Dallas and it seems counter intuitive but is the reality of the situation. People like to cling to a narrative that makes sense to them even if the evidence is against it, a bit like religion really, it gives them something to believe in regardless of the truth.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 09:43 AM
10

"The force defines misogyny hate crime as: "Incidents against women that are motivated by an attitude of a man towards a woman and includes behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman." Plus notice how it is men towards women, so a woman calling another woman a bitch in the street, no problem, a man doing the same, misogynistic hate crime because he clearly hates all women. This is sexism plain and simple.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 09:36 AM
7

"The classification now means people can report incidents which might not be considered to be a crime and the police will investigate." So report non-crimes, what a wonderful waste of police time over nonsense.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:40 AM
30

Make it personal, it implies that her father, brother and all of her partners have raped someone.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:43 PM
5

http://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Video/150826/tdy_tren_ghostbusters_150826.today-inline-vid-featured-desktop.jpg
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:24 PM
2

This should be the poster child feminist movie, it is everything they stand for.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:22 PM
1

It is true in the sense it would have a greater effect on the country's opinion, that is not right but it is true. People need to acknowledge that men's lives to most people mean less. That may never completely change but it is most certainly the case now.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:21 PM
1

That is too far, some women do lie, many do not. We need a fair justice system where innocent until proven guilty applies in all cases and a burden of proof on the prosecution. Unfairnesses inflicted upon men by feminists, their sycophants and liars should not be put upon the majority of honest women.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:17 PM
1

I agree but I think the general movement in general was less toxic, they may have followed toxic leaders but the outcomes they wanted were purer. The current movement has more of both toxic leaders and toxic outcomes.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:07 PM
3

Lol, the issue is not deporting immigrants but immigrant women somehow. She lives and breaths actual sexism doesn't she.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:06 PM
1

I think Theresa May did at one point.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 07:05 PM
2

Attractive people are successful in entertainment, such a shocking statement.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 04:22 PM
1

Commenting on the wag gap and genuine reasons why the small difference that does exist exists is sexism? Hah
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:35 PM
1

"the absence of war-related rapes among IDF soldiers is a source of frustration for Palestinians and their supporters" What! What! What! What the fuck, disappointed by the lack of rapes, what is wrong with these people /facepalm
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:17 PM
2

This always confuses me, the solution to previous bad actions or injustice is never the reverse of it. Slavery of black people, the solution is to enslave white people? Cops are shooting too many people, more people should shoot cops? Women are not hired for certain roles, only hire women? Women have received lots of sexual harassment, harass all the men?
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:53 AM
1

How about men in general, I just had a thought is that perhaps the most sexist position currently in western society that is generally held given that women actually commit the majority of sexual abuse? Not that women should be held accountable for a small percentage of their numbers who commit these horrible acts in the same way men should not.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:05 AM
2

Also less competitive on a personal level which is often something that drives men to succeed.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:04 AM
13

Additionally there is highly unlikely to be any evidence apart from he said she said so which ever authority is prosecuting shouldn't even put the case to trial if that is the extent of the evidence.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 03:42 PM
3

Two wrongs don't ......
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:51 AM
2

And tomorrow we will be reporting on how water is wet and that the Earth is in orbit around the Sun.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:48 AM
12

I am not sure about that, loads of women suffer from this in India and rarely do the perpetrators get punished. This is more to do with a fucked up justice system in India than letting the men go though.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:44 PM
2

What utter nonsense. http://www.salary.com/stay-at-home-mom-infographic/ They are not formally trained in the following areas and therefore would not receive the going rate for any of the roles. Plus seriously spending time with your child is counted as overtime. Someone please shoot me now. Pandering at it's worst.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:22 AM
1

What would of happened if you said no, I mean stood firm on your right to have say 6 months off in the first year with the baby? End of relationship immediately?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:17 AM
2

and IT support.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 10:15 AM
1

Well a lot of that "police won't believe" is preached by feminists whose actions go against those of someone who genuinely wanted to help female victims of rape.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 01:56 PM
1

I am with you on quite a percentage not actually being a crime, my 20-30 is those that are purposefully false from the real crimes. From all I have seen I would put 40% as not actually a crime including genuine misunderstanding or over exaggeration/"a friend told me I was raped although I don't think I was", 20% out right false and known to be and 40% genuine crimes.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 01:22 PM
3

I am trying to imagine the outcry if 75% of allegations from men towards women were false in an area.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:35 AM
2

From the various studies on this I have always estimated that the true number was around 20-30%. That still means 70-80% are true and all allegations should be investigated but people need to keep innocent until proven guilty in their minds at all times.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 08:27 AM
3

I mean it is a culturally accepted norm as opposed to Europe where some people do it but there is no expectation. I am not a fan of it and dislike tipping due to the exploitative nature of the whole framework by businesses on staff but that is consistent across all the food service industry in the states.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 12:22 PM
2

Well given the requirement in the US to tip then it is their wage.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:52 AM
4

Do women who work at Hooters or Tilted Kilt earn more per hour than at wendy's or any other normal Fast Food restaurant or bar. If they do then that should be the end of conversation, there is not exploitation if they are being paid more than equivalent work elsewhere. There is additional gain and they receive it, that is a choice nothing more.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 10:17 AM
13

I am sorry but your presumptions as to why these things occurred are sexist. There are issues in education with a lack of male teachers but it is not the fault of female teachers for that but national policy and scare tactics against men. The overwhelming majority of female teachers are wonderful, the fact they have to follow sexist teaching practices is not a flaw of theirs as women. This applies to all the other areas you have mentioned, you presume that women are less capable than men in thos…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 10:10 AM
1

You are right but unfortunately some on the right are trying to claim that a generally non specific political (on the left right scale) movement opposed to SJWs and what they stand shows that "liberals" are wrong even though SJWs do not follow the majority of liberal principles and by most sensible people on the left are regarded as extreme. They see an opportunity and are taking it, so while the right and the left coming together against this madness has been generally good there are those who …
/r/MensRights25/04/16 09:05 AM
1

That is unfortunately how we have to think of it until common sense returns to this sphere. I would like to believe it when women say they have been raped but unless I know the person I have to take it as a mistake or unknown until there is a conviction etc. The misunderstanding and over sensitivity to mistake situations as something they are not means I cannot take the allegations seriously unless proved in court. I hate that this movement has made us have to question every encounter beyond wha…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:47 AM
1

Indeed, I get really bored of the whoever had the land before argument, everyone in the world is on land that at some point was lived on by someone else and who lost it in a war to another group. That is life, people need to get the fuck over it, stuff happened in history, a lot of it was bad but all we can do is not repeat it. The only areas to discuss this are places that change hands in the last 100 years and even then that discussion comes with a fuck load of context and multiple opinions an…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:28 AM
1

Do you have a link to that stat? Would be good to see.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:42 AM
3

So where was my choice to play as Steve Croft?
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:13 PM
2

He is confusing reporting of rapes with numbers of rape that have occurred. More people are reporting so higher number of rapes, no evidence rapes are actually being commited more.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 08:03 PM
4

Well I for one am shocked by that, man takes 2 years off to travel abroad, on return he finds he earns less than a colleague who has 2 years more experience than him. Why is this a problem or a concern, it is a trade off, I would choose time with my kid over a slightly higher payer, why does this even come up.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:45 AM
14

You are forgetting all pornography is rape and no woman would ever decide to willing do it.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:21 PM
11

Or a Peruvian man wanting to date white women for example, they are short and often not attractive to western standards, is that racism/sexism.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 12:09 PM
11

I do half agree with you, there are some cultural differences that aren't "sexist" but just different ways of doing things, the rest though is but I am not sure these women would be able to accept that. Also slightly confused as to how everyone cheating (men and women in Italy) is sexism.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 08:55 AM
7

The argument almost seems to the defence of an abuser, we did it that one time and were very sorry, I promise women wont do it again, its not what women do, were not like that I promise, please forgive us and look instead at what men do.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 06:42 AM
8

This was posted on my companies internal network and those who posted it did not get this when I brought it up. "The MRA taking the role of Prince Charming who is trying to make a point to argue that we're already living in an "Equal World", and Aurora in this instance representing many females who are tired of arguing the facts with people who just don't want to hear them."
/r/MensRights13/04/16 01:34 PM
6

Indeed, so women will be happy for men to choose the egg of a different woman to be implanted into the woman and that is the impregnated egg that will created their child. Oh wait, no they fucking wouldn't.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 07:12 PM
1

Well also police kill twice as man white men as black men although crime is almost evenly divided between black and white. The whole thing is total bullshit on a plate of dogs bollocks.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 10:02 PM
1

Any tags to follow the salt with?
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:46 AM
4

Her first comment, let's make this about women. My god it never ends. Those two women, their misandry or at the least lack of empathy for men is right there in your face presented as if it is somehow acceptable. The office of national statistics stated that "1.4 million women and 700,000 men" were victims of domestic abuse. If 10% of male victims report and 26% of female victims report then there actually 7 million male victims of domestic abuse and 5.6 million female victims. Which actually mak…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:34 AM
4

But then men can be condemned for not being as emotional as women or not receiving the proper respect for that role, things either need to be equal or the difference between the sexes need to be acknowledged and accepted.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 02:25 AM
3

So it's a friday, how will the media misrepresent us today, oh this, well what a normal day /sadface. Additionally "Buzzfeed reports....", really, two words never to be put together.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:34 PM
1

Could you send this judgement to the judge in your case? Or others like it from whatever country you are it?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:32 PM
1

Automatic loss of custody upon proof of manipulation of the process.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 12:30 PM
3

With teachers there is a serious difference though, teachers are in charge of the student, Adam Johnson had no duty of care or responsibility for the girl.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:18 PM
3

Indeed and this isn't normalising it in the way many misinterpret it to be. It is just reducing the immediate response from throw in prison to lets see if we can help a person with a horrible desire in their head who currently hasn't committed any crimes and we would like it to stay that way.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:49 AM
3

Those fake green votes though, No way 15000 people upvoted the first comment but only 80 downvote the first response to it. Utter nonsense.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:43 AM
2

and that the analysis of the whole of that was bullshit and the data could not be used to prove anything.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:36 AM
2

Also the deeper under ground the worse the Johns are likely to be thereby endangering the sex workers even more as they have no support, are less likely to report a crime to them and might have to take on worse clientel.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:32 AM
28

He was raping me so I chopped his cock off. I am sure they would they would consider the rapist the victim right?# The saddest thing is how they seem to have no understanding of reasonable self defence, saying a man might have to hit a woman back does not say that for a couple of slaps he can hit her so hard so as to cause permanent damage.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:55 AM
-2

Because we are sentient and animals are not. While reasonable care should given towards animals when possible, their lives are not valuable in the way human lives are. The sum of our experiences and what being sentient signifies makes human life far more valuable and important. I am more concerned that these actions suggest these two might consider extending these actions to humans than the actual damage they did to the animals while highly distasteful and disturbing.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:44 AM
-2

Erm, while the actions were fucked up they are in no way the worst acts possible. Given that there were not on humans they are way down the fucked up scale. Life or anything more than about 10 years in prison seems a huge over reaction.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:11 AM
2

"Despite decades of progress, women still make less money than men for equivalent work. Not true Paid family leave remains an elusive dream. Not sexist Sexual abuse against women continues to plague our communities. Has been dropping for decades and occurs in similar numbers to men And many politicians still act as though the top threat to our national security is Planned Parenthood. Not sexist, ignorant assholes they maybe but their actions are not sexist" "In the meantime, outdated attitudes p…
/r/MensRights17/02/16 10:03 AM
2

Hillary isn't viable, she is only a placeholder for a real female candidate who is genuinely capable and deserving to be followed such as Elizabeth Warren. Not that the majority of the republican field aren't placeholders as well.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:58 AM
1

Everything even mildly mainstream does, sure there are some indie and smaller games that might even be regarded as slightly misogynistic or somewhat misogynistic but then so what, the games do not change a person attitude and are often providing a fantasy scenario. I have no issues with there being a game for women where they lust after men or have a harem of men at their beg and call etc, that could be regarded as misandric but it is just a game which is indulging a particular fantasy.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 11:28 AM
1

The women I have seen get ahead are those that know and accept the consequences, they are capable and motivated and do well but are not complaining that they have to work the same hours as a man to do as well. They hate women who slide up the ladder using feminine charms or by what is between their legs as they work hard and receive the benefits, their don't want their hard work to be diminished by others taking the easy route.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:29 PM
2

I watched overtime with Bill Maher and she does just seems like a mean old woman (although seems to have aged quite well in-case any thinks I am making fun of her looks) to be honest, she is so set in her ways and sees the world through a lens of time that either didn't really exist or at the least has long past.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 02:03 PM
2

Women do more housework (that is counted as housework while ignoring more manually stressful tasks and additional tasks that are time consuming but not counted as housework while men work more hours which counter acts any supposed differential) and therefore deserve to not pay as much alimony as through the marriage they gave more than can be calculated on salaries alone. (I can imagine this argument)
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:56 PM
4

To be fair these women didn't implement the alimony that has been imposed unfairly on men for years. Let's take the good from this that the laws will be change now that there is pressure from both sexes. There shouldn't need to be but we have a long road ahead and we should be hopeful that the effects of this realization of unfairness will have on future issues.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:53 PM
17

It is a strange situation, women are being torn between what their role should be by feminists when they should just do what suits them best whether that be career minded, child focused or a mix. Feminism forces women to be conflicted when they shouldn't need to be, whatever choice they make is fine as long as they understand the consequences and how that affects themselves and their partners and they also respect their partners and their choices and sacrifices. Feminism teaches a level of self …
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:48 PM
3

They will just move it on to supposed social pressures on women not to go into these professions when the only major social pressure has been from feminists claiming women will be held back and under paid which in turn causes less women to do STEM. Feminists created the issue themselves. I wonder what the percentage of women in STEM would be if all women doing gender studies and equivalent courses were doing STEM.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:43 PM
2

Remember even when women make a fair independent choice if they don't choose what a feminist thinks they should they are making the wrong choice. Note this is not what the feminist would do as rather than doing STEM they are taking gender studies etc and then surprised there are less women engineers.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 01:41 PM
2

I enjoyed their history series for a while but their somewhat post modernist approach to certain areas and a low level of white guilt started to show through and I couldnt continue with it.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:55 AM
2

I want to see an interview with the real facts (not twisted feminist facts) in front of them question them on this. And the interviewer needs to challenge them when they lie or distort the truth. I don't know if any interviewer would survive the backlash though proving feminists liars on national television would upset many people :(.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:47 AM
4

What happened when you mentioned that actually men are far more likely to have something happen to them. So basically women are overly scared and men are not sufficiently.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:45 AM
2

I almost died laughing when she stated they are non-partisan. Good God they really don't understand irony do they.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:44 AM
1

With all these cases that never should have gone to trial let alone with people sentenced I wonder what percentage of the prison population is completely innocent. Maybe what 5%-10%?
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:36 AM
5

I genuinely think that to some extent that attitude is promoting it. It makes some women who commit these actions think they cant do anything wrong, that domestic abuse is something only men do so whatever they are doing is legitimate. While men are scared shitless about even protecting themselves properly as they might end up in prison.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 10:02 PM
7

Only a woman can say that, men expressing concern for men and boys being left behind get told it is fair for the oppression now mostly dead women recieved from as equally now dead men.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:07 PM
1

Is it possible that when women experience something that has almost exclusively been a male experience and remains still mainly so it affects them as much as it has always affected men. An almost direct representation of women having not previously not understood a somewhat regular part of the male experience and now that they are more involved those that do experience it suffer just the same. We should look to use this to demonstrate the serious issues faced in the areas which are with a majori…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 05:45 AM
5

They realise that new actors get paid a lot less than established stars regardless of sex right? Like how the lower end actors in the Avengers get a lot less than RDJ because they don't have the same pulling power. There is no sexism here.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:45 AM
1

"that most male rapists were sexually abused by women as children." Where are the stats on this? Thanks
/r/MensRights21/12/15 11:54 AM
6

Next week on the BBC, "Men make record amount of money in 2015" oh wait that would be sexist right.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 06:08 PM
2

Good god, how can someone lack that level of self awareness as she does.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:01 PM
1

Geez you are dumb. The majority reason men are less emotional is genetics (which I never argued against) however the low level of cultural impact that does exist is affected by women holding boys less than girls.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:07 AM
2

I am not arguing against that, what I mean is that rather than the cultural influence being good for men, them being loved the same as girls they arent which would only increase the natural position we have.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 09:36 AM
1

This has 92% on Rottentomatoes, what the actual fuck! I can't trust any documentary reviews on there anymore.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 01:00 AM
3

Studies also show that mothers hold girls for significantly longer than they do boys which could add to the lack of emotion and bonding they receive when very young affecting them in latter life.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 10:15 PM
1

In other news water is wet.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:25 PM
3

Which wasn't true as she was actually paid more per day than her co-stars.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 04:23 PM
2

Wow for real wtf. Didn't they stop those.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 08:28 AM
4

That would seem to be the reverse of how it should work. You shouldn't need money to sue someone who may well be stopping you from earning money with actions such as this which prevent you from suing them. /facepalm Monetary requirements for justice to be done.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 08:18 AM
12

"The kind of man that would use something like this would be lucky to get any female no matter what she looked like....." That highest voted comment, good god, the cognitive dissonance with these people. So every woman who uses a dildo would be lucky to date a very overweight man? For Fucks sake.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 03:09 PM
4

Indeed, this is wrong because of the double standard mainly, not what happened.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:52 PM
1

An up and coming woman at my work, hard worker capable etc was saying she wouldn't even hire women in their late 20's to mid 30's out of concern for the cost of losing them to pregancy and I am almost sure would kind of class herself as a feminist (good kind tho). Most women do not think like radical feminists but too many stand by and let them control the agenda and when buzzwords of women need help etc are used come running without thinking through the consequences. Look at Hilary, any man in …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:17 PM
4

Yep, many successful women hate women who want them to represented equally only on gender. My Dad's partner is very successful in her field and loathes the manipulating woman on the board she sits who uses her sex appeal and gender rather than her intelligence and hard work to get ahead.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:08 PM
4

Indeed, people should be proud of what people have done not what their sex was when they did it. I don't want to have to double take whenever a famous woman is praised to check if what they did really had worth or they are only being heralded as woman. Just celebrate those who did things of note regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:16 PM
1

Oh don't worry I am fully aware of the narrative manipulation, it is just so sad they would do it by manipulating peoples grief although nothing seems to be below them.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 04:14 PM
5

With those statistics who tried to claim he was targeting women? That is straight out narrative manipulation.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:20 AM
1

Sure but I don't think 16 or 17 year olds should be having sex with them so maybe from 12 but with only a 2 year difference and then from 14 or 15 3 years difference.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:55 PM
1

Well I am sure you would have a bottom of say 13 and only 2 year age gap extending to say 3 at 15.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:48 PM
1

Well it was only a three year age gap at the time, don't many countries have laws allow 2-3 ages difference for sex below the age of consent, shouldn't this have covered it if America had those?
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:38 PM
2

By regret I meant a longer term form due to issues it may cause him not feeling bad about it the next day in this context.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 10:34 PM
1

That doesn't mean it would have been a good idea or that you wouldn't have regretted it or it could have caused you issues in the future. It could even have defined to some extent a sexual preference for say older women as early sexual experiences can be very formative.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 01:57 PM
4

Do you see no problem with the presumption though that women don't have equal rights in western countries? Is there a natural end to feminism therefore a day after which no one should call themselves feminists (within western countries) as the rights have be equalised? What would that look like?
/r/MensRights29/10/15 02:14 PM
5

Genuine question, why do you call yourself a feminist if you hold what appear to be egalitarian ideals? You seem me to be an egalitarian who currently focuses on womens rights while most people here are egalitarians who are currently focused on mens rights.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 01:50 PM
7

Unless absolutely necessary medically.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 05:35 PM
2

Indeed. That was my thought as well. I find it disturbing that with the statistics right there that show them it is actually overly diverse (ethnicity wise) or under diverse (gender wise) they seem to continue with narrative.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 02:35 PM
6

I have to say this may well be good thing but not in the way this is being presented. The actual stats at the bottom of the article and in the UCAS report show that "among white 18-year-olds some 27.2% entered university in 2014, compared with 38.7% of Asians and 34.3% of black teenagers" and the gender split is "For the 2013 cohort (those who were 18 in 2013 and 19 in 2014) the cohort entry rate for women was 44.4 per cent, over 9 percentage points higher than for men (34.9 per cent). ". So in …
/r/MensRights26/10/15 02:28 PM
1

Well also it was a joke and everyone in the room bar the SJW laughed and took it for what it was.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:35 PM
11

The first bit of that somewhat warranted but from there you go way to far into outright hatred, something many feminists may have for us but we should not have for them. Her actions were horrible and she should suffer the consequences, we should not stoop to her level and wish she were dead.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:11 PM
1

I know, comment relates to the news clips inside the preview.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 06:31 PM
0

The Red Pill subreddit are mens rights activists? The media do love a good non understanding smear.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 11:30 AM
1

How did he even get convicted??? Just because someone has received damage it does not mean that he inflicted it so it comes down to he said she said which is not convictable on any level. Wtf is wrong with these courts.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 09:13 AM
3

Funny how none of the women stated who they were or what race and gender they were or how privileged they felt in the society and yet almost every man did. They really seem to need to bow at the altar of womanhood so that their thoughts might be accepted or else they might be discarded from the group think.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 05:14 PM
1

I absolutely agree that the "alleged attacker" would have done nothing wrong in this circumstance.
/r/MensRights23/10/15 02:07 PM
1

"Statistically, more men than women get hurt by their partners, " "That means one in three intimate partner violence victims is male." How do these two not match up? Is it because one is from the "National Violence Against Women Survey"?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:48 PM
1

What if they are unwilling but express the opposite? There seem to be circumstances where alleged victims say yes and to all intense and purposes seem to consent but actually don't want to have sex. Whether they are fearful or whatever other reason, is this just unwanted sex or can someone be raped with the alleged attacker having not actually committed rape given that they can't mind read? What does this fall under?
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:31 PM
1

I was thinking about that, is that rape or unwanted sex? I thought rape legally required the victim to not want the sex or be unaware of it (eg while asleep) and the attacker to know what they were doing was unlawful e.g. the use of force, ignoring lack of consent etc. What is it if the alleged victim says yes to sex but didn't really want it, gives no reasonable sign of not wanting to and the alleged attacker has no reason to not feel consent was given? Was the victim raped but the attacker did…
/r/MensRights23/10/15 12:25 PM
21

It should be children, parents and vulnerable/disabled individuals non sexist and easy. The majority of adults housed would likely be women which is fine as you aren't going to want to separate children from their parents. You still achieve the goal while not ignoring any children there with their fathers or vulnerable/disabled/old men. Being fair and equitable isn't hard you just have to consider all people as people.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:30 PM
11

The tents are for women and children, not children and whomever their parents happen to be. If most of the children are there with their mothers and therefore you happen to house mostly women their with children no problem. The article states and the quotes confirm that this is women and children regardless of relation. So single women would be included within this. But men in general and especially vulnerable/disabled/old men don't get a look in which is sexist. So due to the actions of the aut…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:26 PM
18

I know right :). I have no problem with children being protected more than adults as they are more vulnerable and that will come with housing their mothers in many cases but they shouldn't be using non-gendered titles when it is gendered to an extent and plus the implication that men don't need protection from cold weather. "no woman, no child will remain without a shelter in this city", Yes because men don't matter as much as women.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 10:27 AM
1

There is nothing wrong with objectification of people you don't know. For those you do know it is only wrong if you actually treat them as objects rather than only objectifying them outside of that realm. E.g. If a teenager is imagining a hot waiter/waitress he/she has only seen once a local diner and what he/she might do with them he/she doesn't need to consider if they would want to be with him/her, how their life is going, their current mental process, if they feel they are getting paid enoug…
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:57 AM
1

The lifestyle bullshit is just ridiculous. Two people living together is cheaper than two people living separately, how could you possibly expect to have the same lifestyle afterwards. I am going to sue my house-mate now that I have rent a one bedroom flat on my own rather than sharing a two bedroom with them and it is more expensive. /s
/r/MGTOW16/10/15 10:06 AM
1

You have to remember all men have always had all the power all the time. /s The reality that the overwhelming majority of men were just as downtrodden and controlled as women would break a narrative that they are not willing to break from.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:41 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage#United_Kingdom is pretty good.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 02:37 PM
9

I almost died of incredulity when I listened to woman's hour yesterday and the editor for Stylist a woman's mag said a big issue for feminism was for women to be treated fairly in the courts. I just don't understand, the facts are clear as day, this isn't a debatable issue where there could be different narratives it is black and fucking white. How do they not get this.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 12:34 PM
2

Maybe you could also talk about the "shoe gap" in that women have more shoes than men. Obviously the shoe gap exists but it is not a problem as men choose to buy less shoes and hence that is why there is the gap.
/r/MensRights06/10/15 11:59 AM
1

Joe Rogan seems a bit like that on his chat with Milo. No sympathy for those that don't fit the prescribed male alpha position.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 12:37 PM
1

Well MRM isn't the opposite of feminism so it wouldn't regard women as inferior. Mens rights is about highlighting mens issues looking for a real egalitarian future. Fighting for women's rights is great but feminists in many cases have to presume the constant women are oppressed rather than just highlighting issues which often leads to a hateful position.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 12:24 PM
1

I also wonder if as masculinity is decried and slandered as toxic etc many men feel the need to go to the extreme to hold on to that. Not that they know what feminists are doing but they feel it's impact through society and have responded in this way.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:55 PM
18

So it would be fine to swap children in a hospital before returning them to the mothers if the genetics are unimportant?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:30 PM
1

Indeed, we aren't in the world from the "Invention of Lying".
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:42 AM
31

Trust but verify.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:37 AM
16

Hence why anonymity is so important at the very least until to charging and preferably until the sentence is handed down.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 11:37 AM
9

And the horrible rhetoric is working as shown in the gender discrepancy and higher than expected totals of this: A much-touted new survey on sexual assault in American colleges shows that college women believe, by an overwhelming margin, that it's better that innocent young men be punished for offenses they didn't commit than to allow a guilty man to go free. (Question 32) This question exposes a sharp gender gap--most college men take the opposite view.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 12:02 AM
0

Up to 80% of Saudi women in surveys are opposed to changing that situation. They are against letting women drive as it would give them less power in the family dynamic and less control over their male relatives. To be clear I am not suggesting this is right (I oppose this obviously) but using Saudi Arabia where in many cases the women want their own freedoms limited due to the privileges this gains them is not the same as a country where women actively want change and are not given it as a major…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:35 AM
1

A 14 year old girl takes responsibility for her part (Her letter knowing what she did is wrong and that maybe she should be in trouble not him) and yet the government is unable to understand or take action to change how fucked up this is. That is a sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:42 AM
1

I don't even look at women in the street anymore afraid of what my look might get, it would not be a look of interest sexually (I am married) but in the same way I look at men as well for a moment out of interest for what is going on around me. That I even have to second guess myself on this and feel more comfortable not looking at people is a sad state of affairs.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:11 AM
1

It is only worthless for politicised issues, for fact based history say the History of Europe it is good.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:20 AM
6

That is the results of decades of boys being ignored in the education system and focusing on ways of teaching that work well for girls but not boys.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:40 PM
1

Well then someone needed to have some balls to stand up even if it was against the law.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 09:25 PM
3

I listen to it while at work and I imagine my colleagues must think I am listening to a comedy with how often I laugh out loud.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:17 PM
2

Greater risk??? A possible lifetime of child support payments you have no control over or a pregancy that you can abort or give up. The chance someones word gets you a prison term or the ability to control someone elses life through your word alone. Yes that seems totally clear as to whom has the greater risk.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 01:52 PM
16

Fails to mention the lack of decent mental health services in the States and the constantly reinforced message that males feelings and concerns don't matter.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:20 PM
2

With so few women on there it would seem likely that the huge majority of men on there didn't have affairs. The whole moral outrage of this has been bullshit anyway.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:49 PM
2

Well those two shouldn't even be on the register to start with so it shouldn't have to take those into account. The same with teenagers put on it because their partners lied about their age etc.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:39 PM
2

Have you got a link to it, I am struggling to find it again. Thanks
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:41 PM
2

Studies show that almost no women truly regret abortions and after 3 years are not psychologically different as a group that normal women.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:38 AM
2

Studies show that there are almost no women regret abortion and after 3 years there were no psychological differences between women who had abortions and the general population. The mental side is usually overplayed.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:31 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/krSS00f.jpg
/r/MensRights25/08/15 10:38 AM
0

But is the boy bragging because that is what he is expected to do or because he actually enjoyed it. The actions of the victim wont necessarily tell you whether it was consensual or not. They may only express their way of coping with it.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 11:38 AM
0

This right here ladies and gentlemen. Why is it so hard for people to get it.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 03:58 PM
14

I am sure there will be news articles thinking it's funny you covered your partners bra in accelerant and lit it.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:54 AM
1

Not sure what you read but I didn't imply anything close to any of that.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:52 AM
2

Is there any sort of modern review of his work and this law? Does his work stand up to modern scrutiny and modern scholarship (Not feminist influenced of course)?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:36 PM
-7

Well said. Maintenance/Alimony Law still needs serious reform but there is good reason for it to be in place at reasonable levels after many divorces, we shouldn't lose sight of that.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:55 AM
3

How much of a factor do you think this plays in the declining levels of female happiness? Since the 60's women have progressively become unhappier, in line with this the relative position of men and women has shifted, do you think this could be the primary reason for the increased unhappiness as hypergamy becomes more difficult and less pronounced? From what I have read the happiest couples seem to have a more slightly attractive younger woman with a slightly more successful man statistically. I…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:30 AM
0

Not normally open-mouthed at the sexist adverts towards men but the 2nd one had me jaw dropped. /facepalm
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:51 AM
2

It is almost as bad as the self flagellation that both Andy Burnhman and Corbyn did on Women's Hour, Quotas, wage gape myth etc. Andy Burnham was asked why he wouldn't just support a woman candidate because she was a woman and respond almost apologetically that he was a man but still the right person. /facepalm I would recommend listening to the Misogyny Book Club on iplayer on Radio 4 if you are in the UK, laugh a minute if you find blatant bullshit and misandry amusing.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 02:51 PM
3

I am a man, it is in my genes. Oppression is my passion and hobby.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:31 PM
6

Not sure if the laughing or the "that exists????? why?????" is worse.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 01:43 AM
1

There are many issues with all of this and I am right there with you but your regular use of pejorative words for women who may well be bad people doesn't help our cause. Your post reads like radical feminists tell everyone how we think, the woman's actions are not good and she may well be an an asshole but the use of slut and whore really gets us no where. You obviously have anger as I think most of us do over the treatment of men but to express that as hatred just as bad as how many feminists …
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:52 AM
12

My complaint for reference: Complaint Summary: Biasing significance of issue using statistics Full Complaint: The article 'It's a matter of dignity' brings to light a real and serious issue facing Homeless women on the streets of the UK. Disappointingly and the issue for my complaint is how the BBC's ongoing women first/feminist bias has affect even the reporting of statistics in a otherwise reasonable piece. A third the way down the article the number of homeless people in the England from esti…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:08 AM
14

Their response to my complaint: Dear Mr ***** Complaint reference: ****************** Thank you for your e-mail about our health feature article reporting the Homeless Period campaign. (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-33720608) You raise a fair point, although the conclusion that this was a deliberate distortion rather than simply an oversight is worth challenging. The figures for sleeping rough in England came from the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) and did not include …
/r/MensRights07/08/15 12:04 AM
23

We support innocent until proven guilty, not presuming guilt is not aligning with anyone.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 10:38 AM
2

That the statistics used misrepresent the issue and do so in a obviously biased way that would not exist unless you wanted it to by providing a false perception on the size of the issue.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:57 PM
2

It is terrible use of statistics to try and over state an issue. It is unnecessary as well as this is a genuine issue that these women are looking to tackle. It is important to talk about how many women are affected, is this a large issue affected hundreds of thousands or something affecting 100. Those two different numbers and the numbers in between need a different level of response and without any detail on how many of those in the stated statistics require help the relevance of the statistic…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:46 PM
5

I have written my complaint to the BBC. "The article 'It's a matter of dignity' brings to light a real and serious issue facing Homeless women on the streets of the UK. Disappointingly and the issue for my complaint is how the BBC's ongoing women first/feminist bias has affect even the reporting of statistics in a otherwise reasonable piece. A third the way down the article the number of homeless people in the England from estimated government figures is stated along with homelessness applicatio…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 01:27 PM
8

This issue is not that they don't mention the number of male victims, this article is very clever in not mentioning how many of the total are women, it gives the statistics for the total number sleeping rough and then so you can't draw any real conclusions as to the how large the problem is it fails to mention the percentage or number of women affected. This is ludicrous, no article mentioning a majority women's issue and specifically talking about it would not state what number or percentage of…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 12:50 PM
2

So basically by having privilege you in fact have no privilege as you couldn't act upon it if you wanted to and must give all your supposed privilege up to supposedly oppressed groups who in reality have all the privilege by being able to order and control those they deem as having privilege to give it up.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 12:13 PM
5

It is like his logic and fairness doesn't extend to any issues that would feminism would throw a hissy fit over if he did it fairly and truthfully.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:18 PM
-3

Right with you there. Does it really have to be her. Couldn't it be someone who hasn't played out a false agenda on so many issues for so long and has real integrity, but I am not sure who that would be. The days of the high integrity newscaster seem to be over.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:21 PM
5

Those comments are slightly scary. It says quite clearly in the article "Authorities say Nancy tried to force her husband's car off the road, but lost control and spun into the path of an oncoming SUV, slamming into it nearly head-on." that she was attempting to cause damage/kill her husband and yet we have: "a cheater isn't worth pursuing. let go and move on." "Never ever chase a man, not worth it. He'll cheat on her too." "That's horrible, any woman who caught their man with another woman woul…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:42 PM
3

Thank goodness she lost or we would have this madness over here.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 10:55 AM
2

Right with you there. West Sussex checking in.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:27 AM
2

"the amount of victims of violence is pretty small. " And are mostly men.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 12:30 PM
18

And the offenses on it need to be reviewed, they shouldn't be putting a 16 year old having sex with 15 year old on it.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:55 PM
2

Technology? This is nothing to do with technology it is that people have finally decided to acknowledge that this exists rather then thinking the normally boys involved were "lucky".
/r/MensRights30/03/15 11:06 AM
23

Not to be rude to the woman in question but why are so many of these cases with really unattractive women?
/r/MensRights26/03/15 09:16 PM
10

How did he get convicted in the first place? All from one photo which doesn't reveal any evidence of the vehicle actually being his. How ridiculous!
/r/MensRights01/02/15 04:25 PM
1

I think you both agree but are arguing over semantics, there were huge negatives to being both men and women before we reached legal parity and equality.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:22 AM
2

It is a pity he didnt mention that the 2nd video with the drunk girl was a sham with the men told what to say, not random men in the street at all.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:08 PM
3

This comment: Yes, and journalists, like yourself, keep enabling them. All the while you continue to ignore the stories which are staring you in the face. 3 MILLION women - yes, million - have downloaded an online application called LuLu which enables them to rate men on a scale of 1-10 based on their sexual performance in bed. They do this, and get away with it, without soliciting the consent of these men. How did The BBC treat this? They got a reporter to walk around The High St. asking women …
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:06 PM
6

Do not go to the comments on the article, it is dark and scary down there.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:34 AM
2

Indeed, feminist policies are not left wing or liberal, they have made gains in those areas with left wingers who overreact to claimed victim-hood due to the lefts higher level of general empathy but non of the policies or rhetoric is decidedly left or liberal.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:10 PM
4

and because denying someone sex is also domestic violence you can commit two acts of "torture" at the same time by telling your wife that you no longer find her sexually attractive and don't want to have sex with her.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:58 PM
2

"The outdated view that domestic violence is a private matter between a woman and her partner is one of the reasons that it remains one of the most serious and widespread human rights abuses in Australia.” " You mean the outdated view is that it is between a woman and a partner rather than the reality which is that domestic violence is between two partners in a relationship with the sexes being utterly irrelevant when deciding on laws.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:14 PM
3

"This means that these women are disproportionately affected by a system designed for men." Laws and punishments only exist for men? How are they disproportionately affected? 7% of prisoners being women means men are the ones disproportionately affected. "Any examination of the women who are in U.S. prisons reveals that the majority are nonviolent offenders with poor education, little employment experience and multiple histories of abuse from childhood through adulthood." And of course studies o…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:59 AM
5

What? "The juror said the panel agreed Ms. Jordan’s beliefs about her ex-husbands, even if incorrect or irrational, met the legal definition of extreme emotional disturbance. “Any belief, however incorrect, fit the description,” the juror said. “It was clear that she believed these stories.” " So if someone commits a terrorist act then they can also use this defence as they believe the stories the religion tells them?
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:33 AM
2

I agree with a decision David Cameron has made, wtf is happening.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 12:44 PM
2

Be careful with your empathy and understanding there, you might offend conservatives or rad fems who seem to be close on this issue.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 12:30 PM
14

Well then men are in relationships with women to be honest they shouldn't be. I am getting married soon and my wife to be knows that we will be splitting any paternity leave between us although not necessarily 50/50 maybe 60/40. Your colleague's wife has no claim over shared paternity leave any more than he has, societal acceptance of this kind of behavior adds to the problem for your colleague but if his wife is so selfish and doesn't want him having quality time with the child I feel sorry for…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 03:01 PM
11

I think the pot is a great idea, the couple can decide between them who takes the leave. There does need to be more education and acceptance of men who wish to take the time off as the reaction in comments on the article shows, combined with this so there isn't a presumption or immediate acceptance that the woman will be the one taking all the time off.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 01:00 PM
17

Those are some very disturbing comments, but then it is a daily mail comment section.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 08:58 AM
35

Fedora, basement, mum's house, gamer, still living at home with parents.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:27 PM
3

Even when people read the subreddit they seem to only manage to find occasional bad down-voted post or purposefully misconstrue a posts headline etc, they make it fit within their world view rather than what is actually here. It is really sad.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:26 PM
0

Wow, that guy :(
/r/MensRights15/10/14 06:26 PM
2

We have the same level of evidence that it wasn't false flag. No reason to presume one way or the other without analyzing the content.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 03:58 PM
1

That comment section on the Brianna Wu story, I had hoped GB wouldn't be a haven of white knights but unfortunately it is. I am genuinely confused, how is one person harassing this developer on twitter, one enough for them to leave their home and two how are the actions of one individual (or even if it was 100 people) gamergate's fault which has hundreds of thousands of supporters?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 01:35 PM
2

Indeed, complete and utter asshats
/r/MensRights01/10/14 10:23 AM
3

"A King County jury convicted him solely on the basis of eyewitness testimony, and he was sentenced to 16½ years in prison, according to the IPNW. " Juries need to be told how unreliable witness testimony is and should certainly not convict on it alone.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:49 PM
6

Refusing to have sex would be domestic abuse towards the woman though.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 01:58 PM
6

And next weeks debate will be "Should men rule the world?" With male only panels and no seats available for women. /facepalm
/r/MensRights29/09/14 01:57 PM
1

Oh no my career might be mildly damaged but I can then sue if I feel it has been! But then it isn't as if I didn't make the choice to have children and of course a career is the most important thing in the world and time with the children is only a cursory benefit that I have to endure.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 08:47 AM
11

"On the other hand, an innocent accused rapist is hardly going to just put his hands up and say "whatever", he's going to fight tooth and nail." No they are not, not when the current seems to convict people without any additional evidence other than the woman's word. Especially in America with plea deals, either take the chance of being sent to prison for 20 years at a 60/40 chance depending on how rational the jury is or only 5 years on a plea. Plus if he is innocent why is it his responsibilit…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 08:40 AM
1

But you really think he would have been a threat at 30 or 40?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:26 PM
0

Early for what? If his mental condition can be cured in 2 years (highly unlikely and would require far higher quality care than people receive inside) why shouldn't he leave if he is no threat to the rest of society? Are we about vengeance or a better society for all?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:18 PM
3

Well that is a presumption, it could well be some CHILDREN at 13 don't know that killing is wrong although in this case it appears he did. He is still a child with a quite clear mental health issue that needs to be looked at. If a solider has severe PTSD and kills a family member in a panic attack do you think he should have any sympathy. Or what about a homeless man who has suffered abuse for years and is schizophrenic and ends up killing a passer-by. Do you have the same lack of empathy for th…
/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:35 PM
1

Wow, just wow.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 11:51 AM
3

Well then he needs help with his behaviour, at 13 he didn't decide to be lacking in empathy and to be a psychopath. Lock him up to protect the public sure but if it is something that can be cured we need to look to focus on that not punishing him for a mental condition he did not choose to have.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 08:59 AM
2

I just found this place through the editor: Tarc associations and my god is it depressing. http://wikipediocracy.com/ A full on SJW attempt to alter Wikipedia to their frame of mind, it would seem this could be a hub for SJW editing of Wikipedia. http://wikipediocracy.com/2014/09/07/wikipedia-and-the-war-on-womens-dignity/ http://wikipediocracy.com/2014/08/26/why-women-have-no-time-for-wikipedia/ These two articles for a start are everything wrong with SJWs and more.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:17 AM
2

Because we are a dimorphic species
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:55 PM
12

Lol, I mean seriously what is going on in their heads. Blatant misandry, but of course no she actually hates women and does because she is controlled by the patriarchy. It's like the people who believe world leaders are lizards, whatever the evidence they are not lizards just proves their point. #facepalm
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:23 AM
0

Indeed: "EDIT2: Haha. You rabid cunts spamming my inbox calling me mangina feminist SJW. That's the thing with you man children. You're like wild hogs that go absolutely fucking mental and eat their young. I have done fuck all for women's rights. I am not a white feminist woman. I am not a westerner and I sure as fuck am not this SJW you cunts speak of. I'm just calling you guys on your bullshit. You say you have no problem with women yet the devil is in the details. You say "it's inclusive" yet…
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:48 PM
2

This comment: http://np.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/2gl2ak/are_video_games_sexist_christina_hoff_sommers/ckkbjfn
/r/MensRights17/09/14 09:41 AM
1

I don't necessarily agree with this, I think it exists but not in the form feminists suggest and I don't think there is anything wrong with it as long as you are not doing it a lot with people you actually interact with.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:34 AM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 09:44 AM
1

I meant evidence before 1800, are there not papers on social make up and behaviour before then? For example something on the protection of women in the middle ages etc
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:52 PM
1

Do you have any papers or evidence I could use to argue that?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:14 PM
1

Those comments /facepalm
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:24 AM
2

Well suspect maybe but not highly suspect as there will be cases where there has been abuse and they felt they could only come forward after the relationship ended. For both men and women.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:04 AM
1

The problem is I know how bollocks all of this is and yet when I first hear it, it almost sounds reasonable and I have to check myself. This only takes a less than a second but the white knight that is ingrained within me still has a low level impact on me. Now for those who don't know truth or who haven't been exposed too it (or won't accept it), I can see how the white knight they were brought up with is still strong and leads them to be as arrogant and bigoted as they are in this. This doesn'…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 11:17 AM
2

Anonymity for all is the only way to go unless there can be shown an overwhelming reason not too in the public interest.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:30 AM
2

Well actually maybe yes, men were not looking at the images to shame them but to enjoy their beauty. In women's magazines the way they are presented does seem to be there only to shame them rather than admire them as the men is this context were doing.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:57 PM
1

"clearly the result of a serious hacking attack on the Apple iCloud accounts" No it is not clear this was the case as many of the celebrities did not have iCloud accounts. Already factually wrong two paragraphs. Some did have iCloud accounts but for others something else was compromised.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:48 PM
3

I am almost certain that was a troll trying to make us look bad.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 10:54 AM
2

They shouldn't be and I have never said they should be. But the seriousness of receiving these threats has been blown way of proportions given the likelihood of anything being carried out (minuscule). "Also, your rationalization of how much a threat may or may not pose a danger has absolutely no bearing on the reality of any specific threat." Really, so the FBI takes all threats equally seriously regardless of the source or plausibility of the threat?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:43 PM
2

So you would have journalistic pieces which exist in their own vacuum? Explaining house price increases without mentioning a change in the law granting easier mortgages and ignoring that this law benefited MPs the most or an article on Russia going into the Ukraine with no mention of previous tensions in the area and only a propaganda quote from the Russian foreign ministry stated as fact. So entirely without context and dishonest that is and would be terrible journalism which is what a lot of t…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:07 PM
2

"The worst thing for people involved is that they have no idea where these people are. They could be in China, or they could be around the corner from them. With all the doxxing going on, it is very plausible to believe that people could find you and hurt you." If it doesn't happen to far more prominent individuals (celebrities, controversial commentators) (which it doesn't) it is not plausible to imagine it will happen a minor internet personality. You tell the police and move on, it is not pla…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:03 PM
1

There already is equal pay for equal time, to any reasonable standard of measurement.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 12:55 PM
2

Death threats and harassment are not significant compared to the larger issue at hand especially given how all the gaming media rallied to cover up and divert attention from the issue and I will explain why. I have received death threats and harassment on-line, although to the extent of the individuals here, so I do know about being on the receiving end. Death threats and harassment are bad on-line but they are not the real world, if someone round the corner from you threatens you physically, we…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 12:23 PM
2

I am highly objective on this issue and it seems you are unable to see that side. You seem unable to be able separate different issues properly or see when one thing is being used to obscure another. You also don't seem to understand what is at stake and how unimportant a few threats to people on the internet are, as wrong as they maybe. It was fun chatting but you don't seem to understand many of the issues properly and so this will be my last reply. Thank you for the civil conversation but I t…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 11:52 PM
2

Spinning a story into a false narrative while trying to hide their own dishonesty and questionable ethics is very much like that. This has nothing to do with making feminist video games. It was never about the game. It was about unethical and questionable relationships in the video game industry and how this may affect their reliability and integrity. The reaction when these genuine issues were brought up was to censor and hide behind a narrative of harassment, this cover-up and the gaming media…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:27 PM
2

So if I call someone a "bitch" or "whore" I hate all women? No, I would be calling that one person a bitch or a whore. :( (not that I have or would ever do that to be clear) "Also we are taking these claims of being harassed on faith from people who have already been shown to be untrustworthy or at least ethical challenged" "How does that not apply even more so to the angry ex boyfriend who posted the information that started all of this in the first place? Why are you not questioning any of the…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 05:10 PM
2

Indeed, should I when I hear someone plays american football think of them only as a drunk jock who has nothing between the ears except for wanting to shag every girl in sight. No, because I won't presume on all of them because of a few who act out, especially when the suggestion comes from such a hugely distorted and dishonest segment of the media as this does. You should feel proud, your are none of those things and spend time doing something you love, if anyone thinks otherwise then they real…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:49 PM
2

This has nothing to do with misogyny, both men and women receive harassment on-line, the language used is whatever causes the most harm. It is not because they hate the persons sex (except for a small percentage that may actually hate their sex) , they may hate that person or have anger towards them but they use language designed to offend and cause pain. For women this language is often misogynistic as that causes the most harm, for men the language is often misandric, suggesting that they aren…
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:43 PM
3

If you stand up and say something stupid and lie on the web then you are going to be harassed, is this right, no of course not and people should never be harassed saying something stupid and lying. But it doesn't mean it is not going to happen and that we should change the focus of a real issue to a side issue which is blown out of proportions to further their goals of having no discussion on the issue at hand.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:41 AM
2

It is not about the letter, please see my comment to a previous commenter which explains why. There is a whole load more to this issue.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:28 PM
3

This issue is that this was never about online abuse, it exists, it's not good, no one condones it, it will continue to exist and it doesn't specifically effect women and we can move on. A minute subset of gamers shouldn't be used to define gamers as a whole. The issue in question which brought about this PR campaign which is what it is by SJWs was about honesty and integrity in the gaming media, nothing to do with threats or abuse. When you try and change the narrative for a serious issue with …
/r/MensRights02/09/14 07:27 PM
7

That is a good piece filled with facts and honesty and I commend him for it but it isn't on their front page and they have been editing the comments of the article that is on the front page that disagree with it's opinion so some serious editorial issues are going on there. One honourable person standing up does not a good editorial team make.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:50 PM
3

Where is this mainstream society where people aren't "marginalised, troubled people who have found it difficult to manage their lives"? That is mainstream society, there is not some core block of society who don't have issues or problems, there are only different blocks of society with similar and often interconnecting issues. To presume that somehow this industry and its consumers stand out from others is horribly presumptuous and naive on the state of a society as a whole.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:53 AM
3

Geez those crocodile tears.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:30 AM
4

I have aspergers, so my brain is even further from the mean but I would never claim to understand exactly another person with aspergers as it comes in so many forms. Let alone how someone neurological normal feels, any precise presumptions will and should always fall flat.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:28 PM
5

To be honest to have that mindset is worse than cheating. Cheating is horrible and I will never condone it, but regarding them as not human any more and in need of punishing is in my eyes worse. Be angry, shout, scream and then leave, don't look back, continue your life. Would I trust someone who cheated in a relationship no, but would I trust someone with anything in life who schemes revenge across a year, I don't think so. If you really are better than them then you will act like it, you wont …
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:08 PM
3

and for wives to ask husbands to hit them so they can enter the US. How to get a free ticket to a new life for you and your child/children: Ask husband to hit you Tell the US Profit
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:32 AM
2

Quite possibly the women would see bad reviews as a sign of discrimination, while men would be more embarrassed and not send them in, hence the discrepancy.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:53 AM
1

Same experience here at a lower level from friend I know and myself. We have found female managers often try to out men men, by this I mean they are overly aggressive in their style and "bitchy" as you say. There have been terrible male bosses as well but similar to you the female bitches exist as a higher percentage than the ass-hole male bosses. This is in the UK.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:50 AM
1

Indeed, there maybe cases where the man is an asshole and just wants a younger woman (and a woman can do the same) but marriages mostly breakdown for genuine reasons which can be to do with a lot of things. It is unfair to presume something on men regarding marriage that if it was a woman in place, the only comment would be "you go girl".
/r/MensRights27/08/14 11:23 AM
2

It seemed like he didn't really believe it himself or felt he couldn't say, "look it really is very unclear and may not exist, and if it does it is very small".
/r/MensRights26/08/14 01:16 PM
2

This comment: "These father's rights groups are MRA's. They get angry about child support yet they want presumption of custody, which is really FORCED shared custody. Many of these father's rights guys have criminal records for beating their wives. IOW, they're abusers who want to see their kids but who have been proven as abusive deadbeats. Nothing to see here really." /facepalm #allhopeislost
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:50 PM
1

But if the only way to prove you didn't rape someone is to video tape the act the presumption should be while having sex is that you are video taped and therefore there is no expectation of privacy.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 09:16 AM
1

"It’s an issue that perturbs both social conservatives, who link the demonisation of dads in “ad land” to family breakdown, and progressive liberals who believe the feckless father stereotype holds back women’s progress by affirming the expectation that parenting is women’s work." Erm what, change needs to happen on this issue because social conservatives and progressive liberals don't like it?? What about men and the women who love them being fed up in general of it being suggested we are all i…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:59 AM
1

Dat presumption on sacrifice :(. Relationships are partnership and not all within them is equal as there are two different genders (straight relationships) and two different people. Both within it must give and take.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 10:12 AM
1

That only applies when they earn a lot more than their spouses. It is unfair but good in that it may change legislation to improve the situation for all. The presumption of continuation of living conditions is ridiculous (also why does this continuation only apply to the lower earner(normally the woman)), alimony should be a set a basic level to live and then an addition up to a cap as a percentage on what the couple earn which will provide a reasonable income for the spouse. My father's SO got …
/r/MensRights14/08/14 10:10 AM
6

Indeed, if women don't want to be engineers or coders why force them?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 09:07 AM
6

"Campus police", two words that should never be seen side my side.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:48 PM
1

Well then women need to apply for representation. I don't know about Texas but in the UK when women stand they are elected equally to men. There are just less women who want to be politicians, which isn't a problem, we shouldn't not be looking for parity in numbers in all things. In the same way I don't expect there to be an equal number of male nurses or care workers etc. The legal issues over abortion in Texas are wrong and are due to conservationism and selfishness more than the sex of the le…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 03:07 PM
3

It would be like men complaining they couldn't stand as close to women in elevators as men because of breasts and that women should do something else with their breasts rather than have them in front of them taking up space which the man could use. Ignoring biology and being fucking retarded at the same time.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:35 AM
2

Don't use Wil Weaton in these arguments, he is very often a dick when it comes to Men's rights and is a feminist apologist.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 10:28 AM
3

Indeed, exactly what I wanted to say. The best explanation so far is that men are more likely to fight for higher pay than women. That is not discrimination, women just need to be encouraged to do the same.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 09:49 AM
1

Maybe if they published their names then there would be a push for anonymity for all rather than the lopsided situation we have at the moment.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 09:48 AM
2

It seems unfair in so many of the comments that they regard him as a full parent. He never wanted the child which appears to have only happened due to malice on the part of the mother for money and so doesn't seem to be much more than a sperm donor who had to pay for 18 years. This probably comes off as a bit heartless but with all the control being in the woman's hands and only responsibility in the man's is wrong. I'm not really sure with how things are at the moment where responsibility lies …
/r/MensRights11/08/14 02:03 PM
2

Well then a 24 hour wait seems to be the least of the issues they face on this issue in somewhere like Texas and it is not men that are imposing this on them.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:49 AM
1

Dat combine of wildly different levels of harassment: "More than 20% reported that they had been the victims of unwanted physical contact of a sexual nature, including touching, physical threats or rape"
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:39 AM
1

There was an Al jazera article that was linked to this in a early thread on world news. I have tried several times to find the article again but to no avail. If I find it I will post it here. There are lots of other articles on this but not from places I would regard as being non biased, since al jazera seems generally biased to the Palestinians from their articles I have read I took this article as being trustworthy as they would be the least likely to have a pro Israeli bias given the articles…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:52 PM
2

Can I ask why she originally gave up work? Was that when your daughter was born?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:36 PM
6

I don't know the legalities of this but I wish you the best and hope that you are able to get the custody rights you and your daughter deserve.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:53 PM
5

Indeed, the only other option is for men to have reproductive rights to the child and the ability to abort which is untenable. Either men gain reproductive rights (including participation in abortion decisions) or parental rights and the ability to withdraw them, so parental rights it is.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:50 PM
1

When she finally answered the only hard hitting question she ignored most of it and decided to turn the domestic violence stat back saying it was only deaths that were important. Geez Would it be too much for her to not continue doing what she has always done by distorting the truth and refocusing it on areas of less importance while ignoring men. Having read through it she should have just written "Only women matter" and have been done with it.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:38 PM
2

Physically I will give you but the mental bit is less clear cut.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:33 PM
0

The issue is also the statistics, Hamas statistics which the UN uses are horribly biased and Hamas has in every conflict in recent memory understated the number of fighters who die only to claim them as fighters 6-12 months late when no one is looking so they can be properly regarded as martyrs and they don't need the PR win of Civilians being the primary casualties. This does not shift any lack of responsibility from the Israelis to fight a just war but take any civilian casualties that skew ve…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:24 PM
3

It sounds to the uninitiated quite good, if I had read this 4-5 years ago I would have thought it was a good thing but know with what I know it is depressing for me. They have been very good a making these laws sound good, I mean who wouldn't want to help women get better jobs, who would wouldn't want to protect those who suffer from violence, while ignoring the reality of the situation, the reasons behind it and that if there are problems they are non gendered and or don't exist in the form tha…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:58 AM
1

What is so wrong with objectification to an extent anyway? If there is an actor playing a superhero and I desire to be the superhero I am objectifying them as the superhero rather than seeing them as an actor. If a woman is in an advert in a seductive pose and I would desire sexually to be with her that is the point of the advert. If I actually met her I would still treat her as a human. If I started objectifying the people I knew of course that would be bad but I see no issue in objectifying pe…
/r/MensRights06/08/14 11:08 AM
4

Unfortunately this is both logical, fair and simple and therefore will never be passed. Additionally as it only is two sections and all current laws require 50+ sections before amendments it will not be allowed to pass the draft stage.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 10:49 AM
7

A lot of this article is full of false equivalences and presumed biases that don't exist.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:58 PM
7

"A common complaint amongst women in the workforce is that instead of being praised for showing the same decisive leadership qualities as their male peers, strong women often end up being classified as “bitches” whose dedication is seen as a form of psychosis rather than that of admirable drive and ambition. In the case of short men, take the above and replace “bitches” with “little Napoleons”, whose desire to succeed is dismissed by many as evidence of “short man’s syndrome” and a pathetic need…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:51 PM
8

A slightly ugly analogy but are you only really raped if it happens 4 times then?
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:43 PM
3

I know how you feel, I have to correct myself often to acknowledge the real suffering women experience when so much of the suffering of men is ignored or reduced. I manage to remain fair but it is hard with so much of the over exaggeration of women's issues and the suppression of men's issues happening.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:40 PM
2

Is this satire? Poe's Law? This seems to be the worst example of it but every other primary comment seems to be very close to Poe Law like. "What May and her right wing colleagues absolutely refuse to acknowledge is this. Men's violence against women costs our society millions....hospitals, counselling, collateral damage to children, courts, police, probation, social services and prison. Women, therefore, deserve an equal amount to be spent on their victimisation and safety. Instead, only perhap…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:30 PM
4

The majority of ISIS fighters will be victims in some form or another, brutalized and forced to accept ideology or die and then to stay alive they must continue with it. I cannot imagine how much that damages their psyche. This kid was only a few steps away from that, these hardened fighters coming out of Syria and western Iraq will have had that for years.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 11:21 AM
1

Indeed, a solution to the problem through equality, who would of thought that?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:23 PM
6

Why does it even need Lesbian? I thought being Gay covered both men and women?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:46 AM
3

How do they ignore the majority of victims who are men, the brainwashing of boys and men into killing machines, the requirement for men to do anything they can to feed their families. Women don't have it easy for sure but men are the main pawns in this battle. Are they just blind to it?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:58 AM
1

The reverse of this has also been the case when casualty figures come from the Palestinian authorities, al jazera (as you can imagine not where I expected to find this) found that Hamas were always under reporting the number of combatants and hid them as civilians in the figures from Gaza. When the fighting was still going on they were claimed as civilians, after when more scrutiny could be done they were found to fighters.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:40 AM
2

I generally feel that feminism is a bit like christianity in that intelligent, rational people choose the things about it that are good and only continue with the more moderate parts. The problem with this is that you shouldnt need to pick and choose, the movement you believe in shouldn't have areas or tenants that need to be ignored for you not to come across as straight out wrong or horrible. Feminism has its place around the world in promoting women's rights in countries where women are still…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:33 AM
3

Good to see you are so open minded, you are very welcome here.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:56 AM
1

It would appear I did, apologies.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:51 AM
1

There will also be many who cannot report it due to threats of violence in the future and this is likely to be a larger group due to the shame and fear for safety.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:36 AM
1

“Feminism is about equality" http://i1.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/010/692/19789999.jpg
/r/MensRights20/07/14 11:17 PM
-2

Then something is seriously wrong if cases are determined on "he said she said".
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:56 PM
1

I know things are fucked up with this is the States but why are they suing the university, rape is a police matter. The university should have no part it in.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:51 PM
3

If he didn't have a valid alibi he could have gone down for this with no other evidence. What does that say about society? Should I consider video taping my every move so it is all accounted for?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:40 PM
2

"Repressed"
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:37 PM
6

I think wrong thread.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:20 PM
1

Yeah I know all about that and it is absurd. My reaction to this one was that at least it was in a court of law where you imagine logic and reason would rule the day but it seems that time has passed.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 01:42 PM
1

How was he convicted???? What the fuck has happened to the standard of proof required? A girl claims something happened and she has some trauma to her body and suddenly that makes him guilty with no other evidence of actual acts. Suddenly we are in the probably happened rather than beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 09:51 AM
7

Whenever I see the lists of things that people supposedly need feminism for the majority are either out right lies or distortions of reality. The few points that have weight are actually often non-gendered issues, such as rape, domestic abuse, gender roles etc.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:35 PM
9

I have been wanting Stephen Fry for prime minister for a long time :).
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:41 PM
4

Because men are not defendants, they have already been convicted.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 08:43 AM
1

They can hear the case for it before, but they can't be indoctrinated in its rituals and beliefs without being old enough to have any understanding of what is going on and not having made any free choice in the matter. I don't think it would end religion in a generation, many would still want to take their parents or community religion but would have a freer choice in the matter. But then if you are saying when people have a free choice they don't choose religion, isn't that a rather large indic…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 05:05 PM
3

You wouldn't need to prove your belief but children should not be taken to religious services and receive religious teaching. At the age of 18 (if that is decided by society the age that children are free enough from familial control) as an adult as the person now is wishes to know more about a religion and join it then they are free do so in any manner they wish including self selecting to have circumcision. There should be religious classes in schools which talk about all major religions and s…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 03:19 PM
2

It won't be as if you had a real choice though, a childhood of indoctrination into the religion will; unless you are very free spirited, be committed to that without ever having had a real choice in the matter. Let alone the pressure from family and friends who might disown you depending on the oxthrodoxness of their beliefs if you don't follow through. Belief is not something that should be taught or indoctrinated.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:07 AM
4

I also an getting increasingly annoyed about MRAs on here politicising the issues when it is a side note and not relevant.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 09:48 AM
3

So in a study about alleged lying in statistics the study itself is actually mis-using statistics to argue a particular narrative. If that isn't a microcosm of some of the issues in feminism at the moment I don't know what is. They might even been right that some statistics currently hide the whole picture for men and women, but their determination to come to a particular outcome before they even investigate gives them no credibility on these issues.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 09:30 AM
1

Specific time frame only, up to a point slightly before the baby could survive outside the womb. I think the current 24 weeks in the UK is too high and should be lower but given how few abortions are carried out after 18 weeks and only in extreme circumstances it is not a huge issue for me. I would prefer that there were no abortions needed but that would be ignoring the practicalities of the situation. The aim should be zero abortions, for anyone pro choice that is the goal even if it is unlike…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 09:05 AM
1

To any with (or more) that isn't legitimate, neither party should have a minimum, they both should contribute to a fair level that is agreed between them dependant on how their roles are organised. Men doing less housework than maybe they should at the moment isn't good but doesn't make it a good idea for over reverse the position.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:51 AM
3

No, no one supports that.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:30 AM
2

That's true, the fear is legitimate, I would almost want to see it tested in court before accepting that there really is no financial liability.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:09 AM
2

No, the law specifically stated that they would have no responsibilities to the child. "While children will be able to access more information about the donor's genetic origins, they will have no financial or legal claim."
/r/MensRights30/06/14 11:31 AM
1

She should have some sympathy, she should not have the primary sympathy but she should have sympathy. The problem is that men in this situation wouldn't, but it doesn't mean we should stand up for what is right regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:42 AM
1

Well you would hope that no one is ever convicted with the primary evidence being the victims memory. Hard evidence is needed for this very reason.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:39 AM
7

You presume there ever really was. There was no special time when people were honest and had loyalty, there have been different times with different rules and social conventions but people have always had the same greed, manipulation and cheating instinct.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 09:27 AM
1

Thank you for the information. There really should be some more scholarship in this area but given the lack of information it would be very hard to get a conclusive result. I am also concerned that in many cases people are being convinced they were raped after the fact when they weren't by female friends etc. who after hearing so much feminists propaganda on the subject shift the actual narrative of the events to fit rather than it just being an evening the person regrets. So it maybe a false cl…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 02:11 PM
1

Links please. Do you know of any in the UK?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 12:56 PM
2

The UN's women report of 2010 has male participation in the workforce at 25-40% higher than women in most countries in the 3rd world. What I stated was a fact, men are out working, women are more often in the home. My statement of facts does not include any judgement over whether this is good or bad. In far too many of these policies the focus is only on women/children while ignoring the men. These men are not having easy life and neither are the women or children. All need help and assistance, …
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:57 AM
5

As a counter point. If the mother is primary caregiver then the father is the primary provider for the household and therefore it would be important that he is healthy enough to work and has the education to provide for his family. I don't believe this is a zero sum game.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:16 AM
5

Why focus this on rape suspects, I don't feel it needs special protections. All those accused of a crime should be given anonymity until prosecution (there may be some very limited exceptions if regarded as in the public interest). If people are truly innocent until proven guilty then they should not be able to be convicted in the court of public opinion.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:48 AM
6

Is it still pussy pass if they shouldn't have been convicted but it is just that if the genders were reversed there would be a different outcome? The women aren't getting a pass, the court is generally being fair to them it i just that men get a raw deal if the shoe is on the other foot.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:57 AM
1

That is true, but as a partial counter the mens movements have never seen themselves as having a mission that will extend past equality too much. MRA seems to be more about correcting a current imbalance and way of thinking rather than needing to exist as feminism regards itself to correct an imbalance that will in its eyes always exist regardless of reality. And yes absolutely there are quite a few inequalities that affect women, it is the blatant disregard for men's issues and sometimes intent…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 02:15 PM
33

I am impressed with how quickly the article manages to slur single fathers and that they would complain about unfounded suggestions with little statistical support while congratulating single mothers without seeing the utter hypocrisy of this. "In so doing they are reflecting the view of the Ministry of Justice – a department that has been over-influenced by Families Need Fathers and Fathers4Justice." I guess that is why Fathers4Justice recently closed its doors as no longer being required, as e…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 11:23 AM
1

I like how they ignore how many feminists jumped on board the bandwagon. It doesn't really matter who started it to an extent, they kept it moving and made it so much larger as 4chan knew they would. It showed the horrible opinions some radfems have and all these feminists wish to do is turn it back on someone else rather than being inward looking as to what made it so popular amongst them.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 11:18 AM
1

"I was a horrible father who cared more for work than my child or didn't have the opportunity to take time off work and therefore you shouldn't spend time with your child because of my spite"
/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:36 AM
4

Shocking lack of listening/reading comprehension skills in those, is there a crisis in schools?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:02 AM
2

My Complaint: The BBC News has a shocking level of misandric bias when it comes to news stories in which men are the primary targets and/or primary victims. In the linked story 12 women are abducted. Women are mentioned in the title and highly prominently through the story. This article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-27862510 from just 1 day earlier in a similar area takes 3/4 of the article to mention that men were target and almost exclusively the victims. The BBC continues to produce …
/r/MensRights17/06/14 10:03 PM
1

If they are going through a post history to discredit someone they are not a true liberal regardless of what they say. Radfem are not liberal, they may claim to be but are not, don't take the worst of a group as a descriptor for the whole. That is used against us, we are better than that.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:42 AM
1

Do you think she will be saying on mother's day "Happy Mother's Day to the mums and single dads out there"?
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:37 AM
5

Well without knowing more details of the case and presuming there was no bad play involved, I am glad she got asylum but I am very much doubting a man would have got the same. Any male versions of this?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:36 PM
7

"I’ve been reading Feministing for a while, but finally signed up today because this article describes so many men that I know. Perhaps it’s because I work in tech, where unempathetic argumentativeness is endemic trait, but I feel like I’m surrounded by these people. Every topic, no matter how serious, is an opportunity for a game. Women exaggerate rape. Women choose not to get paid as much. You can’t prove that Specific Scenario X is directly caused by sexism, there for sexism does not exist. E…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:34 PM
-1

Good article but, that comment section is not so good, I hope they don't regard themselves as MRAs. Too much hate and generalisations. I wish some of them would see the irony of complaining about women being unfair to men while being unfair to women.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:27 PM
8

It is almost as crazy as Elliot Rodgers writings. I read a lot of crazy stuff that feminists write on here but I have never met anyone like this (from UK), are there genuinely feminists this crazy out there? Are they only restricted to academic communities in the US and Canada?
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:22 PM
3

I can see sections of your comment being quoted by people who don't understand humour or satire and it saddens me.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:18 PM
1

Indeed, they are bringing up an important issue but fuck, does it really need to be them bringing it up.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:16 PM
8

They are stuck in an ideological conundrum, for them women never lie and men are all horrible rapists ( for this type of radfem ) when it is shown this isn't the case they have to double down or the cognitive dissonance might kick in and change their beliefs but they can't allow that. The saddest thing is that the largest obstacle to believing someone who has been raped by the police or public is anyone who outright lies about rape leaving them with doubt over every case. If they had any sense (…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 12:51 PM
1

What happens if it is your child but you were told the woman was on the pill or condoms were sabotaged etc etc and therefore no consent to being a father was given?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:46 AM
16

I understand your sentiment and anger but I think that is a little too broad a statement and the sort of thing we have issue with feminists making when it comes to men so it is probably best to avoid huge generalisations like that.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:29 AM
2

"announced to her coworkers " who is her? his ex partner? your former boss?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:05 PM
2

Oh I agree, he shouldn't need to cover himself and the truth shouldn't need to be disguised.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:52 AM
2

Came here to say this, anonymity for all until after conviction unless there is an overwhelming public interest case.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:15 AM
2

The article is in the guardian and I was genuinely surprised to see it there with how gender issuesare so heavily skewed to the rad fem side of things there. Even people in the comments are asking if the article is allowed. I would imagine that sentence is there to cover himself from any radfems who would immediately jump on him if he suggested the reality that men are as equally effected by women. It is still progress to have it on there and I hope to see more reality on this from the guardian.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:14 AM
1

I think it is not so much lying any more, it seems quite frequent that they are convinced by friends or feminist rhetoric that as they had sex while drunk it was rape even when it wasn't. It is not that they are lying but confused at least some of the time.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:55 PM
3

That is not true, 5 men died including the suicide, and 2 women died. 5/7 of the victims were men.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:53 PM
3

I understand where you are coming from and wish we could be more combative but if we are too much then people use that as an excuse not to take use seriously regardless of how truthful and accurate our position. I was talking with my mum(who is a reasonable woman) about MGM and when I was showing her some information posted on here, her first response was not about the information, it was "I don't like how combative they are". The information challenged her world view that circumcision is minor …
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:50 AM
3

Just read them for a couple of minutes and now I need a shower, the hate, lies, contempt and nativity are shocking. Are we sure they aren't all the same person as I struggle to believe so many women (I presume, they could be white knights) could be so stupid/mislead as they seem to be typing off the same play book.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:50 AM
2

It is more that the message is getting out there and people are finally starting to realise that the current party line is not reality.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:29 AM
3

We don't need to compete over it. They are both horrible (to be assaulted or raped), society needs to recognise both and the effects and help those effected without presuming on the victims or over stating either.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 08:28 AM
6

Aspergers is not a disability, it's just a difference.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 11:37 AM
2

Your right, maybe it should be "Why isn't society progressive enough to....?"
/r/MensRights28/05/14 01:40 PM
14

He hated everyone, not equally but he was a racist, misogynist and misandrist. There shouldn't be a competition as to who he hated most.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 01:03 PM
5

The availability of firearms does make these sorts of incidents easier to commit if not specifically more likely. (I am aware that he killed 3 with a knife)
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:13 AM
1

Government may have policies that are feminist etc but that doesn't mean government is naturally feminist. That is the issue I have. A government may be bad, it doesn't mean all governments or forms of government are bad.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:37 PM
1

It is more that I often see a confusion between those that say this government policy is bad therefore government is bad, whereas a policy being bad doesn't mean having a government is fundamentally bad. Although I take your point to an extent, I am probably not being as fair as I could be to their point of view as I don't have a lot of respect for it. I respect the people saying it but I find the "government is taking my money" to be lacking and without any grounding in the reality of society e…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 04:30 PM
2

I wish MRAs would stay away from the goverment = bad message that Stefan here seems to espouse particularly. The goverment may currently be pushing the wrong policies due to the pressure from feminisnts (and this needs to change) but this isn't a discussion on what politicial sturctures we agree with.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 02:16 PM
2

Thanks, very disappointed to get the downvotes on what is an entirely legitimate point and that obviously some members of this community are too closed minded to see. That is bad for mensrights as a whole if they cannot see past their own presumptions.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 09:09 AM
1

Is that more of an issue with sex not being discussed in a mature manner with children and therefore a result of the continued stigma it has. If people were more mature about sex and there was no negative connotation to it would you think there would be less issues? I'm thinking about the Netherlands who are sex positive and mature about what it is and although there is a lot of sex around children don't get affected in the same way.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 09:36 PM
-3

There is a lot more than cooking meals and washing clothes in raising a child. They require time and attention, whether that is teaching them to read or just playing a game to stimulate them or changing their nappy etc etc. This requires time and effort and deserves to be recognised, the only issue is trying to compare it with full time work and suggestions that it is the hardest job in the world.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:48 PM
3

Interesting that she also got custody (I presume full as it doesn't say otherwise), I wonder if that was the default position of the court or did he not fight for her?
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:33 PM
-3

I was with you until you suggested being a housewife is like being unemployed. It is not, it may not be as stressful or require the same hard work as your 50k job example but it still takes work and effort and while not fair to compare to a 10 hour work day it is no way comparable to doing nothing all day.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:28 PM
2

There are many bright people who are religious but doesn't mean they aren't actually very bright.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:25 PM
11

Should we post this to r/feminism or 2xc and see the reaction? I would imagine not coming from a MRA posting account would lead to less angst and more reality.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:14 PM
7

I am great fan of the guardians coverage of Wikileaks and Snowden and often their economic content, but the moment they talk about men they turn a corner and head to crazy town. It is really unfortunate as otherwise I would be a more regular reader.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:06 PM
1

I really meant for the 2000 years of Christianity and Islam rather than back to ancient Egypt etc.. I will edit.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 02:44 PM
2

Decided to watch this and it was indeed terrible. It was impressive particularly with the abuse on the web how naive and biased she was. She complains about killing a prostitute in GTA V while ignoring that 98% of people you kill in the game are men and most are criminals or generally bad people. Does this mean people who play the game will think all men are bad and should be killed at will, shockingly no. With the female gamer receiving abuse no mention of how many times men are told that someo…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:06 PM
1

Do you feel that gender roles are assigned by society and if so should we look to change how much that is the case or is accepting the differences (less than before of course) more the way to go?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 06:25 PM
4

Well said.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 03:26 PM
2

Or concerned that if they are even slightly out of line they might get accused of racism so they over compensate to ensure any interaction could not possibly be regarded as racist.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:09 AM
2

The whole thread on worldnews is people bringing up these questions about the story while not actually blaming the victim and then other people then claiming questioning the story is victim blaming.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 12:17 PM
2

Could you explain what you mean by "Rape culture... i.e. ideas/tropes/expectations which can encourage/excuse/incentivize (even unintentionally) acts of rape, is a problem. " What ideas? What tropes? What expectations?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:54 AM
0

It may not be all bad, but when the only specifics they get into are about men rather than ever mentioning that women can also be abusive and with all the photos of men then the direction this is generally coming from (that men abuse women only) stands out.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:50 PM
2

So the issue is more the damage done to reputation that the chance of an actual conviction from anything like this? Or one mistake when talking to detectives and suddenly they have you on "lying" even though it was under stress etc. and wasn't intentional.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:06 PM
6

Having seen quite a bit of him he is often very right and other times horribly wrong but this never justifies any of the hate or abuse he receives and only wish him the best in finding a way to continue producing his content without receiving harassment that affects his health.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:31 PM
1

The only sensible answer.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 09:23 AM
6

Don't look down on the career someone has. How would we react if someone suggested being an electrician or similar work was hardly a career for a man.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 02:12 PM
2

“What really did it was talking to the women in Holloway and realising they were there mostly because of some thing their husbands, brothers, fathers, had done." Well the thing is Vicky this applies at least equally if not more so to men either trying to provide or protect the women in their life or through the influence of fathers, brothers and friends ending with actions they would not have otherwise committed. Realising that there are cultural and familial reasons for crime is the first step …
/r/MensRights07/10/13 11:04 AM
2

How are they not already? If two people have conflicting statements then with no outside conclusive evidence we have no evidence of a crime.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:03 PM
1

We have a good relationship and if I have the evidence it won't be a problem but thank you for your concern, I know for some it isn't this easy. I am just suprised someone as well read and intelligent as my mother hasn't seen anything regarding this. But I suppose it shows you how hidden this all is.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:58 PM
5

Was there even any evidence of abuse or did she just say so?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:36 PM
6

Just read the wikipedia description of Rebecca Watson for Elevator Gate. "At the June 2011 "World Atheist Convention", on a panel which also included Richard Dawkins, Watson spoke about her experiences with sexism within the atheist movement. In a vlog, about among other things, she described how after the talk and extended discussion with a group of attendees, a man from the group followed her into an elevator and asked her back his hotel room. She cited various contextual reasons why this felt…
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:04 PM
2

So was this on newsnight last night?
/r/MensRights08/08/13 02:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter