TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AdhesivenessEven7287 Archive

View 7 posts and 57 comments by AdhesivenessEven7287 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Basically because men don't mobilise to politically push back against it. Instead they opt for 'letting them have it in the comments', and then down vote those that expose it.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 05:28 AM
27

Really stupid
/r/MensRights09/05/26 10:33 AM
0

Why int the video set to download. Need to save proof.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:04 PM
8

Can't find any evidence. Weird you didn't post any.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 07:53 AM
1

Sounds like best of a bad situation advice you critising
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:29 PM
-1

Well left wing / right wing are subjective deliberations. And left wing what they are commonly publicly percieved as. But under the hood they are definitely not egaliterian which is a cornerstone of what many truly 'left wing' things are.. People can say they are a Communist. But if they are in this case a misandrist then it's just empty words becuase the co-operation to meet those requirements is non existant if they are too focused on tribal discrimination based on group protection.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 09:43 AM
4

A lot of views here are based on spite from lopsided equality. And also feminism has positioned itself as left wing although that is questionable. But therefore the counter opposite group takes the position to be against the enemy however possible. Something like that.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 07:47 PM
2

I've not heard this. But it sounds misandrist. What do you think can be done about this problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/26 09:45 PM
23

Why people be shamed for having a sex drive?
/r/MensRights10/01/26 12:27 AM
-2

This is just rage bait.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 03:20 AM
-21

Watch r/mensrights not see this as a capitalism issue and go onto defend the oppression. Yawn
/r/MensRights13/12/25 03:01 PM
1

These grifters need to gtfo
/r/MensRights09/12/25 10:45 PM
1

Need a new subred for moaning.
/r/MensRights24/11/25 10:47 AM
1

These things seem alien in the uk. What's so bad about them?
/r/MensRights25/07/25 10:43 PM
3

Why is that a sign of how bad things are?
/r/MensRights23/07/25 10:06 AM
10

Would that not suggest then we actually live in a matriarchy if woman are accommodated by default?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 09:25 PM
6

Thanks for commenting. You mentioned Marxism, do you think that has been a force for or against MRA's, and why is that the case? Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/06/25 06:56 PM
-6

Why the left has anti-male rhetoric- immediately cuts in with a strawman about Socialists. If I had a dime 😂 .
/r/MensRights04/03/25 11:35 PM
1

We live in a system were if people are homeless, the ability to get out of that situation is extremely difficult. And when those people are a vast majority of a certain group - male - it's quite clear there is a systemic element. And then there is a group, called MensRights, that sticks up for these oppressed group. And then you ask a question to these group, why they don't address the systemic economic element. And the result: Introducing rabel111. "Obessed with victimhood". Hello, what sub are…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 09:57 PM
1

So you make declare that because coming from the UK I can't criticise other capitalist countries as if I worship Britain, then make the fallacy I even noted in the post about GOV DOES STUFF. All whilst like 90% of people that responded, don't actually address the core argument. It's pretty clear why - at least this group - fails to see the systemic influence on men.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 09:50 PM
2

It's a bad faith argument that shows your privilage. All socialist societies start from revolutions due to the rich getting too out of control. That isn't a time of innocent peace and civility like the world you know in a system that like in America that started with genocide and was built with slavery. To learn more about why i quoted your fallacy, see America and it's unelected billionaire in the oval office for more details. You haven't answered the main question I assume because you don't un…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 09:02 AM
1

So don't answer the question directly, but instead indirectly by advocating brain rot.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:28 AM
1

They didn't commit genocide of their own people. The same amount of people that were sent to the Gulag is the same as American prisons today. And the numbers are ridiculously over exaggerated as a propaganda tool. And as it just so happens there's a capitalist society right now committing a genocide. "Even if Capitalism is anti-male, other systems are even more anti-male." How is that true? And because a present example doesn't exist, because as I've noted in other comments, societies that revol…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:54 PM
2

I believe what you are saying is that the circumstances for men regarding how they are picked wouldn't be much different per system because of a sort of preset nature element of attraction rather than a changeable nuture element which would more likely be present without huge wealth differencials between people. I would respond by with reference to how dating websites designed for private profit influenced the constant swiping to reject culture that would imply something, eugenical. As for how d…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:11 PM
1

Many socialist societies get bombed to oblivion by capitalist ones before they can develop because the Capitalists know the threat. So bit of a misdemeanor in your request. Again, I told you the systemic element capitalism is misandrist. And I also mentioned the mutuality that would negate that disposibility. And you reply with whatabout my previous whataboutism?! Though you do effectively answer the original question.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:18 PM
1

Well the USSR did become a super power in less than a century after coming from literal peasants and kings. And they would have kept going if not for certain disasters or tried to take on the world. The problem historically speaking is Capitalists destroy socialist societies from starting. It's like destroying a seedling and then saying look it didn't turn into a tree, useless! Just because there is not many people against capitalism who are pro men's rights, does that automatically mean that th…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 10:12 PM
1

I'm telling you the systemic difference in the original post. You haven't addressed that.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:20 PM
1

Why is it a 'feminist argument'? And how does the present existence of socialist states influence whether capitalism is anti-male?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 09:00 PM
1

Best comment so far. If we lived in a society, were people were paid the value they produced for their labor power, then it would be the workers in which gain the most comfortable lives. The story of hard work in capitalism is mostly a lie to romanticize what's come to be known as 'the grind' were all your effort diminishes into the wage wall. I believe if men were paid the value they produce, their drive to work would be better rewarded in turn, would increase their drive to work, and then each…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:58 PM
0

So I already provided context in which wealth accumulation is free and limited in the post, may be worth a reread because you seemed to have missed it.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:52 PM
2

"Socialism and communism quickly degrading into aristocracies and dictatorships." Ha.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:49 PM
1

Okay so that suggests this system isn't catered to males and would incentivise moving away.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 03:19 PM
0

Explain the lack of historical perspective part. Because there is a group that don't like capitalism that discrimate against us, therefore, continue the current system of male dispensibility.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 01:39 PM
0

Why do they fail?
/r/MensRights23/02/25 11:48 AM
-2

Why would such people fail to find a partner?
/r/MensRights02/01/25 10:29 PM
3

Just go to the gym at home. Fuck the gym
/r/MensRights24/12/24 09:10 AM
2

Where to go?
/r/MensRights27/01/24 07:31 AM
4

How does capitalism not become a technocracy? if your hopeful attempt to misuse the word communism is nessessary for this nanny state? Maybe I can learn something.
/r/MensRights03/01/24 12:33 AM
5

Looks like modern day capitalism to me. Late stage capitalism more like actually. What people like you fail to see through your obsessive strawmanning that the workers in capitalism are meaningless and disposable, just like men are that we on this group discuss. And always have been. And if we have people just denying that truth because they are hell bent on being a puppet to politician's lies, then we'll get nowhere.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:59 PM
8

"Communism is when the gov does stuff". Is actually a mentality created by the American government over 50 years ago in the form of something called The Red Scare. I agree that what it means to be a man and a father is under assault. But when we use idiotic contradictions we don't do that any favours.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:39 PM
-4

That doesn't take away from the brain dead slander that better describes the poor in the present system. MRAs need a better standard of community if we're going to make a difference.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:11 PM
2

How in any way is that communism?
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:04 PM
3

What a stupid thing to say
/r/MensRights02/01/24 11:00 PM
1

I read be yourself on reddit is a bad move. It makes sense on the surface to be a more likeable persona. To me it seemed relationships isn't something you can fully manipulate. So then don't try. So my strategy became just be yourself with an open heart and somone will come into your life and accept you for who you are. Though chances are you as a man in our egalitarian society will still need to be better and be taking our your wallet as a provider
/r/MensRights17/12/23 01:47 AM
1

It's at the top of which countries are most promiscuous on r/mapporn right now. I wonder if that has anything to do with it
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:06 PM
1

What does this mean for human relationships and relative to MRA
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:39 PM
2

Link does not work.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 07:52 PM
-2

You seem to come from a critical sense of paranoid self victimisation that gives MRA a bad rep. It's not about anyone stopping. It's about encouraging. And it works. End of story.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 02:56 PM
15

Who cares about this? Chess is only set into gendered competitions to get woman and girls into the game. This isn't a men's rights issue
/r/MensRights14/04/23 06:34 PM
-4

Same with veganism. Just strong conditioning
/r/MensRights02/03/23 10:58 PM
10

How so?
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:03 PM
1

Really shouldn't play into these petty games.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 05:56 PM
5

The future is female since anyone that can sell a part of their body like eggs and make thousands is undoubtably going to thrive in tomorrow's scarce future.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 08:18 PM
12

I live in Glasgow and this is just an article. The thought of fear I'm seeing in the comments is dumb. There won't be any night curfews that's ridiculous. How are people supposed to go home from work?
/r/MensRights09/11/22 09:21 AM
2

Did you tell HR like she would have in reversed situation?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 05:15 PM
2

This comment got me banned from FDS. Didn't even know I was subscribed?
/r/MensRights18/10/22 01:15 PM
5

Marry a man
/r/MensRights18/10/22 12:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter